Ernst Zündel and the Wicked Silence



He gave his life so everyone could be free

8 August 2017.  I can’t think of another person who has had a larger impact on the way people think than Ernst Zündel. By standing up to the powers that be, and with a lot of help from his friends, he got the Supreme Court of Canada to eventually and begrudgingly validate the truth of what he was saying.

He got Holocaust Revisionism verified as a real subject with real questions about the historical record, and about the lies that continue to be told that utterly distort the truth of the world.

Of course, the truth never matters when it opposes the designs of the ever present Deep State, that notorious Jewish succubus which sucks the life out of all states and all people.

So far from being able to celebrate his landmark legal victory with his friends, instead Zündel suffered years of imprisonment (at least seven, that we know of) and a permanent ban on public speaking that lasted right up until a few days ago when a heart attack took him away forever.

And all this because they found him innocent!

The charges were all spurious, never clearly defined. He was initially charged with a hate crime for publishing a book by Richard Harwood (a pseudonym) titled “Did Six Million Really Die?” Two trials drew Revisionist experts from all over the world, and they demolished all the fictional Jewish claims. Somewhere along the line somebody blew up Zündel’s house.

(Since that time, officials at the Auschwitz site have lowered their supposed death toll from 4 million to 1.4 million, but using Jewish mathematics, commentators on the Jewish TV networks continue to use the 6 million figure.)

LD: The figure for the Auschwitz dead has been reduced even further since then to 1.1 million, but this figure includes many non-Jews, taking the total figure for Jewish deaths at Auschwitz to just under one million. However, no adjustment has been made to the sacrosanct six million figure. (6 minus 3 = 6 ). 

So Ernst, after being illegally kidnapped in Tennessee and abused for two years in Canada — they never turned out the lights in  his cell and made him write with a pencil stub — was shipped off to Germany for five more years in a prison system in which the truth is no defense because it has been declared irrelevant by law.

Since World War II German courts have been totally polluted by perverted Jewish logic; so unjust are they today that even  Zündel’s lawyer Sylvia Stolz got sentenced to five years in prison for trying to defend him.

The wicked silence

This is the great silence, the wicked silence, where the great powers declare what can be known and what cannot.

We are not allowed to know who our government murders surreptitiously, and we may not challenge the macabre Jewish death fantasies about World War II. Some 271,000 souls was the final camp death toll compiled by the Associated Press in 1946; some $28 billion in Holocaust reparations has been collected by Jewish judges as payment for suffering by survivors of the celebrated 6 million, which is a story the Jews have used to solicit sympathy for themselves since the late 1800s.

Even the grandchildren of Holocaust relatives can collect payments for the trauma they have experienced listening to their parents bewail the suffering they have endured (which when you think about it is the perfect Jewish occupation, making a lucrative career out of complaining about misery you have caused yourself and blamed on others).

Because the Jews essentially control the media worldwide (the Rothschilds even bought the Associated Press a few years back), opposition to Jewish lies is seldom reported. The most important issues of our lifetime — 9/11 and the World Wars — were all precipitated by high powered Jewish finagling, yet virtually no reporting on this can be found in any of the mainstream newspaper archives.

What happened to Zündel and hundreds of his philosophical compatriots trying to rescue the unfairly besmirched reputation of Germany is now happening in America in Oregon and Las Vegas as people who believed they could depend on their Constitution, after more than a year in abusive solitary confinement and only doublespeak from the court, now believe otherwise.

One innocent bystander has already cleverly plea bargained his way to a life sentence, and all the others involved in the Bundy standoff of 2014 or the Oregon standoff in 2016 have undergone something truly appropriate for our new American Gulag, criminal abuse by private prison guards and preposterous restrictions by a power mad judge. Observers of this kangaroo court insist the government’s objective is to never let these people out of jail at all.

The legal situation in America now more resembles the Jewish/Soviet totalitarian model of government than a Constitutional republic, where no appeal against the lawless decisions of a criminal government is possible.

Just as Zundel and his lawyer could not argue against his sentence without breaking more German laws, the corrupt judge in the Bundy trial permits no analysis of the government’s behavior at all.

The complete takeover of Western ranchlands by the Bureau of Land Management may not be mentioned. Remember, the BLM goons were stealing and killing Cliven Bundy’s cattle over a controversial decision by the government to nationalize rangeland on which the Bundy family cattle had grazed since the 1800s.

This question has not been resolved in the courts, but for merely pointing out that BLM’s arbitrary seizures of Western lands, the Bundys and many of their faithful supporters face life in prison from a court system definitely disinterested in the welfare of ordinary people who get in the way of government corruption.

American courts are becoming more like Germany every day. And everywhere in the world free speech is disappearing if you don’t adhere to the principles of the Jewish bankers who now inarguably control every person’s destiny.

Media mindlock

What stands out to me in both the cases of Zündel and the Bundys and their friends is the apathetic response of the public to anyone who is at least making the attempt to stand up for the rights of all of us.

If they don’t see it on TV or read it in the newspapers it’s not really real to them. But worse than that, if they do see it on TV, or read it in the newspaper, they regard it as real. And this has given rise to practically every falsehood we believe in this life.

As the best known publicist for the truth of World War II, Zündel spent the last decade of his life unable to publicly address the issues most important to him. In his absence, however, the Revisionist message has sprung up like mushrooms all across the Internet and most especially on the Jewish-controlled Facebook.

The government that controls us now demands our complete silence about the crimes it has committed and the lies it has told.

Ultimately Ernst Zündel gave his life for our freedom. He refused to be cowed by Jewish lies, and returned the abuse he got from his captors with a stoic dignity that inspired his many followers. He paid a very high price for telling the truth.

No doubt authorities are pleased by the treatment Zündel received, and hope others will be dissuaded from emulating his behavior. Unfortunately for them, the opposite has happened. Inspired by Zündel’s example, the corps of truth tellers has expanded greatly and largely perfected its analysis of World War II, which proves there were no gas chambers, that Hitler only wanted peace, and that Roosevelt strong-armed all the countries in Europe in wiping out Germany once and forever, a goal which today appears to have been achieved.

In fact the real heart of darkness in World War II belonged to the Allies, in the torture of Dresden, the phony trials at Nuremberg and the premeditated starvation of Germans after the war. This is how the Jews rewarded the Germans for their hospitality. We Americans are feeling it now.

We all failed Ernst Zündel by not protesting with sufficient loudness his unjust treatment by corrupt authorities who are enriched by putting Jewish interests above the rest of humanity’s. This includes the entire U.S. Congress.

And we are failing now as men who stood up for the Constitution remain incarcerated under duress by corrupt politicians, held without bail for only protesting federal encroachment on private lands when no-bail is by law reserved only for murderers and traitors.

For the government to call these ranchers terrorists is truly the pot calling the kettle black.

All of us who believed what Ernst Zündel said and did is the real way honest human beings should act. Today this personality type is being systematically exterminated on all levels by a vicious campaign to replace us with a population totally unable to think critically and willing to go along with the crime if the salary is adequate.

However we slice it, as long as we fail to object to the abuse of others who are assaulted for trying to help the common good, we consign ourselves to a future governed by the wicked silence of people who are afraid to speak the truth, who have been intimidated for fear of earning the wrath of the people who rule them.


25 thoughts to “Ernst Zündel and the Wicked Silence”

  1. Great article.

    “Because the Jews essentially control the media worldwide (the Rothschilds even bought the Associated Press a few years back), opposition to Jewish lies is seldom reported.”

    That has been the case for hundreds of years.

    Freedom of the press is the freedom of the lies.

    “And we are failing now as men who stood up for the Constitution remain incarcerated under duress by corrupt politicians, held without bail for only protesting federal encroachment on private lands when no-bail is by law reserved only for murderers and traitors.”

    That’s because the constitutions are written by the Pharisee-Jews…. ‘cryptos’ or otherwise, they are in control.

    Sadly, Ernst suffered because of the fraud.

    1. Ernst and the Bundys were screwed from the beginning..!!

      The ‘framers’ placed “YUGE” license for immorality in their original documents… hidden in plain view.

      The 2nd paragraph of the Declaration of Independence:
      “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

      “..pursuit of Happiness” is 180 degrees from moral principles. It is Humanism crap.

      “If it feels good, do it.”

      So, the document is self-contradictory, hypocritical, within the same sentence. It writes about a Creator and then displays Humanism.


      No wonder Ernst and the Bundys were screwed from the beginning. The Branch Davidians learned it also, as applied by Janet Reno, at Waco. She “felt good” when she did it.

      The documents are NOT written to protect us, the lower people…. but, ONLY the elites in the governments.

      1. Pat,
        Ease up here a bit. Tom Jefferson may have been an early version of an libertarian and maybe a humanist in a good sense. But the phrase “…the pursuit of happiness” does not guarantee happiness. Without “life, liberty, (and private property by the way) how is one to “pursue” that elusive state of being called “happiness”. And even with life, liberty, property with a limited government to only there to guarantee those qualities of a free state of being, does not guarantee happiness no matter how hard one pursues it. Some or many even a lot of people will never on their own be happy not matter how hard the nanny state will bankrupt the nation trying what God and Natures God has deemed impossible.
        Now as concerns Janet Reno and the Waco massacre (a crime against humanity), Janet was against the final debacle. The world’s favorite Presidential First Witch Hillary Clinton gave the order to finish off the Branch Davidians and Reno’s hired gun Assistant Attorney Eric Holder carried out the order. You know the Attorney General of fast and furious gun running to Mexico fame under that baby sh-t colored Obama.

      2. TJ –

        I’ll not ease up one bit.

        I’ll stand with Patrick Henry and denounce the whole damned rotten bunch of Freemason elitists in Philly….. then Annapolis….. then DC.

        The scoundrels were so hated, they were chased with knives, hammers, guns and pitchforks and some almost beaten to death… to the point they had to move around and hold secret meetings, sending messages by coded names… not allowing the public to know what was going on.

        So, you need to get up to speed, Mr TJ, before you tell me to “ease up” any at all…!!

        AND… Franklin even wanted to have the States return to the royal system:

        “Although sold as a revolutionary, in 1764 Franklin called for a change from proprietary to a Royal
        government. That should look very strange to you. We are told he did this to counter the hegemony of
        the Penns, but in any case he was arguing for the Royals just 12 years before 1776. Although he was
        Speaker of the Pennsylvania House, this call for a Royal government cost him his seat. In 1765, while
        claiming to oppose the Stamp Act, he recommended a friend for the post of stamp distributor for Pennsylvania.
        Locals weren’t fooled by his empty words and nearly burned his house down. Learning his lesson, he became a much better liar on the subject, and supposedly helped lead to its repeal.”


        Franklin was one of the greatest deceiver of all time… in early America.

        Not to be trusted.

        I have written about that for years.


        Art I,sec 8, cl 17 “…other needful buildings.” is Franklin’s handiwork in US Const. and one of the reasons Patrick Henry would not sign it. He knew it would allow uncontrolled expansion of DC Government..!!

        Instant study ordered by Pres. Eisenhower in 1955:

        Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within The States (1956):
        “Objections made by Patrick Henry and others, based upon the dangers to personal rights and liberties which clause 17 presented, were anticipated or replied to by James Iredell of North Carolina (subsequently a United States Supreme court Justice) and Mr. Madison. They assured that the rights of residents of federalized areas would by protected by appropriate reservations made by the States in granting their respective consents to federalization.”

        “(It may be noted that this assurance has to this time borne ONLY little fruit.)”

        Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the States
        Report of the Interdepartmental Committee

        For the Study of Jurisdiction Over
        Federal Areas Within the States

        Proof of treachery admitted in his own writings:

        Franklin Autobiography ch10:

        —“I shall take the money, for I understand very well their meaning; other grain is gunpowder,” which he accordingly bought, and they never objected to it.—

        (“Other Grain” is Gunpowder…, “Other needful Buildings” in Art I; sec 8; cl 17.)

        My being many years in the Assembly, the majority of which were constantly Quakers, gave me frequent opportunities of seeing the embarrassment given them by their principle against war, whenever application was made to them, by order of the crown, to grant aids for military purposes. They were unwilling to offend government, on the one hand, by a direct refusal; and their friends, the body of the Quakers, on the other, by a compliance contrary to their principles; hence a variety of evasions to avoid complying, and modes of disguising the compliance when it became unavoidable. The common mode at last was, to grant money under the phrase of its being “for the king’s use,” and never to inquire how it was applied.

        But, if the demand was not directly from the crown, that phrase was found not so proper, and some other was to be invented. As, when powder was wanting (I think it was for the garrison at Louisburg), and the government of New England solicited a grant of some from Pennsilvania, which was much urg’d on the House by Governor Thomas, they could not grant money to buy powder, because that was an ingredient of war; but they voted an aid to New England of three thousand pounds, to he put into the hands of the governor, and appropriated it for the purchasing of bread, flour, wheat, or other grain. Some of the council, desirous of giving the House still further embarrassment, advis’d the governor not to accept provision, as not being the thing he had demanded; but be reply’d, “I shall take the money, for I understand very well their meaning; other grain is gunpowder,” which he accordingly bought, and they never objected to it.

        “Fire-Engine” purchase:

        It was in allusion to this fact that, when in our fire company we feared the success of our proposal in favour of the lottery, and I had said to my friend Mr. Syng, one of our members, “If we fail, let us move the purchase of a fire-engine with the money; the Quakers can have no objection to that; and then, if you nominate me and I you as a committee for that purpose, we will buy a great gun, which is certainly a fire-engine.” “I see,” says he, “you have improv’d by being so long in the Assembly; your equivocal project would be just a match for their wheat or other grain.”

        These embarrassments that the Quakers suffer’d from having establish’d and published it as one of their principles that no kind of war was lawful, and which, being once published, they could not afterwards, however they might change their minds, easily get rid of, reminds me of what I think a more prudent conduct in another sect among us, that of the Dunkers.

      3. Toejamicus: “But the phrase “…the pursuit of happiness” does not guarantee happiness. Without “life, liberty, (and private property by the way) how is one to “pursue” that elusive state of being called “happiness”. “

        It is my understanding that the original phrase was “…and the pursuit of Property” which was changed by the (((freemasons))) to “Happiness”.

        Pat is correct when he says the pursuit of “Happiness” is “180 degrees from moral principles. It is [Jewish] Humanism crap!”

        Incidentally, the US Constitution predates Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto — the so-called 10 Planks specifically — by about 75 years and, guess what, it, too, is an anathema to private property. Cohencidence or Cohenspiracy?

        Although Marx advocated the use of any means, especially including violent revolution, to bring about socialist dictatorship, he suggested ten political goals for developed countries such as the United States. How far has the United States — traditionally the bastion of freedom, free markets, and private property — gone down the Marxist road to fulfill these socialist aims? You be the judge. The following are Marx’s ten planks from his Communist Manifesto.

        1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.

        The courts have interpreted the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868) to give the government far more “eminent domain” power than was originally intended, Under the rubric of “eminent domain” and various zoning regulations, land use regulations by the Bureau of Land Management property taxes, and “environmental” excuses, private property rights have become very diluted and private property in land is, vehicles, and other forms are seized almost every day in this country under the “forfeiture” provisions of the RICO statutes and the so-called War on Drugs.

        2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

        The 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913 (which some scholars maintain was never properly ratified), and various State income taxes, established this major Marxist coup in the United States many decades ago. These taxes continue to drain the lifeblood out of the American economy and greatly reduce the accumulation of desperately needed capital for future growth, business starts, job creation, and salary increases.

        3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

        Another Marxian attack on private property rights is in the form of Federal & State estate taxes and other inheritance taxes, which have abolished or at least greatly diluted the right of private property owners to determine the disposition and distribution of their estates upon their death. Instead, government bureaucrats get their greedy hands involved .

        4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

        We call it government seizures, tax liens, “forfeiture” Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.

        5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

        The Federal Reserve System, created by the Federal Reserve Act of Congress in 1913, is indeed such a “national bank” and it politically manipulates interest rates and holds a monopoly on legal counterfeiting in the United States. This is exactly what Marx had in mind and completely fulfills this plank, another major socialist objective. Yet, most Americans naively believe the U.S. of A. is far from a Marxist or socialist nation.

        6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.

        In the U.S., communication and transportation are controlled and regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established by the Communications Act of 1934 and the Department of Transportation and the Interstate Commerce Commission (established by Congress in 1887), and the Federal Aviation Administration as well as Executive orders 11490, 10999 — not to mention various state bureaucracies and regulations. There is also the federal postal monopoly, AMTRAK and CONRAIL — outright socialist (government-owned) enterprises. Instead of free-market private enterprise in these important industries, these fields in America are semi-cartelized through the government’s regulatory-industrial complex.

        7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

        While the U.S. does not have vast “collective farms” (which failed so miserably in the Soviet Union), we nevertheless do have a significant degree of government involvement in agriculture in the form of price support subsidies and acreage allotments and land-use controls. The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

        8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

        We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000. And I almost forgot… The Equal Rights Amendment means that women should do all work that men do including the military and since passage it would make women subject to the draft.

        9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

        We call it the Planning Reorganization Act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136.

        10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.

        People are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education”.

        Source: Laissez-faire Republic

        Bottom line: Despite or in spite of the (((Constitution))) the US is 100% kiked!

    2. Pat,
      Could you elaborate? What part of the U.S. Constitution was written to harm us?

      1. Don –

        There are many. I shall repeat the one above:

        Art I, sec 8, cl 17 allows Federal purchases of land within the states. For example.. over 90% of Nevada is owned by the Federal Government.

        “…other needful buildings.” is Franklin’s handiwork in US Const. and one of the reasons Patrick Henry would not sign it. He knew it would allow uncontrolled expansion of DC Government..!!

        Instant study ordered by Pres. Eisenhower in 1955 proved it.

        Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within The States (1956):
        “Objections made by Patrick Henry and others, based upon the dangers to personal rights and liberties which clause 17 presented, were anticipated or replied to by James Iredell of North Carolina (subsequently a United States Supreme court Justice) and Mr. Madison. They assured that the rights of residents of federalized areas would by protected by appropriate reservations made by the States in granting their respective consents to federalization.”

        “(It may be noted that this assurance has to this time borne ONLY little fruit.)”

        Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the States
        Report of the Interdepartmental Committee

        For the Study of Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the States


        The Bill of Rights contain qualifiers… and deliver no rights at all. They are a ruse. Many framers resisted but failed to stop them. They saw the dangers.


        The constitution allows for Martial Law Proper called by the President alone.
        Ex parte Milligan – 1866
        There are under the Constitution three kinds of military jurisdiction: one to be exercised both in peace and war, another to be exercised in time of foreign war without the boundaries of the United States, or in time of rebellion and civil war within states or districts occupied by rebels treated [p142] as belligerents, and a third to be exercised in time of invasion or insurrection within the limits of the United States or during rebellion within the limits of states maintaining adhesion to the National Government, when the public danger requires its exercise. The first of these may be called jurisdiction under MILITARY LAW, and is found in acts of Congress prescribing rules and articles of war or otherwise providing for the government of the national forces; the second may be distinguished as MILITARY GOVERNMENT, superseding, as far as may be deemed expedient, the local law and exercised by the military commander under the direction of the President, with the express or implied sanction of Congress, while the third may be denominated MARTIAL LAW PROPER, and is called into action by Congress, or temporarily, when the action of Congress cannot be invited, and, in the case of justifying or excusing peril, by the President in times of insurrection or invasion or of civil or foreign war, within districts or localities where ordinary law no longer adequately secures public safety and private rights.

        “No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it.”


        Direct election of Senators is another, which came in 1913…. to enhance the Fed Res Act, and ensure the Fed Res Chairman selections will be confirmed and not resisted in the Senate.

        There are other examples. This is not the forum for listing them.

      2. ADMIN: BH, please correct typo in your email address or you comments will be held up.


        As much as I am fully on board with the genius that is Thomas Paine, your idealism misses the point, and I wonder if Ol’ Tom would concur with my saying that the reality is that the Constitutional documentation did happen in spite of the fact that “rights” are inherent to our individual creation with no need for them to be “delivered” under the auspices of any man-made documents.

        Given the practical reality of the situation, I still contend that this spurious thing called the “bill of rights” has at LEAST kept the wolf from having smashed down freedom’s door completely and long ago. But then, you know my position (:>)

      3. B-Hawk –

        I was on board with Patrick Henry in this instance… not Tom Paine. 🙂

        “Objections made by Patrick Henry and others….” is from what I wrote. The “others” with him, had even greater stature in their own areas.

        You might want to AT LEAST read the OUTLINE of the study. It shows why Bundy was trespassing, according to the contract… the Consutution.


        The land area of the United States is 1,903,824,640 acres. It was ascertained from available sources that of this area the Federal Government, as of a recent date, owned 405,088,566 acres, or more than **21 percent of the continental United States(in 1956).

        It owns – (in 1956) – more than **87 percent of the land in the State of Nevada, over **50 percent of the land in several other States, and considerable land in every State of the Union.

        The Department of the Interior controls lands having a total area greater than that of all the six New England State and Texas combined.

        The Department of Agriculture control more than three fourths as much land as the Department of the Interior.

        Altogether 23 agencies of the Federal Government (in 1956) control property owned by the United States **outside of the District of Columbia.

        Any survey relating to these lands is therefore bound to constitute a considerable project.

        Origin of article I, section 8, clause 17, of the Constitution.– This provision was included in the Constitution as the result of proposals made to the Constitutional convention on May 29 and August 18, 1787, by Charles Pinckney and James Madison. The clause was born because of the vivid recollection of the members of the Convention of harassment suffered by the Continental Congress at Philadelphia, in 1783, at the hands of a mob of soldiers and ex-soldiers whom the Pennsylvania authorities felt unable to restrain, and whose activities forced the Congress to move its meeting place to Princeton, N.J.

        The delegates to the constitutional convention, many of whom had suffered indignities at the hands of this mob as members of the Continental Congress, were impressed by this incident, and by a general requirement for protection of the affairs of the then weak Federal Government from undue influence by the stronger States, to provide for an area independent of any State, and under federal jurisdiction, in which the Federal Government would function. Without much debate there was accepted the their that places other than the seat of government which were held by the Federal Government for the benefit of all the States similarly should not be under the jurisdiction of any single State.

        Objections made by Patrick Henry and others, based upon the dangers to personal rights and liberties which clause 17 presented, were anticipated or replied to by James Iredell of North Carolina (subsequently a United States Supreme court Justice) and Mr. Madison. They assured that the rights of residents of federalized areas would by protected by appropriate reservations made by the States in granting their respective consents to federalization.

        **(It may be noted that this assurance has to this time – (1956) – borne only little fruit.)

      4. Pat

        It’s the same swindle that put the Indians on the reservations, this now fast-forwarded to what would be the biggest swindle in remembered history – agenda-21

  2. Yes, great article. But there is nothing to be astonished about the wicked silence. I would be surprised if it would be the opposite. We all know which kind of steel wall has been built against revisionists. I went to visit some websites of israelian newspapers. All of them speak about Zundel’s death and if you read the comments everyone is happy and invite to party the event. I also left a message of Jerusalem Post saying: “R.I.P. Ernst! and thank you for everything” . It stayed there for 5 minutes and then it was canceled.

    1. @ Gian Franco Spotti

      I went to that article (google : Jerusalem Post Ernst Zundel), here is a selection from the comments :

      “Yay! One less scumbag using up resources”.

      “Agree….too many of these oxygen bandits proliferating the world!”

      “How can someone without a heart die of a heart attack?”

      “Another nut will raise to the top of the cesspool to fill his place – sadly – there is no shortage. But then he will die one day and there will be 6,000,000 souls to greet him – and he will say, Woops – but it will be too late.”

      “The 6M Jewish souls will NEVER encounter such garbage whose destiny heads into oblivion.”

      “May his soul find no rest,not only a holocaust denier but a denier of the facts,is this mad , bad or both!”

      “I would have preferred him to have had a long, cruel, painful death”.

      “This fat f*** is finally eating dandelions by the roots… good riddance for eternity!”

      But there was also this :

      “It is the democratic right of anyone to question the holocaust. Why are Jews afraid if anyone questions the authenticity of he holocaust? Are they trying to hide the truth?”

      “Yes, he spread lies, but he was an irrelevant clown. On the other hand, Shimon Peres said that there had not been an Armenian genocide and was nonetheless honored by Canada during his state visit in 2012. In sum, only genocide deniers who don’t have political power are punished by Canada.”

      “While it is hard to understand how anyone can deny the evidence, I guess he was entitled to his own opinion – even though it is flawed.”

      “RIP Ernst and thank you for everything.”, by “Green Toast”. That must be you.

      1. Franklin,

        The bloodthirsty Jews you quote from the Jerusalem Post can’t be very intelligent if they actually believe six million Jews died in the so-called Holocaust. But then, the average IQ of Israelis is only 94. Maybe that explains it.

      2. Yes Franklin it’s me.
        I would like to inform you that I’m going soon to translate into italian your wonderful article “White Genocide by Design…..” and I will also translate ” The SS Empire Windrush….” – ” The Misplaced Minister: Ireland and Israel’s Alan Shatter” – “The Jewish origin of multiculturalism in Sweden” – ” A conclusive report on the undeniable & self-evident Jewish creation of the EU” as well as the 5 parts concerning “the war on white Australia”. I will put all together to have one whole translation about the same issue.
        In total they are 109 pages. It will take time but I’ll do it.

      3. @Gian Franco Spotti

        Thank you very much for your planned translations. I wish you much luck for that.
        With Greece Italy is at the forefront of the foreign invasion. Your beautiful country deserves a better fate than being destroyed by hostile savages. Hopefully your translations will contribute to an appropriate response.

      4. Dear Gian: I hope you and your family are enjoying good health and happiness. As soon as you have completed your Italian translation of the Franklin Ryckaert article, please send it to me so that I can publish it on this website. Many thanks, Lasha

  3. Gian Franco Spotti
    “It stayed for 5 minutes and then it was canceled.”
    That’s typical of all the Jew owned media today! They control speech by saying it doesn’t meet social standards or other such bilge. It’s better to live in an honest to God military dictatorship than the cloying, mind destroying “democracies”! Look at the mess Spain and Portugal are in since the passing of Franco and Salazar. Greece would have been better off had they remained under the rule of the Colonels. Democratic politicians are so easy to corrupt!

  4. May I suggest, people read, The Official Record of all Prisoners in Auschwitz Concentration Camp, from May of 1940 through December 1944, by Brian Harrins.

  5. Ernesto was our touch stone,
    A feeling serene and cool,
    He burned the others to the bone,
    The ones from the other school.

  6. ADMIN. Peter: Owing to a computer glitch of some kind, this comment entered our spam folder by mistake. Sorry for the delay in posting. I’ve only just seen the comment.

    Whoever can answer the question as to how the Jews have grabbed hold of almost absolute power in what were the leading nations of the world 100 years ago (Europe) and the USA, Australia, Canada and elsewhere will have done a great service to humanity. A lot of work has been done towards finding this answer by people like Professor Kevin MacDonald and other highly educated people that write for his website and others like Dr. E Michael Jones and Michael Hoffman.

    I’ve learned a lot over the years thanks to people like these, but you can’t learn of this important subject in any university because Jews have taken over American universities and now keep people like this from teaching there. And when they catch a professor doing work they are hostile to (anything that might harm their image and possibly reduce their power) they publicly attack that person and silence him or her. In Europe the Jews have ensured no university professors will write anything critical of them by ensuring that any mention of the Jews domination of the murderous Soviet Union or anything else that blackens their image will result in that person being fired from his job, possibly prosecuted and even jailed.

    While doing this they’ve passed laws that stipulate that European children will be taught about the “holocaust” and visit Auschwitz so when these European children reach adulthood they’ll know to be subservient to the “poor” Jews who Europeans victimized (according to what we’re all told).

    Prior to the Napoleonic Wars Jews lived separately from their host populations. That is the way Jews wanted it. They did not get involved in science, philosophy or music. They lived in “shtetls”, worked often as moneylenders and in eastern Europe and Russia often owned pubs, distilleries and worked as tax collectors for the Czars and others in power they always cozied up to. So their role in European societies was limited. In the 19th century Jews began to mingle with their European hosts, were invited to participate in society as equal partners, invited into universities and government, and this would see their power enhanced greatly, with a disproportionate number of Jews becoming doctors, lawyers, government officials and acquiring power by buying up European medias. They called this “emancipation”,

    Europeans watched as Jews grabbed prestige and power in every country in Europe and eventually saw them overthrow the Czar of Russia, establish the Soviet Union and wreak havoc throughout Europe thru revolution. By then Jews had become major players in Europe with disproportionate power in every European country and they often played a role directly against the interests of the country they were citizens of. This is how Germans perceived many Jews who had organized riots in Germany against the German government during WW I while German soldiers were fighting at the front. By this time Jews were disliked by many all across Europe and despised by others. When WW II broke out, the Jews had been the leaders in the violent USSR and held the top positions in the USSR’s secret service that had tortured so many , and when the German army threw the Soviets out as they conquered territory, they were greeted as heroes by many and revenge was sometimes taken against the Jews for the murder and persecution they had committed against their countrymen. Across Europe in countries like Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Romania, Poland, Germany and in large parts of the USSR, Jews had worked against their countrymen and were the enemy.

    From IHR:
    “As German forces advanced into the Soviet Union in 1941, many people welcomed the troops as liberators from Bolshevik tyranny. The welcome was especially warm in the Baltic countries, western Belarus and western Ukraine. As this four-minute video (no narration) shows, grateful people express appreciation for the troops who brought freedom from harsh Soviet rule.”

    So, after “emancipation” gradually Jews accumulated great power and wealth. The question remains how do they do this and take over virtually everything in a country, even the leading and most powerful countries in the world. The evidence strongly points to the fact that Jews are highly ethnocentric (they use the word “racist” and “discrimination” when others behave like them) and they are intelligent and strong competitors that are highly organized with hundreds of organizations like AIPAC and Anti-Defamation League in the US, Board of Deputies in the UK and similar organizations in every European and white country in the world. Thru ethnic nepotism, hard work, lobbying and working together to advance their interests they gradually dominate. They apparently do this in non-white countries too. Historian David Irving once commented that ethnic Germans once held significant power in many South American countries, owning such things as the countries utilities that they had created. After Jews had arrived in significant numbers they soon acquired those concerns and they appear to dominate the medias there too now.

    So, we’re back to the question Europe grappled with in the early 20th century, how to deal with the Jewish Question.

  7. Thanks to John for his insightful analysis.
    I began receiving Ernst’s Samisdat Publications & his Power newsletter back in the 70s.
    Then, after the 1985 & 1988 trials and the late but right decision in 1992 by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal again and again harassed Ernst, claiming he was a threat to national security.
    So Ernst asked his many friends and correspondents to send him a statement asserting the truth: that he was a peaceful man, only interested in establishing the truth about Germany.
    I gladly sent him my statement, with my signature duly legalized by a notary, which Ernst, with many more, handed over to the judiciary ahthorities in Toronto, to no avail; among the receivers being one or more (((of them))) because soon I received some propaganda sheets from ADL Canada or another similar jewish association.
    In the end, Federal Court Justice Pierre Blais ruled that Ernst was a hatemonger who posed a threat to national security! An absurdity, because the truth was the other way around: Ernst survived three assassinations attempts, an arson attack against his residence in Toronto, May 8, 1995. Five days later the leader of the Jewish Defense League (JDL) in Toronto, Meir Weinstein a.k.a. Meir Halevi and US JDL leader Irv Rubin were caught by the police trying to break into Ernst’s property (The JDL was identified by the FBI as a terrorist organization).
    So Ernst left Canada for the Hills of Tennessee… and long years in US-Canada-Bundesrepublik prisons.

    When Ernst was released from the Mannheim prison in 2010, he was not permitted to join her bride in Tennessee, so Ernst bypassed the rabid US prohibition meeting her in… Guadalajara, Mexico, during the Congreso Internacional Identitario/International Identity Conference, May 1-3, 2015, where Ernst gave a speech about his life and career, receiving a long ovation from the mostly Young audience.
    Guest of Honor was the Mexican revisionist Author, Salvador Borrego, 100 years old, who spoke too, and was

  8. Guest of Honor was the Mexican revisionist Author, Salvador Borrego, 100 years old, who spoke too, and was warmly greeted.

    Rest in peace, Ernst.

Comments are closed.