55 thoughts to “In the Bleak Midwinter (3.44 mins. video)”

  1. TypicalLameDarkmooner : oh boo hoo hoo hoo hoo… in the bleak midwinter jewsus and jewsusses’ jew mommy and jew daddy to jewsus were Refugees!! and now those whiteys in bubba land who say they worship on jewsus, jewsus The Refugee of ALL refugees the jewsus-lervin’ whiteys in kwan land don’t want refugees — and they say they LERV jewsus The Refugee of ALL refugees!!!! oh boo hoo hoo hoo hoo… when will the world will be rid of the kwan’s hypocrisy ???!!! jewsus The Refugee of ALL refugees said hypocrisy is a Sin — THE SIN OF ALL SINS!!! the kwan bubbas do Sin in not wanting tens and tens of millions of Muslim war refugees and millions and millions of other third world war refugees from conflicts all over the third world pouring and flooding into their precious whitey bubba kwan land where they have the gall and the nerve to shout out to the world they LERV jewsus. jewsus The Refugee of ALL refugees!!! NUKE THE BUBBAS!!! We will never rid the world of The Sin Of ALL Sins , Hypocrisy, until that day we NUKE The Bubbas – especially the white ones!!!

    1. Only yesterday you were oozing with sanctimonious Christian piety, referring to Jesus as “Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” and his mother Mary as “Our Holy Mother Mary”. How strange! Today you are referring to Jesus and Mary in the disrespectful terms of a Christ-hating Jew:

      “TypicalLameDarkmooner [post] : oh boo hoo hoo hoo hoo… in the bleak midwinter jewsus and jewsusses’ jew mommy and jew daddy to jewsus were Refugees!!

      You have revealed yourself in the past as a Zionist troll. Several times. Here you do so again on Christmas day, both by your hostility to the beautiful Christian hymn and by your contemptuous references to Jesus and Mary. (“Jewsus and Jewsusses’ jew mommy”). You also advocate “nuking the Whites”, so how can you be the White Italian you claim to be?

      You are most certainly a Christ-hating Jew.

      1. I’m not sure the new monitor is going to put up with you when he gets here. Do you know what makes me a lousy monitor? It’s allowing you free speech on this website. A proper monitor would have given you the boot long ago, and that’s the truth.

        1. TROJ

          I now invite you politely to go and find some other website to post on. To save face, go voluntarily.

          1. @ Avatar

            It does my heart good to know “our” “Palestinian” “avatar” doesn’t have to face the miseries of the bleak mid-winter, living it up down South America way near the equator where it’s always warm and balmy, partaying with his takfiri moozlum buddies and his other good, close, tight buddy-buddies, the mercenary Colombian guerillas who trip over themselves to kill innocent Muslim civilians in the Middle East and destroy their native Muslim countries, on the payroll of jew ZOG, mercenary killers for ZOG Washington, that’s how I know “Palestinian” “avatar” is deeply opposed to the jews in Israel killing innocent Muslim civilians in Palestine/Israel, because all of “avatar’s” friends and buddies are mercenary killers on ZOG’s payroll who go around the Middle East killing innocent Muslim civilians — just like the jews “avatar” is “opposed to” do. “avatar” doesn’t know the dreariness of the bleak mid-winter and doesn’t ever get any kind of winter blues, “avatar” is TOO busy down South America way giving his buddy-buddies the Colombian guerilla mercenaries for ZOG killing innocent Muslim civilians and destroying their Muslim countries in the Middle East on the payroll of ZOG and making a lot of money too Going Away Parties the night before “avatar’s” buddy-buddies ship off to the Middle East to kill innocent Muslim civilians and do everything they can to destroy Muslim countries, and all this for the benefit of the jews, that’s how I know “avatar” is “opposed to” the jews and “opposed to” jew ZOG –> because ALL of the “Palestinian” “avatar’s” buddy-buddies are on the jew ZOG payroll. No bleak mid-winter blues for “our” “avatar”, “avatar” is having TOO much fun partaying down warm and balmy South America way!!!!

      2. troj is indeed a Jewish Trojan horse sneaked under the cover of darkness to this site.
        having said that he is a harmless puppy ,his presence is entertaining to the audience
        his presence from my prospective is needed and welcome

    2. Joe, you are the first to comment on this lovely traditional White Christmas carol, a very common troll tactic as trolls tend to like to get that first dig in. It is a very very Jewish tactic in social media. Then I read all your trash talk and my first impression is… Jewish troll. Only a Jew spews so much hatred about Jesus and would be so inspired as to take His day of birth to be the first to bash Him at a blog you frequent.

      To be honest, the Jew-spew is so irrational and silly, I would bet you over-imbibed the manischewitz. Next year just stay home and rip toilet paper into singles. No one wants to hear the complaining, sarcasm and just plain nastiness. And, I have not read much of your comments but for one or two mentioning me so I don’t know you… but yep, you come across as a member of the tribe in a big way.

      1. @ Noor :

        Firstly, Merry Christmas to you :

        I wasn’t bashing Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, hardly. Come on , Noor, You’re more intelligent than that. At least I hope you are, for your sake. It’s quite blatantly obvious [ to anyone who has any brains that is ] that I was bashing our very own Darkmoon Maxie. It’s very obvious I was spoofing Maxie. Unless you think Maxie who is hooked up-the-kazoo with the International Chinese mafia mobster/gangsters and hooked-up-the-kazoo with The City of London gangster mobster banking joos is The Savior and Light of The World, then I don’t know what. Maybe your hajibee is wrapped too tight around your head, blocking blood circulation to your brain cells, or too much egg nog, who knows.

        It’s quite obviously a spoof on Maxie, how anyone can think otherwise is beyond me. Lighten up everyone. Geeessh.

      2. Nice try, Joe, but it won’t wash! Most unconvincing. 🙂

        Firstly, what you wrote above sounds nothing like Maxie or a spoof of Maxie, it sounds exactly like YOU. Secondly, Max has never mocked “Jewsus or his “Jew mommy”. You have! Several times! Thirdly, why are you now cuddling up to Noor and wishing her a “Merry Christmas” when all your previous comments about Noor have been hostile? Haven’t you accused Noor of running a “Jew website”? … just like you’ve accused Lasha of being a “Jew c**t running a “Jew-controlled website”?

        I think Toby’s right. The new monitor sure ain’t gonna put up with you! (Whoever he is). Only hope he doesn’t boot ME off this site for saying I’m a misogynist! Cos I didn’t really mean it! 🙂

      3. The only full-time, incurable misogynist on this site is Harbinger. Me, I’m just a part-time pussycat of a misogynist who will change my stripes if I meet the right woman. I’m on the lookout for a motherly type. Finding Miss Right isn’t easy.

      4. NOOR
        Happy New Year
        you seems from your picture like a Muslim beauty Princess
        take joe’s comments as entertainment ,don’t bother yourself with his retarded rants
        he is a barking dogy ,he’s not worth your attention

    3. @TheRealOriginalJoe
      The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.

      The faithful witness

  2. It’s Christmas Day, the traditional Christmas celebration of the birth of Jesus, so I would like to make a comment concerning this unusual individual – Jesus, what a guy.

    The following story was related personally to me by Jesus over a brew at a local bar. We had worked together on a construction site, and with his limpid brown eyes, dark curly hair and complexion I thought he was Mexican. However, he would not touch a jalapeño, saying they were an abomination to his palate and when I heard his story, I finally realized it was more likely this Jesus was a Palestinian.

    Here was a young man who knowingly and willingly gave up his life to help his fellow man. What could possibly be more noble? What higher form of altruism is there than to give ones life for an unknown neighbor?

    Jesus said he came for the “lost sheep of Israel”, the lost sheep who blindly followed the Temple’s onerous decrees for continual sacrifice to atone their sins. The Temple kohanim, or priests, were living off the fat of the land. It was said of that day, a man worked one day to pay his rent, one day to feed his family, and one day to pay his taxes (to Rome), the rest went to the Temple. Since there were only six days in the productive week, this meant that half a Jew’s productive effort went to paying tribute to the Temple. Let us now reflect on the words of the great teacher himself.

    “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments, And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues.

    “But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves. Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!

    “Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty. Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift? Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein. And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.

    “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.

    Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchers of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

    “Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
    “Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.”

    Imagine Donald Trump addressing the subject of government in this manner.

    However, Jesus was more than just a demagogue with a bad comb-over, he was the culmination of a movement; a great conspiracy to undermine the Temple and its sacrificial system. Jesus was a product of the collective effort by Essene mystics, born and bred by them for the specific purpose of bringing down the system described in Matthew 23. Jesus knew his fate long before the Sanhedrin decreed their sentence upon him. A burden so great, Jesus sweated blood over the coming debacle.

    Jesus well knew the murderous proclivities of elite Jews and their Temple. He knew the horrible, torturous, punishments meted out to those who went against the Temple system. He knew he was doomed from the very beginning. Yet he continued on, saying to his most trusted confidant Judas, “Hurry, go quickly, lest I lose my resolve.”

    And so Judas hurried off to the Kohein Gadol, Caiaphas, to report the whereabouts of the rebel who had snubbed and rebuked Temple law at every turn before finally attacking their source of revenue directly, within the Temple’s own walls.

    Earlier, at the beginning of his ministry, Jesus used his knowledge of the law to perform a clever trick in blessing wine without demanding the traditional tribute for priestly service. He had the best, but unblessed, wine poured into ceremonially pure receptacles, thereby ritually purifying the wine and negating the need for a paid blessing – “but the servants knew.”

    Later, he reversed the Temple’s official decree of death that could well invoke the terribly expensive “para aduma” purification ceremony, so expensive that even rich Jews balked at the notion of risking touching, or even being in the presence, of a beloved child approaching death.

    Thus, it came to pass the Essene had Jesus set up a public demonstration to rebuke the Temple’s decree of death for one known as “Lazarus”. By raising Lazarus from the sepulcher, a place where a body could be laid to rest in relative comfort before quietly passing over, Jesus made a clear statement: “Lazarus is not yet dead, he is merely another victim of the Temple that has improperly declared him dead.

    Like the un-blessed purification of the wine and the raising of Lazarus, all the “miracles” attributed to Jesus concerned Temple law. Healing was not considered a miracle any more than it is considered so today and walking on water was a neat trick, but no miracle. Why? Because by Temple standards, the definition of a miracle was “an unintentional outcome to the law”. As alcohol is taxed today, wine in ancient Judea was intended to be ritually purified with a paid blessing. Therefore, when Jesus ritually purified the wedding wine without a paid blessing it was a miracle of the worst kind, one that deprived the Temple of its income.

    Once a decree of death was made by a Temple priest, it was never intended that another Temple priest would come along and reverse the decision making a clear point that the individual was not actually dead, thereby voiding the possibility of invoking the required, onerous purification process known as the “para aduma”. It was a truly a miracle that Jesus could once again deprive the temple of its potential revenue. It was truly a miracle anyone would actually be courageous enough to go against the Temple authorities.

    But how did Jesus do this, how did he gain the authority to reverse Temple law and teach against its principals? Jesus was born in the northern village of bet laham literally “house of bread”. Known today as “Bethlehem”, the village was just a stones throw from a monastery administered by an Essene sect known as the Nazarenes. A large lake, known as “Gennesaret” was not far away, so many of the early stories about Jesus are centered around this region which would be referred to by Jews as “Galil” or by Christians as “Galilee.”

    Here the Essene took a young girl into their monastery. She was a pretty maiden, chosen specifically for her intelligence and more importantly her bloodline. The girl’s name was “Mary” and she would be groomed by the Essene mystics to entice a Temple priest into a marriage contract.

    Prior to the birth of Jesus, and up to its demise, the Temple in Jerusalem was THE biggest public works project of its day, attracting skilled workers from around the region. However, there was a problem for the prospective laborer or artisan, one had to be priest to enter many of the areas of the Temple, therefore one had to be both a priest and an artisan or laborer to sign on with the highest paying employer in all Judea. Such was the lot of Joseph, a young priest trained by the Temple as a carpenter or perhaps a stonemason.

    Not many years after his birth, Jesus was delivered to the Nazarene monastery by his parents where he was trained in Temple law and customs. Bright lad that he was, Jesus took to arguing legal minutiae like a duck ~ er ~ priest to water. By the age of thirteen, Jesus had already mastered the law and so when he was taken to the Temple for his bar mitzvah, a legal condition for entry into adulthood where one could now own property and make contracts, he amazed the Temple authorities with his expansive knowledge of their laws and customs. Since Jewish females of that era were chattel, owned by their husbands, they had no need for such ceremony.

    To become a priest and wield the Temple’s legal authority, one had to be born into the priesthood’s bloodline. The paring of a young priest with a woman of Mary’s bloodline made their male offspring an indisputable candidate for the priesthood. All it would take was a priest to perform the initiation ceremony and three priestly witnesses to the event. But what priest would possibly risk the wrath of his fellow priests for secretly inducting a potential rebel into the Temple authority? It would take a rebel priest to perform the ceremony and such a priest was found in the person of Jesus’ cousin John, a man of the same priestly linage.

    From the beginning, cousin John was a different kind of priest, one who rejected the Temple’s sacrifice and its burdensome laws. This is made abundantly clear in the description of his dress. Everything about John, from his dress to his diet fell outside sacrificial law. But most of all, his ritual immersion ceremony, a new form of Mikveh, later referred to as the “baptism,” ran fully against the sacrificial system he eschewed. Like the sacrifice itself, the Mikveh was a regularly occurring, cyclical ceremony that purified and relieved one of certain sins. In contrast, John’s new immersion ceremony was a one-time affair. Once dunked, forever blessed and forgiven. “Such a deal for you my friend,” John would say.

    And so three Temple priests just happened to visit John to see what he was up to on the very day he immersed the young initiate Jesus into the Temple priesthood. Voila! Witness problem solved. Sounds like a plan? It was a plan, a conspiratorial plan against the Temple. From that point on, Jesus was truly a man on a mission, a mission to become the Temple’s final blood sacrifice in the form of the paschal lamb, “the lamb of God.” It would undoubtedly be a horribly painful and bloody death, yet necessary if the Temple was to be brought low.

    Naturally, the first thing Temple opposition tried was to threaten or buy off Jesus. To achieve that end a priest was sent to find Jesus as he meditated and prepared spiritually for his mission. His opposition, referred to as “Satan” which literally means “opposition”, did his best to bully and mock Jesus’ absurd notion of going against the immense power of the priesthood.

    “Why it would be easier to turn these stones into bread”, mocked the priest.

    Taking Jesus to the top of the Temple he tried bullying him again, “If you think you have a chance, then throw yourself off these ramparts. See how you fare without the Temple’s support beneath you.”

    Finally, gesturing out over the ramparts of the massive structure built on the massive plateau of a decapitated mountain, the priest offered his final temptation: “Jesus, look at the world below” and in fact the ‘world’ to the elite Jewish kohanim was Jerusalem. “All this can be yours Jesus, all you need do is throw your lot in with the Temple brotherhood and all our power, all our wealth, and all the women can be yours to do with as you please. We are the elite brotherhood of the circumcised and you are one of us. Come, bend your knee to YHVH, Jesus! Worship our god and our Temple and all you see below will be yours!”

    Unmoved by the generous offer, Jesus spat out his reply, “Get thee behind me Satan” (the Aramaic equivalent of “kiss my tuchas.”)

    And so in rebuking the priests’ offer, the stage was set for the rest of a story that would move quickly from that point on. Jesus now took every opportunity to tweak Temple noses, breaking or refuting legal principal after legal principal. Soon the priests became apoplectic with rage. Finally when Jesus reversed the Temple’s proclamation of death upon Lazarus the “kohein gadol” or high priest hissed “Kill them, kill them both.”

    But there was difficulty in executing the order. First, only a high Roman official could pronounce the sentence of death for the commission of a crime. More importantly however, this was an order to kill a priest, a member of their own brotherhood. No matter how rebellious, Jesus was now officially a member of the circumcised B’nai B’rith or “brotherhood of the cut”. It would not sit well with the rank and file kohanim to witness one of their members summarily executed without the due process demanded by their own Temple law.

    For a time the order went unfulfilled, but when Jesus rode through the Temple’s East Gate in the very manner described by the prophets of the coming Messiah, and went straight to the moneychanger’s tables to attack one of the Temple’s prime sources of revenue, it was too much, the rebel priest had to go. The Essene conspiracy was proceeding exactly as planned.

    Now came a very delicate situation. Jesus had to be turned over for trial and the Essene had to be certain that he would get to trial without being murdered beforehand, something that happened all too often to people taken into custody by Temple guards. They also had to be careful not to alert the Sanhedrin of their intention by making his capture too easy.

    The answer was to produce a traitor among the rebels who would turn Jesus in to Temple authorities. And so during the last supper with his disciples, Jesus leaned over to his most beloved friend and right-hand man, urging him to “go quickly” before he lost his resolve to carry the plan through to its painfully horrid conclusion.

    Judas was appalled at the choice, but was the only one with the legal background and finesse to convince the naturally suspicious Sanhedrin that his intent was that of a true traitor, nothing more. And so, he hurried to the Temple where he had a guard summon the kohein gadol. Caiaphas in turn promptly summoned the Sanhedrin to witness and assess the traitor’s claims. Convinced, they paid Judas the thirty pieces of silver required by law to be paid to an informant; a law that assured the Temple a ready supply of spies and unofficial agents.

    In utter despair over what he had done, Judas threw the money back at the presiding members and legend has it, went out and hung himself over the Hobson’s choice that was to be his fate. Judas was the best and brightest of all the disciples. No doubt, Jesus was greatly pained to have to assign his friend such a terrible task, but it was a necessary part of the plan. While the other rough, uneducated disciples remained ignorant of the plan, there can also be no doubt the urbane, former zealot known as Judas was well aware of how it was to play out in the overall scheme.

    During his trial, Jesus danced around the Sanhedrin’s questions like a matador flashing his cape at an enraged bull. Finally, utterly exasperated, the kohein gadol Caiaphas shot a pointed question at Jesus’ “Do you claim to be the son of god, the new YHVH?”

    To which Jesus replied with gimlet eye, “If you say that I am, so be it.”

    Uplifted with victory, the Kohein Gadol shouted, “There he said it, he has openly admitted to the crime of claiming the title of YHVH!”

    Instantly the supporting members of the Sanhedrin began chanting, “Death! Death! Death! To the traitor! Death to the one claiming the title of our Temple’s God YHVH!”

    Now Jesus would be turned over to the Roman procurator for final judgment, but this led to yet another problem.

    It is not recorded what action had gotten Pilate assigned to Judea, but one can be assured it must have been a serious transgression indeed to get the worst assignment in the Roman Empire. Jews had long been noted for their rebellious nature; they would rise up in revolt at the drop of a Yarmulke. Thus, Roman officials in Judea had to tread very carefully, less they became embroiled in yet another rebellion that would disrupt the region’s commerce.

    By that time, having established major road systems throughout the empire to facilitate the efficient movement of their commerce, Rome was all about the peaceful commerce that fed and supported the empire. Therefore, any such uprising would undoubtedly leave yet another major black mark on the presiding governor’s record.

    All Pilate desired was to quietly serve out his term in the kind of place that later soldiers would typically refer to as “the asshole of the earth”. No doubt, a similar sobriquet would have been applied by Roman soldiers assigned to Judea. All Pilate wanted was to return “to the world”, his world, the Roman world, with no more black marks on his record so he might draw a better assignment within the empire, hopefully much closer to Rome.

    But now Pilate was being approached by these crazy Temple Jews with a request, nay a demand, to have one of their own sentenced to death under Roman law. Worse, this man whom they claim affronted their god had his own clannish group of followers who were reportedly as zealous as their opposition. It was the prefect setup for the very rebellion that Pilate wished to avoid.

    This however was an argument between opposing religious factions and there were many such arguments among many different religious factions throughout the region. As such arguments had nothing to do with Rome or its laws, Pilate attempted what is now referred to as a “work around” solution. First, he personally interviewed Jesus, but found nothing illegal or even scathing about his claims or his words.

    Even though Pilate could find no fault with Jesus, the Temple priests pressed ever harder for the death penalty. Now Pilate tried another ruse, he would let the people decide Jesus’ guilt. Thus Pilate had a known thief and murderer brought out for sentencing as an alternative choice to Jesus. Figuring the choice between a known criminal versus an innocent man would be a forgone conclusion, Pilate had not counted on the Temple’s agent provocateurs stationed among the crowd who began chanting “Jesus!” “Jesus!” We want Jesus! Death to Jesus!

    Now the people had spoken, so Pilate took one last trick from his bag hoping it would satisfy all parties involved – Scourging. He would have Jesus whipped to a bloody pulp, but not executed. Now the Sanhedrin would be satisfied with the sentence and Jesus’ followers would still have their leader.

    However, this too was not to be as once again the Temple authorities demanded execution. Finally, in utter exasperation, Pilate complied with the Sanhedrin’s wishes, no doubt crossing his fingers the execution would not lead to yet another violent Jewish revolt. To show his exasperation and disgust of the matter, Pilate ceremoniously washed his hands of the entire proceedings. He had had quite enough of the Jews’ religious lunacy.

    At that time, it was typical of the crucified victim to be tied to the cross. Nails were expensive, hard to replace and unnecessary for the process to achieve its gruesome goal. In fact to date, there is only one verified archaeological example of a crucifixion carried out with nails, but to achieve the Essene’s ultimate goal, Jesus had to be a blood sacrifice.

    Therefore an Essene priest, posing as a temple authority, approached Pilate with the demand that Jesus be nailed to the cross. No doubt by this point Pilate was fully steamed with exasperation. His reply must have been something on the order of, “Whatever, I’ll have Jesus nailed to the moon if you will go away and leave me alone!”

    And so it was ordained, Jesus was to be goaded to the Mount of Olives where three crosses were positioned facing the East Gate, the very place where Jesus had prophetically ridden a donkey though on his way to attack the moneychangers. In their vindictive rage, the Temple priests wanted Jesus’ last vision to be that of the grand Temple structure he so wantonly attacked, never realizing that the final blood sacrifice of a paschal lamb was about to be committed to their God on their most sacred day of atonement.

    Thus, it came to pass that a man named Jesus gave his life to deliver his people from the criminally onerous financial clutches of the Temple’s kohanim. By law, a blood sacrifice is void unless the animal or victim dies, therefore if the animal or victim remains alive, the sacrifice cannot and will not be honored by god. This presents a legal conundrum wherein the process is put on hold until the sacrifice is complete.

    Jesus’ life was most likely preserved by the Essene, known masters of healing. When Jesus “rose from the dead” he presented an even greater legal miracle than that of Lazarus. As planned by the Essene mystics, the return of the sacrificial paschal lamb from the sepulcher threw the entire Temple system into a religious and legal quandry, slowly spinning downward until the final chapter of the Essene conspiracy, pitting the Jews’ Temple authorities directly against the Romans.

    No doubt, Temple sacrifice went on as before, but now it was different. Jesus had raised serious questions that gave rise to doubt among the Temple’s followers from which the Temple and its sacrificial system would never recover. However, it was yet another revolt that spelled the end of the Temple in 70 AD. Thus, the mission Jesus had begun by refuting Temple law and pointing out the fallacies of its customs, was finally accomplished.

    The mission Jesus had been born and trained for, that of delivering his people,
    the lost sheep of Israel from their sins, was finished. The blood sacrifice of Jesus had fully absolved the sins of the Jews for the last time, delivering them from the bloody financial clutches of the Temple Priests and their sacrificial system.

    Those who sat in Moses’ patriarchal seat and bound their followers with heavy burdens, grievous to be borne, laying them on men’s shoulders; while they themselves moved not one of their fingers. Those whose works only served to aggrandize their position of authority. Those hypocrites who made broad their phylacteries and enlarged the borders of their garments in a show of ostentatious grandeur, who loved the uppermost rooms at feasts and the chief seats in the synagogues all the while devouring widows’ houses. Those who made piously long prayers to absolve themselves from their criminal actions were finally eliminated with the destruction of the Second Temple and its sacrificial system.

    Jesus finished his beer and walking out the door, turned to say: “Jews, my God! Will they never cease their bloody depredations upon the innocent? I hope someone else is willing to come forward this time around. Well, I’m off to see the latest Star Wars movie.”

    Jesus – what a guy.

    Merry Christmas

      1. Noor –

        I am surprised you so swiftly, abbreviatedly agreed with Stanton’s diatribe. He obviously has not read the Bible (kjv) in context. (I believe someone so obviously learned as himself KNOWS BETTER!)

  3. Jesus, whether you believe in him or not, he, or his symbol changed the world and mostly for the better.

    1. Well said, Karen! And Merry Christmas to you! And same to all the other genuine posters on this site.

      1. “Truth can and should be tested lest one fall into beliefs.”

        So where does that leave God? Can you devise a suitable scientific test to verify God’s existence? No, you cannot. Nor can anyone else. Are you therefore saying that no one has a right to believe in God because God’s existence is beyond empirical proof?

        God’s existence must always remain in the realm of beliefs. Never of facts. You either believe (believer), disbelieve (atheist), or you aren’t sure (agnostic). That’s how it has always been.

        I speak as a logician and philosopher.

        Later I may speak of Pascal’s Wager … but this is not the time.

  4. Lasha,

    I love you! The idea of you. That’s why I love this video so much. I was in tears looking at it. It stirred me to the very depths of my being. Thank you.


      TOBY: I know you mean well, but I hope you will accept my sincere apologies for deleting this extravagantly flattering compliment addressed to Lasha. It would only make her blush ferociously if she read it. Fortunately, she won’t, as she has been away from her computer and won’t be returning until tomorrow. Another reason I must delete this undeserved compliment is that we have noted that the more such compliments Lasha receives the more she is hated and resented by women. For psychological reasons, Lasha’s most implacable enemies have always been women.

      1. @ Toby

        I’m sure Lasha wouldn’t have “blushed ferociously” if she’d read that compliment. What a strange website this is! This is the only website I know where the vilest insults and obscene abuse addressed to Lasha Darkmoon are regularly published but where a genuine compliment gets deleted because the monitor thinks the compliment is “extravagant” and “undesevered.” Weird!

  5. Whatever might be said of TROJ, he is no troll, it’s just that this outburst was even more over the top than the most, he outbursted his usual quota.
    He did a poor imitation of Max, which is good, because we now know that TROJ is a poor imitator of anyone but TROJ, and I would guess that one of the skills that a prospective troll must demonstrate at a job interview is passable mimicry.

    If TROJ could control his abundant bile flow, he’d be ok, but that bile is a problem, always looking to offend someone, for whatever satisfaction it gives him, a puzzle to me – so you made someone miserable, what is your personal gain? I don’t get it, please explain.
    Secondly, as soon as some random idea enters your head, if it produces any resonance, you ride it beyond its worth, take it as the world’s most incontrovertible fact, without a slightest background check or seeing how it fits among known facts into a seamless narrative, just pounding the same tiny nail over and over past recognition and making an irrelevant fool of yourself.
    Others are on occasion guilty of that too but never quite to the same neurotic extent.

    And it is a pity because you have some talent, especially for sniffing out phoniness.

    So, incorporate these into the coming resolution list:

    control bile output or at least your reaction to it, nastiness yields at best a temporary satisfaction bit lasting damage, like a toxic drug, also very anti-Christ-like to offload personal discontent onto others,

    when in grip of some idea, however revelatory it may seem at the first glance, do some verification or at least make it fit into a broader picture,

    no endless repetition, twice is the civilized maximum.

    And then, 2016 should see a much improved TROJ compared to 2015.

    1. Imagine if Christ had had some of those traits and is yelling and hollering on the cross:
      whatcha staring at, you m&^%$f*&^@#+g habiru shower curtain hydra heads, go back to your west african lilly pads, I’d just LERV to see you all boiled in maggot ridden ratshit in hell
      Where would Christianity be today?

      Hmm, on the second thought … 🙂

    2. Lobro –

      Certainly, I hope TROJ takes-to-heart your most understanding critique of his psyche! No one could have said it better, IMO. (Although I, myself, have been accused of dissing Lasha, I do not believe it!) (For whatever reasons, TROJ is obviously in jest!) 🙂

    3. Yes, Gilbert.
      Good news: TROJ cannot be anyone but TROJ.
      Bad news: he is still TROJ 🙂

      Anyway, I generally prefer and trust people like that, because successful mimicry is a prerequisite for a parasite and Jew is the world’s preeminent parasite.
      It is the essence of lying, selling fake reality as the real deal, which is what so preoccupied Jesus in his ministry of Truth, which is what so preoccupies the Jew so that Kol Nidre is the only sacred utterance he makes in the entire year.

      And look at Jew, forever pretending that he is something he is not, proclaiming false aims.
      Changing name whenever it suits him, propagandizing, false flags, “lord” Rothschild with those harelip accents of British upper crust while worshipping Devil in his basement synagogue, fake academics endlessly selling their nonexistent superiority, making up biblical stories on the go, everything behind scenes in the dark, nothing out in the open daylight, it freaks them out, perverting, inverting, twisting, every which way but straight.
      No wonder they like movies and theater so much.

      And in that, I must say, they resemble women, which is something that our white women should be on the lookout for because Jew has exploited this tendency for too long.
      I think it is the crux of numerous arguments and controversies we’ve had in this forum.
      And it is good that it bothers TROJ but now he must polish his method, make it his personal spit-shine TROJect.
      I can’t do it for him nor can anyone else.
      We can all sling praise and curses at each other but at the end of the day we are exactly the same, nothing gained, nothing lost.

      I seem to be pursuing 2 happily unrelated subjects here, TROJ and the Jew … must choose the prey …

      Ok, so the Jew, while able to imitate everyone is in the end a nobody, a perfectly empty hole, because there is no truth in him, what grassroots can grow out of Astroturf?

      The coming Antichrist will be very dangerous indeed and a perfect imitator, be ye wise as serpents and innocent as doves (in other words, don’t get too smart).

  6. A sublime piece of music that harks back and evokes memories of the old decencies of Christmas and an England that no longer exists. Beautiful! Lasha. Thank you!
    Also a fine piece of writing by Arch. Good writing is the hardest work I know and I admire those who can apply themselves with such diligence to a most arduous task. Of course, there is another person, who will remain nameless, who produces obviously schizoid posts. Such a “gentleman” is to be pitied and an object of our compassion.

  7. If you think winter is bleak now, and we’re only 4 days into winter, just wait and see how bleak this winter is going to get pretty soon. Obama’s Muslim “refugees” are coming to the USA very soon, this very winter they will be here. And while not all Muslims are like the Muslim refugees, Obama doesn’t want Muslims who are peace loving or tolerant or easy-going. Like in Europe, the USA will be getting the Muslims who are the most intensely Jihadist. For that’s ZOG agenda, to bring Jihad to America.

    1. @ Rich

      Maybe it reflected the “schmaltzy and syrupy” personality of my niece Lasha Darkmoon who selected it out of dozens of others because of the beautiful voice of the singer and the picturesque winter landscapes that went so well with the words? Maybe the video also reflects the schmaltzy and syrupy personalities of the many commenters on this site who enjoyed the video and praised it? What a pity, dear sir, that we all happen to have such poor taste and that you alone are the arbiter of excellence. 🙂

      Intelligent you may be. What you lack is tact and good manners.

      1. Geeez! Sorry I pissed you off, Uncle. But looking back at my comment, I see nothing that should elicit this type of response.

        Obviously, I must have somewhat enjoyed the post made and found value in it if I was reminded of a favored version of it. Just because I can differentiate between two different versions of a classic High Anglican Carol does not equate with me tearing you out a new one. I guess I just didn’t understand the true nature of your sensitivity.

        Happy Christmas.

      2. Uncle, I must come to a partial defence of Rich.
        The terms like schmaltzy and syrupy are unfortunate because they put one subjective judgment against another, namely, awesome and deeply moving.

        What I find is that women generally react to the subjective, anecdotal and emotional content, or qualitative if you will, and men are more quantitatively minded, I certainly like to deal with the metrics when discussing anything.

        Though without any formal musical education, I prefer non vocal music, especially renaissance, baroque and classical, when the only known vocalizations were in folk music or for easy amusement like operetta, cabaret and later on, operas, all of which if not liturgical, had to do with sex, cheating, seducing and finally, in attempt to reach more serious audiences, tragic, unrequited love, suicides, forbidden love due to social restrictions (wonder if Jew had his hand there), Carmen, Mme Butterfly, Romeo+Juliet, I Pagliacci, deeply moving/schmaltzy, depending on your momentary frame of mind.

        But with Scarlatti, Albinoni, Vivaldi, Pachobel, Bach, Beethoven, Schumann, Haydn, the tonal progressions and harmonics are as timeless and inevitable as astronomical orbits or geometrical proofs, alive independently of human emotions.

        Dignified, majestic, deeply moving – or cold, soulless, inhuman, take your pick.

        Maybe the Hindu and Islamic devotional music strikes the best balance, ragas on sitar and tablas, Ravi Shankar and that immortal Pakistani singer whose name now escapes me – Nusrat Fateh Khan (didn’t look him up, remembered on my own, seriously and mysteriously).
        Just like Fitzgerald’s translation of Omar Khayyam’s Rubaiyat (I don’t have to know Farsi to know that Khayyam was special, thanks to Fitzgerald).
        Perfect balance of cold and cheesy 🙂

        All to say, I don’t have to have all the subjective ducks in a row, aligned with Lasha’s in order to remain the best of friends.

        1. @ Lobro

          I reject your argument in defense of Rich because you completely misunderstand my point. I am NOT comparing Lasha’s choice of music to Rich’s choice of music and asserting that Lasha’s choice is just as good, if not superior. I am quite prepared (and so is Lasha) to grant you your unspoken assumption that Rich’s rendition of “In the Bleak Midwinter” is TEN times — nay, a HUNDRED times — superior in its exquisite taste to Lasha’s “schmaltzy and syrupy” offering.

          The point I am making us this: if Rich had offered his choice of music modestly with the prefatory remark, “Here is an alternative version of the Christmas hymn which is more to my personal taste,” that would have been fine. Instead, he chose to put down, disparage, sneer at, mock Lasha’s choice of music by describing it as “schmaltzy and syrupy.” Is this how you would behave if invited to a free meal at someone else’s house? Would you find fault with at the dish offered to you by your hostess by saying, “Too schmaltzy and syrupy for me! How can I eat this garbage? For me, a man of exquisite taste, only the finest gourmet dish will suffice!”

          Being superior shouldn’t involve making others feel inferior. Lasha needs to be treated with a modicum of respect. She is not here to serve as everyone’s punching bag and spitting bowl.

    2. Meanwhile, Toby, I didn’t even listen to Rich’s version, nor have I ever used the terms, schmaltzy and syrupy.

      Moreover, I did describe the choice of those terms ad unfortunate.
      And, what’s more, at no time did I assert superiority or inferiority of one choice or the other, be it a broad genre or a particular piece.

      Can you do me a favor by rereading my post? Thanks.

      What I did assert, were the following opinions or observations:
      though his choice of wording was unfortunate, Rich did not give appearance of disrespect to Lasha, as he subsequently confirmed – the most that can be said is that he would have selected another rendition which he considered more appropriate to the occasion – a purely subjective judgment. I did point that put, did I not.
      Next, I elaborated on a probability of a sexual dimorphism in determining the musical preferences, again at no time asserting any judgment of superiority of one form over another and finished by speculating that other cultures may have had more success in reconciling this divergence.

      In my post’s bottom line, I restated that one’s choice of musical preference shouldn’t in any way affect the substance of friendship – or hostility for that matter, any more than whether one prefers coffee or tea.

      It is now doubly unfortunate that the molehill has grown not even into a mountain but into a smoldering volcano.
      But I will no longer pursue this point because it looks like what the firefighters refer to as backdraft, ie, effort to put out the fire results in even greater conflagration.

      1. It seems to me that the people running this site, don’t like criticism of any kind. They demand the respect of all posters, except TROJ and Madame Butterfly. Weird.

      2. I seriously don’t want to escalate this, especially since there never was any criticism meant or effected on my part, I challenged Uncle to provide evidence.

        Maybe it is just overdose of rich food and wine resulting in raised blood pressure, cholesterol and clothes getting tight, folks get a mite belligerent and need to blow off steam.

        Either that or TROJ was granted his long standing wish and made moderator for a day, conjuring up crimes and misdeeds out of the thin air.

      3. @ Lobro

        Don’t worry, you will see the back of me soon. My days as a monitor are numbered. I was simply defending my niece from disrespect, which I feel I have a right to do.

        BTW, I never accused you of disrespect or of using the term “schmaltzy and syrupy”, so I have no idea why you put up this straw dog. Also, I don’t need to “reread” your post to understand it. I understand it perfectly.

        You have certainly sent Lasha the wrong signal by giving your full support to her principal attacker and abuser, TROJ. Can’t you see that? I leave you with these disturbing thoughts as I tiptoe my way out of this site for good.

        I hope the next monitor will be an improvement.


      4. @ Red Onions

        “It seems to me that the people running this site, don’t like criticism of any kind. They demand the respect of all posters, except TROJ and Madame Butterfly. Weird.”

        Let me analyse your silly comment for flaws in the reasoning.

        1. Why do you feel to need to “criticize the people running this site”? What are they doing wrong? Can you explain?

        2. “They demand respect of all posters.” you say. Who are “THEY”? Can you identify by name the persons who have “demanded” your respect? Can you provide a single quote from any of the administrators saying, “I demand your respect?”

        3. “. . . except TROJ and Madame Butterfly.” You are saying that no action is taken to criticize/discipline TROJ and Madame Butterfly and you find this “weird”. FALSE! Toby has just ticked off TROJ in no uncertain terms, and in spite of the fact that TROJ is this site’s most persistent offender he is allowed to continue posting only because he is regarded as this site’s “resident Court Jester” or “licensed lunatic”. Different rules apply to him because he is off his rocker, understand? As for Madame Butterfly, I understand she has either been banned for her abusive tongue or has been admitted to an alcoholic clinic, so she stopped posting because of her severe mental problems.

        4. “It seems to me that the people running this site, don’t like criticism of any kind.” No need for a comma after the word “site”.

      5. @ Sardonicus. “They demand respect of all posters.” you say. Who are “THEY”? Can you identify by name the persons who have “demanded” your respect?

        Here’s one comment. I never called LD Hasbara, nor implied it.

        December 11, 2015 at 5:27 pm
        @ Pat
        @ Red Onions
        Ooops, I’ve made a huge mistake! I thought, in my haste and carelessness of reading your above comment [PAT] , that the “poem” was referring to JEWS, not Muslims! I would have been less inclined to praise it for its “eloquence” if I had thought it was an attack on Muslims! I honestly got the impression, from speed-reading through the text and not really concentrating, that this was a comment on the JEWISH inability to settle in any country without complaining about it and being unhappy with their hosts.

        Red Onions:—
        I have noted your hostile comment stating that I “endorsed” this comment and am therefore either a hasbara agent or a dupe of hasbara. All this for my totally innocuous 6-word comment to Pat: “Eloquently put. Reads like a poem.”

        I am hoping that your all too apparent hostility toward me will abate somewhat, and that I get a bit more RESPECT from you, when you realize that I was guilty of a simple error. I have never made a negative comment about Muslims in my life and I have the deepest respect for Islam, as the opening section of this article (“Sound Effects in the Qur’an”) will show you.

        I’ve been called “insolent” more than once by Toby. Who are you Sardonicus? Are you a monitor?

      6. @ Red Onions

        I’ve been called “insolent” more than once by Toby. Who are you Sardonicus? Are you a monitor?

        If you’ve been called “insolent” more than once by Toby, it is because you are insolent — as your most recent comment to Lobro amply illustrates. Please note that the word “insolent” is not a rare adjective and that many people use the word as a synonym for “rude” or “unmannerly.” Only a crazy conspiracy theorist would conclude that two people who happen to use this same common adjective “insolent” are either the same person or that both are monitors of this site.

        BTW, the foul-mouthed Dr Parker has just used the same adjective “insolent” to describe you. Oh gosh, how strange! Is Dr Parker perhaps the THIRD monitor on this site? or are we all perhaps the SAME person? Are you and Pat the same person, since you are always talking to each other? and both of you, I note with amazement, are using the same conjunctions “and” and “but”!

        Wow, what a sinister coincidence.

        I suggest you get your head tested, Red Onions. Failing that, I would advise you to stop picking quarrels with so many different people. I’ve been a poster on this site since its earliest days, long before Lobro and Pat showed up here. So I’d advise to stop trying to put on superior airs with me and keep to your side of the court.

        I don’t wish to have any further dealings with you.

      7. Toby,
        For what short term memory serves, the topic was Rich, not TROJ, whose presence I defended out of purely altruistic, Christmassy, namely schmaltzy motives, I can return to that if you so wish.
        The upshot is that you responded petulantly after i pointed out that Rich meant no harm as he himself duly confirmed.
        If Rich and TROJ share the same IP address, then you have information that I don’t.

        Are we done with Rich yet, i.e. you accept that he never meant to belittle Lasha and underlined his wish to dismiss this non issue with a Happy Christmas?

        So one more time Toby, it looks like you harbored resentment against me for coming out in TROJ’s “defence”, however partial, so partial that even he felt insulted by it as his post indicates, in fact he leveled the old “hydra snake head” epithet at me by way of thanks, ie, implying that I am Lasha’s sock puppet.
        Ridiculous enough for you, Toby or is laughter a forgotten skill?
        In fact, since both you and TROJ took offense at the same post, I am fully justified in believing that you are the same person, same hydra, different heads, I defended one head and the other one took issue with it.
        If you really wanted to call it defence, since as I recall, in the spirit of Christmassy schmaltz, I gave him some advice on self improvement, that constituted about 90 percent of the post.
        You said you understood my preceding post perfectly, no need to reread.
        Did you also understand the offending post (TROJ) perfectly and there is no need to reread?
        Good, one more thing then.

        You have certainly sent Lasha the wrong signal by giving your FULL [Haha] support to her principal attacker and abuser, TROJ. Can’t you see that?

        I agree that TROJ is Lasha’s principal attacker.
        TROJ is also my principal attacker.
        TROJ is also Gilbert’s principal attacker.
        TROJ is also Pat’s principal attacker.
        TROJ is also Ingrid’s principal attacker.
        TROJ is also your principal attacker.
        TROJ is also everybody’s principal attacker.

        In the world of 7 billion humans, the only two people temporarily exempt from TROJ’s attacks are Putin and Trump.
        And you entirely miss the unique humor of this situation and the spice it provides to the site but instead grumble darkly about my backstabbing Lasha or whatever.
        IMO, in misjudging my intention so badly, you unwittingly enhance the entertainment value of these exchanges.
        Or maybe it is just the matter of taste, I like Indian curries and you like mashed potatoes.

        And no, I don’t want to see the back of you, not interested in watching your back recede as you tiptoe off into the grey January mist, another ridiculous notion.

        Have a glass on me of something to lift the flagging spirit and get back to work, your retirement application is denied.
        And I promise that the next time you want to deport TROJ to Birobidjan, I will look the other way.

        1. @ Lobro

          Sigh, sigh, sigh. Why do you stab me in the back like this when I have always loved you as I would my own spiritual son or ideological mentor? So wrong of you! All I will say is this, dear friend: whatever happens to us in the future, do not desert this site ever or be driven away by any evil sonofabitch who has it in for you. You are too valuable an asset to lose. The rare intelligence you have exhibited in so many of your posts does not impress me as much as some other quality you possess for which I have no name: let me just call it ‘honor’. That will have to do.

          I have made many mistakes on this site and the biggest of these is to have entered into personal communication with the posters. Truly, familiarity breeds contempt. And because I have made myself familiar (even avuncular) I have become an object of ridicule and contempt. Far better if I had called myself “Mr X” and maintained a remote background persona, aloof, haughty, slightly terrifying. Too late now! I must forever remain “Uncle”, the bumbling Polonius, the all-too-human figure of fun pretending to be Head Honcho of the dreaded Cheka. What a sad joke.

          All the points you make above are accepted. Rich? I like him and respect him. And if he happens to be reading this, I ask him to forgive me for overreacting to his relatively innocuous comment. I hope I haven’t chased him away. Anyone who enjoys the King’s College choir singing Christmas carols is a man of musical taste and discernment.

          TROJ? I’ve even come to like him, but I am in doubts as to whether he is doing this website any good. You are intelligent enough to be able to take him in small doses, but not everyone is. We have had complaints from Stern Unmiling Types (SUTs). We have to cater to the SUTs unfortunately. In fact, we have a prominent female poster on this site who has much to contribute to our discussions but who, unfortunately for me, remains the ultimate SUT: absolutely humorless, inflexible, doctrinaire, and devoid of all the gentle human qualities we would normally associate with the female temperament. I won’t name this scary individual for fear of giving her offense. I am even hoping she is too obtuse to recognize herself as the person I have just described.

          Well, that’s all I have to say. As of now, I am no longer monitor. I may post here as an ordinary commenter from time to time but I will have no power whatsoever to meddle with the comments or interfere with the new moderator who is to replace me. Let me assure you he is OK. Totally impartial and judicious and wishes to be known as “Dr Z.” His surname happens to begins with a ‘Z’ and since he has a doctorate in Evolutionary Psychology, “Dr Z” is the obvious moniker for him. He is a school chum of Monty and also Lasha’s godfather, so it’s not as if he is a total stranger. He has agreed to be Moderator provided he has total autonomy. No one in Admin must step on his toes or question his decisions or tell him what to do — or he walks. 🙂

          In which case, I will probably be reinstated against my will…

      8. Toby, unless you made this decision long in advance – do not leave!
        I certainly never thought of you as in any way bumbling or incompetent, exactly the opposite.
        Nor did I ever begrudge the frequency of interjections, again, exactly the opposite.

        And of course your primary duty is to protect Lasha when you think she’s been calumnied, she is your niece and the site’s standard bearer, the signifer, you are the best qualified to know when she is feeling hurt and vulnerable, so you must wade in and bitch slap a few heads, because by and large we here are a bloodthirsty bunch.

        As for your personal comport, the Divine Claudius survived Caligula’s reign by playing a dimwitted uncle, didn’t he. And proved himself as maybe the finest emperor ever.
        Uncle Emperor, the greatest ever, let no one call him schmaltzy.

        And where am I to find another spiritual father or ideological disciple 🙂 of such quality?

        1. @ Lobro

          Hey thanks for the kind words. But it’s too late for me now. “Dimwitted uncle”, guess that sums me up! 🙂

          On my way out, I sent one final comment into Spamblinka which contained this sentence: “My own analysis says that Toby and Joe are one and the same person.”


      9. Toby, I am truly sorry to see you leave the job and hope that you reconsider.

        As for this bit of comedy

        “My own analysis says that Toby and Joe are one and the same person.”

        I can only respond as follows:
        My own analysis says that Toby and Joe are NOT the same person.”
        Now, that’s believable.
        It took real deep analysis, if you can believe it 🙂
        Maybe the gulagged poster is so sorry to see you go that he hopes your presence continues through TROJ, i.e. he is a TROJan horse out of which you emerge victorious to claim your rightful throne atop the admin pyramid.

      10. I would like to come out in support of red onions, she is extremely informative, and has provided a lot of info, unlike some, who spend their time simply bitching, and moaning.. Oh! and who would pretty much everyone bitch and moan about, if TROJ were not here..

    3. Rich
      December 12, 2015 at 5:38 pm

      “@Pat, How was John Lennon controlled in your view? This is something I would like to examine.”

      I found this online. I had read some of it over the years:
      The Manufactured Invention of the Beatles, Stones, Grateful Dead and the Birth of Rock n’ Roll by the Tavistock Institute; A Jesuit Corporation.

      “The fact that “The Beatles” had their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno was concealed from public view.” John Coleman, former MI6 agent.


      Who Killed John Lennon and Why It Still Matters Today

      There is hard evidence the CIA assigned agents to “investigate the music industry.” After the murders of Tim Buckley, Jim Croce, and Mama Cass Elliot, more information surfaced about earlier mysterious deaths of Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison, and Janis Joplin.

      1. @ Pat, just got round to reading the articles for which you posted links. Shocking stuff. Some years ago, I hired a video, can`t remember what it was called, but it suggested that Hendrix, Joplin, and Morrison were probably murdered, and explained how it might have been carried out. Joplin, apparently, was fond of a nightcap of alcohol, gin, I think, and fresh orange juice, which she kept in the fridge. It was suggested this was probably “doctored”..

        Wonder what Lennon would have thought of Ono`s dishonest profiteering, especially the drawings he made for their child, but, I suppose, a girl has to live..

        re. marijuana. I`ve been hearing positive things about this drug, that it cures various illnesses, including cancer. I think it is also called hemp, from which is extracted hemp oil, a “cure all”, which leaves people wondering why it is illegal, unless, it might f things up for big pharma..

  8. “The Manufactured Invention of the Beatles, Stones, Grateful Dead and the Birth of Rock n’ Roll by the Tavistock Institute; A Jesuit Corporation.”

    The “Jesuit Corporation” in the title is a spoiler — a highly dubious one at that. I’ve only glanced at the article, however.

    Here’s a short and concise article I’m more familiar with, from Henry Makow: “Was the 60’s Golden Age of Rock a Psyop?” http://henrymakow.com/2014/06/Was-Sixties-Golden-Age-of-Rock.html

    “A hidden hand guided 1960’s counterculture and rock music and you can bet it was the Illuminati [code word for Rothschild and associates]. David McGowan doesn’t find a smoking gun but says there are too many telltale signs to be a coincidence. For example, the majority of musicians came from a military or blue blood family background.

    “Many of them had little or no prior musical ability and at the beginning, the music was performed by studio musicians. For example, The Doors’ Jim Morrison’s father was the Navy Admiral involved in the Gulf of Tonkin deception. Jim Morrison arrived on the scene with a repertoire of hit songs yet didn’t play an instrument. McGowen asks: How did he compose them?”

    Re: Beatles

    The Beatles (circa mid-1960s) created fantastic music that still stands the test of time thanks SOLELY to Sir George Martin.

    Sir George Henry Martin CBE (born 3 January 1926) is an English record producer, arranger, composer, conductor, audio engineer, and musician. He is sometimes referred to as “the Fifth Beatle” in reference to his extensive involvement on each of the Beatles’ original albums.[1] He is considered one of the greatest record producers of all time, with 30 number-one hit singles in the United Kingdom and 23 number-one hits in the United States.

    Martin was influenced by a range of musical styles, encompassing Cole Porter and John Dankworth. He attended the Guildhall School of Music and Drama from 1947 to 1950, studying piano and oboe. Following his graduation, he worked for the BBC’s classical music department, then joined EMI in 1950. Martin produced comedy and novelty records in the early 1950s, working with Peter Sellers and Spike Milligan, among others.

    Martin’s career has spanned more than six decades, and he has worked in music, film, television, and live performance. He has also held a number of senior executive roles at media companies and contributes to a wide range of charitable causes, including his work for the Prince’s Trust and the Caribbean island of Montserrat.

    In recognition of his services to the music industry and popular culture, he was made a Knight Bachelor in 1996.


    Needless to say, when the Beatles disbanded and went off on their own as soloists, their true musical abilities, or lack thereof, is a matter of godawful record — pun intended.


    Happy New Year to you RO

    this blog is fine but the attitudes of some posters are weird ,
    I invite you to join the truth seekers and lovers posters in the MSM
    your talent is much needed there.
    Bless your heart Lady

Comments are closed.