Key Quotations from ‘You Gentiles’ — by Maurice Samuel

Maurice Samuel (1895 – 1972) was a Romanian-born Zionist Jew whose most influential book, You Gentiles, was published in 1924. This offered a penetrating analysis of the Jewish psyche and made the important point that Jews were altogether so superior and spiritually advanced compared to gentiles that there was no possibility of the two groups getting on together. Owing to the baser nature of the gentiles, and the fact that they did not take God seriously like the Jews, it was inevitable that Jews and gentiles should be at loggerheads for ever. (LD)

Here are some key quotations from the book:

I. The Question

“Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and to those around him. Ever since he has been scattered in your midst he has had to maintain a continuous struggle for the conservation of his identity.” (p. 10).

“Years of observation and thought have given increasing strength to the belief that we Jews stand apart from you gentiles, that a primal duality breaks the humanity I know into two distinct parts; that this duality is a fundamental, and that all differences among you gentiles are trivialities compared with that which divided all of you from us.” (p. 12).

“You may even have Jews in your midst who did not learn their way of life from us, and did not inherit it from a Jewish forebear. We may have authentic gentiles in our midst: these single protests are of no account; they are extreme and irrelevant variations.” (p. 21).
“I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever – not a mere conviction, not a mere language, not a mere difference of national or religious allegiance.” (p. 23-24).

“You have your way of life, we ours. In your system of life we are essentially without ‘honor’. In our system of life you are essentially without morality. In your system of life we must forever appear graceless; to us you must forever appear godless.” (p. 34).

“We belong to the One mastering God: you belong to the republic of playful gods. ” (p. 36).

“These are two ways of life, each utterly alien to the other. Each has its place in the world – but they cannot flourish in the same soil, they cannot remain in contact without antagonism. Though to life itself each way is a perfect utterance, to each other they are enemies.” (p. 36-37)

II Sport

“THE most amazing thing in your life, the most in contrast with ours, is its sport. By this I do not mean simply your fondness for physical exercise, your physical exuberance, but the psychological and social institutionalization of sport, its organization, its predominant rôle as the outlet and expression of your spiritual energies.” (p. 38)

“Your spirit is sport: particularly your young men, who are not yet absorbed in the struggle for existence, and whose emotions are therefore for the largest part free, must find in sport, in games, in contests, the most satisfactory expression of their instincts.” (p. 40)

“The contention of the majority of your educators, that the moral instinct is trained on the football and baseball field, in boxing, rowing, wrestling and other contests, is a true one, is truer, perhaps, than most of them realize. Your ideal morality is a sporting morality. The intense discipline of the game, the spirit of fair play, the qualities of endurance, of good humor, of conventionalized seriousness in effort, of loyalty, of struggle without malice or bitterness, of readiness to forget like a sport – all these are brought out in their sheerest and cleanest starkness in well-organized and closely regulated college sports. And on the experiences and lessons which these sports imply your entire spiritual life is inevitably founded.” (p. 42)

“Sport is for you a serious spiritual matter. It is the proper symbolization, the perfect ritual, wherein your spiritual forces, finding expression, also find exercise and sustenance.” (p. 43)

III Gods

“Our Jewishness is not a creed, it is ourself, our totality. Indeed, it may be fairly said that the surest evidence of your lack of seriousness in religion is the fact that your religions are not national, that you are not compromised and dedicated, en masse, to the faith.” (p. 73).

But in the Jew, nation and people and faculties and culture and God are all one. We do not say: ‘I am a Jew’, meaning, ‘I am a member of this nationality’: the feeling in the Jew, even in the free-thinking Jew like myself, is that to be one with his people is to be thereby admitted to the power of enjoying the infinite. I might say, of ourselves: ‘We and God grew up together’.” (p. 74).

“You have had patron or appropriated gods: we have a national God. In the heart of any pious Jew, God is a Jew. Is your God an Englishman or an American?
There is no real contradiction between this confessed anthropomorphism and my claim that we Jews alone understand and feel the universality of God. In anthropomorphism we merely symbolize God: we reduce the infinite, temporarily, to tangible proportions: we make it accessible to daily reference. ” (p. 75).

IV Utopia

“We are not free to choose and to reject, to play, to construct, to refine. We are a dedicated and enslaved people, predestined to an unchangeable relationship. Freedom at large was not and is not a Jewish ideal. Service, love consecration, these are ideals with us. Freedom means nothing to us: freedom to do what?” (p. 88)

“For us the end is ecstatic unity, the identification of man with God. Your ideal is eternal youth, ours lifts toward an unchanging climax of adult perfection. You would like to play with your gods forever: we will return to God, to the universe. Yours is a sunlit afternoon, with the combatants swaying forever in a joyous struggle. Ours is a whole world, with the spirit of God poured through all things.
Your Ideal is Plato’s Republic: ours is God’s kingdom.” (p. 89-90)

V Loyalty

“For your system of morality is no less a need to you than ours to us. And the incompatibility of the two systems is not passive. You might say: ‘Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.’ But the misfortune is that the two are not merely different. They are opposed in mortal, though tacit, enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other.” (p. 95-96)

VI Discipline

“In the colleges, in the street, in the army, we betray ourselves. Indeed, your very breaches of discipline differ from ours by a certain conscious rebelliousness which is partly homage: our breaches of discipline are off-hand, unconscious, insolent.” (p. 110)

“The fact is, of course, that in true discipline, en effectiveness, we are by no means your inferiors. No one would dream of asserting that our religion is not more effective than yours in compelling obedience, or in perpetuating itself. The mere fact that we have persisted for eighty generations in maintaining a racial and spiritual identity in the face of so much persecution (and, more significant, of so much infiltration of blood) bespeaks essential discipline of amazing rigor and power. […] Yet I have no doubt that when Germany and England and America will long have lost their present identity or purpose, we shall still be strong in ours.” (p. 111).

VII The Reckoning

“I say, therefore, that in the conflict between us you have fought us physically, while our attack on your world has been in the spiritual field. It is the nature of the gentile to fight for his honor, in the nature of the Jew to suffer for this. […] And so, since we have lived among you, you have instinctively appealed to brute force in combating our influence.” (p. 128)

“We are a disturbing influence in your life not through our own fault. First: we are not in your midst by our own will, but through your action; and second (which is more to the point): we do not attack you deliberately. We are unwelcome to you because we are what we are. It is our own positive way of life which clashes with yours. Our attack on you is only incidental to the expression of our way of life. You too have this field open to you. As surely as we are a spiritual discomfort to you, you are a spiritual discomfort to us: as surely as we attack you peacefully, so you waste us peacefully and weaken our numbers.” (p. 129-130)

VIII But as Moderns

“I have already said, anticipating this objection, that there is the same difference between the Jewish atheist and the gentile atheist as between the orthodox Jew and the believing gentile: I have said or implied that the religion itself is but practical expression of the difference between us, not the cause of it. It is true that the expression of a view serves to strengthen it, as the exercise of a faculty serves to develop it. But expression does not create a view nor exercise a faculty. Even conscious adherence to the Jewish people is but partial expression of our Jewishness: it was not the conscious desire to remain a people which gave us the will to endure: it was our unavoidable commonalty of feeling which made us and continued us a people.” (p. 136-137)

“Repudiation of the Jewish religion or even of Jewish racial affiliation does not alter the Jew. Some of us Jews may delude ourselves as some of you gentiles do. But in effect modernization seems to have done nothing to decrease the friction between us. The dislike continues: and though your masses may not know why they dislike us, there must be a sufficient reason: it is Germany, the mother of the modernized Jew, that gave birth, with him, to modern anti-Semitism. Where the old ostensible reasons for disliking the Jew collapsed, new ones, more self-conscious, were substituted. When modernization removed the old, superstitious form of expression, the professor replaced the priest, science religion. We are disliked on ‘scientific’ grounds, as we were disliked on ‘religious’ reasons were rationalizations. The true reasons underlay these analyses.” (p. 137-138)

“We fail to be gentiles.” (p. 140)

“Our best work has been the old, true work of our people – fundamental and serious examination of the problems of man’s relation to God and humanity. In the arts we have been second-rate, third-rate. While in the moral effort we have exceeded any living race and have produced an overwhelming number of revolutionaries and socialists and iconoclasts of the true prophetic type, we have, in science, belles-lettres and the plastic arts been a thoroughly minor people.” (p. 141)

“We have joined your capitalistic world in deliberate emulation and rivalry: yet Jewish socialism and Jewish socialists are the banner bearers of the world’s ‘armies of liberation’.” (p. 142)

”We modern Jews of the Western world are in this fundamentally different from you. The occasional in you (revolution against the Game) is the dominant in us. Your instinct is truer than you know. The dislike of your modern world for the modern Jews is as relevant as the dislike of your for the orthodox Jew.” (p. 142-143)

IX We, the Destroyers

“IF anything, you must learn (and are learning) to dislike the modern and ‘assimilated’ Jew, for he is more dangerous to you. At least the old Jew kept apart from you, was easily recognizable as an individual, as the bearer of the dreaded Jewish world-idea: you were afraid of him and loathed him. But to a large extent he was insulated. But as the Jew assimilates, acquires your languages, cultivates a certain intimacy, penetrates into your life, begins to handle your instruments, you are aware that his nature, once confined safely to his own life, now threatens yours. You are aware of a new and more than disconcerting character at work in the world you have built and are building up, a character which crosses your intentions and thwarts your personality.” (p. 144-145)
“The Jew, whose lack of contact with your world had made him ineffective, becomes effective. The vial is uncorked, the genius is out. His enmity to your way of life was tacit before. To-day it is manifest and active. He cannot help himself: he cannot be different from himself: no more can you. It is futile to tell him: ‘Hands off!’ He is not his own master, but the servant of his lifewill.” (p.145)

“For when he [the Jew] brings into your world his passionately earnest, sinisterly earnest righteousness, absolute righteousness, and, speaking in your languages and through your institutions, scatters distrust of yourselves through the most sensitive of you, he is working against your spirit.” (p. 145)

“I do not believe that we Jews are powerful enough to threaten your way of life seriously. We are only powerful enough to irritate, to disturb your conscience, and to break here and there the rhythmic rush of your ideas. We irritate you as a sardonic and humorless adult irritates young people by laughing at their play. For the real irritation lies in the fact that to our queries regarding your life there is no answer on our level: as to yours regarding our life there is no answer on yours.” (p. 146)

“We Jews are accused of being destroyers: whatever you put up, we tear down. It is true only in a relative sense. We are not iconoclasts deliberately: we are not enemies of your institutions simply because of the dislike between us. We are a homeless mass seeking satisfaction for our constructive instincts. And in your institutions we cannot find satisfaction; they are the play institutions of the splendid children of man – and not of man himself. We try to adapt your institutions to our needs, because while we live we must have expression; and trying to rebuild them for our needs, we unbuild them for yours.” (p. 146-147)

“Because your chief institution is the social structure itself, it is in this that we are most manifestly destroyers.” (p. 147)

“Dislike of the Jew in business springs from the feeling that we regard all your play-conventions with amusement – or even with contempt. Our abominable seriousness breaks jarringly into your life-mood. But you feel our disruptive difference most keenly, most resentfully, in our deliberate efforts to change your social system. We dream of a world of utter justice and God-spirit, a whole world which would be barren for you, devoid of all nourishment, bleak, unfriendly, unsympathetic. You do not want such a world: you are unapt for it. Seen in the dazzling lights of your desires and needs our ideal is repellently morose.” (p. 148-149)

“We do wrong to thrust these ideals upon you, who are not for justice or peace, but for play-living. But we cannot help ourselves: any more than you can help resenting our interference. While we live we must give utterance to our spirit. The most insistent effort on our part will fail to change our nature.” (p. 149)

“He [the Jew] is a citizen of the world; he is a son of humanity; the progress of all humankind, and not of only of any single group of it, is in his particular care.” (p. 150)

“The unbelieving and radical Jew is as different from the radical gentile as the orthodox Jew from the reactionary gentile. The cosmopolitanism of the radical Jew springs from his feeling (shared by the orthodox Jew) that there is no difference between gentile and gentile. You are all pretty much alike: then why this fussing and fretting and fighting? The Jew is not a cosmopolitan in your sense.” (p. 150)

“He is not one who feels keenly the difference between national and nation, and overrides it. For him, as for the orthodox Jew, a single temper runs through all of you, whatever your national divisions. The radical Jew (like the orthodox Jew) is a cosmopolitan in a sense which must be irritating to you: for he does not even understand why you make such a fuss about that most obvious of facts – that you are all alike. The Jew is altogether too much of a cosmopolitan – even for your internationalists.” (p. 151)

“Nor in the handful of you who, against the desires and instincts of the mass of you, proclaim social justice as the life aim, is the Jew any more truly at home, at one with his milieu, than the old-time Jew in his world. Our [Jews’] very radicalism is of a different temper. Our spur is a natural instinct. We do not have to uproot something in ourselves to become ‘radicals’, dreamers of social justice. We are this by instinct: we do not see it as something revolutionary at all. It is tacit with us. But with you it is an effort and a wrench. Your very ancestry cries out against it in your blood… And you become silly and enthusiastic about it, with flag-waving, and shouting, and battle-hymns, and all the regular game-psychology proper to your world and way of life. Even of this you make a play.” (p. 151-152)

“But such as these radical and international movements are, the modern Jew (the best and most thoughtful modern Jew, that is) is nearer to them than to anything else in your world. He is the only true socialist and cosmopolitan – but in such a true and tacit sense that he is completely distinguished from all of you. It is one of many vital paradoxes – a thing illogical and yet true to life. It is our very cosmopolitanism that gives us our national character. Because we are the only ones who are cosmopolitan by instinct rather than by argument we remain forever ourselves.” (p. 152)

In everything we are destroyers – even in the instruments of destruction to which we turn for relief. The very socialism and internationalism through which our choked spirit seeks utterance, which seem to threaten your way of life, are alien to our spirit’s demands and needs. Your socialists and internationalists are not serious. The charm of these movements, the attraction, such as it is, which they exercise, is only in their struggle: it is the fight which draws your gentile radicals. And indeed, it is only as long as there is an element of adventure in being a radical that the radical movement retains any individuality. And it is only in the fierce period of early combat that you welcome us Jews – as allies. You are deluded in this – so are we. You go into the movement boldly, adventurously; we darkly, tacitly. You make it a game; we do it because we cannot help ourselves. And sure enough, in the end, the split comes again. The liberal and the radical are as apt to dislike the Jew as the reactionaries are. The liberal and the radical do not use the weapons of the reactionaries: but the dislike is there, finds expression in anti-Semitic socialist and workers’ movements and in the almost involuntary contempt which springs to the lips of countless intellectuals.” (p. 152-154)

“Philosophies do not remold natures. What your radicals want is another form of the Game, with other rules. Their discontent joins hands with Jewish discontent. But it is not the same kind of discontent. A little distance down the road the ways part for ever. The Jewish radical will turn from your social movement: he will discover his mistake he will discover that nothing can bridge the gulf between you and us. He will discover that the spiritual satisfaction which he thought he would find in social revolution is not to be purchased from you. I believe the movement has already started, the gradual secession of the Jewish radicals, their realization that your radicalism is of the same essential stuff as your conservatism. The disillusionment has set in.” (p. 154)

“A century of partial tolerance gave us Jews access to your world. In that period the great attempt was made, by advance guards of reconciliation, to bring our two worlds together. It was a century of failure. Our Jewish radicals are beginning to understand it dimly.”(p. 154-155)

We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build. Beyond all temporary alliances with this or that faction lies the ultimate split in nature and destiny, the enmity between the Game and God. But those of us who fail to understand that truth will always be found in alliance with your rebellious factions, until disillusionment comes. The wretched fate which scattered us through your midst has thrust this unwelcome rôle upon us.” (p. 155)

XI The Masses

“The nature of things cannot be solved because we partake of that nature. We can never get round ourselves: we can only turn round. Your world spins in a joyous illusion of progress; we, untouched by that illusion, destructive of your mood, stand aside, static, serious. We will be satisfied with nothing but the absolute.” (p. 186-187)

XII Solution and Dissolution

“Does the situation which I have described constitute a problem? Or is it merely one of the insoluble difficulties of life which, being insoluble, should be understood as such and suffered tacitly? Death is not a problem, being inevitable. Is this struggle between our two worlds as inevitable? Shall we resign ourselves to the struggle and do what we can to mitigate its worst effects, or shall we continue the search for a complete solution?
The one solution which is generally offered as complete and satisfactory, is quite apart from its feasibility, not a solution at all: only a dissolution. The disappearance of the Jewish people by complete submergence in the surrounding world would not, in reality, solve the problem; any more than one solves a chess problem by burning chess-board and figures. But it would seem to do the next best thing: it would apparently destroy the situation which creates the problem. The problem, without having been solved, would at any rate cease to exist.” (p. 188-189)

“And by the dissolution of the Jewish people can be meant only one thing – the disappearance of Jewish identity in individuals or amasses, the complete obliteration of Jewish self-consciousness, down to the very name and recollection. When it will be impossible for any man to say of himself, ‘I am a Jew’, or ‘My father or grandfather was a Jew’ this consummation will have been achieved.
There is only one instrument to this end: free and unrestrained intermarriage. This act or fact alone will count. The mere changing of names, the substitution of religious forms, the so-called ‘liberalization’ and ‘modernization’ of Judaism is ineffective: it is a matter of common observation that there is no inverse ratio between the Westernization of the Jew and anti-Semitism. And this very fact will have to be considered again in its relation to the feasibility of this proposal. If we talk of the submergence of the Jew we must not play with words: words alone cannot submerge the Jew. If there is anything in what I have said you cannot make a gentile of a Jew by arguing with him any more than by lynching him. You can make his children half gentile, his grandchildren only a quarter Jewish – and so on till the balance is perfect.” (p. 189-190)

“Will the ‘dissolution of Jewish identity’ by free and prolonged intermarriage resolve the struggle of the two types? Or will the struggle continue in another form, less obvious but equally uncomfortable? Will the struggle center round isolated individuals, recurrent types? Or will the final product be homogeneous and, in relation to this particular struggle, static?”
Both the negative and affirmative answers to this question are unsatisfactory. Suppose, on the one hand, the struggle continues? Suppose the Jewish character persists in strains, breaks out in individual atavisms, long after the Jewish name has perished? The problem will be the same: your world will be confronted with recurrent instances of alien and destructive types, all the more dangerous because they are not isolated in recognized, repudiated group. Their power of destruction will be the greater because they will work from within. The ‘Jewish’ problem will have disappeared, but the gentile problem would remain as bitter as ever. (p. 193-194)

“Let us examine the negative answer. Suppose there are no ‘reversions of type’. Suppose the Jew is so completely absorbed as to be lost beyond possibility of detection in the surrounding world. Such a consummation, if possible, calls for one inevitable condition; that is, the proportionate Judaization of your world. It is unthinkable that so vivid an element as the Jewish people should be absorbed into your world without producing an appreciable alteration in its constitution. A world that has absorbed the Jews will to that extent be a Jewish world.
And this is precisely the condition which you refuse to admit. You want no tampering with your identity; you want to remain what you are. You have no intention of meeting us at the point of balance. You do not want a world tinged with Jewish blood. You want us to be absorbed in you without leaving a trace. And with the best intentions in the world we cannot oblige. We can, in that sense, no more destroy ourselves than we can destroy a single particle of matter.” (p. 194-195)

XIII The Mechanism of Dissolution

“Among yourselves assimilation is problem enough. The birth and death of nations is attended by wars, pains, humiliations. But what you have done a dozen times over in the last four thousand years we have not done once.” (p. 208-209)

We cannot assimilate: it is so humiliating to us that we become contemptible in submitting to the process: It is so exasperating to you that, even if we were willing to submit, it would avail us nothing.” (p. 209)

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

34 thoughts on “Key Quotations from ‘You Gentiles’ — by Maurice Samuel

  1. Mr Samuel says that, the Jews will never be satisfied with anything other than the absolute. I wonder, then, if absolute extermination of the Jews would be satisfactory to the gentleman?

    1. not even keep one for a high security deadly pathogens biolab?

      as always when stuck for guidance, let’s turn to the timeless wisdom and humanity of l*rd g*d yhwh, as told in torah:

      As the Torah/Old Testament commands: “Now go and smite Amalek, and exterminate everything that is his. Don’t pity him, but kill man, woman, infant and nursling, ox, sheep, camel and ass.” [SAMUEL 15:2-3]

      Saul in fact initially spared the King of the Amalekites, Agag, and confiscated some prime livestock. For Saul’s reluctance to blindly obey the word of the Israelite God and exterminate every living thing, he was considered to have “sinned” and was severely reprimanded by the prophet Samuel. Eventually Saul attempted to make amends by personally hacking Agag “in pieces.” [I SAMUEL 15. 1-33] “So decisively did [Saul] defeat [the Amalekites],” says scholar Bernhard Anderson, “that they vanished from the historical scene shortly afterwards.” [ANDERSON, p. 172]

      “Heretics, false prophets, witches, communities harboring apostates, and the six Amorite nations that occupied Canaan at the time of the Israelite conquest,” notes Joshua Cohen, “are all sentenced to extermination in the book of Deuteronomy. But the cherem [the sentence of “extermination”] on Amalek, is the most renowned ban in all of Jewish tradition. It is pronounced twice: in Exodus, Chapter 17, and again in Deuteronomy, Chapter 25.” [COHEN, J. p. 290]

      Even more troubling, the Old Testament asserts that “the Lord will be at war with Amalek throughout the ages.” [EXODUS 17:16] “Amalekites,” notes the Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion, “were regarded as Israel’s inveterate foes, whose annihilation became a sacred obligation … Only after the final destruction of the Amalekites will God and his throne be complete.” [WERBLOWSKY, R., p. 41] The Old Testament commands Jews to literally “blot out the memory of Amalek,” an order that, as part of continuous religious review, ironically ensures that it can never be forgotten. On the contrary, such a religious sanction secures, notes Joshua Cohen, “the enduring presence of bigotry in [Jewish] sacred teachings.” [COHEN, p. 299]

      A disturbing modern perspective on the Amalekites is their reinvention in some Orthodox and Zionist Jewish minds as Arabs (and any other non-Jews, or even Jews, that are understood to want to “destroy” Israel. Michael Asheri’s Amalek, for instance, is generic Germans.) [ASHERI, M., 1983, p. 340]

      The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German in the meantime.

      ilya ehrenburg truly was a biblical prophet, a continuation of that venerable line that delivered the word directly from the lord yhwh satan.
      this is why they worship his exalted memory in jerusalem today.

      1. “The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German in the meantime.”

        “Stop the hate”, Jew. What “bigotry” and “intolerance”, like the head turd of the ADL likes to say.

    2. The Jews DO believe in “the ABSOLUTE”, Mr Daniel Krupp.
      Are you a filthy, cancerous, hypocritical Jew?
      Their most read book, The Talmud, teaches ABSOLUTE hatred of the Goyim; and, especially, Christians. THIS IS FACT, UNDENIABLE!
      Theirs’ is “the longest hatred!”
      In 2015 AD they believe in ABSOLUTE control, such that, via the US Federal Reserve and Wall St, they effectively control the planet.
      They exert ABSOLUTE POWER!!!!
      As I’ve said many times this ABSOLUTISM is propagated by the Jewish ultra-elite, such as George Soros and the Jews who “rule America.”
      Mel Gibson, my mate, said correctly: “Jews call all the wars!”
      Whether the lesser Jews are part of this ABSOLUTE control mechanism is debateable; although it has to be realized in the West and Israel, Jews, as a whole, fully support their ABSOLUTIST head honchos! Just as Haaretz said MOST Israeli Jews support “getting rid of the Arab-Semites.” (REAL Semites, Mr. Krupp! Are you a Semite?)
      If this is the case, the Gentiles’ planet of 6,000,000,000 people has no room for a cancerous parasite called “world Jewry” in its midst.
      The cancer MUST be extricated for humanity’s sake; otherwise, as Hitler said, the planet will soon become a “lifeless void.”
      Mr Krupp, you are a creature from the depths of Hell!

  2. Typical Jewish nonsense, without a shred of historical or philosophical understanding. Jews lie and destroy because they’re weak. They cannot create and they cannot lift themselves up to compete with Whites, so instead they bring us down to their level using dialectics and inverted morality. That, in their diseased minds, is the work of “God.”

    Everything that makes a society noble, such as honesty, work ethic, directness, and courage, becomes something laughable and contemptible in the eyes of the Jew. The Jew then seeks to smash this society so it becomes a “just” and “godly” society, which in reality is simply a society where Jews control everything.

    Never listen to what Jews say, especially about themselves and us. They’re pathological liars. They’re driven by a deep-seated inferiority complex which best manifested itself during WWII when they fanatically agitated for the destruction of the Reich. When it comes to Jews, Martin Luther said it best: “We are at fault in not slaying them.”

    1. “Jews lie and destroy because they’re weak. “

      Jews lie and destroy because they are destructive, same way, for example, that termites are, not because they are “weak” but because to destroy the structural foundation of wooden framed house or garage is its nature.

    2. “Never listen to what Jews say, especially about themselves and us.”

      Not until I first investigate the matter for myself.

      “They’re pathological liars. “

      Schopenhauer would agree.

      “They’re driven by a deep-seated inferiority complex which best manifested itself during WWII when they fanatically agitated for the destruction of the Reich.”

      Agreed. Unfortunately, they got their wish.

  3. J e w s applied phosphoros grenades against peaceful R u s s k i e s on May
    pixpipeline . com/d/ded6b86b2328 . jpg
    J e w s kill everyone, even R u s s k ie children pixpipeline . com/s/975a6f4adb2b . jpg

  4. Jews are the mix of ancient dravids and nags with aryan izgoys. Before aryan invasion 4000 ago to india dravids and nags worshipped to Kali-ma (black mother) with human sacrifaces. Aryans gave Vedy and sanskrit to dravids and nags and the religion of Light to them. Black woman priests of kali-ma cult were pushed out of india together with their followers. Within 300 years they reached Egypt and they were called Giksosses at that time. They killed the upper Egypt caste and became the rulers of the Egypt where they reigned for about 400 years. Then they killed all Egyptian white babies and with 40 tons of captured gold, silver and copper left Egypt which is descibed in Tora. Later they robbed the ancient Persia the same way, genociding about 500000 people all of which belonged to the white caste of Persia. Read the details in Nikolai Levashov’s book “Russia in curved mirrors”.
    The person writes (expeltheparasite . com/category/adolf-hitler/):
    “I am now pretty much convinced that Russia is the last hope for the White race. If Russia is defeated (or officially kosherised) by the Jewish forces known as the “international community“, then it is all over for the White race. We need someone to get the ball rolling in the right direction. Without some sort of catalyst we will just continue to degenerate as a race until we are no longer. There was seemingly nothing happening whatsoever to get the ball rolling until this ‘Ukrainian crisis’ popped up. It still seems a little surreal, but we shouldn’t underestimate the true scope of possibilities provided for us with the actions of Vlad’s Russia. Russia seems to be providing real opposition to the kosher EU powers even though they may not be explicitly anti-Jewish. Whether they are explicitly anti-Jewish or not doesn’t matter at the moment – what matters is that the Jews really hate this situation where they are being forced to tangle with a country of 145 million people. They cannot complete their ‘Jew World Order’ plan to rule the world if rogue nations the size of Russia exist.”
    Unfortunately he does not understand that Putin and his government are Jews and all top positions in the country are held by Jews or cryptojews. In order to save the white race, all whites should expel jews from top positions everywhere: from China to Americas. Because all “presidents” are cryptojews, including Obama, Putin, Merkel, Dilma, etc.
    The informational war is the only weapon the whites have. Read Levashov’s books. Read “Desionization” by Yemelianov. And explain to everyone who Jews are and what’s their purposes. Only this way the whites and generally all people on the side of the Light may win. Study Russian. All best books about Jews come from Russia, starting from The protocols of Elders of Zion.
    Jews put their signs everywhere. Put Hyperborean signs everywhere. “Aryan” was a Jew word promoted by Jews and Hitler. Use the word Hyperborea. Study writing in Glagolitsa which the pagan slav writing before the Judeochristian invasion.
    Jews lie that slavs were wild and had no own culture. Western Syberia|Ural is the craddle of the white race and the white civilization. The prior white civilization was destroyed 13000 years ago by climatic change invoked by the war with Antlants (Ants) of Atlantida. The western europe was covered by the 4 km layer of ice and no one could live there. But Ural area was warm at that time.
    Read the very important book “The Phenomenon of Arkaim” by Bystrushkin. Translate it into english and spread it. The Ural area was called “The country of the Cities” and it is mentioned in all ancient literature sources: at least of them are mentioned in “The Phenomenon of Arkaim”: the Chinese source, the Indian source and the Scandinavian Source. The scandinavian source tell us that Odin (Perun) and his son came from the place in Ural and that place is described in details. Chinese call Odin the Yellow Ancestor, or the Greate Yui who came from the same place.
    One more important fact: Britain still had Neolyth era when Ural area already had had bronze era which was proved by comparison of Stonehenge with far more advanced Arkaim. Also Egypt pyramids and other facilities were built using the metric system which was the most ancient system of the whites. Of course, it’s a jew lies that the French Jews adopted it first in the 19th century. The ancent Ellinic stadiy equalled to 100 meters. You will find all maths in “The Phenomenon of Arkaim”.
    A good idea for all whites to migrate to Russia and push all non-whites outside with digging an enormous trench of 1 km width around the border.
    Jews are not superhumans. They are afraid of the white riseup. You may read about it on zionist forums. Good luck!
    Jew communists have killed at least 100 millions of Russkies and genocided much more by abortions and evil propoganda of killing babies, pervertions, and drugs. Russkies won’t wake up without the help of other whites from other countries. As well as the West won’t liberate yourself without the help of Russia.
    Remember that the drowned land Daarya in Arctics was the first land of all whites, then Ural and then Euroasia. And Euroasia must return to the whites. Otherwise Jew fascist parasites will kill the Planet. Parasites kill not only individual living beings but entire planets!
    Jesus = Jew sus = Jew is = fucking jew = judeochristianity = cryptojews on top church positions
    god = yahweh = jews = satan = slavery

    1. “Unfortunately he does not understand that Putin and his government are Jews “

      Give us proof. Til you do, I say that’s b.s.

    2. “Jesus = Jew sus = Jew is = fucking jew”

      Enough of the Christ-bashing! Jesus was a Galilean and not a Jew! If Jesus was a Jew, the Jews would’ve supported and promoted him!

      Some history for your ignorant mind:

      The Jews did not consider the Galileans as belonging to their community. A marriage of Jew to Galilean was impossible. So little had the people of Galilee in common with the Jews, that King Solomon ceded part of Galilee to the King of Tyre in payment for cedars and gold. King Hiram found it very sparsely inhabited and settled colonists there, who were not Jews. After the time of Solomon, Israel was divided; and, for a thousand years, there existed no intimate political relation between Galilee and Judah.

    3. Yeah, great write anonymou!
      I’ve thought the same. Go to Russia and kick all the non-whites out! Or, perhaps Scandinavia, where the kooks are currently usurping authority.
      Let Israel survive as an Arab country and it will soon be just a player in Meditteranean madness.
      The whites originated in the cold, Norse countries. The whites are far more intelligent, as are the north-eastern Asians. I like the smart Asians; and they are smaller than us!
      Over-pigmented people belong closer to the Equator, where the hot sun can fry their malicious pea-brains!
      The closer you get to the Equator the more you get fried and the dumber you get!
      Whites should be in the NORTH!

  5. “made the important point that Jews were altogether so superior and spiritually advanced compared to gentiles…”

    LOL…yeah, sure they are.

  6. One last point:

    I have to laugh at this overly proud and arrogant, braggadocious Jewish supremacist. If this uber-conceited sewer rat were alive, I’d like to ask him to name just one great civilization his ‘superior’ Jewish brethren built (answer: NONE). I can name more than a few that his ilk have wrecked with America well on its way to being their latest victim.

    Throughout much of their history Jews have been able to live prosperously off their host populations, but only rarely have they had the opportunity to gain direct control of these populations. When they do, they come a cropper. As a group they have a magnificent talent for overthrowing states, but only a small talent for governing them. The Bolshevik revolution was one of the few times that Jews, instead of exerting great influence on domestic and foreign affairs from the sidelines, actually took over the he1m of their country of residence. But as events showed, within a few years of assuming power in Russia, the Jewish Commissars were tearing at each other’s throats and pushing Russia to the very brink of national suicide.— Wilmot Robertson

  7. Far from talking nonsense this Jew Maurice Samuel gives us a revealing glimpse into the Jewish mind. I can agree with almost everything he writes. The Jews are fundamentally different from all other human beings on this planet. Their arrogance, rebelliousness and destructiveness clearly sets them apart from us.

    “We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build”

    Exactly, and because their “God” is Satan the “God-world” they try to build will be a Hell.

    1. Jews are only different in that they morally justify their destructive behavior. Otherwise they are no different from other Middle Easterners.

    2. @ Franklin Ryckaert: “Far from talking nonsense this Jew Maurice Samuel gives us a revealing glimpse into the Jewish mind. I can agree with almost everything he writes.”

      I absolutely agree. The value of the article lies precisely in the fact that “it offers a penetrating analysis of the Jewish psyche”, to quote Darkmoon in her short introduction. It appears that Samuel’s book received the thorough endorsement of his Jewish contemporaries who felt he was putting into words what all of them felt. There is no attempt at “disinfo” here.

      Here are two quotes which Darkmoon drew to my attention in a private email. She says they are highly significant as well as true, with no attempt to deceive:

      1. “Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and to those around him…. We are unwelcome because we are what we are.”

      2. “I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact.”

      Who could quarrel with either of those statements?

      1. “Gentile” is a derogatory term for all non-Jews, from Whites to Japanese to Arabs.

        We are not “Gentiles,” we are Whites, or Aryans. We don’t fight Jews because they hate “gentiles” we fight Jews because they hate us Whites.

        As long as Whites define themselves in the way Jews define them, they will be losing this battle.

      2. Just remember will ya legionnaire, they hate period. As long as HUMANS define themselves in the way jews define “humanity”, we lose, and are prevented from restoring peace

      3. Only Whites are capable of stopping the Jews. The Arabs are too unintelligent and disorganized and the Asians are too non-confrontational.

  8. In the sporting spirit assigned us gentiles, I say the Jew serves a purpose: TO KEEP US ON OUR TOES!! (That’s about the healthiest way to address the problem, as far as I can see it. 🙂 )

  9. The Jews have every right to say they are superior and different to the rest of us, after all a mere 20 million of them basically control the planet!
    That means over 6,000,000,000 of us Gentiles are either directly or indirectly under their control and incredible POWER DISPENSATION! As Australia’s foreign Minister, Bob Carr, said on resigning, recently: “The Zionist-Jewish lobby controls Australian foreign policy.”
    In other words, it is one Jew for every 300 lowly Gentiles!
    Or, one solitary Jew controls 300 Goyim wretches, all of whom are “one brick short of a load”! I see so much Goyim ignorance in these comments’ columns!
    It would probably be most sensible to join their ranks, if they will have you.
    I could party all day, get free porn, Goyim sluts galore and lots of $$$$’s!
    I, personally, am looking for a beautiful Jewish wife who MUST be a virgin.
    Trouble is, I’ve been out with lots of them and they are ugly, big-mouthed, pseudo-feminists and none of them have been virgins! It is like taking Bette Midler out, or Barbara Streisand, or Pink! They swarm over me like a rash in Melbourne, Australia, and I have just about given up.
    They tell me Tel Aviv is no better – they all act like Amy Winehouse!
    What do I do?
    Is it true that up in the mountains of Ethiopia there are beautiful, black, virgin Jews?
    I don’t mind marrying black!

    1. no jew is a virgin, even at birth.

      can’t have it both ways, either the virgin of the chosen.

  10. Such a typical Jewish thing to merely assert superiority without any evidence. If Jews or Khazarians are morally superior people then why isn’t Israel a more moral nation. No.. I suppose that Maurice would say that Israel is a superior nation morally because Jews just have to proclaim it is true to make it so. Don’t you know stealing body parts is moral; porn is moral; lying is moral; murdering children is moral; usury is moral; human trafficing is moral; the drug trade is moral; creating historical fictions to guilt trip everyone into paying reparations is moral; huh in fact all wars for the sake of Israel are moral, true? Jews are magical people who make everything they do moral by their very existence. So who could disagree with any of the above statements about Jews being moral, universal, divine beings. No one understands God like the Jews do as Maurice says because gentiles are just a bunch of stupid jocks right, jocks are not under any circumstances divine.

    Wait one little minute here!! Why is every Jewish man I know right now glued to the tube for the Basketball Finals, the Hockey Finals; the Socker Finals, etc. etc. and in the meantime it’s baseball season, right?? Jews may not be jocks but they sure do like their TV sports… so maybe things have degraded since Maurice wrote his marvelous brag sheet.

  11. That work, if genuine, is the whine of a eunuch in the king’s harem – not the bellow of a chief or a man of an real magick…

    Consider, ipso facto:
    http://www.jrbooksonline.com/roth.htm

    The money power enables the media power enables the mystique. Tonight, begin reading Deuteronomy. If you’re daring, place a candle, in a bowl of water, between the book (or e-reader, no mater) and a mirror in which your eyes can reflect. Hold a crucifix in your right hand… a piece of paper with the word Christ or Christos or some such is fine as a sigil if you ‘charge’ it…

    Begin reading. Look yourself in the mirror and squeeze your right hand petiodically. Drink, smoke, listen to music, adjust position as needed. This isn’t a sham trance or meditation. You aren’t escaping the world with this kind of sigil magick, you are trying to see past illusion…

    Try to get through Deuteronomy in this fashion in 3-7 days.

    I can only offer you this – you will back on your self from a week earlier and feel that you did not truly understand anything. This is GNOSIS.

    Naturally, adjust the specifics above to suit yourself better if need be, there is nothing magic about chaos magick.

    Belief is a tool.

    What sort of tool is Deuteronony?

  12. how it seems to me

    the above post by michael k is a significant one.

    not that i would ever consider the deutoronomy+candle party trick, i leave this to knowledgeable pros.

    but that referenced book by samuel roth seems to hold extra information, just started looking at it.

    apart from the fascination with bizarre and revolting like people who watch gore and horror movies, vampires with chainsaws and whatnot, this book may contain that extra information we need to wage war on jews. because the war cannot be fought in ignorance.

    one major reason why they are winning, in fact, a crucial/sine qua non reason is precisely that.

    jew has analyzed us meticulously in order to identify and exploit our vulnerabilities while hiding their true nature and thoughts just as meticulously. which is why they prescribe death to anyone who translates talmud, a moser (traitor) of the worst kind.

    arm yourself with information, their psycho-anatomy in order to know where and how to return the blow.

  13. how to be a jew … first learn to write like a jew, it might teach you to think like a jew.

    i get almost physically nauseated when i read anything by a jew, as much by form as by the content.
    there is something of pornographic deviance, a mind rape as the reader is forced to become a voyeur simply to get through a sentence, here is an early one from roth’s book (“genesis of jew-hatred”):

    I want you to learn of these things out of the overflowing of my pen, and know my feelings as if you had heard my own voice uttering them. I would not want the tongues of others, strangers or pretenders to my friendship, to touch this story with the sour whimsy of gossip.

    It struck me like a tidal wave; and before I could make any effort to direct it, it had made an avenue of progress out of every vein and artery of my body, it was riding every one of my living senses: everything I had ever seen, felt, heard and learned was being welded into artillery and commandeered into action in this new battle of my blood.

    he manages to describe even his growing jewitis in homoerotic terms … and we are supposed to be afraid of them?
    i guess even a gay viper is just as venomous.

  14. Throughout this diatribe, the message seems to be one of jewish superiority, mainly by accusing we non-jews of being “alike”. Does not the same apply to jews, are they not “alike”? Destroyers? yes, absolutely, thieves, parasites, liars, killers of gentiles? absolutely. Nothing at all to be proud of, and yet, the jews ooze pride.
    The problem with the gentile world is ignorance, of the sinister intent of the jew.
    The problem for jews is their “jewishness” whether they like it, or not..

  15. I don’t believe “all” Jews are ‘primordial Jewish evil’ but I do have a very good working theory about their behavior and how this brings about dominance. I believe that the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths or sociopaths if you prefer the modern terminology. I’m not just calling names I really do believe they are sociopaths. Reading the more anti-everyone parts of the Torah are almost manuals to psychopathy. Ditto for “the Satanic Bible” also written by a Jew. If there can be tribes of blond headed people it’s not stretch to say there can be tribes of psychopaths. We do know psychopathy can be carried in families.

    Jews can say the most ridiculous lying things with no evidence that it bothers them in any manner. Their behavior in Russia and many others places shows their complete inability for compassionate behavior. It also shows in their fearlessness.

    I also believe it shows in their intelligence. Think about a time when you saw someone hurt or were in a highly emotionally charged state. Think how powerful that emotion was. Now how much brain matter is required for empathy? I bet it’s not an unsubstantial amount. We know sociopaths brains are different. Could it be worth 10 I.Q. points if empathy was replaced with just brain matter devoted to processing power? If you read about psychopaths they have an uncanny ability to persuade people. I believe it comes from intense study of the emphatic people around them acting in a manner that seems to them insane. They feed back to us these states with complete confidence making our internal lie detector faulty.

    At one time I was pro-Jewish and pro-Israel. What changed me was study of 9/11. Specifically building #7. It’s impossible for a building to fall ten stories “symmetrically” at the speed a rock drops. Melted steel or not, it’s impossible. Knowing the Jews control all the media and the greatest story ever is not told tells me they are responsible.

    I think their greatest secret is they are different. That’s why they attack so fiercely when challenged. That’s why their immense effort to portray all people as the same. What would the liberals say if they knew they were being manipulated by people with no more compassion than reptiles? If they lose they lose everything.

    If I’m right about this the only way to get rid of them is to make it known that they are different. Even if some are not, all should be treated as evil as we have no way of separating the good from the bad.

Comments are closed.