Black leader Louis Farrakhan slams Hillary Clinton, praises Donald Trump, and says violence and bloodshed are necessary (3 short videos)

louis-farrakhan-apLouis Farrakhan, firebrand leader of Nation of Islam, denounces Hillary Clinton and praises Donald Trump in the first two short videos featured here (11-minutes in total). In the final 2-minute video, Farrakhan advocates violence and bloodshed as the only way forward. He said this only hours before the recent killings in Dallas.

Farrakhan, sometimes vilified by Jewry as “the Black Hitler”, is not too keen on Jews.

He once said: “The Blackman will never be free until we address the relationship between Blacks and Jews.” And later he added: “That nation called Israel never has had any peace in 40 years and she will never have any peace because there can be no peace structured on injustice, thievery, lying and deceit and using the name of God to shield your dirty religion…”  [LD]

VIDEO 1 :  Farrakhan denounces Hillary Clinton (5.22 mins)

VIDEO 2 :  Farrakhan praises Donald Trump (5.56 mins)

VIDEO 3 :  Farrakhan says violence and bloodshed are necessary (2.18 mins)

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

104 thoughts on “Black leader Louis Farrakhan slams Hillary Clinton, praises Donald Trump, and says violence and bloodshed are necessary (3 short videos)

  1. These videos show that psychopaths come in many colors.
    In the first video he stated that “whites are satan.”
    If you don’t believe that… and believe he is lying or guessing…. you cannot believe the rest of his guesses, without more proof.

    I don’t believe anything he said….. in any of them.

    Keep in mind he said “god hates”…… just because some loon wrote it in a book.

    1. @ Pat

      Since Farrrakhan is clearly anti-White and, it would seem, a cheerleader for race war in America, do you think it possible he is secretly working in collusion with Big Jewry? Is he, in your estimation, a tool or puppet of Jewry?

      Would there be any strong evidence for that viewpoint?

      1. LD –

        In a word… YES.

        I kept wondering when he would admit that he is working for the Pharisee-Jew Bankers…. 🙂

        Then, he is silly enough to try to tell us Trump needs no financial help.

        He calls for violence and bloody wars. Pharisee-Jew Banks profit from those actions.

        Cities where racial violence occurs, end up hiring more cops…. or bring in militaries… increasing debt…. which is needed to keep the system afloat….. world-wide.

        He shares all the psychopathic traits of Pharisee-Jew Bankers’ agents today, and in the past….. even high intelligence.

      2. @Lasha Darkmoon

        Is seems very unlikely that the Jews would secretly support a Black leader with a big following who is so blatantly anti-Jewish. It is true that the Jews have tried to use the Blacks as allies in their war against Whites, but they sorely miscalculated :

        1) No matter how much the Jews may say that they “feel solidarity” with Blacks, that they too have suffered discrimination and persecution from Whites, or even that they are not White themselves, Blacks see Jews as Whites, and as rich and powerful Whites to boot.

        2) Blacks don’t want the Jews to lead their movement. The NAACP was entirely dominated by Jews. Blacks find that humiliating.

        3) Blacks have discovered that the transatlantic slave trade was entirely a Jewish affair. (hence their book The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews.)

        4) In the conflict between Jews and Palestinians, Blacks instinctively choose the side of the Palestinians, since they see it as a conflict between Whites and non-Whites.

        It is only natural that a Black movement against what they perceive as oppressive, powerful and rich Whites would eventually also turn against the Jews. Jews would never support a Black leader who is openly anti-Jewish. It is true that rich Jews such as George Soros support the destructive Black Lives Matter movement as long as it is only anti-White, but as soon as it would become anti-Jewish he would stop supporting it.

      3. Franklin,

        I agree with most of the points you make about Farakhian. I don’t know very much about the man and have no strong opinions on him one way or the other. The one thing that struck me forcibly about the videos was that Farakhian seemed sincere and had a good command of rhetoric. That in itself means nothing of course. Witness Tony Blair who exudes sincerity without being sincere.

    2. Since ‘whites are satan” Farrakhan should stop being a hypocrite by praising Trump ….. and tell his congregations, and those who interview him, to vote for black candidates in 2016.

      Like this:

      WORKERS WORLD PARTY:
      http://www.workers.org/wwp/

      Monica Moorehead (New York)
      Presidential Nominee

      Lamont Lilly (North Carolina)
      Vice Presidential Nominee

      1. Trump going to out the Jews on 911? Nah, in fact, he says it was dancing Muslims. I watched the apprentice a few years back. Joan Rivers, a total idiot, by the way, made it to the final and was totally outclassed by this unknown white business woman. Trump gave the victory to Rivers. Push comes to shove, Trump is with the Jews. How many of his kids have Jewish spouses?
        Jews assume once a goy intermarries with a Jew, he will not go against the tribe

      2. @ Joe Sigur

        As you can see, Joe, none one of your recent comments have been deleted or censored. Because they seem to be reasonable and intelligent comments and we have no reason to treat you badly. And yet I note you are constantly holding my niece Lasha up to ridicule and contempt on your website. (blindlight.org).

        May I ask why you do this? Lasha has never been rude to you or crossed you in any way. If some of your comments were removed from this website formerly, is that any reason to hold a grudge against Lasha? She is not responsible for the Comments section here. I am. And Dr DZ. Lasha does not have time to even read all the comments, let alone censor them.

        You are doing a very wrong thing to vilify Lasha Darkmoon on your website and at the same time claim the right to complete freedom of speech on this site. Please consider my words carefully and behave like an honorable man by making amends to Lasha on your site. Thank you.

      3. A lot of historical white behaviour can be described as satanic, especially where they also ass-lick the satanists of today to the point where the yanks are now owned.

        Take your supremacist white yankee attitude and flush it down the toilet.

      4. You are correct, KOLO –

        Thanks for the reminder.

        It is a nasty hold-over from the Brits… who came across the ocean, from where you live, and brought that brand of satanic attitude with them. Much of that monster-like behaviour was demonstrated in the Salem With Hunts in Massachusetts.

        The North Berwick Witches Trials were examples of a brutal homosexual and satanic white King James of England and Scotland. He enjoyed torturing women. He has a bible named in his honor. 🙂

        In one case, Agnes Sampson was arrested by James VI ans taken to his palace of Holyrood House.
        She was fastened to the wall of her cell by a witch’s bridle, an iron instrument with 4 sharp prongs forced into the mouth, so that two prongs pressed against the tongue, and the two others against the cheeks.

        She was subjected to sleep deprivation, beaten and choked and starved…. until she confessed to the fifty-three indictments against her.

        After the torture…. she was finally strangled and burned as a witch.

        Nearly 2,000 witchcraft trials survive in the Scottish archives, the vast majority from the period 1620-1680, Between 3,000 and 4,000 accused witches may have been killed in Scotland in the years 1560-1707.

    3. I didn’t watch the videos but have watched him before. He was the direct beneficiary of Malcolm X’s death as I recall which is a concern. You can’t have it both ways. If the Jews are behind colonialism and the slave trade and basically forced it on whites similar to what we have in the middle east now, you can’t call whites, the great satan. You call them goy deluded by Jews. By the same token, since the Jews have been happy to take credit for every revolution known to man, how can we as whites demonize blacks and Muslims? We are all as a status quo race deluded goy being played
      My claim is you can’t deal with goy on goy issues as long as the Jews are in power because they are heavily in the mix as covert leaders of all of them
      Now there is a whole dialogue in the white community justifying the colonial behavior of whites implying that whites were behind it. Just follow the Jewish power centers from 1453 on and you will see the colonial empire go where the Jew’s center around (Portugal, Amsterdam, England) https://ia600906.us.archive.org/8/items/JewsAndTheBritishEmpire/The%20Jews%20and%20the%20British%20Empire.pdf
      Interestingly, there is a whole dialogue whitewashing white behavior for it’s supposed colonialist past. One says the Negroes were happy as slaves, the other says the white man was in North America first and had the right to take over all the land there, and apparently, no blacks or natives lived in South Africa, so it belongs to whites.
      I have to ask, why are whites trying to explain themselves over Jewish powerplays? I’ll leave it at that cause I like warm and fuzzy

      1. Farrakhan is the Jews’ worst nightmare. They have lionized the Negro to the point where even they have trouble denigrating him (no pun intended). To date, the Jews’ only option has been to declare Farrakhan Talmudically persona non-grata.

        The only worse nightmare for Jews would be for whites and Negros to ally against the Jew, which is where Farrakhan, while not openly advocating such an alliance, has been leaning towards for sometime. Farrakhan is intelligent enough to realize that his Nation of Islam following will not be enough to counteract the Jewish presence.

        I am certain from the actions of the Israeli Jews towards Ethiopian Jews, he fully understands what they have in store for the “Schwartzers” when they have finished their destruction of the white race. What they did to Qaddafi only hammered that point home.

        It’s the old Arabic saying, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. I first heard Farrakhan speak on the radio in Dallas. I was amazed to hear what I thought was a politician openly advocating the things he was saying. There was not the slightest hint of the usual shuck-jive, ebonic nonsense in his speech. I was yelling, “yeah boy, I’m voting for this guy!” Then he launched into his anti-white tirade and as they cut to a commercial he was identified. While dumbfounded that I had been listening to a Negro, I thought, “you know, despite his anti-white stance, I think I would vote for him anyway.” That was years before I became Jew wise.

        It’s truly a tragedy that Farrakhan is more able and intelligent then the masses of white morons advocating nothing more substantial than holding hands and singing “I’d like to give the world a coke.” It is this abysmal lack of meaningful action today that will eventually lead to rivers of blood flowing from the corpus of western civilization.

        I still enjoy listening to him speak on the Jewish subject. I only wish he had a white counterpart standing for the white race the way he stands for the Negro. But then, if wishes were Zyklon B, there wouldn’t be a Jew left on the planet.

      2. Wow, no one says it like Arch! He has a way with words. One of the best commenters on this excellent website which has already attracted so many intellectual heavyweights.

      3. Joe Sigur: “Interestingly, there is a whole dialogue whitewashing white behavior for it’s supposed colonialist past. One says the Negroes were happy as slaves, the other says the white man was in North America first and had the right to take over all the land there, and apparently, no blacks or natives lived in South Africa, so it belongs to whites. I have to ask, why are whites trying to explain themselves over Jewish powerplays? I’ll leave it at that cause I like warm and fuzzy.”

        Joe, I take it you don’t believe, as some posters here do, that the Chinese were once Whites, and that ancient Chinese inventions — and the list is long and impressive — weren’t really Chinese but White Inventions?

        I wonder, would the rise and supremacy of White Western Science and Technology — which always seems to rear its pretty blond head in any discussion justifying Empires and Colonialism — also be one part of the ‘Jewish powerplays’ you speak of?

        Note:
        There is a long list of Chinese Inventions at Wikipedia, but for those who don’t like Wikipedia, the authoritative work and list was complied in English by Joseph Needham.

        Science and Civilisation in China (1954–[2015]) “is a series of books initiated and edited by British biochemist, historian and sinologist Sir Joseph Needham, Ph.D (1900–1995). They deal with the history of science and technology in China. To date there have been seven volumes in twenty-seven books. The series was on the Modern Library Board’s 100 Best Nonfiction books of the 20th century.” — Wikipedia. It’s available in PDF format. Here’s Volume One

        Incidentally, among Sinologists, Needham is famous for having posed the “Grand Question” aka the “Needham Question”, which goes like this: “Why, if the Chinese had invented so much so early, the stirrup, gun powder, an amazing collection of things, were they so poor? What went wrong in China?”

        The answer is quite simple and in a word: OPIUM! or JEWS!

        They doped us and then they chewed us!

        PS
        For those who might think this post is off topic, well, they’re doing the same damn thing to the West as they did to China 200 years ago. If you don’t understand what the Jews did to China, you’ll never understand what the jews are doing now. Period!

  2. Before his murder, Qaddafi had planned to introduce a gold based African currency. Qaddafi was a close personal friend of Farrakhan. Qaddafi was Jewish.

    1. Got any source references, Tim, or we’re just “supposed” to buy anything you decide you want to sell on any particular day?

  3. I think he is an honest man. He speaks frankly. Self-determination for blacks as well as whites, separate nations, respect of borders, mutual respect where it is due… is the only fair and just way to have peace.
    The old Marxist Left preached racial solidarity among workers. Where did that get us?

    That the ‘usual suspects’ benefit from forced ‘diversity’ and the subsequent chaos does not incriminate Farrakhan.

    1. Yes.

      And the “gaddafi was jewish” is straight from the Mossad meme kitchen, just like “Hitler was jewish”, “Putin is jewish”, jew hosing his intended victims with jew effluent, a venerable ploy that nets many gullible customers, just like the rabbi defacing his own synagogue in order to reap confusion windfall.

      A jew whose rule raised Libyan citizens to the status of Switzerland?
      A jew whose fellow jews sodomized him to death with a bayonet and laughed about it?
      Sure, typical jew behavior.

      As for farrakhan, he seems kind of mixed but quite a bright and passionate guy.
      After all, there are some excellent quality ex-jews, gilad atzmon, 108morris108, brother Nathaniel, Yossi gurvitz, israel Shamir, Moredcai vanunu and a bunch of others.
      I am quite okay with readmitting them into the human fold, while kicking out the likes of Blair and the Clintons.

  4. Farrakhan is clearly not a full blood negro, he might even be half Jewish :

    “Gates, citing an academic source, says Farrakhan’s assertion about his lineage is “highly probable” given that nearly all people of Iberian descent in Jamaica and Barbados are of Sephardic Jewish ancestry.

    Farrakhan was born in 1933, the son of Mae Clark, who was from Barbados. He was named Gene after his father, a light-skinned man with straight hair from Jamaica. His father, Gates writes, was a philanderer whom the family rarely saw.”

    Source : http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/3093/farrakhan-claims-his-father-may-have-been-a-jew

    That would explain his intelligence. Mulattoes usually identify with the black side of their ancestry (see Obama). Farrakhan has some good points (criticism of the Jews, friendship with Qadhafi etc.), but his hatred of Whites is a negative (“White people are potential humans – they haven’t evolved yet.”)

    1. “White people are potential humans – they haven’t evolved yet”

      Well, apparantly he’s not intelligent enough to realise that everything he and his brothers have, including their lives, is thanks to those potential humans. So what are they then?

      I’ll tell you what they are. Delusional stone age cannibals wearing white men’s clothes who, if we are lucky, immitate our behavior, which is alien to them, like everything else surrounding them in white society is. Thanks to filthy jew the necessaty for them to immitate our conduct in order to survive in our societies becomes lesser with each passing day.

      There’s going to be only two options. Separation or genocide.

      1. I think that quote was more or less meant in a satirical way (after all it is Whites who often describe Blacks as “less evolved”).

        Here is a better quote from him :

        “Black leadership has to recognize that principles more than speech, character more than claims, is greater in advancing the cause of our liberation than what has transpired thus far.”

        Source : Louis Farrakhan Quotes – BrainyQuote

      2. @ 1138

        “There’s going to be only two options. Separation or genocide.”

        The jewish controlled US government banned separation. The reason they did was because they want genocide, more gentile dying. The jews have setup blacks and whites for the genocide via governmental policies and the media. The jews know that a race war between whites and blacks would only last a few days since the whites far out number the blacks and the whites are tremendously better armed.

        Any black that wants a race war is either exceptionally stupid or suicidal. Certain death awaits them if there is a race war making the jews quite happy.

        Any white that wants a race war is unknowingly a jewish stooge and will remain their stooge/slave if there is a race war, again, making the jews happy.

        Do not give the jews what they want. If there is going to be a war, it certainly should not be a race war. Whites, blacks, browns, yellows, and reds had better be united against the jewish money mongers and their stooges regardless of their skin color.

      3. Ungenius,

        I agree. A race war is the last thing I want. At the same time it becomes more clear every day that unless the blacks are totally dominated by others they are dangerous animals, certainly not fit to walk around freely in civilised societies or to be even considered equals to whites, and most other races. So segregation is the best solution. But if that isn’t going to be then genocide is the only inevitable outcome.

        It is undoubtedly the biggest mistake ever to transplant huge numbers of Africans into western civilisation. This mistake should have been corrected after the American civil war by repatriating them all back to Africa and leave them to their own devices, and uncolonised, of course.

        Having said that it should be noted that it was also the biggest crime in history committed by western civilisation to genocide an entire nation of what we now call American Indians. In south- as well as north America.

      4. Kolo,

        What are you complaining about?

        It’s only rethoric.

        Or is that only allowed when blacks saying “White people are potential humans – they haven’t evolved yet”

        ‘Cause I could have sworn that it was the other way round.

        Just an observation.

    2. No guessing about his claims…. When he states it in person….

      White people haven’t caught up to blacks…

      I have heard him say the blacks invented computers, rocket ships, space travel and pyramids… 🙂

      BLACK INVENTIONS – Minister Louis Farrakhan – DID YOU KNOW?
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysw1rud7ASY

      EXAMPLE:
      Black folks….
      Layed out… designed of Wash DC.
      Built the first clock in US.
      Invented subways,
      cotton gin,
      sugar distillery,
      traffic lights,
      anti-aircraft gun,
      fountain pen,
      clothes dryer,
      elevator,
      toilets,
      bottle-caps,
      typewriter,
      egg-beater….
      …..etc.

      Performed first heart surgery.

      Designed American flag.

      1. hmmm…the sugar distillery wouldn’t make sense, just makes mo’ work with the machetes cuttin’ down all da cane.

        the cotton gin on the other hand, just the opposite….and the clothes dryer. less work for mammy to be hangin’ da clothes on da line! ;]

  5. “violence and bloodshed are necessary”

    This is why I say bloodshed is inevitable, violence and bloodshed are the only means Jews use to change anything, thus they leave no other option.

    Western civilization has been set up by the Jews for what will probably be the greatest bloodshed in human history, one that will top their twentieth century efforts. The only way the coming horror might be stopped and allow a healthy return of civilization, is for humanity to rise up and eradicate the virulent cancer called “Jew” from its body. A solution for which there is virtually no possibility due to the ignorance and stupidity the parasite has enforced upon them.

    1. Legend has it that the origin of money on this planet can be traced to the arrival of interstallar beings who coerced the Earthlings into gouging the mountains for gold. From this seed came a malignant root, which has spread a parasitic disease throughout the history of the World producing materialistic blooms littering a desecrated landscape

      Meanwhile, there were those indigenous peoples who resisted co-mingling with the interlopers and their descendants, and had early on been left to their own devices. They would go on with their lives immune from an original act which corrupted the spirit of giving. The others would “develop” the World, and money would become a reality of tempered malevolence, sublimating into compliance, with the perceived need to “make a living” – an act of imposition that makes the host possible, and whose chief symbol is buried under the tombstone of “Arch Stanton”

      stars that glitter
      in ancient pools
      ore that titters
      its striving fools
      a vein pursuit
      of rich illusion
      that counts as loot
      the grand delusion
      blessed to give
      be not deceived
      you only live
      from life received
      no man is free
      of strife until
      he looks and sees
      to match Gods will

      1. a self-correction from something I wrote earlier

        the concept of money as a medium of exchange isn’t the problem – only the degradation that holds it’s giving (true) spirit hostage.

      2. I’ll put this thought together once and for all

        EXCHANGE is not the problem, but it’s MEDIUM is

        Nature PROVIDES and then we HAVE what is provided. When ALL have, but someone has something DIFFERENT than you, and vice versa, you might do a SWAP, or you may just GIVE that something away, expecting nothing in return. As long as the BASE of having what nature has provided for your biological survival is undisturbed, acts of giving and exchanging are INCIDENTAL to that.

        When a MEDIUM comes into the picture, this is where the TROUBLE starts. The middleman is the trouble-MAKER; the ground for evil has been seeded, and once it has taken ROOT and allowed to flourish like the poisonous weed it is, then the whole plant must be ERADICATED

        When the dust settles, and those who’ve endured the shitstorm take charge in the World they inherit, this INTERMEDIARY will have no place in a morally grounded society; its seed DESTROYED

      3. Brownhawk,

        The medium is just for convenience and can be anything varying from, shells to rice to cattle to gold or grain or whatever.

        So, it’s the middleman which causes the problem, because his share during the transaction is artificial without any actual useful purpose in society. His share will always be a drain which will leave society with less and less over time. And he doesn’t even provide a medium. Nature provides the medium. I think the middleman is preying on societies by encouraging desire.

      4. @1138

        It doesn’t matter what particular form the medium takes, once a middleman gets hold of it, the intrinsic control of the activity is compromised and it becomes vulnerable to being circumvented, and history shows that iewe-know-iewe always DOES circumvent it

      5. medium: 7) A condition or environment in which something may function or flourish

        This definition conveys the PROPER understanding of “medium” as it pertains to material-related activity

        Some simple examples to illustrate this, and which can be elaborated on:

        You’re in an apple orchard, pick a piece of fruit off a tree and eat it

        You have a bushel of apples. A friend has two gallons of goat’s milk. You make a swap (I choose goats in honor of my grandfather, who had goats on his farm in upstate New York)

        You give something, or offer your services to someone and expect nothing in return. Someone does the same for YOU with the same expectation

        A World that would be inherited will be absent the ATTAINING of goods and services by CONTENDING for them. When the middleman is eliminated ALTOGETHER you don’t have to worry about him. You’ve created what is in effect a “Pale of the Settlement”

  6. One of my teachers gave me a piece of wisdom – anyone in the incarnate human form, no matter how great, will always have some imperfection, however small. This has been reinforced by life experience; too often, the perfect is the enemy of the good. My evaluation of Mr. Farrakhan is surface only, I haven’t studied him or his career in depth, other opinions and anecdotes help complete the picture, which is an ongoing process. I respect discipline – the black Muslim community in the USA, having seen what destruction the poison of drugs and jewish “culture” have done to African Americans, seem to have achieved a modicum of discipline in their communities with relative safety from theft, rape, and murder which is relatively speaking a small miracle when viewing the huge problems so many blacks have. One decent American black I used to know who wasn’t a Muslim, and had served in the military and got to see the utterly pathetic state of black Africa clearly stated that he regarded himself as an American, not an African. I only hope he was able to take advantage of the educational opportunities that military service can assist with. Mr. Farrakhan has the moral courage and honesty to “name the jew”, which is more than I can say for members of Congress and many others right up to the President, who in many cases at the very least have the intellect, but not the moral courage. Let us remember, with caution of course, the perfect is the enemy of the good…

  7. Most ordinary white working people do not have a problem with most ordinary black working people, or of any race, including Jews. We all struggle to survive and maybe prosper. We all love our children. We have more in common than all our differences. All races have sins in their histories. My Anglo-American background is full of terrible acts, but we admit them. The Jews don’t. You can go to jail in Europe for pointing out proven facts about Jewish history. It is now called “Hate speech” which seems to be anything Jews don’t want you to say.

    These double standards applied to Jews are at the root of anti-semitism. They bring it down on themselves. For a race that prides itself on its intelligence it is a paradox.

    Mr Farrakhan is too extreme. War is the ultimate tragedy.

  8. I met Mr. Farrakhan about 25 years ago in Richmond, Virginia, and became a regular reader of his paper “The Final Call”. The black Muslim vendors were always polite and had good bearing and appearance, and I always looked forward to seeing them whenever I had business downtown. Never did I detect animosity for my individual person, but I reckon we all are allowed a bit of prejudice, at times. Farrakhan is allowed, too – but he is, for the most part, genuine and correct. I like him.

    1. I’ll be an monkey’s uncle if Farrakhan was NOT encouraged-on, mentored, guided, and bank-rolled from the very start of his Muslim “ministry” by die-hard intense COMMUNIST jews. [ Just as the so-called “Christian” Martin Luther King had jew COMMUNIST handlers who mentored and guided and bank-rolled King, jew Communist handlers who always of course remained behind the stage curtain, of course never came out publicly and said they were MLK’s jew COMMUNIST handlers ] Farrakhan was put where he is today by jews, by jews via intermediaries in Freemasonry. And what degree of Freemasony is Farrakhan up to these days?

      1. The difference is that Martin Luther King never said anything against Jews or Israel, while Farrakhan does that all the time.

        Farrakhan even said that Jews were behind 9/11.
        Watch this video : Minister Farrakhan : ‘Zionists did 9/11’ :
        https://youtu.be/tGSEzbQeyuA?t=59

        And watch this video : Farrakhan tells the truth about zionist jew rothchilds and the banksters : https://youtu.be/1m58uchF4Qs?t=70

        Do you still believe Farrakhan is an agent of the Jews?

      2. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        Do you still believe Farrakhan is an agent of the Jews?

        Personally, I doubt this. I think we have to give Farrakhan the benefit of the doubt. His sincerity seems to be genuine.

        There will always be conspiracy theorists among us, however, who see the Rothschilds pulling the strings behind every public figure, even the most most virulently anti-Semitic.

        There are people posting comments on this website (G’d bless them) who actually claim that even Adolf Hitler was secretly working for the Jews! 🙂

      3. Franklin –

        “Do you still believe Farrakhan is an agent of the Jews?”

        Sure. If not, they would take his videos down from Google’s YouTube.

        The control methods run deep and have for centuries.

        As Louis read off his references, it sounded like a board meeting list of the John Birch Society….. which is controlled by Pharisee-Jews.

        Gary Allen partnered with Larry Abraham to write the famous book, None Dare call it Conspiracy. Gary Allen was partners with Pharisee-Jew, Bob Chapman, selling gold and silver, and writing their newsletter, International Forecaster. Louis mentioned Stuart Crane, who was an economic professor on the board of JBS in the 60s and 70s.

        [BTW – Gary Allen’s son, Michael, is in thick with Clintons. As a chief at Politico, he is Washington Post trained. He was caught lying about giving Chelea a script to read in his interview with her, as agreed with Hllary.] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Allen_(journalist)

        Then, Louis said something very important in the video…. that the Pharisee-Jews Bankers keep an enemy of their enemies on the payroll. He swerved into describing himself and his movement.

        Soooo…. since he had to be telling the whole truth and all the facts…. we now can state with total certainty – from 2:50 of video – that “Hitler was financed by Rothschild to kill Jews.”

        https://youtu.be/1m58uchF4Qs?t=70

        Yep…. Thanks to your videos…. It is all clear…. now. 🙂

        PS – Anyone who calls “white man satan” does not deserve any benefit of doubt.

      4. @Pat

        1) You can find the most anti-Semitic videos on You Tube (even Jews complain about that). That says nothing.

        2) The John Birch Society was against Communists and the “New World Order”, but never against Jews. Anti-Semites were excluded from the Society.

        3) You don’t have to be perfect in order to be taken seriously. The NOI was founded as a rancorous anti-White movement, hence anti-White statements are to be expected.

        Finally, here is a video in which Farrakhan relates how he refused to denounce the book The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews in exchange for “friendship” with the Jews : https://youtu.be/CWlQykpa0qA

        Very strange behavior of Farrakhan, if he is an “agent” of the Jews!

      5. @ Pat

        PS – Anyone who calls “white man satan” does not deserve any benefit of doubt.

        Sorry Pat, but I have to reject your logic. You can hardly expect an important black leader to come out in support of the White Man. If he did, that alone would be grounds for doubting his credentials!

        Any black leader who said “I ADORE WHITEY AND HE AIN’T SATAN!” would be a bogus black leader. The fact is, Farrakhan clearly has a justifiable grudge against the Jews — he knows the Jews were behind the African slave trade — and his “satanification” of the White man is exactly what you would expect from a genuine black revolutionary!

        So yes, Farrakhan DOES deserve the benefit of the doubt! — precisely BECAUSE he calls the White man “Satan”! 🙂

      6. You may not LIKE Farrakhan because you don’t like him calling the White man a “satan”. But that doesn’t make Farrakhan a fake on the payroll of the Jews. In fact, his “satanification” of Whitey only increases his authentic credentials as a genuine black revolutionary.

      7. Pat,

        “PS – Anyone who calls “white man satan” does not deserve any benefit of doubt.”

        Damn straight.

      8. To Franklin Ryckkaert @ Lolicia Aitken

        Whoever LD is, he or she is right to say that Louis Farrakhan must be given the benefit of the doubt. As an educated African American myself, I can say I trust Farrakhan and I understand his genuine animosity for the Jew. No educated African can be unaware that his greatest enemy throughout the ages has been the Jew, who bought and sold him into slavery and who is now the evil agent behind interracial porn and interbreeding between races.

        We don’t need to ask who the black man would choose as his master if forced to make a choice: between the White Man and the Jew. The facts speak for themselves. Europe is being flooded by Africans who know that the Whites here will treat them properly. They don’t try to get into Israel, because they know the Jews love them so much they would shoot them dead if they tried to climb over their high wall!

        As for Farrakhan calling white people “satan”, that’s just rhetoric. Blacks by and large love Jesus and they don’t see Jesus as black. Or Jewish. They see Jesus as white.

        As long as blacks love Jesus, the White Savior, they can hardly regard Whites as “satans”. That’s just talk.

      9. @ Black Panther

        You are welcome to share your perspective with us, and no we will not insult you.

      10. Black Panther –

        “As long as blacks love Jesus, the White Savior, they can hardly regard Whites as “satans”. That’s just talk.”

        Voluntary actions follow mainly…. this process:
        —Thoughts-Words-Deeds–

        Louis had to ‘think it’ to ‘talk it’….

        Everything Louis says could be labeled as “rhetoric’…. but he was taken very seriously by a black man in Dallas last week…. He said, “I want to kill white cops.” He did that 5 times..!!

        He followed the “rhetoric.”

        He did the ‘Deed’….. after the ‘Words'(rhetoric)…. after the ‘Thoughts.’

      11. LOLICIA AITKEN,

        “The fact is, Farrakhan clearly has a justifiable grudge against the Jews — he knows the Jews were behind the African slave trade — ”

        Ah, I see.

        So after some long and profound hard thinking Farrakhan, apparantly fully aware of who were the actual slave traders, then shouts out “The Jews were the slave traders and therefore the white man is Satan and therefore we must shed white blood and start a race war against him. All because the jew was the slave master. We must not shed jewish blood or start a race war against the jew, nooo! We must shed white blood and start a race war against the white man, after all, the white man is Satan. You know how I know that the white man is Satan? Well, first of all, I’m very intelligent and knowledgeable about our history and am totally in the know about who the real slave masters were, the jews. So any intelligent and logical thinking person can come up with only one conclusuon; the white man is Satan.

        And you are rejecting Pat’s logic??? LOLVL!

      12. 1138 –

        Good points.

        Also, Louis was born in Bronx but his mom was from St Kitts. His original dad was Jamaican and his step-father was from Barbados. ALL of those areas were right in the middle of the Pharisee-Jew slave trade.

        Very, very, very, very intelligent Indies natives would have known that…. as you stated.

    2. I trust your judgment, Gil and it confirms my sense from viewing the videos and his fulsome praise and promotion of the “Secret relationship Between Jews and Blacks”
      the fact that Wikipedia goes into a blubbery attack mode, spewing unsupported invective, such as

      The book has been labeled an Antisemitic canard by some historians including Saul S. Friedman, who contends that Jews had a minimal role in New World slave trade.[5] Henry Louis Gates, Jr., head of the department of Afro-American studies at Harvard University, called the book “the Bible of new anti-Semitism” and added that “the book massively misinterprets the historical record, largely through a process of cunningly selective quotations of often reputable sources”.[6]

      The book was criticized for being antisemitic, and for failing to provide an objective analysis of the role of Jews in the slave trade. Common criticisms were that the book used selective quotes, made “crude use of statistics,”[7] and was purposefully trying to exaggerate the role of Jews.[8] Historian Ralph A. Austen criticized the book, saying that the “distortions are produced almost entirely by selective citation rather than explicit falsehood…. more frequently there are innuendos imbedded in the accounts of Jewish involvement in the slave trade

      tells me that Farrakhan is for real.
      But as always, whenever a credible opposition to Jew is voiced in public limelight, there will be inevitable detractors from the ranks of perpetual naysayers, who intentionally or inadvertently are Jew’s allies in joing forces to tear down Jew’s enemies, ie, those very clearly identified by jew and especially by his volatile reactions and round-the-clock vituperation: Jesus, Hitler, Putin, Hezbollah, Sheikh Imram Khan, Farrakhan, Iranian leadership, Assad, Gaddafi, Hugo Chavez plus those who may well be true opponents of Judaic project but for one reason or another, there is a shadow of legitimate doubt, such as Farage, Trump, Buchanan or Corbyn.
      For each of the above listed public figures, there are at least half a dozen detractors right in this forum happy to remove them from consideration as elements of resistance.
      And then, what are we left with?

      NOTHING

      Oh, how sorry jew is to hear that, you poor self-disarmed antisemites, neither power nor brains, it just ain’t fair and we jews will take this into consideration at the final confrontation, for having thrown every potential weapon down as not having been 100% perfect and pristine and to absolutely everyone’s full satisfaction, Harpo crying “waiter, there is a fly in my neighbor’s soup, all Jews dine free!”

      1. @ Lobro

        Well said sir, you talk good sense. Even though I, a silly low-IQ nigger, say so! Your logic, as far as I can see, is faultless. Keep up the good work.

      2. I like this website and would welcome joining the forum here briefly, provided I am assured I will receive no racist abuse.

        If I am told to go away because I’m a stupid nigger, I will leave at once.

        No problem.

      3. @ black panther :

        We know your black panther organization is being supplied with money and weapons by jew communists and we know your black panthers organization is being supplied with money and weapons by communist chinks, what we don’t know, but you know, is how much money and how many weapons does MEGA War-Crazed Muzlim Erdogan in Turkey give to your Muzlim black panther organization on a yearly basis?

        You’re a “smart” black panther so I assume you’re smart enough to know THE FACTS : Islamic Jihad SERVES THE JEW COMMUNIST ZIONIST NWO and I assume you know ALL THE ISLAMIC JIHADIST GROUPS ARE OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY JEWS.

      4. Black Panther,

        WELCOME!

        You will receive no abuse from me. You don’t sound like a “stupid nigger”. You sound like a smart nigger! 🙂

      5. Even if you are a stupid nigger 🙂 you are still brighter than easily 98% of the brain dead whites out there, the compost material for Jew’s animal farm.
        So, stay and don’t worry about occasional abuse.

        And as far as I am concerned, if blacks (a different genus from a crotch grabbing nigga, creation of Jew impresario in order to foment further discord among his target prey, a comic counterpart to Pussy Riot and white libtards) want their separation, they are fully entitled to it, as are all the other groups, whether by ethnicity, culture or religion.
        SO LONG AS THEY KEEP THE COMMON ENEMY IN SIGHTS.

        So, if you or Farrakhan have no love for whites, it is your prerogative, as long as you realize that we are on the same side of divide, just as are Americans and Russians, Muslims and Christians, refusing Jew’s never ceasing divisive tactics.
        Only in this way can the planetary pestilence be cured.

      6. Black Panther –

        Glad you stopped by. Enjoy it. If you disagree…. it can get pretty shitty. I disagree all the time and stay in deep shit.

        I get called a jew all the time because I don’t believe moon walks and atomic bombs on missiles…. and to me… that’s way worse than being called a nigger.. 🙂

        Question:
        Do you think of jews as being ‘white’.. ?? Do other black folks believe jews are ‘white’..??

      7. Black Panther,

        You won’t find any racists on this site, well that is, in the modern, false definition of the word. You will encounter a few white nationalists, whom, like you realise that we as a people, from our many different lands, are not supposed to all be linked to the collective mind. We were not brought together for some big ‘love in’, quite the contrary, we were lumped together to be nothing more than the slave of the Jew, regardless of religion and race.
        I concur with lobro, you’re hardly a stupid nigger. You speak more sense than 98% of the white population, who are currently transfixed to the Jew show of bread and circuses, 24/7.

        Divide and conquer is the classic strategy of the Jew. Have everyone running around frantically chasing their own tails, while the Jews carry on, unnoticed, undisturbed to continue with their protocols.

      8. @ Pat

        Question: Do you think of jews as being ‘white’.. ?? Do other black folks believe jews are ‘white’..??

        From the way you frame your question, I think know what I am expected to say in order the pass the smart nigga test. In order to pass the test, I would have to say: “No Jews are white, no matter how white they look.” However, this is a complex question and is discussed over here at great length. Take a look.

        You will see some very white looking faces here. They look just like whites to me. And yet we are asked to believe they are NOT white because they are Jewish.

        https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t882602/

        Just let me say one thing which shows a flaw in the thinking of most of you Jew haters here who believe that a Jew is always a Jew even if his Ashkenazi ancestors have intermarried with whites for generations (as in Germany ), so much so that his Jewish DNA is completely submerged in his Euro-Caucasian DNA.

        Look, if a man in America looks TOTALLY WHITE and passes as white, and if you found he had a BLACK ancestor 300-400 years ago who was an African slave, wouldn’t it be outrageous if someone said to him, “You’re not white, buddy, you’re black! Because you have a DROP of black blood in you from your black slave ancestor, you’re just a white-lookin’ nigga!”

        Say you, Pat, discovered that a remote ancestor of yours was a black slave. Would you regard yourself as black even though you look white? Would one drop of black blood make you an African?

        My answer is: No. You are to all intents and purposes a white man, though you may have a smidgen of black blood in your veins.

        The same argument applies to Jews. A smidgen of Jewish blood doesn’t make a white man Jewish. Not genetically. If he identifies as a Jew culturally, like Woody Allen, he’s Jewish. That’s a different matter. But the world is full of Woody Allen lookalikes who don’t have a drop of Jewish blood in their veins.

        Perception counts for a lot. If a man looks white in the mirror, and if most of his ancestors were white, and if he practices Buddhism and has never set foot in a synagogue or read the Talmud, then he IS white — even though one of his ancestors was Jewish in the time of Christopher Columbus.

        That’s my dumb nigga view anyway. Sorry if it’s the “wrong” view!

      9. Gawd forbid we insult a black panther, now I know what exactly what Lasha thinks of us Whites. Black panthers, infamous for KILLING White Americans, but us Whites are not to even say anything insulting to a black panther , or even say anything that the black panther here could construe as insulting. Why, because this black panther we got is a “smart” black panther, NOT a “stupid” black panther. Doesn’t matter that the “smart” black panthers also KILL Whites, that doesn’t come into consideration, we are not to insult the black panther because he’s a “smart” black panther.

      10. @Black Panther

        Your view is reasonable, but unfortunately in the US the unreasonable “one drop rule” is still valid for many people. This holds true if that “one drop” is of Black or Indian origin and for many WNs also if of Jewish origin. My rule of thumb is to count a person as belonging to a certain race if his admixture with another race is not visible in his phenotype, nor likely to reappear in his offspring when further mixed with persons of his main racial background. Many Ashkenazi Jews do not look different from Europeans (you can say that also about some Turks).
        Jews are not a race but a group with a tribal mentality with ethno-religious overtones. In real life this tribe functions as an ethnic Mafia.

      11. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        What you say makes a lot of sense to me. This “one drop rule” violates common sense. Say I fill up the bath with clean water. If a spider fall into the bath with a bit of its web, is the bath water now “unclean”? Do I have to run the bath again?

        Most people wouldn’t. They’d get rid of the spider and jump in the bath. It certainly wouldn’t be regarded as “dirty water”.

        So I fail to understand how one drop of black blood in a white man’s veins can make him, technically speaking, a black man.

        Believe me, there are thousands of white people all over the world — especially in Europe and America — who have Jewish blood in their veins and don’t even know it.

      12. BTW, I am myself a mixture. My skin is a dark bronze. I can pass as white in a dark corner of the bar! 🙂

      13. Black Panther-

        Thanks for the reply.

        Since you don’t know me, and just got here, you should not position your answer in a way to predict what I want.

        You see…. I am one of the few here who believes Pharisee-Jews are not a race… but a cult….. A mixed blooded cult.

        My answers are never framed in a way where I say what others want me to say. That’s why I stay in trouble here.

        You should be willing to answer without any expectations also.

        I guess you expected that answer..?? 🙂

        BTW… Some Italians and Spaniards are bronze also… Oooops…. Moors went there…

      14. I’m trying real hard and doing my best to give Pat the benefit of the doubt, but no matter how hard I try to give Pat the benefit of the doubt, one can’t help to but to come the conclusion Pat just grew a new hydra head today, the new hydra snake head is black, Ooops, excuse me, Pat’s new hydra snake head is an African American, is a black panther, and of coursemente, because its one of Pat’s myriad of hydra snake heads, is Smart. Its smart alright, a real smartie. The tone of Black Panther’s writing is The Exact Same tone as Pat’s writing tone. Exactly the same writing style, same tone of voice, everything the same.

        Which is surprising, because Pat usually does a much better job of disguising himself when it comes to all of his other hydra snake heads. I certainly hope Pat’s not discrminating against, nor being microaggressive nor macroaggresive towards, or in any prejudicial towards, his negro hydra snake head.

        Still, and it’s very obvious, Pat treats his other hydra heads, ALL NON Negro hydra heads, much better than his negro hydra snake head, as Pat makes sure to give his other hydra snake heads their own personality, their own style, different tone of writing, their own personalities so to speak, but with this new nigger hydra snake head of his, Pat turns lackadaisical , TOO lazy to give his negro snake head the negro’s very own precious unique character and personality and way of thinking and different writing style, and that is so wrong to leave everyone with the impression niggers are nothing but no-good lazy-ass porch monkeys, 🙂 .

      15. @ Black Panther

        Welcome.

        You said, “If I am told to go away because I’m a stupid nigger, I will leave at once.
        No problem.”

        Yes, there is a problem with that position. It makes you an easy target for a-holes. Your views are just as valid as others’ viewpoints. If you hang around, you will fine that agreement between posters is not as common as disagreements which is a good thing since learning requires disagreement.

        Concerning the term nigger, I will relate a short story about what I was told nigger means which makes sense. When I was 8 years old living in the southern USA, my family lived about 100 yards from the small local black community. Sometimes when there were no other kids to play with, I would go for walks and talk to a black guy of about 70 years old. One day, I used the term nigger and he asked me if I knew what that meant. I said that is meant a black person. He told me that it had nothing to do with the color of a person’s skin, just the color of their heart. I never forgot what he said and I have found his words to be true.
        Many decades later, I came to the conclusion that what the old man meant was that the word nigger, black heart, and jew are synonyms since there is no skin color involved in either.

        BTW, I am a mutt. I appear to be white, but I am really part English, part Dutch, and part American Indian. Because of my part English and Dutch, I could be considered a savage. 🙂

      16. Lobro,

        “SO LONG AS THEY KEEP THE COMMON ENEMY IN SIGHTS.

        So, if you or Farrakhan have no love for whites, it is your prerogative, as long as you realize that we are on the same side of divide, just as are Americans and Russians, Muslims and Christians, refusing Jew’s never ceasing divisive tactics.
        Only in this way can the planetary pestilence be cured.”

        Yes, very nice. Now call up Mr Farrakhan and deliver that little speech to him. Maybe he’ll stop calling the white man Satan and won’t preach bloodshed and race war anymore but I doubt that he will.

  9. How can anyone say they’re “waiting” for a race war, or a race war is “coming’, or that there “could be’ a race war, or that we should “avoid” a race war, etc.
    The race war started a long time ago. Whites were winning for a long while, now whites are losing.
    Lots of guns? Big Effing Deal. Guns don’t guarantee a win.
    What’s necessary are intangible qualities – mostly summed up in one small word – Will.

    1. “What’s necessary are intangible qualities – mostly summed up in one small word – Will.”

      The “will” to procreate at high rates.

      Pharisee-Jew Bankers need a growing customer base. Reproduction rates of whites won’t accomplish that.

      It is jus’ bidnezz….

      1. PAT,
        Will to survive, life itself, necessitates procreation.* At the very least a stable birthrate. That was generally a given until modern times. As Ezra Pound points out in his poem ‘Usura’

        “…Usura slayeth the child in the womb
        It stayeth the young man’s courting
        It hath brought palsey to bed, lyeth
        between the young bride and her bridegroom..”

        I know you realize other factors are of importance. Intelligent and creative use of available resources are a couple of other qualities required.

        *Makes me laugh. It never required any effort of will, or thought for that matter, for me to participate in
        proliferacy. It seemed to have more to do with desire.

        http://poemhunter.com/poem/canto-xlv/

      2. I understand, SW –

        Whites place careers above children…. and use contraception and abortions more than others.

    2. Yeah, Pat has it real tough here at Darkmoon . I’m crying on the inside for Pat’s suffering here at Darkmoon. I cry, too, because I don’t play the violin so as to assuage Pat’s sorrow in sublime violin sonatas. But alas, I can not 🙁 relieve Pat of his sorrowful suffering for I do not play the violin oh boo hoo hoo hoo hoo….

  10. Franklin –

    “2) The John Birch Society was against Communists and the “New World Order”, but never against Jews. Anti-Semites were excluded from the Society.”

    I quit the Birch Society in the 70s when I found out they were sold out to Pharisee-Jews.

    It happened early on… in the late 50s or early 60s. Robert Welch took the money to keep afloat. Literally ‘sold out’ to the Pharisee-Jew Bankers.

    William F. Buckley, Knights of Malta, helped the deal along.

    https://redice.tv/news/knights-of-malta-cfr-and-bilderberg-group-member-william-f-buckley-jr-dies-at-82

  11. @Pat, BlackPanther

    Question:
    Do you think of jews as being ‘white’.. ?? Do other black folks believe jews are ‘white’..??

    Bravo, Pat!
    Now that’s a great question.
    Because, jew is whatever he wants to be at a given moment so long as it isn’t truth, a shapeshifter to the core.
    NCAAP was set up by banker Schiff around 1905, a Rothschild relative and it had nothing to do with betterment of the “negroe’s” lot and everything to do with destruction of white society.
    The first black president was around 1965, until that time they were all jews.
    Jew will side with a black against white but will call them “schwartzers” in private and sell them at auctions like captured beasts, then blame white Christians, especially Jesuits, kill lots of dumb flies with one swipe.
    Jew will side with pseudo-Muslims in order to destroy Christian Europe through mindless migration of refugees he created (Bernard Henri-Levy, Barbara Lerner Spectre, …)
    Jew will side with pseudo-Christians in order to fan the flames of ignorant prejudice against Muslims (Pamela Geller, David Horowitz, 9/11, …)
    But in the end, jew is Jew, got kol nidre on his mind, he is none of these groups, hates them all with equal contempt and fervor and ceaselessly plots their enslavement and destruction.
    Here is how Jew sees himself as apart from every single human on Earth.
    Therefore, anti-human, forget about race-this and ethnicity-that and religion-something-else.
    He got no race, no culture, no religion, he is anti-all-of-that, especially anti-truth.
    And it is high time that humans realize that and take steps to permanently protect themselves.

    1. Lobro,

      Would it not be better to remove the term ‘Jew’ from the argument, when you yourself have spoken of ex Jews, such as Gilad Atzmon, Israel Shamir, Brother Nathaniel et all, who are exposing ‘Jewry’? Should we not really call the problem what it is, which is Zionism? From what I can see, every Jew that’s causing a problem in this world, is a Zionist, along with their Shabbos Goy Christian and Muslim Zionists.

      1. harb,
        my point is that “jew” is defined by desire to do evil, serve the agency of misery, destruction, lies and betrayal, knowing full well the effect but either not caring or actively enjoying it.

        someone who either never had this desire or lost it cannot be called a “jew”.

        so much simpler than endlessly chasing the ghost of deception from one dot to another, never connecting them: “jew is a race, a tribe but they aren’t, they are a religion (of what?), secularism and atheism welcome so long as they stick to the master plan, they are a self-invented culture with no civilized history”, etc, etc.
        The only unifying principle is Evil.
        So be it.
        Zionism is just the newest lipstick, the leering demon has been exactly the same for 3,000 years of their caveman history.

    2. NAACP was started by two Pharisee-Jews, Joel Spingarn and Arthur Spingarn, AND a mulatto, W. E. B. Du Bois (circa 1910).

      1. scroll down to this heading: 1909 / 1914: SCHIFF & FRIENDS CONTROL THE N.A.A.C.P.

        The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) is the most well-known Black American organization. What is not widely known is that its founders were ALL Zionist Marxists! Early Jewish co-founders included Julius Rosenwald, Lillian Wald, and Rabbi Emil Hirsch. A black Communist named W.E. Dubois was cleverly put up as the NAACP’s front man.

        In 1914, Jacob Schiff became a Board member of the NAACP. With a giant like Schiff on board, the organization was now ready for the big time. Zionist money and influence has long dominated this “civil rights” organization, which did not elect a non-Jewish President until 1975!

        By design, Schiff’s Jewish-controlled NAACP drew Blacks away from the positive influence of the Black-American conservative patriot Booker T. Washington, a dominant Black political leader who believed in America’s founding principles and sought to build bridges between Whites and Blacks.

        The liberal Democrat NAACP represents the opposite of what the Republican Booker T stood for, which was self reliance. NAACP is an anti- White Globalist Marxist tool that serves to divide Americans while herding radicalized Black voters (who they do not care about!) into the Leftist political camp. As a result, even today, 90-95% of Blacks blindly vote for Democrat candidates.

        The rest of the article on Jacob Schiff is well worth reading at least once.
        He was everything that Soros is today and more, the Rothschild A-team player, even down to his Satanic hatred of Russia:

        1905: SCHIFF WEAKENS TSARIST RUSSIA

        Schiff hated Christian Russia with a passion. He worked ceaselessly to overthrow the Romanov Dynasty and replace it with Jewish Reds / Communists. Toward that end, he personally financed, and sold bonds on behalf of, about 50% of the entire Japanese war effort during the Russo-Japanese War. As a result, the war ended with a Japanese victory. Russia’s loss was also facilitated by Schiff’s boy, President (and also a former New York Governor) Teddy Roosevelt, whose negotiating intervention clearly favored Japan over Russia.

        * The left-wing Roosevelt became President after the conservative William McKinley was conveniently assassinated by a Red.

        Sound familiar?
        Faces and names of players change, the plan remains eternal (forget “Zionism”, an empty phrase that people latch onto as if eliminating Zionism gets rid of the problem – reminds me of the absurd GWOT phrase)

      2. Thanks, Lobro –

        From the article:

        “But in the final analysis, the MVZ Award would have to go to the financier (money lender) Jacob Schiff – hands down!”

        That’s why I emphasize business over any other control mechanism.

        Banks and markets are the vehicles with big wheels where the rubber runs over mankind…!!

        McKinley was a ‘monetarist’… wanted gold and silver for currency… and the opposers were known as ‘inflationists.’

        BTW – I would place Bernard Baruch in #2 spot.

      3. Lobro,

        “Blacks away from the positive influence of the Black-American conservative patriot Booker T. Washington, a dominant Black political leader who believed in America’s founding principles and sought to build bridges between Whites and Blacks.”

        I don’t recall Farrakhan even attempting building bridges against common enemy Nr 1. He’s only throwing oil on the flames. He’s no different than Al Sharpton or that other fraud Jackson with his ludicrous ‘Trayvon Martin’ example.

        The only difference maybe is that he’s, or at least was, I haven’t listened to him recently apart from these videos, preaching segregation, which is the only sustainable solution in my view.

  12. In extended reply to Black Panther –

    Race is not always a consideration in establishing nations. That is the case in India and Pakistan.
    Indian Hindus and Muslims are regarded distinct nations, regardless of ethnic or other commonalities, or land areas.
    The two-nation is the ideology that nations can be separated according to their religions and cultures rather than ethnicity.
    Despite living together for more than a thousand years, they continued to develop different cultures and traditions. Their eating habits, music, architecture and script, are all poles apart. Even the language they speak and the dresses they wear are entirely different.
    http://storyofpakistan.com/the-ideology-of-pakistan-two-nation-theory

    1. The best argument against (((Democracy))) is also the best argument against the current (((refugee & migrant crisis))) in the West.

      Pat, from your above link and the article entitled, The Ideology of Pakistan:

      With the advent of the British rule in India in 1858, Hindu-Muslim relations entered a new phase. The British brought with them a new political philosophy commonly known as ‘territorial nationalism’. Before the coming of the British, there was no concept of a ‘nation’ in South Asia and the region had never been a single political unit. The British attempt to weld the two communities in to a ‘nation’ failed. The British concept of a nation did not fit the religious-social system of South Asia. Similarly, the British political system did not suite the political culture of South Asia. The British political system, commonly known as ‘democracy’, gave majority the right to rule. But unlike Britain, the basis of majority and minority in South Asia was not political but religious and ethnic.

      The attempt to enforce the British political model in South Asia, instead of solving the political problems, only served to make the situation more complex. The Hindus supported the idea while it was strongly opposed by the Muslims. The Muslims knew that implementation of the new order would mean the end of their separate identity and endless rule of the Hindu majority in the name of nationalism and democracy. The Muslims refused to go the British way. They claimed that they were a separate nation and the basis of their nation was the common religion Islam. They refused to accept a political system that would reduce them to a permanent minority. They first demanded separate electorates and later a separate state. Religious and cultural differences between Hindus and Muslims increased due to political rivalry under the British rule.

      On March 24, 1940, the Muslims finally abandoned the idea of federalism and defined a separate homeland as their target. Quaid-i-Azam considered the creation of Pakistan a means to an end and not the end in itself. He wanted Pakistan to be an Islamic and democratic state. According to his wishes and in accordance with the inspirations of the people of Pakistan, the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan passed the Objectives Resolution. The adoption of Objectives Resolution removed all doubts, if there were any, about the ideology of Pakistan. The Muslims of Pakistan decided once and for all to make Pakistan a state wherein the Muslims shall be enabled to order their lives in their individual and collective spheres, in accordance to the teachings and requirements of Islam as set out in the Holy Quran and Sunnah.

      Get ready for the Jewish Partition of Europe and Sharia Law!

      1. JFC –

        Seems so…

        A nation can be made from a religion. Nation of Muslims being formed in Europe.

        OR

        Nation Of Islam.

  13. “Calypso” Louie is an FBI stoolie. He’s been an informant and source for decades. MLK,Jr was a KGB operative and his goons took out Malcolm X for pointing out the jew when he became a real Muslim and not the fake NOI kind that Louie here runs. Even though he wasn’t NOI anymore, Elijah Muhammed had his boys hit MLK as retaliation. Around that time, the FBI rounded up all these suckers on both sides after the race riots shocked the World and nearly flushed “Civil Rights” down to the sewer it came from. Revrum Jackson and Calypso Louie get a hands off and system support due to them being informants. The NAACP has always been a jew run op, and KGB ran MLK, but when NOI and MLK’s fake “peace” movement started fighting, they rounded up all the leaders and now they all play in the same fenced in system sandbox. I expect Calypso Louie did the endorsement to hurt Trump, especially with White Power groups. However, his blackout from jew media made it hardly known or cared about.

    1. Dr Doom –

      Right on. I had pics of MLK with Russian agents in the 50s, courtesy of former FBI agent, Dan Smoot.

      ….

      BTW… Rush would really exaggerate the Revvruumm Jacksuhhnnn to imitate Billy Buckley Jr. 🙂
      He also coined “Calypso Louie.”

      I attended his Rush to Excellence appearance in Tampa in 1990 or so.

    2. On exactly whom did “Calypso Louie” inform?? It doesn’t really matter, now, in the grand scheme of things… All the political bullshit is evolutionary, anyway; and instances of betrayal are no more than expedient acts spawned by circumstance at the time. What we are compelled to do, today, doesn’t necessarily define our personna on the morrow. Get over it, and consider the PRESENT.

  14. Louis will be smiling with TROJ –

    ‘Gag Orders’ On FBI Agents’ over e-mail investigations:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QndCtpW3YBw

    Sen Grassley claims…

    ‘Gag’ order: FBI confirms special secrecy agreements for agents in Clinton email probe
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/14/gag-order-fbi-confirms-special-secrecy-agreements-for-agents-in-clinton-email-probe.html

    The FBI has confirmed to a senior Republican senator that agents were sworn to secrecy — and subject to lie detector tests — in the Hillary Clinton email probe, an extensive measure one former agent said could have a “chilling effect.”

    A July 1 letter sent by a senior deputy to FBI Director James Comey to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, detailed the restrictions on agents. The letter, reviewed by Fox News, confirmed agents signed a “Case Briefing Acknowledgement” which says the disclosure of information is “strictly prohibited” without prior approval, and those who sign are subject to lie detector tests.

    “The purpose of this form is to maintain an official record of persons knowledgeable of a highly sensitive Federal Bureau of Investigation counterintelligence investigation,” the agreement attached to the Grassley letter reads, “….I (FBI agent) also understand that, due to the nature and sensitivity of this investigation, compliance with these restrictions may be subject to verification by polygraph examination.”

    The measures show the extent to which the bureau has gone to keep additional details of the politically sensitive case from going public. While Comey has provided some information ‎on why the FBI did not opt to pursue charges, Attorney General Loretta Lynch repeatedly ducked questions on specifics of the case at a House hearing Tuesday. 

    //////

    (Grassley):
    “In light of all these inconsistencies, it is even more troubling that the FBI tried to gag its agents with a non-disclosure agreement on this matter, in violation of whistleblower protection statutes,”  Grassley said in the strongly worded letter.  “…you indicated that agents working on this case were required to sign a non-disclosure agreement that failed to exempt protected whistleblowing. Only after I wrote to you did you advise your FBI agents that they are still free to speak with Congress regarding waste, fraud, and abuse.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *