A US Marine Corps veteran and author asserts that Israel masterminded the 9/11 attacks, saying if Americans were informed of this, they would exterminate the Zionist regime.
“I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period,” Alan Sabrosky, writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs, said in a clip appearing on the public video-sharing website You Tube.
______________________________________________________
“It is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation.” — Dr Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at the US Army War College.
______________________________________________________________
Sabrosky said his colleagues who are still serving in uniform initially react with incredulity to his assertions but upon his explanations regarding the controlled demolition of the buildings their disbelief gives way to rage.
“First is disbelief, and what I show them immediately afterwards is an interview with a Danish demolitions expert named Danny Jowenko, and it shows the third building at the World Trade Center going down – WTC7.”
“The thing that’s necessary is to tell people:
(1) THREE buildings went down.
(2) The third was NOT hit by a plane, it was wired for controlled demolition.
(3) Therefore, ALL of them were wired for controlled demolition.
And at that point the reaction is rage. First disbelief, and then rage,” he added.
Sabrosky said if the Americans were apprised of the truth behind the attacks, they would not hesitate to eliminate Israel without any consideration for the costs involved.
_______________________________________________________
“If Americans ever know that Israel did this, they are going to scrub them off the earth,” he said.
_______________________________________________________
On September 11, 2001, a series of coordinated attacks were carried out in the United States, reportedly leaving nearly 3,000 people dead.
The US government claimed that 19 terrorists, allegedly affiliated with the shadowy, Afghanistan-based al-Qaeda group, had hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners to carry out the attacks.
The official US account of the September 11 events has, however, been widely challenged by various quarters in the US and worldwide.
The US, under the administration of former President Bush, invaded Afghanistan in 2001 after claiming that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by the members of al-Qaeda harbored by the then Taliban regime in Afghanistan.
The US also attacked Iraq in 2003, insisting that the oil-rich country was in possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
In his September 22, 2011 address to the UN General Assembly, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for an independent international probe into the 9/11 incident, saying the attacks provided the US with a convenient excuse to wage wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
“The Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they’re done,” Sabrosky concluded.
See Video here
Part 2: IRAN NOW BEING ACCUSED OF DOING 9/11 BY SAME ZIONISTS WHO DID 9/11!
The latest US allegation against Iran, accusing Iran of being involved in the 9/11 incident, is utterly “preposterous,” a respected political analyst tells Press TV.
James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for the 9/11 Truth, questioned the legality of a Thursday ruling by a US federal judge in Manhattan, alleging Iran’s involvement in the terrorist attacks. He described the judicial ruling as “quite preposterous.”
In an extraordinary move, the court also withdrew Saudi Arabia from the ten-year-old case, even though 15 of the 19 September 11 attackers were Saudi nationals.
Fetzer pointed to multiple investigations on the 9/11 incident by independent journalists, including Alan Sabrosky, Christopher Bolyn, Wayne Madsen, as well as other websites exclusively devoted to probe into the issue, insisting all those researches have revealed that “Israel, the MOSSAD, have played a key role in 9/11.”
The political analyst also made reference to the proposal by Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during his address to the UN General Assembly, calling for an independent international probe into the 9/11 incident.
In his September 22 speech, Ahmadinejad said the US government has been involved in the 9/11 attacks or has allowed them to happen to find an excuse to wage wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Fetzer referred to Washington’s massive media campaign to put the blame of 9/11 on al-Qaeda in the wake of Ahmadinejad’s proposal, and questioned, “So who was it — Iran or al-Qaeda?”
On September 11, 2001, a series of coordinated attacks were carried out in the United States, reportedly leaving nearly 3,000 people dead.
______________________________________________________________
Who did 9/11 — IRAN or AL-Qaeda?
Or was it ISRAEL?
______________________________________________________________
The US government claimed that 19 terrorists, allegedly affiliated with the shadowy, Afghanistan-based al-Qaeda group, had hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners to carry out the attacks.
The official US account of the September 11 events has, however, been widely challenged by various quarters in the US and worldwide.
The US, under the administration of former President Bush, invaded Afghanistan in 2001 after claiming that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by the members of al-Qaeda harbored by the then Taliban regime in Afghanistan.
The US then attacked Iraq in 2003, insisting that the oil-rich country was in possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
This turned out to be the first Big Lie of the 21st century.
See VIDEO here.
Part 3: INTERVIEW BETWEEN MARK GLENN and DR ALAN SABROSKY (2010). EDITED AND ABBREVIATED BY LASHA DARKMOON.
MARK GLENN: Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College.
Now, not only that – Dr. Sabrosky correct me if I’m wrong here – not only are you a graduate of the US Army War College, but you were a director of studies there for some period of time – is that correct?
Dr ALAN SABROSKY: That’s correct. For five-and-a-half years.
MARK GLENN (MG): Dr. Sabrosky, I cannot think of an article that I have read in recent memory that basically sums up the problem that we are dealing with right now as accurately and as succinctly as this essay that you have written.
You have, for all intents and purposes, nailed this thing on the head.
I guess the reason why I got so excited over this article, Dr. Sabrosky, is because one of things that I have noted about the problem that we’re dealing with – in terms of Zionism, the power of the Jewish lobby, and what-not – is that everything is shrouded in some type of confusion or mystery, and I think deliberately so. I think one of the biggest components to this powerful foreign interest being able to get as far as it has.
I mean, let’s face it: it got away with attacking a United States ship for close to two hours killing 34 men – this was an act of war, they got away with it.
Not only did they get away with it, they were rewarded with three-billion dollars a year minimum.
When we look at the two wars that the United States finds herself in, and on the cusp of at least two others, and all of this for the benefit of a certain foreign country sitting on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea – they have been wildly successful at bringing all of this about and I think one of the main components of this is the fact that very few people really understand the nature of the problem – and I think that your article here basically lays out the problem, which is that when you have people that try to make this claim that they are loyal to America and, at the same time, loyal to a foreign government, it is a lie.
ALAN SABROSKY (AS): It is, and it’s more than that, Mark. What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they attack the USS Liberty, they did 9/11. They did it.
I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period.
9/11 has led directly to 60,000 Americans dead and wounded, God knows how many hundreds of thousands of people in other countries that we’ve killed or wounded or made homeless, and it’s an on-going sore. It’s not your sore from the USS Liberty, it’s not my sore from Vietnam. Both of us have those, both of us care about. But this is an open wound.
And what Americans need to understand is that they did it. They did it. And if they do understand that, Israel’s going to disappear. Israel will flat-ass disappear from this Earth.
I sent a film to one of my colleagues and it basically had Americans grieving over their dead coming back. And I showed one of them — it was a woman — just wrenched by grief over her dead soldier. And I said, you know, if Americans ever know that Israel did this, they’re going to scrub them off the Earth, and they’re not going to give a rat’s ass — forgive my language — what the cost is.
Phil Tourney: Your article needs to be shipped off to the library of congress immediately.
AS: Well, I can tell you it’s being read by some people in Headquarters Marine Corps and at the Army War College. I sent it off to them this past week and I’ve had some long discussions with people up there, and there’s some really, really unhappy people.
MG: What are they saying, Dr. Sabrosky?
AS: Astonishment. The first thing, Mark, is astonishment. They didn’t know. They truly didn’t know. And these are not unintelligent people. They really didn’t know.
And the next statement is rage. Real rage. And the Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they’re done.
And if this explodes, I’m going to go down with the rest of them [as a Jew myself]. And I know this. I flat-out know this. But if that was the price for making America whole again….But if that’s the price, then that’s the price I’ll pay. I mean that.
Phil Tourney: You struck me very, very hard just a second ago when you talked about 911. You’re very willing to say that, yeah, they did it: 911. Yes, they did. And, you know, my heart broke.
MG: Just for the record, Dr. Sabrosky, it was about three years ago…and I made a prediction on the air….Someday, maybe a lot sooner than any of us realize, the United States is going to find herself at war with Israel. And I mean a real, live shooting war.
Now, technically speaking, we ARE at war with Israel because she is at war with us. She is out to destroy us. We just haven’t figured that out yet.
My personal prediction is that probably – again, sooner than any of us realize or would like to envision – Israel is going pull off another 9-11. She’s going to pull of another USS Liberty. Obviously, some pretty powerful people in some pretty prominent places, such as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mike Mullen, believe this is a possibility because he cut short a trip he made to Europe a few years ago to hastily fly to Israel to meet with his counterpart and warn him in no uncertain terms how important it was that there not be another USS Liberty part two.
I think that Israel has been watching all of this and has been saying, “We need to kind of let things cool a little bit for now — if we try to pull another one off right now, then that’s it: we’re going to blow our cover.”
something of interest, let’s hear a round of applause from our resident jews.
Israel AG against prosecuting authors of book justifying killing of non-Jews
“when we come upon a non-Jew who is not keeping the seven [Noahide] laws, and we kill him out of concern for the keeping of the seven laws, it is not prohibited.”
(they can run but they can noahide)
since israel’s ag and us ag customarily come from the same yeshiva, what’s sauce for joose is sause for gand … er, those of us in unquestioning compliance with noahide laws.
obviously the “hate speech” laws cannot apply, read the fine print (they may even have it in latin script) in dual patriot act.
and the primary noahide law is blind faith in holocaust and 9-11.
albury, yakob, please put in a good word to call off that drone that was launched against me, yo.
okay, fine, you are not trolls, deal?
According to the article you posted, Israel’s AG, Yehuda Weinstein, is “tending toward not prosecuting the author or endorsers of ‘Torat Hamelech,’” a book which led to criminal investigations by Israel against four rabbis for incitement to racism and violence, and a Jewish ethicist disagrees with the Israeli government. It has little to nothing to do with this discussion, but what’s your point and which one do you agree with?
the point should be clear to anyone heretical enough to think using his own head rather than absorb whatever is tossed his way by priesthood of holocaust and 9-11.
there is a very strong connection there, the latter being entirely the offspring of the former.
both were engendered to promote illuminati goals of world domination “fulfilling the promise of talmud”, lifting the quote from baruch levy’s letter to karl marx.
don’t ask which goals, everyone knows exactly what they were/are.
both are sacrosanct lies, guarded with vindictive jealosy by specialiged ranks of high priesthood as represented by such as cabalist monsters, abe foxman, dov zakheim and michael chertoff and their numerous cohorts, be they in adl or nist (i am sure there is a revolving door between them).
to question either one is political suicide, as is to lesser extent to bring out the topics like uss liberty and other, more peripheral false flag operations.
raising any issue regarding holocaust is maybe the world’s most universally criminalized act of formerly free speech, the odious “hate laws” enacted solely to provide the talmudic inquisitors with a broad spectrum weapon (in every single instance of “hate law” prosecution, the plaintiffs were jews, the defendants mostly white of european stock) and the time is fast approaching when the same laws will apply to the 9-11 truth movement.
because they were both concieved in the same witches’ cauldron and require the same legal sustenance.
otherwise they would both quickly shrivel up and expire miserably in the heat of the open, transparent inquiry.
all rogermorris did was point out how nist came up with one, very remotely possible scenario involving a long chain of individually unlikely events, kind of a rube goldberg machine, to explain the collapse of wtc7 (the solomon bros bldg) and in the end pointed out the numerous ommissions that 9-11 truth activists pointed out in that report.
and this is the crux, isn’t it, that everything about 9-11, as well as before and after involves tremendously unlikely events, which when strung out under assumption of statistical independence as required by not-an-inside-job theory, becomes more than astronomically unlikely story.
and et every step, big or small, alarm bells ring incessantly, “jew, jew, jew, israel, israel, israel”.
this is your nightmare, the one you ward off with chants of “elite group of highly-educated SEs and other experts“.
who but an elitist to spray us with definition of “elite” and “HIGHLY educated”.
presumably that group includes michael chertoff’s nephew who stealhily (until discovered) penned the popular mechanics article “debunking 9-11 myths”.
yeah right.
so tell us how and why, clear, logical, open minded thinking violates noahide laws, the ones that stand above the mere laws of physics.
sorry to keep your research department busy on sabbath.
I don’t have a sabbath, and there’s no indication that the two Chertoffs you mentioned are even related, let alone uncle and nephew. The PopMech contributor’s writing for someone else now, and was in the credits of any 9/11-related articles he worked on, so it was hardly “stealhily” [sic]. To my knowledge, he had no involvement in the NIST WTC investigations, but if everyone who agrees with NIST is suspect, don’t forget to include all of the engineers listed here:
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/someoftheagencies%2Corganizationsandindivi
You may find that the events in the NIST hypotheses are “improbable,” but secretly demolishing hi-rises in Manhattan is impossible.
To AlburySmith.
Pertaining our last question regarding the 2.25 second FREE FALL of WTC7.
To remind you. Within this 2.25 seconds of infiniteTIME, are captured the engineering feats of a magic never before seen., collected by an array of story teller creatioNISTs protected by States Secrets Privilege and the most venal of spies in a conspiracy so vast, it has sat upon the hearts of free humans a BURDEN yet to be undone.
The PIVOTAL 2.25 second FREE FALL of this complex 81 vertically columned 47 storied Government secure steel framed high rise relies on ONE FORMULA. The critical Shear-stud break in creatioNIST analysis hypothetically occurring on ONE level [12/13], creating the ‘new phenomena’ of NIST’s Shyam ‘Pinocchio’ Sunder. Thermal Expansion:sequential building collapse due to ‘Normal Office Furnishings Fires.con”.
WHEREBY 4 massive floor/ceiling beams connecting outer steel structure to internal Girder joining columns 44 to 79, on ONE floor, were theoretically heated by ‘Normal Office Furnishings Fires’ – OBSERVABLY OUT at the time – somehow axially expanding – by your own reckoning ONLY along their ‘top flange’ – breaking the line of 3/4″ shear studs@ 22″ centers, thus freeing the beams/floor slabs without SAGGING which would pull inward the hanging heated steel beam ends, INSTEAD, by NISTs own calculation, beams heated WITHOUT heating the concrete floor slab sat DIRECT upon them[NCSTAR 1.9:352] and also, by NISTs own calculation not CONDUCTING heat anywhere except in the direction chosen by data input on ‘unrestrained ‘ steel, and; so managed to ‘walk’[push] the mass twin-lined shear-studded GIRDER between columns 44 and 79 off its ONE column seat at column 79.
Thus creating the ‘house of card cascade collapse’ across many thousands of uncompromised cold bolt/weld connections of this super strong Government secure building, bringing it to a shattered disintegrated PILE
all concrete pulverized to nanothermate ridden DUST,
in its own footprint , walls neatly folded,
6.5 + or – seconds later.
A building, incidentally, that suffered major INTERNAL EXPLOSIONS before the Great Towers came down and throughout the morning as testified by eyewitness Barry JENNINGS.
NOW. Albury. As you also know, the column connection at 79 was a three way connection. There were two other girder joins there. Neither of which were under attack by NIST algorithm. In the model, once the walking beams had broken the critical single seat join, and created the cascade, we are incredulous to learn the breach allowed internal column 79 to FREE-STAND over 7 stories for a second or so. Until, animated, it began to whip and PULL the ENTIRE 24 core column structure DOWN from WITHIN with no OBSERVABLE breakage of windows over that entire inner collapse first phase; then, a second later, independent, to PULL, in the ‘manner of Controlled Demolition”, the entire outer structure into a straight down sudden 6.5 second + – final ‘collapse’ phase. 2.25 seconds AT free fall.
Questions pale when the reader realizes computations made for the destruct sequences did NOT reference twin lines of shear studs on internal Girder between 44 and 79; were made on UNrestrained steel, did not conduct heat[In a 'thermal expansion model], and did ‘not heat the floor slab in the model’ to get the required stress differentials to allow the CRITICAL shear-stud break of 3/4″ shear studs @22″ centers down the beam lengths.
Something never heard of before.
The agnotological ‘New Phenomenon” of Shyam P Sunder.
But FURTHER, we now learn the NIST analysis failed to address 4 other factors since identified by 911 activists
http://www.911blogger.com/news/2012-03-10/tangled-webs-nist-and-wtc7
1. max 4.6″ axial expansion of beams allowable.
2. sat on a 12″ wide plate. Not “11 per NIST.
3. Below it another plate @ 14″x1’6″ meaning walk off distance required to fail at 9.4″
4. TWO plates welded one either side of girder vertical flange where it hits column, @5.1″ x 3/4″ x 1’6”, locking sideways movement of Girder thus preventing sideways ‘walk’ as contended by NIST.
5. Two lines of shear studs on internal Girders.
The 2.25 second FREE FALL exposes the infinite gap between the real and the creatioNIST fantasy I know you swim with, Albury SMITH.
And DOUBT is the ocean from which every utterance you trawl is cast.
I didn’t know that 2.25 seconds was an “infiniteTIME,” Roger, but what’s your calculation of the time for that stage of the collapse, assuming that the NIST hypothesis actually occurred? The approved Frankel submittals also showed that there were no shear studs on the 44/79 girder, so what’s your source of reference? I’d also like to know what effect these studs would have had at the temperatures normally reached in office fires. Don’t bother explaining how you got so much smarter than an elite group of highly-educated SEs and other experts, since I doubt whether you’ve figured that one out yourself.
Perhaps you could cite some of those “Cardington Institute” findings?
albury smith shill ( aka ass ) is an unqualified, anonymous troll, a demonstrable liar, who spends his life trolling any website that refers to 911 truth, posting his unsolicited absurd misinformation, disinformation and obfuscations on every page possible, tirelessly and repetitively.. all the while pretending to be some sort of final arbiter, on all things 911 who, while remaining anonymous, continually slanders qualified experts http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fUT7XgLiTY
the official version of events is nothing more than mere allegations. there has never been any credible evidence offered to support any of it. as a matter of fact, their own *evidence* actually proves 100% the official version of events can not be true, as a little investigation into the murray street engine shows… http://ckpi.typepad.com/christopher_king/2009/09/murray-street-engine.html
It doesnt matter how or what was used to bring building 7 down, or if it took ten seconds or thirty. The fact that building 7 fell at freefall acceleration for ~2.5 seconds, as acknowledged begrudgingly by NIST, IS evidence that explosives were used as it is IMPOSSIBLE for all the structural support necessary for freefall acceleration to be achieved to be removed instantaneously and simultaneously without some form of controlled demolition. http://rememberbuilding7.org/
as he well knows, and as he is unable to prove otherwise beyond any reasonable doubt, not just because he is an anonymous unqualified troll, but because the laws of physics applied just as much on 9-11 as they do today. any legitimate psychiatrist would therefore regard alburys position as insane. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/09/psychologists-mental-health-questioning-911-sane.html
further evidence of his chutzpah can be witnessed via a simple internet search for “albury smith 9 11″ – his pitiful efforts are quite amusing as he stuggles against an overwhelming growing majority of people who after looking into a few facts, find it not unreasonable for family members of the victims to be calling for a proper independent transparent unfettered investigation with subpoena power, as called for, by an overwhelming, continually growing, majority of the worlds population, a fact verifiable by past and recent polls. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/09/911-and-the-war-on-terror-polls-show-what-people-really-believe-10-years-later.html
the fact is that all the 9-11 commission and nist reports are, undisguised attempts not to investigate 9-11 from different angles and try to select the most likely one according to all available and unrestricted evidence but on contrary, to conjure up some ridiculous set of links that point the finger of blame in direction demanded by the commander-in-chief, bejamin netanyahu and his staff.
when the issue of highly suspicious international insider trading in puts and calls preceding 9-11 was brought before the commission, it was thrown out on the grounds that since it couldn’t be pinned on al-qaeda it was of no further interest.
gavel slams, case closed, elite and highly educated liars smile smugly.
kangaroos would hang their heads in shame if this was in their court.
Jeepers; who else was in on the plot besides the SEC, 200+ NIST forensic SEs and other experts, the bipartisan 9/11 Commission members, Larry Silverstein, NORAD, FEMA, Rumsfeld, Daffy Duck, the FDNY, NYPD, FBI, CIA, the Mossad and all of the other Joos, President Bush’s kid and his sidekick Deadeye, both airlines, the NTSB, FAA, etc.?
These people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FPTWBz9_CM
Keep trolling.
The sane among us think these people did it:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.html
Keep denying it if it makes you feel better.
What were the put/call ratio and put volume for American and United Airlines on 9/11? What were they a week earlier?
Have you and roger solved this mystery yet, lobro?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI
Gee, seems that no matter how many websites you visit, your message simply is not getting through. How frustrating for you.
http://www.spectatornews.com/opinion/2012/05/03/new-campus-organization-of-911-truthers-is-misinformed/
I just visited that one and posted the following:
Albury Smith Reply:Your comment is awaiting moderation.
May 28th, 2012 at 6:19 am
The 9/11 “truth movement” is full of liars and thrives on deceit, but stealing someone’s user name and misrepresenting his opinions is a new low. The comments posted here on May 15th, 2012 at 5:44 am by someone calling himself “Albury Smith” are not mine.
this moronic hatchet job to which you linked was created simply to smear people asking legitimate questions about 9-11 and the multilayered suppression of truth in its regard.
the propaganda stops at nothing, to paraphrase your words,
The 9/11 “truth suppression” is full of liars and thrives on deceit, but cheap ridiculing my making cartoonish comparisons is a new low.
besides, the accounts of ships sunk after collision with icebergs are easily sourcable, numerous and verified.
how about a comparison chart, for ever documented ship i name that went down due to an iceberg, you present a credible evidence of a steel building that collapsed neatly after a six hour fire.
in fact, i challenge you to name one steel building that collapsed totally in any shape or manner due to fire of any length, never mind a meticulous self packing job that occurred not once but THREE TIMES ON THE SAME DAY.
almost like a piece of software uninstalling itself.
and show me one single instance of ANY building collapsing in a way that would do a demolition crew proud, go for it, use whatever other means, missile hits in lebanon, baghdad or gaza, earthquakes in turkey, pakistan, mexico city, bogota or wherever, arson of any sort, anywhere, no matter how shoddy the design and construction.
show your stuff albury smith, don’t stoop to “a new low” by fishing for cartoons.
or, if you insist, use your titanic video to draw legitimate parallels that stand up to scrutiny of even grade 12 or freshman level physics.
I guess SFRM and other fireproofing should no longer be mandatory in all steel-framed hi-rise buildings, huh? Here are some examples of steel-framed buildings that have collapsed solely from fires:
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/firesafetyengineering%26theperformanceofst
WTC 7 had no water pressure to sprinklers and hoses, and interior spans of ~45′ and ~52′ near column 79. What steel-framed buildings do you know of that have survived fires for 5 or 6 hours under those conditions? Are all of these eyewitnesses lying?
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofwtc7fires
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/accountsofwtc7damage
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofthewithdrawalfromwtc
They’re mostly FDNY, and lost 300+ of their colleagues in the WTC collapses on 9/11, so how do you explain the fact that they aren’t in your “truth movement”?
I guess SFRM and other fireproofing should no longer be mandatory in all steel-framed hi-rise buildings, huh? Here are some examples of steel-framed buildings that have collapsed solely from fires:
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/firesafetyengineering%26theperformanceofst
WTC 7 had no water pressure to sprinklers and hoses, and interior spans of ~45′ and ~52′ near column 79. What steel-framed buildings do you know of that have survived fires for 5 or 6 hours under those conditions? Are all of these eyewitnesses lying?
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofwtc7fires
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/accountsofwtc7damage
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofthewithdrawalfromwtc
They’re mostly FDNY, and lost 300+ of their colleagues in the WTC collapses on 9/11, so how do you explain the fact that they aren’t in your “truth movement”?
NIST itself say fires in ‘normal office furnishings Fire’ burn for 20 to 30 minutes in one place as they range around ‘looking for combustibles. 5 to 6 hours under those four beams on floor 12 heating only the TOP flange but NOT the concrete floor slabs TOUCHING them, popping 3/4″ shear-studs @ 22″ centers at 103º to Axially expand in unison ‘walking’ the Girder off the column seat isn’t KNOWN to have actually HAPPENED Albright. It is ASSUMPTION. An HYPOTHESIS. A THEORY.
Unproven. Untested in proper court of law. With expert cross-examination.
Photographs also show the fires OUT on the critical floor before ‘collapse’ initiation.
The whole of the NIST report is agnotological ‘assumption’ Albury. created by algorithms in black rooms. hidden by states secrets privilege. Drawn by cartooNISTs. Cardington found shear-studs don’t break under fire much HOTTER and LONGER than anything anywhere near reached WTC no-matter how you play the figures. Beams SAGGED but still held. You KNOW this. That is what composite beam/concrete floor slabs are DESIGNED to do. You are arguing boiling egg temperatures snapped massive shear-stud connections in a serious steel framed high rise KNOWING the data was doctored by doctor Pinocchio S. and his elite group of highly-educated SEs and other experts.
http://www.911blogger.com/news/2012-03-10/tangled-webs-nist-and-wtc7
I don’t know why people LIE Albury. Or why LIES control a CULTURE pretending FREEDOM™. You better ask around. But the 2.25 second FREE FALL of WTC7 is observable evidence of Controlled Demolition. Of what IS. That is what Controlled Demolition LOOKS LIKE.
And the whole wide world is stuck in its COVER-UP.
It sure feels like an infinity to me.
Reply
albury smith is no more..
he hasnt posted anything, anywhere, for over a month now.
you killed him!
Please show me evidence of C/D on the steel columns at the WTC. Your “researchers” claim they were all cut by explosives on 9/11, so where are the photos, eyewitness accounts, or even rumors of explosively-cut columns found in the debris? Columns cut with oxyacetylene torches are inadmissible.
Please show me evidence of C/D on the steel columns at the WTC
oh but the steel was sold for scrap before the piss hit the ground … ahem, in free fall time, pardon the language.
Ground Zero was the site of one of the largest evidence destruction operations in history. It was the scene of the mass murder of nearly 3000 people.
… does little to diminish the importance of the remains of the towers and Building 7 as evidence, since the collapse of these three skyscrapers contradicts the entire history of engineered steel structures. Yet the remains of these buildings were systematically removed and destroyed, and THEIR EXAMINATION WAS RENDERED IMPOSSIBLE.
my, how (in)convenient, now you challenge me to provide evidence after it was carted off in unholy haste by alan ratner and hugo neu schnitzer who submitted detailed plans for removal and sale of steel girders which were approved on the spot by kenneth holden.
yeah, so to summarize: it is neither a coverup nor destruction of evidence and alan ratner, hugo neu schnitzer and kenneth holden are not dual citizens.
and it is now the responsibility of 911 skeptics to provide the evidence.
xanadu, montecristo, messed up my html again.
can you fix it?
Yeah, they just “rushed” all of the steel out in a mere ~8 months, during which numerous SEs examined it, along with thousands of cleanup workers. A W14 X 730 cut with explosives would certainly have been noticed, and your “researchers” claim that 2 dozen were cut that way multiple times, so where are the photos and eyewitness accounts?
You ask the same questions over and over and over, you’ve been answered over and over and over. ( though you habitually ignore all evidence, others might be interested tinyurl *dot* com/d9fhxvy ) People are not obliged to answer any of your questions. No one is required to prove anything to you. What you believe is of absolutly no consequence, except to you. The government is required to prove their argument beyond all reasonable doubt, and if you care to look, quite a few people believe the contradictory evidence that shows the official theory can not possibly be true.
http://omasiali.wordpress.com/2011/08/14/new-911-poll-half-of-new-yorkers-support-new-investigation-into-wtc7-collapse/
You’ll see there you’ve got quite a way to go, actually, a better way to put it would be, you are arguing a lost cause. No one finds anything you say credible in the least. Feverishly banging away at your keyboard, endlessly, mindlessly, ridiculously spouting the same debunked faith-based mythology, you’re one sick puppy, that’s for sure.
Here’s a short list of some of the people who believe that the mainstream account is true:
http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/someoftheagencies%2Corganizationsandindivi
besides if you do insist on drawing parallels with sinking of titanic, how come that it did not crumple into a pulverized heap of metal like you see in wrecking yards?
that would be a valid comparison, since you insist on using this retarded video as your weapon.
the brilliant minds (shall we say “elite and highly educated group”?) that composed it argue that because ice is demonstrably softer than steel and an iceberg sank a steel hulled ship, therefore it is equally plausible and defensible from a physics standpoint that holding a burning paper file to a steel truss will melt it sufficiently to cause the building to fall down.
good work, albury, be justifiably proud of your video, i urge everyone to see it to see how 9-11 “debunkers” minds and methods operate.
once again, the link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI
We’re relying on high beams like you and roger to unravel the Titanic mystery for us, lobro. The bathtub demonstration in that superlative video is the smoking gun.
it must have been a bunch of islamofascists with boxcutters hiding inside the ship’s hold responsible for the hull getting ripped open.
I see nothing implausible (or amusing) in the very consistent accounts from all 4 planes of what happened onboard, lobro. Is it really incomprehensible to you that a gang of 5 young men with sharp pocket knives and the element of surprise could seize control of an airliner, and one of them with a commercial pilot certificate from the FAA could steer it into highly visible targets in perfect weather conditions?
everything is perfectly comprehensible when an israeli airport security and screening company, that is shielded by an executive white house decree from any investigation is in charge of the deal.
the same company that was “guarding” the london tube on 7-7 and i believe the madrid commuter train network at the time of their tragedy.
and every time the same consisten story of young men (islamofascists) setting off explosives.
it’s a great cv that company has, no doubt the reason why they now got the contract to oversee the montreal subway security among others.
creme de la creme of consistency.
and we are only scratching the surface here, albury, better get back to titanic, way safer.
You’ve been “scratching the surface here” for a decade now, and still have no evidence at all that 9/11 was anything but another al Qaeda suicide attack on the West, as were the 2 US embassy suicide truck bombings, and the Cole suicide attack.
How frustrating for you, You’ve been at this caper for years, but it seems you are actually driving people away from the official conspiracy theory! Hang on…. let me guess! You’re actually a truther in disguise! Reverse psychology! BRILLIANT! At this rate, if you keep going, it wont be long now before there is finally a proper investigation! Keep pretending it was Muslims with boxcutters, That seems to be a good way to get people thinking! Good job! Well done!
http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2010/10/scientific-evidence-not-conjecture-lie-behind-claims-of-controlled-demolition-on-9-11/
in your modesty, forgot to add uss liberty and king david hotel
unfortunately, this was before the jews 100% stranglehold on mass media and some truth managed to leak out and reach wider audiences, e.g., The Jews pretended to be an Arab working party. Having unloading from their lorry several milk churns filled with 225 kilogram’s of explosive, they placed them in the basement of the wing of the hotel occupied by the Secretariat.
yeah, too bad the “elite and highly educated nist structural engineers” and pointy heads weren’t on hand to provide an alibi for jews and explain how only al-qaeda was able to carry out that attack.
jews would never do it, oh no.
we all know what an honest, truth loving bunch they are.
“by truth you shall wage war” is mossad’s motto.
my hebrew is kinda weak but you will confirm that truth translates to kol nidre.
Were the explosions in the King David Hotel only heard by people within a block of it, lobro? How many real controlled demolitions start with explosives going off at ~10 AM to bring down a building at ~5:21 PM?
I haven’t forgotten the liberty incident at all:
http://hnn.us/articles/369.html
Q: “How many real controlled demolitions start with explosives going off at ~10 AM to bring down a building at ~5:21 PM?”
A: One example would be building 7 on Sept 11, 2001.
http://rememberbuilding7.org/10/
Came down at freefall acceleration for over 2.5 seconds, and if not for the aid of controlled explosives, it then defied all known laws of science, physics, gravity, common sense and logic as is commonly understood today.
Look into it, it is obvious, only a fool could deny it.
I was referring to real controlled demolitions, not imaginary ones that make no sounds and leave no evidence in the debris. 24 of the columns in WTC 7 looked like this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY
It is literally impossible to cut 215 square inches of steel in a split second multiple times with explosives and not have people at least 10 miles away hear it.
Ashley Banfield’s a block or 2 away at 5:20 PM, speaking to her studio anchor on a live mike here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0pKUz8UpSs
Did you hear any sounds of explosives? Did she comment on hearing explosives right before the collapse started?
Charges powerful enough to have cut the W14 X 730 interior columns in WTC 7 would most likely have deafened her and everyone else nearby, and she didn’t even notice them. Go figure…
[links altered to avoid "moderation"]
I was referring to real controlled demolitions, not imaginary ones that make no sounds and leave no evidence in the debris. 24 of the columns in WTC 7 looked like this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY
It is literally impossible to cut 215 square inches of steel in a split second multiple times with explosives and not have people at least 10 miles away hear it.
Ashley Banfield’s a block or 2 away at 5:20 PM, speaking to her studio anchor on a live mike here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0pKUz8UpSs
Did you hear any sounds of explosives? Did she comment on hearing explosives right before the collapse started?
Charges powerful enough to have cut the W14 X 730 interior columns in WTC 7 would most likely have deafened her and everyone else nearby, and she didn’t even notice them. Go figure…
[links altered again to avoid "moderation"]
I was referring to real controlled demolitions, not imaginary ones that make no sounds and leave no evidence in the debris. 24 of the columns in WTC 7 looked like this one:
youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY
It is literally impossible to cut 215 square inches of steel in a split second multiple times with explosives and not have people at least 10 miles away hear it.
Ashley Banfield’s a block or 2 away at 5:20 PM, speaking to her studio anchor on a live mike here:
youtube.com/watch?v=y0pKUz8UpSs
Did you hear any sounds of explosives? Did she comment on hearing explosives right before the collapse started?
Charges powerful enough to have cut the W14 X 730 interior columns in WTC 7 would most likely have deafened her and everyone else nearby, and she didn’t even notice them. Go figure…
I am worried about you Albury. You seem to spend and have so much time arguing about 9/11. Do you not have a girlfriend or anything?
I’m worried about you too. Do you not have an on-topic comment or anything?
then there were these poor, misunderestimated, persecuted, chosen ones
October, 2001 – Moshe Elmakias, Ron Katar, Ayelet Reisler
driving a tractor-trailer truck, registered in Florida with the logo “Moving Systems Incorporated” painted on the sides
(hey I’llbury – wasn’t that the same thing on the vans your fellow tribesmen were driving when busted in New York in September, 2001?)
were detained in Pennsylvania for suspicious activities
whereupon authorities found in their truck, suspicious items such as fraudulent travel logs and
a Sony video camera and video tapes – showing strangely
zoom-ins on the Sears Tower ???
(I’ll bury – does these Israelis have some kind of phallic object fetishes what with the filming of towers in NewYork and Chicago?)
and then these 2 Israelis, Salvador Guersson Smecke and Saur Ben Zvi (so always misunderstood these people)
October 10, 2001 – arrested in Mexico’s Parliament building (not nearby, but actually inside, because they was photographers, part-time, moonlighting work) while carrying lots of very dangerous items on their persons – enough to cause the usual anti-semites jump to irrational conclusions that the 2 (former colonel of Israeli army and a active Mossad agent) were planning to do great harm to as many as possible – and then – (this is really so unbelievable) – blame it onto Muslims
now we know, the timing of these is not coincident in the least with the previous month’s activities – likewise the nonsense theories concocted by the anti-semites, just because these 3 incidents all had Israelis being involved,
nevertheless your fellows are buried under a mountain of suspicions and you must dig, dig, dig to get them out – I’llbury
Is everyone who shot video on 9/11 a suspect? Your FL-registered truck has a different company name from one in the “dancing Israelis” yarn. How does any of the mixed fact and fiction in these stories connect the alleged Israelis to 9/11?
You’re supposed to be digging your fellow chosenite-tribal members out from under the mountain of suspicions I’llbury, not digging your own grave deeper, what with answering questions with questions.
Very well, then. Your capitulation is accepted.
Here’s a chance to redeem yourselves – (do your tribe proud this time, instead of the limp-wrist response preceding).
Tell us, I’llbury, what was an “Urban Moving Systems” van doing at Dulles International on the Eleventh of September? Dig, dig, dig faster.
Dig, dig, dig and provide proof that an Urban Moving Systems van was at Dulles on 9/11, and then explain how that would have anything to do with the fact that Hani Hanjour had been staying in a motel in Laurel, MD since 9/2, and his crew of accomplices had checked into a hotel in Herndon, VA on 9/10.
More answering with questions; pathetic I’llbury, weak, lame, pitiful.
Your work is shoddy. All of you should refund the monies paid to you, find a new line of work. Maybe a vaudeville act – where the audience fits the 3rd-rate show.
The burden of proof is upon you (all of you). Surely you can come with the simple fact that another “Urban Moving Systems” van was at Dulles International on Eleven September.
And while you’re all scrambling to find that – find out who was in that van (more Israelis)?
No more stalling by answers with unrelated questions.
Actually, the burden of proof is on you. Was it a “Moving Systems Incorporated” van in your fantasy, or an “Urban Moving Systems” van, and where is your proof of either at Dulles International on 9/11? Since you brought up this yarn, you tell me who was in it, then explain what they had to do with Hanjour and AA 77, and provide some corroboration other than twoofer sites.
I submit this link as a source of interesting information regarding the events of Sept 11. 2001.
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/9-11-whistleblowers.html
Why don’t you get a taped interview with the live hijacker, “Dr. Don”? What 9/11 Commission member or former member has questioned what was IN the report, not what WASN’T? You do know what was in it, don’t you? GeeDubya’s connection was with the bin Laden family, not OBL. How many of the NYC firefighters quote mined there for the use of the word “explosion” are on this petition:
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/?page_id=469
Whats with all the questions? You a cop?
Why don’t you get a taped interview with the live hijacker, “Albury Smith”?
I’m not stupid and gullible enough to believe that any of the hijackers is still alive.
NIST itself say fires in ‘normal office furnishings Fire’ burn for 20 to 30 minutes in one place as they range around ‘looking for combustibles. 5 to 6 hours under those four beams on floor 12 heating only the TOP flange but NOT the concrete floor slabs TOUCHING them, popping 3/4″ shear-studs @ 22″ centers at 103º to Axially expand in unison ‘walking’ the Girder off the column seat isn’t KNOWN to have actually HAPPENED Albright. It is ASSUMPTION. An HYPOTHESIS. A THEORY.
Unproven. Untested in proper court of law. With expert cross-examination.
Photographs also show the fires OUT on the critical floor before ‘collapse’ initiation.
The whole of the NIST report is agnotological ‘assumption’ Albury. created by algorithms in black rooms. hidden by states secrets privilege. Drawn by cartooNISTs. Cardington found shear-studs don’t break under fire much HOTTER and LONGER than anything anywhere near reached WTC no-matter how you play the figures. Beams SAGGED but still held. You KNOW this. That is what composite beam/concrete floor slabs are DESIGNED to do. You are arguing boiling egg temperatures snapped massive shear-stud connections in a serious steel framed high rise KNOWING the data was doctored by doctor Pinocchio S. and his elite group of highly-educated SEs and other experts.
http://www.911blogger.com/news/2012-03-10/tangled-webs-nist-and-wtc7
I don’t know why people LIE Albury. Or why LIES control a CULTURE pretending FREEDOM™. You better ask around. But the 2.25 second FREE FALL of WTC7 is observable evidence of Controlled Demolition. Of what IS. That is what Controlled Demolition LOOKS LIKE.
And the whole wide world is stuck in its COVER-UP.
It sure feels like an infinity to me.
The very significant differences between the Cardington frame and WTC 7′s framing have been explained to you repeatedly, roger, so doing it again at this point would simply be a waste of time. You’re not qualified to refute the NIST findings, and wouldn’t provide a shred of evidence for explosives even if you were able to find something wrong with them, but please feel free to explain why Box Boy and all of his “engineers” haven’t even started modeling the steel around col. 79.
Seems youve had everything explained to you countless times as well, but you still expect people to waste their time with you.
Youre not qualified to endorse the NIST findings, and are obviously too stupid to recognize an explosion when its staring you in the face.
I for one, certainly dont need you or anyone else to tell me what Im looking at here, thanks all the same.
http://terorismevreu.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/wtctwintowerscontrolleddemolition.jpg
No; you need to look at videos of the tower collapses with audio, and then explain why nothing was ejected outward until the tops started falling.
Why do you think anyone owes you an explanation for anything?
Quite simply, 9/11 is the litmus test.
Your position on this matter defines you very clearly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_afIXBaenVE
Your position defines you too. You very clearly can’t justify it.
http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com/2012/05/history-is-one-big-conspiracy-theory.html
The truth about Israel will destroy Israel.
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/246134-Sickening-Israel-returns-bodies-of-Palestinians-it-murdered-in-humanitarian-gesture-
Did it ever occur to you that the so-called “Palestinians” negotiated for the remains of their “martyrs,” and that terrorizing Israeli civilians is “sickening” too?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18276354
Yeah right, the BBC is always my first port of call when I want the truth; especially about matters pertaining to the middle east.
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/the-bbcs-photo-fib-of-a-syrian-massacre/#more-40153
What’s your first port of call, Mary? Some goofy Internet blog?
That’s rich coming from someone who seems to spend the greater part of their life trolling “goofy” Internet blogs.
You posted it. Wasn’t I supposed to read it? Once again, what’s your first port of call for responsible journalism?
Er, you’ve missed my point. I posted the link in response to your BBC link about the oh so compassionate Israeli’s in order to demonstrate how the BBC is not to be relied on since it has a distinct pro-Zionist agenda.
Do you have a better source of information on what’s happening in Syria than the BBC and the rest of the MSM worldwide, and which side do you think the Israelis are on? I’d also like to know what you specifically question in this article:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18276354
and whether you can disprove any of it with your own sources.
Thanks in advance.
WTC7 and Towers ONE and TWO were not ‘secretly’ demolished at all. They were OBSERVABLY and explosively demolished right infront of our faces by one form of controlled demolition or another.
The real ‘secret’ of 911, is how the ‘collapse due to fire’ agnotology got sold to a public considering itself INFORMED, especially when you consider the great forensic engineers of the Commerce Dept had to create a [creatioNIST] ‘new phenomena’ in building destruction physics to do it.
In the case of WTC7, this ‘new phenomena’ hypothesis ‘Thermal Expansion’®, theorizes temperatures as low as 103º from ‘Normal Office Furnishings fires” – known not to burn in one spot for more than 30 minutes as they range about for fuel, and photographically proven OUT at the time and in the AREA NIST postulates critical shear-stud break on the ONE floor occurred; THAT these already out fires heated 4 massive beams, but only along their ‘top flange’ thereby ‘axially’ expanding them in ONE direction to BREAK- for the first time in known HISTORY – 3/4″ shear-studs at 22″ centers – but NOT HEATING the concrete floor slabs sat directly upon them [NCSTAR 1-9:352].
Thats interesting !
However, further along the cartooNIST La La, rather than LOOOOONG beams under heat SAGGING and remaining COMPOSITE as Cardington tests showed, in the NIST model hypothesis, the beams stay straight as Pinocchio’s NOSE , axially expanding to break the shear-studs, thereby ‘walking’ an even larger girder off its secured ONE seat at ONE join at column 79. ONE of three Girder joins at same spot.
http://www.911blogger.com/news/2012-03-10/tangled-webs-nist-and-wtc7#comment-256007
This remarkable ‘new phenomenon’ created a cascade collapse of the entire inner 24 core column structure interactions over 47 stories barely breaking a window, then to spread within a split second across the entire outer structure to SUDDENLY kink, then drop ‘in the manner of controlled demolition’ into its own footprint in 6.5 + seconds. 2.25 seconds AT FREE FALL. 108 feet completely without any RESISTANCE from any of the 81 verticals. All concrete floors pulverized into rushing pyroclastic like DUST clouds later found by Harrit et al to contain unignited thermitic material. And by RJ ‘Ritchie’LEE to contain 150x normal percentages of iron rich spheroids – considered the result violent ejections of molten steel into air.
The secret of 911 is how that hypothesis slid into the OFFICIAL narrative without criminal investigation and cross-examination by experts in a properly constituted court of LAW.
I’d really like to believe that 2 dozen W14 X 730 columns and 57 W14 X 500 columns were all cut multiple times in seconds with explosives, Roger, right in the middle of a busy metropolitan area, since fast, silent cutting like that could very well revolutionize the process of fabricating steel (see link below for the slow, old-fashioned way), but I’ll need some proof of it first. Instead of ignorantly bashing the NIST engineers and the respected forensic structural engineering firms who subcontracted to NIST in their WTC 7 investigation, please urge Box Boy and his “800 engineers” to demonstrate how it’s done on some sample steel columns, and post video of it on ae911″truth.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY
this Albury Smith asshole is really Albury Rosenthal or Liebowitz or some other zio defender of the mossad operation which took place on 9/11/2001.
the idiocy that far less than optimal and highly ‘rich’ fires at lower than 1200 degrees centigrade could weaken the 96 percent of the thermal steel mass of the REST of the building, is so absurd and loony on it’s face that only a moron with absolutely zero understanding of thermodynamics could assert that shit.
heat travels to cold in most realms via conduction. so with 96 percent of the buildings still more or less at not more than 2 degrees uptick from their nominal temperatures, pre impacts, there is no reality in the fraud of stating that weakened structural steel caused the huge mass of at least 96 or more percent that did not suffer any fire damage, to the point of it magically offering ZERO MECHANICAL RESISTANCE to the falling structure.
this jackass Albury Smith is a fraud and an ISRAEL propaganda stooge.
nobody in their right mind believes him. and nobody with a working brain out there believes the official crap story that 19 arab hijackers flew sophisticated airliners to their targets without knowing where the planes were located and without fundamentally reprogramming the onboard navigation systems to allow them to go to their targets, as it was not a fait accompli that these planes were on GCR routes from their takeoff points to the west coast, making navigation to the targets significantly a major chore for these clueless and incompetent hijackers who have been proven to still be alive and breathing the following day, and who left none of their DNA or body parts at any of the alleged crash sites (weren’t identified by DoD at all)
so many many many many parts of the ZIO putz puzzle do not work. Take a good look at the documentary ‘ZERO: an Investigation into 9/11″ and see that these hijackers were still alive and breathing, and were known CIA / MOSSAD assets, prancing around in strip joints on U.S. STATE DEPT and CIA expedited visa’s., prior to their being used as convenient patsies and cover story for the fakery that was 9/11.
Time after time after time, scumballs like Mr. Smith (really Rubenstein or Liebowitz, most likely) are here in these blogs to obfuscate and muddy up the truth that Mossad agents were apprehended and locked up by the U.S. for several months, for their DIRECT INVOLVEMENT in what took place that day, some of whom once back in Israel actually bragged on television about their involvement, by the way. This is what Albury Smith is. He’s a mossad asset at the least, and at best, a zionist jew who is hiding his true identity as a pile of zio garbage.
The world knows that the ‘dancing israeli’s’ were arrested, one other part of their team detonated their van by the G.W. Bridge., while in police custody. Their team leader, Dominic Sutor, is back in the U.S. arranging more murder, and probably was directly responsible for the killing of John Wheeler III who was about to start blowing whistles about his knowledge about what took place that day.
so much evidence has utterly destroyed the Official Conspiracy Theory which is the crap the mossad and their zionist handlers in the CIA put out there in the U.S., that the only place you find anyone who still believes the towers could fall in freefall speed after such minimal damage, are strictly morons in the U.S. who have had their brains turned to ‘mush’ by zio channel of Rupert Murdoch’s Faux Noise gange and the gratuitous doping thru the water system via fluoridated water.
take a good look at the real truth. that ISRAEL and zionists within the U.S. government in the CIA and FBI were the one’s who did this 9/11 false flag attack, not 19 arab patsies who were not even competent enough to pass a Cessna 172 checkout to rent those, let alone fly these planes they did not fly and could not possibly have flown.
take a good look at Veteran’s Today ’911′ section by Prof. James Fetzer, and read the truth about the absurdity of the claims that Osama Bin Laden orchestrated this.
another good place to look is the Vancouver 911 Truth Hearings coming up in Victoria, B.C. on the 16th. of June, 2012. Lots of solid evidence that totally and utterly eviscerates the official bullshit Albury Smith crap.
Albury, go back to Tel Aviv where you belong. Your Israeli passport is about to be
expired. You do not fool anyone.
the truth cannot be propagandized by your b.s., Albury.
I’m not the topic of the article here.
To address one of your many lies:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/01/02/remains-of-the-day.html
Please post links to some of the interviews that these “still be alive and breathing” hijackers must have given in the last decade.
Yes he can. All they need do is click on the link. I await a response to his post from any of you, though, you’re all as incapable as each other.
As incapable as you are able to provide a signed statement from ANY of those people or organistation representatives that states unequivocally that they agree with the Government version of events 100% you good for nothing clown.
If any government in the world believes 9/11 “truth movement” crap at all, please list all of them and their statements, evidence, etc. Yemen? Saudi Arabia? Pakistan? Sudan?
Which ones claimed that US Navy SEALs offed a patsy last May?
How sad, i was there all day on 9/11, parked at one point right under WTC7 in a police vehicle in the AM. The building was on fire all day for good reason, it was fed from the emergency diesel tanks that were whicking to the fire and kept it going. It was a raging torrent, there is no “wire” on earth that could withstand that heat and be used to detonate anything. Sometimes the simple truth is the truth- the building was badly damaged from the fall of the tower, and it ignited, the fire raging all day weakened some of the beams, and the building slowly bowed out then fell ( in front of me I might add). This “they were wired” has to answer what electric wire was used? and what kind of explosive could withstand that heat all day?! Ask about dancing Israelis, ask about them tracking the hijackers down in Hollywood FL, connect those dots please, but this other stuff just serves to delegitimize their real involvement.
Gordon: Some of the UPS generators in WTC 7 were fed by pressurized fuel lines coming from tanks in the basement, instead of by “day tanks” next to the generators that only call for fuel as the generators deplete them when running, and it was initially speculated that ruptures in the pressurized lines fed the fires, but was disproved by NIST’s WTC 7 investigation and noted in NCSTAR 1A. The entire C/D “theory” is stupid, since there’s no plausible motive for it, no evidence, and secretly blowing up office buildings in major cities is impossible, but the “dancing Israelis” yarn isn’t much better.
Their “crime” was recording the event, as thousands of others did, and one eyewitness claimed that they looked too happy about it. They had no foreknowledge, and didn’t go there for the purpose of filming it.
Intelligence info on some of the hijackers prior to 9/11 isn’t a “smoking gun” either. The FBI, CIA, etc. aren’t mind readers, and no one really connected all of the dots until it was too late, unfortunately.
Ahhh.. the lols continue, albury smith gets schooled by Jeremy R. Hammond and others ..
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/06/04/do-we-need-another-911-conspiracy-theory/
He can school the ASCE, RIBA, ICC, and all of these people next:
https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/someoftheagencies%2Corganizationsandindivi
albury everywhere…yaaaaawn
Albury isn’t the topic here.
http://govtslaves.info/former-head-of-star-wars-program-says-cheney-main-911-suspect/
Since Bowman’s been a truther nut for years, I’m wondering why this is all of a sudden newsworthy. The funniest part of the article was this, however:
“…[Charlie] Sheen is an expert on 9/11 who spends hours a day meticulously researching the topic…”
LOL
Pingback: Democrat suggests Jews behind 9/11 attacks « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL
Pingback: EUROPEAN SATANISM, A BEGINNER’S GUIDE | Gazeta Warszawska
Pingback: European Satanism, PART 2 | The Everything Pages