The word ‘anti-Semitism’ used as a weapon against the gentiles

By Lobro

bpwilliamsonI received the material quoted below in a recent email. It is written by the renegade bishop of the Society of St Pius X,  Bishop Williamson (pictured), rejecting the Novus Ordo doctrine. 

Richard the Lionheart Williamson names the J-culprit square on, fearlessly. I might as well quote the letter in its entirety, since it is timely and definitely not off-topic:

“Anti-Semitism” Trickery

Is the word “antisemite” wielded like a sword? Just ask the wielder to define the word.

There are treacherous words which seem to mean one thing and are used to mean quite another. One of the most treacherous words of all is “anti-semitism.” The word seems to mean opposition to all Jews purely and simply because they are Jews, and in this sense it rightly condemns something bad, because some Jews are wicked, but certainly not all. On the other hand it is often used to condemn absolutely any opposition to anything that any Jews do, and then the word is wrongly condemning something good, because whenever Jews do anything bad then opposition to them is good.

But do Jews do things bad? Obviously. They created Islam for Arabs, Freemasonry for Gentiles and Communism for the modern world, all three primarily to fight Jesus Christ and Christianity, and so send souls to Hell.

A book which all Catholics should read who wish to defend the Church against Islam, Freemasonry and Communism, now better known as “Globalism”, is The Plot Against the Church by Maurice Pinay. The book was written just before Vatican II to be put into the hands of all Council Fathers, to warn them of the great danger in which the Church would find herself at the Council.

Sure enough, the Council Fathers ended up praising Islam (Unitatis Redintegratio), adopting Freemasonic principles (Dignitatis Humanae) and never mentioning, still less condemning, the evil system of Communism. Here is how in his Chapter on “Antisemitism and Christianity” Maurice Pinay analyses the treachery of the word “antisemitism”:

Down the ages the Jews have always used vague words with a variety of meanings, writes Pinay, to snare Gentile minds and so prevent them from defending themselves against the Jewish drive towards world domination in that 2000-year war on Christianity which he carefully documents throughout his book.

So in a first stage, by three arguments they seek to prevail upon Gentile leaders to condemn “antisemitism” in its first sense, given above, of opposition to everything and everybody Jewish: firstly, Christ, by establishing the equality of all men before God, condemned any such degrading of a whole race; secondly, Christ told all men to “love one another”; thirdly, Christ and his Mother were both Jewish.

But in a second stage the Jews, having once obtained the Gentiles’ condemnation of a vague “antisemitism,” then proceed to give the word a quite different meaning, the second sense above, of any and all opposition to anything whatsoever that Jews do.

Thus “antisemites” become:

— all patriots exerting their right of self-defence against Jewish subversion of their country; 

— all defenders of the family against the errors and vices of all sorts fomented by the Jews to dissolve it (e.g. abortion, pornography); 

— all Catholics defending their holy religion against every form of corruption being openly or secretly promoted by the Jews to undermine it; 

— all truth-tellers unmasking Jews as the originators of Freemasonry and Communism (now of Globalism and feminism, etc.); 

— and all people in general opposing Jewish subversion of the Church and of Christian civilisation.

By their control of politics, finance, films and above all by their media, the Jews have succeeded in giving such an electric charge to this one little word “anti-semite,” that it is enough to electrocute anyone that it touches.

But who is foolish enough to have allowed them to control politics and finance?

Who has allowed them to virtually monopolise the film industry and the media?

Who thinks it is so smart to have done away with all censorship and is now co-operating with them to enable them to censor the Internet?

The answer: Gentile liberals in every case, who are therefore being enslaved, by the minute, in their New World Order.

Doctor, cure thyself! — For who that reads their newspapers or watches their television programmes has anybody to blame but himself for letting them take over his mind and his civilisation?

Catholics, read The Plot against the Church.

If anybody is accusing you of being an “antisemite,” it is quite possible you have reason to be proud.

Kyrie eleison.

The good Bishop nails it.

With the exception of his brief comment on Islam, something I have trouble with, the points he makes are all valid.

No one has ever heard me dodging the supposedly defamatory adjective of  “anti-semite”: because I wear that epithet with pride. Truly, there should be an “Antisemite Pride Day”.

Celebrated worldwide.

The revulsion that dare not speak its name!

— Lobro

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

27 thoughts on “The word ‘anti-Semitism’ used as a weapon against the gentiles

  1. Islam is the PRIMARY FORCE against Judaism and Jewry. Christianity is all cucked out save a few Eastern Orthodox Christians. I see Christians – primarily Western White Christians (but to a lesser extent non-White Christians as well) as an extension of Jewish power.


    Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian – Researcher – Scholar.
    From “Common Sense”, p. 2-1-53 and 5-1-59

    “Christians have been duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon.”

    “This ‘big lie’ technique is brainwashing United States Christians into believing that Jesus Christ was “King of the Jews”, in the sense that so-called ‘Jews’ today call themselves ‘Jews’. This reference was first made in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the so-called Jews highjacked the word ‘Jew’ in the 18th century A.D. to palm themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus Christ. This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with the so-called ‘Jews’ of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction based on fable.”

    “American Christians little suspect they are being brainwashed twenty-four hours of every day over television and radio, by newspapers and magazines, by motion pictures and plays, by books, by political leaders in office and seeking office, by religious leaders in their pulpits and outside their churches, by leaders in the field of education inside and outside their curricular activities, and by all leaders in business, professions and finance, whose economic security demands that they curry the favor of so-called “Jews” of historic Khazar ancestry. Unsuspecting Christians are subjected to this barrage from sources they have little reason to suspect. Incontestable facts supply the unchallengeable proof of the historic accuracy that so-called “Jews” throughout the world today of eastern European origin are unquestionably the historic descendants of the Khazars, a pagan Turko-Finn ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia, according to history, who battled their way in bloody wars about the 1st century B.C. into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar kingdom. For some mysterious reason the history of the Khazar kingdom is conspicuous by its absence from history courses in the schools and colleges.

    “The historic existence of the Khazar kingdom of so-called “Jews”, their rise and fall, the permanent disappearance of the Khazar kingdom as a nation from the map of Europe, and how King Bulan and the Khazar nation in about 740 A.D. became so-called “Jews” by conversion, were concealed from American Christians by censorship imposed by so-called “Jews”, of historic Khazar ancestry, upon all U.S.A. media of mass communications directed by them. Then in 1945 this author gave nation-wide publicity to his many years intensive research into the “facts of life” concerning Khazars. The disclosures were sensational and very effective but apparently angered so-called “Jews” who have continued to vent their spleen upon this author since then solely for that reason. Since 1946 they have conducted a vicious smear campaign against him, seeking thus to further conceal these facts, for obvious reasons. What have they to fear from the truth?

    “In an original 1903 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia in New York’s Public Library, and in the Library of Congress, Volume IV, pages 1 to 5 inclusive, appears a most comprehensive history of the Khazars. Also in the New York Public Library are 327 books by the world’s greatest historians and other sources of reference, in addition to the Jewish Encyclopedia, dealing with Khazar history, and written between the 3rd A.D. and 20th centuries by contemporaries of the Khazars and by modern historians on that subject.”

    Jesus was a ‘Judean’, not a Jew. (**He was by other accounts NOT Judean…but rather from Galilee. eg. quote below(

    During His lifetime, no persons were descrbed as “Jews” anywhere. That fact is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the “homeland” of the ancestors of those who today style themselves “Jews”. Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time in Asia, their “homeland”, and were known as Khazars. In none of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or referred to as a “Jew”. The term originated in the late eighteenth century as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of Judea without regard to race or religion, just as the term “Texan” signifies a person living in Texas.

    In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called “Jews”, they have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one record, prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as “Jew”. The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which self-styled “Jews” today refer to as “Jews”, were known as “Pharisees”. “Judaism” today and “Pharisaism” in the time of Jesus are the same.

    Jesus abhorred and denounced “Pharisaism”; hence the words, “Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers”.

    by Jason Collett

    Many denominational Christians and even church leaders are under the mistaken belief that Jesus was a Jew. But nothing could be further from the truth.

    Judea and Galilee were two separate states and political entities, as illustrated on the map of Palestine in the time of our Saviour in your Bible. Jesus Himself was not a Jew (Judean) or resident of Judea, He was a Galilean or resident of Galilee (Matthew 26:69; John 7:41), and a Judahite or descendent of the Tribe of Judah. The Judeans of prominence were not of the Tribe of Judah, but of Edomites. Pilate was being ironic when he wrote the sign “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Judeans” for the Cross (John 19:19). That is, “the Galilean who was King of the Judeans,” as in “Queen Victoria of England, Empress of India.” Jesus grew up in Nazareth in Galilee. His disciples were fishermen from the Sea of Galilee. And although He visited Jerusalem, he spent most of His life in his home country of Galilee. John 7:1, “After this Jesus stayed in Galilee; for He could not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him.” His followers were constrained “for fear of the Jews” (John 7:13, 19:38, 20:19).

    1. Jesus WAS A JEW, he had to be to address Temple followers. Think about it carefully. What do you know about present day Jewish “in-group” attitudes? Is it possible they were less beset by this type of “in group” thinking in first century Judea, a region dominated by Jews?

      Stories like that of “The Canaanite Woman” and “The Good Samaritan” highlight the exclusivity of first century Jews. In fact, Jesus clearly states in the Canaanite woman story, that he has come only for “the lost sheep of Israel”. Now why would a non-Jew make such a statement? Imagine the reaction were a non-Jew to even try entering a Tel Aviv synagogue, forget reading from their scrolls or stating how he has come to deliver the Jews of Israel from Knesset law.

      The reception Jesus received as a Jew among his own people is much the same as any messianic Jew might receive today. The difference is that there are no messianic Jews allowed to serve in the Knesset, a comparable position of authority Jesus would have held as a Temple priest.

      There were a number of first century Jews that attempted to claim the title of Messiah, yet the overwhelming majority of Temple followers ignored these claims. So what was the difference between these would-be Messiahs and Jesus? Jesus was an initiated member of the priesthood, the others were not. What is truly a wonder is that Jesus wielded enough priestly authority that people actually began listening to his words.

      There are eighty-eight references Jesus made to his being a “son of man,” a term that shouts the idea loud and clear “I AM A JEW, I AM ONE OF YOU!” This is founded on the Bible’s Mosaic principal that only Jews are truly “men” descended from Adam. Jews therefore consider themselves the Sons of Adam or “Adamic man”. In short, Jews consider themselves, and ONLY themselves to be the “Sons of Man.”

      Then there is the story of how the body of Jesus is interred in Joseph-of-Arimathea’s family sepulcher. (This also clearly points to the fact that this Joseph was Jesus’ true father). Anyone thinking a devout Jew, a member of the Sanhedrin no less, would allow a gentile to be interred in their family tomb, knows nothing about Jews, their history or their culture. Consider for a moment how you might feel were a total stranger buried in your family gave plot – a Jew no less.

      Jesus not only HAD to be a Jew, he had to be a temple priest before any Jew would have listened to his messages refuting sacrificial law. This is exactly the situation one would encounter today with the Catholic church; one has to be a pope, cardinal or bishop, before any Catholic will listen to their ideas about canonical law.

      This is why Bishop Williamson was skewered on the Jews pointy words about their hallowedhoax. In fact, the good Bishop did exactly what Jesus’ did when he spoke out against official Temple (church) dogma about the sacred hallowedhoax. Had the good Bishop merely been a member of the laity instead of serving in a position of authority, his words would have been dismissed and forgotten.

      I simply cannot understand why so many are so intent in their attempt to prove Jesus wasn’t a Jew, as doing so plays directly into the Jew’s big book of historical myths.

      1. im fairly simple so i try to keep things simple

        jews,/ot = hate, greed, murder, death, genocide, deceit, vengeance. the appetizers.
        jesus = love, forgiveness, life, mercy, equality, justice. starters.

        jesus came to save mankind from jewry/satan.

        if jesus was a jew, matzobama-the-bomber deserves his nobel.

        the ot is rubbish.

        some to the new is too much jew. the judaizers infiltrated. the new needs to be weeded.
        paul referred to ot as rubbish.
        and marcion tried to remove the jew from the new.

      2. I appreciate your perspective here Arch. Re. the way Jews see themselves as sons of Man and the rest of humanity as cattle: In the Zohar the Jew is brainwashed to interpret the Biblical scripture “Jehova Elohim made man” to mean He made Israel! (the Jews) “The seventeenth century Rabinnical treatise Emek ha Melek observes: ‘Our Rabbis of blessed memory have said: ‘Ye Jews are men because of the soul ye have from the Supreme Man (ie. God). But the nations of the world are not styled men because they have not, from the Holy and Supreme Man, the Neschama (or glorious soul), but they have the Nephesch (soul) from Adam Belial, that is the malicious and unnecessary man, called Sammael, the Supreme Devil’.” – Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, Nesta Webster, pg. 13. This ancient Rabinnical position serves as the prime cornerstone to satanic Jewish chosenness. It is a lie of course. Christ’s comment re. such psychopathic nonsense is recorded in John 8:44:45 . My understanding of Christ’s reference to being the son of Man rests beyond any reference to Judaism. As I see it he was aware of a larger scope of human history, into much less known record of a prior golden age, of Lemuria where Man, universally aligned with Spiritual Source, resided, fulfilling the role of tending and keeping this sacred garden planet. As a hint of this, a quote from James Churchward’s Children of Mu: “The Land of Mu and the Biblical Garden of Eden were one and the same. At the time of Mu’s destruction her people were in an exceedingly high state of civilization; as regards science she was far ahead of the present time. The great civilization of the old Oriental empires – India, Egypt, Babylonia etc. were only the dying embers of Mu’s great civilization.”
        If you’d be kind enough to indulge me further, I’ll post a little from the extensive works of
        a remarkable visionary, Lloyd Meeker. Studying his work over several years I’ve found he presents valuable insight into what is spoken of as The Fall. I include this here because, as I understand it, this is a perspective Jesus also embraced. What follows comes from Lloyd Meeker in an article written in 1936 titled The Fall of Man. ” The serpent, the devil, Lucifer and Satan all symbolize the same thing, namely the outer mind of the outer body of man. Lucifer was the morning star. Morning symbolizes the beginning of a new day or cycle of creation. The outer mind of divine man was to be the guiding star which should direct the transformation of physical substance according to the law of eternal progress. ‘How thou art fallen, O son of the morning!’
        The son is that which is brought forth in the new cycle of creative activity. That son, the morning star, was and is the outer mind of man. As long as the outer mind of man remained as an open channel for the Christ expression of positive God Being, it was, and is, assured of immortal life. So long as man depended upon the tree of life, even the Lord God within himself, and ate only of the fruit of that tree, which is to say absorbed from and responded to God Being only, he was assured of immortality.
        But there was another tree in the garden, ie., in the body of divine man. That second tree was and is the tree of the serpent, the outer mind of man. Divine man was warned that if he should become self-active without the Christ impulse, that is, if he should respond to the things of material creation, which was of a lower vibration than himself, then he would, by such positive action toward his source of life and such negative reaction toward that in which life was as yet a gift, not an inherent quality, separate himself from his source of life, and in so doing would suffer death.
        Everywhere is proven the Law; two things that are positive toward each other repel each other. Here is the secret of death. At the time of the fall of man the body of divine man, pictured as Eve, was tempted by the mind of divine man, the serpent, to eat, or absorb and be responsive to, the fruit of its own acts. In other words it is clearly seen that divine man allowed himself to become negative and responsive to that over which he had control, and thereby he became subject to that over which he was the rightful master. In so doing he lowered himself from his divine estate to the state of being subject to physical creation, and thereby repelled himself from the Lord God and attracted himself into subjection to physical substance. When he was thus separating himself from the Lord, his source of life, the Lord called unto him, as soon as he would listen, and gave him an opportunity to repent and return. But man became more rebellious still against the source of his life and refused to recognize his guilt. In so doing he pushed himself clear out of the garden of Eden, ie., out of the oneness with the radiant light body of the Lord, and thereby he denied himself the privilege of eating of the tree of life. This is to say, in his positive action toward the Lord he separated himself from the Lord and prevented himself from eating, absorbing and responding to the fruit, the expression, of the Lord. As man continued, in his fallen state, to be positive toward the Lord, he finally brought about a complete separation from the Lord, and then did man die.
        After man began to follow the dictates and ideas of his own outer mind he brought about a further fall by blending himself with a species of animal which had been created in the form much like man today. These animals did not have an individualized Divine Being within them and they were controlled by the external, just as all other animals are controlled. These animals had been created as servants of divine man, to do whatever physical work might be required in the earth. The fallen being that had been divine man saw these animals, that ‘they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.’ Genesis 6:1,2 As the habit of recording, in the days in which the Bible was written, was to describe the acts of the male only, or of the female only insofar as they related definitely to the male, only half of the picture is given. Of divine man, both male and female, the complete record is, and both male and female had a part in the first step of the fall, when they were driven out of the garden by their own acts. Thus it is that the females of the fallen beings had a part also in blending with these animals, for they took them husbands of all which they chose. The second step of the fall was that which brought man down into the fleshly, animal body which he is today.
        When fallen man thus violated the Law of creation by blending with that which was below himself in vibration, control over that Law was denied him, so that from that time on he could not cross with other animals and bring forth anything. If the use of this Law had not been denied to fallen man after his first violation of it he would have filled the earth with terrible monstrosities. Through the wisdom of the Lord he was prevented from doing this, except as he has done it within the realm of his own kind.
        Since the Lord, the Master-Self, was the creator of divine man, the Lord was and is responsible for His creation as long as it exists. When man fell and blended with animals, the Lord, or Divine Soul, went into those bodies as the Savior of them. The perfect Divine Beings- known individually as the Lord, the Inner Soul, the Master-Self, and by many other names- have incarnated into fleshly man for the sole purpose of saving man from destruction, and Divine Souls will continue to incarnate in the fleshly bodies of man until such time as those body temples learn to respond, that they may be adopted into the Father, or Lord, through the Christ radiance, so that man may thereby unite in oneness with the Lord, or until such time as those bodies which refuse to respond shall by their own acts destroy themselves, so that they shall be no more.”
        As I understand it, Christ was addressing humanity, human beings, all of us as sons and daughters of Divine Man, in the manner Lloyd Meeker expressed in his paper, not in the myopic, self-aggrandizing, indeed satanically psychopathic way the Rabbis speak of themselves and their tribe as the exclusive progeny of God.

      3. Maybe Jesus was a Jew, heck, I don’t even know if Trump is a Jew, so how can I tell with certainty about a semi-mythological creature from 2000 years ago.

        But the Joe of Arimathea doesn’t make sense as a physiological father.
        He was a rich merchant and a member of the same sanhedrin tribunal that sentenced Jesus to a humiliating death on the hill of the common criminals, a Passover sacrifice (the Holy Grail may have been the blood collection for top notch matzos 😉 the first Eucharist, sounds like jewcharist, says theoretical linguist lobro).

        Arimathea is a practically a suburb of jerusalem.
        What about poverty stricken birth on a bed of straw surrounded by barnyard animals, how many Jews are known for living on a farm homestead?
        What about carpenter father?
        What about Herod’s massacre of the newborn males in Bethlehem?
        The flight to Egypt?

        Too much of the accepted narrative must be ditched to accommodate a single theoretical construct.

        Which is not to say that Joseph of Arimathea couldn’t have been a renegade and a secret convert to Christ.

      4. The serpent, the devil, Lucifer and Satan all symbolize the same thing, namely the outer mind of the outer body of man. – Amen to this brother. If only Christians could comprehend the idea that evil only exists within man’s inherent, base nature; nowhere outside of man can one find “evil.”

        As for the idea of Joseph being a carpenter (or mason) – By far the biggest and most profitable job in first century Judea was the building of “Herod’s” Temple. Any skilled Hebrew tradesman would have sought employment there. The only rub was that one had to be a priest to work within the Temple confines. The Temple therefore had two options. First, recruit members from the ranks of the priesthood and train them in the skilled trades or two, induct skilled tradesmen into the priesthood.

        The first would be an rather unwieldy and lengthy process involving training people in skills for which they are traditionally unsuited. (Thinkers, especially those of a religious bent, typically do not make good laborers, skilled or otherwise.) However, the length of time required for the construction of the Temple, (it was still under construction at the time of its destruction) would have allowed initiated members of the priesthood to be trained in such a skill from birth. The second risked an issue of having the lower classes inducted into the elite priesthood.


        “Why would the Elohim want to work outside of an already miraculous creation?” – Essene quote concerning the virgin birth

          “Now it happened, that during the time of the high priesthood of this Matthias, there was another person made high kohein for a single day, that very day which the Jews observed as a fast. The occasion was this: This Matthias the high kohein, on the night before that day when the fast was to be celebrated, seemed, in a dream, to have conversation with his wife; and because he could not officiate himself on that account, Yosef, the son of Ellemus, his kinsman, assisted him in that sacred office.” – Flavius Yosefus, “War of the Jews”

        “The law stipulated only kohein could enter the Mikdash, therefore only kohanim could fill the role of construction worker. It was in his role as a carpenter that Yosef served his primary function for the kohanim, participating in the final phase of Herod’s construction of the Mikdash. His actual time serving as a kohein had therefore been quite limited. Had he been older and more experienced in political matters, he would have no doubt been far more circumspect in his approach to Mariam. The kohanim knew the world of Judea belonged to them. Among the Jews, they alone held a power beyond kings and believed all the wealth of this world was theirs for the taking.”

        [ . . . ]

        “Yosef explained that he was the son of Ellemus and a nephew of the acting kohein gadol, Matthias. On the night before Yom Kippur, his uncle had suffered nocturnal emissions during a dream. This event made Matthias ritually impure and therefore unable to officiate in the Mikdash for the Yom Kippur ceremony. For this reason Yosef, had been selected to officiate over the ceremony. – From Chapter Two: “The Conspiracy of Man”, a book guaranteed to twist the traditional religious mind into a pretzel. Read the entire chapter here:

    2. Jesus was a Jew?!?

      “Woe to you, scribes, PHARISEES, hypocrites!”

      Today’s Jews, to a man, woman and larva are descendants of Pharisees, Sephardi as physical and Khazars as psychic Pharisees.
      In that I totally agree with Pat 😉
      So, is someone here saying that Jesus was a Pharisee, calling himself a hypocrite? because he is painting them all with broad brush strokes, isn’t he.
      And the Pharisees wiped out all competing factions, be they ideological or ethnic.
      In fact, i seriously wonder whether the concept of race and ethnicity existed back then, they had tribes, clans and belief systems and mythologies.

      Finally, i had referred to some inexplicable images lately, a subject which now is firmly in my focus.
      And if the faces seen therein belong to Jesus, he don’t look nothin like a Jew, thin nose (even though disfigured by fracture), small mouth, fine hair.
      And he certainly didn’t talk or act like one, so … doesn’t look like a Jew, doesn’t talk (Aramaic) like a Jew, doesn’t act like a Pharisee.

      1. Lobro –

        I also – mostly – agree… go figger.. 🙂

        My ‘focus’ is if they chant kol nidre they are liars. Beyond that…. it is hard to know… just guess, unless they admit it..

        Elizabeth Dilling and Gerald Winrod told me personally who and what they are. I still miss way too often.

  3. “creating islam for arabs” threw me

    still would invite him for a talk and dinner

  4. I heard an interesting theory just a couple of weeks ago or something like. I wish I could remember where. Nonetheless I remember some thing mentioned in the programme. Like Bibi and his ilk of todday hail from the saducées and pharisées of ancient times and that the 12 lost tribes are actually us. He took the tribe of Dan as an example. That they are actually the danes of Denmark because it says so in their name. I think it is interesting because it could explain why they are hellbent on wiping us out. We are rivals plain and simple. With us out of the picture there will only be one kind of “jews” left – them.

  5. A bit more on Jesus the JEW.

    There is no documented evidence of the existence of a village called Nazareth until after the first century and long after the death of Jesus; just as there is scant mention of a tiny village called bet lahm, (literally “house of bread”, now Bethlehem) located a stones throw from Nazareth. While the village of Nazareth did not exist in pre-Jesus antiquity, bet lahm to the north, most certainly did.

    Traditionally, it is held Jesus was born in the tiny, twin village south of Jerusalem also called bet lahm. Yet it makes no sense that a Nazarite would be born in the southern location, as the Nazarene were a northern Essene sect that lived in galil (Galilee). To provide the desired continuity to the gospel narration, a Roman census was invented that required everyone to return to their place of origin. However, there is no, none, nada, zero, evidence (outside the Bible of course) that ANY Roman census was ever conducted in this manner. Remember, this is a Jewish story written by, about and for Jews.

    According to first century historian Josephus, the Essene, from which Jesus descended, were in fact one of the three major religious groups in the region that were at insurmountable odds with the other two groups, the Sadducee and P’rushim (Pharisee). While the Essene were held by the other two groups to be a totally renegade tribe, they had priests from among their members serving in the Temple.

    It was a group of Essene mystical ascetics who came out of the Babylonian exile and traveled west to found, not a village, but a Nazarite monastery, just outside the village of bet lahm in the north. This monastery was where Jesus was trained in Temple law and custom, and why it was said, “nothing good comes out of Nazareth”, as nothing but rebellious troublemakers came from the Nazarene sect.

    The manger birth scenario of the gospels was most likely a Lincoln-log-cabin embellishment to establish Jesus’ humble beginnings and to hide the fact that his real father Joseph, was in fact a well-to-do Temple priest. The virgin birth narrative was relatively common to men of high stature and political appointment of the time, yet how many cases of virgin birth can actually be verified anywhere in history?

    The Sadducee were the Temple administrators and ultimate authority over the sacrificial system, their word WAS LAW. The P’rushim were representatives of the Temple living among the people and interpreting the law to assure it was followed to the letter, which is why you find them all over the region in the gospels. They were in fact the Soviet commissars of their era.

    P’rushim were often called “teachers” and the term “rabbi”, meant nothing more than this. Anyone versed in the law, teaching under the authority of the Temple, would be considered a rabbi. Anyone without that authority would have been stoned to death for heresy. Thus, a Sadducee priest could be a rabbi, as could a P’rushim, but those hailed as rabbi, were not necessarily a member of either group.

    When Jesus was referred to as rabbi, he is merely being referred to as an authoritative teacher of the law. In those times, as today, it would have been impossible in the eyes of the Jews for a non-Jew to have ANY authority regarding their sacred law.

    One might think of the Sadducee as the conservative element of Jewish Temple society, while the P’rushim might be thought of as liberals forever challenging the Sadducee’s interpretation of the oral law. This problem led to a major schism between the two groups. The Sadducee sought to maintain the oral tradition. It was in their favor that nothing was written down that could lead to their being cited in error, while also allowing for easier, surreptitious changes in the law.

    Thus, the P’rushim interpreting and enforcing the law among the people, often could not be sure of their legal standing and feared being cited for an incorrect interpretation by the Sadducees. The P’rushim argued the need for the law to be in a written form in order to assure certainty in their legal interpretations.

    Eventually the P’rushim won the argument. This then is the major reason for the existence of the Old Testament and why the Bible, as we know it, exists today.

    Interestingly, the early Catholic church adopted much the same method as the Sadducee, having but one copy of the Bible for a large region, only available to those priests tasked to interpret their anglicized version to the common people.

    The Essene on the other hand, maintained that the Temple’s entire sacrificial system and its law were a hoax, a sham, a reinvention and bastardization of the original true teachings of Moses, much like Hitler’s true intent has been totally misconstrued and malformed into the sacred Hallowedhoax of today. There is some evidence for this in the story of Ezra’s “discovery” of the original Torah and then reading the law therein, publicly.

    Eventually, Jesus tired of the lies and misinformation being told about him – so he asked me to provide this explanation.

  6. To add a little more simplicity to what 5 Dancing Shlomos said earlier, Jesus said that he was not of this world (no way he is a jew), that he was before Abraham who wasn’t a jew, and that he was not downline from David since David called him Lord (no way he is a jew). Based on this, there was no immaculate conception, but an immaculate implantation. Even if being jewish were genetic which it isn’t, Jesus was not a jew.

    Jesus was referred to as the Son of Man because he was living in human form from womb to death for a specific reason. Jesus’ resurrection after death as a man was the only way to prove that there is life after death for humans.

    To assume that Jesus was a jew without defining what a jew is, is chasing a shadow. A jew is anyone who violates the Second Commandment of “Love thy neighbors (fellowman) as thyself,” because practicing the Second Commandment is the ONLY way to show the Heavenly Father that you love him, the First Commandment. It is that simple, but it is hidden by tremendous amounts of lies and deceptions.

  7. jesus is a jew is a jew/jewcon idea
    war is peace, death is life
    jesus washed himself of jew
    jesus is the light, path from jew
    the small, incomplete g-d of the jew is satan

    christianity was infiltrated early.
    infiltrators still inside and whispering

    1. forgot
      jesus sent to the area
      where concentrated evil existed/exists
      where satan lived/lives
      2000 yrs later
      we can see
      mankind still under threat
      jew the antchrist

    2. jesus sent to the area
      where concentrated evil existed/exists
      where satan lived/lives

      a fine thought

      insha’allah we meet someday in free, jewless Damascus, my friend

  8. The Cestui Que Vie Act 1666. Due to the “black death” in 1665; and people abandoning their property the following year due to “London burning”, a Trust was set-up to maintain rightful ownership of those people who went missing (forced to leave under extraordinary circumstances essentially against their will). In the event of their return, the land/property which they had abandoned would be recognized as theirs and the Cestui Que Vie Act was that Trust protecting ownership of those who were, technically, missing or lost / not dead.

    I first heard about the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 when a rather sinister person referred to it in Court; referring to it being altered in 1948 when its preamble/purpose was removed. Well, we know that in 1948, Palestine was recognized by the U.N. as belonging to those counterfeit-Jews who were/are mostly Ashkenazi with no connection to Judahites and/or Israelites except for taking on the name of a religion, Judaism; but, obeying The Talmud. The truth of the matter was that the preamble of the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 was not removed, but counterfeit-Jews and their followers would have wanted us to believe it might have been. The Holy Land belongs to Israelites and converted-Jews to Christ Jesus; more specifically, to those committed to following the Covenant of Moses and Covenant of The Lamb (Jesus) under only One Who should be rightly called King and High Priest: The Lord Christ Jesus. The Holy Land is being occupied by those disguised as “chosen”. T.H.E.Y. are counterfeit-Jews or so-called Jews with NO RIGHT to live in The Holy Land. So, being an anti-Semite IS WRONG. Instead, help people to discover their true Identity as Israelites racially or spiritually grafted-in. Father and Christ Jesus Chose the Israelites. We are the lost sheep who are being found slowly, but surely. All praise be to The Lord.

    We Live. T.H.E.Y. Die. T.H.E.Y. = The Hierarchy Enslaving You.

    The Abrahamic Covenant

    The Way Home

    The ‘New Song’

  9. I take the archeological approach to the Bible. Basically the Bible was compiled from diverse literary sources (mostly non Jewish in the modern sense) in the post-Exilic period (5th to 4th Century BC). Before there was a written text there was a First Temple that was not unlike other ancient temples in Assyria. This was a Father/Son religion with a Mother Goddess. The father god was a lot like the Christian father god; he had a beard and was remote. The Son was a warrior. So…the symbolism that comes down to use from the Bronze Age (begins hmm around 1300 BC). First Temple was primarily Christian in appearance and structure. Assyrians even wore crosses. The majority of people did not go into exile but had continued practicing the ancient religion as before so the ones who returned to set up the new religion of the Book were revolutionaries. They were resisted as even the Bible reports. Some resisters fled south and its possible that these people supported the early Jesus movement. In other words, First Temple practices continued in the countryside along with the Second Temple revolution, which was confined mostly to the Temple in Jerusalem. Jesus seems to have been from the countryside, and so was probably not Jewish in the sense that we understand that label.

    My understanding is that anti-semitism is a modern phenomena. Most modern Jews come from Yiddish speaking people in south Russia or the pale or maybe the outskirts of Iran. So modern Jews are a distinct ethnic group with a talent for business, trade, and finance. For the most part they are no different than other ethnic groups with the important exception that banking oligarchs come from this ethnicity. I haven’t yet been able to identify any non-Jewish oligarchs. (hmm maybe the Rockefeller’s, not sure) Supposedly it was Voltaire who said “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” For a long time we couldn’t criticize the oligarchs because they were Jewish or at least we couldn’t speak about their Jewishness. Ironically it was folks like Gilad Atzmon who helped us break the silence. Yet I still think that repression of the freedom of speech could get worse. Ironically, the oligarchs don’t seem to care a lot about Jewish folk in the ordinary sense–or at least don’t seem to care. I am thinking of course about the vaccines that are destroying a generation of Jewish kids right along with all other kids–white, black, and brown. Once upon a time academia was filled with smart, number savvy jewish kids who went into business or became doctors and lawyers. No more! They are intellectually maimed.

  10. Jew is as Judas, Smear-In-High-Gear

    Donald Trump Accused of Rape in Federal Court Lawsuit
    The assaults are alleged to have taken place at the home of billionaire and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein

    A new lawsuit filed in Manhattan Federal Court alleges that Donald Trump repeatedly raped a 13-year-old girl a little over 20 years ago. According to the now-adult woman’s filing, the sexual assaults took place at parties held by Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire former hedge funder …
    Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted.”

    In the next section, she adds that “Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed.”

    Purely coincidental timing, no chance of buddy Epstein backstabbing goy, just so happens, y’know, that his secret files and videos got leaked … anyone surprised by this development?
    Sure proof that Trump is the ENEMY and THREAT to Jew project.

    “violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted”,
    “Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed”
    such typical Geshtapo teutonic Mengelevian behavior, alles krautes are das same, yawohl.

    Time for a woman president

      1. @ hp

        Comment held up for monitoring because you had a typo in your email address: “hormail” instead of “hotmail.”

  11. The New Testament portrays Jesus and his disciples as Jews in a Jewish setting.

    Because I grew up in neighborhoods that had many Jews living in them I have always felt that Jews are gemütlich. That is German for “cozy, comfortable, enjoyable.”

    Reading The New English Bible including the Apocrypha at the age of twenty-six further increased my appreciation of Jews. Since then I have read the Bible in seven additional English translations, including the Jewish Study Bible.

    Although I do not keep a kosher kitchen I like to buy food that is kosher certified. I also buy detergents that are kosher certified. Judaism is a very hygienic religion. that is why most clothes and dish washing detergents are kosher certified.

  12. Jew projection or Jew humor?
    whatever it is, truth it ain’t.

    But as i cannot overstress: watch Jew’s reactions, watch what he does not what he says “in earnest” and the picture gets lots of clarity.
    Jew’s one and only true emotion is hate/fear/loathing complex, something that he cannot mask successfully.
    And Trump made brilliant use of it, plastered it all over, then pretended to go OOPS, SORRY and faux-backtracked.

    Now Jew yells the old victimhood, antisemitism, Holocau$t but it is getting threadbare, garnering more laughs every day.

Comments are closed.