Imagine a world in which heterosexuality has been criminalized (Video, 19 minute drama)

Introduced by Editor John Scott Montecristo

The video featured below was submitted to our Comments section yesterday by ‘Sardonicus’. This was in response to another comment suggesting that Lasha Darkmoon had been needlessly “sensational” for writing in the opening paragraphs of her new article — When Abnormality is the New Norm — the following admittedly speculative words:

Can you imagine a world in which heterosexuality has been criminalized and straight people are hunted down and killed? I can. It’s on its way.

You may have to go underground if you are perverted enough to prefer the opposite sex to your own, but don’t worry, they won’t compare you to a pedophile — because by that time pedophilia will be all the rage and incest the ‘in’ thing.

Brave New World, stop! — I want to get off!

Frankly, if Dr Darkmoon is to be ticked off for writing such “sensational” words and coerced into presenting more palatable, politically correct views, we might as well shut down this free speech website.

Sardonicus writes:

There’s nothing “sensational” about imagining a situation that happens to be a staple plot theme of many dystopian science fiction stories.

I can remember reading an excellent SF story by Richard Matheson (I think his name was) many years ago with precisely this theme: a world in which heterosexual lovers were forced to meet up in secret holes and corners and all around them were these very aggressive homosexuals looking for evidence of “sexual deviance” — i.e., perverted heterosexual behavior!

I think Lasha is entitled to use her imagination — “Can you imagine a world” she writes — without being accused of narrow-minded “sensationalism”, don’t you? If you have any doubts that the scenario Lasha “imagined” is the staple fare of dystopian science fiction, check out this 20 minute video:

IMAGINE A WORLD IN WHICH BEING ‘GAY’ IS THE NORM
AND BEING ‘STRAIGHT’ MAKES YOU A PERSECUTED MINORITY.           

Whether this video is a genuine attempt to envision a dystopian future world in which heterosexuality is regarded as “disgusting”, or whether this is straightforward homosexual propaganda by the Gay Lobby, is a debatable point. I think it is almost certainly the latter, with a lot of Jewish input.

You judge.

By the way, Lasha Darkmoon is not a “homophobe”, in case you’re thinking that. She has never been rude or discourteous to any gay person in her life. I can vouch for that.  [JSM]

VIDEO DRAMA  :  19 mins

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

53 thoughts on “Imagine a world in which heterosexuality has been criminalized (Video, 19 minute drama)

  1. Norman Leer put out a failed mock soap opera in the late 70’s called “All that Glitters!” Literally, women acted like men and men were hysterical like women. The show didn’t last but a few months tops. It came out soon after the semi successful Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman show

  2. That is a very disturbing video.
    But I maintain, the more the system promotes same-sex union, the more the healthy young ones will turn against it. The smug culture destroyers are over-reaching. It is natural for the young to rebel. Go on, make same-sex mandatory, go on then and do that. That’s the best thing that could happen, that our current would-be overlords would mandate that.
    It will then be more opposed than ever. Such is the way of youth, to rebel.
    Lasha, dear, remember how you quoted Krishnamurti…
    “It is no measure of mental health
    to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”
    Pound said “Contra Natura”. What is against nature will not endure.
    Period.

  3. Greetings from finland! You have good site, but you still think russia is counter force to jews power! Then ask these questions!!

    1/. He is surrounded by chabad Jews in his cabinet

    The first question that comes to mind is – Would Hitler surround himself with these Jews? Of course not! So why is Putin?

    k

    k

    2/. Russia has just accepted the fascicle holofraud legislation

    This was the key factor in re-igniting my interest in looking at Putin as a main player in this agenda. I cannot accept he is on our side, yet plays this Jewish violin. Why would he visit the holomyth museum, wear a skullcap and pay tribute to this fairy tale? The holohoax is a key factor in holding up the poor victimized Jewish image. All of their plethora of crimes are defused by this myth through holding up the public’s perception. This has to be crushed. To hold up this myth should ring alarm bells for anyone viewing Putin as a political player.

    k

    “We have to clearly realize that any attempts to review our country’s contribution to the great victory, and to deny the Holocaust – a shameful page in the world history – isn’t just a cynical and unprincipled lie, but the oblivion of lessons from history which could result in a repeat of the tragedy,” ~ Vladimir Putin

    k

    k

    3/. He is a former KGB agent

    Enough said. Former communist = working for judai

    k

    k

    4/. Under his governing as president, Russia has morphed into a capitalist society

    Is this man looking out for the interests of his people? Has Russia rejected the JEWISH-based usury/fiat currency? Are the Russian people freed-up from this Judaic curse, just like Iceland? No, no, no.

    Private debts of the Russian people due to Jewish usury amounted to 7 trillions of rubles, comparing to 12,886 trillions of rubles of input to the Russian federal budget 2013. *

    That was Hitler’s first move in curing Germany of the disease of judaism; getting rid of USURY and setting up a ‘independent’ labour-based currency. Within 3 years Germany was back on it’s feet – hence Germany was demonized by the JMSM. Similar for Iceland. So why has Putin not applied this obvious policy to enhance the quality of life for his people? To me it’s a no-brainer.

    k

    k

    5/. Why has he engaged in ‘diplomatic’ pally talks with Netanyahu in the criminal state of israel?

    Netanyahu is a mass murdering criminal, and the head of a criminal state. One simply does not engage in business with these criminals. They need to be outed from the political equation. With their CV, the sane world should not include them in any discussions whatsoever. You shouldn’t even sit at the same table as this monster, unless you’re spitting in his face – not smiling and shaking hands. You don’t do business with the devil.

    Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (R) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meet in Moscow, February 16, 2010. REUTERS

    kk

    6/. Russia supposedly supplied israel with components for their jet fighters.

    Why why why would anyone in their right mind supply mass murders who have a record in slaughtering innocent peoples, with military components??? Is it just business? Of course not.

    k

    k

    7/. Russia supposedly supplies oil to israel

    Again, you do not do business with the root cause of the world’s evil. Especially supplying an important element like fuel. Suppling these murderous thieving usurpers with fuel is indirectly helping to kill Palestinians and others around the world! And what direct help has Putin provided the Palestinians with anyway?

    kISRAEL – PALESTINE

    k

    8/. He attended the Victory Monument in israel *

    On June 25, 2012, Vladimir Putin attended the unveiling of the Victory Monument in Netanya in israel, an unprecedented joint-state venture between israel and Russia; to honor the Red Army, including the half million-plus Jews who fought against Nazi Germany during World War II.

    k

    k

    9/. Putin denies 9/11 false flag

    “The one item I would have added was that Putin dissed the 9/11 truth movement, which really nailed it for me, not to mention pissed me off.” ~ John Kaminski

    k

    .k

    10/. Dumbing down of Russians *

    Between 2005-2010 12’377 schools ceased to exist in Russia, including 10’089 in rural areas. This fits neatly into the JWO agenda.

    k

    k

    11/. Enforced immigration policy *

    Russia takes the 2nd place (globally) in respect of the number of foreign workers; yet at the same time there is massive unemployment in Russia

    k

    k

    12/. Depopulation programme *

    In the period of the last 15 years the number of native Russians has diminished to 6 million people. Russian cities took 40% of places in the international rating of most dying off cities on global scale (e.g. 5th Niżnyj Nowgorod -11,76%, 6th Saratow -11,54% mieszkańców, and so on) (OUN report)

    k

    k

    13/. Putin the oligarch *

    Putin himself is an oligarch and a billionaire, and the figure of billionaires in Russia has rised several times during the presidency of WWP. Simultaneously the minimal wage of the ordinary worker since January of 2013 has only risen to the level of 5205 roubles (520,5 zł, 150 $). According to official data of Rosstat, in the 1st quarter of 2012, 13,5% of Russians (19 million of people) have got earnings under the social minimum.

    k

    k

    14/. Suicides under Putin’s presidency *

    Russia takes 1st place in respect of number of suicides committed by youths and children (9-15) (data from Petersburg, “health commission” member, Swietłana Ryczkowa). These statistics of his presidency are not in alignment with someone who is one of the good guys.

    k

    k

    15/. Putin accepts Agenda 21 martial law *

    On 23th of May, 2007, Putin signed agreement (no 4100940-4) concerning the future intervention of NATO in Russia, in the event of civil disturbances, natural and technological distasters.

    Spring of 2012 – his government purchased 6809 tasers (AIR-107U) to suppress civil protests.

    Yea that sounds like one of good guys to me.

    k

    k

    16/. Putin opens mausoleums in memory of famous Jews who slaughtered millions of Gentiles *

    • Renovation of mausoleum of Lenin/Blank in Moscow. On 7th of Nov 2012 it was officially opened (Petersburg).

    • On 11th of Sep. 2012, a monument of Bolshevik Jew, Dzierzynski (real name, Rufin) was officially opened (Tumen)

    And many others.

    k

    k

    17/. Putin bans free speech *

    Russia has passed a law which forbids certain ‘extremists’ websites. “It can be that there are sites of opposition organizations and independent media written in that list” (RIA Novosti).

    “Not even one ‘extremist’ excess (website) shouldn’t go unpunished” ~ V. Putin (“RIA Novosti”)

    k

    k

    18/. Putin the accused Murderer *

    Alexander Valterovich Litvinenko (officer of Russian FSB secret service who specialized in tackling organized crime) accused Putin of ordering the October 2006 murder of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya.

    But of course he is indirectly murdering thousands of other lives through implementing his master’s policies.

    k

    k

    19/. Acceptance of microchips *

    Since 2013 in Russian Federation there will be implemented electronic identification card system (UEK – Uniwiersalnaja Eliektroniczieskaja Karta), the same as RFID. This is officially admitted by administration of Chabarovsk Country.

    k

    k

    20/. Putin voted for sanctions against Iran

    Punishing them for their non-existent nuclear program

    k

    k

    21/. Why are Russian troops on America soil?

    “Russian troops are on American soil as I write this. If we were really at each other, this would never be allowed.” ~ Buelahman

    k

    22/. This puppet is a freemason

    Is there more to say

    1. Red string (Kabbalah)
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      “Wearing a thin scarlet or crimson string (Hebrew: חוט השני) as a type of talisman is a Jewish folk custom as a way to ward off misfortune brought about by the “evil eye” (Hebrew: עין הרע). The tradition is popularly thought to be associated with Kabbalah and religious forms of Judaism.”

      “In the late 1990s the red string became popular with many celebrities in the United States, including many non-Jews. Led by Madonna and her children, those that have taken to wearing them have included: Aramayis Abgaryan, Michael Jackson, Rosie O’Donnell, Ashotik Eghiazaryan, Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore, Ariana Grande, Paris and Nicky Hilton, Britney Spears, Sienna Miller, Paulina Rubio, Gwyneth Paltrow, Chloe Bateman, Lindsay Lohan, Nicole Richie, Charlize Theron, Sarah Brightman, Mariah Carey, Lucy Liu, Kylie Minogue, Mick Jagger, David Paterson, Naomi Campbell, Camilla Parker-Bowles, Blake Anderson, Colin Haskins, Ansley Parks, Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell, Logan, David and Victoria Beckham, Avril Lavigne, Pedro Andrade, Sebastian Bøtcher Bonde, Sandra Bernhard, Reese Witherspoon, Sasha Cohen, Lauren Conrad, Billie Joe Armstrong, Harry Styles, Lisa Rinna, Anthony Kiedis, Alex Saunders, Kian Lawley and Leonardo DiCaprio. The popularity in the West is often linked to Philip Berg’s controversial Kabbalah Centre.

      Vladimir Putin was seen wearing the red string on a meeting with the president of the Republic of Indonesia…”

      Here, from 2:13 to 2:55 the red string on his hand can be seen
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPTLBYoF3Ls

    2. A giant and focused smear job of half-truths, untruths, irrelevancies presented as portentous, the question arises what did whoever put these together have in mind?

      here is just one example of anti-Putin deceit: Putin denies 9/11 false flag, hear it from Putin’s own mouth and what about the Russian general in the subsequent short video, would he have been allowed to keep that uniform on after that interview, if Putin was in 9/11 cahoots?

      To me, this entire list is a mini-false-flag troll operation, pretending to be anti-jew but factually doing everything to plant animosity against Jew’s foremost opponent in the world.

      Why was Putin seen wearing brown shoes while eating a burrito on a rainy day?
      … ooh, see the sinister severed talking head with flashlight under the chin …

      It looks like we are in for a concerted, repetitive, unrelenting, many-pronged smear job against Putin.

      Shades of Gabreal jones and Dublinmick with their Hitler hatched job, “grandaughter of Eva Braun shits on the chest of Putin in drag as part of higher order Masonic initiation (Scottish) rite!!!”

      1. let’s kill more useless flies with one shot:
        Putin refuses to wear skull cap
        Controversy Over Wailing Wall Visit Mars Putin-s Trip to Israel

        MosNews

        During his visit to Israel Russian President Vladimir Putin did not go to see the famous Wailing Wall. His press secretary said it was for safety reasons, but other sources reported that Putins was reluctant to wear a skullcap.

        Putin-s refusal to visit the Wailing Wall caused shock in the Israeli government, Russia-s Kommersant newspaper reported Thursday. The Israelis easily understood the reason for this refusal: everyone who comes to this sacred place has to wear a skullcap and the Russian president did not want to do that, the newspaper wrote.

        The Wailing Wall visit is an important part of the protocol for all foreign guests. For that reason, Putin-s decision was seen as a slight against the Israelis.

        i guess he was just obeying orders of his Chabad cabinet …

        And since we’re at it, why not mention this (from the horse’s mouth – The Times of Israel)
        Putin: First Soviet government was mostly Jewish

      2. I couldn’t hear or see Putin in that clip.

        Speaking of Konstantin Petrov, he was discharged from the Armed Forces in 1995 by Boris Yeltsin. His book was banned. He died in 2009 at the age of 64.

      3. Putin’s Chat at the Kotel
        http://www.collive.com/show_news.rtx?id=20655

        At the Western Wall, the President offered a prayer and recited Tehillim from a Russian-Hebrew prayer book.

        Leaning over the police barricade, the former KGB officer began to chat with the frum Jewish man who apparently is an immigrant from the former Soviet Union.

        The man related the importance of the Kotel to the Jewish nation, and mentioned the Beis Hamikdash and Shlomo Hamelech who first built it.

        “That’s exactly the reason I came here – to pray for the Temple to be built again,” Putin responded, according to a report on the Bechadrei Chareidim website.

      4. @ Lobro

        Like you, I am a supporter of Putin and hoping he can be trusted but I am hearing bad things about him:

        What do you say to this:

        In fact, Putin has surrounded himself with rich and successful Jews, such as Moshe Kantor (net worth $2.3 billion), Lev Leviev (net worth $1.5 billion), Roman Abramovich (net worth $9.1 billion) and Victor Vekselberg (net worth $13.6 billion). They are all close friends and confidantes of the Russian president, and they are all quite openly Jewish.

        On the Jewish New Year, celebrated in September, Putin sent a holiday greeting to Rabbi Lazar, wishing the Russian Jewish community a “sweet and happy New Year.”

        “For centuries, Jewish values inspired lofty ideals,” Putin wrote. He said that these values enhanced “relations among different peoples…through charity and education, all in the interest of the public good.” In a direct manner, he pledged “fierce opposition to any manifestation of anti-Semitism and xenophobia.”

        http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/55179/how-russian-jews-helped-shape-life-worlds-most-powerful-leaders-jewish-world/#fPG68tdOHZ5BH1gg.97

      5. “Why was Putin seen wearing brown shoes while eating a burrito on a rainy day?”
        My Dear Lobro.
        Why do you not understand? Rainy days are divisive. Indulgent people use those days to stay home, read books, engage in sexual activities, and sleep (generally after sex, except for women, who seem to be energized by sex, see ‘divisive’). Alpha-type persons dislike rainy days. They prefer the sun. Putin knows this. He is very clever. Therefore, by appearing in the rain, his motive is clear. He attempts to lull us.
        With the brown shoes, Putin, a master of illusion, does likewise. I can’t believe you missed it. Since black leather is the sure sign of aggression and violence (very popular with the Chekists and skinheads) and sensible brown pleather is most Charley Brown-like, Putin very craftily disguises what he thinks is his real persona. He is trying to appear harmless, his Charlie Brown to Hillary’s Lucy. Nukes are sometimes referred to as footballs. As Hillary pointed out, Putin is the new Hitler. She is the new Mother Teresa. He wants to insure secretly her election by intimating she will pull away the nuclear football.
        And at last…the burrito. Carl Jung, in his famous treatise ‘Dreams and their Interpretation’ noted that a fascination with burritos was linked to an ancient Semitic cult of phallic worshippers known as the Dongs.
        Orientalists agree that the Dongs were a very bad sort indeed, much like the Thuggees or the Daesh child molesters. Researcher say Putin often eats burritos here…
        http://korea.stripes.com/restaurant-guide/artista-jung-dong%E2%80%99s-tasty-mexican-hideaway

        Note carefully the cryptic name of the place…Jung Dong. That simply ties it all together, does it not, Mr. Lobro?
        Putin is obviously a closeted homosexual rainy day Charlie Brown, who in his own convoluted mind sees himself as a Clint Eastwood in a sunny Italian western movie (similar to Hitler, and likewise really dangerous due to over-compensation), and thinks he can fool the American public by wearing sensible Thom Mcan K-Mart shoes, but who signals to his initiated followers, in a dreamlike Jungian way, his real evil nature and intent by associating with semitic Dong eaters. All quite obvious Lobro. We are not fooled.

      6. Lolicia and others (I think that SW gets it).
        it is also a matter of parallax and architectural perspective, whereby objects further away appear smaller and therefore judging size and prioritizing requires some experience.
        putin shaking hands with some chabad rabbi or commemorating red army march in 1945 assumes equal or greater stature than putin ordering a massive cruise missile strike on some isis hq and he is beyond reasonable doubt a traitor to the gentile cause.
        Well, depends on what you consider “reasonable”, it goes back to that parallax issue.

        when Bush or Blair or Obama say they “respect” islam while raining millions of tons of high explosives, anti-personnel mines, white phosphorus, thermobaric weapons, depleted uranium, wanton extrajudicial assassinations, hellfires off the raptor drones on totally innocent civilian population, i guess by that yardstick it would stand that Muslims never had a greater friend than Blair, right? because look at his sweettalk.

        give me a coherent explanation for how the following chain works out to the Rothschilds advantage, how they actually micromanaged the flow after having drawn it up in the tiniest, fine detail.
        As per Yinon/Clean Break/PNAC, not to mention the Protocols, it has always been their clearly stated aim to dismember all the independent, secular, socialist Arab regimes into tiny tribal easily managed entities, scoop up the mineral wealth, depopulate the lands and leave them cleaned out for halachic, messianic ownership, Nile to Euphrates and beyond, Eretz yisroel, the talmudic wet dream.
        gen wesley clark stated on tv that they were going to knock down 5-7 of such regimes in quick succession: Iraq, Syria, Libya, sudan, iran, Pakistan, egypt whatever.
        And 9-11 got the ball rolling, didn’t it, exactly as per plan, they hit Iraq and pulverized it real quick.
        They moved onto Libya when putin was absent, BHL birthed ISIS in Libya and shipped them off with weaponry and pomp to Syria, publicly bragged about Judas plans, Assad was a dead man walking.
        ISIS got a Mossad caliph, IDF training and logistic support as well as IDF military trainers, advisors, IDF air support roaming all over Syria at will, NATO talking no-fly.
        So far, so good.
        But then Russia steps in and does what? According to anti-Russians, he plays the fine Rothschild game, whereas all the aforementioned plans are suddenly contradicted, ISIS routed, stolen oil shipping pathways disrupted, israel and Washington jewry screaming in outrage, mighty US backing out in a hurry, willing to talk to Assad, willing to fight ISIS …
        because you see, Putin shook hands with rabbi ben lazar which beyond all doubt shows that he is a rothschild agent and the whole thing works out to the rothschilds advantage, like plans for bechtel construction involvement, plazas, Mcdonalds, KFC, walmart, starbucks, gayclubs, the works …
        yea, just like in Iraq, right, where they had the total control …

        Putin kissing up to orthodox faith, renovating churches, ushering in mandatory Solzhenitsyn reading in schools, remember 200 years together? is it banned? tossing pussy riot in the slammer …
        all as per the rothschilds mysterious wishes, you see, reading solzhenitsyn actually promotes in strange ways, the judaic project.
        Which is why solzhenitsyn is also mandatory reading in the US schools, i suppose …

        All deeper reasoning that is well beyond lobro’s grasp, so he foolishly believes that putin threw the monkey wrench into those plans and Wesley clark’s prediction misfired badly, mother of all duds.
        And lobro doesn’t see the tremendous importance of putin’s saying, “jews are nice, our precious friends, but nazees bad like, you know”.

        because lobro is hard to train, cannot comprehend that the words, platitudes, gestures of empty tired symbolism and appearances are way, way more important than actions on the ground.
        Obviously reeducation camp material.

        (i remember how the mossad circassian said that putin banned solzhenitsyn)

      7. 1 Just excerpts from Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago, not 200 Years Together

        2 Russia needs Assad for a lot of reasons

      8. I subscribe to Alternet.org newsletter just to keep an ear to the hallowed libtard Judaic ground.
        And today I receive this petition from that ultra-jew-kabbalist-frankfurt-school journalistic farmhouse, literally titled
        RE: TRUMP AND PUTIN

        The following sponsored email was sent to you by AlterNet on behalf of CREDO Action:

        No classified national security briefings for Donald Trump

        Tell Director of National Intelligence James Clapper:
        “Withhold all classified national security briefings from Donald Trump.”

        Add your name:
        Sign the petition â–º

        Dear Friend,
        Trump Traitor

        It’s stunning.

        Donald Trump just asked Russia to spy on the United States. Here’s how the New York Times reported the news (emphasis ours):

        Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he hoped Russia had hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, essentially encouraging an adversarial foreign power’s cyberspying on a secretary of state’s correspondence.

        “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”1

        Let’s be clear: Trump’s encouragement of a dangerous dictator like Vladimir Putin to commit espionage and publicize state secrets poses serious national security concerns, and may violate federal law. This unprecedented action is even more horrifying given that Trump is scheduled to start receiving classified national security briefings, reportedly as early as this Friday.

        This cannot happen. We need to raise a massive outcry now.

        Tell Director of National Intelligence James Clapper: No national security briefings for Donald Trump. Click here to sign the petition.

        Trump’s shocking request for Putin to spy on the United States comes on the heels of widely reported stories linking Russia to cyber attacks against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) that culminated with a Wikileaks drop of tens of thousands of internal DNC emails over the weekend.2

        There is no legal requirement for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to provide the presidential candidates with classified information. Earlier this month, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan tried to use the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email usage as grounds to block Clinton from receiving briefings. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper refused that request, saying he “does not intend to withhold briefings from any officially nominated, eligible candidate.”3

        It’s hard to imagine that a presidential candidate who has possibly violated federal law, by asking a hostile government to spy on a former secretary of state, should be eligible to receive briefings. It would be irresponsible and dangerous for Clapper to provide them.

        Tell Director of National Intelligence James Clapper: No national security briefings for Donald Trump. Click here to sign the petition.

        Trump is now trying to walk back his dangerous rhetoric. That’s how he’s gotten away with so much already – from racism to misogyny to xenophobia to inciting violence. It’s up to us to push back on this breach as much as we have pushed back on his hate.

        Thanks for taking action today.

        Heidi Hess, Senior Campaign Manager
        CREDO Action from Working Assets

        Add your name:
        Sign the petition â–º

        Ashley Parker, “Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails,” The New York Times, July 27, 2016.
        David E. Sanger and Eric Schmitt, “Spy Agency Consensus Grows That Russia Hacked D.N.C.,” The New York Times, July 26, 2016.
        Jim Sciutto and Theodore Schleifer, “Ryan’s request to block Clinton from intelligence briefings is denied,” CNN.com, July 12, 2016.

        What does this tell us here?
        it says that we and Alternet.org, We Are Change, Occupy Pussy Riot, Open Society are all together in the libtard Noahide dream.
        So go on, sign the petition telling CIA director Clapper never to share a single briefing with the eventual president Put.., I mean, Traitor Trump who obviously takes order from dictator Putin.

        Go on, put your pen or keyboard where your mouth is, sign the petition!
        Because Alternet are Nice Jews, your partners against the Illuminati Rothschilds … or something.
        My brain hurts …

    3. What do you think of his offer to westerners to give them a bit of land if they move to Siberia? Could it be that simple that he simply wants to save himself the trouble of rounding us up for the gulag systems?

    1. @ Talmud

      Interesting comments. But aren’t they a bit off-topic?

      We are not talking Putin here! We are talking about the criminalization of heterosexuality!

      What do they put in the water supply in Finland? 🙂

    2. What happened to Digger, by the way, where is he? He said he would be back in the Spring, it’s summer, like it’s the last week of Summertime July, the very Epicenter of Summer, Hello??!!, Winter’s been over for awhile now, and the Digger is still in winter hibernation, wtf?

  4. God destroyed Sodom for like behavior. Hopefully, He won’t allow us to get that far gone, again. (Where is ISIS when you need ’em????)

    This is a very disturbing video because there exist those among whom such behavior would actually be condoned.
    It is no sin to hate them.

    1. God? What god is being referred to here? YHVH? The Jews’ god of wrathful judgment? When one looks at the vast universe, they must arrive at the inescapable conclusion that “God” must have better things to do then manage a tiny group of psychopathic criminals roaming the earth.

      Allow me one – more – attempt at making it clear – Sodom and that other place barely mentioned.

      The story of Sodom begins in Genesis, chapter thirteen, where the following description is found:

      ~ § ~

      “And Abram went up out of Egypt, he, and his wife, and all that he had, and Lot with him, into the south. And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold. [ . . .] And Lot also, which went with Abram, had flocks, and herds, and tents. And the land was not able to bear them, that they might dwell together: for their substance was great, so that they could not dwell together. And there was a strife between the herdmen of Abram’s cattle and the herdmen of Lot’s cattle: and the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelled then in the land. And Abram said unto Lot, Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and between my herdmen and thy herdmen; for we be brethren. Is not the whole land before thee? Separate thyself, I pray thee, from me: if thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right; or if thou depart to the right hand, then I will go to the left. And Lot lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, even as the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt, as thou comest unto Zoar. Then Lot chose him all the plain of Jordan; and Lot journeyed east: and they separated themselves the one from the other. Abram dwelled in the land of Canaan, and Lot dwelled in the cities of the plain, and pitched his tent toward Sodom. But the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly.”

      ~ § ~

      A number of critical points in the story of Sodom are clearly defined in this portion of the narration, some six chapters before the destruction of the villages of Sodom and Gomorrah.

      (1) As described in the preceding chapter, clearly, both Abram and his nephew Lot have become quite wealthy, especially in terms of livestock, through their extortion plot involving Pharaoh.

      (2) The land where Abram and Lot were living could not support their combined herds. This leads to arguments between the men’s “herdsmen”. This again provides a clear indication as to just how much wealth these men stole through criminal activity.

      (3) Water is therefore the key issue to Abram and Lot’s survival, as both desperately need this water to maintain their stolen herds.

      (4) Sensing some advantageous position in his agreement, Abram magnanimously defers to give Lot first choice in what land he will settle with his herds. Lot naturally chooses the “well-watered plain of Jordan” where Sodom, is located. “Lot lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, even as the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt” Note the singular reference describing Eden, “the garden of the lord,” as being “the Land of Egypt”. The word “like” here is not intended as a comparator, it is a secondary reference to the lord’s garden to reinforce the idea of just how well the region is watered. The comparison is the lord’s garden, the land of Egypt, to the plain of Jordan. It is now established that Lot heads east to become a resident of Sodom while Abram goes west to Canaan, a land that is obviously not “well watered.” This situation provides the underlying basis for the destruction of Sodom for this is where the valuable resources are located that will provide god’s chosen ones with the necessary water to maintain their stolen herds.

      (5) The fate of Sodom is predetermined in this passage. So the reader finds “god” is already intent on destroying Sodom long before taking action.

      The story now moves to the next chapter in Genesis, Chapter 14

      ~ § ~

      “And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same is Zoar;) and they joined battle with them in the vale of Siddim; With Chedorlaomer the king of Elam, and with Tidal king of nations, and Amraphel king of Shinar, and Arioch king of Ellasar; four kings with five. And the vale of Siddim was full of slimepits; and the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled, and fell there; and they that remained fled to the mountain. And they took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah, and all their victuals, and went their way. And they took Lot, Abram’s brother’s son, who dwelt in Sodom, and his goods, and departed.”

      ~ § ~

      This clearly indicates Lot as an established resident of Sodom by the time of Siddim vale, long before Sodom’s destruction.

      ~ § ~

      “And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan. And he divided himself against them, he and his servants, by night, and smote them, and pursued them unto Hobah, which is on the left hand of Damascus. And he brought back all the goods, and also brought again his brother Lot, and his goods, and the women also, and the people. And the king of Sodom went out to meet him after his return from the slaughter of Chedorlaomer, and of the kings that were with him, at the valley of Shaveh, which is the king’s dale. And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all. And the king of Sodom said unto Abram, Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself. And Abram said to the king of Sodom, I have lift up mine hand unto the Lord, the most high God, the possessor of heaven and earth, That I will not take from a thread even to a shoelatchet, and that I will not take any thing that is thine, lest thou shouldest say, I have made Abram rich: Save only that which the young men have eaten, and the portion of the men which went with me, Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion.”

      ~ § ~

      Here we find Lot’s uncle, Abram, rescuing him from a major battle and then meeting with “Melchizedek”, a person of unknown authority, who is most likely the character behind Abram’s tactics and battlefield intelligence, hence the “tithing.” Melchizedek king of Salem, is clearly described as “the priest of the most high god, in other words he is the “kohein gadol” or high priest.

      The scant evidence here points strongly to the idea that Melchizedek, the kohein gadol, is the man behind god’s curtain, the voice of YHVH, the Jews’ personal god who momentarily steps into the scene much as Billy Wilder is seen briefly stepping into the camera shot at Buchenwald. This narration provides the initiate priest, for whom these stories were verbally composed, background as to the invisible power, or power of god, standing behind the visible power of Abram. “And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.” Here Melchizedek blows his own horn, alluding to the fact that it is his power, his tactics and operational intelligence, that delivers Abram’s enemies “into his hands.” It is therefore obvious that Abram tithes to Melchizedek as payoff for his assistance. As ten percent was the standard tithe, one can surmise that Abram gave ten percent of his war booty to Melchizedek.

      Most noteworthy is the fact that Abram strikes an alliance with Bera, king of Sodom by returning all the goods previously seized from him by “Chedorlaomer, and of the kings that were with him.” Herein one finds a close-knit relationship developing between Abram, Lot and Sodom. What happened then? Is it possible that Bera snubbed Melchizedek at this meeting, leading to “god’s” destruction of his village. Here is yet another key, while Abram tithes ten percent of his booty to Melchizedek, he returns everything to Bera, king of Sodom, even his “shoelatchets”. Think carefully about how this might reflect on the relationship between the figures of Abram, Bera, and Melchizedek.

      The reader must now skip over several chapters to continue the story of Sodom, as the narration digresses into the totally unrelated subject of Abram’s immediate descendants, culminating in a joke about Abram’s wife Sarah, who laughs over the fact that she will bear sons at the age of ninety. Of course, with YHVH nothing is impossible. Sarah laughs at the notion, but god is not amused and so she hides her levity out of “fear” of the lord. This is one scary god alright. A this point “god” renames Abram “Ashley Montague”. Uh, I mean, “Abraham.”

      ~ § ~

      “And they (the “lord god” and his agents) said unto him, Where is Sarah thy wife? And he said, Behold, in the tent. And he said, I will certainly return unto thee according to the time of life; and, lo, Sarah thy wife shall have a son. And Sarah heard it in the tent door, which was behind him. Now Abraham and Sarah were old and well stricken in age; and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women. Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also? And the LORD said unto Abraham, Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying, Shall I of a surety bear a child, which am old? Is any thing too hard for the LORD? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son. Then Sarah denied, saying, I laughed not; for she was afraid. And he said, Nay; but thou didst laugh.”
      ~ § ~

      The story now segues back to the Sodom narration.

      ~ § ~

      “And the men rose up from thence, and looked toward Sodom: and Abraham went with them to bring them on the way. And the LORD said, Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do; Seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him.”

      ~ § ~

      Here the lord clearly questions his own actions. He questions whether or not to even tell Abraham what he is about to do. Why? Since “god” is going to commit criminal theft, he suspects Abraham might well bow out of the plan along with his herds blowing the whole plan wide open. But upon further reflection “god” realizes that Abraham and his family are in far too deep to ever consider taking such action.

      ~ § ~

      “And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know. And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom: but Abraham stood yet before the LORD.”

      ~ § ~

      What is obvious in this portion of the narration is that while god ponders the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah for the “sin” of refusing to surrender their water, the men gods agents “turn their faces” to head of down the duty path to Sodom where they will inform the residents of god’s ultimatum your water or your lives! Note how these messengers are referred to as “men” as they are later in the narration. Angel s are nothing more than god’s messengers. As this is the high priest talking for god, these are most defiantly not some form of celestial begins but human in nature.

      ~ § ~

      “And Abraham drew near, and said, Wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked? Peradventure there be fifty righteous within the city: wilt thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein?”

      ~ § ~

      Thus begins Abraham’s infamous countdown.

      ~ § ~
      “That be far from thee to do after this manner, to slay the righteous with the wicked: and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from thee: Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?

      “And the LORD said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.

      “And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the LORD, which am but dust and ashes: Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous: wilt thou destroy all the city for lack of five?

      “And he said, If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it.

      “And he spake unto him yet again, and said, Peradventure there shall be forty found there.

      “And he said, I will not do it for forty’s sake.

      “And he said unto him, Oh let not the LORD be angry, and I will speak: Peradventure there shall thirty be found there.

      “And he said, I will not do it, if I find thirty there.

      “And he said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the LORD: Peradventure there shall be twenty found there.

      “And he said, I will not destroy it for twenty’s sake.

      “And he said, Oh let not the LORD be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there.

      “And he said, I will not destroy it for ten’s sake.

      “And the LORD went his way, as soon as he had left communing with Abraham: and Abraham returned unto his place.”

      ~ § ~

      Here the reader finds the conclusion drawn that there are not ten “righteous” among the Sodomites, yet Abraham makes no effort to verify if there are ten righteous, he just shrugs his shoulders and “returns onto his place.” In exactly the same manner as Sodom, there was no effort to verify the knowingly false allegations that led to the Iraq war. Americans just had to take the Jewish “neocons” word that there were not even ten righteous worth sparing in Iraq. Remember the phony babies-thrown-from-the-incubators sob story? This is the modern version of Sodom’s moral imperative writ large, the need to wipe out every trace of a presiding “god’s” definition of “unspeakable evil.”

      To continue, Genesis 19:

      ~ § ~

      “And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground; And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant’s house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways.

      “And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night.

      “And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did bake unleavened bread, and they did eat.”

      ~ § ~

      The facts this narration presents are as follows:

      (1) Lot recognizes god’s “men/angels” before they enter the village.

      (2) He is expecting their arrival as he is sitting at the village gate waiting for them.

      (3) Lot tries to deflect the angels’ known intent as he diverts them to his home with an offer to rest and be on their way in the morning.

      (4) The angels have another purpose that requires them to abide in the street all night.

      (5) Lot is successful in his persuasion.

      What does Lot fear that causes him to intercept the “men/angels” at the gate to divert them to a discrete location? His fear must surely stem from knowing the outcome will not be good for him or his family.

      What might the “men/angels’” purpose be that requires them to abide in the street all night? What happens in the morning?
      Why are the “men/angels” willing to abandon their original task for Lot’s hospitality? What might god think of this diversion? Let’s examine these events further:

      ~ § ~

      “But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.

      “And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,

      “And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.

      “Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.

      “And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door.

      “But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door.

      “And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.”

      ~ § ~

      The facts here are:

      (1) ALL the people of Sodom men, women, and children know these “men/angels” are staying at Lot’s house and gather to make some sort of protest.

      (2) The Sodomites do not recognize the angels as such, but see them merely as “men”.

      (3) They call out the “men/angels” so they may know them. While this is commonly taken as a reference to sexual demands being made of the “men/angels”, in this context it is not, just as the wording of the Sodomites, “Where are the men which came in to thee this night?” is not a sexual reference to Lot having sex with the “men/ angels.”

      (4) Lot has two daughters, whom he claims are virgins, that he is willing to sacrifice to the Sodomites in hope of deflecting their anger towards the “men/angels.”

      (5) The Sodomites recognize one of the “men/angels” has come to judge them. They are enraged at this idea of being judged and threaten Lot with even worse retribution then they will mete out to the angel posing as their judge. After this, the Sodomites press home their attack

      (6) The attack is successfully rebuked by the angels with something that sounds much like a very powerful pepper spray.

      For those who say these angels had come with the purpose to find the ten righteous among the villagers, how are they to accomplish this by “abiding in the street all night?” Are they simply going to witness the wickedness running rampant all around them or will they conduct a poll? If the Sodomites are prone to partying all night, then when do they sleep? Certainly not during the day as anyone who has lived in an agrarian society well knows. Clearly, the Sodomites are not swooning over the potential sexual delights presented by the “men/angels,” but are extremely angry at them. What they want is to hear is their intent, they know the ultimatum will be the demand for their water but they want to hear it from the “men/angels” directly.

      This is born out by the fact that all the people of Sodom, men, women, and children, turn out to show their displeasure and by their threat to treat Lot worse then they are intending to treat the “men/angels.”

      So what is going on here? It has been established in Chapter 13 that Sodom is well watered meaning not only that it has plentiful water supplies, but these supplies are fed by well(s). Potable water in the dry regions of Judea is as valuable as gold. The well(s) in Sodom (and Gomorrah) would be located in the center of the village, not only for ease of access, but for security as well. Other versions of the story do in fact have the men/angels saying they will wait in the center of the village until morning.

      So why wait until morning, what happens then? If god is going to have his men deliver his ultimatum “your water or your life” then what more appropriate place then next to the village water well? And what better time then early morning when the inhabitants of any normal agrarian village would just be awakening and therefore would be largely caught off guard. Obviously, the “men/angels” have already prepared for a violent reaction as they have armed themselves with a blinding agent.

      However, the Sodomites are clearly anticipating the arrival of the “men/angles” and their ultimatum to surrender their water rights – or else. This is why Lot barely gets to his house before the Sodomites “compass his house roundabout” No doubt as a long time resident, Lot let this information slip out among the villagers hoping to hedge his bets that the Sodomites may be able to fend off “Gods’” attack on their village. This is why the villagers are already inflamed with anger when they see Lot spiriting the men angles to his house.
      Lot offers up his two daughters as a sacrifice to the villagers, that is why he describes them as “virgins”, they are to be a virgin sacrifice. But Lot lies as we later find in the following description:

      ~ § ~

      “And the men said unto Lot, Hast thou here any besides? son in law, and thy sons, and thy daughters, and whatsoever thou hast in the city, bring them out of this place: For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the LORD; and the LORD hath sent us to destroy it. And Lot went out, and spake unto his sons in law, which married his daughters, and said, Up, get you out of this place; for the LORD will destroy this city. But he seemed as one that mocked unto his sons in law.”

      ~ § ~

      Here one finds Lot’s daughters are not virgins, but married to his sons in law. Of course, apologists will be quick to say that Lot has four daughter, two virgins and two that are married, but there is no indication of this, such as Lot saying: “I offer you my two youngest daughters who are virgins.”

      The final result is the wrathful, judgmental, “God” of the Old Testament holocausts the village of Sodom burning it to the ground leaving nothing but ashes and of course – the water wells.

      End note: What follows is the famous scene where Lot’s wife looks back turning into a “pillar of salt.”

      ~ § ~

      “Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground. But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.”

      ~ § ~

      Note there is no mention as to why Gomorrah is included in the holocausting. There is no mention of any evil, but I strongly suspect Gomorrah was a village close by with its own water well(s). Note how the lord god destroys the cropland as well as the villages? This is a common practice of the Old Testament “god.”

      As for the pillar of salt description, salt was an all too common element in the region. The “Dead Sea” is filled with the stuff, not to mention the Mediterranean ocean off the coast of Judea. Therefore, the allusion to salt is one of baseness or commonness. This is the “salt”, the commonness, the unchoseness, of the Sodomites to which Lot’s wife metaphorically returns. No doubt utterly distraught to the point of insanity at the thought of losing her family, her home and everything she knew, Lot’s unnamed wife wandered back to disappear among the village ashes.

      Finally the question of salt. Salt is not only the most common base element readily available in the region, it is also what “Israelites” used to destroy cropland. Sowing the earth with salt kills plant life for an extended period. By Old Testament standards, when one is said to be the “salt of the earth” it is not a glowing description of pious religiosity, but one of baseness, crudeness, worthlessness and a danger to others.

      The Jews owe an apology to the Sodomites for making their name into a perverse pejorative. But don’t hold your breath waiting to hear one.

  5. The jew attempted this kind of social-sexual engineering in postwar WW1 Berlin; some of the filthy animals still remember the time with nostalgia. Mr. Hitler and company had their faults to be sure, but toleration of the corruption of innocent children on a society wide scale wasn’t one of them. No approval is made for the Euthanasia of Gypsies and mentally retarded persons, which program ran from September 1939 and ended in late August or early September of 1941 after the “Lion of Munster” Bishop August Graf von Galen spoke out and General Muller came to an agreement (Muller’s daughter was retarded by the way) on the part of the regime with the Catholic Church. This was not tolerated in Communist USSR either, a regime with worse faults in terms of sheer scope. A retired airline pilot with 37 years experience used to tell me “this is why they put the jews into ovens”. As a rule, nature makes some of us different than others – a gay cook where I used to work in Thailand wasn’t a bad fellow at all, but he kept his private matters private – Thailand is very tolerant but looks with disfavor on public displays of sex. Why would anyone need to corrupt the populace in a country which has been invaded and occupied by Japan, invaded by the Burmese (do visit the ruined capitals of Ayudthia and Sukothai) and once had the Kmer Rouge as neighbours? Corruption of children is one of the worst possible crimes; were I a public official and heard that the late Jimmy Savile or Greville Janner were found beaten to death and dumped on the Israeli embassy’s doorstep I’d stamp the file closed, “death by misadventure”.

  6. did Adam – peace be upon Him – have a belly button?How about Eve . Homosexuality was introduced by sodom and gomorrah as a punishment to passers-by who stole their fruits at that time . They liked the act so much and practised it amongst themselves . At the time humanity was at the early stages of growth and so if God allowed it to continue the human race would’ve ceased to exist,and God distroyed them all and incinerated their corpses to kill the viruses that were still alive inside their bodies.Right now the human race is plenty and there is no threat to the growth of the human race .There is only one race I can think of which is more dangerous than Sodom And Gomorrah .Adam did not have a belly button ,He did not come from a womb ,neither did Eve . Homo sexuality is one of the debris that resulted from splitting the FAMILY ATOM destroying it’s equilibrium . I SUGGEST THAT FAGGOTS SHOULD FORNICATE THEMSELVES BY CLONING THEMSELVES .. PROBLEM SOLVED. WHY CLONE SHEEP OR CHINESE ,THEY ALL LOOK ALIKE .

  7. If fags of the 250 plus varieties of sexual confusion get their way, like a deadly virus or bacterium effect on an organism, they will destroy civilization. Not that they will do this on purpose or by design. It will happen because it is in their nature. Human society is like an biological organism. If the pathogen of sexual confusion in all it’s forms is not purged from the societal organism the organism will die including the sexually confused. And then a healthy human organism will replace the formally diseased organism who didn’t take those steps in order to save itself. And then the whole process starts all over again.
    If the sexually confused Hillary Clinton makes to the White House, the human organism may find itself and most all other forms of life cleansed from the earth by the tiny, tiny atom sent forth by a sexually confused psychopath. The worst of all possible combinations.

    1. TJ –

      “…destroy civilization.”

      There has never been any civilization to destroy… only resignation..!!!

      Thoreau knew that:
      “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. What is called resignation is confirmed desperation. From the desperate city you go into the desperate country, and have to console yourself with the bravery of minks and muskrats. A stereotyped but unconscious despair is concealed even under what are called the games and amusements of mankind. There is no play in them, for this comes after work. But it is a characteristic of wisdom not to do desperate things.”

      ― Henry David Thoreau, Walden & Civil Disobedience

      1. Pat’s hydra head alter-ego persona “Salman” the Mega Uber Islamic Hitler-Obama-Hillary-JohnMcCain-Washington-Jerusalem-Jew-NEO-CONS-In-Alliance-With- Jew-Communist-George Soros Muzlim Brotherhood Jihadist Racist Dhimmitude Sharia Supremacist must be in His Glory today, looks alot like the Democrats just made the American flag ILLEGAL. NO American flags at the Democratic Convention, The Palestinian Flag IS THE FLAG OF THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION.

        [ See bare NAKED islam for Inspiring Jew-ISLAMO NWO details, Patsy ] :

        http://www.barenakedislam.com/

      2. TROJ,

        “Pat’s hydra head alter-ego persona “Salman” the Mega Ub…..”

        Seriously?
        Are you doing your best to become the Lasha Darkmoon, court jester?
        You come up with such insane reasoning it truly beggars belief.

  8. Lasha Darkmoon had been needlessly “sensational” ?
    “Can you imagine a world in which heterosexuality has been criminalized and straight people are hunted down and killed?”
    You don’t have to imagine it. It’s right there: “http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=136942”.

    1. Sean,

      Stupid events like this can easily be avoided, that is, if people begin to understand the law for themselves, not make contracts with the police, by giving them their names and signing documents once arrested and employing legal advisors (solicitors).

      The world of legality has been fused with the world of law. What has happened is a joining of law of profit with common law and in doing so, legislation has been created daily, further to control society ever more. Court rooms are now, no longer places of law and order, but on the contrary, places of persecution and profit. And who are overwhelmingly behind the creation of these new legislation laws?

      People have to seriously realise that the government and the court system IS NOT there to protect them. They are controlled establishments, of the banking fraternity, there to bleed every last penny from humanity and enslave them within a matrix.

      For example, do you know that there are NO drug laws? Yes, the very fact that when people are arrested for ingesting/or being found in possession of ‘said’ drug, they give their name, means that they are, right there and then, signing a contract with the police and judiciary, to be under their jurisdiction?

      Unless a human being steals from, assaults or murders another human being (one could also add the rest of the seven commandments as well) no one and I mean NO ONE has committed any crime whatsoever. In any case such as this you have to hold your own. It means standing on your own two feet and not only not allowing yourself to be intimidated by the police (who will very much try to) but also the court system. Their job is making money from you and 99% of the public do so, courtesy of their element of fear which they force upon society.

      There should be no police force. There should be people learning, instead, how to defend themselves from attack and other forms of persecution.
      There should be no lawyers. Instead there should be people understand the common law of the land and going by it. In doing so, no LEGALESE would ever have been written, to confuse people into giving away their money (and freedom) to people who wish to take it from them.
      There should be no government either. People were governed by their parents and that should have been enough to understand how they should then, later, govern themselves.

      The minute you allow another to have any authority over you, you become their slave. And situations like this prove just so,

      1. HARB
        “What has happened is a joining of law of profit with common law and in doing so, legislation has been created daily, further to control society ever more.”
        Right.I understand that Legislation initially served the people but it eventually came to enslave them as legislators and executives came to a vile agreement at their expense. However , in such a complex modern society I don’t see how to do without a government .

      2. Harb –

        “There should be no police force.”

        I have said for decades that crime would decrease if police forces were disbanded.

        The police cause, and are accomplices in, a lot of the crime…. and prevent very few crimes.
        Most cops are compromised.

        In America… “Dial ‘911’ and die.”

    2. I came up with such “insane reasoning” as Clues have already been dropped concerning The Fact there’s only really one , maybe two at the most, Darkmooners, and that one, or those TWO, play all the parts/roles here at Darkmoon, that’s how I can come up with such “insane reasoning” , because The Clues have already been dropped and once a Clue has been dropped it can’t easily be shoved back up the snake asshole, at least not without having to fight a viper snake and who wants to fight with a Viper simply to stuff CLUES back up its vituperative asshole, NOT fun. More fun to simply go with the flow of The Clues and follow The Clues wherever The Clues may lead, thank you, Harbinger for your “concern”.

  9. Well Uncle, dearest Uncle, considering ALL the Palestinian advocates support MEGA UBER JEW ZOG Hellary who is 100 billion percent on the side of jews and couldn’t give a fuckin’ flyin’ shit for the Palestinians, I figure I can read Bare Naked Islam and discern what is true from what is not true. It doesn’t necessarily follow if one reads Bare Naked islam every once in awhile one plants trees in izzysmells, it just does NOT Logically follow. I did, however, plant a banana tree in my back yard here in Florida the other day, it does NOT necessarily follow I care for your “GOD GIVEN” moozlum magilla gorilla swinging from banana tree to banana tree in the Congo just because I planted a banana tree here in Florida.

  10. WHY SO MANY ARTICLES ON PUTIN AND NOTHING ABOUT THE AMERICAN ELECTIONS?!?

    At a time in the United States the presidential campaign race is going on, Darkmoon is totally obsessed with the question if we should support Putin or not. Excuse me, but unless one actually lives in Russia, it really doesn’t matter if you support Putin or not. There’s nothing we can do about it even if we decide we don’t like Putin.

    I would imagine most of Darkmoon readers are in the United States, I imagine Darkmoon gets A LOT MORE American readers than Russian readers, so the most important question we should all be asking, who do you support for the Presidency of the United States in the upcoming November election and why.

    WHY DO WE NEVER GET ANY ARTICLES ABOUT DONAD TRUMP AND HILLARY CLINTON?!?

    If one only read Darkmoon, one would think this wasn’t an election campaign year in the United States. If one only read Darkmoon, one would think there was going to be an election in Russia in a few days and it’s very very important for us Americans to decide if we’re going to vote for Putin or not.

    Assh*les.

  11. Actually according to the dictionary, Lasha is a homophobe. I am not saying it’s right or wrong – I don’t care. It’s her right.

    Here is the definition (from the mac dictionary):
    :a person with an extreme and irrational aversion to homosexuality and homosexual people:

    Note this: “aversion to homosexuality”

    Meriam Webster:
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homophobe
    :a person characterized by homophobia

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homophobia
    :irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

    Interesting enough they used “or”.

    Wikipedia:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophobia
    Homophobia encompasses a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT)

    So, as long as you have aversion to homosexuality I am afraid you are a homophobe.

    Cheers

    1. @ tiri

      You can call me a “homophobe” if you like. But in my own eyes I am not a homophobe. Because I don’t go around calling queer people “faggots” or “poofters” or spitting in their faces and telling them how much I hate them. I have no personal animosity toward gays. I could spend a whole evening in their company without giving them the slightest offense.

      If a lesbian invited to me to go to bed with her, however, I would have to refuse. If refusing to give homosexuality the green light by hopping into bed with a lesbian is a sign of “homophobia” on my part, then yes, I’m a homophobe. That’s too bad! I’ll have to live with the stigma of being a narrow-minded bigot.

      I was in correspondence recently with an online friend of mine (who happens to be a poster on the Darkmoon site) and we were discussing this very subject. I copy and paste what I wrote to him — and he fully agreed with what I said:

      If anyone is “homophobic” on our site, it’s X [NAME WITHHELD]. But I do think his attitude is understandable. Because he genuinely believes the world would be a far worse place if it was overrun by aggressive gays ramming their opinions down everyone’s throat and penalizing all criticism of them. Straight people must not be bullied and coerced into giving their approval to the gay lifestyle if they are instinctually (and viscerally) repelled by homosexual behavior.

      It’s a complex subject. There’s no black and white here. Gay people are being unrealistic if they think they can demand universal love and approval for their sexual activities from the general public. The very most they can expect is tolerance.

      1. The Neurobiology of Drug Addiction
        Definition of tolerance:

        “A state in which an organism no longer responds to a drug. A higher dose is required to achieve the same effect.”

        Is there a limit of requested tolerance?

      2. Dear @LD (& @Harbinger):

        Sorry for the late reply. It may come as a surprise to you that I am on your side 🙂 I had a discussion recently with someone close and I had the same arguments as you, LD, and this person told me I am a homophobe. I looked it up and, yes, according to the dictionary I am.

        You are right when you say there’s no black and white here. Do we fully understand what causes homosexuality? Last time I checked I found some explanations based on epigenetics. If you search for epigenetics and homosexuality you can find some links.

        I read an article written by a guy that has been confused about his sexual identity since he was a kid. It was a sincere account and obviously he has been in a mental pain for a very long time. I felt sorry for him. Mocking people such as this guy doesn’t help. Calling them names and so on, again, it’s not good. Are all of them like this? Probably not. What happens if you have a kid or a nephew or a niece and discover that he or she likes people of the same sex?

        Tiri

    2. Tiri,

      That said you are most certainly a paedophobe. You have an irrational fear towards paedophiles. Who are you, in this case to disallow a child, albeit menstruating, to not have the right to have sexual intercourse with whom he/she chooses? “But it’s wrong” you will say and I’ll say welcome to the club. I love my male friends but have no desire of sexual perversions with them. The anus is not meant for penetration. Homosexualty is an affront towards nature. It is abnormal, immoral and unnatural behaviour. I couldn’t care less if two men want to bugger each other into serious anal problem, but what I do object to is when they try to say what they do is right and change the minds of youth through their warped, degenerate and depraved views on life.

      Sadly, you are one of the brainwashed and Sir Bertrand Russell’s wet dream. You have accepted that snow is black, or at least a far darker shade of grey.
      I have no irrational fear of homosexuals and their behaviour. Therefore I have NO phobia. I merely see homosexuality and the promotion of it, for what it is – wrong.

      1. P.S.

        Homosexuals are overwhelmingly, over represented in the world of arts & entertainment. They are for two reasons:

        1. The new world order agenda of destroying the family, thus they put homosexuals in the public eye as ‘role models’.

        2. The overwhelming desire for homosexuals to be loved, tolerated and more importantly, accepted as normal, natural and moral, as heterosexuals are. They won’t be and those who do fail to see how brainwashed and indoctrinated they are.

        Homosexuality was legalized so that public opinion would accept paedophilia. And they will.

        It doesn’t matter how many lies you may teach, the truth will always be victorious and homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals, transexuals and transgenders will always be seen for what they are : fruitcakes, with deep mental health issues. This does not, however, make them bad people, nor warrant aggressive behaviour towards them.

  12. PAT
    “Dial ‘911’ and die.”
    An ultimate voluntary patriotic act to update the statistics of goyim genocide.

    1. Yep—-

      Over 2,000 people have been shot just in Chicago this year already. Over 300 dead.
      More than ‘war’….
      Police ‘protection’..?????

  13. @Tiri, phobic means a fear of and I’ve no fear of homosexuals, except for bull dykes. Unlike Lasha I frequent gay bars for the purpose of mocking them and taunting them with faggot and poof and took great pleasure in spitting on them until a bull dyke who I luggered between the eyes beat the crap out of me.

  14. What’s more immoral? Two men or two women having sex and not producing any child or heretrosexuals having sex, producing a child, then going to an abortion clinic to have the child they produced KILLED?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *