Published yesterday on The Occidental Observer
Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz recently remarked that Europe was on the brink of a “cataclysmic event“. What could this be?
On the face of it, Stiglitz appears to be predicting the imminent death of Europe. But this is deceptive. Europe is not going anywhere. It will still be Europe as long as its individual ethnostates remain intact. What Stiglitz is predicting is the death of the idea of a future federalist pan-European superstate: a multilingual leviathan with a single currency, the euro, and no border controls between its individual statelets. This continental superstate, the United States of Europe, is seen as an analogue to the United States of America.
Stiglitz makes his gloomy prediction because he is disappointed by Brexit, the momentous decision of the British people to free themselves from the tentacles of the European superstate. Stiglitz fears that other nations in the EU bloc could get similar dangerous ideas. With Brexit, 17 million people said ‘NO!’ to being ruled over by autocratic foreigners in another country, many of them unelected bureaucrats of dubious provenance and with repugnant ideologies.
“Today [October 1, 2016] is exactly 100 days since Britain voted to leave the European Union,” Quentin Letts writes in his Saturday Essay for the Daily Mail, revealing how the momentous words of the BBC announcer ‘We’re out’ almost made him freak out when he first heard the good news at 4.40am on Friday, June 24. “I sat on my bed and burst into tears of joy,” he recalls. “Our country had voted to escape the alien prison of Brussels and its anti-democratic Commission. We were free.”
Stiglitz and his kind would not have approved the upsurge of populist sentiment symbolized by Brexit, obviously believing that referenda should only be taken seriously when the votes of the masses coincide with the special interests of the ruling elite.
We are talking here about the clash between two completely incompatible world views: between those who, on the one hand, believe that nations states are important and should retain their sovereignty and border controls, and those who, on the other hand, believe passionately that nation states are not important and should be phased out of existence. The latter group, who wield great influence right now, believe that nationalist sentiments are to be discouraged and that nationalism is an unmitigated evil. To this very powerful elite, in which the Jews happen to find themselves ensconced among the upper echelons, it is cosmopolitan internationalism that matters.
It’s worth pointing out that Stiglitz himself belongs to the Jewish elite, so it comes as no surprise to learn that he should disapprove of Brexit. After all, Brexit was a collective cri de coeur for national sovereignty. It was a complete rejection of cosmopolitan internationalism and federal superstates such as the United States of Europe.
— § —
Only when there is a One World Government, it is argued passionately by the anti-nationalists, will there be peace on earth. It is not competition that is needed, it is cooperation. The idea being pushed is that we are all one big human family and must learn to live in peace and beat our swords into plowshares. We must all pull in the same direction. The Jews even have a neat phrase to describe what is needed and longed for so intensely as the ultimate goal of humanity: tikkun olam in Hebrew, meaning literally “the repair of the world.”
The world can only be repaired, it is maintained, when nation states are abolished, when people are free to wander through the new earthly paradise without borders and passports: to live where they want, work where the want, and marry whom they want across the race divide.
It goes without saying that Jews have always been in the vanguard of the cosmopolitan internationalist movement, or the push for One World Government. “We will have a world government whether you like it or not,” Jewish banker James Paul Warburg told the US Senate on February 17, 1950. “The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
The mongrelization of man is not something to be deplored, these people aver, it is something devoutly to be wished. For how can “racism” ever rear its ugly head again in a world without races? When perfect mongrelization is achieved, it is argued, every one will be truly equal. With the disappearance of races and nationalist ethnic groups, IQ disparities will also disappear and there will no longer be any shame about belonging to an inferior IQ group. Most people will be intellectually homogenous, apart from the elite masterclass which will make sure that the rule of intellectual homogeneity applies only to the masses.
With genetic advancements, there will no longer be any excessively fat or thin people, or any exceptionally ugly or beautiful people to make the ugly feel envious. Everyone will be uniformly slim and brown: light coffee brown in the northern hemisphere and dark chocolate brown south of the equator to make allowances for the long-term effects of the tropical sun. In the ironical words of Christian Miller: “The end result will be a utopia of mocha-skinned beauties.”
The human family will then at last be at peace.
No one need fight anyone any more, no one need rob anyone, because we’ll all be one big human family where everything belongs to everyone equally. Tikkun olam will then usher in Utopia—heaven on earth.
Unfortunately, it’s not as simple as that. To quote Christian Miller again:
Egalitarians claim “the race problem” will disappear if the traditionally White nations assimilate and interbreed with non-White populations. Some imagine this will produce a utopia of brown-skinned beauties—society without race by homogeneous default. Others recognize this scenario as the systematic eradication of the White race—White genocide.
There are of course other complications.
Some people will need to rule over the human family—just as parents rule and look after their children—and so the rulers will need to belong to a superior caste. Though all men will theoretically be equal in the New World Order, some, in practice, will need to be more equal than others. These superior beings will enact the role of benevolent dictators, governing the rest of mankind in loco parentis. These will be the People Farmers, to coin a phrase, and the people will be their livestock.
Who are the People Farmers?
We will now deal with this question in detail and show how it is linked to mass immigration, multiculturalism, and, indirectly, to the current rape epidemic in Germany, Sweden, and other European countries.
— § —
We can be sure of one thing: the ongoing migrant crisis in Europe appears to be a carefully planned catastrophe, not an unfortunate accident. It has been on the cards for decades, ever since Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), an Austro-Hungarian aristocrat whose mother was Japanese, arrived on the scene in the early 1920s and established the Pan European Union, the prototype for the United States of Europe.
This was to be a multicultural superstate populated by mongrelized Europeans, according to the Count, who was himself a mongrel. Moreover, it was to be under Jewish rule—or rather, under a mandarinate of elite Jews and enlightened support groups of non-Jewish philosemitic foot soldiers who believed as passionately as the Jews did in tikun olam and the establishment of a one world government.
After World War I, the Jews increasingly seen as the natural born aristocrats of a new and resurgent Europe: the replacement for the effete and moribund Christian aristocracy of the ancien regime that had suffered its first major blow with the French Revolution (1789-1799).
It was Count Richard Eljiro von Coudenhove-Kalergi (henceforth referred to briefly as ‘Count Kalergi’) who in 1950 won the first Coudenhove-Kalergi prize, now better known as the Charlemagne Prize. This prestigious prize has been awarded every year (but sometimes on alternate years) to world-renowned statesmen for the promotion of “European integration”—a euphemism for multiculturalism, mass Third World immigration, and the slow and covert extinction of the white European people by means of miscegenation, mongrelization, and general interbreeding with the darker races of the Third World. It was Count Kalergi, in his 1925 magnum opus Praktischer Idealismus (‘Practical Idealism’), who foresaw a future world built on the premise of Jewish supremacy and the subsequent dissolution of all other national ethnicities.
All the world’s separate races would one day be merged into a single mongrelized mishmash, he predicted confidently, with the single exception of the Jewish people who would remain inviolable and intact.
The following passage, forwarded to me only yesterday by one of my correspondents, made me sit up and think; I had no idea Jews were capable of such meticulous coordination, all working in unison like an army of ants (or a swarm of bees) to bring about a clearly defined result that had been collectively and tacitly agreed upon in advance.
Most people still haven’t grasped the fact that Jews are the principal exponents of the massive non-White immigration invasion into White countries and of course only into White countries.
Examples include Job Cohen in Holland, Barbara Spectre in Sweden, Ervin Kohn in Norway, Anneta Kahane, Angela Merkel and Gregor Gysi in Germany, Gerald Kaufman and David Cameron in England, Ronit Lentin and Alan Shatter in Ireland, and George Soros and Larry Summers in the USA.
Most Jews consciously push for unlimited non-White invasion into these nations. A century ago, Emma Goldman, Bela Kun, Jacob Javits, Vladimir Lenin and Bolshevik affiliates followed a similar agenda, working for Jewish power. It must be understood that it’s been a long standing Jewish policy to subvert and genocide Whites.
(See here, emphasis added)
We will deal later in greater detail (in Part 2 of this essay) with Count Kalergi and his program to alter the demography of Europe. Meanwhile, here is a short video (below) which will help to reinforce what has already been said and also serve as an easy introduction to the toxic ideas of Count Coudenhove-Kalergi.
Why “toxic”? Because these are damaging and anti-democratic policies being implemented by neo-Bolshevik zealots within the European Union and elsewhere. Implementing these iniquitous policies will inevitably spell the death of Europe as we know it. This mass immigration program seems to have been maliciously designed to produce the mongrelization of the White European people in their traditional homelands. The race-mixing agenda of the Kalergi Plan has therefore naturally been seen by many White nationalists—see here, here and here—as a covert and cowardly form of White genocide. It is a silent genocide that is scheduled to take place surreptitiously over several generations, with its White victims wholly unaware they are being bred out of existence and replaced by an uglier, more brutal underspecies with a lower IQ.
To quote Christian Miller again:
The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake—this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application.
The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national histories. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration.
The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.
When Whites become a minority in their own traditional homelands, the game will be over. The writing is already on the wall. Things get worse by the day. Unimaginable cruelty will be the fate that awaits us and our children in the days ahead—unless we take drastic action in self-defense. Don’t forget the old Jewish proverb: “When the ox is down, many are the butchers.”
Continued in Part 2