Robert Faurisson on the Charlie Hebdo Debacle

Edited by Jonas E. Alexis

“In 70 years, no forensic study proving the existence and operation of the ‘Nazi gas chambers’!” — Robert Faurisson

FREDRICK TOBEN
FREDRICK TOBEN

My dear friend, Dr. Fredrick Toben, sent me a letter the other day written by Dr. Robert Faurisson, in which Faurisson provides his own analysis of the Paris debacle. The letter was a response to Michael Hoffman’s queries to Faurisson. Some of the questions includes,

“It appears from my reading, that Charlie was mainly concerned with attacking Islam and Catholicism, and not so much with Judaism and the gas chambers. Even if you were not a regular reader of Charlie, from your vantage inside the intellectual milieu in which you operate in France, can it be said that Charlie was known as a thorn in the side of the rabbis and Zionists?

“Certainly we must concede that the staff of Charlie were courageous and defiant. With this in mind, how do you explain their satire of (or lack of satire) of Judaism and the Israelis?

“Today the French government is posing as the champion of damned and marginalized writers, yet France has been vicious toward revisionists and outlawed even actress B. Bardot for her relatively benign statements, and attempted to prosecute Charlie for the Danish cartoons and of course M’bala. How do you feel concerning this hypocrisy and can you give us a few more examples of French government repression of writers and cartoonists?”

I asked Toben if he would grant permission to publish Faurisson’s letter. Both Faurisson and Toben agreed. It is somewhat a different take on the situation, but it is worth publishing.

§ 

Dear Michael,

ROBERT FAURISSON
ROBERT FAURISSON

I admire the quality of your questions, and thank you for the understanding that you show me. I am going through one of the most difficult periods of my life and, consequently, am unable to respond as I would like. I haven’t the time.

These killings in Paris – with 20 dead in all, amongst whom five Jews – rightly arouse widespread indignation but the Jewish organisations have immediately exploited this indignation for their benefit.

They forget that, in large part, it’s been under the pressure of international and French Jewish organisations that France has hastily engaged in all sorts of military expeditions causing so many deaths in the Arab-Muslim world.

They forget this country’s responsibility in the creation of the bogus State of Israel – soon afterwards arming it with nuclear weapons – and in the appalling fate of the Palestinian people since at least 1948; the presence of Netanyahu in Paris and his doings there were, in themselves, an affront to an entire part of the Arab-Muslim world. Those Jewish organisations live in anger and war; that being the case, how can they be surprised if their adversaries live in anger and war as well?

Such killings may bring to mind a number of murders committed by Jews who subsequently became “heroes” of Jewish history. On February 25, 1994 Baruch Goldstein, an Israeli army physician armed with an assault rifle, shot dead 24 Muslim worshipers and wounded 125 at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron before being subdued and killed there himself. His nearby tomb is a pilgrimage site for many Jews.

The hysteria we are witnessing now in France, in this month of January 2015, has a precedent: that of May 1990 and the “Carpentras cemetery” affair. It was the exploitation of that event that made it possible to intimidate the French parliament into passing what is called “the Fabius-Gayssot Act” of July 13, 1990, punishing by a term of imprisonment of from one month to one year and a fine of up to 300,000 francs (now 45,000 euros), along with several other sanctions, those who dispute “the existence of crimes against humanity” (that is, essentially, crimes against Jews) as defined and punished in 1945-1946 by a body that the winners of the recent war had dared to name “International Military Tribunal” (three lies in three words) of Nuremberg.

charlie-hebdo-650x700-297x320This law, totally contrary to the French constitution, came into effect by appearing in the Journal Officiel de la République Française of July 14, 1990, anniversary of the storming of the Bastille. It was thanks to a televised lie of the Socialist president of parliament, Jewish millionaire Laurent Fabius (his announcement to viewers that the corpse of a Jew in the Carpentras cemetery had been taken out of a grave and impaled through the rectum with a parasol pole), that the French had been outraged. The Catholic authorities rang the great bell of Notre-Dame in Paris.

The President, Socialist François Mitterrand, led a march through the centre of the capital at the head of crowds of demonstrators. We have now, in 2015, seen the same scenario repeated in the same place, with Fabius in the front rank of “protesting” dignitaries, the Archbishop taking the initiative of ringing the cathedral’s bells, the Socialist President François Hollande marching through the streets.

Moreover, those Jewish organisations affect an attitude of desiring to come to the aid of freedom of opinion and expression but, in reality, what they are demanding is increased repression against “Holocaust denial”.

Revisionism has made significant progress in recent years here in France, thanks especially to the Internet. Those groups therefore want censorship of the Internet, of Dieudonné (who has perhaps more than 80 legal proceedings pending against him), of the revisionists and of a number of other unbowed men and women.

For want of time, I shall allow myself just three remarks to finish: 1) the name Charlie-Hebdo has, apparently, nothing to do with Charles de Gaulle; it comes, I believe, from the Peanuts character Charlie Brown; 2) Gayssot is the surname of a former Communist MP and government minister, and the Fabius-Gayssot Act is sometimes called the “Faurisson Law” or “Lex Faurissoniana”; I have lost count of the times I’ve been ordered to pay fines or damages on the grounds of this law; other revisionists have been thrown into prison or, like Vincent Reynouard, a father of nine, will be returning to prison; for my part, I’ve settled for ten physical assaults – of which eight in France – and the actions of the French police, who have carried out numerous searches and seizures, or attempted seizures, at my house, and who have often REFUSED to protect me in the presence of danger; 3) I hope to be able, before long, to send you an English version of my nine-page article (with illustrations) of December 31, 2014 entitled:

In 70 years, no forensic study proving the existence and operation of the “Nazi gas chambers”!

I dedicated it to Professor Ben Zion Dinur (1884-1973), founder of Yad Vashem in 1953, forced to resign in 1959 for having preferred scientific History to Jewish Memory.

I thank you, dear Michael, and congratulate you on the work you have done over so many years, and in such difficult conditions, for the just cause of historical revisionism.

Robert Faurisson, January 13, 2015

Source

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

148 thoughts on “Robert Faurisson on the Charlie Hebdo Debacle

  1. There is no doubt that the obsession with “THE HOLOCAUST” has led to the denial or forgetting of much larger genocides e.g. Mao 77 million, Stalin 60 million, King Leopold 8 to 12 million, Britain’s famines in India during their rule. Insisting on denying any famine relief. Let’s not forget, the USA. Since the end of WW2 of the 248 odd wars, the US has participated 204 of them, thus killing 30 million. When one analyzes the reasons for the US defeats in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq it was because of military corruption, not by the frontline soldiers, but by the leadership of the country, political and military. All these killings can be denied, debated, but not the “Holocaust”
    Why?

    1. i challenge anybody, and i mean anybody anywhere in the world, to presnt me with evidence of just one (1) jew genocided as a matter of official third reich policy.
      given the claim of 6 million, finding one properly documented jew cadaver, gassed, burned or clubbed, dna comparable to living jew sample donors and outside the german camp documentation compiled by the irc and archived in russia, should be a cinch, no?
      so, show it to me please.
      because if not, i claim that it was a holocaust of zero (0) jews, thus any genocide greater than zero is automatically infinitely greater than the so called shoah.

      at least one (1) donbass ethnic russian was genocided in odessa (actually something like 40+ died there in conflagration on specific orders of jew owner of brain dead uke populace, ihor “our benny” kolomoisky, all duly videoed for kikes creaming their pants back home in yizhroel), which makes it infinitely greater than the entire shoahaha.
      and infinitely more recent too.

      1. Don’t want to burst your bubble or anything, Lobro, but the paper I read this morning had an article about the 70th anniversary of the liberation of some concentration camp, can’t remember, and there was a picture of a man holding a notebook that he said showed how he had been moved from one camp to the other. Is he a liar? Has he been paid-off, or brainwashed. Methinks not. This man said he saw the crematoriums smoking. While I do think the whole holocaust thing is a big scam, there must be some nuggets of truth for the myth to have taken hold. Obviously the paper made sure you couldn’t really understand how they came up with the figures. Ie. 6000000 total killed in holocaust, is today’s figure.
        It’s hard to think of anything that hasn’t already been said about this subject. Holocaustianity. If it is illegal to say that the ‘holocaust did not happen’ then I would have to presume that it didn’t happen. Or what we are told the ‘holocaust’ was, anyway. I really cannot understand how it is possible to think otherwise. An actual law. About denying something that may or may not have happen 70 years ago. Definitely sounds like religion to me. Well, more of a cult, I suppose. In wars very bad things happen to people. That’s why most of us don’t like them. And the victors always write the history books. Yes, everything I write is a cliche. Honestly, I really don’t think most people would give a flying fish what really happened 70 years ago now unless it has some relevance to, well yes, the actual price of fish.
        As an aside, in my country (whatever that means now other than sports teams, no not even them really), free speech has been taken away from us for one out of every three years. Apparently because it may cause some of us to have an effect on the way other people think, which may affect how they vote. No one here seems to really mind, though. Of course the media are still allowed to say what they want, whenever, but they’re all owned by the same crowd who have been pushing this holocaustianity guilt religion. Who has the answers? More to the point, who has the right questions?

  2. I’ve only read the top of the article so far, but it should be noted that they aren’t referred to as the “national socialist gas chambers”

    Just sayin’

    1. Interesting point, Brownhawk! I deleted my initial comment to respond to this, because it occurred to me that, because of the omission of ‘National Socialist’, the perpetrators of the lie do NOT want Joe Dumb Public to focus on anything but ‘NAZI’. (After all, they have spent millions and billions seating their propaganda in the public mind…)

      About the only way we can expose it is to speak one-on-one with friends and family about it. A public platform is neither safe nor easy, nowadays. For instance, one day last year, the wife of one of my nephews visited Washington with their small children, and visiting the ‘Holocaust Memorial’ was on their list of things to do. When they visited family, later, the three of them were seated at a table with me, and on it was a black Bible and a white napkin (among other things). I asked them: ‘If I told you this was WHITE (pointing to the Bible), and told you this napkin was BLACK – all your lives, since you were born – it would be very difficult to accept that I’d presented you a falsehood, wouldn’t ?’. Their mother conceded, and so did the children, of course. Then I simply stated that they’d been extravagantly fed that type of lie when they visited that memorial.

      Now, that thought will occur to them whenever the topic comes up – and they MIGHT start thinking about it, sooner or later. That’s about all we can do, besides be very thankful to the courageous individuals responsible for this article, and others unnamed, here, for the work they have done to bring this to our attention. Our responsibility is to DISTRIBUTE those considerations among ourselves, without fanfare or controversy. Plant the seed.

      1. Very well put, Gil. Plant those seeds as best you can. Even though this has proven to be a difficult task, as time goes along, the more we know, the more able we become in crafting ways to get through to people, many of whom at the very least are getting a whiff of rats.

        It’s been said recently on these threads, and it’s always worth speaking again, of the truth going through three stages. (and I’m paraphrasing)

        First it is dismissed as being absurd – second it is scorned, which mean it’s hit a nerve – third it is accepted as being self-evident

        keep pluggin’ away

      2. one good use you could put old testament to, gilby, so keep ’em coming 🙂

        (moses, yhwh and jew saints rolling in their graves – oops, are there any jew saints, never heard of even one – strange that, hey spielberg, foxman, usurstein, we gotta fix this tremendous oversight, what about all the philanthropists, aren’t all rich jews beatified as philanthropists as soon as they die, like sheldon adelson who to all appearances has been dead for the last 15 years and sharing the marinating tank with sharon and the hannukah carp – yet persisting in good deeds beyond the grave?)

    2. Sorry if this is off-topic, too soon…

      @Harbinger

      You are a “national socialist” in keeping with the essence of your sensibilities, and based on your vision for a society as it would reflect being on the moral ground, and in its national form.

      @SPQR

      You understand the basic tenets of national socialism but go off the deep end with your immoral position in advocating genocide. And the best that can be hoped for with a true national socialist position of being on the moral ground would be in ESTABLISHING that moral ground by instilling its MORAL principles in those who would follow them

      @lobro

      While I know it’s “just a word”, my sense is that true national socialists abhorred the word “nazi”. To me, it represents an aberration of the true aims per the social vision for a nation as set forth by Hitler. Once they were goaded into the war this opened the floodgates for “nazism” to be unleashed and corrupted the original form. This was the plan all along per the master manipulation , and in war the worst of human nature rears its ugly head.

      1. There’s nothing immoral about “genocide” when an entire race of people is out to annihilate your race.

      2. @SPQR

        First of all, this is much bigger than being about races. You simply don’t know what you don’t know

        Second, why do you put “genocide” in quotation marks?

      3. i almost never use the term “nazi”, bhawk, except in a jocular sense like i might say “red injun” to keep the fun going with max bilney, because i like and respect national socialists at least as much as the first nations.

        insofar as i know, the corruption of the ideal occurred after the war, in hollywood, once hitler, mein kampf and the aryan movement got the makeover by inglorious basterds which is still ongoing.

        has the devil ever touched anything without corrupting it, a contradiction in terms.
        except the jew, his only and most beloved creation for which the only possible corruption is in the opposite direction, namely, when a jew becomes a former jew, having at great cost broken away from his hive.

      4. First of all, this is much bigger than being about races.

        Race is the key issue.

        Second, why do you put “genocide” in quotation marks?

        I’m wary of all terms coined by Jews.

      5. BH, your comment to Lobro, above, really does make sense. To me. I think! 🙂 Are you suggesting that Hitler was basically forced into war by the Jews? That somehow Hitler ended up being led by the people, at least the opinionated ones, lawyers and stuff?

      6. @SPQR

        A question of morality must address causation. To give an example of what I mean by that I’ll go right back to National Socialist Germany and get into Hitler’s brain (and obviously guessing as to what went on in there)

        Once he realized there would be war, for him, the realization of the ideal in keeping with the tenets of NS upon WINNING this war would deal with the chieftans of International Jewry in exacting a certain manner of punishment. And of course without knowing the specifics this can only be speculated on, given the premise.

        One speculation would be a sentence of hard labor for life, for to simply execute them would deny yourself an ability to exact a punishment that would reflect a moral ground established by Man. The kind of hard labor I envision would have the intent for it to be of an excruciatingly mental and spiritual nature, where the prisoner eventually gets to the point of BEGGING his captors to kill him – but they don’t give him the satisfaction.

        Call it ‘virtual torture’.

  3. @ SPQR

    “There’s nothing immoral about “genocide” when an entire race of people is out to annihilate your race.”

    This is a highly irresponsible comment justifying genocide of the Jews on the entirely spurious grounds that Jews are dedicated to the genocide of the white race.

    If we Jews were anxious to destroy the white race, would we have intermarried with white people over the centuries and done our best to assimilate with them? You have no answer to this.

    We don’t need to genocide the white race, even though it is our implacable enemy and managed to rid the world of roughly one-third of the Jewish population during WWII. We can easily achieve world domination by peaceful means. Why kill people en masse when it more to our advantage to enslave them and dupe them into believing that they are free agents living in a democratic society?

    No, sir. You are wrong and think in extraordinarily crude terms. Why would a man kill his oxen when he would rather keep them alive as beasts of burden?

    “The Revolution won’t happen with guns, rather it will happen incrementally, year by year, generation by generation. We [Jews] will gradually infiltrate their educational institutions and their political offices, transforming them slowly into Marxist entities as we move towards universal egalitarianism.”

    — Max Horkheimer, Frankfurt School philosopher

    1. This is a highly irresponsible comment justifying genocide of the Jews on the entirely spurious grounds that Jews are dedicated to the genocide of the white race.

      Your genocidal mentality is readily apparent in the films you make, the political policies you enforce, and your actions throughout history, which include genocidal incidents from ancient Judea to modern Israel.

      If we Jews were anxious to destroy the white race, would we have intermarried with white people over the centuries and done our best to assimilate with them? You have no answer to this.

      Intermarriage with Jews produces more Jews, not more Whites.

      We don’t need to genocide the white race, even though it is our implacable enemy and managed to rid the world of roughly one-third of the Jewish population during WWII.

      I thought there were more than 900,000 Jews alive during WWII.

      We can easily achieve world domination by peaceful means.

      You already pretty much have a kind of world domination, and after the Soviet Genocide, WWI, WWII, and all the smaller conflicts your people instigated, you surely did not achieve it through peaceful means.

      Why kill people en masse when it more to our advantage to enslave them and dupe them into believing that they are free agents living in a democratic society?

      You kill the aristocrats, the intellectuals, and the natural leaders of a nation and then replace them with shills who follow your orders. That’s what happened throughout the West in the 20th Century. You didn’t need to do it in America because Americans are largely the refuse of Europe.

      No, sir. You are wrong and think in extraordinarily crude terms. Why would a man kill his oxen when he would rather keep them alive as beasts of burden?

      You Jews are not rational, you are an innately hysterical and paranoid race who can’t help but engage in violence against those you’ve subjugated.

      There’s only one way to deal with you parasites.

      https://40.media.tumblr.com/8de8e06a76d72fb42958201d2960f587/tumblr_ncxpocscWJ1s8kz63o1_500.jpg

      1. @ SPQR
        @ Seymour Zak

        SPQR has acquitted himself well in this debate. Well done, SPQR! For a guy in his twenties, you are remarkably well-informed about history and have certainly figured out a consistent overall philosophy of life.

        Not that I agree with your bleak atheism bordering on nihilism, but this is not the place to take you to task on this. Suffice to say, that in a godless universe NOTHING matters. As Dostoevsky once noted, if there’s no God, “all is permissible.” Including the rape and murder of innocent children.

        In such a context, what does the genocide of the white race matter? Nothing matters…and you might as well spend all your days in a drugged stupor or just hang yourself!

        Seymour, keep your promise and piss off!

        Or rather, don’t piss off, because we need some comic relief on this site and you provide it.

        Every site needs its clown.

    2. If the white race is your enemy it is because of your hostility to whites and not the other way around. Jews have been thrown out of every country in the world and they’ve been thrown out of many countries on several occasions. You are the most racist people on earth. While you call whites your “implacable enemy”, the problem is that whites don’t recognize you as their enemy, which you surely are. You are not only white people’s enemies, you are the enemy of every non-Jew in the world.

      Your lies about WW II have collapsed and Auschwitz, which Jews called the main killing center of all the Jews in WW II can now be written off as the biggest lie by Jews in history. In 1991 the head of Auschwitz, Franciszek Piper admitted in a taped interview (on you tube) that the gas chamber that they were telling tourists was authentic, was actually a fake built by the allies after the war. That same year Auschwitz tore down the sign that had stood there for forty years claiming the NAZIS murdered 4 million people and replaced it with a sign that said 1.5 million people were murdered there, still without any evidence whatsoever. So when you say “roughly one-third of the Jewish population” was killed in the war, you better go back and do a recount. Not only has Auschwitz been exposed as a fake and Jew lie, but so have all the other camps. The allies (US Holocaust Museum) now admit there were no gassings at Dachau where they built a phoney gas chamber after the war. And now in the country in which it is absolutely forbidden to contest any of the Jewish lies, where thousands have gone to prison due to Jews making these lies the law and keeping their world renowned hatred alive, a German woman has confronted the Jewish organizations in Germany and the German gov’t and forced them to admit they have no answer to her question, “where were the Jews killed.”

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqMfRkAzSXs

      Whatever number of Jews did die in WW II, died for a war the Jews started themselves. And judging by the way Jews like yourself talk today, not nearly enough Jews died in WW II to prevent another catastrophe from happening. Jews murdered 12 million Germans by starting their hate propaganda campaign the day Adolf Hitler was elected. See video below. Jews lying and spreading hate to so they could eventually start a war against Germany. Ironically, while there was almost no violence at all in Germany at this time, Jews were deliberately murdering millions of Ukrainians and thru mass starvation at this very moment and the Jew controlled New York Times covered up the Jews crime, while inventing a German crime.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myh-dqvUgYA

      Here is famous historian David Irving telling his audience how Jews paid Winston Churchill to attack Germany and make sure the Polish-German conflict would become WW II. You murderous racists burned hundreds of thousands of Germans alive in their cities, murdered 12 million Germans and destroyed the most advanced country in the world, destroyed a continent and killed over 50 million Europeans. Don’t ask me for pity. I’ll consider mourning your dead when you stop your lying and apologize for murdering 12 million Germans.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jc9ltEIwpo&index=4&list=PLD00248D0995D87D1

      Only when whites view Jews the same way that Jews view whites (as an enemy), will European civilization (including USA, Canada, Australia, etc) take back their countries from the outsider Jews.

  4. This entire website is a disgrace and should be shut down at once. There is not a poster here, apart from myself, who possesses an iota of honor or human decency. All I hear about is genocide and the need to wipe out the Jews, the Muslims, and every other race — leaving the whole world in the hands of neo-Nazi White supremacists.

    1. SZ,

      I am not a White supremacist for the record. I do not call for the slaughter of anyone. I do believe in self defense though and in Amerika we are being put on the defensive by Bankers and Zionists who are out to destroy the country and significant numbers of people.

      But… can you tell me the difference between the Nazis and the Zionists? I have not been able to find one. Both were/are skill propagandists. Both exalt themselves and denigrate other (supposed) races. Nazi Germany had a Jewish ghetto, Zionist Izrael has a Palestinian ghetto. In Nazi Germany Jews were maltreated, in Izrael Palestinians are maltreated (to say the least). Izrael considers Palestinians as “grass to mow”. Hows that for human decency?

      One thing I have found out about Zionist Jews: they fear truth.
      Two things I have found about them: they fear honest inquiry and have this neurotic need to suppress – by whatever means necessary – what they cannot control.

      1. I thought Hitler WAS a Zionist. He certainly wanted the Jews to have their own homeland. He wrote about it. Or have I been brainwashed about that, too?

      2. National Socialists did not denigrate other races. They merely took pride in being German, a country that led the world in every scientific field at the time and lead the world in many other fields including music and filmmaking. In film they had a competitor with Hollywood. And they didn’t have nearly the big mouths that Americans have when for instance I recall Fox News claiming the “USA is the greatest country that has ever existed; greater than the Roman Empire.” Actually I’ve heard various statements like that from Americans often. Germans don’t talk stupid like that.

        The National Socialists wanted Jews out of Germany. Jews pursued their own goals, separate and often against Germany’s best interests. And if it’s their country, don’t they have a right to do that? They should. Jews reacted immediately and started spreading hate propaganda and then organized a worldwide boycott of Germany. All this caused Germany to react, by among other things organizing a boycott against Jews. Then Jews began assassinating German diplomats, which resulted in “Kristallnacht.” The Jews were not passive doves; they were actively escalating the violence even in peacetime.

        Germans cooperated with Zionists in getting Jews out of Germany and into Palestine (under British control), for the simple reason they wanted them out. They were hostile to Germany and potential enemies of the state. I assume you know the German Jew Einstein wrote a letter to FDR kicking off the Manhattan Project and only mentioned Germany as the enemy in his letter – that is where he wanted the bomb dropped. German Jews sat in with bomber crews, directing them to targets. They knew where they were. There’s much more, but now do you have an idea why they wanted Jews out of Germany?

        But Hitler spoke out about Palestinian rights on several occasions. He was the first and only western leader that I have ever heard speak out for the Palestinians – to this day. Not one American President has ever done this and of course according to the Jewish owned American media, Palestinians and other Arabs are all terrorists and Jews have a right to steal the Palestinians land. Their reason: they lived their two thousand years ago. It’s remarkable the world doesn’t laugh in the Americans (the Jews biggest lackeys) and Jews faces.

      3. Hitler wasn’t a Zionist, SL. He didn’t intend a homeland for them, per se, in the sense of it to be the bogus nation it became. “Homeland” in this context would mean a new settlement of the Pale. And to think that the area in which this would exist would have been where the bogus nation is presently inhabited is false. The desolate boondocks of Siberia is probably what Hitler and his cohorts had in mind

        Alas……and the rest is history.

      4. B-Hawk –

        Chief ‘Red-Sign’ paid Hitler to SCARE the Talmudists and Pharisees to the desolate lands of Palestine. They did not want to go on their own, leaving their families and their property in the lush lands of Europe.
        Chief ‘Red-Sign’ and selected ‘braves’ bought the abandoned land in Europe for almost nothing. Much of it was gained as spoils of war. They got even more wealthy, owning much of Europe.

      5. Actually, the plan was to eventually remove Europe’s Jews to Madagascar, which is an island and was a French colony at the time. Madagascar was mentioned as late as 1942, but then because the way the war was going this was not realistic anymore.

        Most Jews were evacuated east because they were considered an enemy of the state. The Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann made a statement around 1939 that every Jew in the world is opposed to Germany and will work towards it’s defeat. I think even without his statement Germany realized that from the non-stop propaganda they pumped out, but Weizmann’s statement may also have had an affect..

      6. Peter –

        As you say…”may”….

        But Walter Rothschild and Balfour set a different course from 1917 onward headed to Palestine….. no matter what the Pharisee Weizmann bleated. Walter stood 10 ft-4 in when on his wallet.
        The UN galvanized it c.1946.

      7. B-Hawk –

        Glad to help. It is easy to connect dots.

        What Walter ‘Red-Sign’ wanted…Walter got…. in the early 20th century. He ordered(paid) Balfour to dedicate Palestine for Talmudists. Walter and company financed secret societies (Thule was one) to initiate wars to scare the Talmudists to foreign lands. They were convinced it was their original ‘homeland’ and reluctantly went there… ‘returned.’ This completed much of Herzl’s dream.

      8. Pat

        I think you’ll like this guess.(well, maybe not “like” it exactly) It’s on this subject that I’ve written alot about the last couple of years, and this time with a new spin.

        Hitler went along with the Zionists in dealing with the jews per the Balfour/post WW1 plan suspecting what they were up to in starting another war.

        How did he know this? Glad you asked.

        He could have IF we were to view him like Ellie K. as a Rothschild renegade AND where Ellie’s status as real or fictional is incidental to what they would therefore represent. Based on this premise, Hitler played the game KNOWING that the battlefield would be the final arbiter, and where HIS intent behind a military build-up in the 30’s was ONE thing, ‘Father Red-shield’s’ was quite another in not suspecting the true intentions of his ‘wayward Brave’.

        Also, who was it in the world that saw him as an ally in the ME? You know, the ones who in no way would have accepted jews inhabiting their new Pale on Palestinian lands?

        Again, given the premise (and mindful of your position that a fictional character speaks fiction) the wilderness of Siberia would been a likely destination of desolation.

      9. B-Hawk –
        Siberia… ‘bad rice.’
        They did not even know what time it was in Siberia. Sundials totally useless half the year. Hour glasses always frozen. 😉

      10. Pat

        We’re in the middle of a blizzard out here in New England. Makes me think it’s PERFECT for the location of a new Pale 😉

      11. Make that perfect for SIBERIA, certainly not New England!

        I’m not fond of the idea of guard duty ever since my father told me he was assigned that in Europe on August 14, 1945 – VJ Day. And on his BIRTHDAY no less! 😉

      12. BH, I do remember reading ‘mein Kampf’ a long time ago, but I thought I had misunderstood it because I got the impression that Hitler wanted to move all the Jews to Madagascar. Obviously, I had made a mistake because everyone knows that he gassed them all! Those were the days, oh wow, deja vu. Anyway, if I can work out what a ‘pale’ is in the context you are using I may have to agree with you that I would like to visit Persia, tomorrow. 🙂 (I mean comment tomorrow, not visit Persia.) ‘Night.

  5. Jonas Alexis is a good writer but he is unfortunately working for the wrong people. He should reconsider his options and apply to Abe Foxman for a job. The ADL are looking for good writers like Jonas who would pay him well. So why is he wasting his time writing for dubious organizations like VT?

    The same would not apply to Ms Darkmoon. We don’t want her. She is beyond the pale. She can get lost. I have no time for this woman who is little better than a high-class call girl, a honeytrap whore and a hussy, God rot her satanic soul!

    This is the last time I am going to post here, I’ve had enough of this crazy website. Goodbye.

    1. Wow

      Back to back to back Seymour Zak postings. And he says this is his grand finale, and done with a typical scathing flourish

      We’ll hold you to it, Zaky, but I have my doubts.

    2. SZ,

      To answer your question: To work for Dishonest Abe, would be several steps down for Jonas Alexas. You probably will not understand this, but money is not worth the loss of integrity.

      Judas found out the hard way.

    3. I think he got circs problem. I didn’t know he was a Jew. Hey, SZ, you know what you said about Lasha was uncalled for. You’re obviously a little upset. Take it easy. This site wouldn’t be the same without you, dude. It’s supposed to be balanced! Can you actually do that with a lot of unbalanced people? Sort of gyroscopically like?

    4. Zaky, no offense but I am certain that you are no jew.
      Your effort at satire is indubitably a fine one but it doesn’t fool me.
      My jewdar saws logs through your posts.
      Sorry to out you but you are wheat, not chaff.

      Advice: don’t make a serious suggestion to the writer to seek employment with Abe Foxman, that’s a dead giveaway.

  6. ♫ Palestine sounds as ♫ pretty as roses ♫
    🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂
    Israel sounds as bad as dead rats
    🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁

  7. Zak sure has a way with words. The Jews have been genocided (made up word) so much through out their history it’s a wonder that any are still alive today. In more recent times there was the canard of the 6 million Jews killed during WW1. They couldn’t make that shtick, stick so they tried again after WW2 and so far have been successful with the dumb-downed goy. Even many of the chosen believe this latest 6 million reduction in their world wide population. According to the world almanac, there were about 18 million of the darlings just before the start of WW2. Even that is guess work because the dears are so adverse to live body counts. (They do like very accurate dead body counts). From various sources at the end of WW2 there were still about, plus or minus, 17-18 million of the apple of God’s eye still around. This is the new math at work here before it’s time: 18 million, minus 6 million equals 18 million. This is in round numbers, not 5,999.999 or 6,000.001 but exactly 6 million (obviously a sacred number) for to say otherwise, and caught, it’s beat-up time and jail time in most parts of Europe, Canada, Australia and other points North, South, East and West. They have devised other forms of punishment in America called suicide by hit team or at a minimum fired from a teaching job and treated like a leper.
    A current and accurate live body count of the precious ones would come in at around, again in round numbers, at least 40 million world wide.

    1. Jews have never actually suffered mass death in about two thousand years. The last ones to actually slaughter them en masse were the Romans, and even the Romans were more lenient towards them than they were to the Carthaginians and the Gauls.

      1. there was the holocaust, no? but then again a loser wearing a red cross and a hood like you wont admit it, right? but there, the Jews own you now.
        and the Japanese and the Chinese. Germans don’t wanna hear it neither. that’s why they don’t come here in support of your views.
        I am happy the jews humiliate you everyday. I hope you die in anguish and pain and sadness. an old fart like you giving headaches to everyone.
        and this is from a Palestinian.
        and spqr? we don’t need your support.
        you can go ahead and help the Jews, you both read the bible. you are all a bunch of old testament lovers in reality.
        99.9 of Americans love Israel.
        I bet you voted for bush twice right?
        just thinking of the little Iraqi girls make me wanna puke on your stupid flag.
        go ahead say “the Jews made us do it”, go ahead loser

      2. and you have to watch black players playing basketball and football everyday making millions and screwing those pretty white girls, your granddaughters.
        that’s gotta hurt a racist punk like you spqr
        do you suffer from sexual dysfunction? blacks and muslims dont and they really give it to you.

      3. there was the holocaust, no?

        No.

        but then again a loser wearing a red cross and a hood like you wont admit it, right?

        No, I have nothing but disdain for klansmen. They were useful after the Civil War, but they haven’t done much good in the past century or so.

        Germans don’t wanna hear it neither. that’s why they don’t come here in support of your views.

        Germans live in a police state. This site is probably blocked in Germany. And anyway, most of the good Germans died in WWII.

        an old fart like you giving headaches to everyone.</b.

        I'm in my 20s. How old are you?

        and this is from a Palestinian.

        You wouldn’t be in the situation your people are in now if Hitler had won WWII.

        and spqr? we don’t need your support.

        You don’t have my “support.” I’m relatively indifferent to what happens to you worthless animals.

        you can go ahead and help the Jews, you both read the bible. you are all a bunch of old testament lovers in reality.

        I’m not a Christian, idiot.

        99.9 of Americans love Israel.

        It’s more like 72% actually, but that’s only because the vast majority of Americans are functional retards.

        I bet you voted for bush twice right?

        I wasn’t old enough to vote in the 2000 election, but I didn’t vote for him in 2004. I don’t bother voting at all now.

        just thinking of the little Iraqi girls make me wanna puke on your stupid flag.</b.

        s

        go ahead say “the Jews made us do it”, go ahead loser

        Us? What does that mean? Westerners? Whites? Americans? Whoever you’re referring to, I have little in common with.

      4. avatar you always seem to stir up matters close to your heart, so let’s check it out

        1. just thinking of the little Iraqi girls make me wanna puke on your stupid flag.

        2. do you suffer from sexual dysfunction? blacks and muslims dont and they really give it to you.

        so, which is it, 1 or 2?
        as to whether blacks and muslims suffer from sexual dysfunction, only those at receiving end would be qualified to verify.
        (i heard that powdered rhino horn really does wonders, where are the big markets for it)

      5. and you have to watch black players playing basketball and football everyday making millions and screwing those pretty white girls, your granddaughters.

        I don’t watch sports.

        that’s gotta hurt a racist punk like you spqr
        do you suffer from sexual dysfunction? blacks and muslims dont and they really give it to you.

        Actually according to statistics, you Muslims have some of the tiniest dicks in the world.

        http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=3073

        Seriously? 4.5 inches? You probably won’t even be able to satisfy your 71 virgins in the afterlife.

  8. there was the holocaust, no?

    No.
    YES, THERE WAS A HOLOCAUST, YOU MURDERER
    but then again a loser wearing a red cross and a hood like you wont admit it, right?

    No, I have nothing but disdain for klansmen. They were useful after the Civil War, but they haven’t done much good in the past century or so.
    THEN YOU SHOULD GO BACK IN YOUR MAMAS BEHIND AND BE REBORN ‘CAUSE YOU SURE SOUND LIKE ONE

    Germans don’t wanna hear it neither. that’s why they don’t come here in support of your views.

    Germans live in a police state. This site is probably blocked in Germany. And anyway, most of the good Germans died in WWII.
    MORE LIES, THE GERMANS REGRET WHAT HAPPENED IN WORLD WAR TWO AND THEY JUST WANT TO MAKE IT UP TO THE WORLD AND CONTRIBUTE TO HUMANITY

    an old fart like you giving headaches to everyone.</b.

    I'm in my 20s. How old are you?
    OLD ENOUGH TO KNOCK THOSE TEETH OUT OF THAT MOUTH YOU RUN

    and this is from a Palestinian.

    You wouldn’t be in the situation your people are in now if Hitler had won WWII.
    LIES LIES LIES HITLER WAS A MONSTER RACIST LIKE YOU WHO WOULD HAVE KILLED ME ON SITE

    and spqr? we don’t need your support.

    You don’t have my “support.” I’m relatively indifferent to what happens to you worthless animals.
    ANIMALS? IF I AM AN ANIMAL THEN WHAT ARE YOU? YOU, WHO KILLED ALL THOSE INNOCENT PEOPLE IN AUZTCHWITZ
    you can go ahead and help the Jews, you both read the bible. you are all a bunch of old testament lovers in reality.

    I’m not a Christian, idiot.
    YOU ARE BEYOND REPAIR YOU LITTLE PUNK. GOD HIMSELF COULDNT FIX YOU, YOU LITTLE RETARD

    99.9 of Americans love Israel.

    It’s more like 72% actually, but that’s only because the vast majority of Americans are functional retards.
    NO, ITS 99 PERCENT. IT IS. STOP YOUR DENIAL YOU ARE DONE HERE ON EARTH

    I bet you voted for bush twice right?

    I wasn’t old enough to vote in the 2000 election, but I didn’t vote for him in 2004. I don’t bother voting at all now.
    WHO CARES FOR YOUR VOTE. RON PAUL THE LOSER?
    just thinking of the little Iraqi girls make me wanna puke on your stupid flag.</b.

    s

    go ahead say “the Jews made us do it”, go ahead loser

    Us? What does that mean? Westerners? Whites? Americans? Whoever you’re referring to, I have little in common with.
    OH YEAH? THEN WHAT ARE YOU MORON?

      1. if you are a white nationalist racist little punk like the hypocrite bunch we find here, then we in Palestine don’t want your support. propaganda and people writing on the net are worthless nowadays because Israel is just doing it openly. they don’t care. they own America. they run America. Jews are actually better than you.
        we don’t need sympathy from those who slaughter our brothers in Iraq, Afghanistan Yemen and elsewhere. its us Muslims fighting you -slaves of the Jews-. the Jews sit home and count the money and screw your sisters and daughters with their little penises while you are away fighting their wars..
        If your victims in the third world, be it Japanese Vietnamese blacks natives south Americans or Muslims ever get a nuke and throw it at your heads AND FINALLY GET RID OF YOU THEN THE JEWS WILL JUST PACK UP THEIR SHIT from Palestine AND GO TO THE US WHERE THEY WILL FIND A GREAT AUDIENCE. WITHOUT YOU THE JEWS ARE NOTHING,. so who is worse? you, because you are stronger and you help them. hypocrites.
        you love the Jews. repeat after me. just say “I love the Jews and that’s why I come here every day to whine and moan and cry like the little bitches that we are”

      2. For me there is only one side of the fence. The side labeled TRUTH.
        When I see SPQR talk bullshit about Islam, I call his bullshit.
        When I see you talk bullshit about Hitler, National Socialism, Shia branch of Islam, how great ISIS fake Mossad front is, I call your bullshit.
        When I see Dublinmick talk bullshit about the Jesuits, RC, Third Reich, Hitler and Stalin, I call his bullshit.

        And will continue to do so.
        Especially when I sense a smokescreen to hide the hidden hand of the Judas behind such efforts.

        Whenever my CUI BONO alarm is tripped the thread will hear from me.

        Entiendes?

      3. Avatar, thought you went off to the jungle for ten days, probably to do some gun-running, or drug-smuggling.. Also, you don`t live in Palestine, Venezuela was it? so you think the enemies of your fellow Palestinians are your friends.. My advice to you is, grow up, cool off, you are not doing yourself, or your Palestinian brothers any favours by getting hysterical, and lashing out at everyone YOU precieve to be YOUR enemy.. chill out, calm down, and, above all, get your “facts” right..

      4. AV ATAR
        I don’t know if someone else noticed this about you recenttly:
        Heads,you look Muslim, tails you look Jew.

      1. I AINT ANGRY its you who is angry, denying those poor people you killed in ww2 their peace in their graves. they aren’t even in graves you burnt them alive, you monsters. Denying you did it is the worse of crimes.. I bet you have an excuse for every atrocity you’ve committed, right?
        what was it for Hiroshima? oh yeah
        “we had to do it to end the war. Russia had already capitulated but the Japanese blah blah blah… ”
        or Vietnam
        “communism was spreading and it was very dangerous so we had to go there and blah blah blah…”
        slavery?
        “well when Cain killed his brother Yahweh put a mark on him. it was his skin color. we found him in Africa and brought him here to “our” plantations. them subhumans deserved it because blah blah blah
        the natives?
        “er, them savages needed to be taught our great values accordingly with the old testament , we came, we saw and we conquered but er.. we were here before them 4000 years ago blah blah blah…”
        I AINT ANGRY I AINT KILLED NOBODY
        😉

      2. Question : “Why did Allah create Muslims with such a low IQ?”
        Answer : “Because Allah himself has such a low IQ.” (see the stupidity of the Qur’ān).

        irhāb aleikum.

      3. @ The Avatar

        Koenraad Elst , the german historian writes in “Negation in India”

        The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter. The Bahmani sultans (1347-1480) in central India made it a rule to kill 100,000 captives in a single day, and many more on other occasions. The conquest of the Vijayanagar empire in 1564 left the capital plus large areas of Karnataka depopulated. And so on.

        As a contribution to research on the quantity of the Islamic crimes against humanity, we may mention that the Indian (subcontinent) population decreased by 80 million between 1000 (conquest of Afghanistan) and 1525 (end of Delhi Sultanate)..

        Source : http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam

        How Islam “blessed” India can be read in M. A. Khan, Islamic Jihad, a legacy of forced conversion, imperialism and slavery, which can be read free on line in PDF.

      4. Stunning info, Franklin, which for me begs the question, what “jews” are the equivalent of these utterly evil Bahmani sultans?

      5. Franklin –
        Yes ‘stupidity’ is correct.

        Quran stated the Jesus spoke to Mary out loud while in the womb. And spoke with others as soon as he was born.

        “Holy Quran Converted Me to Christianity” – Former Indian Imam Sulaiman (Mario Joseph)
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsMccnb_270

        Quran Ch 19 – Surah Maryam (verse 19)
        http://www.noblequran.com/translation/

        19. (The angel) said: “I am only a Messenger from your Lord, (to announce) to you the gift of a righteous son.”
        20. She said: “How can I have a son, when no man has touched me, nor am I unchaste?”
        21. He said: “So (it will be), your Lord said: ‘That is easy for Me (Allah): And (We wish) to appoint him as a sign to mankind and a mercy from Us (Allah), and it is a matter (already) decreed, (by Allah).’ ”
        22. So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a far place (i.e. Bethlehem valley about 4-6 miles from Jerusalem).
        23. And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a date-palm. She said: “Would that I had died before this, and had been forgotten and out of sight!”
        24. Then [the babe ‘Iesa (Jesus) or Jibrael (Gabriel)] cried unto her from below her, saying: “Grieve not! Your Lord has provided a water stream under you;
        25. “And shake the trunk of date-palm towards you, it will let fall fresh ripe-dates upon you.”
        26. “So eat and drink and be glad, and if you see any human being, say: ‘Verily! I have vowed a fast unto the Most Beneficent (Allah) so I shall not speak to any human being this day.'”
        27. Then she brought him (the baby) to her people, carrying him. They said: “O Mary! Indeed you have brought a thing Fariya (an unheard mighty thing).
        28. “O sister (i.e. the like) of Harun (Aaron) [not the brother of Musa (Moses), but he was another pious man at the time of Maryam (Mary)]! Your father was not a man who used to commit adultery, nor your mother was an unchaste woman.”
        29. Then she pointed to him. They said: “How can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle?”
        30. “He [‘Iesa (Jesus)] said: Verily! I am a slave of Allah, He has given me the Scripture and made me a Prophet;”
        31. “And He has made me blessed wheresoever I be, and has enjoined on me Salat (prayer), and Zakat, as long as I live.”
        32. “And dutiful to my mother, and made me not arrogant, unblest.

      6. @ Franklin Ryckaert
        @ Pat

        RYCKAERT ASKS: Question : “Why did Allah create Muslims with such a low IQ?”
        Answer : “Because Allah himself has such a low IQ.” (see the stupidity of the Qur’ān).

        In that case Dr Kevin Barrett would have to be a remarkably stupid man to have converted to Islam, don’t you think? So would Lasha Darkmoon have to be a remarkably stupid woman to have confessed to reading the Qur’an “reverentially” almost every day. Why don’t you tell Lasha she is “stupid” for liking the Qur’an?

        If you knew anything about philosophy, you would know that the statement you had made was a “value judgment”, not a factual statement. The Qur’an is no more “stupid” than Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony is “stupid”, just because you may THINK it is “stupid”. Similarly, Dante’s Divine Comedy or the works of Shakespeare may be regarded as “boring” or “irrelevant” or “stupid” if the person reading those masterpieces is lacking in aesthetic judgment or is just plain stupid himself.

        As for the passage Pat has quoted from the Qur’an which he regards as an example of Qur’anic stupidity, I could supply an equal number of almost identical passages from the New Testament and the Hindu or Buddhist classics which would sound equally stupid to an atheist like Pat.

        Here are passages from the early chapters of St Luke which no doubt Pat would find equally “stupid”, without realizing that the “stupidity” lies in his own mind, in his own dead and lethargic response, and that his is a purely subjective reaction to something that is totally beyond his limited capacity to appreciate.

        http://biblescripture.net/Luke.html

        Similarly “stupid” passages may be found in the Jataka tales of Ancient India in which Gautama Buddha is shown undergoing numerous incarnations in animal or human forms. These are religious fables, comparable to parables, and doubtless the unsophisticated atheist will dismiss them all as “stupid.”

        Why don’t Franklin Ryckaert and Pat come straight out and say that they no longer wish to post on this “stupid” website because Lasha Darkmoon must be a remarkably “stupid” person to be moved and touched by the Qur’an?

        Your philistinism and offensive racism I find repulsive, for it is clear to me that your contempt for the Qur’an stems entirely from the fact that the people who live by the Qur’an have brown skins. For your information, the world’s most sublime religious classics were written by men with brown skins — and with, according to Ryckaert, low IQs “on average”. I refer to the Vedic classics, especially the Upanishads and the Gita.

        Lasha, a white Roman Catholic Christian — that I know for sure! — once confessed that there was a stage in her life when she repeated three short suras from the Qur’an as prayers every day: sura 1, 113 and 114. She had gone to the trouble of learning these three suras by heart. Indeed, many of LD’s poems contain Qur’anic references: e.g., poems such as “The Keys of the Unseen”, “The Green Fields of Longing”, and “The Tree of Evil”. None of these poems could have been written without the Qur’an as the inspiration.

        Go on, you heartless philistines, I challenge you to call Lasha a “stupid bitch” for showing respect and reverence for the Qur’an! Feel free to spit on her, your hostess on this website!

        Tolerance for other people’s religions is said to be the supreme virtue. Neither of you possess this virtue. You are intolerant bigots.

      7. @ Sardonicus

        I have great respect for both Franklin Ryckaert and Pat and I certainly don’t expect them to share my love for the Quran and the Upanishads. If they wish to call Dr Kevin Barrett and me “stupid” for liking the Quran, I can’t stop them. That is their privilege.

        I confess that the Quran left me cold when I first tried to read it in an inferior prose translation. Like most people, I found it “boring.” But later on things changed when I began to read it in a different way, opening the book at random during meditation and reading whatever was “given” to me at that particular moment — like a pearl of wisdom, so to speak, offered as a gift to the Seeker.

        To read the Quran in a dry, intellectual way from beginning to end, as one reads a novel or textbook, that is totally fatal. Does the Quran contain “objectionable” passages? Of course. So does the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. There’s alway something, somewhere, you can find fault with.

        For reasons I have explained elsewhere, the Quran is best read in Arabic because of its incantatory qualities and “magical sound effects” which no translation can possibly convey. See

        MAGICAL SOUND EFFECTS IN POETRY
        http://www.darkmoon.me/2011/magical-sound-effects-in-poetry/

        Failing that, Yusuf Ali’s English translation is the only translation I would recommend. This alone produces some of the “magic” of the original. This is because the translation is not only exquisitely sensitive and accurate but is written by a truly saintly Muslim with poetic gifts who gave his entire life to the task. It is written in free verse, not in prose.

      8. Sard –
        I am not an atheist. I do not believe in following any religions invented by men.

        I believe as Thomas Paine did.

      9. @ Sardonicus

        1) People can be intelligent in some respects and at the same time stupid (or naive) in other respects. When it comes to religion you see that often.

        2) Religious books can have great artistic appeal without their contents necessarily being true. Similarly statues of gods of polytheistic religions can be very beautiful, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that those gods really exist.

        3) About “value” and “factual” judgement. Again you confuse esthetics with truth. For those who know Arabic the Qur’ān has high esthetic value, but that doesn’t mean that its contents cannot be stupid.

        4) Yes other religious scriptures can also have stupid contents. Buddha’s “remembering his incarnation as a hare” is surely one of them.

        5) No, I do not judge religious ideas by the color of the skin of their believers. I find Germanic myths barbaric and…stupid.

        6) Sura 1, 113 and 114 are rather meaningless like most suras.

        7) “Tolerance for other people’s religion is said to be the supreme virtue.”

        A superficial “feel good” statement. How “tolerant” would you be towards the Aztec religion with its cruel human sacrifices? Human progress is created not by “tolerance” but by a critical attitude even towards things that by the low IQ masses of the world are considered as “holy”.

    1. Avatar,

      You’re not doing too well right now. Hysterical rage doesn’t win arguments. Calling your opponent a “moron” is counterproductive.

      1. I aint hysterical. I just get a little emotional when facing injustice and cowards like your people

    2. I’m the son of Germans and I thank God for brave, intelligent people like Dr. Lasha Darmoon (when the world is free, people won’t have to use Pen Names any more) and other people on this website. And you obviously have not studied the holocaust at all. All the Jews lies have collapsed, from the soap and lampshade stories, to the mass murder at Auschwitz. The fact you don’t know it is a tribute to the Jew personality – constant and continuous lying, even after they’ve been exposed.

  9. Avatar –
    SPQR –

    Seymour Zak mentioned somewhere, above, that his Talmudists wouldn’t genocide their slaves (us) because they NEEDED them (which reminded me of the arguments we’ve read about the anti-slavery/pro-slavery debates before the unfortunate War Between the States).

    The only way I can figure to gnaw at them most effectively is to deprive them of as much of their ‘life blood’ (our/their monetary substance) as you can. Use their own (Frankfurt School) tactics against them. As Zak correctly pointed out: THEY HAVE ASSIMILATED AMONG US TO A LARGE DEGREE (well, maybe not the extreme Talmudists – but even THOSE parasites would fade away if we didn’t compete so much for their usurious services!). Abstain from frivolous expenditures as much as possible. Situate your minds and bodies to endure hardships. (I do that, myself – and know what??? My life is more peaceful and serene…) I don’t buy plastic gadgetry, or the fancy I-Phones, or new cars (even though I can), AND I try not to ‘feed the system’ with every consideration. Soon, it becomes a HABIT. 🙂

    For everything there is a season. LEARN TO DISCERN!!!

    1. Babylon the Great WILL burn. It will not be pleasant for any of us – but it is inevitable. Don’t try to fight it.

    2. GH,

      Wise words if I’ve ever heard any. Don’t feed the corporate system if at all possible. Starve it to death, and it is possible. Even cutting back will hurt it. Unfortunately, it will hurt those locally who work for them as well, but that cannot be helped.

      Don’t eat corporate food, take corporate drugs, pay for corporate entertainment as much as possible. You will be healthier mentally and physically. That alone will help toughen up an individual for the hard road ahead.

  10. the corpse of a Jew in the Carpentras cemetery had been taken out of a grave and impaled through the rectum with a parasol pole

    That’s the kind of sick thing only a Chosen One would think to do, as evidenced by their fixation with fecal material jokes in endless Hollywood movies the Tribe has pushed onto the Gentile public as humor.

    In an article called The Past, and Future, of Jewish Humor, the Jewish writer Uriel Heilman writes:

    “And if it’s scatological, all the better. For a Jew, a bowel movement is an event,” Waldoks declared. “That’s why there’s so much bathroom humor.”(1)

    Tablet magazine columnist Marjorie Ingall has this to say about the Jewish fecal obsession:

    “Jews have a fine tradition of scatological humor.” and “When new [Jewish] moms get together they love talking about poop,”(2)

    http://theendofzion.com/the-fecal-fixation-of-the-chosen-ones/

  11. Even Faurisson ‘guesses’ by using words like “apparently” and “I believe.”

    “For want of time, I shall allow myself just three remarks to finish: 1) the name Charlie-Hebdo has, apparently, nothing to do with Charles de Gaulle; it comes, I believe, from the Peanuts character Charlie Brown;”
    =====
    I showed that ‘Charlie’ DID have to do with Charles de Gaulle. And they also wanted to include some Charlie Brown flavor. Wolinski stated that. (it was the name of another magazine from Éditions du Square Charlie Mensuel, named after the character Charlie Brown from Charles M. Schulz’s Peanuts.)

    Wolinski co-founded the satirical magazine L’Enragé with Jean-Jacques Pauvert and Siné. He served as the editor-in-chief of Hara-Kiri from 1961 to 1970. In the early 1970s, Wolinski collaborated with the comics artist Georges Pichard to create Paulette which appeared in Charlie Mensuel and provoked reactions in France during its publication. Wolinski’s work appeared in the daily newspaper Libération, the weekly Paris-Match, L’Écho des savanes and Charlie Hebdo

    Charlie Hebdo was an off-shoot of Hara-Kiri

    ‘Charlie’ references Charles de Gaulle.
    ‘Hebdo’ references ‘seventh’ in Greek. (weekly – published every seven days)

    Hara-Kiri was a monthly French satirical magazine, first published in 1960. It was created by Georges Bernier, Francois Cavanna and Fred Aristidès. A weekly counterpart, Hara-Kiri Hebdo, was first published in 1969.

    In November 1970, following the death of Charles de Gaulle at his home in Colombey-les-Deux-Églises, the weekly Hara-Kiri Hebdo bore the headline « Bal tragique à Colombey : 1 mort » (Eng: “Tragic ball in Colombey: 1 death”).

    The choice of the title refers to a tragedy of the same month: a fire at a discothèque where 146 people were killed. The chosen title was somehow downplaying the gravity of de Gaulle’s demise, by suggesting a comparison with a tragedy which had just earlier resulted in the loss of many more people. The government felt this editorial choice was an offence of lèse-majesté against the deceased President. As a result, the magazine was immediately and permanently banned from sale to minors and publicity by the minister of the interior Raymond Marcellin.

    Charlie Hebdo was started immediately afterwards. Charlie in the title refers to General de Gaulle (said Georges Wolinski); but it was the name of another magazine from Éditions du Square Charlie Mensuel, named after the character Charlie Brown from Charles M. Schulz’s Peanuts.

    Hebdo- is an archaic metric prefix equal to 10-to the 7th power(10 million). It is derived from the Greek hebdοmos (Greek: ἕβδομος) meaning seventh. The original definition of the meter established one Hebdometer as the distance from the north pole to the equator.

    1. pat I aint reading all that.
      I am not gonna read comments from someone who is completely brain washed against islam. and we don’t care if a racist man from America who went to Iraq to kill our people demonizes the Koran, its predictable because like i said you are all, essentially, Jews.

      1. and I forgot to add, we don’t care about your insults to the Koran
        ITS THE FASTEST GROWING RELIGION WHILE YOUR STUPID CHILD MOLESTING CHURCHES ARE EMPTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    2. As I was reading Faurisson’s article on Michael Hoffman’s site, I was thinking exactly what you posted here, Pat. You know more than him! Thanks for reiterating what I thought was fascinating information awhile back in another thread. He didn’t even mention Charlie Hebdo as being an offshoot of Hari-Kari. These are important facts. At least they are to me. It helps one to discern just who these people are and what their function may be as a psychological operation.

      1. Rich –

        Thanks.
        I may not know more than he does. He could have forgotten.
        Everyone knows things which others do no know.

        Remember it is Hara-Kiri….not Hari-Kari. 😉

  12. Koenraad Elst sounds like A JEW name, doesn’t it?
    hmmm that makes Franklin Ryckaert a crypto Jew. then pat represents the good white goy who just agrees because he was brainwashed with islamophobia when a child. that’s why he got on that Hercules c 130 and just took off to Iraq to kill hajis, losing both legs in the process. now he sits here all day making smart comments, and pretending he is wise to make up for the stupid mistake of his life. aint this a great example of what goyim means?

    1. AVATAR, I’ve asked once but no reply from you, so I’ll ask again.
      Why do you use the name AVATAR?
      It certainly isn’t Islamic or even Arabic (or Jewish).

      Only the rarest of the rare Islamist would countenance that name.
      Because as you know, all three of the Abrahamaniacs bear a “death to idolators” (asuric) template. If not actively then latently.

      The exceptions being, of course, the rare bona fide theists who are nonsectarian, like Jesus.

      1. avatar is the name of a movie I liked very much because the white guy who is crippled turns on the evil white machine by siding with the native avatars. a situation very similar to Afghanistan and Iraq.
        I liked it. ok?

  13. Ingrid b
    we love isis and there is nothing you or anybody can do or say to keep us from doing so. isis represents quarter population of the world.!
    you sit your behind here all day reading press tv which is an Iranian network that is buying sites all over the net with the strict purpose to demonize Islam and you think you know the truth running your mouth like a parrot as if you really
    really
    really
    really
    really
    knew the truth but you don’t because YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN THERE!
    ITS JUST CONVENIENT TO BELIEVE THAT EVERY SINGLE EVENT IS A FALSE FLAG AND THAT EVERY ONE INCLUDING BIN LADEN AL ZARQAUI AND AL ZAWAHIRI WORK EITHER FOR THE CIA OR THE MOSSAD.
    the mossad and the cia and ALL WESTERN GOVERMENTS are shitting on their pants right now because they are scared of the Arab spring and the Islamic renaissance.
    iran which is shia which is a cult that is actually an Islamic off shot, not islam per se like we are, pays internet sites because it has interests in the area and sees isis as a big threat to their shia half moon project.
    yet they attend the burial of the Saudi king. hypocrites.

    they are worse than the jews,
    if bashar assad was prime minister of Israel there would be no Palestinians left.
    so just go put on some shorts and do some chores in the kitchen, lady

    1. ISIS? woosies.. these overpaid stooges of the US and Israel are running scared, driven out of Diyalah in Iraq, and Kobani in Syria.. Iran is the only country to show any campassion, or decency.. If you love the jews so much Avatar, go to F-ing Israel, as a Palestinian? I guarantee, you wouldn`t last five minutes, in spite of your big mouthed/pea brained ranting..

      1. I have been to Palestine ignorant lady and they treated me better than the stupid Syrian government. Look where that stupid repressive regime is now. The people got up and soon will get them! and soon bashar will hang like they unjustly hanged saddam!

      2. Palestine is not Israel, Palestine is occupied by the Israel you seem to think so highly of, idiot.. Also, it was not the Syrian people who rose up, it was every stupid brainwashed takfirified idiot, such as yourself, who thought they could hang Assad. Four years later, and they`re still trying, in spite of the support, and funding, from the enemies of those you claim to support. So who is the ignorant idiot Avatar?

      3. Thanks for the links Pat, couldn`t access the second one for some reason, but will save the first. A girl I worked with in Edinburgh, who was from one of the islands, and who`se cousin wrote the music named “the Dark Island”, taught me the line of a song in gaelic. When I asked what it meant, she said “stir the porridge”..

  14. @ Lasha Darkmoon..

    The very same realities apply to the Bhagavad gita.

    “In the Brahma-samhita it is stated that the Personality of Godhead cannot be understood simply by study of the Vedanta literature. Only by the mercy of the Supreme Lord can the Personality of the Supreme be known. Therefore in this verse it is clearly stated that not only the worshipers of the demigods are less intelligent, but those nondevotees who are engaged in Vedanta and speculation on Vedic literature without any tinge of true Krsna consciousness are also less intelligent, and for them it is not possible to understand God’s personal nature.”

    Bg 7.24

  15. For inveterate Qur’ān-lovers, this is what Thomas Carlyle said about that book :

    “We also can read the Koran; our Translation of it, by Sale, is known to be a very fair one. I must say, it is as toilsome reading as I ever undertook. A wearisome confused jumble, crude, incondite; endless iterations, long-windedness, entanglement; most crude, incondite;–insupportable stupidity, in short! Nothing but a sense of duty could carry any European through the Koran. We read in it, as we might in the State-Paper Office, unreadable masses of lumber, that perhaps we may get some glimpses of a remarkable man… Mahomet’s followers found the Koran lying all in fractions, as it had been written down at first promulgation; much of it, they say, on shoulder-blades of mutton, flung pell-mell into a chest: and they published it, without any discoverable order as to time or otherwise;–merely trying, as would seem, and this not very strictly, to put the longest chapters first. The real beginning of it, in that way, lies almost at the end: for the earliest portions were the shortest. Read in its historical sequence it perhaps would not be so bad. Much of it, too, they say, is rhythmic; a kind of wild chanting song, in the original. This may be a great point; much perhaps has been lost in the Translation here. Yet with every allowance, one feels it difficult to see how any mortal ever could consider this Koran as a Book written in Heaven, too good for the Earth; as a well-written book, or indeed as a _book_ at all; and not a bewildered rhapsody; _written_, so far as writing goes, as badly as almost any book ever was! So much for national discrepancies, and the standard of taste.”

    Link : http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Critical_Analysis:_Logical_Fallacies

    1. @ Franklin Ryckaert

      Apologies to both you and Pat if I seemed rather upset at your needless contempt for the religious values Lasha and I hold so dear and cherish. This strikes me as a curious fact: that such intelligent people like you appear to have no qualms about trampling on the most sacred feelings of other people who have never done you any harm or attempted to make you feel small.

      May I ask, without prying: is there anything that you hold sacred and cherish? Is there anything you love that you would hate to see trampled into the dust and shown the scant respect that you extend to Lasha and me?

      Is it the “White race”? Is this your equivalent of God? Is this the entity that would bring tears to your eyes if someone insulted it and accused it of being every bit as evil and depraved as the Jews you love to hate?

      1. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        In quoting Carlyle as your “authority” for the awfulness of Islam , you violate your own principle that the argument from authority (argumentum ad verecundiam) is one of the weakest arguments going.

        A thing isn’t true because the Bible or Quran says it is, as you have so often instructed us. So what makes you think we are likely to be impressed when you quote Carlyle as your authority, a man whom Nietzsche describes as “an absurd muddlehead” and a paradigm of “petty-mindedness”?

        Orwell had little time for this crusty and sour-tempered Scottish “philosopher”, now almost totally forgotten. He called him

        “a master of belittlement. Even at his emptiest sneer (as when he said that Whitman thought he was a big man because he lived in a big country) the victim does seem to shrink a little. That is the power of the orator, the man of phrases and adjectives, turned to a base use.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Carlyle#Influence

        The man you quote with such enthusiasm was, by all accounts, a miserable old sod.

        So was his wretched wife who suited him so well in that respect. “It was very good of God to let Carlyle and Mrs Carlyle marry one another,” Samuel Butler quipped, “and so make only two people miserable and not four.”

        Take a look at the idiot you quote! I feel sorry for his wife! 🙂

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Carlyle#mediaviewer/File:Picture_of_Thomas_Carlyle.jpg

      2. Sardonicus –

        Good comment. And I certainly respect you (and Miss Lasha absolutely KNOWS I respect HER). However, if those who hang their laundry out to dry cannot defend their beliefs, here, in an intellectual and/or factual comment, then they’re asking for rebuttal and ridicule. You know that. I, myself, have learned that.

        Just today, I called a friend to tell him something I’d heard today which excited me (about political stuff), and the conversation morphed into the Bible (my citing some Scripture related), upon mwhich he informed me of what might be an improper way of deciphering meanings. It WAS enlightening (he is not, necessarily, a ‘believer’), and I took the time to consider his assertions – and I find that I may have been mislead ALL MY LIFE. Why is it so wrong to point out rational, well-thought-out perspectives??

        Speaking to Israel, God is said to have said ‘Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.’
        In essence, He admitted there ARE other gods – but WE (Israel) are to have NONE other before Him. That’s for us. Others are for something else. My observation is that we should have left the descendants of Esau alone – and they need to leave US alone. Simple. ‘Be kind to the stranger who passes through your land’ (but don’t let him linger too long).

        Thomas Jefferson said ‘We’ll have trouble out of those people someday.’

      3. It seems that we all have our own truths… until better perspectives possibly change them.
        Mine have changed drastically… ever since I had to support myself…. That’s when dad got smarter.

      4. As an answer to your question I can only paraphrase a well known Talmudic saying (tongue in cheek) :

        “Even the best of the Goyim should be criticized”.*)

        So I criticize even the best, and yes that may sometimes seem ruthless to the feelings of believers.

        Buddha’s teaching of an endless cycle of incarnations among all forms of life (even worms), but rarely among humans, untill one realizes that a permanent “Self” doesn’t exist and the non-entity can enter the non-existence of nirvana seems odd to say the least.

        Jesus thought that the “end of the world” was imminent and that he would usher in the “kingdom of heaven” in which the saved would live for ever, which was clearly a delusion.

        And these two are considered the “best” this sorry planet has produced!
        (the less we say about rogue prophet Muhammad the better)

        So yes, I criticize “the best” and that may seem cynical to those who still haven’t seen through the illusions.

        *)From the Talmudic : “Even the best of the Goyim should be killed“.

      5. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        You have given no offense to me personally, still less to Lasha who has always found you one of the most lucid and well-informed of writers — both here and on the Occidental Observer. Though she does not agree with you on all points, nor you with her, she is ready to admit that everything you say is “intellectually defensible.” I believe those are Kevin MacDonald’s own words.

        Lasha is the only practicing Roman Catholic I know who has actually shocked me by saying, only a couple of weeks ago: “There is such a thing as enlightened atheism, and it is a totally valid viewpoint which must on no account be condemned.” I have still to figure out what she means by that. 🙂

      6. @Franklin

        These words of Jesus you quote of course would have to presume what they might mean. You just interpreted your OWN meaning by concluding with:

        “And these two are considered the ‘best’ this sorry planet has produced”

        But what might THAT say about YOUR interpretation? You would have to offer your own words on that so as to convey whatever would be the measure of YOUR understanding.

        Ask yourself, why would you choose to reference Jesus with this “quote” in producing THAT conclusion?

      7. @ Toby

        Thank you for your kind words.

        I think that by accepting uplifting ideas from other religions Lasha is Catholic i.e. “universal” in the true sense of the word.

        Actually I don’t consider myself an atheist (whether “enlightened” or not) but a cosmic agnostic by which I mean that the limited human mind can never grasp the essence of a Cosmic Supreme Being if it exists. What we find in the existing religions is mostly a projection within a limited cosmology. For the three monotheistic religions that is the erronous “Heaven-and-Earth” cosmology, based on the optic illusion that we see the world as a flat disc (“Earth”) covered by the dome of the sky (“Heaven”). “God” is then projected above in that Sky. That Sky-God is then imagined to sit on a throne and to manipulate the weather, with rain as one of his blessings. One can find references to such an illusory Sky-God in the Old and New Testament and in the Qur’ān. It is my experience that it is very difficult to explain the illusoriness of the Sky-God idea to true believers of these monotheistic religions. They don’t understand the limitation of their own mind. Cosmic agnosticism means that no matter what progress we make in cosmology, that will always be limited and therefore an idea of a Supreme Being of that cosmology will also be limited. I hope this clarifies somewhat.

  16. the following comment is simply beautiful i will save it and do research on mr Ali
    ” the Quran is best read in Arabic because of its incantatory qualities and “magical sound effects” which no translation can possibly convey. See
    MAGICAL SOUND EFFECTS IN POETRY
    http://www.darkmoon.me/2011/magical-sound-effects-in-poetry/

    Failing that, Yusuf Ali’s English translation is the only translation I would recommend. This alone produces some of the “magic” of the original. This is because the translation is not only exquisitely sensitive and accurate but is written by a truly saintly Muslim with poetic gifts who gave his entire life to the task. It is written in free verse, not in prose.”
    this is an unique comment
    a “kinz” that I will save forever.

    1. Here is a translation by N. J. Dawood. I’m interested in Avatars opinion about the difference in the english translations. I think you are right about the Muslims, btw, all most westerners care about is just made up TV stuff. Not many of us realise that the Islamic Caliphate has real ‘grass roots’ support, well it’s the impression I get anyway. As if the whole Iraqi army ‘ran away’! I wonder which side I would support if I lived in Syria or Iraq.

      ———-

      THE EXORDIUM

      IN THE NAME OF ALLAH
      THE COMPASSIONATE
      THE MERCIFUL

      Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Creation,
      The Compassionate, the Merciful,
      King of Judgement-day!
      You alone we worship, and to You alone we pray for help.
      Guide us to the straight path
      The path of those whom You have favoured,
      Not of those who have incurred Your wrath,
      Nor of those who have gone astray.

      ———-

      Peace be unto you, Avatar.

  17. Having more than one translation of the same writing breeds confusion. Muhammad was not capable of reading or writing. Really smart guy. Someone to follow, for sure. 😉

    1. keep on quoting the jews or the white supremacist cult. you are doing well. specially when leaking and slurping to your alter egos here. get a life, veteran

      1. Since Muhammad could not read or write… in his own language…. or any other…. he would not be able to ‘proof read’ his approved writings….. even if written in his presence.
        He could be tricked very easily.

  18. I have no problem with Lasha liking the Koran. I do have a problem that she lies about her identity. She calls herself a “Catholic” yet NEVER mentions anything regarding Catholicism. She promotes and proselytizes for Islam. I have no problem she promotes Islam in and of itself. That’s her business, but I don’t see why she has to lie about being a “Catholic”, when it’s blatantly obvious she is NOT a Catholic. Why the charade?

    I do have a problem with Lasha calling herself a “Catholic” then she does nothing but promote and proselytize for Islam all the time. Lasha doesn’t turn my stomach because she promotes Islam necessarily, Lasha turns my stomach because she promotes Islam under a guise, a ruse, a false identity. She promotes Islam under the guise of being a “Catholic”. Lasha lies egregiously about her identity — a filthy dirty thing to do. Lasha is disgusting and her Darkmoon is wretched, putrid, stomach-turning, nauseating, vomit-inducing.

    1. @ The RealOriginalJoe

      You haven’t been here long enough to know anything about Lasha. She is a Roman Catholic Christian who has openly admitted several times that her first love has always been Indian philosophy, especially Vedanta. She has said more than once, I believe, that Christ is Krishna and that Krishna is Christ. No one appears to understand this here.

      She has hardly spoken about Islam.

      Lasha appears to be sympathetic to all the major world religions except one: Talmudic Judaism. She likes them all: Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam. She has spoken positively about all of them because all espouse the same traditional values — the values that encapsulate the wisdom of our ancestors and are in stark contrast to the values of Talmudic Judaism and the poisonous ethos of existentialism and the Frankfurt School.

      1. thankyou so much madame butterfly it is now important to try to make them two fellas richaert and pat the pet to understand that no matter how much they mock islam, it isn’t gonna go anywhere. we are the backbone of humanity fighting the worse enemies of mankind.
        if the Jews taught them that we came from monkeys then fine believe that, but you need to r-e-s-p-e-c-t others as Tina Turner said.
        we are not gonna sit on the couch eat chips and drink beer enjoying Seinfeld trash our faith like you do . then you complain about them but it is you who let them!
        we aint going nowhere! we are the backbone of humanity! we fight evil including people like you two, monkey worshippers! thanks Madame Butterfly
        just remember
        r-e-s-p-e-c-t
        tina

      2. TOBY: I am about to release SEVEN of Crazy Joe’s posts. These posts will demonstrate beyond all doubt that Joe is a low-quality poster who is bringing this site into serious disrepute. From tomorrow he will no longer be able to post on this site.

        Enjoy these, his seven lasts posts.

        These posts would be disallowed on any other website. In fact, Joe has been banned from posting on every other website he has ever posted on. For some reason that escapes me, Joe is now clearly BEGGING to be banned.

        @ Madame Butterfly

        Why don’t U pack-up your kabuki make-up and flitter back to the Orient and STFU, butterfly, do the world a favor for a refreshing change of pace.

        I’ve been around long enough to know Lasha is a jew kabbalah girl. a hebe Lilith’s girl thru-and-thru. Darkmoon is an Israeli website. I figured that out the first day I found Darkmoon. Doesn’t take a long time to figure you Darkmooners out. You all are so blatantly obvious. You all are in desperate need of some good, solid, professional acting lessons. All you Darkmooners do every day is act and put-on personas, but none of you Darkmooners can even do that right. Can’t even get it right, your chosen profession, and you all suck at it. Darkmoon is so pathetic on so many levels, on every level. ALL the kabuki make-up in the world can’t cover up what putrid jews you all are.

        Videre Licet. Ask your “Catholic” Lasha what that means. Then all you Darkmooners can go fuck yourselves in your sheenie hydra-headed snake pit, as you all lovingly coil about one another in your fetid pit of snake shit.

        Your Darkmoon is as ugly as sin, to use a Catholic expression.

    2. Darkmoon is wretched, putrid, stomach-turning, nauseating, vomit-inducing

      roj, are you bulimic or just hate women in general?
      either way, ceaselessly hanging around a wretched, putrid, stomach-turning, nauseating, vomit-inducing site is exercise in masochism.
      surely there are many sites more worthy of your presence that would welcome your views with open arms, maybe even pay you for perceptive comments like the one above.

      as for catholics expressing sympathy, respect and admiration for other systems, ever heard of thomas merton?
      look him up.
      on the other hand, don’t bother, i meant to say it to the wall, better odds of comprehension.

      1. @ lobro

        Glad you mentioned Thomas Merton. Now there’s a Catholic whom Lasha can relate to absolutely: one who knew how to express, in your own words, “sympathy, respect and admiration for other systems.” Another Catholic monk who was equally sympathetic to the Oriental religions was Bede Griffiths, another of Lasha’s heroes. Bede Griffiths actually had a Christian ashram in the south of India. It was as popular with Indians as it was with Westerners. Gandhi, Lasha tells me, was equally at home with the New Testament as he was with the Bhagavad-Gita. The Catholic Church, God bless it, is a very broad church and accommodates all types under its capacious roof.

  19. Joe –

    I have found ‘common ground’ with Islam. My common ground is RESPECT of the discipline required to pursue it. So-called ‘Christians’ have been poisoned so much by the charlatans in the pulpits (cite the John Hagees) they have been guided on a collision course with Islam – when we could have dwelt in peace in this world; separate, but peacefully. (We all know ‘who’ guided the collision…)

    Having been exposed to Shinto in my study of swordsmanship (specifically katana), I found it to be both beautiful – and compatible – with my Biblical teachings. Pursuit of ‘patience’ (the greatest virtue according to the way of Shinto) requires a discipline against proclivities to the seven emotions (hate, joy, anger, adoration, lust, envy, and greed). Isn’t that pretty much in line with ALL the ‘religions’??? 🙂

    1. Very instructive, Gil.

      Guys like Joe FIRST have to understand that there’s common ground to be FOUND. But you can’t have meant joy to be one of those seven emotions.

      Joy transcends emotion. Who and what “guides the collision” robs Man of its ineffable power, and Man has allowed this to occur.

      1. Look at it THIS way, Brownhawk: For every JOY, there comes along a KILLJOY – so don’t bother getting too attached! 🙂 🙂

        For every Yin there is a Yang. One must be PATIENT to endure the embalances – and find advantage over strong opponents. The patient ones are the strong ones.

  20. TOBY: I am about to release SEVEN of Crazy Joe’s posts. These posts will demonstrate beyond all doubt that Joe is a low-quality poster who is bringing this site into serious disrepute. From tomorrow he will no longer be able to post on this site.

    Enjoy these, his seven lasts posts.

    These posts would be disallowed on any other website. In fact, Joe has been banned from posting on every other website he has ever posted on. For some reason that escapes me, Joe is now clearly BEGGING to be banned.

    @ Gilbert Huntley

    Go fuck your fuckin’ smelly shit-smeared heifers on your ranch out west where seldom is heard a red jew cow heifer “messiah” complain and the rattlesnakes are a-slitherin’ all day, Gilbert, and do the world a favor for a refreshing change and STFU. Where seldom is heard the Ishamaelite’s Moon bull “god” and Issac’s red heifer jew cow “messiah” “g-d” discouraging words as the two shit-stained steers fuck each other all-day every-day out on your Huntly range.

    1. this hardly sounds like joe, no matter how crazy.
      could some jew have hacked into his email and presented himself as joe?

      can the tech guy look into the possibility?
      the fact that mossadniks are taking such hysterical steps to snarl the operation of darkmoon is actually encouraging, namely, they are feeling the pain of exposure and wide interest the site generates.

    2. Considering what I just read, I’m not too sure thats a good idea, Toby. But your the boss. Hang on, I thought you resigned. Hard to keep track of all the drama in this place.

    3. Joe –

      How many red heifers would you like to have? (thanks to Toby, I know you can’t answer, hahaha). I really don’t mind selling some to non-Jews – every now and then – or, I could rent one or two to you, but you must return them CLEAN, and disease-free. Think you can handle that?? 🙂 hahaha.

  21. I’m still waiting for you to put up my “‘alternative’ media/mainstream media” post. You know which one I mean. About how your “alternative” ultimately pushes the same agenda as the jew mainstream media, albeit your “alternative” media takes another tack to get us to the very same port and dock as the mainstream kikes.

    TOBY: IT’S BEEN PUBLISHED. CAN’T YOU SEE IT? NONE OF YOUR POSTS HAVE BEEN DELETED TODAY.

    1. Now, don’t you go and blow a gasket, Joe. Toby is very concerned with your well-being (as is everyone else, here, I’m sure), and he’s just doing what is best for you… We CARE! 🙂

  22. Lasha Darkmoon
    January 26, 2015 at 9:22 pm
    “Does the Quran contain “objectionable” passages? Of course. So does the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. There’s alway something, somewhere, you can find fault with.”

    I don’t deny that there are certain parts of the New Testament which are pretty offensive. William D. Pelley wrote in one of his essays that a group of scholars who were known in their time as “ebionites” were commissioned by international jewry with the intention of sabotaging the Christian Faith by making unsightly additions and interpolations into the text of the New Testament. The main idea behind this skullduggery was to weaken the Christian Faith, which after all these years is still a thorn in the side of international jewry, albeit not so much as it was in past centuries. The ebionitic subterfuge was geared toward establishing a reconciliation between the jewish old testament and the Christian New Testament. How much of the New Testament was “forged” by interlopers, and how much is original ?? I would surmise that all passages that elevate the jews are probably suspect. Also, any passage in the New Testament that lends ostensible support to the jewish institution of slavery is probably suspect as well.

    Leviticus 25: 44-46
    King James Version (KJV)
    “Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.”

    1. “How much of the New Testament was “forged” ….”

      …has been a question of mine since I took Latin in high school. That is when I learned that numerous translations of the same paragraphs were allowed to stand… Mainly because of synonyms, and ‘dead’ words.

    2. I doubt very much you will be able to find ANY verses in the New Testament which ‘elevate’ Jews, Goyim saver.

  23. Gilbert Huntly
    January 28, 2015 at 12:47 am
    “I doubt very much you will be able to find ANY verses in the New Testament which ‘elevate’ Jews.”

    Matthew 5:17 is often cited by jews and their apologists as a means of enforcing pharisaical old testament doctrines on Christian believers. While this particular verse doesn’t seem to elevate the jews, it actually DOES have that effect – only in a round-about sort of way. It also brings to mind another verse in the book of Revelation where the lineage of Jesus is traced back to King David of the old testament.

    Matthew 5:17
    King James Version (KJV)
    “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.”

    1. Yeah, STG, they go round about twistin and turnin in elevating themselves to a fare-thee-well

      Got milk?
      Cui bono?

  24. STG –

    If David were a ‘Jew’ you might have a point. He wasn’t. Both he – and Jesus – were JUDEANS. There’s no debating with the likes of you, so I won’t bother addressing you, anymore.

  25. A common point-of-departure is necessary for two parties to arrive at a reasonably acceptable consensus. If one, however, believes fire is HOT – and the other believes it is COLD – the agreement on how someone can be burned by fire may be an endless debate – and fruitless.

    1. Gil

      I don’t think it’s a matter of debate between you and STG. I see it more in terms of there being common ground that’s a bitch to find because of all the biblical tampering that produced a fog. The challenge is in lifting the fog to see the ground.

      How about this as food for thought – a true avatar would be beyond having a traceable lineage, in the sense of “lineage” having been slotted into the context of a deceptive narrative. Starting from this premise COULD lead to cutting through veils of mist.

      1. Brownhawk –

        It’s not so much a matter of ‘debate’ as it is a matter of my having too much to do to bother trying – and he seems pretty set in his opinion, so WHY BOTHER?? It yields no fruit for either of us, anyway. For now, I’m content.

        Your note of the emotion ‘joy’ in the above comment could be replaced with ‘fear’, or ‘anxiety’. ALL emotion should be guarded; and upon reflection, ‘Joy’ should be the one we most embrace, but we too often confuse it with ‘Love’. ‘Love’, unlike ‘hate’, is an illusion which, to me, is poetic (writing poetry about it is fun, and challenging), but is more a state-of-mind too often confused with ‘joy’ – which is why joy needs be called an ’emotion’ of which not to become overly fond. 🙂

      2. Very thoughtful observations, Gil

        “Hate is not the opposite of love” but of joy, meaning haters don’t know what they’re missing, which for me explains why Christ wept for the World with everything and everyone in it because ALL of manifestation is born of love.

        The real opposite of love is fear, and it is the pure haters who ‘invented’ it.

  26. Gilbert Huntly
    January 29, 2015 at 4:14 am
    “If David were a ‘Jew’ you might have a point. He wasn’t.”

    It makes absolutely no difference if David was a jew or not — and for the simple reason that David is their boy !! David is their favorite psychopath, and they even refer to their six pointed star as the STAR OF DAVID. Now let’s postulate the existence of a hypothetical passage in the New Testament – one that links Jesus with the Prophet Mohammed. Would you suspect that such a passage might have been interpolated into the text of the New Testament by the followers of Islam, or would you argue that the point is moot because Mohammed wasn’t a Moslem ???

    “Both he – and Jesus – were JUDEANS.”

    I don’t know about you but I can detect a world of difference between Jesus and david.

    They are polar opposites in every way.

  27. from bishop richard williamson’s circular on the hebdo affair (copied from inbox)

    just see how well the monsignor understands the hellish plan put into action as prescribed so accurately in the (forged/unverified for the politically correct) protocols.

    As for the cartoonists, if France were still Catholic, Church and State would still be united, as they were until the French Revolution, and State authorities would absolutely have forbidden such blasphemous anti-Christian cartoons as those by which Charlie Hebdo may well have provoked Almighty God to allow for the silencing of its cartoonists. But that would be censorship? Only a fool can think we suffer under no censorship today.
    THE CENSORSHIP IS SIMPLY ANTI-CHRISTIAN INSTEAD OF CHRISTIAN.
    WHO TODAY IS FREE TO BLASPHEME AGAINST HOLOCAUSTIANITY AND ITS “GAS-CHAMBERS”?

    no standard vatican eunuch, he.

    As for the muslim gunmen, to a Catholic France they might never have come. Never would Catholic State authorities have despised or hated muslims in their own countries, but at the same time never would they so have lost sight of the historic clash between Islam and Christianity as to allow to settle in France such a mass of muslim immigrants as have been allowed, even encouraged, to settle in France since World War II. Nor would they ever have learned to scorn their own race and despise their own traditions as they have allowed themselves to be taught to do today. By the Fourth Commandment a Catholic loves his own country above all, without wishing ill to any others.

    Most important of all, if France had stayed Catholic, neither the politicians nor the people would have become the puppets that they are today of hidden puppet-masters, the Globalists. In the 17 th century France was Catholic as a whole, but in th e 18 th century, for lack of Catholic faith, its ruling class allowed itself to become thoroughly infected with another form of Globalism, Freemasonry. Launched in its modern form in apostate England in 1717, Freemasonry swiftly spread to France and North America where it master-minded the American and French Revolutions in 1776 and 1789 respectively. Both of them were major steps towards the Globalists’ New World Order.

    Now, for as long as the Catholic Church was still in its right mind, it denounced and condemned Freemasonry as being a secret society designed to undermine and overthrow the Catholic religion altogether – see for instance Leo XIII’s Encyclical Letter, Humanum Genus of 1884. Thus from the French Revolution onwards, States have been ever more separated from the Catholic Church and have been put instead on secular and democratic foundations. More and more the new middle-class rulers have abandoned the Catholic religion in favour of liberalism , which is in effect a substitute religion, adoring man and his liberty instead of God and his Truth. So in the name of “freedom” journalists took over from priests, and their liberal media took over the people’s thinking. But all the while journalists and media have been secretly directed by Freemasonry, working for the Globalists’ New World Order. Here is how, under cover of “democracy” and “freedom,” the highly motivated Globalists have been able to reduce peoples and politicians to puppets of public opinion, moulded by their media. To turn one’s back on God’s Truth is to enslave oneself to Satan’s lies.

    The Charlie Hebdo attack was DESIGNED for a huge demonstration to favour godless liberty, or rather licence, and a murderous muslim-European tension. More such events will follow,
    TO ARRIVE AT BLOODBATHS FROM WHICH THE GLOBALISTS COUNT ON EMERGING SUPREME,
    from which Almighty God hopes that men will see that rejecting him is a huge problem, the basic problem.

    this is the real catholic speaking, this is what jesuits are saying privately (i know because i heard one such 2.5 years ago say it in my presence).
    and people like dublinmick are free to run amok, deflecting the blame onto them.

Comments are closed.