Arthur and the Jews: The controversy over freedom of speech

Introductory note by Lasha Darkmoon

Arthur-Topham-resizedThe trial of Canadian patriot Arthur Topham began in British Columbia yesterday. Arthur’s alleged crime? Incitement to hatred against Jews for publishing on his website various items regarded as highly offensive to Jews, such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and other such ‘incendiary’ material.

If Arthur is found guilty, there will be two immediate consequences:  (1) Arthur will be severely punished with imprisonment, fines, and the shutting down of his websites. (2) Freedom of speech in Canada will have received its final deathblow, with Jews henceforth being the only arbiters of what may or may not be said in Canada.

With Jews alone being allowed to define the parameters of “hate speech”, all negative criticism of Israel will come to be seen as hateful and intolerable. The slightest offense given to a Jew will become grounds for complaint and criminal investigation. Attacking the enemies of the Jews, however, will be freely permitted and even encouraged, with Muslims and Christians becoming the new “Nazis”.

In short, if Arthur Topham is found guilty, a new unwritten Eleventh Commandment will take root in Canada, and, in the course of time, spread like a virus to other countries: THOU SHALT LOVE THE JEWS AND HATE THE JEWS’ ENEMIES AND AT ALL TIMES SERVE AND OBEY THY JEWISH MASTERS.


“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
Jesus Christ, John, Ch. 8, Verse 32

“For nothing is secret that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.”
Jesus Christ, Ch. 8, Verse 17

“If this book has any sombre look, that is the native hue of the story it tells, not the reflection of my own cast of mind. I have written with feeling: the feeling of a contemporary, participant, eye-witness and of a journalist thwarted in his calling, which in my belief should serve truth without fear or favour, not special interests. I have seen more of the events of our century and of the secret perversions of national purposes than most, and have discovered through this experience that it was not all chance, but design. Therefore I have written a protest, but it is a protest against the suppression of truth, not against life.”
Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion (1956), Epilogue, P. 568

Two days from the time of this writing, on October 26th, 2015, a trial in B.C. Supreme Court involving the case of Regina v Roy Arthur Topham will commence in the small city of Quesnel, located in the central interior of the province of British Columbia in an area known as the Cariboo.

In essence this isn’t just the trial of Arthur Topham based upon a politically motivated and spurious Sec. 319(2) Criminal Code of Canada “Hate Propaganda” charge initiated by one of Canada’s largest Zionist Jew lobby organization, B’nai Brith Canada. It’s far more than that. What will be on trial from October 26th to November 6th is the legal entitlement of all Canadians to exercise their Constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of expression, both on and off the Internet –  as written in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Sec. 2b which states that “Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication“.

The outcome of the trial will determine whether or not Canada is, in fact, a truly open and free democracy or a nation whose sovereignty and freedom has been compromised by the wilful, premeditated actions of foreign lobbyists inimical to the country as a whole. In other words Freedom of Speech will be on trial.

The charge itself ought to be clearly understood by everyone concerned about their rights and freedoms as Canadians. Thus we see that the charge under Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code reads as follows:

Roy Arthur TOPHAM, between the 28th day of April, 2011 and the 4th day of May, 2012, inclusive, at or near Quesnel, in the Province of British Columbia, did by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.

B.C. Supreme Court Justice Butler will preside and a jury of twelve men and women will make the final determination of guilty or not guilty.


Basically, to narrow it down to its core intent, I am being charged with willfully promoting hatred against people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin based upon the multitude of articles and online books which I have published on my website prior to and since April 28th, 2011 when the complaint was officially laid against me by Canada’s most controversial serial complainant in the history of the human rights industry. Within a month of the first complaint being laid a second individual, an agent working for the League of Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, also filed an identical charge.

Upon receiving the complaints, the head of the BC Hate Crime Team, former Det. Cst. Terry Wilson located in Surrey, B.C. along with his partner Cst. Normandie Levas, initiated an investigation into the allegations. What was unknown to me at the time was that all three of these individuals knew each other and had known each other in some cases for as long as fifteen years and all three of them were in the “business” of hunting down and attacking individuals and website owners who were being critical of the foreign Zionist state of Israel and/or its ideology known as Zionism.

In fact the two complainants in the Sec. 319(2) complaint were known to be friends and associates as far back as 2007 when one of the same complainants, a Zionist Jew working for B’nai Brith Canada first laid a similar complaint against my person and my website using the now repealed Canadian Human Rights Act legislation known as Sec. 13. In other words I have been attacked by this foreign Zionist lobby organization now for the past nine years and have been in a constant battle with them to retain my basic human rights.

The whole of Crown’s case rests upon the key terms “willfully” and “hatred”, which, in the case of the latter term “hatred”, any person of common sense will realize, is a word that, like its opposite, “love”, is imbued with multiple meanings, all of which are based upon subjective emotions of one type or another.

Now there are some serious problems that accompany an allegation which accuses a person of “hating” a whole “identifiable group” such as the “people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin” based upon not only his own writings but also the written works of dozens of other writers, journalists, video producers, talk show hosts, artists, musicians and so on and these problems will undoubtedly come up during the course of the trial.


Without going into too much further detail surrounding the spurious nature of the charge of promoting “hatred” toward all the Jews of the world (an accusation arising from comments made to me by former Det. Cst. Terry Wilson during the time I was incarcerated after my arrest on May 16th, 2012) I would rather focus on letting readers know a bit about who I really am and what my life has been all about since at least the year 1967 when I first became involved in what is now commonly referred to as “political activism” or “social activism”.

I was twenty years old and in my second year of university at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C. in 1967. For those who were too young to remember the Sixties or weren’t born yet, it was a period of history not that different from the world we’re now living in. Wars were rampant then as they are now. Protests and civil rights and civil liberties were still in their nascent stages of development relative to today’s scene but people were demanding their rights in the Sixties just as they still are today. Police brutality and corporate crime and political corruption were as widespread then as they are now and the mainstream media in 1967 was basically just as controlled by the Zionists as it is today. The only fundamental difference really was the sudden and unexpected appearance throughout Western society of what became known as the Hippie Movement. It was that previously unheard of phenomenon that attracted me and countless others and became the focus of my life; one which has never ceased or abated since I first became involved with it.

The watchwords of the Hippie Movement were “Love” and “Peace” and our collective efforts to manifest those two positive, life-enhancing moral qualities throughout the war-torn society of our day were what inspired millions of my generation to work toward a world where violence and war and terror and hatred would end forever to be replaced by the fundamental Christian values and precepts taught by Jesus Christ, values that included learning to love each other and respect each other as well as caring for the Earth Mother that sustained us all. These were my guiding principles throughout my life and remain so to this very day.

With that in mind the accusation of the Zionist lobbyists, when it comes to dealing with their own hatred of anything or anyone who doesn’t support their ideological objectives or the actions of the foreign state of Israel and its parallel objectives, that every critic of their political agenda “hates” all the Jews in the world is utterly preposterous and beyond all comprehension. Having fashioned the term “hatred” into a twisted, Talmudic talisman of loathing and contempt through generations of endless propaganda emanating from their own controlled media and then inserting the word into Canadian jurisprudence via legal subterfuge and political influence, they now feel that they have the judicial wherewithal to attack their perceived enemies and somehow stem the unstoppable tide of political and spiritual awareness that was birthed in the Sixties and then embellished beyond comprehension and control in Nineties with the advent of the World Wide Web.

The controversy surrounding the Jews throughout history has now reached the point of culmination. Their mission to stop the truth from being revealed. whenever it applies to their own culpable actions, by using the criminal court system to attack the truth revealers is doomed to end in failure just as their efforts to stop the Internet from exposing their heinous acts of terror and murder and destruction perpetrated upon the defenceless Semitic people of Palestine has proven to be unstoppable.

The Age of Orwellian Censorship is coming to an end and it behooves all people of all races, nationalities, ethnicities and colour including the Jews to recognize that no single group of people has the right or the power or the ability to stem the tide of evolutionary consciousness that’s now happening on this planet.

It’s for these basic reasons that I have fought against the Zionist efforts to control our basic human rights over the past nine years. Now we will see if the country is willing to protect its most precious of gift – the freedom to speak one’s mind and express one’s views on whatever issues they deem of value to sustain our God given right to live in peace and happiness without fear and war.

I pray that God will grant us the wisdom to choose freedom over censorship and love over hate.


Please help out with my upcoming Sec. 319(2) “Hate Propaganda” trial that commences in one week on October 26th by making a donation.

Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address.

Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:

Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8

44 thoughts to “Arthur and the Jews: The controversy over freedom of speech”

  1. All over the world people are jailed and otherwise persecuted for trying to tell the truth about the Jewish depredations against humanity. As with 9/11, we have a story to learn about World War II. What really happened is not the way history says it happened. Arthur Topham is on trial for telling the truth. His fate is the fate of all of us. Arthur is about to lose his freedom, and basically his life, because his country, Canada, is controlled by corrupt Jews who prohibit the telling of the truth about themselves, their crimes and their lies. So after you say a little prayer for Arthur, say one for yourself, because after the Jews finish with Arthur, if you have any desire to know and speak of historical truth, they’ll be coming for you, too.

      1. there goes old McCow reinventing good jews, snake blaming the skin it shed.

        Hey, look behind you, i see Hitler, Jesuits, the royals, Masons, Rosicrucians, Theosophists, the clowns guild … while the jew is eating your lunch.

  2. You are so right John.

    I voted with my feet and chose life, out East because after having spent all my life in that northern cadaver watching the inexorable rigor mortis set in, the maggots and bacteria of Lucifer wallowing like titled owners, I could simply take no more.

    I do pray for martyred Arthur in whatever manner it can be termed as prayer, as he follows in the footsteps of previous Canadian martyrs like Ernst Zundel, Prof Denis Rancourt and Chief Ahenakew (I remember watching the Zundel trials with rising dread and urge to puke).
    Wasn’t John Demjanjuk also once a Canadian?

    But that frozen, uncaring gelatinous mass known as Canadian conscience is poisoned and unseeing – The Sleeping Ugliness that scares me stiff whenever I go back to briefly see my family.

    If Ellie is real, let her send a 1% of a 1% of her wealth to help with Arthur’s defense (I figure it will if anything raise the public awareness of this abomination masquerading as human).
    I will surely do what little bit I can.

    1. “If Ellie is real, let her send a 1% of a 1% of her wealth to help with Arthur’s defense…”

      I’m no good at math, but I reckon that would a sizeable sum, since Ellie claims to be in possession of a fortune of $5 billion.

  3. Good Luck Arthur!

    I’m having problems leaving a comment at your site for some reason. Please know that although I can’t be in the courtroom to support you, I’m with you in spirit 110%. And remember, a jury of your peers means NO JEWS ALLOWED!

  4. I posted this article along with your article on the visceral hatred spewed by “the chosen” and their Pharisee voicing their planned genocide. along with the links, I included a benign but direct request to the readers asking their opinion as to the application of “hate laws” to “Goim” but not “the chosen”. In addition to the articles above, I included one about a black gay man being mauled by Jews while they spewed racial/sexual profanities. The jews were NOT charged with “hate crimes” by the honorable A.G. I can’t wait to read the idiot attacks/threats for simply showing both sides of the same coin and asking for a reasonable/honest reply. To me it seems the “Goim” completely lose the little objective reasoning power they have(?), when facts of “the chosen” and their plans for us are presented. It boggles the mind.

  5. Arthur, I’m absolutely appalled that Canada could put anyone on trial on such absurd charges. Best of luck and I hope you are are victorious.

  6. Canada want to prosecute an individual, but not a Corporation.

    Amazon sell “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”

    “Should sell The Protocols and other controversial works? As a bookseller, strongly believes that providing open access to written speech, no matter how hateful or ugly, is one of the most important things we do. It’s a service that the United States Constitution protects, (my words … does it now?) and one that follows a long tradition of booksellers serving as guardians of free expression in our society.”

  7. “In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act” as George Orwell told us.

    Let’s look at this Arthur Topham farce for a minute shall we?

    He’s on trial for discussing history. He is studying history and disagrees with a certain part of it. There has never been any persecution in history of anyone who questioned the status quo, other than of course Galileo Galilei, who was proven to be right all along, in the same context as those pilloried and lambasted as those who research the holocaust and WW2. He is doing what every student of history does and that’s revise it. He is therefore being persecuted for being a historian.

    He’s on trial for “anti semitism” a word that ridiculously has come to mean the hatred of Jews, when having had this discussion with Franklin Ryckaert, I maintained that Jews are but a small portion of the world’s semitic speaking peoples and to hijack this word for defamation against Jewry in context would be like calling someone anti fruit because they don’t eat bananas.

    He’s on trial for discussing not just Jewish writings which are being played out to the word in society, but also things that Jews have spoken of that is clearly documented.

    He is on trial for being yet another whistle blower, warning us of a very corrupt establishment, that just happens to have an over abundance of Jews, disproportionate to their population ratio within the west.

    He is on trial, as John Kaminski quite rightly states “for telling the truth”.

    I remember reading the writings of an American Actonite Libertarian, historian philosopher and many other things; the late John “The Birdman” Bryant, one of many who questioned the holocaust amongst other realities in life. One of my favourite sayings of John was:

    “The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely, but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used against them — except force.”

    and it is this very reason why men and women, in a growing number of lands, are taken to face trial in a kangaroo court and subsequently found guilty. I am very sorry to state that I feel Arthur’s fate has already been decided and will become yet another victim of Jewry’s silencing of people who speak out against them and more importantly, the truth.

    The implications of the holocaust being found out to be a lie would be a horror film for Israel and Jews. They must keep the holocaust lie firmly protected, for in allowing the cat out of the bag would most certainly create worldwide hatred for Israel and the Jewish people. In fact, the world would ignore Israel’s calls for support, no more so than America, when it kicks out the kike and stops funding its protection through its massive defense budget. Israeli goods would be boycotted and with no support nor money coming in, it wouldn’t be long before Palestinians overrun Israel with support from Muslim neighbours, doing so because they know there would be no western help for Israel. Not only would Jews lose their positions of power all over the west, but their assets would be seized pending investigations. The Rothschild banking cabal would collapse faster than a snowflake in hell and reparation would have to be paid to Palestinians and of course Germany for holocaust lies, they would most certainly be found to be behind along with pretty much every other incident throughout history, involving the crown and the British Empire. The reality would be catastrophic for Jewry.

    We would also see the end of the socialist totalitarian state as we would now have an impartial msm, no longer under Jewish control, that would start questioning the all encompassing authoritarian system around us. The new world order and its drive for a one world government, banking system, culture, religion and people would start collapsing, fast. The Rothschild UN, would disappear, as people would see this as another of their babies along with ISIS, who would lose all funding now the Jewish monarchy has fallen – no more Greater Israel plans, resulting in the end of Islamic lands, for Zionism.

    Now let’s weigh it all up: arresting one man (and the continuing arrest of many more) and imprisoning him, maintaining the lie, or letting the aforementioned become a reality and a rightly so worldwide condemnation for Jewry, their ultimate demise, kicked out of yet more lands and the end of Israel and Zionism?
    Well, it’s a no brainer really isn’t it?

    1. Harbinger,

      I agree with everything you said except for Galileo, who has never been persecuted.
      Galileo, a savant but also a polemist, was blamed for the fanaticism with which he defended the heliocentric thesis, during a period where everybody thought the contrary, refusing to work from hypotheses.
      He erected his reasoning as an absolute truth, making a fool of his opponents, while being incapable of proving his system. And when he did publish his reasons, they were wrong like Newton would prove 15 years later. Blocked by his inability to provide any evidence in support of his allegations, he appealed to the Holy Scriptures, while the Church asked the scholars to remain on the scientific ground and to bring facts confirming their demonstrations.
      But Galileo, pompous and arrogant, would have neither the patience nor the humility to wait for the evidence, unlike the very pious Copernic, being critical and insulting with everybody, even with the Pope Urban VIII, who protected him despite all that. Yes, the act of abjuration imposed upon Galileo in 1633 is absurd when you consider it in a modern perspective, but it was first and foremost a disciplinary action, well accepted by Galileo himself. He wasn’t tortured by the inquisition, like a teacher of my family claimed last summer,pfff, he had to spend two weeks in Villa Medicis, poor boy. When the evidence proving the veracity of Copernic thesis were provided, the censorship striking heliocentrism would be lifted and in 1734, Clement XII would allow the edification of a mausoleum in Galileo’s memory in Florence Santa Croce.

      The old Galileo stereotype posterboy of science against obscutantism and the assumed antagonism between the Catholic Church and the “enlightened” spirit of science are hard to uproot.
      Even the famous formula “Eppur si muove” or “And yet, it turns” is apocryphal. It was invented in 1757 in London by an Italian called Giuseppe Baretti for the antipapist English readers.
      But I disgress…
      I wish all the best to Mr Topham in his fight against the obscurantist Shoah democratic Church of human rights. At least the revisionists got objective evidence…


      1. Phil,

        Thank you for that detailed and knowledgeable reply. I must state that Galileo is not one of my strong points in debate and I have always taken the story I knew as persecution on liberty and freedom of speech. That said though, although, as you stated, Galileo couldn’t prove his heliocentrism theory he was correct.

      2. Well I wasn’t a specialist either until recently but the Galileo martyr of science and free speech is a typical out of context historical manipulation and I am all about revisionism, especially in the defense of the Catholic Church who has been unfairly dragged through the mud and presented as opposed to reason and science.
        Now I could argue that the Inquisition was a social progress in term of justice, since it ended the reign of arbitrary and Torquemada had good points after all if you consider that during Middle Ages and Renaissance the social control of religious orthodoxy was perceived to be legitimate. The French revolution killed more people due to religious persecution in two years than all the Inquisitions, Roman, French and Spanish combined in centuries.
        You see, i would say that Mr Topham is just another victim of a global witch hunt opened in Nuremberg, an irrational phenomenon. Too bad the Catholic Church is not here to bring back reason like it did with the real Witch Hunt in Middle Ages. Yes, the evil priests and Jesuits didn’t burn witches either.


    2. We are now at the point in human history where trying to extinguish the truth is like trying to put out the fire with gasoline. When the jews in the past murdered and punished those who figured it out, it worked as a deterrent for others. As stated in the protocols: “when someone steps out of line, use extreme punishment to set an example”

      However, digital technology, the ability of human beings to ask questions and to think combined with empirical evidence and historical facts, are to the jews and their lies that what a fungicide is to a fungus.
      Here is a good take on the holohoax:
      The jewish lies are falling at free fall speed, as fast as WTC1,2 and 7.

  8. Here is my recent letter to Arthur in case anyone else is interested in doing the same to support him and the cause of free speech in Canada (I agree 100% with what John Kaminski said above, if Arthur loses this case, we are ALL in big trouble):

    October 21, 2015

    Arthur Topham
    The Radical Press
    Quesnel, BC Canada

    David Chu
    Republic of Argentina

    Dear Mr. Topham:

    It is with great regret and much sadness that I heard you are being tried for “hate crime” and “hate propaganda” in Canada for your personal and public views on Jews and Germany of WW2.

    It is as if George Orwell’s 1984 has fully metastasized and taken over Canada. Well, maybe not if you win your court trial.

    One of the main reasons why I left the United States, after working and living there for some 20 years, is because it has turned into the real “Nazi Germany” portrayed in fictitious Hollywood movies like Schindler’s List which was based on a novel of the same title that won the Los Angeles Times’ FICTION Book of the Year in 1983.

    Recently, I let my US “Green Card” expire because who would want to live in “Nazi USA” that has bombed and murdered millions of innocent civilians around the world, starting in WW2?

    As a naturalized Canadian citizen, I will probably also let my Canadian passport expire early next year as I do not want to return to a country that harasses, prosecutes, and jails its citizens for “wrong thoughts” and “non politically correct views.”

    The blatant LIE of the “Six Million Jews” and the “Jewish Holocaust” can be easily refuted if one just reads the London Daily Telegraph news article titled “Poland reduces Auschwitz death toll estimate to 1 million” dated July 18, 1990. The London Daily Telegraph is not exactly a pro-Nazi or “anti-Semitic” newspaper. Not even remotely close.

    You may use this letter and my recent article titled “The Jews ~ A Declaration of Truth to the Goyim!” (located online at in any manner you desire.

    I pray for your legal vindication before the Supreme Court of British Columbia and for a peaceful Canada that is just and righteous and, above all, free. God help us!

    Most sincerely and truthfully yours,

    David Chu

  9. Edgar Cayce defines

    Israel “Is not the Jew … but Israel is THE SEEKER AFTER TRUTH”

    Jews “When ye forsake my ways ye shall be scattered. ye shall be without those things that would bring ye into the knowledge until that time is fulfilled

    Hitler “was guided by (the false) spirit : called for a purpose as has been given; not only in the affairs of a nation, but as the affairs of the world:

    Edgar Cayce’s reading #5377-1. Cayce makes it very clear Israel does NOT refer to the Jews, but to Truth Seekers.

    No wonder this never sees the light of day. The numbers following these quotes refer to specific readings given by Cayce, and can be confirmed by the A.R.E., his organization.

    CAYCE QUOTE: Let there be the study, the closer study of the promises which are made in the book [BIBLE], yes, the history of the Jew; yet these HAVING FAILED,

    who is Israel? Not the Jew, but Israel is THE SEEKER AFTER TRUTH. 5377-1

    Other related Cayce quotes:

    For those WHO SEEK are indeed Israel, Israel indeed is ALL who seek;

    meaning not those as of the children of Abraham,

    but of every nation, every tribe, every tongue — Israel of the Lord! This is the full meaning of Israel. 2772-1

    Q: What should be understood be the statement (Genesis 49:10) “The sceptre has not departed from Israel”?


    Israel is the chosen of the Lord and that His promise, His care, His love has not departed from those


    This is the meaning, this should be the understanding to all.

    Those that seek are Israel. So Abraham means call; so Israel means those who seek.

    How obtained the supplanter the name Israel? For he wrestled with the angel, and he was face to face with the seeking to know His way. 262-28

    Citations from the book: The Edgar Cayce Companion, A.R.E. Press, compiled and published by B. Ernest Frejer, 5th Printing June 1999. copyright 1995.


    Edgar Cayce stated that Hitler was guided by spirit, but ultimately went astray.

    These readings also took me 25 years to uncover, and I’ve only found them in a book that is not readily found in most bookstores, and would certainly NOT be available if its contents were known:

    Edgar Cayce’s Story of the Old Testament by Robert W. Krajenke (first published 1973, fifth printing 1997, A.R.E. Press, Virginia Beach, VA)

    EDGAR CAYCE (in 1933 and 1935) COMPARES HITLER TO OLD TESTAMENT JEHU Cayce on Hitler (Nov. 4, 1933: Reading #3976)

    “The reading tells us [Hitler] could have brought ‘light to the world’… [and was] called [here] for a purpose.”

    CAYCE: [Hitler] is called for a purpose as has been given; not only in the affairs of a nation, but as the affairs of the world

    As he stands much in the position as did Jehu, as regards that people that *think* (Cayce’s emphasis) themselves oppressed.”….

    “It would be well that each interested in the policies, and in which is the directing influence in the life of the dictator of Hitler,

    study that which has been the impelling influence in the *man*, in the mind as it acceded to power; for few does power not destroy, as men.

    Yet this man, unless there is material change, will survive even that.”….

    “If the power is held in that line as it has been directing in the present …there will rise a new ideal in the hearts, in the minds of the people.

    If imperialism among the people is kept in abeyance, great may be the rewards to this peoples, this nation. [Germany]”

    Q-1: Analyse Hitler’s attitude toward the Jews

    A-1. CAYCE: When the *character* of those that have received, in a manner, their dictations — or the dictates of the activity of the director in affairs [God/spiritual]

    is considered, then it will be understood how that this is but that dictation which was given of old;

    and how that those peoples though they were called — have wandered far afield,

    and their rebelliousness and their seeking into the affairs of others has rather brought them into their present position. Read they not that which has been given?

    “When ye forsake my ways ye shall be scattered, ye shall be without those things that would bring ye into the knowledge — until that time is fulfilled.

    ” Hence that attitude that is assumed is rather a fulfillment of that prophecy that has been made, and is the beginning of the return that must come throughout the earth (Reading #3976). (Nov. 4, 1933)

    Q-7: Why is it that apparently Hitler is making a mistake in initiating policies that seem to be antagonizing the world? (Nov. 4, 1933)

    CAYCE: Because the world has not yet understood wholly Hitler’s policies.

    For these are initiated rather from the spiritual source:

    and the world is very material-minded, and oft understands little of spiritual direction or dictation.

    But they must come to understand, unless there is more injection of the imperialistic influences… (Reading #3976-13).

    “As more and more question marks arose about Hitler’s rise to power, a question was asked in a subsequent world affairs reading of 1935.”

    Q-4: Explain the relation between the information just given regarding Germany and the changes for this year, and the information already given through this channel [Cayce] on Hitler.

    CAYCE: Read that, my children, that has been given;

    that there was the destiny for the man, if he did not allow imperialism to enter in … and it is entering. Hence must be called into question. (Reading #3976) p. 81

    NOTES from the book:

    Was Jehu psychically developed as the readings imply Hitler was?

    If so, then both men were open to a deeper source of unconscious vitality, energy, and charisma, which made them “chosen” leaders.

    There were subjective channels of a higher force.

    How they used — or allowed that energy to be used becomes the personal responsibility of that soul.

    The book text goes on to say,

    “Although this reading was emphatic about Hitler’s opportunity to fulfill a divine mission, the [Cayce’s} association in 1933 with Jehu was, for a student of the Bible, grimly prophetic.” p. 80

    Mat 23:33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can you escape the damnation of hell?

    Mat 23:34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, wise men, and scribes: some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall you scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

    Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom you slew between the temple and the altar.

    Mat 23:36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.

    The names of Witchcraft Council of 13 which is under Rothschild control and in turn issue orders to various groups.

    One of the purest form of Satanism can be traced to the Jewish Sabbatain sect and its Frankist spinoff.

    The leaders of this up to the Rothschilds were: Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676) Nathan of Gaza (16??-?) Jacob Frank (1726-1791) Rothschilds

    1. John Soulman

      Sorry, but more egalitarian nonsense. This time channeled through Casey.

      I do not believe Casey was channeling the spirit of I AM/Jesus. Like the demon possessed women who could predict many future events who followed Paul yelling all day “this is a servant of the most high”, so too did Casey predict some future events as many thought him a prophet of the most high. If the spirit he was channeling was of I AM/Jesus, how could he be so wrong on these subjects?

      A Prophet of God is 100% correct and Casey isn’t in many cases such as the definition of true Israel isn’t right. While Israel in a spiritual sense is a seeker of truth, it’s those type of the Seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob ALONE who are called Israel. In Revelation it makes clear 144,000 from the 12 tribes of Israel from Jacob’s seed are restored to the land and that others who are saved are from all nations, tribes, tongues. But Just because people of all races etc are saved doesn’t mean that they are brought into the land. How can one restore people to a land they never inhabited in the first place? Obviously one can’t except to those who lived there previously as the homogenous group of Hebrews.

      Abraham doesn’t mean “call”. It means Abra (or Abba) “father” Raham/raam = nations. Father of many nations.

      Genesis 17:1 AND Abram was ninety-nine years old, and the Lord appeared to Abram and said to him, I am thy God, be well-pleasing before me, and be blameless. 2 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee, and I will multiply thee exceedingly. 3 And Abram fell upon his face, and God spoke to him, saying, 4 And I, behold! my covenant [is] with thee, and thou shalt be a father of a multitude of nations. 5 And thy name shall no more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraam, for I have made thee a father of many nations. 6 And I will increase thee very exceedingly, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee. 7 And I will establish my covenant between thee and thy seed after thee, to their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be thy God, and [the God] of thy seed after thee. 8 And I will give to thee and to thy seed after thee the land wherein thou sojournest, even all the land of Chanaan for an everlasting possession, and I will be to them a God. 9 And God said to Abraam, Thou also shalt fully keep my covenant, thou and thy seed after thee for their generations.

      Furthermore, Jacob (which means supplanter) obtained the name Israel (he who overcomes and rules with the Lord) by surrendering to the Angel with whom he wrestled and wouldn’t let go. He would only let go if this angelic figure (Jesus type) blessed him which he did by giving him a new name. (Genesis 35:10)

      The “angel” asked Jacob what his name was and when Jacob said his name (definition given above) he was basically admitting to his part in the deceptiveness in regard to supplanting Esau as the one who would get the birthright, dominion/fruitfulness blessings. In other words, the message in this is to never let go of I AM/Jesus, admit your sins and surrender to our creator/savior.

      The Scepter shall not depart explanation is also dead wrong.

      Genesis 49:10 The scepter shall not depart from Judah, Nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, Until Shiloh comes, And to him shall be the obedience of the peoples.

      The ruling authority was placed in Judah and Levi. Judah had physical ruling authority. Levi spiritual yet both were in Judah, the name for the southern tribes of Israel. The two Houses of David are also in Judah and this is important to remember. Notice how it says “until Shiloh comes”. Who’s Shiloh? Shiloh is Jesus and he comes twice to DIRECTLY intervene in the affairs of mankind. The first time he came the scepter departed from the first House of David, Judah and Levi and went to the second House of David, Ephraim and Manassah marking the end and beginning of those earth ages. The next time he comes the scepter departs again as it leaves the second House of David, Ephriam and Manassah and goes to Shiloh himself surrounded equally by 12,000 from each of the physical 12 tribes of Israel (from Jacob’s loins-whites/Europeans) who co-reign with the Lord. Thus the Davidic Throne is married with I AM’s Throne (Stone of Destiny-Jacob’s Stone) and the Ark of the Covenant (I AM’s earthly Throne). Also married are Jesus (as Husband) to his bride (144,000).

      Food for thought and this is because those Satanists you spoke of above (Roths etc) are erecting a Satanic egalitarian type of “Kingdom” in “Israel” where the “Jews” rule on top with the “gentiles” (non “Jews”) having only “representation” in a new world congress based on non scriptural egalitarian principals applied to all human races (except “Jews’) as if they are scriptural. This false notion that all races, individuals, sexes etc, are equal (except for the ruling “Jews”) that is being enforced upon all white/European nations (multicultural, multiethnic “diversity”) will soon apply to all nations all over the globe and this so no people, no race, no tribe, no tongue will be able to organize and take over the “Jews” JWO.

    2. @JS

      I would like for this post to be my last word on Hitler. We’ll see.

      Things went awry for the National Socialists as planned by the protocolian ‘steering committee’ in turning it into Nazism. And whatever notions of Hitler going off the deep end of occultism can be allayed by the fact that his language in denouncing International Jewry never wavered from his youthful days in Vienna to his final ones in the Berlin bunker. This aim was held with consistency to the bitter end. The only thing that mattered was the original INTENT to eradicate a corrupting scourge.

      All this prattling on about a demonized Hitler who “knew what he was doing in relation to Satan’s mission” is misleading, any occult-related misguidedness on his part notwithstanding.

      You can’t know what you’re doing if you’re being duped with whatever it is you do under the spell of the Satanic objective.

  10. “The outcome of the trial will determine whether or not Canada is, in fact, a truly open and free democracy or a nation whose sovereignty and freedom has been compromised by the wilful, premeditated actions of foreign lobbyists inimical to the country as a whole. In other words Freedom of Speech will be on trial.”

    Is Canada not still part of the Commonwealth?
    Does Canada still not see the Queen of England as their head of state?
    Is Canada therefore not under the control of the Rothschild owned Crown corporation?

    I think therein lies your answer to your question above regarding being a free democracy with sovereignty and freedom. There has never been democracy simply because there has never been any law to hold politicians accountable for pre election promises. Sure, you get to vote, but what use is a vote when you have no say over what your government does? Ah, but there’s your answer right there; why would people, whom you elect to GOVERN YOU have any desire to listen to anything you have to tell them?

    “The whole of Crown’s case rests upon the key terms “willfully” and “hatred”, which, in the case of the latter term “hatred”, any person of common sense will realize, is a word that, like its opposite, “love”, is imbued with multiple meanings, all of which are based upon subjective emotions of one type or another.”

    Yes but common sense has no say in a courtroom where a specific agenda must be enforced. There is, without a doubt in my mind whatsoever, no way Arthur Topham has any hatred for anyone, yet this is entirely irrelevant when continuing to promote the holocaust narrative and persecution of the Jews agenda.

    Take something that happened to me today. I was called a racist because upon having a discussion on Scottish nationalism, which I stated was a pointless waste of time (as people on here know of my views), he whom I was debating with felt (through using the word) that I hated people from other lands and cultures and showed white supremacist views, because I simply stated that “if someone was not of Scottish, Pictish and to a point of Norse heritage connection, then they shouldn’t be allowed to vote in the Independence question.” He simply could not understand the fact that if you define a nation as of a people who are simply born in a land or have lived there for ‘x’ amount of years, this belief destroys the very concept of nation. If as he pointed out that an Englishman who lived in Scotland for 5 years voted for Scottish Independence, what really is the difference between being governed by Parliament in England or Scotland? In effect he is saying that Scottish people are not English and have a right to govern themselves, yet how can an Englishman become a Scotsman after 5 years of being a Scotland domicile? He didn’t realise he was effectively contradicting his stance, by not wanting to be governed by people, who are essentially no different to himself. There is no Scottish nation. It is merely an amalgamation of British, Europeans and their cultures. Nationality no longer exists ANYWHERE in the UK.

    You may wonder what has this to do with the debate on Arthur Topham, well, it has everything to do with it because it’s imposing that one hates another because of an opposing viewpoint as Arthur is being tried for. I have never been a hater of any people, of their culture and been one who has always trumped the rights of the indigenous peoples and their right to exist as separate peoples, wherever they may exist in this world. However, the horror that is hate speech (the Act of Law that is) is there in order to utterly smash anyone’s freedom of speech. Anything that one says in life can be deemed as hate speech, in that you are offending another with your views. Therefore the creation of hate speech offenses means a complete control on speech.
    Take a classic example of hate speech laws here in the UK. I know of a friend who was given 150 hours of community service for calling someone a black bastard. Was the man black? He defines himself as such. Was he a bastard? He was born out of wedlock. So the man is technically, by definition in the English language, a black bastard and even states himself he is one, but for a man of another race to say this, was being racist and derogatory. Arthur Topham finds himself in a similar situation, about to be tried and found guilty for stating the truth.
    Take another hideous example. Another woman I know was given the same sentence for saying she was in the “Pakis, getting some milk” on her mobile phone to a friend. She didn’t even speak to the shop assistant, but he called the police and she was arrested under the Public Order Act.

    Once you destroy freedom of speech and expression you allow tyranny to take control. Destroying freedom of speech continues the lie of the holocaust to be protected and safe from exposure. There can be no discussion on it, as it’s deemed as hate speech to the Jewish people. It was this very reason that I awoke to the perfidy of Jewry. How dare they tell me what I can nor cannot say about whomever I choose, whenever and wherever I happen to be. My life is mine to live and take control of and the right of no other. It’s why the holocaust must be exposed for the lie it is, or the nightmare that Arthur Topham is currently facing is the tip of the Iceberg when it comes to complete control of people’s voices and views wherever they may be in the west. Hate speech law simply is another tentacle of the Jewish, ethnocentric, supremacist Octopus.

    1. Correct Harb…

      Sovereignty rests at only one level. The top.

      The Queen is ‘sovereign’… Canada is NOT…!!

      Canadians can ‘play-like’ they have a democracy…. until the Queen stops it.

      The monarchy of Canada is the core of both Canada’s federalism and its Westminster-style parliamentary democracy, being the foundation of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the federal and each provincial government.

      The current Canadian monarch, since 6 February 1952, is Queen Elizabeth II.
      As the sovereign, she is the personal embodiment of the Canadian Crown.
      Although the person of the sovereign is equally shared with 15 other independent countries within the Commonwealth of Nations, each country’s monarchy is separate and legally distinct.
      As a result, the current monarch is officially titled Queen of Canada and, in this capacity, she, her consort, and other members of the Royal Family undertake public and private functions domestically and abroad as representatives of the Canadian state.
      However, the Queen is the only member of the Royal Family with any constitutional role.

      People are NOT sovereign anywhere living in any lands of organized governments. Include USA.

      1. “People are NOT sovereign anywhere living in any lands of organized governments. Include USA.”

        Actually, if one is a white/European, born on Mainland America, they are born a Sovereign (American National) with equal rights to both the Pope and Crown. However, most everyone born in America is immediately given a birth certificate which is a Corporation created by the Corporation state who’s name is yours but in bold caps. So from this point out the legal fiction Corporation state (that was created, owned and controlled by the “Jews” of the 3 City states) doesn’t consider you a Sovereign ,but instead, always fraudulently, addressing your living soul as if your flesh and blood body were the creation of the “Jews” Corporation state expressed as the Corporation fiction they made in bold caps out of your name.

        Everything in America is run by contract law but the proof that this birth certificate Corporation fiction supplanting your living soul is a fraud, thus unlawful, illegal, null and void, are these words in the Declaration of Independence..

        “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men (white man) are created equal (the law applies equally to all white man) that they are endowed by their Creator ( I AM/Jesus) with certain un-lienable Rights (rights that cannot be contracted, taken, stolen, transferred or indebted away), that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

      2. Yes Pat I concur..almost. Canada is nothing more than Britain, albeit divided by the Atlantic Ocean. Many also believe that the USA is also owned and controlled by the crown, especially considering the peace agreement between the USA and the UK after the War of Independence was decided by the British. We can also look at the control of the USA by the Rothschilds as well.

        “People are NOT sovereign anywhere living in any lands of organized governments. Include USA.”

        This is the only part of your answer I would disagree with. An individual who studies the law and clearly knows the difference between contract and common law and sees why they have a birth certificate and the implications behind it.
        Everyone in this world is born sovereign. It is their willful ignorance of and compliance to the system that puts shackles upon their feet.

      3. Harb –

        I carried the same thought of being ‘sovereign’ for over 40 years… I even lectured and taught it as you described.

        You mentioned studying law….. and I have studied law informally for many years. I have Black’s 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th editions, well used, right here. I have Bouvier’s 1859 and much of Holmes’s works. I have Koeffler-Reppy “Common Law Pleadings” (1969-West) right here as well. The latter gave me the most insights for my conclusions. I spent many days in law libraries until they shut out the public. I enjoyed reading Anderson’s UCC there. It was kept vaulted away in the back.

        I am a novice… no expert at all. I was just trying to figure it all out. I have self published some books and put them into the ‘patriot’ groups over the years. I studied and worked with Benson, Becraft, Clarkson, Beckman, Freeman, Wangrud, Griswold and numerous others.

        And what I figured out is…. If I have no place to enjoy and operate my rights… I have none… and I am not ‘sovereign’ at all. The government is. They own the land. I am actually trespassing on their reservation, their land…. confiscated through numerous Discovery Doctrines over the centuries. Finding those Doctrines, applied by European ‘sovereigns’ and, even, Jefferson, cemented my beliefs.

        I came to that conclusion, partly, about 20 years ago, after I read about ‘Freeborn John’ Lilburn…. born long before SSN. His points have been used in numerous cases over the years, even SCOTUS.

        It made me see that so called ‘sovereigns’ spend a lot of time in jail… Not free.

        To me ‘not free’ means ‘not sovereign.’


        John Lilburne (1614 – 29 August 1657), also known as Freeborn John, was an English political Leveller before, during and after the English Civil Wars 1642–1650.

        He coined the term “freeborn rights”, defining them as rights with which every human being is born, as opposed to rights bestowed by government or human law.

        John Lilburne was the son of Richard Lilburne, a landowner of estates at Thickley Punchardon and elsewhere in County Durham

        If you don’t like wiki:

      4. @Tyron

        So let’s see if I’ve got this straight.

        A half-white, half-red man was created half-equal to the fully white man.

        So for starters, tell me why Jefferson didn’t make this particular distinction in his D.O.I.?

      5. Brownhawk


        Do you believe you have those inherent rights bestowed upon you by the creator of all?

        If Yes, and you don’t doubt, you do
        Anything else is bullshit

        However, does this mean you have the same rights to the land as a physical person bestowed upon Jacob?/Israel as part white man? I leave that up to the Lord, however, in the spiritual realm, I am convinced if you hold onto Christ, especially if you are murdered for the truth like him, then you surpass the physical promises and will become that to which all physical Israel hopes for: an angelic type being, “reincarnated” in their Adamic form that knows no death, pain, suffering or sin. In short ‘half breed” you WIN IT ALL!!

        Does that explain it for you?

      6. Pat,

        I’ve always known you are a learned individual. You also have some years on me as well. Again I can’t fault a word especially when I do very much agree that we are all nothing more than animals in cages with invisible bars.

        Ok, let’s put it this way – we are born free and should be free individuals to do what we wish, but the state, imposes the system, which are nothing more than the wishes of powerful peoples, upon all peoples and should they not follow what these people wish, then the state, via their employed thugs, the police and the judiciary, will arrest and imprison us.

        I’ve been a big proponent of ‘leveller’ belief. It coincides with my beliefs of sovereignty within all individuals.

        It is the system, via the state that puts chains upon peoples feet and those who see this and attempt to take them off are arrested and imprisoned again by their thugs.

        Thankyou for your detailed reply.

      7. Harb –

        The reason for my continuing here is that Arthur is feeling the weight of Canada’s law. Laws affect everyone. Some are interested. Some are not, but perk up when sued or hauled into court.


        Another part of the ‘law’ in the US which helped me come to my beliefs today is the rule of ‘Eminent Domain’…. which means you can claim your rights to property until a government – even a city government – takes those rights away….. and gives them to another PRIVATE party. (In the case below it went from a woman to Pfizer Drugs…. which never used it as claimed. To make it worse the property was a ‘historical’ site.)

        This was the decision which caused Sandra O’Connor to leave SCOTUS. She opposed the opinion. So did Thomas, Scalia and Renquist. This is a horrendous ruling:

        Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one PRIVATE owner to another PRIVATE owner to further ECONOMIC development.

        As for a belief in sovereignty, I am not in total disagreement with you, at some level.
        Biblical principals offer some help there to those who choose that route.

        There is a principle that a man cannot serve two masters. If you become a ‘Bond-Servant’ of Christ, then no one else is your ‘Master.’
        I know some who have taken that very interesting path successfully.
        You can search – ‘Christ’s Lawful Assembly.’

        Also see:

        The rough and tough, former Special Forces member, well known actor, John Quade(John William Saunders – deceased) was a proponent. See his very compelling lecture:

        Non-Statutory Abatement (based on Common Law & God’s Law)

        He mentions…
        The ‘nom de guerre argument.’ (all caps)
        Even ‘Right to Travel’ is a commercial term.
        Key is to never make an ‘appearance.’
        Scripture is the highest ‘Law of The Land.’
        US courts are military courts.

  11. Instead of being sued for printing facts — we have suffered 4 arson attacks and 3 attempts on my life.

    Our advertisers have been threatened to make them disappear.

    We know who ordered these hits and a mafia torch began bragging about it recently with a stupid cover story for one of the incidents when my car was blown up.

    Our street people who sell the paper gain awareness of the larger political disaster that is Canada.

    I am being forced to consider moving to Russia or Iceland for freedom which doesn’t exist in Canada.

  12. Best wishes to Mr. Topham and all the great folks who support him and free speech. The problem with suppression of speech and creating martyrs out of ordinary people for dissenting opinions is that you inevitably create devious and eventually massive violent opposition, and as the repression gets worse, guess what happens. Everyone hates, dislikes, fears, etc.- it’s important to begin by throwing the filthy lie back in their faces and call this oppression what it is, tyrannical suppression of dissenting opinion and freedom of speech. ‘Hate crime’ sounds Orwellian to some, but to me it sounds like the weak expression of a desperate loser, incapable of rule and devoid of talent in creating or managing, and whose days are visibly numbered. Thanks to the spoiled rich men’s sons in CFR, the zionists, etc. this is what we have come to – yet again. The intelligent totalitarian looks something like Franco; the common zionist variety is vicious, widespread, but ultimately weak. Believe it or not, even the Rothschilds losses were far more than most realize (and what a shock to the Rothschilds) when Britain got stripped of it’s empire after WW2. The response to oppression should be boycott and subversive action of many kinds, not flight, though means of flight should always be kept ready but used only if absolutely necessary- that is sensible advice for anyone in the atomic age, or any age; earthquakes, hurricanes,political upheaval, etc. are always with us. The dislike for ‘things as they are’ begs justice, perhaps rough justice at times, so at least ‘strike from afar’ if you’ve already left. There are so many vulnerabilities these creatures take for granted as safe, but it’s important to target specifically (try to avoid innocents, unlike the zio methods, only doomed arrogant idiots create more and more and more unnecessary enemies) . One person can’t do everything, but when many persons do something…

  13. Let’s hope the Canadian justice system remembers its traditional roots in English law, not neocon (Jewish) whining. This trend toward dismantling the traditional English legal system is so upsetting. Of course, if someone were to confront a Jewish person on getting rid of freedom of speech, they would vigorously deny that was true. So they are great supporters of free speech in theory and in fact persecute people for expressing themselves. It took me a long time to realize that there is this big disjunct between what is claimed and what really is. Supposedly Jewish religion and people are open minded about questions. They pride themselves on saying that their religion is freer and more open because questioning is welcomed. Not true! You can ask a question but it has to be the right question. Very few questions are acceptable. It’s like their version of free speech which comes with many conditions like the tiny print on the back of a bad contract. This is so Kafka like… absurdly sinister, and brutally real.

    1. Kapoore,

      “Let’s hope the Canadian justice system remembers its traditional roots in English law, not neocon (Jewish) whining”

      Let’s hope that they most certainly do not if the case between Simon Shepherd and Stephen Whittle is anything to go by.

      Hate speech is now firmly entrenched within the UK Jewish legal system, under the Public Order Act 1986. Anyone who speaks out against another in a derogatory manner is now liable to face a fine, a community payback order, both or imprisonment. There is no longer any freedom of speech in the UK, thanks to Jewry, moreso if you criticize it.

      See more on Shepherd and Whittle here, here, here, here and here

      1. What I can’t figure out is why Muslim hatred isn’t hate speech. Muslims don’t even get a shot at the legal system before they are blamed for all these acts of terrorism that somehow never make it into the courts because the perps were shot and killed by the police before they are even arrested and HMMM “read their rights.” I now smell false flag every time a “Muslim” commits a crime that oops they are killed for in the confrontation, and then the incident is used to trump up hatred of Muslims. Now someone is going to bring up the invasion of Muslims into Europe and all the crimes they are committing, etc. Hold on… in the U. S. Muslims are a voiceless minority that generally do not commit crimes until the U.S. government uses them as propaganda stooges. So hate crimes only protect one group and that group is Jewish. Just like the Homeland Security money goes mainly to synagogues and Jewish schools (or so I hear). Are you beginning to get the feeling that this is a form of aristocracy. If you are Jewish that automatically bequeaths all kinds of special privileges. Enough said..

  14. He should be able to get it thrown out of court bc for one thing they’re not even the real jews! They are khazarians converted to judaism. Do the research. Nasser couldnt have said it better himself, about those fake jews over in Israel now ” “You will never be able to live here in peace, because you left here black and came back white” (1952). Also, Revelation 3:9King James Version (KJV)
    9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have lovedi thee.

    I pray the case goes in your favor Arthur..

Comments are closed.