Angry Jewess Forces Cambridge University to remove David Irving book from library shelves

The Cambridge University College named after Winston Churchill has been forced to remove a David Irving biography of the wartime prime minister, following a complaint from an eminent Jewish historian, Christian Today has learnt.


BANNED FROM COLLEGE LIBRARY SHELVES
AFTER BOLSHY JEWESS KICKS UP A FUSS   

A row over Irving’s book broke out after Dr Irene Lancaster, a respected academic and the first teaching fellow in Jewish history at Manchester University visited Cambridge University last month for the launch of a biography which she translated of the former Chief Rabbi of Haifa, Shear Yashuv Cohen. 

Jewish academic Dr Irene Lancaster . . . “shocked” to see Irving history book on open display in college library shelves 

Dr Lancaster, who was staying at Magdalene College for the launch which was hosted by that College’s Master, the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, visited the Roskill library at Churchill College on February 1 for research purposes. Churchill College is twinned with Haifa Technion, Israel’s most prominent scientific university in Haifa, where Dr Lancaster previously lived and worked on inter-faith relations.

After being shocked to discover two volumes of Irving’s biography ‘prominently’ displayed alongside a biography of Churchill by the Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, Dr Lancaster complained to the office of Cambridge University’s Vice Chancellor, Leszek Borysiewicz.

On February 15, Dr Lancaster received an unsigned email from the Vice Chancellor’s office, stating:

“The Roskill library is essentially a library for Churchill studies. David Irving is very much part of that historiography. Holding his books in no way endorses his views or his scholarship and we would argue that the reverse is true. His books are held, however foul the views contained therein, so that others can challenge them and refute them.

“Irving’s biography of Churchill has been held at the Roskill library on open access for visiting scholars studying Churchill to consult if they so desire. However, having been alerted to the issue of their display by the concerns you raised, the College and Archives Centre are removing Irving’s books to closed access. Historians who wish to access them for specific scholarly reasons to do with the biography of Churchill will be able to do so, but only by request. The books will not be openly available on the shelves. We do not wish inadvertently to suggest that we endorse Irving in any way – we emphatically do not.”

The decision to remove Irving’s work from open display was taken jointly at the highest level by Churchill College and the University.

It came after separate complaints over anti-Semitic leaflets being distributed around Cambridge University last month.

A Cambridge University spokesperson told Christian Today:

‘The University is fully committed to the principle and promotion of freedom of speech and expression. The University upholds the rights of people to participate fully in legitimate debate, partly so that they are able to question and test controversial ideas. Holding banned or challenged books in no way endorses the views or scholarship of the authors. Rather, they are accessible to scholars to allow them the opportunity to challenge and refute their contents.

‘The books were moved from a shelf in the Roskill Library to the Library reserve store, a closed area. Academics continue to be able to access the work by request. The University and Colleges of Cambridge have made clear that that discrimination in any form will not be tolerated, as has been publicly stated by the Vice-Chancellor. Churchill College, together with all Cambridge Colleges, remains committed to providing an environment that is inclusive, diverse and welcoming to those of all faiths, and none.”

Dr Lancaster said:

“Winston Churchill is regarded as a hero among the Jewish people. Seeing two volumes prominently displayed in the Churchill archive desecrating the University next to the book by Boris Johnson who admires Churchill, made me feel sick to my stomach. These [Irving] books should be labelled as offensive and historically worthless. They are an incitement to racial hatred. In the light of ongoing anti-Semitic incidents at Cambridge University including the leafleting of Holocaust denial material based on Irving’s work the very next day after my visit to Churchill College, I think that the University should review its general library policy.”

SOURCE

THE PUSHY JEWESS WHO GOT HER WAY
AND FORCED  A GREAT UNIVERSITY
TO CAPITULATE TO HER DEMANDS

‘Guess why I’m smiling . . .’ 

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

62 thoughts on “Angry Jewess Forces Cambridge University to remove David Irving book from library shelves

  1. So merely because madame Lancaster (what a beautiful crypto name!) feels “sick to her stomach” David Irving’s two books about Churchill had to be removed from the university’s public library ? Oh wait, there was also the event of the leafleting of Holocaust denial material based on Irving’s work the very next day after her visit to Churchill College. What a coincidence ! Well, as Jew-wise Goyim, knowing how Jews use to operate, we rightfully suspect that the Jews themselves organized that leafleting. Once again a success for the eternally scheming tribe ! Or is it ? Well, in the age of the Internet not really. All of David Irving’s books, including the two volumes of Churchill’s War can be read free of charge on his website here : http://www.fpp.co.uk/
    So madame Lancaster, ban as much as you can, you cannot stop the information.

    For an introduction to “the man who is regarded as a hero among the Jewish people”, the cowardly, drunk, corrupt bastard who was bribed by the Jews to do their destructive bidding, watch this video by David Irving : https://youtu.be/OYbQToOEYI8

      1. His mother was jenny jacobsen/jerome.
        The jews allways change their name when they want to adapt to their environment.

      2. ADMIN: Comment released from Spam

        franklin, surely you can do better than that.
        the linked denial is weak, biased and superficial.
        And no david irving does not deny churchill’s jew roots.

        biased:

        If David Irving told me the time, I would check five different clocks before I accepted it, but he does admittedly have a reputation for finding new documentary evidence (usually provided by elderly Nazis)

        so, the documentary evidence is somehow less legit if provided by elderly nazis – good show burbridge.

        biased, dripping with sarcasm, also reveals where burbridge’s sympathies lie:

        Why did Churchill hate that nice Mr Hitler? Why did he betray the Aryan race? Why, it’s obvious, isn’t it — he was one of those!

        burbridge’s case is “clinched” by an article by moshe kohn in jerusalem post and the tone of sarcasm used.

        THANK God – at last we know the truth about Winston Churchill: he was a psychopathic revanchist, obsessed with defeating Germany in World War II, thus preventing Adolf Hitler from saving civilization from the Red menace. Several rational British historical revisionists have just revealed this, half a century after Churchill inflicted all that pain and grief on those poor Germans.

        Or is it a related idiosyncrasy that bothers those revisionists? I mean the streak that caused Churchill to draw on Jewish – particularly biblical – modes and language, especially regarding the treatment of enemies like Hitler and Mussolini. Are they particularly galled by his penchant for calling on God, despite his rejection of “the Christian or any other form of religious belief” (as he wrote to his mother in 1898)? And with typical Churchillian cunning, he did all that in the name of “Christian civilization”… (That cunning no doubt came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother, Lady Randolph Churchill, née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome. )

        let’s all have a gleeful snigger at the pain and grief inflicted on those poor Germans, the firebombing of 750,000 Dresden civilians or the multi-million rape of German women or the operation hellstorm.

        I guess their common hate of germans somehow elevates them morally above suspicion, instant unassailable credibility.

        Finally, a short reply by irving:

        VERY interesting, comments David Irving. I know only what The Jerusalem Post printed. I will eventually correct the bad date in new editions of “Churchill’s War”, vol. ii: “Triumph in Adversity” . I don’t know who drew my attention to The Jerusalem Post article. I don’t buy the argument that it was being sarcastic or tongue-in-cheek. Who is David B? His research appears very thin (” I began with an Internet search”).

        in short, franklin, the theory is far from debunked.

        i myself don’t know whether churchill was a jew or just another shabbo in the vein of the clintons, merkel or tony blair and it doesn’t matter to me.
        they are all equally qualified rejects from human race.

      3. @Lobro

        The only source in Irving is that article of Kohn in The Jerusalem Post, and yes that is clearly sarcastic. Kohn ridicules the idea that because Churchill was bad, according to his detractors he therefore must have had Jewish blood (as if bad Goyim don’t exist !). Burbridge’s research of Churchill’s geneological background reveals no Jews in his ancestry. Perhaps you have done better research? Irving obviously doesn’t like to be caught on a fault, both of the date and of basing a theory on a dubious source, so he feigns scepticism to save face. Read again Kohn’s article and tell me if it is not sarcastic ! (and even if it is not sarcastic, it offers no documentary proof).

        Sorry, but besides bad Jews, bad Goyim also exist.

      4. Kohn’s sarcasm does not extend to this:

        Jewish genes transmitted by his mother, Lady Randolph Churchill, née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.

        If there is sarcastic content in this line , I fail to appreciate it.
        Of course, as an unapologetic antisemite, I would accept that Kohn is merely being a Jew, ie, lying.

      5. @Lobro

        Yes it does, you left out the first part of the sentence, clearly sarcastic, since Jews would not ascribe evil cunning to themselves :

        “That cunning no doubt came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother, Lady Randolph Churchill, née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.”

        Jews may be consummate liars, but they don’t lie to harm themselves.

      6. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        Sorry, but besides bad Jews, bad Goyim also exist.

        Exactly. I hate to say it, but the evil and sheer depravity of the goyim throughout history are there for all to see. Consult any book on serial killers and you will find most of them are non-Jews.

        As for Churchill, there is no convincing evidence that he was a Jew. Consider that as a younger man he had actually come across as anti-Jewish. Here he is in 1920 in a major British newspaper — these are hardly the words of a crypto-Jew, are they?

        “. . . the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new.

        From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

        There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.

        http://library.flawlesslogic.com/ish.htm

        To believe that Churchill, an alleged crypto-Jew, would write so openly that Jews were an atheistical bunch of revolutionaries who had engineered the Bolshevik Revolution and produced a lot of baddies, well, that makes no sense at all.

      7. The truth of the matter is that Churchill did a complete U-turn on Jews in the 1930s and 1940s to further his own career and become Prime Minister of Britain. He SOLD HIMSELF TO THE JEWS. Churchill was an alcoholic and spendthrift gambler who had lost his fortune several times over. His debts were enormous and he was in DEEP, DEEP TROUBLE until a certain South African Jew with pots of money came to his rescue and PAID OFF ALL HIS BILLS.

        After that Churchill became a complete and loyal servant of the Jews. Having saved him from bankruptcy, they cut a deal with him: “Follow our instructions to the letter and we will continue to pay your gambling debts and finance your political career.”

        It was a Faustian bargain that Churchill accepted with alacrity. He was the ultimate shabbos goy.

        The name of the Jew was Sir Henry Strakosch, a naturalized Austrian Jew who had made his fortune in South Africa. He hated the Nazis, and above all Hitler, and he wanted Germany destroyed. He was Churchill’s paymaster and got Churchill to act as his paid agent. Read all about it here:

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3231410/Winston-spendaholic-teetered-brink-bankruptcy-saved-secret-backhanders-new-book-Chuchill-s-finances-reveals-spent-40-000-year-casinos-54-000-booze.html

      8. CHURCHILL: ” . . . this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation.”

        Here Churchill is clearly alluding (WITH APPROVAL) to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. He is writing these words in 1920, just before the outing of the Protocols as a “forgery”.

        No Jew would ever cite the Protocols with approval to make his point that Jews are intent on world domination. This was precisely what Churchill was doing: making a profoundly anti-Semitic statement, at a time when anti-Semitism was in vogue and people were far freer to criticize Jews than they are today.

        The idea that Churchill was secretly a Jew himself therefore has to be rejected.

        I have explained above: Churchill did a massive U-turn from anti-Semite to philosemite once the Jews promised to pay his debts and bring him to power.

      9. @Sardonicus

        That is exactly how the Jews control elite Gentiles : by money. Often also by blackmail, mostly of a sexual nature. Churchill is rumored to have been a homosexual. The same is true of George W. Bush and Barak Obama. Control the elite and you control a country. Control a superpower and you control the world. That’s the idea of the Jews.

      10. @Lobro
        “Of course, as an unapologetic antisemite, I would accept that Kohn is merely being a Jew, ie, lying.”
        No, you’re not antisemitic, which is DNA or racially-based, you’re anti-jewish, which is based on Talmudic, i.e., inhuman and criminal jewish behavior. “Anti-semitism” is in fact virtually nonexistent and we should not even use the term, one which has been cunningly used by the “enemies of the human race” (to use St Paul’s term in 1 Thes. 2.15) to silence and crush all opposition. Would a person who is against abortion call himself “anti-choice”, like the pro-aborts call one who opposes abortion? Of course not. And likewise we should not call the pro-aborts “pro-choice” but “pro-abortion”. When we use the language of our enemies we are in danger of thinking like them, or at least becoming confused about our own identity. We can even end up behaving like them. We are up against agents of Satan. Let us not fall into the trap of misusing language as they would have us do, to our own downfall.

    1. I wonder what madam Lancaster’s reaction would be if she were to be confronted with the 13th century law which bannished all Jews from this kingdom in perpetuity which in fact still stands but for some unknown reason ?is never enforced, enjoy reading your opinions .

  2. Madame Lancaster only needs a nest of slithering serpents erupting from her scalp to be the epitome of a Gorgon. When are the people in England going to enforce the edict of expulsion by good King Edward I? It’s never been formally repealed.

    1. Edward “Longshanks” was England’s nearest thing to Ivan the Terrible. We do need somebody with his guts, but maybe not his methods.

      1. Edward Long Shanks used the same method in his time as the Jews are using in Palestine, can you imagine the reaction from the chosen people should the Longshanks law be enforced today in this country and the English were to use the same method.We certainly do need a leader with his level of courage as you say, the method,,,well maybe, it’s the only way the Jews understand that’s why they use it themselves.

  3. If all this book-banning is allowed to stand then Britain is headed for Orwell’s “1984”.

      1. Hi Franklin,
        Agreed, but it looks as though that will be the next step, and Darkmoon will be the first target. The Power of the Jewish Lobby seems to be growing. Amazon for books and also the banning of Iranian “Press” TV from Britain’s satellite SKY TV service.

        George Orwell, where are you now?

  4. Excellent article. I’d like to make 3 short points. Only the first two are about the article, per se. But the last, I think, is also relevant.
    1) Are Dr. Lancaster and Barbara Spectre sisters/cousins? There does seem to be a resemblance.
    2) If Lancaster is such an “eminent historian” how could she be in favor of banning books she doesn’t agree with? You can’t be both eminent and in favor of censorship of history at the same time, can you?
    3) Several years ago Pat Buchanan (one of my favorite writers) wrote a nuanced, more objective history of Hitler’s rise in “Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War.” However, he certainly wasn’t pro-Hitler, or anti-Jew. He gave equal blame for the carnage to Churchill. In this age of increasing intolerance by those who want to keep the sheeple dumb and happy, one wonders if such a mild book as Buchanan’s, which dared to question the decisions of the “great” Churchill, could be next?

    1. @Follyofwar

      “…If Lancaster is such an “eminent historian” how could she be in favor of banning books she doesn’t agree with..?”

      Lancaster is a Jewish historian, so she plies her trade always with the question “is this good for the Jews?” in mind.

    2. @ FollyOf War

      “2) If Lancaster is such an “eminent historian” how could she be in favor of banning books she doesn’t agree with?”

      Jews are always “imminent” in their own self centered mind. It comes from their “chosen” lie which means to them that everything that they do is soooo special. The problem comes when those not in the cult believe their jewish lies and corresponding bullsh*t.

  5. “Eminence”

    I didn’t read Irving’s book but I guess banning it would be an eminent stupidity. Can’t this eminent Jewish Scholar debunk this book just with her eminence?
    PS.
    Want to promote it? Ban it.
    I’m going to read it. May it add a notch to her eminent anger!

  6. A “banned book” list is like a “banned gun” list: EVERYBODY WANTS ONE (one of the books/guns). Projected gun bans have almost always increased demand and attention… Maybe a book ban will do, likewise. 🙂

  7. I was just thinking in relation to the Holocaust narrative that David Irving has got it right. He has the most up to date research with British decoding of the German encryptions where they actually mention the number of deaths from the death camps. So the history is completely jumbled and obfuscated to fit movie scripts but in reality there were about 3 and 1/2 million Jewish people murdered during the World War II. Many were shot in the woods and some were later killed in death camps that were destroyed after the war. The David Irving recent revision matches well with stories of survivors, and the Holocaust museum numbers in Israel.

    OK so David Irvings books on Winston Churchill are now in the reserve library for scholarly use only….no check outs. At least they won’t be stolen and destroyed. How long are the book banning, burnings, and removals going to last in a world where we’re facing a changing of the guard. Recently Ron Paul said that 80% of the American public believes the CIA had something to do with the death of John F. Kennedy–no amount of censorship was able to keep the truth from the public apparently. At this point, probably half the country no longer believes in the official version of 9 11, and in the beginning that story was so censored you couldn’t even whisper the truth in a dark parking lot. I guess that the movie versions of the Holocaust and World War II still occupy a central space in some people’s minds but not many. In the end, lies are boring and have no resonance in the soul. Only the Truth is a strange attractor.

    1. Hi Kapoore
      Agreed, in the long run the truth will out. Historians in 2217 will not be scared off by the Jewish Lobby. I used to believe the official Holocaust story but gradually I came across facts, verifiable facts, that did not fit. In the end I realized that the Holocaust story did not stand up to scrutiny.

      There is no doubt that the Germans killed many Jews, but at the end of WW2 there were still 210,000 Jews living in germany. About 170,000 had died from all causes during the war, but disease, bombing, starvation would account for many of those deaths. The one group of Jews who were singled out for death were the Socialist/Bolsheviks.

      Regarding the camps; until proper scientific and archaological investigations are carried out we will not be any wiser, but no fuel (coke) trains were seen on aerial photos, and there was no evidence of thousands of tons of ashes and bones. None of it fits the cyanide (Zykon) gassing and incinerating story. Also the camp at Auschwitz could never have gassed and disposed of 3,500 bodies every day for 7 days a week for 3 years (4 million). I have experience of running factories and I can tell you it is extremely difficult to get anything on that scale running, and it would have requires a site ten times the size of Auschwitz.

      However the plaque at Auschwitz no longer says that 4 million people were murdered there. I believe the figure has been reduced to 1 million; still a massive task. So somebody must have had their doubts.

      The official red Cross figure for deaths in ALL THE CAMPS was 262,000, and bear in mind that the Red Cross had access to all the camps and took in humanitarian relief. They reported outbreaks of typhus but not gassing of inmates. Surely they would have know if mass murder was taking place.

  8. Irving on Churchill

    “Dismantling Churchillian Mythology” by Theodore J. O’Keefe

    Irving went on to describe several sources of secret financial support enjoyed by Churchill. In addition to money supplied by the Czech government, Churchill was financed during the “wilderness years” between 1930 and 1939 by a slush fund emanating from a secret pressure group known as the Focus.

    Irving on the Focus:

    The Focus was financed by a slush fund set up by some of London’s wealthiest businessmen — principally, businessmen organized by the Board of Jewish Deputies in England, whose chairman was a man called Sir Bernard Waley Cohen…..

    Irving then revealed further details of Churchill’s financing by the Czechs, as well as the facts of Churchill’s financial rescue by a wealthy banker of Austro-Jewish origins, Sir Henry Strakosch, who, in Irving’s words, emerged “out of the woodwork of the City of London, that great pure international financial institution.” When Churchill was bankrupted overnight in the American stock market crash of 1937-1938, it was Strakosch who was instrumental in setting up the central banks of South Africa and India, who bought up all Churchill’s debts. When Strakosch died in 1943, the details of his will, published in the London Times, included a bequest of £20,000 to the then Prime Minister, eliminating the entire debt…..

    the complete article on:

    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p498_okeefe.html

    Best regards.

    Fabrice

    PS Jews rule the United States by now and maybe that little by little they are starting to rule even in UK!!

    But Brexit , if well designed, will avoid such a terrible end for British people who deserve a much better future!!

  9. Angry Arch speaks out:

    Winston Churchill is regarded as a hero among the Jewish people. Seeing two volumes prominently displayed in the Churchill archive desecrating the University next to the book by Boris Johnson who admires Churchill, made me feel sick to my stomach. These [Irving] books should be labelled as offensive and historically worthless. They are an incitement to racial hatred. In the light of ongoing anti-Semitic incidents at Cambridge University including the leafleting of Holocaust denial material based on Irving’s work the very next day after my visit to Churchill College, I think that the University should review its general library policy.

    Jews, the lowest form of scum-sucking parasite on this earth, have turned your world upside down. They laud their criminality as a virtue and praise their criminals with endless lies while destroying the lives of those who provide the slightest hint of truth. These are the mamzers that endlessly screamed, whined and kvetched about the suppression of books and free speech in the 1960s!

    These are the mamzers that stood with big-mouthed bullhorns behind civil disobedience when (((they))) considered the law “unjust.” Today, these same mamzers, these lower than lowest scum of the earth, scream about “hate speech” which only they are allowed to define; smugly demanding censorship while holding their corrupted laws, created to enforce these hatefully obscene burdens, as sacrosanct.

    For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. – Matthew 23:4

    Don’t the goyim get it yet? Jews have no standards. They have no limits, no guidelines, moral or otherwise. Jews have no friends, allegiances, no honor, no truth, no virtue, no compassion, no love. They have none of the character traits that built and maintain western civilization. Jews are the destroyers of worlds.

    Like automaton termites, they gnaw away ceaselessly at western civilization, serving only to destroy everyone falling within their deadly caustic sphere of influence. Jews are an empty race of criminally psychopathic murderers that will smile at you one moment before driving a knife in your back the next.

    When will Christians wake up to the fact that Jews ~ (((JEWS!!!))) not Romans ~ are the mamzers that murdered their savior in the most heinous manner imaginable. Jews haven’t the slightest shred of redeeming character worthy of consideration or salvation.

    And they that had laid hold on Jesus led him away to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled. But Peter followed him afar off unto the high priest’s palace, and went in, and sat with the servants, to see the end. Now the chief priests, and elders, and all the council, sought false witness against Jesus, to put him to death; But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. And when they had bound him, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the governor.

    When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person. Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our (((children.))) – Matthew 27

    How much clearer can these words be? Jesus may have forgiven his murderers, but Christians are utter fools to forgive Jews for their most murderous crime against all humanity, and this is just one among many thousands of millions of such horrible crimes committed by Jews over the millennia. It should never be forgotten, nor should Jews ever be forgiven for their gleeful murder of Jesus.

    There is no lower form of life then this bloodsucking, parasitical cancer. This is the scum to whom white people are giving the benefit of the doubt. It’s time to wake up and start slinging their shit right back at them.

    Give Jews no quarter in the same manner they deny the goyim any. Whether directly or indirectly, Jews are responsible for civilization’s most monumental ills. Therefore never hesitate to assign guilt to Jews for every criminal action, whether they are Jewish or not, for it is Jews that have legalized criminality and made censorship socially acceptable. Nothing will change until humanity’s collective finger points straight at the Jew, charging: guilty! Guilty! GUILTY! Guilty, on all charges! Jews are guilty for all time!

    1. Hi Arch,
      Despite what the New Testament says I don’t think Jews alive now should be held responsible for things their ancestors did. Neither should the English alive now should be blamed for Scottish deaths at Culloden.

      What angers me is the incredible power of Jews nowadays and their attitude, that they are special and everything they say or do is soooo special (See Ungenius above). The double standards are breathtaking

      They have stolen a country, Palestine, and in fact are still stealing it bit by bit. So there is an outcry about the Russians taking back what has always been the Russian Crimea, but not a peep about Israel.

      You can mock Christianity or Islam, but utter one word against the bloodthirsty, vengeful and genocidal God of the Old Testament and the Jewish Lobby will come down on you.

      Their own Lobby, Jewish Power being used nowadays causes anti-semitism. It is time we could say it is so without fear of having our lives ruined. The “Grapes of Wrath” are being trampled out now and “fateful vengeance” is bound to follow if things carry on as they are.

      Jews are smart people and must realize that they are their own worst enemies. It is a dilemma. I am anti-war and anti-violence and I can see trouble brewing.

      1. The God of the OT is Christ, and He HATES Jews! He instructed the ancient (Aryan) Israelites to exterminate the Canaanites (((merchants))). Our ancestors failed to wipe out these satanic genes, and after Jericho and Ai, they went soft and decided to spare them and put them to work as slaves.

        They now rule over US and are systematically destroying us!

  10. Like American aviator hero Charles Lindbergh, leading industrialist Henry Ford, popular actors Marlon Brando, Mel Gibson and many others, historian David Irving experienced the viciousness of organized Jewry when he wrote things they didn’t like. One of the most famous Americans, Lindbergh went from being viewed as a America’s hero to a traitor when he was attacked by the press for his leadership of the “America First” committee in the 1930’s / early 40’s and its efforts to keep the US out of WW II. Mel Gibson went from being a very popular actor and talented director to an “anti-Semite” when he made the very popular movie “The Passion of the Christ” in 2004. Gibson is a traditional Catholic and Jews in the media attacked his movie as “anti-Semitic”, pressuring him to change it and when he subsequently got angry one evening and vented his anger towards them, saying something like “Jews start all the wars”, Gibson was blacklisted and had his career ruined by Jews for the next 13 years. This year, he appears to be making a comeback. He was praised by Hollywood at the Oscars recently. The truth is no excuse. Jews have been working very hard to pass censorship laws to stifle anything that is uncomplimentary towards them. This has been going on for decades and the Jews are working overtime on it now as the Jews role in politics and history becomes better known to the public. Many leading personalities, or leaders in their fields have had their careers ruined by organized Jewry.

    David Irving went from being recognized as the “greatest living authority” on Nazi Germany by The New York Times ,to being branded as an “anti-semite”, whose books were worthless. That is the power of the Lügenpresse.

    Here are a few reviews of another of David Irving’s books before the move to take him down by organized Jewry.

    “AND IT IS wryly, bitterly amusing to reflect that a British historian, David Irving, perhaps the greatest living authority on the Nazi era, has recently asserted in his book HITLER’S WAR that there is not a shred of evidence to prove that Hitler himself knew anything about the methods adopted by Himmler to achieve the ‘final solution of the Jewish problem.'”

    — Stephen Spender, The New York Times review of books,
    Sunday . . . March 1977.

    “THE AUTHOR has combined impressive research and beautiful writing to produce a meticulously recorded portrait of the man who led his nation to disaster.”
    — Boston Herald American

    and

    EVEN THE not easily corrupted Board of Deputies of British Jews were impressed by David Irving’s Hitler’s War, assessing in a secret intelligence report on Mr Irving in 1991:

    Hitler’s War”The book however was far more than a simple denial of Hitler’s role. It was thoroughly researched and employed a variety of themes . . . It also confirmed Irving’s reputation as one of the world’s most thorough researchers and an exciting and readable ‘historian’.”

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/reviews/HWReviews.html

    The reason David Irving is so viciously attacked is because Jews were not just bystanders in WW II. They played a leading role in it and historian David Irving explores their role in “Churchill’s War”. David Irving’s books rely on primary sources, meaning not what another historian wrote (which may or may not be true) or newspaper articles. but primary sources like diaries, letters and such, and Irving provides detailed footnotes in his books.

    Dr Irene Lancaster no doubt doesn’t like that Mr. Irving writes about these Jewish activities leading up to the war. Wealthy Jews paid the financially struggling Winston Churchill huge sums of money in 1936 to attack Germany and Zionism’s leader Chaim Weizmann told Winston Churchill that if he was helpful toward the Jews, Jews would bring the US into WW II on Britain’s side against Germany, just as they had in WW I.

    In a letter dated September 10, 1941, from Chaim Weizmann (leader of Zionism and later the first president of Israel) to British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, Weizmann wrote the following:

    “There is only one big ethnic group [in America] which is willing to stand, to a man, for Great Britain, and a policy of “all-out-aid” for her – the five million Jews. From Secretary Morgenthau, Governor Lehmann, Justice Frankfurter, down to the simplest Jewish workman or trader, they are conscious of all that this struggle against Hitler implies.

    It has been repeatedly acknowledged by British statesmen, that it was the Jews who, in the last war, effectively helped to tip the scales in America in the favour of Great Britain. They are keen to do it – and may do it – again.”

    The entire letter:

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/Churchill/Weizmann_Zionists/WSC_100941.html

    A copy of the actual letter that Irving retrieved from Israel, where Weizmann’s papers are held:

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/Churchill/Weizmann_Zionists/Weizmann_Churchill_corr.pdf

    If it became widely known that Jews played a leading role in pushing the world into WW II, while Germany was repeatedly expressing its desire for peace with the west (Great Britain, France, USA) and Germany said it was aware of Jewish efforts to push the west to go to war against Germany, people might begin to think the “holocaust” was a result, possibly retaliation, for the over 10 million Germans that were killed in the war by the Jews allies.

    Adolf Hitler on the Jews role in the upcoming war:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0V_xf3OQgM&spfreload=10

    1. Observing how they look at life this is probably a self fulling prophecy for them , with a bunch of hopelessly
      brainwashed dullards going along for the ride.

  11. What is appalling in the Lancaster ban is there is absolutely no mention why Mr. Irving’s books are unacceptable – other than they were written by David Irving and present a less than flattering, fawning, brainwashed and dead view of the widespread variety after zion international canonized Churchill. One has to wonder is Madusree Mukerjee”s “Churchill’s Secret War” officially banned as well? This work describes Churchill’s criminal culpability in the Bengal Famine of 1943 in which over a million subjects of the British Empire starved to death. Churchill personally ordered food diverted to the already well supplied British troops as His majesty’s subjects watched their families, friends, and neighbors starve slowly to death in one of the most appalling man made genocides of the 20th century. Churchill’s sole response to anguished appeals for help was: “Why hasn’t Gandhi starved yet?” Your hero Boris, and plenty of other saps, not mine. If one can still find Mukerjee’s work on the failed University’s shelves, an undeniably major episode of history, then one can only conclude that Irving’s first volume comes a little too close to the truth for the sordid, inhuman khazar International with it’s brief but important description of the well fed spendthrift Mr. Churchill and his jewish backers in the meetings at London’s finest, the Savoy and elsewhere. Jewish member (and Communist spy, interned during the War as a dangerous non British national) of the Focus, Eugen Spier freely describes SOME of the groups activities with Mr. Churchill in his book titled “The Focus”. Naturally he neglected to mention Henry Strakosch’s (another ‘focuser’) timely cash gift to Churchill as he was putting his country home on the auction block to pay his debts incurred by his grotesque gluttony and ruinous gambling. For more on that see “No More Champagne”, the first volume with another planned by David Lough, who despite his herculean efforts to put Churchill in some kind of positive light, simply can’t get very far away from the gluttony and admits that what we know so far is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. Your hero, Mrs. Lancaster… Cambridge was once a great University – now, a factory for mindless saps for Globalist/ International devious inhuman zionist schemes.

    1. You wonder what Mrs. Lancaster thinks of Victor Rothschild, Churchill advisor and Communist Spy (see “The Fifth Man” by Roland Perry). It was Victor, the 3rd Lord Rothschild, who infamously advised Churchill to bomb the German trains supplying the concentration camps, saying “There will be no room for schnorrers in the new country”(Israel). Quite an admission of what many of the jews were in there for in the first place, eh Mrs. Lancaster – especially since over 150,000 LOYAL German jews served in the German military, including a general, General Milch. I guess Cambridge began its slide into rot long ago. What a shame.

  12. What is appalling in the Lancaster ban is there is absolutely no mention why Mr. Irving’s books are unacceptable

    not only that, peter,
    we just take this hook, line and sinker, gobble it up without a thought –
    Dr Irene Lancaster, a respected academic and the first teaching fellow in Jewish history at Manchester University
    is bitching about something or other that we gentiles say to other gentiles.

    And why pray is
    Dr Irene Lancaster, a respected academic and the first teaching fellow in Jewish history at Manchester University
    a RESPECTED ACADEMIC??? Who assigned this lofty designation on a coyote ugly jewess, who in any other age would have been a worn out brothel keeper, madam Slutsky not DR LANCASTER?
    why does Manchester University have a faculty spot for JEWISH GODDAMN LYING HISTORY???
    who allows her to smear the white anglosaxon race with her lies, starting with her stolen name for which alone she should be arrested and branded with hot iron in shape of kabbalah witchcraft signs?

    That’s the real crime.
    That they kill 60 million Christians at one go and we worry that “quite a few” jews are okay, let’s not rub their feelings the wrong way.
    That they are openly planning to slaughter at least another 60 million more and we worry that understanding this message is anti-semitic.

    Was Lancaster the big warplane that delivered firebombs to Dresden?
    They chose ASH WEDNESDAY because of the symbolic jewish black occult humor angle.
    There is some jewish history for you.

    1. You’re exactly right of course. It’s a title given to her by a know nothing from Christian Today, while Irving’s book is labeled “foul” because it shows how close Jews were to Churchill and how they pushed him to continue and escalate the war and then blame the incredible carnage on Hitler and the Germans. Irving’s opponent, Deborah Lipstadt, in the 2000 libel trial he brought is another one. Her degree is in religion and she is not a historian. Her sole interest in history is keeping the overblown holocaust story alive. She too is a nobody that is called “respected” by the know nothing Lügenpresse that knows what the powerful Jews want written. Probably everybody is guilty of it. I did it. Someone applies the label “respected” to someone and others repeat it and when it comes to WW II it turns everything upside down and elevates know nothing idiots like Lancaster and Lipstadt to expert status, while David Irving is deprecated because Jews don’t like the truth written about themselves.

      Virtually all the other top historians have commented on David Irving’s books, many being very complimentary and some being very critical. But virtually all, even those scoundrels that don’t like him and say he “lies” or “deceives” know it and say it, that David Irving is an expert on the material. Why does this “respected academic” Lancaster not even have a bio on Wikipedia. I consider Wikipedia a trash website when it comes to history, but it dedicates a huge article to David Irving to tear him down and they don’t even have an entry for the “respected academic” Dr. Irene Lancaster, while the Jewish run Wikipedia usually builds up Jews.

      The website “The Occidental Observer” has dedicated a section of its website, a whole series of articles on how Jews select a fellow Jew in a particular field and they build him up to guru status. They have done this with many people, such as Sigmund Freud and others. TOO wrote a series of articles on the composer Gustav Mahler and how the Jews are pushing his reputation to genius status. He never had such a high reputation before, but Jews in the media are elevating his reputation with laudatory articles on him.

      “Why Has Mahler Become a Cultural Icon?”

      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/?s=mahler&x=0&y=0

      The Jews are doing the same thing with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza. He has not been thought of as someone that had such a great impact, but Jews are elevating him to being the leading philosopher of the enlightenment period.

      “Pariah to Messiah: The Engineered Apotheosis of Baruch Spinoza”

      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/?s=spinoza&x=0&y=0

      1. Thanks for bringing these TOO articles to light, Peter.
        I just noticed that my post was in reply to Winston, sorry about my distracted carelessness.

        by the way, admin, what happened to Renouf video, both it and my comment got vaporized.

      2. @ Lobro

        I see you’ve just posted the first comment there. So everything appears to be OK. (The article was temporarily withdrawn and then reposted).

      3. Toby, Toby … is Sister Monica on sabbatical?
        better pay attention to the road curves before she returns to read you the riot act … Toby or not to be. (:|

    2. when toby the cretin around none of my comments get published that shows how unhinged he is ,sick bastard

      1. DOT COM…

        An old proverb says:

        “Every receptacle exudes the odour of the substance it contains.” 😉.

  13. Have we reached a tipping point?

    Is this the time when the majority will see that a small minority have controlled their countries and led them into wars and ruin?

    Is voting against “The Elites” destroying Jewish Power?

  14. If Churchill College, Cambridge University puts the David Irving Books back on the library shelves, and if Amazon puts Holoskeptic books back in their catalog then we will definitely know that the tipping point has been reached.

    This lady has been able to get her way. and have history books she doesn’t agree with removed from a university library, because she is a Jew. If she had been a Christian the college would not have done it.

  15. They just can’t stand the truth. It is to them as a crucifix is to Dracula. It is our most powerful weapon and it must be used full-bore soon… WHATEVER that truth may be.

  16. Jews would be a disgraced if the gentiles realized that the official holocaust story does not ring true.

  17. NOBRO IS HERE NOW, WOEBRO IS BACK WITH US AGAIN!!!! OH THANK GAWD!!

    WHAT WOULD WE DO WITHOUT OUR KNOWBRO!

  18. @ Sean

    The old proverb you quote, “Every receptacle exudes the odour of the substance it contains”, is very apt and comes from an old Sufi parable.

    Here one is told that the “perfume” of God “lingers in the soul” of those who have been touched by God, in the same way that the smell of the wine remains in the wineskin no matter how many washings or rinsings the wineskin has received with pure water.

    I was told of this parable in an email from Lasha Darkmoon a few months ago.

    1. sard, before you decide to repatriate yourself, a word of warning,

      the strong smell of god would be considered offensive in public places, eg, public transport in the sanitized godless west.

      anyone failing to use godeodorant would risk losing his job and friends.
      i am very careful about this whenever i return to toronto.

  19. David Irving posted this video on his website today of a lecture by Michael Hoffman delivered in 2001 after the Irving vs Lipstadt trial. It’s a fascinating speech. This video was banned by Google three days after it was posted on Google’s online video channel in 2006. Now it’s back. For those that don’t know, the Irving vs Lipstadt case was a libel case in which David Irving accused Deborah Lipstadt of libeling him by, among other things, calling him a “Holocaust Denier” in one of her books. David Irving acted as his own lawyer. Lipstadt received huge funding from Hollywood people, including the likes of Steven Spielberg. David Irving lost the case, which bankrupted him. In England, the losing side has to pay all the court costs.

    Michael Hoffman gives a speech about Amalek from Jewish lore and “and indicting Prof. Lipstadt and her allies for invoking the Amalekite theology, which is the “missing link” in grasping incitement to violence against WWII revisionist historians like Irving.”

    After Michael Hoffman is thru delivering his speech, Mr. Irving reveals that after the trial he learned that the Israeli Ambassador was present in the courtroom, surrounded by armed guards when the trial’s verdict was delivered. That is the first time guns were ever in a British courtroom and no doubt this was done with the permission of the judge. Combined with the threatening atmosphere Mr. Hoffman described, there is little doubt these things were on Judge Gray’s mind when he delivered the trial’s verdict.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8GB_8WCmyU&feature=youtu.be

  20. John F Kennedy, the very sane and very popular former US president’s diary is being auctioned off. JFK writing about Hitler:

    Writing while in Germany in 1945-

    ‘You can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived,’

    ‘He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him.’

    ‘He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.’

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4340596/JFK-s-diary-reveals-deep-fascination-Adolf-Hitler.html

    JFK’s admiration for the great leader is obvious and his former research assistant is doing his best to explain these sentences. More than seventy years of hatred and lies have created a distorted history in the minds of the world’s people. Kennedy’s father tried to keep the US out of WW II as the ambassador to England. Like Charles Lindbergh, he was critical of Jews and their role in pushing the world towards war. Henry Ford spoke similarly.

    But the Jewish media and Jewish financiers were more powerful than the western elites of the USA, the USSR, France and Great Britain.

Comments are closed.