How to break the power of the Jews

Based on a comment by John Kirby

“We have been taught a false history, and the Jews have ridden to power on it.”

With notes by Lasha Darkmoon on the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution

Fake anti-semitism has been used to gain holier-than-thou immunity for Jews. Their power lies in the fact that most people are afraid to even use the word “Jew”. Until we can clear that “fear of the smear”, we will never be able to break Jewish Power.

If the holes in the Holocaust story, or the Jewish leadership of the Bolshevik mass murderers, were even mentioned on the History Channel it would be a good start. How could millions of Jewish bodies have been cremated when there was no fuel to be had in Germany at that time? and no trainloads of coke have ever been shown on aerial photographs of Auschwitz.

David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington:

“The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.

“Of 384 commissars there were 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians, and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number 264 had come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial Government.”

The five men who executed the Tsar and his young family were all Jews. We even know their names.

Note by Lasha Darkmoon

After the February Revolution of 1917, Nicholas II abdicated his throne and took refuge with his family in a house in Yekaterinburg. The Czar, his wife, his son, his four daughters, his servants and family doctor were all killed in the same room by the Bolsheviks on the night of July 17, 1918. It has since been confirmed that Lenin ordered the clandestine killings from Moscow.

Veteran British journalist Robert Wilton explains in his cult classic, The Fall of the Romanovs, how the murder of the Tsar and his family was orchestrated entirely by Jews:

“The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indeliby impressed with the stamp of an alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov, and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, and Yorovsky, is the act not of the Russan people, but of this hostile invader.” (Robert Wilton, The Fall of the Romanovs, p.148).

John Kirby continues:

Even before Stalin came to power, countless numbers of Russians were killed by the Cheka, who were mainly made up of Jews.

Nobody, absolutely nobody, dares to mention this in the mainstream media.

We have been taught a false history, and the Jews have ridden to power on it. They have hi-jacked America and it will be difficult to break their grip.

Endote by Lasha Darkmoon

There are numerous articles on the internet giving exhaustive details of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution. I have myself made an initial attempt to tackle this subject, though far better and more scholarly articles than mine have been written on the Stalinist era and the preponderance of Jews in the Soviet government from 1917 to 1953, the year Stalin died or was secretly assassinated—reportedly by his Jewish doctors. (See “The Mass Murder of Russian Christians and the Destruction of their Churches.”)

All these people in the picture below were known as  “Stalin’s Jews”. They worked for him faithfully for decades as soon as he had acquired a secure foothold in the Soviet government after the death of Lenin. Though not all these were ethnic Jews (e.g., Felix Dzerzhinsky), all of them were either Jews, married to Jewesses or “Jewified non-Jews” (to use a phrase popularized by Albert Lindemann).

Bolsheviks-cut3It is important to note that Stalin himself was not a Jew but a Georgian, though he is often erroneously identified as a Jew by those who ought to know better.


“The unprecedented catastrophe of the Russian revolution required an explanation… For very many this lay in the coming to power of the Jews, and their hatred for the Russian people. For after the revolution of February, 1917, the Jews acquired full rights with the rest of the population, and the barriers set up by the Pale of Settlement were destroyed. Jews poured from the western regions into the major cities of European Russia and soon acquired prominent executive positions in all major sectors of government and the economy…. The mainly Jewish nature of the Bolshevik leadership—and of the world revolution in general—cannot be doubted….

“The Jews were especially dominant in the most feared and bloodthirsty part of the Bolshevik State apparatus, the Cheka, which, writes Brendon, “consisted of 250,000 officers (including 100,000 border guards). In the first 6 years of Bolshevik rule it had executed at least 200,000. Moreover, the Cheka was empowered to act as ‘policeman, gaoler, investigator, prosecutor, judge and executioner’. It also employed barbaric forms of torture….

“So complete was the Jewish domination of Russia as a result of the revolution that it is a misnomer to speak about the ‘Russian revolution’; it should more accurately be called the ‘Russian-Jewish revolution’.”

(Scroll down to “Bolshevism and the Jews”, here).

Here is a useful chart for reference purposes:

SOVIET GOVERNMENT, 1919.
The High Commissaries of the People in 1919,
two years after the Bolshevik Revolution:

ALIAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . REAL NAME. . . . . . . . ETHNICITY

Lenin ………………………..Oulianoff ……………….Partly Jewish
Trotsky……………………….Bronstein …………….. Jew
Stekloff ………………………Xachamress …………. Jew
Marloff………………………Zederbaum……………..Jew
Gottsief ………………………Prapkine………………  Jew
Kameneff……………………..Rosenfeld……………..Jew
Soukhanoff……………………Grimmer……………..Jew
Lagesky……………………….Krachmann…………..Jew
Bogdanoff ……………………Silberstein ……………Jew
Goreff…………………………Goldmann……………..Jew
Ouritsky………………………Radomselsky………….Jew
Voladarsky……………………Kohen…………………..Jew
Sverdloff ……………………..Sverdloff……………….Jew
Kamkoff ……………………..Katz ……………………..Jew
Gattesky………………………Eurstenberg…………..Jew
Dann…………………………Gourevitch………………Jew
Meshkovsky…………………..Goldberg……………..Jew
Parvus……………………… Gelphanat……………….Jew
Rossanoff……………………..Goldenbach………….Jew
Martinoff………………………Zimbar………………..Jew
Tehernomovsky……………Tehernomokdich……Jew
Pialnitzky………………………Levine…………………Jew
Adromovitch ………………….Rein…………………..Jew
Lointzeff……………………….Blechmann…………..Jew
Zvezditch………………………Fonstein………………Jew
Radek…………………………Sobelson………………..Jew
Litvinoff-Wallak………………Finkelstein…………Jew
Lunatcharsky………………….Lunatcharsky………Russian
Kolontai……………………….Kolontai………………..Russian
Peters…………………………Peters……………………..Lett
Macklakowsky………………. Rosenblum…………..Jew
Lapinsky……………………… Levenson………………Jew
Vobroff…………………………Natanson………………Jew
Ostodoks……………………….Akselrode……………..Jew
Gasine…………………………Gerfeldt………………….Jew
Glasounoff…………………… Schulze…………………Jew
Lebedieva………………………Limso…………………..Jew
Joffe……………………………..Joffe……………………..Jew
Kamensky………………………Hoffmann……………..Jew
Naout…………………………..Gunsbourg………………Jew
Lagorsky………………………..Krachmalnik………….Jew
Isgoeff………………………….Goldmann……………….Jew
Valdimiroff……………………..Feldmann……………..Jew
Bounakoff………………………Foundaminsky……….Jew
Manouilsky……………………..Manouilsky…………..Jew
Larine…………………………… Lourie…………………..Jew
Krassin…………………………..Krassin………………..Russian
Tchitcherin………………………Tchitcherin…………Russian
Goukovsky………………………Goukovsky…………..Russian

Soviet Government (1919): Summary

Bureaucracy……………..Total number………….Jews
Peoples Commissaries……………22……………………….17
Provincial Commissaries………  23……………………….21
Commissariat of War…………     43……………………….33
Foreign Affairs………………………16……………………….13
Finance…………………………………30………………………24
Justice…………………………………. 21……………………….20
Public Instruction…………………..53………………………42
Social Assistance……………………..6………………………..6
Labour……………………………………8………………………..7

Total number of Bolshevist Government officials in 1919 : 545 
Total number of JEWS in Bolshevist Government in 1919: 447

SOURCE (scroll down):  http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=13845

These two highly recommended articles should be read and carefully digested by all those who are interested in the Jewish Question:

1.  Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR, by Kevin MacDonald, annotated by Lasha Darkmoon

2. The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia’s Early Soviet Regime, by Mark Weber.

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

98 thoughts on “How to break the power of the Jews

  1. Good to check-in, here, and find such another INFORMATIVE article! (One of the finest features of the Darkmoon site is the unbridled commentary – from which this article was allegedly derived.)

    Will these wounds never heal? When do we (as non-jews) begin to feel content that the Jew is trying to assimilate himself into the community of humanity? Have not some jews made a pretty good effort? Does constantly reminding ourselves of past atrocities exacerbate the circumstance, or give it disappearing impact? While I consider it fortunate to have accesss to historic revelations such as this article – I have to wonder, sometimes, if we are not ‘whipping a dead horse’…. Because most Jews with whom I, myself, have interacted seem to be VOID of the dark proclivities required of Bolshevism.

    1. Nobody is void of dark proclivities. We are all capable of committing great evil. But that is an aside and not my main point. Having said that, I do understand where you are coming from.

      What I find most interesting about this particular article is the way in which Jews are identified. They are considered to be a separate entity. They cannot be Russian, or Chinamen, or anything but Jews. I don’t know, but I suppose it was in Germany that they first started to assimilate and try to be viewed as Germans. But in my opinion it took America to allow them to fully integrate.

      But have they really integrated into American life? To say they have would require that America is integrated. It is not. And I don’t think it ever was. Just look at the waves of immigrants starting with the Irish in the mid 19th Century through the Eastern Europeans in the early 20th. They were always separated and treated as chattel.

      I think those of us who are old enough to remember TV consisting of 3 networks and very limited local programming experienced the peak of integration due to this programming. But it was a myth. It was the new religion, was it not? God talked to you through the radio or the TV. It was the Gospel of the 20th Century. You are a farmer, Gilbert. You understand what broadcasting is, don’t you? In case you are exclusive a rancher, and for everyone else, I will mention that broadcasting is the automated version of casting seed into a field. It spins around and tosses the seed in an omnidirectional circle. Just like radio and television waves are transmitted.

      With the advent of cable, and more radio stations, etc., we have gone from broadcasting into an era of narrow casting. This is evident in magazines also and of course the internet.

      My point is that there is no assimilation. What existed at one time was simply the result of shared media experience and interaction. In other words, we all had exactly the same stuff inside our heads. Unfortunately it wasn’t very important stuff. For instance, Gilligan blew it again and the Skipper was ready to kill him. Until next week.

      We are now so fragmented that we no longer see eye to eye with most people we identify as belonging to the same group.

      I suppose this is a long winded way of just trying to state that what you call assimilation of Jews cannot be accurate, because in my view assimilation is a myth. It’s a great pretending. And it works because if you start to examine it you will quickly fall into despair and most people we interact with on a daily basis are in the same boat as us in that they are merely trying to survive by putting food on the table and keeping current on their tax bill so they can continue in the rat race. In other words, we are now mostly new serfs who have to give a large percent to the bankers through the government.

      The Jew is only ‘integrated” because we have disintegrated. If we had a common culture, the Jew would still be an outsider. Of course this disintegration began with the Protestant Deformation of the 16th Century. From there it was all downhill.

    2. Acutely true GH!

      “HOW TO BREAK THE POWER OF THE JEWS?”
      The answer is as simple as daring to use the word “JEW?”

      Yes, we know that “Lev Bronstein” and others of his ilk were Jews by birth, and bound by some common group dynamic which held them apart from the rest of society. Yet how do we account for the self-identification of the Russian and other European ‘revolutionists’ of the Bolshie type with the secular, anti-religious world view so common to their kind? Were they “Jews,” or were they the spawn of an ethnic sub-group which views the group itself, as “God?” If they hated Christianity – they most certainly did – is it not true that they hated all organized religions as well, including “Judaism?”

      What if the term ‘Jew’ is in itself a cloak, a coverup for a conspiracy which needs a group to which all blame can be attached, so as to better work its own way into the body politic unseen? To break the power of those who seek to break the gentile world to pieces, we may need to see through this screen of lies and distortions – and place ourselves in the shoes of they who would conquer by stealth, using “Jews” as their stalking horses.

      Talmudism and “Judaism” are not the same thing – we know this, because we know that there are, for instance, Karaite “Jews” who follow only the Old Testament teachings and regard the talmudic utterings as a heresy. Just as “Sionism” and “Judaism” are not the same thing. Sionism is a political program with a racialist theology attached, Judaism is a patriarchal theology with a millennialist project of redemption attached. Where they meet, that is the subject of most interest!

      All Jews are taught that a Messiah will come for them, at an unknown time, and that his arrival will lift them into a temporal ascendancy as a group. Two separate streams of Judaist millennialism which postulated their leader to be ‘the one’ came together in the form of a Sabbatean-Frankist movement by the late C18th, after battling both rabbinical Judaism and secular authority. Failed as Messiahs, their leaders kept a tight grip upon the imaginations of their followers, who were encouraged to ‘convert’ – only on surface, to Islam, or Christianity – becoming as they did, neither Jews nor Christians, nor Muslims, but something different from all. Their theology, at its heart, was simply the Gnostic vision of inversion. Inversion of values led to salvation – sin was purity, purity was sin. To ‘save’ the world it was necessary to sin.

      Neither pure Luciferianism nor Satanism, the theology of this group is not an inversion of Christianity so much as an erosion of values into a distillation of ‘evil’ as a guiding philosophy… that is, if you will accept the definition of evil as the deliberate despoliation of innocence and the quest for absolute power over others.

      We live in a world where the upper reaches of power are in the hands of men who are absolutely evil; the documentation of their carnal appetites, depravities, and rape, torture, murder of innocents is not deniable. It can only be ignored. Some of them are Jews – most are not. Yet all worship at the same altar of absolute evil. What is the power which has subverted them? Can it really be “the Jews” -when there are Jews who are not -absolutely evil?”

      Something is not making sense here, some further mystery needs be penetrated in order to proceed to the point where we “KNOW” the perpetrators and can without doubt hold them accountable. Are we not allowed to ‘name’ the Jew, because if we were to fully do so, we would find them to be but an empty cipher, and would therefore be forced to look at last, at the criminals behind the curtains? Criminals with blood ties to “Jews” and a cultural affiliation with “Judaism,” yet are neither Jews nor Jewish?

      “Breaking the power of the Jew” may yet come to involve, rather ironically, breaking the power of the spell which the word Jew has over us. Free at last of the fixation, unburdened by the obsession to make “the Jew” impossibly fit into the sole source of our dissolution and decay, we might at last find the means to reach the correct conclusions about both their ‘role’ and the role of the real perpetrators who remain hidden behind them.

      Yes, we have indeed been ‘taught a false history,’ Let us avoid further complication of our circumstances by merely substituting one false history for another, all of them imposed by the dialectical reasoning of – either this… or that!

      1. Thank you for articulating (so well!) thoughts for which I lack the education. Even though I am called-to-attention by the consideration of Kol Nidre (Thanks, Pat!), it remains that I have not seemed to have been victimized, specifically, by the general practice of that religious doctrine (at least, I have been unaware of it), and whatever therefrom I have lent myself to has been a product of ‘poor business’ insofar as my own conduct is concerned. Am I deceived? Quite possibly. By benefit of this fine collection of comments, I will endeavor to be more wary – and THAT is all anyone can possibly do in life and business. In fact, being made ‘aware’ is the purpose of all this investigation (or should be). 🙂 I can only conclude that, in general, we must be wary, BUT THAT DOESN’T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT ALL WHO HAVE ‘JEWISH’ ROOTS are in lock-step with its Talmudic design any more than all who have roots in Christianity are in lock-step with the teachings of Jesus. There are NO ‘perfect’ beings, and we can only righteously judge jews – or anyone – reflecting on our OWN imperfections, which are myriad.

      2. @ Toby

        I just sent you my first post of the day. I dated the post [ January 19th, 2016] and I numbered it as you requested I number my posts [ Post # 1] . The first sentence reads :

        “The most direct and efficacious way to defeat the Jew NWO is to reveal the biggest psyops in all of history ”

        The post was NOT long-winded. I don’t how many words exactly, but NOTHING close to 500 words. Probably about 80 words, around there. It was rather succinct, if I do say so myself. NOTHING close to how many words your pet “Ormanci” always uses, how your pet “Ormanci” just LERVS to go on and on pontificating in somewhat the same manner as “our” Fr. John is always sermonizing on and on without let-up.

      3. @ TROJ

        However short your comment is, I have no wish to publish it. We are discussing a serious topic here in case you haven’t noticed: the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and how to curb the power of the Jews. We are NOT discussing the geocentric theory of the universe. Stop wasting my time — and everyone else’s.

      4. We are granted, at best, only a few snippets of information with which to make our investigation of where the truth may be found. But since they are the only clues we have, we need use them.

        From the J Stone website yesterday, an example of such:

        “GyÃrgy Schwartz, better known to the world as George Soros, was born August 12, 1930 in Hungary. Soros’ father, Tivadar, was a fervent practitioner of the Esperanto language invented in 1887, and designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity. The Schwartz’s, who were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros, in order to facilitate assimilation into the Gentile population, as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930s.

        Soros has admitted to having carried some rather “potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.” Be that as it may. After WWII, Soros attended the London School of Economics, where he fell under the thrall of fellow atheist and Hungarian, Karl Popper, one of his professors. Popper was a mentor to Soros until Popper’s death in 1994. Two of Popper’s most influential teachings concerned “the open society,” and Fallibilism.

        Fallibilism is the philosophical doctrine that all claims of knowledge could, in principle, be mistaken. (Then again, I could be wrong about that.) The “open society” basically refers to a “test and evaluate” approach to social engineering. Regarding “open society” Roy Childs writes, “Since the Second World War, most of the Western democracies have followed Popper’s advice about piecemeal social engineering and democratic social reform, and it has gotten them into a grand mess.” ”

        Little by little, we could, had we the stamina and intent, find the answers we need from jigsaw pieces such as this one. “Non-practicing Jews” is actually code – if one knows who to read it – and the tell tale signs of the Sabbatean-Frankist Gnostic inversion of values is all over the visage of a guy like Soros.

        Lacking that stamina and intent, and the moral quality of respect for truth over polemics, we will however, always find it easier to just finger “the Jews” – which suits our real enemies just fine.

    3. The only people with stronger programming than the white mice of western civilization are Jews. Jews have over two thousand years of intensive religious programming that, to this day, governs every aspect of their lives and culture. Even Jewish atheists, like many of those in the Soviet Union, eventually come back to their mother religion.

      Why? Because Judaism is not about god. For Jews, god merely serves as a righteous, religious front for stealing the power and wealth of others so Jews can become gods incarnate. Is it any wonder that Christianity has come to reflect the exact same self-centered proclivities as Judaism?

      Some of the above statements bespeak an ignorance of both history and culture of the Jewish race. The reality is “The culture of blood has permeated the very core of Judaism until it has become a genetic component of their race.” Once again I will spell it out in detail for those failing to perceive the “dark proclivities” of the Jews. Note, this is a description of a ceremony well over 2500 years old.

      “The Torah originally referred to the first five books of the Old Testament. Leviticus, Deuteronomy, and Numbers contain the Levirate laws forming the basis of Judaism’s sacrificial system. The system was founded on the sacrifice of both blood offerings, in the form of specified animals, and non-blood offerings in the form of specified grains. In the early days of the sacrificial system, the Tabernacle was nothing more than a moving slaughterhouse, a place where priests butchered animals to atone for sins against their God, Yahweh. It is telling that only the best, “unblemished” animals could be offered for sacrifice.

      “The indication as to the true purpose of this system lay in the fact that priests took roughly ten percent of the choicest cuts of meat for themselves while burning the fat and viscera upon the altar as “sweet savor” to the lord. The remaining meat was then returned to the sinner. Think about this for a moment, the Lord God of the Israelites preferred fat and viscera to the prime cuts commanded by the priests.

      “After making their sacrifice, the Hebrew sinner was marked with blood. The blood was mixed with other bodily fluids and daubed on either the forehead or big toe. The mixture ensured longevity of the mark. The blood marking was visible proof that a tribesman had paid his “sin tax”. Later, this mark was washed off in a ritual purification bath called the Mikveh, at which time the sacrificial cycle began anew.

      “However, this marking system had one obvious, glaring drawback. Blood is a commonly available substance produced by the higher organisms. In their attempt to control the easily counterfeited blood mark, priests forbade their followers from butchering their own animals or even possessing the instruments for doing so. This was the primary reason for the kosher slaughter, a process where the living animal’s throat is slit to ensure the pumping heart will drain the blood as completely as possible. This also led to the prohibition of various implements and practices used in the butchering process. The priests defined these as “clean” or “unclean”, but think “legal” or “illegal”, as these are in fact legalistic dictates that have almost nothing to do with hygiene.

      “Any contact with blood was strictly prohibited, like that produced by menstruating women or “lepers”, which meant anyone with running sores. As a result, a byzantine legal structure arose to control the minutiae of everyday life. There is a forgettable tract in the Mishna that elaborates on the cleanliness of a bowl. The upshot of this legal commandment is that if a bowl in intact, then it is unclean; but if the bowl is smashed into pieces of which the largest piece is no larger than the tip of a man’s little finger, then it is clean. This makes absolutely no sense unless one understands the bowl in question can be used to hold and mix blood products.

      “Eventually the phylactery replaced the blood marking. This was a small box attached to the forehead or the back of the wrist holding a scroll with a passage from the Torah. The scroll changed in accordance with the sacrificial cycle; and like tabs on a license plate, could be checked as proof that Temple followers were current on their tribute. Despite this modification, Levirate laws concerning blood products remained in full force.

      “Imagine yourself as the young child of a primitive, nomadic, tribesman. Having heard only stories, you are dimly aware of the importance of a much talked about, upcoming ritual. You are aware this ritual occurs on a regular basis. The anxiousness of your parents is palpable when discussing the subject.

      “On the prescribed day, the ritual begins. You follow your parents down to a running stream. A man, richly attired in strange garb, stands in the water. One by one, your neighbors walk into the stream where the man mutters strange words as he immerses them while rubbing their forehead with the palm of his hand. After your father has undergone the ritual immersion, you note the red mark on his forehead has disappeared. The ritual continues until every adult in the village has undergone immersion. Someone nearby whispers “The sacred cycle has ended.”

      “The following day, your mother wakes you earlier than usual. Your family spends the morning carefully preparing for the coming activities. You want to play with your friends, but your mother insists you attended to her demands, so you accompany your father as he goes out among his meager collection of animals. He spends quite a bit of time inspecting the herd until he finally chooses a prized ewe. This animal happens to be one of your favorites. You have often played with the sheep, chasing them around the meadows. When you finally caught one, you buried your face in its soft wool, taking delight in the earthy aroma. It is the smell of life and life seems to be everywhere among the hills where the herds roam.

      “Later that morning, your father takes you by the hand and with animal in tow, you find yourself dragged to a portable slaughterhouse your parents refer to as the “Tabernacle.” Here you are to witness the important ritual they have been discussing over the preceding weeks. You enter a large enclosure surrounded by a fence made of white cloth. In the middle of the enclosure is an odd tent-like structure with rude, wooden columns and woven tapestries covering the entrances. Soon, other families begin arriving with their animals.

      “Eventually the ceremony begins. A neighbor steps forward to present a prized calf to one of several strangely dressed men, like those you saw at the stream the day before. Your parents refer to these men as “priests”. One by one, sinners step forward to present these priests with their prized animal.

      “Your neighbor drops to his knees in front of a priest, closes his eyes and begins chanting something unintelligible. While witnessing this spectacle, your father grabs your hand and places it alongside his own on the prized ewe. You can feel its heart racing as the animal transmits its terror though the palm of your hand. The priest takes hold of the head of the struggling animal and wrestling it to the ground, with quick, practiced motion, slits its throat with his razor sharp knife. The animal struggles, kicking and bleating in protest, as geysers of blood erupts from its jugular vein. A froth of blood spews forth, splattering you and everyone present. You can feel the spark of life draining out through its hide as the stillness of death overcomes it. You look down at the viscous, red, fluid splattered on the front of your robe, staring with revulsion at the red stains spreading into the fibers. The stench of death assaults your nostrils, addling your senses.

      “As the animal ceases struggling, you look up from your bloodstained robe to see a priest-butcher moving quickly to catch some of the blood in a golden bowl before it finishes saturating the ground. Muttering strange incantations with eyelids half closed, he seems to be in a trance. Then with a shout, he lifts the golden bowl skyward at arms length before splashing the rapidly congealing blood over and around the base of the altar. The priest comes out of his trance to begin eviscerating the animal. During this process, the bloody guts are laid aside so they can later be burned on the altar as sweet savor to a god with an abiding taste for burnt fat and viscera.

      “In just a few strokes, the priest-butcher finishes his gory task. Working rapidly, he begins butchering the animal. Separating the portions of meat, he carefully lays aside a large portion of the best cuts for himself, before returning the remaining meat to your father who, by now, has provided the priest full admission of his sins.

      “After the act is complete, the priest produces a smaller bowl with a cupful of the animal’s blood. He mixes this with other bodily fluids, some that smell like semen. Using his thumb, the priest-butcher smears a large daub of the mixture on the forehead of the entranced, chanting sinner kneeling before him. Then, with a loud shout, he declares that by this act, your father’s sins have been forgiven.

      “Your father staggers to his feet and like a drunk on a binge, lurches away from the butchering table with a beatific look on his face, even as the priest calls for the next sinner to step forward. Suddenly you feel the full emotional horror of the fate awaiting the other animals brought to this slaughterhouse. All the while, these men called priests, howl, chant and dance about, reciting their ritualistic incantations that beg god’s forgiveness. It must have been a horrifically, bloody spectacle.

      “The bloodlust continues well into evening. What you never witness is the secret ceremony inside the Tabernacle’s tent where the high priest in a final act of crazed bloodlust, drinks the sacrificial blood before the mercy seat. The Levirate injunction against consuming blood is a public admonishment to restrict the use of blood products. However, the priesthood exempted itself from its own laws and secretly does not observe such restrictions.

      “This covert act, along with the more acceptable act of consuming sacrificial meat, will later be replayed by Jesus during his last supper, when he symbolically offers wine and bread representing his body and blood to his disciples. A few days later, the priests fold their Tabernacle tent and move on. They will move to the next tribe where the sacrificial cycle will again be played out.

      “Consider the effect this gruesome spectacle might have on a child. Blood spewing everywhere, chanting priests mesmerized in crazed bloodlust, driven on by the howling and grunting of animals bleeding out the last of their life on the ground. The cacophony is accompanied by the restless bleating and bellowing of animals, awaiting their fate. Sinners, with hands raised towards heaven, cry out for god’s forgiveness. Imagine your parents continually consumed with the thought of blood and the avoidance of it, thoughts that translate into an unnatural obsession about the stuff.

      “Picture your priest as a butcher. Imagine going to church on Sunday and seeing the priest slitting the throat of various parishioners pets at the alter and catching the blood in a golden bowl. After bleeding out the animal, he splashes its blood around the altar while dancing around in a trance-like state, chanting pleas to God for the forgiveness of sins and begging for salvation.

      “After the service, you say to your spouse, ‘That certainly was a different sermon this week wasn’t it dear?’ She replies, ‘Oh I don’t know, next week is communion, when we eat the body of Christ and drink his blood. Speaking of that, let’s hurry to the restaurant before the church crowd gets there.’

      “Extrapolating this bloody horror out over generational millennium, has led to the creation of a psychopathic culture of bloodlust. This psychopathy is not a preference, not a peculiar, incidental, twist in a few exceptional personalities, but a culturally inbred condition; one that can neither be altered, nor escaped. The culture of blood has permeated the very core of Judaism until it has become a genetic component of their race.”

      Thus, while the “dark proclivities” of the Jews may remain hidden, there is no doubt these lay just under the surface within the Jew’s reptilian brain.

      1. One more paragraph and Stanton would have a complete manuscript to turn into a 666 page book on the subject. And a short paragraph at that, just one more paragraph for a complete book, and it wouldn’t even have to be a long paragraph.

        In the meantime, my “long” posts get censored all the time. Heck, even my medium-length posts get censored all the time. Fuck, even my very short and very succinct posts get censored all the time. In the meantime, Stanton’s “short” posts are about 100 times longer then my shortest posts, but I’m the one who writes “long” posts.

      2. @ TROJ

        You need to get another occupation. None of your comments are even remotely relevant to what we are discussing here. 50% of them are angry rants filled with obscenities, and the other 50% are attacking ever single commenter on this site who has anything of interest to say. Is it really so hard for you to make a short, polite, on-topic comment?

    4. Gilbert,
      I don’t recollect how many times did I bring up the NINETY-SIX PERCENT (96%) figure in the last week, namely a properly sampled survey by a professional demographic study firm in Israel, of Jewish attitudes (in Israel and diaspora, identical results) toward the repeated massacres and bombing demolitions of Gaza people and infrastructure.
      The stated support is, I repeat what I have repeatedly repeated: NINETY-SIX PERCENT (96%).
      If anyone thinks the survey publisher is lying, take it up with them.
      (None of the Jews I know are liars 😀 )
      And I will go so far as to question whether the remaining 4% are in fact the mythical Good Jews.
      Because surely among them, there are mythical Smart Jews who see the killing campaign as contributing more damage to the Ancient Project than it’s worth in terms of national orgasm they get through it.
      So, to be fair, maybe 2% are seriously good ones, 1 in 50.
      Worldwide.

      Now, let’s suppose that you know that some parasite is ravaging your main cash crop and of the entire county, farmer buddies crying in their brew how some damn bow weevil devoured their marijuana crop so that in a normal year, a million dollar yield was reduced to $20,000, barely enough to grease the axles of the mighty Deere, Caterpillar and Kubota machinery you run.
      But your shift supervisor Jose comes to you with the likely story, No worries señor Gilberto, all of ours is fine, no te preocupes.
      How likely is the likely story?

      Bees and hornets may look alike but try asking for hornet honey in a shop, see where it gets you.

    5. ” … the Jew is trying to assimilate himself into the community of humanity?have not jews made a pretty good effort?”

      No, they’re NOT. They ID themslves as jews. When you ask them, they say, ” they’re jewish.” NOT, American, or Italians, or Russians. Not as Human Beings, or from this Earth. Plain and simple. Their loyalties lie with their own. They’re are a “People apart.” Their own words. Both Race AND religion.

  2. Q: How to break the power of the Jews?

    A: Look for the pimp who employs the Jewish whores – that’s where the real power is – and break his backbone.

    It is a historical mission of Russia for the 21st century, folks. Your job is to relax, sit back, and enjoy the show.

  3. Considering the information in this article, is it any wonder that America has become the USSA, a Union of Socialist States of America? Is it any wonder Americans are seeing a massive, Soviet style, centralization of government powers? Is it any wonder that America now has government agencies as diverse as the Coast Guard, FBI, TSA, NSA, the Pentagon, Department of Justice, Department of the Interior, all umbrellaed under the Orwellian, Soviet styled, and named, “Department of Homeland Security?”

    Is it not obvious that this tiny minority of elite Jewish parasites are reforming America to suit their hive-minded activities in the very same manner as they reformed the Soviet Union to suit their needs? Therefore, is it not reasonable to conclude that at some point, America will receive the very same mass murder treatment meted out to the Russian citizenry?

    Total number of Bolshevist Government officials in 1919: 545
    Total number of JEWS in Bolshevist Government in 1919: 447

    Jews in the Bush Administration
    ——————————————————————————–
    Jews in the American government – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAc0W57Tkvg

    Seven minutes of unelected Jewish representative names that served under the Bush administration. Can anyone produce a similar list of those evil “Nadzees” or Muslims holding key positions of power within the American government?

    Archived on July 19, 2004 from http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/bushjews.html where it appeared under the title of “Jewish Virtual Library” in accordance with the “fair use” provision of copyright law for use as research, educational, and scholarly investigation and study which is the focus of the scholarly website Jew Watch.

    Ari Fleischer (2001-2003)
    White House Press Secretary

    Josh Bolten
    Deputy Chief of Staff

    Ken Melman
    White House Political Director

    David Frum (2001-2002)
    Speechwriter

    Brad Blakeman
    White House Director of Scheduling

    Dov Zakheim (2001-2004)
    Undersecretary of Defense (Controller)

    Paul Wolfowitz
    Deputy Secretary of Defense

    I. Lewis Libby (Liebowitz)
    Chief of Staff to the Vice President

    Adam Goldman (2001-2003)
    White House Liaison to the Jewish Community

    Tevi Troy (2003-2004)
    White House Liaison to the Jewish Community

    Noam Neusner (2004-)
    White House Liaison to the Jewish Community

    Chris Gersten
    Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families at HHS

    Elliott Abrams
    Director of the National Security Council’s Office for Democracy, Human Rights and International Operations

    Mark D. Weinberg
    Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs

    Douglas Feith (2001- )
    Under Secretary of Defense for Policy

    Michael Chertoff
    Head of the Justice Department’s criminal division

    Daniel Kurtzer
    Ambassador to Israel

    Cliff Sobel
    Ambassador to the Netherlands

    Stuart Bernstein
    Ambassador to Denmark

    Nancy Brinker
    Ambassador to Hungary

    Frank Lavin
    Ambassador to Singapore

    Ron Weiser
    Ambassador to Slovakia

    Mel Sembler
    Ambassador to Italy

    Martin Silverstein
    Ambassador to Uruguay

    Jay Lefkowitz (2001-2004)
    Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council

    Blake Gottesman
    President’s personal aide

    John Miller
    Director, State Department Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

    Michael Chertoff
    Secretary, Homeland Security

    1. Great points here. I will add the new phenomenon which some call the Israeliazation of the local police departments. Soon they will be treating us like the Jews treat the Palestinians.

      What makes America so great for this Sovietization is that it is done with a smiley face. The Soviets had the jackboot we have the feelies. Orwell vs Huxley.

      1. Exactly….”When fascism comes to America, it will not be in brown and black shirts. It will not be with jack-boots. It will be Nike sneakers and Smiley shirts.” – George Carlin

  4. Good post, Arch.
    Wasn’t Chertoff also a dual national Israeli? I used to think that the US government didn’t allow its officials to be dual nationals.

    1. Felix –

      Chertoff sold all the airport body scanners to US.

      Conflict of interest??? I believe so.

      Body Scanners Create Profits for Chertoff and Others

      Expanding the use of full-body scanners at airports will improve the nation’s security, says the Obama administration.

      It also will benefit the manufacturers of the equipment, including those lobbying on their behalf, like former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.

      Chertoff’s consulting firm, the Chertoff Group, represents OSI Systems, one of two companies licensed to sell full-body scanners to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). OSI, maker of the Rapiscan machine, garnered attention recently because its CEO, Deepak Chopra (no relation to the spiritual author and speaker), was invited to travel with President Barack Obama on his trip to India.

      The arrangement demonstrated the closeness of the company with the White House, and the trip was a potential money-maker for OSI, now that India plans to install scanners at its airports in the wake of the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

      http://www.allgov.com/news/where-is-the-money-going/body-scanners-create-profits-for-chertoff-and-others?news=841793

      1. I saw a video recently, where a so-called “airport security” freak, spent twenty minutes rubbing his hands all over the body of a fourteen year old girl, in front of her father..

    2. When I was a child this was the case. Only in rare instances were Americans allowed dual citizenship. For example, a child born to parents serving overseas in the military could, if allowed by foreign law, maintain a dual citizenship with the country in which they were born. I well remember the awe I experienced when I met a few of these children boasting of their foreign citizenship.

      Dual citizens were not allowed to serve in government for the very reason of potentially conflicting interests. When and where these laws changed remains a mystery to me. However, there can be no doubt exactly what group of minority parasites were behind opening up American legal standards to dual citizenship. After all, these are a people who have long considered themselves “cosmopolitan internationalists” and now “globalists.”

      Dual citizenship also serves their open immigration policies, as immigrants can later return home, as with the case of the migrant Mexican workers who avail themselves of American government largess before returning to their motherland. While Mexicans can return home to Mexico, where can white Americans return home to?

      Like so many other laws, citizenship laws have been slowly redefined and restructured until they are antithetical to their original intent. Since ancient times, the Jew’s primary means of shaping a culture has always been through the power of the law. They know nothing invokes both fear and respect among the masses of gullible goyim like the words – “IT’Z DA LAW!” Why else would there be so many law and cop programs oozing out from Hollywood’s studio latrines?

      Jews know that law is invariably held sacrosanct among the gullible masses and as masters of Talmudic law, the control of any nations laws is a slam-dunk proposition for the crafty Jew. One of the first things Hitler did was to remove Jews from Germany’s utterly corrupt legal system. And from the moment Hitler revised Germany’s legal policies, the moribund German corpse, strangled by the legality of its Versailles noose, began to revive.

      1. Arch –

        The ‘oozings’ come under purview of CIA’s Operation Mockingbird:
        Most Americans are under the influence of TV and radio sources for the daily dose of propaganda. Not understanding they are being lied to and made to believe a lie, it becomes a formidable task to get folks to see the light. They want to see, it’s just the lie is so big, so pervasive at this point it is hard for people to grasp the size of the depth and breadth the lie has reached.

        http://www.activistpost.com/2015/01/propaganda-101-operation-mockingbird.html

        Video:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCfTIapds0

  5. The blind leading the blind! You all fail to see what should be obvious – what should be the proverbial big pimple on the end of your nose.

    We do not have a Jewish problem, and we do not have a Negro problem, and we do not have a third-world problem. What we have is a white problem. Jews represent about 2.5% of the total US population and not much more than 1% in most western democracies. Blacks are stupid, inept and lazy as are the remainder of the featherless bipeds in the non-white world.

    Whites have lost their willingness to be tough. They have lost their willingness to make hard decisions – decisions that are anything but politically correct. Whites are trying too hard to be nice – to be fashionable – to look good. We must abandon this madness and all the spiritual poisons that created it, especially that most foul of all spiritual poisons – Christianity. When whites become tough again all the problems will disappear – perhaps overnight. And we all know what must happen to ‘kick-start’ whites again – a real taste of racial reality – not just somewhere else but right outside your door. I see this happening in Europe and much sooner than most people think.

    Above my office desk I have an amusing photo. It was taken in Africa. In the background is a vulture and in the foreground a picaninny. I have put a caption under it that reads; “all good things to those who wait.”

    For those who think I am being inhuman may I suggest a read of a recent article on the New Observer entitled; “Year in Nonwhite NYC School Cures Liberal.” This link should get you there:

    http://newobserveronline.com/year-in-nonwhite-nyc-school-cures-liberal/

    1. “We do not have a Jewish problem, and we do not have a Negro problem, and we do not have a third-world problem. What we have is a white problem.”

      Really? So how might one explain National Socialist Germany? If it is a “white problem,” why wasn’t National Socialist Germany beset with the problems currently extant among all white western nations?

      Why did Germany rapidly return to its former status of a healthy, productive, nation as soon as it expelled the Jews to once again become a white society? If it is a white problem, why didn’t NS Germany fall into the same patterns now seen, not only in America, but in all white western nations?

      And why is it solely a white problem? Why don’t the third world countries suffer from problems like mass immigration that displaces its native citizenry? Is it because they are not white or because they are not overwhelmed by Jews manipulating their immigration laws?

      And how might one explain Africa? Was the mass murder of whites throughout Africa simply because of a white problem? Do we absolve Joe Slovo of all responsibility for the ANC which has led to the destruction of white Africans?

      Those wanting to blame whites for the social ills do so at the risk of mistaking symptoms for the disease.

      1. Arch:

        I love your enthusiasm but again you are not seeing the big picture. If white people focused exclusively on their interests as a racial group none of what you detail would have occurred.

        Though I have a PhD in Chemistry I do love history, and of particular interest to me is the history of European settlement on the African continent. There are two events worth mentioning of what whites can do when they act according to their own racial interests.

        “The Battle of Blood River is the name given for the battle fought between 470 Voortrekkers (“Pioneers”), led by Andries Pretorius, and an estimated 15,000–21,000 Zulu attackers on the bank of the Ncome River on 16 December 1838, in what is today KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Casualties amounted to 3,000 of king Dingane’s soldiers dead, including two Zulu princes competing with prince Mpande for the Zulu throne. Three Pioneers commando members were lightly wounded, including Pretorius himself.”

        “The Battle of Rorke’s Drift, also known as the Defence of Rorke’s Drift, was a battle in the Anglo-Zulu War. The defence of the mission station of Rorke’s Drift, under the command of Lieutenant John Chard of the Royal Engineers, and Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead immediately followed the British Army’s defeat at the Battle of Isandlwana on 22 January 1879, and continued into the following day, 23 January. Just over 150 British and colonial troops successfully defended the garrison against an intense assault by 3,000 to 4,000 Zulu warriors. The massive, but piecemeal Zulu attacks on Rorke’s Drift came very close to defeating the tiny garrison but were ultimately repelled. Eleven Victoria Crosses were awarded to the defenders, along with a number of other decorations and honours.”

        In the case of Rorke’s drift my British ancestors showed the blacks what a white man can do to defend his land with the aid of a Martini-Henry rifle, a British bayonet and a lot of will power.
        The American also have a saying “Remember the Alamo.”

        When the time comes you will need to ask yourself I am white and I must think only in terms of what is good for white people.

        The reason the Jews are so successful is because they think as a race with the best interests of the Jewish race as their primary motive for action.

        Whites are too busy trying to be fashionable, trying not to offend other races, feeling guilty for being better than the other races in all the skills necessary to build a civilization and maintain it.

        I hope the time will come when I have a chance to use my Martini-Henry for the interests of white people. My great-grandfather affectionately called it a “Zulu stopper” and he was right.

      2. You are forgetting something whitey, Africa was, and is, the land of Africans, whitey was the invader, what`s good for the goose, right!

      3. “Whites are too busy trying to be fashionable, trying not to offend other races, feeling guilty for being better than the other races in all the skills necessary to build a civilization and maintain it.”

        Precisely my point. Who is responsible for programming whites to follow this narrow, self-absorbed path? Sans Jews there would be nowhere near the number of dumbed down whites that presently inhabit the western world.

        “The American also have a saying, “Remember the Alamo.” Not to belabor the point, but the Alamo was a holding action. The defenders knew they would not survive the onslaught. These men intentionally sacrificed themselves to save the remaining Texicans. So what happened between 1837 and the twenty-first century? – Jewish infiltration of America and its culture.

        When you look at these websites, it is clear that not everyone of the white race have fallen so low. But the massive proportion that have, are ruling the day. One thing that has long bothered me is that no one ~ NO ONE ~ ever took me aside in my youth and said, “Let me tell you who runs the world and how they do it.”

        Surely not everyone was in the dark during those years. The Jews program their children with hatred and derision for the goyim, why couldn’t white people provide fair warning about Jews for their offspring? It took me 45 years to figure out on my own the reason behind those problems that baffled not only me, but my peers as well. Fortunately however, I have a GED in stupidity. As soon as I started hitting these problems with the Jew stick, the answers became clear, making perfect sense out of what had seemed nonsense.

        Jews have pretty much sewn up the impossibility of informing the youth of today of their inherited realty. If not for Talmudvision programming, then the “see something say something” mentality, i.e be a squealer, be a rat, will soon alert the legal squirrels about the loose nut talking to children. With today’s laws it is far too easy to be slapped with a hate crime or the charge of “pedophilia” or child abuse.

        One of the primary rules of a communist takeover is to take hold of the minds of the children. Since the Jews wrote the big book of communism, it stands to reason why such laws are now in place.

      4. @Ingrid B

        “…Africa is and was the land of the Africans…”

        This shows both your ignorance and your double standards. First of all, Africa is not a “land” but a continent. If by “Africans” you mean Blacks, then you forget that North Africans are not Black but Caucasian. There is some admixture with Blacks, especially in Egypt, but the basic stock in North Africa is Caucasian. Berbers in the Atlas mountains can be blond and blue eyed. Here are some examples :

        http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1LUpSIWLWHs/UlLhQTArRAI/AAAAAAAABYU/le0CYhX6JWg/s1600/Amazingh_tribe_caucasian.jpg

        These people are genuine “Africans”. North Africa never was originally Black.

        Originally Blacks only lived in West Africa and the Sahel. The rest of Africa was populated by Pygmies and Bushmen. The whole of Sub-Sahara Africa became Black through – yes that’s the correct term – COLONIZATION. From around 500 B.C. Bantu tribes began to fan out over the continent from the region of Nigeria, driving the Pygmies into the jungle and the Bushmen to the South. Eventually the Bushmen were driven into the Kalahari desert of South Africa. About the same time the Dutch landed on the Cape, Bantus were entering the East of South Africa. The Bantus therefore are as much “colonizers” of South Africa as are the Dutch. Due to the good treatment by the Dutch (“apartheid” or not) the South African Bantus increased enormously in number, from the original about 1,5 million to the present 44 million. The idea, popular among “anti-racists”, that South Africa was originally a Black country, colonized by wicked racist Whites is wrong.

        And Ingrid, if you so much stress that “Africa is for the Africans”, why don’t you alsdo say that “Europe is for the Europeans” and send your beloved Congolese “refugee” neighbors home? But of course you have double standards : Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, but Europe for everyone!

      5. Franklin,

        When you choose to make ‘history’ a valuable in your tool box, you have an excellent grasp of it!

        I just about choked the other day here when reading the words of one of the ‘whites only’ factionalists to the effect that the inhabitants of North Africa were originally black – a claim so spurious as to cause one to cringe at the net effect of all these ‘whites are more intelligent/important etc.,’ blatherings – which is pretty much to demonstrate the opposite. You have written much the same as I would have, in correction – but one can only cover so much ground here, and needs therefore, stick to their priorities.

        So, with us both agreed as to the value and necessity of history for the presentation of truth, let us go back, at the appropriate time, to the ‘debate’ in which you argued for removing history from the allowable arguments, and resume that conversation with it once again back in its right place.

      6. That was rude. Let me, an ignoramus, pose a question Franklin. If Africa is not composed of earth/land, then it must be composed of another element, which would that be Franklin?

      7. @Ingrid

        The thing is, dear Ingrid, that words mostly have more than one meaning. Which one is applicable depends on the context. The word “land” can mean :

        1) Solid part of earth’s surface.
        2) Ground, soil, expanse of country.
        3) Country, nation, state.

        It is clear from the context that when you say “Africa is the land of Africans”, you mean the third meaning, and Africa is not a country, nation or state but it is a continent. And even as a continent it never was the exclusive habitat of black Africans, but also of Whites, who lived in North Africa long before the Bantus spread all over Sub-Sahara Africa.

    2. White Warrior –

      You write ‘…that most foul of all spiritual poisons – Christianity’, and fantasize someone considering the validity of your words. Indeed, sir! Are you mad – or just stupid??! I just finished reading a commentary in the Washington Post about a discussion going on in the British Parliament over whether or not to ‘ban’ Donald Trump from Great Britain, parliamentarians citing his ‘racism’, ‘miscogyny’, and phobia of foreigners (!). OK, fine. As an American, I’d be GLAD to feel no consanguinity with those arrogant little fucks (they’re thought of as being ‘white’, aren’t they?), and, if Mr. Trump should become President, we, as a nation, should feel no compulsion to rush to the assistance of Britain, ever again. (Are they mad – or just stupid??!)

      Those of you who are constantly ranting Christ-bashers and self-professed atheists on this site do your causes no service. You are like the little Brits in Parliament, behaving like petulant brats! 🙂

    3. Kind of reminds me of this: “Everything for everyone and nothing for ourselves” – (Para todos todo, para nosotros nada). A Zapatista slogan…

    4. WHITE_WARRIOR
      January 19, 2016 at 9:03 pm

      “Blacks are stupid, inept and lazy as are the remainder of the featherless bipeds in the non-white world.”

      ABSOLUTE NONSENSE.

  6. Irrelevant Ingrid!

    This white man lives by the best principles of his race. We took America because we wanted it. We took Australia because we wanted it. We took Africa because we wanted it. We took these lands because we knew we could use them in ways that the natives could not. Look at Australia for example. A barren, hostile wilderness – an arid land, which had for 60,000 years been inhabited by a Neolithic people with an average IQ of 67. In less than 200 years Europeans turned this barren wasteland into a modern society with cities the equal of Europe.

    Why?

    Because we could!! Because we could use the land in infinitely superior ways to the way the Aboriginal had used it.

    The aboriginal now lives in a better society – a more literate society – a society he could never have built. He has benefited by our hard work, our industry and our intellect.

    Regarding South Africa! The Zulu like the White was a recent settler. Zulus arrived in South Africa about 100 years before the whites. When the Zulus arrived they systematically went about killing the natives – also blacks.

    You might want to review the history of the Rwandan genocide to see what blacks do to other blacks. Let us stop the noble savage bullshit right here and right now!!

    1. Taking other peoples lands, and properties is theft, just ask the jews, your attitude makes you no better, a common criminal. makes me wonder why the whites feel they are so hard done by, why they have to bleat like jew all the time, anyone would think they were the victims..

  7. Arch:

    Even if Jews disappeared from the face of the earth this very minute we would still have problems. Our problems stem from our unique psychology as a race – kindness, generosity, honour, duty, right and wrong, etc, etc. These things are good and were necessary for us as we developed as a people. They enabled us to succeed where other races failed, but today these things are used against us by the Jews.

    The facts are simple – we as a race must be geographically separated from other races so we can work out our needs. Even without the Jew peace will not come until whites have only themselves to think about. We cannot be distracted by the blight of the blacks or the browns or the yellows. They must solve their own problems and the only way we can solve ours is not to be distracted with their problems.

    The worst thing we did in Africa was to give them access to our medical science. Why? For every black that does not starve to death, they will breed another 8 starving blacks. As a race they are a complete failure and they will take us down with them. Whites need to forget about them and concentrate on whites. Those whites who cannot reprogram themselves they too can go and live with the blacks – we are better off without them.

    1. Something here that I am trying to get past without success:

      Our problems stem from our unique psychology as a race – kindness, generosity, honour, duty, right and wrong, etc, etc.

      So if we ditch this unique psychology of ours that distinguish us as a race, what then, what are we?

      Like a post-op transvestite who changes ITS mind and wants to revert to HE.
      (Though it seems that this is exactly what we have become … only Russians are still standing)

  8. Shit! I didn’t know Africa was white, I always though Africa was black and North Africa was Arab; so if Africa is white where did so many black people come from?
    Ahh! But thank you White Warrior (Franklyn’s alter ego) for saying it like it is,
    “Africa is black yes”, but “we took it ’cause we could”
    “America is Cherokee -and other tribes- but we took it
    ‘Cause we could”
    “Australia (where is max?) Is aboriginal but we took it ’cause we could” …
    That’s how I like it, just say it like it is ..
    “We are pirates
    And
    Buccaneers,
    We are not just Soldiers… We are not just Warriors… We are Vikings, Homeboy!
    And we would do it all over again!
    “But sigh them God Damned jews somehow got all the money and gold we got from all those endevours and trips we made robbing and killing people the world over for the last thousand years and -with the exception of a few wasp families- who are conditional partners to the crafty Jew- they got all the money and therefore all the power in the fuckin world! Have you ever seen Mac Cain’s face at Aipac’s, wearing a smoking and an ugly, short tie and shit? how it glitters every time he sees a Jew, almost like he just saw Jesus? But no, the rest of us, seven hundred million whites aren’t invited to AIPAC ’cause we are poor mechanics, plumbers, electricians and farmers whose children are sent to faraway wars for the jews, by orders from the Jews who run our governments … and they have to go to those wars so they can get college cookie points, but … They comeback either crippled or fu cked up up here and many end up kicking the bucket by suicide (which is better otherwise they’ll be robbing people to get high on meth),
    But what can we do?
    How can we curve the power of them jews?
    Maybe Rickaert could answer this question instead of arguing by lying about Africa’s demonym

    1. @Avatar

      “…Shit! I didn’t know Africa was white, I always though Africa was black and North Africa was Arab; so if Africa is white where did so many black people come from..?”

      Your ignorance and incapacity to read is staggering. I said NORTH Africa always was white. Those people spoke Hamitic languages, like many Berbers still do. In the 7th century North Africa was COLONIZED by Muslim Arabs, who imposed their religion and language on the local population, but not entirely. There is still a considerable number of Berbers in Morocco and Algeria who kept their language.

      Originally Bantu-speaking Blacks only lived in West Africa, while Nilo-Saharan-speaking Blacks lived in the Sudan. In the Horn of Africa lived the Hamitic speaking Kushites, who are racially a mixture of Caucasians and Negroids. Their descendants are the Somalians. Later on Semites from Yemen settled in Ethiopia and mixed with the local population. Their descendants are the Ethiopians.

      The rest of Sub-Sahara Africa was sparsely populated by Pygmies and Bushmen. That part of Africa has been COLONIZED by Bantu-speaking Blacks since about the 5th century B.C. and only then became Africa the proverbial “Black continent”.

      The Bantus of South Africa have as little or as much right to South Africa as the Boers and they owe the phenomenal increase of their number solely to the goodness of the Boers.

      If you object to the history of White colonization of North America and Australia, then surely you also object to the history of Arab imperialism, but I still have to meet the first Arab who does so.

      1. Tour de force Franklin.

        Effin tour de force [!]… if I may say so! You have grown in my estimation by leaps and bounds, all in the space of a day. I begin to suspect, you have have, like myself, ‘come alive’ at the horns blast of pending battle.

        A worthy opponent indeed. The stuff every knight longed for in the days when we were still – men worthy of the name. Palestine needs a new champion here – the Goliath of old is not available for retreading further, after that complete demolition. Bravo, Sir.

      2. Wise words indeed Ms Ingrid/

        in light of which, allow me to suggest that you cancel any notions of a middle eastern speaking tour, in favor of staying at home – as a kind of \alternative\ Norwegian Nation Wealth Fund.

        That way, seems all would be well served, and by minding your own knitting, the chances of spinning a silk purse out of a sow’s ear would be greatly enhanced!

        your most,
        etc., etc.,

      3. @ Ormanci

        Thanks for the compliment. History is important. One should always base one’s arguments on historical facts ( and not on historical myths, no matter how “political correct” at the moment ). Historical parallels could be indications of present motives, but are in itself no proof thereof.

        If you are interested in historical atlases for quick reference, I can heartily recommend the series written by Colin McEvedy, edited by Penguin Books :

        The Penguin Atlas of Ancient History.
        The Penguin Atlas of Medieval History.
        The Penguin Atlas of Modern History (to 1815).
        The Penguin Atlas of Recent History (Europe since 1815).
        The Penguin Atlas of North American History, to 1870.
        The Penguin Atlas of African History, from which I drew my present information.
        These are thin, broad booklets with handy maps.

        For world demographic information, see : Colin McEvedy and Richard Jones : Atlas of World Population History, also edited by Penguin Books. The latter work will arm you against such outrageous statements of people like Rehmat, who avers that Whites transported 100 million Blacks from Africa as slaves (it was only 11 million), or killed 160 million Indians in North America, while there were at most only 3 million Indians at that time, or the statement by “Justice for Chinese” (in his video) that the opium trade on China killed 600 million Chinese, while there were only 300 million Chinese at that time.

        As for our last discussion. I think part of the disagreement between us is that you are inclined to think that because Jews are wicked and strife for world domination, they are capable of anything, even of the attempt at territorial expansion in the Middle East “from the Nile to the Euphrates”, of which I think I have sufficiently demonstrated not only that it is militarily, politically and demographically impossible, but also that the Israelis have shown no behavior in the past that such foolish endeavor is indeed their intention. All my critics, you included, adduced other examples of Jewish attempts at domination, as if that would prove their attempt at territorial expansion.
        You quoted the Oded Yinon plan, which is real but is not about territorial expansion, but about weakening Israel’s neighbors. You also mentioned the Jewish talent for controlling whole nations from behind the scenes as a small minority. That too is real, but is different from territorial expansion. “Justice For Chinese” showed maps of Jewish territorial expansion inside Palestine, which is real but is different from territorial expansion outside Palestine.
        Finally, Lobro reproduced a letter from a rabbi in Constantinople in the 15th century to a Jew in Spain, exhortating him to strife for world domination, as if that would “prove” that modern Israel has a serious plan for territorial expansion in the Middle East. As if that wasn’t irrelevant enough, he gave another “proof” : the Jewish control of American institutions.

        For some people it seems impossible to stick to the subject of the debate, which is in this case the question : does Israel strife to expand its territory “from the Nile to the Euphrates” yes or no? I have still not seen any valid refutation of my claim that Israel doesn’t.

      4. @ornancy, I wouldn`t dream of beating my chest and crowing, I leave it to those who probably couldn`t punch their way out of a paper bag..

        Be interesting to see if Franklin has an answer to my post above..

      5. Franklin,

        I recognize – and am quick to praise – merit wherever shown, no matter the source. If you achieve a high degree of excellence in a comment, you will find me an unprejudiced observer of that fact, no matter opponent or ally.

        While I realize that you believe much of my wording to be obtuse, there is an alternative possibility Which is that it is produced from a nuanced view of things which cannot be easily comprehended via a dialectically determined way of thinking. Such as holds sway in the Occidental world. The major problem with using that dialectically-determined viewpoint is that those who use seem not aware that it is indeed “a” viewpoint, and by no means the only – or the only valid lens through which to study history or any other subject. Because of there singular misconception on this matter, such persons believe that they need not trouble themselves to really study another persons words, in order to understand them – they merely fall back on dismissing those words if they are not easily accessible to them through the lens they choose to use.

        If you were to review the totality of my comments here, for instance, you would find it impossible to blanket characterize them in any – most certainly not in the way you describe here:

        “I think part of the disagreement between us is that you are inclined to think that because Jews are wicked and strife for world domination”

        … in fact one would have to go no further than this very thread to find evidence of a more – shall we say –
        idiosyncratic way of viewing the question that the one supposed by you. Interpretation of the real goal or meaning of the Yinon Plan for example, will vary from person to person – I brought it into play in the original response to your comment before the aborted ‘debate’ occurred for a reason which I have yet to expand upon, and have no wish to do so until such time as we do either revisit the subject in a real debate rather than faux one, where someone chooses to do my speaking for me.

        Although I cannot be sure that this is so – but your statement –
        ” I think I have sufficiently demonstrated not only that it is militarily, politically and demographically impossible, but also that the Israelis have shown no behavior in the past that such foolish endeavor is indeed their intention”
        would appear to indicate that you are unlikely to be willing to revisit that aborted effort at debate, because you have clearly not yet willing to acknowledge that I have given good reason to suppose it is possible for the subject party to achieve the FUNCTIONAL GOAL of political and economic domination of a swath of territory even much wider than the quoted real estate… without need of resort to either military means or “settlement.”

        Try as you may, there is simply no way of avoiding negating that premise without a specific rebuttal of the points which supported it – most certainly not by merely declaring that YOU believe you have “sufficiently demonstrated.” As we have both more or less declared our respective arguments to have defeated the other, the only way to break that impasse is to throw it open to the gallery to decide, instead of letting Ms DM invoke force majeur!

        Finally, it is essential in this matter than you abstain from lumping different persons arguments together as a ‘you all say this’ device which grants you imaginary immunity from having to consider MY words under the THEIR merit – alone. I noticed the use of that device in the original ‘faux- debate/media spectacle produced here, and immediately downgraded my estimation of your sincerity as a debating partner because of it. As here noted – I have happily raised that estimation since then, and you will find – should you look outside from your ‘all of you do ….’ fortress that I neither hold a grudge from moment to moment, should anyone choose to play fair and with sincere intent regarding the rules of debate, nor do I stoop to inanities or straw man arguments when deploying history in service to my argument.

        Just as I do not let the putative Greater Israel canard divert me from investing the Yinon Plan with the proper interpretation, I do not follow Lobro in using, for example “the Protocols of Zion” as a debating tool, nor other specific elements which he finds useful.

        And just as it was somewhat gauche of others to have my name placed together with yours in a marquee that suggested that you & I were going to debate, rather than you and an unrelated third party… it is similarly outre of you, in this case, to invoke our well spoken and insightful colleagues name in connection with my own here. If you will do my the courtesy of paying attention to my words – and to me as an interlocutor unique from others, when we are in discussion, I believe it will prove to both our benefit.

        Failing that, as bizarre as it seems, I am left to suppose that it will be necessary to point out to the benefit of ALL concerned – that just as I am not Darkmoon – and Darkmoon, to the best of my knowledge, is not me…
        Lobro is not I, nor I he…I. Having a debate with either of those mentioned third parties is a fine thing indeed, as long a such debate is clearly distinguished from being a debate with “Ormanci!”

      6. @ Franklin Ryckaert
        January 20, 2016 at 9:56 am

        Can you read?

        Sir, in my “Elegy for 600” video, I claimed that: “An estimated 600 million Chinese souls were addicted to their vile opium.” https://youtu.be/AfXkaONUFiI?t=476

        Therefore your statement: “…Justice for Chinese” (in his video) that the opium trade on China killed 600 million Chinese, while there were only 300 million Chinese at that time.” is either a gross lie or a gross misunderstanding of my video.

        I take this opportunity to quantify my figure of 600 million addicts: The jews were lacing cigarettes in China with opium as early as the 1750s (this was how they got the Chinese addicted in the first place), a good 100-years before opium became endemic in China. As recently as the late 1940s, opium was still readily available in China under the phony “Nationalist” government of the jew stooge Chiang Kai Shek, meaning the opium trade lasted approximately 200 years and afflicted as many as 8 to 9 generations. It stopped when Mao Tse Tung came into power in 1950, which is a good end point for our purposes here.

        Lasha Darkmoon, herself, in her excellent essay “China and the Jews” writes: “This, then, is how the British Empire became so powerful: by winning two Opium Wars with the help of Rothschild money. (The First Opium War: 1839-1842; the Second Opium War: 1856-1860). The Brits grew rich on Chinese tea, Chinese silk, Chinese porcelain, and acquired Hong Kong on a 99-year lease. And on this they built their Empire, with the help of the mercantile Jews. What did China get in exchange? — Millions of opium addicts. By 1905, it has been calculated, 27 percent of Chinese males had become addicted to opium, with “13.5 million people consuming 39,000 tons of opium yearly.” https://www.darkmoon.me/2014/china-jews/

        In my opinion, the 27% addiction rate seems rather low. My guess would be closer to 40%, and if you are correct in believing that the population in China at that time was 300 million, then we are already talking about 120 million addicts! If you multiply 120 million by 5 generations, you easily have the figure of 600 million addicts. But as I argued above, the opium trade was executed or prosecuted over 200 years or about 8 to 9 generations. In other words, 600 million addicts over 200 years is a conservative figure.

        PS

        Recently, I made the new and controversial claim here on Darkmoon that the jews’ opium not only overtly destroyed China but it also covertly destroyed the Chinese at the DNA level, in what I call the “Fetal Opium Syndrome.” https://www.darkmoon.me/2016/white-extinction/#comment-915111

  9. Next installment for my highly popular series “Putin For Dummies”:

    Putin to European Jews who feel unsafe: ‘Come to us’

    Putin can help the Jews to dump the pimp and become a normal and decent people, and the Jews, in return, would cooperate with Putin dismantling the Western Civilization – which is beyond repair anyways – without a major blowup of the world.

    A perfectly legitimate, mutually beneficial, and wise offer for cooperation, in my educated opinion.

    1. @Ormonkey & Other Primates

      The stupidity of this crowd is mind boggling! They are bitching endlessly about the evil Jew and how to get rid of him. Now, comes Putin and solves the problem in one stroke: he is ready to take off your hands the Jew – all of them, all 14 million. And what do you do? You didn’t even notice! You keep playing your “It’s the JEW, JEW, JEW” mantra like a broken record. Shouldn’t you, instead, be grateful to Putin for solving your problem, dummies?

      Putin is not afraid of the Jews, 14 million is a drop for a country like Russia – she will accommodate them, she will teach them good morals and help to become decent citizens, like everyone else. We have a lot of work to do in Birobijan area, and Siberia in general.

      What you don’t realize, dummies, is that when the whores leave the pimp, the pimp along with the dogs, the pigs, and the sheep, that used to living good off the dirty profits from the whores, will go down like a stone.

      But make no mistake – Putin knows that very well.

      1. Circ-

        More about “Putin The Dummy”:

        Putin is NOT anti-establishment or anti-new world order, nor are the BRICS.

        Eastern opposition to the NWO is a lie. Period.

        In fact, the BRICS have argued only for GREATER inclusion in the IMF system and have no intention of developing a legitimate alternative to “Western” globalization. If you do not understand that the BRICS are part of the NWO, not opposed to it, then you do not understand a thing. 🙂

        http://personalliberty.com/economic-endgame-explained/

    2. Circ –

      See the next part in the series “Putin The Dummy” which shows that ‘Bad Vlad’ has no control over the Jews who set oil prices which is destroying Russia’s economy and the Ruble.

      The Jews control Putin…. as they do in all countries with stock markets. If not, he could raise the price of oil all by himself, being the number one producer of petro-products. He belongs to London’s Pharisee-Jew Bankers. 🙂

      See what Moscow Times is reporting:

      Russia’s Ruble Falls as Oil Price Tumbles

      The ruble weakened sharply on Monday morning as the price of oil fell to new lows, worsening the outlook for Russia’s recession-hit economy.

      The Russian currency tumbled 1.3 percent to almost 78.6 rubles to the U.S. dollar in morning trading, close to record lows and less than half its value two years ago.

      The decline echoed the oil price, which dipped to 13-year lows of below $28 after the lifting of sanctions from Iran worsened fears of oversupply on global oil markets.

      The ruble’s rapid devaluation reflects the importance of oil exports to the Russian economy. Half of Russia’s budget revenues come from the energy industry and the current government spending plan assumes an average price of $50 per barrel in 2016.

      A series of crisis meetings in recent weeks have seen the government commit to slash spending by 10 percent in many areas…..

      http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/russias-ruble-falls-as-oil-price-tumbles/556175.html

      1. Pat,

        pigheadedness is a fairly common thing for … pigs – not humans;
        obstinacy is a merit for … donkeys – not people;
        contrariness is a trait of … teenagers – not adults;
        contumacy is good for … wanted criminals – not my patients;
        obduracy goes with … a fossil – not a vibrant mind.

        Now, here is what I want you to do, Pat. Copy the above, paste it on the wall next to your bed, and recite it before you go to sleep every day for the next three weeks.

        It should work, just remember – you have to have faith in your therapist. If it doesn’t … well, we always can try something else.

      2. Circ –

        You should send the list to the Editors at Moscow Times. I quoted them.

        Your Russ brothers may care… I do not. 🙂

        Have this on your way….

        A plan for global governance has also been touted by international elites over the years, the roots of which would supposedly begin around 2015. The Gorbechev Foundation, which boats many American elites as members, has long predicted the rise of a global governance. In 1995, the executive director of the foundation, Jim Garrison, had this to say to the San Francisco Weekly:

        “Over the next 20 to 30 years, we are going to end up with world government. … It’s inevitable. It will happen and become just as normal to have a relationship with the rest of the world as we now have, say, if you are a Californian and you go to Vermont.”

      3. Hey, Circ –

        Send “pigheaded” ‘Gorby’ your list too… 🙂 🙂

        SputnikNews – Gorbachev says Putin’s economy is a failure, with NO PLAN.

        “It is unclear how long it will take Russia to solve the crisis it is in, as the Russian government has no effective plan,” Gorbachev said.

        Even with a PhD in Finance…. “Putin The Dummy” has NO plan:

        http://sputniknews.com/russia/20160119/1033388462/russia-economy-gorbachev.html

        End to Sanctions Against Iran Prompts Ruble to Fall Against Dollar, Euro

        Read more: http://sputniknews.com/russia/20160118/1033301626/ruble-falls-against-dollar-euro.html#ixzz3xoFVimz5

        The ruble lost about half its value against the dollar. It is now worth about a penny in USD. 🙂

      4. Thanks, Gilbert –

        No helmet needed. 🙂 I’m on TB’s mail list.

        TB is not connected to Kremlin insiders.

        I quoted Gorby… still hooked directly into Russian and Kremlin’s top politicos.

        He is globally powerful… pushes UN Agenda-21 with the big wheels.
        Mikhail Gorbachev – Nobel Peace Prize laureate and former President of the USSR – is the Founding President of Green Cross International, which he established in 1993 in response to the 1992 Rio Earth Summit call to create a “Red Cross for the environment”.

        http://www.gcint.org/who-we-are/our-people/mikhail-gorbachev/

  10. Christianity as a whole, represents the biggest disadvantage the white race has in overcoming the Jewish problem. Christianity (in any form) is nothing more than self-inflicted Jewish Supremacy. As a race, we will never overcome the Jewish problem, until the Christian problem is solved first.

    1. “Christianity as a whole, represents the biggest disadvantage the white race has in overcoming the Jewish problem.”

      I agree… Christians dubbed them “chosen” people. God’s “chosen” people.. That’s hard to shake out of their minds.

      Mainly because Pope embraces them. Loves them. Praises them. Gives them what they want.

      Hundreds of Christians have told me over the decades, “You better not talk against the Jews. They’re god’s chosen people…!! No, sireee..!! You’re going to hell..!!”

  11. Kudos for Ingrid! She, with her succinct and pointed remarks, easily beats the shit out of arrogant ormonkeys, frankies, and all kinds of butt-headed warriors behind the bushes.

    1. That is commendation indeed, coming from you!

      Thanks to your timely dropping in together here, we can – so to speak – kill two fowl with one stone.

      Since you have insisted on offering unsolicited and ill-considered ‘advice’ to all and sundry here… I am prepared to return the favor – in spades! The remarkable similarity tween you and your fave of the moment seems to be centered round a fixation with expressing disdain for others who can use words with facility, and employ them in service to an idea, rather than a cause fixee, or a bubbling over of some psychic turmoil better keep private.

      Both you and she would find it far more in your interests to disguise your envy and resentment of others, than to offer it up on public display in such persistent fashion as to render yourselves mere laughing stocks and caricatures. Your ceaseless seeking out… like carrion fowl that can be relied upon to arrive at every fresh kill…
      of dissension, ill will, and misunderstanding, as well as your noxious efforts to cultivate and/or nourish all outbreaks of the same here… is duly noted…

      as the mark of some kind of interdimensional ‘energy vampire’ which feeds upon negative human emotions like a vulture feeds upon carrion. All good stuff, but much the better practiced in the privacy of your respective cave or crypt. Think about it!

      1. @ Ormanci

        “Both you and she would find it far more in your interests to disguise your envy and resentment of others, than to offer it up on public display in such persistent fashion as to render yourselves mere laughing stocks and caricatures.

        Please let us know who is the “SHE” you are referring to? Who is this mysterious female, pray tell, who is so envious and resentful of your superior talents? — you whose grammar is so bad that you don’t even know the difference between IT’S and ITS? 🙂

        Come, Mr Ormanci, give us the name of the female here who is envious and resentful of your genius! Failure to do so would be proof of your cowardice.

      2. Well Howdy Doc! Good to see you weigh in on subjects troubling to you. If you followed along on the thread from where our Rusky buddy makes his affection for the female in question a matter of public record, it is no great feat to leap to the conclusion that my comment directly under it is a reference to that same person.

        Or is it? I suppose it depends to some degree to just how badly one has their knickers in a knot! Not that I would suppose that you have such a problem… yours seem to be more of a dilemma as to how to ‘throw down the gauntlet’ without having yet found a whiff of a pretext for doing so! Tell ya what… you select the damsel of your choice to go to battle on behalf of … then knock yourself out finding a windmill to go with the package!

        I’ll stick round here and work on my punctuation and grammar issues – yes, it’s true, I am under therapy with Squire French, but still have considerable trauma to work through. I’m told that you are somebody or others alternate avatar here, but I can’t remember whose! That you Dashwood, err, I mean… hell – what is that guys name who ‘doesn’t have a leg to stand on!?!??’ Cowardly of me not to remember, what?

      3. HOW TO BREAK THE POWER OF THE JEWS

        I don’t know how to break the power of the jews, but I do know this :

        Muslim immigration into Europe and into the United States advances the Jew COMMUNIST NWO agenda/goal of destroying White countries [ for the benefit of World Jewry ]. Don’t support Muslim immigration into the United States. What’s happening in Europe now because Europe was flooded with Muslims is a disaster for Europe. The Muslims are on all kinds of intensely violent JIHADS and their Muslim Islamic JIHADS get more intense and violent all the time. ZOG Washington wants the Islamic Muslim Jihads here in the United States also. The Islamic Jihadist Muslim Brotherhood is the group coordinating the flooding of Europe with Muslims. Obama’s half-brother is a member in good standing in the Islamic Jihadist Muslim Brotherhood [ in Egypt]. Hillary fully supports the Islamic Jihadist Muslim Brotherhood. ZOG Washington wants to bring Islamic Muslim JIHAD here into the United States. Just like what’s happening in Europe now.

        I’m sure there’s good Muslims in the world who want no part of Islamic Jihad, [ and I’m don’t say that sarcastically, I mean it ] but The Thing Is : ZOG Washington doesn’t want good Muslims in the United States. ZOG Washington is encouraging and recruiting the most intense and the most violent Muslims in the Muslim world to immigrate into the United States, NOT the good Muslims opposed to Jihad, but the Muslims GUNG-HO for Islamic Muslim Jihad.

        The Muslim immigration issue is MORE about the real and true nature of ZOG more then anything else, and ZOG Washington is ALL about fomenting confusion, turmoil, animosity, violence, blood-shed, and WAR. ZOG Washington’s Muslim immigration agenda is about bringing Islamic Muslim JIHAD to the United States, just like ZOG Washington has played such a giant role in flooding Europe with Muslims ; And the Muslims ZOG Washington did so much to swamp Europe with are on all kinds of Islamic Muslim JIHADS. Europe is NOT getting the good Muslims opposed to Jihad, and we here in the United States will NOT be getting the good Muslims opposed to Jihad. We will be swamped with the same kind of Jihadist Muslims Europe is now swamped with.

        Supporting Muslim immigration advances and strengthens Jew power, advances their Jew Communist NWO agenda/goals. DON’T SUPPORT advancing Jew power, don’t support Muslim immigration into the USA. Muslim immigration is a disaster for Europe and it will be a disaster for the United States.

    2. Wow! Circassian, you seemed to hit a sore point. With regard to respective caves, or crypts, maybe we should just tiptoe off, and leave these “intellectuals” to massage one another`s “intellectual” egos, or anything else they may want massaging. .

  12. “How to break the power of the Jews”
    Are there anything that could be more simple? Just find Jew in yourself and kill him. Exercise your power.
    Sure, it is uphill job for mentally circumcised, but that’s another problem.

    1. Magomed –

      A profound observation! To render my own interpretation, I would say that overcoming Fear and Greed would go far toward ‘killing’ that part of ourselves which lends us to the designs of the megalomaniacs of this world. Our own weaknesses indict us! 🙂

  13. “The Mass murder of Russian Christians” is unbridled fantasy, Leo Tolstoy tossing in his grave. He considered there was none and attempted to introduce “true” Christianity himself, but was proclaimed anathema. Reading of gospels before revolution was strictly forbidden (as well as reading the Bible in Europe in Middle Ages). Rural priests (80% of all because Russia was rural country) didn’t have foggiest idea about Christ and were sure that God’s name was Nikola. Before Jews-bolsheviks ritually killed tzar Nicholas the 2-nd and his family on July 17-th 1918, he was betrayed by “Christ-loving” Church in February previous year, lithurgy texts were amended and chair of the “anointed” was solemnly carried out of the hall. This event described in more details in the newspaper”Russky Vestnik” by those who intend now to introduce Christianity in Russia again, more true than that of Leo Tolstoy. They insist that revolution 1917 in Russia occured just because of this betrayal.

  14. Franklyn,
    You never answered the question,
    You got all busy explaining about the kushi nation in south sudan and the Arab Berbers in Algeria -who are salafi muslims, by the way-, you wrote about how it wasn’t 114 million blacks, whites -in cohorts with the jew mastermind- brought from africa, writing that no, it was only ten percent of that number, (making this time an exception by contradicting your favourite website “wikipedia” who does say it was about a hundred million) you mentioned all those ancient tribes but when it comes to us the canaanites and our rights in Palestine you go into blackout mode, but its ok
    Just answer…
    How does humanity get rid of the Jew power?

    1. @Avatar

      “Us the Canaanites?” The Canaanites were exterminated by the invading Israelites, if we are to believe the book of Joshua of the Old Testament. A more realistic scenario is that they were gradually absorbed by the Israelites. Anyway it is not possible that the modern Palestinians are the direct descendants of the Canaanites. In the year 70 A.D. the rebellious Jews of Palestine were defeated by the Romans and partially expelled from the land. In the year 135 A.D. they rose again and were definitely defeated by the Romans and reportedly all expelled. To sever any bond of the land with the Jews, they henceforth called it “Palestine” after their ancient enemies, the Filistines, who were descendants of the so-called “People of the Sea”, probably people from the Aegean, who settled in the Levant in the 13th century B.C. and are absolutely no ancestors of the modern Palestinians. Who the Palestinians really are nobody can say. They are probably a mixture of some Jews who still remained in the land and converted to Christianity and later to Islam, descendants of the invading Arabs in the 7th century, and various people who settled in the land from the surrounding countries during the Arab and Turkish rule of the land. Some are descendants of neighboring Bedouines. Their identity as “Palestinians” is a recent development as a reaction to the Jewish state.

      How to get rid of the power of the Jews? That is not easy because the Jews not only control all key-positions of power in all Western countries, but also control their minds via control of the media. The Internet gives us the opportunity to liberate us from their mind-control, but then we still have to liberate ourselves from their political and financial control. All we can do now is to spread information. Next, politicians should arise who expel them from political power. Taking control over our banking system will be the last and most difficult battle. As for Palestine, I see no possibility to expel the Jews. They are militarily simply too strong and are motivated to stay. No Hamas, PLO or Hizbollah can defeat them. Sorry, but that is the reality.

      1. “Their identity as “Palestinians” is a recent development as a reaction to the Jewish state.”

        So what did they call themselves prior to 1948 and the establishment of the jewish state ? Are you trying to say that they were just plain old “generic Arabs” who just happened to be living in Palestine during the early part of the 20th century ?? It just doesn’t seem right to say that the Palestinians never existed except as a reaction to the British theft of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, when in all likelihood they were living in that area all along.

      2. “Anyway it is not possible that the modern Palestinians are the direct descendants of the Canaanites…To sever any bond of the land with the Jews, they henceforth called it “Palestine” after their ancient enemies, the Filistines, who were descendants of the so-called “People of the Sea”, probably people from the Aegean, who settled in the Levant in the 13th century B.C. and are absolutely no ancestors of the modern Palestinians. Who the Palestinians really are nobody can say.”

        “Canaanites,” as a Biblical people. are no more real a reflection of a recognizable population group than any other of the mis-nomed ethnicities described in that Levitical propaganda piece. The story of famous “Uriah the Hittite” in the 2nd Book of Samuel demonstrates the manner in which those Biblical scribes were almost invariably faulty in their knowledge of neighboring peoples from times other than their own. Uriah was neither a Hittite, nor were there any “Hittites” at all to be found anywhere at the time of that writing. In fact, recent scholarship is making it appear increasingly likely that the entire concept of “Hittites” – which is a term invented in the C19th to describe a population group we know now to have called themselves Nesites – is a mistaken description of the broad group of Anatolian peoples who are now loosely called “Luwian,”

        In the same manner, the “Canaanite” is a construction which the Biblical record only confuses our understanding of, just as even our knowledge of what actually was the “Land of Canaan” is not increased from reading that source. The more reliable archaeological record has, over time revealed a steady presence of those we are accustomed to think of as ‘the Canaanites’ along the Levantine and Syrian coasts of the Mediterranean, all the way up into Cilician Anatolia, where Phoenician inscriptions show the presence of these “Semitic” populations[Judan as well as their Palestinian neighbors!]from back into the times of Mospos and the Kizzuwatna Kingdom.

        In fact… and this is what is most damaging to Franklin’s claim of “impossibility”… recent scholarship – most particularly the work of Hawkins – has allowed previously faulty transcriptions of philological data to be modified as to prove what had been known as “Walastina” is more correctly to be termed “Palastina” – and that the “Philistine”/Palestinian presence in those coastal areas is irrefutable – as Yakubovich puts it:

        “While the intrusive origin of the Philistines
        in southern Levant is reflected in the Biblical record,
        scholars lacked for a long time comparable internal
        textual confirmation for the ‘Amuq plain, and this
        complicated the direct link between philological and
        archaeological data in the instance of Cilicia.”

        As we trace the progression of ‘brandings’ and ‘rebrandings’ by which the original “Canaanites” have traveled through history – from Canaanites to “Phoenicians,” then “Carthaginians” and so on, we realize that this widely traveled Semitic group has appeared and reappeared in many guises – including that of “ancient” Palestinians/Philistines, and “modern” Palestinians, no matter the religious superficialities of the moment, nor the textual confusion which revisionist rabbinical propaganda polemics like the Hebrew “Bible” are want to cast.

        Previous eras of similarly faulty, if more ‘modern’ scholarship have led us astray in interpreting shadowy concepts such as “the Sea Peoples” to indicate violent changes to population demographics in the middle east which current, more balanced scholarship is increasingly showing to be a fictitious version of history.

        The movement of commercially oriented peoples such as the Phoenicians throughout the whole of the Mediterranean -from very earliest recorded times[as per my comments in the FAUX DEBATE thread which Mr F.R. has STILL not gotten himself caught up to, let alone rebutted!]shows a much more steady pattern of movements throughout the zone – and the continuance of stable populations of both Indo-European and Semitic groups alike… in close collaboration which each other…
        unlike the now discredited previous notions of post-Mycenaean “Dark Ages” and disappearing ethnicities. The Palestinians/Falastinians are indeed directly traceable thanks to these new currents of scholarship – and Franklin’s large arsenal of historical atlases and outdated sources is proving simply not up to the task of making a successful case here… and in other, more important arenas of debate!

        Up next!
        HOW TO BREAK THE POWER OF FAULTY RENDITIONS OF HISTORY –
        LET THE DEBATE BEGIN![Minus the intrusions of unwanted ‘middlepersons!’]

        “Who the Palestinians really are nobody can say,” if we wish to play the game of “hear no evil, see no evil” … but let us put aside such childhood games… in favor of a tourney of ideas!

      3. @Save the Goyim

        They considerd themselves as local Arabs. As others before, you confuse physical existence with consciousness of identity. Of course these people existed physically before, but they saw themselves not as “Palestinians”. An idea of group identity can develop in various ways. One is as a reaction to having a common enemy. That is quite common in history.

  15. Franklin Ryckaert
    January 20, 2016 at 9:56 am
    “I think part of the disagreement between us is that you are inclined to think that because Jews are wicked and strife for world domination, they are capable of anything, even of the attempt at territorial expansion in the Middle East “from the Nile to the Euphrates”, of which I think I have sufficiently demonstrated not only that it is militarily, politically and demographically impossible, but also that the Israelis have shown no behavior in the past that such foolish endeavor is indeed their intention. All my critics, you included, adduced other examples of Jewish attempts at domination, as if that would prove their attempt at territorial expansion.”

    In that old Aesop’s fable about the frog and the scorpion, the scorpion bit the frog because it was “his nature” to do so, and this imo provides a fairly decent explanation of what’s been going on in the Middle East for the past hundred years. It could be that Mr. Ryckaert is correct regarding the issue of territorial expansion: It could be that the jewish state isn’t trying to build an empire “from the Nile to the Euphrates.” But only the most ignorant would argue against the idea that the jewish state is behind the effort to annihilate its neighbors when all of the available evidence points to the fact that organized jewry is indeed behind all of the madness which is consuming the region. Like the scorpion in Aesop’s Fable, organized jewry is working night and day to bring about horrific and irreversible catastrophe. Why ?? Because such is the nature of organized jewry.

  16. It should be more than obvious by now that the jewish state is trying to follow the teachings of the Torah, which calls upon the nation of Israel to utterly obliterate all of the surrounding tribes. The foremost goal of jewish-dominated politics – beginning with the torah and right up until to the time of Theodore Herzl – has always been to carry out the most evil & horrendous acts against its victims while defaming them in the process. The charade is reminiscent of one particular Old Testament story – the story of Naboth’s Vineyard – in which a false accusation was leveled against a man named Naboth with a view toward obtaining the rights to his vineyard. It was a false accusation which led to the acquisition of Naboth’s Vineyard, and likewise, it took a steady barrage of false accusations in order to bring about the mass murder of the Arabs and Germans that were standing in the way of international jewry and its ambitions. Let us not forget that organized jewry is a master of the false accusation.

  17. The way to break the power of any enemy requires knowing the enemy’s weaknesses. The jew’s have one primary weakness, lying which give them the illusion of power. The only way to overcome lying is with the truth.

    The jew’s primary lie is that they worship the Heavenly Father and are His chosen people which causes many Christians and Muslims to accept the jewish lies and fake special status. Destroying this lie requires the truth be known to Christians and Muslims that the God the jews worship in the Old Testament is not the Heavenly Father of Jesus and that most of the Old Testament is a jewish lie with just enough truth to make it believable. The Old Testament was written in 622BC as a revolt from the Heavenly Father. Comparing the teaching of Jesus from the Heavenly Father to the actions of the jewish God of the Old Testament makes this truth evident. Additionally, since the jews’ real “holy” book is the Talmud, the nastiness and evil of that document must be made clear to Christians and Muslims.

    Once the primary lie is adequately exposed, all the other jewish lies will fall naturally including their financial scams.

    The jewish problem is a spiritual difference, the battle between good and evil, Jesus versus Satan, which is why the jews hate Jesus more than anything.

    1. That is correct Ungenius – –

      They have another HUGE weakness… BRAGGING.

      They tell on themselves when boasting. They even reveal their plans they are so proud of.

      …..

      One of the best ways to defeat them is to get out of debt and become as self-sufficient as you can.

      Christianity is a ‘personal’ religion…. not groupies…. which is one of the main reasons Pharisee-Jews hate it. More difficult to control. ‘Personal savior’ does not make the Pharisees happy.

      1. UNGENIUS
        “The way to break the power of any enemy requires knowing the enemy weaknesses”. Quite right, Achilles’ enemies knew that. And there are some more very serious stories, still unknown to people, in this connection. But sometimes enemy is beaten with his own weapon and there are remarkable examples.
        You mention such notions as lie, truth, good and evil. Regretfully, these terms are disputable and cannot serve as common denominator. Different people mean different when they say “truth”. Lie also is not always as bad as it might seem and sometimes much better than “truth”. And above all, there are things worse than lie.
        A matter stay no better with good and evil, even philosophers stumble here (albeit some say that all what unite people is good and all that separate is bad and good is what is good for all). Very often good turns out to be evil and the reverse. So, all terms, which mean something common, should be used cautiously. You are at liberty to disprove my argumens. Good luck, stay well.

        p.s. I did not pay attention that you renamed real and ill-used power into “illusion of power”, maybe Joke.
        p.p.s.”The Jewish problem is a spiritual difference…” You are great man, UNGENIUS and do not know that. On December 26, 1840 this problem was discussed in French parlament, impressed Karl Marx, and he has written a book “Jewish question” 3 years later. Your opinion and his coincide!
        Quote: “In Germany, where there is no political state, no state as such, the Jewish question is a purely theological one. The Jew find himself in religious opposition to the state, which recognizes Christaniny as its basis. Christian state relies on unreal, imagined form of human being. This state is imperfect and Christian religion is considered as addition and consecration of its imperfectness. This way religion for Christian state appears as a mean, hence this is a hypocritical state”.

  18. UNGENIUS
    Solution? – As simple as Russian balalaika. To follow the reason. That is to go on with milking the bull / steaming in the wake of Satan.
    First half explains Omar Khayyam: “He, who follows the reason, is milking the bull and doomed to be always at loss, because reason is sold at a price of garlic”.
    Second half explains Martin Luther: “Reason is the first strumpet of Satan”.

  19. Celebrate 27 January, The Holocaust Denial Day
    There should be a solemn wreath laying ceremony at the grave of Unknown Undead Jew, dress in appropriate attire, y’know what I mean.
    Like, Sombre is the watchword, e.g., wear a Sombrero, mariachi band playing La Cucaracha, El Día de los Muertos sugar skulls piled onto a macabre pyramid or ferried around in little boxcars on a model railroad … should be fun a moving occasion.

  20. Bernie Sanders is another Jewish Freemason Communist who if elected as President will plunge America into a new Soviet-style administration along with his as yet to be named crew and cabinet. America will literally become the new Soviet Union, complete with gulags and camps and genocide overnight.

Comments are closed.