Les Be Friends: The Shocking Case of Gayle Newland

A dysfunctional lesbian gets over six years in prison for posing as a man and tricking a straight woman into have sex. Why so harsh a sentence when convicted pedophiles are getting less?

By TOM RAWSTHORNE 
for the Daily Mail

Abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
with pictures, captions and brief commentary

LESBIAN GAYLE NEWLAND:
“It was just a bit of fun!”

As the jury foreman delivered the guilty verdicts, Gayle Newland shook her head and wailed: “I can’t go back to prison — I can’t.” Three weeks later, she returned to court for sentencing and was told she would be jailed for six-and-a-half years.” Newland once again failed to hold back her emotions, sobbing in the dock and stamping her feet. “No!” she cried out.

While at HMP Low Newton, a maximum security prison near Durham, the 27-year-old Newland  spent time on the same wing as mass murderer Rose West. Newland, a privately-educated university graduate, rubbing shoulders with Britain’s most notorious living female killer? How on earth did that happen?

In brief, Newland was jailed for pretending to be a man to trick a female friend into sleeping with her. Posing as a male called Kye Fortune, she went online to seduce a fellow student at the University of Chester.

When they finally met in person, she persuaded her victim to wear a blindfold at all times. Then, maintaining the deceit that she was a man by using a strap-on sex toy, Newland had multiple sex sessions with her.

The victim not only wore the blindfold during sex but also for at least 100 hours when the pair were together — going for drives, sunbathing and even ‘watching’ films. When the student finally ripped off her blindfold, she was horrified to discover Gayle Newland, not Kye, standing in front of her.

Unlike Newland, her attractive 25-year-old victim was not a lesbian. Had she known her lover was another woman, she said, she would never have consented to sex. And it is this which goes to the controversy at the heart of the case.

Newland’s supporters rail both at her conviction and her sentence, branding it ‘shameful’, ‘cruel’ and ‘shocking’. Similar sentiments have been expressed by members of the legal profession, who question how such a deception could merit a sentence that even paedophiles and rapists do not always receive.

They say that a number of similar recent cases show that young men and women — often gay or transgender — are being unfairly treated by the criminal justice system purely because of confusion about their sexuality and gender.

—   §   —

That Gayle Newland is a complex character there can be no doubt.

Raised in a £500,000 house in Willaston, on the Wirral, she attended £12,400-a-year Queen’s School in Chester paid for by her father Brian, who ran a construction company. (See Gayle Newland, pictured here with her affluent middle-class parents).

At school, she began developing her online alter ego, Kye. At first she used the false name to speak to girls on internet chatrooms, but soon it became part of a bizarre double life, Kye Fortune’s character embellished with an American man’s photographs and videos.

Asked to explain why she hid behind this fake profile, Newland said: “I had gone from primary school where I was happy — a mixed primary school, where all my best friends were boys — to a completely different environment at an all-girls school. There I found myself attracted to girls.”

By the time Newland got to the University of Chester to study creative writing, she had used Kye to dupe unsuspecting girls on more than one occasion, but never before with such devastating effect.

Her victim this time was also at the university. An attractive but vulnerable young woman, she had been brought up in a Methodist family and had recently split from a boyfriend, with whom she had been in an abusive relationship.

She told Manchester Crown Court that Kye first contacted her on Facebook in 2011, claiming he was a fellow student. They spent hours talking, coming to regard each other as boyfriend and girlfriend, despite never having met.

For a year, Kye stalled — claiming to be self-conscious of injuries suffered in a car crash and to be seriously ill with cancer.

After a year, Kye agreed to meet the stranger who had fallen in love with her online, thinking she was a man — but with strict conditions. The stranger would have to put on a blindfold before he entered her room and she could not touch him.

As a precaution, Newland wore a woolly hat, swimsuit and bandaged her chest to hide her breasts. The other woman agreed. She was ‘naive’, she admitted, and also ‘desperate to be loved’.

In this way they would have sex more than ten times.

The victim even agreed to requests to cover her eyes while watching films, eating dinner or sunbathing.

Their relationship progressed in this bizarre way until the summer of 2013, when, during a sex session, she realised Kye actually had long hair. Pulling off her blindfold, she found Newland standing there, sex toy at the ready.

TEN TIMES . . . AND SHE NEVER KNEW WHO WAS MAKING LOVE TO HER!

“There was no point until the day I took the blindfold off that I thought for one second that a woman was the person behind this,” she said.

Shocked, the victim ran out of her own house. Newland followed and CCTV footage showed them rowing in the street. That same evening Newland attempted suicide, jumping off a canal bridge. “I have done something I shouldn’t and now my friend can’t forgive me,” she would subsequently tell police.

The deception, the victim said, had a devastating effect on her life. She suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety as a result.

“I hated myself. I felt filthy, disgusting,” she told the court. “There were not enough showers in the world to clean me.”

[LD]: A more recent case of online seduction is perhaps even more bizarre. A 15-year-old boy contacted a female called Marie Dent who also claimed to be 15 years old. After a passionate online courtship, the two agreed to meet. Though the female stranger may have seemed older than she looked, she insisted she was 15 when she met up with the 15-year-old boy for the first time. Sex then took place. On the second occasion, the boy’s mother walked into the boy’s bedroom where the couple were engaged in sex. She was horrified to learn that her teenage son was having sex with a 44-year-old woman who looked at least 10 years older! Here is a recent picture of the ageing cougar who has yet to be sentenced for seducing a minor. [LD]

—   §    —

In the latest trial, Gayle Newland  was convicted by a 11-1 majority verdict of three counts of sexual assault by penetration.

“This was a deceit of such subtlety and cunning in its planning, and was a deceit from your point of view so successful in its execution, that an outsider to this case might find the facts difficult to comprehend,” said Judge David Stockdale QC, sentencing her to six years in prison for the assaults.

While the sentence may seem harsh, it is within guidelines for these sorts of offences. Newland perpetrated a deception that lasted for years, did not plead guilty, and had shown no remorse. The impact on the victim also had to be taken into account.

In recent years a number of cases similar to that of Newland have reached the courts. Yet none has resulted in such a lengthy sentence.

Newland herself was said to have had a ‘complex’ psychological background. She’d been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, in which a person can experience distress because there is a mismatch between biological sex and gender identity. She’d also been diagnosed with Asperger’s, a form of autism, as well as eating disorders, anxiety and depression.

But while accepting them as a mitigating factor, the judge said they were ‘not an excuse’ for what she had done.

Because it also emerged during the trial that Newland’s deception of the student was not her only one. Police gathered evidence that, as Kye, she had targeted three other women. The uncontested witness statement of one of them, who began speaking to Kye in 2009, showed a very similar pattern of behaviour.

The witness described falling in love with Kye online but being fobbed off with excuses, including about cancer treatment, whenever she pushed to meet.

Newland made no attempt to meet the woman, but allowed a relationship to develop even in 2014 while on police bail for offences against the original victim.

At the sentencing, it also emerged that Newland had pleaded guilty to an unrelated offence of fraud.

While on bail for the sexual offences, she had defrauded the marketing agency she was working for. Her company paid bloggers to endorse products in online postings, so she pretended to be ten fictional bloggers and invoiced the firm for £9,000 ($12,000).

For this offence she was jailed for an additional six months — meaning that she faces a total of six and a half years in prison.

Even when released, the stigma of what she did will remain with her. Newland was told that she must sign the sex offenders’ register, and remain on it for life.

“Why sex offender?” she tearfully asked from the dock when informed. A question some — but by no means all — will doubtless sympathise with.

GAYLE NEWLAND

“No! no! I can’t go back to prison — I can’t!”

LD: Gayle acted wrongly, but convicted pedophiles and drink-drive road killers are getting far less than six and a half years in prison for their crimes. I regard this as a needlessly draconian sentence. Gayle needs help and understanding, not such a savage punishment. Shame on the judge! 

Original source
Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

109 thoughts on “Les Be Friends: The Shocking Case of Gayle Newland

  1. Lasha Darkmoon inserts this comment into the article above but gave no link to her source. You will now find the link below.

    [LD]: A more recent case of online seduction is perhaps even more bizarre. A 15-year-old boy contacted a female called Marie Dent who also claimed to be 15 years old. After a passionate online courtship, the two agreed to meet. Though the female stranger may have seemed older than she looked, she insisted she was 15 when she met up with the 15-year-old boy for the first time. Sex then took place. On the second occasion, the boy’s mother walked into the boy’s bedroom where the couple were engaged in sex. She was horrified to learn that her teenage son was having sex with a 44-year-old woman who looked at least 10 years older! Here is a recent picture of the ageing cougar who has yet to be sentenced for seducing a minor. [LD]

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4752832/Essex-woman-44-posed-teen-online-groom-boy-15.html

    1. @ LD

      LD: Gayle acted wrongly, but convicted pedophiles and drink-drive road killers are getting far less than six and a half years in prison for their crimes. I regard this as a needlessly draconian sentence. Gayle needs help and understanding, not such a savage punishment. Shame on the judge!

      I agree absolutely. As a character in Dickens once said, “The law is an ass.” A six and a half year sentence in prison for pretending to be a guy and having it off with a sexy young straight girl is way too much.

      Moderation in all things please.

      I guess one consolation for this Gayle Newland character (who is not a bad looking chick) is that she will now find herself surrounded in prison by loads of lesbians who all have the hots for her. Gayle had better watch out. She could be gang-raped! And that will be her punishment.

      Hmm . . . not a bad punishment for a lesbian! 🙂

      Like they say, every cloud has a silver lining. 🙂

      1. Sardonicus

        I find your comment demeaning, not only to lesbians but to all women. Your flippancy is not appreciated. This woman got what she deserved. A few hundred years ago she would have been burned at the stake as a witch.

      1. @ Lobro

        The word “Les” has nothing to do with the Christian name “Les”. Nor is it a typo. Sorry you missed the pun!

        My “Dictionary of Slang” explains:

        lesbie/lesby (n). A lesbian; thus the punning phrase lesby friends, a play on the words “Let’s be friends.”

        Understand?

      2. Curiously enough, the word “LES” is also a slang abbreviation for lesbian, as in the phrase: “Is she a les?”

      3. @ Lobro

        Looks like I am missing out on diversity of friends …

        If you’re suggesting by this comment that the only people who are capable of understanding lesbian slang must either be lesbians themselves or have lesbian friends, you are wrong. I am not a lesbian, nor do I have lesbian friends, but I understood at once that “LES BE FRIENDS” was a play on words from the very common slang phrase “lesbe [= lesbian] friends” = “Let’s be friends”.

        90% of slang is criminal slang or sexual slang anyway. And I assure you one doesn’t have to a criminal or a sexual pervert to understand it! 🙂

      4. Lobro –

        Yeah – Yeah – Yeah.. we know…

        Just because you missed the ‘punch-line’… 🙂

        You have to hold yourself above the rest of us who ‘got it’ – the play on words – right away…

        HA-HA-HA..!!! Thin waffles… 🙂 🙂

      5. I had no idea that my TOTALLY inoffensive remark would cause such undertows threatening life and limb.
        I thought I had caught a simple typo but the bats came flapping out of the belfry.
        This Arnold character seems to stir into life whenever I post … I have yet to assign a face to Arnold, came pretty close but doubt remains.

        Doubting Thomas ended up as a believer while I seem to travel the opposite way.

        Anyway, Sard, Pat, no big deal, les be civil 🙃

    2. In the article it says;

      “They say that a number of similar recent cases show that young men and women — often gay or transgender — are being unfairly treated by the criminal justice system purely because of confusion about their sexuality and gender.”

      From Wiki;

      “John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a psychologist, sexologist and author, specializing in research into sexual identity and biology of gender. He was one of the first scientists to study the psychology of sexual fluidity and how the societal constructs of “gender” affect an individual… His work has been both celebrated for its innovation and criticized, particularly in regard to his involvement with the sex-reassignment of David Reimer[1] and his eventual suicide.”
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

      The sad case of David Reimer plays an important role in the understanding of the transgender nonsense. David was raised as a female after a botched circumcision. His twin brother Brian committed suicide as did David. John Money, the pedophile apologist, oversaw the ‘experiment’.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer

      1. Alot of stupid inane childish comments today, Uncle puts all of them up on the commentary board. I send in a very intelligent post about Ernst Zundel and Uncle CENSORS it. I guess Uncle prefers idiotic childish posts that sound like a bunch of retarded kids wrote the posts.

      2. @ TROJ

        Sorry to hear you are disappointed with the “stupid inane childish comments today”. Also that you feel your own posts are being “censored”, a frequent complaint of yours. Please let me know which of these three comments you think contain precious nuggets of wisdom which you would like to share with our readers. I quote only a few lines from each comment just to give a flavor:

        COMMENT 1:

        Pat : I called you a (((f*ckin piece of shit fuckin hebe sheenie jew kike))) because when I sent in a post [ with solid source references ] about 911 being a Nuclear Event you got EXTREMELY defensive, EXTREMELY perturbed, EXTREMELY bothered, EXTREMELY annoyed…..etc etc etc

        COMMENT 2:

        The posts in which I call you [= Toby] and your mommy, the Moaner [= Sister Monica], “CUNTS” , are also FACT BASED TRUTHFUL posts, by the way. In case you were wondering if my posts calling you and your mommy, the Moaner, CUNTS were FACT BASED posts or not. They certainly are FACT BASED posts. I assure you the posts in which I call you and Moaner your mommy CUNTS are definitely FACT BASED posts, *grin*…..etc. etc. etc.

        COMMENT 3:

        In a way, Newland’s girlfriend is lucky, her head is so into la la la la la land she thinks licking a plastic dildo is actually licking REAL dick. poor Moaner [= Sister Monica], when she licks her plastic mandingo nigger dildos as she does every night and many times during the day also she fully well knows the dildos are plastic and NOT REAL nigger dick for she knows even the most low down low level most streetish most hoodlumish niggers don’t want anything to with her, *grin*, she knows because she has so many memories of being turned down by niggers, even the nigger bonobos swinging from the banana trees with IQs of about 20 some less even in the congo don’t want to go anywhere near Moaner’s yeast mold and mildew infected twat so Moaner actually suffers ALOT more each and every night and many times during each and every day when she licks her plastic mandingo nigger dildos during her lunch breaks and coffee breaks yearning yearning yearning yearning if only the black plastic mandingo nigger dildos were THE REAL THING , so Moaner suffers ALOT more in one night or in one lunch hour or one coffee break than Newland’s girlfriend ever suffered her whole life.

        “I send in a very intelligent post about Ernst Zundel and Uncle CENSORS it.” you complain bitterly. “I guess Uncle prefers idiotic childish posts that sound like a bunch of retarded kids wrote the posts.”

        Yes Joe, I know exactly what you mean when you say “idiotic childish posts that sound like a bunch of retarded kids wrote the posts.”

        Look in the mirror.

      3. What do you English call it – a “wanker”? That’s what TROJ is… He sits in his padded cell down there in Chatahoochee, and wanks-off on thoughts of defiling Sister Monica. He’s really quite insane, you know – but entertaining! 🙂
        The orderlies will come by soon and hose him down with a high-pressure hose, and he’ll be calm for awhile, again. It runs in cycles. He can’t help it, Toby. (You’re being very kind.)

      4. @ Gilbert Huntly

        He can’t help it, Toby. (You’re being very kind.)

        It’s not kindness on my part, believe me. Remember that this guy has been banned from EVERY OTHER WEBSITE he has ever posted on. We only post a minute fraction of his posts and the only reason we do so is that my niece Lasha Darkmoon has vetoed the complete banning of his posts. Why? I have no idea. She thinks they serve some valid purpose but she has never explained to me what that purpose is. A very strange lady in many ways, my niece, quite unlike my other relatives.

  2. “…The victim not only wore the blindfold during sex but also for at least 100 hours when the pair were together — going for drives, sunbathing and even ‘watching’ films. When the student finally ripped off her blindfold, she was horrified to discover Gayle Newland, not Kye, standing in front of her…”

    It is difficult to feel much pity for this “victim”. Who on earth would not become suspicious because of such conditions ? And could she not recognize her partner as a woman by her voice in the first place ?

    1. And could she not recognize her partner as a woman by her voice in the first place ?

      Maybe the female victim knew all along that her partner was another woman but got a secret (but unconscious) thrill out of role playing.

      After all, it’s only one step from “Mundus vult decipi” to “Mulier vult decipi.”

    2. This is what I was thinking. How in the world is it possible that the victim did not recognize her sex partner was not a man?

      Maybe the younger generations – millennials? – have been so messed up by modern culture that they lost their senses. They have unlearned to trust their God given senses, they have been subverted by holyweird and the entertainment industry and their marxist education in such a way that they accept any sick idea: after all they adhere to the ‘all inclusive’ and rainbow program.

      Why would you wear a blindfold to start with. Would you not want to see the person you are intimate with?

      To me these are sad, sad, lost people. ‘We will corrupt the West untill it stinks’ comes to mind. It’s all Frankfurt School confusion!

    3. F.R.,
      This narrative is pure fantasy. It couldnt have happened. Its common sense. At some point the blindfold had to be put on. When? Did Miss Newland call the victim on her cell phone and instruct her to put on the blindfold before they met? More than 100 hrs. together and each time the victim needed to go to the restroom, Miss Newland walked her there? The couple never ate together? Hard to do with a blindfold. I would even believe the Shoah before I believe this narrative.

      1. When they were having sex, didn’t the victim ever touch Newland’s chest? If she had, then she would have realized her partner Newland had female breasts. I find it hard to believe that during the sex they had, the “victim” never touched Newland’s chest. It would be real obvious, even with a blindfold on, that Newland was a female. Or, was the “victim’s” hands tied down also? Female breasts usually do NOT feel like a man’s chest.

        They probably had some kind of argument or falling out and the “victim” decided to play “innocent” and she got her revenge by taking it to court. Maybe Newland cheated on her with another woman one night and the “victim” got real jealous and angry.

      2. TROJ –

        The court records show she licked the dildo…
        ….and couldn’t tell the difference..!! 🙂 🙂

        Testimony:
        “…persuaded her to lick Kyle’s penis and did …”

        Here is the actual court case from 12-11-2015:

        Court: Chester Crown Court
        Judge: Judge Roger Dutton DL
        Case Number: T20147351
        Defendant name: Gayle Dawn Newland
        Offence: Assault by penetration [3 counts]

        http://www.thelawpages.com/court-cases/Gayle-Dawn-Newland-16413-1.law

        …………

      3. @ Pat

        That’s a valuable “find”, Pat. Nowhere in any of the newspaper reports of this case did I ever read that the female victim had “licked the dildo” and thought it an actual penis. This case gets weirder by the day!

        Can you imagine a blindfolded girl (age 25) licking another woman’s strap-on dildo and believing it a real penis? I guess it’s possible. Remember this particular victim was said to be a “virgin”. She had never had sex before, so how could she be expected to know what a real penis was like?

        To complicate matters, she thought her “boyfriend” Kyle was an Asian, a Filipino with a very deep voice!!! 🙂

      4. Sard –

        Even ‘virgins’ give ‘head’…. and, certainly, ‘hand-jobs’.. 🙂

        You must know that…as all high-school boys do..!!

        I’ll bet even Costello learned in school.. 🙂

      5. What on earth are you talking about, Pat? I went to a very respectable boy school — no girls allowed! — and all the virgins
        I ever knew were chaste as the driven snow. They wouldn’t have known a ‘hand-job’ from a handstand. And the only ‘head’ they gave was when they tried to get ahead! 🙂

      6. Sard –

        Talking about??????

        No wonder you’re on leave in Osaka… because you never learned and don’t understand what women want.

        Security and sex and children and money…. not necessarily in that order. 🙂

  3. As ANONYMA said, perhaps the “victim” enjoyed the events but later backtracked and screamed foul. Otherwise she must be suffering from sensory malfunction so serious that she is need of medical help. Unable to distinguish a penis from a piece of plastic? Unable to question why the plastic “penis” maintained a solid erection at all times. Unable to distinguish bodily form and voice of the “lover”. What about the genitals of the “lover” – was she unable to distinguish a vagina from a penis? Who has sex with someone they have never seen? Never mind doing so 10 times! In the UK, the chances of clapping hold of some disease are very high. Was the “lover” clean?

    This report is a nice example of Cattle Control Experiment UK. I am surprised the lunatic UK judge did not dismiss the case on the basis that “gender is a mental construct” and so no harm was done.

    1. Good points, Flan
      It brings to mind the old rugby song!

      “A policeman from near Clapham Junction,
      whose organ had long ceased to function,
      deceived his good wife for rest of his life
      by the dexterous use of his truncheon!”

      The “victim” in this case is a right idiot! I’d have let the lesbian go with a caution. Talk about wasting the police’s time.

      1. Newland defrauded the marketing company she worked for, so that’s shows a penchant for being a con artist and a scam artist. Maybe Newland tried to scam money from her “girlfriend” and the girlfriend didn’t appreciate it Newland was trying to scam her out of money so the girlfriend had her hauled into court. The girlfriend played “innocent and naive and an abused victim” in court, more of a chance to get Newland found guilty. The “innocent” girlfriend ain’t innocent either. The girlfriend sounds rather shady also. Or, maybe the girlfriend wanted to join in on a scam or two and Newland didn’t want any partners in her scam activities.

      2. Felix. Rugby. A real mans game!

        “Talk about wasting the police’s time.”
        UK police waste their own time quite well enough, poking around for “hate” in Failbook, Youtube and Twitter; sending insurance reports when there is theft (never investigated), subjecting UK motorists to psychological torture experiments that have progressed from rat laboratories, performing “outreach” to immigrants. I suspect investigating lesbians was one of the more worthwhile investigations that particular week. 🙂

  4. The “victim” was complicit by virtue of her willing participation in sex games. In a society which does NOT condemn faggotry or transsexualism, ANY judicial condemnation is extreme hypocrisy. The mental damage which may have been suffered by the “victim” pales in comparison to the damage caused an entire society by the
    Cultural Marxism which spawned it. Obviously, both the victim and the perp were strangers to a more traditional code of conduct.

    1. Gilbert’s right. We’re all swimming round in a sewer of Cultural Marxism. Thank the media for that.

      And who controls the media?

      Shhhhhh! . . . . . No subversive questions please!

    2. G.H.,
      Theyre both losers. There was a time when virginity meant something. Not any more. Nowadays once a girl gets the car keys she starts “dating”…..ie. …sexually active. Im 50 years old, never had kids and glad I didnt. If some male adolescent “popped the cherry” of my little girl, Id have killed the little fool and be encarcerated for life.

  5. The good news is… now she can have all the kinky lesbian sex she wants in prison. Maybe after 6-1/2 years, she’ll want to stay there. I have no sympathy for deceivers, whether they be eternal jews or queers. If Brits were more concerned about the ongoing invasion of their country by the third world than sexting, they’d be better off. Until then, Cheerio old chaps!

  6. From the article:
    “They say that a number of similar recent cases show that young men and women — often gay or transgender — are being unfairly treated by the criminal justice system purely because of confusion about their sexuality and gender.”
    “…confusion about their sexuality and gender.”
    “…confusion about their sexuality and gender.”

    I believe much of the confusion arises from using the wrong words these days.

    “Gender” is not synonymous with “sex.” NO WONDER confusion abounds..!!

    “Gender” was used as a language denotation – masculine, feminine and neuter.

    Masculine and feminine are not the same as male and female, and neuter does not equate to hermaphrodite.

    Sex offenders…. are just that… SEX offenders, and not GENDER offenders..!!

    The CHOSEN – constantly – change our words and… change our minds… and control us.

    The CHOSEN ruined the word, GAY..!! Queers are not all that HAPPY, anyway. 🙂 They are always bitching about their problems with GOOD people.

    1. Pat,
      Your slippery. Maybe theyre quite a few “Pat Juniors” walking around that even “Pat Senor” doesnt know about.

      1. DON –

        I don’t understand why you would claim that I am “slippery”…. just because I know the difference between ‘gender’ and ‘sex’…. and explain that difference to those who follow the CHOSEN ‘word-changers’ blindly.

        I can remember when all forms and applications required filling in the blank marked ‘SEX’ with the words ‘Male’ or ‘Female’ or ‘M’ or ‘F’…. or checking the box ‘M’ of ‘F’ as appropriate. TODAY the space asks for ‘GENDER.’ In that case the most correct answer would be ‘None’ or ‘N/A’..!!

        As a prank… when asked for ‘SEX’ on the useless forms…. many of us wrote “OFTEN” in the space provided..!! 🙂

  7. Did the lesbian commit the “heinous crime” of not being Jew?

    Roman Polanski – The political whores making up the FBI haven’t been able to “bring in their man” for over 40 years,…and counting

    “Woody” Allen – “Ick”, ’nuff said

    Jeffery EpSTAIN – three months then pardoned by another pedophile, half of the Clinton crime family.

    On top of all that, I’ve been catching tidbits here and there about an INCEST epidemic in the land of (LOL) “God’s Chosen”, Israel.

    1. Pat is Correct. The word “gender” refers to classifications of nouns. “Gender” does NOT mean “male” or “female” or “trans-gendered” as in a male who thinks he’s a female or a female who thinks she’s a male. The word “gender” refers to the classification of nouns. That almost everyone uses the word “gender” to mean male or female or trans-gendered just proves how ill-educated we now are in the West.

  8. : A more recent case of online seduction is perhaps even more bizarre. A 15-year-old boy contacted a female called Marie Dent who also claimed to be 15 years old. After a passionate online courtship, the two agreed to meet. Though the female stranger may have seemed older than she looked, she insisted she was 15 when she met up with the 15-year-old boy for the first time. Sex then took place. On the second occasion, the boy’s mother walked into the boy’s bedroom where the couple were engaged in sex. She was horrified to learn that her teenage son was having sex with a 44-year-old woman who looked at least 10 years older!

    The next president of France!

      1. Wiggins,
        Brings to mind the old Russian saying. “There’s no such thing as any ugly woman! Only a shortage of vodka.”

  9. yes the wise Fat-tina sonya Slobomayor Kagan and I say ruth ginsburk is a lesbian and I think one of the male judges is a homo

    1. well, i believe every single word, individually and together.

      Newland has been doing it for years, here she says FUCK EU and the entire European continent has been wearing blindfold for years and still believe in the power of TRUE LOVE.

      she can easily pass for a man, i don’t even need a blindfold to be fooled by Victoria Newland.

  10. I believe convicted pedophiles should be getting far worse punishments than they do. I suppose if it was the 19th century still and they were caught doing it they’ed likely be put to death. Of course I doubt elite pedophiles would have been.
    The whole thing is sick beyond words.
    I don’t feel Gayle Newland got something she didn’t deserve. What she did multiple times is as near to rape as one could get I feel.
    What a bizarre case. The only sense that young woman was missing was sight…and yet there it is.

    1. @ Skye Solo

      “I believe convicted pedophiles should be getting far worse punishments than they do.”

      I agree. I think Jesus had a good idea about something worst than a millstone around the neck at the bottom of the ocean for those harming little ones. It could be as simple as incarcerating pedophiles in the general prison population and turning a blind eye.

      1. I agree Ungenius. I feel the way they are currently treated you’d think they robbed a store or something — with no weapon at that. They are reprehensible. We don’t need to try to figure out and discuss their personal psychological drives that they behave the way they do. It should be a side issue and not affect the sentence they get.

  11. Asperger’s along with what Newland did equals jewess. I’m surprised Newland was even prosecuted and sentenced, unless of course, the victim was also jewish which would mean that one jew out-jewed another jew. That would also explain the long sentence by the jewish legal system.

  12. this whole story is unbelievable.
    unless maybe the so-alled victim is mentally retarded, and deaf maybe.
    it’s simply not credible that this woman had sex with newland ten times over a period of months and never had any idea she was also a female.
    she never once caught on by the voice? or did he have to wear earplugs too?
    women are just not that stupid.
    the bit abut the blindfold is not possible to believe.
    did this newland woman have a lawyer with her at her trial?
    i can’t believe she did.
    what lawyer couldn’t cast reasonable doubt on a tale as flimsy as this?
    besides all that – the sex was consensual. nobody forced or even coerced anybody into anything. therefore there’s no crime.
    and, where the actual harm anyway?
    if the victim couldn’t distinguish newland’s gender throughout then what’s the trauma?
    i mean, by these standards any lie one person tells another would constitute culpability.
    but the real message here is how the courts have become unaccountable to reason, totally corrupted by their own power. it’s the nanny state.

    1. the real message here is how the courts have become unaccountable to reason

      UK College Of Policing’s Hate Crime Operational Guidance:

      For recording purposes, the perception of the victim, or any other person …. is the defining factor in determining whether an incident is a hate incident, or in recognising the hostility element of a hate crime. The victim does not have to justify or provide evidence of their belief, and police officers or staff should not directly challenge this perception. Evidence of the hostility is not required for an incident or crime to be recorded as a hate crime or hate incident.

      http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2017/08/the-law-in-todays-britain.html

      As I keep saying: UK, (Tribe) Cattle Control Experiment. Subjugate success in the land of the Bulldog Breed means the methods will succeed globally.

  13. Lasha, you are too kind to a fault. Yes, she needs help and understanding and it pales in comparison to a paedophile or a drunk-driver killing someone, but it borders as a case of rape. The victim (herself obviously with love issues) was understandably mortified after discovering the truth. What a shock that must have been. It was truly non-consensual sex.

    Deuteronomy 22:5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so [are] abomination unto the “I AM” thy God. http://JAHTruth.net/nsong.htm

    1. In the current environment where clothes and bodily form/appendages are manipulated, increasingly at tax payer expense, then a man may appear as a woman and vice versa. It is up to the parties involved in illicit sex to conduct dna testing if they care about these matters.

      I’m curious to know if transvestites are attracted to the appearance of the “opposite” sex or the “same” sex. What would be the judgement if two transvestites were involved. Complicated. 🙂

      Surely, according to current Tribe landscape, inadvertent illicit sex with a person of unhappy gender must abound.

      Sounds like, not content with the effects of mass media, the Tribe are using the courts to push “unhappy gender” into the minds of the masses even further.

    2. New Song –

      Read on to Deuteronomy 23:1, and it is clearly stated how the Lord is disposed to the emasculated (pecker whacked-off) male. Then on to Deuteronomy 28, the blessings and curses acquired for good and bad conduct; and their application to the conditions of our contemporary society. Gayle Newland has done no more than has been obviously condoned by the current evils and perversions. The crime is the judgement of that same perverted society condemning her to six years in jail for it. The hypocrisy!

      1. So true Gilbert. Which is why I am not a judge! 🙂 My moniker is the ‘New Song’ and yet I am mostly associated with only the Old Testament by a handful who comment here.

    3. @Old (Testament) Song

      Deuteronomy is one of the worst books of Yahweh’s Chosen Bandits. It calls for war, robbery, rape and murder :

      10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it.

      11 And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee.

      12 And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it:

      13 And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword:

      14 But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee.

      15 Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.

      KJV, Deut. 20 :10-15.

      Don’t try to derive “morality” from such an immoral book.

      1. FR –

        “15 Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.”

        The US and Britain and Russia and China and Japan and Germany and many others around the world…. have been following the Old Testament all along..!!!

        Parts of the KJV were actually accepted globally..!!

        Whether Christians or CHOSENS or not.. they ALL ‘swerved into’ obeying the Lord…..whichever Lord was written about there.

        Or one they chose.. 🙂

      2. F. R.
        As you are the expert on all things Hebraic, so correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t Deuteronomy concocted centuries after the other books of the Torah by crazed and power hungry Judahite priests?

        I must confess I have little respect for creatures that inflict barbaric deaths on innocent animals through their cruel kosher slaughter.

      3. @Felix

        Yes the book of Deuteronomy was concocted by priests to start a religious reformation :

        “…scholars have accepted that the core of Deuteronomy was composed in Jerusalem in the 7th century BC in the context of religious reforms advanced by King Josiah (reigned 641–609 BC)…”

        Wikipedia : The Book of Deuteronomy.

        The genocide of the peoples of Canaan as described in the books of Joshuah and Deuteronomy most probably never happened (a slow infiltration of the land of Canaan by the Israelites is assumed, not a sudden and bloody conquest), yet millions of people still see these ancient genocidal fantasies as “God’s Word” and that has to be criticized.

      4. Felix –

        “So anyone who cites it in a discussion as God’s word is a dupe of the Jews!”

        Yes. Duped from the beginning. God’s word is an invention of man.

        That’s why there are thousands of gods…

        You can pick any one, or several, for yourself..!! 🙂

      5. Another judge in our midst by the name of Franklin Ryckaert; or perhaps, merely a guess on FR’s part to explain that which he cannot see or hear because he refuses to listen to it.

        Josiah was a king and he was well aware of the reform that was desperately needed. The Israelites had gone astray (I never said to follow them!). He had in his midst The Ark of The Covenant and the contents within It he shared with Faith. What’s wrong with that?!

        http://JAHTruth.net/arkmovie.htm

      6. @OLD SONG

        King Josiah (or some of his priests) fabricated the book of Deuteronomy in order to push through a reform. That book is a fraud, like so many parts of “God’s Word”.

        And the Ark of the Covenant is in Ireland? Give me a brake !

      7. F.R.,
        As a child, I was subjected to the horrors of a Southern Baptist church. The “preacher” would give sermons in flowery language condoning all the rape, genocide, theft….etc….of the Old Testament. I rebelled and started thinking independently. All the congregación was instructed to worship Jews. How could a “Christian” exalt the very reptiles which Jesucristo cursed repeatedly? For more than 40 years Ive never set foot in a Zio-Christian church and am proud of it.

      8. FR, Ungenius get their anti-Torah sources from none other than counterfeit-Israel. Driven by unseen forces that they are unaware of, they are protecting the ENEMY. What a pity, when Jesus’ sacrifice was to bring The Truth and some people deny it.

        “Since c. 600 BC, there has been a conspiracy by a few to conquer and destroy the many. The few are identified in the Bible as the Synagogue of Satan who falsely claim to be from the tribes of Judah and Benjamin and who ghettoised themselves at Jerusalem under the Talmud. This would be the origin of the people we call ‘the Jews’. A small sect of people ruled with an iron hand of tyranny and fear by a minority of apostate / counterfeit Levitical priests who claimed (falsely) to speak for Yahweh, whose house on Earth was the Temple in Jerusalem and to be His Chosen people, when they are not, but are, in reality, His enemies, whom He hates (Malachi 1:1 – 2:11). Using this deception they have claimed that the Scriptures about Israel refer to them and that they should destroy anyone who will not accept their evil Talmud and lordship; as they did to Jesus.” http://JAHTruth.net/illumin.htm

  14. Gayle Dawn Newland was found guilty of sexual assault by penetration.
    She was found not guilty of two further counts of sexual assault.

    Here is the actual court case from 12-11-2015:

    ……

    Court: Chester Crown Court
    Judge: Judge Roger Dutton DL
    Case Number: T20147351
    Defendant name: Gayle Dawn Newland
    Offence: Assault by penetration [3 counts]
    Defence Barrister: Nigel John Power QC
    Prosecuting Barrister: Matthew Corbett-Jones
    http://www.thelawpages.com/court-cases/Gayle-Dawn-Newland-16413-1.law

    …………

    My comment:

    From the ‘Sentencing Remarks’ the jury was clearly uncertain about some of the case.

    This very weak ‘proof’ was offered about the actual events:
    “The row that ensued spilt out onto the street and was captured on CCTV for the jury to see.”

    The story could have many fabrications in it, which could not be proved as fact.

  15. Lasha Darkmoon, I respectfully disagree. Her crime is not only a crime of fraud and deception, but a crime against nature. I’m sure with your credentials you understand what I am saying. This crime is further aggravated by attempted repetition, lack of remorse and a demonstrated willingness to participate in other fraudulent acts. Six and one-half years is quite lenient for one so deranged. As far as whether the deranged should be put in prison is another question. In more just, loving and less degenerate times she would be banished from society.

    1. @ Aodh Mor MacRaynall
      @ New Song

      I am responding on behalf of my sister Lasha Darkmoon who is not available for comment. Basically, I want to say that Lasha is in full agreement with you that Gayle Newland committed a crime. A genuine crime. At no point did Lasha suggest that this lesbian malefactor was guiltless and should be let off with a slap on the wrist. All Lasha questioned was the severity of the sentence, not the ‘Guilty’ verdict.

      Her exact words:

      LD: Gayle acted wrongly, but convicted pedophiles and drink-drive road killers are getting far less than six and a half years in prison for their crimes. I regard this as a needlessly draconian sentence. Gayle needs help and understanding, not such a savage punishment.

      By “help and understanding” LD did not mean leniency, still less exoneration, she meant proportionate treatment. Her feeling that Gayle Newland has been treated with disproportionate severity is backed by the best legal brains in Britain. So this is not just her personal opinion.

      Top legal expert Matthew Graham explains: “I should imagine with the Gayle Newland case you could ask 20 different people and get 20 different answers as to whether it is criminal or not, and what sentence it deserves.”

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4741312/Is-fraudster-Gayle-Newland-really-sex-offender.html

      Bear in mind that the purpose of punishment is not Old Testament revenge — “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” — but therapeutic rehabilitation.

      1. She got convicted for 6.5 years but if it is anything like Australia she will be out after 18months

      2. @ Scott

        I agree. My own view is that there will be an appeal and that the original 6-1/2 year sentence will be commuted to a far lighter sentence of maybe 3 years. With good behavior, Ms Newland could be out after 18 months. She will also, I predict, be transferred to a far more cushee open prison and given early parole. Just a guess on my part.

        The reason I make this prediction is because of the formidable strength of the LGBT and transgender lobby. This powerful group is already kicking up a godawful fuss and demanding more “humane” treatment for Newland.

      3. Fair enough, but the phrases “best legal brains in Britain” and “top legal expert” sort of make me blanch. Punishment, banishment and rehabilitation are not to satisfy a supposed legal obligation to abstract legal code but to protect society from further harm and to provide restitution for the aggrieved. Now, whether going to prison for a long time does that can be debated and I think should be. I cannot see that the rehabilitation is to help her; she is not the victim. It is to protect other people from her ever doing this again.

  16. OBITUARY ERNST ZUNDEL

    “…I was just alerted by Don G. at Stormfront that Forum member “IchBinSchwabisch” posted today at 9:40 a.m. —

    It is with GREAT, GREAT sorrow., that I bring the VERY tragic news., of the TRULY heroic German “Hollow-Caust” investigator, Ernst Zundel (with 2 major court-trials in Canada, back in 1985 & 88)., as I just got off the phone with his sister in Germany, that he is in fact., and had VERY unfortunately., just past-away yesterday, Saturday, August 5th…

    May God bless his soul for his life-long struggles in the defense of his people / folk, AND my God protect his loving wife, Ingrid…..

    Unfortunately., as of this moment / day., I have NO details as to the cause of his passing., but will do my best to find-out (without over-stepping my bounds with his family) as to what transpired to bring about such a GREAT loss to the / our cause…”

    Source : carolynyeager.net/

    1. @ Franklin Ryckaert

      I suspect this is false report but I will check. LD received an email from Ingrid Zundel only a few hours ago (Sunday morning) and there was no mention in it of Ernst’s death yesterday (Saturday). Ingrid also mentioned in a previous email to LD that several of these false reports had been circulated on the internet by malicious parties.

      Still, I’ll do a check and see what I get.

      Meanwhile, I’m almost certain this is a false report.

      1. If that is the case, I am sorry to have bothered you. I didn’t expect fraud of this nature. This is perhaps a war of nerves against Mr Zundel and his wife.

      2. FR –

        We never expect the heights of perfidy of the CHOSEN.

        They even spread the false rumors in the bible.

        Many believe(guess) it is factual…. and are made to feel guilty if they choose otherwise.

        That is weakness the CHOSEN attack, expertly, psychologically…. globally..!!

        Rumors abound.

      3. I regret to say that the report of Ernst Zundel’s death has just been confirmed to me in a private email from Ingrid. My deepest sympathies are with her. I will just copy what Ingrid says:

        Dear Lasha –

        It is true this time. I have just notified Jeff Rense and Veterans Today, two websites that featured Ernst many times — and positively. I will copy what I sent to them. You are welcome to post this as well.

        Ingrid

        NOTIFICATION OF ERNST’S DEATH TO RENSE AND VT:

        It is my quiet duty to notify you that my husband, Ernst Zundel, passed away yesterday at the home in the Black Forest in Germany where he was born.

        Details are still sketchy, but I know that his sister, Sigrid, was with him when it happened. She found him unconscious and called the ambulance. He was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. Apparently it was a heart attack.

        That is really all I know at this time.

        Please put this notice on the VT website. There will be an official press release in a few days.

        What can I say? Perhaps just this: “…that there has passed a radiance from this earth…”

        Ingrid Rimland Zundel

  17. ERNST ZUNDEL, A scholar, gentleman and one stand up guy! He always remained true to himself, his beliefs and above all to TRUTH! Condolences to his beloved wife Ingrid.

  18. i must say that hardly anything here makes much sense to me, i guess i am a dinosaur.

    For a year, Kye stalled — claiming to be self-conscious of injuries suffered in a car crash and to be seriously ill with cancer.

    As a precaution, Newland wore a woolly hat, swimsuit and bandaged her chest to hide her breasts. The other woman agreed. She was ‘naive’, she admitted, and also ‘desperate to be loved’.

    In this way they would have sex more than ten times.

    The victim even agreed to requests to cover her eyes while watching films, eating dinner or sunbathing.

    an explanation would be ok but not expected.

    “Victim” was “naive” and “desperate to be loved”.

    so, true love doesn’t exclude multiple blindfolded sex sessions with a car collision monster full of metastatic lumps who refuses to ever be seen or touched … and has a squeaky, high pitched voice, “radiation+chemo, dear, y’know how it is but i got a 10 inch shlong that won’t quit … and yes, exposure to UV is quite okay, it’s that special type of cancer, ultravioletoblastoma“.
    desperate indeed.
    and BLINDFOLDED MOVIES?!?
    what are we watching tonight? Soylent Green.
    what’s for dinner tonight? Soylent Green.

    1. too bad the Victim caught on purely accidentally, they could have lived happily ever after … kiss the frog blindfolded and wait for the miracle, don’t worry if it smells like turd.

  19. Ernst Zündel has died

    On this, the 72nd anniversary of the Allied holocaust in the city of Hiroshima, Japan, comes sad news from Günter Deckert, that 78-year-old German human rights activist and World War II revisionist Ernst Zündel died of heart failure at his ancestral home in Germany, yesterday.

    He was a most amazing person; a good friend to this writer; few men have loved the German people more than he.

    We will publish a retrospective of his life in a day or two.

    He is survived by two children, Hans and Pierre; and his widow, Ingrid Rimland Zündel of 2662 Wears Valley Rd., Sevierville, TN 37862.

    — Michael Hoffman

  20. I think the sentence is perfectly just. Whether pedophiles or other degenerates often get less is immaterial to the the question. Let’s take victories like this in the hopes that sanity may be coming back, or maybe never went away, and it’s manifestation may lead to simple things like not going to prison or losing a job over refusing to use the pronoun preference of assorted freaks in our midst. Or not losing your business because you disapprove of homosexual weddings and refuse to bake a cake for them or photograph their “nuptials”.

  21. SOMEONE WAS ENJOYING THIS TOO MUCH TO PULL THE MASK OFF . WHAT CHANGED ?

    I
    F SHE WAS WILLING TO BE SCREWED BY A GUY , WITH A MASK ON ????

    WHAT DOES THAT SAY ?

    APPARENTLY THE JUDGE FELT LEFT OUT ,

  22. flan is right – it’s tribe cattle control experimentation.
    it demonstrates indulgence of all kinds of subjective nonsense.
    in this case female whimsy, which can and has and will make mockery of logic and common sense wherever it may.
    the fact that the story is totally unbelievable, and yet a conviction was obtained, demonstrates the separation from reality, which is all about the arrogance of power.
    i mean, did this genitool come with a heating element?
    maybe they make em like that now, i wouldn’t know, but i could guess 7 or 8 d cell batteries might do nicely.
    not sure how things are supposed to work in what’s left of england, but i do know how things no longer work in what’s left of the constitutional republic called the usa.
    here the founders understood that over time the courts have to be kept in line with public perceptions and sentiment on what does and does not constitute criminal conduct.
    the twelve man jury, composed of a diverse group of regular citizens, is designed as a check to make sure the authorities do no become as ridiculous as in the case above, where there’s obviously some ulterior motive behind a ruling that makes no practical sense.
    ultimately, under the constitution the jury is supposed to be in control of the courtroom, having the final say on everything.
    that means they can let defendants off the hook in cases where they don’t believe in the law at issue and it also means they can uphold an arrest and make a conviction in cases where people have been arrested and charged even though they haven’t actually broken any laws. this should be happening with harmful activities like circumcision and fracking.
    but the power structure is always loathe to require actual harm to a real victim as a necessary factor in prosecutions.
    the fully functioning jury is the essence of the ‘judicial branch’ of the government.
    the constitution guarantees the right to ‘trial by jury’.
    it doesn’t say anything about any federal officers called judges, who have now usurped all the power in the courtroom..
    a conviction requires unanimous agreement among all twelve.
    because it’s not supposed to be easy to convict people, and send them away to prison for six and one half years for something as goofy as this, which could never have happened if a fully informed and properly functioning jury had been empaneled.

  23. Ernst Zundel, an exceptionally honorable, fearless man committed to the truth. Truth is eternal so his memory lives on.

    My sincerest sympathy to his wife, children, and all of his family.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *