Banned In America — For Being Too White

The Occidental Observer


“Sorry, sir, we can’t let you into America — you’re too White!

I was pretty excited this morning. After weeks of preparation, and months of discussions, I was getting ready to leave Europe for the United States. My purpose of travel was a week of talks and co-operation with the leadership of the National Policy Institute, with a view to significantly expanding the output of Washington Summit Publishers. I was also looking forward to socializing with some old acquaintances, and forming new friendships and alliances. My last visit to the D.C. area, two years ago, was extremely memorable. One serendipitous moment that will always stay with me was watching a Congressional debate with Kevin MacDonald, as three Ultra-Orthodox Jews took their seats in the public gallery directly behind us. You couldn’t have scripted it better.

I was chuckling to myself this morning as I recalled that incident and, with my bags packed and beside the door, I went to grab some breakfast. As I started to eat, it occurred to me to quickly check my email before I set off for the airport. There were two new emails in my inbox, but one immediately caught my eye. It was from Customs and Border Protection, and the headline immediately made my heart sink. The last time I had heard of the phrase “Your ESTA status has changed” was in Chris Dulny’s post-Charlottesville video, during which he explained that immediately on returning to Sweden both he and Daniel Friberg had received just such an email indicating that their travel privileges to the United States had been revoked. I clicked on the provided link, entered my details, and there it was:


I’ve been travelling to the United States for more than ten years now, without issue. I’ve lived there for extended periods of time, and was planning to do so again in the near future. My children are U.S. citizens, descended on their mother’s side from the earliest settlers of South Carolina. The revocation of my travel authorization is therefore a deeply personal issue, as well as a social and professional one.

It’s also a perplexing one. I have no criminal convictions or history of immigration violations. I’ve spent thousands over the last decade making sure that any paperwork necessary for my often mobile family was appropriately dealt with. Indeed, we were willing to play the game of the modern globalist state — to go along with the idea that citizenship and belonging were purely bureaucratic matters. At times this was deeply irritating, if not infuriating.

I remember at least two occasions on which my blonde, blue eyed wife was thoroughly questioned/harassed on entry into Europe by African and Pakistani immigration officials. A young woman whose family origins stretched deeply into the British Isles, Germany, and Sweden, thus found her ability to enter her ancestral homelands placed in the swarthy hands of Third World newcomers.

Today, “Border Protection” seems to mean nothing more than limiting the ability of law-abiding, documented Whites to travel freely, safely and comfortably, while turning a blind eye to floods of illegals, rapists, vandals, and welfare claimants.

” . . . turning a blind eye to floods of illegals, rapists, vandals, and welfare claimants.”

Will America be safer by preventing my entry? Perhaps.

The America slowly morphing into a coffee-colored mass of Walmart shoppers will be slightly safer. The America of bloated, parasitic capitalism will be slightly safer. The America dominated by foreign interests, and subject to the victimhood fantasies of a dangerously paranoid international clique, will be slightly safer.

The interests opposing us are only too aware that in communication lies our great strength. Our ideas are powerful, primal. They move people. The exchange and spread of our ideas is thus viewed with alarm. They must get us off the internet. They must prevent us from meeting in real life. Our marches and rallies are treated as signs of the apocalypse. They desperately seek to muzzle us while simultaneously parroting the lie that we are weak and irrelevant; nothing more than an echo of a dying America — the America they don’t want to be made safe.

In truth, it is open season on this America, the one created by the nation’s founding stock. In truth, “Homeland Security” and “Border Protection” offer protection only for the multicultural globalist project (America 2.0) while subjecting America 1.0 to an endless onslaught of demographic displacement and interracial rape and violence. The horrifying reality is that the dystopia we are seeing unfold is less 1984, and more Turner Diaries.

Over a century ago, a Jewish intellectual from Europe arrived at a New York harbor. Sigmund Freud stood on the deck with Carl Jung, and as he scanned the horizon of surging skyscrapers he turned to his disciple, whom he referred to as ‘the Aryan,” and whispered, “They don’t realize we’re bringing them the plague.”


“If only Americans knew, we are bringing them the plague!”

I find it ironic that one of the most important questions featured in modern U.S. immigration paperwork is whether the traveler has any “communicable diseases.” The border officials of a century ago may have succeeded in the quarantine of tuberculosis and affiliated diseases, but they had no defense against the ‘plague’ brought by Freud and others like him.

They were ineffectual at preventing the spread of the contagion of Cultural Marxism, the mendacity of Boasian anthropology, or the insidious and warped calculation of psychoanalysis. By the 1960s these “communicable diseases” had weakened America 1.0 sufficiently for it to abandon its sense of self and throw its doors open to the world.

Today’s borders are even more porous, although it appears that the Deep State has now designated the desire for White survival to be a “communicable disease.” In the eyes of the corrupt status quo, therefore, it is I, and those like me, who bring “the plague.” We carry with us a ‘contagion’ that might help awaken White America to its impending destruction, that might help it to remember that it was once called to a higher task, and a future better than that offered by being a soulless, deracinated consumer.

Have our overlords succeeded today? Perhaps. But only in the way that an antibiotic may, for a time, offer some resistance to a virulent and adaptive pathogen. Our ideas, as I said, are powerful. The status quo has become bloated, its tactics tired. We are mobile, determined, and tactically agile. We are resilient. We came back to Charlottesville.

And I’ll see you in D.C. yet.

55 thoughts to “Banned In America — For Being Too White”

  1. Dr. Joyce –

    We are being forced to become radical, or fade away. Remember that the next time you hear some white would-be “intellectual” call someone “bigot” or “racist” in disdain. I know (and am friends with) Klansmen who were at the Charlottesville event. In everyday life, they are typical of “middle America” – but are often ridiculed by their own ethnicity. The farther we fall, the harder the climb back to good ground. We need all the help we can get!

  2. Dr Joyce =

    You wrote:
    “The interests opposing us are only too aware that in communication lies our great strength.”
    “They must get us off the internet.”

    They want us on the internet. That’s how they tracked you.

    Your communication – monitored – is their great strength also.

    1. Pat,
      Agreed. Back in 2003, in the mountains of North Carolina, I went onto a “controversial” website. Three days later, at my place of work (a Walmart Super Center) a trench coat showed up and started asking me questions . I refused to answer. He than sat in the closed deli section for an hour pretending to read a book. Later, he left. Believe me, all your Internet activity is being watched. Even every post you do on this website is monitored…….probably by Israeli housewives in Haifa.

      1. Don –


        It is no great stretch of anyone’s thought process when they learn the internet was started as a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) project… known as ARPANET.

        Brief History of the Internet

        The first recorded description of the social interactions that could be enabled through networking was a series of memos written by J.C.R. Licklider of MIT in August 1962 discussing his “Galactic Network” concept. He envisioned a globally interconnected set of computers through which everyone could quickly access data and programs from any site. In spirit, the concept was very much like the Internet of today. Licklider was the first head of the computer research program at DARPA, starting in October 1962.

        While at DARPA he convinced his successors at DARPA, Ivan Sutherland, Bob Taylor, and MIT researcher Lawrence G. Roberts, of the importance of this networking concept.

        Leonard Kleinrock at MIT published the first paper on packet switching theory in July 1961 and the first book on the subject in 1964. Kleinrock convinced Roberts of the theoretical feasibility of communications using packets rather than circuits, which was a major step along the path towards computer networking. The other key step was to make the computers talk together. To explore this, in 1965 working with Thomas Merrill, Roberts connected the TX-2 computer in Mass. to the Q-32 in California with a low speed dial-up telephone line creating the first (however small) wide-area computer network ever built.

        The result of this experiment was the realization that the time-shared computers could work well together, running programs and retrieving data as necessary on the remote machine, but that the circuit switched telephone system was totally inadequate for the job. Kleinrock’s conviction of the need for packet switching was confirmed.

        In late 1966 Roberts went to DARPA to develop the computer network concept and quickly put together his plan for the “ARPANET”, publishing it in 1967.

        At the conference where he presented the paper, there was also a paper on a packet network concept from the UK by Donald Davies and Roger Scantlebury of NPL. Scantlebury told Roberts about the NPL work as well as that of Paul Baran and others at RAND.

        The RAND group had written a paper on packet switching networks for secure voice in the military in 1964. It happened that the work at MIT (1961-1967), at RAND (1962-1965), and at NPL (1964-1967) had all proceeded in parallel without any of the researchers knowing about the other work.

        The word “packet” was adopted from the work at NPL and the proposed line speed to be used in the ARPANET design was upgraded from 2.4 kbps to 50 kbps.

        (much more at the link above)

  3. Gilbert,
    Speaking as one who has studied guerrilla war. There will be no change in the descent of the USA into the abyss, unless patriots are willing to take drastic action. All guerrilla leaders in the 20th Century studied the methodology of Michael Collins, leader of the IRA during Ireland’s War of Independence, who targeted policeman, particularly Special Branch (political police) in Dublin Castle. He even had an informer in their ranks. The US is a very target rich area, banksters, shyster academics, politicians et al. Most importantly, take a leaf out of Farah Aidid’s book, the Somali, who totally eschewed electronic communications, thereby neutralizing the electronic warfare specialists sent by the US military to capture him. The Rangers got the thrashing of their lives in Mogadishu. Shun all electronic communications between members, no tech trumps the hi tech of the NSA. Remember the Unabomber was only caught because a family member recognised his style of writing. Avoid atrocities such as attacks on civilians. Shysters and oppressors only. The American people would applaud every banker that got topped.

    Deal ruthlessly with informers. I had a very close friend of mine recently retire from the Northern Irish Service who told me of the “six pack” punishment meted out by both the Prods and the Boyos to informers; a bullet in each elbow, both kneecaps and both ankles. They’ll never play rugby again, that’s for sure.

    However as I am not an American, and have absolutely no desire ever to travel there, this advice is offered only hypothetically. I doubt whether there are enough Americans willing to take such risks to free their country. I’m afraid your country and its people are doomed.

    1. I know I shouldn’t be commenting here since I’ve recused myself, but I know Lobro won’t mind if I take this opportunity to praise this excellent comment by Felix. It says more in three short paragraphs than some published writers say in three books.

      These’s no doubt at all that avoiding detection must be the prime aim of any resistance fighter doubling as a highly principled assassin engaged in guerrilla warfare. Such fighters must have had it so much easier in the old days before internet surveillance and DNA testing. 99.99% of those who get nabbed by the police have either compromised themselves by careless online activity or leaving behind their DNA traces.

      Felix’s suggestion is to avoid communicating by computer. You can’t hope to get away with murder if you email your mistress: “Relax, I’m gonna bump off the wife next week!” Far greater discretion is advised. Not that anyone on this respectable family site is thinking of uxoricide — I hope that’s the right word for wife killing — but you know what I mean.

      Detective story writers are always planning “the perfect murder”. I’d love to know if such a thing is possible if one is engaged in systematic assassination like the killer in Frederick Forsythe’s thriller “The Day of the Jackal”. People can be caught by DNA traces left behind at the scene of the crime 30 years ago.

      Another thing that leaves you open to detection is to trust other people, i.e. fellow conspirators, in the hope that all of them will remain loyal to you and keep their mouths shut. It only takes ONE informer or infiltrator to bring down the whole cabal. The Unabomber, the lone fighter, may be relatively safe, but how much can one man accomplish? Not much. 40-50 men working in unison will be much more effective. But they are so much more likely to be caught, especially if they have wives.

      Sorry, this is a bit off-topic. But if we are talking about “White resistance” to police oppression, we need to do three things: (1) avoid communicating online. (2) avoid leaving behind our DNA traces. (3) avoid the mistake of trusting someone likely to betray you.

      There may be other factors to bear in mind. I leave that to others.
      I haven’t got that far. I’m just a guy approaching this from the viewpoint of a crime novelist.

      1. Sard, of course i won’t mind if you praise felix, the teutonic guerilla champ and my personal friend whom i look forward to seeing again soon.

        There was another, ages ago at xymphora, by the name grettir, a boon addition to any forum, who tried to organize a collegial convention of like-minded posters in Mexico … unfortunately apathy prevailed.
        But short of face-to-face, all we can do here is send telepathic winks, not in Collins’ fighting manual.
        Exchanging online tales of personal Rambo exploits leaves me distinctly unmotivated.
        Not questioning your Zen ability to deliver lethal kicks while running sideways inside a walled courtyard 🙂 mind you.

    2. Good advice, Felix! Thank you. A couple of decades ago, I DID devise a method of communicating off-phone and off-line, but it only is useful for in-county communique. Now, throughout our state, we are pretty well in touch when necessary – facilitated by our local governments (unbeknownst to them). Can’t say more, obviously, but we all know the day is coming when we’ll need it. 😏

  4. Thank you for fine article, Dr. Darkmoon and Administration, and Dr. Joyce, current recipient of Zundel type illegal persecution. Good observations about electronics by Pat and Felix. For once I agree with Freud. We need some medicine to wipe out the sickness. Small Pox vaccine was developed when it was noticed By Dr. Jenner that milkmaids developed an immunity through exposure to Cowpox. I’d suggest using similar methodology to deal with the “imported Plague” as mentioned by Freud. Mohamedd Farrah Aidid’s guidelines are one of many historical examples (Aidid died in 1996, so his success was short lived). Shunning electronics is good advice. So is avoiding non selective consumerism – hitting ’em in the wallet is always very painful and practical.

    Now , let’s take a brief look at recent history. The development of ISIS, “Islamic” State of Iraq and Syria, is not without useful historical comparisons. “The World Significance of the Russian Revolution” by George Pitt-Rivers is a brief but very good little known book available to readers today. On page 32 he describes the career of one of the lead murderers, Jean Baptiste Carrier in the Illuminati (Frankfurt Jew) inspired French Revolution. “Carrier enrolled companies of criminals, negroes and mulattos, one of which was called “The Company of Marat,” just as Trotsky & Co. formed Terrorist Troops and Chinese Gangs in Russia, and just as the troops of “Lenin Boys,” under a useful homocidal Jew maniac called Szamuelly, were formed during the Communist Terror in Hungary. These companies were used by Carrier to butcher men, women and children, chiefly of the peasant class, as Prudhomme describes, during the terror at Nantes. It was Carrier who invented the famous “noyades” or wholesale drownings, which also took place at Nantes; when, according to the estimate of one of Carrier’s own committee, 9,000 people, priests, peasants and women with babies were herded into barges, which were taken out and sunk in the Loire”. Typical Illuminati (Frankfurt Jew), Bolshevik, and now ISIS methodology – mass murder.

    Now a closer comparison with ISIS recruitment as typified by now dead French Jew Simon Elliot (“al Baghdadi”, Sen. John McCain’s favorite coffee partner) and the Mossad Israeli captured in Libya masquerading as an Islamic Imam, Benjamin Elliot, who conned Libyan recruits to murder Egyptian Copts and others. Oh, and don’t forget the seduction of the Kurds by Mossad officer Lt. Col Sagi while we’re in the ME. Back to Pitt-Rivers, page 26: “The Bolsheviks…have systematically appealed to the cupidity,acquisitiveness and lust of those with little to lose, by holding out to them the prospects of enrichment, at the expense of those to be dispossessed, and of acquiring their women.” SOUND FAMILIAR? Pitt-Rivers continues: “In the words of the decree of the Soviet of Kronsdat posted in Saratoff in East Russia and in Ekaterinberg in the beginning of 1919, “Social inequalities and legitimate marriages having been a condition in the past which served as an instrument of the bourgeoisie, thanks to which all the best species of all the beautiful have been the property of the bourgeoisie, the proper continuation of the human race has been prevented. All women according to this decree are exempted from private ownership, and are proclaimed to be the property of the whole nation.” What, therefore, was merely voluntary promiscuity in the earlier communisms became rape in Bolshevik Russia.”

    Now, we look at Europe and the USA, where Soros is flooding docile countries with the most hostile swarms of savages and vengeful culturally impossible to assimilate who’ve had their lives stolen from them by the likes of Mr. Elliot and Efraim. Syria (and Iraq, and Lebanon, soon others) is turning the corner and the EU and the US can too, far more easily in fact than the cost born by Syria. The Jew provided the means – by properly and appropriately redirecting and guiding the anger of these miserable humans to the real criminals responsible for their pain – the Jew, agent of Shaitan.

    1. That’s “Benjamin Efraim” captured in Libya, not Elliot. My apologies. Now, please feel free to quote me when befriending new citizens, no soap boxes necessary – one good Arabic speaker can do far more to deliver the message among his fellows. Woe to the Zionists.

  5. The US is a very target rich area, banksters, shyster academics, politicians et al.

    And ain’t it funny how the only targets “terrorists” can seem to find are white schools, white churches, white gatherings and Jew leased trade towers with billion dollar insurance policies?

    OK, for all those stupid “terrorists” who are either illiterate and did not read the book on communist revolutionary takeover or failed to pay attention in tactics school, here are the basics, a short list of goals for insurrectionist takeover: (Of course this is assuming that, as a terrorist, one actually has specific goals in mind for their Jihad.)

    1. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If the U.N. charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one world government with its own independent armed forces.
    2. Capture one or both political parties in the United States. (In David Horowitz’s book The Shadow Party, he shows how the Democratic Party is now under the control of what he calls the Shadow Party of Socialist-Communist influences.)
    3. Get Control of the Schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the Party line in textbooks.
    4. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
    5. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
    6. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. Eliminate all good sculptures from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.
    6. Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.
    7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
    8. Break down culture standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
    9. Present homo-sexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
    10. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”
    11. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.” (A.C.L.U. lawyers accomplished this goal in a very short 4 years from publication of the book The Naked Communist.)
    12. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a world-wide basis. (In 2012, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsberg and A.C.L.U. member said exactly this while visiting Cairo, Egypt.)
    13. Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
    14. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of “the big picture.” Give more emphases to Russian history since the Communist took over.
    15. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture, education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
    16. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
    17. Infiltrate and gain control of big business. (Then move the jobs overseas, to stifle the American economy. Import goods from other countries, to create an imbalance of trade.)
    18. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
    19. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influences of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of the parents.
    20. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use “united force” to solve economic, political or social problems. (Occupy Wall Street is being organized by the Communist Party.)

    Hey stupid! Can you see anywhere on this list where it says to mindlessly shoot up schoolyards or concerts? If as a terrorist, one is mindlessly shooting up schools and concerts, then they are NOT following the plan for takeover and thus commit actions contrary to the stated goals of revolutionary overthrow! And after all, isn’t that what terrorism is supposed to be all about?

    Next time why not try a television station? Why not shoot a few talking heads before taking to the camera and announcing that the revolution has begun and you are taking over America. How about blowing up a leading New York newspaper to show how much you hate the media hate campaign directed against you. Then again one could takeover a university’s administrative offices and train a machine gun on the hostages; that seemed to work well in the sixties.

    Or why not target a few of those immensely wealthy Jewish capitalist oppressing your people in Palestine? Why not provide the media with Jewish blood and guts splashed all over the screen, instead of the blood of innocent children? Next time why not blow up a top government administration building instead of a trade tower to make your statement – or did you miss V for Vendetta?

    Is it not obvious that your present murderous actions only serves to set the rank and file against you? Think about how you feel when you see the IDF murdering your children with head shots, does this help turn your people towards supporting the Jew’s settlement plan? How about doing something constructive instead of random acts of violence and vandalism? How about getting some goals stupid!

    Instead, why not have people help you out by targeting (((those people))) oppressing them, as opposed to slaughtering innocent people on music appreciation night? Why not go to your local library and check out a few books about Robin Hood and Jesse James to find out how they used that very technique to gain people’s affection.

    Just how much genius does it take to realize that you, the rabid terrorists bent on a sacred Jihad, are doing nothing more than helping Jews achieve their goal of taking over the country? After that, what do you think the plan is for all you “terrorists” that helped them achieve their goal?

  6. The US is lost, its takeover complete, only when the parasite jumps ship to its next victim can the nation begin to rise again.

  7. France has the same and maybe already an even more “YUGE” ‘no-white’ problem as does the US….

    African Births Will Outnumber French Births in France in 3 to 5 Years!

    The national rate of African births in France is 39%. And, an astonishing 73% of children born in Paris are African.

    [9,335] 🙂

    1. In 2012, when Nicolas Sarkozy was the President of France, he gave a speech on globalist plans for France: “The goal is to meet the challenge of racial interbreeding. The challenge of racial interbreeding that faces us in the 21st Century. It’s not a choice, it’s an obligation. It’s imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We risk finding ourselves confronted with major problems. We MUST change; therefore we WILL change. We are going to change ALL at the same time. In business, in administration, in education, in the political parties. And we will obligate ourselves as to results. If this volunteerism does not work for the Republic, then the State will move to still more coercive measures.“

      Looks as if France is on target for non-white births, wonder if there are stats on bi-racial births, the obvious goal of the “interbreeding” Sarkozy was talking about.

      1. And Sarkozy is a Jew, devoted to the Kalergi Plan, just like the Jewropean Parliament:
        Some internet sites have reported that the number of babies born to blacks in Paris, France, is now 54%, according to the medical reports of the incidence of drepanocytosis in that country… However, the statistics clearly show that it is only a minority of Africans who have this inherited disease. In other words, if 54% of births in Paris show up with sickle cell, then the actual number of black births in Paris is actually far higher.

      2. Carnaptious,
        I guess in the future when American servicemen ask a “French” woman to talk dirty to them she’ll respond with vocal grunts, clicks and whistles…….the language of the African pygmies. 🙂

  8. It is too late to expect the success for a ‘white’ nationalist movement. One reason the so-called minorities, which are really the majority on many occasions, became so influential in politics and the workplace is because a ruling, controlling “elite” allowed that to occur. At this point, it will only be allowed for their purpose of causing strife, division, fighting.

    There is already a Law in place provided by God and it is the only Law. No-man has the right to rule over another. Period. That is the Movement that needs to be promoted if the defeat of the NWO is sought. There is no other Law, nor is there any other Way, but one.

    The ‘New Song’

    1. The right to self defense (legal on earth and in heaven) actually compels a person, a city, a nation to ‘rule over’ miscreants, cretins and goblins disguised as human beings. Scum of the earth I believe they’re called.
      And rule over them with as big a stick as is necessary.

      A ‘built in’ human default (thanks be) not needing any inner or outer contemplation to cipher.

  9. Unlimited and illegal immigration is going to be the destruction of America and it is being led by the Zionists and just as a parasite destroys its host , so shall the Zionists destroy America.

    1. DF –

      You wrote:
      “Unlimited and illegal immigration is going to be the destruction of America”

      Chief Powhatan told Pocahontas about that crapola in 1612.!! 🙂


      1. And they’re giving away a free iphone to every FEMA customer!

        Probably have people lining up and fighting to get in, just like WalMart on Black Fridays.

  10. America is a Jewish country, and has been for some 20, 25 years if not longer. It’s too late. Witness how the Republicans put up no resistance, as an example.

  11. The author’s travel is ‘banned in America’ not so much for being white as it is for the fact that he can afford to travel, and do intellectual work. The Rothschilds’ Shabbos Goyim are following instructions for the control necessary for destroying the middle class intelligentsia who happen to be mainly white people.

  12. I guess this site is sponsored by Soros, the Rothschilds’ right hand:

    More Rothschild-owned media:
    ‘In 2008, Reuters reports, a survey of east Germans found 52% believed the free-market economy was “unsuitable” and 43% said they wanted socialism back. Karl Marx may be dead and buried in Highgate cemetery, but he’s alive and well among credit-hungry Germans… Karl Marx was recently chosen from a list of 10 contenders to appear on a new issue of MasterCard by customers of German bank Sparkasse in Chemnitz. In communist East Germany from 1953 to 1990, Chemnitz was known as Karl Marx Stadt… There’s another reason why Marxism has something to teach us as we struggle through economic depression, other than its analysis of class struggle. It is in its analysis of economic crisis. In his formidable new tome Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism, Slavoj Žižek tries to apply Marxist thought on economic crises to what we’re enduring right now… This is surely Marxism at its most liberating, suggesting that our futures depend on us and our readiness for struggle… Surely there is no straight line from The Communist Manifesto to the gulags…’

    Oh, yes, there is! Travel bans are just the beginning.

  13. This writer, white or otherwise, should thank his lucky stars for being refused entry into the real Nazi Germany. Who the hell wants to step onto the bloody soil of the USS Titanic just as it is about to sink? It’s high time to get the hell out of the USA.

    Once the Great Crash begins or when they preempt it by going to war vs. Iran, North Korea, China, and/or Russia, you’d wish you were far far away from that land of FEMA camps. And remember 10 minutes too late . . . is TOO LATE!

    1. “Once the Great Crash begins or when they preempt it by going to war vs. Iran, North Korea, China, and/or Russia, you’d wish you were far far away from that land of FEMA camps.”

      My feelings exactly. Orange Clown’s pushing hard, and he seems to have painted himself into a corner with all of his bellicose rhetoric toward North Korea and Iran. I don’t think there’s much time left.

  14. I’ve been reviewing Andrew Joyce’s Twitter timeline to see if and when he announced his upcoming visit to the USA. I can’t find an entry that spills the beans on his travel plans, but Joyce did begin a new timeline in mid-August, the previous one having been deleted. That seems to happen with uncommon frequency to conservative commentators, although the “Kill Whitey” variety of tweets made by so called progressives seem to be quite OK.

    It’s easy enough to see (((whose))) feathers Joyce might have ruffled as the time approached for his US visit. Beginning in mid-August, Joyce began posting examples of tweets that almost invariably begin with “Fellow White people” or variations on that theme. And just as invariably, it turns out that these are people who soon announced that “I’m not white, I’m Jewish” or variations on that theme. There are literally dozens of examples, many of them promoting anti-White books or anti-White articles, while some are simply anti-White comments. More than a few of them claim Whiteness is a social construct, doesn’t exist, or is wholly invented, but they also assert that Whiteness, and hence White people, must be abolished, eliminated, or be forced into extinction.

    Featured prominently in some of Joyce’s tweets are textbooks on Diversity, Multiculturalism and Whiteness, big sellers apparently at college and university bookstores. Our (((“fellow Whites”))) in teaching positions are able to require the often outrageously expensive textbooks they wrote be purchased for courses that are required in order to graduate. I’m just guessing now, but it appears that it would not be difficult to fill a small library with nothing but books on the “benefits” of Diversity and Multiculturalism, and the “evils” of Whiteness, almost all of them written by our (((“fellow Whites”))).

    As noted by Felix, Pat and Winston, anyone who shares anything electronically should know by now that the information will be sucked into Five Eyes + Israel databases. Snowden’s revelations of widespread surveillance weren’t exactly “news” because quite a few people had been speaking or writing on the subject for years, but until Snowden’s documentation was released all such claims could be dismissed as “conspiracy theories”. Even assuming that Joyce did not make his travel plans widely known, he still had to reserve airline tickets, obtain a visa, reserve a hotel room and possibly a rental car. In addition, he undoubtedly communicated by e-mail or cell phone with the National Policy Institute, where he was to participate in talks, and he probably touched base with the friends he intended to visit. Any of those electronic transactions would have been gobbled into the gaping maw of the surveillance state, ready to be used against him at an appropriate time.

    Joyce’s Tweets no doubt caused considerable consternation among the (((“fellow Whites”))) he featured in his tweets, some of whom are quite influential or well connected. The dots are easily connected. Furthermore, Israel gets a copy of all of the raw data collected by NSA, including data they are not supposed to see. Israeli intelligence agencies are then trusted to remove and delete the data they should not see, but I have a bridge to sell to anyone who believes that actually happens. If complaints from (((“fellow Whites”))) don’t get the desired reaction from US authorities, a call back “home” can bring bigger guns to bear on their behalf.

    The Anti Defamation League has recently joined with Twitter to “bring balance” to Twitter, but what results from that unholy union can hardly be called balanced. The ADL’s influence is already becoming obvious as conservative voices are silenced repeatedly, while the violent, murderous or genocidal voices of progressives are given free rein. Check out Andrew Joyce’s timeline linked above to see examples of what progressives are allowed to say while conservatives get banned for even minor infractions of Twitter rules, and sometimes for no apparent reason other than being conservative voices.

    Had Andrew Joyce not been blocked from traveling to the USA, he might well have found himself in much deeper waters. Robert Spencer, another pro-White activist denounced as a White Supremacist, is planning a trip to Florida to speak next week, and Florida’s governor has already declared a state of emergency!

    Those who see this thirty year old drive to eliminate White people as a war already lost fail to account for the desperation that would cause Florida’s governor to declare an emergency. Clearly, it’s not just Spencer’s presence that elicits such a reaction, but a growing fear that whatever Spencer might say will find a receptive audience in Florida. And that would seem to be case judging from the results of a recent poll that found 67% of working class White people feel they are discriminated against, and a majority (> 50%) of middle class Whites also feel that way. Like it or not, we are living in very interesting times.

    1. CARNAPTIOUS, just adding to your post:
      The CIA received its first files on citizens and its first strategies from the ADL…
      We are bombarded with the theory that the race features one is born with are a social construct, while transgenderism is natural. Are there really people who believe this nonsense?

      1. Are there really people who believe this nonsense?

        Oh, yeah. Millions of ’em, probably 80% or more of college graduates since the mid-1990s. I had a sister, now deceased, who worked her butt off to get into UCLA, only to find that the Cultural Marxists had already become entrenched there (in 1992). She dropped out after just two quarters rather than face two years worth of required courses in Womens Studies, Black Studies, Critical Race Theory, and endlessly confessing her “White Privilege”.

      2. [Here is some self-revealing dialectics: ‘deadly white supremacists… Replaceables’]
        ‘Following the deadly white-supremacist rally on August 12, 2017, in Charlottesville, Virginia, we asked three writers to share their thoughts on the causes and consequences of that weekend…
        A Basket of Replaceables by Peter Trachtenberg
        All the time I was watching the young white fascists rioting in Charlottesville, I kept thinking, Those losers…’

        [More self-revealing manipulators and controllers:]
        …White supremacy has roots in scientific racism and it often relies on pseudoscientific arguments. Like most similar movements such as neo-Nazism, white supremacists typically oppose people of color as well as people who are members of most religions.… Christian Identity is another movement closely tied to white supremacy… Creativity (formerly known as “The World Church of the Creator”) is atheistic and it denounces Christianity and other theistic religions.[52][53] Aside from this, its ideology is similar to that of many Christian Identity groups because it believes in the antisemitic conspiracy theory that there is a “Jewish conspiracy” in control of governments, the banking industry and the media…
        White supremacist recruitment activities are primarily conducted at a grassroots level as well as on the Internet. Widespread access to the Internet has led to a dramatic increase in white supremacist websites.[57] The Internet provides a venue to openly express white supremacist ideas at little social cost, because people who post the information are able to remain anonymous.
        …Many of us were, and are, angry. Many of us have been for some time about the resurgence of white supremacy and anti-Semitism we see all over the world… If you are feeling distressed and heated, you have reason to be. White supremacy makes Jesus angry… The church should call white supremacy what it is: terrorism, but more than terrorism. White supremacy is Satanism. Even worse, white supremacy is a devil-worship that often pretends that it is speaking for God. White supremacy angers Jesus of Nazareth. The question is: Does it anger his church?

      3. Thanks for those links. Sadly, there’s no shortage of similar material, and more is generated every day. The only group of people who are not permitted to be proud of their race, proud of their achievements, and proud of their culture are White people. According to the dogma of the communist left, there is no such thing as a white race, but white people are born racists; all the achievements of White people were stolen from others in acts of cultural appropriation; and White culture, as well as White people, don’t exist. It’s also impossible for non-Whites to be racist, and impossible for White people not to be racists. There’s an amusing video of an Antifa protester, who has been “punching nazis all day”, getting chastised by other Antifa members for being White, being a racist, and “having racism in his DNA”. No more links allowed, sorry.

    1. Andy –

      I’ll bet pooper was thinking,”Why, oh why, does Sir Evelyn make me do this??”

      Seems that by the look on the the black guy’s face on the girl’s left, he was asking something similar.. 🙂

    2. The ‘Black’ and ‘White’ the duality.
      White is Black, and Black is White.
      ‘good/evil’, ‘true’/’false’…. etc.

      “Sorry, sir, we can’t let you into America — you’re too White!
      White meaning ; conformist, pseudo intellectual, academic, scribe, politician ..etc

      John 13:5-6-8
      ” After that he poureth water into a bason, and began to wash the disciples’ feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded. Then cometh he to Simon Peter: and Peter saith unto him, Lord, dost thou wash my feet ? Peter saith unto him, Thou shalt never wash my feet. Jesus answered him, If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me.”

      1. @ Duke

        Sir Evelyn Rothschild approves of your comment.

        Dr. Andrew Joyce was not allowed into America because he refused to wash black negro feet. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

        By the way, where in the Bible does it say Jesus kissed Peter’s foot? Washing the negro immigrant’s foot and kissing it are not the same thing.

        When Jesus did it for His disciples, it was symbolic of spiritual cleansing and His humility. Pray tell, what is the symbolic significance of Pope Francis kissing the negro immigrant’s foot?

      2. JfC, I like your insightful sense of humour. 🙂
        Symbolism has been the hidden political weapon for 20 centuries. It’s blasphemy for us, slaves, to interpret it, and therefore punishable, so don’t ask 😉

      3. @ GFC
        Re: Banned In America { ? For Being Too White ? }

        Give my regards to Sir Evelin, the devil himself.
        My quote from the New Testament:
        ” When Jesus did it for His disciples, it was symbolic of
        spiritual cleansing and His humility.” This is true and
        it exposes the Pope’s fake gesture, however, you did not
        post the image to expose the Pope, you had another
        motive in support of Andrew’s article.

        The article is written by a pseudo intellectual with
        racialist overtones. The message is that a person’s
        mindset(spirit), is determined by the color of his skin.
        (outside appearances).

        By the way, will you allow me to wash your feet ?
        The faithful witness

  15. I can relate to the author and the article. I only doubt the statement that it was to Jung, among 5 psychologists on board of the German steamship George Washington in August 1909 when the two were already at loggerheads, that Freud said that nasty sentence, let alone that Jung would have upheld such a morbid attitude, and would have agreed to be called “Freud’s disciple”. The two had a brief relationship when Jung was very young, no cooperation, and did not agree on anything. It’s sad that Jung had to put up with constant harassment by the overbearing tribe, and now his name is placed in the same bag with them. At that conference at the Clark University in Massachusetts, where Freud’s daughter Anna raised a statue of her father, Freud gave 5 lectures [on psychology of sex, including infant sexuality], and Jung 3 [on how human mind uses associations]. The audience was manipulated so that many more attended Freud’s lectures than Jung’s [or anyone else’s]. At that time, Freud was better accepted in the US than in Europe.

    It wouldn’t be smart to advocate a ban on studying psychology or any related science, particularly when it is clear that organisations, such as Tavistock, intelligence agencies and the military sector, are, often secretly, doing research in this field, and applying the findings on the population with success. If we have no knowledge of this field, we are a more vulnerable target.

    1. @ Snez

      You’re quite right about Freud and Jung. They were poles apart. Ultimately, the factor that led to the complete breakdown of the relationship between them was Jung’s questioning of Freud’s “authority”. The word “authority” lies at the root of their mutual antagonism, for it was the exact word Freud used in a show-down with Jung which Jung later reported on at some length.

      Jung’s great sin when it came to Freud and the Freudians was Jung’s refusal to become a disciple of Freud, an uncritical admirer of the Master and his assumptions — none of which had any emprirical basis. A book worth reading, in which Freud is outed as a fraud, is Hans Eysencks’ “The Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire.”

      Freud was a man deeply in need of psychotherapy himself. He had oral cancer exacerbated by chain smoking and cocaine addiction, both of which he indulged in enthusiastically with the full knowledge that they were making things worse for him. He also believed that smoking was a “substitute for masturbation.” So, go figure! 🙂

      1. Thanks, Toby. 🙂 Here is a solid explanation, although I wouldn’t entirely agree with the rest of the text:
        ‘A main schism which separates the two psychiatrists pertains to religion. Freud felt religion was an escape and a fallacy, which ought not to be propagated. His relationship to religion resembles that of Karl Marx. Religion was “opiate” of the masses. His faith was fully in the mind’s ability to access its unconscious thoughts, thus curing any neuroses.
        Jung conversely believed that religion was an important place of safety for the individual as he or she began the process of individuation, exploring and accepting all parts of the self. Religion further was a means of communication between all types of people, because although religions differed, the archetypes and symbols remained the same…
        In some of Freud’s letters, he accuses Jung of anti-Semitism, based not so much on the acceptance of Judaism as a religion, but rather on discrimination against Jews in general. Jung’s respect for the religious aspects of Jewish life was greater than Freud’s however.’

  16. Disciple: Actually, Freud had a rather pessimistic view of human nature: he believed that we are all beset with irrational and chaotic impulses that cannot be eliminated.

    Śrīla Prabhupāda: This is not only pessimism, but evidence of his poor fund of knowledge. He did not have perfect knowledge, nor was he trained by a *perfect man. Therefore his theories are all nonsense.
    (see Nietzsche for definition of ‘perfect man’)
    Disciple: Whereas Freud was sexually oriented, Jung was more or less spiritually oriented. In his autobiography – Memories, Dreams, Reflections – Jung writes, “I find that all my thoughts circle around God like the planets around the sun, and are as irresistibly attracted by Him. I would feel it to be the grossest sin if I were to put up any resistance to this force.” Jung sees all creatures as parts of God and at the same time unique in themselves. He writes, “Man cannot compare himself with any other creature; he is not a monkey, not a cow, not a tree. I am a man. But what is it to be that? Like every other being, I am a splinter of the infinite Deity….”

    Śrīla Prabhupāda: It is also our philosophy that we are part and parcel of God, just as sparks are part of a fire.

    Disciple: Jung further writes in his autobiography, “It was obedience which brought me grace….One must be utterly abandoned to God; nothing matters but fulfilling His will. Otherwise, all is folly and meaningless.”

    Śrīla Prabhupāda: Very good. Surrender unto God is real spiritual life.

    Dialectic Spiritualism: A Vedic View of Western Philosophy (partial)

    1. Thank you HP for a good link. As obvious, Jung was the first benevolent “globalist” because he studied and analysed religion, philosophy, anthropology and art on a planetary level, with a view to understanding the mind, as psychologists should do, and would have done without the interference of rabbis’ egotism:
      ‘A rabbi debates God and defeats Him. God admits the rabbi won the debate.’ – Baba Mezia 59b
      I think that Jung managed to achieve a certain level of objectivity, a far higher level than Freud and Adler, and not to mention later Jewish “psychologists” who have manipulatively overtaken this field, as Jews, with the help of the Rothschilds now own science. The most prolific scientists today come from white people and Indians, but are kept on Jewish leash, which is the best that can happen to them.
      Three things, I think, that people generally miss when they judge prophets, scientists and artists are: 1) that each icon is still human, and as such under the influence of their racial, cultural and personal background; 2) God has a different meaning to different people, and these differences exist on many levels: individual, small groups, nations and even continents; and 3) religions, science and art, as they are today, include the entire human history before the 1st century BC – if we cut that period out, our understanding is crippled, and thus our welbeing.
      In my opinion, ancient Greeks gave a great contribution, by recognising that humans have ‘free will’, which they believed Gods allowed to humans, and which was a continuation of the Sumerian-Indian thought on the Fate-Destiny relation. At the same time, the Nordic tradition, which has been on life support for centuries, realised that true human will is the evolution of nature.

      1. Thanks, HP. I don’t see them as opposite, and wouldn’t use “vs” between them. Predestination presupposes infinity [as physicists, and for example, modern Taoists, call it], or eternity [as most religions and philosophies call it]. Among Christian thinkers, in my opinion, Thomas Aquinas was closest to understanding that they are in unity, rather than contrast, or separation. What differs is how we experience it.
        I don’t know about other commenters here, but I can’t always open your links. In this context, it is sad that the best diamonds of human thought and writing cannot be found on the web.

    2. Homer,

      Thanks for your very helpful and wise contributions to this site in regard to the recent discussion comparing Freud and Jung. This quote you gave strikes at the very heart of the difference between the two thinkers and makes me realize how steeped Jung must have been in Indian philosophy:

      Disciple: Whereas Freud was sexually oriented, Jung was more or less spiritually oriented. In his autobiography – Memories, Dreams, Reflections – Jung writes, “I find that all my thoughts circle around God like the planets around the sun, and are as irresistibly attracted by Him. I would feel it to be the grossest sin if I were to put up any resistance to this force.” Jung sees all creatures as parts of God and at the same time unique in themselves. He writes, “Man cannot compare himself with any other creature; he is not a monkey, not a cow, not a tree. I am a man. But what is it to be that? Like every other being, I am a splinter of the infinite Deity….”

      “Like every other being, I am a splinter of the infinite Deity” is pure Vedanta. Jung accepted that, as Shankara, Madhva and Ramanuja would have done. Freud, being totally rooted in a rabid atheism, would have scoffed at it as being “mystical mumbojumbo”.

      1. LD, complete agreement as to Freud.
        As the Swami said – “Therefore his theories are all nonsense”

        Thanks and best of fortune to you.

  17. Covington’s Twelve Principles
    1. Covington’s Paradox: “The Cause is so right. The people in it are so wrong.”
    2. Covington’s Corollary: “Just because the people in it are so wrong, does not mean that the Cause is not right.”
    3. If and when there is White revolution in this country, it will be made by men who live within half an hour’s drive of one another.
    4. I can find a thousand men who will fight and die for the Northwest Republic. I can’t find ten who will work for it.
    5. Judaism is not a race or a religion. Judaism is a state of mind. Some of the worst Jews you’ll ever meet will not have a drop of Hebrew blood in their veins.
    6. The office is inseparable from the man. If a contemptible man holds a public office, then we are under no obligation to respect either.
    7. All law and political power is based on a credible monopoly of armed force. Break that monopoly of armed force, and you break the state.
    8. The respect of tyrants is earned by the shedding of blood. It is the only way to get their attention.
    9. People who fear even to speak of armed struggle will never succeed in supplanting the state. Those who will at least speak of it, albeit with discretion where required by common sense, have some remote chance of winning. However far they may be from home plate, they’re at least in the right ballpark and playing the right game.
    10. Direct action without a specific political goal is just crime, and will fail. A political goal without direct action of some kind to attain it is just fantasy, and will fail. The two mixed together in the wrong proportions will fail. Finding the right proportion is an art, it varies in each individual case, and there’s really no way to teach it. Successful revolution is always in the final analysis played by ear.
    11. Moral courage is just as important as physical courage. Sometimes more so.

    posted by The Old Man at 8:08 AM | 0 Comments

  18. Andrew Joyce has been busy posting to his Twitter timeline. He has a lot of “We live in an age…” posts, some of which are funny, some true, some infuriating:

    “We live in an age where Jews deny their influence by: limiting our speech, “educating” our law enforcement, and drafting our legislation.”

    “We live in an age where we can jail someone for a tweet but can’t deport a foreign rapist.”

    “We live in an age where we are told that White culture doesn’t exist but also that it is especially evil.”

    I’m surprised they haven’t yet suspended or terminated his account because ADL, Facebook, Google and Twitter have all joined together to remove “hate speech” (basically anything that offends the ADL / SPLC)

    Many of the usual conservative “voices” are gone today. Dr. Joyce may be next. If you want to see where his thoughts have been since he was banned, check out the link. But do it quickly because his account probably won’t last for long.

Comments are closed.