Explosive Assange/Pilger Interview on US Election: Expect Riots if Hillary Wins

RT :   “Whistleblower Julian Assange has given one of his most incendiary interviews ever in a John Pilger Special  [released late yesterday] courtesy of Dartmouth Films. Here he summarizes what can be gleaned from the tens of thousands of Clinton emails leaked by WikiLeaks this year.” 

LD : Despite the enormous populist support for Trump and the extraordinary loathing in which Hillary Clinton is held by millions of American, Assange says that “Trump cannot be allowed to win.”

Trump has already indicated that he will not recognize the result of the election if he loses, given the enormous enthusiasm he has generated during his speeches, compared to the relatively tepid and anaemic response evoked by Hillary Clinton on similar occasions. Recent news reports reveal that “election related violence is increasing and Right-wing armed militia groups are even preparing for unrest if Mrs Clinton ‘steals’ the election, as they fear will happen.”

If Hillary Clinton wins this election, as Assange predicts, we can expect riots to erupt all across America. Violent insurrection, in the circumstances of a rigged election, would appear to be more than justified. Hillary Clinton clearly belongs behind bars, not in the White House.   [LD]  

581d639ec361889f4e8b464c

John Pilger (left) conducted the 25-minute interview at the Ecuadorian Embassy where Assange has been trapped since 2012 for fear of extradition to the US. Here is a transcript of the interview followed by the YouTube interview itself.


THE SECRET WORLD OF THE US ELECTION

John Pilger: What’s the significance of the FBI’s intervention in these last days of the U.S. election campaign, in the case against Hillary Clinton?

Julian Assange: If you look at the history of the FBI, it has become effectively America’s political police. The FBI demonstrated this by taking down the former head of the CIA General David Petraeus over classified information given to his mistress. Almost no-one is untouchable.  The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that no-one can resist us.  But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI’s investigation, so there’s anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak.  We’ve published about 33,000 of Clinton’s emails when she was Secretary of State.  They come from a batch of just over 60,000 emails, [of which] Clinton has kept about half — 30,000 — to herself, and we’ve published about half.

Then there are the Podesta emails we’ve been publishing.  John Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s primary campaign manager, so there’s a thread that runs through all these emails; there are quite a lot of pay-for-play, as they call it, giving access in exchange for money to states, individuals and corporations. These emails are combined with the cover up of the Hillary Clinton emails when she was Secretary of State, which has led to an environment where the pressure on the FBI increases.

‘Russian government not the source of Clinton leaks’

PILGER : The Clinton campaign has said that Russia is behind all of this, that Russia has manipulated the campaign and is the source for WikiLeaks and its emails.

ASSANGE : The Clinton camp has been able to project that kind of neo-McCarthy hysteria: that Russia is responsible for everything.  Hilary Clinton stated multiple times, falsely, that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That is false; we can say that the Russian government is not the source.

‘Saudi Arabia & Qatar funding ISIS and Clinton’

PILGER : The emails that give evidence of access for money and how Hillary Clinton herself benefited from this and how she is benefitting politically, are quite extraordinary. I’m thinking of  when the Qatari representative was given five minutes with Bill Clinton for a million dollar cheque.

ASSANGE : And twelve million dollars from Morocco …

PILGER : Twelve million from Morocco, yeah.

ASSANGE :  For Hillary Clinton to attend a party.

PILGER :  In terms of the foreign policy of the United States, that’s where the emails are most revealing, where they show the direct connection between Hillary Clinton and the foundation of jihadism, of ISIL, in the Middle East.  Can you talk about how the emails demonstrate the connection between those who are meant to be fighting the jihadists of ISIL, are actually those who have helped create it.

ASSANGE :  There’s an early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton, not so long after she left the State Department, to her campaign manager John Podesta that states ISIL is funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar.  Now this is the most significant email in the whole collection, and perhaps because Saudi and Qatari money is spread all over the Clinton Foundation.  Even the U.S. government agrees that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIL, or ISIS. But the dodge has always been that, well it’s just some rogue Princes, using their cut of the oil money to do whatever they like, but actually the government disapproves.

But that email says that no, it is the governments of Saudi and  Qatar that have been funding ISIS.

PILGER :  The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the Saudis and the Qataris, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation while Hilary Clinton is Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia.

ASSANGE :  Under Hillary Clinton, the world’s largest ever arms deal was made with Saudi Arabia, worth more than $80 billion.  In fact, during her tenure as Secretary of State, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value, doubled.

PILGER :   Of course the consequence of that is that the notorious terrorist group called ISIl or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation.

ASSANGE :  Yes.

PILGER :  That’s extraordinary.

‘Clinton has been eaten alive by her ambition’

ASSANGE :  I actually feel quite sorry for Hillary Clinton as a person because I see someone who is eaten alive by their ambitions,  tormented literally to the point where they become sick; they faint as a result of the reaction to their ambitions. She represents a whole network of people and a network of relationships with particular states.  The question is how does Hilary Clinton fit in this broader network?  She’s a centralising cog. You’ve got a lot of different gears in operation from the big banks like Goldman Sachs and major elements of Wall Street, and Intelligence and people in the State Department and the Saudis.

She’s the centraliser that inter-connects all these different cogs.  She’s the smooth central representation of all that, and ‘all that’ is more or less what is in power now in the United States. It’s what we call the establishment or the DC consensus. One of the more significant Podesta emails that we released was about how the Obama cabinet was formed and how half the Obama cabinet was basically nominated by a representative from City Bank. This is quite amazing.

PILGER :   Didn’t Citybank supply a list… ?

ASSANGE :  Yes.

PILGER :  Which turned out to be most of the Obama cabinet?

ASSANGE :  Yes.

PILGER :  So Wall Street decides the cabinet of the President of the United States?

ASSANGE :  If you were following the Obama campaign back then, closely, you could see it had become very close to banking interests. So I think you can’t properly understand Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy without understanding Saudi Arabia.  The connections with Saudi Arabia are so intimate.

‘Libya is Hillary Clinton’s war’

PILGER :  Why was she so demonstrably enthusiastic about the destruction of Libya? Can you talk a little about just what the emails have told us – told you – about what happened there? Because Libya is such a source for so much of the mayhem now in Syria: the ISIL, jihadism, and so on. And it was almost Hillary Clinton’s invasion. What do the emails tell us about that?

ASSANGE : Libya, more than anyone else’s war, was Hillary Clinton’s war. Barak Obama initially opposed it. Who was the person championing it?  Hillary Clinton.  That’s documented throughout her emails. She had put her favoured agent, Sidney Blumenthal, on to that; there’s more than 1700 emails out of the thirty three thousand Hillary Clinton emails that we’ve published, just about Libya. It’s not that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state — something that she would use in her run-up to the general election for President.

So in late 2011 there is an internal document called the Libya Tick Tock that was produced for Hillary Clinton, and it’s the chronological description of how she was the central figure in the destruction of the Libyan state, which resulted in around 40,000 deaths within Libya; jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in, leading to the European refugee and migrant crisis.

Not only did you have people fleeing Libya, people fleeing Syria, the destabilisation of other African countries as a result of arms flows, but the Libyan state itself err was no longer able to control the movement of people through it. Libya faces along to the Mediterranean and had been effectively the cork in the bottle of Africa. So all problems, economic problems and civil war in Africa — previously people fleeing those problems didn’t end up in Europe because Libya policed the Mediterranean. That was said explicitly at the time, back in early 2011 by Gaddafi:  ‘What do these Europeans think they’re doing, trying to bomb and destroy the Libyan State? There’s going to be floods of migrants out of Africa and jihadists into Europe, and this is exactly what happened.

‘Trump won’t be permitted to win’

PILGER :  You get complaints from people saying, ‘What is WikiLeaks doing?  Are they trying to put Trump in the White House?’

ASSANGE :   My answer is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that?  Because he’s had every establishment off side; Trump doesn’t have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment, but banks, intelligence agencies, arms companies… big foreign money … are all united behind Hillary Clinton, and the media as well, media owners and even journalists themselves.

PILGER :  There is the accusation that WikiLeaks is in league with the Russians. Some people say, ‘Well, why doesn’t WikiLeaks investigate and publish emails on Russia?’

ASSANGE : We have published about 800,000 documents of various kinds that relate to Russia. Most of those are critical; and a great many books have come out of our publications about Russia, most of which are critical. Our Russia documents have gone on to be used in quite a number of court cases: refugee cases of people fleeing some kind of claimed political persecution in Russia, which they use our documents to back up.

PILGER :  Do you yourself take a view of the U.S. election?  Do you have a preference for Clinton or Trump?

ASSANGE :  Let’s talk about Donald Trump. What does he represent in the American mind and in the European mind?  He represents American white trash, which Hillary Clinton called ‘deplorable and irredeemable’.  It means from an establishment or educated cosmopolitan, urbane perspective, these people are like the red necks, and you can never deal with them.  Because he so clearly — through his words and actions and the type of people that turn up at his rallies — represents people who are not the middle, not the upper middle educated class, there is a fear of seeming to be associated in any way with them, a social fear that lowers the class status of anyone who can be accused of somehow assisting Trump in any way, including any criticism of Hillary Clinton. If you look at how the middle class gains its economic and social power, that makes absolute sense.

‘US attempting to squeeze WikiLeaks through my refugee status’

PILGER :  I’d like to talk about Ecuador, the small country that has given you refuge and political asylum in this embassy in London.  Now Ecuador has cut off the internet from here where we’re doing this interview, in the Embassy, for the clearly obvious reason that they are concerned about appearing to intervene in the U.S. election campaign.  Can you talk about why they would take that action and your own views on Ecuador’s support for you?

ASSANGE :  Let’s let go back four years.  I made an asylum application to Ecuador in this embassy, because of the U.S. extradition case, and the result was that after a month, I was successful in my asylum application. The embassy since then has been surrounded by police: quite an expensive police operation which the British government admits to spending more than £12.6 million. They admitted that over a year ago.  Now there’s undercover police and there are robot surveillance cameras of various kinds — so that there has been quite a serious conflict right here in the heart of London between Ecuador, a country of sixteen million people, and the United Kingdom, and the Americans who have been helping on the side.  So that was a brave and principled thing for Ecuador to do. Now we have the U.S. election campaign, the Ecuadorian election is in February next year, and you have the White House feeling the political heat as a result of the true information that we have been publishing.

WikiLeaks does not publish from the jurisdiction of Ecuador, from this embassy or in the territory of Ecuador; we publish from France, we publish from, from Germany, we publish from The Netherlands and from a number of other countries, so that the attempted squeeze on WikiLeaks is through my refugee status; and this is, this is really intolerable. It means that [they] are trying to get at a publishing organisation; they try and prevent it from publishing true information that is of intense interest to the American people and others about an election.

PILGER :  Tell us what would happen if you walked out of this embassy.

ASSANGE :  I would be immediately arrested by the British police and I would then be extradited either immediately to the United States or to Sweden. In Sweden I am not charged, I have already been previously cleared by the Senior Stockholm Prosecutor Eva Finne. We were not certain exactly what would happen there, but then we know that the Swedish government has refused to say that they will not extradite me to the United States we know they have extradited 100 per cent of people whom the U.S. has requested since at least 2000.  So over the last fifteen years, every single person the U.S. has tried to extradite from Sweden has been extradited, and they refuse to provide a guarantee [that won’t happen].

PILGER : People often ask me how you cope with the isolation in here.

ASSANGE : Look, one of the best attributes of human beings is that they’re adaptable; one of the worst attributes of human beings is they are adaptable.  They adapt and start to tolerate abuses, they adapt to being involved themselves in abuses, they adapt to adversity and they continue on. So in my situation, frankly, I’m a bit institutionalised — this [the embassy] is the world … it’s visually the world for me.

PILGER : It’s the world without sunlight, for one thing, isn’t it?

ASSANGE : It’s the world without sunlight, but I haven’t seen sunlight in so long, I don’t remember it.

PILGER :  Yes.

ASSANGE :  So , yes, you adapt.  The one real irritant is that my young children — they also adapt. They adapt to being without their father. That’s a hard, hard adaption which they didn’t ask for.

PILGER : Do you worry about them?

ASSANGE : Yes, I worry about them; I worry about their mother.

‘I am innocent and in arbitrary detention’

PILGER : Some people would say, ‘Well, why don’t you end it and simply walk out the door and allow yourself to be extradited to Sweden?’

ASSANGE : The U.N. [the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention] has looked into this whole situation. They spent eighteen months in formal, adversarial litigation. So it’s me and the U.N. verses Sweden and the U.K.  Who’s right?  The U.N. made a conclusion that I am being arbitrarily detained illegally, deprived of my freedom and that what has occurred has not occurred within the laws that the United Kingdom and Sweden, and that those countries must obey. It is an illegal abuse.  It is the United Nations formally asking, ‘What’s going on here?  What is your legal explanation for this? Assange says that you should recognise his asylum.’ And here is.

Sweden formally writing back to the United Nations to say, ‘No, we’re not going to recognise the UN ruling, so leaving open their ability to extradite.

I just find it absolutely amazing that the narrative about this situation is not put out publically in the press, because it doesn’t suit the Western establishment narrative — that yes, the West has political prisoners, it’s a reality, it’s not just me, there’s a bunch of other people as well.  The West has political prisoners. Of course, no state accepts that it should call the people it is imprisoning or detaining for political reasons, political prisoners. They don’t call them political prisoners in China, they don’t call them political prisoners in Azerbaijan and they don’t call them political prisoners in the United States, U.K. or Sweden; it is absolutely intolerable to have that kind of self-perception.

ASSANGE : Here we have a case, the Swedish case, where I have never been charged with a crime, where I have already been cleared by the Stockholm prosecutor and found to be innocent, where the woman herself said that the police made it up, where the United Nations formally said the whole thing is illegal, where the State of Ecuador also investigated and found that I should be given asylum.  Those are the facts, but what is the rhetoric?

PILGER : Yes, it’s different.

ASSANGE : The rhetoric is pretending, constantly pretending that I have been charged with a crime, and never mentioning that I have been already previously cleared, never mentioning that the woman herself says that the police made it up.

The rhetoric is trying to avoid the truth that the U.N. formally found that the whole thing is illegal, never even mentioning that Ecuador made a formal assessment through its formal processes and found that yes, I am subject to persecution by the United States.

Sourced from RT

VIDEO : 25 mins

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

112 thoughts on “Explosive Assange/Pilger Interview on US Election: Expect Riots if Hillary Wins

  1. One can only wish for the American people to rise up and overthrow their rotten rulers. The senior generals in the Pentagon are too corrupted by money to mount a coup. Perhaps there are some patriotic “young turks” in the middle ranks willing to take a risk for their country? Imagine that, rule by (((Citibank))) and (((Goldman Sachs)))! America ruled by Jews isn’t a conspiracy theory, after all. Of course one is a filthy anti-semite for daring to suggest such a thing.

    1. I am appalled at the complicity of the American goyim. Americans have been programmed to question and debate instead of act. The fact that these questions even exist should be enough to take Hillary out of the race in the same way the slightest question about the Golden Negro’s citizenship should have been sufficient to immediately remove him from office.

      The real question about the Kenyan is why this question arose in the first place. When did Americans begin assuming presidential candidates are American citizens? Is it because we’ve been conditioned by what clearly have been white presidential candidates of the past?

      Why isn’t a candidate’s citizenship fully vetted before they enter the race? Americans trusted Jews to validate the Golden Negro’s citizenship just like they trusted the Jew’s voting machines to count their votes. Just how stupid is the white race?

      Isn’t it obvious who’s running the country, yet we trust Jews to be honest about critical information about a presidential candidate’s citizenship??? Especially when considering Jews were the primary force behind twisting immigration laws that now allow huge numbers of third world flotsam and jetsam to flow into the country as though a huge sewer line of “humanity” ruptured onto America’s shores.

      This is the highest office in the land, one that allows access to America’s nuclear arsenal. The fact that Americans spend a second quibbling over what should be unarguable details, shows just how stupid the goyim have become. The slightest questions of this nature should be more than sufficient to immediately disqualify and remove any and all of the political ruling class as well as any candidate running for office.

      Of course, were that the case, then Jews would not be able to put their corrupted slime before the grazing herds as viable mulch.

      1. I agree completely. The stultification of the American voters did not happen overnight though. It was a well planned and executed process, starting with lowering the standards of education from the primary school on. No student is held back one for nonperformance anymore, because “social promotion” intervenes and kicks the illiterate student onward so as to avoid damaging his self-esteem…
        I remember reading some statistics a while back about the results of reading comprehension test given to high school graduates: in states like Arizona, Arkansas, Mississippi and Tennessee between 15 and 24% of those tested were functional illiterates, based on two tests: being able to read instructions on a medicine bottle and road directions, both of which they failed.

    2. Lasha Darkmoon’s prediction of a last minute surprise move by the FBI that would exonerate Hillary Clinton and give her campaign a last-minute boost has proved 100 per cent correct.

      In a previous article, a week ago, she writes with uncanny prescience:

      A sudden announcement by FBI Director James Comey, two days before the election, giving Hillary a clean bill of health over her problematic emails, could result in a last-minute surge in support of Hillary that could sweep her into the White House. According to one report, the FBI “may be able to sift through them [the emails under investigation] before election day.”

      https://www.darkmoon.me/2016/muslim-radical-salman-hossein-says-hillary-will-win/

      To these valid speculations both Franklin Ryckaert and Ariadnatheo raised objections. Ryckaert said the FBI couldn’t possibly read 350,000 emails in a few days and pooh-poohed the whole idea. Ariadnatheo said, “I don’t believe it,” implying that her failure to believe something made it false.

      LD has been vindicated by recent events. I’ve just turned on the BBC news and everything LD said over a week ago has come to pass.

      FBI Director James Comey has just announced, two days before the election, as LD predicted, that not a single incriminating Clinton email has been found so far. He has given Hillary a clean bill of health, just as LD said he would.

      Hillary is jubilant, Trump is choked. The FBI has done exactly what LD said it would: given Hillary a sneaky last-minute leg-up toward the Presidency.

      1. Congratulations to LD…!!!

        Diebold and ES&S will do the rest.

        Hillary will be (S)elected.

        Stevens wins again.

      2. “Ariadnatheo said, “I don’t believe it,” implying that her failure to believe something made it false.”

        “I don’t believe it” means “I don’t believe it.” It does not “imply” anything else. It simply means I cannot believe such a thing could happen. Yet it did.
        Nevertheless, just as it may indeed energize her base it may also increase the frustration of those who hoped to see her down because reopening the investigation gave them hopes they now see dashed.

      3. Ariadnatheo,

        I hope you understand I was not attacking you. Or Ryckaert. You are among the best posters on this site. The comment you have just made proves it, especially this bit:

        It simply means I cannot believe such a thing could happen. Yet it did. Nevertheless, just as it may indeed energize her [Hillary’s] base it may also increase the frustration of those who hoped to see her down because reopening the investigation gave them hopes they now see dashed.

        I can sense your genuine pain at the turn events have taken. I feel that pain too. A kind of numb despair.

      4. No, Sardonicus, I didn’t think you were attacking me. We are just having a dialog. I am still trying to understand which is the most likely probability:
        — the one I’d call Pat’s Premise (that it was all scripted out to the last detail and it unfolds exactly as planned long, long ago);
        or
        — The Colosseum Concept (mine), that there are two gladiators (owned by the same gladiator school) in the arena, each trying to put the other away, to claim the prize (his turn at the big trough until the next game). The loser gets political death. We are the degraded version of the Roman spectators: we shout and give thumbs down to no effect. But not because it was all decided well in advance but because the patricians are stimulated by the turns of the fight and enjoy the suspense. Risk free. Almost as good as betting on the weather when you control it.
        Obviously I am partial to mine.

      5. Ohhhhhhhhhh, Ok, Ok, I get it! The FBI, those sterling characters sworn to uphold the law, the Constitution, all its amendments and mom’s apple pie; those American heroes who, against all odds, valiantly defended America’s sacred security without due process at Ruby Ridge and Waco, step in to say “We came, we glanced, she was exonerated,” and majority America can fold its election hand in defeat. Dealer another hand of election cycle if you please. It’z zoooo zimple! Even the stupidest of the goyim will figure it out.

      6. @Sardonicus
        Well, Lasha may have been right after all that is was a trick to exonerate Hillary, but what about the Wikileaks that clearly implicate her in illegal acts? It may be that Comey was sincere, but has been under such severe pressure (death threats) lately that he turned around. Anyway, Diebolt voting machines will do the rest and Hillary together with her husband-in-crime will enter the White House. The American people is too tame to revolt. Forward to the New World Order under leadership of Yahweh’s Chosen Mafia !

      7. Marvelously prescient from Lasha, although 2 days is not enough time to change made up minds.
        Perhaps this is a parlor trick used to create a distraction, create the illusion of a last minute reprieve, to move attention and help further camouflage the outrageously rigged voting.

      8. Well, Ariadna, it’s hard to tell which of these two premises is the correct one at this stage. While I have great respect for Pat, his premise appears to have one serious flaw. It assumes that (((Our Masters))) are incredibly intelligent and all they have to do is script history and everything will come to pass as they plan it, like a novel planned in advance by a master novelist, scene by scene. Life isn’t like this. The unpredictable constantly happens. Chance and randomness occur to fox even the cleverest planner.

        Very few of the best novelists plan their novels like clockwork. The best novelists, including Dickens and Trollope, wrote the Unplanned Novel. When they sat down to write, they had no idea what they were going to say. Nothing was meticulously scripted. The Muse took over.

        Your premise therefore strikes me as far more likely: politics as entertainment laid out for the masses. Both gladiators working for the same masters, fighting it out. But with one difference. The loser doesn’t have to die. He is not a doomed gladiator. He just retires into private life and is well rewarded for playing his appointed role.

        If that were the case, however, each participant would not only be acting but be aware that it was all a big show. They would be simulating anger, despair, outrage and so on. Many would disagree with you here and say: “Nonsense, Trump and Hillary are not simulating! This is not method acting. They are genuinely angry, not pretend angry.”

        Once the public become aware it’s all a stage play, what then? Who will bother to vote? What becomes of “democracy” then?

        Still, I like your idea very much. It has the merit of high originality and could well be true.

      9. I once had a third scenario of my own. I mentioned it to Pat and he seemed to approve. I don’t attach much importance to my own scenario though — because of its bizarre implausibility.

        This is what I thought: that both Trump and Hillary were trying to lose by seeing which of them could outrage and disgust the public more. The winner of the contest would be the candidate who failed to outrage and disgust the public sufficiently. Each candidate was striving to make himself/herself the Greater Monster. The loser would be the one the public thought was the Lesser Monster.

        The Lesser Monster (the Loser of the contest) was lumbered with a 4-year prison sentence known as the Presidency. The White House became their prison. Here they took orders and were forced to play the undignified role of presidential puppet, to be jerked around on strings by the (((Master Puppeteers))) who were the true rulers of the country.

        The one who “escaped” the White House by proving himself the Bigger Monster, whom no one wanted to vote for, was not “killed off” (like the losing gladiator in your scenario) but rewarded by being allowed a life of lucrative leisure. No White House chores for him! Just delightful leisure, with oodles of money and travel and de luxe hotels and writing his memoirs and the charmed life of the yacht-owning hedonist.

        What think you of my scenario? I don’t blame you if you think it’s pretty dumb! It’s just an idea I had…

      10. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        The American people is too tame to revolt.

        Sadly, I am forced to agree with you. But not all the people are sheeple. I am thinking of the militias. This paragraph from LD’s introductory comment mentioned militias and gave me some grounds for hope — hope that some Americans won’t take this outrageous “election theft” lying down:

        Trump has already indicated that he will not recognize the result of the election if he loses, given the enormous enthusiasm he has generated during his speeches, compared to the relatively tepid and anaemic response evoked by Hillary Clinton on similar occasions. Recent news reports reveal that “election related violence is increasing and Right-wing armed militia groups are even preparing for unrest if Mrs Clinton ‘steals’ the election, as they fear will happen.” [Quote from the Daily Mail].

      11. Sardonicus

        “While I have great respect for Pat, his premise appears to have one serious flaw. It assumes that (((Our Masters))) are incredibly intelligent and all they have to do is script history and everything will come to pass as they plan it, like a novel planned in advance by a master novelist, scene by scene. Life isn’t like this. The unpredictable constantly happens. Chance and randomness occur to fox even the cleverest planner.”

        I disagree.
        Why?
        It’s incredibly easy to plan something when you control all the major factors. And this is what’s been happening. Remember that every think tank, N.G.O. out there that’s controlling governments, are merely a further sub organisation, under a ‘mummy’ umbrella one. The human race has been studied like a rat in a lab. The Jews/freemasons/masters…whatever you want to label them, know our very next move, because every possible reaction has been thought of and acted out. When you have vast amounts of money, the world is your oyster and there’s nothing you can’t do, other than buy love and happiness, along with the integrity of a good soul, but sadly for everyone, there are thousands upon thousand who are not and easily purchased.

        I’m completely with Pat on his synopsis. The Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), it’s sister group in the USA, has been putting in heads of state in both for well over 120 years.

        I suggest that yourself and Ariadnatheo, if you haven’t already, read the writings of Bill Clinton’s mentor and historian for the CFR; a one Carroll Quigley. Two books spring to mind – The Anglo-American Establishment and Tragedy and Hope. They’re both real eye openers, so much so that a little too much was said for their liking and they were called back after publication. Very few originals exist and they cost quite a bit for those looking to purchase them.

        Nobody likes the thought of being an owned and controlled lab rat. It’s not a nice thought, but until people understand the truth and know their enemy, they’ll never know what to do, who and how to fight against it and win.

  2. A comprehensive overview of the situation assessed under the light of Hilary released e-mails. Don’t forget that Hilary kept for herself 30.000 e-mails. The most compromising ones might be among them.
    That didn’t get us out of the woods though.
    Clinton is favored by the ptb and the corrupt elite while Trump is supported by the average Joe and by academics uninitiated to satanic rituals.
    The rights belong to the vast majority but the might belongs to the rogue minority.
    American people ought to belie this expression, soon: ” Might is right”.

    1. @ Bob in DC

      No, your logic is at fault. Mentioning the J-word on every single occasion is no proof of intellectual integrity. Paul Craig Roberts doesn’t mention the J-word. That doesn’t make him crooked or dishonest. The higher you get in the food chain, the more you need to exercise discretion and make use of euphemism, innuendo and subtlety. Pilger would lose his high reputation as a dissident mainstream journalist if he kept flogging the J-word.

      The constant use of the J-word is not only amateurish but smacks of the juvenile delinquent. You don’t get Solzhenitsyn frothing and fuming about “JEWS!” and “KIKES!” and “YIDS!”

      That’s strictly for amateur anti-Semites on sites like this, where it is not encouraged but graciously allowed as a concession to the intellectually unsubtle.

      I myself belong to the intellectually unsubtle brigade, so there’s no point hurling the J-word at me. 🙂

      1. The constant use of three brackets to indicate the (((JEW))) is the latest trend. It’s not exactly subtle, is it? You are welcome to do it and preen as much as you want, imagining yourself fantastically clever and subtle, but the sad truth is you’re just being amateurish, juvenile and totally unoriginal by making use of this silly convention whose only purpose is to annoy (((the Usual Suspects))).

        If it’s so important to keep using the J-word to prove you’ve passed the litmus test, why keep avoiding the J-word by using the 3 brackets?

        A bit illogical, isn’t it?

      2. Sard –

        “Pilger would lose his high reputation as dissident mainstream journalist if he kept flogging the J-word.”

        Very correct. He knows who controls his income, his very livelihood..!!!

        You know who is in charge… it is – always – THE ones you cannot criticize.

        I use the ‘subtle words’ – -“Pharisee-Jew Bankers in London.” No one knows who they are anyway.. 🙂

      3. Using the term “J-word” rather than simply stating Jew maintains an opaque cloak around the Jewish infection as much as using the term “N-word” does in blocking the dragging of the fallacy of white privilege into the light. Shall we all begin using “the H-word” to quantify the money making lie regarding the fairytale holocaust? They are all words, just words, granted “nigger” is a nasty denigrating term which can and is used against more than just the negro race, a contemptuous term used to refer to a person of any racial or ethnic origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, ignorant, etc. However, the one exposing the use of the nasty term is simply repeating it, not incorporating it into any act they themselves may be committing.
        “The ____ word” to me is nothing but a politically correct term meant for the kosher media etc. Rather like “protecting” a child from dental harm by saying the C word hoping the “little ones” won’t know it means candy.

      4. Not to worry, Pat. I actually agree with you here. I quite like the phrase “Pharisee Jew bankers in London”, even though it lacks subtlety. 🙂

        Not everyone can afford to be heroic commenters on the darkmoon site, speaking their minds bravely under pseudonymous user names. They need to make a living like Pilger as dissident journos in the mainstream media. They have wives and children to support.

        If it gives you satisfaction, as it does other heroic commenters on this site, to sneer at such people as Pilger and Assange as “media whores” and “presstitutes”, feel perfectly free to do so. That’s your privilege!

        The difference between you sneerers, however, and talented men like Pilger and Assange, is that they are writing and speaking under their real names while you sneerers are doing so under pseudonyms!

        Myself, I read Pilger and Assange with interest, doing my best not to sneer at the way they view the world. Many people have different opinions. I like to consider these contrary views dispassionately, without jumping to the conclusion that everyone who holds a different viewpoint to me is a scoundrel working for the Jews. 🙂

    2. The folks don’t have to be named. One is rather foolish to turn from the truth just because the speaker does not use terminology that pleases the reader. Over the decade I have fluctuated over who and what Assange was / is but, in the long run, it does not matter. He has provided a service to us all with his sacrifice and that says a lot right there. When was the last time you put your money on the line in such a serious manner?

      Such an expectation also, IMHO, indicates a smallness of “reach” of comprehension by simply shooting the messenger from pure frustration instead of appreciating and working with what he has provided. Assange is part of a plan to bring the beaste down …. on that level, such language is unnecessarily inflammatory.

      1. The folks don’t have to be named. Or bracketed. I tried to bracket once and found it to be ludicrous. But seriously, one is rather foolish to turn from the truth just because the speaker does not use terminology that pleases the reader. Over the decade I have fluctuated over who and what Assange was / is but, in the long run, it does not matter. He has provided a service to us all with his sacrifice and that says a lot right there. When was the last time you put your money on the line in such a serious manner?

        They know also their readers/ followers…. are smart enough to figure things out for themselves.

        Such an expectation also, IMHO, indicates a smallness of “reach” of comprehension by simply shooting the messenger from pure frustration instead of appreciating and working with what he has provided. Assange is part of a plan to bring the beaste down …. on that level, such language is unnecessarily inflammatory.

      2. Noor,

        I and a lot of people, do not believe Assange is legit in the slightest. Lenin’s view on how to beat the opposition is to control them, instantly springs to mind with Assange. All of a sudden up pops Assange (and Anonymous) and not a mention of Rothschild, Mossad or anything to do with the inner sanctum of Jewry whatsoever, just the usual Saudi this and Qatar that, ‘miraculously’ coming at a very important time, when people are waking up to what’s going on and beginning to question the status quo, no longer believing what they read, see and hear from the main stream media.

        Assange, like Jones and the rest of the ‘truther’ brigade are leading everyone on a merry dance, as the paid, pied, pipers that they are.
        If he and Anonymous, truly are what they are, having all the access to the cracking of top secret information, then they would be cutting straight through the pulse of who’s in charge, instead of leading everyone on a wild goose chase and giving us far, far more than they are.

  3. Hm, as it stands, this would be the 1st comment, maybe better that i wait until at least half a dozen float past the bridge, i will cut+store it for then.

    i cannot help the sense of unease with this interview.
    there is an undercurrent of deceit and i may be wrong but let someone dissuade me and set me straight.
    this smacks of a limited hangout in CIA jargon, an institutional plea bargain, settling for an insignificant misdemeanor in exchange for being let off the big meat hook connecting to a major atrocity.

    a few salient (imo) points.

    • only lukewarm condemnation of hillary and lukewarm support for trump coupled with very fuzzy opinion of russia and putin,
    • much of the interview is about assange’s supposedly rough spot, yet he evinces an almost indifferent attitude,
    • talking about these issues without mentioning jew is like showing concern about some big triangle showing above ocean surface, if we can only get rid of that triangle, maybe persuade it to go underwater, everything will be safe for the beach crowd,
    • didn’t assange support the official 9-11 script of 19 illiterate jihadis pulling the terror stunt of the ages? i may be wrong on that …,
    • why is it that these type of interviews are always conducted by these marginal jews who are for some reason accorded special gravitas, anointed as the real opposition-revisionist deal whereas others like christopher Bollyn never get the invite to the alt-party? there is Glen greenwald, seymour Hirsch, pilger and several others who can be relied on not to cross the line in the Negev sand.

    Things are not good, says Assange.
    Translation: things are apocalyptically bad.

    [afternote: good that Bob in dc said it first]

      1. You got it, ariadnatheo
        A bunch of tools are used to lower the politic temperature: controlled opposition, controlled leak, controlled disclosure ,controlled riots, controlled language…all leading to controlled outcome.

        By the way, as HARBINGER and LOBRO hinted, even a disposable political façade like Hilary C. are lukewarmly criticized, let us not talk about the permanent board whom these very political figures dare not mention even in private.

        A word to SARD
        SARD, if you happen to have a Jew or Jewess as a friend we are sorry for them. I personally don’t blame the ordinary Jews who happen to live here and there , who are not involved in the operations of the conspiring cabal.In fact, ordinary Jews – I mean as individuals- are often subtle intellectuals, sociable and helpful. If you happen to have a Jew as a neighbor, odds are you’ll enjoy his neighborhood.

        Perhaps we should opt for the Z-word, as not all Jews are “zworded” 🙂 are they?

      2. @ Sean

        I am only a soft anti-Semite, hating the bad Jews. The good Jews I cannot hate, for how can one hate good people?

        Your comment brings to mind a recent incident. Last week I went to a dinner party at a lady friend’s house. About 20 people, including two Jewish couples and their three children — seven Jews in all.

        After the guests had left, I said to her: “How come you asked all these Jews to dinner? Didn’t you tell me only recently that you had strong reservations about Jews?”

        She laughed and winked. “These particular Jews are fine,” she told me. “They are all model citizens. But you know something? As soon as they leave, I always check the spoons!”

    1. Asange is either a “half truther” or a PSY-OP of TPTB. For the latter opinion, see :

      http://www.tomatobubble.com/snowden_fake.html

      If Asange is really fake, then that means that the fall of Hillary Clinton is the aim of TPTB itself. Perhaps they see her now as too much uncontrollable and are ready to accept Trump, who is surrounded by Jewish advisers anyway and has pledged his allegiance to the Jewish state already.

      The NWO has two wings that partly cooperate and partly fight each other : the Zionists and the Globalists.

      For the Zionists the security of Israel and its dominance of the Middle East is most important, hence the 9/11 false flag and the fraudulent “Global War On Terror” to remove Israel’s enemies.

      For the Globalists Israel is not so important. They are more interested in controlling Russia and China (and then the rest of the world), hence confrontation with Russia and China is more important than Israel. Globalists are also interested in destroying the sovereignty and ethnic identity of nations, hence their advocacy for “open borders”.

      Jews can be found in both wings. Kissinger and Soros for example are Globalists and they don’t care much about Israel. Hillary belongs to the Globalists, but her erratic behavior is seen as a threat to Israel. The Zionists have now decided to remove her and are prepared to work with Trump. In the bargain they are prepared to renounce such typical Globalist NWO projects as open borders for the US and confrontation with Russia.

      If this analysis is right, then at best we can expect from a Trump presidency peace with Russia and closed borders, but increased support for Israel and Trump will never expose 9/11 as a Jewish false flag.

  4. This interview cleared up all of my previous misunderstandings based on accurate but completely irrelevant data, such as PNAC, “7 countries in 5 years,” “Israel’s role in the US foreign policy”, etc.
    These two statements made it clear how I had underestimated Hillary/the Clintons:

    “you can’t properly understand Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy without understanding Saudi Arabia.”
    [Forget Israel, he never mentions it.]

    and
    “Libya, more than anyone else’s war, was Hillary Clinton’s war….. It’s not that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state — something that she would use in her run-up to the general election for President.”
    [So Libya’s destruction was her idea, her project. In fact all the recent wars have been presidential wars and she wanted one of her own, an ambition in which she was encouraged by corporations and Wall Street, whose only common denominator is that they are greedy. So: remove her, problem solved! There is ONE evil foreign state that has helped her: the creators of ISIS and the very same terrorists responsible for 9/11– Saudi Arabia.]

    PS Just saw Lobro’s comment. Unlike me he is still confused. Hope my comment helps him.

      1. lobro, lo lo lo lo lobro
        I ain’t dumb but I don’t understand
        why lobro gets to opine all the time
        but my lolita express poem ain’t up on the commentay board yet
        come on and hurry up slobro slo slo slo slobro
        lobro, lo lo lo lo lobro!

  5. Expect Riots if Hillary Wins

    This wording of “RIOTS” causes me to feel even better about the accusations that Assange is being paid to be a ‘whistle-blower’ and is script-reading for those Pharisee-Jew insiders who are making things up to increase voting turnouts…. and as a distraction.

    Whites do not riot spontaneously in the US.

    Blacks do riot in US…. And they are infiltrated with provokers.

    Blacks who will “RIOT” want Hillary to win.

    Blacks who will “RIOT” hate Trump and businessmen whitey-types.

    I “EXPECT” no “RIOTS” if Hillary wins.

    Whites have a history of NOT RIOTING in US. They never even rioted when Hillary’s bunch burned to death the women and children in the Branch Davidian CHURCH building and home in Waco, Texas..!!

    This is a jewel..!!
    Assange calls Lobro and TROJ and many other Trump supporters here…. “white trash and red-necks”..!!! 🙂

    ASSANGE : “Let’s talk about Donald Trump. What does he represent in the American mind and in the European mind?  He represents American white trash, which Hillary Clinton called ‘deplorable and irredeemable’.  It means from an establishment or educated cosmopolitan, urbane perspective, these people are like the red necks, and you can never deal with them.  Because he so clearly — through his words and actions and the type of people that turn up at his rallies — represents people who are not the middle, not the upper middle educated class, there is a fear of seeming to be associated in any way with them, a social fear that lowers the class status of anyone who can be accused of somehow assisting Trump in any way, including any criticism of Hillary Clinton. If you look at how the middle class gains its economic and social power, that makes absolute sense.”

    If Assange actually believes this crap…. he should be shunned by people who actually have brain cells.

    Thanks to Darkmoon for helping to expose Assange and his perfidy.

    1. This is a jewel..!!
      Assange calls Lobro and TROJ and many other Trump supporters here…. “white trash and red-necks”..!!! 🙂

      It doesn’t toggle my offense levers, Pat, tho it is funny.
      “White trash” is Hebrew for Aryan, since Shylock is and always has been scheming to send us all to the trash heap of history.
      not that he will succeed.

      and if he did, then what happens on the Planet of Abes? And nigs, neither of them white and capable of building and maintaining civilization.
      is yehudi going to preach shmolocaust guilt to the nigrah in hope to jar his conscience into servility? Hah!

      Dem surahly deeserves each otha.

  6. Released yesterday, here is a good, revealing candid 12 minute Fox News video hosted by Judge Jeanine Pirro, interviiewing several creditable personalities:

    YouTube: Judge Jeanine Pirro – Trump Back On Stage After Security scare – Donald Trump Jr

    “She is not trustworthy.”

    The truth through Wikileaks and various alternative news sources is managing to make its way through the oligarchy owned and controlled mainstream media. The corruption in the current US administration and those behind the Hillary Clinton campaign, not only to mention of her own unmeritorious actions, is staggering.

  7. International Law does not apply to the US of AIPAC…Global Terrorists and the poor “chosen” [the only victims ever] who do Genocide in Palestine Stolen,Walled In for death…..

    1. I think that is kind of changing. Last year, the Palestinian Authority filed a complaint against Israel and Benny Nut-Job-Yeehaw (and his crew) in the International Criminal Court (ICC) regarding the 2014 siege on Gaza. The ICC investigator said there was evidence of wrong doing but did not recommend proceeding. Her logic being because only 1500 innocent people died, it did not justify the ICC resources necessary to prosecute. A judge for the ICC rejected her conclusion and kicked that decision back to the investigator and instructed her to proceed with a criminal prosecution. Waiting … waiting …

  8. We thank thee Jew god with our tacit support of Israel’s sacrificial murder of Palestinian children, that this Hillary-dog and Trump-pony election draws to a conclusion. In John Hagee’s name we pray – Amen

      1. Keep up this blasphemy and don’t complain if at end times you’re not… is it ravished, ravaged ruptured or raptured?

      2. None other than, and former next door neighbor as well. Shucks folks, ya’ll can line up to join pastor Hagee in a prayer for Armageddon any ‘ol time! Come on down to the Corner Stone Church in San Antonio Texassss, a place where a body can kick offen’ their shoes off and sit a-spell. Bring a donation and we’ll see ya’ soon.

  9. SHIllary is the Rothschild darling and Kissinger’s bitch. The Jew media is behind her all the way.
    If the bitch ever resides in the White House again, it won’t be because she “won”, it will be because the e-voting machines were programmed to chose her, which is the likely scenario.

    So there will be no SHillary ‘winning’, it will be Shillary “appointed”. The US doesn’t have FREE AND FAIR elections any more. 911 changed everything.

  10. All this talk of ‘Saudi’ and ‘Qatar’ when it comes to investing in terrorism and yet NOT ONE MENTION of CFR, RIIA, Rothschild et all. Is he serious? Does he really think that those, who have been doing the groundwork for the last goodness knows how many years, are stupid?

    I’m beginning to see Assange for the block of lead that he is, completely opaque.

    The Jews are distancing themselves from Hillary. It seems that they’re gathering evidence of her and Saudi and ISIS involvement, but they’re certainly pushing the national selection towards Trump. He’s the ‘good cop’ in the good cop-bad cop scenario we see unraveling. Yes, he tells us he wants peace with Russia. And yes we also hear him on 9/11, speaking of bombs within and getting to the truth, as well as sorting out the corruption within Congress. Could this be the link to the previous video on here with Huma Abedin? Could this be the grand setup to eventually crush the correct conspiracies of Jewish orchestration of 9/11? The careful grooming of Abedin, into the higher echelons of society, with her Islamist/ISIS connections – her parents in London Goodge Street, funded by a wealth Saudi, a funder in ISIS? And so, Trump gets in and instantly calls for 9/11 investigation, that will throw the Saudi Jews to the wolves, resulting in an invasion of the country and theft of their oil? They know that the people want blood for 9/11 and the Jew knows that it needs to do everything in its power to distance itself from it.

    More so, if Assange truly was a threat, he’d be dead already. Mossad, CIA, MI5 could easily send in a Jason Bourne and ‘remove’ him.

    1. Harb –

      I agree.

      “Jason Bourne” types have been used for many centuries. Get to ANYBODY – – ANYTIME..!!

      Here is a Corsican “Jason Bourne” in Dallas in 1963:

      A CIA memo mentions Jean Souetre, a.k.a. Michel Roux, a.k.a. Michel Mertz – a world-renowned Corsican hit man with a long history as an accomplished assassin and with ties to the French Connection drug trade stretching from Southeast Asia to Marseilles, France, to New Orleans.

      http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/corsican-assassin-in-dallas-on-day-jfk-killed/

      Another guess, based on the same “Bourne-type” ‘asset trainees’…. who do exist:

      A journalist and author named Stephen Rivele alleged that in 1981 a Corsican gangster and drug trafficker named Christian David told him that Guerini organized the Kennedy assassination and that the actual shooters were a Corsican drug dealer and hitman named Lucien Sarti and two other Marseilles mobsters. (David allegedly turned down the murder contract himself.)

      David told Rivele that prior to the assassination, Sarti flew from France to Mexico, then crossed the border to Texas, where he met someone from the Chicago mob. From there, they drove to Dallas.

      http://www.ibtimes.com/french-connection-did-corsican-mobsters-kill-john-f-kennedy-898346

      1. Pat, “ANYBODY – – ANYTIME..!!” C’MON MAN!
        Mladic springs to mind. Sixteen years worth of SAS, bounty hunters and Jason Bourne all after his “war criminal” hide (aka) wanted dead or alive, and all they got was a lousy negotiated surrender, SIXTEEN YEARS LATER.
        I do remember once or twice (reported) they did catch up to his posse, (but the survivors don’t want to talk about it).
        BTW, anyone seen ‘Jason Bourne’ lately?
        Maybe he caught up to Mladic, too..

      2. Hp

        I can’t remember saying that about Pat. If I said that, I retract it. If a sense of humor can be quantified by the number of smiley faces used, Pat wins the Nobel Prize for Humor. 🙂

    2. If it does not mention the J-word when talking about the problems the world is facing today, it is missing the point. If it disseminates the kosher narrative of 911 it has no credibility.
      If its interview is published in the kosher media its message is kosher.
      Assange is emasculated opposition.
      It does not matter which orifice of the ziobottom wins the pussidential erection.
      The laws of the Kabalists, by the Kolnidreans will rule the Kosherland.
      Politicians are just bulltwats performing the queefs the rabbis enjoy. With an accent reminiscent of Oxfart jUniversity.

  11. @Sardonicus:
    Your comparison between Pilger and PC Roberts is wrong on at least one count: PCR does not DEFLECT (as Pilger does), he does not push a limited hangout narrative. He makes it perfectly clear about whom and what he is talking about, even though he uses the euphemism “neocon” — a term that by now has just about become a synonym of “zionist Jews.”
    Pilger is not the courageous opinion maker you make him out to be just because he uses his real name to criticize Israel no more no less than Ha’aretz does.
    When The Wandering Jew came out he refused to endorse it or say anything positive about it, as quite a few other Jews did.
    Are we supposed to cut him some slack because he has a wife and children to support? Why does he have to do it being a gate keeper? Why not pick another occupation he can apply himself to honestly?
    Using one’s real name or a pen name says nothing about the veracity of the message. Should we distrust or disrespect you because you sign Sardonicus?
    To some of us who happen to think that global Jewish power is the single greatest danger to mankind in our times those who do not think so are not necessarily scoundrels working for the Jews, as you put it. Not unless they are in high and visible positions from which they are able to implement state policies and/or manipulate public opinion. The rest may be sincere in their… uninformed opinions, which is not a reason to sneer at them. With or without triple parentheses, the extent of the Jewish power globally must be exposed. I don’t understand why you insist on this needing to be “subtle.”

      1. Some are saying that Hillary is going to disappear [ which is fine with me ]. I just hope Hillary takes her doppelgangers with her when she disappears. It would really suck if Hillary disappears but her doppelgangers remain, and we’re stuck with her stand-ins as a president. That would be pretty much the same thing as if Hillary didn’t disappear.

      2. Like dudes, my Ineffable Spiritual Connection to The Cosmic Harmonic Electrical Power Grid which guides Our, or at least guides MY Higher Consciousness, The Cosmic Universal Higher Consciousness is informing me that the energy behind this latest Darkmoon piece is NOT good energy, and is NOT being presented for the sake of Truth or the sake of being Helpful but for the sake of making a volatile situation even more volatile.

        It’s more about wishful thinking and more about wanting massive blood shed than about sharing Truth. It’s about what a certain ilk really want for the United States and the energy animating Lasha to feature this piece, it’s palpable Darkmoon is communicating its desire to see this massive blood-shed civil war manifest in reality. It’s about visualizing what you want to Manifest and want to see happen In the Physical dimension. It’s NOT at all coming across that Darkmoon is the even the least bit upset about this possible outcome of The Election. Quite the opposite,

        Oh wow man, this is a bummer, the energy being projected from Darkmoon, the energy emanating from Darkmoon, is ALL about wanting and chanting to Kali and drooling and hoping and chanting and wanting and drooling some more and more and more for this civil war massive blood shed Election outcome, and that’s like so NOT groovy, dudes and Moon Goddess dudettes.

      3. An act of desperation from Obama and Hillary and cabal. It means they’re desperate — it means they don’t think can they steal the election successfully, as they thought they could in the beginning of the campaign. It means they know they’re losing and know there’s a real high chance they won’t succeed in the stealing the election.

        If the election was already a foregone conclusion Hillary is the winner, either by a fair vote, or by stealing the election via voter fraud , Obama would NEVER have gone on TV and so publicly and so blatantly encouraged illegal aliens to vote. He would not show his true colors so blatantly and so publicly if he and Hillary and cabal were sure they had it in the bag. Obama going on TV encouraging illegal aliens to vote is an act of desperation and means Hillary and cabal are in a very weak position and they think, they know, there’s a really high chance they’re going to lose, they know Hillary is not going to win the popular vote, and they think they can NOT steal the election successfully, as they thought in the beginning of the campaign.

      4. Who da man?
        Sard, you da man, as Kipling used to say
        take it on the chin and just keep the smile on while counting stars.
        because ariadna did make great points about pcr and pilfinger.

      5. TROJoe on November 7, 2016 at 12:23 am: Oh wow man, this is a bummer, the energy being projected from Darkmoon, the energy emanating from Darkmoon, is ALL about wanting and chanting to Kali and drooling and hoping and chanting and wanting and drooling some more and more and more for this civil war massive blood shed Election outcome, and that’s like so NOT groovy, dudes and Moon Goddess dudettes.

        It is all going according to plan. Here is the end of Emmanuel Rabinovich’s 1952 speech:

        We may have to repeat the grim days of World War II, when we were forced to let the Hitlerite bandits sacrifice some of our people, in order that we may have adequate documentation and witnesses to legally justify our trial and execution of the leaders of America and Russia as war criminals, after we have dictated the peace. I am sure you will need little preparation for such a duty, for sacrifice has always been the watchword of our people, and the death of a few thousand lesser Jews in exchange for world leadership is indeed a small price to pay. To convince you of the certainty of that leadership, let me point out to you how we have turned all of the inventions of the White Man into weapons against him. His printing presses and Radios are the mouthpieces of our desires, and his heavy industry manufactures the instruments which he sends out to arm Asia and Africa against him.

        Our interests in Washington are greatly extending the Point Four Program [viz. Colombo Plan] for developing industry in backward areas of the world, so that after the industrial plants and cities of Europe and America are destroyed by atomic warfare, the Whites can offer no resistance against the large masses of the dark races, who will maintain an unchallenged technological superiority. And so, with the vision of world victory before you, go back to your countries and intensify your good work, until that approaching day when Israeli will reveal herself in all her glorious destiny as the Light of the World.

      6. Gyorgy –

        “It is all going according to plan.”

        I agree… Yes…. IT IS…!!!

        Especially UN Agenda-21 and Sustainable Development… Even in Russia and China.

        CBCSD
        http://english.cbcsd.org.cn/

        China-US join hands in green development and recycling economy:
        CBCSD … Business Council for Sustainable Development …

    1. He is himself an illegal alien. What else can you expect from him? Besides, globalists want to abolish nations anyway and that includes the USA.

  12. Podesta knew this was coming up and hinted at it, thinks Dryden (Zero Hedge):

    “With just two days left until the election, John Podesta went on one of the Clinton campaign’s “friendly” political talk shows to bash FBI agents leaking harmful info about their various investigations into Hillary’s assorted criminal cases. In an interview that wreaked of a little desperation, Podesta lashed out at FBI agents saying “the leakers should shut up.” With the interview occurring earlier this morning before the recent news that the FBI has balked, yet again, at bringing official charges against Hillary, it certainly seems possible that Podesta had advanced knowlege that a Comey announcement was forthcoming (see “Hillary Cleared As FBI Folds Again: Comey Says “Conclusions Unchanged From July” On Clinton Email Review”).
    “I think what Mr. Comey did just 9 days ago was a mistake. I think it broke with precedent. I think it was criticized roundly by democrats and republicans. It was a mistake.
    There is a reason for that policy. It looked like it was interfering in the election.
    I think the men and women of the FBI are doing a tremendous job out here across the country. But the leakers should shut up.”

    When asked whether Comey should resign for his “mistake,” Podesta said that he’s never questioned Comey’s motivation but that it was a mistake nonetheless.
    It’s unclear how this new revelation will impact the “leakers,” though to the extent they continue to disagree with Comey’s assessment it could very well result in accelerated leaks by disgruntled FBI agents.

    Ironically, Podesta didn’t offer any criticism of Loretta Lynch or her Justice Department for obviously obstructing the original FBI investigation after having a 30-minute secret conversation with Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Phoenix earlier this year and having other DOJ lawyers explicitly instruct FBI agents to “stand down” on active leads into alleged Clinton Foundation corruption.

      1. Ariadna –

        You can connect the financial and political dots any way you want. Hint: In 1996 Stevens helped finance Dole and Clinton, as masters of ‘straddle’ investments.

        Stevens beat Wall Street many times, while arising within the lands of the illiterates, which produced dummies like Douglas MacArthur, William Fulbright and Sam Walton. 🙂

        At one time, Stevens was the largest volume brokerage and investment firm not in NYC.
        http://www.stephens.com/

        In 1933, Witt Stephens founded W.R. Stephens Investments to trade Arkansas Highway bonds, which at the time were selling for as low as pennies on the dollar. By the time the bonds paid off at par in the early 1940s, Stephens had gained a reputation for municipal bond expertise and providing sound financial counseling. In 1946, upon graduation from the U.S. Naval Academy, Jackson T. “Jack” Stephens joined his brother and with a handshake, the two brothers formed Stephens Inc. and a partnership that lasted more than 45 years.

        In 1948, Stephens sold Sheridan Telephone Exchange to Allied Telephone Company, which later became Alltel Corporation, thus beginning a decades-long relationship that in part continues today.

        In 1956, Jack Stephens was named president and CEO of Stephens Inc. and Witt left the firm to become president and chairman of Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company, while both retained their 50-50 share of Stephens Inc. Witt returned to Stephens in the early 1970s.

        Jack began to grow Stephens by providing private equity to many young growing companies, much in the way of the British Merchant Bank investing model, predating by decades the private equity endeavors of Wall Street firms. Jack’s acumen as an investor was combined in remarkable fashion with his ability to form enduring personal relationships with his partners. Several generations of companies and business leaders came to know Jack as not only a smart investment banker, but as a loyal and reliable friend as well.

        **Jack’s influence grew well beyond Arkansas to the boardrooms of corporate America and to the halls of **Washington D.C. His opinions were constantly sought by investors, CEOs and **politicians.

        In 1970, Stephens Inc., along with White Weld & Co., raised $4.95 million in an IPO for a small Arkansas-based discount retailer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., owned by Sam Walton and his family. The capital, and subsequently raised capital, helped to fund Wal-Mart’s rise from $32 million in sales to the largest retailer in the world.

        In 1971, Stephens Inc., together with First National Bank of Commerce, underwrote $113 million in tax-exempt bonds to help build the Louisiana Superdome. At that time, this was among the largest single tax-exempt bond issues in history and Wall Street had turned it down.

        In 1989, Stephens **advised Tyson Foods in its acquisition of Holly Farms, resulting in a $1.5 billion hostile takeover. In 1992, Stephens invested in Viking Range Corporation, providing the growth capital needed to seriously expand the company into a leading national brand. In 1993, Stephens purchased Donrey Media, renaming it Stephens Media Group. When sold in 2015, Stephens Media Group’s properties include the Las Vegas Review-Journal and daily and weekly papers.

        In 2010, Stephens helped to create Halifax Media. Based in Daytona, FL., Halifax owns and operates 33 newspapers, primarily in the southeast.

        In 2006, Warren Stephens acquired 100% of Stephens Inc. A little over a year later, the global economic crisis, triggered by the meltdown of the housing markets, severely impacted financial markets and posed a grave threat to all financial institutions. Having avoided the over leveraging that brought down other investment firms, *as an inside group…. Stephens remained sound and continued to grow during this period.

        Since its acquisition by Warren, Stephens Inc. has grown substantially. The Public Finance Department has experienced a 47% growth, the Private Client Group has grown 66%, the Research Department has experienced a 71% growth, and Investment Banking has grown 95%. Stephens Insurance, an affiliate of Stephens Inc., has grown more than six times since the 2006 acquisition.

        There ya go…. 🙂

  13. Thank you for posting the transcript, as well as the video. I prefer the text to scan the text, rather than a watch a video, which requires a time commitment.

  14. Apalling. Comey, current FBI director, now tells us yet again “there’s nothing to prosecute”. The above article predicts riots should HRC be elected. Remember what the jew did in Ukraine, Israeli snipers firing into BOTH sides in the street to whip things up before the jew stole the country, no doubt protected from interruption on the cozy rooftops by creatures like Loretta Lynch, James Comey, and associates. The jew may yet find more of a problem in a place like the USA, with all those nasty guns (and murderers like the Washington Sniper killing at random from the trunk of a car through a broken tail light, not the greatest role model, but damn hard to catch). Complaining, riots, and probably votes simply aren’t going to work, STRATEGY is needed, complaining and wining aren’t an effective strategy – though I hope I’m wrong about votes. Bitter as all this is, I can’t imagine being James Comey. If I was, I’d give up restaurants and bring my own coffee to work; it would be easier to resign however, and go live near Paulson’s place in Argentina.

  15. @Franklin Ryckaert:
    “The American people is too tame to revolt.”
    It’s not so much that they are tame as that they are not as “American” as they used to be. The melting pot mantra has been withdrawn long ago, replaced with “this, that or the other is beautiful,” and along with “diversity” as a goal there has been also a substantial infusion of illegal (mostly Hispanic) immigrants. So instead of “American” they are all flying their diversity flags marching behind the Democrat promise of benefits (called “rights”) without responsibilities.
    Those who might be inclined to protest this election travesty are branded as racists, xenophobes and misoginists.

  16. feel sorry for the bitch?
    are you kidding julian? you feel sorry for a mass murderer, who finds mirth in killing?
    it’s not about her ambition. it’s about a totally corrupted state. hold the whitewash bro.
    is she caught up in it?
    yes, quite willingly.
    hrc has been operating as an intel stooge since ronald reagan’s cia/mafia cocaine first hit florida, and then on to mena arkansas, back in the eighties. her and bill know exactly how that all works. if they ever forget – they’re rubbed out. but that’s not likely.
    they’re frontmen for the big globalist bankster warmongering complex.
    of course they’re in cahoots with the saudis in the creation of isis, because they all (jews) want the continued destabilization of the middle east and africa and the discombobulation of europe by immigrant invasion.
    she keeps gagging up the same old crap about the russians being the culprits in everything because that’s the basic beltway formula for the continued munitions contractor confiscation and transfer of whatever economic wealth may be generated by the working class, who used to make up the middle class..
    it’s always been the russians this and the russians that, when the real truth is that the higher-ups in russian intelligence have worked hand in glove with those from the us since the big long presidential jew train of fdr, truman, eisenhower and johnson.
    joe mccarthy an the john birchers couldn’t get them out. they’ve been here ever since, playing that balalaike like a fender stratocaster, now with the big freemason/jew putin doing some conducting.
    both korea and the vietnam war were orchestrated for the purposes of “containment” by the global security state religio-corporate intel network. that’s all matured into the neocon post 9-11 endless war – global surveillance state.
    trump now tries his charge against a hardcore deep-state cabal, operating at the behest of the globalists, who stand in gross disregard of anything american. and it’s all being protected by a thoroughly co-opted and complicit commercial media, which is doing what every other state-run media does, with its phony polls and biased coverage – pretend your candidate has the lead. they make it only about trump’s personality and scue the coverage wherever; this while trump repeatedly fills his venues with tens of thousands of people, with more jammed up outside, and hillary can barely fill a high school gymnasium.
    what might trump’s real angle be? maybe we’ll never know.
    well said arch. my opinion – american society is effectively controlled by the female. and the last thing she wants to see is someone who is not politically correct in charge. she has been co-opted with the same jive the jews, indeed judeo christianity, like to run on – the big victimization horseshit story. they don’t want to hear the truth, not if it threatens their house of cards.
    you heard assange deny trump, in his slightly roundabout way. assange doesn’t say the j word either. assange sold out the israeli related emails to the new your times way back at the beginning.
    good observations lobro, though i’m not sure i agree with you on christopher bollyn.
    right pat -since when do whites riot? it sounds like assange got that line straight from the splc. and you can expect the war on white people to escalate precipitously if hillary is selected. somehow it’s the white patriots who are the danger, though the blacks, and mexicans now, do all the street violence, while the country is being steadily overrun with non-white immigrants. assange’ further assessment of trump as the leader of the white trash mob obviously lays more pipe for the continued and increasing demonization of white patriots.
    gilroy kelley – now you know why a good 90% of us ambassadors to other countries are jews. it helps keep the world court sewed up too.
    no, you can’t seriously discuss these things without saying the jew word, and no, it doesn’t detract from your intellect if you do.
    remember hilary’s statement about assange – “can’t we just drone this guy”. anybody buying that?
    assange looks like a fake. the emails won’t matter, except that the controversy will in the end only add to the firewall.

  17. Recently out, published reader opinion with merit: It’s ignorant to vote for Hillary Clinton without reading WikiLeaks

    Those voting for Hillary Clinton, defending Clinton and supporting Clinton without reading the information reported by WikiLeaks are intellectually no different than those who criticize climate science without ever having read the science. In short, if you defend Clinton and ignore WikiLeaks, you have something in common with Sarah Palin. Let that sink in for a moment. Finished processing that?

    Now process this — if the journalists responsible for reporting on Watergate were labeled “Russian sympathizers,” charged by the media as “attempting to influence an election,” and banned from travel or communication access, how would history judge the event?

    This is exactly what has happened to Julian Assange, who has done more for journalism than any of these corporate-owned, brand-named media products have done this election cycle. Either you support access to information or you have a problem with an informed public. Which side are you on?

    It is obvious that the elite oligarchy has a problem with an informed public. It is why Hillary Clinton wanted him droned (silenced).

    1. Here’s the elites’ reaction, spearheaded by their FBI puppet: FBI Chief Jim Comey Clears Hillary Clinton—and Puts Himself in the Crosshairs

      11.06.16 1:50 PM ET The FBI just said—again—that it won’t be criminally charging Hillary Clinton for spilling secrets. But the probes into Clinton’s activities are far from over. And now, the Bureau and its leadership could be the ones coming under investigators’ scrutiny.

      FBI Director James Comey pronounced on Sunday that investigators have found nothing in emails to and from Hillary Clinton recently recovered on Anthony Weiner’s laptop that alters the FBI’s decision not to recommend criminal charges against the Democratic nominee.

      “Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton,” Comey wrote in a letter to the heads of four congressional committees. The FBI chief had previously said that while Clinton and her aides were “extremely careless” to use a private server for official business when she ran the State Department, “no reasonable [bought and paid for] prosecutor” [Loretta Lynch] would have pursued a criminal case against them for mishandling classified information.

      Comey’s announcement suggested that the FBI will not continue to pursue Clinton over her controversial email system, which came as welcome news to her campaign less than two days before Americans head to the polls.

      The oligarchy elite wants Hillary in office, and they are doing everything within their power to see that happen. Somehow, they (Loretta) communicated their (her) intentions to the FBI chief, to cause a change in (his) heart over news of the most recent findings.

      1. I agree with Scott Creighton (except for his prediction about the wiener):
        “The Clinton-Weiner Halloween Surprise is over and once again the slick Clintons come out unscathed.
        The first FBI investigation into half that many emails took a year. Comey finished this one in less than a week.
        I stand by my original conclusion: that was a back-up of her illegal private server made right after she left office for her personal use “writing a book” (or blackmail is more like it) and when it got out what Comey really had, there was no way the masters of the universe would let him keep it or report on it’s contents.
        Imagine: secrets of the fake bin Laden raid… the truth behind the Benghazi psyop that allowed her to militarize the whole of North Africa with the CIA and drone strikes aplenty… communications between her and the assets they had in Russia when she tried that color revolution, the ones she had in Iran when they tried that one… the truth behind Syria and who she was really communicating with at the start of that regime change operation…
        So much they could have found but now we will never know. It’s not for us to judge the dealings of the servants of the masters. I guess Comey learned that lesson.
        I wonder how long it will be before Weiner ends up “hanging himself” in his jail cell?”
        https://willyloman.wordpress.com/

  18. @Sardonicus
    Corrections: (1) In my scenario the losing gladiator is not killed, as you say. I said POLITICAL death: he just does not get to run again (Goldwater, Gore, etc). (2) In my scenario the gladiators do not know, as the spectators don’t either, that it is a sham. To them it is real.
    Now to your proposed scenario:
    I am in awe. It has great aesthetic appeal. It is reminiscent of Borges’ lottery. It is not only very well put together but it is also the TRUTH, as expected from a thing of BEAUTY, as the limey poet said.
    Indeed, the one who is sent to the Big House is the “lesser of two evils,” the one who failed to score high on the scale of abominable moral decay.
    You have my sincere admiration.

    1. @ Ariadnatheo

      Corrections: (1) In my scenario the losing gladiator is not killed, as you say. I said POLITICAL death: he just does not get to run again (Goldwater, Gore, etc). (2) In my scenario the gladiators do not know, as the spectators don’t either, that it is a sham. To them it is real.

      Sorry I misinterpreted you. Well, yes, now that you have explained that “death” in your scenario meant political death and that neither the gladiators nor spectators know it’s a scam and believe sincerely in the drama in which they are enmeshed, I really do think your scenario has the hallmarks of genius.

      If you’re right — and I have a sinking feeling that the universe is bizarre enough to accommodate your scenario — then life has all the grim features of an Alice-in-Wonderland script on horror steroids. No kidding. It brings to mind the biolgist JBS Haldane’s famous dictum: “The Universe in not only queerer than we imagine, it is queerer than we can imagine.”

      As for my scenario, the universe would have to be bordering on lunacy if presidential candidates are doing their best to lose. Here the candidate who presents himself as the Greater Monster is the real winner and is rewarded by NOT having to serve as Presidential Puppet. Instead, he wins a life of blissful retirement with infinite leisure.

      I have to say I prefer your scenario to mine if only for this reason: it’s a damn sight more plausible than mine! 🙂

      1. No disrespect to Pat and Harbinger, but I cannot believe the Jews are so omniscient and super-efficient that they can get their way and become Masters of the Universe just by meticulous planning of every single move. As I say, life doesn’t work like that. Chance intervenes at every stage. There is also such a thing as karma: evil deeds are punished by evil fates.

        Harbinger’s idea of a scripted universe — the Jews gaining universal control and thenceforth leaping from one victory to another — just doesn’t ring true. That’s determinism. A return to the mechanistic universe of Newton.

        Grow up, Harbie! We’re now in Brave New World! — not with Isaac Newton under the apple tree! 🙂

      2. The Jews don’t care about reality — chance can intervene a million times and all the Jews have to do is ignore it or channel it. They achieve this mastery by controlling, warping and destroying culture. That is why the protocols emphasize the domination of finance, media and education.

        For example, this is why real whistle-blowers are completely ignored by the MSM and limited-hangouts are draped all over the media. Chance…schmance. This is also why the Official 9/11 bullcrap continues to infect many minds — Jewish control of consciousness melding mechanisms just keeps pushing the nonsense. And it works everytime.

        Jewish domination of culture also allows them to immediately control or co-opt any genuine opposition that manifests itself. Gilad Atzmon describes this as two Jewish controlled groups arguing with each other; the goyim shrugging their shoulders thinking “the Jews have got this one covered, no point in interfering”. This is what has happened with the pro-Palestine movements — they’re now run by Jews and spend their time picking over what is and isn’t a so-called anti-Semitic statement or policy.

        Finally, same with the US election. Both candidates are clearly Zionists but the gullible, wishful thinking goy actually think they have a choice in the outcome. This is unreal and it is Jewish control of culture that makes it so. I wasn’t intending to post again but I just get angry reading posts that suggest Jewish power aint what it is cracked up to be.

        It is. They organized two World Wars; numerous revolutions; dominate Western culture (perhaps even Russia, notice the continuing stupid ceasefires and the Zionist assault on Raqqa); and now we have the War on Terra, the real WWIII that Paul Craig Roberts mistakenly suggests will be nuclear. We’re already living it and is a World War Z by proxy.

        I think J power will only collapse when it reaches its Zenith and there is a mass awakening. Hubris will take down the f**kers; not a Zionist-whore in the White House.

  19. @Pat:
    So this Stevens is the king maker because his bribes are irresistible so all he had to do was to pay Comey off. Interesting but not compelling.
    PS Are you originally from Arkansas by any chance?

    1. Ariadna –

      Yeah. I am from Arkansas originally. I did hold political elected office there. However… I have had over 100 different addresses where I could have received mail in my lifetime. Owned many homes in many states.

      I did not expect any other response. Typical. Predictable. Majority are right there with you.

      Fairy tales of Armageddon are more compelling to most of us…. the lessers. Horror stories are more popular than the accountants’ ledgers. CAFRs are just not that exciting…. not compelling. If you completely understood the CAFRs and Fund Accounting, your response would have been much different.

      The owners of the governments know that. They agree with you.

      The titular heads – Presidents – are set out there to disagree with all of us. Leaders are placed to make an argument for distractions from the books of the accountants. Then, the facts are never known. 🙂

      BTW – FBI applicants wanting to be agents are required to have a degree in law or accounting.

      1. Don’t you go accusing me of anti-accountantism, Pat. It’s nothing to do with any aversion you think I have with ledgers. I’d give anything to see some Rothschild ledgers.
        The reason I asked is that there is a probability, even a tiny one, that people see what’s up close as a lot bigger than what’s at a distance. It’s the law of perspective.

      2. Pat,

        You held political office before? Great minds think alike…

        I’m thinking seriously of running for political office here in Vancouver in the next provincial election slated for May 2017. Actually, subject to funding from just a few well-to-do Chinese businessmen (negotiations are in progress) I will be setting up a new political party very soon.

        What can you tell me about the CAFRs? I haven’t done any research on it yet. Do state or provincial and municipal governments really have more money than they know what to do with? Can I run on a “No More Taxes” as my number 1 platform?… in order to have a mass appeal beyond the Chinese voters, not that the Chinese would have any problems with no more taxes.

        Or would that idea be too tin foil hatish?

      3. @ Justice For Chinese

        Hopefully you will be running for a local office, not a national office. Taking a bath in local office can make you clean, but not so in a national government office.

        If you are running for a local office, have issues, but do not run on them. Local elections are popularity contests. I can give you some easy tips to guarantee a win with not much money expended so that no one owns you. No need for a new party. You will still have time for being artistic. Let me know if you want my tips.

        If you are running for a national government office, issues do not matter either. Getting as dirty as possible guarantees the win. Creating a new party is normally a guarantee of not winning. You will no longer post at Darkmoon since you will be too involved with rolling in the cesspool trying to satisfy those that own you or want to own you. Being artistic will be the last thing on your mind.

        Of the millions of things that a person could do with their life, the last thing they should consider is becoming a politician.

        As for CAFR’s, in the USA CAFR’s apply to State governments. I do not recall local governments like cities and counties having them from my days of being a political activist. I knew a lady who got deeply involved in her State’s CAFR to stop a tax increase by her State government. She was singlehandedly successful in stopping the State tax increase, but she had to put up with constant monitoring (hacking) of her computer from “State” locations after that. There are always consequences for getting governments to do other than what they have in mind.

      4. JFC –
        “Do state or provincial and municipal governments really have more money than they know what to do with?”

        Yes. Most do, but not all tiny ones. CAFR is a financial network spanning the US and other countries are following the way to entice investors.

        All governments in US at all levels are required to have a CAFR – IF – IF – they are to sell bonds and borrow money. Their ratings are based on Moody’s and S&P… etc.

        When reviewing a CAFR take an extra-special notice of the “Notes” sections. That’s where many ‘extras’ are found. You will find ‘investments’ there.

        Several years back, I helped a friend in Michigan find $10 Billion just in foreign investments when the state was wanting a tax increase of $2 Billion. The tax increase passed. Everyone should be so lucky as to have ‘taxing authority’ and rely on Diebold and ES&S to pass it… 🙂

        This is on Page 81: FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
        September 30, 2014, foreign investments were approximately 17.1% of total assets of the systems;

        total foreign investments were $10.4 billion.

        The list of foreign investments is on Page 82. (China and Russia seldom appear on the lists. Mexico always does.)

        http://www.michigan.gov/documents/budget/CAFR_FY_2014_478784_7.pdf

        ….

        Ungenius –

        “As for CAFR’s, in the USA CAFR’s apply to State governments. I do not recall local governments like cities and counties having them from my days of being a political activist.”

        All those municipal entities you mentioned are required to have CAFRs. Even water districts, schools, ports….and hundreds of other types of entities require them.
        All public colleges have one. Just the list of types is overwhelming.
        There are thousands of CAFR filing entities in every state.

        As an example, here is the Univ of North Carolina CAFR 2014:
        http://finance.unc.edu/files/2015/12/2014_cafr.pdf

        Apart from CAFRs…. other scams exist…

        States even have Local Government Investment Pools – LGIPs – set up. That’s where the cities, counties, utility districts, police departments, fire departments, sheriffs and libraries and hundreds of others can get in on the money funnel scam. 🙂

        They may use catchy names and not “pools”… Here is the LGIP for Texas, called
        “Texas TERM”… 🙂

        “Welcome to the TexasTERM Local Government Investment Pool”

        -https://www.texasterm.net/

        To find the one for any state enter ‘LGIP and name of state’ in a search.

        Florida:
        Florida’s LGIP closing balance in June 2008 – $7,063,811,226. (Over $7 Billion)

        https://www.sbafla.com/prime/portals/8/SummaryReports/Archive/200806_MonthlySummaryReport.pdf

        Florida changed the name to: Florida Municipal Investment Trust – FMIT – “A League Of Cities”

        -http://www.floridaleagueofcities.com/Finance.aspx?CNID=54

      5. JFC –

        If I were to do what you intend to do, I would use the template of an ‘association’ rather than a ‘party’.

        Call it ‘Vancouver Taxpayers’ Assn’ and everyone can be members because they all pay sales taxes and property taxes and fuel taxes.

        Once you have a member base of several hundred you can defeat any local issue when the election is not rigged.

        You can even pressure local politicians with your list, even if only 100 strong. They know that most local elections are won or lost by less than 100 votes. Some by under 10 on a recount. That includes state representatives…. even governors. We just had a city council race that was won by 2 votes on recount.

        It is a powerful tool for the people, locally. Many have taken my instructions and prevailed.

        If you charge $5 – $10 a year for dues…. you can run ads and hire legal help….. if you need money.

        Use “Robert’s Rules of Order” as a guide for set-up…. for compliance.

        http://robertsrules.com/

      6. @ Pat

        Thanks for the intel. 🙂

        I had a look at Walter Burien’s CAFR1 website and watched a few of his videos on YouTube last night. According to him the scam is over 60 TRILLION DOLLARS!!!

        His most memorable and most succinct line was: “The Government is the market.” (i.e. most of the surplus money is invested in the stock market controlled by the… “Anglo-Zionists” — OK, I shall try my best to use this term henceforth instead of “kikes” for fear of alienating the affections of this site’s administrators and its politically-correct-obsessed fans.)

        Re: Your idea about association rather than a political party…. is very useful and encouraging. Will look further into the subject. Thanks again.

        @ Ungenius

        Your comments and opinions here are always read by me with interest and pleasure and any advice you wish to give me on my bid to become the Chinese Hitler (lol) will also be read with interest and pleasure. Please do contact me privately via my Joe Canuck website. 🙂

      1. And if you saw me you’d know right away I am not “typical.”
        Pat hurt my feelings with that more than I can say in words. If he does not retract, I will skulk and declare him a typical Bubba, I swear. I am not incapable of rancor, you know.

      2. @ Ariadnatheo

        I am not incapable of rancor, you know.

        Tut tut, and here I was thinking you were Saint Ariadna! 🙂

  20. it is certainly true that secrecy and conspiracy in government have to be overcome and done away with if humanity is ever to progress beyond the pyramid power structure way of doing things, war and exploitation systemic. and we are now well into the internet age, where advanced communications technology, a good result of positive effort, has the potential to crack the avaricious security state complex and change society for good. it only stands to reason that the ptb will run whatever co-option game they an come up with to deflect the effect. the red cross operates close to the front lines because that’s where you have to be to manage the conflict. yes, guys like pilger, assange and snowden, with his cia background, will pop up and appear genuine. but none of us should believe it just because. if trump were to actually win somehow and do all the things he says he will, then maybe.

  21. If Hillary Clinton wins this election, as Assange predicts, we can expect riots to erupt all across America.??
    I expect Martial Law declared on no later than the 9th November & a disarming of the American people who own weapons ?? (Mostly Republicans ..Democrats are usually anti guns) Which IMO can erupt in another Civil War ??
    As told by many southerner, Civil War was only a cease fire ??

    1. @ Mr Reynard

      “If Hillary Clinton wins this election, as Assange predicts, we can expect riots to erupt all across America.??”

      Riots do not happen with heavily armed citizenry, revolutions do. Riots are for rock and bottle throwers, and arsonists. Revolutions are for trigger pullers.

      “I expect Martial Law declared on no later than the 9th November & a disarming of the American people who own weapons ?? (Mostly Republicans ..Democrats are usually anti guns) Which IMO can erupt in another Civil War ??”

      The US government does not have the manpower to disarm the American public even if the American public is willing to give them up without a fight. Yes, an attempt to disarm the American public would lead to war, but not a Civil War like the jewish banker planned and executed 1860 war of two Nations, North and South, fighting it out. It would be a massive guerrilla war that could not be defeated. The jewish paradise maintained by the US jewish stooge government would cease to exist. Assuming survivors, the jews could return to Europe where they came from and help all of their recently imported migrants.

  22. as i get older and more suspicious (my SQ=150 and growing, suspicion quotient), i am also starting to see many parallels between seemingly unrelated states, mental, ideological and historical.

    yes, Mr Reynard, it’s gonna Rain Hard.

    the American civil war was a rehearsal for the world wars of the 20th century and the coming one soon to neighborhood near you.

    how come?

    well, like this:
    it established the sorry precedent of the naive good guys, the homeboy patriots and native sons slaughtered by the cursed evil of the Juden marshaled shabbo forces, endlessly brainwashed into blind obedience, in firm belief that they are the righteous ones, kikeochristians fighting the “good” war, committing good atrocities, fine genocide, excellent rapes and pillage, capped off by blessed perversions of history rewritten for Juden-Satan benefit.
    Cohenist Calvinist protestantism is an essential ingredient in scrubbing the minds before marinating in kabbalah juice.

    consider the fighting songs of Dixie, Wehrmacht and others marching to protect their homesteads:
    jaunty jigs, extolling the happy land: “then I wish i was in Dixie, hooray, hooray, in dixieland I’ll take my stand to live and die in dixie“, or Croatian WW2 “za dom, spremni” (for home / ready) – now proof of holocaust minded bloodlust of Croats
    Now the heavyfooted march of the Battlehymn of republic: “mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the lord … he has loosened fateful lightning of his terrible bright sword
    See? I repeat, do you See? Righteous invasion, slaughter, ethnic cleansing, carpet bagging in the name of Lord Lucifer in whose unholy name all atrocities are forgiven in advance

    they shall all be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, void and made of no effect; they shall not be binding, nor have any power; the vows rapes shall not be reckoned as vows rapes, the obligations genocide shall not be obligatory genocidal, nor the oaths thefts considered as oaths thefts.

    Just follow The Laws by numbers, let the Boss take care of the invoice and the butcher’s bill.
    and exactly the same scenario is revealed now with respect to Russia and china before the eyes capable of seeing, the same Talmudochristians refusing to unblind themselves, banging the righteous drum in the name of some abomination conveniently named Patriotism.

    Gory, gory hallelujah.

    1. As i was saying: Protestants Get Ready to Grovel
      The rise and fall of Human.
      it’s like that diagram showing amphibian crawling up the beach, growing legs, getting bipedal, a primate, an ape, a neanderthal, cromagnon, modern man … christian, ziochristian, back to primate, 100%-shabbo-amphibian again, worse than the original discard.

      “the 500th anniversary of the Reformation would be the ‘perfect time’ for Protestant leaders to recognise and apologise for the ‘horrific antisemitism’ of their movement’s founder, Martin Luther.”

      The truth of the matter is that Martin Luther didn’t know about Zionism, Israeli criminality, Alan Dershowitz, Bernie Madoff, Jeffrey Epstein, or Sir Philip Green but he still had a serious problem with the Jews.

      Color Evolution, anyone?

  23. Mr Trump made a big mistake when he said that Mexicans brought drugs, crime and rape. He must know that 99% of Mexicans in the USA are hard workers, doing jobs most white men could not do. If I see a road repair gang working in 100F weather I have nothing but admiration for these men. I would be dead within a few hours.

    BUT!!! There is no doubt that most of the big drug dealers and criminals speak Spanish. Many of them are not Mexican but central and South American. I think most legal Mexican immigrants would agree. You see it every evening on TV. A violent crime is anounced and before they show the faces or name names you can bet the perps are Latino. Mr Trump has made amost every Mexican his enemy, just by not being more careful with his words. I think it will cost him the election.

    If Hillary wins I think thewars will continue, maybe expand.

    1. An act of desperation from Obama and Hillary and cabal. It means they’re desperate — it means they don’t think can they steal the election successfully, as they thought they could in the beginning of the campaign. It means they know they’re losing and know there’s a real high chance they won’t succeed in the stealing the election.

      If the election was already a foregone conclusion Hillary is the winner, either by a fair vote, or by stealing the election via voter fraud , Obama would NEVER have gone on TV and so publicly and so blatantly encouraged illegal aliens to vote. He would not show his true colors so blatantly and so publicly if he and Hillary and cabal were sure they had it in the bag. Obama going on TV encouraging illegal aliens to vote is an act of desperation and means Hillary and cabal are in a very weak position and they think, they know, there’s a really high chance they’re going to lose, they know Hillary is not going to win the popular vote, and they think they can NOT steal the election successfully, as they thought in the beginning of the campaign.

  24. Sardonicus,

    No disrespect taken.
    However….

    You, unlike me, are an optimist. Your outlook on life is one of hope and surrealism. I am, as you know, completely the opposite.

    “I cannot believe the Jews are so omniscient and super-efficient that they can get their way and become Masters of the Universe just by meticulous planning of every single move.”

    Look at the life of Jew? From a young age, their in Synagogues, learning. What, I have an idea, but regardless, the determination is already in ground right there.
    What of Rothschilds theft of the British Stock Exchange? Was that not meticulously planned, or did he just ‘wing it on a prayer’?
    The control of banking, the msm, academia, music, arts and film, politics, NGO’s, minority groups…..the list goes on and on. Do you think all of these just happened to fall into the hands of Jewry, or did the goy simply say “Ooo, I think I’ll give my business away to the poor persecuted Jews”?
    And you then state:

    “There is also such a thing as karma: evil deeds are punished by evil fates.”

    Erm…no.
    There is the belief that there is karma, but if there is, it tends to pop up at the oddest of times, punishing those who shouldn’t be and not punishing those who should. What of Jimmy Saville, or Lord Jenner, to name two Jewish paedophiles? Where was their karma? “They’ll get that when they die…” you have as much evidence to believe there is a hell as others believing there isn’t. No one knows what happens once you’re dead, because you’re, erm, dead. Many truly evil people never had any bad things happen to them and they just kept on doing wrong. I wonder just how many deaths the dead Rothschilds have been responsible for and what karma happened to them Sard?

    “Harbinger’s idea of a scripted universe — the Jews gaining universal control and thenceforth leaping from one victory to another — just doesn’t ring true. “

    And the protocols?
    And the letter from Albert Pike to Mazzini?
    What was it that Henry Ford stated again:

    “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.”

    And the five dancing Israelis? Did they not state, on TV, they were there to ‘document the event’?

    There’s no need to tell me to grow up, when there’s far more reason to believe that we are living in a script, written by incredibly powerful people, who control the world’s wealth to do so Sard.
    Your opinion is formed through believing, without evidence, that things in life just happen by happenstance and there is no ‘All Seeing Eye’ and ‘Big Brother’. My opinion, on the contrary, is formed through looking at history and reading literature, that speaks of how the future will be. Again, this is why I’m a pessimist (realist) and you’re an optimist (surrealist).
    I don’t hope for things to get better.
    I know that they only will through the sacrifice of many, as history has told us many times over.

    We are not living in Brave New world. That’s been the last 60 years. Now it’s time to continue the timeline and move into 1984.

  25. William Fulbright was the most distinguished Senator of his day. He was Chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. He was a five-time Senator, but came out against Jewish Power. He was deselected at the next state Primaries. He was a good man who told the truth, and founded the Fulbright Scholarships, but he paid the price:-

    Appearing on the Oct. 7, 1973 CBS “Face the Nation” television program two days after the outbreak of war in the Middle East, Senator Fulbright was asked, “which would be the best way to settle the Arab-Israeli war,” and “would it not be in everyone’s interest for the U.S. and the Soviet Union to refrain from furnishing weapons to either side?” Fulbright responded: “Yes, but the U.S. government alone is not capable of doing that, because the Israelis control the policy in the Congress and the Senate and unless we use the U.N. and do it collectively, we know the U.S. is not going to do that….Somewhere around 80 percent of the Senate of the United States is competely in support of Israel and of anything Israel wants.”

    And that was in 1973.

    1. John –

      You are correct about his being tossed out by Pharisee-Jews after serving several decades in the US Senate.

      I always worked hard against him and voted against him because he was a very liberal Democrat who completely supported the UN.

      We were ALL shocked when he came out against Israel. His conscience may have gotten the best of him.

      General Brown had to apologize publicly to Israel that same year – 1974.
      He was forced to grovel on TV. I watched in dismay. I remember exactly where I was standing at the time, in a JFK moment of reflection.

      ……………….

      1973
      Egypt and Syria attack Israel to regain occupied territories;
      massive U.S. arms airlift enables Israeli victory;
      Arab states begin oil embargo;
      Senator William Fulbright states “The Israelis control the policy in the Congress and the Senate.”

      1974
      U.S. Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, General George Brown, reveals Israeli emissaries pressure Pentagon for arms, promising: “Don’t worry about the Congress. We’ll take care of Congress”;

      Sen. Fulbright, serving 30 years, was defeated in Arkansas primary after heavy donations from Jewish contributors to his rival, the first of several Congressional critics of U.S. Mideast policy to be targeted and defeated by Zionist fundraisers

      http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n4p-6_Okeefe.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *