-
“The sun, the darkness and the winds are all listening…”
“The sun, the darkness and the winds are all listening…”
“There is one God looking down on us all. We are all children of the one God. The Sun, the darkness and the winds are all listening to what we have to say.”
— Geronimo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eum4xW4c4X8&feature=related
Edited, with pictures and captions by Lasha Darkmoon.
(Note: Darkmoon does not agree with the views expressed below,
but she believes that such views have a right to be expressed.)
The religious beliefs of most people are so brittle and shallow that they don’t understand that for some droll prole like me to rant on at such stupendous lengths about the hypocrisy of organized religion doesn’t mean that I am against it, or that I hate it.
It means that I think how we worship God is absolutely the most important thing in the life of every actually sentient human being, and as I survey the syncretic horizon of human belief systems, I am engulfed in shame and anger at both what people believe, and how those beliefs have so needlessly trashed the lives of so many innocent lifeforms. Needlessly.
It is all the externalization of the monster that scratches at the inside of our skulls. And no one realizes it. They just keep killing.
I yearn to scream out against all this blind, herdlike absurdity, and have done so right here on the Internet for going on ten years: first very popular for identifying the Zionists as the cause of all our political troubles, then blackballed for discovering there is only one kind of Jew, and no kinds of ex-Jews.
______________________________________________________________
No matter what a Jew says he is, he is a Jew, and has, can and will never change. He can’t. It’s the programming, not the biology.
________________________________________________________________
The circumcision ritual. The constant reminder that everybody hates him. The passed-down knowledge of every trick in the book about how to screw somebody else. And the holy promise to deceive.
A Jewish monster has infected all our souls.
They didn’t like me very much because they already had so many Jewish or neo-Jewish talk show hosts who all started calling me an anti-Semite and that sort of thing. Who can blame them? After all, most of their customers are Jews, or Jewified goy robots, trying to keep up with the latest Jewish media induced trends.
I can say now that all my work, blackballed and ridiculed as it has been over the years, is now bearing fruit.
I keep hearing that people are less afraid to use the ‘J-word’ these days, except of course on all those mainstream venues or the cool Internet sites like Salon and Huffington Post, which still remain attached at the hip to the Jewish viper’s money machine.
Above all else we all need to attempt some kind of comprehension of the extent and magnitude of how Jewish thinking, spreading like an inexorable stain of bribery and coercion throughout the world, has permeated and perverted our lives, to the degree that the skills we need to even perceive this psychological encroachment on our otherwise normal minds have been removed from public school curricula and public media, hastening our slide into semi-conscious servitude.
I’d guess we’re way past two thirds of the drop of the slide, which increases exponentially toward the bottom. Nobody has figured out a way to stop the slide. I have, but nobody listens.
And those who do listen . . . listen only so far, heads nodding in agreement all the way down the line until I get around to mentioning the main Jewish tool for the subversion of all societies in the world — Christianity!
_______________________________________________________________
Christianity is the tool the Jews have used to destroy the world. Don’t argue with me. Or I’ll cut you to ribbons!
_______________________________________________________________
All Christians use subjective propaganda to defend their arguments, propaganda which has been demolished by scholars who find it hard to get jobs in the Jewish controlled world, but nevertheless whose incontrovertible research throbs like a radioactive secret to those with the nerve to seek it out and transcend all this spiritual malarkey that keeps people in chains.
Take note.
The first things Jews always do, starting with the Hebrew plundering of Egypt (about which we read a totally convoluted version in the Old Testament), is to command both sides of every conflict, which is why they covertly support one combatant while openly supporting the other.
That’s why in Rome factions of Jews set up reasons for discord, and so enflamed the slaves to overrun the people who built everything, using the incentive that “all your sins will be forgiven.” No, I’m not trying to describe modern day Atlanta.
Or like when Roosevelt sent Harriman to run Russia in 1941 when Hitler attacked and Stalin had a nervous breakdown. The Jews always figure out a way to keep a war going.
You saw it — or failed to see it — during the Vietnam War of the 1960s, in which Jewish radicals led millions into the streets to protest a war insisted upon by the Jewish financiers, for no reason other than to kill people and sell weapons. Primo destabilization technique!
Thanks to Jewish media keeping protest songs superficial, you also failed to see the subplot: that of addicting generations of young Americans to heroin, smuggled onto the streets of America in the same way they do it now — in the coffins of dead American soldiers.
______________________________________________________________
The soldiers sacrificed in Afghanistan for the Jewish mafia’s principal drug dealers, the CIA, are not to know that their coffins are used as secret compartments for heroin — smuggled into America in this underhand way.
“You will learn this was done in Vietnam with US soilders. They hid the heroin in their body cavities. So it makes sense that they are still doing it today with dead US Soldiers killed in Iraq [and presumably Afghanistan]. How else are they going to transport all that heroin into the US?” (See here)
_______________________________________________________________
But I digress.
Christians are unreliable allies in the fight against Jewish world tyranny precisely because they are creations of that tyranny.
Alexandrian Jews invented Christianity and peopled the Bible with vaporous characters who never existed. They took the exploits of Egyptian kings and ascribed them to the Biblical patriarchs.
And it gets worse. Much worse. Not only did the Jews create Christianity at the outset, they authored every Protestant variation of the Roman Catholic faith that has ever been invented, giving you some idea of the magnitude of this Jewish mindlock which like a giant fishnet has shackled the entire world in its concepts and ideas.
All of these without exception are corrupt because they are based upon a deliberately false observation, a dangerous lie that people have chosen to believe.
As I have listened to the various Christian critics of Jewish practices over the years, it has occurred to me that they don’t really want to correct the ubiquitous criminal practices of the Jews as much as they want to regain the insane totalitarian power that the Jews have stealthily stolen from them over the centuries.
Nation after nation has been plundered, poisoned and prostituted by this Jewish money machine: they have big teeth to bite your balls off if you refuse to obey.
And yet, without realizing that their whole plotline was Jewish from the beginning, with the fanatical Zealots inflaming the Roman slave quarters, contemporary Christian proselytizers insist that their Messiah was not Jewish, though the new religion that first gave him his name 300 years after he supposedly lived was composed exclusively of dogmatic Hebrew theologians surrounding the Emperor Constantine.
The Bible is a front story to deprive the human race of its real history. Instead, we have the artificial godman with the bleeding heart.
If you think the Palestinians can tell you the real story about the Jews, then you better think about the stories Native Americans tell you about Christians.
If you reflect that the leader of the Roman Catholic Church can call Jews the elder brothers of Christians, then you’d better ask yourself: how come it says in the Jewish Talmud think about that part of the Jewish Talmud that the corpse of Jesus Christ is hanging upside down for all eternity in a vat of full excrement?
______________________________________________________________
Gittin 57a says: “Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.” Another version (possibly a footnote or explanatory gloss) reads: “Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in semen. Christians are boiled in dung.” (LD)
______________________________________________________________
Who are these people? How is it we’ve been conned into believing what they say? Then we get the really bad news: we were to blame all along, because we were only too pleased to swallow the lies that were fed us. Yes, we chose to believe these lies, and the vast corruption emanating from those lies is now poisoning the world. We can see that all so clearly.
We have reached the point in human history where ee have come to realize that anyone who subscrbes to the falsehoods of the mainstream monotheistic religions—Judaism, Christianity, Islam—are committing treason against God — yes, and treason against every living thing!
It is the maintenance of this elaborate system of lies that is destroying the world.
Sucking up to “God” in this lascivious way is about the worst thing a human being can do. Just look at those disgusting TV evangelists and door-to-door Bible thumpers spreading a psychological poison invented 2000 years ago by the Jews…for the benefit of simple-minded morons!
All these pathological projections are the handiwork of megalomaniacal pariahs and outlaws who never possessed anything they did not steal from someone else.
Religion is much too important a matter to be left in the hands of sexually frustrated priests and perverted rabbis.
For the record, I am a worshipper of the indigenous people of the planet, our true ancestors, because I know that to venerate them is to venerate life, and to venerate ourselves; rather than this unquenchable thirst for an otherworldly dominion that guarantees we will destroy each other.
It is our duty and privilege to nurse the indigenous peoples of this planet back to health, back from the diseased condition in which we have left them, while pursuing the insane objectives ascribed to a non-existent God.
In restoring their health, we will restore our own.
For it is written in stone and clearly understandable: To venerate those who came before us, esecially those who are the direct descendants of our ancestors, is to prove that we love ourselves.
The Christianity the Jews invented for us teaches us to hate ourselves, and to kill ourselves in disputing over minor points of theological dogma.
To worship an invisible God, twisted into monstrous shapes by perverted men, guarantees — yes, GUARANTEES! — that we destroy ourselve.
The scratching on the inside of our skulls can only be alleviated by love.
Nobody has ever said it better than John Fitzgerald Kennedy did, not so long ago: “To be what man was born to be — free and independent!”
_______________________________________________________________
Arthur Schopenhauer: Christianity has nothing to offer India in Philosophy..
Here is a passage from The World as Will and Representation which he wrote in 1819:
‘Never has a myth been, and never will one be, more closely associated with a philosophical truth accessible to so few, than this very ancient teaching of the noblest and oldest of peoples. Degenerate as this race may now be in many respects, this truth still prevails with it as the universal creed of the people, and it has a decided influence on life today, as it had four thousand years ago. Therefore Pythagoras and Plato grasped with admiration that non plus ultra of mythical expression, took it over from India or Egypt, revered it, applied it, and themselves believed it , to what extent we know not. We, on the contrary, now send to the Brahmins English clergymen and evangelical linen-weavers, in order out of sympathy to put them right, and to point out to them that they are created out of nothing, and that they ought to be grateful and pleased about it. But it is just the same as if we fired a bullet at a cliff. In India our religions will never at anytime take root; the ancient wisdom of the human race will not be supplanted by the events in Galilee. On the contrary, Indian wisdom flows back to Europe, and will produce a fundamental change in our knowledge and thought.’
-
@ hp
No one will deny Schopenhauer is right to praise Hindu wisdom. Nothing in English can quite equal Max Müller’s 50 volume translation of The Sacred Books of the East. But I don’t think Schopenhauer is very convincing when he uses Hindu wisdom as a big stick to beat up on Christianity.
Not being a Christian himself, and with a tremendous admiration for the Upanishads and other post-Vedic Hindu religious classics, you would expect the German philosopher to enjoy a little sneer at the expense of Christianity.
The fact is, Schopenhauer makes use of a fallacious argument here by comparing like with unlike—by comparing oranges and apples. Thus he compares the sublimes sages of the Orient with “English clergymen and evangelical linen-weavers” who go out to India as missionaries to convert the “heathen”.
This is a bit like comparing Shankara with Billy Graham and concluding that Christianity is rubbish in comparison with Hinduism
Instead, he should have compared the Oriental sages to the sublimest of Christian mystics: to Plotinus and Eckhart and Tauler and St John of the Cross. He would not have been able to practise his sneer so easily then!
Another weakness in Schopenhauer’s argument, whereby he attempts to disparage Christianity, is that Christianity does not pride itself as much on its “philosophy” and “mysticism” as Hinduism does. Christianity is a religion akin to karma yoga and bhakti yoga…in which salvation is achieved through a combination of good works and devotion.
Christians don’t need to be sublime philosophers and deep students of Shankara to achieve salvation. All they need is simple devotion and humility. They are like those simple Indians who achieve salvation by good works and japa and puja to their stone idols. Or perhaps like the devotees of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, avatar of Krishna, who achieve holiness by chanting the Hare Krishna maha mantra.
In the same way, Roman Catholics have their rosaries and Tibetan monks their prayer wheels.
You don’t need to understand the Upanishads to get into heaven, thank goodness! Maybe understanding the Upanishads will actually work against you. There’s such a thing as being too smart for your own good!
There are four things man needs to find salvation and none of these require cleverness or philosophical acumen. These are the ‘four roots’ of St Macarius, a Christian mystic: faith, love, humility, and renunciation.
Manopubbaṅgamā dhammā manoseṭṭhā manomayā
Manasā ce paduṭṭhena bhāsati vā karoti vā
Tato naṃ dukkhamanveti cakkaṃ’va vahato padaṃ.
Manopubbaṅgamā dhammā manoseṭṭhā manomayā
Manasā ce pasannena bhāsati vā karoti vā
Tato naṃ sukhamanveti chāyā’va anapāyinī.
A rather brusque description to draw, is it not; “beating up on Christianity?”
I see Schopenhauer’s words as a mater of fact conclusion not needing excess emotion nor in depth philosophizing to arrive at. Time has proved this out.
The events at Galilee did not supplant their ancient wisdom and neither did Islam or Buddhism. Nor will they in the future, I’d suggest.
As for “Nothing in English can quite equal Max Müller’s 50 volume translation of The Sacred Books of the East.” perhaps this was true fifty years ago but since then Srila Prabhupada’s monumental works have appeared and claimed their place as the preeminent works of Vedic knowledge extant. Especially in the Western world.
I agree, as per Srila Prabhupada, that Christianity contains all that is needed to achieve salvation. You yourself know his personal feelings and devotion to Lord Jesus Christ, God’s son, “our guru.”
The apples and oranges comparison I see as a non sequitur.
If eating or contemplating an apple results in liberation/salvation and eating or contemplating an orange achieves like, then this transcends any analogy, mundane defining or word jugglery.
As for the “comparing Shankara with Billy Graham” analogy, how about a comparing of Shankara with, say, a Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur?
Would we then conclude then Advaita is rubbish as compared to Dvaita?
Doesn’t Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur’s Dvaita ultimately have more in common with Billy Graham’s theology than Shankara’s Advaita, despite the immense volume and depth of philosophy and science Shankara’s Veda offers?
Apples and oranges as well?
In truth I agree, we agree, as I’m sure you know, with your conclusion as to simple devotion/Bhakti for everyone. And I mean EVERYONE! (;>)
Lord Sri Krishna Balarama ki jaya!
All glory to Lord Jesus!
Srila Prabhupada jaya jaya!
——————————————————————————–
Bhagavad-gītā As It Is 10.42
TRANSLATION
But what need is there, Arjuna, for all this detailed knowledge? With a single fragment of Myself I pervade and support this entire universe.
PURPORT
The Supreme Lord is represented throughout the entire material universes by His entering into all things as the Supersoul. The Lord here tells Arjuna that there is no point in understanding how things exist in their separate opulence and grandeur. He should know that all things are existing due to Kṛṣṇa’s (God) entering them as Supersoul. From Brahmā, the most gigantic entity, on down to the smallest ant, all are existing because the Lord has entered each and all and is sustaining them.
Thanks, Homer. As usual, I stand corrected. Sometimes I argue for argument’s sake. BTW, are these Indian religious texts you mention and quote easily available in book form? And is there an online link?
Xanadu, simply Google – Vedabase.
As for below – uh-huh.. (I knew that)
The old log in the eye trick.
I have heard this a lot that the Jews control through Christianity and I don’t believe it. Ordinary Jews loath Christianity as much as John Kaminsky does. They are probably reading his rant with glee. I agree with Darkmoon, read the best of a religion not the worst. Read Dionysius the Pseudo-Areopagite, start with Mystical Theology, and Letters 9 & 10. Christian monks copied the Greek classics for a thousand years and without their work we would have no Classics departments. Part of the reason we trust our observations (impericism) is due to the Franciscans who developed a method of contemplation that relied on direct observation of the natural world. Christian culture has given us sublime music and art because the beautiful is an attribute of God, as is Truth. It’s possible to be a Christian and to have only one name for God and that is Truth. But getting back to Christianity as an evil tool in the hands of the Jews–hog wash. They haven’t a clue–seriously not a clue. And it really isn’t being anti-semitic to say this because it’s simply the way it is. Christianity is a rival religion and the enemy. I just don’t agree with what you are saying, John, although I do think you are a courageous man who has given a lot up to speak your mind. Has it ever occurred to you, though, that you might be in the clutches of Jewish propaganda against Christianity—your rant has a certain ring to it that I recognize.
John Kaminski knows a few things, but like many with a little knowledge and less ability to think, he runs off into the territory of universal explanation. I agree with his central premise, it is essential for people today to throw off judaic propaganda which infects many areas of study. I would be the first to agree that Christianity has the trojan horse virus of judaism. Despite that, however, it is or was the attempt to liberate mankind from judaic vengeance. Like vaccines and antidotes, you need a little bit of the poison to counteract the poison. I believe it would be better “strengthen the things that remain” (Rev.) and work within the Catholic Church to reaffirm its historic teachings re the Jews – not this modern pabulum of the judaizers.
John kaminski needs to subscribe to Culture Wars!
Arthur Schopenhauer seems to be as much ignorant of Hinduism as most Zionist Christians are ignorant of Judaism. Both Hinduism and Judaism are based on racism and hatred toward non-tribes. While Hindus worship thousands of god and godesses – Jews worship a piece of land (Holy Land) and world events (Holocaust, anti-Semitism). Among Hindus, there are 220 million outcast (Dalits). In India, over one million female babies are killed each year via abortion and other means. There are over 34 million widows who cannot remary under Hindu law.
Like Judaism and Christianity – a Hindu woman, once married, is not entitled to inheritance from her parents. Contrary to that – marrying a widow is commanded as a great charity in Islam while daughters married or unmarried are entitled to inheritance from their parents.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/plight-of-hindu-widows/
i believe that hinduism had a great and noble start but was terribly perverted by the priest class who craved power over the illiterate believers – the hindu style goyim if you will.
this was told to me by at least two renegade brahmins while in india last summer.
they were thoroughly ashamed and repentant and disowned their class, shaved off the little pony tail, stopped the rigorous routine of sturctured prayers and all.
so i say,
let’s not throw the hindu baby girl with priestly bathwater.
they seem to have been the first to extrapolate the ideas of universality of existence, suffering and ultimate justice from which the great ideas of ethics sprang, jainism, buddhism, christianity and thence islam and sikhism alike.
btw, i really like the sikhs, true men of honor, felt at home among them.
i would not hesitate to partner with them in any venture, be it business or war.
When all is said and done, honor remains the only god that matters. Lose your honor and you lose God. Keep your honor, even as an atheist, and God is in you without you knowing it.
Fully concur, lobro.
Since this is a Christian-centric article I’d add that when Jesus traveled to and through India, (whether true or not the lesson is the reason), he railed at the Brahmins for the very same perversion of Shastra via their caste perversions. And this was 2,000 years ago!
Lord Chaitanya Mahaprabhu did the very same 500 years ago.
There isn’t a place anywhere which isn’t untouched by human fallibility, especially insidiously ongoing since the ubermaterialistic commenced, perpetrated and aggravated by venture capitalism, imperialism and all the rest.
There are no doubt a few select groups whom are in all truth “better” than most through their ideals backed up with actions supporting these ideals of honor, respect, compassion.
These groups are not always so easy to designate either, to classify or brand one way or another.
I agree the Sikhs are one as are Hezbollah and in fact the Quakers. I’m sure there are many other groups but none get much press as is the norm.
First and foremost everything starts at home so as usual, same as it’s ever been, individuals and individualism is key.
You lobro are a perfect example.
jesus threw rupee-changers out of the temple!?
my man …
and yes, hezbollah and quakers are a righteous bunch.
as are jain, according to what i’ve been told.
less sure about parsi, but giving them benefit of doubt for time being.
I’m not sure what John Kaminiski meant by Alexandrian Jews invented Christianity but I have a hunch. There is so much brilliant archeology of the Bible that it’s a little overwhelming when someone buys into rehashed James Frazer and I’m afraid that is what John Kaminiski might have done. The classical scholars of the 19th Century made the mistake of interpreting the ancient world from the perspective of late antique Greek writers, and this is what James Frazer used as a foundation for his work. However, when 20th Century archeologists began to piece together the ancient world (a world that is being destroyed before our very eyes) they realized the Greeks had merely projected their own prejudice onto ancient religions and so Frazer’s ideas were proved wrong–there were no resurrecting gods like he promoted, etc. Occultist who have huge imaginations and make it their business to take possession of all “rejected knowledge” took over the cause of James Frazer, the ressurrecting gods, Egypt (from the Greek point of view), and the occult “secret chiefs” who have more cunning than imagination promoted this fabricated version of the ancient world as the new world religion. (Plus they stuff it to the brim with anti-Christian occult rants like Aleister Crowley’s) Well, we don’t have to speculate too far to understand who the “secret chiefs” were (and possibly are). In fact, Christianity was not invented in Alexandria but in Palestine. The New Testament is a text with a context and that context is well known. The Gospels were hymns until written down in the mid to late 1st century and they were mostly written down in either Palestine or Turkey. St. Paul was from Turkey. The only Biblical text I can think of that was composed in Alexandria ( a completely Greek City from which the Eygptians were excluded) was the Book of Wisdom and it isn’t part of the Hebrew Bible. That isn’t to say that Egypt didn’t have an influence on the Bible since these two regions had a long and convoluted history. Right now the West is benefiting from scholars fleeing the middle east wars and the deep history of the ancient world including Christianity might be rewritten again from an Assyrian point of view… but the Frazer stuff is occult and the occult is probably … hmm do I have to say it?
The modern Christianity was invented by St. Paul (John Hagee of Jesus time) while on hunt for one of Jesus’ apostle who escaped to Damascus. Both Jesus and St. Paul were Judean and not Jews.
The Christian New Testament was written in the first century C.E. in the common Greek of the Mediterranean area and parts of the Middle East at the time. This form of Greek is called Koine Greek. It developed from classical Greek spread by the conquests of Alexander the Great. As different people began to use the tongue, it evolved and changed into Koine Greek between 300 B.C.E. and 300 C.E. This form may have been the second language of Jesus and his apostles – after all, the gospels note that Jesus spoke with Pontius Pilate, who would have been more likely to understand Greek than Aramaic. The New Testament was probably written in Greek because it was the most common language around the Mediterranean at the time.
Like Buddhism – Sikhism also has Hindu roots. Sikhism was started by a Hindu Brahmin Guru Nanak, who grew-up in a Muslim neighborhood. He spent several years in Makkah and Baghdad – learning the ‘Unity’ of the Creator. Sikhism, like Islam is based on the principle of ‘One Supreme Allah’, but carry-on many Hindu cultures. However, modern Sikhism was invented by a Hindu Marhata warlord, Guru Gobind Singh.
Barack Obama, who is portrayed as the representative of America’s African minority and a great believer in Jewish Holocaust by Nazis – refuses to recognize Sikh genocide by Hindus in India and during his December 2010 visit to India – refused to visit Sikhism most holy site, the Golden Temple in Amritsar – fearing that by wearing the customary ‘Turban’, could remind the Jewish Lobby of Obama’s Muslim father.
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/obama-and-minority-rights-in-india/
hey you guys, rehmat and kapoore.
appreciate your sharing the erudition and will remember the gist (the only thing i can retain, but forever).
so koine was like internet english of its time … glad that new testament wasn’t written today, it would feature exchanges like roman soldier: “lol”,
disciple: “stfu”
and so on.
it just struck me why christians are unreliable allies.
it is because they are unreliable christians.
@ Lobro
it just struck me why christians are unreliable allies. it is because they are unreliable christians.
I’m glad you’ve seen through Darkmoon at last. After all, this woman is a professed Christian. As such, your negative comment about Christians is obviously directed at her. She is not only an “unreliable Christian” but also an “unreliable ally.”
The way forward is the way of gentleness and peace. I don’t myself despise Christians. It can’t be helped if they’re on the wrong path. In a sense, they need to be re-educated and shown the folly of their ways.
One of the best ways to achieve a greater understanding between Christians and Jews is to start teaching Christian children in school, from the earliest possible age, the good points about Zionism and the necessity of backing Israel against the anti-Semites.
This is one way:
http://www.cufi.org/site/PageServer?pagename=kids_homepage
The hostility to Israel I have encountered on this website is beyond my comprehension. It has to have a patholgical basis. The more I read Darkmoon’s articles and posts, the more I realize this woman is mentally unbalanced.
She has to be crazy to hate Israel.
jake, let me make this short.
today’s christians are unreliable christians precisely because they evicted jesus christ from the discourse.
you know, the same hesus christ which talmud has hung upside down submerged in vat of boiling excrement.
in this sense, unreliable christians and reliable talmudists’ paths are converging towards a fine harmony.
Discuss Christianity with real Christians not masked dis/misinformation lying Jew
Kaminiski is all his glory
“John Kaminski’s persona is that of is a hatemongering outraged pseudo-intellectual burnt-out beatnick-wannabe. He has always been a Marxist, so naturally he promotes nihilism, suicide, and other Kike tactics for the “goyim”. Kaminski talks a complete pile of rubbish, especially when discussing Church history.
A typical example of Kaminski’s kikish lies and lunatic ravings:
“The creation of the Christian bible is actually the principal template for deception that has been followed ever since its clumsy conception in 325 AD by a group later called “a synod of fools and madmen.” Uttered as it was by the Empress Irene, a Khazarian Jew serving as de facto Pope in 787 AD, one can only wonder what from the original Bible was lost as she changed the lineage of Jesus from Galilean to Jewish.”
Re Kaminski’s lies:
The canonicity of the Bible was established centuries before Nicea. It was never “conceived” anywhere at any time. Therefore Kaminksi is in eror when he asserts that “the Christian bible [had a] clumsy conception in 325 AD.
The Seven Ecumenical Councils were: 325: Nicea; 381: Constantinople; 431: Ephesus; 451: Chalcedon; 553: Constantinople; 680: Constantinople; 787: Nicea. It was the invalid council of Constantinople in 785 A.D. that was denounced as “a synod of fools and mad men” at the valid Council of Nicea in 787 A.D. Therefore Kaminski is in error when he incorrectly refers to the canonical 325 Nicaean council by a term that was canonically applied to the uncanonical 787 Nicaean council. He’s obviously just regurgitating the kind of anti-Christ nonsense of the Freemason Lyman Stowe (1907: “Bible Astrology: The Bible Founded on Astrology”), and the Blavatskyites, and Gourdieffites, and Albert Pike, and Eliphas Levy, ad nauseum. [Please see, "Lucifer's United Nations".]
Kaminski alleges that an Athenian woman was a Khazari “de facto” pope. His error, or lie is based on a confusion of the Athenian Empress Irene Sarantapechaina, with Princess Tzitzak, whose baptismal name was Irene. How could the Empress Irene Sarantapechaina the Athenian have been a Khazar? She was thoroughly Greek, married to Leo IV. Leo IV’s mother, Tzitak, was a Khazari princess. And this a century before any Khazar became a Jew. The liar Kaminski describes the Empress Irene as “Khazarian” in an attempt to imply that she was somehow disreputable and somehow Kike. The point of all this “Khazar” nonsense (regarding Irene & Leo) that the Kikestan-in-Palestines spread, is to imply or assert that the Christian Roman Empire and the Orthodox Church were controlled by Kikestan-in-Palestines. How this could have been is never really explained. The reason they do it is because the Christian Roman Empire (“Byzantium) was the most successful and powerful Christian nation, and it kept Kikestan-in-Palestines out of education and politics. It’s “Khazar nonsense” because Princess Tzazak/Irene died in 750. In fact, the Empress Irene the Athenian was in constant conflict with the enemies of Orthodoxy, including her husband, his brother, and her son. All of them were iconoclasts and she is together with St John of Damascus known as the greatest defender of icons and the monasteries. Therefore the suggestion that she was in any sense Kike/Jewish/Judaic is especially ridiculous. And how on Earth was she “the de facto Pope”? The ecclesiastical authority in the empire was the Patriarch of Constantinople. Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne as “Holy Roman Emperor” precisely because Charlmagne refused to recognize Irene as Empress. How could she be the “de facto” pope when Leo III was pope, and anyway the ecclesiastical authority in the empire was the Patriarch of Constantinople, not the so-called pope. To summarize: It’s absurd to suggest that Empress Irene was in any way “de facto pope” when (a) Leo III was “pope” [i.e Bishop of Rome] (b) the Bishop of Rome had no authority whatsoever over the Church of Constantinople, and (c) the canonical authority in the Church of Consataninople, and the chief cleric of the empire, was the Patriarch of Constantinople. And how could she have been the “de facto pope” (or anything) in 787, when she only reigned from 797 to 802? And how could she “utter” anything about a single word in the Bible when she had absolutely no authority to do so, and besides that she never did. Nor was the text of the Bible altered in any way at the Council of Nicea in 787! [In other rants, Kaminski also confuses the Emperor Leo IV (750–780) with Pope Leo IV (847–855).] Kaminski attributed actions and a role to Empress Irene, the Athenian wife of Emperor Leo IV, that she neither did nor was ever in any position to do. His chronology is at least ten years off, anyway. His purpose is also to make stupid people believe that the New Testament was “uttered” (?) by Empress Irene ten years before she became Empress and also somehow, magically, in 325.
These are facts. A few simple internet searches for those who are not very knowledgeable about history would be enough to ascertain the foolishness of Kamanski’s statements. But instead we are treated to Talmudic “arguments” based on ad hominem, ipse dixit, and argumentum ad verecundiam fallacies. This is how The Kike operates.
The facts, for review, are:
Emperor Constantine V lived from 718 to 775, and reigned from 741 to 775.
Emperor Constantine V was married to the Khazar Princess Tzitzak, daughter of Bihar. (They married in 732.)
Princess Tzitzak was baptised as Irene.
Emperor Constantine was an Iconocalst. He was opposed to icons of Christ (i.e. he took the Judaic and Muslim position (later also the puritanical position)). He assaulted monks, monasteries and the Church in general. His wife Tzitzak/Irene was a true Orthodox Christian, and defended the Church, the monks, and the Iconography of Christ.
Emperor Constantine V and his wife Tzitzak/Irene had a son, who became Emperor Leo IV.
Because his mother was Khazarian, Leo IV is referred to as “Leo the Khazar”.
Emperor Leo IV lived from 750 to 780. He was ceremonially co-emperor from 771, and actually emperor from 775 to 780.
Leo IV married Irene Sarantapechaina in 769.
Irene Sarantapechaina was a Greek, and is known as “Irene the Athenian”
Leo IV began his short reign as an Iconoclast, and persecuted the Church, just as his father (Constantine V) and grandfather (Leo II) had done. Leo IV was very influenced by his wife to become slightly more tolerant of Orthodox teachings regarding iconography, monasticism, and so on.
When Leo IV died in 780, his wife, Irene the Athenian, became guardian of the infant Emperor Constantine VI (771–797). She was the empress of the Christian Roman Empire 797 to 802. She is blessed in the Church as one of the Church’s greatest defenders.
Khazars converted to Judaism sometime between 790 and the early ninth century.
Kaminski appears to be stoned when he writes:
“The letter J had yet to be invented in 325 AD. Hesus was a Druidic divinity, the Emperor Constantine was a Brit, Krishna was the oldest god on the planet. This is where the name comes from. Any stories about JC flying around and doing anything are fiction. Occasionally, good fiction.”
”
Read the rest….
http://whatdoyoubelieve.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-413.html
highly informative, erudite post.
although it is true that kaminski is an old hippie and that shooting from the hip characterizes that breed, i nevertheless feel that his heart is in the right place.
these old rebels are sometimes apt to toss the baby out with the bathwater in their instinctive recoil from authority and history is a notoriously slippery and refractive topic, the history of history is one of shamless, blatant manipulation.
it stands to reason that manipulation weakens with distnace from political convenience, hence the more ancient the history, the more reliable the narrative.
except with jews, since their earliest pseudo-history is a political prop just like holocaust and equally fraudulent.
John Kaminski views all religion as simply dope for the masses without understanding much about it himself. He seems to advocate that people should drive their car through the front window of a bank or synagogue. I don’t think modern day Christianity is anything like what Jesus taught to begin with and it is my belief that what Jesus taught was more like Hinduism anyway. And it is not a belief system at all but a form of practice to achieve actual results. His mailing list is also a rather strange bunch of people in my opinion. They seem to think also that everything bad happening in the world is because of haarp.
Tantrism is an area I feel is extremely distorted in the modern Christian world. The Gnostic Gospel of Thomas conveniently disappeared. It hints at Tantrism and very much parallels Buddhist thought on this subject. Why do I say this? Well Thomas uses phrases such as the two must become one to experience heaven referencing male and female coupling. Man must be reborn. How does man be reborn? He must once again enter into the birth canal. Negative and positive energy are the highest forms in the universe. They cause lighting in the sky and a baby to form in the mother’s womb. It is my contention and that of many others that Mary Magdelene was called a prostitute was because she was a female monk and practiced Tantra. Yes she was the disciple that Jesus loved and Thomas was his twin brother if we are to believe the Nag Hammadi texts. gnosis. So we are not talking about a belief system but one of action.
Gospel of Thomas/Sacred Texts
Jesus made reference using the term “be wise as serpents!” Well how do you be wise as serpents? Serpents coil together lying motionless. The energy both positive and negative begins to swirl in a circle. Such simple concepts have been lost in series of long debates leading nowhere.
http://dublinsmick.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/the-germans-call-it-mehr-als-leben-more-than-living/
http://www.elephantjournal.com/2011/05/before-buddha-became-a-buddhist-he-was-a-yogi/
A hindu describes Jesus versus Churchianity
http://www.hinduism.co.za/jesus.htm#whyahindu
Was Jesus a yogi? We know Siddhartha was before he became a Buddhist. He is said to have sat under the banyin tree and practiced tantrayana with his consort where he became enlightened.
http://www.hinduism.co.za/jesus.htm#Was%20Christ%20a%20Yogi?
thanks for another non-ranting, non-simpletonic post, this time by a mick.
reading it is such a pleasure that i am grateful for my ignorance of the subject.
maybe because of severe taboos and constraints, our societies regard for matters of sex is pathetically twisted and rationally discussing the issue is a difficult task.
it seems easier to slide into psychosis than liberate oneself from it, if indian experience is any indication.
i wondered at the base reliefs along the walls of the temple in karnak/orissa unabashedly celebrating the above cited union, then wondered equally at the supremenly anal-retentive present day culture after neurosurgical procedures by brits.
hm, will peruse the links and more importantly, think about it.
sex in our culture is an act of war, not union.
an aside: if you were to drive your car through the window of a bank and kept going, you’d exit through the window of a synagogue, and vice versa.
worth buying a car, just for that.
It might be time to ask ourselves why all great masters come from the east. In the west we produce, Billy Graham, Oral Roberts, Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggerty, Jerry Falwell and Jim Jones.
China, India, Japan, Siberia and most of the east practice Tantrayana. When something isn’t working maybe it is time to take a look at it.
The British warlord Constantine killed the Vedic Pope in the Vatka or vatican. Up until that time Vedic doctrine was world wide. He then gathered his wise men together to piece together the bible. What many or unaware of is that Constantine actually journeyed to India to study under Vedic masters. He knew what to eliminate and what to incorporate in order to short circuit religion and produce a pliable congregation which would be loyal and complacent to bolster a sagging roman empire.
It is there something about Jesus lamenting to the scribes that they not only do not wish to experience the kingdom, but wish to deny it to others? Sexual teachings are no longer the gateway to enlightenment but the original sin. The priest can explain how to deliver you from these evil lusts if you listen to them. Give them money.
A watered down Christianity is rather a simple program, you must believe. It can work from nine years of age to 90. The nine year old can preach to the masses. It is so simple, they believe and the masses do not. Someone’s head is sprinkled with water, they say they believe and are transported to heaven upon their death. The bible is the blueprint. Unfortunately if we believe the dead sea scrolls and I do, that doesn’t seem to be what Jesus is saying. He is says the scriptures are the dead words of dead men, seek the living God in the temple of the spirit, the body.
http://www.essene.com/GospelOfPeace/peace1.html
In fact here Jesus sounds like a Yogi or nature american speaking of the earthly mother and the father in heaven. (Great spirit)
These endless debates over scripture do absolutely nothing. The combining of ying and yang accomplishes something. It is a practice, not a belief.
A very interesting and intelligent comment. Are you a Roman Catholic by birth? Based in Ireland? If so, how did you become so interested in Vedic lore and Indian philosophy? Has it made you abandon Catholicism? Or has it given a bizarre new twist to your interpretation of Christianity? What proof is there, incidentally, that Christ went to India and studied under the mahatmas?