The Secret Life of a Pedophile (Part 2 of 3)

PART 1  :  INTRODUCTION

PART 2  :  THE  MAKING  OF  A  PEDOPHILE

An Online Conversation with ‘Don’,
a Self-Confessed Pedophile

Edited by Lasha Darkmoon

3790158

JonBenét Ramsay . . . beauty queen groomed for pedophilia.
Strangled to death on Christmas Day 1996, age 6.
38 sex offenders were living within a 2-mile radius of her house.
Her murderer was never found.

NOTE :   In Part 1, which serves as an introduction to this interview, we revealed that self-confessed pedophile ‘Don’ was interviewed online in our Comments section almost three years ago by a poster called “Balthazar”. At that time, at any rate, the interviewer bore the user name “Balthazar” and claimed to be a clinical psychologist. This person gave his full permission to publish the interview below on condition that we used his real name, “Dr David Green”. (For more details, see Part 1).

We should like to take this opportunity to warn readers that there is some upsetting material here, both in the sexual revelations that follow and in the two videos produced by the late Dr William Pierce that serve as useful commentaries and codas to the discussion, one video at the end of Part 2 and the other at the end of Part 3.  

Discretion is advised and those of a delicate disposition should perhaps avoid reading the articles. (LD)  


DON: Not all pedophiles who are attracted to children want to hurt them. Being attracted to someone is one thing, meaning harm towards them is something totally different.

From personal experience, I have been around kids who have attempted to touch me and play with me in ways that are NOT appropriate. I’ll give an example. I have a female friend who has a daughter who attempted to sit on my face one day while we were play wrestling. She is 6-years old. Her mom saw it and became angry and told her that she did not like that behavior. She has attempted to sit on my face more than once. She actually tries to put her crotch in my face. Not only that, she tries to raise up my shirt at times. She loves to sit on my lap for some reason … and while on my lap she will attempt to lick my ears or my neck.

I think that vaginal or anal sex with young children is wrong and should never ever be legalized, because it could cause harm to their body. But other forms of sex or intimacy such as oral, masturbation, kissing etc. are not mentally or physically harmful so long as it is not forced or coerced onto the child.

DR DAVID GREEN: Since you don’t think mutual masturbation or oral sex with a child is harmful in any way, assuming that the child is happy to go along with it, may I ask if you have ever had this experience yourself with a child?

DON:  Honestly, I think young girls are GORGEOUS. But I have NEVER touched a child in any sexual way. I am attracted to ALL females of all ages. Shirley Bassey is 75 years old and I think she is hot and I would date her without even thinking about it and I am only in my early 30s … so with that being said …I can easily get my needs fulfilled by an adult woman without having to mess with children. But I admit … I am attracted to them.

I have had many chances to mess with children, but I choose not to do so. I respect their bodies. So even though I look, I would not cross the line.

When I have had fantasies about young girls, it is never penetration sex, like when I fantasize about adult women. I only fantasize about kissing on them, or playing in their hair, rubbing and other intimate things that do not involve penetration of any sort. I have never thought about hurting them. Penetration sex with someone so small is not a turn on to me at all.

I do believe there are other ways that adults and youngsters can enjoy intimacy and affection with one another… such as kissing, cuddling, masturbation and oral sex.

This particular little girl [6-year-old daughter of a female friend] does things that are hard to ignore. Like one day she was sitting on my lap while I was playing my video game … and she started playing with herself. I have never witnessed a kid masturbating… so I didn’t really know what she was doing at first.

At first I thought she was scratching an itch … but after a while she started moving her hands faster … I didn’t know how to handle the situation … I didn’t know if I should tell her to stop or what … I walked out of the room and I went and splashed water on my face because I was stunned by what I saw. She even left a wet spot on my pants leg because she had a dress on.

Honestly, I think young girls are gorgeous … I do believe there are other ways that adults and youngsters can enjoy intimacy and affection with one another… such as kissing, cuddling, masturbation and oral sex.

I know that sounds crazy that a 6-year-old can make a 30-plus-year-old man feel uncomfortable. But I have never been in a situation like that before. Ever since that day I have two chairs in my game room so that she doesn’t have a reason to sit on my lap … but sometimes she will sit on my leg when I have my feet propped up on the foot stool as I sit in my chair and she will rock back and forth…

I would never do anything to her. I love her to the point that I would give my life for her. She shows me more attention than any person in my life, so she means the world to me. I love her more than I love myself.

Yes, it is a bit of a turn on, but I love her too much to do anything like that… I can take my small urge and direct it in a more positive way…. Maybe I do have a pedophile mind … and yes it does get to me … but when you love someone, it’s easier to resist the urge…. No amount of pleasure is worth losing the respect she has for me.

DR DAVID GREEN:  Well, you are certainly very candid in your disclosures and I read what you have to say with great interest. I am a clinical psychologist, but I can’t say I’ve come across many individuals like you before. You admit to having pedophile tendencies, but I think you would hesitate to call yourself a “pedophile” because of the derogatory connotations attached to that term.

Okay, so I am going to ask you a few questions now in the hope that your replies will be honest and truthful. I urge you to tell the truth because, let’s face it, it’s a complete waste of your time to enter into conversation with me otherwise. I ask these questions because I am genuinely interested as a psychologist. If you can be truthful, please answer. But please, I urge you, don’t lie. That would be a complete waste of your time as well as mine.

Feel free to ignore any question you consider needlessly intrusive or over-personal.

DON:  You’re welcome … I see no sense in lying …

DR DAVID GREEN:  Right. Here’s Question 1. If you could have non-penetrative sex with a beautiful little girl, aged 9 or less — kissing, mutual masturbation, oral sex — or full penetrative sex with a beautiful adult woman, which would you prefer to have? Imagine a world in which both forms of sex are equally legal.

DON:  Well, I would prefer the beautiful little girl to the adult woman.

DR DAVID GREEN:  Question 2. What age range attracts you in a little girl? In other words, when do they become too old to turn you on sexually in the same way? Also, what age would you regard as too young?

DON:  My favorite age range is 5 to 11. As far as too young … hmmm … I don’t start to feel an attraction for little girls until they are around 5-years-old.

DR DAVID GREEN: Question 3. Since you think sexual fantasies about little girls are permissible, providing the child is never penetrated, have you ever masturbated in private over the mental image of a little girl, including the 6-year-old girl you say you love so much?

DON:  Yes, I have. I regularly think of little girls when I masturbate, including the one I love.

DR DAVID GREEN:  Question 4. If it ever became legal for underage children to offer their sexual services to adults in state-regulated “houses of pleasure”, i.e., non-penetrative sex involving no more than heavy petting and mutual masturbation, would you yourself welcome such an innovation and would you consider visiting such a temple of Adult-Child Love?

DON:  My answer is : Yes, I would welcome such an innovation. And yes, I would definitely visit [such “houses of pleasure”, i.e., child brothels].

DR DAVID GREEN: Thank you for these answers. I believe you are telling the truth. I would like to ask you a few more questions, so hang on and don’t go away. I’ll write again tomorrow when I have some more time.

DON :  You’re welcome, there’s no point lying . . .

AP157409819909

Pretty 6-year-old girl  . . . the same age as Don’s little “girlfriend”.

6-year-old Jersey Bridgeman, from Arkansas, was found raped and murdered a few doors from her mother’s home in November 2012.  (See here).  Question: Why does a 6-year-old girl need to wear lipstick? 

—  §  —

DON (next day) To be honest I was kind of shocked that you asked so many questions. When you first started asking me questions, I could sense that you had a high interest level about people who are attracted to children. That’s why I opened up the way I did.

I never really told anyone that I have those thoughts. So it was kind of nice to be able to open my thoughts for a change. So I guess I should be thanking you for taking the time to read what I had to say. It’s not like I can go and tell all of this to my family and friends. I have a rather large circle of people in my life because I am well liked.

I also have a daughter with whom I have a great relationship … many friends and even a girlfriend. None would ever suspect I am a “pedophile”! ☺

DR DAVID GREEN: Let me explain that, as a clinical psychologist, I am intensely interested in ALL the “paraphilias”, i.e., sexual aberrations, and that pedophilia is simply one of them.

I think you will admit, if you are honest, that your pedophilia is a sexual addiction and it is one that has grown over the years and is now fully rooted and become part of your character and identity. In your case, I perceive no desire to change or shake off your addiction. You appear to like being what you are. You experience no guilt. You don’t say with a sigh, “Oh, if only I could be normal!”

You have actually admitted that, if given the choice, you would rather have a sexual encounter with a beautiful 9-year-old girl than with a beautiful adult woman. That admission itself, together with the admission that you actually masturbate to mental (or even photographic) images of little girls, makes you a full-fledged pedophile—not just a guy with “pedophile tendencies” whose primary interest is adult women.

You will notice that my tone is completely non-judgemental. This does not mean that I sympathize with pedophilia or think it’s a good thing. Frankly, I would be horrified if child brothels were ever legalized.

Obviously there is a wide range of pedophile activity. At one end of the spectrum, I believe, you will find men who are sexually attracted to children only on a very occasional basis but who are primarily interested in adult women. They have had sex with adult women and masturbated over them, but they have never done this with children and they would feel guilty about doing that.

Confusing the issue is the fact that puberty is now being reached at a far earlier age than in past times; even girls of 8-9 are now having babies or abortions. In a state of nature, among animals, any female capable of reproduction becomes a valid sexual object. Animals don’t discriminate over age differentials or quibble about the age of consent!

In the Middle Ages, child brides were common and a girl of 12 could find herself legally married to a man in his seventies. The “age of consent” is arbitrary and no one knows where to place it. This is all very confusing.

I will tell you this in advance: according to my theories, in nine cases out of ten all these aberrations (including homosexuality) have an environmental cause and are not genetic—though in the case of homosexuality, a small minority are definitely born that way and are in no way to blame for their orientation, though maybe they are for their lifestyles. [Phrase in italics added later at the request of Dr David Green. — Ed].  I do not think you were born a pedophile, I think you became one at some stage. It gradually grew on you, I believe, until one day you became aware of it.

Let me know if I am correct in this supposition.

My next question follows from the above: Can you explain the circumstances that made you evolve into a pedophile?

I am assuming that there was once a time when you were not a pedophile, when you were not conscious of any sexual desire for children. But of course I could be wrong.

DON: I knew that would be your next question. Okay, I’ll do my best to answer it…


LD :  If you can spare a few extra minutes, please watch this important video produced by the late Dr William Pierce about the grooming and sexual corruption of children. This will prepare you for the chilling revelations to come in Part 3 : Child Porn and the Sexualization of Children.

VIDEO : 10 mins

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website, Darkmoon.me, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

122 thoughts on “The Secret Life of a Pedophile (Part 2 of 3)

  1. Aww, ain’t she a beaut

    O beautiful for specious skies,
    For amber waves of grain,
    For purple mountain majesties
    Above the fruited plain!
    America! America!

    Fruited indeed for,
    brokeback mountain majesties,
    It’s the pedophiles dream!

    Biden says Jewish ‘influence’ behind American cultural politics is ‘immense… immense’

    You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress. You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates. So many notions that are embraced by this nation that particularly emanate from over 5,000 years of Jewish history, tradition and culture: independence, individualism,
    FAIRNESS ©, DECENCY ©, JUSTICE ©, CHARITY ©.

    [Now on sale at selected outlets at a low, low price at $1.99!]

    “You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, … “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan or American advances in science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people.”

    “I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” he said. That’s why he spoke out on gay marriage “apparently a little ahead of time.”

    “It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace” gay marriage, Biden said.

    “Think behind of all that, I bet you
    85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.
    The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said.

    Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence, he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. “You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the recognition of … rights in the Constitution without looking at these incredible jurists that we’ve had.”

    [Pretty hard to argue with the bottom line, coming up]

    “JEWISH HERITAGE HAS SHAPED WHO WE ARE – ALL OF US, US, ME – AS MUCH OR MORE THAN ANY OTHER FACTOR IN THE LAST 223 YEARS.

    [Allah be praised, I wasn’t born on the 4th of July]

    And that’s a fact,” he said.

    JonBenét Ramsay, though she lived just 6 years, lived an American Jewish Dream, died a very American Jewish Death and I am surprised that Joe omitted her mention in his prostration.

    1. Thank you Lasha for this important article and the outspoken video by Dr William Pierce that makes it crystal clear who is behind all this filth and perversion.

      Wow, that really blew my mind!

      People should send this article to their friends on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites. It deserves the widest possible circulation.

      1. This is a very moving article. Truly, I despair for our children. The world they are growing up in is a world to give any parent nightmares. I wouldn’t want to be young today.

      2. Posted by Admin on behalf of “Bastiat”, an obvious Zionist troll:

        My cat had kittens the other day and i suspect it was the work of jews.

      3. @Bastiat (<Bestial?)

        Your so-called "Jewish humor" cannot save you anymore. Once the Goyim have become Jew-wise old Jewish tricks don’t work anymore.

        Yes you Jews are behind most of the crimes, corruptions and perversions in the world. Watch the video of William Pierce, it is all Jews behind it.

      4. Bastiat,

        That sounds like a typical nick a jew loving libertarian would pick. Libertarians suffer from a mental disorder. Enough said.

  2. Only Lucifer’s “chosen” are arrogant enough and confident in their ownership of the “Judas Class” to openly describe their plans for the HUMAN race – Only the western cultures are arrogantly ignorant enough to ignore the warning signs.
    Had I been slapped awake a few decades earlier, I would have prepared more to flee this “sewer Nation”.

  3. Little girls are “sweet”, not sexual. It is difficult to conceptualize how a grown man can get sexually aroused by playing with a little girl. (I have found it interesting, though, to try to visualize what they will look like when they become grown women – as well as speculate with a buddy about what a young woman will look like when she ages, e.g., like whether her tits will sag, or her belly will protrude by age 40! 🙂 ). It’s just in play and fun. People take themselves too seriously! Don would do well to avoid such encounters with his little 6 year-old beloved friend. So far, he hasn’t really violated the rules of propriety – just allowed himself to be subject to sordid psychoanalysis. He is responsible enough to realize that he has to be very careful how he admonishes the little girl for her conduct, lest he cause her lifetime anxieties about herself.

    1. @ Gilbert Huntly

      Don would do well to avoid such encounters with his little 6 year-old beloved friend. So far, he hasn’t really violated the rules of propriety . . .

      I don’t think you could have read the article properly — unless you think jerking off over 6-year-old girls is NOT “violating the rues of propriety”!!! 🙂

      DR DAVID GREEN : Question 3. Since you think sexual fantasies about little girls are permissible, providing the child is never penetrated, have you ever masturbated in private over the mental image of a little girl, including the 6-year-old girl you say you love so much?

      DON : Yes, I have. I regularly think of little girls when I masturbate, including the one I love.

      So you think this perv’s behavior is fine and dandy, do you, jerking off over 6-year-old girls — including the one he loves?

      1. No, you assumptive bitch. I merely said that he hadn’t apparently violated propriety with his girlfriend’s child. (I doubt the cogitation’s of your own, sick mind would bear much public scrutiny, either!)

      2. Sorry Gilbert, I got the same impression from reading your comment that Lolicia did: that you are a borderline perv.

        Not a perv. A borderline perv. With pervy tendencies.

        So it’s all “entertainment”, is it? Courtesy of that Jewish sleaze artist Jerry Springer who you seem to admire so much. If you admire this Jew sleazeball, I can see where you’re coming from.

        And it ain’t a nice place! 🙂

      3. I don’t give-a-damn WHAT he ‘jerks-off’ about, as long as he keeps it to himself!

      4. @ Gilbert Huntly

        I owe you an apology, sir. I spoke foolishly and intemperately. This as because of the extremely upsetting nature of this article. I lost my wits for a moment.

        Lobro’s comment quoting the words of Jesus Christ — “Let him who is without sin among you cast the first stone” — should be the epigraph of his article. Unforgettable words. No one says it like Jesus.

        If Gilbert wishes and if Admin agrees, let my foolish comment be deleted.

      5. Oh no, Dr. Parker… All the comments, here, are for thought and consideration. No apologies needed! I understand ‘why’ you might voice such – but I know better than to so consider myself. While I am staid and proper in my own ways, I enjoy the perversity of thought. I admit I like pretty women (of all ages and persuasion), but I strive never to be improper in my conduct toward them. (Which leads me to admit that I think ‘Lolicia Aitkin’ is, most likely, a very comely lady!) 🙂

        We’re very entertained! I am sitting here in my ex-wife’s house, enjoying bourbon ‘n branch, while passing-the-time being ENTERTAINED by y’all’s banter!

    2. Say whatever you might, one hot summer evening, two beers in, this guy’s resolve just might take that turn ….

      I would hope that, should the child’s parent be aware of the current state of affairs, were she responsible, she would take that child and get the hell outta Dodge. Like yesterday if not sooner. No panic, just end it.

      As the mother of two stunning girls successfully raised to adulthood, I had to do this once when they were in their early teens and felt not a qualm about saying, “Please do not contact us any more.” This ended a three year relationship with not only a closet pedophile but almost an entire group of people who had kept silent ~ knowing of his proclivities and not informed me. This was despicable in my opinion. BTW eventually that person did offend and paid the ultimate price.

      This is a disturbing read in its blatancy but not surprising as anyone who has read my blog will attest. From the very beginning, ten years ago, I have focused on this illness that is now blossoming into huge businesses. I was back then completely unaware of the Talmudic aspect of these things.

      Ah, yes, the Noahidation of America and its OUT DATED morals and scruples…. As I worked on this and other perverse materials over the years, of course I learned the source of the decadence. Hence the last article listed below comes across as sincere and a tad naive. I did not understand the Noahide connection…

      The Frankfurt School in Your Child’s Classroom
      http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2016/05/the-frankfurt-school-in-your-childs.html

      THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL: CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPT
      http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2009/05/frankfurt-school-conspiracy-to-corrupt_23.html

      NY TIMES: PEDOPHILIA: A DISORDER, NOT A CRIME
      http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2014/10/ny-times-pedophilia-disorder-not-crime.html

      DISTURBING SEX KITTEN FRENCH VOGUE PHOTOSHOOT FEATURING CHILDREN
      http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2011/03/disturbing-sex-kitten-french-vogue.html

      MK ULTRA AND MIND CONTROL IN THE WHITE HOUSE
      http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2010/01/mk-ultra-and-mind-control-in-white.html

      CHILD PORN IN THE CLASSROOM
      http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.co.uk/2009/12/child-pornography-in-classroom.html

      Anyhow, now I feel dirty having looked and considered these things for far too long on a sunny summer morning. Time to go jump in the pool and clear both head and spirit.

  4. In five weeks ‘DR. PHIL’ McGraw returns for its 15th season with the exclusive three-part interview with JonBenet Ramsey’s brother, Burke.

    As the 20-year anniversary of the still unsolved 1996 murder of his sister nears, Ramsey, who has never spoken to the media, breaks his silence.

    The three-part season premiere airs Monday, September 12th; Tuesday September 13th; and Monday September 19th.

    http://www.drphil.com/advice/a-dr-phil-exclusive-jonbenet-ramseys-brother-burke-breaks-his-silence/

    Dr Phillip Calvin McGraw is raking in the $$$$ with earnings at $70 million for 2014, and ranked him the 15th highest earning celebrity in the world.

    Opra Winfree found him and bankrolled him.

    I am guessing this will make both bank accounts even bigger. Making their exploitation profits from tragedies.

    “Winner, Winner… Chicken Dinner..!!”

    1. it goes to prove the (((economists))) assertion that raping and killing 6 yr olds is good for economy and should be encouraged to keep recession at bay.

      decency makes dr phil ill.

      #6YrOldWhiteLivesDontMatter

    2. And would you believe much of what you heard?

      MK ultra runs deep. There is no doubt as I have learned from past studying of this family, based on the behavior of other such families, that JonBenet was not the only abused child here. If so, an alter could make him totally believe what he is saying, despite the truth being otherwise. An alter can easily fool all forms of lie detectors even though the truth might be vastly different.

      On the other hand, he might be 110% speaking the absolute truth in every which way but loose.

      Just sayin’.

  5. He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone

    The line between sanctimony and hypocrisy is thin and blurred.

    Leave Gil alone.
    In fact, leave “Don” alone, because he could have also kept his mouth shut and lied to his spot in the lineup of the righteous.
    He spoke his personal truth and for that he is to be condemned?

    A man is only partly in control of his thoughts, the sin begins when he refuses to control his actions.
    Everyone agrees that a dog may growl but until he bites someone, it shouldn’t be put to sleep, so why doesn’t this apply to humans?

    And further on, if Don’s account is true and we must assume that it is, otherwise no point discussing, what about that little girl, who in all her bestial innocence teases Don so mercilessly and is likely at some level aware of the turmoil she causes and enjoys her power?
    What is she, would you call her a trollop, a whore?
    What about 9 yr old boys popping little mirrors under girls’ dresses in class, are they pedophiles, the giggling girls are sluts?
    Should those boys reserve their curiosity only for women certifiably over 18?

    This is a goddamn minefield, walk carefully because hypocrisy is a deadly sin.
    There was a time in my puberty when the thoughts of sex persecuted me so much, day and night that I literally prayed to god to release me, was envious of the elders who were over that hump and could think about other things in life – was I a pervert at the age 14?

    Judgement is based on answers.
    You have all the answers without ever bothering to ask any questions.
    Point the finger, lightning bolt zaps the offender, done – this is Jew magic.
    It is called the Mosaic law.

    Here is the full quote for you to think about:

    Then they reminded Jesus that adultery was punishable by stoning under MOSAIC law and challenged him to judge the woman so that they might then accuse him of disobeying the law. Jesus thought for a moment and then replied, “He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”

    (I think that Jon Benet’s parents should be executed first of all, they are every bit as evil as the rapist-murderer who killed her – what kind of mother is that fercrissakes?)

    1. Right you are, Lobro! Horses and cattle are bred for conformation and purpose – not people (unfortunately). Like horses or cattle, however, we people are not/should not be held accountable by our proclivities of sex – but for our ACTIONS – by their propriety. If one has the thought that another “needs killin'”, his thoughts should not be disposed to physical judgment. Therein lies the danger of all this psychoanalysis. Whenever someone asks ‘how’ I would solve ‘all the world’s problems’, I usually respond by saying “There’s not enough ammunition in MY arsenal to SOLVE all the world’s problems!” Simple as that. Does that make me a ‘sociopath’?? 🙂

  6. Regarding that video of William Pierce : it is of course entirely to be expected that those who are behind this attempt to sexualize little girls are Jews. They are themselves sexually highly perverted (including by pedophilia), and they promote their own perversion to undermine us Goyim.

    For a glimpse into the perverted soul of these satanic creatures, look at the face of this Jew Irving Teitelbaum, mentioned in Pierce’s video :

    http://cjournal.concordia.ca/journalarchives/2006-07/nov_23/photos/Teitelbaum-CMYK.jpg

    1. That’s old news, Pat. Uncle’s been shipping “thought criminals” to Spamblinka for years now. Melvin is still languishing in concentration camp. Mel’s thoughts were an immense threat to us all and to the USA and to the whole world. Uncle *yawn* saved us from a certain horrible painful death, I guess, the day Uncle shipped Mel off to Spamblinka.

      Uncle 😉 is afraid of his own shadow, lol.

  7. Lasha,

    I’m having real problems digesting this, just as I did with part one. The thought of anyone being attracted to pre-pubescent children is completely beyond me. There are most certainly millions of hebephiles in this world and I really can’t see why there needs to be a name for one who has sex with another, whom nature has already defined as ready for procreation. I know, for example, that the overwhelming majority of teens today are sexually active, some starting at 12 years old. When I was at school, the thought never crossed my mind. The hiding I would have gotten from mine as well as the girl’s father was enough to not even bring about contemplation.

    People’s views of sex today have drastically changed from when I was younger. This continuing urge is completely beyond me, but then again, I’ve never been one, driven by the desire for sexual intercourse.

    Paedophilia will be legalized. Homosexuality was merely the precursor, that opened the door to allow tabboos back into society.

    I don’t know if I’ll read the following parts. I find this really disturbing and as you know, I certainly scrape and sever tendons in discussion, being able to talk about almost everything, but this, well…….

  8. Urges are just that, an elemental force that did not arise consciously and must be fought and controlled.
    One does not say, “I shan’t be aroused” or “i think i want to be aroused by so-and-so”, not that i have ever met such a person.

    We, each of us, is given a unique set of problems to try and solve and a unique quiz of questions to try and answer – this is the whole of life, and nothing else.
    I don’t believe in running to someone else to solve your problems and answer your questions, which is why I despise psychology and psychiatry, again it reeks of that Mosaic law when the “sages” of talmud laid down the minute rules for everything and tried to turn the followers into mindless, soulless automations with themselves set up as G-d (G-d reads tlamud standing up in reverence, right? He reads it to get answers to his own questions, right?)

    None of us can help Don, not Dr Green, not Dr Parker, not Dr Darkmoon, not me either, which is why i only have a glancing interest in these murky subjects of pain and torment, can only be glad that I am free and clear, just like I am free and clear of say, bone cancer, another field of pain and torment, where i am helpless to aid the sufferers.
    They must make their peace with the world and move on to the finish line on their own, ignore the hook-beaked vultures lining the roadside.

  9. Pharisee-Jews – kol nidre chanters – condone child sex acts.

    Hollywood thrives.

    Talmud Pedophilia: The Jewish Religion Allows Sex with 3-Year-Old Baby Girls and Little Boys Under Nine

    The Talmud is the sleazy substrata of a religious system gone terribly astray…. Judaism’s most revered authority actually endorses such sins as lying, oath-breaking, and indirect murder. And it even sanctions one of the greatest sins of all: child molestation.

    http://www.dailystormer.com/talmud-pedophilia-the-jewish-religion-allows-sex-with-3-year-old-baby-girls-and-little-boys-under-nine/

    1. The Talmud is the sleazy substrata of a religious system gone terribly astray

      And I say,
      The Talmud is the sleazy substrata of a satanic system gone terribly according to plan.

      And it is the best definition of this unholy den of vipers known as Jews; everything evil, filthy, depraved, perverted is their substance, they roll and wallow in it, they breed it generationally into their genes so that at some point they may truly claim some sort of ethnic or racial identity, a genotype and phenotype that alerts one’s jewdar.
      They are born into the breeding program like horses are born into racing stables and though some have the strength to pull themselves free of this quagmire of vice, most cannot and sink ever deeper into it.

      This is Talmud and its biomass.
      Talmud (and its “spiritual” predecessor) never had anything in it that was sufficiently good to be twisted or could go astray, it was that way from the word go.

      So this is where I hit a wall of sorts, what mind conceived such a program, i simply cannot picture some neanderthal camel humper with this comprehensive understanding and sophistication, so that even in the time of Jesus they already had an excellent grasp of banking and financial mischief, those temple moneychangers were every bit as sharp as Madoff or Nathan Rothschild.
      I think that the entire ministry of Jesus had one sole purpose: to vaccinate the world against this disease.
      And by and large he seems to have failed, even though some macrophages are still in business, still fighting the battle – we are the proof.

      1. Don’t worry about it, dear Lobro. He said all these things must come to pass… After all is said and done, the ‘truth’ will out. 🙂 I am listening to Donald Trump’s speech in Wisconsin (?), and he is ‘outing’ a lot of TRUTH!

      2. Even Jesus was showing that spiritual imaging goes only so far with Talmudists.

        When he had enough of their crap…. he turned over the cash registers and computer monitors…. and grabbed a whip and KICKED some Pharisee-Jew Bankers’ asses..!!

  10. I generally don’t like involvement of any kind with this subject, suffice it to say that if all the convicted offenders permitted by a disfunctional government to reside anywhere near children like the Ramsay child were found beaten to a bloody pulp I think a positive lesson would be transmitted. If unconvicted advocates of Child predation were found skinned alive I think a most useful message would be transmitted. There is something to be said for the proper use of Force Majeure. Then we could get started on the jews in Hollywood. In about 3-5 years these problems would become extremely rare.

  11. Interesting…..

    In our democratic society, they create ‘law’ systems, enforced by police, who arrest fathers for either beating up or murdering people who tamper with their children.
    In an anarchy, there would be no police to arrest fathers, brothers, uncles and in general men who beat up/murder paedophiles.
    In an anarchy there would be no paedophiles in religion, banking, politics, the police, the judiciary, the armed forces and other establishments within society.
    And yet, every hollywood movie, msm article on anarchy promotes it as a hell on earth. I wonder why?
    Ironically democratic societies protect bad, whereas anarchy protects good.
    People have still not cottoned on yet to this simple fact.

    1. @ Harbinger

      “In our democratic society, they create ‘law’ systems, enforced by police, who arrest fathers for either beating up or murdering people who tamper with their children.”

      Just this past year in Texas, a father caught a man raping his very young daughter. The father beat the guy to death with his bear hands then called 911. They thought about bring chafes against the father for beating the perp to death, but decided not to do it because they did not think they could get a jury to convict the father.

      “And yet, every hollywood movie, msm article on anarchy promotes it as a hell on earth. I wonder why?”

      It’s because the jews that own and run Hollyweird are part of the same cult that owns and runs the government. There would be no jewish control without government since it runs on jewish law, the “Mosaic” Law.

      “Ironically democratic societies protect bad, whereas anarchy protects good. People have still not cottoned on yet to this simple fact.”

      I have for two reasons.

      Reason One: Since becoming a followers of the teachings of Jesus, I am an “anarchist.” Jesus taught self governance and, although not calling for a rebellion against Rome, did not endorse any form of government.

      Reason Two: I grew up in “anarchy” in rural southern USA. The crime rate was real close to zero. Law enforcement was one patrol car that passed through every Sunday afternoon at 2:00 PM. If anyone had called the police, it would have taken them a couple hours to show up. Any criminals would have had to deal with a victim’s relatives and friends well before the pop lice would have been able to get there. Every household was armed. Criminals had no protection from law enforcement. Things worked quite well. No one worried about their children being out and about playing. There were no jews in the surrounding area, just a few pseudo jews called Freemasons that most everyone kept a close eye on.

      Just a week ago, I was recalling our childhood past when the topic came to my younger sister’s brush with a pedophile. We lived about 100 yards from a general store. My 9 year old sister used to go to the store to buy candy whenever she had money. One day she came home and told me about the owner, in his fifties, of the store trying to kiss her. I informed my older brother about the incident so he and I went to the store and explained what we would physically do to him if he ever attempted to bother our sister or any other girl again. We did not tell our dad for fear of immediate physical consequences to the store owner. The store owner must have believed we were sincere, we were, and nothing ever happened after that. Anarchy works..

      1. Ungenius,

        Yes, I’m sure there was anarchy in the Byzantine empire as well. And the lack of any government was undoubtedly the main reason it lasted so long 🙂

        Same thing for NS Germany. Only after Hitler’s introduction of anarchy in Germany it became the most prosperous and advanced country in Europe in less than 5 years, starting from less than scratch.

        Of course anarchy works. Because everybody on the planet is exactly the same and has the same ideas about right or wrong. Right?

        Ungenius, you have never lived in anarchy. It’s just that in your childhood law enforcement was facilitated on the side of the people. That’s why criminals had to be very very careful. That was precisely because in those day there still was such a thing called law and order and people, including those in law enforcement, still knew what was wrong or right.

        There has never been any long lived anarchy in the entire history of planet earth. If you live in a small community somewhere minding your own business then don’t ever try to develop that small community into a prosperous one or develop anything that has any value because outside criminals will come and take all you have. You can’t stop them unless you will organise yourself, which inevitably will lead to a some form of government, period. The alternative is to always stay an underdeveloped little community of which its members have to be all exactly the same.

        It is precisely because we are all different as individuals that there has to be a set of rules – that everybody will agree to – and that everybody should abide to. Because you see, there really is such a thing as common interest.

        Anarchy could only work if everybody was exactly the same, had the same personality, the same virtues, the same world view, the same ambition, the same intelligence, the same morals, the same emotions, etc.

        Die hard anarchists and libertarians make the same mistake. Just because our current ‘government’ is in reality not a governmnet at all but more a camp capo in servitude of the international oligarchy lead by the jews they assume that there never ever can be such a thing as a good government, or, a real government. Well, history has proven them wrong. There were many real governments before traitor gentile aristocracy started playing ball with jew.

        You think for example that Amazone Indians live in anarchy? No way. They have laws which have to be respected by everyone.

        No anarchy can exist because nature itself is highly anti-anarchist. There wil be rule, so everything stands or falls with what kind of rulers rule. Nothing mysterious about that.

      2. “No anarchy can exist because nature itself is highly anti-anarchist.” Given the traditional, mistaken definition of anarchy, how does this idea mesh with “chaos theory” and fractiles? I might point out once again that anarchy worked for Spain until centralized government stepped in to correct the situation to their satisfaction.

        For most, the amazing thing about the Talmud is its sheer size. Most people think the Talmud, like the Bible or Koran, is but a single volume. Few people realize it comprises twenty separate volumes; a work in progress that contains some 3.5 million words at this point.

        Like the OT, the Talmud is all about the law. As with any Jewish legal effort, the Talmud attempts to address, define and govern every conceivable human action. As it is often said, “The Talmud even dictates the proper direction one must face when pissing in the desert.”

        The law is the foundation of Jewish power; that is why law is so important to Jews and why they study it from their earliest age. It is what young boys study in the Yeshiva, receiving little gold stars for successfully arguing and winning Talmudic points of law. It is how the Jews win arguments with god.

        It is why Jews have a quaking fear of anarchy, which is not a social condition of total chaos as popularly defined, but a lack of centralized government and its “rule of law” that can be twisted in the manner now witnessed today throughout western civilization. Thus it should come as no surprise that Jews decry anarchy in the same manner as they do German National Socialism.

        Like the original Old Testament, its modern counterpart is essentially the legal library for Judaism. In its day, when recorded on scrolls, the OT was also a large, collected work consisting of multiple “books”, much like the modern Talmud. At the time it was considered a huge compilation of Temple legality. Only much later did it become condensed into a single volume.

        From a literary standpoint, the Old Testament is the worst book ever written. The most glaring issue is the total lack of continuity in the stories. Characters and situations arise and then fade only to be resurrected several chapters later. The multiple meanings of words that must be read in context to be properly understood, along with indefinable jargon add up to a literary abortion that only the most devout are able to pursue.

        True to the intent, those outside the inner circle of Jewish experts have little or no idea of what they are reading. While the outsider believes they are reading an historical account or the inerrant word of god, Jewish experts know the Bible is nothing more then the rude beginning of their rule of law.

        From the Jews’ legal perspective, law is written to make it incomprehensible to all but the expert trained in such legalities. It serves their economic and political interests that one must have an insider’s knowledge of the law to effectively represent their case before the courts.

        Today, while it is still technically possible for one to represent themselves in court, such attempts are heavily discouraged by Judges who caution people not to try representing themselves. Thus, Americans are subject to laws they can nether understand, define or argue before those august, judicial bodies dressed in appropriate black robes. This was exactly the situation Jesus was addressing in the first century.

        Viewed in the proper perspective, one can see the same twisted legalese and commentary in American law present in the Old Testament. In its day, the OT was just as incomprehensible to the common man, requiring a gaggle of legal experts, kohanim, soferim and p’rushim, to interpret and administer the law for them in the same manner as the various levels of courts, judges and lawyers interpret and administer the law today.

        Nothing in this situation has improved, it has just progressed to an ever greater degree of insider expertise and incomprehensibility to a point where even legal experts have difficulty in judging what their own laws dictate. But then that is exactly how ancient Jews designed their legal system.

      3. Arch –

        “Nothing in this situation has improved, it has just progressed to an ever greater degree of insider expertise and incomprehensibility to a point where even legal experts have difficulty in judging what their own laws dictate. But then that is exactly how ancient Jews designed their legal system.”

        Yep….. and why the Supreme Court is being ‘stacked’ with Pharisee-Jews and Pharisee-Jew Bankers’ agents.

        There are NO property rights…!!

        And Sandra O’Connor resigned over Kelo v City of New London…. a travesty by Pharisee-Jews on the bench.:
        https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/545/469/

        See the VERY SAD results today…. still an empty lot:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

      4. In KELO…. the effect was to remove words from the US Constitution….. actually, from the Bill of Rights…!!

        They ‘legislate’ from the bench.

        The principal dissent was issued on 25 June 2005 by Justice O’Connor, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Scalia and Thomas. The dissenting opinion suggested that the use of this taking power in a reverse Robin Hood fashion— take from the poor, give to the rich— would become the norm, not the exception:
        “Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random. The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms.”

        O’Connor argued that the decision eliminates “any distinction between private and public use of property — and thereby effectively – DELETES – the words ‘for public use’ from the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.”

      5. O’Connor argued that the decision eliminates “any distinction between private and public use of property — and thereby effectively – DELETES – the words ‘for public use’ from the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.”

        It the old story of Jacob’s clever conniving theft of Esau’s birthright and inheritance. A mess of pottage for Esau’s inheritance and a gross deception to steal his birthright at the behest of Jacob’s domineering mother. The Jews have stolen the country from under American noses and the fools are not even aware of it. Of course such law will only hold so long as they control sufficient force to exercise their will over the people.

        For years, Jews have been running numerous minor test cases of legalized land theft, killing or imprisoning those who resisted. The latest case happened in Oregon and went by quietly and pretty much unnoticed by the public at large. The idea is “I’ll keep my head down, after all it didn’t happened to me.” Or more commonly, “turn the channel, there’s a game on tonight.” These are the test that cases have demonstrated to Jews the goyim are ripe for harvest.

        It’z coming, it’z coming fast.

      6. Ungenius,

        Anarchy is the only solution to living a free existence. Anarchies, unlike societies, with their many organisations, cannot be controlled. Sure, there will be areas where people will huddle together, form tribes and become aggressors, going out to attack, rob and murder people weaker for themselves, but there will be other communities who band together to start again in a peaceful co existence with one another.
        Anarchy would instantly remove the control that Jews have over society, along with the many practitioners of the mystery schools. All the powerful globalists in this world would fear for their lives as people would ask why their lives have been turned upside down and who was responsible. The Rothschild empire (and bloodline) would cease to exist. They’d be ripped to pieces when the people found them. This is why they push more and more for an authoritarian society, in order to protect themselves from the mob, whom they know will obliterate them should they find the truth.

      7. 1138,

        “Anarchy could only work if everybody was exactly the same, had the same personality, the same virtues, the same world view, the same ambition, the same intelligence, the same morals, the same emotions, etc.”

        Anarchy simply means – without rule. That is all 1138.
        Think of today, with the many pieces of legislation that control our very lives, from driving licenses, to being fined for having non plastic containers in plastic recycle bins? Of course, this is all straight from the talmud, where legislation (not laws) are created impose yet more control. In an anarchy, there would be none.
        In an anarchy, there would certainly be codes to follow, especially within tribes/communities that would undoubtedly appear, but these codes would most certainly be basic common laws – no stealing, no assault, no murder, no stealing your neighbor’s wife etc.
        What there wouldn’t be would be fedual societies, where people would impose themselves as rulers and make everyone else go out, work the fields and give them a good living.

        If anything there would be leaders, but these leaders would not RULE over others. They would merely be like the elders of tribes, who were the backbone of human society throughout history, whether Celtic, Germanic, Amerindian, Oriental and Aboriginal. These elders would educate and be the balance between good and bad, right and wrong. There would be no governments. As people would realise that the reason they are where they are now, scraping an existence together after a world war, is all because of politicians, who were bought by globalist, Jewish bankers, to impose their wishes upon the world population.

        The Jews don’t want anarchy. Jews don’t survive in anarchies. They can’t buy anyone to do their wishes. They aren’t powerful enough to impose their rule over others and their chosen people concept goes out the window. Putting a Jew into an anarchy would be like dropping a fish on dry land. It would die. This is why Hollywood will make horrific films like The Road to scare the hell out of people into what an anarchy would be like.

        Your life – learn to live it. Take up a martial art to defend yourself/make weapons. Learn how to farm the land/hunt. Learn how to build a home. Don’t live in a society that essentially turns you into a baby being weaned of a state breast. Do not allow anyone to authority over you. If you live this way, as our ancestors did, you will be free.

      8. Harbinger, Arch, Ungenius,

        Apparantly we disagree, right?

        Well, ok. But consider this. We will agree that individuals differ, ok?

        There are individuals that are more intelligent than others, there are individuals that are more talented than others, there are individuals that have more ambition than others, there are individuals that are more criminal than others, there are psychopathic individuals, there are good hearted individuals, etc etc etc.

        Now, if there is no rule, no judicial system, then who’s going to punish pedophiles? Who’s going to punish murderers? Who’s going to punish robbers? I don’t suppose anarchists will believe that without rule pedophiles, murderers and robbers will magically sease to exist? If you advocate that the group of decent people will punish those criminals ( where, when, and how will they punish criminals and according to whom do they need to be punished? ) then you have rule. Mob rule, which will not be consistently neutral for a very long time. What if one of the criminals turns out to be a member of one of the decent families who will protect their family member, mmm? What are you goingf to do then? You have a vete on your hands which will become violent.

        And what about an individual, or a family, a clan, or a certain etnocentric group that acquires all, or a substantial part of the community’s wealth or wealth outside the community ( which will happen guaranteed due to the differences in intelligence, ambition and goals in live of individuals ) with which it can buy other morally weak and corruptable individuals to do their heavy lifting, like extortion, murdering or robbing. Well, I’ll tell you what will happen. They will rule.

        And what if you manage to live happily with a small community minding your own business and one day ships will turn up carrying strangers with mighty weapons and not many good intentions? Well, from that day on, they will rule.

        If you argue that we don’t need a central global government then i agree. But groups of people, starting with races, then sub groups within races divided in nations do need to be strong in order to maintrain themselves. Groups that are not strong will be wiped out by others who are strong(er), that’s how nature works. Small groups of individuals may have lived for hundreds of thousands of years, but even they didn’t get or held anything without being able to defend themselves against others. Trust me, those small groups had a shaman, a group leader, or group elder or a counsil of wise elders who kept it all together and held the traditions and customs of that particular group. So they were/represented the law.

        And even besides all of what I have been saying, humans are social animals and in any social structure there is a hierarchy. So that automatically implies higher and lower status of individuals within that group. And of course the voice, vote or wish of a high status individual or group within that group will carry more weight in that group than that of a lower status individual or group within that group. Hence, there is rule.

        And today, more than ever, with over 7.000.000.000 people on this planet small groups won’t stand a chance against others, who don’t have such noble ideas about individual freedom or no rulers above them but think quite different, like in terms of etnocentrism, which is absolutely normal to think because that’s the way nature has programmed us all. It’s a necessaty to guarantee the reproduction and survival of our genes.

        Anyway, not only does a group has to be strong and well organised to be able to maintain civilisation, but even more so to defend it against its competitors. This is only possible with an neutral authority which all members will respect, whether it is a shaman, a group eldest, a king or a Reichskanzler.

        In my view the concept of anarchy is at least a naive one but at worst a deliberate attempt to weaken our great race and civilistation by promoting either unrestricted individualism or anti-authoritism or even both. It could only work if everybody on this planet had the same world view.

  12. I never saw the video. I just couldn’t handle it. Because the text alone was disturbing alone. Not only was it creepy but it also made me nauseous just reading about his fantasies. I don’t know if watching it would make me barf up half of my intestines but why take that risk? Thanks but no thanks. What a horrifying world it will be to live in once they have legalized it. Because protesting against it will of course lead to persecution and even prosecution. And if you don’t back off after that, possibly murdered. The depraved jews paradise will be the healthy goyims worst hell. That is for certain.

  13. Not all erotic attraction to children represents pedophilia. It is perfectly natural for boys with budding curiosity and inchoate sexual stirrings to put mirrors under the girls’ skirts… They are EQUALS.
    Pedophilia is strictly an ADULT’s sexual attraction to children. It also has a dark component of POWER over the weak, vulnerable and innocent which adds to their sick thrill.
    It is a pathologic deviation to feel attracted to the “object of one’s obsession” before secondary sex characteristics have even developed. Hence the need to sexualize little girls by tarting them up. In a way dressing little girls as adult tarts is similar in its weird and twisted intent as homosexual “queens” dressing up as women: if you are attracted to men, why pretend they are women?
    If you are attracted to children why pretend they are miniature women?
    One thing is certain: pedophilia is not curable. A society hollowed out by rot that pushes “tolerance” and moral relativism will embolden pedophiles. They are already clamoring to lower the age of consent.

    1. @ Ariadnatheo

      One thing is certain: pedophilia is not curable.

      You have written an exceptionally fine comment, showing an acute psychological perception into the nature of this dreadful problem, but please allow me to qualify your above statement by saying that pedophilia IS curable in exceptional cases. No cure is possible for this disease however — as for homosexuality — unless the patient recognizes it as a disease and is driven to change by sheer self-nausea and the burning need for normality.

      I have come across a case of a pedophile (who had actually been to prison for child molestation) who was completely cured after undergoing hypnotherapy and also practicing intensive meditation which involved elements of autosuggestion and visualization. This man genuinely reached a stage when he experienced amazement at the mere idea that he had ever hankered sexually for children. The desire for children had evaporated overnight, so to speak, dispersing like a dark mist from the mind.

      This was either a cure or a remission — as often happens with cancer.

      This man felt he had been possessed all along by demonic entities of some kind — entities that had somehow snaked their way into his psyche and INFECTED him with a spiritual VIRUS. The expulsion of the virus cured the infection.

      Some viruses persist for years and often perish on their own accord; others are driven out. I do believe strongly that many forms of “evil” are the result of spiritual viruses. This cannot be proved scientifically of course, but neither can exorcism nor the existence of God.

      As Hamlet said to Horatio, “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

      1. I personally believe that Christ exorcised real demons, not imaginary ones. The pedophile demon is one such demon. Right now the Catholic Church has 300 trained exorcists working for it on a full-time basis.

      2. I’m glad to hear that The Church has maintained its position on exorcists! I remember encountering William Peter Blatty at a party in Georgetown, and he assured me it was real – and that he thought it would mark the undoing of his faith should the church dispose of the practice. (I have always admired the Catholic Church – but, alas, was born Protestant and never had occasion to practice the finer things!)
        🙂

      3. @LD – “I personally believe that Christ exorcised real demons, not imaginary ones.”

        “Demons” and “evil” are the reflection of man’s basest natures taking over his physical body. When these natures conflict sufficiently with opposing cultural convictions it leads to insanity. As Sufis maintain, the only reason such matters are viewed as “otherworldly” or supernatural is one’s lack of understanding the underlying principals of how these things work. Thus “demons” exist, but not in the traditional form imagined.

        For an exorcism to be effective, a cultural context is necessary. This context must be present and understood by all parties. This is why a Catholic priest cannot effectively exorcise the demons from a primitive native Indian, living deep in the South American jungles. An aboriginal Indian would have no idea of the Jesus entity being invoked to exorcise his demons. One might just as well invoke Ghost-buster’s Stay Puft Marshmallow Man. Yet a tribal witch doctor would have little trouble dealing with the Indian’s demons. But what chance would this same witch doctor have of exorcising say a Southern Baptist’s demons?

        Like most religious beliefs and traditions, exorcism among western cultures is invariably misunderstood by those applying its effect. One might see them as witch-doctors administering traditional allopathic medications, e.g. a “magic pill”, while chanting mystical words. The medication often works, but the true reason for its working (or not working) is not properly understood. Ironically primitive tribes have a much better understanding of these functions than their civilized counterparts.

        The demons Jesus exorcised in the story of the Gadarine swine was a mental schism that had developed between the man’s personal convictions and Temple law. This is why the man lived in a tomb with swine herds, as according to Temple law, these are among the most unclean things of all. His profound, oppositional stance split his mind, driving him insane.

        Jesus knew that to heal his condition, it would take a recognized authority, a Temple priest, to forgive him of his perceived sins. The sight of Jesus, a Temple priest, drove the “possessed” man to paroxysms of rage, until Jesus explained that he had not come to further harass and denounce him, but to heal his psychic wounds as only a Temple priest might.

        I can understand the concept behind Jesus’ “driving” the man’s multiple “demonic” sins into the unclean swine as people believe that such entities must be displaced to be eliminated from the soul. There is also a certain truth that energy cannot be destroyed, only transferred or transmuted.

        Thus, Jesus’ act of exorcism would have made perfect sense to the “possessed” man and all witnesses. However, there can be little doubt that the swine committing the lemming-like act of running into the sea, is naught but the author’s a literary embellishment to enhance the impact of the story. After all, would a loving, compassionate Jesus destroy the livelihood of a gentile village simply to reform one individual of his Temple sins? Not the Jesus I know.

        I reflect on the irony of a university course I once took titled Magic, Witchcraft and Religion. At the time, I considered the elective class absurd and totally useless for advancing my goals. However, what I learned in that class has served a far more long term, useful function than most of the other classes I attended. It was in fact the first step towards accessing portions of a much greater body of knowledge on these subjects. Once more I find in this only an illusion of accident or coincidence.

      4. arguing whether demons are “real” is a waste, unless “real” is agreed on.
        if reality is that which can be tested empirically, then by their definition demons are not real since they exist outside the experimental realm.
        but if “reality” is extended beyond the laboratory metrics, so that some independent entity may exist beyond the 5 senses yet can impact on our thoughts and emotions, then voila! there is your demon.

        and by the same coupling mechanism whereby the demon may engage and affect our psychic state, it should be possible to influence the demon, which is what i believe the witchdoctors of kabbalah do.
        I don’t think that judaic “faith” goes beyond this exploitation, they simply consider demons as useful tools in acquiring temporal power of the goyim.
        These would be the lesser demons, kind of dumb psychic beasts of burden that carry ill-intentioned messages and moods and dump them onto the goyim.
        Possibly, though, there is a super-demon which we may refer to as Devil, one whose intellect far surpasses the rabbinical cavemen and it is they, in turn, who end up carrying its water.
        Possibly? Likely.
        Kind of like that greedy wizard in the Lords of the Rings who, hoping to amass greater power, fell into the clutches of the Big Bad Guy (forgot his name).
        I think that Tolkien had quite a few ideas that he stealthily promoted without openly going against the Jewry.

        But of course, all this is empty blather to those who put the empirical chickenwire fence around their experience.
        Believe in half of what you see and none of what you hear can be taken two ways …

      5. ask yourself to what extent are you in full control of your psychic faculties, urges, fears, phobias, attractions, random visions, and so on.
        physical urges like hunger or digestion are easily traced to their cause but many of these psychic manifestations cannot.

        it does no harm to assign them to independent, unobservable entities living outside our material realm.
        It saves time in wondering what they are and instead one can engage them in a constructive way, by either encouraging, discouraging or directing their influence … in other words, questions of their “reality” are useless compared to the practical effects obtained.
        And life becomes more of an adventure, instead of mindlessly drowning in the couch in front of the Jew-tube.

      6. @ Arch Stanton

        “For an exorcism to be effective, a cultural context is necessary. This context must be present and understood by all parties. This is why a Catholic priest cannot effectively exorcise the demons from a primitive native Indian, living deep in the South American jungles. An aboriginal Indian would have no idea of the Jesus entity being invoked to exorcise his demons.”

        Based on my research of the topic of driving devils from a person, it does not matter whether the person possessed of a devil even speaks the same language or has the same culture. The person being relieved of the devil has no say in the matter at all since they are under the influence of the possessing devil. The person possessed does not need to grant their permission to be treated since that permission is never given by the occupying devil(s). All it takes for a person to drive a devil from someone is to tell it to leave using the name of Jesus. If the belief of the person commanding the devil to leave is adequate in their command, just a mustard seed worth, the devil has no choice but to leave the possessed person. There is no magic involved, no praying, no chanting, no standing on the head while gargling peanut butter, etc., just command it and believe it.

      7. Well said, Ungenius.

        (This comment is also addressed to Lobro).

        To my mind, this is a very simple matter. First of all we should always bear in mind Baudelaire’s famous dictum, “La plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu’il n’existe pas.” (The devil’s finest trick is to persuade you that he does not exist.)

        Let’s forget all those fussy distincions about what is “real” and “not real” . . . or the futile attempt to show that the Devil is “real” only in a symbolic or metaphorical sense, unlike man who is often thought to be REALLY “real”. No, there’s absolutely no reason why the Devil should not possess a superior reality to man in the world of Platonic universals. Man’s reality in comparison could be relatively unreal, like the shifting shadows on the wall of Plato’s cave.

        Once we concede that the Devil is a Real Entity — real in every sense of the word — we should have no further difficulty accepting the existence of demons: of demonic entities (= jinn/djinn (pl.) in Islam). These entities can enter the human psyche and take possession of it. The role of exorcists is to expel these demons. Christ, among other things, was an accomplished exorcist.

        Naturally the Freudian psychoanalysts scoff at all this “antiquated unscientific claptrap.” They prefer to cure patients their own “scientific” way — even though Freud has now been totally discredited and psychoanalysis shown to be UNscientific. (See Hans Eysenck’s The Rise and Fall of the Freudian Empire).

        The simple fact of the matter is that Freud could not have done what Christ did. Freud’s “talking cure” just generates more talking, i.e., hot air. And often makes things worse for the patient. Those who go to psychotherapists often just need someone to talk to; they are paying for attention. Having one’s own shrink is seen, especially in Jewish circles, as a status symbol — like having your own personal fitness trainer. An amusing anecdote from the life of Freud will illustrate this.

        Freud once complained that he was in need of a long holiday but just couldn’t afford to take an extended leave of absence. When asked why, he replied wittily: “Because when I get back from my holiday my patients will all probably be cured!”

        An amazing revelation: therapy ensured that the patients kept their problems and continued to be a lucrative source of income.

      8. “This man felt he had been possessed all along by demonic entities of some kind — entities that had somehow snaked their way into his psyche and INFECTED him with a spiritual VIRUS. The expulsion of the virus cured the infection.”

        Note the reference to a disease, one obviously inbred by his immersion in a culture heavily infected by pornography and sexual promiscuity. Not also the absence of priests and Jesus in this man’s “exorcism” that drove his demons out.

        “Based on my research of the topic of driving devils from a person, it does not matter whether the person possessed of a devil even speaks the same language or has the same culture. The person being relieved of the devil has no say in the matter at all since they are under the influence of the possessing devil.”

        Such is the claim by advocates and believers in traditional christian exorcism.

        “The person possessed does not need to grant their permission to be treated since that permission is never given by the occupying devil(s). All it takes for a person to drive a devil from someone is to tell it to leave using the name of Jesus. If the belief of the person commanding the devil to leave is adequate in their command, just a mustard seed worth, the devil has no choice but to leave the possessed person. There is no magic involved, no praying, no chanting, no standing on the head while gargling peanut butter, etc., just command it and believe it.”

        Belief is the primary cultural condition previously mentioned that allows exorcism to work its magic. As I pointed out, if the possessed individual has no knowledge of the existence of Jesus, then it is unlikely, but not impossible, they will respond to an exorcism in his name.

        Obviously pagan, tribal, witch doctors in primitive regions do not drive demons from the possessed in the name of Jesus. American Indian Shamans performed exorcisms centuries before the white man brought the knowledge of Jesus to their shores. Therefore it is not any specific persona that is important, but the cultural conditioning in the knowledge and belief, by both the exorcist and the possessed, that such a power exists which makes exorcism possible. Obviously all cultures throughout history have witnessed demonic possession. Is this a mystical possession by an external evil entity or an internal spirtiual/mental condition inherent in mans nature?

        Exorcism is however secondary to the condition of possession. How does a person become possessed? Why is it the average individual will probably never meet a demonically possessed individual requiring exorcism? How do these demons make a choice in whom they will possess in the first place? If demons are so powerful in their ability to possess the unsuspecting, then why are so few possessed by them? Or is their power so weak, an individual’s psychic constitution must prove weaker than the demon?

        As I pointed out in the case of the Gadarene swine the man’s possession was due to his inability to reconcile his personal convictions with his cultural upbringing. To his mind his religion was evil and corrupt beyond measure yet his strong cultural conditioning (and this was before TV) conflicted with this view to the point it drove him insane, the typical condition imbued by demonic possession. This is clearly evident by the clues provided in the story.

        We know that the possessed man is a Jew by the fact that (1) He revels in those things considered most unclean by the Temple, i.e. “tombs” and “swine” and (2) Jesus takes pains to address his condition when he initially refused to do so in the case of the Canaanite woman. In that story, Jesus makes the statement, “I have come only for the lost sheep of Israel” a clear reference to Jewish Temple followers. From this it can be deduced the man’s possession stems from those “demons” produced by the Temple’s cultural conditioning. Jesus is a known member of the kohanim, his reputation preceding his arrival in Gadera.

        As the Mikdash kohanim drove the man to living in tombs among swine in the first place, the arrival of yet another kohein would naturally drive him into fit of rage. However, when this new kohein says he has come to lift the heavy burdens imposed by the Temple and its sins from the man in the form of driving these demons from him, the possessed man’s attitude changes immediately. After all, who but one with the authority of a kohein could remove his demons? And how does Jesus exorcise the man of his demons? By driving his unclean nature induced by Temple demons into unclean swine. This was a physical example of Jesus’ fundamental message about the Temple, just as the temptations by a “Satanic” priest on top of the Temple relate to the Temple’s utter spirtiual corruption and debasement.

        The real question concerning possession should be: “Is Hillary Clinton demonically possessed by evil spirits or is she just another bat-shit crazy psychopath?” Is it possible a priest could turn this woman into a viable presidential candidate simply by driving the demons from her? Or did some other priest of even higher position make her an offer from the top of the Federal Reserve building she just couldn’t refuse?

      9. @ Lasha

        Thanks for the reply. Yes, I should have listed Lobro in my initial posting.

        Your brief expose on psychoanalysis is something everyone should know and guard against as well as the drugs they push to go along with the deception of helping a person.

        @ Arch Stanton

        We have different perspectives concerning casting out devils which is fine. Without different perspectives, there is no discussion from which others can determine what they want to believe.

        “American Indian Shamans performed exorcisms centuries before the white man brought the knowledge of Jesus to their shores.”

        According to American Indian legend, Jesus came to American long before Europeans arrived. It is in The Book of Mormon and it was written down in a book, “He Walked The Americas” by L. Taylor Hansen with excepts from the book here: http://www.nativeamericanprophecy.com/he-walked-the-americas/index.htm
        “America Before Columbus” addresses Jesus being in the Americas as well as this link: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=239
        American Indian legends and the Book of Mormon are the only original places where Jesus was referred to as white.

        As for being possessed by a devil, some people believe that everyone is possessed which I strongly doubt for many reasons. Some believe that devils just pick someone out and that there is no defense from them which I also doubt. The original Lords Prayer says for the Heavenly Father to protect us from the evil one, not from evil, which a certain defense against the devil and his devils. I suspect that a person has to be evil in some way to become infested with a devil. It’s an invitation.

        How do you tell if someone is possessed by a devil? Those that I have spoken to about this simply say that you just know, similar to knowing when someone should be raised from the dead. I have not personally encountered a just knowing moment yet.

        “Jesus makes the statement, “I have come only for the lost sheep of Israel” a clear reference to Jewish Temple followers.”

        The quote is Matthew 15:26 – “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” This can be interpreted two ways which are 180 degrees apart.

        Taken out of context, either wrote above could be misinterpreted, but taken in context, it is obvious the Jesus came for Israelites and gentiles or Jesus would not have healed the Canaanite woman’s child.

        Matthew 15:22-28 – And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs. And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table. Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.

        Additionally and contrary to common teachings, Jesus started his ministry with Israelites and gentiles on the west coast of the Sea of Gallilee both healing and teaching.

        I really do not like quoting scripture since it makes a post rather long, but experience has taught me that most people do not bother to go and read it.

  14. be all that as it may – abuse of children is one big factor in any reptilian power structure type of society. judge any country by how bad is its infant mortality rate. is circumcision routine? how about the autism rate from vaccine injury? and of course there will always be cases where children are sexualized and then ritually murdered, as with poor little jonbenet, while the perpetrators will never be prosecuted; because pedophiles occupy the high positions in the courts, police and political office. where there should be an office that never lets these cases rest, jonbenets’ and hundreds of other cases of missing and murdered children will gradually slip quietly into the past, forgotten.

    1. Uncle :

      I trust you’re NOT going to CENSOR my “Good Samaritan” post. Though you probably think I’m very naive for being so trusting. Do I trust in vain? Or, will Trust Triumph in the end? Yes! Yes I say Trust Will Triumph! 🙂

      1. On ‘The Good Samaritan’:

        The Most Holy Sacrament of Extreme Unction :

        ~ He bound up his wounds pouring in oil and wine ~

        It’s very sychronistic the subject of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and casting out demons would come up today, for today is the Twelfth Sunday after Pentecost, and the reading today is from Luke: 10 , the Good Samatarian.

        ~ But yet rejoice not in this, that spirits are subject unto you ; but rejoice in this, that your names are written in heaven ~

        The story of the Good Samaritan is not about the “Social Gospel”, is not about curing the poilitcal ills of the world, is not about Leftism/Communim or any political, economic, social, “ism”. The story is about Our Lord and Savior’s Ministry to save us from Sin and win Eternal Salvation for our souls. It’s about “Realized Eschatology”, as opposed to “Proleptic” eschatology. It’s about the Four Last Things for us as individuals, Death, Judgment, Heaven and Hell. NOT about the Parousia which is a public matter. It’s a story that has to do with private matters between an individual and God. About the kind of relationship we have with God. It’s not a story about what we should do to solve the social injustices in the world. Christ came to save Our Souls, not to promote any kind of politcal-economic “ism”. The story about the Good Samaritan is NOT about curing the social ills of the world, it’s about Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ binding our wounds and releasing us from the Bonds of Our Sins. The story of the Good Samaritan is about the Most Holy Sacrament of Extreme Unction, basically. This, all the above in this post, Extreme Unction, was always in the Early Church and up to the Protestant Reformation the true and real meaning of The Good Samaritan in the Gospel. The story of the Good Samaritan got distorted after the Protestant Reformation.

        http://www.drbo.org/chapter/49010.htm

  15. Not very nice at all….if the backward goyim,would take the time to read the vile,talmud..it would blow their tiny minds…..never forget…only jews can be victims and the NSA,CIA,FBI,mossad,GCHQ,MI5,MI6 will protect the VIP perverts.

    1. Thank you for the video, Rich, I really appreciate it. Yes, I did find the sermon interesting and I learned some things I didn’t know before about the story of The Good Samaritan.

  16. Paedophilia is a form of child-sacrifice to Baal. Many of the children are also murdered. The Judahites were a disobedient lot of people by repeatedly disobeying The Commands of God. The Judahites under Solomon incorporated sorcery into their lives, making those Judahites evil, but not The Torah. In Mosaic/Torah Law, paedophiles would be executed.

    Mosaic Law having been abandoned and the system as corrupted as it has become can only be restored at this present time by Christ Jesus. Entwined with evil jews and counterfeit-jews, Mosaic Law is wrongly considered evil (Talmudic) and not the solution, but it most certainly is the solution as a ‘New Song’.

    Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for Light, and Light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
    5:21 Woe unto [them that are] wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!
    5:22 Woe unto [them that are] mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink:
    5:23 Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him!

    http://JAHTruth.net/nsongad.htm

  17. Youngest mother on record.

    Virgin birth???

    Into the hospital at Pisco (Peru) came a tired, ragged Indian woman from the foothills of the Andes. She led by the hand a shy little girl, scarcely three feet tall, with chestnut braids and an enormously bulging abdomen. Pointing to the frightened child, the Indian woman begged Surgeon Geraldo Lozada to exorcise the evil spirits which had taken possession of her. Certain that little Lina Medina had an abdominal tumor, Dr. Lozada examined her, and received the surprise of his life when he discovered she was eight months pregnant, making her the world’s youngest mother ever.

    There was never evidence that Lina Medina’s pregnancy occurred in any but the usual way, but she never revealed the father of the child, nor the circumstances of her impregnation.

    Her pic:
    http://www.oddee.com/item_90966.aspx

  18. The fashion industry has been pushing this crap longer than Dr. Pierce seems to have been aware. Find a (((Sears))) catalogue from the early 70s, and in it you will find children’s (girl’s) fashions being identical to mom’s. In the late 70s, I criticized a friend who was dressing her 8 year old daughter in the same style as herself, and had begun to “allow” her daughter to wear make-up. The daughter was troubled by being sexually active by age 12 (perhaps earlier) and living on her own by age 16 as a full blown trollop.

  19. I really hope LD et al would stop promoting the Catholic church. The Catholic church is known for its paedophilia problem. Not one mention thus far, of the Catholic connection.

      1. COMMENT DELETED

        Personal attacks on your hosts and their religion are the height of bad manners.

        If you don’t know how to behave properly, don’t bother to post here again.

        — Admin Toby

      2. admin,

        i think pat’s comment was equally impolite. these people lack the intelligence and good manners to know that free speech does not mean you can go onto a site and tell the host and hostess how much you despise them and their religion.

        why don’t you put these grossly offensive boors on permanent monitoring?

        or just ban them if they continue to abuse the hospitality of your site.

      3. i hate such intolerant and insensitive louts. what has lasha done to deserve these foul personal attacks on her by the likes of pat and new song?

        why the f**k can’t they just leave her alone and comment on the article?

        f***ing sadistic bullies.

      4. I’m sure no offense was intended. Though it’s obviously a bit tactless and insensitive to pour a bucket of shit over someone else’s deepest religious beliefs.

      5. To be clear….

        My comment was a political statement not a religious one… directed at the sovereign STATE and GOVERNMENT and leaders of the Vatican.

        It was not intended to be directed to anyone connected with this site.

        Lasha knows it was not directed at her. That would never happen.

        The Vatican should be offended on many levels for things to be righted.

        I belong to no religion.

      6. I don’t know what all the fuss is about since Lasha can hardly be described as a “Catholic” in any true sense of the word. She has already stated more than once that she would be regarded as an outcast and pariah in a Catholic church because of her enthusiastic endorsement of the great Oriental religions. However, I suspect there are other people on this site who are sensitive to attacks on Christianity, so maybe it’s best not to offend these good people needlessly. If you’re a meat eater, do you go around insulting vegetarians? I should hope not! 🙂

      7. @ Pat

        I was not offended by anything you said. Please understand that you have my full support at all times. Pay no attention to the idiots who attack you. They are probably jealous of your superior talents.

        @ New Song

        Ditto for you, dear New Song. I didn’t have time to read your comment because it was deleted before I could read it. But rest assured I wouldn’t have been offended by anything you’d said. I enjoy reading your comments and think they are brilliant. So thank you for giving us the benefit of your wisdom. I blame my Uncle Toby for his excessive over-protectiveness.

      8. Pat can be a bit testy at times, but Pat’s not at all malicious.
        He’s too reasonable for that nonsense. His comment was also reasonable.
        Hardly more than an aside, these days..

    1. Dr. Parker is correct; no offense was intended, but my comment does not fit Dr. Parker’s description. It was deleted because it was perceived as a personal attack to the hosts and their religion. What hurt the feelings of a few, might have been helpful to other readers.

      Pat’s reply was sarcastic? Mine was not. LD stated that ‘therapy’ helped the paedophile who (later?) felt he had been possessed by demons; then, LD stated the Catholic church has exorcists working for it. Was she implying that perhaps their exorcists could help the paedophiles? It appears to be the case. Based on what she inferred, I replied accordingly.

      1. @ New Song

        Pat’s reply was sarcastic(?) Mine was not. LD stated that ‘therapy’ helped the paedophile who (later?) felt he had been possessed by demons; then, LD stated the Catholic church has exorcists working for it. Was she implying that perhaps their exorcists could help the paedophiles? It appears to be the case. Based on what she inferred, I replied accordingly.

        Toby had every right to delete your insulting comment. Nowhere in the article is there ANY reference to exorcism. Also, nowhere in the LD comment you object to did LD suggest that the pedophile who felt he was possessed with demonic entities might benefit from the services of a Catholic exorcist. YOU inferred that wrongly, mistakenly, erroneously!

        You put 2 plus 2 together and came up with 5!

        You write: “Was she [LD] implying that perhaps their exorcists could help the paedophiles? It appears to be the case.”

        False! She made NO REFERENCE either in her article or in her comment to exorcists helping pedophiles. Not once.

        “Based on what she inferred,” you add, “I replied accordingly.”

        But she inferred no such thing. YOU inferred! I challenge you to find ANY reference in the relevant comment where LD says this pedophile might benefit from the services of an exorcist:

        LD’s COMMENT :

        I have come across a case of a pedophile (who had actually been to prison for child molestation) who was completely cured after undergoing hypnotherapy and also practicing intensive meditation which involved elements of autosuggestion and visualization. This man genuinely reached a stage when he experienced amazement at the mere idea that he had ever hankered sexually for children. The desire for children had evaporated overnight, so to speak, dispersing like a dark mist from the mind.

        This was either a cure or a remission — as often happens with cancer.

        This man felt he had been possessed all along by demonic entities of some kind — entities that had somehow snaked their way into his psyche and INFECTED him with a spiritual VIRUS. The expulsion of the virus cured the infection.

        Some viruses persist for years and often perish on their own accord; others are driven out. I do believe strongly that many forms of “evil” are the result of spiritual viruses. This cannot be proved scientifically of course, but neither can exorcism nor the existence of God.

        As Hamlet said to Horatio, “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

        Sorry, New Song, but there’s nothing wrong with that comment. Nowhere is LD suggesting here or elsewhere that this pedophile might be cured if he called in a Catholic exorcist. You are making that up, New Song. You are guilty of a spiteful and malicious invention.

      2. @ Admin Toby

        Well done, Toby!

        You had every right to delete the malicious lies of this pseudo-Christian sourpuss.

      3. Sardonicus,

        I think New Song could be losing her marbles. Most of her posts are off-topic. She hardly knows what she’s supposed to be talking about. All she does is regurgitate irrelevant Biblical quotes. She’s the original religious maniac. I don’t think NS is malicious or spiteful as you claim. Her only reason for posting on this site is to advertise her own site, which she does every time she posts a comment.

      4. @ Admin Toby

        Will you please delete my two comments above about New Song. I regret getting involved in this sordid affair. It’s just that I hate seeing Lasha constantly misrepresented and dissed by these venomous females.

      5. @ Sardonicus

        I will let your comments stand because they express a valid viewpoint. At no time did Lasha Darkmoon either state directly or suggest indirectly that exorcism might be a good way to cure pedophilia. I repeat: she never said this. This was a mischievous suggestion made by the poster known as ‘New Song’.

        All Lasha did was make two unrelated comments, both of which are reasonable comments in every way:

        1. She said that Christ had exorcised demons and she believed those demons were “real” demons, not metaphorical or symbolic ones. She added that the Catholic Church had at least 300 professionally train exorcists working for it.

        2. She said that a pedophile she personally knew about — who had experienced a complete cure or remission of his pedophilia after years of intensive psychotherapy involving hypnotherapy, autosuggestion and visualization — had expressed the view that he must have been “possessed by demons” and was relieved that he was finally rid of them.

        At no time, however, did Lasha suggest that all pedophiles were “demonically possessed” and that that exorcism might be a good way of treating them.

    1. Hey Joe, where you going with that tongue in your hand?
      Are you goin’ down to shoot some nice lady?
      For messing around, messing around with another mantra?
      (that ain’t cool)

  20. Lasha would be a pariah in a PRE-VATICAN-TWO PRE-NOVUS-ORDO traditional Catholic Church, this is true, BUT Lasha would be very warmly welcomed and totally accepted and Lasha would feel right at home with the Novus Ordo church, with a New Age jesuit pope on the order of the Hindu “catholic” “intellectual-theologian-ascended-guru” , the New Age New World Order Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin. The Novus Ordo church now is pretty much ALL about Teilhard de Chardin and Hinduism [ and Buddhism also, with a dash of Lutheranism, but not hard core lutheranism, just enough lutheranism to eliminate The traditional Mass of the Ages, eliminate the Holy Sacrifice of The Mass, [ luther’s dream] , so Lasha would like the lutheran influence in the NWO church also, Oh yeah, the NWO church also LERVS ChrISLAM and Lasha is always telling us to respect the Muslims and respect Islam, so, really, the NWO church has EVERYTHING LASHA LERVS ] , so I’m sure Lasha would fit in perfectly fine. Though she may feel out of place in a Novus Ordo church as none of the Novus Ordo women wear veils in their NWO Novus Ordo churches and I know how much Lasha LERVS her veils , so in that sense, but ONLY in that sense, would Lasha be a bit out of place.

    1. LOL, Joe.

      I think that dash of Lutheranism you talk about in the Novus Ordo Church is Cheap Grace. The idea that Luther put forward that snow falls on shit and changes nature. Aquinas states that nature is perfected by Grace.

      No need for the Sacraments in an Age of “Amazing” Grace, right?

      1. Protestantism is the intermediate link that brought us the Age of “Amazing” Will And Grace.

        Last time I checked, Hollywood wasn’t in Malta or Poland or Croatia or Portugal, places where Lutheran thought never put down root.
        Even the uncouth migrants know that.

  21. Let me see if I understand this.

    Penetrative sex with children is bad, but “oral” sex or “masturbation” with them is all right? Isn’t oral sex “penetrative” too? So if he sticks his dick in their pussy or anus that’s a no-no, but if he fingers their pussy or sticks his dick in their mouth, that’s perfectly all right? Is that what he is saying?

    And he pretends he’s a good guy because he doesn’t really “do” these things, see? He really seems quite proud of himself. He seems to think we should admire him.

    I think he needs a good dose of tar and feathers. I don’t believe he wouldn’t do these things. I just think he wouldn’t admit it. “Let him who is without a machine gun among you use the first flame-thrower”.

    Also, I raised 3 girls from infancy to adulthood and I never noticed any of the stuff he claims to have noticed all the time. I think he’s grooming them. Pure and simple. Don’t let him anywhere near your children. I think he’s having us on. Psychopaths love this kind of psychological mind-game. It’s a psychological strip-tease act.

    1. Carlos,

      “Penetrative sex with children is bad, but “oral” sex or “masturbation” with them is all right? Isn’t oral sex “penetrative” too? So if he sticks his dick in their pussy or anus that’s a no-no, but if he fingers their pussy or sticks his dick in their mouth, that’s perfectly all right? Is that what he is saying?”

      Any insertion, into any orifice, within the human body, without the consent of the individual being penetrated, is classified as rape (physical assault). You are perfectly correct. If I grabbed a woman and pushed my finger into her mouth, that is, under the law, rape.

      1. You are perfectly correct. “Any penetration” is, I believe, the words used in the statute books. Ironically, if you kill her first, it’s not rape. Sexual intercourse with a dead body is a crime, but it is not the crime of rape. It is an “element” of the crime of rape that the victim must be alive. She can be unconscious, but she must be alive. So take a lawyer along on your next murder spree.

  22. Every religion contains this sentimental truth, in a form appropriate for every person.
    The catalyst of inclusion is universal. One MUST ‘bend a knee’ and mean it.
    Sincerity is the only requirement.

    Shri Adi Shankaracharya said it lucidly, sincerely, perfectly. As did Jesus. As did Krishna.
    “Worship Govinda, Worship Govinda, Worship Govinda. Oh fool! Rules of Grammar will not save you at the time of your death.”

    3.20.27

    1. It will be very interesting and lots of Fun too, 😉 , to hear what Grammar Fiend has to say to the words of Shankaracharya and HP. Personally, I always liked Grammar Fiend, and as far as I know, he never said anything about grammar usage that was incorrect. Good grammar is very important, actually. It focuses your mind and makes you more articulate, it’s easier to sort out your thoughts if you know the rules of grammar. So good grammar leads to more articulate, more lucid, praying, for praying of course is a form of Communication. In the case of prayer, Communicating with God. Grammar may not save you at the time of your death, but good grammar will make you better understood by those around you and make your life here on earth a little bit easier, smoother. God would prefer we all know and use good grammar because God is ALL about clear lucid Communication.

      1. Thanks, Joe. I just can’t agree more! I tried, but I just can’t.
        Now if precision grammar might honestly and sincerely compel a person to bend that knee, I’d surely be rootin’ for it, big time!, but since it doesn’t, I just can’t do it.
        Shucks Joe, how many words does a person need to pray?
        I suggest three words is plenty.
        Kinda hard to screw up three words, let alone misconscrew them.

  23. Whaddya bet this “Don” character ends up in prison inside of 10 years? He’s a smart ass. Ha, ha, look at me.

    Of course, the real problem is not what we choose to call it, but what it does to the victim.

  24. We’re getting off topic. One thing I’ve always noticed, though. At the time of the Marc Dutroux scandal in Belgium, there was a general panic with loads of expensive “public service announcements” on TV which seemed obviously designed to put ideas in people’s minds that were never there before.

    Of the millions of people who saw these announcements, there must have been thousands who thought, “Hey, if so many people are doing it, and it’s so easy to get away with it because children are so easily manipulated and they almost never report it, well, there must be a good reason they do it, so it must be pretty good sex in its way. Hmmmm…..”

    It’s like the old tale of Bre’r Rabbit and Bre’r Fox, where, the more Bre’r Rabbit says, “Please don’t throw me in the briar patch”, the more Bre’r Fox feels like doing exactly that, and in the end he does, which is exactly what Bre’r Rabbit wanted.

    It’s a difficult problem, because child victims won’t speak out unless people are aware that this happens but it in publicizing it, you’re just giving ideas to a certain number of people who probably never thought of it before and might never have.

    Amazingly, at the same time, I translated a whole load of junk about “abolishing discrimination against the mentally ill” — believe it or not! — and a whole big paper about child molesters which never even mentioned or considered the concept of punishment!

    It was as if punishment was something that only existed on another planet! Liberals want to “understand” everybody but they never want to punish anybody for doing wrong!

    Liberalism is a big cause of practically all problems.

    1. I’ve expressed myself very badly, but If you’d seen the dramatized TV announcements at the time, you couldn’t have escaped the impression that they were really intended to glamorize child molestation as something really new and almost fashionable and avant garde. They wasted a lot of money on them, but as I recall the problem only got worse, as far as anybody knows.
      Anyway just as there’s no survival without bravery, there’s no justice without punishment.

    2. Carlos,

      “Liberals want to “understand” everybody but they never want to punish anybody for doing wrong!”

      Quite correct. Their game is to punish anyone who dares to do good.

  25. Thank-you Lasha for your kindness and appreciation. I’ve posted the deleted comment on my website. It is not uncommon for me to post comments I make in duplicate places. If it applies, I simply copy and paste it from one location to another. Makes sense to me.

    A brief personal history is …… I’ve always been religious (not in an organized-religion). I was born that way and, so, perhaps it comes from a past-life. I am certain I walked with Jesus 2000 years ago (I could go into detail, but prefer not to). He is the whole of my life. It is rare that I would speak or think without Christ Jesus’ influence in some way or other.

    To admin Toby,

    Directly after LD’s comment about the paedophile aided by therapy, LD said –

    “I personally believe that Christ exorcised real demons, not imaginary ones. The pedophile demon is one such demon. Right now the Catholic Church has 300 trained exorcists working for it on a full-time basis.” – end of quote.

    “The pedophile demon is one such demon.” Followed by the Catholic church’s exorcists. You omitted that ‘connecting line’! By doing so, you are misrepresenting the whole truth in the argument you are presenting here for why you deleted my comment. Shame on you!

    All paedophiles ARE possessed. Why else would they do it?

    1. @ New Song

      For some reason your comment ended up in our spam folder. I am releasing it now. You are entitled to believe that all pedophiles are demonically possessed and post whatever you wish on your website, but you are not entitled to make false statements about Lasha Darkmoon. And if you continue to do so, you will be banned from this website for spreading malicious disinformation.

      Lasha has asked me to make it clear that at no time did she suggest that all pedophiles are demonically possessed. Nor did she ever state that exorcism would be a suitable way of curing pedophiles. This is something YOU inferred because you wanted to believe it.

    2. @ New Schlong

      “The pedophile demon is one such demon.” Followed by the Catholic church’s exorcists. You omitted that ‘connecting line’! By doing so, you are misrepresenting the whole truth in the argument you are presenting here for why you deleted my comment. Shame on you!”

      Listen, you insolent piece of shit, I am getting a bit sick of you and your inability to understand that Lasha Darkmoon at no time said the silly things you attributed to her! You made it all up! I am also getting a bit pissed off hearing all your sanctimonious twaddle about how devout a Christian you are:

      “I am certain I walked with Jesus 2000 years ago (I could go into detail, but prefer not to).”

      Ever heard of HUMILITY? The greatest Christian virtue, huh? You haven’t got much humility, have you?

      You also have very little intelligence if you think you can post malicious comments on someone else’s website, misrepresenting the comments of your hostess, and then abuse the monitor to his face by telling him “Shame on you!”

      What does he have to be ashamed of, huh? He just posted your fucking comment, didn’t he, with the line you say he left out. So what’s your fucking problem exactly?

  26. Thank-you Lasha.

    Unbeknownst to you (Toby), you were influenced by satan to delete my comment. That argument you presented for deleting my comment does not hold because you have some who comment about Lasha with extreme disregard and rudeness and that Toby is wrong to allow their comments to be posted; yet, in the same breath, you act like ‘the protector’. I, merely, commented in regards to her point of view. Lasha seems like a nice person.

    And I’d like to add that madame butterfly is letting a demon use her to speak. The devil wanted my comment deleted because it upset him so, and now he is having his tizzy fit!

    1. Maybe you’re right, New Song. I wouldn’t be surprised if quite a few people posting on this site are occasionally under demonic influence. This certainly wouldn’t exclude myself, since I make no pretentions to superior virtue.

      As for Madame Butterfly, you most make allowances for her. Many of her posts are written under the influence of alcohol, not Satan. I believe she is chilling out an expensive clinic in London which you may have heard of. It’s called the Priory. Quite a few celebs, including Kate Moss, go there with obsessive-compulsive problems and for addiction therapy. MB claims to be a contemporary of Kate Moss and to have enjoyed many conversations with her at the Priory.

      Instead of railing at us poor Demoniacs, New Song, why don’t you say a prayer for us? That would be a nice Christian thing to do. 🙂

      1. If you have the time, repost the comment I deleted and I will let it pass through this time. As a reformed Demoniac, it’s the least I can do. Cheers! (Toby)

  27. Let’s assume there are demons out there, at least some guided by sentient will.
    Arguing whether or not they exist is futile because their existence can no less be disproved than proved by scientific methods (measurability/replicability thing).
    Thus the assumption is just for fun if you will, a gedanken experiment.
    The malicious mind that guides them is likely to be a logical one and will search for victims whose possession will bring the biggest payoff, however, the battle for possession will be more costly, protracted and risky if the intended prey is strong and smart, so it is a case of optimization – the most frequent possessed are also the weakest and worthless, the same ones likely to end up in cults.

    And when one thinks about it a bit, this is precisely how Judaism preys on the goyim, most of the shabbos are weak and worthless, the strong and independent ones are not worth the effort, probably the best catches are made through the masonic lodges.
    I think that the likes of Bill Clinton and Barak Obama were the prime trophies, Angela Merkel even better if she is for real (not 100% convinced).
    Tony Blair is completely in their clutches, not as skillful a player as Bill+Barak.

    1. Ariadnatheo, having studied the mess of the British isles and pedophilia in sickening and satanic depths over the years, that headline is, alas, almost guaranteed to be sickeningly true. Satanism and sexual abuse are terribly ingrained into that society and to different degrees in certain areas, but has been given a pass for decades by the very compromised media. The Jimmy Saville situation barely touches the surface. Most Brits prefer to pretend it just does not go on; victims often ending up being further victimized and marginalized.

      1. The Cult of Zen Gardner: A Monster in Disguise

        “Despite his personable appearance, this wordsmith has left devastation wherever he has been. Several well respected alternative community champions, dropped him because they felt that “something was not right”, while others, including some very well known and celebrities on their own merit haven’t yet got close enough to him to witness the dark side of Zen because it’s masked with a joyous good guy facade. The truth is much darker, as I will reveal.”

        http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/?p=13298

      2. @ Pat

        Yeah, I guess it looks bad for Zen. But here is his answer:

        http://www.zengardner.com/my-missing-years/

        The sinner repents, Pat . . . He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone.”

        Reading Zen’s article, I don’t see any admission that he was himself involved in any dodgy activities. He admits to shutting his eyes to the activities of other cultists and being caught up “in the net of the fowler.” What he is actually accused of doing is not clear. It’s all a bit murky.

      3. The article you link to from Philosopher’s Stone seems to have been written by one of Zen’s enemies. The guy who wrote it sounds like a witness for the prosecution.

        However, you could be right. I know nothing about Zen, having never met him. All I know is that he writes these mystical and transcendental type articles. He’s also a featured columnist on Rense. It would be interesting to know if Jeff Rense will decide to dump him after these revelations.

  28. Thank-you Toby. This world is upside down and inside out. Planet Earth is a lunatic asylum for the criminally insane. If realizing THAT does not bring one to their knees, then they really are on the higher end of insanity. We are all insane, except for Christ.

    http://www.thewayhomeorfacethefire.net

    Today someone struck up a conversation with me about Trump being a racist. Racism is man-made. God specifically said people were to stay with their own kind/race. The Tribes of Biblical Israel were commanded to marry within their Tribe, otherwise there were penalties (i.e. loss of inheritance; and rightly so). Doing that is not being a racist. Negative behaviour associated with racism is another story, but wanting to live with the race the same as one’s own (more specifically, a similar culture) is absolutely warranted.

    Christ Jesus simplified the matter and said regardless of race, be ye perfect as My Father in heaven is perfect. Even the devil is no excuse for poor behaviour towards one another. One must suffer the penalty for untoward behaviour towards another; that is God’s Law.

    Alcohol in excess is a medium for demonic behaviour and madame butterfly needs help! I would ask that you not give her a voice when she behaves badly. It is not good for any one to be allowed to publicly act out in an offensive manner; to be given such privileges. Public speaking is a privilege because of its ability to influence and affect people’s lives.

    The Devil hates The Law of God! He writhes in pain at Its righteousness and Its Justice because he is a liar and he wants evil to thrive like some cancer (abnormally grotesque).

    What an odd reversal of logic to have the hope for the paedophile (a victim of possession) with the possibility of being returned to normalcy by the exorcists working for the Catholic church. I have never heard anything more incredulous.

    I used to be like some, fighting for the ‘underdog’ (but never a paedophile), out of a false sense of compassion. I then realized, that type of compassion was not what Jesus taught his followers. It is one of the false teachings from the Catholic church meant to appear kind, loving, just; but, in reality it is the opposite (and exactly what Lucifer is to Truth).

    The Catholic church is Lucifer on tap. It is one of the most corrupt and vile organizations.

    There are numerous testimonies of survivors of Vatican abuse that should be considered.

    The real therapy would be for the child to take part in the paedophile’s execution, so that they the child might return to some sense of normalcy and resolution (IF that is possible).

    Deut. 17:10 And thou shalt do according to The Sentence, which they of that place which the “I AM” shall choose shall show thee; and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee:

    17:11 According to The Sentence of The Law which they shall teach thee, and according to the Judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do: thou shalt not decline to do The Sentence which they shall show thee, and turn not away from it [to] the right hand, nor [to] the left.

    17:12 And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the “I AM” thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and [thus] thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.

    Priests and judges have since been replaced by Christ as the one and only High Priest and Judge. There is only one Judge (directly under God). That Judge is the Eldest Son of God.

    Revelation 17:4 And the woman was arrayed in PURPLE (bishops) and SCARLET (cardinals) colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:

    17:5 And upon her forehead [was] a name written, MYSTERY (2 Thess. 2:7), BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS (her daughters) AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

    17:6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of her saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.

    17:7 And the angel said unto me, Why didst thou marvel? (Stop it!) I will tell thee the MYSTERY of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.

    17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the Bottomless Pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were NOT written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

    17:9 And here [is] the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth (Rome).

    http://JAHTruth.net/robab.htm

    1. Well said, New Song! I’m glad to see you back in the saddle. Be ye therefore perfect . . . good advice! But who ever took it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *