The Jewish Origins of the Open Borders Movement

By Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

Sourced from the Occidental Observer

Who are the world’s best gravediggers . . . digging the graves of America and Europe and filling them to the brim with White corpses? To find out, read this disturbing article by Andrew Joyce. 


In a 2015 essay on ‘Whiteness studies’ I attempted to lay the groundwork and contextualization for a more developed study of the scale and devastating impact of contemporary Jewish intellectual activism in our colleges, universities, and wider culture. In that essay I noted the importance of Jewish activists including Noel Ignatiev, Ruth Frankenberg, Ricky Marcuse, and Terry Berman, who between the mid-1970s and late 1990s engaged in an effort to develop an academic discipline known as ‘Whiteness studies.’

Since its inception, Whiteness studies has occupied a unique space in an increasingly multicultural disciplinary landscape. Unlike Black studies, Jewish studies, or Asian studies, this sphere of academia is not intended to constructively explore the achievements, history, and culture of its scrutinized ethnic group. Rather, the genre exists to subject ‘Whiteness,’ and by implication White people, to a uniquely hostile dialectic consisting of the debasement of White culture, the degradation of White history, and the delegitimization of the European claim to existence. As such, the discipline may be regarded as an act of ethnic warfare, based as it is on the intended conquest of minds and consciences, and eventually, resources and territory.

In all Western countries, Whiteness studies, in both its academic and social justice expressions, remains disproportionately directed by Jews. This is an empirically observable fact. A book could be written on Jewish involvement in this academic “discipline” alone, but it should suffice here for a brief survey of some key examples. These include Syracuse University’s Barbara Applebaum, who has made a career out of advancing notions of ‘White guilt’ and ending what she describes as “White moral innocence.” In a similar vein is Leeds University’s Say Burgin, who teaches a course titled “Why is my curriculum White?,” while University of California’s George Lipsitz, author of How Racism Takes Place, has also written several books on ‘Whiteness’ and White guilt. Jewish feminist Michelle Fine, based at City University of New York, has produced numerous works on “White privilege,” including her book Witnessing Whiteness. Other Jewish academics highly active in the Whiteness Studies field include Lois WeisDavid Theo GoldbergMaurice BergerLawrence GrossbergJennifer Roth-GordonCynthia Levine-RaskyLaura S. AbramsJudith KatzMelissa SteynPaula Rothenberg, and Amy Eshleman.

Jewish involvement is perhaps even more intense in the sphere of so-called social justice activism. One of the foremost operators of “Whiteness workshops” in the United States is Dara Silverman. Silverman is a “consultant, organizer and trainer who has been building movements for economic, racial, gender and social justice for over 20 years. From January 2015 to July 2016, Dara was the founding Director of Showing up for Racial Justice (SURJ).  As a consultant, Dara works with small and mid-sized groups to build their organizing skills, fundraising and organizational capacity. Dara was the Executive Director of Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (JFREJ) in New York City from 2003–2009.”

Notorious Jewish activist Tim Wise has praised Silverman as “a critical voice in the newly-invigorated movement of anti-racist white allies. A relentless co-conspirator with leaders of color in the struggle against white supremacy and racial inequity, Silverman’s grasp of movement building strategy is second to none.” Regarding the actual content of her work, Silverman offers to ‘cure’ Whites of their “toxic Whiteness” via workshops and ‘webinars.’ In essence, these efforts are programs of deracination, executed via psychological abuse centered on guilt inducement. This effort at separating a people from their identity is more than a little hypocritical given that Silverman has stated in at least one interview that “I’m Jewish and I have a pretty strong connection to Judaism.”

uaaffuyjkqekwi2md3df_400x400Jewish activist Dara Silverman, a specialist in psychological abuse and guilt inducement who offers to “cure” Whites of their “toxic Whiteness”.

In addition to Silverman, many more Jews have been attracted to the despairingly lucrative and fashionable business of convincing Whites to abandon their identity. Among them are Jon Greenberg, author of “10 examples that prove White privilege protects White people in every aspect imaginable,” and “Talking to Kids about Whiteness.” Other prominent figures in the social justice sphere of the assault on Whiteness include Debbie Zuckerand Robin Nussbaum. When New York’s Vassar College decided to hold a series of Whiteness workshops last October, the two workshop leaders were Diane Eshelman and Michael Drucker, both of whom are Jewish. While the weakening of the internal or psychological supports of White identity is sufficiently problematic in itself, the problem is compounded by intensive Jewish activism in other spheres of academic and ‘social justice’ activity. The most damaging in these respects are the Jewish dominance in ‘critical race theory,’ and its correspondent political expression in the form of the open borders movement.

Readers who have been observing the ongoing ‘refugee crisis’ over the last couple of years will most likely have come across the phrase “No one is illegal” at some point. The refrain is particularly popular in Germany, where Kein mensch ist illegal became the rallying cry of tens of thousands of successfully deracinated German liberals, and thus was a key feature of the migrant tsunami that would engulf that unfortunate nation.

And indeed, it was Germany that first gave birth to the term and the movement it would encapsulate. It was at the documenta X art exhibition in Kassel in 1997 that this particular ‘anti-racist’ movement is largely considered to have been formally founded. That year’s exhibition and the movement it spawned were organized by French-Jewish ‘Artistic Director’ Catherine David. David was keen to turn the entire exhibition into a political statement, something that didn’t endear her to some of Germany’s more conservative art critics. Undeterred, she turned the city of Kassel itself into a ‘lesson’ for gallery visitors, and one of her artist associates and fellow Jews, Lois Weinberger, even planted ‘flourishing weeds’ from southern and southeastern Europe along the disused tracks at Kassel’s main railway station as a metaphor for migration and a ‘post-national’ world. Amidst the flagrant promotion of fellow Jews Eva Hesse and Chantal Ackerman, it was the fervid Jewish intellectual atmosphere of documenta X, and its abstract theories about migration and ‘post-national’ identity, that gave rise to Kein Mensch ist Illegal, a phrase that those present borrowed from the writings of Elie Wiesel.


LD : A few seconds of quick thinking will show you the stupidity of Elie Wiesel’s thought. No one is claiming that a human being is “illegal”. What is being claimed is that trespassing on someone else’s land is illegal.

Although the formal origins of the movement may be traced to Kassel 1997, this was arguably only the spiritual birth of the group and its specific ideology. More formal codification of its theory would arrive in the early 2000s with the publication of British-Jewish intellectual Steve Cohen’s No One Is Illegal: Asylum and Immigration Control, Past and Present (2003). Cohen, who died in 2009, had by then worked for three decades as an immigration lawyer in Manchester, where he set up the Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit, and participated in Anti-Deportation Campaigns. He was a member of the International Marxist Group (IMG) from 1968 until the end of 1974, though he appears to have been very publicly engaged in Far Left politics until he was beaten unconscious by British Nationalists who broke up one of his meetings in 1976. Thereafter his public involvement appears to have lessened and took on a more reclusive aspect. Cohen was a member of the Jewish Socialist Group for most of his life, and he was a quintessential Jewish intellectual in that he was both prolific and intense, writing books, manifestos, and pamphlets about anti-Semitism, socialism, immigration, borders and the welfare state.

In 2003, Cohen capped thirty years of activism with the publication of his opus, No One Is Illegal. While the slogan-title was perfectly fitted to Cohen’s own ideological trajectory, he was also keenly aware of its resonance on the Continent, where it was the main statement of the Jewish-inspired transnational European open borders network which formed in the late 1990s. This network had by 2000 developed into the main grassroots grouping of radical migration-related politics on a European level. One of its primary tactics was the maintenance of an ongoing visible presence in border camps such as the notorious camp at Calais, along with political campaigns against migration control, and Europe-wide action days. Cohen’s contribution to such ‘direct action’ politics, via the publication of his book and an accompanying manifesto, was to provide both rarefied theory and abstract ‘moral’ justification.

Cohen’s theories were, and remain, extremely basic. They draw heavily from his Jewish background, in the sense that Cohen has a highly fluid, abstract, and nomadic attitude to the nation state and nationality in general. Having been wanderers upon the earth since pre-history, one can hardly be surprised that, Zionist distractions aside, Jews would continue to possess an aversion to “soil” nationalism, even if they maintain the absurd pretense that “blood” nationalism matters as little to them. The central issue here resides in the fact that Jews have been remarkably, and very problematically, insistent on corroding the soil-attachment of the settled peoples among whom they dwell. Steve Cohen was a perfect example of this highly corrosive force. In his 2003No One Is Illegal manifesto he asserted that immigration controls “are inherently racist in that they are based on the crudest of all nationalisms — namely the assertion that the British have a franchise on Britain.”

In Cohen’s worldview the British, and Whites wherever they are, are mere squatters on land they can be rightfully dispossessed of. Their resources are free for the taking in the course of “competition.”

Cohen, the apparent life-long Communist universalist, thus reveals a startlingly capitalist/social Darwinist view of land and territory, even to the extent of employing Capitalist language (‘franchise’) in order to make his point. This struck me at first reading as a vindication of Yockey’s idea that Marxism has an unshakeable “Capitalistic provenance,” but even stronger was the echo of the familiar socio-political position of ‘the Jew’ as both arch Communist and Capitalist.

Like that of many Jews, Cohen’s political ideology was itself fluid and lacking borders, characterized chiefly by racial opportunism.

For instance, we know that Cohen would never say that the British were entitled to colonize Africa in the nineteenth century because of the absurdity of the “Africans having a franchise on Africa.” The reason for this is that Cohen’s theory, like anything derivative of Jewish Bolshevism, isn’t really about open borders, or Socialism, at all. It is instead about White dispossession. Cohen’s formulations and arguments all focus on non-White migrants seeking entry to historically White nations. His argument about the “franchise” on land is little more than a blueprint for dispossession, inspired by his own archaic Jewish grievances, real or imagined.

Cohen’s ‘theory’ progresses to the statement that immigration controls “are only explicable by racism. Their imposition is a result of and is a victory for racist, proto-fascist and actual fascist organizations. It is impossible to see how legislation brought into being by such means, legislation accompanied by the most vile racist imagery and assumptions, can ever be reconfigured and rendered ‘fair’.”


“In Cohen’s worldview,
Whites are mere squatters on land
they can be rightfully dispossessed of.”

LD : But Cohen would not agree that Africans are squatters on land Africans can rightfully be dispossessed of by Europeans. Or that the Jews are squatters of land in Israel that they, too, can be rightfully dispossessed of by Arabs.  If “no one is illegal”, why doesn’t Israel open its borders to the 22 Arab states around it? Why build an apartheid wall shutting out the Palestinians “if no one is illegal”? [LD]

It is difficult to imagine that anyone with a reasonable level of intelligence could ever accept arguments like Cohen’s.

Even setting aside racial prerogatives, the idea that immigration controls are “only explicable by racism” is incredibly weak given that it ignores the imperatives of national security, cultural preservation, and the protection of jobs, health, and wages. One assumes that Cohen would have seen “vile racist imagery” in even the most everyday concern of a British housewife that her child should have a place in the local school, or a bed in the local hospital. His argument relies on there being an “implicit Fascism” in these important facets of life in White nations. This was something that Cohen probably did perceive, but only because of the miasma of grievances, inadequacies, and psychological complexes implicit in his own ethnic background.

The third key argument of Cohen’s manifesto is that “the demand for ‘fair’ controls simply ignores the link between immigration controls and welfare entitlements. This link is itself intrinsically unfair — and racist.” Cohen’s preoccupations with ‘fairness’ and ‘racism’ are here employed again to obfuscate the genuine and necessary concern of citizens who have invested in a welfare system built and developed in a once ethnically-homogenous and high-trust society. Cohen viewed the desire of the British to stop immigrant non-investors from reaping disproportionate gains from their welfare state as ‘unfair’ and ‘racist.’ To paraphrase our Jewish theorist, Cohen refuses to accept that foreigners do not have a “franchise” on British money. Cohen also refuses to acknowledge that a state with no borders will in time cease to be a state at all. In such an environment a ‘welfare state’ becomes an impossibility.

The final facet of Cohen’s ‘Open Borders’ manifesto ends with the assertion that “controls can never be ‘fair’ to those who remain subject to them.” Cohen’s argument here is based on a putative entitlement of the foreigner. Cohen’s believes that the stranger is entitled to limitless acquiescence.

‘Fairness,’ in Cohen’s mind, is the opening of the gates of Britain, a tiny country already struggling with a population of 64 million, to a world holding 7.5 billion people. ‘Fairness’ in this calculation amounts to national suicide, not merely in the sense of the forfeiture of national borders and institutions, but the total annihilation of the organic nation in the form of the British people. In this sense, it is a manifesto for genocide.

This sinister document was the foundation stone of the ‘No One is Illegal’ movement in Britain, where a group adopting the same name was launched under the leadership and direction of Steve Cohen, his co-ethnic associate David Landau, and two women of unknown provenance. Over the last few years No One Is Illegal groups have been formed throughout Europe and the United States: Spain (Ninguna Persona Es Ilegal), Sweden (Ingen Manniska Ar Illegal), Poland (Zaden Czlowiek Nie Jest Nielegalny) and Holland (Geen Mens Is Illegaal). These groups have been allied to growing activist organizations calling themselves ‘No Borders.’

Far from declining with the death of Steve Cohen, the Jewish prominence in the Open Borders movement has perhaps become even more acute in recent years. The range of theory underpinning the effort has also slightly diversified. George Mason University professor Bryan Caplan is the founder of and is the most visible North American figure calling for an end to immigration control.

caplanBryan Caplan (pictured)

Just last year Caplan wrote an article for TIME in which he argued that “instead of redoubling our efforts to curtail immigration, we should return to the historic American policy of open borders—admitting everyone eager to come build a better life for themselves.”

Unlike Cohen’s arguments, Caplan relies on an exclusively capitalist appeal — the lie that open borders will mean the influx of immigrants who will make American’s richer.

As far as lies go, this must rank somewhere alongside that of Menasseh Ben Israel (1604–1657), who not only told Oliver Cromwell that a readmission of Jews to England would make the nation richer, but that it would also lead to the imminent return of Jesus Christ.

Caplan boldly claims, without statistics or evidence, that “immigrants, like tourists, are normally paying customers, not beggars.” However, we know from statistics that they are beggars.

It has been estimated that “40% of young Muslims in France and 50% in Germany are unemployed and in receipt of social benefits. For example, an estimated 40% of welfare outlays in Denmark go to the 5% of the population that is Muslim. According to Otto Schily, former German interior minister, speaking of immigrants in general: “Seventy percent of the newcomers [since 2002] land on welfare the day of their arrival.” In Sweden, perhaps the most acute case, immigrants are estimated at 1.5 million out of 10 million people; immigration is estimated to cost almost $14 billion per year.”

Completely ignoring this reality, Caplan’s refrain is that “immigrants are rarely charity cases.” In fact, in Caplan’s argument immigrants will bring their nations “trillions of dollars of extra wealth creation, year after year.” This is the promise of the Second Coming for an atheistic and materialistic age.

Taking his cue from Steve Cohen, Caplan published his own manifesto on “Open Borders Day, March 16th 2015.” The manifesto is signed disproportionately by Jewish and non-White intellectuals from colleges across the United States, but also including some in Canada and Europe. A particularly interesting aspect of the manifesto is that it avoids the economic ploys raised by Caplan in his TIME article, and instead returns to the empty moralizing of Steve Cohen’s 2003 effort. Caplan argues that “freedom of movement is a basic liberty that governments should respect and protect unless justified by extenuating circumstances. This extends to movement across international boundaries.”

Caplan continues that “border controls predominantly restrict the movement of people who bear no ill intentions. Most of the people legally barred from moving across international borders today are fleeing persecution or poverty, desire a better job or home, or simply want to see the city lights.”

They simply want to see the city lights? Caplan and his supporters demand that “international borders should be open for all to cross, in both directions.” This refrain about traffic moving in “both directions,” is one of the more insidious and disingenuous ploys of the open borders advocates. Indeed, it is at the core of the effort to convince Whites that by abandoning their borders they too will be “set free.” But how long will be the line be for flights from New Hampshire to Mogadishu? From Copenhagen to Damascus? In the nightmarish realization of the dreams of Cohen, Caplan, and their swelling numbers of colleagues, there will be no traffic in “both directions.” There will be an almighty surge from all dark corners of the earth to those parts of it where the last dim light of civilization yet glows.

—  §  —

In Sun Tzu’s Art of War it is noted that it is a better offensive tactic to take your opponent’s forces whole rather than in piecemeal fashion. National borders, national identities, and the piecemeal nature of the White socio-political existence are obstacles to globalists of all descriptions seeking our defeat. Much better for them that we be united in economic bond-houses like the European Union, where diktats and immigration directives can be handed down to the great mass, leaving no stone unturned, no patch of land untouched. Much better for them that our borders be obliterated, absorbing us forever into the great chaos of dark humanity. But, as Sun Tzu said, knowing your enemy can be a first step to successful defense. And perhaps now we have a slightly clearer appreciation of his tactics and his methods.

39 thoughts to “The Jewish Origins of the Open Borders Movement”

  1. “He was a member of the International Marxist Group (IMG) from 1968 until the end of 1974, though he appears to have been very publicly engaged in Far Left politics until he was beaten unconscious by British Nationalists who broke up one of his meetings in 1976. Thereafter his public involvement appears to have lessened and took on a more reclusive aspect.”
    Well he got a deserved comeuppance. 😉

  2. If a white European man was to offer to cure Jews of their “toxic” Jewishness, or demand that Israel open its borders he would be arrested for “Hate Speech”.

    The very worst people I have met in my long life have been Jews, not just some of the worst but all of the worst. They were obnoxious, self-centred and arrogant, and definirtely anti-white European. That is the truth in my personal experience. These people rise to the top because we fear the smears and denigration we face if we stand up to them.

    1. Most Jews I have met have been decent people. The minority who show obnoxious behaviour spoil it for the decent Jews. But we gentiles are smeared and denigrated if we criticize any Jew, or resist Jewish Power. So the way I see it the decent Jews themselves must act. At least they cannot be accused of anti-semitism.

  3. The only way to combat these international destroyers of nations is to demand that they practice their “principles” on their own ethnic state of Israel.

    An exclusively Jewish state is racist. Israel should have open borders. All Palestinian refugees of 1948 and their descendants (now already 5 million !) should have the right of return. Asylum seekers or even poor people in search of a better life from the whole Third World should have the right to settle in Israel. Poor people from the slums of Cairo, Calcutta and Bombay should be accepted with open arms in Israel by the millions.

    Following picture is what the Jews should do… for Israel !

    We are all human ! We all bleed red ! No one is illegal !

    1. You’re welcome, Karen. LD has always been a great admirer of Kevin MacDonald’s work. She also thinks very highly of the writers Kevin has managed to attract around him on the Occidental Observer site. Andrew Joyce happens to be one of her favorites.

  4. These commie,athiest,racist pigs make my blood boil.I can barely type right now.god help us be strong and wake others up faster.

  5. Mr. Andrew Joyce,

    Yes, jews don’t like Whites, but in reality, jews don’t like anyone who isn’t a jew. You take this too personal; otherwise an excellent essay.

    FYI, the jews used Christianity to deracinate the Chinese in the 19th century in order to better push their opium and usury. Follow the shekels, to the very end of the trail, my friend… you almost did:

    Andrew Joyce: It has been estimated that “40% of young Muslims in France and 50% in Germany are unemployed and in receipt of social benefits. For example, an estimated 40% of welfare outlays in Denmark go to the 5% of the population that is Muslim. According to Otto Schily, former German interior minister, speaking of immigrants in general: “Seventy percent of the newcomers [since 2002] land on welfare the day of their arrival.” In Sweden, perhaps the most acute case, immigrants are estimated at 1.5 million out of 10 million people; immigration is estimated to cost almost $14 billion per year.

    Mr. Joyce, I like your quotation from Sun Tzu at the end — I’m partial to Chinese writers. 🙂

    However, if you really followed the master’s advice and understood your enemy, you would know that the so-called “welfare state” is a jewish fraud and the real problem, in, and, of itself.

    The welfare state is the biggest generator of JEWISH DEBT in peacetime!!!


      “…jews don’t like anyone who isn’t a jew. You take this too personal…”

      Whites have a history dealing with these parasites that goes back hundreds, if not thousands of years. We have kicked them out of our various homelands and provinces over 109 times throughout history. They (the jews) have poisoned our wells, figuratively and literally, countless times and in countless ways. I’d say these facts qualify as VERY personal to Whites! Care to show me some similar history where jews have done the same types of things, and to the same extent, to Chinese people or other non-Whites? Can you give me any evidence showing that the Chinese have kicked the jews out of China, or where the Mexicans kicked them out of Mexico, or where the Africans kicked them out of Africa for wrecking the civilization?

      Please, this site deals with WHITE issues, things that concern WHITE PEOPLE. You, judging by your username (along with the subtext of your post), are non-White and therefor your opinions in this area, no offense, are pretty worthless.

      My own opinion, being a Caucasian White man, is that this is an excellent article and spot-on.

    2. Please don’t think I was being hostile towards you, JUSTICE FOR CHINESE, in my 1st post to you. But, unless you (your people) have been victimized by jews as much as Whites have, you really can’t comprehend how personal this thing is to us. Jews are in the process of all-out GENOCIDE against Whites — world wide — and have been for quite some time. It’s EXTREMELY personal, like I said before.

      I actually forgot to mention that I agree with your assessment of the ‘welfare state’. Take care. =)

  6. The writer has callously ignored the causes of recent high immigration into Europe. Using the false flag of September11, 2001 as an excuse, the satanic US/Nato/Israel alliance (and, in the case of Syria, assisted by the stupid Muslim vassal states of the Gulf + Turkey) has destroyed the economies and infrastructure of Iraq/Libya/Syria/Afghanistan while murdering and maiming millions of lives (including thousands of Christians) and rendering many millions more homeless and without any means of sustenance. These destroyed lives sought refuge in other countries, including Nato countries whose governments were responsible for the destruction of their lands and livelihood. Nato countries of Europe have a moral responsibility to welcome these lost souls and nurse them back to health. Your attitude is inhuman: yes, we shed the blood of millions of human beings in the Middle East, so what?

    You should be writing about the evil of the US/Israel/Nato hegemonic designs to conquer the world and control its resources.


      This “refugee” excuse is, in itself, a lie. Many of the INVADERS who are pouring into Europe (and America) aren’t refugees from Syria to begin with… or refugees from anywhere else. They are coming from places like North Africa, Pakistan, Turkey and elsewhere…. young men of fighting age, many from various prisons. They are weapons of mass destruction, their “immigration” into our countries actually PAID FOR by jewish organizations.

      This narrative that “the evil West” created all of these MILLIONS and MILLIONS of “Syrian” refugees through aggressive war policy… and that now we’re just reaping karma from this… is a LIE.

      You’re NOT going to guilt-trip those of us who are wide awake. And how dare you accuse the author of being “heartless”… while White women are being RAPED by Muslims and we’re being victimized by violence by your people!

      1. Well said, JimB. Your comments are spot-on!

        Just to let you know that ‘Justice For Chinese’ is one of the best commenters on this site who is deeply concerned over what the British Empire did to China in the Opium Wars, creating over 20-30 million drug addicts.

        His point is that the Jews helped to finance the East India Company and that the Brits were just Jewish pawns. So his animus is not so much against the Brits as against the Jews who were behind the East India Company.

        JFC combines political research with polo, a unique combination! 🙂

      2. JIMB:
        Your ignorance is appalling. Investigate the false flag of September 11, 2001 and its consequences. Your blind prejudice and sheer inhumanity come through very clearly when you equate consequences of US/Nato invasions of Iraq/Libya/Syria (all prosperous and stable countries) with “white women being raped by Muslims”. Consequences of US/Nato invasions:

        Two million deaths + millions more maimed
        Destruction of economies and infrastructure resulted in many millions being forced out of their countries just to survive. Tens of thousands died in the process.

        Countless Muslim women raped by the invaders (but that does not count?)

        You are totally brainwashed by western mainstream media and blinded by your innate prejudice against other cultures. You are truly a distorted product of the Old Testament:

    2. Also I think the middle-men or merchants were primarily Jews. I recall they owned the vast warehouses of opium as-well. Tis been a while since I read up on the Western…or rather Jewish-controlled Western destruction of China.

    3. Agreed Mr Sakib. Western countries should never have destabilized the Near East. After 911 the world was sympathetic towards the USA, and Bush should have appealed for assistance in tracking down the people who organized the event, That could have been done willingly without war and the deaths of so many. There would have been big rewards for the truth.

      It would also have given time to aswer the questions about the strange vertical collapse of three high quality steel framed buildings, an event without precedent; and also an investigation of the people involved in the sale and security of those buildings.

      There are still too many unaswered questions regarding 911.

  7. Still finishing article (which by the way is great) but just wanted to comment on this observation…

    “His argument about the “franchise” on land is little…” more than the usual Talmudic bulls**t. There are no forms nor categories for the goyim. Of course, the so-called franchise is planned to fall into the control of the Jews — in the end they’re just grubby liars, thieves and murderers. And they call themselves Gods. Good grief!

    That’s all I wanted to “say”, or vent 😛

  8. No one is illegal. How about two? or ten million.
    what about “(woe to you,) scribes, pharisees, hypocrites, parasites, deadbeats and freeloaders” demanding the product of white sweat?

    J4C is right: “The welfare state is the biggest generator of JEWISH DEBT in peacetime“.

    Jewish and non-White intellectuals …

    what lurks inside this phrase?
    if jews are distinct from non-White then by simple complementary principle they are White.
    but their naked, strident hatred for Whiteness absolutely excludes this possibility – jew is not White and i have no trouble agreeing with this statement.
    Ergo, since humans are either White or non-White, JEW IS NON-HUMAN, by his own admission, to disagree with this would be both antisemitic and antihuman, i woulkd heartily recommend a lengthy prison term for anyone claiming that Jews are human.

    as for “non-White intellectuals”, i by no means deny the possibility of such a combination once i hear the widely accepted definition of just what separates an intellectual from non-intellectual (i have my idea).


    3. placing a high value on or pursuing things of interest to the intellect, esp. the higher or more abstract forms of knowledge.
    4. developed by or relying on the intellect rather than emotions or feelings; rational.
    4. a person who enjoys mental activity and has highly developed tastes in art, literature, etc

    Hmm … really.

  9. Why would someone with the swarthy, hooknosed, flabby face of a witch like (((Barbara Spectre))) want to destroy all the tall, thin, cute, generoud blonde Aryan Girls!

  10. In the Roman Law maxim there is the saying, within Fraud and Deceit: “Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived.”.

    And this really is what society is all about. It is either making the choice to break free from the control or stay within it.

    Westerners have been deceived because they have ALLOWED themselves to be deceived. They have therefore sewn the wind and must now reap the whirlwind. The cost? The end of their civilization and their race. There is EVERYTHING that can be done to stop this from happenning but I must point out that NOTHING will be done.

    Western women, fighting against western men will see them leave, to partner with foreign brides in Eastern Europe and Thailand. They will then be forced into burkhas and to follow the religion of Muhammad, pumping out children for their husbands, while taking turns, with his other wives, to look after his brood, cook and clean the house. And of course, pray daily to the moon god.

    The western man has been deceived by the elixirs of the Jewish snake oil salesmen. They have sat aside, while their lands have been flooded with immigrants, being told how evil they are and to wallow in self guilt until they go up to that great big gig in the sky.
    The very fact that Specter, states openly about the destruction of western society and that Jews will be resented for this, is testament to the incapability of western men, to not only actually do something about it, but to even be bothered by it.

    Whenever I read an article, such as this, it’s merely another acknowledgement, of the apathy within western society, a deeply cowed civilization, who are completely incapable of fighting back, having accepted political correctness fully praying at the altar of thou must not offend. It’s almost comical, thinking of what it was like when the Titanic began to sank as the diners continued to dance and the band play, while the water was pouring in.

    The question is – Should the white peoples of Europe be saved?

    Are they worth it?
    If you have no desire to defend your land from invaders, then just as those who wish to be deceived, be deceived, be invaded and also become subjugated.

    It’s time the awake start thinking about how to survive the end of their civilization and what to do within it. It won’t be beaten. The invasion was the last ingredient in the chaos cake, it’s now been mixed and cooking away nicely in the oven time-bomb.

    It’s time to start looking to your future, not the past, of how and why what has happened has and who’s responsible, because it won’t do diddly squat to stop the end result. Your reality is about to drastically change. You are about to understand what it’s like to be the subjugated. It looks like James Warburg will get his world government through conquest instead of consent.

    1. Harb –

      Glad to read ya…

      Let him who wishes and begs to be invaded, be invaded.

      See Sweden’s reaping whirlwinds:

      Sweden is collapsing. Number of no-go zones rises to 55, 4/5 police officers think about changing career and they made only 1 arrest after 70 cars set on fire by refugees.

      Swedish police lose control amid refugee crisis as number of ‘no-go zones’ rises to 55

      The inflow of asylum seekers in Sweden, a country with one of the most liberal laws towards refugees, is putting an increasing strain on the country’s police. There are now reportedly 55 areas in the country, where the law is not fully upheld.

      1. STOCKHOLM, Sept 19 (Reuters) – Sweden’s centre-left
        government said on Monday it will boost spending on immigration
        and integration measures by 3.5 billion crowns ($408 million) in
        its 2017 budget.
        The money includes an additional 2.5 billion crowns for the
        Migration Agency and 600 million to Sweden’s courts and will be
        spent on measures such as support for traumatised children and
        housing assistance.
        The government’s autumn budget will be presented on
        September 20.
        ($1 = 8.5681 Swedish crowns)

    2. Harbinger,

      Welcome back! We have really missed you. Not nice of you to desert us! 🙂

      In regard to your quote above, “Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived”, there is another very famous Latin quote that comes to mind. Lasha once sent it to me in an email when we were talking about this subject:

      MUNDUS VULT DECIPI = “The world wants to be deceived.”

    3. you were missed, harb.
      somebody brought out a very good point about white race being a non-sequitur because it is Europe’s rich checkerboard of unique cultures that combined for the global powerhouse that more than anything else defines Earth’s civilization to a space outsider.
      And Jewdevil has just about destroyed that, the color of the skin is a symptom of a greater disease.
      Truly, if Russia is either window-dressing or is for real but loses the coming death fight with forces of talmud, there is absolutely no chance of revitalizing the European world, which like it or not is entirely rooted in antijudaic “Christianity of Christ” as a social, political and cultural force, which today is spent, fizzled out, especially since the Council of 1962, pipeline of faith run dry.

      What remnants of white race have interest in the new project, they must start from scratch, incorporating and rejecting what chunks and shards are seen to be useful and effective.
      Without decisive, foundational Anti-Protocols, it is not even worth a try.

  11. The Jew knew exactly what to do with you whiteys ,you earned it.pure and simple
    next target is India ,these people have been asking for it ,the Jew will enslave these monkies.
    after that or even at the same ,the Jew master will set his sight on China
    by the way ,this darkymoony site is 110% Jewish , the operators are Jewish
    like Joe said Qabala and some ,the Queen of deception and her sidekicks

    P.S I just wrote what I believed to be the truth ,if you ignore it or not ,it’s irrelevant ,since many comments I wrote never seen the light ,it’s okay with me , but my true satisfaction comes from the fact that you read it and know that you can’t fool everyone.
    I could tell and sense that your lust and seduction has no limit ,it’s uniquely Jewish
    historically Jewish .
    I could go on and on ,but frankly I felt the heat building up ,so I had to stand up and walk away from the machine ,my thoughts and my image of you.

      1. Sardonicus
        your hostility is not good for your health ,relax relax and take a deep breath
        you should have learned one thing from the Japanese Monks to be patient and polite
        but i guess your whitey dna is somehow wicked.

    1. “next target is India”
      Home sweet home?!


      Hmmm, maybe it is possible after all..

  12. My people = True Israel (the people). Not the counterfeit-jews like Barbara Spectre.

    2 Chronicles 7:14 If My people, which are called by My name, shall humble their “selves”, and pray, and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

    7:15 Now Mine eyes shall be open, and Mine ears attent unto the prayer [that is made] in (or toward) this place.

    7:16 For now have I chosen and sanctified This House, that My name may be there FOR EVER: and Mine eyes and Mine heart shall be there perpetually.

    7:17 And as for thee, if thou wilt walk before Me, as David thy father walked, and do according to all that I have commanded thee, and shalt observe My Statutes and My Judgments;

    7:18 Then will I stablish the throne of thy kingdom, according as I have Covenanted with David thy father, saying, There shall not fail thee a man [to be] ruler in Israel.

    7:19 But if ye turn away, and forsake My Statutes and My Commandments, which I have set before you, and shall go and serve other gods, and worship them;

    7:20 Then will I pluck them up by the roots out of My land which I have given them; and This House, which I have sanctified for My name, will I cast out of My sight, and will make it [to be] a proverb and a byword among all nations.

    7:21 And This House, which is high, shall be an astonishment to every one that passeth by it; so that he shall say, Why hath the “I AM” done thus unto this land, and unto This House?

    7:22 And it shall be answered, Because they forsook the “I AM” God of their fathers, which brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, and laid hold on other gods, and worshipped them, and served them: therefore hath He brought all this evil upon them.

    1. @ Observer

      No. I am not Jewish.

      I seek to follow ‘The Way’ of Yeshua. It is explained in the moniker I use: New Song.

      The ‘New Song’

      If you don’t mind me saying so, what you are matters less than what you do / are doing. The Israelites of The Bible messed up time and again. No more time for those mistakes. Perhaps, when I wrote “Israel (the people)”, I should have written spiritually grafted-in because, though race plays a part, Jesus says we would be Judged by what we are doing.

      Explained in detail here –

      Romans 2:6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:

      2:7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:

      2:8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the Truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,

      2:9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;

      2:10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:

      2:11 For there is no respect of persons with God.

      2:12 For as many as have sinned without Law shall also perish without Law: and as many as have sinned in The Law shall be judged by The Law;

      2:13 (For not the hearers of The Law [are] just before God, but the DOERS of The Law (The Torah) shall be justified.

      2:14 For when the Gentiles, which have not The Law, do by nature the things contained in The Law, these, having not The Law, are a law unto themselves:

      2:15 Which show the work of The Law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and [their] thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)

      2:16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Christ the Saviour according to my gospel.

      2:17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in The Law, and makest thy boast of God,

      2:18 And knowest [His] will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of The Law;

      2:19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness,

      2:20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the Truth in The Law.

      2:21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? Thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal?

      2:22 Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? Thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?

      2:23 Thou that makest thy boast of The Law, through breaking The Law dishonourest thou God?

      2:24 For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you, as it is written.

      2:25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep The Law: but if thou be a breaker of The Law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

      2:26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of The Law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

      2:27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil The Law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress The Law?

      2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither [is that] circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:

      2:29 But he [is] a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision [is that] of the heart, in the spirit, [and] not in the letter; whose praise [is] not of men, but of God.

      1. @ New Song
        Thank You New Song For Your Thoughtful Reply.
        I Want You To Know That This Original Pure Real Jew
        Appreciate And Love You


  13. Who are the world’s best gravediggers . . . digging the graves of America and Europe and filling them to the brim with White corpses?

    Clint Eastwood: “You see in this world there are two kinds of people, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig. You dig.” 😉

    Cohen, the apparent life-long Communist universalist, thus reveals a startlingly capitalist/social Darwinist view of land and territory, even to the extent of employing Capitalist language (‘franchise’) in order to make his point. This struck me at first reading as a vindication of Yockey’s idea that Marxism has an unshakeable “Capitalistic provenance,” but even stronger was the echo of the familiar socio-political position of ‘the Jew’ as both arch Communist and Capitalist.

    About 2/3rds the way down, you will find the following statement:

    Book title page:
    Skousen, W. Cleon. Naked Communist
    Salt Lake City, Utah: Ensign Publishing Co.
    C. 1961, 9th edition July 1961.

    You will find the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto interesting at this point. Here they are: [….]

    Americans, being the most naive people among the nations, now believe that Communism is dead because the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain have been removed. The ironic truth is that Communism has just switched names to become more “politically correct”. Today it is called international democracy. The reason that the Berlin Wall came crashing down is not because Communism is dead but because they have achieved the planned agenda to communize the West, including America. Washington D.C. has indeed become part of the New World Order of atheist governments. With the last vestiges of Christian law having been removed from “American government” over the last twenty years, there is no longer a threat of resistance against world Communism. In reality, “American government” became part of the Iron Curtain, thus there was no more need for the likes of a Berlin Wall.

    Once again, in their foolishness, the American public has believed the lies of their “leaders” who applaud “the fall of Communism”, while they have sold out the country to anti-Christian, anti-American statutes and regulations on the federal, state, and local levels. Posted below is a comparison of the original ten planks of the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, along with the American adopted counterpart of each of the planks, The American people have truly been “buried in Communism” by their own politicians of both the Republican and Democratic parties. One other thing to remember, Karl Marx was stating in the Communist Manifesto that these planks will test whether a country has become communist or not. If they are all in effect and in force the country IS communist. Communism, but by any other name…??

    The lengthy document makes for an interesting read.

    Announcement: US citizens, the Government has all the (militarized) guns. You all are diggers!

    1. Let me expand further by including the remainder of the document:

      In the early ’60’s during the days of the “former” Soviet Union, Russian Premier Nikita Kruschev pounded his shoe on the podium of the United Nations and shouted to the West, “We will bury you!” Fearing an invasion from the Reds, America proceeded to build the most awesome military machine in history. Unfortunately, we forgot to guard our political homefront from being taken over by socialist – communist – liberal activists who would gain office and destroy American law by process of gradually installing the Communist agenda within our legal system and seperate branches of government. The Communist program from the start has been one which sees their revolution of 1917 succesful only upon total domination of the world. [….]

      1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.
      The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management.

      2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
      Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State “income” taxes. We call it “paying your fair share”.

      3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
      We call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

      4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
      We call in government seizures, tax liens, Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.

      5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
      We call it the Federal Reserve which is a credit/debt system nationally organized by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

      6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State.
      We call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver’s licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

      7. Extention of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
      We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Evironmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

      8. Equal liablity of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
      We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Fedral Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

      9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
      We call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136.

      10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.
      People are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome-Based “Education” .

      Regarding abolition of children’s factory labor, I’ve seen changes over time where high school children have greater difficulty obtaining after school work. 5th and 6th grade students no longer perform volunteer “Junior Police Officer (JPO)” duties providing escort of students in cross walks under supervision of a teacher, learning responsibility.

Comments are closed.