-
“The world that awaits us, if our New Masters prevail, will be a grim dystopia. It will be a spiritual wasteland in which an unprincipled elite rides roughshod over the teeming masses. It will be a cruel world of exploitation, moral darkness, and unspeakable brutality.” — Lasha Darkmoon, America Vanquished
Darkmoon upon America
by Israel Shamir
Response, Pictures and Captions by Lasha Darkmoon
The gifted British poet Lasha Darkmoon recently published a new essay in two parts called America Vanquished, claiming that the US, Germany and Russia were colonised by Jews.
How close to truth is she? Being a Gothic poet, she embellished her essay a lot, but here is the important part. She says:
In short, the Jews took over America and turned it into a Jewish colony. As simple as that. Their American hosts were hoist with their own petard.
But why worry? American Jews are Americans, are they not? If they’re smart enough to take over America, as they have demonstrably done, why shouldn’t they proceed to the next logical step and take over the world—yes, dominate the world through America? No one denies this is America’s aim: full-spectrum dominance. So if the Jews control America, and if America controls the world, doesn’t it follow logically that the Jews control the world? The logic is irrefutable.
Jewish world domination takes on a different perspective when viewed through this historical prism. No “conspiracy theories” here. No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance — with Jews leading the pack.
You could say the wild-eyed dreams of the Protocols have at last been realized, but not in the way their original masterminds intended.
-
ANTI-SEMITIC CARTOON OF THE PREDATORY JEW GRASPING THE GLOBE IN HIS TALON-LIKE CLUTCHES (French caricature, 1898). “No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance with Jews leading the pack.” — Lasha Darkmoon.
ANTI-SEMITIC CARTOON OF THE PREDATORY JEW GRASPING THE GLOBE IN HIS TALON-LIKE CLUTCHES (French caricature, 1898). “No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance with Jews leading the pack.” — Lasha Darkmoon.
Lasha Darkmoon claims, that if the Jews form an elite in the US, then US world dominance is a form of Jewish world dominance.
Her second claim is that the US has became a colony of Israel. She even claims that “America is now Israel’s slave”.
There is a huge logical leap here: even if US Jews form an important part of the US elites, why would they give away their leadership to their cousins and brethren in the Middle East?
DARKMOON: (stepping in) Good point, Mr Shamir. Now consider my logic and try to refute this: If the Israeli Jews give the orders to the American Jews, and if the American Jews control America, then clearly America has become an Israeli colony. But if, on the contrary, American Jews exercise all the power and tell the Israeli Jews what to do, then clearly Israel is an American colony. The logic is inescapable.
Let’s go to the next step.
Once it is admitted that America is controlled by its Jews, whether Israeli Jews or American Jews, America becomes in effect a JEWISH colony.
Given that American Jews were former immigrants to America who have managed to “take over” America, you could say that Jewry has colonized America. Ergo: no matter which way you slice it, America is either an Israeli colony or a Jewish colony. The logic of my argument, I put it to you, is irrefutable.
We can take this therefore as proven: if America is not an Israeli colony, taking its orders from Israeli Jews, then it is a Jewish colony, taking its orders from American Jews.
SHAMIR: World Jewry is a project rather than reality; in real life, Jews of different countries do not feel themselves a single united body though they do interact. Compare them with Catholics: these have the Pope and a single hierarchy, and still they are united in prayer only. Jews have no Pope, no hierarchy, and are even less united.
DARKMOON: Jews less united than the goyim? Wow! I never thought any group could be less united than the goyim, or more united than the Jews in knowing “what is good for the Jews”. If you are trying to convince us that the Jews are DISUNITED just because no two Jews think alike, some preferring Buddhism to Judaism and others preferring kippas to hats, then you are on very shaky ground indeed! We are well aware that no two individuals, whether Jewish or non-Jewish, think alike; just as we are aware that no two individuals have identical fingerprints. It doesn’t follow from this, however, that people with different opinions are going to be disunited, any more than it follows that people with different fingerprints are going to be disunited.
To say that Jews lack unity is almost like saying America lacks military power. Or the Queen of England is short of cash. The Jews have far more unity, I put it to you, than any other other ethnic group in the world. This fundamental cohesion of the Jews is something I have pointed out in my recent essay America Vanquished:
“The extraordinary success of the Jews, who make up only 2.5 percent of America’s population, can be attributed to meticulous organization, coordination and networking. This advantageous cohesiveness derives from an evolutionary characteristic of the Jews: an exceptionally strong ethnocentricism which has enabled them to infiltrate almost every single organization that could possibly threaten them as a group.” (See here)
Despite the superficial differences between various types of Jews, the Jews are surely a paradigm of unity and cohesion compared to other ethnic groups.
You yourself, Mr Shamir, have written: “Palestine is not the Ultimate goal of the Jews; the world is.” Consider that statement. Can you seriously tell me that the Jews are likely to achieve this grandiose goal of world domination by being disunited and disorganized? by lacking coordination? No, of course not!
One could supply countless arguments to demonstrate the remarkable unity of the Jews in achieving “what is good for the Jews”. Pray tell: how did the Jews manage to take over the mass media, Hollywood, academia, the judiciary, the executive branches of government, Wall Street, the world’s banking system, the lavishly funded Think Tanks, even the porn industry, if they were disorganized and disunited?
The major Jewish organizations that crisscross America like a spider’s web—AIPAC being only one of them—can hardly be accused of ineffective disunity.
You’ve heard of mesira, the code of honor among Jews that make them stick together through thick and thin, never betraying an organ-stealing rabbi or even a serial killer to the goy authorities. Isn’t sticking together the ultimate form of unity?
You’ve heard of the Sayanim, Mossad’s one million worldwide helpers. How these faceless individuals, all Jews living in lands outside Israel, work away for Israel in providing “safe houses”, transportation, access to communications networks and other facilities for Mossad spies. Full details of the existence of the Mossad Sayanim network were given in the 1994 book The Other Side of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky, himself a renegade Mossad agent.
The Jewish Sayanim remind me of bees, all buzzing away for the common good, all united by a common purpose: to cram the hive full of honey.
One final point, Mr Shamir, which I know will make you graciously concede victory to me on this vitally important issue: in saying that “the Jews have no Pope, no hierarchy, and are even less united” than the goyim, you are guilty of a glaring contradiction. Wasn’t it only a few years ago that you argued the very opposite? Far from implying that the Jews were a disunited group, you stated that they possessed an almost supernatural unity, comparing them to locusts that moved in ordered formation to achieve their common goal.
“It is hard to swallow that the Jews have a strategy,” you said, “but no strategist. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are popular precisely because they posit such a supreme strategist.” And then, to drive home the point, you added the famous quotation from the Bible: ‘The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation’ and devastate whole countries as if by plan.” (Cabbala of Power, p.13)
That last phrase—“and devastate whole countries as if by plan”—is your own. You are daringly comparing the Jews to locusts who have an uncanny and almost supernatural ability to act in unison.
-
CAN JEWS BE COMPARED TO LOCUSTS, ACTING IN COORDINATION? “The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation” (Proverbs 30:27) and devastate whole countries as if by plan.
CAN JEWS BE COMPARED TO LOCUSTS, ACTING IN COORDINATION? “The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation” (Proverbs 30:27) and devastate whole countries as if by plan.
SHAMIR: Israel is a very important element of Jewish life, Lasha, but this does not mean an Israeli Prime Minister can order Jews around.
Granted, politically active Americans think that one can’t succeed without Jewish support. This much we can learn from the incredible reception of Netanyahu in the Capitol and from Obama’s capitulation. And US politicians think that the US Jews love Israel; that is why they express their love of Israel. However, the American Jews’ feelings towards Israel are not that straightforward. Remember a prominent American Jewish politician Henry Kissinger? He facilitated the greatest Arab attack on Israel in 1973 in order to take Israel down a notch.
So, US Jews are certainly an important part of the US elites. Consequently they influence world politics, while the Israeli Jews are just family and friends of these powerful American Jews. This is the secret of Israeli influence: without the support of American Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size.
-
“Without the support of American Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size.” — Israel Shamir
“Without the support of American Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size.” — Israel Shamir
The US Jews’ position in the US is so strong because US society has been formed and influenced by the Jewish spirit of predatory capitalism, as expounded by such diverse thinkers as Karl Marx, Werner Sombart and Milton Friedman. Defeat of financial predatory capitalism could undo the Jewish hold. It would de-Jewify the Jews and society in general.
And here we come to your second claim, Lasha: namely, that Russia and Germany are colonised by Jews. Even granting your poetic licence, this is far from the truth. Germany is not colonised by Jews; it is still occupied by the US troops.
DARKMOON: I’m not disagreeing with you, Mr Shamir, about Germany being under US occupation. In fact, I quote Eustace Mullins in Part 1 of my essay saying exactly the same thing. But I certainly never said that Germany had been “colonized by Jews”. Where did I say that? I would never have made such a ridiculous statement. I said that about America, but not about Germany.
SHAMIR: Jews play a negligible part in modern German life, Lasha. Even after the the defeat of the Third Reich, there was no resurgence of the Jewish spirit. Germany has a strong social security structure. Predatory financial capitalism has made few inroads. Germany is not a neoliberal state. The Germans pay tribute to Israel, that’s true; but this is only a result of American occupation. The West Germans are indeed indoctrinated in guilt feelings towards Jews, but East Germans have no guilt feelings whatsoever, and they influence the totality of German feelings. If and when US troops leave Germany, Germany will reassert itself.
Again, Russia is not colonized by Jews. Some Jewish oligarchs were expelled, and others were imprisoned by Putin. Russia usually votes against Israel in the UN and supplied enemies of Israel with its advanced weaponry. Russia now has fewer Jews than Scotland: about two hundred thousand altogether by official census, and twice that much by overblown Jewish organisations’ estimate. Granted, Russia has no anti-Semitism, and it has some influential Jews, but the important decisions are not made by them.
Was Russia “colonized by Jews” after the October 1917 revolution? This is the weakest part of your essay, Lasha. I’m afraid you know little about this subject and just repeat the silly claims of others.
DARKMOON: Again, Mr Shamir, I must point out with all due respect that at no time did I ever claim that Russia was “colonized by Jews”, nor did I even imply it. The same with Germany. However, if that is the impression I gave you, then I must apologize for not making my meaning clearer.
SHAMIR: You tell us that important Bolsheviks used pseudonyms; true, but this is not always connected with their Jewishness. Lenin’s real name was Ulyanov, but this is not a Jewish name. The early Bolsheviks were guerrilla fighters, and they used all sorts of names to evade surveillance. This is also a part of underground ethos.
DARKMOON: Again, I am in full agreement with you, Mr Shamir. So there’s no point ticking me off for disagreeing with you!
What I said in my article was that almost every single revolutionary Jew in Bolshevik Russia hid behind a non-Jewish name. This was either because they were engaged in subversive activities or because they were anxious to avoid being the victims of the virulent anti-semitism of those times.
Pseudonyms were adopted by non-Jews just as frequently if they were involved in seditious activities. Stalin, whose real name was Joseph Djugashvili, had at least 40 pseudonyms. See Simon Sebag Montefiore’s Young Stalin, p.395, for a list of his false names. Lenin, who was half Jewish, not only had over a hundred bogus names, but also went in for glued-on wigs and giant spectacles!
SHAMIR: Abu Jihad, Abu Ammar and Abu Mazen are nicknames, but surely they are not Jews. You and your readers, Lasha, should read Lindemann’s book Esau’s Tears. This deals extensively with the question of the Bolshevik leaders Jewishness.
These crazy numbers you quote— “66 million Russian Christians killed by Jews”— “out of 388 members of the new revolutionary government in Russia, only sixteen were real Russians”—were invented by anticommunists.
DARKMOON: Good point, Mr Shamir. I concede that the 66 million figure is probably a gross exaggeration, just as the SIX MILLION FIGURE is often alleged to be. (Note, I myself make no comment on this figure, since mathematics is not my forte.) However, both figures have been advanced by their respective propagandists. I decided to quote the 66 million figure for two reasons: (a) because I believe it was mentioned by the great Solzhenitsyn who was not given to lying; and (b) because the 66 million figure is actually mentioned in the title of Eustace Mullins’ classic essay, “The Secret Holocaust”, which I quoted extensively in my article. (See here). Since I was quoting from Mullins, I decided to quote his figures also, giving my readers his viewpoint.
The most conservative figure for the Russian Holocaust, now agreed upon by specialist historians and even cited in the Times newspaper (UK) is 50 million dead Russians. This figure was achieved within a 36-year period of mass murder (1917-1953), initiated by Lenin the half-Jew and continued by Stalin, a Georgian non-Jew, who surrounded himself on all sides by Jewish commissars and sexy young Jewesses he liked to bed.
If you think fifty million deaths is an inflated figure, I assure you it is not.
One Jew alone, the infamous Lazar Kaganovich, personally claimed responsibility for killing twenty million. It was he who stood atop the rubble of a Christian church and proclaimed, “Mother Russia has been cast down! We have torn away her skirts!”
Apart from Kaganovich, there were other Jews who contributed to the massacre of Christians under the cruelest circumstances: Ilya Ehrenburg, Natalfy Frenkel, Mathias Berman, Genrikh Yagoda (lingerie pervert), and, last but not least, Lavrenti Beria—though Beria may or may not have been Jewish. Mainstream historians assert that he was not. But they would, wouldn’t they? — given that Beria was not only a mass murderer of peasants, but also a bloodthirsty sex maniac and pedophile who buried children in his basement — probably alive. (See here and here, pp. 516-519 ).
At no other time in the history of the world has a country been so saturated with Jewish influence as it was between 1917 and 1953 in the Soviet Union: the time of the great gulags and the merciless slaughter of the peasants.
America now faces a similar saturation problem. There have been no Soviet-style massacres in America — not yet, thank God. But who knows what grisly surprises history has up its sleeve?
If the Jews can kill 50 million people in Russia and get away with it, they can kill 50 million people in America too, but maybe they won’t get away with it so easily next time. If they can do it once, they can do it twice — unless the leopard changes its spots.
SHAMIR: We know that imperialist propaganda is able to utilize anti-Jewish prejudice in its own interests: thus, when the Empire bombed Libya, its propagandists improbably claimed that Qaddafi is a Jew and a sympathiser of Israel. When the Empire hunted Julian Assange, its fifth column claimed that he is a Mossad agent. For this reason one should be cautious at accepting such claims: they can be done by enemies with subversive purpose.
Jews played an important part in Soviet Russia’s life, and they paid for that by their obedience and strict observance of Russia’s interests. If they strayed, they were severely punished by Stalin; if they played ball, they were allowed to stay in positions of power.
The lesson of Soviet Russia and Jews was directly opposite to that read by Lasha: even if Jews play an important role in the country, a determined ruler can correct and limit their influence.
This can be done by undoing financial capitalism. Not in vain, some Jewish pundits describe Occupy Wall Street as an “anti-Semitic movement”. Though the participants surely harbor no evil thoughts about the Jews, their goal of destroying the neoliberal model is at variance with Jewish power structures. Without their money, the Jews will shrink into mere shadows of themselves, and the nightmare will be over.
- THE ROTHSCHILDS AT PRAYER: “Without their money, the Jews will shrink into mere shadows of themselves, and the nightmare will be over.” — Israel Shamir
“More than one family friend has mentioned that, for every meal, the Rothschild family sets a place at the table for Lucifer.”
— Fritz Springermeier, quote and picture found here.
DARKMOON: (summing up): I am not really in disagreement with you on most important points. Even though I have accused you of being guilty of a “glaring contradiction” — your apparent U-turn on the unity of the Jews, once united like a swarm of locusts flying in ordered ranks, now disunited and split into several conflicting groups — this need not in fact be a contradiction at all. It could be a development or new nuance to your views, an added complexity; indeed, a kind of paradox in which the Jews are united and disunited at the same time, just as the universe is filled with light and darkness at the same time, and just as good and evil exist simultaneously in the same heart.
On one point, however, I am forced to take issue with you: I never said that Germany and Russia were “Jewish colonies”.
America, yes; but not Germany and Russia. And America only in a metaphorical sense. To all intents and purposes, America has become a Jewish colony.
Jews did not emigrate to Germany and Russia en masse as they emigrated to the United States. They were already well entrenched in Germany and Russia, part of the unassimilated population of those two nations for several centuries. They sprung to prominence in Germany, reaching their maximum degree of influence in the time of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933), just before the ascent of Hitler to power.
In Russia, the Jews sprung to similar prominence at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, led on by the Jew Lenin and his Shabbat goy henchman, Stalin, who was later to become the world’s greatest mass murderer—aided and abetted by his closely knit contingent of court Jews.
See Simon Sebag Montefiore’s sensational 2-part biography Young Stalin and Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar.
Never before have I read a biography with so many Jews in the forefront, all seething like maggots in the rich soil of Mother Russia, all thirsting like vampires for the blood of their Christian victims.
Full marks to Simon Sebag Montefiore, himself a Jew, for having the courage to draw our attention to these frightening freaks of nature.
They belong in the seventh circle of Dante’s hell.
- “ANOTHER PEOPLE WILL POSSESS YOUR LAND…” — Lasha Darkmoon, ‘The Coming Doom’.
Life is too short and precious to waste it on “anti-Semitism”. One has to move beyond this puerile response to Jewish world supremacy. Perhaps the role of the Jew in human affairs is to be the beast of prey that teaches the rest of us to run a bit faster.
_________________________________________________________
Here’s what I wrote recently to a Christian Zionist, who complained that my previous message to him about Christians fighting in wars amounts to “liberalism”:
Dear X,
what is “liberal” about wanting the followers of the “Prince of Peace” to really behave peacefully?
is just taking Him at His word really a political act …. or simple truth?
now that I have you on the line, why should Christians spend their money, that could be used to evangelize to the ends of the earth, to go on pilgrimmages like those you lead to the “Holy Land”?
is that land not ruled by anti-Christian Talmudic Jews? Have they ever repented of their hatred of Jesus?
do you realize that the Talmudic claim that Jesus performed miracles by means of satan constitutes the unpardonable sin, according to Mark 3:31?
Why do Evangelicals like yourself tell Gentile Christians that we are just sinners, but you fairly slobber with joy over Zionist Israel, never once criticizing its members for being sinners, pretending as though its decisions are a new Christian sacrament that are immune to all criticism?
and do Christians need to pay them obeissance in order to get into Heaven?
Do you read the Gospel with bifocals, perhaps? One part in focus for Gentiles, the other part out of focus for Jews?
and what percentage of each trip to Israel do you get to pocket, as in kickbacks from your Israeli masters? Who pays for your 15 trips there, to date?
Thanks for responding.
I am curious. Especially after living myself in IsNOTreal for 20 years.
israel shamir stays away from the predominantly fictional holocaust (jews only) but reduces the murders by jews.
i respect mr shamir but disagree with here. the jews have been and still are among history’s most monstrous mass murderers.
israel shamir stays away from the predominantly fictional holocaust (jews only) but reduces the murders by jews.
It’s very obvious.
i respect mr shamir but disagree with here. the jews have been and still are among history’s most monstrous mass murderers.
Jews never, ever tire of telling us about the ‘evils’ of Adolph Hitler and the National Socialists. Anyone who stands up to and defeated (for 12 years) the international criminals and tyrants of organized Jewry is not evil but a HERO in my book. Compared to the theretofore unseen butchery, terror, oppression and tyranny that the Jewish Communist plague brought upon the ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, etc., as well as the documented but unpunished war crimes of the Allies, “Uncle” Adolph and his men were respectable gentlemen in comparison.
John
Dear Miss Darkmoon,
I have just read an exchange between you and Israel Shamir on whether Jews control America and the world. Your points are all true enough, and obvious enough too…as far as they go, that is.
But there is more at that door, my dear, much more. What I mean is simply this: on the so-called Jewish Question, even amongst the cognoscenti, there are “haves” and “have-nots.” Some have the ultimate truth and others, the vast majority of the Jew-aware, do not.
There is a good reason why the vast majority of us Jew-haters are still quite in the dark. There is a hidden dimension here, and it is not the Illuminati per se, although many of them are part of it. As to who and what the Jewish power structure actually is..behind the last of its many masks, there is a “33rd Degree” of knowledge, as it were. Thus, even within those who imagine themselves to be the cognoscenti on the Jewish Question, there is a big secret.
Knowledge of this secret defines the difference between consensus reality and true reality. The answer is hidden, yet it is right there in front of us, if only we shall see. They have trained us to look but not to see.
The key lies in the old saying: THE EYES ARE THE WINDOW TO THE SOUL.
The key to your unlocking for yourself what this truth is, lies in their eyes. I am going to TEACH you how to SEE their eyes and what is really there. Once you learn this, you will never see the world the same way again.
There is one thing they cannot always hide, and that is a certain something in their eyes. Look at the following videos closely. Follow these directions when you do:
(1) Enlarge the video image. Do not view these on the smaller sized You Tube screen.
(2) Have your finger poised on your PAUSE button.
(3) Turn OFF your AUDIO when you watch.
(4) Watch very, very CAREFULLY, but ONLY watch their eyes. Do NOT look at anything else in the videos…not even for an instant. Often, what you need to see in these videos is only present for fleeting moments. Often you have to watch for several minutes before you see anything unusual in their eyes. But then “IT” really is there. Exactly why it comes and goes at times is a matter of some debate. But leave that point aside for now.
You look at these films and then tell me whether you now “see” what I mean:
====================================================
1. Jew Michael Bloomberg (mayor of New York)
It is VERY clear in this film:
http://www.youtube.com/user/FrequencyFence?blend=9&ob=5#p/u/57/5nTqaSWMK-k
=================================================================
2. Jew Bernie Sanders (U.S. Senator from Vermont)
http://www.youtube.com/user/FrequencyFence?blend=9&ob=5#p/u/53/yOUa2j18ms8
(Not quite as clear as with Bloomberg, but nearly so…still very pronounced.)
=================================================================
3. Jew Michael Chertoff
(ex chief of the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aHk7mv-71M
==============================================================
4. Jew Nicholas Sarkozy – President of France
(This film is much less clear than the others above, but it still has its convincing moments. The phenomenon is to a degree also present at certain moments in the interviewer’s eyes, but let us leave her aside…and focus only on Sarkozy. Look especially hard at his PUPILS at these points in the video:
4:14 – 4:16
8:35 – 8:42
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sw4oeVbEShk&feature=channel_video_title
=============================================================
Now…in fairness, and perhaps MOST disturbing of all, those who exhibit, shall we say, these “tell-tale eyes,” are by no means exclusively Jews.
Still, in my research, I have stumbled across mention of one genetic correlation that seems to come up in so many cases. Those who exhibit these shape-shifting eyes seem DISPROPORTIONATELY to have the “O-negative” blood type, although not all O-negatives have these weird eyes.
And guess what racial group in the world has the highest percentage its members with the “O-negative” blood type?
JEWS! (40%)
If this correlation interests you, I can dig up sources. Let me know.
Anyway, take a look now at supposedly non-Jewish these world leaders:
==================================================
5. Ex U.S. President George Bush, Sr.
Stop the film at exactly 4 SECONDS from the start, just at the moment when he looks up! This is VERY CLEAR. His pupils are vertical slits!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eaaubr3nnHI&feature=channel_video_title
================================================================
6. Polish President Aleksander Kwaśniewski
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onTof7hM_IQ&feature=channel_video_title
=================================================================
7. Australian Prime Minister Julie Gillard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7Ca8CjQmBg&feature=channel_video_title
=================================================================
I could show you countless additional examples. The best single You Tube channel I have seen on this issue is:
FrequencyFence
It seems the “Jewish Problem” is really a whole lot more than merely what people think.
After you view the videos above, the question I have now for you, “Lasha Darkmoon,” is this:
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Best regards,
FM
Very curious. I would not expect people to give you much credit for these claims but honestly the pupils certainly do look to be vertical slits (reptilian?).
Cynics might claim this could be the effect of the video images/pixilations although the George Bush comparison with Bill Clinton looked authentic. I would like to see more videos of “non-reptilian” eyes.
Also I would like to know what you think FM.
Most of us are comfortable only with what we know, understand and can explain…. going beyond that can be too challenging for many people and to push the point risks all the credibility of what has gone before. I understand this and am happy to accept the “possibility” of most claims no matter how outlandish they seem. I accept that this is also a potential risk to my credibility …but hey what would a humble turtle know anyway : )
Years ago David Icke ran into pretty serious problems in Vancouver, BC, because the local Jewish organization decided “reptillians = Jews” and gave him a very tough time. They still call it anti semitism (silly expression) and try to keep him out of the country. He denies the connection but they are insistent. Maybe they know something they are not saying?….. Except for Chertoff, those are pretty impressive examples. Bloomberg is amazing. I wish all those clips were as well worked over…
talmudists clearly and directly tell that jews are completely different from rest of humanity, even on biological level.
DEAR DARKMOON,
WHERE DOES SHAMIR GET THAT FIGURE OF A COUPLE HUNDRED THOUSAND JEWS REMAINING IN RUSSIA? I KNOW A LOT OF JEWS WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE EMIGRATED TO ISRAEL STARTING IN THE SEVENTIES. BUT I’M ALMOST SURE CONSIDERING THE RICHES OF RUSSIA THAT MORE THAN A COUPLE HUNDRED THOUSAND REMAIN. I LOVE YOUR NAME DARKMOON.
J.J. NELAHW
You are right. Israel Shamir is not quite sincere in his position against Dr. Darkmoon. Indeed few millions jews, hidden jews, half-jews (still jews by galakha law) and 1/4 etc., and goyim in jews circle of influence are living in Russia. Mostly in the capitals (Moscow, St Petersburg, regional or economic capitals). Moscow is heavily jewish city since 1920′s. In 1922 in Moscow were 28000 jews, in 1939 – 250000. Almost all of them in positions of political and economic power. No jewish “farmers and workers” in “farmers and workers paradise” as their propaganda described USSR.1937-38 Stalin’s Moscow legal processes were against jews e.g. trotskyists on high positions of political, military and NKVD power. Now – the same situation. 2012 Moscow protests were heavily jewish, almost exclusively by participation and completely jewish by organization, funding and leadership, with very jewish slogans:”We’ll not forget, we’ll not forgive”, “This is our town, Putin – get away!” etc. No surprise mass media coverage was very favorable for their tribesmen and hostile to the “ex-KGB tyrant” Putin who won Russian elections close to 70% votes in his favor (and this are true numbers).
Jews are a FICTION. Even a total fiction. As is Marxism (where profit is a transfer of wealth to the Jews, a fiction), and Glyphosate, and GMO and weaponized syphilis (aka bergdorphius Lymes) as are vaccines … ad infinitum. At some point even Life itself can, like the Jew, be considered as a fiction.
American “men” are so right-sided (infused with misogynous Jewish existentialism), it is even arguable that Creation itself makes sense to them only as a mental fiction. In their current condition, right from wrong cannot be known by American men, instantaneously and spontaneously, from within. Their guts have been shredded. It might be different with women, but the circumcised Jew, who harbours a deep hatred for women, knows that unprotected, they are physically too weak. In one of the most influential pieces of literature ever, it was S.ATAN, which translates to 3.1415, who taught Eve (women) to know right from wrong, at an intuitive level.
There is something warong with a people who pray to the cross-dressing demon bitch named Lilith. Owls at her side, she calls herself daddy Jehovah. Is it any wonder that the people who pray to this sexually psychotic cross-dressing demon bitch, and their children, become demons themselves? Ahh, but good literature is a fiction itself, as well. To make it worse, their very own invention, the demon bitch cross dressed as God, has disinherited them. When in his last will and testament, a father promises to give $1 to his oldest son, who he calls his “chosen one,” and then gives outright the remainder of his Estate, billions or whatever, to his “other children,” that particular Chosen One has been effectively disinherited. For $1. When the bipolar demon bitch Jehovah PROMISED his Chosen (call them whatever you like) a patch of dirt … a fistful of sand (in exchange for which the Jewish tribes have only to kill everybody, including happy puppy dogs — Joshua Ch.5 — the fiction again), and he GAVE the entirety of the remaining Universe to his “other children” (the REALITY), then He effectively dis-inherited his Chosen Ones (call them whatever you like).
That makes them not only demons, but now because they have been disinherited by their own patch-of-dirt hypothesis, they are pissed off demons. In their own wet dream, they have disinherited themselves.
In Lymes disease, even the cyst form is still Lyme’s disease. The envelope of proteins, that protects the inner spirochete by mimicking human proteins, is just as much a part of Lymes, as is the weaponized spirochette of syphillis within. Dr. Tullio Simoncini developed a theory of cancer based on a definition of fungus as a proto-biological phenomenon, much as this fiction called the Jews (Shamir is right on this point) are a proto-human phenomenon (Darkmoon is right on this point). His definition was so beautiful: He observed that fungi can change and exchange dna rapidly, depending on the geometry situs of their location within a cancerous tumor. The inner fungi (the Illuminati) have a different dna and function than the fungi that appear at the protective periphery of a tumor. The outer peripheral fungi adapt a dna/mycoplasma which makes them look just like a regular healthy ordinary cell to the immune system of the host. So the peripheral fungi have a capacity for deception. Their role is to protect the inner cancer-causing fungi. BOTH manifestations of the fungi have the same objective, which is death of the host.
What Simoncini observed in his reportedly successful treatments, was that it is of no use to try to directly take out only the center fungi. As soon as you attack the fungi at the center, the peripheral fungi will instantaneous switch their dna. New tumors will spontaneously organize, with new center colonies and new peripheral colonies. (I am not saying his theory or treatment is right or wrong. In fact I don’t think his treatment adequately considers the emotional and spiritual bodies. But I am recording his observations on the Jewish behavior of fungal colonies.) There is no such thing as a single cell fungal colony. They form into highly organized colonies, that have a spontaneous and highly intelligent and deceptive form of group think. When the fungi at the center are attacked, the peripheral fungi instantaneously change their dna and undertake new roles, as determined by their new geometry situs within the evolving tumor(s).
So it is with the good Jew (the peripheral Jew who because of his existentialist bent can at best mimic humanity) and the bad Jew (I kill everybody because I can – the Illuminati Jew). Both good and bad Jew pray to the same cross-dressing bipolar demon bitch, who calls herself Jehovah. Some pray to her owls, others to her papal bulls. This includes the zionist christians, and szionist muslims, and the Marxists, and the existentialists, and etc. ad infinitum.
I emphasize this to stress importance of FICTION. If good literature is defined as something that changes history, then by that definition, the Bible of the cross-dressing demon bitch who calls herself Jehovah, has been good literature! That includes the voodoo of its commandments for making burnt offerings out of children, and for mutilating their chakras (Moses Maimonades, 12th c. rabbi — “… we circumcise our servants, soldiers and slaves for reason …”), and for killing all the puppy dogs of a village when Jews want its women and children as concubines. When praying to a cross-dressing demon bitch like Jehovah, let us not underestimate the importance of good fiction.
It may be that to find a cure, we need only find a better fiction. Dante … Comedia! Kepler … Harmonice Mundi! Cervantes … Don Quixote! Even Shaftesbury … Characteristics (Oxford (1990s?) or Robertson (1900s?) editions ONLY … the cross-dressing homosexual dons of Cambridge have intentionally spewed forth a paperback edition that is so corrupted with liberal editorial license as to render Shaftesbury unintelligible.)
Dear Lasha,
Your ending to this uneven article (response to Shamir) is a cop-out.
“Life is too short and precious to waste it on “anti-Semitism”. One has to move beyond this puerile response to Jewish world supremacy. Perhaps the role of the Jew in human affairs is to be the beast of prey that teaches the rest of us to run a bit faster.”
Why write about the disasterous effect of Jews on all the rest of us, if you are then going to sum up by saying: Oh, never mind. Maybe they have a useful purpose.
Lasha, pay no mind to Yaeger. In general she is a pain in the a** who has it in for just about EVERYONE out there trying to contribute something to this fight but herself. You are a great writer/thinker and the world is a better place because of you.
Someone who signs himself “endtheconflict” has no business suggesting that someone who signs with their own name should not be listened to. How ludicrous!
The praise or criticism of “endtheconflict” has no value whatsoever since no one knows who he is. What are these numerous unidentified people, who fill comment boards all over the Internet, afraid of? Even Lasha Darkmoon is a pseudonym, although it appears some know her personally.
I have thought well of Darkmoon’s anti-Jewish essays in the past and circulated them, but she is apparently still afraid of being called an antisemite. That is what I’m pointing out. How can you state as factual that Jews are directly responsible for murdering 10s of millions in the last century alone, and several millions in this, and then follow that with “…maybe they’re just trying to teach us to run faster.” That may be a clever ending for a sophisticated writer, but it completely takes the edge off and makes her reader comfortable with Jews again.
“It’s not all Jews,” you say? Well, no Jew that I know is willing to take responsibility for it, as a Jew. Nor is any liberal willing to ask or expect Jews to take responsibility. Passing off responsibility is the name of the game that almost all play. Taking Responsibility is what is needed. Don’t look for THAT here at darkmoon.me. Here you find some interesting and even bold articles written by a talented word-crafter. Fine and good. But too many of the no-name multitude act like this is all that’s required. They too hate the Jew and bow down to the Jew at the same time.
It is this fear that we have to overcome.
Dear Carolyn,
I have replied to your above comment at some length later on in this thread. I hope you’ve seen my response.
As to why I use a pseudonym, this has explained in the opening paragraph here:
http://www.darkmoon.me/about/
Dear Lasha,
Yes, I should be more forgiving of your particular situation. Learning you are only 33 years old … well, that is good reason to protect your livelihood, and also probably your love of teaching. That is not something I have to worry about.
Do forgive me if I am coming on too strong, but that is just about the only way to get attention amongst the mass of verbiage we find ourselves plowing through. It seems to me there is much contradiction going on, and it is not accidental.
Best wishes.
Dr. Darkmoon in addition to your comment to Rehmat….. where the real control is and the reason for OWS!
“Give me control over a nation’s currency and I care not who makes its laws”…..
Baron M. A. Rothschild 1744 – 1812.
* Rothschild banks in London and Berlin are part owners of the US Federal Reserve.
I am very disappointed at the total lack of content with regards to what unites Jews. It is one thing and one thing only. World dominion for when Messiah returns.
I miss wrote. Sometimes I forget yesterday from tomorrow. I should have said, when Messiah comes.
Darkmoon, many will be pacified by debate, sans doute. Personally, I would rather
spend my enegies and buying power boycotting all jewish goods and services rather than following the tedium of ‘he sez/she sez. Wphysicallyhy not turn your genius and popularity towards giving True Americans the opportunity to buy only”Holy Virgin” olive oil…. Olive Oil that is produced only from Palestine and by Palestinian hands. This way, americans can vote with their consumer power, being spiritually and mentally energised; and physically benefitted by this special nourishnent. With Darkmoon’s special blessing on the label, popular appeal and solidarity will surely grow: with popular demand that it be stocked and specially presented in all food outlets Darkmoon will become a household name , blessed at every table.
Domine Vobiscum
Darkmoon, many will be pacified by debate, sans doute. Personally, I would rather
spend my enegies and buying power boycotting all jewish goods and services rather than following the tedium of ‘he sez/she sez. Why not turn your genius and popularity towards giving True Americans the opportunity to buy only”Holy Virgin” olive oil…. Olive Oil that is produced only from Palestine and by Palestinian hands. This way, americans can vote with their consumer power, being spiritually and mentally energised; and physically benefitted by this special nourishnent. With Darkmoon’s special blessing on the label, popular appeal and solidarity will surely grow: with popular demand that it be stocked and specially presented in all food outlets Darkmoon will become a household name , blessed at every table.
Domine Vobiscum
Pingback: Texas Secessionist Movement Growing! - Page 48
It is now time to pronounce judgement on this subversive article. It is a complete waste of readers’ time. From it they they learn precisely nothing. They will certainly not learn to love the beleaguered Jews who have experienced innumerable setsbacks throughout history.
We have been expelled from no fewer than 109 countries since the year 250 A.D. From pillar to post we have wandered the earth, persecuted through no fault of our own and lashed on by the cosmic hatred of the thrice-damned goyim.
For these crimes against the humanity of G-d’s Chosen a heavy price, I predict, will one day have to be paid. Darkmoon predicts the slaughter of 50 million American Christians in the foreseeable futiure. Well, it may well come to that. And if it does, I will cetainly have no tears to shed.
You have heard of the law of karma. You have heard of blowback. For the age-old persecutions of my people, condign punishment is now overdue. You’ve got it coming, goyim.
You heads will be chopped off. Your arms and legs will be torn asunder. Your tongues will be pulled out of your heads with red-hot pincers and fed to the raving dogs.
Much rejoicing in those days. Hosannahs to the gods of terror! Yea, I and my childeen will be all smiles and no tears will run down our cheeks as we witness the dreadful doom reseved for the unutterably evil and depraved goyim.
Soon may it come, ah soon, soon!
By reading your post, I believe I have experienced firsthand Gilad Atzmon’s notion of “collective madness” as it pertains to your tribe … You are a very petty, self-centered and disturbed person …
Ruth I can understand how you feel. It is wrong to blame all Jews and you have every right to defend yourself. Unfortunately the tone of your comments are counter productive and only reinforce the false prejudice held by some against you.
If I may quote from fellow jew David Currie above:
“It is NOT “Israel” who is the enemy – it’s international Zionism based primarily in the the City of London, and New York City. Tel Aviv may be destroyed in the coming war, but Zion will still exist – Zion is the entire planet. Those of us who are righteous “Jews” need to expose the Zionist psyop which is designed to use us for scapegoats! I applaud Israel Shamir for being one of those righteous Jews who expose the truth as he sees it.”
You should discuss this with your spiritual leaders. In the mean time you may find some relief here:
http://www.thedailybell.com/3211/Ms-Darkmoon-and-Real-Zionist-News-on-the-Great-Jewish-Conspiracy
It should be obvious by now that ‘Ruth Bernstein’ is a hoax … that is, not a Jewish woman but a Gentile parodying a Jewess. That several of you keep fighting with this parody doesn’t say much for the acumen of the general Internet reader, nor for their ability to recognize where the fight actually is.
There’s a lot of real work necessary to be done; instead we are fooled into shadow-boxing. Say goodbye to Ruth and don’t waste anymore time on her, except perhaps in exposing the hoax.
I tend to disagree, there are number of statisticians and historians ( who have claimed that around 50-60 million Russians alone have been killed.
To start off, according to Rober Conquest he gives a carefully accumulated total for the Stalin years alone (at least 20,000,000 killed); and in his samizdat translated into English, Dyadkin, a Soviet geophysicist, did a demographic analysis of excess Soviet deaths, 1926 to 1954, and concluded that Soviet repression killed 23,100,000 to 32,000,000 Soviet citizens over this 29-year period.
Panin claims that 57,000,000 to 69,500,000 were killed, and says that estimates of authors in the West vary from 45,000,000 to 80,000,000 million.
Solzhenitsyn mentions a 66,000,000 figure calculated by an ŽmigrŽ professor of statistics.
Stewart-Smith gives an estimate of 31,000,000 killed in repression.
According to By R.J. Rummel a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, has recently calculated that approximately 54 million Russians were systematically killed by the Soviet Communist regime from 1917 to 1987.
Igor Bestuzhev-Lada, writing in a 1988 issue of the Moscow weekly Nedelya, suggested that during the Stalin era alone (1935-1953), as many as 50 million people were killed, condemned to camps from which they never emerged, or lost their lives as a direct result of the brutal “dekulakization” campaign against the peasantry.
Stalin killed 50 million,” The Sunday Times, London, April 17, 1988.
The list goes on and on, there are numerous number of statistical studies which vary in the range of 45 million and up. Not sure what grapefruit Mr. Shamir is drinking but it sure isn’t 100% juice . Regardless good article!
Thanks for these statistics. This is an exceptionally well-informed post. I have copied and saved it.
Totally agree
Micks and the Yids, we’ll get those 9/11 bastards because no other poor bastard even knows he is even awake. Small problem – there are no Micks left. I’m told Jews love an argument. Lasha/Shamir – enjoy.
ON COMMENT POLICY
There is no moderation of comments as such on this site. This is a free speech zone. This is not to say that comments will not be deleted on exceptionally rare occasions, i.e., if they are deliberately designed to sabotage this website or destroy the reputation of some individual by defamatory statements.
We could easily, if we wish, delete all abusive comments here. We could also block the Zionist trolls from disrupting the flow of discourse. Instead, we have decided to stand aside and let the madhatters speak their mind.
How else can the doctor in the loonybin cure the patient unless the patient is allowed to speak?
— John Scott Montecristo (Editor-in-Chief)
@ Thomas Mallon
@ Eamon
Apologies for the delay in posting your respective comments. Understand that when you read that your comments are undergoing “moderation”, this is not my doing. This is something the computer does automatically, usually when you post one or more links. I then have to then read and “approve” the comment.
On this particular occasion, owing to the sheeer volume of posts, I was unaware that your comments were awaiting moderation.
Rather than just “approve” them now, which would mean that they’d appear way back in the thread where others would miss them, I’m now going to copy and paste them as new comments.
Again, sorry about this unfortunate delay.
— Montecristo
Darkmoon’s major premise, “If the Israeli Jews give the orders to the American Jews, and if the American Jews control America, then clearly America has become an Israeli colony” begs the question.
Influence? Yes. “Gives the orders”? That is sheer and irresponsible hyperbole.
——————————————————————————-
One idea: 9/11.
I realize that some still mindlessly adhere to the official 9/11 narrative. If anyone needs more or different examples to support LD’s major premise, they are plentiful and not hard to find. To paraphrase a rather infamous sociopath: If one controls the money supply of a nation, he controls the nation itself. Yes, the US (and the entire, formerly-Christian West) is given orders by the ZioNazi crime syndicate of the Money Masters who created and own Israel. If you doubt this, go ask JFK (or JFK Jr., or Abraham Lincoln, or James Garfield, or any other high-profile victim of the Money Men who dared to speak the truth).
Did anyone happen to see that the ZioNazis are now openly admitting they have nukes? Far too few seem proportionately outraged by the now-public but long-known fact that they have, with the covert assistance of the British, had them for decades. If I were a rank-and-file Judaic living in Israel, I’d get out of there faster than you could say, “Incoming!” The same would be true if I were living in NE Japan, but that is another kettle of fish…
In reply to Eamon:
JFK Tried to Stop Israel from Developing Nukes!
See video http://warisacrime.org/node/53850
“On July 7, 2010, at “The Spy Museum,” in Washington, D.C., the IRmep sponsored a panel discussion. It was titled: “Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal: Espionage, Opacity and Future.” One of the speakers was the IRmep’s Director, Grant F. Smith. He is the author of the books, “Spy Trade,” “America’s Defense Line” and “Foreign Agents.” Smith underscored in his remarks that President John F. Kennedy tried to stop Israel from developing nuclear weapons. And, that his brother, Robert F. Kennedy, the then-U. S. Attorney General, had “ordered” a then-leading Israeli front group in this country “to register as a foreign agent.” For background on this event and its sponsor, The Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy, go to: IRmep. (29 minutes, 04 seconds)”
No wonder there is an all out media war going on against even the memory of JFK. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE3xGicpTJI
SHAMIR says: “Jews play a negligible part in modern German life, Lasha. Even after the the defeat of the Third Reich, there was no resurgence of the Jewish spirit.”
——————————————————————————————
Has anyone ever heard of the Morgenthau Plan or learned about what the ‘good guys’ did to Germany and Germans after the war? Morgenthau… ’tis a fine Irish name, don’t ya know? Why did the Secretary of the Treasury outline the post-war plan for the treatment of Germany?
Here are two links which might assist those who do not know about this ugly plan and dark period of history:
[1] http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=907
[2] http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/Morgenthau.html
There is an excellent, short book on the subject called “Gruesome Harvest.” If you dare to read it, keep a vomit receptacle close at hand. The diabolical actions of that time are affecting Germany to this day.
Who controls the modern German monetary system? As they are tied into the Euro, they are, in fact, controlled by the Judaic Money Masters. Control the money supply, control the country.
— Editor’s note. Apologies to Thomas Mallon for failing to post this long but extremely important comment earlier. Readers are urged to read and ponder it carefully.
Solzhenitsyn Breaks Taboo: The Role Of Jews In Soviet-era Repression — Guardian
Alexander Solzhenitsyn writes:
“Executed [during the Bolshevik revolution] army officers were Russians, the noblemen, priests, monks, deputies were Russians… In 1920s, the pre-revolutionary engineers and scientists were exiled or killed. They were Russians, while their place was taken by Jews. The best Russian Psychiatric institute in Moscow, its Russian members were arrested or exiled, while their place was taken by the Jews. Important Jewish doctors blocked the advancement of Russian medical scientists… The best intellectual and artistic elites of Russian people were killed, while the Jews grew and flourished in these (deadly for Russians) years.”
—Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Evrei v SSSR i v budushei Rossii, 2001
* * *
Nobel laureate under fire for new book on the role of Jews in Soviet-era repression
Nick Paton Walsh in Moscow
Saturday January 25, 2003
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who first exposed the horrors of the Stalinist gulag, is now attempting to tackle one of the most sensitive topics of his writing career – the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet purges.
In his latest book Solzhenitsyn, 84, deals with one of the last taboos of the communist revolution: that Jews were as much perpetrators of the repression as its victims. Two Hundred Years Together – a reference to the 1772 partial annexation of Poland and Russia which greatly increased the Russian Jewish population – contains three chapters discussing the Jewish role in the revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of Soviet Russia.
But Jewish leaders and some historians have reacted furiously to the book, and questioned Solzhenitsyn’s motives in writing it, accusing him of factual inaccuracies and of fanning the flames of anti-semitism in Russia.
Solzhenitsyn argues that some Jewish satire of the revolutionary period “consciously or unconsciously descends on the Russians” as being behind the genocide. But he states that all the nation’s ethnic groups must share the blame, and that people shy away from speaking the truth about the Jewish experience.
In one remark which infuriated Russian Jews, he wrote:
“If I would care to generalise, and to say that the life of the Jews in the camps was especially hard, I could, and would not face reproach for an unjust national generalisation. But in the camps where I was kept, it was different. The Jews whose experience I saw – their life was softer than that of others.”
Yet he added:
“But it is impossible to find the answer to the eternal question: who is to be blamed, who led us to our death? To explain the actions of the Kiev cheka [secret police] only by the fact that two thirds were Jews, is certainly incorrect.”
Solzhenitsyn, awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970, spent much of his life in Soviet prison camps, enduring persecution when he wrote about his experiences. He is currently in frail health, but in an interview given last month he said that Russia must come to terms with the Stalinist and revolutionary genocides – and that its Jewish population should be as offended at their own role in the purges as they are at the Soviet power that also persecuted them.
“My book was directed to empathise with the thoughts, feelings and the psychology of the Jews – their spiritual component,” he said. “I have never made general conclusions about a people. I will always differentiate between layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution. Another, to the contrary, was trying to stand back. The Jewish subject for a long time was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a Jewish writer] once said that the best service our Russian friends give to us is never to speak aloud about us.”
But Solzhenitsyn’s book has caused controversy in Russia, where one Jewish leader said it was “not of any merit”.
“This is a mistake, but even geniuses make mistakes,” said Yevgeny Satanovsky, president of the Russian Jewish Congress. “Richard Wagner did not like the Jews, but was a great composer. Dostoyevsky was a great Russian writer, but had a very sceptical attitude towards the Jews.
“This is not a book about how the Jews and Russians lived together for 200 years, but one about how they lived apart after finding themselves on the same territory. This book is a weak one professionally. Factually, it is so bad as to be beyond criticism. As literature, it is not of any merit.”
But DM Thomas, one of Solzhenitsyn’s biographers, said that he did not think the book was fuelled by anti-semitism. “I would not doubt his sincerity. He says that he firmly supports the state of Israel. In his fiction and factual writing there are Jewish characters that he writes about who are bright, decent, anti-Stalinist people.”
Professor Robert Service of Oxford University, an expert on 20th century Russian history, said that from what he had read about the book, Solzhenitsyn was “absolutely right”.
Researching a book on Lenin, Prof Service came across details of how Trotsky, who was of Jewish origin, asked the politburo in 1919 to ensure that Jews were enrolled in the Red army. Trotsky said that Jews were disproportionately represented in the Soviet civil bureaucracy, including the cheka.
“Trotsky’s idea was that the spread of anti-semitism was [partly down to] objections about their entrance into the civil service. There is something in this; that they were not just passive spectators of the revolution. They were part-victims and part-perpetrators.
“It is not a question that anyone can write about without a huge amount of bravery, and [it] needs doing in Russia because the Jews are quite often written about by fanatics. Mr Solzhenitsyn’s book seems much more measured than that.”
Yet others failed to see the need for Solzhenitsyn’s pursuit of this particular subject at present. Vassili Berezhkov, a retired KGB colonel and historian of the secret services and the NKVD (the precursor of the KGB), said: “The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change.
“If Solzhenitsyn writes that there were many Jews in the NKVD, it will increase the passions of anti-semitism, which has deep roots in Russian history. I think it is better not to discuss such a question now.”
* * *
Source: Guardian Newspapers
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jan/25/russia.books
Jewish group objects to ‘Great Famine’ case
June 15, 2009 KIEV, Ukraine (JTA) — A Jewish group in Ukraine is objecting to a criminal case brought over the “Great Famine” committed in the 1930s.
The nation’s security service is pressing the case against a list of former Soviet officials accused of committing the Holodomor, which caused the deaths of millions in Ukraine in 1932-33. Most of the names on the list were Jewish.
Ukrainian lawmaker Aleksandr Feldman, leader of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee, said last week that it was “a farce” to press the case.
“All organizers of the Great Famine are dead,” he said.
Last July, the Ukrainian Security Service released a list of high-ranking Soviet state and Communist Party officials — as well as officials from NKVD, the police force of Soviet Russia — that essentially blamed Jews and Latvians responsible for perpetrating and executing the famine because most of the names on the list were Jewish.
The Ukrainian Jewish Committee called on the secret service to revise the list, which incited interethnic hatred, in order to clear up the “inaccuracy.”
Feldman believes there is a danger that the “Holodomor Affair” materials are being used for political purposes.
In late May, security service head Valentin Nalivaychenko claimed at a meeting with representatives of the World Congress of Ukrainians that “Ukraine has collected enough evidence to bring a criminal case regarding the famine, which was artificially created by the Bolshevik regime and caused mass death of citizens.”
Through the World Congress of Ukrainians, Nalivaychenko turned to leading foreign lawyers with a request to help find out the circumstances connected with preparing and committing the genocide.
Source: JTA http://www.jta.org/news/article/2009/06/15/1005888/jewish-group-objects-to-holodomor-lawsuit
Thanks again, Thomas, for this invaluable comment. (JSM, Editor).
You are very welcome. I thought I was put on a “do not allow comment list”. Thank you.
No such list, Thomas. If ever a comment you post does not appear as a posted comment AT ONCE, add another comment under it immediately, asking why your comment hasn’t appeared. This would alert me to the fact that I need to do somethng about it. However, there may be a slight delay before I notice your second comment. I could be away from my computer or asleep…or we could be in different time zones, which complicates matters.
Fair enough and thank you again.
dont read soviet or modern jewish interpretations of USSR history. Read book of first hand witness – Prince Nikolay Zhevakhov “Evreiskaya revolutziya” (“jewish revolution”). You will see that Solzhenitzyn was very shy indeed in his descriptions and conclusions. Even so, it provoked rage among moscow jews, one of them Yevgeny Satanovsky, president of the Russian Jewish Congress. What to tell here – his last name is speaking for itself. “Satan” -ovsky
In reply to Carolyn Yeager
Carolyn writes in an earlier post:
Dear Lasha,
Your ending to this uneven article (response to Shamir) is a cop-out:
“Life is too short and precious to waste it on “anti-Semitism”. One has to move beyond this puerile response to Jewish world supremacy. Perhaps the role of the Jew in human affairs is to be the beast of prey that teaches the rest of us to run a bit faster.”
Why write about the disastrous effect of Jews on all the rest of us, if you are then going to sum up by saying: “Oh, never mind. Maybe they have a useful purpose.”
My response:
I respect Carolyn and admire her passionate, uncompromising nature. She does not suffer fools gladly. Whether or not I am one of these fools for “copping out”, is of course an arguable point. If I were discussing this issue with Carolyn over a glass of wine somewhere, I think she would understand.
Suffice it to say that this is an unfathomably profound issue. The first thing we need to decide is: what is a “Jew” exactly?
Are the Jews a race, as Kevin MacDonald insists; or are they a culture, a construct, an elusive je ne sais quoi, as Israel Shamir and Gilad Atzmon seem to believe?
The world is split into two camps on this vital issue.
Shamir insists that a Jew ceases to be a Jew when he throws off the shackles of “Jewishness” by becoming a Christian. He then becomes a gentile, a goy. Indeed, he is now an ex-Jew.
You can’t be an ex-leopard, but apparently you can be an ex-Jew. (Like you can be an ex-criminal or an ex-monk.)
Kevin MacDonald will have none of this. He insists that there is a genetic component to Jewry. That white Ashkenazi Jews and black Ethiopian Jew belong to the same race and therefore have common “Jewish” characteristics — though they may well look different.
See here:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/10/a-dissident-meditation-on-jewish-identity-a-review-of-gilad-atzmons-the-wandering-who/
MacDonald takes issue with both Gilad Atzmon and Prof. Shlomo Sand on what he calls the “Khazarian hypothesis”. He rejects the Khazarian thesis put forward by Koestler in The Thirteenth Tribe. He says the latest research disproves the Khazarian thesis completely. (See above link).
In other words, the Ashkenazi Jews DO have a link to the Holy Land…and are therefore the remote descendants of Abraham and Moses. As such, they have a Biblical right to the Holy Land. Just like the Sephardic Jews do, who are Semitic. Indeed, according to MacDonald, the Ashkenazi Jews ARE Semitic. They would have to be, wouldn’t they, if all Jews belong to the same race?
This is of course the case only if MacDonald is correct in rejecting the Khazarian thesis, and if Koestler and Shlomo Sand are wrong to accept it.
I am not myself taking sides here, please note. I am trying to listen to both sides carefully.
So this is what I would say to Carolyn whom I genuinely respect and admire as a formidable firebrand: before we both agree that I’ve “copped out”, we must decide what a “Jew” is.
And we must also decide whether to accept or reject the Khazarian thesis of Koestler.
This is a very thoughtful reply.
Dear Lasha,
Thank you very much for your kind reply. I did expect a reply from you and you didn’t disappoint me. That’s a good sign!
You have put your finger on the important question indeed, and stated it very well. What is a Jew? Can a Jew become a non-Jew by “reforming” his attitudes and beliefs? I have become persuaded that a Jew is a leopard — much more a race than a religion. Therefore, Israel Shamir and Gilad Atzmon remain Jews and cannot “shake off” their Jewishness, no matter how much they might want to. The same even goes for the popular Brother Nathanael Kapner, who many believe, even himself I’m sure, that by becoming a Christian he is no longer a Jew.
This is a tragic reality for those Jews who do not like and do not want to be associated with Jews and the history of Jewish behavior. But this doesn’t make them non-Jews, or absolve these ones of responsibility. It is genetic, and while individuals may come along who are of a better quality, the prevalent tendencies reassert themselves in their progeny.
I previously thought of Atzmon and Kapner as no longer Jews because they renounced their Jewishness (being a Jew). I’ve since learned that Atzmon never actually meant to do that. I was still believing in “good Jews.” Now I don’t categorize Jews that way but just hold that Jews are harmful (antipathetic) to white society and must be excluded therefrom, and that necessarily means all of them. I say “white” because I don’t try to speak for other races; they can decide for themselves. I’m not a believer in anyone “conquering the world.” And as you can tell, I’m not a multiculturalist.
This is too strong a medicine for most to swallow.
I also previously greeted Shlomo Sand’s work with joy. Now I question it. But for you, Lasha, and also for Kevin MacDonald, to say that if Jews are a race this gives them a ‘Biblical right to the Holy Land,’ doesn’t follow. We have to sort out who was who in the biblical accounts. We are taking the Jew’s word for it, which we shouldn’t do. We have always given them way too much acceptance because they are so crafty and talented in promoting their tribe and their ideas.
We, as white people, need to study, research, ponder and discuss/debate among ourselves just what the Jews are, without the input of Jews. This is something Kevin MacDonald has done better than most. He has shown a great deal of intellectual and moral courage, though even he is restricted by “political correctness” to a degree because of his position in academia and his proper desire to have his work read.
To sum up: Who are the Jews? I think we have been bamboozled by this genetically-connected group of people and we should stop that right now. We will never come out from under their spell while we are still listening to them (let along that they hold all the most influential positions in our nations [what's left of them]). This includes listening to the so-called “good Jews” too. Tough talk, but necessary.
Being able to talk with you over a glass of wine would be a marvelous experience, I’m sure. Who knows, maybe some day …
“But for you, Lasha, to say that if Jews are a race this gives them a ‘Biblical right to the Holy Land,’ doesn’t follow.”
Sorry, Carolyn, I expressed myself clumsily. I didn’t mean to suggest that the Ashkenazis had a right to the Holy Land if it could be proved that they were the direct descendants of Abraham and Moses.
What I was trying to say is that they would have a right to the Holy Land IN THEIR OWN PERCEPTION if they could say: “Hey, this land belongs to us, because our ancestors came from this land. We’re descended in a direct line from Moses and Abraham.”
Even then, of course, this would be a dubious claim because it would depend on accepting the Biblical premise that GOD HAD GIVEN THIS, THE HOLY LAND, TO HIS BELOVED CHOSEN ONES, THE JEWS.
No sensible person believes this claptrap nowadays except Old Testament literalists who also believe implicitly in the story of Adam and Eve. I don’t think Einstein or Freud would have been foolish enough to claim that, as Jews, they had a right to the Holy Land as God’s Chosen Ones.
So what I am saying is simply this, and I know no one here will disagree with me:
(1) If the Ashkenazi Jews can be shown to be TRUE SEMITICS, whose ancestors came from the Holy Land, they could then make out a plausible case for occupying the Holy Land now — plausible only to the foolish and gullible however. They could say, “This land is ours because our forefathers lived here and practised Judaism.”
(2) On the other hand, if the Khazarian hypothesis is true, then the Ashkenazi Jews don’t have a leg to stand on. They can hardly say: “Our ancestors came from Khazaria and were converted to Judaism in the 8th century. We have no genetic link with those horrid Sephardic Jews, and even less with the Ethiopian black Jews. And another thing, none of our ancestors ever put a foot in Palestine! But hey, the Holy Land belongs to us all the same! Why? Because, um, we damn well say so!”
One thing is clear: the Jews must be secretly very pleased that the Khazarian hypothesis has been called into question. It serves them well if it can be shown that they have a genetic link, however tenuous, to the people who once inhabited the Holy Land.
Lasha (and others who concern themselves with this)
Apart from the fact that you didn’t address most of what I wrote, whether “Ashkanazis” are semitic is not the important question for us — that is probably a distraction gratefully engaged in by those who still wish to avoid the real question. All born Jews are genetically connected in a distinctive way and they share behavioral and character traits … as races do.
The better question is whether Jews are the people in the Bible that they claim to be. About that, we are listening to Jews and taking their word for it. A huge mistake. But leaving that aside, the most important question for Europeans is what effect Jews have had on our culture and societies. NOT A GOOD ONE! Their highest gifts lie in the areas of intrigue, camouflage, theft and sabotage. That is reason enough for us to say, We don’t want you here. That is what a sovereign people do.
Please don’t anyone belabor me about the contributions of Jews and their questionable “Nobel prizes.” If you fall for that, you should be put back in first grade. Let them live among themselves and use their gifts to benefit themselves … if they can. That is the last thing they want. If Jews are really such a great people, why have they never created a civilization of their own? Archaeologically, nothing can be found. Because the “Christian world” prevented it? Not at all. Because they have always and only lived as parasites.
It seems that our religious teachings (including “new age”) have led us to believe it is better that we should perish than that we should offend or exclude those of another race! I say there is no possiblity of a utopian global world of “peace” where race consciousness is done away with The fact is, only white people think that way. For example, look at what happened in South Africa once black rule took over: more inequality than before, but reversed. And much more violence.
If you want to see White America Vanquished for good, continue letting the Jews control the debate. Whether called Sephardic or Ashkanazi, it doesn’t matter.
Eloquently put, Carolyn. You make your points with passion and sincerity. The path you recommend is obviously White Revolution, a revolution analogous to the Bolshevik Revolution, but led this time by Whites.
Its object? To quarantine the Jews. Not exterminate them, just segregate them: so that whatever harm they did, they did only to themselves.
Wasn’t this what has been tried before several times and failed? Didn’t Stalin try to segregate the Jews in 1934 in Birobidjan?
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/birobidjan-the-first-jewish-state/
The Brits tried to quarantine the Jews in Uganda, the Germans in Madagascar.
The Jews, however, insisted on Palestine. Which is what they got. As I pointed out in Part 1 of “America Vanquished”, it was tacitly understood that the Jews would all move en masse to Palestine and get out of everyone’s hair. They reneged on their promise. Having gotten themselves Palestine and called it “Israel”, most of them refused to go and live there. Only 37 percent of Jews now live in their own country.
Isn’t this extraordinary?
Your solution, dear Carolyn, is the solution of an idealist. In practise it won’t work. Fact 1: THE JEWS WON’T GO AWAY VOLUNTARILTY. You yourself have called them “parasites”. Since when do parasites leave their hosts voluntarily?
They don’t. Only violence will achieve what you want, Carolyn. So you are in effect calling for a bloody revolution.
I don’t know the answer to these questions, but one thing you and I are in agreement over: the Jews are an urgent problem, and unless the problem is soon resolved satisfactorily we can except total disaster.
Even as I speak, a massive genocide is being planned against a totally innocent people who have not started a war for hundreds of years: the Iranians.
How many will die in this new conflagration? Will this catastrophe convulse other nations? Will World War III break out?
Who is behind all this warmongering?
Yes, you’ve got it right in one word. I don’t need to tell you what people are beating the war drums the loudest. I don’t need to tell you what race living among us is salivating for human blood like vampires.
Something needs to be done, but who will do it? As I have asked several times in essays that no reputable editor will dare to publish: AMERICA, WHERE IS THY RESCUER?
Cheer up, Lasha.
http://rense.com/1.imagesH/walm_dees.jpg
Prof. MacDonald is right.
Thomas Mallon said… In reply to Eamon: JFK Tried to Stop Israel from Developing Nukes!
—————————————————————————-
I already knew that, Mr. Mallon. I am not sure how you got the opposite impression, but I appreciate your posting the info; it will assist those who might not know. He also went against the Money Men by signing an executive order to abolish the Fed and start issuing United States Notes. Either move would have been sufficient to irk the ZioNazi Money Masters; doing both sealed his fate. Godspeed, sir
Godspeed also with you, good man!
Darkmoon said: “In other words, the Ashkenazi Jews DO have a link to the Holy Land…and are therefore the remote descendants of Abraham and Moses. As such, they have a Biblical right to the Holy Land. Just like the Sephardic Jews do, who are Semitic.”
—————————————————————————-
Even if we grant that MacDonald is correct in his thesis about Khazars, etc., he is wrong about how it pertains to the present. Being a “descendent” of Abraham does NOT give one a right to the Holy Land any more than I have a right to property in the lands of my ancestors. If I go back to Ireland or Sweden, whence my ancestors came to the USA, may I simply claim land that now belongs to others? Of course not. What if I can prove that my direct descendents once owned a specific piece of property? Well, no one in Ireland or Sweden will cooperate with such insane actions, acting as if I still have a right to the land. I would be arrested, and rightfully so, if I tried to take what does not belong to me.
Once Christ was crucified, the Old Covenant was OVER, as powerfully manifested by the tearing of the Temple’s massive curtain. Any rights the perfidious Judaics once had that flowed their relationship with God no longer apply, nor have they for 2000 years. If necessary, read that last sentence again. They are like men waiting in a silent, empty train station for a train that left the station 2000 years ago. They failed to fulfill the very raison d’etre of their God-given mission — i.e., accepting and pointing out the Messias to the entire world. Now, the only rights that have any relevance or applicability in the Holy Land are those that pertain to the natural law. Ergo, it was wrong and criminal to displace the present owners of said property. Yes, God, in His wisdom, has allowed it; that does not make it right, in se.
Prof. McDonald today writes, as you likely know:
“Atzmon completely avoids any mention of modern population genetic studies that show conclusively that Jews are indeed an ethnic entity and that widely dispersed Jewish groups are more similar to each other than to the peoples they have lived among for hundreds or thousands of years. Instead he relies on Shlomo Sand’s The Invention of the Jewish People to argue that Jewish peoplehood is an invention of the 19th century resulting from the influence of German nationalism…” http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/10/a-dissident-meditation-on-jewish-identity-a-review-of-gilad-atzmons-the-wandering-who/?show=comments#comment-53892
Nothing new here except that he is likely correct.
And then, McDonald continues,
“Moreover, there is no evidence to support the Khazar hypothesis—also adopted by Sand and Atzmon — that Ashkenazi Jews have no genetic connection to the Middle East or to other Jewish groups but rather stem from a conversion event of a Turkic people in the Middle Ages. There is no evidence to indicate that is where the Ashkenazi population came from–linguistically (Yiddish is a German dialect), contemporary population genetic evidence, or their own historical memory. There is in fact evidence that the Khazars converted to Judaism, but it’s long way from that to supposing that the Khazars are the ancestors of the Ashkenazim. The reason people like Atzmon buy the Khazar hypothesis is that they think it de-legitimizes Israel–a political motive. But one need not support Israel even if one acknowledges the ethnic coherence of Judaism, and certainly there is no need to think the US should support Israel unconditionally just because Jews are an ethnic entity”.
Whether someone in his ‘self-denial’ doesn’t accept the historical truth that almost all of 12.7 million world Jews are either Khazarian Turks or North African Berbers – doesn’t deligitimizes Zionist entity. The fact that the ancestors of mored than 95% of the alien Jews now occupying Palestine never lived there for the last 2000 years.
The so-called “biblical G-d promised Holy Land to Jews” is as much a historical fraud as the “Six Million Died”. It’s Zionist-funded ‘Scofield Bible Study’ which promised Palestine to Jews and not the God of the New Testament.
The great majority of the Jewish communities still living in Morocco Algeria and Tunis or immigrated to occupied Palestine – are ethnically North African Berbers who converted to Judaism in the 7th century. The expulsion of Jews from Spain (in 1492 CE) and Portugal (in 1497) brought thousands of new fugitive Berber Jews to Morocco…..
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/10/01/israels-berber-amazigh-card-to-fight-islam/
@ Eamon
Darkmoon said: “In other words, the Ashkenazi Jews DO have a link to the Holy Land…and are therefore the remote descendants of Abraham and Moses. As such, they have a Biblical right to the Holy Land. Just like the Sephardic Jews do, who are Semitic.”
—————————————————————————-
EAMON: “Even if we grant that MacDonald is correct in his thesis about Khazars, etc., he is wrong about how it pertains to the present. Being a “descendent” of Abraham does NOT give one a right to the Holy Land any more than I have a right to property in the lands of my ancestors….”
I happen to agree with you. I expressed myself clumsily in the quote you give by me. I’ve already explained in a post above, in reply to Carolyn Yeager, that a soupcon of Semitic blood would give the Ashkenazis a right to the Holy Land ONLY IN THEIR OWN PERCEPTION and in the perception of the FOOLISH AND GULLIBLE who believed in the Old Testament literally…i.e., in the promise that Yaweh had given the Holy Land in perpetuity to the Jews and their Semitic descendants — meaning the Ashkenazis too, if it can be proved they have a drop of Semitic blood in their veins.
This is what the Ashkenazis want us to believe in staking their claim to Palestine: that they are basically a Semitic race and that ALL Jews, black, yellow, white, and brown, are genetically related in some way.
Those who question the Khazarian thesis of Koestler and Shlomo Sand are unfortunately handing the Jews a precious gift on a silver platter: a moral claim to Palestine, however specious that claim may be.
Lasha, You write, “Spot on as usual, Thomas”. Now that’s not nice because I have criticized you rather strongly—whilst respecting your work. As a man and, as someone wrongly called me here, a misogynist one at that, that makes me feel bad. I have a natural inclination to say, Aw, I didn’t mean it honey, take the car keys and go out and have a good time. We men—despite our fierce personas— are suckers for female wiles! And God help us if any cry. We melt like ice cream on a sunny day.
In any case, we are agreed. And you are spot on about the media. There’s the trouble—monopoly!, exploited by prominent Jews and enabled by myopic goys. As for the latter I’d like to take the stick to them all. As for the former I pray they will learn to behave lest our polemics turn to hatred. And hatred I want nothing of—as i know you don’t either. Now go get the keys…and be back at a reasonable hour. Maybe daddy was a little too hard on you!
“Shamir insists that a Jew ceases to be a Jew when he throws off the shackles of “Jewishness” by becoming a Christian. He then becomes a gentile, a goy.”
————————————————————————————–
For 2000+ years, those Jews who have failed to accept the Messias have not been part of the spiritually-faithful tribe (or “gens”), the true and spiritually-defined Israel, which includes people from ALL tribes where mere flesh is concerned.
A man’s genetic makeup is what it is and does not change. A Jew who is still ensnared within the Talmudic Synagogue of Satan is a Jew in both senses of the term, if you will, at least as the modern world uses said term. We might say he is such according to body and soul, matter and spirit, etc. [For what it's worth, just as those who are Jewish genetically can separate spiritually from the Talmudic Synagogue of Satan, so genetic non-Jews can take on, or be infected by the spirit thereof. IMO, this is what has happened throughout the formerly-Christian West.] Leaving the Synagogue of Satan in order to become a Christian changes nothing where a man’s genetic makeup is concerned. Materially, he is still what he has always been; his ancestors do not change. The change takes place on a spiritual plane. What change? Well, he enters the true Israel, whose membership is open to all, regardless of blood, genetics, etc. In this sense, when a Talmudic Jew becomes a Christian, it could be argued that he actually ceases to be a spiritual “gentile” and becomes a part of the true Israel, to which all are called and welcomed.
As the Psalmist wrote: “…all the gods of the Gentiles are devils.” About whom can this be said most accurately, if not the god of the Talmudic Synagogue of Satan?
Shamir, who claims to be an ethnic Jew who converted to Christianity, has a very confusing background, but a couple of characteristics are clear: he’s definitely an anti-Zionist, he’s definitely a left-winger, and he’s definitely been accused by Zionists of being anti-Semitic (in the anti-Jewish sense).
As the debate makes clear, though, he’s actually an enabler of Diaspora Jewish fascism (Judeofascism) because:
a) he claims the Jewish question has nothing to do with the ethno-religious-ideology of Judaism and its culture of insatiable racism, aggression, malevolence and greed, but rather scapegoats capitalism for ideological Jewry’s malignancy, dishonor and defective character;
b) he minimizes and dismisses the organized Jewish role in the original holocaust, the one perpetrated by Leninists, Stalinists and Jewish Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union, and minimizes the numbers exterminated under this mass murderous joint-venture between Judeofascists and left-wing Gentiles. (If he minimized the Nazi-perpetrated alleged Holocaust(TM) in a similar manner, he would be labeled a “Holocaust deniar” by the Judeofascists and declared guilty of illegal “hate speech.”)
c) as a dedicated and stubborn left-winger, he is actually the anti-Christian enemy of the ultimate and most effective, experienced, and moral enemy of the Judeofascist aggressors and their evil agenda, be they Diaspora Zionists and crypto Zionists or Israeli Zionists: the confident Greco-Christian Western ethic and its unapologetic anti-Jewishness.
Even if his politics are misguided, I can nonetheless appreciate Shamir’s dedication to standing up against the most nakedly and un-apologetically Judeofascist Israeli Zionist element, but his oily disingenousness and discombobulating with regard to the Diaspora Judeofascist element has not only a very left-wing flavor too it, but a very Jewish flavor, as well. (This shouldn’t be a surprise, though, given that the modern left — as with the neocon right — is largely a manifestation of squirmy-brained, ideological Jewish “thought” and “morals.”)
Additionally, his denial of the concept of Diaspora Judeofascism, in the end, does nothing but enable the larger, murderous, Judeofascist agenda.
Fortunately, Lasha Darkmoon does a comendable (if somewhat anti-climactic) job of cutting through his dishonest, left-wing, Judeofascist-enabling rhetoric.
http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/11/zionists-claim-israel-shamir-is-anti.html
To Chris Moore
In response to the article you sent me as published on your site: “Zionists claim Israel Shamir is an anti-Semite when he’s actually a left-wing, Diaspora Judeofascism-enabler”
http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/11/zionists-claim-israel-shamir-is-anti.html
Thanks, Chris. Very interesting. Your usual eloquent self! But I am not sure you are being altogether fair to Israel Shamir. It is more than possible that you have misunderstood him.
It was Shamir who submitted my article, America Vanquished, to Jeff Rense for publication. But for Shamir’s kindly intervention on my behalf, America Vanquished would probably have remained unpublished.
You see, I had grave doubts about submitting this article anywhere—aware as I was of its controversial nature and its capacity to give serious offense. I also thought it could endanger me and my family. Try and understand that.
Shamir is a very complex man and has received a great deal of bad press. Unlike Gilad Atzmon, who is the flavor of the month after the publication of his recent book (‘The Wandering Who’), Shamir has had a highly adventurous past — like that of some swashbuckling pirate of the Caribbean. He has made himself some serious enemies in the process.
Why this should be so, it is not for an unworldly person like me to speculate.
* * *
Another point, Chris: you misrepresent my position on your blog by describing me here as “an anti-Jewish activist”. That’s pushing it too far, I’m afraid. I am a passionate anti-Zionist, yes; but anti-Jewish, no!
If by “anti-Jewish” you mean to imply that I am against ALL Jews in general, then you are dead wrong. That would make me an anti-Semite.
I even end this particular essay with these words:
“Life is too short and precious to waste it on ‘anti-Semitism’. One has to move beyond this puerile response to Jewish world supremacy. Perhaps the role of the Jew in human affairs is to be the beast of prey that teaches the rest of us to run a bit faster.”
Life is too short to waste it on anti-Semitism.
Would an anti-Semite make such a statement?
Given that, as discussed (below) Judaism is not a race but rather a sinister and highly damaging ideological nation that itself is dogmatically and institutionally supremacist, I see nothing wrong with being openly and proudly anti-Jewish at all.
To be anti-Jewish, obviously, is not to say that every individual Jew is irredeemable, nor that the entire nation should be destroyed.
Regardless, I respect your right to define yourself as you see fit.
With regard to Shamir, no question the man deserves due credit and respect for his anti-Zionist brilliance, courage and literary accomplishments.
As for his left-wing politics, not so much…
On the question of whether Judaism is a race or religion, my theory is that it is an ethno-religious-ideology that organically and physically transforms the brains of many of its adherents over time, into what we would regard as mental illness.
Hence, some Jews genetically inherit their organic pathology, for others, it is implanted over time by Jewish culture in the same way that people can be driven insane by environmental factors.
No question, though, a Jewish ethnicity makes Jewish pathology easier to implant.
But take a non-impacted ethnic Jew and raise him or her from infancy in a healthy, non-Jewish environment, I see no reason or overwhelming evidence to claim that that person is destined for Jewish pathology, any more than a person with a family history of mental illness is destined for insanity.
“On the question of whether Judaism is a race or religion, my theory is that it is an ethno-religious-ideology that organically and physically transforms the brains of many of its adherents over time, into what we would regard as mental illness.”
I think you have some highly original ideas here. You are saying, in effect, that the thoughts and images people hold in their minds, will, in the course of time, produce organic changes in their brains. Thinking bad thoughts intensely will sooner or later drive a man mad — by literally destroying those parts of his brain that help to keep him sane.
I think you are absolutely right.
There is a great deal of evidence to show that pornographic images release erototoxins into the blood stream — epinephrine and dopamine among them — that will in the course of time destroy the frontal lobes. The frontal lobes, when healthy, help us to maintain self-restraint in the interest of our own survival.
Porn addiction, and indeed all sex addiction, destroys the frontal lobes and creates a brain-damaged individual who has very little control over his actions.
What does this have to do with Jews? Well, you can work it out. If the Jew thinks evil thoughts about the goyim long enough, it will drive him crazy. And you know the old Latin adage: “QUEM DEUS VULT PERDERE, PRIUS DEMENTAT.” — Whom God wishes to destroy, he first drives insane.
“You are saying, in effect, that the thoughts and images people hold in their minds, will, in the course of time, produce organic changes in their brains.”
——————————————————
The thought to which you are responding may or may not be completely original, LD, although I am not attempting to take anything away from Mr. Moore by saying so. I only say this because it is a demonstrated fact that music (and, perhaps, sound in general) can and does cause such physical changes. If you’d like more info on that, please let me know. Thinking dark thoughts on an habitual basis manifests itself externally. Why should we expect it to have no impact internally? Do we not all know, through personal experience, how stress can immediately and powerfully affect our bodies? The connection between body and soul is far more intimate than some seem to realize, which is why the way many moderns treat their own bodies is disgraceful and, quite literally, disastrous.
The Jews could not have made the great strides that they have towards their New World Order without the help of the Christian majority.
I shall have my revenge…and the Christians will bear the brunt of it!
@ JSM,
Thank you kindly for taking the time to explain the situation regarding posts that ‘await moderation.’ I was not worried, but it was good of you to clarify. Godspeed
Eamon
Darkmoon: “Even then, of course, this would be a dubious claim because it would depend on accepting the Biblical premise that GOD HAD GIVEN THIS, THE HOLY LAND, TO HIS BELOVED CHOSEN ONES, THE JEWS.
“No sensible person believes this claptrap nowadays except Old Testament literalists who also believe implicitly in the story of Adam and Eve.”
—————————————————————————
God did, in fact, give a certain land to the Jews back in the proverbial day. Holy Writ is crystal clear on this point. However, that was but one intimately-connected benefit of a mission that they, as a whole, failed to accomplish. Ergo, they were, according to God’s providence, scattered far and wide. Just as they no longer have a covenant with God, they no longer have any right to any of the benefits that flowed therefrom. That train left the station 2000 years ago…they just don’t see or want to accept it.
As far as Holy Writ and the proper understanding thereof, if a passage was written as history, it is to be taken as history (if one is to consider oneself a Christian). Holy Writ can, and often does have multiple layers of meaning at the same time. From http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/2007/12/11/the-four-senses-of-scripture/ :
“There are two basic senses of Holy Scripture: the literal (or historical) and the spiritual. The spiritual sense is further divided into the allegorical, the tropological (or moral), and the anagogical.”
Some passages contain multiple senses; others contain only one. There is no reason on God’s green earth for a Christian to posit the idea that the story of Adam and Eve is anything other than literal (i.e., historical), which is not to say other senses cannot also be found in some parts of that particular historical account.
St. Paul once wrote, “For if by one man’s offence death reigned through one; much more they who receive abundance of grace, and of the gift, and of justice, shall reign in life through one, Jesus Christ.”
St. Paul is speaking of Adam here. There is no wiggle room: if one does not believe St. Paul, or that there was a real man named Adam — the first man, who was created in innocence but fell from grace — there is absolutely zero reason to believe that anything in Scripture is true. I am not here to judge anyone’s conscience, but to speak the truth to the best of my ability. Godspeed
For LD:
Real Lesson Number One: Never let Judaics (or, for that matter, any other private, self-serving group) anywhere near any nation’s means of money creation.
What do we think has served as the supreme tool, making all other things, such as controlling the media, possible? It has been the control and manipulation of the moolah, pure and simple. The US presidents who have been assassinated have been assassinated for one reason: they posed a threat to the Money Masters’ monopoly and nefarious designs. [Yes, JFK crossed two non-negotiable lines, but that is another kettle of fish.]
If someone is a Jew it tells me very little, often precisely nothing. I have known wonderful human beings who are Jews who paid me well, fairly, for a days work. What I want to know is what they think, how they behave.
It is the media moguls who are the ones I have long observed are ourtto destroy all decent culture. That they control news and entertainment and attempt to interpret and mediate all of history “for” us is a frightful thing (Of course gentiles Murdoch and Turner are no better at all!).
Murdoch is a crypto-Jew. David Irving argues the case convincingly:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/05/Murdoch2.html
So do many others:
http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&sugexp=ppwl&cp=31&gs_id=51&xhr=t&q=Rupert+Murdoch%27s+Jewish+origins&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&biw=1440&bih=760&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=Rupert+Murdoch%27s+Jewish+origins&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=fc628c8affdbe193
YES – Murdoch, like Sarkozy, had a Jewish mother – and both are very good defenders of the Zionist entityy indeed.
On October 13, 2010 – one of the most powerful Israel Lobby groups, and Jewish Supremacist organization, Anti-Defamation League (ADL) honored the mainstream media tycon, the billionaire Rupert Murdoch – for his “stalwart support of Israel and his commitment to promoting respect and speaking out against anti-Semitism”……
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/murdoch-israel-and-jews-under-attack/
Murdoch a cryptic Jew? when everyone is a Jew the case against the Israeli lobby is seriously diluted. Some say the same about Rockefeller and others. Too much of this is asserted not proved. Having said that, many, many Americans have undeniably adopted the usurious-capitalist mentality which refuses reasonable regulation and the end of monopolies. In part it arguably began in earnest as far back as “Reformer” John Calvin who turned usury into a theology.
Er, more bad news, TM,(or good – depending on one’s perspective)….indeed Calvin, aka Cohen, aka Cauin was also a marrano jew…not at all hard to imagine where that usury thing came from!
to whit: “The following staggering piece of evidence that Calvin was Jewish was obtained from the proceedings of the B’nai B’rith Convention in Paris in 1936.
“Once the revolution had been decided upon, the Jewish plotters introduced Calvinism into England to split Church and State, and divide the people. Contrary to general belief, Calvinism is of Jewish origin. It was deliberately conceived to split the adherents of the Christian religions and divide the people. Calvin’s real name was Cohen! When he went from Geneva to France to start preaching his doctrine he became known as Cauin. Then in England it became Calvin. History proves that there is hardly a revolutionary plot that wasn’t hatched in Switzerland; there is hardly a Jewish revolutionary leader who hasn’t changed his name.
“At B’nai B’rith celebrations held in Paris, France, in 1936 Cohen, Cauvin, or Calvin, whatever his name may have been, was enthusiastically acclaimed to have been of Jewish descent (The Catholic Gazette, February, 1936)…
“‘We are the Fathers of all Revolutions, even of those which sometimes happen to turn against us. We are the supreme Masters of Peace and War. We can boast of being the Creators of the Reformation! Calvin was one of our children; he was of Jewish descent, and was entrusted by Jewish authority and encouraged with Jewish finance to draft his scheme in the reformation (which was to convince Christians it was alright to charge usury and other damnable heresies which are in violation of God’s Laws).” (The Catholic Gazette, February, 1936)”
“The modus operandi of International Jewry is the dialectical process — sowing discord, polarizing the masses and playing both extremes off against one other. The animosities they generate render the masses incapable of recognizing the true conspirators and, even if they did, the rivalries would be so ingrained they would be unwilling to unite against the conspirators. This modus operandi is clearly stated in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion: “Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments, discords, and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage. In the first place we keep in check all countries, for they well know that we have the power whenever we like to create disorders or to restore order.” (Protocol 7)”
@ Lorcan
An invaluable comment. I had no idea Calvin was a Jewish “convert” to Christianity. It’s the old tactic of infiltration. One is forced to wonder how many of those Christian Zionist pastors, with a flock of 60 million gulllibe Christians at their beck and call, are really Jews in Christian garb.
In addition to the media, I should not neglect to mention the Neocons, bankers, etc….and the throng of money-grubbing gentiles who provide these with the indispensable scaffolding for both corporate decadence and economic implosion.
Astounding article that floored me, thanks! The Jews are obscured parasite within the body politic that have remained hidden from view because Christians worship a Jew who validated the Torah and the Jew’s chosen status. Christianity is a Judeo death cult that forms the broad base of Zionist controlled America, during the entire takeover of America the Christians apologized and assisited the Jews. So if you want to do something about the hell tribe’s world despotism then you must overturn the Christian myth and their Jewish savior. Here’s an essay I wrote on this problem:
“Jesus is the Path Straight to Hell
Shocked by the title of this post? In a few short sentences I will logically prove that following Jesus leads to hell. First of all, as shown in previous posts on this and other blogs of mine, I clearly show that Jesus was Paul’s invented Jewish character inserted into the popular myth of his day Mithraism. Jesus is the Jew Zeus so to speak. Whether there was an actual historical Jesus is not being debated here, the god like Jesus is an invented character so that Jews could psychically overcome the Roman occupation of Judea.
So if Jesus doesn’t really exist what exactly are those Christians actually doing when they go to Sunday church and sing praises to the fictional Jewish god? They are in actuality worshiping the Jews. There has been a huge metaphysical understanding that has been dawning on me recently, if Jesus is myth then where is all that worship (whore)ship energy going? Since the Jews are evil practically beyond description, Jew worship would be a path straight to hell because you would be giving your personal power and energy to the Jews. So its not just the Jews, the Christians are feeding the evil beast by their belief system, making them complicit in the Jewish world crime scene.
Why are the Jews evil? Because they kill, rape, plunder, lie, cheat, manipulate the good for their profit. They destroy life, that which destroys life or what is aLIVE is EVIL. Within the Jewish mythos, their angry jealous god Jehovah judges then destroys, the prime trait of the Jewish culture. Judaism is a cult of judgment.
In order to have a great harvest the Jews have cultivated flocks of Christians that are willingly taxed and sent to die fighting Jewish enemies, which is everything non Jewish. Not just Palestinians or other Arabs, anyone not under the thumb of the Jewish central bank and money or commercial legal system. Plus anything that is alive like plants and animals, even the planet itself. To a Jew, a tree or a cow is not a living thing, it is dollars to be profited. I got news for you Christians reading this, you are Jew cattle if you follow Jesus. If you believe anything Jewish you are completely doomed. AND DON”T TRY TO GET OUT OF YOUR PREDICAMENT BY SAYING JESUS WASN’T A JEW!
Now the Jews do not want just to tax you, which is a usage fee for using their no reserve debt created paper notes, they want you to fight their wars, and most of all they want your total subservience and obedience. They want to control your mind through the media (especially the jewtube) and what they really want to do is break your spirit and make you a willing slave. Christianity a slave religion for non Jews, to be a Christian you first have to give yourself to something other than yourself, another Jew trick of deception.
Thus I am showing you that following any religion born of Judaism, like Christianity, is a death sentence for the individual and the planet. Since there is no judging god, hell, or devil, believing in these ideas creates an outpicturing of that thoughtform, a living hell on planet earth. Christianity, plain and simple, is a death cult. Look at what is happening to our planet and look who is willingly following the orders of Jew money controllers, and I might add there is nothing on the horizon that is going to stop this juggernaut except a nuclear holocaust.
Worshiping a dead Jew can not save anyone’s soul, period. The way out, the door out of hell, is to simple stop beLIEving the Jew lies, burn the Bible and Torah, and rid your mind of all the memeplex and get in touch with your spirit and creative self.
If you are a Christian you need to be saved alright, saved from your Jewish mentality. Jesus is the way into the Jew vision of reality, the Jewish revision of previous myth and history, with Jesus your mind indoctrinated in Jewish words, phrases, memes, doctrines, the Jewish way of thinking, the mind of the Jew god of greed itself. ”
http://christians-are-jew-whores.blogspot.com/2010/12/jesus-is-path-straight-to-hell.html
http://christians-are-jew-whores.blogspot.com/2010/11/christians-are-worshipping-jews.html
And its not just Christians that are Jew whores, New Age speaker like David Icke are apologizing for Judaism:
http://eliminatealljewsonearth.blogspot.com/2011/01/david-icke-whitewashes-judaism.html
Alex Jones another Jew apologist:
http://eliminatealljewsonearth.blogspot.com/2009/07/zionism-or-judaism.html
Phishna’s essays:
http://www.blogger.com/profile/16312560191165755438
overwhelmng evidence that Israel did 911:
http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/israel-did-911-all-the-proof-in-the-world
Just introducing a little humor into the mix: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/09/mike-tyson-is-herman-cain_n_1084239.html?ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false
The entire world is beginning to go through the cosmic ringer, individually and collectively. Things will become so intense that ALL of us will be awestruck by the displays of true power that will become more and more frequent and visible to all. Still, ’tis good to laugh along the way. This is a dangerous time, but it is also a time full of truly wonderful possibilities. What follows is up to us… Godspeed to you and yours as we enter the heart of the Great Purification
Who and why originated the Jew vs Gentile animosity? Did it start in Babylon or earlier? Did the Romans create Christianity (by making it their official religion) to foil the Jews plans to control the world?When was the WASP estalishment replaced by the Kosher establishment? I think WW2 did the trick,
Hi Lasha
This is a reply to Lorcan’s November 3rd “rebuttal” to me. Since, for some mysterious reason, the ability to reply to him was deactivated (out of mercy?), I reply here.
Text in its entirety follows:
Hi kids,
Forgive the lateness of my reply, but I was busy doing adult things. I will try to make this as brief as possible for, I confess, I am bored.
Lorcan
Your powers of comprehension are on par with your writing skills. This is, by no means, a recommendation. Either you have completely misinterpreted my statements, or you disingenuously do so in a misguided attempt to bolster yourself. I believe your actions are a combination of both these things.
Where to begin? My… my….
In your “deconstruction” of my argument, you employ circular logic and rhetoric—the very things of which you accuse me. Notwithstanding this hypocrisy, you also falsely attribute your ill-conceived idea of what might inspire happiness within me so that you might lambast it. This is the classic ”straw man” argument which simply speaks of your desperation. If you wish to argue with me, argue my ideas, not falsely contrived ones.
Regarding your “concession” to me, it was most gratuitous and demonstrates your lack of understanding of the words you use. To wit, for you to concede a point to me, I would first have had to have made it. This I did not do. It is again a case of you ascribing falsehoods to others in a vain attempt to secure a debate. Are you still with me?
In so far as ideas of happiness are concerned, anyone content with the current state of world affairs is either ignorant of what is happening or indifferent to the suffering of innocents. As ignorance and indifference are anathema to me, I welcome any exposition that casts a light on evil, especially one that does not sugarcoat matters. If you require some sort of glossy patina to cover reality’s sadness, knock yourself out. It is wrong for you, however, to impose your ideas of harmony onto others who are willing to grapple with the world for what it is.
Lasha,
If you are interested in reaching a wider audience through your writing, you need to be wary of lavishing effusive praise on your “constituents,” especially when it is unwarranted. Is your goal the truth, or is it a sycophantic following?
Your inner angst at having suffered the stings of an effective reply to your grisly musings is not a subject pertinent to the pages of this site, which is a forum for discussion related to surviving the genocidal plans of a cabal of hegemonists.
Your repeated failure to recognize the distinction between that simple premise and your own flailing efforts to be heard as background noise trashes your credibility here and is an embarrassment to yourself and the readership; kindly get over yourself, and stay on, or at least close to the relevant theme, or just go away.
To Darkmoon’s comment of 11-11-11, 10:25 a.m.
Funny you should call me an idealist; I think of myself as having become a practicalist who wants to “fix” problems in the only way that will actually work. Idealism, to me, is a belief in Utopia, which I associate with “the lion lying down with the lamb” and/or the Jew becoming assimilated and “lying down” with the Gentile, living in harmony. Utopia is a dream, but will never be a reality in this world of struggle and competition.
It is the length of time Jews have been a problem – from the beginning, which should tell us something. This is not a tractable problem. Naturally Jews will not go willingly, and they now control even more finance, military hardware, government positions, media, you name it. But before they get even more powerful, we must do something. Your gut feelings that cause you to write what you do, Lasha, are so correct! And if the Jews are the face of Satan in the world, we can be sure that face will also have many benign appearances (i.e. Atzmon, Shamir) in order to fool us, to make us let down our guard. [I do not mean that Atzmon, Shamir are conscious deceivers.] Isn’t that how Satan operates–by fooling us, by deception. Absolutely yes!
That’s why I say the first thing we must do is to stop talking to Jews, stop including the “good Jews.” I understand how likable they are. But here is a fairy tale someone told me: A wolf knocks on your door. You, the lady of the house, open the door with your little daughter standing at your side. The wolf tells you he’s come to warn you about other wolves in the neighborhood who are plotting to harm your family and steal your daughter. [Your husband is off in a corner in his easy chair reading the newspaper or watching football on TV.] Persuaded he is a good wolf, you invite him in. While you are fixing dinner, he eats your daughter.
We urgently need to discuss our fate and our plans without the presence or input of a single Jew. This means racial profiling … sorry. Right now, we are bowing down to Jews by listening to them more than we listen to our own kind; by reading and reviewing their books; featuring their writings and discussions; in the final analysis, even expecting them to save us from their own people. How weak and pathetic can we get?
You are right, I am calling for separation. But let’s begin the separation in our own lives, in our own thoughts, on our own websites. Let us have a separate conversation. We cannot afford to think in terms of individuals, but we must think in terms of groups, and preserving out own nations, including our living spaces. We should have Juden-free areas for Gentiles on the Internet. Watch the Jews attack those with a vengence … because that is what they hate/fear the most. Think about it: they must infiltrate everywhere. There is no place on earth where there are not Jews.
What will achieve this, Lasha? WILL. All of your friends here who do not have the will to separate from the Jews, you should shake them off. All of us should shake off those who love their enemy for whatever reason. Loving the Jew (and all that he brings to tempt us) is the fatal error.
Carolyn, thank you for taking the trouble to write this long and detailed explanation of your position. So, this is where you stand: for the ostracism or quarantining of the Jews.
In your perceptiom, the Jews suffer collectively from some disease that infects the rest of us. Why risk infectiom, you ask, by mixing with Jews? Forget about distinguishing between good Jews and bad Jews, you say: all Jews carry infection, even the so-called good ones.
This is a far-right position, Carolyn. You know that. It is Nazi ideology.Please understand that, unlike most of your other critics, I am not using the word “Nazi” here as a term of abuse — as a way of putting you down. I’m simply using it in a factual way. This is the way Goebbels would have argued. Am I right?
The Nazis, as you know, attempted to do precisely what you advocate. And it didn’t get them anywhere, did it? They failed in their attempt to get rid of the Jews. You will assert that extermination of the Jews was never a Nazi policy. It was deportation. In the eyes of the people who hate you, this would make you a “Holocaust denier” — for refusing to believe that Hitler and his crew set out methodically, and with evil intent, to genocide the Jews.
Okay, let’s assume you are right. (It’s not for a callow ignoramus like me to argue with you.) So where did Hitler’s desire to make make Germany Judenfrei (“Jew-free”) get him? Precisely nowhere. He ended up dead in a bunker.
The Jews won.
Look around you now. Who do you see in top positions everywhere? Who squeezes Germany dry with constant demands for more money in the form of Holocaust reparations? Who are the moral blackmailers ad infinitum? When will their extortions ever cease? When will the US government get the message that occupying Germany for 66 years after end of WW-2 is no longer acceptable to the German people or indeed to anyone else — apart from Israel and the diaspora Jews and their Zionist lackeys.
You say you are a “realist”. But where did Hitler’s “realist” policies get him? He failed to get rid of the Jews. They are still with us. And if they are listrening to this debate, they are getting very angry with us for daring to discuss them in terms of infectious agents who need to be quarantined.
“What! Are we bacteria or viruses of some kind?” they wail. “This is virulent anti-Semtism! Talk like this will lead to another Auschwitz! Away with Yeager and Darkmoon to a CIA rendition camp in Uzbekistan, where we shall recommend boiling them alive for being so detestable!”
As long as Jews control the media, Carolyn, they control the minds of the masses. Therefore no one is listening to you. No one is listening to your wild words as they are blown away like dead leaves on the wind, dear Cassandra, Prophetess of Doom!
I hope you have a sense of humor. I need a drink. Care for a glass of wine…?
Yes, I have a sense of humor; I got a nice laugh from your ending. Very honest and real. I thank you for making my position so clear. But I don’t think your argument against it – that Hitler and the National Socialists lost – is effective. Of course they lost – look what was put up against them! Practically the entire rest of the world! But not because all the rest of the world hated them, but because of the power and intrigue of the Jews.
Hitler and his NS, indeed the whole German nation, stood up against the Jews. That was a glorious thing, and it remains glorious in the hearts and minds of millions even today, as much as ‘they’ try to stamp it out. They can’t and they won’t … so Hitler left an eternal legacy. We all die, Lasha … it only matters how we live. You know that.
So are you recommending that we can’t beat the Jews, or, let’s say, get them out from our midst, because the last great effort was eventually crushed? Why bother writing your articles, then? Or are you recommending that we get as many Jews on our side as we can and maybe we’ll make some inroads. Do you think Jews will really be against Jews?? I don’t think so. Many will talk like it, but they only go so far; they stop short of getting rid of these Jews, which is what needs to be done. Norman Finklestein is *constantly* being praised for his “Holocaust Industry.” But he still believes in the ‘Holo’ and says many of his relatives (just not his parents) died in gas chambers (a lie, for sure).
You write this: “Look around you now. Who do you see in top positions everywhere? Who squeezes Germany dry with constant demands for more money in the form of Holocaust reparations? Who are the moral blackmailers ad infinitum? When will their extortions ever cease? ” The Germans know this too, believe me. But this is not the worst. The worst is the millions of German civilians and POW’s who were killed and starved to death for several years following May 1945, at the behest of Jews and those who were already beholden to them. The Morgenthau Plan was just one part of it.
Are these the people we should leave in charge, while we look the other way? If my words blow away like dead leaves, so do yours, my dear. So maybe just write your poetry?
And also, I’m simply saying that to begin, we should exclude Jews from our debate/discussion. Otherwise, the debate is endless. Talk about words that just blow away …
Carolyn, I have loved listening to you. I know exactly what you’re saying! You have a brilliant, penetrating mind…and I do believe I have crept into the dark cavern that is your brain and sat there awhile amid the ominous shadows. You say that my words, like yours, are dead leaves in the wind. Thou speakest truth, O Cassandra, Prophetess of Doom!
I am only too conscious that my words are dead leaves on the wind, both in my poetry and prose.
This is how I see life, Carolyn: as an interplay of maya and lila, i.e., illusion and sport. We are all flickering shadows on the wall of Plato’s cave: bubbles on the Great Mind Sea where Vishnu the Creator forever lies dreaming…and we are his fitful dreams, Carolyn, the figments of Someone Else’s imagination.
Do I speak nonsense? Almost certainly. I’ve never come across a single thing in my life that makes any sense — except a tax bill.
* * * * *
I wrote somewhere recently that the ongoing occupation of Germany was “an act of vengeance by the Jews for the crimes of Hitler.”
That phrase, I know, would have displeased you.
“What crimes?” you would have asked. And if you’d been my editor, you would have insisted on inserting the word “alleged” in front of “crimes”. The phrase would now read: “the alleged crimes of Hitler.”
In your perception and from your standpoint — my own standpoint remains nebulous and unknown — is that the Allies perpetrated far more crimes than Hitler did. Hitler just fought his War as best he could, trying to win against a formidable array of forces.
The Allies on the contrary, egged on by the Jews, were the real criminals.
They were responsible for the mindless cruelties of Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki. They carried out a sadistic vendetta against German citizens in the aftermath of World War II, raping, torturing, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians.
About all their shocking crimes these crafty master criminals remain remarkably silent. Not a word in the Jew-controlled media about any of their gruesome abominations on Moloch’s altar! All we hear about is the Jewish Holocaust of six million in gas chambers —chambers whose very existence have yet to be proved. So you will argue, Carolyn. And your words will ring true for many, since they are freighted with sincerity.
Even if we were to grant the six million figure, you would argue, what about the “secret Holocaust” Eustace Mullins spoke of — the systematic extermination of SIXTY-SIX MILLION CHRISTIANS in the USSR under Shabbat goy Stalin and his bloodthirsty band of cheka Jews?
How does sixty-six million compare with six million?
Why is it we only hear about the magic six million figure?
It’s a bit like asking: “Why get excited about the crimes of Jack the Ripper’s landlady when it’s the crimes of Jack the Ripper that interest us?”
Much has been suppressed, Carolyn, as you know. Much has been swept under the proverbial carpet. We live in a matrix of lies, distortions and half-truths.
Yes, I confess it freely — and to hell with anyone who should scold me for it! — I have more tears to shed for Rachel Corrie than I have for Anne Frank. And honi soit qui mal y pense — shame on him who thinks this evil!
Greetings Darkmoon ,
“We live in a matrix of lies, distortions and half-truths. ”
Your witnessing to this basic truth which rules our daily lives provokes a response in appreciation. Much of difference between your position and that of CY’s is a reflection of that quoted fact: the result of clever imposition of a filter through which all debate, indeed, all thought, in the “West” is screened =the hegelian dialectic. Thesis-antithesis-synthesis is the tyranny imposed upon the modern mind, to the detriment of all clear thinking and survival instinct.
False opposites impose upon the thinking of well meaning people the fatal temptation to settle for the easy conclusion, at the expense of rigorous investigation. “Hitler” vs. “the Jews” – how almost unavoidably tempting it is to divide the debate along those lines!
But “Hitler” was a design and construct of the same forces which have tailored “the Jews” into the foot soldiers and bagmen for their campaign of terror against the ëuropean civilization model.
He was a ‘mischling,’ a product of the mixing of ‘so called’ jewish blood with Alpine-Atlantean. A racial sub-caste which is prevalent to a degree that would shock many of the contributors here, who mistakenly presuppose their own freedom from the same viral infection which they rail against.
I’ve never been comfortable with the term “white” as it is employed in common parlance on sites like MacDonalds’ or here – (there is nothing more ‘white’ by appearance than a red headed lily pale eastern european jew!) but the alternative designations are all too cumbersome and arcane for a general discussion forum such as this one. So, bowing to practical necessity, it needs be recognized and dealt with that many more of us than is realized are to some degree products of this intermixing, and therefore bear the effects of an existential confusion of identity and allegiance than is admitted to(or admissible by) the ‘white’ community. The entire ruling structure of the ‘landed’ classes of the west was stealthily and purposely subverted via a program of interbreeding that the Sabbatean Frankist banking hierarchy employed to ruin the moral fibre of our blood lines. That much can be documented…but even we plebian elements cannot pretend to be spared from the grand program of intermixing which has proceeded apace since the loosening of morals which will, in retrospect, prove to have been the governing theme of the C20th. The myth of racial purity, for the west, is just that. In a previous posting I referred to the Khazarian marauders and their Germanic rape victims…in the previous century the same effect was accomplished via drugs, social fashion, and clever propaganda campaigns. Nothing new under the sun, just refinement of technique.
That may be too much for many to digest…so a simpler, hopefully more effective means of communicating this truth might be to just say this: in Tolkiens masterful ‘fiction’ of prophetic wisdom, he imagined a race of cursed beings which he named örcs, a product of the intermingling of the corrupted souls of tortured and falled elves with base species. That brilliant metaphorical description of our troubled times, and troubled selves needs be taken aboard by all who seek to free the world of evil and corruption…by freeing themselves\ourselves firstly! A work of compelling importance and incredible pain.
I’ve left you alone, for the while, Darkmoon, in recognition of, and respect for, the clear manifestation of your own instinctive pursuit of the necessary gestation period through which you must come to rebirth yourself as whole and undivided.
Perhaps your publicly documented struggle to do just that, which you privilege us to witness here, will in end been seen as the greatest of your contributions to our common cause!
Many thanks for your pertinent comments, Lorcan. There’s not much I can add here. Except to comment briefly on this:
“I’ve never been comfortable with the term “white” as it is employed in common parlance on sites like MacDonalds’ or here – (there is nothing more ‘white’ by appearance than a red headed lily pale eastern european jew!) but the alternative designations are all too cumbersome and arcane for a general discussion forum such as this one.”
I’ve always felt that the term “White”, expecially with a capital “A” as used on the Occidental Observer, is a mistake. For two reasons:
(1) If that red-headed East European Jew you speak of is to be regarded as NON-WHITE, which the White nationalists would insist upon, then this makes no sense: since in a lineup of, say, 12 white-looking Caucasian people, it would be impossible to pick out the non-White Jew.
It’s therefore logically absurd to call this East European Jew “non-White”, given that he’s indistinguishable from a group consisting of entirely white people.
(2) The word “White” moreover, in today’s multicultural world, has becomes a rebarbative or offputting word. It has acquired slightly derogatory connotations among the politically correct. If you interlard your conversation with references to your “whiteness”, sooner or later you are branded a “White Supremacist”. As indeed Kevin MacDonald has.
MacDonald, to give him his due, sticks to the word “White” because I think he feels it’s the best word to use. He has considered the alternatives and rejected them as inadequate. As you say, they all tend to be a bit “arcane and cumbersome”.
We discussed this question at great length on the Occidental Observer about a year ago. I was myself one of 3-4 dissenters to the continued use of the word “White”. I suggesed the word “blanco” (Spanish for ‘white’). This was (rightly) rejected.
For American Whites, we dissenters finally agreed that the word “Euro-Americans” was probably the best. Nothing arcane or cumbersome about that. The word did not have the same racist connotations as the word “White”.
“Euro-American” is not the perfect word though. This is because Ashkenazi Jews can rightly point out that they, too, are Euro-Americans.
Still, let’s not chop logic and fiddle with words while Rome burns…
We
To Lorcan and Darkmoon,
Two people whose real identity I do not know …
The descriptor White does not refer only to skin color, but to the entire list of characteristics associated with, and displayed by, those who belong to what has been and is still called the White Race. Jews do not belong to the white race no matter what color their skin is. Nor do many others who can claim a whitish skin. It’s in the blood. So all this talk of race as meaning skin color should cease.
Your comment, Lasha, that Jews can point out they are Euro-Americans is similar to your earlier comment that they can point out they originated in the Holy Land. But why should it matter what they say? They can point out they come from the Moon too, and I guess you will feel compelled to accept that! Because they invaded Europe and lived there for 100 or more years does not make them Europeans. Real Europeans should decide who is a European and not be told who is by those who are not!
Lorcan, in his sophistry, can pretend to have superior knowledge of “the dark forces” and of “the real Adolf Hitler,” but to one who can see clearly it remains a simple matter. You know a tree by it’s fruit. Lorcan’s babbling about Hegalian dialectic and Hitler was a Jew is already overused by Internet gossipers. Try Daryl Bradford Smith … Lorcan may be a friend of his.
Why is Hitler so attacked, even by the Lorcan types? Because he was uncompromising in his racial laws. It is you compromisers whom have been confused by the “dark forces” and their revolutions that have taught all “humanity” to repeat blindly “Liberty, Fraternity (Brotherhood), Equality!” As if there could be such a thing. It is the road to destruction of the best.
I leave you to indulge in your space-agey, multicultural ideas, with all the commenters-in-hiding who love to come onto boards like this under cover of their cute little ‘handles’, chosen with such care, no doubt. They don’t have the courage of their convictions, or they don’t want to reveal their ethnicity or race. As you have rightly said, Lasha, the words are dry leaves that blow away unless there is real honest-to-God truth in them. Or some courage. Or some actual accomplishment that can be pointed to.
It seems odd that Lorcan writes to you as if he is your mentor, yet you seem way above him in the afore-mentioned virtues. Kevin MacDonald, of course, outdoes you all.
Godspeed.
@ Caroline Yeager
“Kevin MacDonald, of course, outdoes you all.”
He certainly does, Carolyn. His knowledge is truly vast and he probably knows more about Jews than any other man in America.
But I’m not aware that the modest Ms Darkmoon has said anything here to contradict MacDonald. Nor has she set myself up in opposition to MacDonald in any way, as your needlessly boorish remark would seem to imply.
Why is it you feel this constant need to put other people down, Carolyn? In a previous post you dismissed Ms Darkmoon as “a mere word-crafter” (or words to that effect), implying that all she was good for was waffle and spin and fancy phrases.
Why this inability to show respect for Ms Darkmoon whose articles have received such wide acclaim? Is there something wrong with you medically? Do you suffer from dyspepsia or low blood sugar, or do you have hot menopausal flushes?
The big question in my mind is this, Carolyn: if Kevin Macdonald can so easily make Lasha Darkmoon, his humble disciple, look like a third-rate intellect, as your boorish comment would suggest, what does he make YOU look like?
Has he ever, I wonder, come out in open support of Hitler? Has he ever published a single article on his site that questions the Holocaust? Doesn’t he bend over backwards to say nothing that could get him labeled a “neo-Nazi”?
Unlike yourself, Carolyn.
The idea that you and Kevin MacDonald are ideological blood brothers, fellow members in the same club of elite intellects, is manifestly absurd.
Don’t give yourself delusions of grandeur, Carolyn, by putting yourself on the same pedestal as Kevin MacDonald.
@ endofconflict
I don’t think Carolyn Yeager’s comment was at all “boorish” or disrespectful to Darkmoon. Her language was fairly mild and measured. All she meant to say was that, compared to Kevin MacDonald, Darkmoon was an ignoramus.
I think Darkmoon would be the first to admit that.
Darkmoon is used to being called a fool and patronized by the likes of Yeager, who obviously regards Darkmoon, age 33, as an immature upstart.
@ Carolyn Yeager
Carolyn, pay no attention to these idiots. Though I don’t agree with all your ideas, you have acquitted yourself well in this debate with Darkmoon. I look forward to further comments from you in the future.
To Berenice,
I don’t regard Darkmoon as an ignoramus or an upstart. I think she is an intelligent and talented person, and has been very gracious to me here on her home ground. It is true, though, at age 33 she is still young and has the kind of ideas I had at that age. So I certainly don’t fault her for them. I just hope she doesn’t fall further under the influence of Lorcan.
To Sardonicus,
Thank you. I am done for now and don’t plan to be back for quite awhile. I never expected to write as many comments as I have, but I hope they have been heard, that’s all. I’ll probably follow this blog, at least for awhile, and look for your comments.
One of the best ways to separate the dissimulator from the sincerely engaged on sites such as this is to evaluate the degree to which they can stay clear of personal attacks, and make their points without rancour. On this, and several other levels CY, your latest missive leaves many open questions…they should be answered so as to clear the way to back to what is actually under discussion on this thread and others like it.
I’ve noticed the tendency of those with the greatest surfeit of bitterness resort to the device of making their attacks on persons,(as opposed to ideas) through addressing the site owner rather than the intended recipient of their attack. Is the tactic a veiled protest at the shock you have received to see espoused here positions contrary to your own? Do you wish her to somehow shield you from these assaults on your seemingly tender sensibilities? Why do those who most easily crumble into anguished rage at seeing their notions challenged here wave the biggest clubs?
And related to same, what is this concurrent motif of ]am leaving now, I leave you to, I am taking my ball and going home now, that pops out of the same mouths?
I’d be happier to be addressing the more substantative issue of your fallacious notion about identifying communities via blood typing in an era of blood mixing, but I think there has to be a consensus to delete the heavier projections of animus towards others that some consider a necessary element of their presence’ here. That would signal constructive rather than destructive discussion, and go far to make sure that those who pontificate on what ‘real Europeans’ are have a grasp of some of the cultural traits that a putative real European will have inherited, via blood or otherwise.
It’s a civilization, not a race. One of whose hallmarks is ‘civility’ – refuse to show it at peril of declining your inclusion within same.
Carolyn Yeager, I have only been recently introduced to this site. There is always some honest writer worth reading, and you are one at the very top of that list! As you quoted LD, “…the words words are dry leaves that blow away unless there is real honest-to-God truth in them. Or courage…..”
Every day, one of the things I pray for is discernment. I do believe you are the real deal!
Lorscan writes, “I’ve never been comfortable with the term “white” as it is employed in common parlance on sites like MacDonalds’ or here – (there is nothing more ‘white’ by appearance than a red headed lily pale eastern european jew!) but the alternative designations are all too cumbersome and arcane…”
I think Euro-American is best. It does not strike me as either cumbersome or arcane but precise and tradition-minded. Why should we alone be encouraged to give up our traditions or to dilute them with alien notions?
I can respect the intent to try and find a marker by which a community of interest can identify itself, but the one you proffer leaves as much in question as all the others. Euro -American suffers the same history-based defect as ‘white.’
The term american can only rightly be applied to those born in ‘the americas’(or at it’s widest, born to those who were born there….it would be an act of foolhardiness to posit the inclusion of some immigrants to that hemisphere and the exclusion of others. Or to impose the same distinctions on their progeny. Is the child born to immigrant Wisconsin German father and Turkish mother, for instance any more or less American than that born to a Veracruzano Spanish father and Mixtec mother, or granchildren of ante-bellum Scots-Irish father and Cherokee mother? If they all hold passports from the americas, are they not all americans to the same degree? By nationality, of course they are, but equally they are suitably ‘euro-americans’ as most precisely can be defined.
Applying the same historical lense to the falsely titled ‘first nations’ of the americas presents an even greater degree of confusion to the project of coming up with a term suitable for the purpose intended. When the amazing work of ‘amateur’ ethnologist Ethel Stewart finally gets the credit due it, the task of those seeking definition via verbal constructs such as ‘european” or ‘native’ will appear even more doomed to failure…her work with linguistic tools has been corroborated lately by DNA studies showing that a great part of ‘red indian’ groups of north america have genetic markers which include those traditionally assigned to the ‘white’ peoples whose ties to the full continuum of ‘europeanness’ have been defined according to the centum satem isogloss…the euro-asian admixture of their genetic background shows clear evidence of the same process by which our ‘real european’ forbears were a similar distillation of tribal fusions of ‘white’ or ”caucasian’ Tokharian-YueChi elements with Uighur, Turkic, Sino-Tibetan waves of conquest and assimilation. The nomadic tribes of euroasia who provide the greater part of our common ‘EUROPEAN’ rootstock were product of the same process of assimilation and distillation.
That ‘we’ are so different in our roots from any of the rest of the ‘Eurasians’(of whichever continent)from which we spring(including Persian, Indian, and those Rehmat recently pointed out are outliers of similar ‘white’ haplogroups in the foothills of the Himalayas!) is a myth that will have to be painfully abandoned by all those who seek to defend our common heritage and common cause, before we can effectively counter the divide and rule tactics of our common enemy hiding behind ‘the mask of zion’.
ps, TM, it’s hard to keep up with the timeline of comments on this site, so only recently have I had a chance to read yours on the previous thread…regarding unanimity and division. We are substantially in agreement, and I salute your willingness to provide a template for civilized argument for the less well taught to learn from here.
Darkmoon – The term ‘White race’ like ‘the Jewish Uniqueness aka the Chosen people’ has the same agenda – RACISM against those who challenge their ‘self-defined’ agenda. It’s a polotical poly like Nazi, Neo-Zazi, holocaust denier, anti-Semite and jihadis.
If White-race bigots travel to Gilgit, Kashmir, Hunza, Syria and Iran – they will be surprised to find people with more whiter skins than Europeans.
No body is certain what color skin the first man (Adam) and woman (Eve) had. However, almost all the biblical prophets who were born in the Middle East – strangly turned to be Whitemen, especially Jesus with blue eyes!!
Judaism is no a religion nor ‘Jews’ existed outside Europe. In the places where the descendents of prophet Jacob’s (Israel) settled in region of biblical prophets – they’re called ‘Hebrew Tribes’. Most of them followed the teachings of prophet Abraham which were later updated by Torah and Holy Qur’an.
The so-called ‘Holy Land’ is not a real estate which could be bought by Jewish Rothschild or the Wall Street. It’s importance lies in the common religious history of the three Abrahamic religions.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/searching-for-jesus-as-eh/
Hi Lasha,
A great article and dignified debate…something we don’t often see. You’re awesome.
Also, on Remembrance Day, let’s remember the greatest killing machine of all time: our own governments. Professor Richard Ebeling says in a review http://www.fff.org/freedom/1094f.asp of Professor Rummel’s book Death by Government:
The megamurdering states of the 20th century have been: the U.S.S.R. (1917-1987), 61,911,000; Communist China (1949-1987), 35,236,000; Nazi Germany (1933-1945), 20,946,000; and Nationalist (or Kuomintang) China (1928-1949), 10,076,000. These are followed by the “lesser” megamurdering states: Japan (1936-1945), 5,964,000; Cambodia (1975-1979), 2,035,000; Turkey (1909-1918), 1,883,000; Vietnam (1945-1987), 1,678,000; North Korea (1948-1987), 1,663,000; Poland (1945-1948), 1,585,000; Pakistan (1958-1987), 1,503,000; Mexico (1900-1920), 1,417,000; Yugoslavia (1944-1987), 1,072,000; Czarist Russia (1900-1917), 1,066,000.
Thanks for these statistics. I’ve saved them.
The whole film, “The House of Rothschild”, can be either seen or downloaded here:
http://www.archive.org/details/The.House.of.Rothschild
Hollywood’s zionist propaganda. Check the credits, ALL jews. But I like Rense’s comment:
“While this 1930ish Hollywood movie is only semi-accurate it certainly shows more then the PTB would like you to know today. I think this film was made as a response to the anti-Rothschild sentiment sweeping the world in the 1930′s (thanks to people like Henry Ford Sr. and Charles Lindbergh Sr.). As usual it backfired and “they” subsequently went “underground” and began using the tactic of keeping their name out of the news and using the media to point the finger at their front men (it’s the “Federal Reserve”, it’s “the Illuminati”, it’s “the corporations”, it’s “the NWO” ad nausea). Of course, every non-Jew (in the film) is painted as “anti-semitic” and the Jews must fight back with the only tool they have…money.”
I agree it backfired as there are enough interesting facts to make it worth watching.
“But I like Rense’s comment…”
Do you mean Jeff Rense himself? If so, can you provide a link to where he said this? Thanks.
Do drop into the old Xymphora website once in a while, Lasha. I’m sure they miss you.
Well well well, look who’s here! What brings thee hither, friend, from Planet Atlan?
Actually, I miss the old Xymphora quite a lot. It was heady stuff…”the feast of reason and the flow of soul.” I keep wondering where they’ve all gone…
Lobro and Homer have dropped in here briefly to leave their comments. It was like old times. They didn’t linger long though. Yes, maybe I’ll drop in sometime to say ‘Hi’ on MFA…
Bye for now, friend, and take care…
Xanadu
Yes, please do. Some mention of you in the latest comments page at Xymphora’s and MFA’s
The United States is a country built upon the four C’s: Crude, Cars, Credit, and Consumption. They are intertwined and can’t exist without crude as the crucial ingredient.
As the amount of crude available declines and the price rises, the other three C’s will breakdown. Our warped consumer driven economy collapses without the input of cheap plentiful oil. Those at the top levels of government realize this fact.
It is not a coincidence that the War on Terror is the current cover story to keep our troops in the Middle East. It is not a coincidence the uncooperative rulers (Hussein, Gaddafi) of the countries with the 5th and 9th largest oil reserves on the planet have been dispatched. It is not a coincidence the saber rattling grows louder regarding the Iranian regime, as they sit atop 155 billion barrels of oil, the 4th largest reserves in the world.
It should also be noted the troops leaving Iraq immediately began occupying Kuwait, owner of the 6th largest oil reserves on the planet.
Oil under the South China Sea and in the arctic is being hotly pursued by the major world players.
China and Russia are supporting Iran in their showdown with Israel and the U.S. As the world depletes the remaining oil, conflict and war are inevitable. The term Energy Independence will carry a different meaning than the one spouted by mindless politicians as the oil runs low.
I’m not sure if Calvin had Jewish origins, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Calvin#Calvin_and_the_Jews but he did say this:
“Scholars have debated Calvin’s view of the Jews and Judaism. Some have argued that Calvin was the least anti-semitic among all the major reformers of his time especially in comparison to Martin Luther.[91] Others have argued that Calvin was firmly within the anti-semitic camp.[92] Scholars agree, however, that it is important to distinguish between Calvin’s views toward the biblical Jews and his attitude toward contemporary Jews. In his theology, Calvin does not differentiate between God’s covenant with Israel and the New Covenant. He stated, “all the children of the promise, reborn of God, who have obeyed the commands by faith working through love, have belonged to the New Covenant since the world began.”[93] Still he was a supersessionist and argued that the Jews are a rejected people who must embrace Jesus to re-enter the covenant.[94]
Most of Calvin’s statements on the Jewry of his era were polemical. For example, Calvin once wrote, “I have had much conversation with many Jews: I have never seen either a drop of piety or a grain of truth or ingenuousness – nay, I have never found common sense in any Jew.”[95] In this respect, he differed little from other Protestant and Catholic theologians of his day.[96] He considered Jews deicides and “profane dogs,” model evildoers who “stupidly devour all the riches of the earth with their unrestrained cupidity.”[97]
Among his extant writings, Calvin only dealt explicitly with issues of contemporary Jews and Judaism in one treatise,[98] Response to Questions and Objections of a Certain Jew.[99] In it, he argued that Jews misread their own scriptures because they miss the unity of the Old and New Testaments.[100] Calvin also wrote that the Jews’ “rotten and unbending stiffneckedness deserves that they be oppressed unendingly and without measure or end and that they die in their misery without the pity of anyone.”[101]“
Thanks, that puts a different complexion on the matter. It seems we can no longer assume that Calvin was a Jewish “infiltrator”. What is clear however is that all the Protestant sects, beginning with Luther, weakened the Catholic Church considerably by splitting it down the middle.
Many of the fringe Christian sects today have been suckers for “sexual liberation” (i.e., sexual bondage in disguise). When two men get married in a church, with the blessings of a minister of Christ, we are only one step away from a man marrying his cocker spaniel in church. It may well come to that.
It seems to me that any Christian who fails to back the Catholic Church, the only true historic opponent of Jews incessantly plotting its downfall, is siding with the Enemies of Christianity. I do not for a moment say that ALL Jews are enemies of Christianity. But Orthodox and Hasidic Jews certainly are. And most liberal, atheistic Jews have nothing but contempt for Christianity and its traditional values.
I see Old Christianity as having much in common with Islam. The true Muslim must know in his heart that the “typical Jew” is his enemy…and the true Christian knows that also.
We must stand together, both Christian and Muslim, against the Synagogue of Satan. We must recognize the common enemy.
The 60 million Christian Zionists are the only problem. This is what comes from having strong religious instincts combined with a low IQ.
A breakthrough posting, this one from you, Darkmoon, and a signal that your site may have reached the elusive but incalculably valuable stage of real debate amongst seekers, after phony intercessors are finally beaten back in their attempts to sideline the discussion into the usual time worn sewers of divisiveness and racial hegemonist blather. Bravo!
In a few paragraphs you have signed on to the solidarity of Christian and Muslims against their common manipulators, and also unfurled the banner of your (not so lapsed?!?) Catholicism.
Bravo. Not because I have any sympathy with your choice of Christian heresy…(the story runs deep in our family still, of the St Bartholemews Day Massacre, when they floated the Protestants down the river in barrels, and my anti-papist nature is bred in the bone…I’ll never forget the gut wrenching feeling of nausea I had the first and only time I walked into a Catholic church!) But that’s no reason to stop me from joining up in common cause with those who can see the sectarian splits in Christendom as product of the ‘hidden hand’ of cabbalist manipulators! My implicit “protestantism” is much less important to me than my implicit membership in a cultural continuum now under siege from the darkest of forces.
The old divisions MUST be healed if we are to have a reasonable chance of defending our culture. I therefore laugh with(rather than at) the brazenness of your “It seems to me that any Christian who fails to back the Catholic Church, the only true historic opponent of Jews incessantly plotting its downfall, is siding with the Enemies of Christianity” and welcome your honest declaration of faith in what you feel true…we are all ‘true’ Christians based on the deeds in our hearts, not the words on our lips…and indeed, all the ‘peoples of the Book’ do have common cause as well as inherited common values to defend by standing together! That, of course, includes all “jews” who remain outside the sway of the babylonian black magic cult of the talmudists. “Huc tendimus omnes”
I’ll leave my musings on the several other important points you have covered here for another venue.
Several problems pop out with this presentation….only one of which is that the source used to bring into question the probability of Calvins’ marrano jew status is a sionist-controlled propaganda outlet: http://www.ascertainthetruth.com/att/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=429:zionist-control-of-wikipedia&catid=73:who-controls-the-media&Itemid=118.
the content of which is to be heavily discounted by anyone looking for factual representations of persons or events.
Perhaps an even larger one is the modest declaration of our correspondent, as per his website: as quoted therein
“Maitreya, the World Healer
Some wait with longing for the Messiah- Krishna/Kalki- The 12th Imam, Mahdi, Jesus Christ, Quetzalcoatl/Thoth, Maitreya, the Ascended Master, the Avatar, the Buddha yet to come. Each culture, all waiting for the return of their chosen one at the Dawn of the Millennium.
What if? What if all these beings exist within one man?
Naseer Ahmad is a teacher who has travelled many years, come quietly among you for those who would choose. He heals not only through his hands and presence and the peace he leaves behind; he has also met each being on this planet through the transmission of his energy across the parallel dimensions of time and space. He offers a message of Peace, Love and Joy, but also brings great change.He is Krishna, Kalki, Imam Mahdi and Messiah, Jesus Christ. And more.”
By comparison with which, I suspect the rather outsized ego of “john calvin” was but a speck of dust. Oh well, I guess variety is the spice of life!
I’ve known Naseer for some time now, but purely in the cyber world as a fellow poster on the xymphora website. (I used to post there two years ago).
Naseer, whose poster name was “Man from Atlan”, is a sincere and vastly erudite anti-Zionist who lives in Toronto. He is married to a nice Jewish lady called Chloe and they have two delightful daughters.
Naseer has written a few books about his former existences on the planet Atlan. (This apparently exists in a remote galaxy or in a different dimension.) He has gathered a few disciples around him, so I understand, and practises spiritual healing. He also travels quite a bit, spreading his message. He believes implicitly that he is the long-awaited Messiah.
I have never been hostile to Naseer, as have many others who regard him as a charlatan, because by nature I am tolerant and well-disposed toward all such guru figures. The world is full of them, and I myself have often sat at their feet and tried to imbibe wisdom from their lips.
The world would be a poorer place without them.
Lasha Darmoon said, “Yes, I confess it freely — and to hell with anyone who should scold me for it! — I have more tears to shed for Rachel Corrie than I have for Anne Frank. And honi soit qui mal y pense — shame on him who thinks this evil!”
This good doctor is a true red,white and blue. Rachel Corrie’s name will live for eternity. Lasha is not only a poet and brilliant writer, but she has a heart larger than Texas.
Pingback: THE MAD DOG’S DAYS ARE NUMBERED, by Lasha Darkmoon | Darkmoon
Pingback: THE MAD DOG’S DAYS ARE NUMBERED | SHOAH
Pingback: THE MAD DOG’S DAYS ARE NUMBERED « Middle East atemporal
Lasha Darkmoon , Carole Yeager, Kevin McDonald and others like them clearly both want the same thing: to have their cake and eat it too. People like them don’t look at Jews as a people, but as a “problem”, or a “question”. Both of them really insist that all Jews should feel guilty for being racially different from whites, for not being of European blood or heritage. They want Jews to feel inferior to the Eurpean whites and to think that their worth is only in how much their interests, desires, dreams, are in accordance with that of whites, and how good an “effect” they have on the whites. According to them, all Jews whether intentionally or not, only exist ( or are genetically predisposed) to cause misery for the whites. Both of them clearly believe that the world is the white man’s oyster and that any and all white people should do with the non-white people (whether Black, American Indians, and yes, Jews) as they please. Therefore, since every Jews is somehow “guilty” for the real or imagined “Holocaust” of Russian Christians, and for being “of no good” to the infallible Europeans, or Euro-Americans. Just as they believe that whites are entitled to have Internet websites reserved for whites only, they also believe that whites are entitled to drive all the Jews from “their” territories, simply because they can. Here are some questions to consider:
Why have’t any of these truth seekers and Holocaust revisionists put the alleged “Christian” Holocaust to the same scrutiny that they insist that the Jewish Holocaust should be put under? Why should everybody believe everything that has been written up to date about the Stalinist massacres? Is it because they do consider Christian victims to be superior to the Jewith victims of the Holocaust? Therefore if these “inferior” Jews ( never mind the actual numbers of the actual perpetrators) did manage to commit these massacres, then the “superior” Christians had the right to do to the Jews whatever they pleased and murder as many of them and their children as they wished?
Do the non-whites have the same rights to decide whether they want to have the whites living in their midst? Why is it that when Zimbabweans elected Mugabe and said that it is unfair that the whites should occupy all the best land in their country and demanded some justice, the Britain and almost the whole Western world imposed sanctions on this country? Shouldn’t non-whites have the same right as the whites ( at least the ones on this forum) feel they are entitled to? If the whites in Europe decide to deport all non-white natives, shouldn’t the native blacks in Zimbabwe have the same right?
One could write a whole book rebutting this silly comment by a halfwit hasbara Jew, but it wouldn’t be worth it. Full marks to this site for allowing the silly comment to stand so that we could all have the dubious pleasure of reading it.
This is proof of that old saying that the Jew screams “Help! Murder!” even while stabbing you in the back.
i am perfectly ok with demand that christian holocaust in ussr be subjected to the same certification process as the jewish one in ww2.
mugabe is right in asking that whites give up the illegally occupied land.
whether losing the farming skill of the white settlers is offset by the gain of the land is a question for zimbabweans to ponder.
my impression is that this is the main reason for suffering those white farmers in their midst, just like german menonite farmers are responsible for much of argricultural production in belize and guatemala.
as for expelling jews everywhere by popular demand, jews made their bed and must sleep in it … in khazaria.
the fact that over many centuries they were expelled from many localities by many indigenous nations speaks for itself.
and always the fake lament and rending of clothes: “woe is the poor jew, persecuted in unreasoning hate of (your choice) muslim/catholic/orthodox/protestant/italian/polish/german/irish/english/latvian/spanish/russian/croatian/austrian/hungarian/roman/byzantine/syrian/portuguese/french/south african/argentinian/etc goy”.
so, do you, anonymous, have a valid explanation of why the jew is hated globally across all nations, religions and cultures, so that even where they fight and bicker among themselves and have nothing in common except loathing for the jew.
at no time did the expulsion occur as result of top level prejudice, it was always the simmering repulsion threatening to explode into a popular rebellion with possibilty of sweeping out the elite, contaminated and corrupted by jew.
read toaff’s bloody passover, he makes it clear whose sympathies the various popes and holy roman emperors held – invariably those of rich jews with their always ready corrupting geld to ransom the ritualistic child murderers and cannibals of uncouth ashkenazi plague invading their lands from the north.
and speaking of “white rape of africa”, don’t even go there, anonymous.
seeing how the damned tribe of slavers is primarily responsible for the galactic suffering, anguish and genocide of african slaves dragged to talmudic plantations of the new world.
seeing how jews main line of business since ancient time has been commerce in human meat, right up to today’s time, white slavery from eastern europe, organ harvest, etc.
where do oppenheimers/de beers get their blood diamonds from, their enormous gold and platinum hoard from?
Very good. You have rebutted him thoroughly. He will now skulk off into the shadows.
A few points need to be mentioned in regard to the exploitation of Africa by non-Africans.
(1) I have heard it reliably reported that the average IQ of Africans (less than 80) makes them technologically incapable of building dams, water purification plants, irrigation systems, electicity generators, airports, high-rise buildings, and just about any of the amenities and modern conveniences found in most other advanced countries. Left to their own devices, Africans would sink into neolithic barbarism. I don’t know if this is true or not, but it seems likely that when the lights go out in a 5-star hotel in Africa, a White man will have to be called in to fix the problem.
(2) I guess you can call it “exploitation” when the Whites go in there and take advantage of African simplicity. This is obviously wrong. We want to profit in some way by giving Africa the benefit of our technological expertise, but we don’t want to screw the bloodjuice out of them.
(3) Unfortunately, this is exactly what the big oil companies did to Iran in the 1950s. Screwed the country dry. The capitalist exploiters are greedy and don’t know when to call a halt to their depredations.
(4) “Anonymous” conveniently forgets that one of the greatest exploiters of Africa nowadays is Israel. The fairest dealers in Africa are in fact the Chinese. They know how to give good service and take a reasonable profit for themselves. Neither America nor Britain show any such moderation. The same rapacity these two countries exhibited in Iran they still exhibit in Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere.
the usual suspects (whites, naturally
) ripping off africa, as always
quote:
Leviev’s CONTACTS WITH ANGOLA’S GOVERNMENT led to him gaining a foothold in the country’s rough-diamond supply. Following concerns that illicit diamond trading funded the Angolan civil war and could taint legal production, Leviev says he presented the country with a plan to reduce smuggling and increase revenues by funnelling diamonds through only one source – and the government accepted the plan.
The Uzbekistan-born Israeli citizen, who owns a home in Hampstead, north London, has also attracted controversy beyond Angola. His diamond store on New York’s Madison Avenue is a frequent target for protesters attempting to raise awareness about Leviev’s companies’ involvement in settlement construction in the West Bank.
uzbekistan, russia, angola, london, new york … fucking the whole world in order for anonymous to wonder why the whole world feels fucked.
and this is just one hookworm out of the big bunch.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I was totally unaware of this. Seems it’s always the same old rats under the piles.
and btw, arkady gaydamak looks damn semitic doesn’t it?
the most semitic since genghis khan.
no wonder that eretz israel, from volta river to yangtze is rightfully his.
yeah … ain’t genghis got funny eyes?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1e/Arcadi_Gaydamak_P5200026.JPG/250px-Arcadi_Gaydamak_P5200026.JPG
just don’t call him khazar or asiatic, it doesn’t sit well with kevin macdonald and the occidental observer truth-in-science types who maintain that ashkeliars are descendants of palestinian biblical tribes.
maybe macdonald and cohorts also see history through slanted eyes …
The Oriental Observer
Pingback: AMERICA VANQUISHED, Part 2: America under Jewish Rule, by Dr Lasha Darkmoon |