Bishop Williamson on Putin and the Message of Fatima (Video, 15 mins)

The resurgence of Christianity in Russia is abhorrent to the Usual Suspects who need the soul-destroying atheism and nihilism of Communism in order to create a culture of despair. This video will leave you in no doubt about one thing: that Putin is a devout Christian who is aware of the message of Our Lady of Fatima, which is that the Russian people need to return en masse to their Christian roots, as indeed Western man needs to do also, in order to resist enslavement and spiritual death at the hands of the Hidden Slitherers. [LD]  

VIDEO 2 : OF RELATED INTEREST (17 mins)

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

32 thoughts on “Bishop Williamson on Putin and the Message of Fatima (Video, 15 mins)

  1. Although I do not agree with seeking out Lady Fatima (Virgin Mary) for advice, the following is found in the Old Testament of the Bible:

    II Chronicles 7:14 (NHEB): if my people, who are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

    I agree with the bishop, that the US leadership has no interest, seeking wicked New World Order agenda, whereas the Honourable Vladimir Putin seeks the best for the Russian people and the world. God will indeed bless Russia. God is not blessing Israel nor the US, because neither seek His face, humble themselves and turn from their wicked ways. Israel continues to oppress the non-Israelis surrounding and within their land; Obama promotes homosexuality, not seeking the best of the US people and world, and endorses Hillary Clinton, who has a history of wickedness. This is why the US is not experiencing any blessing, but all things opposite – economic and natural disasters, widespread crime and disease.

    1. Yes, Gyorgy, but I cannot understand ‘why’ it is supposedly only perceived by Catholics. Every Sunday, in the Methodist or Episcopal Church, the Nicean Creed is recited wherein we profess “we believe in the Holy Catholic Church….”. No matter what the Pope does, the faith of ‘the people’ ultimately decides the fate of ‘the nation’ according to God’s will. Russia has suffered because her people abandoned her Catholic roots. America suffers because people have ignored their ‘Protestant’ teachings. In the end, there is only ‘faith’ – not necessarily papist consecration – for all of us.

      1. The Nicene Creed is using the definition of “catholic” as “of, relating to, or forming the church universal” (Miriam Webster Dictionary), not necessarily the Catholic Church as a denomination. Basically it is referring to the body of Christ through Christians worldwide. But I agree with you Gilbert, if you look at many “Christians” today, you see little difference between they and the rest of the people. Marriage infidelity, poor work ethics, cheating on tax returns, watching dirty TV programmes and movies, visiting Internet pornography, showing racial discrimination toward new and visiting church attendants, lack of benevolence toward the truly poor, division among neighbours and etc. permeate unfortunately.

    2. Gil, a great and valid question

      I cannot understand ‘why’ it is supposedly only perceived by Catholics.

      As a catholic, i should adopt a sectarian view and blether about virtues of catholicism but won’t because it is a losing proposition, both sects are rife with betrayal of Christ.
      i do believe that the eastern branches hew more closely to the true spirit, especially the Russian and Middle Eastern ones, maybe by having been inoculated against Judaic disease through centuries of painful proximity.

      but i will say this: only the Catholics profess special affinity for the Holy Virgin, ie, the feminine side of mercy, compassion and forgiveness so central to Christ’s mission.
      She seems to be the designated courier for the alerts and admonitions from Heaven, maybe due to some kind of advocacy process whereas She argues on behalf of the weak sinners or something – really no clue, just riffing as is my specialty.
      So where is She to go with her message?

      An ordinary catholic is in much closer everyday communion with Her than with Jesus, directing personal prayers, requests, pleas and so forth at Her and therefore sees Her as more human and approachable, thereby establishing a living 2-way linkage with the numinous.

      i think that the vatican pros only play along unwillingly and are suspicious of the Virgin cult as vestiges of pre-Christian paganism common to imperial Rome and ancient Slav mythology, however it is too deeply entrenched a movement all along the Mediterranean rim and central europe to be eradicated.
      Putin seems to have caught the Fatima bug, being a truer Christian than most of the Vaticanists.

      So we get fatimas and you don’t, nyah, nyah, nyah 🙂

      1. 🙂 She’d be a wonderful, sweet consolation, Lobro, but we Protestants were taught that all such interventions ‘twixt us and Jesus are just pagan icons. However, THIS “Protestant” sees nothing sinful in a reverence of Mary – as long as one maintains a focus on God. No doubt Catholic clergy are able to sort out the difference between faith and devotion, but I’d not trust the average layman to do so. The Catholic Church is very mechanized (in a good and logical way!), but sometimes the mechanics of each component of an engine can get too complicated, and waylay the operator from his intended destination.

      2. Which could be designated as “Leading the sheep astray”, which has obviously happened since the times of Martin Luther’s considerations. I, myself, am inclined to simplicity. We make mountains out of molehills, and have suffered for it.

      3. @ Gilbert Huntly

        I, myself, am inclined to simplicity.

        Just as well, dear.
        I don’t think complexity would suit you. 🙂

      4. “So we get fatimas and you don’t, nyah, nyah, nyah”

        I laughed out loud.

        People are starting to perceive that Christianity has been the primary target all along. I know people who rejected their Catholic upbringing and are now starting to think about Christian morality again — they see the propaganda attacks aimed at their children. Presumably it is a survival instinct kicking in; or Jonas E. Alexis’ practical reason punching ’em in the face. It gets you in the end.

        Did we ever get to find out what was in the 3rd Fatima “warning”? I still don’t know what was predicted at Knock in Ireland, and Lourdes in France. I never paid attention 😛

  2. Thanks Cod,in my country Orthodoxy is very strong,especially among the young population.
    Although the atheist government does everything possible to spread atheism.

  3. It’s not a good idea for Christians of any denomination to squabble over doctrinal points. This is how the Jew divides and conquers. If the Buddhist Russian Minister of Defence, Sergey Shoygu can make the sign of the Cross at a military parade in Moscow I don’t see any reason for Protestant antipathy to respecting the Divine Feminine as personified in Mary. After all Dame Julian of Norwich spoke of the Divine Motherhood of God. Devout Buddhists will meditate on Kuan Yin, the Goddess of Compassion not out of any sense of idolatry, but only a motivation for acquiring the qualities of compassion. If one takes the time to read the book of Sirach in the Apocrypha, in the preamble it states that Wisdom was created before all things. “Who can seek HER out?” Feminine and origin of the name Sophia. Remember Hagia Sofia, one of the greatest churches in christendom, now occupied by Turkey?

  4. At some point Msgr Williamson mentions the Pope Pius X Encyclical Pascendi of 1907 and it is a powerful warning against precisely that which took place since, in accordance with The Protocols which saw their first publication in Russian around that time

    (…) owing to the efforts of the enemy of the human race, there have never been lacking “men speaking perverse things” (Acts xx. 30), “vain talkers and seducers” (Tit. i. 10), “erring and driving into error” (2 Tim. iii. 13). Still it must be confessed that
    THE NUMBER OF THE ENEMIES OF THE CROSS OF CHRIST HAS IN THESE LAST DAYS INCREASED EXCEEDINGLY, WHO ARE STRIVING, BY ARTS, ENTIRELY NEW AND FULL OF SUBTLETY, TO DESTROY THE VITAL ENERGY OF THE CHURCH, AND, IF THEY CAN, TO OVERTHROW UTTERLY CHRIST’S KINGDOM ITSELF.

    Words of truth, it all came to pass in abundance as the world rolls on toward the lamentable prophecy.

    Those who would negate Christ can say whatever they want but there is no denying the factual accuracy and validity of these multiple warnings of Pius X, The Protocols and The Fatima.

    1. The Protocols of the Elders of Zon was first written in Hebrew, not a language known by many gentiles, especially members of the Tsar’s secret police. It was almost exclusively used in synagogues. The scrolls of the Torah are witten in Hebrew.

  5. This is a very informative video.

    As stated in the preface of the video… Politics and religion ARE tied together… Bishop Williamson has a “mature understanding” of that. He knows what the ‘text-generation’ does not know.

    He was asked, “Did Putin ask the Pope to consecrate Russia.” And….“consecrate” means to change. Turn over.

    The Bishop stumbled and groped for words, and stammered and did not use complete sentences in the very beginning…. and used….. “seems” and “apparently what happened..” Because he did not KNOW the facts of Putin’s request… OR he did not want to divulge what he DID KNOW…. being sworn to secrecy. So, he ‘made it up’ as he spoke.

    At (4:50 min) Bishop Williamson stated that, “….many of the high up Catholic Church members are Freemasons.“

    In that statement he also claimed: the Freemasons are “…under the grip of (((THE SAME PEOPLE)))..”

    That means the Vatican is “under the grip” of interlopers…. “…the same people…”

    Here:
    https://youtu.be/qmVXp0gNVu4?t=289

    Bottom line: The Pharisee-Jew Bankers in London own and control the Vatican and global finances.

    ………………

    Putin HAS TO GET PERMISSION from the pope because the Roman Catholic Church claims the entire world.

    –Donation to the Roman Catholic(universal) Church–
    A Donation, when referred to in canon law in the Roman Catholic Church, is the gratuitous transfer to another of some right or thing.

    The right to acquire property by last will and testament dates only from 321 in the reign of Constantine I.

    Pope Innocent II (1198-1216), the most energetic champion of papal supremacy, thundered incessantly to all Europe that he claimed temporal supremacy over all the crowns of Christendom:
    for, as the successor of St. Peter, he was simultaneously the supreme head of the true religion and the temporal sovereign of the universe.

    His tireless exertions saw to it that papal rulership was extended over sundry lands and kingdoms.
    The power given by the Donation to the Roman Church was further enhanced by that inherent in the papacy itself. As the direct successors of Peter, the popes were the only true inheritors of the might of the Church, and hence of whatever and whoever were under her authority.

    The theory ran as follows:

    ‘Christ is the Lord of the whole world. At his departure he left his dominion to his representatives, Peter and his successors.

    Therefore the fullness of all spiritual and temporal power and dominion, the union of all rights and privileges, lies in the hands of the pope.

    Every monarch, even the most powerful, possesses only so much power and territory as the pope has transferred to him or finds good to allow him.’

    This theory was supported by most medieval theologians. It became the firm belief of the popes themselves.
    In 1245, Pope Innocent IV expounded this doctrine to none other than the Emperor Frederick, saying that, as it was Christ who had entrusted to Peter and his successors both kingdoms, the heavenly and the earthly, belonged to him, the pope:
    by which he meant that the spiritual dominion of the papacy had to have its counterpart also in papal dominion over all the lands, territories and riches of the entire world.

    ……………………………………..

    Pope Pius XII consecrated the whole world to Mary’s Immaculate Heart in 1942 and carried out a similar consecration of Russia in 1952, but neither of these fulfilled Mary’s request at Fatima. This collegial consecration, in union with a “moral totality” of the world’s bishops, was finally carried out by Saint Pope John Paul II in 1984.

    Fatima received further Papal support when on May 13, 1979, the Pope declared Jacinta and Francisco “venerable,” the first stage in the process of their possible canonization.

    Saint Pope John Paul II further emphasized the importance of Fatima by beatifying Jacinta and Francisco on May 13,2000 during the Jubilee Year. It was during these beatification ceremonies that all the details of the third part of the Fatima secret were revealed, the – THIRD – millennium was ENTRUSTED TO….. Our Lady of Fatima.

    http://wafusa.org/the-story-of-fatima/

    1. “Doctrines of Discovery” directly applied and guaranteed ownership in the “New World” lands.

      Origins of the Doctrine of Discovery
      To understand the connection between Christendom’s principle of discovery and the laws of the United States, we need to begin by examining a papal document issued forty years before Columbus’ historic voyage In 1452, Pope Nicholas V issued to King Alfonso V of Portugal the bull Romanus Pontifex, declaring war against all non-Christians throughout the world, and specifically sanctioning and promoting the conquest, colonization, and exploitation of non-Christian nations and their territories.
      http://ili.nativeweb.org/sdrm_art.html

      Papal Bulls of the 15th century gave Christian explorers the right to claim lands they “discovered” and lay claim to those lands for their Christian Monarchs. Any land that was not inhabited by Christians was available to be “discovered”, claimed, and exploited. If the “pagan” inhabitants could be converted, they might be spared. If not, they could be enslaved or killed.
      http://www.doctrineofdiscovery.org/

      Chief Justice Marshal:
      “On the discovery of this immense continent, the great nations of Europe … as they were all in pursuit of nearly the same object, it was necessary, in order to avoid conflicting settlements, and consequent war with each other, to establish a principle which all should acknowledge as the law by which the right of acquisition, which they all asserted, should be regulated as between themselves. This principle was that discovery gave title to the government by whose subjects, or by whose authority, it was made, against all other European governments, which title might be consummated by possession. … The history of America, from its discovery to the present day, proves, we think, the universal recognition of these principles.”

  6. @ Pat

    “…The right to acquire property by last will and testament dates only from 321 in the reign of Constantine I…”

    You are referring here to the Donatio Constantini which has since long been recognized as a fraud. Emperor Constantine never wrote such a document. That was a forgery from the 8th century, and recognized as such in the 15th century.
    See : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donation_of_Constantine

    As for the Doctrine of Discovery, that sounds exactly like the Islamic idea of jihad :

    “…In 1452, Pope Nicholas V issued to King Alfonso V of Portugal the bull Romanus Pontifex, declaring war against all non-Christians throughout the world, and specifically sanctioning and promoting the conquest, colonization, and exploitation of non-Christian nations and their territories…”

    “…Any land that was not inhabited by Christians was available to be “discovered”, claimed, and exploited. If the “pagan” inhabitants could be converted, they might be spared. If not, they could be enslaved or killed…”

    In what sense, pray tell, are Catholics any better than Muslims, if they subscribe to such repulsive ideas?

    1. Franklin –

      Thanks for the thoughts and comments.

      I have found that it matters little what you and I believe, but what really matters is what judges, magistrates and law makers and interpreters believe. And that varies by the mile.

      It even varies by who is sitting on the bench……… in the same courtroom. 🙂

      Suzette Kelo believed it was wrong for the City of New London, Connecticut, to take her land in 2005. They took it anyway. SCOTUS used some of those old beliefs carried over for centuries to do it. Although 4 judges on the ‘supreme jury’ believed she was correct…. 5 did not. Oooops. Sandra O’Connor resigned.

      1. Pat on September 27, 2016 at 8:19 pm: I have found that it matters little what you and I believe, but what really matters is what judges, magistrates and law makers and interpreters believe. And that varies by the mile. It even varies by who is sitting on the bench……… in the same courtroom. 🙂

        Why would you think that? In this comment section, it is the personal opinions of discussion that matters and not that what others think. Otherwise, why is there the purpose of discussion? 😛

        Suzette Kelo believed it was wrong for the City of New London, Connecticut, to take her land in 2005. They took it anyway. SCOTUS used some of those old beliefs carried over for centuries to do it. Although 4 judges on the ‘supreme jury’ believed she was correct…. 5 did not. Oooops. Sandra O’Connor resigned.

        I looked at Oyez: Kelo v. New London to grasp a handle on what you were referring to. Imminent domain was used previously for public benefit, i.e., highway construction, military bases, public government run schools, public parks, etc. All benefit from highway use. Military bases are for national defence. Schools benefit the community served. Public parks are open to all. Previously, it was not used for places of commerce, to not directly benefit private companies.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

        Thomas also issued a separate originalist dissent, in which he argued that the precedents the court’s decision relied upon were flawed. He accuses the majority of replacing the Fifth Amendment’s “Public Use” clause with a very different “public purpose” test:

        “ This deferential shift in phraseology enables the Court to hold, against all common sense, that a costly urban-renewal project whose stated purpose is a vague promise of new jobs and increased tax revenue, but which is also suspiciously agreeable to the Pfizer Corporation, is for a ‘public use.’”

        Thomas additionally observed:
        <blockquote“Something has gone seriously awry with this Court's interpretation of the Constitution. Though citizens are safe from the government in their homes, the homes themselves are not.

        545 U.S. 469, 518 (2005)

        By the argument that anyone can visit a store as a definition of “public use” is a form of avarice. Thus, the new age definition of “public use” is nothing more than a perversion of justice. It would be interesting to know the background of those who push such agendas, as they are a false cloak to benefit the public, when in fact it benefits certain wealthy individuals.

      2. Gyorgy —

        Thanks for the reply.

        “In this comment section, it is the personal opinions of discussion that matters and not that what others think.”

        I believe that. I also believe what I wrote: “I have found that it matters little what you and I believe, but what really matters is what judges, magistrates and law makers and interpreters believe….”

        I stand by that belief….. That is MY personal opinion of discussion. And it matters….. especially to me. 🙂

        You wrote: “It would be interesting to know the background of those who push such agendas, as they are a false cloak to benefit the public, when in fact it benefits certain wealthy individuals.”

        Since you looked up the decision you…. can see it was the Pharisee-Jew judges who voted to take the land. Breyer had protests outside of his home. Had to call police.

        What makes an even more sad ending… Pfizer never built the complex and business they stated they wanted the land for its employing 1,000+ people. It is an empty lot now.

        BTW – It is (E)minent Domain.

  7. Pat on September 27, 2016 at 11:21 pm: What makes an even more sad ending… Pfizer never built the complex and business they stated they wanted the land for its employing 1,000+ people. It is an empty lot now. BTW – It is (E)minent Domain.

    My bad, Pat. 😉 I looked up my mistake. Imminent is 1. liable to happen soon; impending. Eminent Domain is the power of the state to take private property for public use with payment of compensation to the owner. Given that Pfizer never made good, seems that it was imminent domain instead of eminent domain. 🙂

    And yes, I had a suspicion of the culprits, but thought to give the benefit of the doubt. It is just another example of abuse of power for a cause that never was.

    1. Gyorgy –

      No problem. You are not the first to make that error. I may have the advantage of looking into property laws since the 70s. It was once on my front burner, especially back then, with friends in Texas in court for frivolous reasons.

      I followed Kelo from the start. That result was that I learned it is futile to object to their power over property takings for any reason in the US. The group in Oregon and Idaho and Montana and Texas learned the hard way.

      My interest rose again with the NAFTA Super Highway deals and…. Rudy Giuliani brokering the selling of US Interstates and state highways to foreign corporations in the 90s and early 2000s, one was Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., a Spanish transportation company….. mostly owned by the Spanish government.
      http://www.cintra.es/en/Company

      See an example led to completion:
      Firm Advises Cintra in First Privatization of Toll Road in Texas
      March 1, 2007
      DALLAS (March 1, 2007) Bracewell & Giuliani LLP advised Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., a Spanish transportation company, in its successful bid to develop State Highway 121 into a toll road through Collin and Denton counties. The award to Cintra, approved by the Texas Transportation Commission, is the first privatization of a Texas toll road.
      Bracewell is acting as project counsel to Cintra with respect to the 50-year concession from the Texas Department of Transportation. Cintra will pay a $2.1 billion upfront and annual lease payments totaling $700 million.
      “Cintra was awarded this project because of its proven expertise and competitive proposal,” said Thomas O. Moore, partner with Bracewell & Giuliani. “This is the largest transportation deal of 2007. This is one of only five deals in the country.”
      Three firms have competed for the Comprehensive Development Agreement for State Highway 121 since last summer. The proposals were reviewed and scored based on selection criteria set forth by the Regional Transportation Council, the metropolitan planning agency for the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
      This CDA is a public-private partnership that allows the provider to handle all facets of developing the toll road, including completing construction and operating and maintaining the corridor.
      Cintra, a subsidiary of Grupo Ferrovial specialized in toll roads and car parks, is one of the world’s leading private-sector developers of transport infrastructure.
      http://www.bracewellgiuliani.com/news-publications/news-releases/firm-advises-cintra-first-privatization-toll-road-texas

  8. Based on the tabs I have been keeping on the Syrian war, the second video was accurate and would be a good source for anyone seeking the truth about what is really going in Syria. It would have been nice if it did not move so fast so that I did not have to constantly use the pause button.

    The first video with Bishop Williamson had some decent info (nothing I did not already know), but the part about Putin was just speculation. If Putin or the Pope had wanted everyone to know what went down in their meeting, there would have been a video of the meeting released. No different than when the Krill and the Pope met in Cuba recently.

    So, since it is speculation, my speculation is that Putin and the Krill both closed their meetings with the Pope with the same comment, “You’re no help in solving problems. You still refuse to return to the doctrine of the original church.” Consequently, neither Putin or the Krill subordinated themselves to the Pope regardless of what Papal Bulls were issued in the past.

    1. Ungenius –

      “The first video with Bishop Williamson had some decent info (nothing I did not already know)”

      You have been holding out on us…. 🙂

      I have never read where you stated what the Bishop did:
      At (4:50 min) Bishop Williamson stated that, “….many of the high up Catholic Church members are Freemasons.“

      Here:
      https://youtu.be/qmVXp0gNVu4?t=289

      1. @ Pat

        I had no idea that you were keeping such meticulous records of what I post. I feel so complimented. 🙂

    2. I concur with your speculation, Ungenius

      I don’t have the time right now, but in a few hours I’ll be posting something that addresses this further {<:)

      1. B-Hawk –

        I thought of your messages about Illuminati when I saw this.

        1.5 million views in 5 days…

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkXS946P4sQ

        Published on Sep 23, 2016
        Angelina Jolie admits to the satanic ritual she performed to enter the Order of the Illuminati in newly surfaced secret footage where she is talking to two close friends. Jolie details an Illuminati sacrifice.

      2. The planet is crawlin’ with vermin, Pat. But the angels that hp alluded to are also here. And hp’s posts often provide me with a good segue:

        The plan for a Satanic state started in earnest with the onerous “Doctrines of Discovery”- a diabolical setup that in effect sanctioned arrogance by claiming a bogus authoritativeness in the name of Christ, but which has nothing to do with his teaching, the Vatican being nothing more than a judaistic wolf in papal sheep’s clothing.

        Christ taught that the only legitimate authority is vested in the individual, wherein the “State” is simply a collective of individuals having a common interest of peace and security whose strength ensures the “quiet enjoyment” it protects.

        I think Putin only gives the APPEARANCE of showing deference to the precept of this bogus institutionalized authority. As I see it, this is Russian stoicism at it’s best – look at WHAT IS and deal with things AS THEY ARE. His apparent genuflecting to an imposter is no different than in the political realm of being between a rock and a hard place trying to navigate through the most treacherous of waters, where a “dead reckoning” is often the only option. But his support of the Russian Orthodoxy is all that counts.

        While Christ never advocated for a church in his name because he KNEW what would happen when dogmatism reared it’s ugly head, in reflecting the doctrine of the original church, the Russian orthodox position keeps any dogma to a bare minimum, and is certainly not on board with the Doctrines of Discovery which has evolved to the insidious Agenda-21 agenda. This is at the heart of why Russia is in the cretin’s crosshairs.

        Paul Warburg made his statement of “consent or conquest”. But in their heart of dark hearts, even the protocolian authors probably knew that Russia, with its backbone of the Orthodox church honored, would never capitulate while most of the rest of the World consented, and that it would come to attempts at conquest.

  9. To : Monte, Lasha, Lucy, UncleAunt, “Catholic Nun Mother Superior” “Sister” Monica, Lady Godiva, or whoever the f*ck is in charge up there in ADMIN. :

    As you all know, because you all CENSORED IT, I sent in a post last night I shall refer to as the “Secret of Nagasaki + Our Lady of Akita” post. And you all are CENSORING IT because? Because you all are “Catholics” and the post is about Catholics in Japan? Because you all are a bunch of lying dissimulating hydra-headed, dual-minded, fuckin’ two-faced fuckin’ phonies who couldn’t give a shit about Catholicism and how you all fuckin’ lie thru your teeth about being “Catholics” and the only thing you all like about the Catholic Church is that The Church is now totally usurped and now totally ALL about the New World Order. Because you’re all TOO busy TOO preoccupied having TOO much FUN crying your crocodile tears. Because you’re all a bunch of scumbags?

    You’re all “Catholics” and I’m “The Chief Sheikh Imam of Masjid al-Haram”.

    1. Joe,

      The video you posted was strictly OFF-TOPIC, like most of your posts. Out of kindness and consideration for you, we would have posted it if the video had been shorter. But not a 50-minute video about the Catholic Church in Nagasaki!

      A 5-minute video would have been OK — but not 50-mins. That’s far too long.

      Hope you understand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *