In Defense of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)

By SEEB

MECCA  LONG  AGO
(Click to expand)

I would probably be classified as a Sunni Muslim. Obviously I don’t see myself as a Jew. Nevertheless, I have to consider if Islam was started or engineered by the Jews. Or if Abraham and Moses etc are really narratives stolen from the Egyptian Pharaohs and claimed by the Jews.

These are all valid questions and one of the fundamental tenets of the Quran is to question and investigate.

Surviving reports indicate that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم‎) was 63 years old when he died and revelation began when he was 40. So there were  23 years of intermittent revelation of the Quran until its final completion.

Of these 23 years during which the Quran was revealed, the first 13 of them were spent in Mecca, the Prophet’s home town. Arabs were an ancient race whose main form of cultural transmission was oral. They were a primitive people, mostly camel-herders with some commerce but no sophistication like the great Byzantine and Persian kingdoms.

As for the Jews, they never settled in Mecca. They were primarily located in Yathrib, today called al-Madhina or Medina, meaning “the Radiant City”. Mecca was the true heart of the Arabs since it housed the Kaaba. I know of no Jewish tribes to settle around the Kaaba and it is doubtful the tribal Arabs would have allowed that.

In Mecca, as people began to believe in the unseen, eternal God without form the persecution grew. The prophet was protected because he came from a respected clan (Banu Hashim) and also on account of his uncle Abu Taleb, an elder who was held in high respect. The persecution became so bad that some were being killed openly. The Prophet advised his followers to leave Mecca and go to Abyssinia (Ethiopia); he said, “You will find there a Christian king who will give you asylum.”

The Prophet remained and endured. The leaders offered him wealth and position in the hope that he might compromise and give some allowance to their gods. He declined. They decided to banish his entire clan. They were banished from the town to the outskirts for the last three years at Mecca. They only survived on account of some countrymen feeling sorry for them who would sneak food in for them at night.

Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم‎) enters Mecca in December 629 (right)

How was it possible for the Jews to give instructions to the Prophet? Why would he endure such hardships to himself, his family and his whole clan? Why would they support him at all if they did not have a high regard for his character? Keep in mind he died a poor man and was proud to be poor. It is reported that he said, “Poverty is my badge.” He wanted food only for that day so he could thank God and then put all his hopes in God for the next day. When he died he left some weapons and a sleeping mat; that’s all. He passed a decree that none of his family would ever be allowed to take charity from the government. Not ever, even until the end of the world.

During the last years in exile, the Prophet’s wife died and finally his great protector, his uncle.

Now the Meccans were intent on killing him, but then a delegation of people of Yahtrib (Medina)  came and asked him to move to Yahtrib to become their arbiter and judge. Here he was to encounter the Jewish tribes and witness their cunning and deceit for the first time. On several occasions they tried to poison him and kill him. Finally, after accepting the pledge to defend the city, they secretly joined the enemy; after which he banished them for good.

Here are some verses of the Quran regarding the Jews:

Hast thou not turned thy vision to those who were given a portion of the Book? They believe in sorcery and evil and say to the unbelievers that they are better guided in the (right) way than the believers! (4:51)

(They have incurred divine displeasure): in that they broke their Covenant: that they rejected the Signs of Allah; that they slew the Messengers in defiance of right; that they said “Our hearts are the wrappings (which preserve Allah’s Word; we need no more)”; nay Allah hath set the seal on their hearts for their blasphemy and little is it they believe. (4:155)

They went in their unbelief to such an extent that they uttered terrible slander against Maryam (Mary) (4:156)

and their boast, “Behold, we have slain the Messiah Jesus, son of Mary, the Messenger of God!” However, they did not slay him, and neither did they crucify him, but it only seemed to them so; and, verily, those who hold conflicting views thereon are indeed confused, having no [real] knowledge thereof, and following mere conjecture. For, of a certainty, they did not slay him. (4:157)

and [for] their taking usury although it had been forbidden to them, and their wrongful devouring of other people’s possessions. And for those from among them who [continue to] deny the truth We have readied grievous suffering. (4:161)

And thou wilt find them [the Jews] the greediest of mankind… (11:96)

Proclaim a woeful punishment to those that hoard up gold and silver…. Their treasures shall be heated in the dress of Hell, and their foreheads, sides and backs branded with them. . . . ‘Taste then the punishment which is your due. (9:35)

They [the Jews] will spare no pains to corrupt you. They desire nothing but your ruin. Their hatred is clear from what they say, but more violent is the hatred which their breasts conceal. (3:117-120)

The most vehement of mankind in hostility [are] the Jews and the idolators. (5:82)

And they say: “None shall enter paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian.” Those are their (vain) desires. Say: “Produce your proof if ye are truthful.”

Nay, whoever submits his whole self to Allah and is a doer of good he will get his reward with his Lord; on such shall be no fear nor shall they grieve. (2:111-112)

The Quran also recognizes the good people from the Jewish community:

Not all of them are alike: of the People of the book are a portion who stand (for the right); they rehearse the signs of Allah all night long and then prostrate themselves in adoration. (3:113)

“Behold, we have slain the Messiah Jesus, son of Mary, the Messenger of God!”
— Quran 4:157

However, like I have said before, the Quran’s call is to a generic, innate religion. It includes and transcends the Jewish framework. It is interesting to note some of the last verses to be revealed were about usury:

O ye who believe! fear Allah and give up what remains of your demand for usury if ye are indeed believers. If ye do it not, take notice of war from Allah and his Apostle: but if ye turn back ye shall have your capital sums; deal not unjustly and ye shall not be dealt with unjustly. (2:278-279)

In addition to the prophet’s life there are reported sayings about this time – the last age – that are remarkable in their clarity and reality. Here are a few examples:

— The destitute Bedouins shall compete building tall buildings in the sky.

— The slave woman shall give birth to her master. (This is an expression which means ignoble people of low character shall occupy positions of power).

— The false messiah shall travel through the Earth on an iron donkey; the distance between its ears shall be 40 cubits.

— The false messiah shall travel through the Earth like clouds driven by winds.

— The false messiah shall come with mountains of wheat; if you follow him you will eat otherwise you will be subject to poverty.

— The false messiah shall come with two bodies of flowing liquid, one looks like water and one looks like molten lava. If you are in that time choose the molten lava for verily it is cool water. (Inversion system at work).

— One of the last group of people to come out with the false messiah is a conspiracy of women.

— The world will be run by usury so much so that none would be able to escape. If you escape its embers you will still get its stench.

— Holding on to Islam will be like holding coals in your hand.

— A great smoke shall cover the Earth (maybe still to come, time will tell)

— For every man there will be 50 women (I believe this is coming very soon; the Y chromosome has been under heavy attack for some time now).

— The oppression will be so great that a man will pass by a grave and sincerely say, ” I wish I was in your place.”

I know of at least 200 more transmissions of the Prophet that are pertinent to this time (If you ever get a chance you can download a book by Imran Hosein on his site; it is called Jerusalem in the Quran, it’s a good read). These are some of the reasons why I believe that Islam and the Prophet is not part of the Jewish construct. Real religion is from God and He will open the hearts of any seeker despite what the Jews may claim.

Most of these Ashkenazi Khazarians who are running the world are not true ‘Bani Isareel’ anyway and for the most part they worship Lucifer, twisting and distorting  the Torah and the Talmud in every way possible.

There are many people in these godless times who think that religion is childishness and religious people are somehow like naive children. Men like Nietzsche and the philosophers of the Frankfurt school, Horkheimer et al, sought to disconnect man from any kind of spiritual understanding of the world; more so from the traditional understanding of the soul. Whether Nietzsche sought to reject the understanding of the eternal soul and postulate something else, at the end it is just a theory that cannot be proven – no different that religious belief.

The Marxist of the Frankfurt school obviously did not believe in the soul and since man has no innate moral code his actions, in part, are due to the society around him. Hence if a crime is committed, society has a share of blame in it. This has led to consequences that society is continually suffering from, not the least of which is the idea of entitlement and the decriminalization of criminal behavior.

It is interesting to note that the corrupt people who fund these types of godless groups continually bombard the world with every kind of vice, crimes and filth in all branches of the media, so much so that the collective consciousness of humanity is forever spiraling into darkness.

“SPIRALING INTO DARKNESS”
(Click to expand)

See ‘America will be completely destroyed by Russia in one hour

In my opinion, they fully well understand that the physical world to come is seeded in the spiritual collective consciousness of the present. They have attacked humanity from the root and if the root is gone everything else tumbles. For me, it is imperative to revive a sincere religious consciousness if we are to reverse this.

That being said, I respect atheists or anyone who recognizes who the current enemy of humanity is and is willing to embrace the struggle. Forgive me for this long post, I will leave you with a statement from Fredrick Von Schilling: “Nature is visible spirit and spirit is invisible nature.”

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

104 thoughts on “In Defense of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)

  1. If you happen to be hostile to Islam in general and Muslims in particular, please make every effort to be polite to the Muslim writer of this article.
    He happens to be one of our regular commenters and this is his latest extended comment.

    1. Islam another jewish invention like ‘ christianity’. Both brainwash tools invented by the ‘ christian’s older brothers’. What a joke.

      1. Mark the Moron strikes again.

        He can always be relied upon to contribute his bucket of green spit.

        Back to your Tel Aviv child brothel!

      2. @ sardonicus, sardonic smile. Again I am not a jew, am not a christian, just me myself and I. For the ‘ christians’ i would ask your attention for Matthew 5:17, as spoken by your favorite fake nazarenian, ‘ I don’t come to destroy the law or the prophets, but to fulfill the Law’. The ‘ christians’ should know the Law is the Old Testament of the jews. He came, if he ever came, for the jews not for the goyim.
        Again get rid of judaism, christianity and islam. Three invented ‘ Cults’ by and ruled by the jews.

    2. JEFF RENSE and his guest Devvy Kidd should be indicted for incessant incitement to violence against Muslims, and for spreading disinformation about Islam..

      1. And what should happen with Muslims who rape, murder and openly proclaim they will enforce Sharia on our countries ? Oh wait, that is “disinformation”, all Muslims are innocent angels, reason the more to allow millions and millions of these “angels” into our countries ! Ingrid dear, you have once more shown your moral superiority to us evil islamophobes !

      2. @ Franklin Ryckaert,

        You are contradicting yourself, Franklin.

        Because if every so-called Muslim atrocity is a “false-flag” attack, as you keep insisting, how can Muslims be held responsible for anything if they are always being “framed” and set up as “patsies”?

        You can’t have it both ways, Franklin. If Muslims are to blame for all these terrorist acts, why do you keep blaming the government for pinning it on them?

        So what do we have here, Franklin: “Muslim terrorists” or “crisis actors”? You can’t have both! 🙂

        Genuinely baffled,

        Sardonicus

      3. Franklin,

        I am genuinely amazed at how so many posters on this site can call almost EVERY terrorist act involving Muslims a “false flag attack”. Don’t you see the dangers of crying “Wolf!” once too often?

        I also find it very odd that you should cite Kevin Barrett, a MUSLIM, as your authority for the Manchester attack being a false flag attack, when you hate all Muslims. How can you rely on a Muslim for the truth when you have such a low opinion of Muslims? It doesn’t add up, Franklin. You contradict yourself at every turn and are just mass of glaring inconsistencies. 🙂

        Pardon my frankness, but I do have enormous respect for you and I hope you will be able to explain to me the two huge contradictions of your position:

        (1) How can Muslims be blamed for constant acts of terrorism if almost every act of terrorism is a “false flag attack” perpetrated by some government agency, meaning that all Muslims who are later arrested have been set up as “patsies”?

        (2) How can you cite with approval an article written by a Muslim, Kevin Barrett, when your default position is hatred and contempt for all Muslims, starting with the Prophet Muhammad?

      4. @Sardonicus

        The “mystery” (or “contradiction” if you will) can be solved if you keep in mind that I am primarily motivated by the truth and not prejudices.

        If it is the truth that most (if not all) “Muslim terrorist attacks” in the West are false flags or hoaxes, then I will say so. And on closer inspection they are mostly false.

        As for the Muslim Kevin Barrett, he has done splendid work on the Charlie Hebdo false flag case in Paris and has earned my respect. Veterans Today may be 40% disinfo, that means that still a 60% is genuine. What is true and what is false can be decided by critically looking at the facts presented and the arguments used. Kevin Barrett’s facts about Manchester were convincing and I cited them.

        As for my “islamophobia”, unlike most here, I have actually read something about the (violent) life of Muhammad and the (violent) history of Islam, and I condemn both. I don’t want millions of Muslim immigrants in western countries.

        On the other hand, I equally condemn the destructive attack on Muslim countries on false pretexts. The best solution for Muslim countries is an authoritarian regime by a secular ruler, who brings stability, prosperity and modernity to his country. But it is exactly such regimes that are slated for destruction by the Zionists !

        I hope this cleared things up.

      5. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        Thanks for your excellent response to my doubts and queries. I can see you are 100 per cent sincere and I respect your intellectual integrity and honest attempt to look for the truth in a labyrinth of lies. Yes, Kevin Barrett has done a lot of good work, that cannot be denied. It’s also true that VT has to be 60 per cent true if it is 40 per cent false, and it’s up to us to separate the wheat from the chaff.

        The point on which I agree with you most is the absolute necessity of preventing White genocide in Europe and America by stemming the flood of Third World immigration.

        Like you, I am absolutely opposed to multiculturalism and out-of-control mass immigration. We have seen the migrant crisis grow from bad to worse under Merkel and Blair and the EU with its patron saint Count Coudenhove-Kalergi. We have seen Europe becoming a dump for the Third World, with an incessant stream of bogus “refugees” flooding in from Africa and the Middle East. It is undeniable that these “invaders” are mostly Muslims.

        You and I are on the same page for all the really important matters and differ only on the minor details.

  2. “SPIRALING INTO DARKNESS”

    “See ‘America will be completely destroyed by Russia in one hour‘”

    I doubt that. The ‘Ransomeware’ attack almost brought down Russia.. 🙂

    Russia was hit hardest by the global ransomware attack, and it is unironically angry
    May 15, 2017

    A few U.S. institutions are known to have been affected by the malware, believed to have exploited stolen NSA cyber tools, most of the damage has been reported in Europe and Asia, including freezing up many …. **British National Health Service HOSPITAL SYSTEMS…!!

    ***The biggest victim, however, was Russia, according to the Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab. And Russian officials are pretty upset.

    “Humanity is dealing here with cyberterrorism,” Frants Klintsevich, a top official on the Russian Senate’s defense committee, told Russia’s state-run Tass news agency. “It’s an alarming signal, and not just a signal but a direct threat to the normal functioning of society, and important life-support systems.”

    http://theweek.com/speedreads/698895/russia-hit-hardest-by-global-ransomware-attack-unironically-angry

  3. I am glad for this article, as it offers a better perspective of Islam than I have before encountered. 🙂
    This article is worthy of careful reading!

  4. Maybe you and your cousin Lasha and Lobro are not hostile to Muslims and Islam.
    but 99.99% of your readers are latent haters of Islam ,the greek bitch and franky boy are just an example.

    1. @ Tukam

      We have already explained at great length in our ‘Policy Statement’ that our website cannot be held responsible for the opinions and attitudes of our numerous commenters. If you are right that 99.99% of our readers are Islam haters — that has to be an overestimate — what can we do about it? Delete 99.99% of all comments?

      You need to ask yourself: why don’t more Muslims post on our site? We are certainly doing nothing to stop them. Why don’t they fight Islamophobia on our site? They would be welcome.

      1. Every time someone uses the word “Islamophobia” that is for me already a red flag, as if that word is supposed to be some sort of legitimate way to automatically categorize an entire group of people critical of Islam.

        My first impression when I saw the title of this piece was, whoever wrote this is a fine example of submission and knows nothing about Islam. The history here is based on what? Where are the bona fides of this writer? Although there is nothing wrong about opinion, It must be recognized as such.

      2. The word “Islamophobia” is perfectly acceptable to us. The “bona fides” of the writer? Well, he happens to be a regular commenter on our site. Beyond that we know nothing about him.

    2. Tukam,
      Can you explain why “Muslim” men…..the “refugees” in Europe are so hostile to the people there? They rape boys and women between the ages of 10 and 80. Are you proud of your “Muslim” brothers there? And you are proud to be a “Muslim”? Give me an example of mass rape of Muslim women by Christians. I wait for your response if you are even capable of reading my post. Chou.

  5. “The Bible is the most hateful religious book in the world,” Israeli scholar Israel Shahak.

    The New Testament quotes on several places Jesus saying that he only came for the people of Israel. On the other hand, Holy Qur’an never claimed that the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was descendent of prophet Israel (Jacob).

    Holy Qur’an doesn’t blame Jews for the Crucification. It claims that Jesus didn’t die on the Cross but was raised to Heaven by the Mercy of Allah – and will return to finish his moral life.

    Historically, Muslim lands have provided sanctuary for the Jews persecuted or expelled (108 times) in the Christian Europe.

    If the prophet of Islam was a student of Judaism, even though he couldn’t read or write, how come Holy Qur’an doesn’t curse prophet Jesus and his mother Saint Mary – as Jewish Holy Talmud does.

    Pope Frances and Pope Benedict XVI are on record admitting that Christianity is an extension of Judaism.

    Canadian Jewish academic Henry Makow is on record saying that both Judaism and Christianity have long been destroyed by the organized Jewry and that’s why Muslims are the victims of the phony ‘War on Terror’ in order to destroy Islamic resistance to New Jewish World Order.

    I’m not sure if SEEB is a Muslim dude or he is another student of Daniel Pipes…..

    https://rehmat1.com/2011/05/31/bible-jesus-and-the-evildoers/

    1. the Prophet knew how to read and write – don’t read sectarian Propaganda – he didn’t get formal schooling but he certainly knew how to read and write – the word “Ummy” means Gentile and not illiterate just like the word nikah means “sexual relations” and not marriage.

      the Prophet wrote and signed many documents and treaties…

      he couldn’t be illiterate if he knew how to put out these documents…even if he didn’t physically write them but dictated them he had to have some knowledge of basic Arabic dictums. going farther than just a regular conversation..

      I hate it when stupid Muslims say the Prophet was illiterate. I mean is this why Muslim lands are filled with illiterate people?

      1. Here comes another bigot. I’m sure he also believes that the Prophet wrote Holy Qur’an as the rabbis wrote the Old Testament and Christian Gospels written by individuals who never met or heard Jesus.

        Holy Qur’an testifies that when the Archangel Gabriel appeared in the cave Hara and told the Prophet to read – the prophet responded: “I cannot read.”

        As head of the first Islamic state in Medina – the Prophet signed all the treaties with Jews, and correspondence with Kings of Persia, Rome and Egypt – by using his seal (ring) which was prepared by Salman Farsi, the first Persian Jew who converted to Islam. Some of these documents preserved in Istanbul Museum are witness to that truth.

        Do you know, the Prophet married two young Jewish widows and one young Coptic virgin – gifted to him by the King of Egypt?

        https://rehmat1.com/2011/03/14/untold-a-history-of-the-wives-of-prophet-muhammad/

      2. Rehmat, I believe the Qur’an is divine inspiration to Prophet Muhammad. When the verses were revealed to him, he wrote it down with his companions/friends. It was written on leaves and leather and other hard materials.

        Read the Covenants of Prophet Muhammad – I can assure you the Prophet Muhammad knew how to erad and write BUT he did NOT come up with the Qur’an. The spiritual concepts and level of Sophistication in the Qur’an is BEYOND what any human mind can engage in.

        The Qur’an never states the Prophet said he can’t read. That is the Hadith which has very little credibility. He had 23 years and he couldn’t read?

        Salman al Farsi was NOT a Jew. You dishonour him you dumb Paki. I was named after him. He was enslaved by the Jews twice before being released by Prophet Muhammad. He was born into a religious Zoroastrian family. His birth name was Rouzbeh. He converted to Christianity and eventually to Islam. He is the one who protected Madinah from the Jewish organized Confederate Tribes (alliance – al ahzab). Salman Al Farsi was never a Jew and he disliked them.

        The Prophet was literate but didn’t go to formal school so he avoided a lot of cultural/sectarian brainwashing. He knew how to read/write. You can’t run or manage a proper business if you don’t know how to read or write on a basic level. Then you can’t be trusted to travel distant lands if you are illiterate. The Qur’an was inspired to him. He is just the Messenger NOT the Author of the Qur’an. Does this make sense to you Rehmat?

        You are either ignorant of the Quran or you use fake/questionable Hadiths to proclaim the Prophet as being illiterate – here a Muslim site claims the Prophet was literate.

        http://www.quran-islam.org/main_topics/new_information/muhammad_(P1259).html

        As for the Jewish women – I believe 1 of them was his concubine/mistress. Similarly, Mariah was never his wife but concubine/mistress. Both of them were not full marriages.

      3. Franklin Ryckaert, that site is junk.

        I don’t believe NASA’s description of the earth and skies as being legite. The earth is like a pancake, stretched out, no doubt about it. The moon is also a source of light. It can’t be landed upon. The Qur’an’s description of the earth, skies, sun, and moon match what our ancestors knew. The earth is fixed. It’s not rotating.

        The rest of that link is junk. It takes events and incidents out of context.

        For example, humans are closes to chimpanzees in their DNA structure. After the chimpanzees, they are closest to pigs/swine. God clearly decided to turn the Jews into (((offspring of the apes and swine))). Moses never literally turned a staff into a serpent but only temporary to swallow the illusions of the magicians up.

        The Wall that Alexander the Great/Dhul Qarnain built was to protect the people of the Kavkaz/Southern Russia from the mischief and chaos of the Khazars (Gog and Magog). Alexander the Great/Dhul Qarnain built it in the border between Georgia and North Ossetia. That wall’s remains existed in the late 19th century until the Communist revolution. It no longer exists.

        Everything in the Qur’an is true. We just don’t have enough information yet to verify everything. So far what I have read so far has been verified.

      4. @Salman Hossain

        “…The earth is like a pancake, stretched out, no doubt about it…”

        “…The earth is fixed. It’s not rotating…”

        So the earth is a flat disc and in order to have the difference between day and night, the sun rises in the morning at the east side of that disc and sets in the evening at the west side of it and during the night travels under the flat disc of the earth from the west side to the east side in order to rise just in time in the east ?

        I am deeply impressed by the wisdom of Allah who has created such an ingenious world to live on ! But the question remains : what is the IQ of that Allah who created such marvel ? or rather : what is the IQ of people who believe in such a world view ? But don’t worry. I gladly grant the privilege to be stupid to 1,5 billion people.
        Salaam.

      5. Salmon –

        You wrote… and claimed:
        “The moon is also a source of light. It can’t be landed upon.”

        Where is THAT in Koran??

        If that is the case…. there would ONLY be a permanently full moon. There would be NO ‘crescent moon’ to place on the flags representing Islamic entities. 🙂

        Islamic symbols of crescent and star:
        http://symboldictionary.net/?p=2395

        Mohammed must have had more sense than that..!!

        Also…. Where is ‘flat earth’ in Koran??

        If it is in there…. that’s another reason to shut down Islamist sects who would consider ’round-earthers’ to be heretics and chop their heads off.

        WHEW..!!!!! 🙂

      6. FR –

        Thanks. AMAZING..!!!!

        Istanbul: ca. 1553.
        This map depicts “a traditional Islamic projection of the world as a flat disk surrounded by the sundering seas which are restrained by the encircling mountains of Qaf”.

        https://wikiislam.net/index.php?title=File:Flat_Earth_The_Wonders_of_Creation.jpg&filetimestamp=20101113104417&

        Musselmen “BIGGLY” need 21st century info capabilities…..

        Give ’em a cell phone and an ISP… NOW…!! It will save lives..!!

        No wonder they strap explosives to their asses.. 🙂

        BAN the Koran…. and the lies in there.

      7. the Moon Landings were fake and there is land BEYOND the edge of the disc known as the “Antarctic” – read the book – Worlds Beyond the Poles. God says in the Qur’an there are multiple lamps/suns – there are suns beyond Australia and New Zealand.

        Do you get what I am saying?

        Check out work by Eric Dubay proving the flat earth. He is absolutely right. The earth is indeed flat.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFjG4jpUhQI

        Check out the Flat Earth Conspiracy. Eric Dubay isn’t even Christian or Muslim and he hates Jews. He is in fact a follower of the Aryan religion – Buddhism/Hinduism. His research matches word for word what is described in the Qur’an – regarding the skies/the moon and sun/ and of course the flatness of the earth. The Sun rotates around the earth – and the earth and moon follow each other in their own course wrapping themselves up like a turban and the sun comes to its own resting spot – i.e. the “North Pole”.

        The earth is indeed flat. The Bible and Qur’an are right on this.

        NASA is filled with Jews and/or Freemasons. The Gig is up.

      8. Franklin Ryckaert and Pat – you really don’t get it – the JOKE is on YOU and I am laughing my ass off at you monkeys for being such fools. Supposedly you are “jew wise” but you can’t see the earth is flat like a pancake. Plain and simple. Everything rotates around us! ha ha ha
        The earth is flat indeed!!! Why deny the obvious?

        The Moon Landing hoax was staged by the Jew and Freemason Stanley Kubrick. He even secretly admitted it on tape before his death that it was fake. The different phases of the moon are timed automatically. It is one of the wonders of God. Even the crescent shows a transparent or translucent moon with stars in the background. You can’t have stars in the background of a crescent if the moon was a solid terrestrial object. The Jew/Freemasonic brainwashing is really good between your earlobes. You can’t land on the moon. It’s not terrestrial like the earth. To me, you guys are the idiots.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY3ArB9VmsY

    2. @ Rehmat

      Holy Qur’an doesn’t blame Jews for the Crucification (sic). It claims that Jesus didn’t die on the Cross but was raised to Heaven by the Mercy of Allah – and will return to finish his moral life…. I’m not sure if SEEB is a Muslim dude or he is another student of Daniel Pipes…..

      You should be ashamed of attacking your fellow Muslim SEEB and making out he is a bogus Muslim. It is your comment that shows lack of understanding and correct Qur’anic knowledge.

      Seeb quotes above this comment supposedly made by Jews in the Qur’an — they had been boasting about how they had killed Christ:

      “Behold, we have slain the Messiah Jesus, son of Mary, the Messenger of God!”
      — Qur’an 4:157

      If you have a Qur’an, check out this quote and you will see it there. I have THREE versions of the Quran, one in Arabic, and the quote will be found in all of them. Here is what the famous Yusuf Ali translation says:

      . . . they [the Jews] said in boast,
      “We killed Christ Jesus
      The son of Mary,
      The Apostle of God”; —
      But they killed him not,
      Nor crucified him,
      But so it was made
      To appear to them…
      For a surety
      They killed him not.”
      — Sura 4: v.157

      In other words, Rehmat, the whole passage makes it clear that the Jews INTENDED to crucify Christ and THOUGHT they had succeeded in crucifying him. But they were WRONG, according to the Qur’an. Because Christ, according to Qur’anic teaching , died on the cross only IN APPEARANCE and not in reality. Verse 158 (sura 4) makes this clear:

      Nay, God raised him up
      Unto himself.

      So your comment “Holy Qur’an doesn’t blame Jews for the Crucification (sic)” is wrong and misleading if you are trying to exonerate the Jews and let them off the hook, i.e. if you are trying to make out that the JEWS had nothing to do with the crucifixion and that the Romans were 100% to blame.

      I have Yusuf Ali’s Qur’anic commentary here and he makes it quite clear that the JEWS were behind the ATTEMPTED CRUCIFIXION of Christ. They INTENDED to kill Christ and THOUGHT they had killed him. But no, the Quran adds, “God raised him up’, so the Jews were foiled. Their evil intentions came to nothing.

      As every Muslim knows, this is the one big difference between the way Christians and Muslims view the crucifixion of Christ. Muslims firmly believe that Christ did NOT die during the crucifixion but only SEEMED to die, whereas Christians believe that Christ DID die but was raised from the dead again on the third day. (Resurrection).

      SEEB has my full backing for this article in which he quotes extensively from the Quran. All his quotes are authentic and can be checked and double-checked for accuracy.

      So how can SEEB be “a student of Daniel Pipes”, eh? A shameful remark!

      — Ibn Ghazali,
      Sufi scholar,
      Tehran

      1. @ Rehmat

        Lol – next time you’re going to accuse me of insulting your Muslim brother Fareed Zakaria – a Zionist filth with a Jewish wife.

        I give a dam if you support Salman Rushde or Muslim Martin Luther. I stand by the historic truth and not by Jew, Christian, Muslim or Hindu name.”

        LOL to you, Rehmat! 🙂

        You have obviously lost your mind.

        No one on this site, as far as I know, has accused you of “insulting Fareed Zakaria — a Zionist filth with a Jewish wife.” Not once have I mentioned the name of “Salman Rushdie” either. Or the “Muslim Martin Luther”.

        So I just don’t know what you’re talking about. Where did you get these names from? Not from me or anyone else writing on this website.

      2. I repeat:

        I have never once made a single comment ANYWHERE about Fareed Zakharia or his wife. Nor have I ever spoken about Salman Rushhdie or Martin Luther King. NOT ONCE!

        So you have to be 100% CRAZY! 🙂

      3. @ Ibn Ghazali

        “As every Muslim knows, this is the one big difference between the way Christians and Muslims view the crucifixion of Christ. Muslims firmly believe that Christ did NOT die during the crucifixion but only SEEMED to die, whereas Christians believe that Christ DID die but was raised from the dead again on the third day. (Resurrection).”

        Yep, that is a basic difference. Although prophets of the Old Testament prophesied that Jesus would be killed, none of them prophesied that Jesus would be resurrected. It could be that prophets do not always get the full story from the Heavenly Father. It would be God’s discretion I suspect.

      1. Thanks Sean – –

        Everyone is GUESSING..!! 🙂
        You can choose from…. “Conjecture….” “Assumptions..” “Substitutions..”

        Holy Quran 4:157
        “… they killed him NOT.”

        https://youtu.be/qHF5evfPwmc?t=942

        …………………………………………………..

        Verse (4:157) – English Translation

        http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=157

        Sahih International:
        And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.

        Pickthall:
        And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah’s messenger – they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain.

        Yusuf Ali:
        That they said (in boast), “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-

        Shakir:
        And their saying: Surely we have killed the Messiah, Isa son of Marium, the messenger of Allah; and they did not kill him nor did they crucify him, but it appeared to them so (like Isa) and most surely those who differ therein are only in a doubt about it; they have no knowledge respecting it, but only follow a conjecture, and they killed him not for sure.

        Muhammad Sarwar:
        and their statement that they murdered Jesus, son of Mary, the Messenger of God, when, in fact, they could not have murdered him or crucified him. They, in fact, murdered someone else by mistake. Even those who disputed (the question of whether or not Jesus was murdered) did not have a shred of evidence. All that they knew about it was mere conjecture. They certainly could not have murdered Jesus.

        Mohsin Khan:
        And because of their saying (in boast), “We killed Messiah ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah,” – but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) ]

        Arberry:
        And for their saying, ‘We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, the Messenger of God’ — yet they did not slay him, neither crucified him, only a likeness of that was shown to them. Those who are at variance concerning him surely are in doubt regarding him; they have no knowledge of him, except the following of surmise; and they slew him not of a certainty — no indeed;

  6. starting at 2:00 , she talks about the final stage that will complete the control of all people on earth.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WruCxsh8mfw

    One of the big reasons they damonize Islam is that it kills the claim that there is an aliens up there who are about to invade us on earth and that doesn’t sit well with the globalists.
    The holy Quran clearly states

    we live under a dome and none can leave the earth , nor can come down to earth .

    God tells us : We created you from this earth and INTO it ye shall return . Note my emphasis on (INTO) and not (TO) ,which might give the possibility of leaving the earth and coming back to it .

    God tells us clearly in the Quran that we are at the top of food chain , so to speak , and there is absolutely no intelligent life any where in the universe better than us , and that God made everything else subservient to us .

    therefore as a Muslim I will never buy the crap of alien invasion they have been throwing at us from the first ever video game called SPACE INVADERS to hollywood movies like 4TH of July and such .
    IN the novel 1984 , it was said keep the masses entertained , addicted to gambling and alcohol and they will never rise up , and Islam is against all of these things .

    Islam is the last obstacle in UNIFYING ALL MAJOR religions , which was Donald Trump’s mission starting with Saudi Arabia (center of Islam) to the center of Judaism his next stop and then off to the Vatican to meet with the Jesuit and free mason pope Francis .
    That part of the reasons why they hate Islam . Don’t forget the Wahhabists who are crypto Jews in Saudi Arabia have been destroying Islam for sometime .

    1. AL

      21:32. And We made the sky a protected ceiling; yet they turn away from its wonders.

      17:70. We have honored the Children of Adam, and carried them on land and sea, and provided them with good things, and greatly favored them over many of those We created.

      16:8. And the horses, and the mules, and the donkeys—for you to ride, and for luxury. And He creates what you do not know.

      16:49. To Allah bows down everything in the heavens and everything on earth— every living creature, and the angels, and without being proud.

    2. @ AL

      “God tells us clearly in the Quran that we are at the top of food chain , so to speak…”

      I’m not sure what is meant by “so to speak,” but I would discourage humans from petting, playing with, or hanging out with theses critters that might upset the food chain statement: Alaska brown bears, polar bears, grizzly bears, lions, tigers, sharks, piranhas, alligators, crocodiles, just to name a few.

      The Old Testament in Genesis 1:28 says that mankind has dominance, not top of the food chain, over all the critters, but I still would avoid some of them as mentioned above. 🙂

      1. UNGENIUS

        nice touch , sir . you can always subdue the biggest elephant with the smallest dart . you can also eat it afterwards – laugh out loud .

  7. Islam is actually a Christian heresy, if you really want to go ALL THE WAY with meticulous theological analysis, but I don’t get the impression anyone really WANTS TO GO ALL THE WAY WITH THAT, TO GO ALL THE WAY WITH METICULOUS THEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS WOULD REVEAL THE TRUTH AND BETTER WE GIVE OURSELVES THE OPPORTUNITY TO BULLSHIT ALOT. And Yes, meticulous theological analysis is very boring and tedious, and Yes, Darkmooners LERV to bullshit ALOT, :), AND DARKMOONERS ALWAYS MANAGE TO FIGURE OUT ALL KINDS OF IMAGINATIVE WAYS TO GIVE THEMSELVES THE OPPORTUNITY TO BULLSHIT ALOT . So yes, I understand. Yes, I do understand, this whole thread of commentary is going to about bullshit and NOTHING but bullshit.

    1. @ TheRealOr1g1nalJoe

      Another brain-dead poster with shit for brains.

      I’m glad the 3 brackets have been put around his name again where they rightly belong. It’s time Admin gave this joker the boot. He has overstayed his welcome and brings the Darkmoon site into severe disrepute.

      I’ve no doubt at all that this degenerate scum is the inmate of a mental institution..

      1. Yeah well, at least I’m not crazy enough to marry you, no wonder your lovey dovey hubby decided it be better to get devoured by a lion than to remain married to you, and you two were married for how long, like an hour or two? And that was enough for him to decide he’d rather get devoured by a lion than to remain married to you, so yeah 😉 sure you got it going on, babe, lol.

  8. Fine article. I presume the reports indicating likely future scenarios are from the Hadith, reports of the sayings of the Prophet Muhammed. Most Westerners and moderns from many places are unaware of the Hadith literature, which is fairly extensive, as separate from the Holy Koran. It would be great to source the reported sayings with attributions to their specific origin, though sometimes that may be difficult or nearly impossible. It is important that the young of Islamic countries with little or no opportunity to study (but with internet access) be provided the opportunity to make better informed choices, as Israel corrupts and uses them like cannon fodder. Witness the surreal spectacle of armed fighters (claiming to be Islamic) apologizing to the IDF for firing on them by mistake. Apologizing to the criminals who routinely murder Palestinians (many are Muslim) and practice wholesale theft of their land, natural resources, and property as well as the most harsh and brutal occupation would seem to be at odds with an informed perspective, such as described quite well above. This, and criminal behavior in refugees shows a need for discipline. Iran has grown in influence by instilling and practicing this necessary discipline, but Turkey and other Sunni countries could begin to make an effort – right now Turkish leadership doesn’t seem to perceive this weakness, one which the jew cheerfully exploits.

    1. Voice of reason – let Winston’s words sink in.

      i too take a practical approach to Islam, without bothering with theories and Qu’ranic internecine squabbles, my sympathies are firmly with the Shia sect, primarily Iran, Hezbollah and Syrians (Alawite and Sunni alike) because they present genuine resistance to Jew and throw a serious wrench in the wheels of his triumphal progress to messianic fulfillment and the world bondage to Satan.

      While the petty minds scrabble in dirt, pecking at each other, i encourage a pan-gentile alliance to overthrow jew’s tyranny and deal the mortal blow to Judaism and its pretensions.

  9. “Like all religions, the Islamic faith has experienced reinterpretation and change of the original precepts over time. While the prophet Muhammad established five times for daily prayer, many Muslims today have adopted a change to three times for prayer. On the matter of deity worship, the Sufis, who are said to be the original cult springing from Muhammad, accept the personal aspect of the Lord and speak of the Lord’s form in their poetry. But generally, that level of personal conception is no longer accepted today.”

    Islam

    1. hp

      I would say that one need go no farther than regarding the sufis when it comes to Islam’s proper representation of Truth.

      1. No, the Sufis represent Gnostic heresy within Islam like the Protestants represent Gnostic heresy within the Church [the Catholics and the Orthodox].

  10. All religión is a form of control. Scriptura, if we follow, dictates every aspect of our lives. Furthermore, we also have “profesia” which basically tells us whats going to happen in advance. Profecía disempowers us. People, when united, can accomplish anything. But profecía denies us involvement in our futures and in many ways becomes self-fulfilling. People like Moisés or Abrahim were only people who lived thousands of years ago. They are completely irrelevant to me. Muhammad and Jesucristo were interesting historical figures and I respect them. But billions of good human beings lived and died with no knowledge of their existance. There, however, is a force in the Universo that is beautiful and good beyond description. You may assign any name you like to this force….Dios, God, Allah……you choose. Thats Just human language. I feel the presencia of this force which had no beginning and no end. This force is completely independent of scripture, profecía and the squabblings of child-like humans. I believe that most people are endowed with enough inteligencia and consciencia to live good lives. As far as an after life, who knows? I dont need scriptura promising me eternal life in exchange for my obediencia to a particular creed. In am happy to live and die independent of all religion. Chou.

    1. Well said, Donaldo! I’m glad to hear you respect the Life Force. Here’s a glass of vino rosso to the Unknown God…. Cheers! 🙂

      1. Madame Butterfly,
        You are truly a flower. Your response is a privelege. You are beautiful. God bless.

    2. RE DONALDO COLINA

      WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!

      Watch out for this Colina Spanish person who just recently showed up here at Darkmoon. I know him from other wesbsites. He pretends to be NOT affiliated with any religion. If you become friends with him, what happens is, he will, very gradually, step by step, little by little, take you down the path that leads to HINDUISM. Then he’ll expect you to convert to Hinduism.

      Next thing you know you will have a very overbearing Hindu guru priest on your hands. Did you do you yoga today? No? why not? I told you you have to do yoga every day. Is your Kundalini energy spiraling up your chakra system yet? NO? Why not? Probably because you’re not a vegetarian. I told you to stop eating meat and start being a vegetarian. Is your third eye open yet? No? Why not? I told you what you have to do to open your third eye, how come you’re not doing it? You bettter start doing what I tell you or else. Did you wash in the Ganges yet? NO? I told you gotta wash every day in the Ganges, NOT in your shower at home. Get with the program.

      Then he”ll expect you to smoke alot of pot and do LSD and DMT and peyote and all kinds of Aldous Huxley NWO Tavistock SOMA drugs. He might even expect you to supply him with “mind enhancing” NWO Aldous Huxley “Sacred” “sacrament” drugs. You will be expected to listen to alot of Beatles, non-stop Beatle music, and he will test you on the Beatle music/songs to “make sure” you’re being a “good” “acolyte” to Hinduism, or let’s say, his version of Hinduism.

      Then he’ll put a lot of pressure on you to become a due-paying member of his Eastern Temple, of course he owns the Temple and of course he’s the High Guru Priest, and he”ll expect you to tithe. Yes, he will want you money too.

      If you show this Spanish person who is “not affiliated” to any religion any friendship whatsoever , he will automatically in his Colina mind consider you an “acolyte” of his HINDU EASTERN TEMPLE and will turn overbearing HINDU religious on you. He’s a real smooth sauvecito operatorado alright, he’s desperado for converts and acolytes, drugs and money. PROCEED WITH CAUTION — PROCEDA CON PRECAUCIÓN!!! – AROUND THIS SPANISH PERSON WHO IS NEW TO DARKMOON BUT PRETENDS HE’S BEEN HERE FOR 40 YEARS. HE PRETENDS ALOT ABOUT ALOT OF THINGS.

      1. REALORIGINALJEW
        I hardly believe you know me from other websites. What websites? Im not that important. Im just another peón. ..”nobody”….en Espanol…….You are obviously a “hook-nose” troll.
        I wish I had the words for you, but here I am in México with señoritas on my left and on my right….I simply have no time for you. Eat your heart out Jew boy. Salud!

      2. ….senoritas on my left and senoritas on my right….

        is that you, Max, you ol’ Aussie crocodile?!

    3. Your “force in the Universo” is USELESS if it cannot communicate with mankind. That means it is either blind or limited in its power or it does not exist. And how do you know that this “force in the Universo” is “beautiful and good beyond description” if it did not send you a message explaining itself ? Do you posses a miraculous gift of Cosmic telepathy ?

  11. Excellent read by Seeb. May Allah accept this in your account of good deeds (amal salih).

    I do take issue with Rehmat for casting doubt if the author of this article is a Muslim. But assuming for the sake of the argument he was not, Rehmat and other Muslim commenters here should be grateful for Seeb’s brilliant and well argued piece.

    Rehmat confounds me even more by questioning if the author was a student of Daniel Pipe. Give me a break! Daniel Pipe is Muslim enemy number one who suggested 15 years ago that Muslims and Arab should not be allowed in the US military or even the police department. With all respect to Rehmat, he was wrong on both counts.

    Finally, I am grateful for Darkmoon for allowing Seeb to fight Islamophobia on this site.

  12. “Behold we have slain the Messiah, Son of Mary & Messenger of God” – Quran 4:157.

    So much is the Crucifixion of Jesus shoved in our faces – for His assailants are – even today – desperate that we believe them – but it was not Jesus on the cross.
    Jesus was prophesied – they knew He was coming – but they did not expect what He was.
    He could do magic tricks.

    * He brought Lazarus back from being dead 4 days – now who can do that – in fact it is a reality of biological life & happens on a regular basis – (youtube – people who came back to life).

    * The miracle of the loaves & fishes – was it 4.000 hungry people to feed – Jesus obviously had powers of hypnosis & mesmerism & understood crowd psychology – the same thing happens at every Religious Revival Fest & Rock Concerts.

    You see Jesus was not the average guy with ZAP POWER –
    He was more like STAR MAN with alien “Beam Me Up Scotty Powers” & the then Establishment were primitive –
    grovelling on their hands & knees & whaling witch doctor types – in the face of this.
    Never the less – they wanted what Jesus had – His super power – convincing themselves that He was an average human Joe & they could handle the magical powers – after all he was flesh – “how dangerous could it be” ambition can take one to extreme places.
    The up & down of it is that the Establishment Elite – ate His flesh & drank His blood – while he was still alive mind you ( He had to be alive according to such ritual killing DEMONIC ) in a sacrificial ritual to attain his divine abilities – this was the First Holy Communion – Jesus prophesied it at The Last Supper to the 12 apostles – for it they 12 who betrayed Him.
    We should know who was nailed to the cross – only no one has looked.

    1. I was a religious kid – I will be 67 in January & I am still that kid looking for real answers.
      Friday morning was confession at St Marks.
      Saturday afternoon I went to the Adelphi Picture Theater, Nicholson St, Nth Carlton, Vic. Australia.
      On Sunday morning it was Mass at St Bridget’s – just across the road.

      1. @ R Davis

        “I was a religious kid – I will be 67 in January & I am still that kid looking for real answers.”

        Having been where you are at, I will pass on to you that which was passed on to me in a brief encounter with a messenger that told be and a friend, “The answer to all questions are in the Gospels.” The messenger was correct based on my experience. Give it a whirl. There is nothing to lose and everything worthwhile to gain.

        “He could do magic tricks.”

        It is not magic. It is how the Heavenly Father made things to work and Jesus explained, in the Gospels, that all people have the power to control the elements, raise the dead, heal the sick, and cast out devils. If this were not true, he would not have told his believers to do these things as long as they are based on the Second Commandment, “Love they neighbor as thy self.” I know some that do these things and they are average Joe’s except for their commitment to the teachings of Jesus as compared to most people.

      1. HP, thanks. Years ago I was into Zen, and I even had the Enlightenment experience while high on LSD. So I have some feeling for what these mystic types you referred me to are talking about. Yet they don’t understand Kant’s metaphysics. For instance, space and time are not ideas that are applied to sense data, as these guys said, but rather, they are like “feelers” by which sense data is possible, by Kant. They are the forms of the mind’s ability to be affected by what is outside of it. It is impossible to have sense data that is not in space or time, therefore. Kant’s use of the word “transcendental” is also misunderstood by these guys. Kant just means the conditions that must exist for experience to be what it is, not a higher reality, by “transcendental.” Anyhow, Kant does say that Christianity is the only moral religion in _Religion Within the Bounds of Bare Reason_. The meaning here is that morality is something independent from religion, which exists in its own right, and Christianity is the only religion that makes reference to this and leads the way to it. My personal theory is that a false morality arose in the ancient Near East, and the Jews were unclean in this way, and Christ exposed this state of affairs to them and showed them the way back to true morality, which is something innate.

  13. Please don’t take this personally, i know not all Muslim are bad people or terrorist and that Islamic terrorism is mainly a Jewish tool, But all Abrahamic religions are a curse on mankind, Islam is no different from Judaism or Christianity. Islam wants it’s own Islamic world order, Christianity wants it’s own Christian world order and Jews want their own Jewish world order, Yes Mohamed was Jew wise but that doesn’t absolve him of his sins, Mohamed was a violent warlord and Islam is a violent imperialistic religion, Islam and Mohamed have alot of blood on it’s hands, Islam and Mohamed are a lesser evil doesn’t mean they a better than Jews. And lets not forget that Islam approves first cousin marriages which is inbreeding and literally makes you sick and degenerate, Islam literally makes you dumb and sick. genetic disorder from inbreeding doesn’t sound like divine advice from god to me.

    1. @ Arya

      Let’s check out Arya’s bad grammar. Note the word “SIC” in the passage below written by Arya. And then ask yourself: is such a badly educated person entitled to lecture us on religion?

      Please don’t take this personally, i know not all Muslim (SIC) are bad people or terrorist (SIC) and that Islamic terrorism is mainly a Jewish tool, But all Abrahamic religions are a curse on mankind, Islam is no different from Judaism or Christianity. Islam wants it’s (SIC) own Islamic world order, Christianity wants it’s (SIC) own Christian world order and Jews want their own Jewish world order, Yes Mohamed was Jew wise but that doesn’t absolve him of his sins, Mohamed was a violent warlord and Islam is a violent imperialistic religion, Islam and Mohamed have alot of blood on it’s (SIC) hands, Islam and Mohamed are a lesser evil doesn’t mean they a (SIC) better than Jews. And lets (SIC) not forget that Islam approves first cousin marriages…”

      It always amuses me when people like Arya try to give the impression of deeper knowledge of religion and access to higher truths when a cursory examination of their prose reveals a complete lack of education. Arya has not not even managed to master the most elementary rules of English grammar. He has the illiteracy of a sixth grader in a school for pupils with learning difficulties. He has failed the basic test of literacy by failing to distinguish between ITS and IT’S.

      Correct me if I am wrong, but would you like to take instructions on the Abrahamic religions from a person with learning difficulties? In one short paragraph, Arya has made SEVEN mistakes!

      I think Arya needs to go back on school and learn the three r’s before he gives himself the superior airs of a world expert on the Abrahamic religions. If Christianity is good enough for geniuses like Isaac Newton, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, it should be good enough for ignorant and semi-literate smarty pants like Arya.

      1. @Grammar Fiend

        Yes, Arya makes spelling mistakes, but that doesn’t mean his criticism of Islam is wrong. I can agree with : “…Mohamed was a violent warlord and Islam is a violent imperialistic religion…” , and : “…let’s not forget that Islam approves first cousin marriages which is inbreeding and literally makes you sick and degenerate…”

        You say : “…If Christianity is good enough for geniuses like Isaac Newton, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, it should be good enough for…”

        This is the logical fallacy called “appeal to authority”. Newton, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky may have been geniuses in their own fields, they were no authorities in the field of religion.

      2. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        OK, I accept what you say for the most part, because at least you have gained my confidence by showing high intelligence and literacy skills.

        I perceive two serious flaws in your argument though, and these lie in your final paragraph:

        This is the logical fallacy called “appeal to authority”. Newton, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky may have been geniuses in their own fields, they were no authorities in the field of religion.

        FLAW 1 : The sin against common sense. Whose opinion would you value more highly if you were a university professor specializing in the philosophy of Wittgenstein and you had to give marks to two essays by your students: Essay 1 is grammatically and orthographically correct throughout, Essay 2 doesn’t know the difference between ITS and IT’S and keeps spelling Wittgenstein’s name wrong, as “Wittengenstien” (sic). So forget the “Argument From Authority”. Common sense tells you that you would be a fool to take seriously anyone with sub-literacy skills.

        FLAW 2: Who can be justly regarded as an “authority” on religion, Franklin? Apparently Newton is not to be regarded as an authority on religion because he was a mere physicist who happened to be one of the world’s foremost scientists! So tell me, do you think Professor Ananda Chatterji of the University of Bangalore, with higher degrees in Theology, a world-renowned “authority” and “expert” on comparative religions, is entitled to tell Isaac Newton to shut up by saying: “Listen, Isaac, I am an acknowledged expert on religion and you are not! So will you kindly shut up and accept that Christianity is a false religion!”

        Tolstoy and Dostoevsky? Oh gosh, who cares what they have to say about Christianity? These are merely world-famous novelists! They have no qualifications in Theology, so they should shut up!

        So what are YOUR qualifications, may I ask, for pronouncing judgement on Islam? Are you an Islamic “expert”? Have you got a degree in Islamic theology?

        Is Christ an expert on Christianity? Or should we value the Pope’s opinion more highly than Christ’s? After all, I don’t think Christ had higher degrees in Theology! 🙂

        The truth is: the only experts on religion are those who actually PRACTICE the religion and see that it WORKS for them. Similarly, the only experts on bicycle riding are those who ride bicycles regularly. Not those who DON’T ride bicycles and say bad things about bicycles!

        Anyone who knocks Islam without experiencing it, as YOU do, is exactly like someone who knocks bicycle riding without have learned to ride a bicycle! 🙂

      3. @Grammar Fiend

        1) Making spelling mistakes often is the result of sloppiness, rather than ignorance or stupidity. Intelligent people are often distracted and pay less attention to mundane matters. Ever heard about the “absent-minded professor syndrome” ?

        2) If you have a degree in comparative religion, then at least you are better qualified to judge a religion than a layman, no matter how brilliant in other fields.

        3) Part of a justified criticism of a religion however is to judge the moral behavior of its founder, its moral precepts and the behavior of its followers throughout history. In these respects Islam is highly blameworthy.

        For all practical purposes Muhammad in Medina behaved like a warlord, encouraged his followers to rob caravans, kill their men and take their women as sex slaves. Muhammad had 800 men of a Jewish tribe in Medina, with which he had a conflict, beheaded in front of himself and their wives and children sold into slavery. People who mocked Muhammad’s prophethood were murdered on his order. For the most part Islam spread by the sword. Islam was and is always connected with violence.

        4) The Qur’an is full of blunders, very strange if it was revealed by Allah, believed to be “infallible”.

        5) I don’t think any of the enthusiastic defenders of Islam here ever has read the biography of Muhammad (or extracts thereof), or a critique of the Qur’an, or a critical history of Islam.

        6) All they know is that the Islamic world is under attack by the Jews, and since they think Jews are bad therefore Islam must be good, because in their simple mind there is only “good-against-bad” in this world.

        7) A good introduction to criticism of Islam can be found at :

        https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

        Look under “Islam” at : “Ten obvious reasons why Islam is not a religion of peace.”

        Under “Muhammad” : “Myths of Muhammad”, and : “Compared to Jesus.”

        Under “Qur’an” : “Why the Qur’an is not from Allah, 10 reasons.”

        8) Criticism on Muhammad is not based on disinformation by the Mossad, but on a biography written by ibn Ishaq, a Muslim from the 8th century, translated by A. Guillaume. If you have the patience to read all the 431 pages, you can read it on line.

        9) You don’t have to practise a religion in order to be able to judge it, especially in its ideological and moral aspects. If people think that their religion “works for them”, then that is fine. The Mafia also “works fine” for its members, still I am justified to judge it, without being a member of it.

    2. @Arya from your SN I am assuming you are Iranian. Probably Nationalist and don’t like to be called Iranian and identify yourself as Persian. The Iranian nationalists and Zorasterians hate Islam rabidly. They have never gotten over the fact that some ragged Muslims defeated such a mighty empire within such a short time and eventhough the Persians ountnumbered the Muslim army by more than 3 to1. There is no country that goes by the name of Persia today. I would not be surprised if you are Zoroastrian. FYI the Zoroastrian religion as well as Judaism and Christianity do not prohibit cousin marriages including first cousins. In Zoroastrian Middle Persian (Pahlavi) texts, the term xwēdōdah (Av. xᵛaētuuadaθa) is said to refer to marital unions of father and daughter, mother and son, or brother and sister (next-of-kin or close-kin marriage, nuclear family incest), and to be one of the most pious actions possible. The models for these unions were found in the Zoroastrian cosmogony. (http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/marriage-next-of-kin) Christianity has gone through phases regarding these marriages. Constantine married his children to their cousins. The OT is full of cousin marriages. Later on you had to get dispensations from the church. You only need to look at India and Zoroastrian marriages to see examples of this. Does that give you a sick and degenerate feeling about Zorasterians? Did the Persians not go around conquering other lands and were they not violent enough? Bet you are proud of their conquests. Do your ancestors not have enough blood on their hands? Some say Shapur the Sassanid King is supposed to have skinned the defeated Roman emperor Valerian alive and had him stuffed and displayed in the Palace.

  14. Fortunately for Christians, there is no named sect which demands we become judge, jury, and executioner of those in non-compliance. Catholics and Protestants now coexist without violent contentions (which seems yet beyond the abilities of different Muslim sects). Love is more of a motivator than Fear, in Christian dogma – “forgiveness” being a cornerstone of the Christian attitude. Although I can appreciate a huge respect for any man who is disciplined in the ways of Islam, I perceive little regard for “forgiveness” in him for breaches of dogma.

  15. Religions other than Christianity are more inclined to worship a METHOD than worship God. Ritualized conduct is more highly-regarded than spiritualized demeanor. Evil, itself, is of more concern than its symbology. At Luke 19:27 Jesus is quoted as saying “But those mine enemies which would not that I reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.”. Notice He did not announce any stringent dress codes, or mannerisms – only a mandate to regard Him as Regent.

    1. Franklin,

      You win the Nobel Prize for restraint.

      And I intend to win the runner-up Nobel Prize by saying no more! 🙂

      1. I too have a pretty high IQ, but my intelligence has not blinded me from accepting two facts:

        (1) that there is not a single religion in the world that cannot be denounced and held up to ridicule by those who are determined to do so;

        (2) that there is not a single religion in the world that cannot be praised and held in the highest honor by those who are determined to do so.

        High IQ in itself is not enough to pronounce negative judgement on the Talmud, for example, and to say with any hope of being proved right: “This book is evil.”

        Why?

        Because the Jews have the highest IQs in the world. And their high IQs give them a different perspective on the Talmud. So they are equally entitled to say: “This book is good. Exceptionally good. To call it ‘evil’ is utter nonsense!”

        Same with the Qur’an, it seems to me. Men of exceptionally high IQs have valued and respected the Qur’an and will dismiss with contempt all efforts to belittle it. All the horror stories about the Prophet Muhammad, for example, can be dismissed as the fabrications of his anti-Islamic detractors.

        How can you be certain that the bad things said about Muhammad are not the black propaganda inventions of Jews and Islamophobic Christians?

      2. Attacking the Quran is pointless. That’s a bit like attacking bread and wine. Because bread has gluten and wine has alcohol and calories, and the combined effect of eating bread and wine can make many people horribly sick and fat and increase the number of road accidents.

        Attacking the Quran is also a bit like attacking lamp posts — by saying, for example: “Lamp posts should be banned because they encourage dogs to pee in public!”

      3. Sardonicus: “Because the Jews have the highest IQs in the world. And their high IQs give them a different perspective on the Talmud. So they are equally entitled to say: “This book is good. Exceptionally good. To call it ‘evil’ is utter nonsense!”

        This is a non sequitur.

        By the way, are you sure Jews have the highest IQs in the world? If you are right about Jews having the highest IQs, then Israel should have the highest average IQ. It does not. It is ranked number 12 (average IQ of 95), according to “IQ Research”: https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country

        However, I will concede the fact that Jews are master criminals and evil geniuses… which is attributed to their lower than a snake morality, not their higher than thou IQs. 🙂

      4. @JFC

        The relatively low IQ of Israel can be explained. 20% of the population consists of Arabs. Of the Jewish population only half is Ashkenazi (IQ 110), the rest consists of Jews of Sephardi (IQ 98), Mizrahi (IQ 91) and Ethiopian (IQ 68) descent. Many of the “Ashkenazi” Jews from Russia are only half or quarter Jewish, some not even Jewish at all but married to a full, half or quarter Jew. Besides, Ashkenazi Jews of high intelligence will not be eager to emigrate to Israel, where the opportunity to fleece Goyim is far less than in the rich West. Rest assured that Jews in the West, prominent in finance, politics, media and academia, are indeed highly intelligent, whether we like that or not.

        For info on Jews and intelligence, also in Israel, see :
        Metapedia : Jews and intelligence.

      5. @ FR

        Where did you get this: “Ashkenazi (IQ 110)” ?

        Is this commonly accepted among IQ researchers?

        Some initial doubts/questions in response to your comment:

        1. Why don’t countries where the Ashkenazis (who are predominately and genetically “Slavs”) come from, like Poland, Russia and Ukraine — and where there are relatively speaking zero “shitskins” to lower the average — rank higher than number 8 in terms of average IQs?

        For your information, Poland is ranked #8 with an average IQ of 99; Ukraine and Russia are tied at #10, with an average IQ of 97.

        2. Jews are one of the most inbred people on earth, especially the top of the pyramid clans like the Rothschilds…. common scientific and biological knowledge says inbreeding leads to dumbing down and degeneration not the opposite. How do you explain this paradox?

        3. If Jews, Ashkenzais in particular, are so smart, how come they never produced their own civilization and didn’t even have a god damned country of their own until 1948? What are their wonderful contributions and inventions that have benefited mankind, pray tell?

        In defense of Jews, lest I be accused of being antisemitic, I will admit that they’re pretty damn smart if they can create money from thin air and make us debt slaves by paying compound interest to them in perpetuity.

        Perhaps you have confused EVIL with “Smarts”.

        Of course, in a world without morality, Jews are indeed the smartest people on earth.

    2. @Pat

      Ashkenazi Jews are Jews from Europe, except from Spain where they are called Sephardic Jews. The name Ashkenazi is derived from Ashkenaz, a Biblical figure :

      Ashkenaz is a term found in a number of contexts. It is found in the Hebrew Bible to refer to one of the descendants of Noah as well as to a reference to a kingdom of Ashkenaz. Ashkenaz is the first son of Gomer, and a Japhetic patriarch in the Table of Nations.

      His name is likely a derivation from the Assyrian Aškūza (Aškuzai, Iškuzai), a people who expelled the Cimmerians from the Armenian area of the Upper Euphrates,[1] The Assyrian name is likely based on that of the Scythians. The intrusive n in the Hebrew form of the name has been explained as a scribal mistake confusing a waw ו with a nun נ (i.e. writing אשכנז ašknz for aškūz אשכוז).[2][3][4]

      The association of the term by medieval Jewry with the geographical area centered on the Rhineland led to the Jewish culture that developed in that area to be called Ashkenazi, the only form that the term is still used today.

      Source : Wikipedia, Ashkenaz.

      DNA study has revealed that Ashkenazi Jews are racially a mixture of Jewish men from the Middle East and European (mostly Italian) women. For info, go to :
      Wikipedia, Ashkenazi Jews.

    3. @JFC

      To your first question :

      “…The average IQ score of Jews has been calculated to be 112–115 (Cochran et al.), and 107–115 (Murray; Entine). A study found that Jews had only mediocre visual-spatial intelligence, while their verbal IQ (which includes verbal reasoning, comprehension and working memory) compensated for this with a high median of 125.6…”

      Source : Wikipedia, Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence.

      1) Ashkenazis are not predominantly genetically “Slavs”. They are a mixture of Jewish men from the Middle East and European (mostly Italian) women. See Wikipedia : Ashkenazi Jews, Male lineages : Y-chromosomal DNA and Female lineages : Mitochondrial DNA. Italians have a high IQ.

      2) Jews are indeed highly inbred. But their “degeneration” led to an increase of all kinds of hereditary diseases PLUS higher intelligence. Following passage explains the “paradox” :

      “Today’s Jews suffer from a number of congenital diseases and mutations at higher rates than most other ethnic groups; these include Tay-Sachs, Gaucher’s disease, Bloom’s syndrome, and Fanconi anemia, and mutations at BRCA1 and BRCA2. These mutations’ effects cluster in only a few metabolic pathways, suggesting that they arise from selective pressure rather than genetic drift. One cluster of these diseases affects sphingolipid storage, a secondary effect of which is increased growth of axons and dendrites. At least one of the diseases in this cluster, torsion dystonia, has been found to correlate with high IQ. Another cluster disrupts DNA repair, an extremely dangerous sort of mutation which is lethal in homozygotes. The authors speculate that these mutations give a cognitive benefit to heterozygotes by reducing inhibitions to neural growth, a benefit that would not outweigh its high costs except in an environment where it was strongly rewarded.”

      Source : Wikipedia : Ashkenazi Jewish Intelligence, natural history of intelligence.

      3) The Jews as a small nation lost their country in their rebellions against Roman rule in AD 70 and AD 135. Since then they have lived as small minorities scattered all over the world. Thus they could not develop a civilization of their own.

      Jewish intelligence is more of the manipulative than of the creative kind. Intelligence is in itself a-moral, it can be used for good or bad purposes. For a people that constitutes only 0,2% of the world’s population but possesses such extraordinary wealth, power and influence, Jews must be highly intelligent, but – as we all know – they don’t use their intelligence in a moral way. They are criminal psychopaths, but highly intelligent.

      1. @ FR

        Thanks for taking the time to reply but I wasn’t entirely serious. I’ll look at the Wikipedia sources you cited, when I have more time and when the mood strikes me, but I’m not sure I want to waste much time studying the intelligence of a parasitoid. At the end of the day, that’s what Jews are: Parasitoids! …that eventually kill their hosts. How smart can that be, really?

        Parasioid:

        A parasitoid is an organism that spends a significant portion of its life history attached to or within a single host organism in a relationship where the host is ultimately killed. Thus, parasitoidy is a similar evolutionary strategy to typical parasitism, except for the more serious prognosis for the host.

        There are parasitoids in a wide variety of taxa, including microbial diseases, plants, crustaceans, insects, and vertebrates. Especially among the Hymenoptera, ichneumons and many wasps are highly specialised for a parasitoidal way of life. Some parasitoidal wasps are used in biological pest control.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitoid

  16. As the RUDE and VIOLENT unwelcomed Islamists invade Paris….

    – WHITE GENOCIDE (is) CELEBRATED AT EIFFEL TOWER..!!

    A giant mural painting on the floor below Paris’ iconic Eiffel Tower was completed in September of 2016 by a Los Angeles-based artist named Cleon Peterson.

    The bizarre “work of art” is titled, “Endless Sleep” — an obvious reference to the coming “endless sleep” of the White Race.

    There is really no need for us to interpret the meaning of Peterson’s obscenity. To all but the most brain-dead libtard, the massive 500 square-meter image, best viewed from the top of the Eiffel Tower while looking straight down, speaks for itself.

    Black figures are superimposed over the White characters, as a Black male and White female embrace passionately in the center.

    –The linked arms of the Blacks form a 6-pointed Star of David.–

    The Star of David at the center is an obvious tribute to the terrible Tribe that is behind White Genocide and to the House of Rothschild in particular. But don’t take our word for it. Here it is, from a tweet, from Peterson himself:

    Peterson, an “ex” heroine addict, tweeted out his gratitude to French banking couple Benjamin and Ariane de Rothschild.

    We suspect (though we have no solid evidence to present) that the “gratitude” is related to Peterson (with 10 helpers) having been commissioned to paint the disgusting White Genocide mural.

    Should there be any remaining doubt as to what the Eiffel Tower floor mural truly symbolizes, a review of the self-loathing artist’s earlier works — depicting what he refers to as “the hedonistic triumphs of those who recognize themselves as victorious in the unfolding mirror of history” — clearly confirms what Peterson and the Rothschilds are dreaming about. Be forewarned, these images are obscene and unsettling.

    http://tomatobubble.com/white_genocide_eiffel_tower.html

    1. thanks, pat,
      another link on the same theme.

      we should all be grateful for this arrogant heads-up, those who are okay with endless sleep deserve it.

      the only quibble i have is with the use of the word “islamists” because they are just actors in jew’s charade, antithesis to the real thing.
      Like calling hillary or podesta or susan rice a christian.

      1. the nigrah clown petersen’s visual technique is a shameless theft from the dutch artist mc escher (my math prof hsm coxeter was a close friend of his).

      2. Lobro –

        Yes… How “BIGGLY” “arrogant” of me and you to repeat the facts..
        …. some might write.. 🙂

        Good link you provided also… Thanks…

  17. It reads all very nice, but when I look with my eyes, the West is being overrun by Islam and the East. Not only now, but also in the past. Major conflicts were fought over this matter in the past between the West and the East, with fatal results for the Occidental genetical basis.

    There is a gap between what is being preached, and what is being put into practice. People will interpret the contents according to their nature. This is not a judgement, this is an observation.

    If the way religion is being lived, has a racial and genetic basis, Islam manifests in a way that does not fit the Western way. To put it simply, it is not my way, it does not fit my genetic base. It is something forced upon me. I do not like things which are forced unto me. I want to choose and live according to my nature. I can only thrive in healthy soil. That is not healthy soil for me. I do however acknowledge it might be healthy soil for a people who have been knitted in a different way by their genes.

  18. Sardonicus,
    Is your IQ written in stone? How can you assign a number to intelligence? The “Jew” has a high IQ? I once knew a Jewish attorney who left his Jewess wife of 30 years for an 18 yr. old stripper. One year later she divorced him and took milliones. She will never work again. Now he is single and broke. Very smart Jew.

      1. Good point Franklin. We are all individuals and should be judged as such. If you want to speak Spanish, you should take courses. You dont say “entiendes” to someone you dont know. You should say “entiende”. Chou.

  19. @Seeb
    Thank you for the article.

    He passed a decree that none of his family would ever be allowed to take charity from the government. Not ever, even until the end of the world.

    Very interesting. What are the references for Mohd. making this very important statement?

    I would be interested in your opinion of the referenced and researched book:
    https://biblicalmullahs.blogspot.de/2015/10/biblical-mullahs-introduction-table-of.html
    whose thesis is that the trouble and strife making by Muslims is because after the death of Mohd. muslim leaders returned to cruel First Testament practices and justified it in made-up Sunna and Hadith.

    For over 10 years, my understanding of the Quran derives from “OutSyed The Box”, syedsoutsidethebox.blogspot.com/, supplemented with reading the Quran that Syed (the blogger) makes references to. My opinion is that the Quran not aggressive toward others. The “chopping off their heads passage” is in the context (read preceding passages) of muslims being FIRST attacked, acting in self defense. The trouble and strife come from the Biblical Mullahs, not from Mohd.

    @EX SOUTH AFRICAN
    Your position is perfectly understandable in a world where the Tribe media are pushing the myth of 99.999% peaceful Muslims, obviously to facilitate White genocide by mass immigration. If you read the two links above I think you too will find that the Quran appears (I have not read every word) to be peaceful . What makes Muslims non-peaceful is:

    1.Death threats for changing religion.
    2. Death threats for questioning their priest class (imams).
    3.Horrific made-up material in books called the Sunnah and Hadith

    However no one in the Tribe media is willing to discuss this. Syed, who calls himself a fundamentalist is absolutely scathing of Muslims for the above reasons. You may find much of this contained in his book “Malaysia and the Club of Doom”, subtitle, “The Collapse of the Islamic Countries”.
    http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7722589-malaysia-and-the-club-of-doom
    If you find it palatable to deal with master censor Amazon, you will find it there too.

    1. To be clear, I am absolutely opposed to:
      – mass immigration of any sort
      – immigration by those who will become a burden (uneducated, unskilled)

      The excuse for mass immigration of UN “human rights” / “refugee convention” is transparently false. When one’s house is on fire one does not rush across town to seek refuge in an opulent mansion, one fights the fire and one calls upon neighbors to help. Flying (sic) on expensive airliners several thousand km and harboring in a “not too” opulent country, then waiting several years for the green light to enter Australia using UN documentation is hardly a refugee case.

    2. @Flan O’Brian
      Narrated Abu Huraira: Al-Hasan bin `Ali took a date from the dates given in charity and put it in his mouth. The Prophet said, “Expel it from your mouth. Don’t you know that we do not eat a thing which is given in charity?” (Bukhari and Muslim)

      There is no disagreement among the Sunni legal jurists on this matter. Maalik, Ash-Shafi’I, Abu Hanifa and Ahmad all agree. As far as I know it is the same in the Jafari School of the Shia Muslims.
      Imam al-Shaafa’i said:
      Voluntary charity is not haraam for the family of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him); rather it is only obligatory zakaah that is forbidden for them.

      Ibraaheem ibn Muhammad told us, from Ja’far [al-Saadiq] ibn Muhammad [al-Baaqir] from his father that he used to drink of the water provided to people in Makkah and Madeenah and I said to him: Are you drinking from the sadaqah (charity) when it is not permissible for you? He said: It is only the obligatory charity (i.e., zakaah) that is forbidden to us. ..
      Al-Umm (2/88).

      Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
      …Ahmad said, according to the report of Ibn al-Qaasim; rather they should not be given anything of the obligatory charity [zakaah]. But as for voluntary charity, it is not forbidden. There is another report from Ahmad which says that they were also forbidden voluntary charity, because of the general meaning of the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): “Charity is not permissible for us.”
      Al-Mughni (2/275).
      Ibn Al Qasim was one of the main students of Maalik, the great jurist of Madina; Madina is really the birthplace of the Law and Maalik had direct connection with the living community. Currently, I know of 2 cases in our community here in N.A. that won’t take anything from the government even though they are needy and it is not really Zakaat (Charity).

      Thanks for the link, I read the book. In principle the author is correct but in many places –in my view- he has overstepped. The Egyptian scholar, Muhammad Ghazali pointed out that the companions themselves never left any records of recorded hadiths and in fact, the Caliph Umar forbid people to collect them and insisted on educating people with the Quran. Ghazali said that Umar said that the day you make another book to compete with the Book of Allah is the day you will be disunited like Bani Israeel (from his book “Fiqh as Seerah”).
      It would be good for us to return to this as a basic principle, however there is relevance in the hadith but it should never be used to trump the Quran, the Quranic intent should not be compromised or maneuvered, which is what ‘legalism’ is prone to do.

      One of the primary advantages that Islam has that no other tradition has (to my knowledge) is a living chain of transmission. For example, I learned to pray from a living man who learned from a living man…all the way back to Maalik …back to the Prophet. The books are there and there are differences but I am more confident in the living chain. This is the main distinction of the school of Maalik or more appropriately, as Maalik called it, the Madinan School. They viewed the living community of that time to be the custodians of the Sunnah (practice of the Prophet).
      Today many people equate the hadith with Sunnah, which is incorrect. It can be sometimes and sometimes not. That is why Sufyan Ibin Uyayna (first generation) said, “Hadith are a source of misguidance except for the fuqaha (legal expert).”

      It may seem contradictory that Maalik was one of the first to compile hadith since he was adamant that if you want to know the Sunnah then take up residence. I believe that by that time the world of Islam became vast and people elsewhere were collecting them. Maalik wanted to put the bare minimum that reflected religious practices and laws of Madinan society. This is the reason why he kept reducing his collection from 10,000 to approximately 3400. He was always worried about putting limitations on human actions. He said that no man has the right to do so except God. To questions he was not certain about, he was famous for saying, “I don’t know.”
      Here are some beautiful statements from Maalik that have become part of my consciousness:
      -Knowledge is not the memorization of sayings or verses (rewayyaat). It is a light that God puts into the heart of the believer.
      -A half of knowledge is knowing what you don’t know.
      -Knowledge is knowing what to take and what to leave.
      -Knowledge is from whom you take it.

      We are living in dark times of confusion. I call it ‘Dajjalic Times” or times of the one-eyed false messiah. Since there is no spirit people only focus on the outward – religiosity has replaced righteousness. Thank you and everyone else for appreciating the article. A special thank you to Lasha and Admin for presenting it.

      1. Seeb –

        “We are living in dark times of confusion.”

        It has never been otherwise…. according to what I have studied.

        Whole lotta darkness spawned THE Chabad’s Noahide Laws… waaay back.. !! 🙂

  20. @ Ungenius – The Jewish Bible (Old Testament) doesn’t mention the story of Jesus (as).

    Paige Turner MD, having been a born-again Christian for 22 years, she devoted her life in studying Bible and holy Qur’an to find material to apply to convert Muslims to Christianity. However, to her great surprise – in her comparison, she found many historical lies and distortion of the so-called “Bible bieng the Word of God”. In her book “How to Prove That Christianity Is Not True” published in 1992 – she wrote that “nothing in the Old Testament pertains to Jesus”, which the priests quote to ignorant Christians. For example:

    Genesis 17:19 – “And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac; and I will establish my convenant with him for everlasting convenant, and with his seed after him.”

    According to Dr. Turner – God also blessed and multiplied Ishmael, who was another son of Abraham. At this point God told Abraham and Isaac and all male members of their household to be circumcised. this makes no reference to any Messiah, but rather states that He will establish his convenant with Isaac and that it would be everlasting (as long as they obey Lod). The verse, however, had nothing to do with Jesus.

    Isaiah 53:7 – “He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth; he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth Not his mouth.”

    Howevr, according to Mark 14:61-62; Luke 22:70; John 18:37, and Matthew 27:11 – the ‘sheep did open his mouth in front of Pilate and the chief priests (rabbis). Therefore, the statement in Isaiah 53:7 cannot be interpreted as pertaining to Jesus.

    Numbers 24:17 – “I shall see him but not now. I shall behold him but nigh; there shall come a star out of Jacob, and a scepter shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Seth.”

    When did Jesus destroy any children anywhere? When did he smite the corners of Moab? King David, a descendant of Jacob, did these things. He, David, is the star out of Jacob and scepter (king) that shall rise out of House of Israel.

    Genesis 49:10 – “The scepter shall not depart from Judah (one of Jacob’s sons); nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh coms and unto him shall be gatherings of the people be.”

    Jacob was gathering his sons to explain why Judah (according to Bible he fathered two boys from his own widowed daughter-in-law) is best qualified to assume the family’s leadership role when Jacob can no longer function as leader. In other words, he is speaking a “living will” to his immediate inheritors, without mention of any Messiah.

    Hosea 11:1 – “When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt.”

    The prophet here is speaking of the Exodus of House of Israel out of Egypt and complains in the next vesrs that they sacrificed to Baalim and burned incense to graven images. Clearly this is no reference to any future time, but to the time already past.

    Isaiah 9:6,7 – “For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulders; and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The Mighty God, The Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace……..”

    This verse refer to the child that Isaiah fathered with the (previously ) virgin prophetess (while two friends watched), and is the third of three prophecies related to this child – which all were proven false.

    1. King of Syria did invade and defeated King Ahaz (2 Chronicles 28).

    2. Child was not named Immanuel but Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz. Joseph and Mary did not name their child Emmanuel either.

    Deuteronomy 18:15 – “The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethern, like unto me, unto him ye shall hearken.”

    Prophet Moses (as) was warning the Levites. Jesus was of the tribe of Judah, not the tribe of Levi, and therefore, could not be the prophet referred to in this verse. The prophecy was for Moses’ brother Aaron, who next speaks in place of Moses.

    Dr. Turner mentions dozens of other verses from Jewish Bible which have nothing to do with the arrival of Jesus among the House of Israel.

    https://rehmat1.com/2009/01/10/searching-for-jesus-as-eh/

    N.B. The Zionists hiding behind Muslim names are welcome to ponder and use their holy “F” word in response …..

  21. ADMIN: Comment found in Spam — NO IDEA WHY — and approved for posting.

    @Pat

    Before responding to your comment I just want to say something about the article. There are those who imply that the portrayal of the Prophet is a romantic one without having information from the early sources. This is not the case, I’ve read Ibn Ishaq, Ibn Hisham, Ibn Saad, Waqidi, Tabari (not all 30 volumes, some are still on the shelf); 5 other biographies of the Prophet and bits of 10 others. The early collectors collected everything, some reliable, some not; some unusual things were recorded since they were precisely that, unusual and the commonly known not recorded. Sometimes you have one report that runs counter to 10 others. This is to their credit and the impartiality they attempted to implement. If you cherry pick only the ones that suit your needs then you can come up with something completely different to what the author believed to be true.

    “We are living in dark times of confusion.”
    It has never been otherwise…. according to what I have studied.
    Whole lotta darkness spawned THE Chabad’s Noahide Laws… waaay back.. !!

    While it is true that good and evil always existed in human life and will continue till the end, I believe this age is different and unusual. I don’t think in the history of the world we have almost all branches of humanity’s survival and direction in the hands of one entity. Most, if not all of our social structures and systems have been infiltrated or co-opted by this group. From the corruption of our water, Eustace was one of the first to talk about; the corruption of our food; the corruption of our air, from Chemtrails to unseen EMF pollution; the corruption of finance and money; corruption in our media and information agencies; corruption in our education system…..you can’t escape their web. Of course the web is to keep you trapped until you are spent, all the while sucking your blood. For me it is frightening and I don’t think I am alone in thinking this. I remember the book, “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” by John Perkins and looking at a clip of him on youtube. When he was asked why spill the beans now? He paused and said, “I have children and grandchildren….”
    Imagine a child being born into the world today: From the get go, vaccines and more vaccines…pabulum and an assortment of other fake foods…pretty soon virtual parents..off to school for conditioning..this can take a long time; they have to make sure they get it right. All the while the debt is growing and bulging so when you get out you gotta start paying. A big part of your adult life: pay, pay, pay no time to think about anything, just surviving. Oh! add to that fake news, fake food, fake elections, fake presidents and God forbid you make a slip and say something about the ‘chosen ones’. I’m talking almost complete control from the international scale to the national, down to our very homes. There is almost no space left that is truly our own. What’s left of liberty? Was it not Rousseau who said that liberty is intrinsic to the human constitution so much so that if you give up a part of it, nothing can indemnify you and if you give up all of it then you cannot be considered a moral man?
    The worst part is the deception. The schooling and media are always refining their techniques and each generation is getting stupider. End result: man is a social creature, he tends to go with the heard. It’ll take you a lifetime just to convince your own brother of what’s happening…if you’re lucky.
    People have to be told even the simplest things, like what looks good on them and if it ain’t got a Nike label on it then you suck. No Sir! It’s not even like my father’s time.
    I’m thinking to move to where Lobro is, out of NA but I can’t stop thinking of the future generation.

    Here is a story that was taught to me by a LIbyan teacher I spent 3 years with:
    A long time ago in the City of Baghad the Sultan was walking along a road. He was finely dressed and had a train of advisors and courtiers with him. Along the way he came upon an old man who was planting an olive tree. The Sultan was puzzled and asked the old man: “Ya Shaykh (old man) what motivates you to plant this tree when you know you’re going to die without ever deriving any benefit from it?”
    The old man turned to him and said, “Others before us planted for us, so too we must plant for those to come.”
    The Sultan was so impressed that he ordered that this man be given some dinars. When he was given the dinars, the old man smiled and said, ” You see, I’ve already benefited from it.”

  22. @SALMAN HOSSAIN you stated:
    As for the Jewish women – I believe 1 of them was his concubine/mistress. Similarly, Mariah was never his wife but concubine/mistress. Both of them were not full marriages.

    Maria the Copt and her sister accepted Islam before their arrival in Medina. There are sources that support this and here is one of them. If Maria the Copt had converted to Islam she could not have been made/kept as a slave:
    Tabari recounts the story of Maria’s arrival from Egypt:

    In this year Hātib b. Abi Balta’ah came back from al-Muqawqis bringing Māriyah and her sister Sīrīn, his female mule Duldul, his donkey Ya’fūr, and sets of garments. With the two women al-Muqawqis had sent a eunuch, and the latter stayed with them. Hātib had invited them to become Muslims before he arrived with them, and Māriyah and her sister did so. The Messenger of God, peace and blessings of Allah be upon Him, lodged them with Umm Sulaym bt. Milhān. Māriyah was beautiful. The prophet sent her sister Sīrīn to Hassān b. Thābit and she bore him ‘Abd al-Rahmān b. Hassān.
    — Tabari, History of the Prophets and Kings.[2]

    Many sources list her as Muhammads wife. She and the Jewish lady were also included in the title of “Mothers of the faithful” a title which applied to Muhammads wives only.
    Here is reference to the Jewish lady by Tabari (838 – 923 AD). You can find other sources of reference elsewhere supporting this:

    “God granted Rayhanah bt. Zayd of the Banu Qurayzah to his Messenger. Mariyah the Copt was presented to the Messenger of God, given to him by al-Muqawqis, the ruler of Alexandria, and she gave birth to the Messenger of God’s son Ibrahim. THESE WERE THE MESSENGER OF GOD’S WIVES, six of them were from the Quraysh.” (Tabari volume 9, page 137) [9] [10]

  23. Turkish born journalist, author, speaker and interfaith activist Mustafa Akyol in his book, “The Islamic Jesus” makes the laughable claim that prophet Jesus was not only “King of Jews” but also a common link which unites Christianity with Judaism and Islam. First of all, Jesus was not a Jew. He was a teacher and not a king. His mother Saint Mary was cousin of prophet Yahya (John the Baptist) who was not Jewish but descendent of prophet Yakub (Jacob, Israel).

    The term JEW was invented by the Zionist Scofield Bible for the non-Semitic African Berber and Turkic Khazarian tribes who converted to Judaism in the 4th and 10th century.

    Holy Qur’an accepts all biblical prophets from Adam to Jesus as Divine-guided sinless. Jewish Bible (OT) doesn’t mention prophet Isa (Jesus). On the other hand, Jewish Talmud calls Jesus bastard (sic) and his mother Mary whore (sic). The prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned as the final Messanger in the Gospel of Barnabas which was not canonized in 325 CE.

    The New Testament quotes Jesus on several place that he came to “House of Israel” only – meaning not to guide Goyim. Catholic Church for centuries blamed Jews for the murder of Jesus. Holy Qur’an, however, reject Yahud and Nasara story of Jesus (as).

    Watch below how interfaith is hated by Jews in Israel.

    https://rehmat1.com/2017/06/18/interfaith-war-on-islam/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *