Mind Rape


Do our children need this?

Two outrageous booklets published by the German government in 2007 contain these chilling words:

“Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. The child touches all parts of their father’s body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same.” 

So we have now come to this critical point: where mutual masturbation between parent and child is being promoted by degenerate government officials as a life-enhancing recreational activity. Good for “bonding”.  Next step: state-organized incest.

Toddlers are encouraged in this toxic official document, once available on the internet but now discreetly removed, to indulge in “unlimited masturbation.” Their parents are expected to offer practical demonstrations if need be — the better to produce sexual precocity in their offspring. “Children should learn there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body,” the booklet advises. “The body is a home you should be proud of.”

Children, it is suggested in the brocure, should be taught the movements of copulation as soon as they reach the age of four, giving them what virtually amounts to a crash course in the Kama Sutra as soon as they have learned to walk.

Depravity, it seems, cannot be taught too early.

In Holland, things have gone further. Here a political party, set up by convicted pedophiles, clamors for the legalization of child pornography and intergenerational sex between children of twelve and adults old enough to be their grandparents. I forgot to mention bestiality. They want to legalize that too.

When husband and wife find themselves separated for some reason—for example, if one of them is in hospital or away on business—there is always the family pet to turn to as a sexual surrogate. There is nothing new about this repulsive suggestion. In 2001, Jewish professor Peter Singer of Princeton University put in a good word for bestiality, suggesting in an essay called Heavy Petting that one might like to get it on with the family dog if one were feeling a bite lonesome. No one batted an eyelid at Princeton or elsewhere. Jewish professors at elite universities, after all, are beyond reproach. Ticking them off for being filthy-minded perverts would not only be tiresomely uncool, it would also be “anti-Semitic”. And we can’t have that, can we?

We live in a world in which we have to pretend that mutual masturbation between parent and child, and sex with the family dog, is just one of those things we need to take in our stride—lest we be accused of sexual prudery.

The question is this: who is to blame for the sexual perversions we see proliferating all round us? How did it get so bad? What would our great grandparents have thought if they could suddenly wake up and find themselves in our world? Wouldn’t they be shocked out of their senses?

This sexual licentiousness, growing by the day thanks to the internet and mass media, is far deadlier and more corrosive than it was half a century ago, before the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Those who are responsible for this sickening descent into sexual depravity are clearly the same type of people who helped to kickstart the sexual revolution. They are the same people, moreover, who control the mass media.

Who controls the mass media? Any idea? Who determines the imagery and attitudes drip-feeding steadily into the minds of the public? Who runs Hollywood? Who contaminates mass consciousness? Who defiles the collective mind? Who pulls the puppet strings of marionette man? Who are the Bad Shepherds leading the sheeple astray?

Who are to blame, in short, for letting the world go to hell in a handcart?

I won’t bother to answer these questions. More to the point, I dare not. If you don’t know who owns the media—lock, stock and barrel—you’re wasting your time reading this article.

—   §   —

To undermine Western civilization, the Frankfurt School Jews—from 1923 onwards into the 1960s and beyond—called for the most negative and destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life. Kevin MacDonald wrote at great length about these unpleasant people in his magnum opus The Culture of Critique. To destabilize society and bring it to its knees, to engineer collapse, to produce crisis and catastrophe: this became the aim of these maladjusted and mentally sick Jewish revolutionaries masquerading as enlightened intellectuals.

They were simply sick-minded charlatans with university degrees.

All of them had one thing in common which they did their best to conceal from the public: they were all compulsive masturbators. Their brains were kinked up, their characters completely warped, with all the jerking off they kept doing in their spare time — that is, when they were not busy penning poisonous treatises trying to infect other people with their sexual perversions.

Jewish psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957) was a case in point. He is sometimes described as the high priest of the “masturbation industry”, to borrow a phrase from E. Michael Jones’s magisterial work Libido Dominandi, where Reich is discussed in great detail. Sex, according to the philosophers of the Sexual Revolution inspired by Reich, is to be the panacea for all society’s problems: the new opium of the people. If people cannot have bread, let them eat cake. If they cannot have jobs, security, fulfillment, and a valid purpose in life, let them have sex as a substitute. If nothing else, recreational sex will provide a useful distraction and give people something to do.

A compulsive masturbator himself, Reich believed that masturbation was a useful tool in producing “well-balanced” individuals without religious hang-ups or anti-Semitic attitudes. His major finding (here and here) was that masturbation and the religious life were incompatible, which is why he advocated masturbation as the most effective means of eradicating the religious instinct—which he regarded as the ultimate evil. “What Reich discovered was a fundamental truth of sexual politics, one discovered by the Catholic Church long ago,” Dr E. Michael Jones comments. “Either masturbation destroys your prayer life, or prayer destroys your ability to enjoy masturbation. The two forms of activity are psychically mutually exclusive.” (See here, p. 259)

The result is that Reich, as you might expect, was not only an enthusiastic devotee of the solitary vice but recommended it to all his patients, even going so far as to masturbate his female patients in person. “The pleasure of living and the pleasure of orgasm are identical,” he pontificated, thereby equating infinite happiness with the provision of an infinite number of orgasms.

Reich was, by his own account, not only a compulsive masturbator from early childhood but a self-confessed pervert with wide-ranging sexual interests.

Beginning sexual activity at the early age of four with a maidservant whose pubic hair he was allowed to play with, he went on to seduce the family cook at eleven-and-a-half. While still a small boy, he had begun to take an unhealthy interest in farm animals and could be seen prowling around the stables where he “stimulated mares by inserting whip handles in their vaginas.” At 15 he began visiting brothels where his insatiable appetites made him the talk of the town. If you doubt me, read his Autobiography. You’ll find it all there, set out in grisly detail.

Renowned sexual researcher Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956), though not Jewish himself, was financed by the Rockefellers and made a household name by the Jewish New York Times. He too, like Reich, was an out-and-out charlatan, a lapsed Catholic turned atheist who was fanatically devoted to masturbation and to all manner of sexual perversions. These he did his best to popularize by attempting to normalize them, making out that they were far more common than most people supposed.

It comes as no surprise to learn that Kinsey, like Reich before him, was an avid consumer of pornography, even going so far as to photograph his own penis on several occasions and getting his wife to act in home-made porn movies. A sexual pervert of the kinkiest kind, Kinsey once inserted a toothbrush into his urethra and had himself filmed, subsequently adding this gem to his porn collection. Himself a homosexual with an avid interest in little boys, he would make a point of measuring the penis, both recumbent and erect, of every male he interviewed while conducting his “research”. Why? One can only guess.

Legalizing pedophilia is the ultimate aim of the Homosexual Lobby, an aim which would have won Kinsey’s enthusiastic support. The Father of the Sexual Revolution was not only a bisexual pedophile, with a preference for little boys, he was also a sado-masochistic criminal who was actively involved in the sex torture of little children. (For more details, see here)

If you wish for an in-depth analysis of Kinsey’s kinky preoccupations, this YouTube video may be of some help.

A year before he died, Kinsey sliced off the foreskin of his penis with a pocket knife—a crude attempt at self-circumcision. No one has been able to figure out why he did this. Kinsey’s death, however, has been ascribed to his sexual proclivities.

Dr. Judith Reisman writes:

An early adherent and advocate of masturbation, Kinsey suffered an untimely death due, at least in part, to ‘orchitis,’ a lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of orgiastic self-abuse.

Kinsey believed that all sex was legitimate—pedophilia, bestiality, incest, adultery, prostitution, group sex, voyeurism, indecent exposure, female exhibitionism, mutual masturbation, sadomasochism, sodomy, coprophilia—and he worked to overthrow all laws prohibiting any of these perversions. (See here)

Though not himself part of the Frankfurt School, which was predominantly Jewish, Kinsey marched in lockstep with the Frankfurters and was definitely a Cultural Marxist. His influence in promoting a widespread sexual degeneracy, in the name of scientific research, can hardly be overestimated. Which is one reason why he was lionized by the New York Times and is still, to this day, regarded as a cultural hero.

One thing they won’t tell you is that their hero masturbated himself to death.

—   §   —

The vile policies devised by the Frankfurt School, they hoped, would spread through society like a virus — “continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means”, as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their “quiet” cultural revolution, the Frankfurt School made the following twelve recommendations, all calculated to undermine the foundations of society and create the dystopia we now see all around us:

—  The creation of racism offences and hate speech laws.

—  Continual change to create confusion (e.g. in school curricula).

—  Masturbation propaganda in schools, combined with the homosexualization of children and their corruption by exposing them to child porn in the classroom.

—  The systematic undermining of parental and teachers’ authority.

—  Huge immigration to destroy national identity and foment future race wars.

—  The systematic promotion of excessive drinking and recreational drugs.

—  The systematic promotion of sexual deviance in society.

—   An unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime.

—  Dependency on state benefits.

—  Control and dumbing down of media. (Six Jewish companies now control 96 percent of the world’s media).

—  Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

—  An all-out attack on Christianity and the emptying of churches.

For the above, I have made heavy use of a cult classic article by Timothy Matthews called “Conspiracy to Corrupt”. This was originally published on a Catholic website (Catholic Insight) but has now been discreetly removed, yet another sign of Catholic capitulation to organized Jewry. You will find the 2010 article here on the Truthseeker.    

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of “pansexualism”: the search for indiscriminate sexual pleasure, the promotion of “unisex”, the blurring of distinctions between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women, and, finally, the undermining of heterosexuality at the expense of homosexuality — as, for example, in the idea of “same-sex marriage” and the adoption of children by homosexual couples.

Willi Münzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus:

“We must organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.” 

These iconoclastic nihilists kept their sights firmly fixed on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture. Each of these would be their target. If things didn’t go from bad to worse, year after year, they felt they were not succeeding. To these revolutionary Jewish thinkers:


The destruction of the family, beginning with the systematic brainwashing of children in school: this is where we are now.

All families were seen as essentially evil, especially happy families. The idea was to make all families dysfunctional by encouraging a widespread contempt for authority, beginning with parental authority. This would later be extended to schools, where a contempt for teachers was inculcated by making it impossible for teachers to instruct disruptive pupils or discipline them effectively. A breakdown in child discipline was essential in order to achieve a greater end: the creation of systematic despair in both parent and teacher, leading to a complete breakdown of morale and suicidal depression. Nothing could have been better for the pharmaceutical industry. The best way to get everyone on antidepressants is to make everyone depressed. It’s not rocket science.

The whole point of Cultural Revolution, after all,  was “to create a culture of pessimism” (Georg Lukács) and “to make life impossible for everyone.” (Willi Münzenberg).

If you’re feeling depressed right now, don’t worry. At least you know the reason why. It’s not because you have a serotonin deficiency which prozac can cure. It’s because an evil cabal of degenerates have been doing their best to destroy your morale and poison all that was wholesome in your life. And mind rape your children. They’ve been at it for decades.

Despair creation. That’s what it’s all about. The creation of mass insanity.

They take their motto from Milton’s Satan—“Evil, be thou my God!”

VIDEO : 1.20 mins

Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website, Darkmoon.me, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

160 thoughts to “Mind Rape”

  1. “…We must organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat…”

    With “dictatorship of the proletariat” they of course meant dictatorship of the Jews, just like in the Soviet Union.

    This is what those demonic Jews wanted to destroy :

    Return of kings.com Corey Savage, December 21, 2015 :
    38 pictures that show the decline of America since the 1950s

    1. Stunning article! This is Darkmoon at her best. Not a single word wasted. The criminal mafia behind all this degeneracy is denounced in no uncertain terms here. And yet the cancerous tumor remains, growing day by day to monstrous proportions, awaiting the excision of the surgeon’s knife.

      Herein lies the tragedy: the disease is known, but there is no known cure. The surgeons exist, but their scalpels are blunt and rusting from long disuse.

      The world needs rescuing, but there are no rescuers.

      1. Thank you for a brilliant article, Lasha! One of your best so far! Don’t mind the idiots of the Masturbation Lobby trying to put in a good word for jerking off.

        I guess it’s OK if kids do this, it’s part of growing up, but it’s pretty sad if the solitary vice turns you into a dirty old man. What might have been appropriate at the age of 16 becomes rather pathetic at the age of 66.

        1. What might have been appropriate at the age of 16 becomes rather pathetic at the age of 66.

          Well said! This reminds me Malcolm Muggeridge’s brilliant comment on pornography:

          “Its avowed purpose is to excite sexual desire, which, I should have thought, is unnecessary in the case of the young, inconvenient in the case of the middle aged, and unseemly in the old.”

      2. You can’t fault Muggers….sadly missed, although not everybody’s cup of tea…………

    2. Sadly, via the “*sniff*, holocaust “victim” card, the zhid has, with the help of dual citizen plants, FED RES trillions and their love of and worship of the owner of this system of things, Satan, most in “Idiot culture” will do as Ezra Pound blasted them for decades past;

      “No Rothschild is English… No Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Kahn, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you murdered your Empire. It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians.”
      , March 15, 1942 radio broadcast

      Even something as grade school obvious as AIPAC/Israel’s false flag of 9/11 will not wake them up, because they FEAR waking up and appearing to be “politically incorrect”.

      Even with this article written by a former congressman, you don’t hear a “peep”, terrorized by the beast of political correctness. Like a deer caught in the headlights.


      “It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed.” ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

      “We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America
      (The Jew, December, 1925, Zinobit)

      Can you imagine the life your children will have under the boot of these perverted, carnal dogs?

  2. ” The world needs rescuing, but there are no rescuers.”
    The above statement is false.

    Hebrew 9
    26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world:
    but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
    27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
    28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that
    look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

    1. @ Duke

      ”The world needs rescuing, but there are no rescuers.”
      The above statement is false.

      I’m sorry, but the statement is perfectly valid. If it’s your belief that the world is full of goodly rescuers, and that you are one of them with your impressive Bible thumping, then why is the world going from bad to worse? Why does degeneracy increase by the day if there are so many fine rescuers leaping around and rescuing the world from evil?

      Listen, friend, I myself need “rescuing”! . . . Who is rescuing me, hmm? Are you rescuing me?

      You’ll have to do better than thumping your Bible! A quote from the Good Book ain’t gonna sole my problems, let alone the increasingly horrendous problems of a dysfunctional society heading for hell.

      1. New Song,

        Will you “rescue” me with your Bible quotes?

        C’mon honey, I’m waiting! 🙂

      2. @ Miss Boswell

        “Will you ‘rescue’ me with your Bible quotes?”

        What is it exactly that you need to be “rescued” from?

      3. @ Harold Smith

        Ah-ha, an intelligent man! You ask an intelligent question! Such a relief to find an interlocutor on one’s wavelength.

        What do I need rescuing from? — Listen, friend, we all need rescuing who are lost in the labyrinth … who can see no light at the end of the tunnel. We need a guide to lead us out of the darkness.

      4. MISS BOSWELL, I share your dismay at the state of things, and the sad hesitancy to action in the face of it. It follows though, that if we want to change the world for good we must change ourselves first.
        I think that is what those hopefuls who are arguing with you are trying to say.
        Of course simply “thumping the Bible” is not solely what God expects of us – we are called to get off our butts and exercise our free will – that is, to cooperate with the Ineffable in establishing the new earth.
        Fair-minded Europeans are not quick to war, wanting to exhaust all other options first. Perhaps we have been too tardy lately.
        I want to thank you for the smarting call to action.
        Lastly I must say – we do not need “a guide” to save us – we must collectively, with God’s help, save ourselves.

    1. Jan,

      I am deeply grateful to you. I have made the necessary changes in my article. For some reason, I was unable to gain access to any of this material on my computer at first try. If I’d done a more thorough search, maybe I would have found it sooner or later. So the fault is mine entirely. Mea culpa.

      Many thanks for your help!


  3. Sigmund Freud, Stalwart Zionist, proposed a theory that human sexuality actually begins at birth, when a baby is sucking breast milk. His attempt to pervert the PRIMAL instinct (hunger) is insane – ‘mind rape’ indeed!

    ‘I do not mean to deny the importance of sexuality in psychic life, though Freud stubbornly maintains that I do deny it. What I see is to set bounds to the rampant terminology of sex which vitiates all discussion of the human psyche, and to put sexuality itself in its proper place… primacy among the instincts is held by hunger… The keynote of Freud’s thought is … devastatingly pessimistic.’ – C.G. Jung

    1. Fraud, is what many enjoy calling the pseudo-science of Freudian analysis.He was essentially a liar, fool, and involved in great amounts of financial theft.

      Like most if not all mental illness and psychoactive disorders treatment, Freud knew that the gullible clients (patients) were not only malleable, but subject to his sociopathic suggestions.Freud was the spiritual grandfather of such evil globalists as Kinsey, Heffner, Flint, and other demonically-possessed men and women.

  4. There was a Rescuer. The body He used was killed 2000 years ago, but He Lives on. What He Taught His people was not the Teachings of the world, but that of the Spirit.

    Matthew 21:33 Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country:
    21:34 And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent His servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.
    21:35 And the husbandmen took His servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.
    21:36 Again, He sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise.
    21:37 But last of all He sent unto them His son, saying, They will respect my Son.
    21:38 But when the husbandmen saw the Son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.
    21:39 And they caught him, and cast [him] out of the vineyard, and slew [him].
    21:40 When the Lord therefore of the Vineyard cometh, what will He do unto those husbandmen?

    Matthew 22:2 The Kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain King, which made a Marriage for His Son,
    22:3 And sent forth His servants to call them that were bidden to the Wedding: and they would not come.
    22:4 Again, He sent forth other servants, saying, Tell them which are bidden, Behold, I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and [my] fatlings [are] killed, and all things [are] ready: come unto the Marriage.
    22:5 But they made light of [it], and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise:
    22:6 And the remnant took His servants, and entreated [them] spitefully, and slew [them].
    22:7 But when the King heard [thereof], He was wroth: and He sent forth His armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city.
    22:8 Then saith He to His servants, The Wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy.
    22:9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the Marriage.
    22:10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the Wedding was furnished with guests.
    22:11 And when the King came in to see the guests, He saw there a man which had not on a Wedding Garment:
    22:12 And He saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in here not having a Wedding Garment? And he was speechless.
    22:13 Then said the King to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast [him] into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
    22:14 FOR MANY ARE CALLED, BUT FEW [are] CHOSEN. http://JAHTruth.net/kofkad.htm

    1. John, they are not even Jewish invention – the Hebrews copied one of Sumerian myths, as can be seen in the Epic of Gilgamesh, a rare available piece of writing.

    2. @ John

      You have nothing to offer us in exchange for the precious things we will have lost if we take your misguided advice. What do you have to offer us except sex and shopping? Or do you offer us Wotan?

      I suggest you occupy yourself with the dreary comforts which make you happy and not expect others to welcome with open arms the sickly fruits that satisfy you.

      We need the bread of life, not junk food. 🙂

    3. Jews definitely “promote” sexual perversion but it exists anyway without their help. I once had a conversation with a young man who did 2 tours in Afganistán. He told me that at night while on patrol they would use night-vision equipment. He said he saw every form of bestiality one could imagine. Afgan men would engage in intercourse with every animal imaginable. Dogs, cows, goats, sheep and horses……female I hope. Afgan women price their pre-marital virginity. So what is a young Afgan male to do? Oh well, evidently masturbation isnt on the menu. Give them credit for that. All of this perversion in a “conservative” Muslim culture with no promotion from Jew.

      1. @ Donaldo

        I will allow this Islamophobic comment of yours to be published only in the interests of free speech. Personally, I reject the idea completely that all (or most) Afghan men are engaging in bestiality. Why should we believe the anecdotal testimony of this “young man who did 2 tours of Afghanistan”? Being an unwanted Western invader in Afghanistan and therefore an enemy alien, your friend has every reason to lie. Afghans are among the finest warriors in the world. They are manly specimens. They don’t become like that by having sex with sheep and goats!

        Sr. Monica

        1. No, it is not Islamophobic to say that pederasty is fairly common in the Islamic world. That’s a fact. It was also quite common in Ancient Greece. But to assert that every Afghan male is into bestial sex, having it off with sheep and goats at every opportunity, IS Islamophobic. Only a pathological hatred of Muslims in general could motivate such a hateful calumny.

      2. @ Pat

        You wrote: “Afghans are among the finest warriors in the world.”

        That is definitely not the case. It is difficult to find young men there who are not high on hash or other drugs 24/7….. even in their army.

        Sister Monica is right and you are wrong.

        Afghanistan is the only nation in the world that has never been conquered and taken over by foreign invaders. The Brits tried and failed miserably. What do you think caused the total defeat of the British, not once but several times?

        The indomitable Afghan soldier.

      3. Dr Johnson –

        You wrote:
        “What do you think caused the total defeat of the British, not once but several times?”

        It does not matter what I think about why Brits pulled out….

        Afghanistan is under US Military occupation right now..!! 🙂

        The US drug producing troops are supplying 90% of the opium to the UK and EU.


      4. @ Pat

        So what? Afghanistan was under British occupation too. Occupation is not conquest. Even if you Americans happen to have your boots on the ground in Afghanistan right now, that does not invalidate Sister Monica’s comment that the Afghan male is a fine warrior. He is managing to fight back. To resist occupation. To kill and be killed. That makes him a fine warrior.

        So Sister Monica is correct. And you, as usual, are being contrary in order to draw attention to yourself. You are basically, I am discovering, an exhibitionist.

        If you’re trying to chase me off this website, a recent newcomer, you will fail.

      5. Dr Johnson –

        You wrote:
        “If you’re trying to chase me off this website, a recent newcomer, you will fail.”

        There is no need for you to use exaggerations and false assumptions about me and playing a victim… Just comment and do not use silly inventions and “YUGE” guesses about me like others do to make their points.

        I “BIGGLY” like your comments… I want you to stay..!! 🙂

      1. Dr. Johnson,
        Madagascar is one nation that has never been conquered militarily also.

  5. These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. – Matthew 10

    And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. 23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. 24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. – Matthew 15

    Jesus said it twice making his point clear – “My mission does not concern the gentiles.” He commanded his disciples not to address the “gentiles.” Are you a “gentile”? If so, why do you not comprehend the master’s words.

    1. Arch

      You seem to be stuck on the same view as the oxymoron Judaeo-Christians. Jesus did not come only for the Israelites. In Matthew 10, Jesus sent his 70 disciples on a specific mission, the lost sheep of Israel. The double negative of Matthew 15:24 is normally misinterpreted as you indicate.

      Everyone is free to believe as they choose, but below are just a couple of the numerous cases contrary to your conclusion that Jesus only came for the Israelites.

      Jesus said in John 3:16-17 – For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

      Jesus started his ministry around the sea of Galilee which was populated by many other than Israelites as written in Matthew 4:23-25 – And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people. And his fame went throughout all Syria: and they brought unto him all sick people that were taken with divers diseases and torments, and those which were possessed with devils, and those which were lunatick, and those that had the palsy; and he healed them. And there followed him great multitudes of people from Galilee, and from Decapolis, and from Jerusalem, and from Judaea, and from beyond Jordan.

      1. Ungenius
        It always surprises me how people can put so much faith into a book decided upon som 1700 years ago. At the time they had many scripts to choose from, so why did they choose the way they did?
        I have asked this question to christians time and again, and it always boils down to something like a ‘revelation from above’.
        Why is it so difficult to see the weakness in this whole ‘creation’? Instead christians demands its religion to be the one and only religion with a divine source? Nok unlike the five pillars I’ve been told about from people swearing to another religion.
        One of the surest result of it all is that everybody in my country, and throughout Europe knows more about the old history and myths of this rather uninteresting people instead of our own. And I find that appalling. Somebody is laughing behind the scene here. On our behalf.
        Arch pinpoints one of the many contradictions in the Bible. The book is loaded with them. Even Yahveh seems to change through the book.
        I really do not care which Abrahamic religion you talk about. Their myths and sentiments suits the people in the Middle East who created them. To many of my countrymen and myself it is just not attuned to our collective psyche at all.

      2. ‘To many of my countrymen and myself it is just not attuned to our collective psyche at all.’

        BJØRN THORSØNN, when C.G. Jung said something very similar,
        ‘the differences which actually do exist between Germanic and Jewish psychology and which have been long known to every intelligent person are no longer to be glossed over… every child knows that differences exist…’
        he was called a Nazi anti-Semite, and ridiculed among the academia and in the press, his work prevented from entering education, and now reparation is demanded from his followers. Here is an example:
        He fought with the “chosen people” in every way he could.

      3. @ Bjorn Thorsonn

        “I have asked this question to christians time and again, and it always boils down to something like a ‘revelation from above’.”

        Actually, I agree with you because I am not a Christian. I am a follower of Jesus, known as The Way before adoption of the term Christian. Since Jesus was from the beginning, before Abraham, The Way is not Abrahamic. The teachings of Jesus stand on their own without support from other parts of the Bible. Accepting and practicing the teachings of Jesus is the only way to salvation of the soul. Salvation is not contained in any portions of the Bible except the Gospels. I came to this conclusion through research, common sense, and yes, an extremely brief encounter with a person I call the parking lot messenger. All of this occurred after I properly prayed for the truth 15 years ago.

        Contradictions disappear when lies are put aside. One of the biggest lies of all time is the idea that the Bible is the “divine word of God.” For anyone that bothers to think, the Old Testament is blatantly false and stands in contradiction to the teachings of Jesus. The book of Acts is a return to the Old Testament and contradicts the teachings of Jesus while paving the way for Saul/Paul’s letters. I agree with the renowned historical researcher Eustace Mullins when he called Paul, the impostor. Paul leads back to the Old Testament with enough Jesus spice to make it seem credible. Revelations is contrary to the teachings of Jesus and contradicts what Jesus said about his return. The early followers of Jesus considered Revelations to be confusing and of no consequence as documented by one of the early Bishops of Alexandria. The “divine word of God” lie certainly worked to lead people away from the simplicity of salvation as taught by Jesus. Christians are certainly confused by unnecessary complexity as past and current actions clearly demonstrate.

        Most people consider me to be a heretic. They could be right and I could be wrong, but I am the only one accountable for what I believe to be the simple truth. Everyone gets to decide for themselves.

      4. Bjørn, Snez, Ungenius – a great exchange stream, hard for me to add anything useful.

        One caveat: i don’t know anything about St Paul and having heard both + and – on him from people whose opinions i respect, i will let +s and -s cancel and leave a blank space until i am sufficiently motivated to do my own fact checking.
        But Ung’s theory does sound persuasive – for now.
        And Jung was my first great influence even as a teen and tho today i may give him a bit of an argument regarding his respect for kabbalah and alchemy, which i understand to be in some part a jew sport, he remains an important thinker in my view.

        And yes, OT is a crowbar used to pry Jesus away from gentiles, a pernicious dissolver of moral responsibility in exchange for blind kowtow to Jew LAW – incredible that this is obscured to so many.
        New Song is a prime example of an OT cultist, otherwise really a nice lady, if only she could quit the crowd of the chanting corpses.

        If St Paul is truly responsible for introducing it to defile the message of Jesus, then he is just another crypto Donmeh wahhabi LBJ marrano pope Francis.

      5. Srila Prabhupada: What is the meaning of the word Christ?
        Father Emmanuel: Christ comes from the Greek word Christos, meaning “the anointed one.”
        Srila Prabhupada: Christos is the Greek version of the word Krsna.
        Father Emmanuel: This is very interesting.

        Krishna and Christ

      6. Lobro, Jung studied all religions, without excluding Judaism. A true scientist has an objective stance towards everything that exists, and Judaism does exist, however much we may dislike it. He is the only academic who clearly understood the human need for spirituality, which animals don’t have although animals also show very developed psychology (logical thinking, emotions, behaviours etc.). Jung was also quite well educated and productive in anthropology, archaeology, literature and philosophy, whereas Freud was just a drug addict who heavily relied on Judaism and Christianity in his theories. Freud was obviously struggling with a sense of guilt, and trying to resolve it. If you look at Jewish Yom Kippur, the origin of excessive guilt comes from Judaism. Vidui (in Hebrew) means ‘guilt’ or ‘sinfulness’, which in essence means ‘guilt of being alive’. The same guilt was introduced in Christianity, then elaborated in Communism (you should feel guilty of acquiring property even by hard work or inheritance), in Freudian guilt of love and reproduction, furthered to the guilt of race, ethnicity, gender, etc., by other Jewish thinkers. Many types of guilt have been imposed on Goyim, and Jewish imagination is not stopping creating new types of guilt for Goyim, used for robbing and destroying Goyim. Goyim should get rid of all that unjustified guilt within themselves before starting dealing with Jewish guilt. I personally think that excessive sense of guilt originates from Hebrew exile from Babylon. No hard feelings – I have just tried to clarify. 🙂

    2. Arch, I am just like Jesus. I was crucified by the US empire, which was manipulated by the Jews. My mother was just like a saint because she was painfully honest; she was incapable of telling a lie, or hurting anyone. We had done nothing wrong to the empire and the Jews. You can make a myth of my life too.

      1. Snez”

        You wrote:
        “Arch, I am just like Jesus. I was crucified by the US empire, which was manipulated by the Jews.”

        I am glad to see you can write that “crucified” has different meanings to different people.

        I have been making that point for decades.

        You were not actually nailed to a cross until you died. Good to know..

        Exaggerations and myths and allegories abound… even today. That was the claim of Thomas Paine 200+ years ago.. 🙂

      2. ‘You were not actually nailed to a cross until you died.’

        Then we should be fine becoming zombies in a cage that Jews and Shabbos Goyim are preparing for us. (We can add it to Thomas Paine, and hope we won’t be convicted of “seditious libel” by Jewish “common sense”.) 😉

      3. Snez –

        You wrote:”Then we should be fine becoming zombies in a cage that Jews and Shabbos Goyim are preparing for us.”

        Do as you wish. I am not a part of YOUR “we” here.

        I have never written that. You invented it. So… you can do it. 🙂

    3. … and then there’s the curious case of the Christian Identity people or “Christian Identitarians”, notably pastor Dr. James P. Wickstrom and his followers…

      they believe they are the real “lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

      In other words, they believe they — Whites — are the real Jews!

      The real chosenites, sans the hooked and crooked nose!

  6. I agree with the vast majority of what Lasha wrote. However, I hope she is not in favor of going back to the Victorian Era in her denunciation of masturbation. That belief, promoted in the US by sex hater Dr. J Harvey Kellogg (yes, the Cornflakes guy), led to boys incurring much unnecessary shame for their inability to refrain from the “solitary vice.” That’s why he wanted all boys (and girls too) to be circumcised. Kellogg, a fundamentalist Christian, did much damage to society by bringing the EVIL of barbaric Jewish forced circumcision to mainstream Christian America. Kellogg also thought that sprinkling some carbolic acid on the clitoris of young girls would do the trick. Guess what – nothing stopped children, especially boys, from masturbating. And rumor is that the prude Kellogg never did consummate his marriage of 40 years. As a substitute he had a male masseur give him a yogurt enema every morning.

    Yes, masturbation can become excessive and an unstoppable compulsion. But shaming children for engaging in it is not the answer either. Parents should at least tell their children, at an appropriate age, that there is no shame in it if done in moderation. We don’t need to put a guilt trip on our children for secretly pleasuring themselves.

    1. @ follyofwar

      If you want to jerk off, no one’s stopping you. But please don’t find fault with those who prefer chastity to masturbation. Chastity is not a crime.

      The pleasures of the flesh you may find irresistible. So feel free to indulge yourself in hedonistic self-stimulation. But why, pray tell,
      deny others of a more spiritual bent the exquisite pleasure of sexual self-restraint?

      Not jerking off, I assure you, is a far more refined pleasure than jerking off.

      1. @Miss Boswell,
        I was taken aback by your dismissive response to what I felt was my honest and nuanced response to just one point of LD’s excellent article. The personal attack on me, claiming I was a depraved masturbator, was contemptible. I’m a retired senior citizen with two grown children and am way past any desire to self-pleasure.

        But I am a man and remember how young males think. The male sex drive at that age can be overpowering. I assume you are a woman, and perhaps it is easier for a woman to remain chaste and refrain from the “solitary vice.” But are you really saying that young males will be happier and more spiritual if they totally refrain from self-pleasure? Thousands of years of biology says otherwise. If what I’ve heard about Catholic seminaries is true, even the would-be priests cannot keep it in their pants.

      2. Miss Boswell,
        For a male adolescent, “that act” is normal. But once a man has a wife or lover the “manual act” should stop. Theres simply no substitute for the pleasures a womans body provides. I love it and can never get enough. Besos.

      3. @ follyofwar

        I apologize sincerely for any offense I gave you. I was guilty of hyperbole and literary extravagance in suggesting that you were yourself in all probability an enthusiastic practitioner of the solitary vice because of your tolerant and laissez-faire attitude to masturbation among children and young people generally.

        See this from my point of view, Folly. If my children masturbate and I catch them at it, I’m not going to throw a fit. I’m not going to punish them. I’m going to treat them kindly and with the utmost tolerance. Being a Catholic, however, and with ingrained moral values from childhood which I adhere to absolutely, I am NOT going to smile and ruffle their hair gently and murmur:

        “Go ahead, my darlings, jerk off as much as you want! This is normal sexual behavior for the young and is highly recommended by our politically correct Jewish masters! Hey, everyone does it and it’s great fun! 🙂

        The Jewish sexual pervert Wilhelm Reich did it constantly and it cured him of the dangerous tendency to religious belief. How marvellous! He masturbated himself into atheism, because, as we all know, regular masturbation and the love of God are totally incompatible! (See above in LD’s excellent article, quote by E. Michael Jones).

        Yes, my dear children, why not follow in the noble footsteps of Alfred Kinsey — surely a great man? — who masturbated himself to death? (See LD’s article above)

        I am not a prude. I don’t advocate what you sneeringly call “Victorian” values, but I am against my children being taught to masturbate in school by their Cultural Marxist teachers. I want these f***ing perverts to be given a hundred lashes and banned from teaching! I don’t want my children to fall under the influence of pervs offering lessons with titles like “Ten Easy Masturbation Techniques For School Children And Young Adults.”

        Pornography has become an epidemic. It is accompanied by compulsive masturbation that is known to damage the brain by actually changing the structure of the frontal lobes. See

        Pornography’s Effect on the Brain (Part 1), by Dr Lasha Darkmoon

        Pornography’s Effect on the Brain (Part 2), by Dr Lasha Darkmoon

        I am an immense admirer of LD’s work, especially in the sexual field, which was brought me to this website. I happen to know LD has offered sex counseling to many patients suffering from sex addiction, particularly porn addiction, and that her consistent advice has been to stop masturbating. Not to ration it, but to stop it completely. I happen to hold that view myself.

        I don’t advocate “occasional” masturbation, in the same way that I don’t advocate the “occasional” heroin fix or the “occasional” act of murder. That’s my position and nothing will persuade me to change it.

      4. Miss Boswell,
        Why are you a “Miss?” Perhaps you should become a “Mrs.” and experience the pleasures of the flesh. Besos.

      5. @ Folly of War
        @ Miss Boswell
        @ Donaldo Colina

        Folly of War – Thanks for bring up the pervert Kellogg. Not many know anything about him except cereal.

        Back when I was 14 years old, I had a prostate infection. It was not fun to say the least. The doctor that treated me told me, not in the presence of my parents, that I either needed to masturbate or become sexually active since stale accumulated semen results in prostate infections. Since it takes two to tango, I only had one option until I became old enough to get married because I certainly did not want a repeat of the prostate infection. Back in those days, young women were more prone to be chaste until marriage. I assume the doctor was correct since I have not had another prostate infection.

        I relate this only to state that the need for sexual release in males is apparently more physically important than to females.

        Had I been born 100 years earlier, I probably would not have been put in the position to masturbate because I would have been married at the ripe old age of 14 years to a young woman of 13 or 14 years of age. I would have been able to provide support for a wife and family. That would not be the case today in a society that demands a person finish high school ed-jew-cation, about 18 years old, or even college ed-jew-cation, about 22 years of age or more, in order to acquire the ability to support a family. Now, young males face either masturbation of loose females for sexual relief for 4 to 9+ years more than their ancestors. Quite clever on the part of the (((architects))) of modern western society that creates fertile ground for sexual perversion. All the jews have to do is add pornography and the job is complete. Turning nature upside down is a jewish joy and considered normal.

        Maybe MB is a ‘Mrs’ as she stated she has children and is a strict Catholic;
        “Being a Catholic, however, and with ingrained moral values from childhood which I adhere to absolutely,”

    2. Kindly review social decorum, modesty, and morality of the Victorian Age, as you put it, before engaging in obtuse generalisations.

    3. folly,
      i happen to know a bit about the kellogs because for many years they were big sponsors of some research done by a group i was affiliated with as an outside consultant, i traveled to battle creek, mi on a number of occasions, even on a company jet couple of times, for semiannual meetings, progress reports, reviews, cadging more money and so on.
      Until a corporate overhaul brought in some mexican ceo who wanted a clean slate and booted us out, to be replaced with more of the same, to say, other university research groups.
      Truth to tell, i didn’t mind because i was starting to dread trips to battle creek, with prevalent main street usa mentality even more primitive than some dayak headhunters of borneo … at dinner at our hotel, the gap-toothed girl (kind of like this )would proudly wheel out the “meat wagon” with slabs of dead cows dripping on its metal trays to choose from … at least no enemas were forced on us.

      the kellog foundation is very rich and truly philanthropic, i.e., not jews – their annual budget was at the time (>20 years ago) in excess of $300m and it all went to combating blindness and eye diseases in the third world – not a penny spent on anything else – i.e., good, christian organization.

      but their start was quite flaky as you mention, they ran some kind of nutritional clinic and the name of the game was daily enema with which they terrorized their high-paying guests, there were stories of them found hiding behind curtains hoping to skip an odd session.

  7. Maybe a helpful thought or two here, as per Jung and Freud.

    Hayagrīva: He [Jung] writes, “It was obedience which brought me grace. One must be utterly abandoned to God. Nothing matters but fulfilling His will. Otherwise all is folly and meaninglessness.”

    Prabhupāda: Very good. Surrender. Sarva-dharmān parityajya (BG 18.66). That is real life.
    Hayagrīva: He [Freud] felt that the father God is an infantile wish. He says, “The whole thing is so patently infantile, so incongruous with reality, that one whose attitudes…”

    Prabhupāda: So what is his reality? Infantile conception of God, but what he is, except the child?

    1. HP, most schools teach only Freudian theories; the consequence is that becoming mature is inhibited.

  8. @ snez you are right they copied but not only from the sumerian myths!
    By the way I must admit that Lasha wrote
    a good article. But the picture with jesus loves should be changed to Big Brother loves you as ‘ jesus’ has always been a jewish invention upon which the Goyim could project all their ‘ hopes, fears etc’.
    Jews masters of deception.

    1. John,
      Jesús wont return anytime soon. He was stopped at the border. Didnt have his papers.

  9. Excellent piece.

    And once a person realizes and truly understands what’s going on (i.e., exactly what’s happening, who’s behind it and why), that person becomes an instant “loner” in this society.

    In the movie “They Live”, as soon as “John” (Roddy Piper) put the unique “sunglasses” on, he became an instant “loner”; a desperate man whose “reality” was now completely different from almost everyone else around him. And I’m finding the situation around here to be exactly the same.

    1. I put on those sunglasses long ago and see the world now with new eyes. Or rather, Someone Else slid the sunglass on to my nose.
      I had no idea such sunglasses existed.

  10. The belief that evil exists is a mind rape. Religions make that up, as part of mass hypnosis of believers. Religions rape the minds of believers…. for profit.

      1. I call ’em criminals..!!

        The Pharisee-Jew trick is you can’t take evil to court.. 🙂

        Keep blaming evil and criminals run rampant…!!

      2. “I call ’em criminals..!!”

        So do I. But what is it that makes “them” “criminals” (in the sense of “malum in se”)? It’s the “evil” that they do that makes them “criminals”, right?

        “The Pharisee-Jew trick is you can’t take evil to court.”

        The pharisee-jew trick is to own the court too.

        “Keep blaming evil and criminals run rampant…!!”

        The issue is whether or not “evil” exists, not how I personally apportion “blame” between “evil” (per se) and the evil doer that does the evil.

      3. The Pharisee-Jew trick is you can’t take evil to court.. 🙂
        Keep blaming evil and criminals run rampant…!!

        Whose court, Pat?
        It is Jew’s court.
        And there is a good reason why you can’t take a jew to jew’s court, a perfect example of futility.
        A criminal is whoever jews declare to be a criminal, which is why there are no jews in jails, but 100 yr old germans who served in German army and truth seekers are criminals who must go into solitary confinment to be eaten alive by diseased rats.
        Jesus is a criminal boiled in semen, etc.

        All this is allowed (by our kind, the Gentiles), because we lost the connection with the REAL judge, the real court, the recognition of evil and the mandate to confront it without fear, because the adherent of truth should have nothing to fear.

        Ignoring evil is the best fertilizer of evil, hogtying ourselves to talmudic Law is to surrender to it.
        Kind of like a farmer who abandons the natural practices of the centuries past in pursuit of quick Monsanto Roundup returns.

      4. Lobro –

        I like the way you are always “hogtying” yourself.. with so may circular points in your statements, and answering your own questions..!! 🙂

        I keep it simple.

        Evil IS criminal conduct.

        Evil is conducted by criminals. However, criminal acts are different in different countries.

        One country’s EVIL is another country’s VIRTUE.

        Arch Stanton makes that point below:

        Arch Stanton
        October 2, 2017 at 4:39 am

        Evil is nothing more than one’s subjective opinion.
        Classic example – How many here say Jews are evil? Yet many Jews would agree? How many here say that killing children is “evil”, yet how many Israeli Jews would use that term when describing their murder of Palestinian children? Their only comment is, “we thinks it’z worth it” or “we’re killing future terrorists.” My – oh – my, helping eliminate terror from the world, what higher virtue can there be for the noble Jew – wouldn’t you say?

        What one says is “evil” another paints as virtue.

      5. Pat, rather than trivializing the discussion by making it a game of rhetorical ping pong, “I like how you make me a winner by xxxyyy”, i am trying to bring some clarity to the issue of good and evil.

        first, your argument provides the Jew with a giant escape hatch, no matter what he does.
        And in fact, this is the very hatch he has always been using but i see no point in giving it a gentile’s sanction.
        Here is an example of what Jew says – and does and has been doing it for millennia

        Deuteronomy 20:16-18 (New International Version)

        16 However, in the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes.
        17 Completely destroy them …

        And you *** keep it simple ***

        Evil IS criminal conduct.
        Evil is conducted by criminals. However, criminal acts are different in different countries.
        One country’s EVIL is another country’s VIRTUE

        Indeed, jew says since his God (yeah right) commands him to do all this, to torture a christian child to death as part of ritual sacrifice to obtain blood for top notch matzo, your argument provides him with perfect defense in that you refuse to judge him other than whether he has broken some law in some country – certainly not in his, so everything is okay (One country’s EVIL is another country’s VIRTUE).
        Why do you do this, Pat? Refuse to accept a universal standard.

        Because this is at the crux of things.

        I and most of posters here, especially the Christian ones, especially the ones rejecting the Old Testament for the psychotic POS it is
        *** insist on absolutism of a moral code *** (just like Jesus did)
        whereas you
        *** promote a relativism of some tribal law *** which picks and chooses the winners based on who they are and where they are (which country), rather than how they behave under all circumstances.
        This is precisely the Jew’s defense.

        This is the classic ruin of atheism, the partial logic of truncated set of premises taken to the endpoint, which is why Jew is ceaselessly promoting atheism for the goyim, everything is fine, raping toddlers, pets, so long as one is having fun, keep the hormones pumping, drugs and porn are there to stimulate the biophysical bliss while suppressing the intellect.
        Indeed, as the above Deuteronomy quote, and many others clearly show, NOT to commit genocide and other infernal acts is in itself a transgression against their so-called God.
        You may think that it is perfectly justifiable, given the right jurisdiction but I say it is evil everywhere, anytime and must be expunged by every available method – because it is universally, absolutely evil, just like a lie can never be the truth, imbalance can never be balance, no mater how hard the 1984 ministry of truth doublespeaks its way into law.

        this relativism is like the diver rupturing an eardrum, succumbing to vertigo, becoming disoriented and heading in the wrong direction hoping to break the surface and grab a lungful of air – the end result is neither trivial nor relative to the stricken diver.

      6. Lobro –

        You wrote:

        “Pat, rather than trivializing the discussion by making it a game of rhetorical ping pong, “I like how you make me a winner by xxxyyy”, i am trying to bring some clarity to the issue of good and evil.”

        Here is clarity… without the circle-speak:

        Good actions are not criminal.

        Evil is criminal action. Criminal action is evil.

        That “BIGGLY” brings “YUGE” clarity.. !! 🙂

      7. Lobro –

        You wrote:

        “Why do you do this, Pat? Refuse to accept a universal standard.”

        Because… “universal” is a Pharisee-Jew game and trick…. to give them a pass…. through their global networks… such as the UN. You should KNOW that by now. Maybe it will sink in for you after a few more decades of study. 🙂

        I want ALL criminals punished under the laws of their own countries.

        Claiming they are evil will NOT get them arrested.. which is just ONE reason why they flourish..!!

        Jail their asses.. “BIGGLY”..!!

    1. Here is evil defined objectively.

      „The universe is always doing this. It is always moving from the simple to the complex. The universe, this universe that we know, began in almost absolute simplicity, and it has been getting more complex for about fifteen billion years. But we are all moving towards it– everything in the universe is moving towards it. And that final complexity, that thing we are all moving to, is what I choose to call God. If you don’t like that word, God, call it the Ultimate Complexity. Whatever you call it, the whole universe is moving toward it, our level of complexity, this level of complexity, with a consciousness capable of understanding the process, would be duplicated. Anything that enhances, promotes, or accelerates this movement toward the Ultimate Complexity is good. Anything that inhibits, impedes, or prevents this movement toward the Ultimate Complexity is evil. The wonderful thing about this definition of good and evil is that it is both objective and universally acceptable. This definition is based on what we know about how the universe works (…) The nature of everything in the universe is to do this. The more complex something is, the more alive it is. Say, take fighting. If everyone were to start doing it, there’d be chaos at first, and then death and dying. Which hinders our movement towards this infinite complexity.(…) The universe moved on until it reached what it is today, in all it’s glory. Humans, animals, the birds and the flowers. The stars and the galaxies. And it still moves on.”

      „This is a test that you should apply to every man who tells you that he knows the meaning of life. Every guru you meet and every teacher, every prophet and every philosopher, should answer these two questions for you: What is an objective, universally acceptable definition of good and evil? And, what is the relationship between consciousness and matter? If he cannot answer these two questions, you know that he has not passed the test.”

      „In order to know about any act or intention or consequence, we must first ask two questions. One, what would happen if everyone did this thing? Two, would this help or hinder the movement toward complexity?” – Khaderbhai

      Shantaram by Gregory David Roberts

    2. “Pat,” Evil is willful violence, and harming of the innocent. When in the case of babies and children, adult behaviour that is harming, damaging; not loving and nurturing–that is evil.Unless you are prepared to debate your absurd comment, return to your efforts at autodidact, self-awareness, and kindly rethink your promulgation.

      1. TROJ –

        You wrote:
        “If evil doesn’t exist then why is everyone always crying about the evil jews and ((( their))) evil lackeys,”

        You will have to ask each of them individually. 🙂

        I call them criminal Pharisee-Jew Bankers in London and US.

        I don’t use (((….))) either. New readers don’t get the hint. 🙂

        1. You all can push me around and treat me like garbage all you want, that does NOT change THE FACT you helios can’t refute with COLD HARD OBJECTIVE EMPIRICAL SCIENTIFIC FACTS the Great Catholic Saint, SAINT ROBERT BELLARMINE — and you all know it too, you all know you’re incapable of truly refuting Catholic Saint Bellarmine, that must make you helios feel real frustrated. Go ahead, take your frustrations out on whiddle joew, you will still feel frustrated no matter how much you treat me like garbage for you all know you’re incapable of going up against THE GREAT CATHOLIC SAINT, CATHOLIC SAINT ROBERT BELLARMINE. I hope I’m not being TOO repetitive here, with my repeating “CATHOLIC” and “CATHOLIC SAINT” and THE NAME OF THE GREAT CATHOLIC SAINT, CATHOLIC SAINT ROBERT BELLARMINE. I know how annoyed uncle gets when I get repetitive, so out of consideration to uncle I constrain myself from getting TOO repetitive, :). Everything in moderation, that’s what I always say, *grin*.

      2. Fezz –

        I don’t have to “rethink” anything.. You made my exact point for me. Thank you.. 🙂

        You wrote:
        “Evil is willful violence, and harming of the innocent.”

        Violence implies a criminal act.

        Evil is conducted by criminals. However, criminal acts are different in different countries.

        One country’s EVIL is another country’s VIRTUE. 🙂

        Arch Stanton makes that point below:

        Arch Stanton
        October 2, 2017 at 4:39 am

        Evil is nothing more than one’s subjective opinion.
        Classic example – How many here say Jews are evil? Yet many Jews would agree? How many here say that killing children is “evil”, yet how many Israeli Jews would use that term when describing their murder of Palestinian children? Their only comment is, “we thinks it’z worth it” or “we’re killing future terrorists.” My – oh – my, helping eliminate terror from the world, what higher virtue can there be for the noble Jew – wouldn’t you say?

        What one says is “evil” another paints as virtue.

    3. PAT —

      If evil doesn’t exist then why is everyone always crying about the evil jews and ((( their))) evil lackeys, the “shabbos goys” and all the evil ((( they))) and ((( their))) lackeys commit? If evil doesn’t exist, then there’s NO reason for Darkmoon to exist. If evil doesn’t exist, that kinda undermines the purpose of Darkmoon which is to uncover and reveal evil.

      Might as well turn Darkmoon into a Science website, perhaps a Science website focusing on Cosmic Astro-Physics, this way Pat the world’s leading MEGA-HELIOCENTRIC-PHYSICIST-SCIENTIST-ASTRONOMER-ASTROLOGER can still be ¡THE sTaR! of the show and he’ll still have a forum to boost his ego which needs constant re-inforcement and re-assurance and constant ego-stroking, even if he himself has to to do all the ego stroking of his ego and even if he himself is the only one complimenting himself for his ” High IQ intelligence”, whatever it takes to keep that ego feeling “important” in order to maintain even a resemblance of sanity.

      A little bit self-absorbed are WE?

      Whatever you do, make sure Pat’s ego is always assauged and soothed and placated, so he doesn’t wind up in a strait jacket in Chattachoohee again, we wouldn’t want to do that to the doctors and nurses at Chattahoochee, they have enough to deal with it as it is without us dumping Pat on them and once again they’ll have their hands full, to say the least, in order to put it as politely and diplomatically as I can, *grin*.

      1. Well my my, how considerate you are to the new readers, Pat. Sounds like you’re taking etiquette lessons from Gilbert, Darkmoon’s very own Miss Manners, 🙂 .

      2. Evil is nothing more than one’s subjective opinion. Classic example – How many here say Jews are evil? Yet many Jews would agree? How many here say that killing children is “evil”, yet how many Israeli Jews would use that term when describing their murder of Palestinian children? Their only comment is, “we thinks it’z worth it” or “we’re killing future terrorists.” My – oh – my, helping eliminate terror from the world, what higher virtue can there be for the noble Jew – wouldn’t you say?

        What one says is “evil” another paints as virtue. Jews consider those who can successfully lie, cheat, steal and murder the dumb goyim are paragons of Jewish virtue, chust doink their Tikkun Olam duty. Would you agree? Those same virtuous Jews say the white man is inherently evil by his very nature. Would you agree?

        The problem with the term is that, in many subconscious minds, it lets the guilty off the hook as evil is typically associated with the “devil” (d-evil) or some other form of supernatural entity. This allows the guilty perpetrators to be compassionately viewed as victims of the very “evil” they do.

        This is the same type of twisted logic demented Jews apply, not only to their own criminals, but for the criminal Negro as well – “Your honor, it wasn’t my client’s fault they are murderous scum, it was the white man’s anti-semitism or oppression, or it was their childhood upbringing in the ghetto” etc.

        “Evil” is an earlier, religious form of the environmental excuse and could even be excised from the unwitting physical accomplice – for a reasonable price of course. In fact, on occasion Jesus moonlighted as an exorcist, driving out “evil demons” from otherwise saintly Jews.

        As with the Jew’s environmental-excuse claptrap, when the term “evil” is stripped away, there is nothing left to blame but the guilty Jew ~ I mean ~ criminal (oh wait – same thing), who then must be held fully accountable for their crimes because they won’t be able to say – “de debil made me do it.” After all, they can’t hang debils now, can they?

      3. “Evil is nothing more than one’s subjective opinion.”

        As I see it, a simple, fundamental definition of evil is: when one person intentionally does something to another person (or persons) that he wouldn’t want that person (or persons) to do to him, if the situation were reversed.

        For example, would the jew that ran over Rachel Corrie with a bulldozer have had a problem if the situation were reversed? If the jew can convince me that he would have no problem being crushed to death by a bulldozer operated by Rachel Corrie, then I will say he didn’t do evil.

      4. @ Harold Smith

        Good analogy.

        All good hangs on the Second Commandment according to Jesus, “Love thy neighbor as thyself.”

    4. Pat,
      My Mexican wife was born Catholic but converted to Christianity later. Whenever the Pope visits México he charges exorbant speaking fees.

      1. @ Señor Colina :

        So you’re saying that Lasha who is a Catholic is NOT a Christian? Lasha who is a Catholic says she’s a Christian and says her Darkmoon is a Christian-inspired website. So Lasha equates Catholicism with Christianity. So you’re saying Lasha is wrong to equate Catholicism with Christianity? I certainly hope you’re not implying Lasha is a LIAR for equating Catholicism with Christianity. I’m talking about traditional Catholicism, NOT Novus Ordo “Catholicism”. Novus Ordo “Catholicism” is NOT true and real Catholicism. Real and True and Traditional Catholicism is CHRISTIANITY as the Catholic Church was THE FIRST CHURCH IN THE WORLD OF CHRISTIANITY AND IT WAS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH WHICH UNITED THE WHITE RACE IN WESTERN EUROPE. THAT WAS BACK IN THE DAYS THE WHITE RACE WAS REFERRED TO AS “CHRISTENDOM”.

  11. When my tomcat was spraying in my apartment on a daily basis I looked for a drug that would tone down his sex drive. I discovered that no such drug existed. Darkmoon’s excellent article provides an explanation as to why such a drug is not available.

  12. This sexual licentiousness, growing by the day thanks to the internet and mass media, is far deadlier and more corrosive than it was half a century ago, before the sexual revolution of the 1960s.

    I know what LD means, but just be be pedantic, there is a link in the chain : Parents, who are too stupid and lazy to control the internet and mass media in their lives.

    I had two other reflections on LD’s subject. Web search “holographic sex” and you will see the next “frontier” is cybernetic sex with partners on the internet. No need for it to ever get messy with bodily fluids. I see this as part of the convergence to UN Agenda 2030 – stacked and packed zombies in cities on “universal Income” – it is imperative to the .01% that minds are distracted by sex and legalization of drugs.

    Secondly, this is not just about depravity and distraction. It is about condemning mankind to spiritual devolution due to the forcing downward of Chi, Prana or whatever you wish to call life force. Life force, most concentrated its sexual form is responsible for evolution, either through the reproduction of the race when directed downward or for spiritual evolution and genius when directed up to the brain. There are many references to this fact throughout civilizations and history. The late Gopi Krishna (websearch this site for at least one reference) was a modern scientific voice who explained this well.

    The world is diverging by IQ and spirituality at a rapid pace. Spiritual evolution will also halt when the “big brained clever people” such as Elon Musk (SpaceX, Tesla) and Ray Kurzweil (Google) self lobotomize by handing over their brains (interfacing) to automated random and mathematical search engines, aka AI. At that point, new spiritual truth and art is dead.

    1. Please continue to post on this site. I may not agree with everything you say, but listening to what you say is a rewarding experience. 🙂

  13. “Worse Is Better” can be a double edged sword. Jews and jewthinkers promote it to bring forth their form of ‘salvation’, while some in the resistance see it as shock treatment to awaken more leaders. So far, kikejews have had the upper hand.

  14. “…In Holland, things have gone further. Here a political party, set up by convicted pedophiles, clamors for the legalization of child pornography and intergenerational sex between children of twelve and adults old enough to be their grandparents. I forgot to mention bestiality. They want to legalize that too…”

    That “party” proved to be a flop :

    “The Party for Neighbourly Love, Freedom, and Diversity or The Charity, Freedom and Diversity Party (Partij voor Naastenliefde, Vrijheid en Diversiteit, PNVD) was a Dutch political party with no representation in parliament,[1] and only three known members.[2] It was commonly known as “pedopartij” (“pedo party”) in the media, due to its advocacy for legalization of child pornography and the lowering of the age of consent to age 12.[1][3] PNVD was founded on 31 May 2006 by three self-described pedophiles.[2][4] Its motto is “sapere aude” (“Have courage to use your own reason”).[5] PNVD has not participated in any election. In 2006, it did not receive the 30 signatures from each of the 19 Dutch electoral regions it would need to get on the ballot for the 2006 elections.[6] Since 14 March 2010 the party no longer exists.[7]


    Most of the destructive influence of the Jews on our culture can be evaded by simply not watching TV or films (for many Americans that is asking too much !). Evading the Jewish destructive influence on education is more difficult, especially in countries that do not allow homeschooling, or for parents who cannot afford to send their children to private schools. The masses are controlled by the mass media. If one wants to live wholly outside the influence of the Jews, one should live like a hermit or live like the Hutterites, Mennonites and Amish do. Say what you want about such people, but they are physically and mentally healthy.

    1. FR –

      You wrote:
      “If one wants to live wholly outside the influence of the Jews, one should live like a hermit or live like the Hutterites, Mennonites and Amish do. Say what you want about such people, but they are physically and mentally healthy.”

      I agree. I have an uncle in Lancaster PA… in his mid 90s. He lives in a Mennonite seniors home in luxury. I have spent quite a bit of time around them.

      THEIR Key – – They police themselves..!!!

    2. @ Franklin Ryckaert

      Most of the destructive influence of the Jews on our culture can be evaded by simply not watching TV or films (for many Americans that is asking too much !).

      I couldn’t agree more. I used to a fan of movies in the good old days.
      I mean, nothing wrong with Hitchcock. But there has been a sharp and progressive deterioration in the quality of movies in the last 10-15 years. They get worse by the day, since they cater for audiences in the 80-100 IQ range. All gadgets and special effects, no real plot. Sex scenes interspersed with car chases. Gorefests galore.

      Until recently, my wife and I for pure relaxation would try to watch a Hollywood movie DVD every Saturday evening. We bought the best we could in the 2nd hand market. A choice of thousands. We had to turn off almost EVERY DVD after 15-20 mins. Mindless trash all of them. The scriptwriters all degenerate Jews. The directors, producers, cameramen were all Jews. The lack of true talent was staggering. They were BRILLIANT at doing almost everything — except telling a story.

      Now I prefer a good book or going for a quiet stroll after Saturday dinner. Maybe a bit of classical music. Hollywood has nothing whatsoever to offer people like me and my wife.

      1. Dr. Johnson ,
        Once in a while a true talent comes along. I love Mel Gibsons movies.

    3. I totally agree Franklin. I haven’t had a television for 20 years and totally refuse to read the print rags these days…..The days of Douglas Reed reporters for the Times are long gone….sadly.

  15. Now you know the sickness that was enveloping Germany in the 1920’s where a certain group of Mammonists used perversion, prostitution, illegal drug sales and pornography to make fortunes while Germans watched their nation circle the toilet bowl.


    In the USSR, their Kosher cousins were using the old-fashioned way of killing people, with a bullet to the back of the head, while Germans were getting spiritually killed.

    And now, it’s America’s turn. Just don’t call out who is behind this mind-rotting filth, because you don’t want to be branded as anti-Semitic, do you?

  16. This a disgusting article ,I couldn’t even bring myself to read it ,i remember someone once said ,this site is a mad house and lasha darkmoon is not normal ,she come across as a sex addict and a loony.
    I am sick of your constant addiction to sex perversion articles which reflect your sick twisted minds.and then you have the nerve to claim that you are a family oriented and a Christian site
    you are nothing but a twisted mentally deranged hyenas ,agents of the Zionists cabal

    1. I agree with my fellow Jew, (((The Observer))), that this is a disgusting article. For example, Dr Darkmoon falsely claims that Jews control the mass media. A disgusting antisemitic canard. I’ve just read the title of this article on the Truthseeker site by a writer called Kevin Barrett.
      Its title: “Jews do NOT control the media.”


      I can’t be bothered reading the article because I know this is true anyway. The American media is controlled by the Vatican through the Jesuits. We all know that. A few Jews are placed in top positions just as camouflage but they don’t have any real power. The real power lies with the satanic pope and his Jesuit legions.

      1. Yes, and Tamara Cohen is not a Jewish name, but typical for “Vatican Jesuits”.

    2. The Observer,
      “This is a disgusting article. I couldnt even bring myself to read it.” If you hadnt read it, how would you know it was disgusting, Jew boy? Go home. Sub-zero intellectual light-weight.

  17. I can’t help comment here as I think it was Toby who perhaps correctly said, given some of my comments, I was a sexual dilettante, or words to that effect. I was wrongly playing up sex and promiscuity to underline what our stupid Western world has become. 3 people have largely influenced me – Henry Makow and his writing about how the top dog, Jewish controllers have utilised females to their ends; Muggeridge who explained that a nearly decivilised West will eventually revolve atound sex as its only fantasy; and Nesta Webster who predicted that women of “disordered imaginations” would help destroy the West. Look at the disgusting Pussy Riot; look at the above picture; and Makow’s pics of women declaring they are “proud sluts.” I worked in academia and could no longer put up with the feminist led affirmative action and continual attacks upon me and my male colleagues. I agree completely with Lasha’s excellent article, but perhaps, unfortunately, can’t help putting a “mysoginist” twist on it. Please look at the women with red paint on them and think of a pop star like Miley Cyrus swinging naked on her wrecking ball, watched by millions of young girls. I HOPE I am not being mysoginist by talking about Miley or Madonna.

    1. @ Max Bilney

      An excellent comment, Max, proving your mettle as a man and as a thinker. We’d hate to lose you as a regular poster because we basically like the cut of your jib. So please continue to post here if you wish.

      Bear in mind, however, that we are a conservative, pro-religious website with a firm belief in traditional moral values. “Liberalism” and “sexual liberation” and all such trendy left-wing views we regard as puerile and beneath contempt. (At any rate, LD does, having been seriously damaged in her youth by such modish ideas).

      We don’t approve of sexual libertinism or the promotion of “womanizing” on our website. Those are essentially “Jewish values” which spring from Cultural Marxism. Atheism, nihilism, sexual perversion, these all go together and we don’t want people promoting such toxic material on our site. Your contempt for Miley Cyrus and the feminist slut queens is shared by us.

      1. Thankyou Toby, I’ll stop giving an obfuscating message in the future and keep in mind my serious Christian values which revolve around my belief that the man, Jesus, truly showed us “the way, the truth and the life.” I stressed, in an earlier comment, that the newly reformed God that appeared in story after the 300 years silence (Matthew Henry commentary), no longer advocated a “chosen” who were permitted to do mass murder and enslavement. Unfortunately, we have among us those who think genocide is quite YHWH permissible. And they have the support of most Western world pseudo-Christians, or that group conveyed by the ludicrous dialectical conundrum, Christian-Zionists.

    2. Hi Max, yourself and Miss Boswell have both mentioned ‘Muggeridge’. What do you think of the decades of groping accusations made by women?

      “Well, few knew better than he. For until he re-found his discarded Christianity and then embraced Catholicism at the age of 79, he’d been debasing it himself for decades.
      Some of his targets were the wives of friends, as we shall see. Some of them were working at the BBC at the same time as he was, as is made plain by the BBC’s official historian Professor Jean Seaton in her authoritative new book Pinkoes And Traitors, covering the period 1974-1987.”

  18. the jesuits are the jews.
    the way fritz springmeyer put it – it’s like a pie of wedge shaped slices. the big ends are different groups but when you get to the center there’s a real small group of lords controlling the whole pie…
    sometimes this site reminds me of the faculty at catholic high school.
    what a bunch of sex starved horny devils.
    they were all pretty much consumed with the subject of masturbation, making sure you were well aware what a big problem it must be.
    religion has to have its enemies – yourself if you have no real sex life.
    while marriage is their only authorized version.
    control the subject’s sexuality and you control him.
    porn isn’t so bad if it’s used by couples as an aid.
    but in time it’s at best a poor excuse for the real thing.
    too bad there are so many lonely people in the world..
    see how we like to condemn the unhappy and unsuccessful – dirty old men.
    obviously sex with children below puberty should be a serious crime.
    and 21 or 18 years consensual is way too old for prosecution purposes.
    no force, no fraud, no theft. no harm. no foul.
    high prosecution ages are more manifest examples of religious control over society, making criminal cases out of victimless crimes.
    the idea of making it more egregious when one party is way older than another is discriminatory against the elderly and i get the feeling it’s generally a jealousy thing on the part of females in general…
    violent rape of children is probably about as bad as it might get but i think that’s not much worse than artificially genderizing toddlers, especially where drugs are administered to block puberty.
    even now nobody prosecutes circumcision.
    infants have no standing.
    that’s the pedophile mentality. religion is full of it…
    people think their children are underlings.
    and don’t tell me the homosexual community in general does not go more lightly against pedophelia.
    still no peep on the big pizzagate scandal. don’t hold your breath. it’s too big to prosecute…
    prosecuting 1000 dc pedophiles would make the sate and all the local leos look too bad.

    1. @ barkingdeer

      porn isn’t so bad if it’s used by couples as an aid.

      I’m not saying you’re a Jew, but in saying this you show clear indoctrination by the Jewish establishment. Healthy married couples don’t need to watch porn to give an extra fillip to their sex life. And unhealthy couples need to avoid it. A man who can only get an erection by watching a young and luscious chick opening her legs will then screw his aging and unattractive wife. Great! You recommend that? Should he put a brown paper bag over his wife’s face, as I’ve known many of these pervy men to do, while he screws his homely wife?

      In recommending porn for married couples as a “sex aid”, you are simply recommending dirty sex.

      If any man wants to make love to me, he must do so without watching another woman open her legs and give him the come-on. Understand? No brown paper bags over my face please! 🙂

      1. @ barkingdeer

        There are millions of women who have lost their husbands to pornography. These men prefer jerking off to porn than having sex with their wives. There is a name for these cast-off women: “porn widows”. Anyone who recommends pornography is, quite simply, a sexual pervert. So I regard you as a perv, pure and simple.

      2. @Miss Boswell you, quoting BD, said;
        “@ barkingdeer
        porn isn’t so bad if it’s used by couples as an aid.”

        Did BD really just say that? I thought what he said immediately after…
        “but in time it’s at best a poor excuse for the real thing. too bad there are so many lonely people in the world..”
        …gave context. What say you?

      3. @ Jumbo

        I’m sure Miss Boswell would have taken the trouble to answer your questions (especially about Muggeridge) if you had spoken to her politely. It’s always a good idea not to address your intellectual superiors, which Miss Boswell clearly is, as if you were looking for a quarrel. Which you definitely are.

        One of your sneery comments, using the stupid words “yada yada yada” to put this lady down and make her feel bad, was thankfully deleted.

        I suggest that your latent hostility to Miss Boswell stems from the fact that she is resolutely anti-porn and anti-masturbation. That gets you upset, doesn’t it? I can’t help wondering why. 🙂

      4. Darlington,

        I think you are being needlessly harsh to Jimbo. He’s OK. Like so many men nowadays, he’s suffering from lots of pent-up testosterone and doesn’t know how to find an outlet for it. So he kicks the dog, snarls at his wife, is rude to the girl at the supermarket till. Finally, he comes on the Darkmoon site and tries to find a suitable target for his rage and pain at the poor cards life has dealt him. Bingo! He finds them in “Miss Boswell”, the only female in sight — a convenient punching bag for a male in search of instant relief from tension.

        I don’t mind actually, being a trained psychologist. Jimbo has my full support! I’d offer him free therapy if I could, but I know he wouldn’t accept.

      5. Miss Boswell
        You stated: There are millions of women who have lost their husbands to pornography.
        I most ardently insist that this type of development is promoted both by a carrot and a stick.

      6. @Darlington
        “using the stupid words “yada yada yada” to put this lady down and make her feel bad,”
        Haha very funny. Is ‘yada’ the posh intellectually superior way of spelling and pronouncing the word ‘yadda’? Or maybe it’s just the jewish spelling as, apparently, it’s the 153 episode of Seinfeld;

        “I can’t help wondering why.”
        Don’t trouble yourself Darls, it’s no concern of yours, i can assure you! 😉

        @Miss Boswell
        “He’s OK.”
        Oh cheers, that’s very reassuring.

        “So he kicks the dog, snarls at his wife, is rude to the girl at the supermarket till.”
        Uh? Are YOU ok? I think your ‘training’ in psychology is having a negative effect on your judgement. Here, some free advice, get a smaller horse. 😉

        “I’d offer him free therapy if I could, but I know he wouldn’t accept.”
        Hmmm that would depend of course on the type of therapy on offer. Also it would be prudent to accept therapy from one who is qualified rather than just ‘trained’.
        You and Darlington have a familiar tag-team thing going on, reminiscent of Ariadna and Poupon Marx’s short lived superiority stint.
        Anyway I’ve no quarrel with either of you. Btw I was impressed by your ‘fessing up on the weak ‘week’ spelling mistake. All the best 😉

    2. @Barkingdeer,

      Your wrote: “Even now nobody prosecutes circumcision.” Well, prosecution does occur, but only if the victim is a female. Right now in Detroit, a female Muslim doctor is being prosecuted for performing ritual nicks on two young girls. I believe she spent a few months in prison until she came up with enough money for bail. The trial is pending.

      In the US a 1996 law made Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) illegal, but males were exempted. Why? All the so-called medical reasons for it are total BS. It’s all because of Jewish power and their cult of SATANIC forced circumcision on male infants. As long as Jews control this country, in particular the medical and legal professions, it will be impossible to outlaw Male Genital Mutilation (MGM). As long as gentile parents willingly give their two day old baby boys to Jewish trained doctors to have their penis butchered, the Jews will remain firmly in charge. As they laugh at our stupidity.

      The Catholic Church was historically totally opposed to circumcision as mutilation of the flesh. Now they’ve gone silent. It’s sad that the Pope is afraid to address the issue for fear of being called an anti-Semite. The Christian Church cowers before the power of the Jew.

      I wonder what Miss Boswell’s opinion is on the subject?

      1. I wonder what Miss Boswell’s opinion is on the subject?

        Probably the same as yours, Folly. I am not a practicing Catholic. Just because I was baptised into the Catholic Church does not mean I approve of the present Pope or the Catholic Church’s shameful capitulation to organized Jewry.

      2. You will understand where I stand on Catholicism when I tell you that I back Bishop Williamson on the Holocaust and am a great admirer of the work of Dr E. Michael Jones, both of them Catholic dissidents who have fallen foul of the Catholic Church and been more or less excommunicated.

  19. Tamara Cohen,
    Come to Papi,
    Ill rock your World and show you real love, Jew woman.

  20. @ Lasha

    Excellent article as usual.

    There is a rescuer for those dealing with the mess. Jesus told us the way. Each individual has to apply his teachings. Reading his teachings is good, but if there is no action by the individual, nothing changes for the individual.

    Fortunately, there are more good people in the world than there are evil people in the world. The good ones normally do not get the attention of the jewish media (imagine that), so we falsely assume the problem of evil is larger than it really is. Anyone that would make a list of the decent people they personally know versus the evil people that they personally know will prove my point. If this were not true, humanity would have killed itself off long ago in compliance with Satan’s desire. Instead, humanity is constantly expanding.

  21. YHWH (Yahweh) or the Tetragrammaton, ‘the holy name’ means the family, in which each letter stands for one member of the family: father (Yod), mother (He), son (Wau) and daughter (He). There’s nothing wrong with it on a symbolic level. The problem arises when the Jews apply it to sexual intercourse within the family, resulting in debilitating incest.

  22. I call THIS… CRIMINAL… not evil:

    Last night….
    At least 50 people were killed and 400 injured after an active shooter opened fire at a country concert near or at the Mandalay Bay resort and casino on the Las Vegas strip, sending panicked crowds fleeing throughout the area. One witness told CNN he saw “dead bodies everywhere.” It’s now the worst mass shooting in U.S. history.


      1. Pat

        Judging from the sound, and for the range, I believe (and have heard) it was a belt-fed .30 Calibre (“medium”) machine gun. (No reason for the magazine-limit crazies to start hollering about “assault” rifles…)
        Maybe an M60, or a foreign equivalent.

      2. @ HP
        @ Pat
        @ Gilbert Huntly

        Yes, definitely a “medium” machine gun. I guess my time in Vietnam was good for something. Gilbert is probably right about the M60 or equivalent belt fed. I’d say an M60 since they could claim that it was an AK47, same 7.62 slug.

        I would suspect that there were at least two shooters since two windows were out. The dead patsy was not one of them. False flag with dead people this time. The lying media is harping the anti-gun agenda to the max calling the guns military weapons instead of assault weapons.

      3. Ungenius

        “…dead people this time.”

        I concur. But I’ll add that no way was it to the tune of 59 dead and 500 injured. This is a gross exaggeration designed for effect so that the msm can refer to it as “the greatest mass shooting in U.S. history”

    1. well, here is one who by that judgment standard is neither CRIMINAL nor evil, David Ovadia brags about shooting 13 Palestinian children in one day.
      Because he is not a criminal, he never was prosecuted – what for, in israel he is a perfectly law abiding citizen.
      What’s 50 killed to him? a 3-days work … and all children, of all ages, legit so long as goy.

      IMO, if the story of Steve Paddock is taken at face value, his morals are on higher level than Ovadia’s, because he was an equal opportunity killer, didn’t choose his targets based on faith and in fact, they were all white, probably all christian since neither blacks nor jews frequent country and bluegrass performances much.

      (my son posted on facebook about 3 weeks ago while staying at that hotel – mandalay bay … it will be a century or two before i even consider going to vegas again, sheldon adelson will have to survive without my money)

  23. This article reminds me of “Benrubi’s ideas” a chapter of Giovanni Papini’s book “Gog”

  24. The current msm, political topic in Australia goes under the Orwellian-loaded terminology of “Marriage Equality.” Oppose same sex marriage and thus you oppose such a grandiose altruism as EQUALITY. Screaming, violence-prone “rainbow warriors” call you a Nazi fascist if you are on the NO side of our current nation-wide survey – a survey which will apparently prove that over 70% of Australians support the YES case. So it looks like sodomy/buggery/anus-stabbing is in! Even significant church leaders are on the YES side. My eldest daughter, a medical doctor, explained the disgusting nature of what doctors call “poo-stabbing”: An unwashed, bacteria-clad anus is licked and penetrated; a thin membrane is often ruptured and a range of diseases can be spread; expensive medications are required to deal with the sickness and disease; many suicides occur; gay men average over 200 buggery partners. These sodomites and their female counterparts want church marriage, blessed by Jesus. (As in above picture) They want to surrogate/adopt small children. Meanwhile our girly trash, teen magazines inform us that over 40% of modern girls indulge in anal sex.

  25. This article, though it is very well done – as Lasha is accustomed to doing – has content almost too disgusting to debate or discuss. Unless they harm our children, perverts are best ignored, or dealt with harshly.
    Just having begun, once again, to attend Methodist services, here, in Small-town USA, I became suspicious when our pastor informed the congregation that they need keep an “open mind” to coming reforms in the church. Sounds like a prelude to faggotry in the pulpit to me! Once again, I will decline to set foot in any such establishment – just like I did with the Episcopal Church. Everything that once was respectable is now tarnished!
    Whenever I hear about a mass shooting such as happened in Las Vegas last night, I’m not astounded or surprised.
    The whole damn world has gone nuts!

    1. You should try the Catholic Church, Gilbert, if ever the methodists go soft on “faggotry”, as you call it.

      The Catholic Church is the last bastion of traditional values. Though I am an outcast and pariah to Catholicism, the religion of my ancestors, I still have a soft spot for Holy Mother Church.

      We hear lots of stories about pedophile priests and other sex scandals in the Church, but I can honestly say that I have never met a single monk or priest or nun who wasn’t a holy, clean-living person. They all tried very hard to live the Good Life and set the best example they could. God bless them!

      1. I believe you, Miss Boswell – but taken on the whole, the Catholic Church has many flaws, too – not the least of which is the current Supreme Pontiff! It seems that ALL the churches have been polluted by the “correckt politik” crowd, and have ignored their Biblical admonishments. None of them come off well, in that regard, and I am only chancing the Methodist because of my family and friends – and I reside in a rural place too far from a Catholic Church to be workable for me, anyway.

  26. Hi Gilbert, I might be wrong, but didn’t the Presbyterian Church, USA, accept homosexual marriage? In Australia plenty of visible clergy are on the YES side, as is our ABC and Prime Minister. Jewish groups remain quiet. There is no “love equality” in buggery, rimming, etc. Buggery, as I explained, is a filthy, germ prone, high risk activity. The Australian, Orwellian-named, Safe Schools Program, teaches small children that buggery-orientated “love” is worthwhile and normal. More on the filthy, but true nature of this equality laden love: The muscles of the anus collapse after too much sodomy, meaning that many homosexuals lose bowel control and like many porn actresses, have to wear adult nappies. The msm, of course, glosses over the truth.

  27. miss boswell – “i have tasted the maggots in the mind of the human race and i was not offended. for i knew i had to rise above it all, or drown in my own shit”. that’s from the song – maggot brain…
    i would say those who call people dirty names are probably most likely the deep down dirty ones themselves.
    i’m over catholicism too, though like most things, including porn, it’s not all bad.
    in any case, whatever obscenity is found exists only in the mind of the beholder…
    be advised – not all married couples are healthy. not all marriages are perfect.
    not everybody is married, however, seeing what some people are stuck with one might want to be thanking his lucky stars..
    as long as nobody is actually being harmed – then whatever.
    folly – i saw that on rense. you can bet fgm goes on all through the no-go zones. humans are subjects under these archaic religions… original sin and all that. sex is dirty. in latin “peccare” is the “sinful thing”… and the planet is dirt..
    males of course are the main enemies of the religio-state, whereas they choose more to schmooze the females, which isn’t hard to do, crossdressing and all that, and play them off against the males.
    roman catholicism, christianity as we know it, has always been a jew conspiracy.. so was the reformation…
    the jews are way, way ahead… but that’s changing…

  28. @ Lasha Darkmoon,I think your article is creepy and scary….because the truth is barbaric and most criminal.You must be aware, that the global,wandering…”you know who” will hate you….keep up the great work for soon George Orwell’s 1984 will be upon all of us.Good luck and be happy.

Comments are closed.