Jewish First Wave Feminists

Sourced from Renegade Tribune

By Aria Whitebeam



Contrary to the common perception, many of the suffragettes in first wave feminism were wealthy Jewesses. Rich Jews such as Israel Zangwill and Edward Benays were generous patrons who helped to finance the suffragette movement.

 “Jewish woman have played a significant role in all aspects of the American feminist movement. Whether agitating for the reform of marriage and property laws, woman suffrage, birth control, improved conditions for working women, the Equal Rights Amendment, or a myriad of other causes aimed at fostering equal opportunities for women, they lent their support to and often pioneered campaigns for women’s rights.”  — Joyce Antler

Jewish women were at the forefront of women’s action, holding leading, influential positions of presidency, vice presidency, treasury and began forming and heading leading suffrage associations internationally. They became the first ‘female’ appointed judges, magistrates and female ‘immigrants’ in countries which required citizen sponsors, gaining legal residence without those sponsorships. These elite Jewish women had huge influence and wealth, and used it in the women’s action movement. Jewish women had their own Jewish branches of suffragettes (JLWS) gathering their ideals, before gaining for themselves international positions of power.

Linking feminist goals with Jewish loyalties… Indeed, the League’s strong feminist commitment became quite clear as it joined secular national and international suffrage organizations.” (Jewish Women’s Archive).

It is openly discussed that there was a massive amount of feminists who happen to be Jewish who were ‘creative’ in the second wave of feminism, almost as if they were not present in the first wave as well. The waves, as they are called, I find rather confusing as before the first wave there were preliminary efforts and actions in the 1830-80’s, cementing foundations and Women’s associations, which were more discreet. Then, Mrs. Propaganda appeared in the early 1900’s, then the swinging ‘sexties’ happened, and now we have naked models with writing on their chests, paid puppets acting for Soros, just like the suffragettes models were paid puppets acting for Bernays, back in 1920.

I want to highlight that the feminist movement has always had many Jewish leaders and discuss some of the Jewish women who brought the movement about. As they outwardly shouted for women’s rights, they also gathered together black rights, immigration rights, changes in law for marriages of women from other countries as well as ensuring Jewish settlements in the US, and advocating free love and birth control.

The first wave feminists hoped to give all western women a future of sex without love, life without children, children without a family and men without women. This is one of the reasons life is difficult for all, because solid family bases are becoming rarer, and without a good foundation a person is normally lost, as psychology would explain. I do not believe women wanted it this way, and that they all welcomed this change; this change was made for them. Like everyone else they got swept along with a world they did not create, but was created for them. Many women at the time of these drastic changes worried that families would be torn apart.

Anti-suffragettes were also headed by Jewish women, who would infiltrate suffragette meetings and lecture about these concerns. I feel , like many others do, that the elite Jewish powers like to control every part of an action. Whilst showing their opposition to the suffragette movement, Jewish neighborhoods were still showing percentages of pro-suffrage at 76- 93%. I personally believe, psychologically, when we hear others discuss the problems we feel we are facing, we feel relieved that something is being done on our behalf and are then personally less vocal. We feel vindicated when we hear another voice our concerns. In other words it prevents the action of some of us, as we feel action is already occurring. This is why many people become confused in the well of politics, because there is an illusion of division. People tend to blame one act, and how it affected one sex or group, but we need to remember that the reason the Jewish elite are controlling us is because they are holistically heinous. They are everywhere. The saying “hitting two birds with one stone” is nothing, as they are hitting millions with thousands of accurately aimed stones. The Jewish elite create movements and infiltrate the existing ones, engineering outcomes to suit their agenda, and they do this consistently in every arena.

I would like to point out that the suffragettes would recognize each other through jewelry of three different gems: peridot, amethyst and pearls. This was no ordinary woman, fighting for a vote, or to work in a desired field, or to go where she pleased, this women had money and a lot of it. Ordinary women would be glad to go home, have a home, or not have to work alongside their undernourished, worn-out children. The average working class woman had a voice alongside her man, was valued by her family, and she did not need to beg for their attention or minuscule change. I would not like to romance this hard living woman, but I shall not render her to be forgotten alongside rich elites and greedy Jews, as they alter her history and make it theirs. I have heard many personal tales from friends and family of strong family leaders from that time, who all other family members respected and feared to go against, and the notion that all women were without power is untrue – they were the ‘head of the house’ in poorer families, and mom was literally ‘the word’.

Many people admire the feminist first wave movement for giving women the vote, ensuring better working conditions for women and highlighting the working conditions involved in child labour. Although it appears women got the vote in 1918, it only applied to women over 30 with adequate property rights, or if their husband held those property rights. In other words the wealthy got in there first, voting for the changes they personally wanted. All women got to vote properly without distinctions ten years later. Critics, however, have demonized them for destroying families and have claimed they were racial eugenicists because of birth control. The materials I have read, though, suggest most feminists have fought for gender and black rights together, creating the ‘liberal’ thoughts of ‘inequality’ that we face today. Attacking feminism for bringing about clinics that are aborting black babies is, in my opinion, ignoring the larger situation – that many, many white babies throughout Europe and America are aborted daily alongside black infants. The centers would not be so vast if they were only for 13% of the female American population.

Although the second wave ensured the legality of abortion, the first wave, led by Jewish women, literally cemented the centers in which Planned Parenthood (once called the American Birth Control League), now stands. The Jewish first wave founded and ran the birth control centers that cause such controversy even today. Of course I am pro-life myself; I am a National Socialist who believes that we should grow our nations and nurture our families, not end them, and even if I wasn’t, I could not turn a blind eye to the barbaric way in which abortion is carried out. Do I hate women who have had abortions? I feel many women are led into a path of destruction from many angles; those I have known who have aborted children have often never had more because of guilt to the one they did not have, others have found it a haunting part of themselves they cannot forgive. I still, however, could never make this decision and struggle to grasp that others do, but understand the world we live in is engineered to bring about atrocities.

The picture to the right claims every baby is loved and wanted. This is the truth because if they are not, planned parenthood can find ‘solutions’. The sign also claims that Planned Parenthood is the future of America. Planned Parenthood is a very prominent part of ‘family planning’, which is given funding from the Gates foundation constantly; if you check his donations page, they receive money regularly and ongoing.

Why is it important to look at this now? Because Lefty Lefties wouldn’t be where they are today, without these movements of the past. We need to understand why a woman’s role of being a mother became antonymous with slavery and bondage, that going against nature was natural, that more pride was to be found in serving others before their own, and that women could not have both careers and children, but should prioritize only one. If we read prominent feminist works it becomes clear that motherhood is deemed as an unnecessary chore, as is birth itself. I am not against a woman attaining whatever career she chooses, if she so desires, but to say holding a baby frustrates us from our real self is ridiculous. Our real self learns patience, beauty, grace and honor whilst nursing a child; these qualities form a fantastic worker in whichever field she chooses, once a child has helped her learn who she is. There is plenty of opportunity to work before and after having children, and sometimes alongside having children, if the family has the available support.

British suffragettes were supported financially and publicly by Israel Zangwill, who was said to have given an unlimited cash flow for the cause. He famously advocated for his own homeland, however the author of  ‘the melting pot’  advocated racial mixing throughout america and his theatre production claimed America to be the land in which all races would fuse to make a new man. Edward Bernays, nephew of  Fraud, also contributed large sums, allowing his wife Doris to use their funds for feminist actions whenever she chose. The suffragettes had a huge income:

In 1908, Labour Party subscriptions and donations were around £10,000, while by 1909 the WSPU ( The Women’s Social and Political Union) had an annual income of £21,213 and growing” (History Extra).

This sum is equivalent to about 2.8 million American dollars today.

First Wave Influential Jewish Feminists

Jewish women emerged as national leaders of the suffragette movement Maud Nathan and Martha Klatschken, for two, were especially well known for their oratorical abilities and organizational know-how. Their imaginative protest tactics, such as delivering a nonstop twenty-four-hour-long streetcorner lecture,or giving what is called a silent speech, whilst standing before a vacant store, helped draw attention to the cause. Rather than organize a distinctly Jewish branch of the suffragette movement, however Nathan and her collegues believed it would be more effective to mobilize Jewish women to join the ranks of the women’s rights movement as a whole”( Jewish Americans and Political Participation, Medoff, 2002)

This list of Jewish elite women who were pioneers in the feminist/ suffragette movement is in no particular order.

Ernestine Rose (1810-1892),  pioneer of the suffragette movement, who is viewed as the first American feminist. She helped the passing of the women’s property law, as well as advocatedf or Jewish settlers without sponsors in Prussia. As she came to Berlin she was without a sponsor and just happened to chat with the king, and he changed the official position for her and others. Considering everywhere she went she faced anti-Semitism and women hatred, she managed pretty well.

Henrietta (Netta) Franklin (1866-1964), from the rich Jewish banking Montagu family. “In 1885 Netta married Ernest Louis Franklin, a member of one of Anglo-Jewry’s most prominent religiously and politically liberal families, and soon became active in the family’s concerns.” (Jewish Archives), abolishing white people, I assume?

Lilian Helen Montagu (1873-1963), Netta Franklin’s sister, was a social worker and a magistrate, who helped form Jewish girl clubs. Lily Montagu was the ‘driving force’ for the Jewish liberal movement in England. She apparently wrote her published stories to put her own mental anguishes into some spiritual sense.

Maud Nathan (1862-1946) was married to her Cousin Frederick Nathan and was a suffragette activist who’s fame was international. “She believed that Jewish women had a special civil responsibility that could best be demonstrated through social reform and political participation”  (Jewish Book Council, 2013).

Martha Klatschken (born, 1878) was head of East Orange county chapter, New Jersey, a socialist who would lecture for up to 24 hours at a time, and walk from store to store promoting votes for women.

Rose Heiman Halpern (1881-1976), aided Margaret Sanger to open the first birth control clinic. Halpern promoted Birth Control use for decades.

Fanny Fligelman Brin (1884 -1961), “National Council of Jewish Women’s prominence in the women’s peace movement” (Klapper, 2013). Brin helped form the World Affairs Council and delegated for America in United Nations conferences.

Hannah Mayer Stone (1893-1941) was a paediatrician who worked in birth control, which are slightly contradictory professions considering most ‘birth control’ clinics became abortion centres. Stone was also a pioneer in Marital Counsel. Stone was the medical director of Sanger’s Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau.

Rebecca Hourwich Reyher (1897-1987) was a journalist who empowered women and demanded women’s working rights. She focused on writings of the African women’s plight, whilst being a part of the National Women’s Party.

Gertrude Weil (1879-1971) “found the Goldsboro Equal Suffrage Association in 1914 and served as its first president” (Jewish Women’s Archive), supported Planned Parenthood throughout her life. Weil was the President of North Carolina Equal Suffrage League, and she later became the president of the ‘North Carolina League of Woman Voters’, which educated women on how to use their new found voting rights.

Mary Belle Grossman (1879-1977) was a political activist and later Judge. Grossman was one of the two first women admitted to the membership of the ‘American Bar Association’, she was considered one of Cleveland’s most successful activists and a treasurer of the woman’s suffrage party of greater Cleveland. Grossman was the first municipal Judge and an African American advocate.

Rosika Schwimmer (1877-1948) was a leader of American, pacifist, feminist and suffragette movements. Schwimmer was one of the first ‘World Federalists’ who founded the ‘Hungarian Feminist Association’. In the ‘Hungarian National Council of Women’ she was appointed a governing body on the board of children’s welfare. The secretary of the ‘International Women Suffrage Alliance’ and vice president of ‘Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom’, whose headquarters are in Geneva. Schwimmer attempted the creation of a world government.

Belle Winestine (1891-1985) headed the Wisconsin and later Montana suffragettes. Winestine was the main aid of Jeanette Rankin, as she lobbied for her, carried out her publicity and was her legislative assistant. Winestine was of the Jewish “Fligelman” family, and also lead the campaign to give women the right to attend Jury service.

Frieda Fligelman (1890-1978) was a feminist who sought reform and wrote on ‘the richness of African Negro languages’, and the sister of Belle above.

Anita Pollitzer (1894-1975) was a rebellious feminist activist from Charlestown. She held positions of leadership in the National Women’s Party, as the chairman from 1945-1949. Apparently she ‘charmed’ Harry Burn, who had the deciding vote on the 19th amendment, the woman’s vote.

Rosa Mannus (1881-1943) was “active in the Dutch branch of the International Women’s Suffrage Alliance (IWSA)” (Jewish Women’s Archive). Mannus set up the International Women’s Conference against war, and was the vice president on the ‘International Alliance of Women’, previously the ‘International Women’s Suffrage Alliance’.

Rosalie Loew Whitney (1873- 1939) of the Brooklyn’s Women Suffragette Party was “New York congressional chair in the Woman’s Federal Equality Association and a speaker for the National American Woman Suffrage Association at the House of Representatives suffrage amendment hearing in 1918” (Jewish Women’s Archive). Chief of the New York legal aid society and New Yorks congressional chair in the ‘Women’s Federal Equality Association’, and speaker for the ‘National Suffrage Association’. Whitney founded and was officer and attorney of the ‘New York Women’s National Republican Club’.

Emma Goldman (1869-1940) was a part of the birth control agenda, who wrote books and lectured on the freedom of sexuality and the importance of birth control. Funnily enough she edited the magazine called ‘Mother Earth’ which championed ‘free love’. Goldmans writings were popular in Europe and America.

Rose Pastor Stokes (1879-1933), a part of the birth control agenda. She married extremely wealthy James Graham Stokes, they gave a lot of attention to forming ‘settlements’ in New York. Born to an Orthodox Jewish family ‘Wieslander’. Stokes was a founding member of the ‘Communist Party of America’.

Bessie Moses (1893-1965) was an obstetrician and gynecologvist who owned a birth control clinic called the ‘Baltimore Birth Control Clinic’, later a part of Planned Parenthood. Moses was the  Director of the Baltimore Bureau for Contraceptive Advice and was the Medical Director until her retirement.

Margaret Sanger (1879-1966) was founder of the ‘Margaret Sanger Bureau’, formerly named ‘Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau’, and also of Planned Parenthood. This much talked about lady is thought not to be Jewish herself, but was married to Jewish man William Sanger, so I have included her as her husband and close colleagues were Jewish. I believe her influence upon the liberal social and sexual revolution had a Marxist ideology and she believed that human lives were individually not of value. Sanger openly wrote of her race perfection, that weeding out those inferior was justified, and apparently she was anti-abortion until “Hitler changed her mind, and his views for eugenics had rubbed off on her”. *rolls eyes*

Lena Levine (1903-1965) of Planned Parenthood worked under Margerat Sanger. Lena was a Psychotherapist and gynecologist. Levine wrote pioneering works of birth control and sexual enjoyment and was a sex education advocate.

Hannah Greenebaum Solomon  (1858-1942) formed the first ‘National Council of Jewish Women’. She attended the International Council of Women in Berlin in 1904, which afterwards decided to branch an International Women Suffrage alliance. The ICW worked in The League of Nations formed after World War One.

Bertha Solomon (1892-1969), whose family founded the Zionist movement in South Africa, was a voice for feminism. Solomon was a practicing advocate of the supreme court and a member of the Parliament of South Africa. Her daughter married Michael Comey, who was Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations from 1960-1967. Bertha spent a lot her time in Israel.

Doris Freischman Bernays (1891-1980) was part of Bernays publishing. ‘Propaganda’ was the Bernay’s way, which says it all. She aided her husbands theoretical work, as he bragged how easily he manipulated the suffragettes to aid his advertisement campaigns. She was also the first women to be given a passport in her maiden name.

Hertha ‘Marks’ Ayrton, born Phoebe Sarah Marks (1854- 1923), was a student of Edith’s father, William Ayrton. Hertha was a British scientist and a suffragette. Her work was the first to be awarded medals of honor to a woman, and she opened the doors for other women in her field to become vocal within physical sciences institutes.

Edith Ayrton (1875-1945) was wife of Israel Zangwill. She helped form the Jewish League for Woman Suffrage. She was an author and political activist for the women’s cause. She was step-daughter of Hertha (above).

Matilda Ayrton (1846-1883) was a suffragette. She was Edith’s (mentioned above) biological mother, and  one of the first female physicians in Britain and an active suffragette who died whilst Edith was very young.

Emmeline Pankhurst (1958-1928) is perhaps one of Britain’s most notorious suffragettes. It seems that her father was of Jewish origin. Her father was a ‘Goulden’, who is suggested to be a part of the larger Goulden Jewish family in Manchester

I am positive I have missed at least half of the Jewish women involved. As this article was growing fast, I curbed it here.

Suffragettes and feminist activists I have read about and could not confirm as Jewish, for example Jeanette Rankin, the ‘Astor’s’ and others (who I have not added to the list) were from rich banking, Quaker and/or farming families. All of the first influential wave were elite and held positions within the feminist movement that gave them power. I would hate to say all feminists were in this movement to purposely make progress for the Jewish elite’s agenda of destruction, as many would have been compassionate individuals who wanted to make a better world for others to live in.

The reason I have pointed out some of the many leading Jewish elite women in the women’s feminist action is because I believe the efforts of feminism from the first wave (and beyond) have not, in my opinion, made women ‘equal’ (as this is impossible) or their lives more abundant, but less so. We no longer give birth at home within our communities as we once did, since feminist action paid for by Jewish purses took birth to the hospitals and removed our female bonds, and taught us mothering is a burden, not a beauty.

We no longer find men who talk for us. I am not being so rash as to say remove our vote, not at all, but what I am saying is the effect that this has had on families is that people no longer need to adjoin together in thought, they do not need to be morally and intellectually in harmony, as they did before. I believe it would have crossed our mind before marriage, does this man have my values? This is something I feel we have lost, and it effects our ability to parent well together. Partners that believes in real, important issues together are a force to be reckoned with, while partners bickering and distracted by the many available distractions are not.

I understand this work I have compiled could be immediately criticised for including Margaret Sanger ,who is not proven to be Jewish herself, but I felt she was an important person to discuss, as her literary work really does belittle motherhood, and she appeared to be the leading voice for many of her Jewish colleagues, and she used her husbands Jewish finances to promote both of their beliefs. Because I have shown that there were pro-suffragettes and anti-suffragettes, it could be assumed that they were not all working towards one goal, and that perhaps Jewish women in general are more politically active because they are perhaps in most cases more vocal in comparison to other religions or groups. Of course there is always the argument that Jewish people always rise to the top because they are ‘extraordinarily intelligent’ and naturally lead, but I personally believe this is not the case. Back in the days when I was unaware, I still felt it odd that Jewish people were the only ethnic minority who had an abundance of fortune, as this goes against what sociology theory tells us about minorities in comparison to majorities – that minorities have nothing, not that they have everything – and Jewish people are very much an exception to this rule.

The first wave feminist hype would like us to remember that it was all about the vote and how well they did in securing a future of equality for women. Equality is another leftist illusion, which says we are all the same; this is a derogatory view to mankind, which leaves every nationality and gender unappreciated for what they hold different. Lefty, Lefty isn’t for love, as everything in their design is back to front. Nature is not equal, men and women compliment each other as being inequal to one another and join together and become a whole, as nature would intend. Women are mothers, our bodies are created to bring forth babies, babies that are our nation’s future. Ultimately I believe feminism, controlled by elite Jewish powers, has removed one simple beautiful truth, and therefore separated the woman from herself. They have told us to mother is unnecessary and an option which we can take or leavebut I believe, a woman does not make a child, a child makes a woman and a woman makes a family, this family makes a community, and this community makes a nation.

57 thoughts to “Jewish First Wave Feminists”

    1. Leo –

      Thanks…. the bad guys and gals are all connected… at the top.

      As Makow showed, but misspelled his name as Meyers… Gloria Steinem was recruited into CIA by Cord Meyer…

      Meyer was the same agent who recruited Billy Clinton into the CIA at Oxford.

      “They all darkly point to Bill’s participation in anti-war peace conferences in Stockholm and Oslo, and his trip to Leningrad, Moscow, and Prague while he was at Oxford. ‘Who could have paid for this?’, they ask. ‘It had to be the KGB!’ they claim.”
      Cord would shake his head. “What rot – we paid for it. We recruited Bill the first week he was at Oxford. Bill’s been an asset of The Three Bad Words ever since.”

      The murdered, Stew Webb, also reported it back in 1993, originally in the Spotlight Newspaper:

      “According to sources within the CIA, Clinton was used by the agency to infiltrate protest groups and report on their activities. In addition, Clinton used his cover as a Rhodes scholar to view the Khrushchev memoirs, then he stole documents for “the Company”, Webb said.

      “According to sources, Clinton was answering to London bureau chief Cord Meyer when he took the Khrushchev documents. Contacted in Washington recently, Meyer denied Clinton was working for the agency (CIA).”

  1. “The first wave feminists hoped to give all western women a future of sex without love, life without children, children without a family and men without women”.

    And there you have it. Forget second and third wave feminism. The rot was already there at the very start!

    “The materials I have read, though, suggest most feminists have fought for gender and black rights together, creating the ‘liberal’ thoughts of ‘inequality’ that we face today. Attacking feminism for bringing about clinics that are aborting black babies is, in my opinion, ignoring the larger situation – that many, many white babies throughout Europe and America are aborted daily alongside black infants. The centers would not be so vast if they were only for 13% of the female American population.”

    Interesting isn’t it how it’s always the minorities? If blacks are having abortions in the USA, alongside whites, then common sense dictates that seeing as they make up about 1/6th of the overall white population of the USA, then there are obviously FAR MORE whites babies being aborted than black. And correct me if I’m wrong, but do Jews not have a monopoly on abortion clinics?

    It’s one thing that I’ve never understood about women. Why would you sleep with another, knowing that there is always the risk of getting pregnant, especially when you have no desire for children? The act of sexual intercourse, although today, heavily promoted as ‘love making’ is and always will be there for the procreation of the species and people need to start relooking at that factor. Sure, you love your partner, but you shouldn’t be having sexual intercourse if you’re not trying for children and are going to abort should you get pregnant. Although frowned upon by the Catholic Church, masturbation is a far better alternative, especially when no infants may be murdered as a result of it.

    “Emmeline Pankhurst (1958-1928) is perhaps one of Britain’s most notorious suffragettes. It seems that her father was of Jewish origin. Her father was a ‘Goulden’, who is suggested to be a part of the larger Goulden Jewish family in Manchester”

    Although the article was an enjoyable read, I was quite surprised that there was NO mention whatsoever of the Fabian Socialists, who were a driving force behind the British Suffragettes. And for those who know about the Fabian Socialists then you’ll know how this organisation is most certainly one of the tentacles of the New World Order.

  2. We had the best eugenics program. It was the intuition, discernment and subsequent discrimination of women. They decided whose genes were fit to see another generation. They chose and then raised that generation of men. The braintrust and engineers behind men. We all want Mama to be proud of us. That’s just one facet of their feminine power and prerogative. Feminine wisdom and power are mocked and ridiculed as something childish and silly. It’s now that they’re only regarded as having physical functions.

    When they say “math is boring”, maybe we should ask “What do you see in the numbers? Is 7 a girl? Is 13 fat? Is 19 a murderer?” Maybe they see social interplays and maybe math needs their perspectives. Other things they say a lot are “YOU should KNOW!”, “Do you promise?”, “You never listen to me”, “I’m not talking to you! (and they DON’T)”… , they’re right about those things too. They just have a mysterious way (to a guy) that they communicate.

    Girls are so naturally righteous. They hate lies, liars and cowards. They’re civilized, they’re charming, they’re thoughtful of other people and polite, they respond to intelligence. So, WTF happened to the righteous girl that was once that woman? Did she give up on her righteous idealism for lack of support in it? She seems to have gone totally apostate to her brassy girl instincts and is angry about that too. Never been burned, she feared no flames. That’s virtue. There’s a tidal wave of a movement on to burn the girl’s virtue, and all the so called ‘men’ salute Jezebel as she herds them off to propaganda camp. The song went “Go away little girl, before I beg you to stay”, now it goes “Go away jailbait, before someone thinks I’m a pervert”. Reading between the lines, that can only mean they think she’s the new taboo siren.

    Jezebel leads her to a cliff and convinces her it’s safe to jump, because he has a rubber that Jezebel passed out to all the disrespectful molestors. Crashed and broken on the rocks below, who comes up with the bandaids and the whole ‘men are pigs’ feminist doctrine to comfort the girl, but Jezebel again, and Ahab is a feminist flogged punk. So, what’s his face King of Assyria comes up and says “We want the fairest of your virgins”. Ahab says “take em! Do you want some gold too?” These days, they talk it up around the water cooler, when their daughters are dating negroes, other girls or midgets, thinking that raises their star with their ultimately jew bosses. If I keep thinking how fucked up this is, I’m going to need a 24 pack of beer real soon.

    Listen up, Girls. When you get some bozo lecturing you about going all the way to prove your love, he’s not talking about your ‘all the way’. Yours is way way way up there. He’s talking about riding you to where he gets off. With your emotions and expectations so far removed from that deed, you’ll be cold, and that is usually a thing that makes a guy decide he doesn’t like you at all. He would marry you if he meant what he says about ‘proving love’. He probably only wants to do it to brag about it to his friends anyway, like an insecure pussy who has some mommy issues. You should have your ‘all the way’, and 99 more without any dick making an appearance, and your virtue plays a big part in how soon that happens. If he were sensually mature, he would want that too. Stop giving losers pussy! It’s unnatural and tragic! You’ve been deserted by cowardly white men and pimped out by your own fathers, just so they can be suckups at work, if you’ve even known them. It’s Jeremiah’s lamentations again, except worse. Now, that’s happening to the virgins with their own consent, and the full blessing and encouragement of so called ‘adults’. We deserve everything we’re getting.

    1. Girls are so naturally righteous. They hate lies, liars and cowards. They’re civilized, they’re charming, they’re thoughtful of other people and polite, they respond to intelligence.””

      What planet are you living on – Venus?
      Girls are NOT naturally righteous.
      Everyone, in general hates lies, liars and cowards, unless you are a masochist that is.
      I have met many uncivilized and what can only be described as bitches when it comes to the fairer sex.

      I try not to generalise when I write. You however have generalised. If women were what you presume above, there would be NO feminism and the toxic misandrists that it breeds.

    2. LEPIEU P
      Good admonition. We deserve everything we’re getting. (Albeit a bit disputable.)

      1. LOL, yeah Magomed

        We’re a fierce army of warriors who will run and hide from 10 year old girls, especially horny ones (“Horny” isn’t the right word for them, but what would the right one be? Intimate pinings? Amorously affectionate? Whatever it is, it’s nothing overwhelming and the most genuine compliment I can get, with their keen 3rd eye for the whole gestaldt). Put them in panties and we are SO outta there!

        I just thought of a funny cartoon. That charging WW2 soldier with one foot way up in the air, weapon in hand. Except in this one, he’s running away from tweeners in panties.

        Lolicia, you’re a live one.

  3. Lepieu P,

    “Stop giving losers pussy! It’s unnatural and tragic!”

    Quite correct. Very perceptive.

  4. Couple of random thoughts …

    Henrietta (Netta) Franklin (1866-1964), from the rich Jewish banking Montagu family…. She apparently wrote her published stories to put her own mental anguishes into some spiritual sense.

    The mental anguish of rich jews is just too much for my sensitive nature to bear, especially when they search for spiritual context, heavy lidded opaque eyeballs turned upward, “eli, dalai lama, sabachtani, what’s the gold fix today?” their heartrending cries echo in the deaf night of the soul, that’s why i never read their stories, for fear of a nervous breakdown.

    The gliberal jews are much worse than the yarmulke cluster, they are the world’s prime socially transmitted disease and I wonder how they mutated within the original judaic biomass inside the ghetto, were they also rabbinically designed and ordained, wound up by talmud and loosened upon the unsuspecting world?

    They infiltrated and attacked men by way of gold, working on their territorially acquisitive greed (jew’s gold will help me win war with goy next door and i will repay the jew with anticipated plunder – except that jew financed both sides and scooped up the lot).

    They infiltrated and attacked women by simon pure bullshit of absurd, intentionally half-baked abstractions, empty verbiage, knowing that women’s minds and perceptions are attuned to personal wavelengths (Lepieu said it much better) and they have neither time nor inclination for abstractions, so dear to men … yeah, I AM generalizing, pure trendology, so don’t give me that “my mom ain’t like that”.
    This was actually the topic of an article about 2 months ago, “women betray society” or some equally unfortunate, inane title, yet some observations there were bang on, I said it then and was pelted with rotten tomatoes and I say it now, wearing gardening coveralls.

    Burning the Black Mass candle at both ends …

  5. THE KALERGI PLAN is motoring full steam ahead in London. Paki Kahn and smarmy, unctuous trustafarian Rithschild jew Zacj Goldberg are the only candidates. NOT A SINGLE WHITE PERSON!!!!

    The repulsive, uppity, turd-faced paki midget has let it slip. Labour mayor candidate Kahn said: “There are too many White Men in London.” There’s a solution for that, you ugly turdlet: Go back to your cousin-humping, goat-fellating Turd World desert.

    Don’t like White men? Good. Happy to live in the civilisation we created tho aren’t you. We don’t like dunb tyrdlets who budbuddingding in your usual breathless incoherent manner. Bet you and your gangraping, corrupt nomads won’t leave. No, an 11yo White girl is waaaaaaay more attractive than a camel in a tw shack. And if only you can get the White man to leave, there’ll be nobody to stop you pimping out primary schoolgirls from your sinecure as a ‘lawyer’ frim North London Poly who can barely speak English.

    You’ll just have to prey on the stuipdest Worzel Gummidge trolls of tge Valleys like huw stevens. Oh we have lectric and lots of benefits in the Valleys where we can play the cheese game cos the prumitive ugly munchkins who live here have never created anything. C.

    1. The civilization you created under the direction of your Jew lords with the resources and labor of the paki? The paki is your slave boy and he is happy to be the slave of the English who are the slave dogs of the Jew. You all fit well together in the holes of London. It’s perfect.

  6. It’s curious how any article on feminism on this site can be guaranteed to flush out the misogynists. 🙂

    I have news for you, you lunkheads: feminism may be a disaster, but women are not! Don’t get the two mixed up, you sad wankers!

    If it wasn’t for the woman who gave birth to you, you wouldn’t be here — quetching and complaining and whining about all women being a dead loss. Oh gosh, how superior you all are! Forgive me while I puke.

      1. Don’t forget the dear old whatever.

        if it wasn’t for men that gave birth to women … nice to know there is absolutely no difference between sexes, whether one wants to be known as titperson or dickperson is matter of aesthetic preference, physically, mentally and emotionally they are all one, any differences merely cultural.
        So, I fulsomely retract my previous claim and it is indeed true that it is women who wage wars (eyes are windows into the soul, aren’t they) for power and geopolitical gains, while as seen above, men bond on person-person wavelengths and suckle future generations of warriors.

        Yup, got it all mixed up, so sorree, everything is just as it should be, whatever differences existed, Jew leveled the playing field and I stand contrite and politically corrected.

      2. Them fancy bio-chemico shenanigans are pre-me, lobro.
        When I was born, (literally shudder), one freezing cold 3 am Diciembre morning,
        my dear old dad was camped out in the woods somewhere, with the rest of the gang! (smart guy)
        But even then.. I still somehow knew I had me a dear old dad.

    1. “I have news for you, you lunkheads: feminism may be a disaster, but women are not! Don’t get the two mixed up, you sad wankers!”

      And what are feminists if not overwhelmingly women (and a truly sad minority of confused males)? The argument here is not that women are a disaster but women who choose feminism are.
      And I hate to say it, but if you’re having sexual intercourse, without the purpose of procreation in mind, then you are a wanker as well, if that is, as a woman, you happen to be using your partner’s penis, as a hand’s free dildo to bring you to sexual satisfaction, or are a lesbian with your girlfriend and a strap on.

      1. @ Harbinger

        You are a self-confessed misogynist, right? And why? Because you were short-changed by one or two women. Is it reasonable to assume that all women are sluts and slags just because the women you happened to know at one time treated you badly? No, it isn’t!

        @ Lobro

        You’re as bad as Harbinger. Some woman has given you a bad time, I reckon, and this has given you a jaundiced view of all women.

        FYI, not all women are feminists or even sympathize with feminism. I hear the woman behind this website is an anti-feminist. Good for her! So am I. There are literally thousands of women who hate feminism and campaign against it. There are hundreds of anti-feminist websites run by women.

        Here is a woman you and Harbinger should admire, a famous anti-feminist woman we anti-feminists all respect:

      2. lolicia,

        “You are a self-confessed misogynist, right? And why? Because you were short-changed by one or two women.”

        It appears that you have read little of my writings, for were you to know of my reasons as to why I confess to being a misogynist, it’s most certainly not just because of being ‘short-changed’ by women as you put it. I am a misogynist, but only in half of its definition – a strong mistrust of women. I hate no one.
        My reason for mistrusting women is a mixture of growing up with three sisters, beautiful I might add and the games they played to get what they wanted. Upon leaving family life, I saw this on a far larger scale, most notably in the workplace and rampant in bars and nightclubs. No woman should ever be trusted save your mother, that is, for she will never do you wrong. It’s a pity the same can’t be said for siblings and mothers of offspring. I came to my conclusions from life. It would take more than being mistreated by one or two women to have the understandings I do. That said, I am always courteous and polite in the presence of women. I simply do not fall for their guile.

        And more to the point, where on earth is the misogyny in my reply to you? There is none. What there is is simple refutation of your reply and the pointing out of those who engage in sexual intercourse, not for the action of procreation, but self pleasure are, in your words: “wankers”.

        You mistakenly think that I call all women feminists when my point is clear on this very forum, about feminists.

        And yes, I’ve heard of and listened to Camille Paglia, but I disagree with her strongly in her belief that feminism is dead, quite the contrary in fact. She needs to get around many of the college campuses in North America and even here in the UK.

      3. Lolicia,

        go ahead, inhale deeply the invigorating fumes of self righteousness for the power they give you, like Popeye downing a can of spinach, so you can thrash lobro-like strawmen that loom threateningly over the global womanhood.
        But another trick of Popeye’s will keep you safe and that is never to stray too far from the cartoon environment, outside of which logic lurks to trap the unwary – you’ve been warned!

        Some women gave me hard time, some gave me good time, many wouldn’t give me time of day and some gave me a bunch of laughs, did you know that LOLicia?
        This is why I can’t get angry at you, when I see you inhaling that poison blowgun aimed at me.
        I ain’t no damn Miso Gynist, tho you made a public stand on that platform.
        Shall we chop up that definition, given by the thoroughly Jew-feminist Psychology Today?
        The 12 ways to spot lobro the Miso Gynist:

        ▪ He will zero in on a woman and choose her as his target. Her natural defenses may be down because he’s flirtatious, exciting, fun, and charismatic at first.
        ▪ As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality. He may change quickly from irresistible to rude, and from rude back to irresistible.
        ▪ He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.
        ▪ He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
        ▪ His behavior toward women in general is grandiose, cocky, controlling, and self-centered.
        ▪ He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
        ▪ He will unknowingly treat women differently from men in workplace and social settings, allowing men various liberties for which he will criticize female colleagues or friends.
        ▪ He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
        ▪ On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
        ▪ Sexually, he likes to control women and gives little or no attention to their sexual pleasure. Foreplay, if it occurs at all, is only a necessary means to an end. He likes oral sex but only as a recipient. His favorite positions enable him to avoid looking the woman in her eyes.
        ▪ He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
        ▪ He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

        So what’s my Miso-score?

        from what i remember, i said THIS:

        ▪ They infiltrated and attacked men by way of gold, working on their territorially acquisitive greed (jew’s gold will help me win war with goy next door and i will repay the jew with anticipated plunder – except that jew financed both sides and scooped up the lot).

        ▪ They infiltrated and attacked women by simon pure bullshit of absurd, intentionally half-baked abstractions, empty verbiage, knowing that women’s minds and perceptions are attuned to personal wavelengths (…)

        This is the core statement I made, on which you seem to have based your charge of misogyny, or am wrong, it is something else? if not, let’s deal with it.

        Do you disagree with those two statements and if so, how and why and moreover, show me how they add up to my asserting female inferiority.

        the minds of men and women are either,
        (a) different, or
        (b) not, they are the same.

        Which is it, Lolicia?

        If (a), how exactly do they differ in their social focus and how does your claim differ from mine and furthermore, even if true, how does it establish my misogyny, remember, this is the issue.

        If (b), how do you distance yourself from the dreaded feminists whom you are at pains to disown?
        Because only by asserting (b), ie, that there is no mental, psychological, emotional or experiential difference between men and women can you even tentatively approach the accusation that I am a misogynist, namely, “lobro is a misogynist and Lolicia is a feminist“, which even if it proves the case against me, condemns you even worse, ie, a liar, when you asserted categorically on several occasions that you are not a feminist.

        i got a hankie ready in case you burst into tears 😉 due to my relentless persecution.

      4. @ Lobro

        For someone so omniscient and intellectually unassailable in his own eyes, methinks the gentleman doth protest too much. 🙂

      5. @ Harbinger
        @ Lobro

        Thank you for responding to fully to my criticisms. I will say this to both you and Lobro. I infinitely prefer your misogyny, which has an air of manliness about it, than the sickly condescension of the effeminate men who grovel at the feet of the feminists. There has to be something stupid about a man who actually admires the Pussy Riot girls and the Femen whores.

        Neither you nor Lobro, thank God, would ever degrade yourselves by burning incense before those brain-dead sluts who have brought shame on the entire female sex.

        Like the Darkmoon chick I so admire, I don’t vote at all. Even before I read her advice not to vote I was always a conscientious non-voter. This has nothing to do with being a woman or believing that women have inferior minds and should stay out of politics. It’s because I don’t believe in democracy. I think democracy is a con trick invented by the elite — particularly by Commie Jews — to pacify the masses and get their “consent” to their own subjugation and servitude.

        They want your votes, these bastards, and when they don’t get your votes they will rig the voting.

        Even if the principle of voting were a good one, I think it’s completely vitiated by handing the privilege to vast numbers of people unfit to even tie their own shoe laces. Women don’t need the vote. They are voting for all the wrong reasons anyway. Because they like the cut of a man’s jib. I actually know a woman who told me in confidence that she’d voted for Obama because of a dream she’d had about Obama sodomizing her. What a joke.

        @ Lobro

        Actually, I’m a bit of a misogynist myself. As you can see. I have a very low opinion of my own sex. I agree we women are a dead loss collectively. Except in bed. That’s one area in which we reign supreme as far as you guys are concerned.

        I guess we’re better than sex dolls, even if we ain’t so pretty.

      6. Lollypop,

        “Actually, I’m a bit of a misogynist myself. As you can see. I have a very low opinion of my own sex.”

        You start off a dialogue attacking myself and Lobro, calling us out as misogynists and then you call yourself one, as a female. 🙂
        The difference is, unlike you, I don’t have a ‘low opinion’ of women. I just don’t trust them, through experience. I call myself a misogynist because of my mistrust in women, but sadly I am viewed as one who hates because of it, which is completely wrong.

      7. Hopefully no feathers ruffled, Lolicia, let’s pass around the peace pipe.
        In my mind, i tend to slide these terms around and reuse them in somewhat novel ways.
        Thus, it is the Feminists™ who denigrate women in all sorts of ways and most obviously by insisting that they are nothing but a variant of gynecologically enhanced men, while rejecting all those, often ineffable qualities that ennoble women and make them at times hugely superior to men.
        Like insisting that gazelles are a type of hogs and their proper behavior is to wallow in mud and farm sludge.
        Only a Jew would think to mint a coin with two heads.
        Of the infinitely vile Femen and the Pussy Riot, I have nothing to say other than that they are traitors to humanity, women, men and children alike, not to mention their nations, traditions, culture and decency, the doormats of Talmud, much, much worse than common prostitutes, with whom I mostly sympathize though not approve of.
        They deserve a bullet and a burial at the town dump.

        Next, I totally prefer the company of women to men, almost all my good friends are women whose company I find inspiring, stimulating and enriching because they can teach me to see what previously i’d been blinded to.
        Their criticism is always welcome and instructive and if they occasionally profit from my “manly” perspective and peculiar mental skills, it’s a fair trade for both.

        Long live the difference.

  7. So what’s the problem? I thought it was determined here, and at Renegade, that Feminism is not a problem. And i do recall the Black Pigeon Speaks video creating quite the dust up here.

    In fact, John Kaminski was banished because of it. Here and at Renegade.

    I find myself in a curious position here. I usually disagree with just about everything John Kaminiski ever offered in terms of a solution…

    I think the big story here is that Votes for Women, First Wave Feminism – whatever you want to call it, was part of the Birth Control crusade. Of course their ranks were filled with Jews. Who else could be bothered with such nonsense at the time it was happening except a Jew?

    But the Rockefellers were certainly involved and we do know that Birth Control was mostly a Protestant operation.

    I believe I am the only one here who consistently brings up the sin of using birth control.

    Well, dear readers, you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

    Please don’t complain to me about Jews in the Suffragette Movement and become unhinged by videos put out by Black Pigeon Speaks. Please don’t complain about Birth Control if you currently practice it and also slam the Church for being behind the times on the this issue, and just about everything else.

    There does come a time where you have to put up or shut up. Or to put it in a nice way, you must be doers of that which you preach and not just pontificators.

    It is just like Faith. Faith is dead without works. Of course that is another truth that Catholics are consistently mocked over.

    1. God points, Rich.

      Men and women should spend less time in politics and voting, and spend more time on having, and caring for, their own children.

    2. @ Rich

      In fact, John Kaminski was banished because of it. Here and at Renegade.

      If you have any evidence that John Kaminski was banned by this website, or “banished” as you put it, please let us have it. Your statement is false. Kaminski threw a tantrum when his views were criticized. And he had the audacity to complain of “censorship” when not a single article or comment of his was ever deleted or disallowed here. He left in a rage of his own accord.

      “I resign!” he said angrily. We accepted his resignation. That is not being banned or “banished”.

      Kaminski was indeed “banned” by Renegade Tribune for having the impudence to question the authority of its editor and publisher Kyle Hunt and to issue him with highhanded ultimatums. “Publish me or else…..” he said, resorting to moral blackmail. I’m sorry, but that’s just not acceptable.

      — DZ

    3. Rich,

      The thing is that the constant promotion of sex and thus turning it into an even bigger industry than it was (prostitution, porn & stripping) has made people even more addicted to it, seeing it not as the reason for the continuation of the species but an ‘extra curricular activity’.
      I no longer engage in it, although at the ripe old age of 45. In fact it’s something that I’ve never been bothered about simply because of the problems caused because of it. That night of sexual pleasure, moreso, as a man who’ll stop the natural orgasm from happening in order to ‘satisfy’ the woman, can turn into many years of financial and psychological hell. And for what? It almost makes me think if the insect kingdom and the deadly reality of male mating with female, for the male that is, is very much part of the human kingdom too.

      We do most certainly have a problem with birthrate in the west, but it is as has always been planned – to turn society into one of complete hedonism, free of sexual restraints and perversion, where the state will clean up the mess of a night of debauchery, the night before. In other words they want society ‘going at it like rabbits’ but not producing any offspring.

      1. Harbinger –

        Taking a pretty woman into your care is often rewarding in other ways than just sexual. It is (for me) a challenge to ABSTAIN, yet show affection. They need it – and appreciate it. If carnal pleasures ensue, just try to control yourself, as a man should practice control IN ALL SITUATIONS. Be a gentleman. I’d rather be with women than with men in just about every aspect of social interaction. Having sexual intercourse is all about being kind and gentle, and is a natural culmination of fondness. I do not waste time on women of whom I am not fond, and, subsequently, have numerous ladyfriends who are not feign to approach me as a confidant. We all need that, at times. Be nice! 🙂

    1. Everyone, be nice to Darkmoon’s youthful commentariat. They could be Indigo children for all we know, 😉

  8. Of course the jews were behind female voting. They want as many people as possible voting for their own oppression. Why should the males have all the “fun” of delusional liberty? The jews thrive best when everyone voluntarily oppresses themselves within the jewish system of governments.

    It’s the same for the “equal pay for equal work” concerning jobs (just over broke). It was really “equal pay for equal slavery.” Through economic manipulation, the jews suckered women into the slave labor pool of jobs. Voluntary jewish slavery disguised as economic freedom did it.

    There seems to be a tendency among some to blame females in general for falling for the jewish ruses that gutted their natural female functions. Those blaming females for being suckered into the same jewish system that males were suckered into long before is like the pot calling the kettle black. The lying jews are the ones behind the sucker games for both genders. Humanity expects the truth and the jews, knowing this, provide only lies for their control/domination benefit.

    1. Ungenius –

      “They want as many people as possible voting…”


      More people voting makes it much easier to steal elections. Justifications for the stolen outcomes are really tough when only 10 people vote.

      Big turnout = easy big fraud.

      1. Pat,

        They wanted women voting, not just because of what you’ve stated in stealing the elections, but more women involved in voting, brings about women in the workplace. Women in the workplace brings about the state getting junior. I think this was their plan all along and voting was merely a smokescreen to grab the children, so as to start their indoctrination process and bring about their complete control of society.

        A totalitarian cannot control a society unless it’s united, that is, groups of anarchistic states within that society are every totalitarian’s nightmare. Just as they reel all of them in order to control, the same can be said of getting the children out of the homes, away from their parents and into state brain laundries for e-Jew-cation. Eventually, families become defunct and mum & dad are replaced by Big Brother.

      2. Harb – –

        Correct. Many reasons…. and none for the good.

        Another is for more participation for more debt for campaign supporting businesses… such as media and printers… etc. Big business… $$$ billions….!!

        My physical ability to write has been cumbersome in recent years… and getting worse. So, I limit it these days.

        That’s why I copy and paste….. and post lists.

  9. I respectfully disagree with you, Ungenius. Humanity does not expect the truth, for Humanity doesn’t really want the truth. The Jews are not the only liars around. If the Jews were the only lairs around and everyone else was all about the truth, the Jews would not have such any easy time of it “fooling” everyone. The Jews have a very easy time lying and getting away with their lies because so many love the lies the Jews tell. Plenty of NON Jew liars around also, and they do love lying and they do love living in a world of lies.

    If NON Jews were all about the truth and the Jews all about lies, the NON Jews would never have let the Jews take over. The Jews are where they are basically because the world loves lies. Those in the Christian world who are honest, for example, are ostracized and treated like garbage before any Jew comes around. Treated like garbage by their/our own kind first and foremost, then treated like garbage by NON Christians, Jewish and otherwise.

    The world doesn’t want the truth, not really. If the world really wanted the truth we’d be living in a much more truthful world. There’s nothing magical or super-natural about Jewish power. And the Jews do NOT have the high IQs they’re always bragging about . Their “high IQ” is based on throwing out the scores of the low-IQ jews , of which they’re plenty around . Include the IQ scores of ALL Jews, their mean average IQ is no higher than anyone else’s, in fact, it’s a bit lower than others. The Jews have the power exactly because so many love lies and mendacity, that’s all. It’s not rocket science to figure out.

    The basic foundation to propaganda and mind control is flattery. The world loves flattery, though Humanity knows Humanity doesn’t really deserve the flattery, but Humantiy laps up the flattery and the compliments of The Liars, both Jew liars and NON Jew liars, even though Humanity knows it doesn’t deserve the flattery, Humanity wants flattery a lot more than it wants The Truth.

    1. TROJ –

      Just be careful of how you PRESENT the truths of matters. It is better to avoid ACCUSATIONS. 🙂

    2. @ TROJ

      Thanks for the respectful approach in your comment.

      If humanity did not expect the truth, they would not fall for lies. If humanity expected lies, lies would not be effective. It is that simple.

      Concerning jews versus non-jews which has been a past topic a time or two. My personal viewpoint on what makes a jew, a jew, is not whether they have sex within their tribe, but that anyone is a jew that does the lusts of the devil with lying as a primary trait. Control over humanity by elites, regardless of their sexual partners, is always accomplished with the use of lies no matter where they are located on the round rock.

      The jews were really clever by picking a term, jew, that they define as they desire over time for their benefit. Had they they chosen the term asshole, it would have been much easier to understand their traits and to identify them. 🙂

    3. A Crow’s got from God a piece of cheese somewhere.

      And now, sitting on a branch,

      The Crow’s going to have its tasty lunch.

      But, lost in thoughts, the Crow keeps in beak

      its booty.

      Unlikely, a Fox is looking for a rooty.

      She has been stopped by odour of the cheese,

      She stares hard upon the cheese, she’s caught by cheese.

      The cheat is nearing the tree on its tiptoe,

      She wags her brush not taking stare off the Crow.

      She’s sweetly speaking to the Crow’s heart:

      “My dear, you are so smart!

      Your neck is nice, your eyes are vivid!

      Who hasn’t seen – he can’t believe it!

      What pretty feathers, lovely beak you have!

      And voice of angel you undoubtedly have!

      You sing without shame! If, such a pretty being,

      You also, my friend, are expert at the singing,

      “You’d be the King of birds, I’m feeling!”

      The Crow’s now dizzy at the praising words,

      With joy the breath is stifling in the throat,

      As if in answer to the faithless Fox’s words

      The Crow croaking with all the Crow’s throat.

      The cheese is down – Fox with it runs homewards.

      1. The thought is known everywhere,

        That flattery is bad and vile, but all in vain, –

        The evil finds a corner in the heart again.

      Several moments need clarification. In your reasoning you step in contradiction with yourself.
      1)”…Humanity doesn’t really want the truth.” Saying”Humanity” you obviously mean all living beings “walking on two legs and without feathers” (Plato’s definition of human being) and boldly speak on their behalf. But then you divide Humanity from Liars, Humanity in one camp, Liars – in the other (“…Humanity laps up the flattery and the compliments of The Liars,…). And what is worse, it turns out, seekers of truth, that often payed for their exploits with their life and whom we obliged much,suffered for nothing and thrown overboard, if they did not exist at all. (Aspiration for cognizance of the essence of things given to a man is a punishing whip.)
      2)”Truth”- usually people interpret this term arbitrarily, at their discretion, sometimes reinforcing it with the word “wholy”, drawing suspicion upon themselves. It is topic standing by itself, many people scrutinized it. Anaxagor from Klazomeny (500-428 B.C.) for instance, considered that “Owing to weakness of sensations we cannot judge about truth.” Soviet scientist Leo Gumilyov (spent 18 years in prison) came to conclusion that truth was adequite perception of the observed facts, and philosopher Leo Shestov (Yehuda Shwarzman) assumed hundred years ago that truth was something that was still not discovered, and so on.

      1. Nik,

        Let me add my provisional definition of truth.

        First, the truth is not as important as the search for it.
        Consider that oftentimes, one arrives at the truth by elimination of lies, eg, truth about Holocaust (like St George harpooning a swampland packed with slimy, writhing reptilian dragons).

        Thus, the truth is that which Jew seeks the most to avoid.

  10. “…a woman makes a family, this family makes a community, and this community makes a nation.”
    Very simple and right, ancient Romans knew that and family had been [email protected] of the empire. Until emperor Constantine killed his wife Fausta and son Krisp. Pagan priests refused to forgive him such sin and he introduced new, Christian values, more progressive. Later on each one who wanted to kill his father, for example, and not suffer the pangs of remorse or fear of inevitable punishment, had to pay just 5 “rubles” for indulgence. This way Constantine has become Great.
    As regards that jewish people always rise to the top because they are ‘extraordinary intelligent’…we shall see what we shall see, where their “intelligence” comes from…
    Some 20 years ago in new Russia, triumphant with Christianity and democracy again, after 1917, new, free TV emerged with interesting programs. One of them:” Chto? Gde? Kogda? – What? Where? When?” A team of 5 or 6 ‘extraordinary intelligent’ people each Sunday played intellectual game against all others, giving right answer to any question from province. This team was headed by Mikhail Barshchevsky, lawyer, later representative of the government in State Duma, a jew; judging from his declaration for 2014 (96 000 000 rubles income – much intelligent). One day a question entered from province: ” According to William Shakespeare clever man should possess of 5 qualities, I’ll prompt 2, – keenness of observation and inventiveness,- name 3 others.”
    Team raked their brains and pretty soon ascertained two – fantasy and reasoning, but tried hard as they could, they failed to name 5-th. Prize, decent sum of money, went to province.
    So, where jewish intelligence comes from?

    1. Their (haha) intelligence sure doesn’t come from elbow grease and sweat!
      It comes from re-arranging/defining the meaning of intelligence.
      A sober, interesting and informative comment.

  11. Some additional background on one champion of feminism, not to mention slavery …

    I know there is little room at the top or should I say, the bottom, given the likes of Judas Iscariot, Ilya Ehrenburg, Dov Zakheim, Bernard Henri-Levy and so forth but surely Hillary must be shortlisted.

    Imagine this: she demolishes the only decent country in Africa and one of the world’s finest, gruesomely murders its ruler and satanically giggles on air in glee at his martyrdom, then immediately jets off on taxpayer’s expense in Air Force plane to check on her slave plantation to make sure the captive 10 million niggas don’t take a piss break in the garment sweatshops, that the gold mines grabbed by her brother are churning out those nuggets, Rothschild drumming fingers on that big desktop impatiently.

    Beady eyes bulging with humanitarian concern, time for woman president, time for kindness indeed, time to show what those suffragettes yearned in anguish for in their banking chateaus.
    (that top picture is from some jew movie about suffragettes, hounded and harassed by catholic priests, right? lots of NYT critics stars and thumbs up …)

    1. @ Lobro

      HELLiary would definitely be the best pick for President of JewSA. She has proven that she can enjoy lying and murdering, devil’s lusts and JewSA traditions. By my definition of what a jew is, she is jewish beyond doubt.

      With your picture Pat, you have revealed a new super sub-basement of porn. Your past computer virus problems may not have been a virus at all. Your computer may have just been revolting at storing that image. Even machines have limits. 🙂

  12. “Was there any form of filth or shamelessness, particularly in cultural life, without at least one Jew involved in it? If you cut even cautiously into such an abscess, you found—like a maggot in a rotting body often dazzled by the sudden light—a little Jew.” ~ Adolf Hitler

    The abscess in this article was a particularly nasty pustule called “feminism”.

    Then there is this gem, heretofore unknown by moi, discovered while I was looking for the above quote.

    “For us, this is not a problem you can turn a blind eye to-one to be solved by small concessions. For us, it is a problem of whether our nation can ever recover its health, whether the Jewish spirit can ever really be eradicated. Don’t be misled into thinking you can fight a disease without killing the carrier, without destroying the bacillus. Don’t think you can fight racial tuberculosis without taking care to rid the nation of the carrier of that racial tuberculosis. This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end, until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished from our midst.” ~ Adolf Hitler

    The Jew as a terminal disease, not just an interesting thought, but a favorite theme of mine.

    Then there is this howler: “Why does the world shed crocodile’s tears over the richly merited fate of a small Jewish minority? … I ask Roosevelt, I ask the American people: Are you prepared to receive in your midst these well-poisoners of the German people and the universal spirit of Christianity? We would willingly give everyone of them a free steamer-ticket and a thousand-mark note for traveling expenses, if we could get rid of them.” ~ Adolf Hitler

    The Egyptians had the same offer. Obviously, removing Jews from a country is never enough.

    From Manetho’s Aegyptiaca

    “According to the ancient mythology, Avaris was Typho’s city. But when these men had entered it, and found it suitable for a revolt, they chose a ruler from among the priests of Heliopolis, whose name was Osarsiph. They swore an oath that they would obey him in all things. The first laws he gave them were that they should not worship the Egyptian gods, nor should they abstain from any of the sacred animals that the Egyptians held in the highest esteem, but could kill them, and that they should not ally themselves to any but those that were of their conspiracy.”

    (This is a perfect description of what Professor Jan Assmann calls “normative inversion” in his book “Moses the Egyptian”)

    “These people, whom we have called kings before, and shepherds too, and their descendants,” as he says, “held Egypt for five hundred and eleven years. Then,” he says, “the kings of Thebes and the other parts of Egypt rose against the shepherds, and a long and terrible war was fought between them.” He says further, “By a king, named Alisphragmuthosis, the shepherds were subdued, and were driven out of the most parts of Egypt and shut up in a place named Avaris, measuring ten thousand acres.” Manetho says, “The shepherds had built a wall surrounding this city, which was large and strong, in order to keep all their possessions and plunder in a place of strength.

    “Tethmosis, son of Alisphragmuthosis, attempted to take the city by force and by siege with four hundred and eighty thousand men surrounding it. But he despaired of taking the place by siege, and concluded a treaty with them, that they should leave Egypt, and go, without any harm coming to them, wherever they wished. After the conclusion of the treaty they left with their families and chattels, not fewer than two hundred and forty thousand people, and crossed the desert into Syria. Fearing the Assyrians, who dominated over Asia at that time, they built a city in the country which we now call Judea. It was large enough to contain this great number of men and was called Jerusalem.”

    Let’s review: The Hyksos are called “Shepherd Kings”. So what is the numba one profession attributed to Biblicial Jews? They elbow their way into Egypt, divide the country and irritate the native Egyptians for five hundred years before the Egyptians scream “enough” and try driving them out by force. However, the Hyksos hole up in a city they “found suitable for a revolt”, previously stolen from Typho. The city’s name is ~ I’m not making this up ~ Avaris; proving once again the cosmos has an obvious sense of humor by assigning this hilarious literary Mark of Cain on the usual guilty party.

    Finally, the Egyptians conclude a treaty with the Hyksos which, from other accounts, included a handsome buy off price. Here is the description of the Hyksos’ payoff in Exodus: “But every woman shall borrow of her neighbour, and of her that sojourneth in her house, jewels of silver, and jewels of gold, and raiment: and ye shall put them upon your sons, and upon your daughters; and ye shall spoil the Egyptians.”

    Borrow? BORROW? Are you kidding me? BORROWED? “Borrow” indicates a return of something. Since when do Jews return anything? Take another look at the Jew descriptor “avarice”. For Jews, the word “borrow” is merely a more socially acceptable synonym for “steal”. It’s like saying Jew central bankers “borrow” the tax dollars that are, after all, paid “voluntarily.”

    Then comes the punch line: “After the conclusion of the treaty they left with their families and chattels, not fewer than two hundred and forty thousand people, and crossed the desert into Syria. Fearing the Assyrians, who dominated over Asia at that time, they built a city in the country which we now call Judea. It was large enough to contain this great number of men and was called Jerusalem.”

    Give-me a break! A mass “exodus” of the 240,000 Hyksos from Egypt!? To a land called “Judea”!? Where they built a city called “Jerusalem”!? Could these be Jews? Ya think?

    Nawwwww! Ask most anyone dealing with Egyptian history and they will tell you it’s all just a big coincidence. Besides we know that Manetho was a notorious Egyptian propagandist, on par with Josef Goebbels, who likewise took great delight in dissing the Jews. Today, we wisely know the Hyksos had nothing to do with the Jews. Now repeat after me: The Hyksos were not Jews, the Hyksos were not Jews.

    And finally, with all the chutzpah Jews can muster, they stole the good name of Alisphragmuthosis for use in a cheesy song from their movie titled “Mary Poppins” – SupercalifragilisticAlisphragmuthosis.

    1. @ Arch Stanton

      Good post! If it walks like a duck, has feathers like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck.

      Your comment has been stored for my future use. Because of my views concerning the fallacies of the Old Testament, some people ask whether I believe the story Moses, the passover, and the exodus. My reply is always this; “Mose was real because he met with Jesus un the garden, but the story of Moses cannot be true because it makes no common sense in so many ways.” If further discussion occurs, I explain the idiocy of the story in numerous ways. Now, your comment can be added to the discussions. Thanks.

      1. Ung –

        Here’s another mistake: Red Sea was actually Reed Sea.

        You might want to add that in the original Hebrew text the body of water the Israelites crossed when leaving Egypt is called yam suph, “Sea of Reeds,” – NOT – Red Sea.

        Suph by itself means ‘reed’ not red.

        This was pointed out as early as the 11th century, by Rashi.

        In the Biblical narrative of The Exodus the phrase Yam Suph refers to the body of water that the Israelites crossed following their exodus from Egypt. The appropriate translation of the phrase remains a matter of dispute, as does the exact location referred to. One possible translation of Yam Suph is “Sea of Reeds”, (suph by itself means ‘reed’, e.g. in Exodus 2:3).

  13. “Anti-suffragettes were also headed by Jewish women, who would infiltrate suffragette meetings and lecture about these concerns. I feel , like many others do, that the elite Jewish powers like to control every part of an action. Whilst showing their opposition to the suffragette movement, Jewish neighborhoods were still showing percentages of pro-suffrage at 76- 93%.”

    “~~~ I personally believe, psychologically, when we hear others discuss the problems we feel we are facing, we feel relieved that something is being done on our behalf and are then personally less vocal. We feel vindicated when we hear another voice our concerns. In other words it prevents the action of some of us, as we feel action is already occurring. ~~~”

    “This is why many people become confused in the well of politics, because there is an illusion of division. People tend to blame one act, and how it affected one sex or group, but we need to remember that the reason the Jewish elite are controlling us is because they are holistically heinous. They are everywhere. The saying “hitting two birds with one stone” is nothing, as they are hitting millions with thousands of accurately aimed stones. The Jewish elite create movements and infiltrate the existing ones, engineering outcomes to suit their agenda, and they do this consistently in every arena.”

    A brilliant, concise, analysis of the Jew’s foremost controlling methodology, well worth reading again and pondering over. When one controls both sides of an argument, the outcome is certain. This is a perfect description of America’s electoral process. What is most amazing is how the gullible goyim repeatedly fall for the controlled opposition ploy as if somehow such a thing is inconceivable as opposed to being a most obvious solution for controlling true opposition.

    Is it not strange how many names of the women listed in the article are totally lost or forgotten to what is termed “remembered history”? This is typical for Jewish influence in major events. The same thing happened to the Jewish Bolshevik leaders of Russia’s communist revolution. They too have disappeared down the Jew’s magical memory hole of forgetfulness.

  14. When I go through a museum in Italy and see room and room of Madonna and Child, I want to cry. Once upon a time this beautiful relationship was the central religious mystery. A modern mother often has a drug addict husband, or a husband that has no work. She is expected to carry her weight in the market place. (She is more employable than her husband because she is cheaper) She drives to work with her child in the carseat, and so much of the baby’s life is spent there because she does the triple shift: she earns the living, she shops, she cleans the house, and she is the primary care giver.

    In the Jewish world ( and I know because I live there) one of the secrets is that when the mother finds out she is pregnant with a girl there is something almost like shame that sweeps through the family. She’s not having a boy, how sad. I was in a state of shock when this happened to my daughter who married into an elite Jewish family–not orthodox but reform. Also shocking was the realization that because her husband was a “genius” it was not necessary that he really work. In the old Eastern European Jewish villages of yesteryear the great achievement for a woman was to have a son and that he be a genius. Earning a living was secondary—that was for those less well endowed.

    The problem with Jewish woman working out this problem on the American landscape has been that many of us grew up in better circumstances. I came from pioneer stock where women and men had separate but equal roles. Everyone had to pitch in. No girl sat on the couch if her mother was in the kitchen. Nobody was permitted to stay in bed–all hands on board, so to speak. But at the same time, no woman had to change a tire. In that world a woman took care of the kids, which half the time meant shoving them out the door to go play, while she cooked and cleaned. She may not have had a car but she talked on the telephone. She was not responsible for homework–that was the kid’s responsibility. She was not responsible for making a living–that was her husband’s responsibility. No child could disrespect his mother, talk back to her, berate her without the wrath of the father. Women were protected. And in Christianity women have a central role….. I grew up with the idea that as a woman I had direct contact with God, that like the Virgin Mary deep inside of me was the mystery of the universe unfolding.

    Feminism is bleak in comparison as we see with the sale of baby body parts, with predators so threatening of children that they don’t play outside, and that women are discouraged from nurturing their children. So many husbands rule in their boxers from the bed where they reign supreme because geniuses are not required to so anything. Women can do it all. What changed with feminism is that all women now have to live the life of jewish women in the “shtetl”, it’s not really liberation of women but demotion of women to unbearable servitude.

    1. When I was a kid back in the 60s I remember reading a lot of magazine articles about the women’s liberation movement. The general drift of all the articles was how important women liberation is for the world, that’s because women are inherently and intrinsically all about Peace and Nurturance, and what a shame it is they were shut out from the halls of power and we don’t hear their voices. If women were only liberated, if they only could be free to hold important positions in our society/culture, the world would be a Nurturing place, a much more Peaceful place. If women were liberated and we could only hear their voices, we’d hear the Voice of Nurturance and Peace. Boy, what a pile of bullsh*t that was. [ I actually believed what I was reading back then, lol. But I was very young so cut me some slack, thank you. ]

      Now that women are liberated, even the very epitome of the 60s ANTI WAR movement, Jane Fonda, supports the MEGA war-crazy/warmonger Hillary Clinton. And all the women who trip over themselves to join Uncle Sam’s military, and very proud of themselves to do so.

      I’m not saying women are horrible or anything. I’m just saying women aren’t as wonderful as they think they are. They’re not as peace-loving as the propaganda would have it, not as nurturing as the propaganda would have it. [ And the young men of the 60s generation who rallied against “The System” are just a phony as the young women of the 60s generation who rallied against “The System”. ]

      Now that the 60s generation is in power in Washington, they’re just as war crazy as any other generation, including the women. In many ways, the 60s generation was/is a lot more hypocritical and lying and greedy as the generation they rebelled against.

Comments are closed.