Pornography’s Effect on the Brain, (PART 2)

Pornography is no longer the relatively mild aphrodisiac it used to be in the Summer of Love, 1967, when the Sexual Revolution first began to take off.  With the advent of the internet and the advance in audiovisual communications, its lethality has increased exponentially. Future advances in the area of holographic images and reality drugs threaten to make porn so irresistible to future generations that ordinary sex as we know it will pale into insignificance and fail to exercise its customary charms. Autoeroticism will then reign supreme; and the zombie sex addict, dead-eyed and drooling with unquenchable lust, will inherit the earth and turn it into a vast masturbatorium. . .

To continue, click HERE.

COMMENTS  WELCOME, preferable on the Occidental Observer website. But if you wish to leave your comments here, feel free to do so.

Many thanks,

Lasha Darkmoon

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website,, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

32 thoughts on “Pornography’s Effect on the Brain, (PART 2)

  1. It would appear that Dr. Darkmoon has suffered from an eclipse of principles of generalization. If homosexuality can be cured by this method, then why not heterosexuality? It seems obvious that by using the same methods, people would easily shift to homosexual preferences. She assumes that heterosexuality has not been conditioned. By what logic? In fact, she pathologizes homosexuality and privileges heterosexuality. Is this because she cannot reason beyond her conditioning? Apparently she has been so strongly conditioned that any other possibility is dark to her reasoning.

    In fact, many people have wished they were homosexual (but found themselves not sexually attracted to same sex partners) and this research could be used to help people overcome their previous conditioning!!!

    I am amazed that the “politically correct” members of the research community did not figure this out. This is not a method for normalizing society to the fretful needs of the normal, but to allow preferences to be reset: Clockwork Orange Under a Darkmoon.

    It behooves social scientists to become as aware of their biases as they are of the biases of their subjects. Perhaps several shots of semiotics before writing?

    G Neff, Ph.D. (Psychology)

    1. Thanks, Neffy. You make a good point. It had never occurred to me that I’d been genetically conditioned to like the oppposite sex rather than my own. Damn those pesky genes!

      So where do I go to apply for homosexual conditioning? How do I go about turning myself into a lesbian? Any tips?

      Trouble is, I like the way I am. I’m not sure I’d like to hop into bed with Madelene Albright, even if I was conditioned! 🙂

      1. don’t you see that you illustrate neff’s point perfectly?
        your argument is that you are what you are and should be left that way without reconditioning.

        if a homosexual were to present the exact same graphic arguments for his preferences as you just did, e.g., a bunch of preening beefcakes over lovely madeleine albright, how could a turing machine figure out who is the test subject some anon female or an equally anonymous homo?

        or put it another way: had you been born inside a male incarnation, would you agree to a frankensteinian surgery that would make you hop into bed with Madelene Albright?

        aside: looking at that gallery of musclebound nozzleheads, i wonder how many of them prefer each other’s company to a female one (not necessarily mad albright’s).

        in the end, this thread barely touches upon the only question of interest.

        at what point does the hormone stream impact on one’s ability to act in a morally defensible way.
        (and it goes without saying that the term “morally defensible” is in dire need of reasonable definition – mine would be something simple and symmetrical like “do to others as you would have others do to you”)

      2. sliding off on a tangent here, my favorite sport.
        in that hunk gallery, so many captions say stuff like “ooh, aah, grunt, i wanna marry you”.

        why are women stuck on marriage per se … guys never talk about marriage except as an object of dread.

        where i live is a popular wedding destination, whenever it happens, all the women in neighborhood get excited, rubbernecking, come running out with cameras, like it is an amazing circus act (with a high price of admission).

  2. As a general rule, I’d agree that men look upon marriage with dread. However, there are a few men around (I know them) who really want to be married, have children, do the whole domestic thing, behave themselves, etc. without any prompting from anyone. Of course down the line, it may not work out a they had planned, marriage doesn’t automatically make you happy just because you wanted it. But that doesn’t change the fact that some youngish men do want marriage!

    1. wyandotte, i agree with the general concept, except for the qualifier “and behave themselves”.
      i hold out the possibility to behave oneself outside the institution.

      but i think i was referring more to the spectacle of wedding … something i find quite stressful, even when i am not a protagonist.

      and on the subject of children, i don’t think anyone should be granted the license unless prepared to ensure that the kids turn out better than the parents.
      otherwise, what’s the point, that the world suffers a shortage of people?

      1. I’m not sure that it’s possible to guarantee that children are going to “turn out” better than the parents. First, the parents would have to build a sane society. That isn’t doable at this stage, we are too far gone – yet some people still want to have children no matter what!

  3. people other countries, 3rd world sorts, accept marriage as part of life. a necessity.
    it is how life continues. it is how the culture continues.
    things americans believe, probably from novels, silly movies, dont enter their thinking.

    of course what i keyboard may not be close to the discusssion. i read a word here there.

  4. Jews will attempt to mainstream pedophilia next. In addition, with the proliferation of porn on the internet, it should be noted that for years now that female performers almost always perform heavily trimmed and waxed so no pubic hair shows but only a bare genital area. Is this a deliberate attempt to echo extreme youth, desensitize people to an unnatural female appearance, and therefore set the table for pedophilia? Not trying to be pervy, but Jews play the long game, and with them nothing can be ruled out.–want-to-have-sex-with-children

    (This correspondence is not regarded as “confidential” since the sender’s identity has been protected).

    Hi Darkmoon,

    Can you tell me what is considered to be compulsive behavior of masturbation, once per day? once per 2 days, per week?

    Is it the same effect if you have sex with your partner exact same amount of times as you would masturbate on the brain?

    Thank you,


    1. Hi JS,

      Those who masturbate must make up their own minds if they are behaving compulsively. If they wish to stop masturbating and cannot, they are clearly in the grip of an addiction and therefore acting “under compulsion”.

      Most people who drink do not regard themselves as alcoholics. It’s not a problem for them. But some people drink to excess and know it, and they find it hard to cut down on their drinking, and they diagnose themselves as “alcoholics”. They then seek out help from such organizations as Alcoholics Anonymous. It’s exactly the same with sex. Just as there are alcohol addicts, there are sex addicts. If they refuse to recognize their addictions and bury their hands in the sand, they must take the consequences of their folly.

      An example of compulsive masturbation was provided in Part 2 of the article: the case of “Ralph”. He was addicted to pornography and masturbated to it. He went to a doctor for help. Would he have done so if he’d felt he had no problem? He even lost $1000 on a bet that he could not stop masturbation to pornography. By any definition, I guess you could call this “compulsive masturbation.”

      I doubt if moderate masturbation damages the frontal lobes, but the numerous quotations I gave were all from reputable scientific sources, including a professor of neurology at Texas University and world famous sex addiction counselor Dr Victor Kline. I am not myself making moral judgments. If people wish to masturbate, I am certainly not telling them to stop. I am not a preacher. I am, as I say, merely citing the latest scientific research.

      In a previous article, Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance, I gave the case of sex killer Thomas Schiro who started masturbating at the age of six to pornography and continued throughout his life, doing it 10-12 times a day. By any sane definition, this is “compulsive masturbation.” Serial killer Ted Bundy blamed pornography and compulsive masturbation for his descent into psychopathy. He had nothing to gain by lying, since he said this to his medical interviewer on the eve of his execution when it was too late for a reprieve.

      I know you will not be impressed by any of these arguments. That’s okay with me. I am not in the business of trying to convert people or stop them masturbating. My role as a writer is simply to lay out the facts. You must decide for yourself if you wish to accept those facts or reject them.

      Experience has taught me that those with a strong addiction to masturbation usually reject the facts. Such people only accept with equanimity what they wish to hear.

      Best wishes,

      Lasha Darkmoon

      1. (Posted by Darkmoon on behalf of J.S.)

        Thank you for this valuable information.

        I know that almost all male population masturbate, so I tried to keep not to, for 8 months. I felt an enormous amount of energy that months, psychic and physical, but after that I had sex with my ex girlfriend and somehow felt release in a few days, so I agree that masturbation damage the brain and cause addiction if connected to pornography, because I found that myself when I was also doing research with my hypnotherapist years ago that it affects, although she tried to convince me the opposite, that masturbation is a normal and perfectly okay condition. I knew that it isn’t it.

        I also felt uncontrollable behavior, lack of psychic abilities after masturbation, it means that affects the brain in a negative way, but it as you wrote, it releases dopamine and does effects similar to other drugs. But I don’t know if there are difference if you get release of that dopamine with regular sex with some partner or masturbation for the brains.

        Please let me know what you think.

        thank you,


      2. Have no fear whatsoever about sexual intercourse with a human being. This is almost never addictive or “compulsive”, especially within a loving relationship.

        Sex with your wife or girlfriend is normal and healthy. This cannot possibly damage your brain. If that were the case, the entire human race would be brain-damaged!

        Best wishes,

        Lasha Darkmoon

      3. Have no fear whatsoever about sexual intercourse with a human being. This is almost never addictive or “compulsive”…

        yeah, human beings are ok. try and avoid animals, blowup dolls, sexbots, robots, golems, zombies, lamias, tulpas and assorted phantasms. o yeah and avoid solo if you can. better still, join monastery or blow your brains out.

      4. Talmud strictly forbid masturbation. To the grade that parents are advised do nor allow their sons of the corresponding age to sleep on their backs or stomachs – just on the side. In accordance with formal talmudic teachings masturbation is punishable with death. In traditional Christian doctrine masturbation – is deadly sin, that doesn’t allow ascent to Heaven. In XX “jewish century” psychologists, psychotherapists, media – all jewish controlled sources, made masturbation look “completely normal”, “acceptable” and even “recommended” in school (?!). Cant you see the picture? It is evident.

  6. Here’s a 5,000 year old Perspective..

    “Arjuna said: O descendant of Vrsni, by what is one impelled to sinful acts,
    even unwillingly, as if engaged by force.

    “The Blessed Lord said: It is lust only, Arjuna, which is born of contact of the
    material modes of passion and later transformed into wrath, and which is the
    all-devouring, sinful enemy of this world.

    “As fire is covered by smoke, as a mirror is covered by dust, or as an embryo
    is covered by the womb, similarly, the living entity is covered by different
    degrees of this lust.

    “Thus a man’s pure consciousness is covered by his eternal enemy in the form of
    lust, which is never satisfied and which burns like fire.

    “The senses, the mind and the intelligence are the sitting places of this lust,
    which veils the real knowledge of the living entity and bewilders him

    “Therefore, O Arjuna, best of the Bharatas, in the very beginning curb this
    great symbol of sin [lust] by regulating the senses, and slay this destroyer of
    knowledge and self-realization…” (Bhagavad-gita 3.36-41)

    1. Homer,

      Thanks for this great quotation from the Gita. “Regulating the senses” must here be interpreted, I think, as “curbing the eye.” The eye is the major portal of lust.

      The disciple must purify his heart first by prayer and meditation. And maybe by fasting (or tapas). But the best fast of all is the “fast of the eye”. The eye is like a wild horse and needs to be reined in at all times.

      What does eye tapas, or eye ascesis as I prefer to call it, consist of? It means avoiding “the lust of the eye” by going around with lowered eyes. This entails: (a) not looking at the objects of lust, and (b) looking away quickly if one’s eyes happen to fall on such an object.

      This logically entails the complete renunciation of TV, movies, magazines and newspapers — all sources of potential contamination. This is all the more necessary when we understand what kind of people own the mass media, i.e., the merchants of obscenity.

      It isn’t easy learning to curb the eye. This is one of the hardest skills to acquire.

  7. Remember the chariot?

    Mighty horses are the unruly senses.
    Reins are the mind used to control the senses.
    Driver is the intelligence in control of the reins.
    You are the terrified passenger waiting for the inevitable disaster if the driver (intelligence) doesn’t employ the mind (reins) to control those chomping at the bit senses which are ready, willing and able to run you right off the cliff; as it were.

    It’s near impossible to not look.
    Like biting into a juicy peach and not tasting.

    Go ahead and look but be ready willing and able to see your mother, sister, daughter in place of animal lust.
    Cleansing of the heart means the eyes, ears, tongue will fall in line.

    This is civilized. Who says tapas have to be painful?

  8. Go ahead and look but be ready willing and able to see your mother, sister, daughter in place of animal lust.

    Thanks for quoting that bit about the chariot, the horse and the reins. So apt. You can’t beat the Vedic sages.

    The bit about seeing in every woman your mother, sister and daughter is good advice, too, and I’ve heard it before from both Eastern and Western sources.

    I recollect from my reading of medieval history a story about some French Catholic saint — I think it was St Louis — who lived in a famous monastery in France. He was so fanatical about curbing the “lust of the eye” that whenever female visitors entered the cloisters he used to turn round and run!

    The story goes that once his own mother visited him in the monastery and he refused to see her because she was a woman. He went and hid in a cupboard. Think of that!

    And this was the Middle Ages when women were clothed from head to foot in voluminous, ankle-length dresses. Even their heads were veiled, since the female hair was regarded as sexually inflammatory. Only very young girls (child virgins) were allowed to go bareheaded.

  9. Yes, this is the way of sannyasins, monks, renounced order.

    They take extraordinary measures to remove even the possibility of accidental error in fulfillment of their dharma.

    Of course, you and I (at least me) are not renounced sannyasins like St. Francis and others of rightful renown..
    How might St. Francis see women?
    In the very same way he saw men and children and birds and fish and deer?
    I think so.

    The opportunity, however, is there for everyone. Even you know who.

  10. @ Lucy Skipping
    (Lasha’s sister)

    Can you comment on the increase I’ve seen in White women “embracing” their overweight or “curvy” status based on their appeal to non-Whites…?

    My belief is that blacks share a more common linkage with other primates than whites — specifically the species of baboon that tends to excite over females with a “pronounced” posterior. In this particular species of baboon, the bigger (and brighter red) the behind, the more attractive she is to the male.

    What do you think about there being a possible correlation between women’s ever-increasing girth, and thus posterior size, in the U.S. — including white women — and the increase in promotion and visibility of blacks’ emphasis on “booty” or curvaceousness as a desirable trait?

    1. @ ‘Guest’ onOccidental Observer

      In answer to your questions:

      (1) It is pretty well known that black women, as a whole, have bigger and more curvy posteriors than White women. Black men definitely find this an attractive feature and seek it out in White women. The more well-endowed a White female is in her buttocks area, the more likely she is to appeal to a black man.

      (2) Fat women as such are not attractive to most men but they can become a fetish. Some fat women actually try to put on weight so as to appeal more to the type of male who is turned on by obesity.

      (3) The overweight White female (plump with big bottom) will often find that a black male finds her attractive while a White male does not. This encourages her to have sexual relationships with black men. She can’t get White men so easily, so she goes with blacks who are willing to take her on.

      (4) Whether the black man’s partiality for big-buttocked females has some correlation with the baboon’s partiality for big-buttocked female baboons is an interesting possibility. No doubt much can be made of it!

      (5) The idea that fat women could be coming into fashion can be dismissed as absurd. The trend is toward slimmer and slimmer women. The fashion industry, led by Jews, is now doing its best to popularize the anorexic model.

      The point is to make ALL women feel neurotic about their weights, forcing them to go on slimming diets that will benefit Big Pharma and produce a future race of skeletal, osteoporotic females.

      There is very little that organized Jewry does that is beneficial to mankind. Almost everything they do seems calculated to create organized chaos and mass misery.

      1. Slim models promoted for two reasons: 1) they look not as fertile female but rather as male adolescent (homosexual connotation). 2) slim anorexic woman is less prone to conceive and carry the child, e.g. slimmer female population obsessed with goal to loose weight will have lower birth rate.

  11. In 2002 the Israeli military force marched into Ramallah and after they did that they took over the TV stations which is pretty much standard procedure but after they did that then something unusual happened. They started broadcasting pornography over the TV stations. This leads you to the question of why were they doing that.

    why indeed.

    the way of luciferian jew is to contaminate everything pure, chaste, noble, beautiful, human.
    he is as hell bent on poisoning the human as his boss is intent on poisoning divine.

    the effortless manner in which he succeeded so far makes me believe that his fall from grace will be correspondingly more spectacular.

    1. Infections, contamination, toxins – all are weapons. You can infect the organism, contaminate the drinking water, make the food toxic etc.. It will harm the body, corporal structure of your enemy. This will work against humans or animals alike. Chemical, biological, nuclear (for example deadliest cobalt bomb) weapons of mass destruction work like that. But you can also infect minds, contaminate information space, create ambient of toxic culture. And these will work agains humans who possess second signal system (gift of word). These are weapons of mass destruction in information space. TV here possess unsurpassed destructive power for minds. There are laws against environmental contamination but nothing against harmful information – unfortunately.

Comments are closed.