The Fabulous Wealth of the Rothschilds (3-minute video)

The Rothschild family is reported to own $500 trillion,
half the entire wealth of the world.
Their tentacles stretch everywhere.

xx

 

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

58 thoughts on “The Fabulous Wealth of the Rothschilds (3-minute video)

  1. In the following video The Aristocrats : the Rothschilds at 31.03 – 31.50 you can see Jacob Rothschild inspecting an absolutely MONSTROUS sculpture of a black gorilla, which he had installed in a new house for his Rothschild Foundation as a piece of “art”. It says a lot of the spiritual character of this man if he really thinks such monstrosity is art :

    https://youtu.be/b0su39y7QOM?t=1912

  2. As I have stated on numerous occasions…..
    London’s Pharisee-Jew Bankers own and control the world’s gold and prices.

    Anything to the contrary is allowed to be written with their permission and control also, since they own and control the media and publishing sources.

    Those same bankers own and control the world’s governments. Agents are in place worldwide. They can afford the payroll.

  3. One can be assured that what is being watched is misdirection and disinformation. Hiding the truth is a Jewish cultural trait. Jews seldom, if ever, tell the truth about themselves, their history their culture or their families.

    This can be seen in the video where the narrator talks about how the Rothschild fortune has dwindled. Ya sure, you betcha! After hundreds of years of amassing global wealth, the House of Rothschild suddenly went stupid and began losing their fortune.

    Instead of facts, what Jews offer for public consumption are outright lies and half truths that tell a story completely removed from the truth. What the Rothschilds will never say, or allowed to be said, is whom is actually in control of the house of Rothschild, how much wealth they own and/or control and how much power they exert over the planet. That information can be used to target, so it is only natural for Jews to misdirect those who might use such information to plan their actions.

      1. Thanks, Ingrid –

        I understood what the priest stated about ‘thin air’ well over 50 years ago. I started collecting 90% silver coins in 1962, when word got out of its removal from US coins.

        No one knows how much gold there is in the world… and who has physical possession of any of it. All that is told is rumors and hearsay.

        All rumors on internet…. spread like ‘smoke’… especially by preachers like this one excommunicated to a lowly preacher…. who has only seen his gold plated ornaments and chains on his ‘pots of smoke’ which he waved on occasion to look like an official cultist, spreading smoke and rumors.
        He can now apply for broker on Wall Strret financial firms, L)

        Everyone loves a good rumor…. like this:

        The World’s Favorite New Tax Haven Is the United States

        Moving money out of the usual offshore secrecy havens and into the U.S. is a brisk new business.

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/us-tax-haven_us_5637c1b7e4b06317991345ec

        And:
        The U.S. Is Now A Top Global Tax Haven

        http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/nov/02/united-states-overtakes-caymans-singapore-tax-haven-financial-secrecy-index

  4. Does it matter how much money they have? Assuming we could possibly calculate the sum accurately? The point is they have as much money as God in the present paradigm. In fact they are “god” in the current schema. Making money out of thin air to buy everything they or their cronies desire to own.

    In the ’70s I figured this out by listening to Jethro Tull. Not the farmer who invented a seed drill but the Rock and Roll band. Of course, I did not yet know the Rothschilds or any of the other Masters of the Universe, but I was able to catch on to the general gist of things through their song Bungle in the Jungle.

    Walking through forests of palm tree apartments —
    scoff at the monkeys who live in their dark tents
    down by the waterhole — drunk every Friday —
    eating their nuts — saving their raisins for Sunday.
    Lions and tigers who wait in the shadows —
    they’re fast but they’re lazy, and sleep in green meadows.

    Let’s bungle in the jungle — well, that’s all right by me.
    I’m a tiger when I want love,
    but I’m a snake if we disagree.

    Just say a word and the boys will be right there:
    with claws at your back to send a chill through the night air.
    Is it so frightening to have me at your shoulder?
    Thunder and lightning couldn’t be bolder.
    I’ll write on your tombstone, “I thank you for dinner.”
    This game that we animals play is a winner.

    Let’s bungle in the jungle — well, that’s all right by me.
    I’m a tiger when I want love,
    but I’m a snake if we disagree.

    The rivers are full of crocodile nasties
    and He who made kittens put snakes in the grass.
    He’s a lover of life but a player of pawns —
    yes, the King on His sunset lies waiting for dawn
    to light up His Jungle
    as play is resumed.
    The monkeys seem willing to strike up the tune.

    The key to this all is that the monkeys seem willing to strike up the tune.

  5. I have read Eustace Mullins’ ‘World Order’, and his ‘Secrets of The Federal Reserve.’. Discarding bias, I must say that those jew-boys are GREAT businessmen! How could one possibly argue with the notion that lending to governments is more secure than lending to individuals??? No wonder those boys are rich! (Most of us are just pissed off that our own ancestors didn’t think of it FIRST!). 🙂

    1. Maybe this is why our ancestors didn’t think of it first, Gibert:

      Larceny – The unlawful taking and removing of another’s personal property with the intent of permanently depriving the owner

      Back in those Dark Ages, larceny was not considered an honorable business practice, but luckily, the Christian values went out the window long ago and what once was unlawful is the gold standard today.

      Besides we know that Jews earn everything by the sweat of the brow, don’t they.

      1. I agree, Lobro, but ALL were, at first, WILLING PARTICIPANTS. They sought-after Jew wealth; and Jew, having been denied participation in traditional pursuits, devised his schemes out of necessity for his own survival. Jews became lenders and ‘rag pickers’ because they were prohibited other means of livelihood. Some (like the Rotheschild ancestors) chose their customers with steady discernment – and their customers were WILLING participants. When any of us ‘invest’ in a certain stock share on ‘the market’, we seek a ‘return’ advantageous to our monetary gain. When we bet on a horse, we (usually) do so citing certain advantages recognized by our OWN discernment – anticipating GAIN in our purse. What is ‘money’ worth if it isn’t worth pursuing??? It affords us nice things, influence, and social position. The Misters Rotheschild just happened to latch onto a very profitable game – willingly played by ALL participants! 🙂

      2. Listened to a podcast in the night, “Dave McGowan Interview: Programmed To Kill”. This poor sod split with his wife a couple of years ago, was unable to keep up the payments on his house alone, thought he might get to wait until after the holiday, get to spend time with his kids, but an eviction notice was pinned to his door, fourteen days before Christmas. What sort of heartless bstrds would do such a thing?????????????

      3. “Besides we know that (many) Jews earn everything by the sweat of (another’s) brow, don’t they.”
        Yes, indeed they do.

      4. I think you missed the point GH, when this guy bought his house, there were two people making payments..

  6. Reality check:

    In monetary terms, debt is a negative number that has no real value which is why debt currency is worthless and is manufactured out of thin air. So, if someone is willing to sell me physical gold or silver for instruments of debt, that makes the gold or silver worthless as well. Consequently, the Rothschilds are as broke as everyone else even if they have $500-trillion of money, gold, or silver. They just want everyone to think that they are not broke.

    Finance is all an illusion to gain control of force to continue the illusion of finance. The only real currency is food and it has been that way since the beginning and it will be that way until the end. The problem with controlling food is that food grows automatically on most land surfaces of the planet and flourishes even more with a little help from a farmer. Those who can feed themselves off the land are as free as you can get materially – spiritually is another matter. The jews and governments know this simple fact which is why they are almost all in favor of continuing the illusion of finance and the control it permits.

  7. I want to use this space to thank all good hearted europeans for helping every way they can my people from syria who are going through a very hard time as we speak; I want to thank all the volunteers that hold the babies while the mothers are disembarked to safety
    Thank you

    1. Contrary to the aim of your extended polemics here which seek to further divide east and west into opposing camps of ‘we’ and ‘they’ – Syrians are not ‘your people’ …. any more than the Ashkenazi terror gang who occupy your[umm – former] neighborhood are ‘your people’ due to close geographical proximity.

      Syria, a constitutionally secular state which demographically comprises a cross section of middle eastern ethnicities and cultures, is a mosaic of peoples whose origins cannot possibly fit into ANY DEFINITION of being “yours” to own.

      Arabs bump into Kurds, who live near Turkmen, while remnant populations of ancient Assyrian, so-called “Neo Hittite”(more accurately- Luwian)and even Canaanite occupy pockets everywhere across breadth of Syria, along with Armenian and Greek minorities. Perhaps more importantly, the Muslim population, if that is the mistaken yardstick which you are using to stake your claim, is but one of several religious persuasions making up the Syrian spectrum. Mandeans, who predate John the Baptist, Syriac/Nestorian/Assyrian/Orthodox Christians, Alawites, Ismailis, Druze, Alevi and Jews all worship separately but side by side.

      As a matter of course then, and in abeyance to the deliberate media distortions you lap up uncritically, the people who get in and out of small boats on voyage to European destinations are a variety – of ethnicities… not “ARABS”… not “MUSLIMS…. but SYRIANS~!

      In it’s own way your partisanship and effort to polarize perspectives into this -or -that dialectic, is as invidious as the more obvious work of the Muzzie-haters/MightyWhities/phony”Jew” bashers and other hasbra trolls and mossad flunkies who post here and elsewhere. If you live in South America, why not make your new neighbors ‘your people’ – and give up on floating old ghosts in an attempt to scare up trouble?

      Beyond the photo shoot take on real life events – PEOPLE help other PEOPLE dude – Same as it ever was! I’m not wishing to be extra hard on you here…. but really… you do more to help Frankie R and the folks who wanna sweep up the ‘racial filth’ of “your people” and dump them all back in “your land” than you appear to realize. Or maybe you do>? Naive Poster or Provocateur?

    1. Laugh of the day, if we are prisoners of the Matrix, this guy is in solitary confinement:

      “Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the ‘cause of the world’s problems’, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives.

      The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover, using them [i.e., the Rothschilds] in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front.

      “History books will tell us that the French Revolution first began in 1787 or 1789, depending on which book you read. However, it was actually planned by [Jesuit] Dr. Adam Weishaupt and the House of Rothschild almost 20 years before the Revolution took place.”
      – William Sutton (Author of The New Age Movement and Illuminati 666

      Ellie, you are a Jesuit!!!
      You don’t fool us with that anti-Catholic rhetoric.

      1. Anti-Catholic Jesuits ain’t so far off the mark

        …once sufficient “Dis-enchantment” from the collective trance of dialectical reasoning has set in; history as agit-prop tool set aside, the Jesuit phenomena as an outgrowth from the Illuminados secret society of middle ages Spain bears all the tell tale signs of your favorite targets here.

        Catholic ‘converts’ from the judaic community, known as marranos, were used a stalking horses to worm their way into positions of influence within that church, just as they had previously done within the Caliphate. When they – acting upon instructions of their kabbalist bosses, set up the Jesuit sect, it was exactly parallel to setting up something like a mystical Islamic society such as Bekitas – allowing adherents to get close to center of authority at the same time as maintaining an agreeable degree of unorthodoxy which attracted the unwary ‘seeker’ who is always prey to the designs of the occultist.

        The confluence of that tradition of hidden rabbinical/talmudist secret society with the eastern one arriving via Josef Frank from the Dolmeh Islamic equivalent stream of Sabbateanism, mixing together in Monrovia and the Hapsburg Empire to form into the better know “Illuminati” was sealed with the money and influence of the Bauer family. These binded strands of occultism would use the Continental Masons as their dupes in order to forward their plans for wrecking European culture from within.

        Like the hollowed out carcass of the caterpillar which the cordyceps fungus parasitized, that Papist offshoot of the original Christian tradition has been ossified into a dead body of faith that is turned into the source of nourishment of a foreign tradition inimical to the health of the host.

        Jesuit = “When a Cordyceps fungus attacks a host, the mycelium invades and eventually replaces the host tissue, while the elongated fruit body (ascocarp) may be cylindrical, branched, or of complex shape.”

      2. Ormanci, while not denying that there is a lot of truth in what you say, the “Jesuit” picture is far from complete, IMO.
        There is much to link to, so I will just run a (partial) list, can dig up links at another time.
        Ignatius Loyola WAS NOT a Jew but a Basque nobleman, trained in the knighthood spirit of the day, a swashbuckling swordsman that killed opponents in duels (how Jewish is that).
        Indeed, the Society was welcoming to converted Jews at first before they caught onto the marrano ruse (i believe that the terms “converso” and “marrano” denoted sincere and fake converts respectively) but after about 50 years got wise to the deadly danger, kicked out all those of Jewish background and instuted very strict genealogical checks on prospective entrants – i posted this information earlier and can look it up again.

        The Protocols state with great emphasis that the Jesuits are a capable enemy, the only gentile institution with training, discipline and subtlety to counteract The Elders of Zion but that “luckily”, they have been successfully and sufficiently slandered and discredited in the minds of the retarded goyim to be removed as a serious threat.
        ————
        It is absolutely, unequivocally true that we, the goyim have sunk far beneath the mental competence of our forebears, have no doubt on that score, our inability to perceive our predicament is the tragic testimonial to that.

        I repeat the following challenge to anyone: what has the entire so-called civilization created in the 20th century that the future generations will remember by way of beauty, culture, flight of the spirit – 6 or 7 billion brain+soul dead, walking, ever-yapping corpses snapping selfies, online mausoleums?

        Compare it to Central Europe (Germany, Austrian Empire, Russia) of the 19th century, Renaissance, the enlightened caliphates of Saladin and Persia, the Hellenic, Classical and Archaic Greece …

        The downfall started in earnest with Judeo-Protestant invasion of Catholic England by Cromwell that saw full scale triumphant return of the Jew, brutal uprooting of the RC church right across, the Irish genocide and harnessing of the thusly lobotomized WASP beast toward the global conquest of looting, destruction and enslavement.

        Advice to all; don’t stare at the picture from 2 inches away with a magnifying glass.
        Step back.
        Even further, so you can also watch the behavior of the gallery visitors.

        I am no Jesuit-man, the order is of no interest to me because it is gutted, a spent force, useless against the Ancient Enemy.
        But to consider it The Enemy is tragicomic in the extreme – shooting ourselves in the foot doesn’t hurt? Let’s aim for the head …

      3. @Ormanci

        To abuse yourself of the idiot “it’s the Jesuits” conspiracy-theory, go to :

        https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/…/fallacy-of-the-jesuit-conspiracy-theory

        and see how many Jews are behind this conspiracy theory, but if you have enough common sense you would already have understood that this theory is nonsense.

        BTW, “Bekitas” should be “Bektashi” and “Dolmeh” should be “Dönmeh”.

      4. Franklin,
        I see that this is one of your less salubrious and on point days – oh well… we all have them! Anywooo…

        to disabuse yourself of the serial supposition on your part that you can avoid actually reading and comprehending my words before disgorging your volley into the empty straw man target =

        since I DO NOT subscribe to an “it’s the Jesuits” theory – I have no need to disabuse myself of one.

        Actually reading my comment – as foreign to your nature as it may be…. would have established the absence of that particular canard, and instead given a more alert reader pause for some thinking. Along the lines of…

        If one strand of talmudist\kabbalist false front arrangement against the enemy is formed out of a group of a mixed society of their hidden agents and their usual gentile dupes – and another is created from a melding of diasporic eastern sephardics and ashkenazim, also filtered through a pretend conversion to Catholicism…

        the result is a new group, or synthesis which is not -repeat NOT – the Jesuits – whom I correctly identified as “an outgrowth from the Illuminados secret society of middle ages Spain – and later subsumed into the “Illuminati” which operated through continental Masonry. Your spurious insert of something peripheral to what has been actually described is your trademark diversionary tactic to remove substance in favor of superficiality.

        This process of changing form and evolving tactics is a readily discernible feature of talmudic/kabbalist tactics through the centuries. My closing remark – which equated Jesuits with the very descriptive analogy of the fungal takeover of a living organism embellishes that point – and would show any reader of good faith and open mind the key difference between my nuanced recounting of the variations in form and shape of kabbalist front groups, as described in the balance of my comment, and your – to put it bluntly – malformed and erroneous red herring inserted in its stead. In your hands, history becomes a blunt object wielded at the passerby, rather than a reasoned inspection of the evidence leading to logical conclusions.

        If you are still hurting from the battering I gave to your similarly poor outing in relation to the Palestinian identity question on a previous thread – I suggest you let it go! I have given your kudos where warranted – and applied necessary critique to your historical deviations where also required – no use sulking squire. In like mode, it will cheer you to know you are correct about the spelling of Dönmeh – as opposed to Dolmeh, which is a popular dish we have here. I may have been subject to the influence of pre lunch hunger pains when writing that! As for Bekitas – not so much. Beşiktaş is the correct spelling – as you can see it gets rather mangled by conversion to the Indo-European system. I did drop the first s in error though. You have happily disabused me of that mistake!

        Common sense is happily not a deficit I suffer Franklin – commons sense in avoiding the recurrent use of straw men like “it’s the Jesuits” would go far to lessen the impression that it may be one you do.

      5. And the poor Christ remains,
        On the caboose of the train,
        But it ain’t him to blame,
        He’s only a pawn in their game..

      6. Ormanci –

        “This process of changing form and evolving tactics is a readily discernible feature of talmudic/kabbalist tactics through the centuries.”

        Good point, and well taken.
        It turns out that I am a guilty party there, by accident…. by “mistake.’

        “Mistake’ is a lawful defense.

        Criminal Defenses of Mistakes of Fact and Mistakes of Law
        https://www.justia.com/criminal/defenses/mistake/

        Oooops…. I just did it again. 🙂

      7. Lobro,
        You suffer none of Franklin’s attention deficit syndrome – and can be counted upon to do a more that commendable job of READING other people’s comments before responding to them – in this case a couple of things may have slipped through that filtration system… and also I may need to fine tune the presentation.

        Playing off of the closing two sentences of your own comment, I saw the opportunity to make a connection to the ongoing theme we have touched upon here – of the background to ‘hidden hand’ tactics by which the talmudic kabbalist achieves their goals via deniable stratagems. JESUITS as anti-Catholics resonates with that theme, for sure!

        For me, they are a part – and only a part – of a process of subverting the Catholics to a talmudist agenda. No different than that which they did with the Protestants…. and as you yourself say – “it is gutted, a spent force” in this day. I put some attention in my comment to joining them in a contiguous thread of mischief which I believe successfully details their real role and the proper historical context of it, which is not at odds with that statement.

        That’s why your closing words – “But to consider it The Enemy is tragicomic in the extreme” – which appears to be of a similar meaning to Franklin’s much more egregious misreading of my comment… is hard to fathom. If you find someone here who considers “the Jesuits” to be “The Enemy,” it would probably be suitable to turn those guns upon them – it ain’t me you’re lookin for!

        When everything is done in a cloaked – concealed manner such as has been the case with our kabbalistic-talmudist crew through the centuries, the tracking of correspondences and apparent contradictions gets onerous. So I try to stay as precise as possible. With that in mind, when I read you to say –

        “Ignatius Loyola WAS NOT a Jew but a Basque nobleman, trained in the knighthood spirit of the day, a swashbuckling swordsman that killed opponents in duels”

        I (momentarily) quayle before the task of cutting through the cog dis this subject engenders. Having left Loyola’s name out of the comment – and knowing full well that the Illuminados and the milieu out of which the “Society of Jesus” was one of mixed Gentiles, Jews, and crypto-jews…and that Diego Laynez, who followed Loyola as the 2nd Superior General was well known to be of Jewish background, yet a 4th generation “Catholic” – I wonder to what further lengths I would need go to establish a context to my comment in which straw men of any variety could play no part?

        If ‘kabbalist bosses,’ likewise does not give a hint of there being a multi-level, as well as multi-generational project of the kind for which you show an acute sensibility… such that the delicate thread of continuity which bound my comment into a contiguous strand of players of whom the Jesuits are part, but not all… then there may be more to what this word Jesuit means in the Darkmoon demi-monde than I have yet to grasp! Jesuits are somewhat peripheral to my own interest in this matter, but I glean from your comment combined with Franklin’s that the word has come to have some weighty connotations in discussions I have not been a part of.

        There is though, an alternate explanation to the exclusion of persons of Jewish[and Moslem!]descent from order to which I credit at least an equal weight to the one you mention in your comment. In a letter from November, 1598 the Superior General admitted that a major consideration in passing the decree excluding those of Jewish and Moslem ancestry was pressure from Spain: «we will never have peace with the King, with his principal ministers and with the Inquisition nor would the Society ever have the status it deserved unless the decree was passed».

        I want to further respond to your interpretation the expulsion event therefore, with regards to what the “inquistion” was really about, but it would be premature to do so here, without some further thinking through my approach so as to get it across without possible confusion such as my first comment produced. As usual, you’ve kicked off a new range of thinking on this subject for me… which is the major goal, for me, in having these tete a tetes. Refinement of the presentation is the heart and soul of communicating, and can never be assumed redundant. I’ll be working on the way to present the ‘kabbalist continuum’ as a constant [under]current of Christian politics thanks to this little spur. Many thanks.

      8. The world was formed not from a solid piece nor a molten piece but a swampy piece of place, for we are the descendants of the lizards who crawled outta the swamps to build our present day Glorious Civilization! We’re Transmigrating into Gods!! Our very own GODS!! That’s why I just LERV living in Florida! There’s like so many swamps around here it feels like being close to God! close to our Roots!, close to the Big Bang! Before the joos and those awfully atavistic xtians labeled everyone and threw everyone into boxes. Before the joos and the xtians and all of their rules. Like it’s so kewl to live in Florida where there’s NO rules!! You can even go shopping at your local Walmart in your pajamas you slept in the night before and haven’t washed in months and everybody is like way kewl with that!!! There’s like tons of really hip Floridians who are totally into IT man! In the swamps where we all started out we’re free from the joos and the xtians finally!! Yea!!! We’re transmigrating and transmorphing thru the Cosmos into our very own GODS!! I know that’s true because I read the “Science” section at Infowars every day!!! Oh sure, Alex Jones is controlled opposition, but that only goes for the politics and geo-political situation and the joos, but when it comes to Science Emerick knows his Godly shit alright!!! No “sacred” insidious joo cows and NO perfidious NWO Matrix jesuits like Teilhard de Chardin for example in the Science section, only Eastern Temple Ascended Masters!!

      9. Orm,
        Few points while trying to exercise brevity – not easy.
        PRIMARILY, my post was aimed at the general reader, who, especially if heartland American, may have definite notions of Jesuits as a force way more sinister than any Judaic manifestation.
        If you read the topmost entry by crisscross, the string of inanities and logical fallacies is astonishing, e.g., Bonaparte says how bad the Jesuits are, practically the following line says Bonaparte was a Jesuit, etc.
        Yet, all of this, including that Loyola was a Jew, especially that Loyola was a Jew, is stock in trade of the Catholic haters and baiters, not a few Yanks among them.
        This litany by Crisscross is quite par for the course and I am very tired of hearing it.
        The Toronto that I grew up was a hard rock Protestant town and I am very familiar with this sentiment, where the Anglicans were by far the most considerate and enlightened of the bunch, the dour, hostile Presbyterians, Orange Lodge boors to whom Jews were either a minor nuisance or in fact, a solid ally in the centuries old hatred and persecution of the Papists. My reference to Cromwell was not a trivial one.
        I can tell you that (at that time very few) the black Protestant Jamaicans and Bajians (Barbados) were more socially acceptable than the Catholic Irish and the Quebecois.
        So, this is the primary backdrop for my tirade against Crisscross’ entry.

        Next, my point is that the Jesuits are a close knit, impenetrable community of very bright Christian GOYIM (having expunged Jews from their midst centuries ago, all with post grad education and devotion to careful analysis.
        They are not in thrall of quarterly reports but think and plan long term.
        For all these reasons, the Kabbalists (I guess, “Cabal” for short) accord them fearful respect and near equal status as a tricky adversary.

        My Chicago friend, an Irishman of social standing, big donor to the Dems, Notre Dame, Loyola and U of Chicago brought me into contact with several Jesuits.
        And let me tell you that they are formidable.
        I ventured a few sallies in Jewwise direction and they deflected it with a knowing smile.
        Knowing, also, because my friend, though a Catholic, is primarily a businessman, made his fortune with a Jew partner and has nothing but a boundless admiration for them – so, basically, these Jesuits were signalling to me to watch my step.

        Anyway, enough of this post, I hope it covers the area of general interest.
        Much to read in the threads and catch up on, including the monkey village across the Mekong.
        My cottage is on the right bank, across Vientiane and I am only here for couple more weeks.

    1. No clue, there are physicists around here better qualified to answer this.

      I would think that it is presently molten due to gravitational pressure and has been from the word go but prior to that it may have been a bunch of frozen dust and ice chunks mashed together.

    2. Truthfully equate the Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin with Emerick’s New World Order “Transhumanism” “religion” straight out of the jew’s qabalah , the “religion” of the “one world government from jewrusalem” , and all-of-a-sudden the vehemently ANTI-CATHOLIC/ANTI-JESUIT “Fr. John”
      [ speaking via his hydra head Ormanci which sounds more like a low-end-discount handbag manufacturing company supplying the boutiques in the inner cities then it sounds like anything else ] All of a sudden the vehemently and adamantly ANTI CATHOLIC/ANTI JESUIT “Fr. John” is finding all kinds of bullshit arguments to disassociate the perfidious Jesuits from Emerick’s perfidious “religion” of the perfidious NWO, lol. I bet “Fr. John” is a Heliocentric Global Earther shill too. I just know he is.

    3. Flier –

      Sammy might state,”Rumors of its birth are greatly exaggerated.” 🙂

      Since only rumors exist. I have no clues otherwise.

    4. @ Flyingcossack

      If we assume that the physical sciences have any validity, the creamy molten center came after the initial hard stuff arrived since it takes intense pressure from gravity to create the creamy molten part. On the other hand, if we assume that God created it, it could have come as an instant package deal just the way it is, creamy center with hard coating, or God could have created the physical laws and pulled it off the way our view of the physical laws work.

      It really doesn’t matter. What matters is that the earth is presently here, we are on it, and we should avoid the liquid rock that comes to the surface at various times in various places.

  8. This, for all to read, especially Pat, SPQR and Putinophobes.
    A very informative read.

    A few words from the editor:

    a very important piece for those who just can’t seem to think outside the box with regards to Putin and the kinds of shrewd political moves he makes. Nota bene what the piece says concerning Putin ‘carefully weighing his comments about the nation’s history to avoid alienating some voters’–for those who claim that Putin is ‘working for the Jews’ due to his refusal to praise the Third Reich and the fact that he signed a law into effect making it illegal to question the Holocaust, people can now better understand why for him to come out and challenge ideas held sacrosanct by the Russian public (as misguided as they may be) would turn out to be a political disaster that Israel, America, and the West would be all too willing to exploit to their advantage.

    Intelligent ‘anti-Semitism’ for thinking Gentiles … ??
    Why, I do believe I meet one every morning in the shaving mirror 🙂

    1. Lobro –

      There is no proof of the claims there. Claiming Putin is “shrewd” does not make it so. It is a construction made from rumors. I could write one in the alternative and claim it valid. I could write “Putin The Dummy”…Oh… I already did that.

      Nothing in the rumored claims proves Rothschild is not Putin’s boss. Putin’s moves in any direction are allowed, not by him…. or he would be given a parade down Elm Street in Dallas. Or by an obelisk in Russia.

      No Cuban cigar for you… maybe just a Cuban sandwich 🙂 … but you don’t eat pork.

  9. This is a lie…. by the yardstick used by many here. That yardstick is that Reuters is always issuing lies, since it is owned by Rothschild…. So the reverse of this would be truth:

    China’s gold imports via Hong Kong rebound in 2015….
    should be… according to 'yard-stickers' here…
    China’s gold imports via Hong Kong ‘FELL’ in 2015

    See the ‘lies’ Reuters tells…

    Jan 26 China’s net gold imports via main conduit Hong Kong rebounded to nearly 862 tonnes in 2015, data showed on Tuesday, as weak prices lifted the appetite of the world’s top consumer in December.

    China’s net gold imports rose to 861.7 tonnes last year from 813.1 tonnes in 2014, according to data emailed to Reuters by the Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department.

    Net imports in December jumped to 129.266 tonnes from 79.003 tonnes in November, the data showed. (Reporting by Manolo Serapio Jr.; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman)

    http://www.reuters.com/article/china-gold-imports-idUSP9N12N014

  10. The Rothschids are not listed in the Forbes 500 wealthiest people.

    Given that they helped finance the startup of nearly all major banks they must have squandered a lot, or hidden it well.

    1. John –

      Hidden, of course… in plain sight… Forbes is in their employ and told what to print. Dictators with huge wealth and power might even kill Forbes.

      The Rothschild and Rockefeller Dynasties: With great power comes great secrecy

      “Forbes’s rich list doesn’t include members of Royal families or dictators who hold their wealth through a position of power, or who control the riches of their country.

      “In this way, the real people pulling the strings are able to work in absolute secrecy without any media attention at all (unless it is carefully-constructed positive propaganda, like this article on the philanthropy of the Rothschilds, of course). Forbes’s policy to exclude heads of state from the rich list explains why the Queen of England is absent, although nobody has the slightest idea of her wealth in any case: her shareholdings remain hidden behind Bank of England Nominee accounts. As the Guardian newspaper reported in May 2002: ‘The reason for the wild variations in valuations of her private wealth can be pinned on the secrecy over her portfolio of share investments…Her subjects have no way of knowing through a public register of interests where she, as their head of state, chooses to invest her money. Unlike [British politicians and Lords], the Queen does not have to annually declare her interests and as a result her subjects cannot question her or know about potential conflicts of interests…’

      “The same can be said for the Rothschilds and Rockerfellers, whose European forebears were richer than any Royal family at the time. The families are believed to have set up and own the Federal Reserve (G Edward Griffin’s The Creature From Jekyll Island and this research by journalist Dean Henderson are recommended reading if you want to get deeper into this topic). Could this be why the families, whose power in manipulating global affairs for the past few hundred years cannot be underestimated, are protected by Forbes’s ‘don’t even go there’ policy? Retired management consultant Gaylon Ross Sr, author of Who’s Who of the Global Elite, was apparently told in 1998 that the combined wealth of the Rockefeller family was approx $11 trillion and the Rothschilds $100 trillion…what might that figure have reached 17 years later? One can hardly begin to imagine, but maybe money isn’t the most important thing to your average trillionaire, anyway…”

      http://www.trueactivist.com/secrets-of-the-elite-why-forbess-rich-list-doesnt-include-the-wealthiest-families-on-the-planet/

      1. HP –

        I tried the “mutterings and chantings” routines sans thunder… and got slapped by my wife. I gave up.
        She though I was ‘grumbling’ and complaining again…. still.
        Go-figger.

  11. Once upon a time the Western world had a golden mean, a golden rule, and a center…now as in Yeats poem “the center cannot hold, mere anarchy is loosed upon the world…” . In this clip on the Rothschilds one man comes on and says there are multiple agendas like too many programs running at the same time, or maybe it’s more like walking into a store where they sell big screen TVs all turned to a different channel. Nowhere is there truth, meaning, spirituality. We are run by the money men and all we have is a materialism that turns to trash instantly. Everything is a lie. Everything that can be bought is bought by the same people…who might be as little as one family. They buy but can’t create anything beautiful. They create only poverty, and, palaces that are too big with basements full of gold. They are powerful enough to kill whomever they want so everyone who challenges them will die. The corpses pile up. Dead children litter the earth…children who should have had lives are killed and maimed by vaccines, by drone wars, by fields mined with bombs, by poisoned food and poisoned water. This is the legacy of the Rothschilds. This is the mess they have made.. we will know someone by their works…their works are hideous. They are hideous.

    I know nothing about the so called Black nobility. In my opinion, the Rothschilds want to own the Catholic Church as part of their collection because it was the Catholic Church that gave us monasticism and all the beautiful art and architecture of the West. The collectors want it…. I went into a mountain town outside of Rome to view one of the most ancient monastic buildings… a building that began when Rome was falling. On the walls are frescos and in the frescos are scorpions, those scorpions are the Jews… I was allowed to go into a locked chapel and I saw another painting of the Crucifixion filled with scorpions. I took a picture that I promised I would never publish, and I won’t. In a way, I’m ashamed of it. I never told my Jewish husband that I had it. Somehow it says something that should not be said, shared, known. That was the beginning… the world run by the scorpions.

    1. Monte San Giovanni in Sabina?
      Let us know the location, I end up in Rome and neighboring regions every few years.

      There is a great painting I remember seeing of the funeral of the Virgin, how a Jew tries to desecrate the pall by tugging on it and St Peter turns back angrily and strikes the offender with paralysis.
      Wish I remembered the painter’s name, he was a renaissance Italian.
      In the meantime, this, by Taddeo di Bartolo will suffice.
      Note the Jews in the left corner, the stricken rabbi with claws frozen in clenched pose.

      St Peter didn’t suffer them gladly.

  12. As time passed and her two-thousand year old Judeo Catholic

    There is no such thing as a Judeo-Catholic or Judeo-Christian ethic/creed/theology etc

    There was a clean and complete break with the synagogue of satan and the ne True Holy Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church is the new israel.

    Now, there are innumerable protestants who are zionists who favor the racial supremacists, the Messias-Deniers, but count me out of any putative continuity community

  13. Goodness needs an evil in order to be conscious of itself, does it not, Madame?

    No, God knows Himself in his eternal existence – before evil entered time – whereas your assertions are, um, irregular.

  14. Kapore — about being married to a circumcised husband:

    “While I can see (and see all around me) that some women are willing to put up with being married to circumcised men, I cannot fathom why, except that they are ignorant of what they are missing. From a woman’s perspective, circumcised sex really is not good at all. It’s awful. It’s irritating. Compared to what sex is meant to be, it is so far unrelated I don’t see why it is even called sex. Putting up with that for years and years, even with lubricant, is not, in my humble opinion, a sane decision.

    I simply cannot imagine making love for years and years with a circumcised man. This may seem shallow, and you are right to question this and to find fault with it, and with me. But I still cannot bring myself to imagine it. As the woman who posted mentions, intercourse with a circumcised man is truly painful. It is not spiritually or emotionally satisfying. It hurts.

    I realize that women do, routinely, marry and stay married to circumcised men, and that they find happiness in their marriages and in the kindness of their husbands. But I still cannot imagine consciously making such a huge sacrifice. I do not know how they do it. Is this shallow? I am not sure. Certainly if sex is important to keeping the marriage bond strong, then it is not shallow. Sex cannot make a marriage stronger if it is continually putting one of the partners through pain and distress.”

  15. I think probably circumcision is one of the practices that is not good. I have read that it shocks the baby’s nervous system when done in infancy. I don’t think, though, that the Muslim practice of circumcising three year olds as is done in Egypt or 7 year olds as in Turkey is much better. Generally, I oppose violence of any sort done on infants and children. I have read that these massive amounts of shots that children receive in the U. S. also can shock the system. Fortunately, though, children are resilient, also people in general. All Jews circumcise even the least religious, even those married to non-Jews. It’s a very big taboo not to… Thus my son was, but the practice is fading and if I have a grandson possibly not… at least not children married to non Jews.

    In terms of sex, I wouldn’t know what I’m missing as the practice in the U.S. was common among my generation. So… I’m not sure what to say, except that I’m happily married. I think there are worse things to worry about for me. I am far more disturbed by other aspects of jewish culture. Anyway, I’m happy for you that you have escaped this questionable practice.

  16. Jpower, I realized on reflection that I didn’t give you a very good answer as I was taken back by the question.

    A better answer is that women adapt to their husbands as nature has a stake in the survival of the young and so cements parental partners with the maximum amount of compatibility. I have never read that this applies to circumcised versus not but in all other respects this seems to be the case. So sexual desire is not just about genitals but multiple factors and women have a biological imperative or advantage to love and desire what they have. Still you are probably right in your thesis because nature doesn’t make mistakes and altering what is natural rarely is a good idea—like when the Chinese use to force women into those tiny shoes that maimed their feet so they could barely walk. Similar thing here…

    The argument against infant circumcision though is that it isn’t good to stress a baby. When babies cry with that high pitched scream that is what is called an encephalitic scream and indicates extreme stress and possibly brain swelling. Now we plunge hypodermic needles into children multiple times that are filled with toxins and viruses in the name of making them healthier, although there has never been a scientific study that has proved this is true. When these babies come home and scream the encephalitic scream the doctors reassure the mothers this is normal and then recommend infant painkillers–the worst possible thing as it lowers the glutathione and prevents recovery. Parents who would never spank their children take their children to doctors for multiple shots at 2, 4, etc. months. The level of aluminum hydroxide put into babies is way beyond the industrial limit and it does go from the muscle into the brain where it stays causing long term inflammation. No part of this program really makes sense even so called “herd immunity” because in some cases there is no immunity from vaccination, vaccines shed, and even in the best case scenario the immunity (unlike immunity from having the disease) wanes in a matter of years. So what makes us so callous to the suffering of infants? This is insanity.

  17. Rothschild and other London Pharisee-Jew Bankers are pushing every bank to CHARGE people for holding their ‘fiat money’ in ‘savings’ accounts.

    NEGATIVE INTEREST RATES for ‘savers’ will be everywhere soon:

    Japan Follows Europe Into Negative Interest Rate Territory

    Economists still observing the impact of European central banks who have adopted below-zero rates.

    The Bank of Japan became the latest to experiment with below-zero interest rates in a bid to rev up economic growth and inflation, taking a cue from Europe where similar moves by central banks have yielded patchy results.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/japan-follows-europe-into-negative-interest-rate-territory-1454057165

    Mattresses don’t charge to place anything there. 🙂

Comments are closed.