Francesco Hayez — The Fall of the Temple
“A good time for the Jews is not a good time for mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The regimes that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody else.” — Israel Shamir
. . . by Lasha Darkmoon
1. What is good for the Jews is bad for everyone else
As things get better for the Jews, they get worse for everyone else — a pattern repeated in every single country where Jews have gained a foothold.
Take Germany, for example. Germany emancipated its Jews in 1871, making them equal citizens. By 1879, a mere eight years later, the Germans were complaining bitterly that they had been taken over by the Jews.
The very title of Wilhelm Marr’s 1879 treatise, The Victory of Judaism over Germanism, speaks volumes.
Listen to Marr’s passionate cri de coeur:
“[My words] must be understood as a “scream of pain” coming from the oppressed. Resigned pessimism flows from my pen. I shall announce, loudly and without any attempt at irony, that Judaism has triumphed on a worldwide historical basis…. I am sure that I have said what millions of Jews are quietly thinking. World power belongs to Jewry. The twilight of the gods has come upon us: you, the Jews, are the masters, and we are the slaves. What is there left to us? Let us accept the inescapable, since we can’t change it. Its name is: Finis Germaniae—THE END OF GERMANY!”
Today, white Americans are incomparably worse off than they were 50-60 years ago. Jews, on the other hand, are incomparably better off, owning a disproportionate amount of American wealth. Whether this is due to their own superior talents or to networking, banking and stock market manipulations, and financial scams à la Bernie Madoff, is another question.
Given that Jews make up 2 percent of the American population, the Forbes List of America’s 400 richest men ought properly to contain on it the names of eight Jews only. The last time we checked, there were 139 Jews ranked among America’s 400 richest men.
Most of America’s richest billionaires today are Jewish. Whites, Asians, Hispanics and Blacks are left far behind. (See graph)
The richer the Jews get, the more everyone else suffers, as Samuel Marr had argued as early as 1879 in the passage cited above. It’s the same in all other countries. There has been a massive transfer of wealth from non-Jewish into Jewish hands over the last 50 years.
According to Israel Shamir:
The Jewish universe is good for Jews. It is a curse for others. In the US, as Jewish influence has grown steadily since 1968, the lives of ordinary people have worsened. A good time for the Jews is not a good time for mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The regimes that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody else.
The problem is compounded by the fact that right now elite international Jewry seems to have tightened its grip on North America and Europe to an unimaginable degree. The Jews call the shots everywhere in these increasingly “Jewified” continents, wielding disproportionate influence through their control of the media. They foment wars in foreign countries and sexual decadence wherever they manage to gain a foothold — as, for example, in Weimar Germany.
And then there’s the immigrant problem deliberately created by the Jews in order to weaken and destroy the White race — “the cancer of human history“, according to Jewish writer Susan Sontag.
Jews have been the ringleaders responsible for flooding the White man’s homelands with endless hordes of immigrants, creating in the process a multicultural menagerie which will eventually lead to the metamorphosis of Whites into “a mongrelized slave race of low-IQ, mud-colored runts.” (Anonymous correspondent, email).
Israel, however, remains resolutely mono-cultural and opposed to non-Jewish immigration, an apartheid society in which only Jews matter and where every other ethnic group is discriminated against and treated with barely disguised contempt.
There is an old Latin proverb that goes, Remedio amaro amaram bilem diluunt; literally, “With a bitter remedy they wash away the bitter bile.” Translated into elegant English, this gives us the wise adage: “Drastic remedies for drastic diseases.”
If we may venture to do so without giving offense, let’s now consider some drastic remedies for the Jewish problem.
2. Seven drastic remedies for the Jewish problem
Among the various remedial measures for tackling the Jewish problem, the following seven may be mentioned as the most drastic and extreme. I would like to make it clear that I am not myself recommending these seven measures en bloc. I am simply reporting the suggestions put forward by other people at various times:
(1) Mass extermination of the Jews.
(2) Quarantine or sequestration of Jews in separate secure locations.
(3) Mass sterilization of the Jews.
(4) Confiscation (or nationalization) of all Jewish assets and property.
(5) Emancipation of the media from Jewish monopoly control.
(6) The immediate abolition of the state of Israel and the restoration of Palestine to the Arabs, with full reparations.
(7) De-emancipation of Jews, i.e., the re-imposition of severe restrictions on Jews and their various fields of activity and areas of influence.
While all seven of these plans for dealing with the Jews can be described as “drastic”, some are more drastic than others. The solution calling for mass extermination is clearly the most drastic, closely followed by mass sterilization. Both these measures lead to the complete destruction of Jewry: one quickly and violently, the other slowly and gently. Both are genocide.
Quarantining of Jews, confiscation of their wealth, and the abolition of Israel are milder “solutions” to the Jewish problem because at least they allow the Jews to go on living, albeit with a severe curtailment of their liberties. Their ostensible aim is to put a stop to Jewish exploitation and criminality, and, above all, to prevent cultural contamination through the Jew-owned media.
It is inconceivable that the Jewish problem could ever be solved as long as Israel exists and as long as the mass media remains in Jewish hands. So these two preliminary steps are of paramount importance if the world is to be saved from Jewish encroachments: the abolition of Israel and the emancipation of the media from Jewish monopoly.
Finally, there is the de-emancipation of Jewry. This is the least draconian of the seven measures mentioned above: it not only allows the Jews to go on living, but it allows them to go on living in the midst of the gentiles. It is designed to ensure that Jewish influence is kept to a minimum. Jews are free to do what they want provided they keep out of public affairs and stop harming the surrounding non-Jewish population, e.g., by peddling sexual deviance to the masses through pornography.
What does de-emancipation of the Jews involve? This consists in depriving Jews of full citizenship rights and of hemming them in with their former restrictions. It consists of sanctions, of making things tough for the Jews — in short, of “keeping them in their place” by denying them access to key professions.
Here is Eustace Mullins telling us how Ezra Pound would have solved the Jewish problem if he had been given the chance. What Pound is recommending is simply de-emancipation of the Jews, or the demotion of Jews to second-class citizens with limited rights. According to Pound, this was the technique the Byzantine Empire had used for twelve centuries to keep the Jews under control. And it had worked. So perhaps, as Mullins suggests, one should give it a try again:
“The answer to the Jewish problem is simple,” [Ezra Pound said, according to Mullins] “Keep them out of banking, out of education, out of government.
There is no need to kill the Jews. In fact, every pogrom in history has played into their hands, and has in many instances been cleverly instigated by them.
Get the Jews out of banking and they cannot control the economic life of the community.
Get the Jews out of education and they cannot pervert the minds of the young to their subversive doctrines.
Get the Jews out of government and they cannot betray the nation.” (See here)
And now the taboo topic of mass extermination, the most alarmingly anti-Semitic of the seven drastic solutions to the Jewish problem mentioned above.
A certain poster on the Darkmoon site, mysteriously known as “SPQR”, would not have been satisfied with my sober academic approach to the Jewish problem as outlined in Part 1 of this essay. “The only solution to the Jewish problem,” he insisted recently in one of his online comments, “is their wholesale extermination!”
Fearful of being branded “exterminationists” by association, we wondered initially whether we should delete this inflammatory comment. We decided to let it stand because it seemed to us unworkable and bordering on the absurd.
“To beat the Jews and free our lands,” this highly intelligent and articulate firebrand continued, “we will have to become the most merciless and bloodthirsty race the world has ever seen, because nothing less will stop them and their black and brown foot soldiers — what they call “immigrants”. Make no mistake, genocide IS THE ONLY ANSWER to the Jewish question! It’s not even a question anymore.”
For my part, I decided to maintain a prudent silence. Naturally, I could not agree with this armchair revolutionary that wiping out every single Jew in the world was a good idea. Apart from being morally repugnant to most people, it was a messy and impracticable scheme. In fact, it was physically impossible to carry out.
Let’s assume for argument’s sake that you are World Dictator and that you have decided to have a Jew-free planet. So tell me: what exactly is your modus operandi?
How do you round up all the Jews prior to their extermination? Do you draw up a list of individuals to be exterminated? How do you know whose names to put on the list? Do you concentrate your homicidal energies on the world’s 13.8 million full Jews, or do you also go scalp hunting for the almost-Jews, half-Jews, and quadroon-Jews? And how about the crypto-Jews? Do you start killing people off because you suspect they might be Jews? What if the Jews decide to take the obvious step of going underground and pretending to be non-Jews?
How do you exterminate the Jews
if you don’t know who the Jews are?
“I want to exterminate the Jews!
Will all Jews please identify themselves
by putting up their hands.”
— Imaginary Anti-Semitic World Dictator
That’s not going to work, is it?
My Canadian correspondent John Lobro, a retired mathematician and veteran political analyst, stops short of extermination, but he too is convinced that only drastic remedies will suffice to cure the age-old Jewish sickness. In a personal email to me, he says:
“I am telling you this privately: there can be no accommodation with the Jew without making plenty clear to him that he is a powerless cockroach in face of our overwhelming force and mastery.
Every ounce of Jewish material wealth must be nationalized and Judaism permanently banned on pain of capital punishment. Jewish meeting places (i.e., synagogues) must be demolished, this being the price for the physical continuation of the Jews.
Believe me, there is simply no other way forward, these people are so evil and implacable in their hatred of the goyim. Their burning wish is for our destruction and enslavement. We need to fight fire with fire, not with brotherly love.”
— Personal email, May 28, 2014 9:05 AM.
The confiscation of Jewish wealth and property in nothing new. It has been tried in the past on a number of occasions without much success. Having had their property confiscated throughout history, Jews have managed to devise various ingenious methods to foil their oppressors and squirrel away their wealth in secret locations. The richer the Jew, the more his wealth is likely to be safely hidden away beyond the reach of vindictive confiscators.
Who knows where, in what subterranean vaults and Aladdin’s caves crammed with gold bullion and precious gems and priceless works of art, the fabulous wealth of the Rothschilds lies hidden?
The easiest way to hide Jewish wealth in a hostile, anti-Semitic environment is of course to cease to be openly Jewish: to go underground by becoming a crypto-Jew, thus camouflaging oneself within the surrounding gentile population.
As for the quarantining or sequestration of Jews in internment camps, this has as little chance of working as mass extermination. Jews are unlikely to volunteer for either option, and any attempts to implement such drastic steps against them would result in Israeli death squads wreaking bloody vengeance.
Now that the Jews have their own state, together with the Samson Option, pushing them around and devising schemes for their mass destruction is no longer advisable.
The same arguments apply to the other draconian measures listed above. De-emancipation and the mass sterilization of the Jews, accompanied by the immediate abolition of the state of Israel without consultation with the Israelis, are not measures likely to win the approval of those who possess over 300 nuclear warheads and have already threatened to blow up the world if pushed too far.
3. Anti-Semitism is increasing — why?
Before we leave this distasteful subject behind, it would be only fair to point out that Jews themselves have never been squeamish about mass extermination, provided it is non-Jews who are being exterminated. It was essentially a Jewish regime in the Soviet Union that between 1917 and 1953 managed to exterminate 66 million Russian Christians and destroy their churches. And indeed, the same genocidal policies by Jews are pursued today in Palestine against the Arabs.
It seems the Jews don’t like being killed, but they don’t mind killing other people in vast numbers. Provided they can get away with it and pin the blame on others. And so the 3000-year-old Jewish problem still rankles remorselessly, like a festering sore, with anti-Semitism as widespread and virulent as it ever was.
In Germany, a country now completely under the Jewish thumb, where a single whisper casting doubts on the Holocaust will get the dissident historian hauled off to prison, one out of four Germans (27%) are classified by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as “anti-Semites”. In France, more than one out of three people (37%) say they hate the Jews. In Greece, the figure is even more alarming: roughly two out of three Greeks (69%) confess to harboring anti-Semitic sentiments.
As for the Islamic world, it is here that anti-Semitism is most deeply entrenched. In the Islamic crescent, 74% of the people hate the Jews. In Iraq, it is 92%. And in Gaza, 93%. (See here)
“We will have to kill and kill and kill!” a psychotic Jew with crazy eyes intones. “All day, every day!”
With Jews like this around,
is it any wonder that anti-Semitism is so prevalent?
4. What lies ahead?
These are the questions that ought to be exercising every mind in America right now. They are questions of vital importance on which the lives of our children will one day depend:
Is a new Red Terror on its way, courtesy of the neo-Bolshevik cabal that controls America?
Will history repeat itself? Will the blood of Christians flow through the streets of American cities, as it once flowed through the streets of Moscow and St Petersburg when the Jews were in charge?
Will thousands of Christian churches in America be reduced to rubble one day, as they were in the Soviet Union under the Bolshevik regime when Jews reached the peak of their power?
Will Christian nuns be raped and their breasts hacked off and red-hot pokers thrust up their vaginas, as in the Soviet killing fields and torture chambers of the twentieth century?
Will Christian monks and priests have their eyes gouged out and be boiled alive in cauldrons, as they once were in the Soviet Union when the Jews ran amok under Lenin and Trotsky and Stalin and Lazar Kaganovich and Ilya Ehrenberg and Beria the serial killer who liked burying his child victims in his basement?
We’ll have to wait and see.