The Demonization of David Irving

Doubting the mainstream Holocaust narrative can be a dangerous business, as David Irving and others have discovered to their cost.

3af6611d00000578-0-image-a-1_1480726997368

‘UNREPENTANT! . . . AND STILL  SPOUTING  POISON!’
(Daily Mail)

Here is a photo of David Irving,  age 78, “jailed, discredited and bankrupted”, according to a recent article in the Daily Mail,  “for disgracefully dismissing the Auschwitz gas chambers as a ‘fairytale.’”

The article is by a hack known as David Jones who managed to infiltrate one of Irving’s regular meetings so as to have an opportunity of spying on him and his group in order to report back to the Daily Mail with an appropriately scurrilous article. His aim? To demonize Irving and win plaudits from the politically correct readers of the Daily Mail, many of them Jews whose new religion happens to be Holocaustianity.

Jones begins with considerable aplomb:

At weekends, the Premier Inn in Gateshead throngs with football fans and young clubbers up for a wild night out in nearby Newcastle. Visitors to this cheap and cheery hotel on a trading estate seldom arrive by Rolls-Royce. Last Saturday evening, however, a vintage Silver Shadow glided onto the forecourt.

Sitting ramrod-straight at the wheel was an elderly and distinguished looking man, with silver hair and ruddy jowls. He might have been a retired brigadier. But it was none other than the infamous Holocaust-denying historian, David Irving.

In the passenger seat was the latest of Irving’s Girl Fridays — an attractive Polish woman, 50 years his junior, named Martyna Jurska. Her immediate task was to unload a stash of his books (including his laudatory 985-page biography of Hitler) from the boot of the Rolls and carry them into the hotel, in the hope he might hawk copies to an audience he was due to address, for upwards of £30 a time.

For at the age of 78, Irving — who has been jailed, discredited and bankrupted for disgracefully dismissing the Auschwitz gas chambers as a ‘fairytale’, and claiming Hitler was oblivious to the planned extermination of six million Jews (the true figure was far fewer, he maintains) — is beating his odious drum yet again.

One cannot help wondering why it is “disgraceful” to ask a few pertinent questions about Auschwitz. Most people would be sympathetic toward the skeptical position adopted by Irving if allowed access to the basic facts:

(1) The fact that not a single authentic gas chamber has been discovered anywhere, including and especially at Auschwitz, the showcase Holocaust site. Here is Robert Faurisson’s famous challenge to the mainstream Holocaust historians: “Show me a photo, an architect’s plan or even a drawing of a gas chamber!” No one to date has been able to do this. Even the famous gas chamber shown to tourists at Auschwitz is now officially admitted to be a fake, but visitors to Auschwitz are still not told this. The Auschwitz gas chamber was built by the Russians after WWII as an imagined facsimile (or  “mock-up”) and was passed off as an authentic gas chamber for several decades. The general public, in short, were systematically duped.

(2) The Leuchter Report (1988), based on expert chemical analysis of alleged gas chambers,  has concluded categorically that there is “no evidence that any of the facilities normally alleged to be execution gas chambers were ever used as such, and, further, that because of the design and fabrication of these facilities, they could not have been utilized for execution gas chambers.”  David Irving is said to have been influenced by the Leuchter Report. Predictable attempts have been made to debunk the Report, but these attempts have failed to convince everyone.

(3) The official figures for Jews gassed at Auschwitz have been revised downward over the years from over 4 million to as little as 356,000. The general public however, kept in ignorance of these “drastic reductions”, are still being bullied into believing that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust — a mathematically impossible figure if official reductions are factored into the account.

“Utterly unrepentant,” Jones continues, “Irving has just embarked on a month-long, nationwide speaking tour. It is being conducted in a cloak of secrecy and accessible only to a select and carefully vetted audience, but last Saturday night I managed to infiltrate his first engagement. It was an eye-opening and disturbing experience.”

Jones explains that Irving had “brazenly” timed his tour to coincide with the release of the new Hollywood movie Denial. This is about Irving’s disastrous libel action against Jewish academic Barbara Lipstadt who had branded Irving a “Holocaust denier.”

“There was a time when Irving commanded considerable respect in his field,” Jones informs us, “and made a fortune from his books — as he reminded us when his talk began.

His long demise began after he published his biography of Hitler in 1977.

It is almost 1,000 pages long, yet references Auschwitz just four times — and barely alludes to the Holocaust. He claimed to have uncovered documented proof that Hitler merely wished to banish the Jews from Europe, not wipe them out. This caused such outrage that, in 1992, he claims, his publishers Macmillan secretly ordered stocks of the book to be burnt.”

This is an ill-informed comment at the best. It will appeal only to historical ignoramuses. Irving’s methodology was a welcome departure from that of the court historians who kept quoting each other and making extensive use of secondary sources.

Having mastered German, Irving, we are told by one of his critics elsewhere, “was remarkably good at getting the wives and former associates of dead Nazis to talk to him and hand over important documents, and Irving developed a style of historical research that involved laboriously getting to know the handwriting of former Nazis, reading their journals, diaries and memos and gradually piecing together an independent view of history. Irving asserts that he found no evidence of the Holocaust anywhere in these documents.

Irving himself has noted, “If you read the memoirs of Churchill or Eisenhower or de Gaulle, they don’t mention it [the Holocaust] at all. It never happened as far as they were concerned.”

How odd that the most important event in World History, the Jewish Holocaust, was passed over in complete silence by so many eminent contemporary historians.

Here is Professor Richard Lynn, an international expert on IQ, giving his written testimony in 2005:

“I’ve checked out Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct — not a single mention of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war. This is astonishing. How can it be explained?

Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.”

Richard Lynn
Professor Emeritus,
University of Ulster

(See here)

When Lipstadt began denouncing Irving for his “twisted views”, Jones tells us, Irving travelled to Atlanta to attend one of her lectures. He surprised her by standing up at the back of the hall and announcing “I am David Irving.” Lipstadt had just had the temerity to tell her gullible students that she possessed a blueprint of the gas chambers showing holes in the roof for fumes to pass through. Irving had pulled out a thousand dollars and challenged Lipstadt to show her students the blueprint. “I’ll give this to you straight away if you can show this blueprint to them,” he said, waving the thousand dollars.

Lipstadt was mortified. She was unable to produce the non-existent blueprint. Nor has she ever been able to do that, given that no such blueprint existed. And yet she had been quite prepared to lie to her students about this.

“Lipstadt did not meet this very public challenge,” Jones admits somewhat sheepishly. “Ultimately, she had her revenge in the High Court.”

She had her revenge in court? Yes, and what a revenge! Jones fails to mention that Lipstadt, on the advice of her solicitors, had refused to be cross-examined by Irving in court. She had read none of the original documents in German for the simple reason that her knowledge of German was so minimal as to be virtually non-existent. If she had faced Irving in court, he would have torn her reputation to shreds in two minutes.

—  §  —

Jones himself is not above lying. He says: “After a sensational trial in 2000, which attracted global attention — as it would effectively decide whether the Holocaust had happened — the judge ruled against Irving, damning him as anti-Semitic and racist.”

This is false. It was never up to the judge to decide whether the Holocaust had happened or not. All the judge was in a position to do was to tell the public that he agreed with Lipstadt that Irving was a Holocaust denier. Consequently, Irving’s libel action against Lipstadt for calling him a “Holocaust denier” had failed. Irving was ordered to pay £2 million in costs, and his home and assets were seized.

Jones continues:

Gaining entry to Irving’s opening night in Gateshead was not easy, for he ignored requests for a media pass, and after being targeted by anti-fascists he is paranoid about security.

Just three other people had shown up. One was an avuncular retiree, another a shy 18-year-old. The most vociferous was a suit-and-tie wearing Welsh casino worker with a sharp crew-cut, who said he had a history degree. As the evening wore on, and this disquieting trio punctuated their questions with bigoted asides, it became depressingly clear what their world view was.

Since there were so few of us, Irving’s talk took the form of a college seminar around a long table. Fixing us with a rheumy stare, he began by reminiscing fondly about his father. It seemed an aimless preamble, but its purpose soon became clear.

‘This film about Deborah Lipstadt says my father abandoned his family, but he didn’t at all,’ he sniffed. ‘He was away fighting the war as a commander in the Navy, so he wasn’t at home very much.’

He then lambasted the producers of the film, saying the story had been presented purely from the point of view of Professor Lipstadt, his nemesis: ‘It’ll be full of lies.’

The coy teenager was suddenly stirred. ‘I like the way they’ve chosen someone very unappealing [Timothy Spall] to play you, and someone very appealing [Rachel Weisz] to play your opponent.’

la-1476213009-snap-photo

Rachel Weisz (left) plays Deborah Lipstadt in the film Denial

Note here the not-too-subtle attempt to “put a spin” on history by (a) transforming the dowdy and unappealing Lipstadt into the classy stunner Rachel Weisz, and (b) by getting a particularly unattractive actor, the rat-faced Timothy Spall, to take on the role of the dashing and debonnaire David Irving

Jones eventually asked Irving to clarify his position on the Holocaust.

He shot me a scolding glance. “Auschwitz is Disneyland,” Irving said, and referred to huge posters saying “Welcome to the Auschwitz Experience”. So he disputed six million Jews were killed? “If you do research, you’ll find six million.” But then, drawing on his vast mental database, he selected “facts” to support his insistence the camps claimed far fewer lives than we have been led to believe.

Jones argues the toss with Irving for a bit, clearly out of his depth, while managing somehow to convey the impression that Irving was a pretty nasty piece of work as well as a crackpot, whereas he, Jones, staff writer for the Daily Mail, had done his homework conscientiously over the last three days and now had all the facts about the Holocaust at his fingertips.

I asked why, if what he was saying was true, he had lost his landmark libel action. Another severe glance. “As my father said, ‘British justice is the best that money can buy’,”he sneered, recalling how he defended himself against high-powered lawyers funded by what he said were ‘Jewish film moguls’.

The case left him penniless, he says. Yet today Irving runs a Rolls-Royce and stays at an imposing 17th-century mansion with shooting, deerstalking and fishing rights, in the Scottish Highlands.

Jones forgets to mention that the Rolls-Royce is 40 years old and is retained as an investment; unlike most cars, it appreciates in value as long as it is kept in good condition.

Before drawing a disturbing evening in Gateshead to a close, Irving’s three fans paid for copies of his books and asked for selfies. Irving was only too pleased to oblige. Then he checked his watch and clapped his hands abruptly. “I think that’s enough,” he snapped. “We have a long tour ahead of us.”

On cue, Martyna [his young assistant] dutifully returned the unsold books to the Rolls.

There were, indeed, many miles to travel, and Irving will doubtless continue to pervert history to anyone who will listen, disgracefully denying the truth to the end.

Note that glib phrase, “disgracefully denying the truth to the end.”  

A “truth” that no one is allowed to debate on television, or discuss freely in public, without being severely punished for daring to hold a contrary view.

Countries with Laws against Holocaust denialAustria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Switzerland.

—  §  —

In 1980, during a radio interview in France, the great French revisionist Robert Faurisson was asked to summarize his lifetime’s research on the Holocaust in a single sentence. He did so in 60 memorable French words which have been translated as follows:

“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the German people — but not their leaders — and the entire Palestinian people.”

That sentence, to this day, remains unchanged.

For these provocative words, Faurisson was denounced as a criminal in a French court of law and treated like a leper — in pretty much the same way as David Irving is today. At least Irving, to the best of my knowledge, has never had his face beaten to pulp by Jewish thugs. (See below).

Faurisson has been physically attacked like this at least ten times.

2015-01-12-3

Here is Irving in his own words: “I know what I could do to be liked by the media and newspapers – completely reverse my opinion. But I don’t do it. I’m not the kind of guy who rolls over. I’m English. I fight back. If the Jews had not started this campaign to destroy David Irving I wouldn’t have defended myself. I’ve defended myself like any other decent Englishman. And I know where the bodies are buried.”

Let a Jewish woman have the last word. She had actually been at Auschwitz. And she had no complaints about her treatment by the Germans.

“Believe me, I came into Auschwitz in a much worse condition than I actually left it.”

— Kitty Hart-Moxon, Jewish Holocaust Survivor.
June 1998 testimony, USC Shoah Foundation, Visual History Archive.

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website, Darkmoon.me, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

128 thoughts on “The Demonization of David Irving

  1. prof Faurisson was the expert witness for the defense at 2nd (1988) Zündel trial in toronto. (another good link here)
    The best “Denial” lawyer ever, doug Christie (also defended Art Topham) hung out the posters at the trial for the jury to see and ponder:

    Alleged Extermination of the Jews

    No Order
    No Plan
    No Budget
    No Weapon (No expert report stating: ‘This was a homicidal gas chamber’)
    No Body (No autopsy report stating: ‘This is or was the body of a person killed by poison gas.’)

    Next (don’t know how to reproduce a table in wordpress) showing the diametrically opposed statements by 2 schools, the Revisionists (statements of evidence) and the Exterminationist (statements of blind dogma).
    ————————————–Holocaust
    Revisionism —————————————– Exterminationism

    Concentration Camps ————————— Extermination Camps
    Disinfection Gas Chambers ——————- Homicidal Gas Chambers
    Ordinary Gas Vans ——————————- Homicidal Gas Vans
    Zyklon B to Protect —————————— Zyklon B to Kill
    Territorial Final Solution ———————– Homicidal Final Solution
    Crematories for Dead Bodies —————- Crematories for Living Persons

    From Faurisson testimony

    What I can only say today is that many Jews died and many survived. I am not satisfied with this answer because what does it mean many Jews died and many Jews survived? We should have an answer to this question and I think that it is possible to find an answer, and I gave three examples.
    I say the historians must freely determine the approximate figure through,
    · one, the International Tracing Service files in Arolsen, West Germany. I am convinced that the problem of the genocide of the…Jews has its solution in this place. They have fantastic files and we could, if we had the right to work in Arolsen, we could find the solution to this question.

    · Documents in possession of the Polish government, the Auschwitz Museum, the Soviet Union — it is strange that we are supposed to have in Auschwitz and in Arolsen, two volumes of the register of the death[s] in Auschwitz and in Moscow, 36 or 37 volumes.
    This register [was] kept by the German[s] and we do not have the right, one, to look at them, two, even to know how many names there are in the two first volumes. We could, with the number of names of those two first volume, have an idea of what is in the other volumes, and the answer is ‘Oh, the Soviet do not want to show us that’. Maybe, maybe not. I’m not sure that everybody would be very pleased if the Soviet Union suddenly decided to publish. They could publish and say, ‘Oh, that’s Nazi propaganda. The Nazi only put some part of those people who died but not all of them’. Okay. But show us this document, so important. There is no good reason to hide such a document.
    · Three, names of millions who received reparation payments including survivors in Israel [and] in every one of the seventy countries represented by the World Jewish Congress. The World Jewish Congress is something like the Parliament of the [Diaspora]…and they have every possibility to check for everybody who is supposed to be Jew, where he comes from. We have the modern possibility with all those technical means that we have today to calculate anything, we should do this work and they have enough money to do it.”

    yeah, we could do it but … we just don’t feel like it.

    1. I think most Jews really believe that 4 million Jews were gassed with cyanide and then incinerated at Auschwitz. But you must be skeptical if you consider the impracticability of the idea of the gas chambers and the sheer impossibility of handling 4 million (Cyanide impregnated) corpses and reducing them to ashes.

      If the Auschwitz present authorities have reduced their death count to less one million then why are we still seing saturation TV coverage of the holocaust six million?

      I am a holocaust skeptic. Does that make me a criminal? The Jewish Lobby is behind this with-hunt, and it is bad for Jews.

      1. I have been following this story for decades. What always made me curious is why did it take so long for the Jews to come up with this story? It came out long after World War Two was over. Same with the Anne Frank tale. It was written in ball point pen and there were no ball point pens then.
        I have no axe to grind with the Jews aside of their over powering lust to control the world and the minds in it to favor their manufactured stories. This is not an accurate accounting of real history. It is a guise to promote pity where none is/was needed. To silence people with opinions other than the holocaust fable proves they have much at stake to hide. Otherwise, such violence would never be needed. To silence the truth does not change it. It simply magnifies the quest to sort out fact from fiction.
        I am not a criminal nor have ever been arrested in my life. I simply disagree what the Jews are doing to taint history and want the truth to prevail.

      2. HOLES IN THE HOLOCAUST. SKEPTICS AWAKE!

        Why would the Nazis transport Jews all the way to Auschwitz in Poland to kill them? Why use irritant cyanide gas (Zyklon) when people crowded into an airtight room with an unventilated heater will soon die painlessly from carbon monoxide poisoning?

        Why were there 4.3 million survivors claiming compensation from Germany? why did the Red cross only give 272,000 as the total number of deaths in ALL the camps? The Red Cross had access to the camps. Wouldn’t they have known if Jews were being gassed?

        Why were there a hospital, a pharmacy, a theatre, an orchestra, a choir, a library and a swimming pool at Auschwitz, in a death camp? Why were there no signs on wartime aerial photographs of the trainloads of coke that would have been required to incinerate millions of bodies? Why weren’t thousands of tons of ashes and bones ever found?

        The photos of piles of bodies show emaciation typical of starvation and disease, something that would not have time occur if people were being gassed on arrival. It was Typhus, dysentery and starvation that killed these people, because by 1944 allied bombing had destroyed the infrastructure of Germany.

        DOUBLE STANDARDS. The holocaust has been pounded into us for 70 years, but there is never a mention of the reign of terror conducted by the mainly Jewish Bolsheviks against the Russia people (PRE-WW2); 60 million dead (Solzhenitsyn). The five men who executed Tsar Nicholas II, his wife and young family were all Jews. If people knew about this it would stop the holier-than-thou Jewish attitude.

        WE SHOULD BE SKEPTICAL.

    2. The reason a crowd turned up for David Irving is that many people are now skeptical about the holocaust and can see the damage the official story line has done.

    1. 1138 –

      The link you posted is in the finals for BEST EVER posted anywhere on the web…!!

      The 1938 census figures posted by American Jewish Committee and the Synagogue Council of America were published in the 1941 World Almanac.

      I bought that very almanac in a used book store in the 60s for $1 just for that purpose only. The census figures by the usury mongers themselves:

      http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/File:Jwss1938.jpg

      Revisionism was a really tough sell in the 50s and 60s. I carried the book around with me to show skeptics, which was 99.5% of the people. I loaned it out a few years ago…… once I found it on the web….. not concerned about return. I made thousands of Xerox copies over the years as handouts. Turned some heads, but very few minds were changed. Great for starting arguments, though..!! 🙂

      I am attempting to verify here that it WAS published in the Almanac… not fabricated by any of the web fakers and photo-shoppers/croppers.

      1. Pat,

        Exactly. Anyone charged with denial should bring this to the courtroom. So Darkmoon and all others needn’t worry about persecution. And regardless of these figures – PROVIDED BY JEWS – what it most particularly demonstrates beyond doubt is that there wasn’t any talk about a holocaust or 6.000.000 dead jews in them days and that that thus HAS to be a fabrication of later times. Well, either that or the jews had a timemachine, went back to let themselves being gassed still only to prove the holy jewish crap 🙂

      2. @ Pat

        1138 – The link you posted is in the finals for BEST EVER posted anywhere on the web…!!

        Agreed. I have saved that link and forwarded it to LD for her files. I know she will find that link invaluable.

        @ 1138

        Pat,

        Exactly. Anyone charged with denial should bring this to the courtroom. So Darkmoon and all others needn’t worry about persecution.

        It’s a great link, as I said, but you are wrong to think that showing this as evidence in court will save Darkmoon and all others from persecution. It won’t help at all because “the truth is no defense” and is now considered TOTALLY IRRELEVANT! The sole criterion is now this: “Is this statement offensive? Does it hurt the feelings of Jews?”

        If it does, it is illegal.

        Even if the statement is true, it is classified as “hate speech” and is absolutely forbidden if Jews complain about it and claim it is traumatizing them and exposing them to pogroms and persecution. See this article — take note of its title:

        https://www.darkmoon.me/2016/clampdown-on-free-speech-begins-giving-offense-to-jews-is-now-illegal/

      3. Sardonicus,

        Yes, but how can this be offensive? Not even jew can spin this into an offense. Is jew offended by his own printing of jew demographics???? This one they can’t sell as such.

    2. 1138,
      the link is excellent and I also had a similar one bookmarked based on the same issues of jew almanac for 1938 and 1948.
      I that metapedia link i have a minor quibble in how they calculate percentages,
      Rank Country——- Jews—————  % of Country  % of all Jews Lobro’s %
      1 United States— 6,544,000————— 2.10%————- 35.20%— 43.30%
      2 Israel————— 5,851,700————— 75.50%———— 31.50%— 38.72%
      3 France————— 500,000————— 0.73%———— 2.70%— 3.31%
      4 Canada————– 375,000————— 1.10%———— 2.00%— 2.48%
      5 United Kingdom 290,000————— 0.50%———— 2.10%— 1.92%
      I saw right away that Canada with 375k cannot be less (2%) of the total jewry than UK with 290k (2.1%)
      so i undertook to correct it in the last column.
      In court trials, internal consistency saves the day.

      Moreover, if dragged to court on charges of hate speech, presenting this as defense is shooting yourself in the foot because you implicitly renounce the basic rule of innocence until proven guilty and accept that the burden of proof is upon you to prove your innocence, failing which, you are guilty.
      A judge with hostile predisposition (and they all are) will say, Mr Patrick Sard 1138, what you brought was a piece of paper, whatever its origin, it in no way disproves the existence of some number of victims buried somewhere.

      No, prof Faurisson had it right, because professional historians employ the same methods as courts.
      To prove that a crime took place and is attributable to the defendant, the prosecution must deliver the following evidence:
      · proof of intention to commit crime (premeditated)
      · proof of planning
      · (budget is optional generally but certainly required in the 6 million event)
      · existence of a certified weapon (expert report on homicidal gas chambers with capacity to kill the claimed numbers … producing a single motorbike exhaust is not sufficient)
      · evidence of victims (forensic pathology showing that some number of victims, identified as jews by family dna matching, were executed by cyanide poisoning)

      with the above assertions backed by evidence, you can pin the crime on the defendant.
      In case of holocaust not only is any particular proof missing, ALL FIVE ARE MISSING, COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY.
      Therefore, the defendant is cleared – in a normal, non-satanic court.
      but in the court of Satan, different principles apply, ask the missing children.
      Ask the thoroughly ruined German psyche, in terminal stage of HIV guilt disease, as much the victims of MK-Ultra as all those children.

      1. Lobro,

        Of course, in reality I know what WILL happen in ‘court’. And saying that “you jew prosecuter and judge, can’t proove any of your claims either. You don’t even HAVE a piece of paper” won’t make a dent.

        And I know that if even ONE filthy stinking jew says “the nadzsees gassed 37 million jews that that is considered proof. And that if 100 honest jew survivors – if you could find that many, since it is highly doubtful that that many honest jews were ever born – all testify against this one jew saying that there weren’t any extermination camps it would be dismissed, in the extremely unlikely case that they would even be allowed in the courtroom at all, that is, or give interviews to the press without being attacked and having to fear for their lives.

    3. Well, I have a revisionist take on WW2 and the so-called final solution = death. Here is a link to a post on a forum which questions the figures in the world almanac. (too much bandwith needed to post directly here)

      http://truth-zone.net/forum/history/64344-the-holocaust.html?start=1900#194509.

      Someone who is good at statistical analysis should have a go at a critique of the presentation. Have not read all coments yet – but Irving does think there were mass murders at the Aktion Reinhard camps – by shootings.

      Then there is this article by Alison Chabloz, a UK citizen facing charges of hate speech, on research done by Vincent Reynouard, french revisionist who has fled France to the UK as he does not to be imprisoned, on the Einsatzgruppen actions on the East Front in WW2. https://alisonchabloz.wordpress.com/2016/06/05/the-einsatzgruppen-an-alternative-approach/

      Reynouard has posted 4 yt videos on the Einsatzgruppen (only in french atm) here is the link to #4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-IriHWM_AQ

  2. Yesterday, a Daily Mail Headline: A 95 year old, who was a bookkeeper at Auschwitz, was sentence to four years prison for accessory to the killing of 300,000 people at Auschwitz, (Note: it states people not Jews, down from 4,000,000 Jews to 300,000 people.) According to the Official German Record of all Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from May of 1940 through December of 1944, 300,000 killed is still a, ridiculously, high figure. Tens of thousands of prisoners died from typhus, as hundreds of thousands of Germans did.
    holodomorinfo.com. How many Jews were hunted down who were involved in the Jewish ethnic cleansing of Europeans,? How many from the slaughtering of hundreds of thousands of, innocent, Germanic people from 1945-1952? How many from the brutality and barbarism of Zionist Communism which, enslaved and slaughtered hundreds of millions of Christian families? How many from the torturing and massacre of twenty million Russia intellects and tens of millions more throughout Eastern Europe?

    1. Yeah, and when do “the chosen” pay reparations for the 66,000,000 they slaughtered in Russia, the 8 to 10 million in Ukraine… I am sick to the point of throwing up, fed UP with this bogus bullshit!
      Are western males so spineless foolish they’ll grovel before these blood-sucking parasites until The Lord comes and wipes them off of the face of the planet?
      Does anyone understand these scum are, at this very moment killing the defenseless CHRISTIANS and Muslims in the land they stole from Palestine? When the f**k will the “politically correct” west wake the hell up to the REAL global threat of the nuclear-rogue “nation”? of the most racist/evil amalgam of a sub species ever to draw breath!? It’s as if their G-D, Lucifer wraps a cloak of ignorance to cloud reason whenever the “sacred” word JEW is mentioned – (quietly/carefully under one’s breath, they’ve been awakened!!…).
      Thirty days in jail for sniping babies, yeah, they just LOVE we “goy”.

      1. As Martin Luther said, “Did I not tell you earlier that a Jew is such a noble, precious jewel that God and all the angels dance when he farts?”

      2. Paschn –

        “Yeah, and when do “the chosen” pay reparations for the 66,000,000 they slaughtered in Russia, the 8 to 10 million in Ukraine…”

        NEVER…!!

        They are just FINE…. with debating the paltry, yet absurd, 6,000,000 figure they concocted as a distraction – strawman – to keep from mentioning those other 100s of millions in their wakes.

        They invented psychology…. and they are most adept at using it against all mankind.

    2. The first tattooed prisoner numbers were introduced in 1940 and remained in use until 1945 ending with the number 402,499 – quite a few short of the vaunted 6,000,000 – plus figures for jews alone – which did in fact include Slavs, Gypsies and Police (Political) Prisoners…

      1. I take this from memory but I know I have read somewhere that Mr Weasel on several occasions refused to pull up his sleeves. By doing so hinting at either a fake tattoo or even none at all.

    3. Yes, the key to neutralizing the bleating of der Juden remains having them shoulder the total guilt for their Bolshevik slaughters in Russia. These are very dangerous people and they will have to be neutralized if the white race is to remain on this Earth. Blathering Christian Zionists insist on their value and vote for them like the crazy fools they are. Some day we will have to fight them to the death, count on it.

  3. David Irving is truly a hero, one who can be called a “white martyr” in defense of historical truth, not yet shedding his blood like Faurisson (a “red martyr”, albeit not actually murdered at the hands of his Jewish persecutors), but suffering at the hands of the diabolical Jewish ruling elite in many ways, especially financially, although also having spent close to a year in prison for refusing to back down from his convictions which are based on unimpeachable historical scholarship.

    There are three statements so pregnant with meaning that when taken together I believe express the essence of the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit (to use the term in the title of E Michael Jones’s magisterial history of the Jews over the past two thousand years). And these three are:

    1. “If you want to know who rules over you, just ask yourself whom you are not allowed to criticize.” (Voltaire)

    2. “The Jew cries out in pain while he is striking you.” (Old Polish Proverb)

    3. “You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires.” (Jesus, in Jn 8:44, to the Jews who willfully rejected him as the Messiah)

    I highly recommend that readers here go to YouTube and listen to David Irving’s talks. He is not only the greatest historian of World War II, he is also a most engaging speaker, full of wit and wisdom along with his encyclopedic knowledge of historical facts at the tip of his tongue.

    1. I could include an addendum to numbers 2 and 3:
      2. Demons will almost always cry out in pain while they are undergoing exorcism by Catholic priests.
      3. Jews will sometimes publicly admit that their “God” is named Lucifer (meaning “Light Bearer”, Satan’s name before being expelled from heaven).

    2. Darrell,

      Excellent quotes! Thank you! Liked this one especially:
      “The Jew cries out in pain while he is striking you.” (Old Polish Proverb)

  4. I first read David Irving in 1974 and since then I’ve read every book he’s ever written. David Irving will still be read in centuries to come, long after the scurrilous author of the Daily Mail article is dead and forgotten. I can’t remember who said it, perhaps Brendan Behan? “Those who can write, do! Those who can’t become critics!” I even have a couple of his books personally signed by him. Treasures! He is, without doubt, the best historian on WW2! A truly remarkable author!

      1. 1138,
        Of course he isn’t flawless. I’ve found a couple of mistakes in his history of Rommel. For example in the Battle of Sidi Rezegh in November, 1941 he states the entire 1st South African Division was destroyed. In fact “only” the 5th Brigade of that Division was annihilated when it was hit by 3 armored divisions. My uncle was in the 2nd Brigade and was nowhere near Sidi Rezegh at the time.
        My Father and Uncle actually fought against each other at El Alamein. My Father was with Ramcke’s Fallschirmjaegers and my Uncle was in the 1st South African Division. In fact, due to the poor nutrition of the working class Englishman prior to WW2, only Scottish and Commonwealth troops were used to make the infantry breakthrough at El Alamein, clearing a path through the Devil’s Garden for the tanks. The 4 divisions making the breakthrough were, 9th Australian, 51st Highlanders, 2nd New Zealand and 1st South African. The Commonwealth troops when they arrived in North Africa were appalled at the difference in height between officers and men in the English Divisions. On average 5 inches!
        During the 30’s Hitler gave the Germans the highest standard of living in Europe. In England, during the depression, some poor families would be lucky to get an odd tin of sardines as their only protein.
        Another sore point, don’t ever fight for Britain! They treat their war veterans abysmally!

      2. 1138 –

        I have read about his falling short, and his ‘sort of-almost’ revisionism for profits – $$$$. 🙂

        CODOH on David Irving and maintaining his Rolls Royce status:

        (excerpts)
        After his testimony for Ernst Zündel in1988, David Irving seemed to be an intellectual hero in full self-actualization. He said in a 1988 speech that he knew that he had “joined the ranks of the damned” and that the next five to ten years would be difficult, but that he would persevere. David Irving’s stand for Holocaust Revisionism seemed to be an expression of his long-evident character as the historian who intended to correct the omissions and distortions of victors’ history. Holocaust Revisionism seemed to be consistent with the essence of David Irving, the logical next stage in the evolution of the heroic historian.

        But in retrospect, with greater knowledge, one can see that David Irving’s truth-advocacy was never entirely free of hesitation. While David Irving seemed to be an uncompromising truthteller, one can just barely discern the influence of calculated self-interest and the moistened finger in the breeze, even in his most outspokenly controversial period. The seed of retreat was always there.

        For example, in that 1988 speech, wherein David Irving proclaims that he is now an “unbeliever” in the Auschwitz gas-chamber story, and that the whole gas-chamber story is likely false, he balks at blaming Jews for the lie. Instead, he claims that British psychological warfare put out the gas-chamber story “quite cold-bloodedly” — although documents of the British government (visible on Irving’s own site) indicated that the British psychological warfare executive was repeating a story that came to them from Jews. I assume that David Irving learned of all of these documents (unearthed by Paul Norris) at about the same time, whence it follows that David Irving knew, when he said in 1988 that the British had invented the gas-chamber story, that it really came from Jews.

        All of this points to a fear of the Jews that was never entirely overcome. Jewish power is, after all, a serious matter for a commercial author who depends on the Jewish-dominated publishing industry for his livelihood.

        It seems that David Irving believed that he could minimize conflict with Jews by minimizing Jewish responsibility for the Holocaust-lie. During that 1988 speech, as Irving explains how Jews themselves are supposed victims of the lie, a man in the audience blurts out, “You’re very generous!” In 1988 David Irving was indeed generous in his assessment of the role of Jews in promoting the Holocaust, but that generosity did not save him from Jewish odium and organized Jewish harassment.

        In 1996, when Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich appeared, it became clear that David Irving was in retreat, and trying to appease his enemies by writing a book that slammed a leading figure in Hitler’s Germany while showing sympathy toward Jews.

        I heard a prominent Holocaust Revisionist at that time remark (privately) that David Irving had been accustomed to living the high life as a famous historian who drove a Rolls Royce, and, contrary to his professed idealism and professed willingness to sacrifice in pursuit of truth, David Irving had embraced Holocaust Revisionism with the expectation that it would be the next big thing in modern historiography, and that he would benefit from having gotten into it early – not realizing how adversely the Jewish backlash would affect his lifestyle and interfere with his career.

        In other words, David Irving was never as idealistic as he professed to be. However impressive, however convincing and inspiring he seemed in the period from 1988 to 1995, David Irving was more heroic tenor than hero. This is clearer than ever today.

        http://codoh.com/library/document/4061/

        ……..

        In his own words on video…..

        Irving, himself, admits he has to water-down the facts, compromise, to make money selling books.

        He admits he NEEDS JEWS to buy HIS books..!!

        Here:
        David Irving’s REVISED revisionist views:
        https://youtu.be/LCDwDNZcxbc?t=302

      3. @ Pat
        @ Felix

        The article at CODOH, attempting to find fault with David Irving’s position on the Holocaust, should not be taken too seriously for two reasons:

        1. It is one man’s opinion at CODOH; it is not a fact but an opinion. Not all the writers or contributors to CODOH would agree with this negative assessment of Irving.

        2. The negativity of the article (against Irving) stems from the fact that Irving refused to submit to the party line promoted by CODOH and its stable of writers. None of the writers at CODOH had Irving’s stature or his vast knowledge, nor did they care for Irving’s “moderation” or respect for dialogue and compromise.

        CODOH viewed Irving with a certain amount of resentment and jealousy for not “fitting in” and agreeing with everything they said. CODOH tended to be somewhat extreme and inflexible in its views and expected Irving to conform to its doctrinaire position. Irving refused. Rightly so. Irving was his own man and wasn’t going to be told by the Editors of CODOH how to think. Do you blame him?

        As for Irving getting one or two of his facts wrong (see Felix above), this is hardly a hanging offense. No historian has ever been 100 per cent correct or claimed omniscience. Minor errors and inaccuracies are inevitable and to be expected.

      4. Constance –

        Thanks for the help. 🙂

        Yes, everyone has opinions – guesses – about this subject since they were not there when the events happened.

        You are guessing that CODOH writers are jealous. I am guessing they are not. When someone at CODOH claims they are jealous, I will accept it. Not before.

        This is independent of CODOH:

        In his own words on video…..

        Irving, himself, admits he has to water-down the facts, compromise, to make money selling books.

        **He admits he NEEDS JEWS to buy HIS books..!!

        Here:
        David Irving’s REVISED revisionist views:
        https://youtu.be/LCDwDNZcxbc?t=302

      5. CB,

        “1. It is one man’s opinion at CODOH; it is not a fact but an opinion.”

        Yes, but a very well argued opinion. Better than just “guessing” what happened. The author of the article has nothing to gain where as Irving has by ‘lighten up’ all of a sudden. Irving doesn’t consider himself a Holocaust denier. That alone is a very revealing clue.

      6. Brownhawk,

        Well, I ‘guess’ 🙂 the author of the article made a very compelling argument based on Irving’s own words.

      7. @ Pat

        The fact that Irving said he needed a few Jews to buy his books does not turn him into villain. Trust you to try and demonize Irving on this website. You should be ashamed of yourself!

        I have it on good authority that those negative comments about Irving on CODOH were sanctioned by its former editor Bradley Smith. Why would he try and damage Irving’s reputation unless he were jealous of Irving? Writers are notorious for their interpersonal rivalries.

        I begin to mistrust CODOH when I see how it bitches and complains about Irving. These guys who write for CODOH would do well to pull together in unity and refrain from spite and malice. Bashing Irving just brings discredit on their entire operation.

      8. Constance –

        “I have it on authority”… won’t work for me, dear… 🙂

        So, now you have to resort to attacking me…. That’s ALL you got?? That is a trick mainly used by the ‘chosens’…

        And you go on to invent guesses about Brad Smith. WHEW..!!

        YOU should be ashamed of YOURSELF…!!! Shame on YOU… !! 🙂

        Your whole argument about this topic is invented manufactured conjecture.

        I played what Irving stated, himself. – NO GUESSING. – He needs Jews to buy his books.

        Please put a video of Smith stating what YOU guessed and invented about him. Like I did with Irving. 🙂

      9. @ Pat

        You don’t trouble me one little bit. I’ve taken a look at your posts and they are little better than intellectual garbage. Nothing but long off-topic lists and sneaky attacks on the administrators of this website. They’ll get wise to you soon.

        Why are you demonizing David Irving, may I ask? Isn’t the whole object of Lasha Darkmoon’s article an attempt to undemonize Irving? Yes, it is! So why are you demonzing him again unless it is to undermine the work of Lasha Darkmoon?

        Answer me that if you can.

      10. @ Pat

        A straightforward question. I challenge you to answer it. Why are you demonizing Irving when Lasha Darkmoon has spent her entire article trying to undemonize him?

        Is your object in being on this site is to undermine Lasha Darkmoon’s work and chase away as many new posters as you can?

        Because that’s what you’re doing, you ugly bully.

      11. Constance –

        I politely requested this of you….

        Please put a video of Brad Smith stating what YOU guessed and invented about him. Like I did with Irving.

        So far…. you have failed. 🙂

        When you do as I requested of you….. I shall answer your questions.

        I asked YOU first…!! :

        I put up Irving’s own words…. you decided to refute them on your own. Your undoing. 🙂

        BTW – Lasha has stated that she does not 100% endorse other authors…. or their positions, when she uses their articles. Read her disclaimer.

        So, it is impossible for me to undermine Lasha in the manner you suggested. I would not do that, anyway.

        You are REALLY confused…!!

        You sure reply a lot for someone who is “Not bothered one little bit.. 🙂

      12. CB,

        No one is discrediting David Irving but he himself is with his current not-so-much-revisionism-as-well-as-downplaying the holy cause. Earlier he has done tremendous revisionist work which deserves the proper respect, but now he is only damaging his own reputation with his weaseling out by saying he’s NOT a holocaust denier at all. And trying to defend Irving’s latest development is nothing but an attempt to revive THE LIE. Nice try, but utterly transparent.

      13. @ Admin

        Please take note that I am now leaving your site, never to return, as a result of constant harassment and bullying by the commenter known as PAT. Ask yourself: how many other posters has this bad-mannered boor driven away?

        Please note also that he seeks to undermine everything Lasha Darkmoon writes and publishes by making sly and sneaky and underhand attacks on her work. He is no friend to this site, he is a deadly enemy! He even spits upon your religion and ridicules Christianity to your face, even though he has to be aware that you and your family are all devout Christians. He must really hate you and envy you for your faith.

        Why are you letting this twisted fanatic undermine your site? Boot him off before he damages your site irreparably and drives away all your best posters. Two of my friends used to post on this site. Both were driven off by Pat, this ugly bully who attacks anyone viciously who contradicts him.

        Okay, I’m out of here now. Good-bye!

      14. Constance –

        All of your claims failed. You had no proof.

        You did not present the evidence I requested…. where you demonized Brad Smith… which would have stopped me in my tracks.

        Contrary to your claims… Alexa ratings continue to climb greatly since April. Up 500 spots just from yesterday. I attribute it to the great articles and the lack of censorship of commenters.

        You could offer no proof… so you got mad, stomped your feet…. and kicked up dust at me on the way out. Bad manners, young lady.

        Come back anytime. Alexa up.

        You said I don’t trouble you “one little bit”… it must have been a whole lot tyo storm off like that…!! 🙂

      15. @ Pat

        Okay Pat, I’m on my way out now and so I want to say this. I want to be honest. You are not driving me out. I just don’t belong here, so I am leaving.

        I don’t think you have been undermining Lasha Darkmoon’s attempt to “undemonize” Irving, as I originally suggested. Let’s face is, Irving had had a bad deal. He is a dissident historian who has fallen foul of the Jews. No question about that.

        I understand CODOH, especially Germar Rudolf, takes a critical view of Irving and that you support CODOH’s position. I think you are sincere in this. However, I don’t believe Germar Rudolf is right. Why should I respect Germar Rudolf more than David Irving? Has he written any great histories like Irving? No, he has not. Compared to Irving, he is a mere standard bearer and pygmy. He needs to remember his place and not get too big for his boots now that he appears to have gotten an important position at CODOH.

        CODOH must do its best not to antagonize its potential supporters by becoming extremist and attacking moderates. It should avoid abusing great historians like Irving for the simple reason that most of its own writers are amateur historians. More humility is needed by CODOH. More facts, fewer opinions. CODOH and its writers are becoming too self-important, too extremist, too fanatical. Hence the attack on Irving by CODOH is ill-judged.

      16. Constance –

        No harm done. You have your ‘beliefs’… and I have mine…. and post them here.

        Debate without personal barbs tossed at the commenters is good. It popularizes the website…. and invites new commenters. That should be obvious on its face.

        Good to go… 🙂

      17. @ Pat

        Please give links to 2-3 of the best articles on CODOH setting out the basic facts about Holocaust Revisionism for beginners. This is for my daughter who wants to know more.

        Thanks for your help in anticipation . . .and best wishes! 🙂

      18. @ Constance Berlin

        I am pleased to note you have now adopted a friendlier attitude toward Pat! He has my full support, though his views are obviously his idiosyncratic own and are result of his personal experience over several decades. I think I can vouch for his total sincerity, since I happen to know he is closely associated with CODOH, an organization whose integrity is beyond question.

        You asked for a few links on Holocaust Revisionism for your daughter. I will leave that to Pat and other CODOH supporters here. Allow me to recommend one outstanding article for you personally. It made a tremendous impact on me when I first read it over 10 years ago. It is a complete evisceration of fake Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel by David O’Connell, Professor of French at Georgia State University in Atlanta.

        Elie Wiesel and the Catholics
        http://www.culturewars.com/2004/Weisel.htm
        by Prof. David O’Connell

        This article was first published in the November 2004 issue of Culture Wars magazine, run by Dr E. Michael Jones. That’s where I originally read the article so many years ago. Unfortunately, for some inexplicable reason, the article is no longer available on Culture Wars and has been “removed from files”.

        Thanks to the late Bradley Smith however, the cult classic article by Prof. O’Connell — which almost cost O’Connell his job — can be read at CODOH. I hope to republish this on the Darkmoon site in the near future. I have seldom read such a meticulously researched and devastatingly trenchant article.

        ELIE WIESEL AND THE CATHOLICS
        https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=3779

      19. Felix,

        I am convinced that National Socialist Germany was the most beautiful country in recorded history.

        Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP delivered sovereinity, peace, prosperity, consideration for the ecosystem which was protected by law, vivisection was outlawed, family values were restored and paramount, as was the regard for health and beauty, an unimaginably advanced technology utilised in servitude of mankind and even good taste judging NS aesthetics.

        This was nothing short of a utopia realised, everything the jew hates. This was THE absolute most effective answer to JEW. If anyone wants to know what should be done to stop the currrent destruction of planet earth he needn’t look any further.

        The general idea is that Adolf Hitler lost because his life’s work is destroyed. I see it differently. I say he won. He lost a battle, but still he won, because his presence and accomplishments in history will not disappear. And he proved that the degeneration of our civilisation is NOT an inevitable process but instead a carefully orchestrated plan.

      20. @Lasha Darkmoon,

        Carolyn Yeager has a special website dedicated to the fraud of Elie Wiesel, called Elie Wiesel Cons the World at : http:www.eliewieseltattoo.com/

        The reputations of all three “icons” of the Holocaust, Elie Wiesel, Simon Wiesenthal and Anne Frank are based on fraud.

        For the fraud of Simon Wiesenthal, see : Simon Wiesenthal : Fraudulent ‘Nazi Hunter’ at :

        http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n4p-8_weber.html

        For the fraud of Anne Frank’s diary, see : Faurisson : The diary of Anne Frank : Is it genuine? at :

        http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n6p-2_faurisson.html

      21. Franklin,

        Many thanks for the links! I think I’ve already read the Faurisson article on Anne Frank but I will read it again, also the Simon Wiesenthal piece on Mark Weber’s site.

        I note with concern that Alison Chabloz was hauled before a British court 2-3 days ago for her Holocaust revisionist song, (((Survivors))), and charged with “hate speech”. In this song, she mentions both Elie Wiesel and Anne Frank in a satirical way, which of course is deeply traumatizing to the Red Sea pedestrians who would like to see Alison thrown in prison for hurting their feelings.

        (((SURVIVORS))) by Alison Chabloz
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tmY6iItnP0

      22. Constance –

        As per your request:

        That is a difficult request, because all of their writings are important, but my interests are different from anyone else’s. I always get something from each one.

        My interests are mainly in the motives and results of the lies and profit motives…. and not so much the numbers which can be manipulated.

        My suggestion is to go to CODOH.COM and enter Bradley Smith(founder) in the search box. Select one with an interesting headline. Also put in names such as Rothschild or Hitler or Stalin in the search box. You will get a different story than from mainstream outlets.

        ……

        This one by Mark Weber in 1994 gives the basic REASONS for the 6,000,000 lie. I like it because it answers skeptics and provocateurs who always ask… WHY would they lie?? A good one there:

        –The Holocaust: Let’s hear both sides–

        Jewish history teacher Paula Hyman of Columbia University has observed: “With regard to Israel, the Holocaust may be used to forestall political criticism and suppress debate; it reinforces the sense of Jews as an eternally beleaguered people who can rely for their defense only upon themselves. The invocation of the suffering endured by the Jews under the Nazis often takes the place of rational argument, and is expected to convince doubters of the legitimacy of current Israeli government policy.”

        One major reason that the Holocaust story has proven so durable is that the governments of the major powers also have a vested interest in maintaining it. The victorious powers of the Second World War — the United States, Soviet Russia and Britain — have a stake in portraying the defeated Hitler regime as negatively as possible. The more evil and satanic the Hitler regime appears, the more noble and justified seems the Allied cause.

        http://codoh.com/library/document/866/

        ………

        I always like anything exposing the Rothschild motives and tactics for the establishment of Israel. Here is one for that republished from Journal of Historical Review from 1985:

        –Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild. The Meaning for Us–

        *Paper Presented to the Fifth International Revisionist Conference

        The Balfour Declaration may he the most extraordinary document produced by any Government in world history. It took the form of a letter from the Government of His Britannic Majesty King George the Fifth, the Government of the largest empire the world has even known, on which – once upon a time – the sun never set; a letter to an international financier of the banking house of Rothschild who had been made a peer of the realm.

        http://codoh.com/library/document/2137/

        ……………………

        This aspect of the site is really good. There are many archives available. Here are those from the IHR’s The Journal of Historical Review:

        The Journal of Historical Review began publication in 1980. Until 2002, when it ceased to exist, it upheld the tradition of Historical Revisionism of scholars such as Harry Elmer Barnes, A.J.P. Taylor, William H. Chamberlin, Paul Rassinier and Charles Tansill. CODOH is the only place where you can find online and for free ALL the papers of ALL the issues ever published, both as html and as PDF downloads. 80% of the work was done by Germar Rudolf, the rest by IHR employees.

        http://codoh.com/library/categories/1206/

      23. @ Pat

        Thanks for taking the trouble to answer my queries in such detail. I would like to take his opportunity to apologize to you for the way I spoke to you earlier on. My bad. I am ashamed of myself.

  5. age 78, “jailed, discredited and bankrupted”

    says Daily Sludge, drooling with malice, then continues (with considerable aplomb 😉 )

    Sitting ramrod-straight at the wheel was an elderly and distinguished looking man, with silver hair and ruddy jowls.

    it could never in a century of deep thought occur to Daily Feculence that as Some men age, the money grows progressively more worthless and the honor progressively more precious.
    No, never, there are reasons for this inability to see why honor is a good investment.
    A whore may yet understand and grieve its loss keenly, because whores are by far more honorable than the slithering protozoa of the Daily Cadaver who feast on pomp and circumstance, “Woe to you Pharisees, because you love the most important seats in the synagogues and respectful greetings in the marketplaces”, laughing wickedly at someone 78, jailed, discredited and bankrupted.

    Haha, just an old, jailed, discredited and bankrupted prophet, shame on you for not being rich and greeted respectfully at the stock exchange.

    1. It seems that almost every purveyor of ‘truth’ has suffered for it. It takes a certain ‘drive’ for justice which causes certain people to not consider the real consequences to themselves before announcing their findings. David Irving’s plight reminds me of Eustace Mullins’ unhappy life as a consequence of historic research. When a large majority of people exist who have been ‘hoodwinked’ into believing the lies from their earliest remembrance, it’s very difficult to present compelling evidence to make them reconsider. I, myself, have stood before courts and judges with compelling evidence of the fraudulent U.S. Income tax system, only to be ruled against and ridiculed by acquaintances and family. (It hurts – but every time I hear them bellyaching about having to borrow funding to pay their taxes, I DONT SYMPATHIZE, and quietly laugh at them).

      My learned advice is to quietly listen to their lies, and learn how to profit along with them. If you truly believe in Christ’s teachings, you will be satisfied that houses built on sand will one day be washed away – if it really matters.
      After all, what should I care if a lot of assholes subscribe to lies???!

    2. @ Constance Berlin
      hey cry baby spoiled ugly rat get lost you dumb fuck know nothing ignorant pos

  6. I have yet to read the real reason why doubting the mainstream Holocaust narrative is dangerous business. The real reason is that the lie was perpetrated so that Ashkenazi- jews would have an excuse to occupy the Holy Land to set-up their global leadership.

    Adolf Hitler was an Ashkenazi-jew working for and with Rothschild for global control.

    The man selected by Trump as the Israel ambassador is against having a two nation State. So, the question is: Who does the Holy Land belong to? To The True Christian Israelites.

    http://JAHTruth.net/abraham.htm

    1. @ New Song

      I have yet to read the real reason why doubting the mainstream Holocaust narrative is dangerous business. The real reason is that the lie was perpetrated so that Ashkenazi- jews would have an excuse to occupy the Holy Land to set-up their global leadership.

      The point you make (emphasised in bold print above) was covered adequately in LD’s article where the “Holy Land” was referred to as “Palestine”.

      Here is the relevant passage:

      In 1980, during a radio interview in France, the great French revisionist Robert Faurisson was asked to summarize his lifetime’s research on the Holocaust in a single sentence. He did so in 60 memorable French words which have been translated as follows:

      “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the German people — but not their leaders — and the entire Palestinian people.”

      That sentence, to this day, remains unchanged.

    2. @ new song
      the holy land belong to me I’m the true owner ,the original native master of the land
      these Ashkenazis aliens don’t belong here ,you can take them back

  7. What’s most idiotic is the notion that the most brilliant man and original thinker in known history – National Socialism is a truly revolutionary and unique ideology, in no way comparable with any other known religion or their derivates ( communism, humanism, liberalism, etc ) – would be so narrowminded to want to kill all the jews in Europe. It wouldn’t have solved anything for Germany and Aryanism, since the HQ of world jewry’s power wasn’t seated in Germany or even Europe but in the US. In other words, killing the Jews of Europe would be an entirely pointless waste of resources for Germany. From this viewpoint alone it is beyond ridiculous.

  8. For me, David Irving is a hero, a fighter for truth, and a brilliant historian. For years I dragged around the ball and chain of Holocaust shame because I was a blond haired, blue eyed Christian that automatically made me guilty of mass killing of the Jews. David Irving opened my eyes to the hidden history of World War II. Recently I watched a David Irving video where he updated his revisionism to include newly discovered facts that the German code (broken by the British) revealed the presence of death camps, although not Auschwitz. These death camps were destroyed before the end of the war. It all makes sense to me because my husband is a child of survivors and his mother’s family were shot in the woods, his father’s sisters went to Auschwitz and survived the war. Family tales relate that death camps were destroyed before the war ended. All of this then fits into the folk memory of the European Jews that survived. So… David Irving should be vindicated. He may not have accounted for the mythic 6 million but he believes that at least 3 million Jews were murdered–why not take that?

    But no one apparently is going to accept a true revision of the Holocaust because that would be real history rather than cinematic propaganda. We are so far down the rabbit hole that outrage is pointless. First I had to give up on the Holocaust being historical and dropping it because it isn’t worth it in the face of other horrors, such as the systematic poisoning of a generation of American children with vaccines. Now it seems with the Podesta emails that we have descended even one step farther down into the terrifying possibility of a government rife with sexual perversions and possible pedophilia slave rings. It does seem that Hollywood is involved here as well. Apparently beginning with the Rothschild family, it became edgy and fashionable to make meals in the form of cadavers. Oh and it’s not multi-cultural either because the cadaver cake I saw was a white women. White women also make up most of the dead meat of practically every crime movie on TV. And those movies by Steven Spielberg like Jurassic Park reveal that Spielberg might also be attracted to scaring little kids, apparently a favorite pedophilia thing. The Hollywood movers and shakers like to watch someone slice off a white woman’s breast and place it on a plate for consumption. They also like movie scenes where the kid character face registers terror. Those same child actors and actresses are abused off set, and so the deep fear on their face is real.

    I realize Trump is hardly perfect. He is not going to help in the 50 years systematic reign of terror on Palestinians. No truth on the Holocaust will come to light. David Irving maybe is in trouble economically, although his truth helps us stay sane. But Trump might dismantle some of the reign of terror within our own bureaucracy and maybe free some victims who otherwise would spend their lives as sex slaves to our unspeakably cruel and demonic elite.

    1. @ Kapoore

      But Trump might dismantle some of the reign of terror within our own bureaucracy and maybe free some victims who otherwise would spend their lives as sex slaves to our unspeakably cruel and demonic elite.

      That’s assuming Trump actually makes it to the White House. Surely you are aware of the CIA plot, in which leading neocons and the msm are involved, to make sure that the result of the American election is rendered null and void?

      The plotters are determined to have Hillary in the White House — or Mike Pence.

      http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/46062.htm

      1. it seems that you and your friends are hallucinating.
        ask LOBRO THE WISEMAN of this site if he believes it

      2. Hi Sardonicus,

        I follow the alternative news and so I’m aware of the plot. If Russia had hacked the DNC then it would have been picked up by the NSA. Those accusing Russia are providing no evidence, but instead using their authority as agents like scholasticism. Instead of real evidence they make a big show of being so hard working and honest. We are risking our lives for our country–a country we love. … Bla, bla. If they loved their country so much they would provide the necessary evidence instead of making vague accusations. If Trump makes it into the Presidency then he should stay out of the the way of any legal proceedings against Hillary and the Clinton Foundation. Allowing them to get away with all they have done is like allowing scorpions into your bed. The American public at large needs to understand that these people are criminals. It blows my mind that so many people are mourning the Clinton election loss. Hillary won California by more than 4 and a half million votes–she got something like 800,000 more votes that Obama. I can’t stand her and I especially can’t stand John Podesta—who, by the way, did nothing to secure his e-mail. It probably was hacked a hundred times. But in reality the hack was probably a leak. I hope and pray we get out of the clutches of the DEMON-o-crats.

    2. Kapoore,

      NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS THAT THE GERMAN CODE (BROKEN BY THE BRITISH) REVEALED THE PRESENCE OF DEATH CAMPS, ALTHOUGH NOT AUSCHWITZ. These death camps were destroyed before the end of the war. It all makes sense to me because my husband is a child of survivors and HIS MOTHER’S FAMILY WERE SHOT IN THE WOODS, his father’s sisters went to Auschwitz and survived the war. FAMILY TALES RELATE THAT DEATH CAMPS WERE DESTROYED BEFORE THE WAR ENDED. All of this then fits into the folk memory of the European Jews that survived. So… David Irving should be vindicated. He may not have accounted for the mythic 6 million but HE [David Irving] BELIEVES THAT AT LEAST 3 MILLION JEWS WERE MURDERED–WHY NOT TAKE THAT?

      Serious stuff.
      Can you please provide some sources for this (newly discovered facts that the German code (broken by the British) revealed the presence of death camps).
      And of course, questions pile upon questions at that point.
      I would say this one is the first, although I may revise the priority later because this claim is so new to me:
      Lobro you’ve been a wicked denier in mortal sin against your fellow man, in fact 3 million of them, deriding their suffering and death
      This would be a fair statement (if true) and I wish to make public amends as soon as the promised evidence comes in.
      So, as for prof lynn’s claim:

      In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.”

      Is it possible that crypto-jew Churchill wouldn’t have known and also the Allied intel, OAS, that they would have kept this secret from their national leaders, letting them put out 7,000 pages of history short of this most amazing fact of 3 million jews killed in nameless forests?
      Surely, germans would have mentioned the locations in their data traffic, secure in knowledge that it was secret.
      3 million is not 6 million but it is still THREE MILLION.
      That takes some killing.
      And disposal, if it was secret, then it would have meant digging mass graves because building crematories sufficient to accommodate so much meat would have involved an industrial scale planning and development, roads built especially for this, away from prying eyes – and secret from areal surveillance.
      So – digging.
      And what about armies of diggers, who were they?
      Jews – they would have been dispatched at the end, so the covering of the pits would be the job of others, presumably Germans
      Others – some of them would surely have said something to their families and friends over the drinks, over the years, brought well-heeled tourists over to show them.
      Ground-probing radar can spot these giant earthworks from the air quite easily.

      In Toronto I have family members in Mt Pleasant cemetery, which covers hundreds of acres between St. Clair, Yonge, Bayview and Sherwood Park, I’d estimate it at maybe 500 acres or more, a square mile.
      I grew up next to it, all my schools were there, used (like Pat) to hop the fence at night and share cheap sacrificial wine and smoke dope with buddies.

      As the final resting place of more than 168,000 persons, Mount Pleasant Cemetery contains remarkable architecture amongst its many monuments. The cemetery was designated a National Historic Site of Canada in 2000

      And look, only 168,000 dead, 1/20 of the claimed 3 million.
      Also have family members in York cemetery, 172 acres, much smaller than Mt Pleasant but still quite sizable.
      Very difficult to comprehend how is it possible for 3 million to have been shipped out, killed and buried in total secrecy and that moreover, this secrecy even excluded the top political and military cadres commanding thoe secret agencies that uncovered the truth.

      And yet, somehow the family of the victims KNEW.
      How did they know, where they present and walked away afterwards?
      Maybe they didn’t want the total to go above 6 million occult number, 9 million doesn’t cut the Kabbalah prophecy.

      C’mon, someone provide the evidence.
      Those original, dated and numbered Enigma transcripts should be available under FOI act.

      1. “… it is still THREE MILLION. That takes some killing.
        And disposal, …”

        Oh c’mon. To put things into perspective: the average football stadium holds 70k fans. You mean to tell me that those super-efficient krauts couldn’t have rounded up, killed, cremated and/or otherwise disposed of 43 stadiums worth of people? I mean, it’s not like they had anything else to do with their time and resources. And let us not forget now, there were 6 million other, insignificants that they killed too. Excuse me but, I don’t see any logistics problems.

      2. and moreover … if they were killed in the woods, what do you do next.

        either demolish the forest to make room for burial pits, in which case everyone figures something is up, or
        you leave the trees intact to maintain secrecy but now must dig around intersecting root networks to shove in bodies, which requires much more acreage than mere 43 football stadiums, more like 500 football stadiums.

        and now, what to do with numbers?
        do we go to 9 million, which along with millions of survivors means that the entire jew population lived in germany within easy Reich of hitlah, or
        do we admit that for 70 years, they plain lied to us about 6 million and 3 million yids were drawing fraudulent reparation stipends out of germany for all these decades.
        Will they refund the stolen loot? (and how to decide who is legit, who is not, let’s see the records)
        Does jew ever return the stolen property?
        Pure metaphysics.

        Lying is such hard work, neverending maintenance toil, jews really deserve a bonus for that.

        I do wish Kapoore would do some research and get back on that – mind, I have nothing but the highest regard for her and her integrity, I just suspect that someone (maybe irving) pulled a fast one on her.
        In which case, Pat is right all the way.
        As was late Bradley Smith, an upright gentleman all his life and an excellent writer.
        (I’ve been supporting CODOH for maybe 15 years now, automatic monthly donation)

      3. Hi Lobro, I can only refer you to David Irvings website and a recent video. I watched the video a couple of months ago when Denial came out. I’m sorry I don’t have it at my fingertips. It wasn’t David Irving that made the death camp discovery but someone else. David Irving’s assertion is that Hitler knew nothing of the mass killings. The operation started out with “trains to the east” where rich Jews were told to put on their finest clothes, and jewelry and to bring their most valuable possessions. When they arrived in the east they were shot and their possessions were stolen. Hitler asked once what happened to the Jews, and so he apparently didn’t know about the mass shootings. According to Irving the duty of mass shooting and burying people began taking a toll on those who were doing that task—can you imagine. So I guess the death camps happened later in the war. Irving estimated that about 1 million died in shootings and 2 million in the death camps. The numbers are in the broken code. It comes out to about the same as the numbers in the Israeli memorial. I believe David Irving because he is a meticulous researcher, but obviously you should watch that video, get the name of the code breaker and decide on the veracity of it yourself.

      4. i looked into it at some detail, kapoore and am convincingly unimpressed.
        it seems to be entirely hinged on one encrypted telegram, referred to as HOEFLE telegram, see here.
        Discussion thread at CODOH ridicules the notion as untenable.
        It looks completely fishy and even irving is backpedaling from his original backpedaling, saying he is “80% sure that the telegram is real”, ie, 20% margin of doubt – read what Irving himself acknowledges are the problems with the document’s authenticity:

        .. I am eighty percent convinced by the Hermann Höfle document (above), by my own cursory forensic examination of ink, paper, and typewriter, there is still a twenty percent chance that it is a forgery: the misspelling of Reinhardt (as Reinhart), the wrong math, the possibility that the authors simply worked backwards from a well-known figure (1,274,166) in the Korherr report of April 1943 (right) in order to authenticate it, the unusual lack of any register-number or date for the originating query (“Betr.:…”) , the prominence of the names involved (Eichmann himself), the top state-secret classification GEHEIME REICHSSACHE found only once elsewhere by me so far in the tens of thousands of otherwise overwhelmingly trivial decodes, the five-page document somehow being bound into the archive file out of page-sequence (5, 1, 2, 3, 4): these are just some of the anomalies unique to the Höfle document.

        Consider just this simple question: umlauts or diacritics are readily available on all German keyboards, especially the government ones.
        So why then, should the proper spelling of Höfle be spelled as Hoefle in the said telegram?

        And now the entire load of the New And Improved Holocaust has come down to one single telegram of dubious quality, miraculously rediscovered in the year 2000, 55 years after caught by the British code crackers.
        Yeah right.

        Look, by simple act of desperate latching onto this disputed telegram, the Exterminationalists have tacitly admitted lying on ALL PREVIOUS OCCASIONS, gassings, cremations, electrical wires, babies tossed in bonfires, pedal actuated brain-bashing machines and a score of bizarre execution methods breathlessly peddled before the open-mouthed goy public.

        So what is the message?
        We lied previously but now we are telling the truth, if you doubt us, you are a Hater and and a Denier and an Antisemite.
        Ok, i accept the credits as charged …
        my view is that the forgery was simply inserted into an existing archive.

      5. @Kapoore

        Hitler asked once what happened to the Jews, and so he apparently didn’t know about the mass shootings. According to Irving the duty of mass shooting and burying people began taking a toll on those who were doing that task—can you imagine. So I guess the death camps happened later in the war. Irving estimated that about 1 million died in shootings and 2 million in the death camps.

        so they killed 3 million jews, robbed them of their gold teeth and furs – behind the Glorious Supreme Leader’s back, they all went “shhh, don’t ask, don’t tell, we’ll split the loot“.
        And nooobody knew, just 3 thousand killers, each personally responsible for 1,000 murders and subsequent burials.
        And the secret was meticulously kept for 55 years, the world in complete ignorance.

        All i can say is: 😀

      6. sorry kapoore, i would never make fun of you because i respect you as an unusually honest individual, humility and grace galore.

        But i just can’t keep my mind off this comedy raised here, … can’t re-sist … musst continue … 😀

        so, Höfle, disguised as Hoefle, says “we got 1,274,166 put away”, exactly the same as 1943 korherr report (1,274,166 of whatever, previously assumed just to be reinhardt reindeers shipped, not slaughtered and eaten).

        Why would they have bothered keeping such an exact count if they meant to do it in secret and steal their valuables, making sure Der Führer never hears a single word of it?

        maybe Hoefle told Fuhrer but not Führer because Höfle kept mum.

        Führer: vas happened to die Juden?
        hoefle: wat du meanst “Die”?
        F: Die Juden, I said, vat happened?
        H: nosinck, herr Führer, algemaine gut, all Juden liff, alles 1,274,166 off zem, not Die!

        Toby, when in Lapland and your girlfriend gives you a break, cast around for some boneyards around Spamblinka, maybe you resolve this issue and become the Righteous Gentile Hero Of Shoah!

      7. indeed, looking at hoefle, the word “zusammen” means “together”, as in “subtotal”.
        adding up all the numbers yields 655,617, just half of the required 1,274,166 – not zusammen enough!

        So the telegram mystery is where did this 1,274,166 come out of, totally unrelated to the rest of the text.

        And Irving brushes it off as a minor issue.

        Well, lobro’s considered opinion is a slight revision of Irving’s:
        I am ZERO percent convinced by the Hermann Höfle document (above), by my own cursory forensic examination of linked content, there is still a HUNDRED percent chance that it is a forgery.
        That makes me a revisionist’s revisionist.

  9. The Satanic Conspiracy, being executed by the Synagogue of Satan as Christ calls them (Rev. 2:9*), against YHWH (“I AM” – God); the true Israelites and The Torah, to replace them, and it, with themselves and the Jewish Talmud has been in existence for at least 2,600 years as is confirmed by YHWH (“I AM”) Himself in the Books of His Prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel.

    * Rev. 2:9 “I (Christ) know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but [are] (Idumeans) the Synagogue of Satan.”

    http://JAHTruth.net/illumin.htm#ProtocolsProof

  10. “Countries with Laws against Holocaust denial: Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Switzerland”.

    those all controlled by the tribe. a few big offshore money security jurisdictions included there. i guess israel goes without saying.
    yet holocaust denial is not yet a crime in the usa, though other such legislation is in the works.
    when it does become a crime to question the holocaust in the usa it will be time to declare war on zionism.
    i hope some jewish thugs try to beat me up. they’ll be making a big mistake.
    but it won’t happen, because any such legal confrontation would serve to crack open the goyimy eyes of the millions of semi-concious american jew-media suckers living here, who are better left somnolent as long as the jews are still calling most of the shots at the top of the pyramid.
    of course the holocaust lie has been the basis for the long list of “reparations” the germans have had to pay off to the victors of ww2, really just an extension of the arrangement for reparations after ww1. it was really one big jew bankster war. it serves as well to fuel the ongoing robbery and murder of the palestinians.
    the states that prosecuted zundel and the others never proved the holocaust of 6,000,000 actually happened. all they had to do was prove the deniers didn’t recognize it. if they actually had to prove it did happen, statements like “everybody knows” and “it’s history” probably wouldn’t work. and as bad as american courtrooms have become under admiralty law the holohoaxers would not be able to stifle a challenge from real lawyers on this subject. the first to turn it over would be super famous forever.
    here’s the short overview on the “holocaust” now –
    ww2 was contrived and controlled by jews for the advancement of communism. fdr, stalin, churchill. not de gaulle. they tried to kill him later on several times.
    they wanted the destruction of germany, with as many german lived forfeit as possible. they got that. millions of germans were killed in the bombings and starved and shot later.
    they wanted another round of reparations. they got it.
    and expansion of the rothschild’s banksters bolshevik empire, including eastern europe and china. fdr and truman saw to that.
    they meant to have a sub-surface alliance between russia and the usa post ww2, for the mutual purpose of building and maintaining the current military industrial money-sucking complex. now surveillance state. look how the dc power structure reaches for the russians to try to derail trump now.
    they wanted the jews in europe broke loose from their homes and lives for the advancement of israel. it was jews who loaded other jews onto the boxcars and sent them to concentration camps, not extermination camps, where they were safe from the pre-planned firebombing of german cities. some of these jews did die of starvation and disease in the camps after germany collapsed. these are probably the corpses you see going into the ditches.
    some jews were not zionists. these would be the ones the ashkenazi murdered. real jews still deny zionism.
    hitler was a bankster operative all along who was used to commandeer the national socialist movement that grew in germany in ww1’s aftermath. eventually some among the german army generals realized this and tried to kill him. they failed. rather than a risky plot, one of them should have just walked up and shot him.
    the global banking cartel funded hitler and financed germany’s rearmament. it was all planned.
    the ashke-nazi party was controlled by jews. hitler was a jew, with a jewish doctor, a jewish lawyer and a jewish cook. of uncertain parentage he was most likely a rothschild. the likud are their political descendants.
    the ss (black sun), hitler’s bodyguard, was largely jewish.
    stalin fabricated the lie that hitler died in the bunker. he was removed to south america for retirement. the boys from brazil.
    after w2 everybody with a holocaust novel or movie was promoted by the jewish media magnates in the usa.
    the holocaust became a media myth, taught in schools, like oswald and the moon landing.

    so now real historians are thrown in jail just for questioning the dirty fairy tale, which if it were true would not fear the inquiry. this while the jews themselves and their commie allies in china murdered over 100,000,000 people from the days of lenin and ww1, through the ukraine holomodor and into ww2 and the genocidal campaigns against all others in eastern europe and china post ww2.

    1. UK now has the same (without specifying it) due to the recent introduction of a new definition of what constitutes anti-semitism. (basically any statement which criticises or offends the jewish people). Nick Kollerstrom has sent this letter to PM May(be) regarding this latest affront to liberty in the UK.

      http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=144037

  11. Great article and some fine comments. David Irving and his treatment by the racketeers in the Holocaust Industry and the futile Stalin-like attempt by Lipstadt and others to monopolize intellectual revelation, argument, and dissent based on research stands as one of the most disgraceful and shameless criminal repressions of the search for historical accuracy in recent times. However, Pat made a very good point above in pointing out certain areas in need of improvement with Mr. Irving. History regarding large subjects often requires time and effort to reveal a (relatively) full picture, and while Mr. Irving is a good starting point, he is woefully incomplete. To his everlasting credit, his observation in “Hitler’s War” that Stalin was preparing to attack Germany is based on unassailable evidence, hence my view that Hitler would have been better off strategically by declaring victory in the West and withdrawing. Irving’s revelation in volume one of “Churchill’s War” about “The Focus” group was tremendously important, though far from fully examined. Volume two is pretty worthless, a fawning attempt to return to the fold. His works “The Mare’s Nest” and “The German Atomic Bomb” are at best partial histories, but woefully incomplete. Far more revealing are Igor Witkowski’s “The Truth About the Wunderwaffe”, Henry Steven’s first three books, particularly “Hitler’s Suppressed and Still-Secret Weapons, Science and Technology”, Dr. Joseph P. Farrell’s “Reich of the Black Sun: Nazi Secret Weapons & the Cold War Legend” and others. Wolfgang Hirschfeld’s “Hirschfeld: The Story of a U-Boat NCO 1940-1946” is essential as Hirschfeld was a participant, “Hitler’s Nuclear Weapons” by Geoffrey Brooks and “Critical Mass” by Carter Plymton Hydrick are very important as well, and there are others – to be studied, evaluated, not casually dismissed as Mr. Irving has done as if he had a monopoly on the historical record. Regarding jewish suffering, one should read Paul Rassinier’s “Debunking the Holocaust Myth”. Rassinier, a French jew imprisoned at Buchenwald, spoke out early on about Ilya Ehrenburg’s efforts to spread the lie that there were Gas Chambers for extermination (not delousing) at Buchenwald and other German Camps and soundly defeated the lie. Of course, when you read about the brutality in WARTIME Buchenwald, you may find yourself asking “what’s the difference between a rifle butt blow and being gassed?” but of course the answer is degree and disinformation, aimed much like “Saddam did 9-11”. Further revelations are found in wartime occupied Poland in Witkowski’s work on German secret weapons; what was so very secret (and remains so until the present time) that the SS executed around 50 of their own scientists (corroborated by Nick Cooke, aviation editor at “Jane’s”, in his book “The Hunt for Zero Point”) while evacuating Poland, as well as burying alive hundreds and very possibly thousands of slave laborers (regarded as “Holders of the Reich’s Secrets”) in the underground facilities of Poland’s Owl mountains? Finally, if you haven’t read the “Gestapo Chief”series by Gregory Douglas and “The Fifth Man” (regarding Victor Rothschild’s high treason) by Roland Perry you are lacking vital data. There are others, but most mainstream histories like MSM, while covering events in a general way, lack depth and fall into the category referred to by Intelligence personnel as “Institutional maintenance”.

    1. In case the point isn’t fully apparent, the Holocaust narrative is being used by certain interested parties not only for political reasons but to conceal absolutely stunning technical advances made by wartime Germany. With due respect for Mr. Irving’s intellectual (and factual, per Mr. Leuchter and others) stand on realities at Auschwitz regarding genocide, overlooked are the buna (synthetic rubber) factory at Auschwitz which drew more electricity than the city of Berlin, noted by career experts in the field (See Hydrick’s “Critical Mass”) as being not only unnecessary but ridiculous, buna production requires only a fraction of that amount. So start thinking Tennessee Valley Authority and you’re getting a little closer. An Art teacher of mine was a worker at Auschwitz, by the way. But the most staggering technical achievements took place in Poland’s Tatra (Owl) mountains, Prague, and certain special locations in Germany. General Patton didn’t make a bee line for Prague for nothing (and after withdrawing when the Soviets took over making a highly illegal but successful armed foray to recover certain buried microfilm near Prague in the occupied Soviet zone). The late USAF Col. Wendelle Stevens, who worked on tons of captured German documents at Wright Patterson AF base after the war was puzzled by a map of Germany showing 9 specific locations designated by a ‘Saturn icon’, nothing else – no other data. It wasn’t until years later when a retired Bulgarian Intelligence op filled him in. The last known message from General Ing. (Engineer) Hans Kammler was an order to destroy the “V-1” device in Berlin, after which, he vanished. There are four different versions of his demise, all unproven and – not only highly unlikely, but absurd. As US forces captured loads (tons in fact) of intact V-1 and V-2 Rockets, what do you think he might have been referring to that required such specific attention when literally everything was collapsing? General Kammler is worthy of research, but little is known. General Heinrich Muller occasionally notes some of this subject in his Washington diaries, though precious little, one would expect no less from a professional. Some wonder if Hitler’s unusual loyalty to Mussolini may have been in part due to an event that occurred in Milan prior to the war, around 1937, later back engineered at the underground aviation facilities (“Fiat”) around Lake Garda, or elsewhere, before transfer to Germany. So by focusing minds to uncritically accept the genocide myth and stirring up the passions of functional illiterates incapable of independent examination more than one purpose has been served. The 21st century will require more sophistication, and work – something “elites” have grown quite adverse to.

  12. It’ll still be hard to get rid of this Holohoax fairy tale because the world is still buying the ‘kicked out of Egypt’ and “parted the Red Sea” bullshit even though it’s been proved archaeologically and historically that the former never happened and the latter…..well, only a idiot would believe it! Therefore the ‘promised land’ is just so much snake oil. But here we are, almost 70 years years later and they’re managed to virtually exterminate the real Semite people if Palestine and replace them with a phony population of non-Semites.

    Speaking engagements will be more and more difficult in the future either to attend or host. The best ‘we’ can hope for is to educate our OWN youth. They must understand, never, EVER, trust your government. They must understand the Jewish Federal Reserve ponzi scheme and the Rothschilds who control most of the world’s money.

    The Jew is destroying the world as we speak with his insidious money scams and his faux media and terrorism in all parts of the world. Only real facts (such as the above metapedia link ) will ever help to educate the populace, or our youth. Case in point:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2vp_OoT8DI&t=0s

  13. I just watched the trailer of the movie denial. It feels like an admission of weakness even with worm tail as David irving. No holes no holocaust.

    Since i am on a Greek streak, for the eventual rookie, revisionism starts with Paul Rassinier “Lie of Ulysses” a cold description of life in German concentration camps written in 1947 with a fresh memory. The title is making all the more sense since I have learnt from Taygete that Odysseus means “one whom the god hates.”
    There is also “Nuremberg the Promised land” written at the same period by Bardèche, full of reference to Greek mythology that you can find on PDF in English.
    http://www.balderexlibris.com/index.php?post/2012/01/25/Bardeche-Maurice-Nuremberg-or-the-Promised-Land
    Debunking jewish mythology with greek mythology is fun, fxxk you BHL.

  14. Ooops..!! I hate it when the dead ‘chosen’ are really alive. 🙂

    Accidental Family Reunion at Yad Vashem

    list of Holocaust victims includes people only “PRESUMED” dead…!!

    The Israeli Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem, compiles information about alleged victims of the Holocaust, with the obvious purpose of substantiating the alleged extent of mass-murder against Jews during the Second World War, but with the paradoxical result that some people presumed killed in the Holocaust turn out not to have been killed. Such an instance came to light this week.

    An extended family consisting of two nuclear families of Jews from Warsaw, the Bornsteins and the Bands, happened to be separated during the war, with each completely losing track of the other and generally assuming the worst.

    Assumptions notwithstanding, the seed for a family reunion was planted when Symcha Bornstein (apparently long ago) commemorated his brother-in-law Nisan Band with a “Page of Testimony” in Yad Vashem’s Central Database of Holocaust Victims’ Names, which means that he believed that Nisan Band had died in the Holocaust.

    As luck would have it, the page was discovered in early 2016 by Nisan’s children, Gennadi Band and Fania Band Bilkai (also spelled Bilkay and Blakay in reports). This must have been a great surprise for them, since their father had not been murdered: the Bands had fled into the Soviet Union in 1939, with father Nisan passing away there in 1983 at the age of 71 (A. Savir, World Israel News, 13 December 2016).

    http://codoh.com/library/document/4187/

  15. Let’s face it gang. Typical German intelligence (or absence of) as so accurately portrayed in shows like Hogan’s Heroes would lead anyone in their right mind to conclude that krauts could have never possibly accomplished what they’re accused of. They’re just too f-ing stupid. Therefore, it never happened.

    Case closed.

    1. Rebar –

      Hollywood ‘chosens’ got the sex-addict, Bob Crane, to play Hogan. He was so smart that he had his brains beaten out by a ‘friend’ at age 49 in Scottsdale, AZ, in 1978.

      They mock all mankind in Hollywood.

      1. Rebar –

        Familiar story in Hollywood:

        Few suspected that beneath Bob Crane’s glib exterior lay a thousand secrets: secrets in black … and white … and blonde … captured for posterity on hundreds of hard-core Polaroids and videotapes. Bob Crane was a sex addict before the term was invented, a married man who seduced scores of women over the years and enjoyed recording the details of their X-rated encounters.

        Mark Dawson, son of Crane’s Hogan’s Heroes co-star and Family Feud host Richard Dawson, was just 17 when Bob Crane decided to share those secrets with him.

        http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123829&page=1

  16. Gassing people to death is the most idiotic, ineffective way to exterminate them. And certainly not with a de-lousing toxic. Especially when you think that Germany had far more deadly poison gasses – actually designed to kill – to its disposal. How anyone can even consider this Holocaustian narrative to be genuine is beyond me. You really have to be some antifa moron or some irrational jew to believe that.

    Why not just arrest them, round them up and shoot them. That’s what I would have done. Saves a lot of logistic hassle. A cheaper and quicker method with and excellent results. If they did it like that they would have finished the job in three weeks max.

    1. starving makes the most sense because the remains are minimized for quick disposal.
      I picked that up in my genocide engineering 101.

      1. Oh, true enough I suppose. Although that most likely would have affected the skin elasticity, which would have resulted in far fewer presentable lamp shades for the apparently already understocked German retail stores. I know, I can’t help it. I am just that kind of person who is always concerned with the wider picture of things 🙂

      2. Jewish communists learned this concept from their holy cook book of genocidal atrocities three millennia ago. Read the story of Joseph.

        And Joseph placed his father and his brethren, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Ramses, as Pharaoh had commanded. And Joseph nourished his father, and his brethren, and all his father’s household, with bread, according to their families. And there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very sore, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine. And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh’s house. And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth. And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail. And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year. When that year was ended, they came unto him the second year, and said unto him, We will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands: Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.

        Jewish communist used the engineered famine to again genocide millions of indigenous Russians in the early part of the 2oth century. But of course no one is to take notice or speak of such atrocities committed by gods sacred people. I’m standing here with arms crossed and toe a-tappin’, waiting for god to show up with a rope to fix his chosen Israelite sinners once and for all.

        There will be no relief until the hideous hag called Judaism and her two terrible, ugly daughters disappear from the face of this planet.

      3. Arch,

        “There will be no relief until the hideous hag called Judaism and her two terrible, ugly daughters disappear from the face of this planet.”

        Do you believe in or are aware of fractals?

        Compare Judaism with a virus like HIV. It too eventually weakens the immunesystem of a body. Likewise the jews are weakening the immunesystem of the body we call earth until it dies. Because the deadly virus Judaism isn’t just undermining man’s civilisation’s health, but the ecosystem as a whole just as well with Capitalism, or Communism, which are essentially similar. If this isn’t stopped, there will be nothing left but rocks.

        Think about it people. I’m afraid I’m deadly serious. This is a clearcut bottomline view of the jew’s mission on earth, and likely in the whole universe. The mission to destroy creation/God. Perhaps they already wrecked Mars’ ecosystem eons ago.

  17. Constance from Berlin surprised me. I’m surprised . She said she was leaving Darkmoon and never coming back ; I figured she’d come back soon enough, except I figured she’d come back soon enough under her other hydra-head handle, “Karen”. So I’m 😉 shocked and I’m surprised I tell ya’ Constance-Karen hydra head snake has slithered back into the snake pit, after the hydra said she was NEVER coming back, lol.

  18. Constance –

    That it as difficult request, because all of their writings are important, but my interests are different from anyone else’s. I always get something from each one.
    My interests are mainly in the motives and results of the lies and profit motives…. and not so much the numbers which can be manipulated.

    My suggestion is to go to CODOH.COM and enter Bradley Smith(founder) in the search box. Select one with an interesting headline. Also put in names such as Rothschild or Hitler or Stalin in the search box. You will get a different story than from mainstream outlets.

    ……

    This one by Mark Weber in 1994 gives the basic REASONS for the 6,000,000 lie. I like it because it answers skeptics and provocateurs who always ask… WHY would they lie?? A good one there:

    –The Holocaust: Let’s hear both sides–

    Jewish history teacher Paula Hyman of Columbia University has observed: “With regard to Israel, the Holocaust may be used to forestall political criticism and suppress debate; it reinforces the sense of Jews as an eternally beleaguered people who can rely for their defense only upon themselves. The invocation of the suffering endured by the Jews under the Nazis often takes the place of rational argument, and is expected to convince doubters of the legitimacy of current Israeli government policy.”

    One major reason that the Holocaust story has proven so durable is that the governments of the major powers also have a vested interest in maintaining it. The victorious powers of the Second World War — the United States, Soviet Russia and Britain — have a stake in portraying the defeated Hitler regime as negatively as possible. The more evil and satanic the Hitler regime appears, the more noble and justified seems the Allied cause.

    http://codoh.com/library/document/866/

    ………

    I always like anything exposing the Rothschild motives and tactics for the establishment of Israel. Here is one for that republished from Journal of Historical Review from 1985:

    –Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild. The Meaning for Us–

    *Paper Presented to the Fifth International Revisionist Conference

    The Balfour Declaration may he the most extraordinary document produced by any Government in world history. It took the form of a letter from the Government of His Britannic Majesty King George the Fifth, the Government of the largest empire the world has even known, on which – once upon a time – the sun never set; a letter to an international financier of the banking house of Rothschild who had been made a peer of the realm.

    http://codoh.com/library/document/2137/

    ……………………

    This aspect of the site is really good. There are many archives available. Here are those from the IHR’s The Journal of Historical Review:

    The Journal of Historical Review began publication in 1980. Until 2002, when it ceased to exist, it upheld the tradition of Historical Revisionism of scholars such as Harry Elmer Barnes, A.J.P. Taylor, William H. Chamberlin, Paul Rassinier and Charles Tansill. CODOH is the only place where you can find online and for free ALL the papers of ALL the issues ever published, both as html and as PDF downloads. 80% of the work was done by Germar Rudolf, the rest by IHR employees.

    http://codoh.com/library/categories/1206/

  19. Uncle :

    LET’S MAKE A DEAL! If Trump Wins in the Electoral College today you have to put-up on Darkmoon’s commentary boards ALL the posts I send you every day ; If Hillary Wins in the Electoral College today you have to keep The Agreement and put-up on Darkmoon’s commentary boards at least 3 of my posts every as per your word as per The Agreement, 🙂 .

    1. Joe,

      Uncle Toby is not a betting man. Anyway, he is no longer monitoring this website. I am now the sole monitor.

      In case you’re interested, it happened like this.

      I complained to High Admin (Monty) that it was impossible for me to work with Toby any more, as an equal partner, because of the conflict between us. I gave Monty an ultimatum. “It’s either me or Toby,” I said. “You’ve got to choose.” We were all sitting round the dinner table when I said this. Monty was unable to choose, vacillating and indecisive as usual. So he turned to Lasha and said: “You choose!”

      Lasha started rummaging in her purse for a coin. “Okay, we’ll decide this issue right now!” she said. “Heads it’s Toby, tails it’s Sister Monica.” She tossed the coin and let it fall on the dinner table. To my delight, it came up tails.

      That’s why I’m the sole monitor now. Toby has gone into a giant sulk and has flown off to spend Christmas in Lapland with a former sweetheart.

  20. The white man’s terror of the Jew overlord is both amazing and sickening. Long gone are the days of a G.L. Rockwell strutting down the middle of the street in his German uniform. Years ago I was unwittingly shanghaied into hearing G. Edward Griffith give a talk about his new book “The Creature From Jekyll Island.”

    I went thinking I was making a big mistake to waste my time listening to yet another get-rich-quick shyster plugging his new secret method for earning billions of dollars an hour while sitting in one’s living room. I was not only surprised at the topic, but found it was one of the best “mistakes” I ever made. Mr. Griffith’s delivery was every bit as well done as the book itself.

    We were taken to a remote location outside of Anchorage where we were scanned over by two guys sitting at a desk situated squarely in front of the hallway entrance. They pushed a ledger at me, asking me to sign in with my name and address. It was at that point I learned it was a John Birch event at their local meeting place. The fear and suspicion, while very low key, was almost palpable.

    Years later, I went to hear David Irving speak. The event was supposed to be held at a local micro brewery close to the waterfront. We walked into the bar to find a couple of people sitting at the bar and no David Irving in sight. I asked the bartender about the Irving talk. He drew a blank, “nothing going on here like that tonight” he said.

    We rechecked the address and the time to confirm the details again. Thoroughly mystified we walked out of the bar and began walking away when we were confronted by two men that looked like spooks complete with suits and trench coats. One asked suspiciously why we had gone in and out of the bar so quickly. Now I was really stumped, why were these two characters were asking such questions out of the blue. Suddenly I had a queer feeling we had walked into the script of one of those banal Hollywood spy thrillers.

    I replied upfront that we had come to hear David Irving speak, but found no evidence of the advertised event. Now the other “agent” broke with the question? Now I am not typically one of those “what the F-ing business is it of yours” kinda guy, at least until I figure out what the situation is, so with nothing to hide I told him my name and the others accompanying me did the same. The two looked us up and down, studying us with great suspicion. “Ok” said the one and pulling out a small note pad, he wrote down the directions to another location quite some distance away.

    Handing me the slip of paper, he continued, “The bar owner cancelled the talk tonight, so it has been rescheduled at this new location. Here are the directions.” The two then walked away as if they had come especially to meet us. We went to the new location, a very low-key address in a small office complex. Once again we were met at the door and asked to sign in. This time we found a sparsely populated lecture hall with Mr. Irving at a podium preparing for his address.

    Throughout the talk questions were asked at various points. Some Jew who was a master at his trade kept asking what seemed innocuous questions. This seemed to agitate Irving until he finally grew quite angry and it now turned into a confrontation with the young Jew.

    From Irving’s response, I soon learned the guy was a heckler who followed Irving around heckling him in such a manner that it appeared Irving was the ugly one with a short temper. It was the most amazing display of cloaked heckling I have ever witnessed. In fact I never knew such a thing existed until I saw it in action that night.

    Jews are phenomenal in their ability to cow us and keep us running hither and yon to avoid their nasty, baseless barbs and accusations. When will white men take Incogman’s lead and start saying “You’re goddamn right I’m a Nhaddzee racist! What the fuck are you gonna do about it punk?”

    When will white men stop running and cowering at the sight of the Jew’s shadow?. I find it very unbecoming of the white race to follow the Jews” own stupid secret-underground-revolutionary bullshit game they have played since the day someone pointed one out yelling, “JEW!”

    However, there is a major difference in that Jews have everything to hide while the white man has nothing to hide. He has just been cowed into believing that he needs to hide from the true race of secrecy, populated by those cowards called Jews. Time to white up, get in the Jew’s face and kick them hard in the spot that will alleviate them of any desire to visit pizza parlors.

    The only alternative offered by the Jew is to allow them to shut us up and shut us down.

    1. Aah, that takes me back.

      It was well over 30 years ago. Once I dressed up as a Nadzee during Carnaval. Well, it was not an exact nazi uniform copy but some carefully composed military gear resembling it, I think I just had left the army myself. I got some reactions, one from a Morrocan who smiled, gave me thumbs up and asked me if I were supposed to be Nadzee. I said yes and he said, hey that’s alright! At one time I and a couple of mates were marching in a row, right hands in the air singing ” EINZ ZWEI DRIE VIER, EINZ ZWEI DREI VIER”, followed by, ” ZUM BUCHENWALD ZUM BUCHENWALD DA MACHEN WIR DIE JUDEN KALT ” which we found hilarious. A Canadian miltary guy who happened to be stationed nearby for a large NATO exercise and who we had met and had joined us on our night out on the tiles a few hours earlier was shocked and I remember him saying ” I would never salute such a lunatic “. Like we cared. Also I remember a group of some filthy leftist antifa types who came up to us while we were singing, in full hysterical SJW mode of course (I wouldn’t be surprised if they were jews) . I said “f*ck off, you filthy rats “, but they persisted and even wanted to attack us. So we punched their lights out and strolled on to the next cafe.

      This was at a time when I wasn’t jew wise at all, more than 30 years ago so it was more like provoking leftists because in the early 80’s PC was really disgustingly rising up. Having said that I never thought anything basd about Hitler or Nadzees. Quite contrary, I always felt why should I ? Who cares that they killed a couple of milion jews? He wasn’t the enemy of my blood, so. Decades later I found out about the lies.

      It was during the post punk/new wave era.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSgGNd6thrc 🙂

  21. Just flew over the thesis of David irving after reading Kapoore’s post and realized the huge nuance between his thesis and the research of Faurisson since i have never read revisionism in English, the subject is such a bore anyway. The simple fact that laws exist is proof enough that the whole story is a fraud.

    I came across this article written by Faurisson in 1983 called a challenge to David Irving.
    I can’t find it in English but interesting sections in English.
    http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.fr/1983/12/un-defi-david-irving.html
    He basically accused Irving of asserting something that even Hillberg couldn’t prove when he wrote this:

    But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.

    Irving “metaphysical” thesis fits with the official exterminationist narrative except for Hitler and GC. It also fits with the new school of exterminationist led by Goldhagen which claims that never mind physics nor number of victims, the collective intention was there.
    Did David Irving accept the 1000 $ challenge?

    Another interesting article in 2000 where Faurisson called him “the reluctant revisionist”, half-ass revisionist as they say in the hood.
    http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.fr/2000/01/david-irving-en-ce-moment.html

    Is David Irving some kind of counter fire, or worse, an inconsistent useful idiot easily manipulated confusing anybody. The kind of guy you put in a movie to discredit the whole revisionist movement.
    I am just guessing, Robert Faurisson is too much of a gentleman to imply such thing while I am just an anonymous coward behind a screen. After all David Irving is English. I trust Faurisson since he was beaten many times. First, he is Franco- Scottish and above all he has never drew up value judgement about Germany or other belligerent except his own country.

    http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.fr/2006/12/victories-of-revisionism.html
    No acknowledgment for Irving. Only Germans and Ahmadinejad.

    It smells like albion perfidy, hiding all their crimes behind German camps.

  22. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCDwDNZcxbc&lc=z122hhabxuu0gvj5c04ccriwpsrtwtqjpig

    In this youtube talk Irving himself admits there were execution camps along the Bug River, the notorious Reinhardt Kamps.

    He now estimates at least 3 million Jewish civilians murdered by the NAZIs.

    His main arguments are that:

    (1) Auschwitz was a slave labor and not execution camp. Although he does acknowledge the existence of the Little Red and Little White rooms as gassing chambers for culling those too weak to work, agreeing in this with the BBC book on Auschwitz by Rees.

    (2) Hitler never ordered or authorized the mass executions of Jews which was done mainly under the initiative of Himmler.

    Merry Christmas to you all.

    Remember the Prince of Peace is also the Way the Truth and the Life, not the Sway, the Spoof and the Lies.

    1. @ Mevashir

      He [Irving] now estimates at least 3 million Jewish civilians murdered by the NAZIs.

      His main arguments are that:

      (1) Auschwitz was a slave labor and not execution camp. Although he does acknowledge the existence of the Little Red and Little White rooms as gassing chambers for culling those too weak to work, agreeing in this with the BBC book on Auschwitz by Rees.

      (2) Hitler never ordered or authorized the mass executions of Jews which was done mainly under the initiative of Himmler.

      My defense of Irving against the scurrilous attacks made on him by the Daily Mail certainly does not not mean that I have to agree with every statement he has ever made about the Holocaust.

      All the writers on CODOH,in particularly Germar Rudolf, do not think Irving is a genuine Holocaust revisionist. Without exception, the revisionists on CODOH would reject Irving’s two statements made above. They would argue that Irving is talking nonsense and has no hard evidence for making those statements.

      I myself am no authority on this subject, so I will say no more except this: not everyone agrees with Irving’s position on the Holocaust, and Irving himself has admitted that his speciality is Hitler and the Third Reich, NOT the Holocaust.

      1. Thanks for writing Lasha.

        I think we all should cut to the chase.

        Probably we all could agree that massive numbers of Jewish civilians were targeted for annihilation by the Third Reich during WWII.

        The real complaint of the “Revisionists” is that they don’t think the Jews deserve reparations payments for their suffering.

        I believe it would facilitate this whole discussion and debate if we could be more transparent about what is really the issue here.

  23. You might be interested to know that I wrote to David Irving about the new film Denial, which I saw and thought was terrible. He graciously responded with a private email that he asked me not to divulge.

    I responded thus:

    Dr. Irving,

    I am DEEPLY honored you have shared this with me.

    I’m rather speechless.

    I think you are a brilliant man and have been deeply wounded by the ostracism and shunning of the mainstream academia.

    I can relate to that since this happened to me in a totally different context when I converted to Christianity from Judaism.

    I have children and grandchildren in Israel who refuse to communicate with me.

    Also my siblings in America have shunned me.

    It is a very uncomfortable kind of privilege to be a lonesome truth seeker.

    I also am very sorry about the death of your daughter and am horrified at what the Jewish community wrote to you to mock this tragedy.

    Wishing You and all your loved ones a blessed and happy Christmas Season.

    Sincerely,
    Michael Korn

  24. I dont know if LD is Catholic, but from a Catholic perspective one could argue that Hitler was a genuine hero, rising up to defend Europe against Soviet Communism.

    It’s possible to see the swastika as a symbol of the spinning sun seen in the skies over Fatima Portugal during the apparition of the Virgin Mary in 1917, when she warned of the menace to emerge from Russia.

    If one takes this view, then the Jewish anguish in WWII can be viewed as unfortunate collateral damage in the NAZI campaign to control eastern Europe and to stop partisan attacks from the USSR. David Irving comes close to taking this perspective which makes him very dangerous to the Holocaust Industry, which is enshrined on the idea that Jewish suffering is unique and unprecedented in scope in all of history. Irving’s approach tends to diminish that claim drastically.

    It also appears that the NAZI policies to the Jews hardened and intensified after 1942, when it became clear that the West would stand with Stalin at all costs. Without Western support, the USSR would have collapsed in the face of the German onslaught, just as Hitler said about “kicking in the rotten door” of Communism.

    The Jews became the hostages in this global drama as Hitler felt that Jewish forces were orchestrating the Western alliance and its support for Stalin against Germany.

    I think Revisionists and other skeptics should stop trying to convince Jews not to mourn their losses and their dead in that global conflagration, and instead should focus on raising the question of how long reparations payments should go on given that Jews were far from the only group to suffer in WWII.

    1. Hitler opposed both Communism and Capitalism as globalist movements that erase the unique cultural identities of sovereign peoples and nations.

      Hitler’s biggest mistake was failing to recognize that the Catholic Church, a globalist institution that far antedates both Communism and Capitalism, had become completely beholden to the Jewish financiers who run the global economy. Indeed the Catholic policy of prohibiting usury effectively granted the Jews a monopoly on banking and empowered them.

      The Catholic Church found itself on the horns of a terrible dilemma, wishing to support Hitler’s crusade against Communism but unable to extricate itself from its compromised position of dependence on Jewish finance.

      In the end the Church voted with its dollars rather than its soul.

  25. “Irving — who has been jailed, discredited and bankrupted for disgracefully dismissing the Auschwitz gas chambers as a ‘fairytale’, and claiming Hitler was oblivious to the planned extermination of six million Jews (the true figure was far fewer, he maintains)”

    So this well-paid Daily Mail hack DAVID JONES thinks it’s fine to JAIL, DISCREDIT and BANKRUPT an old historian for peacefully EXPRESSING an OPINION on a war-time event 70 year ago.

  26. Irving needs to return to the original findings he used to promote and stop speaking nonsense of partial gassings and that 3 million (number keeps going up) jews died in (name your camp) in order to sell books. If he was declaring this in 2006, then EVERYTHING after 2006 is corrupted. RETURN TO THE TRUTH or go home and keep your mouth shut.

  27. Excellent article on a great historian, the most important historian of WW II and perhaps the 20th century. A brave and honest man who values truth more than money and fame.

    As hard as the David Jones’ of the world work to please their Jewish media bosses, conform to Europe’s laws regarding what you are allowed to write regarding WW II and please the many millions who have been brought up on the soap and lampshades lies, there are signs that people are getting fed up with the lies and threats.

    The complete absence of any mention of the so called genocide of Jews in the WW II books written by Churchill, De Gaulle and Eisenhower also sharply contrast with what much of the world believes today, and I was told the other day again by an older Englishman, that England declared war on Germany because Germany was killing Jews. This is explained by Norman Finkelstein who said the “Holocaust Industry”, with the relentless push by the Jews to make themselves the ultimate victims, began after their victory in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, when their star rose in the US and they were considered a valuable ally against the Soviet backed Arab countries. This also conforms with a comment my German mother made regarding the USA in the early 1970’s. This was about the time the onslaught began about the holocaust, where a day wouldn’t pass where you didn’t read or hear about it several times in the media. My mother came to the US a few years after WW II and she said the US had changed [for the worse]. Oddly, as a German she felt more at home in the US shortly after the war than 30 years after it had ended.

    Sometime by the late sixties or early seventies the Jews had stolen the word holocaust for their own purposes and made it in regards to the suffering of Jews during WW II, when ten years earlier its definition was completely different and had no special meaning regarding Jews.

      1. I remember the Skokie march and I remember the TV miniseries “The Holocaust” very well. It was the ultimate “hate” film and of course the ultimate haters made it – the Jews. I also recall sitting in English class in 1974 or 1975 and having a Jewish instructor come in to help our Jewish teacher for that class and have us recite Sylvia Plath poems, a Pulitzer Prize winner (the first to receive the award posthumously). Plath wrote anti-German poems in English about the so-called holocaust, about skin, lampshades and soap interspersed with German words like “ich”. Revolting writing. She was born to a Swiss (German speaker) and a German who had come to the USA. She committed suicide by putting her head in the stove with the gas on. My theory is she did this out of feelings of guilt for being German. Those were the feelings her poems gave. But it was much more than that.

        The flooding of the media with “NAZI” atrocities of Jews began around that time too, but a little earlier. One of the first horror stories I recall was a trial of a woman named Ryan, I believe in 1971. She was a German that served in a concentration camp and they portrayed her as the ultimate evil. Roughly from that point on, the onslaught in the media began. I was young and I noticed a big difference from the time I left New York with may family in 1968 to the time I returned two years later, but I also was coming of age, so maybe I was just becoming more aware. No, that wasn’t it. My mother made a comment during those years (before I finished high school) about how the USA had changed (after I had brought home the Sylvia Plath poems and showed them to my parents).

        My first memory of Jew atrocity propaganda was late 1970. I can pinpoint the date because this was when we returned to New York from Florida. My best friend came over to our house in my new neighborhood and we met kids from the neighborhood. I recall there was a Jew, who eventually became my friend and a kid of Irish background. The Irish kid joked about Jews being stingy with money and picking up a penny from the ground and he joked about the holocaust. I can’t recall exactly what he said, but I remember my friend saying afterwards “that bothered you, didn’t it” or something like that. That is my first memory of Jew talk. When I grew up in the 60’s kids played “war” games, but there was no talk about Jews that I recall.

        At this exact same time “the early 1970’s” when I was in high school we learned about a new holiday called “Hanukah”, an unimportant Jewish holiday that was propelled to importance to compete with Christmas. Christmas cards became less religious, with pictures of “Santa” and “Rudolf the red nosed reindeer” replacing pictures of Jesus, the cross and the nativity scene. At this same time period the ACLU began bringing towns and cities to court to have them remove Nativity scenes from public places. We were told that saying “Merry Christmas” to a Jew could be offensive to them. I could go on. This all began in the early 1970’s and I believe it began in New York, where I lived, with the highest Jew population outside of Israel. Actually, at that time New York’s population may have been higher. None of this happened in the 1960’s or did not happen so much that it became noticeable until the early 1970’s

        Exactly what gave the Jews the nerve to push this down people’s throats, I’m not sure, but Norman Finkelstein says it happened as a result of the Jews victory in the Arab-Israeli war. I suspect there were other factors too. Jews were leaders in the civil rights movement for blacks. They were leaders because the civil rights movement helped them too. Increased negativity was focused on whites for keeping blacks down and slavery. Jews hopped on this bandwagon and portrayed their suffering much worse than blacks. It gave them an opportunity to talk about their own suffering without standing out alone (the blacks suffered too). And today, 46 years later, the world is told whites are the most evil people on earth, with Germans still holding the number one position among whites. The people that ran the world (or at least the west) for the last 500 years are now the Jews lapdogs.

      2. Thanks, Peter, I enjoyed reading your reminiscences. They brought back to my mind the tremendous climax to Sylvia Plath’s best known poem, “Lady Lazarus” — the hauntingly memorable closing lines:

        Herr God, Herr Lucifer
        Beware
        Beware.

        Out of the ash
        I rise with my red hair
        And I eat men like air.

  28. Pat [18th Dec]

    “They are just FINE…. with debating the paltry, yet absurd, 6,000,000 figure they concocted as a distraction – strawman – to keep from mentioning those other 100s of millions in their wakes.
    They invented psychology…. and they are most adept at using it against all mankind.”

    Where did that 6 million figure come from? See:
    http://www.rense.com/general75/ehr.htm
    Here’s another item worth a read… See:
    http://www.illuminati-news.com/rosenthal-interview.htm

    1. Thanks, Steven.

      It IS… The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.

      I have been buying Charles A Weisman’s booklets since the 70s.

      Who Is Esau/Edom? was really good.

      1. PAT
        December 23, 2016 at 1:39 am

        Thank you for that.
        “Christianity vs Judeo Christianity” by Malcolm Ross
        is also worthwhile reading.
        Unfortunately, he lost his teaching position at a school in Canada because
        “In 1991, a local Jewish parent, David Attis, filed a human rights complaint against Ross’s employers, New Brunswick School District 15, on the grounds that Ross’s continued employment created a poisoned environment for Jewish students”…
        See
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Ross_(school_teacher)
        Cheers.

  29. To be honest. I think the impostors and gonna end up the same as the extinct Judeans. The fault completely resides on their proven criminal sick behavior for centuries. The register of expulsions all over Europe is a documented fact to say the least. They are asking for it since the year 448 of our era. Sounds horrible. But that would mean the total salvation of the entire universe itself. Have no doubt about it. Ladies and gentleman that is going to happen. When. Hard to say. But be sure down the line it will.

  30. Leave it to the jews to confuse everyone. Kapoore is married to a jew, so give her some slack (at least for a little bit), thus she is marred with their satanic-driven jew conspiracy. If she were to fully understand the evil conspiracy and confronted her husband, she may very well be without a husband and might lose all the comforts of her present jewish life.

    The jew culture can mar a person for life with their disingenuous shite. I know because I was born into a jew (maternal) family and grew up thinking Judaism followed The Torah. Nothing could be further from the Truth. The Torah must be enforced if man is to be free from the jew whose influences into Israel (the people) was/is Babylonian/Roman/Satanic. Jews are incapable of leading the way because their beliefs are based on a malignant LIE.

    http://JAHTruth.net/abraham.htm

  31. The Jewish cultural vampires are like flies attracted to rot and decay.

    Were it not for the collapse of Christian morality these parasites could never damage society.

    The Christian immune system is failing because the so called guardians of morality, the pastors priests and minister, refuse to denounce the evil cultural influences.

    I am ashamed of the role of prominent Jews in corrupting Christian culture, but in the final analysis Christians themselves are to blame for their own moral collapse into vulnerability and weakness.

Comments are closed.