As published recently on The Occidental Observer
Is it ‘Goodbye Europe’? . . . Or is there still time?
Though no one has accused him of being Jewish, Count Kalergi emerges as one of the twentieth century’s most outstanding philosemites: more Jewish than the Jews, if it’s possible to imagine that.
In proclaiming that the Jews were now the spiritual aristocrats of the world—that they had supplanted the spineless and “dilapidated” non-Jewish feudal aristocracy after the French Revolution—Count Kalergi made it clear that the Jews were to rank foremost in any future world government. A future world without Jews at the top of the pyramid, dispensing wisdom and justice, was inconceivable to him. The Jews were to be the movers and shakers, the crème de la crème. They would give the orders, and the rest of the world would bend the knee and obey.
If you think all this sounds a bit like a conspiracy theory, rest assured it is not. Count Kalergi’s principal ideas had impeccable intellectual antecedents. There is nothing “conspiratorial” about cosmopolitanism or internationalism, one world government, and the push toward a “United States of Europe” seen as a stepping stone to one-world government. In an excellent 2-part essay by Canadian writer Clare Ellis, on which I have relied heavily, she speaks in her opening paragraph about “a pan-European economic order that essentially suppresses ethnic European bonds in favour of cosmopolitan ideals,” adding in her second paragraph: “The non-ethnic based European Union was envisioned as the first step toward the eventual unification of humanity under a World Federation in perpetual peace.”
— § —
This is what it’s all about: the predominant idea is that no peace is possible as long as separate ethnocentric nations exist in violent competition with each other. Nations must be abolished and borders must disappear. The future citizen will be a Citizen of the World, a cosmopolitan—and he will be free to travel wherever he wants without a passport, work wherever he wants, and live wherever he wants. Indiscriminate interbreeding will be the norm, leading to the eventual extinction of individual races. Racial discrimination and disparity of IQs will be a thing of the past when everyone is a mongrel.
Let’s start with the “United States of Europe.” This is most definitely what Angela Merkel wants. It is what every cosmopolitan internationalist wants, especially the organized Jewish community. It would be a mistake to insist that the Jews were necessarily behind this original idea. It is more likely that the idea appealed to the Jewish proclivity toward internationalism and provided a significant role for them in any future power structure—which is why they accepted the idea of one world government with such alacrity.
When the United States of America was founded on July 4, 1776, the United States of Europe at once became a theoretical possibility—an analogue to the United States of America. Here is what the first president of the United States, George Washington (1732–1799), wrote in a letter to the Marquis de LaFayette: “One day, taking its pattern from the United States, there will be founded the United States of Europe.”
George Washington was simply voicing an idea that had been around since the early years of the eighteenth century, if not earlier. In 1713 the Abbe de Saint Pierre’s Project for a Perpetual Peace was published. This floated the idea of a European federation in the context of international peace. Apparently this book had an impact on Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) who wrote: “It is not possible that the confederacy being once established, that any seeds of hostility can remain amongst the confederates.” These ideas then made their way into the head of Victor Hugo, the great French poet, novelist and dramatist. Hugo was to proclaim in 1849:
A day will come when all nations on our continent will form a European brotherhood….A day will come when we shall see…the United States of America and the United States of Europe face to face, reaching out for each other across the seas. (Quoted later by Count Kalergi himself, see here)
It would be too tedious to list all the great writers, thinkers and statesmen who dreamt of a one-world government based on cosmopolitan internationalism where perpetual peace reigned, thanks to the abolition of individual warring states. Among this ‘Gallery of Greats’ will be found the renowned German philosopher Immanuel Kant who in 1784 published his Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim, followed in 1795 by Toward Perpetual Peace.
Clare Ellis writes: “Kant explained that the conflict of interests, or Hobbesian state of nature, between individuals and nations was what drove human progress and would, through cooperation, mutual recognition, and self-discipline, lead to a future cosmopolitan ideal, a federation of states in perpetual peace.”
This hunger for peace was particularly keen after the horrors of World War I which had devoured the flower of European manhood.
Here are the names of a few other famous men who all dreamt of a world basking in perpetual peace and spiritual sunshine under the benevolent rule of a one world government: Winston Churchill, Konrad Adenauer, Leon Blum, Charles de Gaule, Aristide Briand, Albert Einstein, Sigmund Freud, Bertrand Russell, Thomas Mann, Paul Valery, Gerhart Hauptmann, Rainer Maria Rilke, Stefan Zweig, Franz Werfel, and Arthur Schnitzler.
‘Peace’ was their watchword, the word constantly on their lips, and it was a word which resonated with the masses: with all who had fought so bravely and lost their loved ones in the 1914–1918 bloodbath.
Count Kalergi’s basic ideas were not particularly startling or original. All the great men listed above shared his ideals: a world enjoying perpetual peace in which internecine warfare between individual states had been abolished. However, this extraordinary half-breed with the Japanese mother (of noble Samurai heritage) and his aristocratic European father of many mixed ethnicities (Austrian, Hungarian, Flemish, Czech, Greek, with a dash perhaps of the Hebrew in his veins) had a curious affinity for other half-breeds and with Jews. His adulation of the Jews was boundless and he had a soft spot also for mongrels, being one himself. Put these two facts together and you have Kalergi’s unique Weltanshauung: the vision of a future European superstate, followed later by a one-world government in which every citizen would ideally be a cosmopolitan mongrel (like himself) and the rulers would be an aristocracy of uberintelligent Jews and spiritually enlightened philosemites.
Let’s hear it from Count Kalergi himself. In his early book Pan-Europa (1923), he writes: “If world organisation is to take the place of world anarchy, then the first step must be for the states to form themselves into super-states … so the unification of Europe will be a necessary step on the road to a united humanity.”
That’s the basic idea. Step 1: a unified Europe. Step 2: a unified world.
Let the Count continue, now showing his hand in respect to (a) the future mongrelization of man, and (b) the supremacy of the Jews in this future superstate:
The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian–Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.
And here he goes on to offer golden words of praise for the Jews:
Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. (Emphasis added, see here)
Kalergi completely rejected “national egocentricity” He thought that ethno-nationalists were “the principal obstacle to his ideas” and “a primary cause of human misery.” To obtain European integration “existing patriotisms” had to be “sterilized for mischief” while retaining those elements which are “for good.” (Here)
Neither Mussolini nor Hitler thought much of Kalergi’s ideas. Indeed, Hitler referred uncharitably to the mongrelized count as a “cosmopolitan bastard.” The ultimate anti-Semite, Hitler was probably not only aware of Kalergi’s passionate philosemitism but also of the financial backing Kalergi had received from Jews.
The Pan-European movement, which was subsequently to morph into the European Union, had been enthusiastically supported from the outset by powerful Jews. Baron Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild was Kalergi’s personal friend. In 1924 Rothschild had introduced Kalergi to Jewish banker Max Warburg who at once opened his purse to Kalergi and generously poured 60,000 gold marks into his lap. For the next three years Max Warburg kept on financing Kalergi, introducing him to three other fantastically rich Jews who were equally munificent: Paul Warburg, the American financier Bernard Baruch, and Baruch’s brother Felix.
To give Kalergi his due, I don’t think he loved the Jews so much because they were generous to him. He loved them because he genuinely thought highly of them. His philosemitic sincerity rings true—it is palpable in everything he wrote—and these eminent Jews probably thought, “This is just the man for us. He likes us for ourselves, not our money.”
This creation of a new Europe, a Pan-Europe, would be overseen, according to Kalergi, by a “social aristocracy of the spirit”. He claims that the traits—”strength of character combined with sharpness of spirit”—that are required for the spiritual aristocratic leadership of Europe can be found in the Jewish people alone. These traits, peculiar to the Jewish as a people, “predestine” them “to be leaders of urban humanity, the protagonists of capitalism as well as the revolution.”
“It is the Jewish Socialist leaders,” he tells us, “who want to redeem us with the highest self-denial from the original sin of capitalism, free people from injustice, violence and serfdom and change the liberated world into an earthly paradise.”
Further, he [Kalergi] wrote: “[As the] influence of the nobility of blood decreases, the influence of the nobility of spirit [as found in Jews] is growing. Such a development will find its end only when an aristocracy of spirit [i.e., the Jewish aristocracy] will seize the reins of society’s power: by seizing powder, gold, and printing ink to devote to the welfare of the community.” (See here, emphasis added)
Note those three items: powder, gold, printing ink. These were to be the Jews’ instruments for gaining control: “powder” = gunpowder, or control of the arms industry; “gold” = control of the money supply and banking; “printing ink” = control of the mass media.
Count Kalergi knew exactly what was needed, and no one else could have put it better.
— § —
All the recipients of the prestigious Charlemagne prize have been ardent philosemites cast in the Coudenhove-Kalergi mold, believing passionately in a New World Order in which Jews would feature prominently. As you might expect, all the winners of the Charlemagne Prize (see this picture) have been enthusiastic supporters of multiculturalism and mass immigration, two relatively recent winners being Tony Blair (1999) and Angela Merkel (2008). Note that both Blair and Merkel have been assiduous champions of Third World immigration to the West, helping to create horrendous problems in their respective countries.
These are the People Farmers and we are their livestock.
With the help of America, their military arm, these elite shadowmasters foment and manufacture lucrative wars in Muslim countries in order to increase the supply of so-called “refugees” to the West. It’s not the refugees who are primarily to blame for the refugee crisis, it can be argued; it’s the refugee creators. The refugees may be seen as mere pawns on the chessboard. It’s the chessmasters, the neo-Bolshevik Übermenschen who sit like brooding spiders weaving their webs of intrigue in the shadows, these are the ones who are chiefly to blame for the migrant invasion of the West.
Perhaps it’s time to say, “Good-bye, Europe.” The Kalergi Plan certainly seems to be working. If Count Kalergi were alive today, he would be delighted to see all his plans coming to fruition.
— § —
The migrant crisis that has convulsed Europe recently under the ominous auspices of Angela Merkel and her admirers will soon fall upon America with a vengeance unless steps are taken to nip this disease in the bud.
Kevin MacDonald and others have written exhaustively about America’s disastrous immigration policies. To recap briefly, for America’s problems and Europe’s problems are closely interconnected, and the same elites who see Europe as their prize have America in their crosshairs too. It’s a question of “Europe today, America tomorrow”.
From the 1880s onward, when a large influx of Jews from Russia and Eastern Europe flooded into the United States, American Jews never ceased to agitate for more non-White immigration in order to dilute the American ethnic pool and alter America’s demography in their own interests.
White Americans, who were still in charge of America at that time, refused to take orders from pushy Eastern European Jews and delivered a well-deserved snub to them by passing the 1924 Immigration Act which effectively imposed strict limits on non-White immigrants. This was not “racial discrimination,” as it was characterized by White America’s newly arrived vociferous critics. It was the introduction of race quotas designed to foster orderly integration and ensure that America continued to remain predominantly White; in the words of Kevin MacDonald, “to maintain the ethnic status quo.” (See video below)
The 1924 Act, as you might expect, incensed the Jews.
One of these angry Jews, Dr Stephen Steinlight, was still spitting feathers many years later as he raged that the majority of Americans in those bad old days of the Roaring Twenties (when the Jews were not yet in control) were a “thoughtless mob”, guilty of a “monstrous policy”, a “vast moral failure”: that these White Americans, our ancestors, were a bunch of “vilely discriminatory” rednecks who were “evil, xenophobic, and anti-Semitic.” Dr Steinlight’s diatribe would not have been complete without a reference to the Holocaust. “Tens of thousands” of Jews, he fumed, might have been saved from the Holocaust “had the United States not closed its doors.” (See here).
The Jews never give up, however. Perseverance is perhaps their greatest strength. Once they want something, they make sure they get it by wearing down all opposition by ceaseless lobbying, bribery, intimidation, threats, collective organized outrage, media propaganda, and various other underhand means too depressing to mention. In other words, they tend to get their way in the end per fas et nefas—by fair means or foul.
In 1965 the Jews finally got their way by pushing through the Immigration and Nationality Act, also known as the Hart-Celler Act. This changed the entire quota system in favor of non-White immigration. The floodgates were thrown open now to Third World immigration.
A quick glance at the figures will tell you all you need to know. In 1920, America was 90 per cent White. That figure was the same ten years later in 1930. In 1940 the figure was identical. In 1950, ditto. By 1960, it had slipped maybe a fraction of 1 per cent. So several decades went by with barely a change in the demographic mix of America. Nine out of ten faces Americans saw in the street were White faces in the first half of the 20th century. By 1965 this figure had fallen one percent to 89 per cent. The 1965 Act now began to kick in, and the activists successfully campaigned to increase the numbers far beyond the 1965 provisions. The changes in the statistics suddenly became dramatic.
Here they are:
PERCENTAGE OF WHITES IN AMERICA
1920 : 90% White
1930 : 90% White (no change)
1940 : 90% White (no change)
1950 : 90% White (no change)
1965 : 89% White (1% less white)
1970 : 87% White (2% less white)
1980 : 83% White (6% less white)
1990 : 76% White (7% less white)
2000 : 72% White (4% less white)
2010 : 68% White (4% less white)
2015 : 61% White (7% less white)
(See here for 2015 figure)
CHANGE FROM 1950 : 39% less white.
Note. The figures from 1920 to 2010 given above come from the US Census Bureau. (See chart here)
“White Americans face incremental genocide by design,” Christian Miller concludes, “which is precisely why so many fail to recognize the creeping trend. Genocide need not be associated with machetes, firing squads, or executions. The type of genocide White Americans face is far more subtle, which makes it all the more dangerous.”
In one more generation, White Americans will be a minority in their own country: a persecuted minority hounded by discriminatory practices and surrounded by hostile outlanders baying for their blood and branding them “racists” and “White supremacists” for daring to ask: “Don’t we have rights too?”
Apparently not; Whites don’t have any rights in this multicultural menagerie we have allowed our enemies to create for us. Even as I put the finishing touches to this article today, I read this headline screaming at me from the front page of the Sunday Mail:
BBC SACKED ME FOR BEING A WHITE MAN.” Note the subtitles; meanwhile readers are given false comfort by being informed of what the royal family has been up to.
— § —
Unless something drastic is soon done to arrest the process of White extinction and reverse it, if necessary, by mass deportation of all those immigrants who have made their way into our countries under guise of being desperate “refugees,” there is little hope for us and our children.
All these newcomers arguably need to be reclassified as “invaders” and satisfactory arrangements made for them to be relocated elsewhere. Just as no homeowner is under moral obligation to house and feed uninvited guests under his roof—guests who cause uproar and confusion on a daily basis, making impossible demands on him and even raping his daughters—so there’s absolutely no moral obligation, either, to throw open the gates of our healthy ethnostates and let in the toxic hordes of the Third World. Pathological altruism is a disease; and all those who wish to commit national suicide should be regarded as mentally unfit to take part in the democratic process.
This is a formidable problem, nor is it likely to be solved by discussion. It’s action that is needed now, not words. A strong man with a will, that’s what is needed. A rescuer who knows what needs to be done, and does it—despite all the chattering monkeys around him.
And so this is the big question now, the question whose answer we all await with longing: who will rescue us from our rulers?