-
GOD BLESS AMERICA
GOD BLESS AMERICA
The official line for the atrocity carried out in Kandahar has now been clearly established: a US soldier went off base alone in the night and proceeded to kill 16 civilians in a nearby village before setting fire to the bodies.
Tensions were already inflamed over the burning of the Quran by American soldiers, and following on from the revelation of “kill teams” collecting body parts as “trophies” and the leaked footage of troops urinating on dead Afghans.
The latest line from the US government on the killings has been to discuss at length the mental state of the gunman. Initially, he was described as being possibly “deranged” at the time of the shootings; then, it was stated that he had suffered a “mental breakdown”, yet another soldier from Fort Lewis-McChord to have buckled under the strain of warfare and gone on a killing spree — a considerably more common trait for US soldiers than their NATO allies.
Additional reports have since emerged pointing to a “traumatic brain injury”.
So far, nothing seems out of the ordinary with this narrative – until you include the eyewitnesses.
According to PakTribune: “One Afghan father who said his children were killed in the shooting spree accused soldiers of later burning the bodies.” Reuters were told by witnesses that “a group of US soldiers” arrived at the village and were responsible for the killings.
Resident Haji Samad said:
They [the Americans] poured chemicals over their dead bodies and burned them … I saw that all 11 of my relatives were killed, including my children and grandchildren.
A neighbour, Agha Lala, added, “They were all drunk and shooting all over the place.”
- Afghan children on their way to school…only too aware that they, too, could one day fall victims to the psychopaths in uniform who have occupied their country.
The official response from the US came shortly after: “Based on the preliminary information we have this account is flatly wrong,” the official said. “We believe one US service member acted alone, not a group of US soldiers.”
No information has been provided to refute the testimony of the eyewitnesses, who also described shots being fired from several directions.
As Afghan lawmaker Abdul Rahim Ayubi observed,
It is not possible for only one American soldier to come out of his base, kill a number of people far away, burn the bodies, go to another house and kill civilians there, then walk at least 2 kilometers and enter another house, kill civilians and burn them.
Local Panjwai councilman, Abdul Ghani, corroborated the unlikelihood of a single shooter, stating, “The villagers said they were hearing machine gun fire and pistol fire from different directions.”
-
YOU KILLED OUR CHILDREN!
YOU KILLED OUR CHILDREN!
Afghan President Hamid Karzai to America: “You killed our children!”
While objectively-speaking the evidence would point towards multiple shooters, once again the media have taken the pronouncements of unnamed “US officials” as gospel truth.
The official line has been set in stone: in print and on the TV news channels.
As for the eyewitness accounts of drunken troops killing over a wider area, firing wildly, urinating on the dead bodies and then burning them—that, predictably, has been expunged from the record and gone down the Orwellian memory hole.
It never happened.
-
WHAT AMERICA IS GOOD AT : KILLING THIRD WORLD CHILDREN
WHAT AMERICA IS GOOD AT : KILLING THIRD WORLD CHILDREN
-
Thank you, America.
Thank you, America.
Based on this article By Andy Dilks.
See also:
- US soldier accused of killing 16 Afghans could be executed, says Leon Panetta13 Mar 2012
- Hundreds take to streets to protest at killing of 16 Afghan civilians13 Mar 2012
- US soldier who killed villagers should be put on trial in Afghanistan, parliament demands12 Mar 2012
_________________________________________________________
Pandora Alexandrovna Pushkin is a Russian-American academic and human rights activist.
_________________________________________________________
UPDATE
Comment offered by Northerntruthseeker:
I have been just as disgusted as everyone else has been over the last week since learning of the attack on a group of 16 innocent Afghan civilians by some 20 US soldiers in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan.
That brutal attack, in which some nine women and children were needlessly slaughtered, was bad enough, but now today come new allegations that at least two of the women were raped by these US soldiers before being killed.
Two members of the fact-finding mission, Hamidzi Lali and Shakila Hashemi, told the general meeting of Afghanistan’s parliament on Saturday that the American troopers raped two Afghan women before starting the massacre.
It is no wonder that the people of Afghanistan are all up in arms over this latest senseless murder by the American occupiers of their country. There have naturally been new calls for the immediate withdrawal of all American and NATO forces from the country. The Americans have been in Afghanistan for ten years now—and they have definitely overstayed their “welcome”.
For the last few days, I have been watching the US news media outlets try to spin this latest act of cold-blooded murder, as they vainly try to get America off the hook. They have failing miserably. Instead, they have turned themselves into laughing stocks.
The real farce is that the US Government is continuing to spin this story as an act committed by a “lone gunman”. All the evidence shows otherwise.
The simple fact is again that America and NATO shouldn’t even be in Afghanistan in the first place. They were only sent there on command of their Rothschild Jewish masters to have the Opium poppy fields put back into production — this for the financial benefit of Lord Rothschild.
Now, 10 years later, they have literally destroyed Afghanistan. They have left it irradiated with depleted uranium—for the next four billion years! They have killed thousands of innocent Afghan civilians. They now have the impudence to suggest that, when they leave the country officially, they will nevertheless leave behind some of their troops as permanent “peace keepers”.
This latest act of murder by psychopathic American soldiers underlines an obvious point. America is not interested in peacekeeping. The Afghan people want America to leave. Every single American. Right now. They see the Americans as the rest of the world sees them: as brutal occupiers.
The 20 or so American soldiers responsible for this atrocity must be brought to justice immediately.
The US must not only apologize to the Afghan nation for this latest massacre, but it must withdraw its forces from Afghanistan at once.
A picture of “American Psycho”, Kandahar serial killer Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, guilty of killing 16 civilians in afghanistan recently:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/19/article-2117216-1239F654000005DC-580_634x456.jpg
@ xanadu
it would add to the levity of the threads to lure someone like 5 dancing shlomos to comment here on occasion.
but the commenters here are a somewhat serious lot, god v. no-god is where the action is.
i try my best to keep up but the eyes tend to glaze rapidly … need to see an theo-opthalmologist.
afterwards i can whip out my cape, yell, god in distress, lobro to the rescue!
(ding-ding-ding go firebellsinthenight)
Jew seems like a very impolite, vulgar and dirty word
i totally understand you belle, given that jews seem like a very polite, refined and pure people.
and indeed, who can look upon the faces of such avatars of judaism as abe foxman, elliot abrams, meerav wurmser, pam geller, larry silverstein, rabbi yitzhak ginzburg (search his photo out in lasha’s articles) george soros, binyamin netanyahu, alan greenspan, henry kissinger, richard perle and millions of others without being struck by their inate nobility borne of invariably noble thoughts.
because good, kind thoughts result in good, kind faces, nothing to do with genes.
which is why devil looks beautiful and christ is ugly, as the wise men of talmud would argue.
which is why the latter, being an impolite, vulgar and dirty creature is consigned by talmud to be boiled in a vat of rabbi excrement.
So what makes you think Firebell is a gorgeous professorial chick? (Belle)
don’t know about gorgeous but this poster uses kind of feminine syntax or at least it sounds so to my ears.
s/he knows a fair bit about american political history, seems to have absorbed the import and not just the data.
seems reasonably logical and unfazed by ad hominem, indicating an experienced debater, such as may be encountered in the academic class, where bitchy infighting is par for the course.
the only gorgeous professorial chick i know is you, xanadu, so don’t feel any existential angst yet.
and because she can take it, being a tough trooper, i like to rattle her chain with posts like the above
uh … just struck me why … my subconscious overfloweth with imagery …
fiery-belle-in-the-night
won’t be able to sleep tonight:-D
the above rabbi knows how to initiate an interesting train of thought
… if a Jew requires a liver transplant to survive, it would be permissible to seize a Gentile and take their liver forcefully.
what if a liver is required for one of delicious traditional jewish dishes, venerable rabbi? (i know that ears are a must for purim hamantaschen, i just love their crunchiness)
and thank you for being ever so polite, well mannered and pure of heart that you refer to me and my kind as gentiles, rather than goys.
clearly, you are one of the finest.
the ideals that inspire our noble warriors
by rape you shall wage war
according to Qarim (rabbi-idf colonel) , the rape of female prisoners is not just permitted, it is also essential to war; the success of the whole at war relies on it.
which is why the last lebanon invasion failed so miserably, the heroes of torah failed to get near enough to women to prove their battlefield bravery.
any idf soldier who fails to rape and organ-strip when presented the opportunity will be court martialed before military sanhedrin.
dislaimer(fbn): no disrespect intended, only the truth.
i gave these warriors exactly the respect due.
lobro, you are right on the money my friend.
Sofar, Israel was humiliated twice in its entire history.
Both in Lebanon. In the year 2000 and in 2006, where the IOF left Lebanon like dogs with their tails between their hind legs. They lost so many soldiers, many Merkava Tanks and other hardware. Hezbullah did open a museum in south Lebanon right after the last war. One of their destroyers off the coast of Beirut was sunk by a heat seeking missiles. It was shown life on Almanar TV as it happened. Israel did fail miserably. A) it was not able to Kill Nassrallah, B) and was not able to free the two captive israeli soldiers. It took the entire IOF one week to advance 5 km into the village of Maroun Alrass.
Finally, as they were leaving Lebanon, IOF were weeping like women. No offense to the ladies here. Fact remains, IOF are lazy, savage, barbaric, undisciplined, have no fear of God, and lack human decency.
Last story I read about rape by IOF a month ago on The Ugly Truth, it was between two of their male soldiers. This is still under investigation. Will keep you posted.
@ lobro
Hey, I don’t think FireBELLE would have dug your comment about rape-loving US soldiers! She would have gone berserk! Maybe it’s a good thing she’s gone, given her admiration for the boundless nobility of the US soldier under all circumstances …even at Falluja, Haditha, Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo!
One point on which I feel I must *correct* you: I read somewhere that Israelis on the whole — and this would apply particularly to the Ashenazis who make up the bulk of the IDF — are physically unattracted to Arab women and feel revulsion at the mere idea of raping them. Raping a dishy German woman after WWII in Germany, that was entirely different. They would actually have enjoyed that.
It’s my own theory that soldiers don’t around raping women they are physically revolted by.
I don’t think white American soldiers (or IDF soldiers for that matter) would go around raping black women in Africa if there was a big war with some African country. The white-on-black rape statistics in America bear this out. Almost zero percent.
Though it’s true that some Palestinian girls can be exceptionally attractive, I think you will generally find that Ashkenazi Jews are repelled by Arab women and just wouldn’t want to rape them.
hm … there i go sliding down another tangent.
so, scarcity of white-on-black (sounds so missionary) rape is further proof of racism?
but then, abundance of black-on-white constitutes what, respect?
need to redefine racism, then.
i agree that physical revulsion may indicate overall racist view of the “spurned victim”.
but he main point about racism is that it indicates a sense of group superiority over another group.
thus, the negroes (i use the fashionably pejorative term because i refuse to follow linguistic fashion, there was a time when “negro” was respectable while “black” wasn’t) are not racists, they simply hate us.
and hate is fuel for rape, just as jealousy is, the perp wants to, in some way, get even, debase the victim, bring her down to his perceived level.
now, notice how jews, as the overwhelming practitioners of slavery, interbred with their negro possessions, thus many blacks (ok, why not) have jewish sounding surnames.
what is at work here?
having total mastery over someone, to the point that someone becomes something, but with feelings that can be trampled at whim, is an aphrodisiac.
especially to someone without any moral code whatever.
thus, not sure that palestinian women are out of danger zone.
On inter-racial sex
so, scarcity of white-on-black (sounds so missionary) rape is further proof of racism? but then, abundance of black-on-white constitutes what, respect?
You misunderstand me. I’m not calling anyone “racist” or making a point about racism. Didn’t even mention the word.
I was just pointing out a curious statistical fact. Huge numbers of white women get raped in America every year by black men. The number of black women raped in America by white men, however, is so small that for statistical purposes the figure is computed at ZERO percent.
You mistake my point completely if you think I’m saying white men are “racist” because they don’t want to go near black women. I’m not make a race point.
No, I’m just baffled at the fact that white men are indifferent to the charms of black women and don’t lust after them. If they did, they’d rape them more often, wouldn’t they?
I find this baffling because black men are quite DIFFERENT to white men in this respect. Black men DO lust after white women, which is precisely why they rape them so often!
* * *
Your idea that black-on-white rape is fueled by an atavistic HATRED of the white race — blacks getting their revenge on the white race by raping the white man’s woman — is not being questioned by me. That’s true. But the rape is also fueled by an unquenchable LUST, not just by pure hatred.
The black man, I have repeatedly been told by white women who have had black lovers, is driven by a tremendous desire for white female flesh. Many of them (Elridge Cleaver is one) actually admit to PREFERRING white women to the black women of their own race. After all, this is the very basis of inter-racial porn.
This kind of porn, who do you think it caters for? Not for white men, certainly! Most white men, I know for sure, are totally repelled by interracial porn. It does nothing for them.
I’ll tell you who are the main customers of inter-racial porn. I’ve researched this subject for a long time. 80-90% are black men. And 10-20%, unbelievably, are white women. (The participants in inter-racial porn are ALWAYS black men and white women).
* * *
Older white women go to Jamaica every year to pick up black lovers. Thousands of them from all over Europe converge on Jamaica every year. Young blacks make a killing as gigolos.
In contrast, white men NEVER travel to Africa or the West Indies to pick up black women! They prefer Thailand for cheap sex tourism.
Lots of white women, for some strange reason, are besotted with black men. This is because they find black men incomparably better lovers. (Purely from the physical aspect; their emotions ofen remain untouched).
A white woman I once knew, and whom I questioned minutely in counseling her, told me that black men were more forcible and energetic during sex and went on for much longer periods, sometimes for several hours, giving her multiple orgasms. In contrast, white men often ejaculated prematurely and the average act of intercourse with white men lasted between 10 seconds and 10 minutes.
Apologies for this off-topic comment. I’ve never been an enthusiast for sticking to the point.
interesting non-points, as always, from one point dodger to another.
forget the stuff about I’m not make a race point, because neither am i.
but there is something else possibly … is it that white women are more likely to indulge in rape fantasies, whereas black ones are more likely to react in violently defensive fashion, like men of all races would, which discourages the would-be rapist?
the bottom line of some of your poems indicate as much … anyway, don’t mean to make a huge deal out of an otherwise taboo subject, only discretely point in its direction.
been thinking more, sometimes the tangent beats the original direction.
why does black men-white women work so well.
1. white women are likely to indulge in violent sex fantasies where they are treated like objects, something that has been cauterized by encroaching twin diseases “feminism” and political correctness.
they crave the release of animal instincts, which have been supressed in white males.
so now, white men are insecure to the point that they are more interested in “performance”, i.e., how they are perceived by others than their own enjoyment.
2. black men have less moral inhibition and are more likely to give vent to their own violent fantasies, also fueled by hate and contempt.
women’s opinions and feeling don’t matter, they are to be used and discarded.
this also explains why they are more likely to be involved in crime.
add to that unhealthy nutrition with all the hormone altering chemicals, stress laden lifestyle and the death of white on white sex is cemented.
There’s a definite anomaly here. It’s this:
(1) Black men + White women = Lots of sex going on here. Many interracial porn sites cater to this mutual animal lust. Lots of sex tourism in which white women, almost always in their 40-50s and not particularly attractive, are seeking out black partners for casual sex in West Indian countries, esp. Jamaica. Huge numbers of white women being raped every year by black men in America. I’d like to assure you this has nothing to do with white women’s “rape fantasies”. No white woman (except a nutcase) actually WANTS to be raped and puts herself in a position where she IS raped!
Also: There is a great deal of jealous rage experienced by black women against the white women their back menfolk lust after. They resent the fact that these white women are “stealing” their men from them. Black women almost always prefer sex with their own kind and don’t dig white men all that much.
(2) White men + black women = Very little sex or mutual attraction here. White men hardly ever rape black women. This has nothing to do with the fact that black women offer more resistance to rape than white women, but everything to do with the fact that white men are far more likely to be turned on by white women than by black women. Black women usually leave white men cold. They just don’t WANT to rape black women.
The points I’ve been making on interracial sex are all borne out here:
[1] INTERRACIAL SEX: Women who travel for sex: Sun, sea and gigolos.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-who-travel-for-sex-sun-sea-and-gigolos-407202.html
[2 INTERRACIAL SEX: White Woman tells why she prefers black men and despises white men.
http://www.nypress.com/article-12509-a-white-woman-explains-why-she-prefers-black-men.html
ok, ok, just put forward my hastily home grown theory.
you clearly have done your referencing.
just one question, then.
what exactly is it that makes white women so much more desirable to men of both races?
i see it as being some kind of obvious vulnerability that appeals to baser, predatory instincts of a hunter in man.
moreover, this vulnerability is cultivated by choice of clothes, fashion, cosmetics and behavior.
wouldn’t you agree?
and if so, then … let’s call them fantasies of vulnerability then … fantasies which black women simply don’t project.
You could be right about “vulnerability”. But I think your question is easily answered by the very assumption underlying your first question: “What is it that makes white women so much more desirable to men of both races?”
The answer is pretty obvious: white women are more RAPEABLE for the smple reason that they are more SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE!!!
By all objective criteria, white women are the most beautiful in the world. They are not only more attractive to white men, they are more attractive to black men…to the Japanese…to Indians.
C’mon, who would you rather rape if you were a soldier let loose in a foreign land: a beautiful white woman or an unattractive dark-skinned one?
You’ve traveled in India. You must know that the Indians, however much they dig Indian women, also have a tremendous lust for white women. In fact, when arranged marriages and dowries are set up in India, the color of the bride is often stipulated. She must be “fair” — the fairer she is, the more desirable she is as a bride.
Your speculations about “vulnerability” are probably spot-on. You see, “vulnerability” (like “innocence”) is in itself a desirable attribute in a woman. This is because the more vulnerable and helpless a woman is, she more FEMALE she is and looks.
The tougher and more aggressive she is, the more male she is and looks.
So who would that hypothetical soldier prefer to rape: the attractive femme woman or the unattractive butch one? No choice! The femme is infinitely preferred.
* * *
Final point. For the black man, a white woman is a prize. A conquest he can be proud of. How the black slave must lust for the unattainable plantation owner’s daughter!
You’re absolutely right though, I think, about the black man’s atavistic rage against the white race being the fuel that makes the black man rape so many white women. It’s not just lust, it’s blinding rage. Elridge Cleaver made that clear.
What else can explain the bizarre phenomenon of the countless GERIATRIC WHITE WOMEN raped by young black burglars in their twenties? Not lust certainly. It’s pure hatred.
I’ve just been reading about a case today involving a young black aged 20. He breaks into a house where he brutally rapes and kills the 85-year-old wife and severely injures her 90-year-old husband.
So tell me: why did this guy need to RAPE a frail 85-year-old woman?
* * *
By Nina Golgowski PUBLISHED: 11:07 EST, 20 March 2012 | UPDATED: 13:06 EST, 20 March 2012
An 85-year-old woman was sexually assaulted and battered to death by a home invader who also shot her 90-year-old husband in the face with a BB gun.
Nancy and Bob Strait, who had celebrated their 65th wedding anniversary in December, were discovered by their daughter at their home in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Both the pensioners were rushed to hospital where Mrs Strait, who was nearly blind, died from her injuries.
Mr Strait, who served in the 101st Airborne Division in World War II, suffered a broken jaw, broken ribs and severe bleeding. He is in a serious condition in hospital.
Here’s a pic of the happy couple:
http://data.christogenea.org/images/article-2117695-1240BB4D000005DC-466_634x394.jpg
Click here and scroll down:
http://saxonmessenger.christogenea.org/
(I don’t usually read this website, but a correspondent of mine sent me the link today)
no argument there, xanadu, you seem to have researched the subject thoroughly (nor will i check the links, your word is enough).
hm.
but tell you what, the “white vulnerability”, as a fashion accessory can be learned, i think.
personally, i have seen black women (not a huge percentage, obviously) that exhibit those tinkerbell characteristics of vulnerable feminine grace, softness (so many look as tough as pythons, repulsively athletic, as in fact many white ones, especially pop stars do), small, long boned hands, necks, doe eyes and they are every bit as attractive to me as the white ones displaying same characteristics.
maybe they grew up adopted or something …
Then get your shit together and fight among yourselves. We don’t want our children there either!