The Rise of the Generals

By Patrick Buchanan

The neocons are now in control of America. Meanwhile Israel and its vassal state America are helping to subjugate the Middle East with the help of hired Muslim mercenaries. You can’t make this up, but these mercenaries are cleverly disguised as “terrrorists” with whom USREAL is actually pretending to be at war. (LD)

April 28, 2017.   Has President Donald Trump outsourced foreign policy to the generals?

So it would seem. Candidate Trump held out his hand to Vladimir Putin. He rejected further U.S. intervention in Syria other than to smash ISIS.

He spoke of getting out and staying out of the misbegotten Middle East wars into which Presidents Bush II and Obama had plunged the country.

President Trump’s seeming renunciation of an anti-interventionist foreign policy is the great surprise of the first 100 days, and the most ominous. For any new war could vitiate the Trump mandate and consume his presidency.

Trump no longer calls NATO “obsolete,” but moves U.S. troops toward Russia in the Baltic and eastern Balkans. Rex Tillerson, holder of Russia’s Order of Friendship, now warns that the U.S. will not lift sanctions on Russia until she gets out of Ukraine.

If Tillerson is not bluffing, that would rule out any rapprochement in the Trump presidency. For neither Putin, nor any successor, could surrender Crimea and survive.

What happened to the Trump of 2016?

When did Kiev’s claim to Crimea become more crucial to us than a cooperative relationship with a nuclear-armed Russia? In 1991, Bush I and Secretary of State James Baker thought the very idea of Ukraine’s independence was the product of a “suicidal nationalism.”

Where do we think this demonization of Putin and ostracism of Russia is going to lead?

To get Xi Jinping to help with our Pyongyang problem, Trump has dropped all talk of befriending Taiwan, backed off Tillerson’s warning to Beijing to vacate its fortified reefs in the South China Sea, and held out promises of major concessions to Beijing in future trade deals.

“I like (Xi Jinping) and I believe he likes me a lot,” Trump said this week. One recalls FDR admonishing Churchill, “I think I can personally handle Stalin better than … your Foreign Office … Stalin hates the guts of all your people. He thinks he likes me better.”

FDR did not live to see what a fool Stalin had made of him.

Among the achievements celebrated in Trump’s first 100 days are the 59 cruise missiles launched at the Syrian airfield from which the gas attack on civilians allegedly came, and the dropping of the 22,000-pound MOAB bomb in Afghanistan.

But what did these bombings accomplish?

The War Party seems again ascendant. John McCain and Lindsey Graham are happy campers. In Afghanistan, the U.S. commander is calling for thousands more U.S. troops to assist the 8,500 still there, to stabilize an Afghan regime and army that is steadily losing ground to the Taliban.

Iran is back on the front burner. While Tillerson concedes that Tehran is in compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal, Trump says it is violating “the spirit of the agreement.”

How so? Says Tillerson, Iran is “destabilizing” the region, and threatening U.S. interests in Syria, Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon.

But Iran is an ally of Syria and was invited in to help the U.N.-recognized government put down an insurrection that contains elements of al-Qaida and ISIS. It is we, the Turks, Saudis and Gulf Arabs who have been backing the rebels seeking to overthrow the regime.

In Yemen, Houthi rebels overthrew and expelled a Saudi satrap. The bombing, blockading and intervention with troops is being done by Saudi and Sunni Arabs, assisted by the U.S. Navy and Air Force.

It is we and the Saudis who are talking of closing the Yemeni port of Hodeida, which could bring on widespread starvation.

It was not Iran, but the U.S. that invaded Iraq, overthrew the Baghdad regime and occupied the country. It was not Iran that overthrew Col. Gadhafi and created the current disaster in Libya.

Monday, the USS Mahan fired a flare to warn off an Iranian patrol boat, 1,000 meters away. Supposedly, this was a provocation. But Iranian foreign minister Javad Zarif had a point when he tweeted:

“Breaking: Our Navy operates in – yes, correct – the Persian Gulf, not the Gulf of Mexico. Question is what US Navy doing 7,500 miles from home.”

Who is behind the seeming conversion of Trump to hawk?

—  §  —

The generals, Bibi Netanyahu and the neocons, Congressional hawks with Cold War mindsets, the Saudi royal family and the Gulf Arabs – they are winning the battle for the president’s mind.

And their agenda for America?

We are to recognize that our true enemy in the Mideast is not al-Qaida or ISIS, but Shiite Iran and Hezbollah, Assad’s Syria and his patron, Putin. And until Hezbollah is eviscerated, Assad is gone, and Iran is smashed the way we did Afghanistan, Iraq, and Yemen, the flowering of Middle East democracy that we all seek cannot truly begin.

But before President Trump proceeds along the path laid out for him by his generals, brave and patriotic men that they are, he should discover if any of them opposed any of the idiotic wars of the last 15 years, beginning with that greatest of strategic blunders – George Bush’s invasion of Iraq.


70 thoughts to “The Rise of the Generals”

  1. Pictures can say with maximum impact what words can only say inadequately. Full acknowledgements to Lobro for the brilliant picture which stands at the head of this article. He sent it to me yesterday and I thought this might be a good place to use it.

  2. “And their agenda for America?”

    “We are to recognize that our true enemy in the Mideast is not al-Qaida or ISIS, but Shiite Iran and Hezbollah, Assad’s Syria and his patron, Putin.”

    Pat Buchanan should know better than that. He has been in the very depths of global politics since the 60s. He has been the speech-writer and mouthpiece for US Presidents..!! Deep-State lackeys seek him for advice and representation to the media. He is on the front lines of the major info threads. He is an ‘Establishment Man’ as was GHW Bush.
    [Drummey’s book The Establishment’s Man (Appleton, Wl: Western Islands, 1991).]

    Buchanan, of all people, should know… the US supports all those people, factions and countries which he wrote there. Especially ‘Put-On’…. the rider of the Paper Bear… 🙂

    1. Pat,
      I think Buchanan does “know better than that.” But, in his declining age, he seems desperate to stay relevant to the mainstream media. He knows that the print media, many of which still publish his articles, would drop him like a hot potato if he wrote what he really thinks about Jews and Israel. MSNBC fired him as a long-time analyst on “Morning Joe” for writing the truth in “Suicide of a Superpower.” Too politically incorrect for the delicate sensibilities of the Zionist suits who run the place. Ever since AIPAC called him out for saying that Congress is Israeli-controlled territory Pat has softened his rhetoric some. However, in the above article, I was pleased that he mentioned Netanyahu as being a force, along with the generals and Congressional hawks, in “winning the battle for the president’s mind.”

      But, Pat, regarding your quote from the article, I didn’t take it the same way. I think he’s saying that the media WANTS the public to think that Iran, Hezbollah, Assad’s Syria, and Putin are the enemy, not that he thinks they are. Pat’s written plenty of other times that they should not be our enemies – most especially Assad and Russia.

    2. Pat, what is wrong with being an “establishment man”? We do, of course, have an establishment. Nothing is to be gained from being a revolutionary. He represents his people within the establishment. What’s wrong with that?

      Buchanan is a hell of a lot smarter than Trump. Said only since Trump took most of Buchanan’s campaign and retooled it for 2016 which included a nod to the homos and women in a way that would make Buchanan blush.

      As smart and wise as you are, Pat, I have to sometimes take you with many, many grains of salt. Because you suffer from despair, my brother. If I held your views, that there was no hope, I would do one of two things. I would either be a crook and try to join the criminal cartel at a low level, or I would be living a life of wine, women and song. Although the latter sounds much more enjoyable and probably not doable without the former.

      Pace, Pat!

      1. Rich –

        Thanks for the reply.

        You asked:
        “Pat, what is wrong with being an “establishment man”?”

        I left the comment too ambiguous for today’s folks. We ARE ‘word controlled’ and have always been so.

        The book was a “YUGE” success when it came out…. to help expose Bush and “BIGGLY” boost Perot.

        An “Establishment Man” back then was a CFR and Trilateral Commission and UN-Rockefeller stooge.

        We ‘conservatives’ wanted him GONE…. he promoted and passed NAFTA..!!!

        None of us thought Clinton(bigger stooge)…. who signed NAFTA into law…
        …. would win against the hero of Desert Storm.. 🙂

      2. Pat

        I think you misread that paragraph. In the crafting of it he should have used quotations to indicate Washington’s position. Buchanan DOES know better, it’s just that no one in the halls of power are listening to him any more.

        Read it again and you’ll see what I mean

      3. B-Hawk –

        I don’t need to read his crap again.

        I already know Buchanan.

        He dodged the draft with arthritis complaints. “I can’t go to war..!! My fingers hurt..!!”

        Sure…. they hurt… except when paid “YUGE” $$$ for writing long-winded lies for Nixon. 🙂 🙂

        He wrote the LIES for the the biggest liar in DC in 1969…. Nixon… until ousted.

        When Nixon took the Oval Office in 1969, Buchanan worked as a White House adviser and speechwriter for him and Vice President Spiro Agnew. Buchanan coined the phrase “Silent Majority.”

        ALL national leaders are liars…. and so are their writers..!! 🙂

      4. JDC –

        How ‘Agnew-ish’ of you..!! LUVVITT..!! 😉

        YOU KNOW… ALL national leaders are liars…!!!

  3. Thank God for Patrick Buchanan. Let’s hope that President Trump is willing to listen to him. At the moment Trump seems to be going through the type of reversal that always seems to happen when someone makes the White House–suddenly the domestic agenda is on the back burner and all that matters is the global agenda (whatever that is). Ever since the end of March, Trump’s presidency had been a keen disappointment.

    Anyway, the only good part about any of this new major debacle is that Trump has managed to expose the deep state for what it is with his bull in the china closet style. As Trump slowly succumbs to being poisoned by the neocon agenda we get to watch every excruciating scene. Every one of Trump’s bad moves is done on the big screen and the creepy actors that are now shepherding him through his new persona are also in plain sight. It’s all becoming too clear, while under Obama and presumably under a Clinton administration the moves would have been as hidden and seamless as they are supposed to be. Oh well. At one time we said the Emperor has no clothes and now it seems the Deep State is also walking naked next to the naked Emperor.

  4. Trump now claims to be BOTH a Nationalist AND a Globalist. During the campaign he said he was against the Globalists, now he’s a Globalist himself, albeit a half-Globalist. A half-ass Globalist and a half-ass Nationalist. Yet another dual-minded one in this Age of Kali Yuga, the age of the dual-minded.

  5. “Who is behind the seeming conversion of Trump to hawk?”

    Sigh. Conversion? Why must we deferentially assume that Chumpster’s campaign was not a fraud from the beginning?

    Let’s do some reasoning. At the end of Obama’s second term, the “Globalist” (Jewish) “foreign policy” agenda is apparently stalled and in trouble; “America” is obviously in trouble – because of the Jewish agenda – and many people are apparently sick and tired of the costly and increasingly dangerous interventionist “foreign policy” in particular.

    With the mutual exclusivity of the two now painfully obvious, which one do we choose? Do we rescue “America” or do we rescue the Jewish agenda (world domination and control at any cost)?

    And now at this critical juncture (perhaps the most critical in U.S. history), along comes Chumpster.

    Why at the age of 70 would Chumpster want to run for president? Apparently because he can see that America will not survive the “globalist” agenda. Apparently because he realizes that when NYC gets hit with a nuke, his “Trump Tower” and his family will be destroyed along with everything and everyone else. Apparently because he was not willing to trade his property, the lives of his family, NYC, etc., for Damascus.

    So what we had was a man with a plan; a plan to save America from the scourge of “globalism”. A wealthy man (who apparently doesn’t need money), who’s not a career politician, who’s been openly critical of the immoral, costly, self-destructive “globalist” “foreign policy”, who can see what’s at stake here for himself, his family, his property and his country, etc.

    Thus the Chumpster campaign made sense under the circumstances; it was at least plausible. And this is the line of reasoning that caused me to vote in a presidential election for the first time since 1992.

    But there was one troubling thought festering in the back of my mind: If Chumpster is not what many of us think he is, we’re screwed; REALLY SCREWED, because there is really no middle ground here. If he’s not doing this for the right reasons, then he’s either seriously mentally ill and/or he’s doing it for all the wrong reasons, and that will most certainly bring disaster.

    Being “converted” from “nationalist” to rabid “globalist” isn’t like being talked into a choice of vanilla cake rather than chocolate. If Chumpster was running for president for all the right reasons, ipso facto he could not be “converted”.

    The “conversion” theory is generous nonsense, IMO. Chumpster’s campaign was all about rescuing the Jewish agenda.

    “But before President Trump proceeds along the path laid out for him by his generals, brave and patriotic men that they are…”

    Is that sarcasm?

    1. Why must we deferentially assume that Chumpster’s campaign was not a fraud from the beginning?

      You must be prepared to take that approach to its logical conclusion if other leaders seemingly “convert” along the way. Hopefully this will not be the case.

    2. Yes, Harold. I was under the assumption that Trump may have wanted to create an environment where average working people might be able to spend a weekend at one of his glamorous hotels for special occasions like an anniversary. His business isn’t going to survive if normal people can never afford it.

      I think it is OK for Buchanan to talk about a “conversion”. After all, he is simply juxtaposing the campaign from the reality of his presidency. And you are correct to label it is “generous”. It may be a bit of sarcasm though as well, as in he converted from nationalism to globalism and Christianity to, well, you know. We know how to read between the lines.

      At least Pat Buchanan still gets published and has somewhat of a large readership. Unlike E. Michael Jones who has been placed into what he calls the “dynamic cone of silence”. Pat knows how to play the game. And it still is possible that Trump is just an idiot and thought he could take on Kim like he took on Rosie O’Donell.

      I will leave you with a funny story. When one of Pat’s recent books came out he sent a copy to E. Michael Jones and inscribed in it that “we white guys have to stick together”. Jones, as you may know, doesn’t find much meaning in being white. Neither do I. This irritated Jones.

      This is a very good article to post on other boards any of you may also participate on. It is a great summary and will catch up to speed those who have not paid attention.

    3. Harold,
      Few realized it at the time, but Trump showed he was a fraud, or at least didn’t do his homework, when he anointed Christian Zionist neocon Mike Pence, the unpopular governor of Indiana, to be his running mate. When Trump won, he put Pence in charge of staffing his cabinet. That’s how, just to mention one, we got Trump hater Nikki Haley to be the Russia-hating US mouthpiece at the UN. And, if not Pence, who was responsible for Mike Flynn being fired? Pence has been working since day one to stealthily undermine Trump and it appears he’s succeeding.

      1. I don’t know what to think about Flynn. I didn’t trust him either. Some of us were of the opinion that he was talking tough about Iran and elements in the Deep State, grown-ups if you will, were not going to have it. As we cannot afford to take on Iran. Let’s drop the concern of whether or not such an action would be moral at this point. It just can’t be done.

        I’m starting to think that Trump showed he was a fraud in a subtle way when he would read his stupid little poem about the snake. Maybe he was the snake?

    4. @ Harold Smith

      Being “converted” from “nationalist” to rabid “globalist” isn’t like being talked into a choice of vanilla cake rather than chocolate. If Chumpster was running for president for all the right reasons, ipso facto he could not be “converted”.

      The “conversion” theory is generous nonsense, IMO. Chumpster’s campaign was all about rescuing the Jewish agenda.

      I hate to have to agree with you, Harold, because I would have much preferred it if Trump had been a man of destiny about to fulfil the role of America’s rescuer. The man who helped to cast off the Jewish yoke! Alas, it was not to be. It was a pipe dream all along. And the alt.right were taken in and horribly deceived.

      I’m not saying the alt.right were stupid or gullible. That wouldn’t be fair. They were men of high principle and highly intelligent. Like Kevin MacDonald and Richard Spencer and other well-respected luminaries, White nationalist stalwarts who saw the Jews as a “hostile elite” and were consequently branded “anti-Semitic” and ‘White supremacists”.

      I really do believe that they fell for Trump in the same way as a guy falls for the wrong type of woman, as the result of an infatuation. Their main concern was immigration and they wanted the white majority to remain in a majority and not get swamped by a whole bunch of foreigners. Trump’s promise to limit Muslim immigration and build a wall to keep out the Mexican hordes was therefore music to their ears. They wanted to believe this so badly that they did. They were too trusting. They were swept away by the enthusiasm of their own wishful thinking.

      I see it like this, Harold, and I know you will agree with me. Trump knew in advance that Congress would say “NO!” to his immigration plans. It was all stitched up in advance. It was easy for Trump to make these grandiose promises, to give the alt-right White nationalists hope, but he knew those hopes were destined to be dashed — that it would all come to nothing.

      A multicultural society is absolutely essential to the Jews. They’re been striving for that since the early 20th century and got their way with the 1965 Immigration Act which helped to open the floodgates to non-Whites. So there was no way they were going to allow Trump to reverse all those gains.

      It didn’t take Trump long to remove his mask. It is my own belief that the man is a Zionist through and through. He’s not an opportunist sucking up to the Jews for gain. No, he is a “spiritual Jew” like Stalin. Head over heels in love with the Jews. He was almost in tears recently going on about the Holocaust. His sincerity was palpable. He is mad about his Jewish grandchildren. Mad about Ivanka. And only too pleased to listen to Jared whose pro-Jewish opinions mesh with his own.

      You know something? I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump converted to Judaism halfway through his presidency. The shock to the nation would be profound. But what could the alt.right do about it? Nothing. For the Jews, this would be the ultimate victory.

      Think of it — a public conversion to Judaism by the President of the United States!

      Unbelievable? Yes. But don’t rule it out. It’s a funny world and it could happen.

      1. @ Sardonicus

        Great comment.

        “I see it like this, Harold, and I know you will agree with me. Trump knew in advance that Congress would say “NO!” to his immigration plans. It was all stitched up in advance. It was easy for Trump to make these grandiose promises, to give the alt-right White nationalists hope, but he knew those hopes were destined to be dashed — that it would all come to nothing.”

        I agree. Most or all of his campaign rhetoric was just disingenuous posturing.

        “He’s not an opportunist sucking up to the Jews for gain. No, he is a “spiritual Jew” like Stalin. Head over heels in love with the Jews. He was almost in tears recently going on about the Holocaust. His sincerity was palpable.”

        He definitely “worships the beast”. And because of this, he is probably much more dangerous than Obama was and much more dangerous than Hillary would’ve been.

        I see him as “LBJ on steroids”, and if LBJ was willing to conspire with Israel to murder his own men on the USS Liberty, to try to get a war started, what will Chumpster do? I would not put anything past this demonically inspired madman.

    5. On the campaign trail , Trump always reminded me of a man in a bar trying to cajool a much younger woman. Everything he said was on cue and exactly what his audience wanted to hear. No realist should believe someone who speaks this way. Reality isnt always so pleasant. The American people (like the young naive woman) believed his sweettalk. Its now the morning after and Trump, after scoring, has sailed into the sunset and is not returning her calls. Who is to blame? The manipulator or the manipulator?

  6. I have subscribed to this man’s youtube channel. He has been giving a talk everyday of Trump’s administration. It is kind of like sitting on the stoop in the old neighborhood and discussing politics. If you watch, you will notice that he also is careful in how he puts things. Although he is a lot more blunt than Mr. Buchanan.

  7. A fine, precise summary of the ‘New’ Mr. Trump and his ill advised illegal outsourcing of US foreign policy. Mr. Zarif’s observation applies to Russian speaking Crimea and many other places. Mr. Buchanan rightly observes that it is important to know at the deepest possible level who you are dealing with especially in the military. I got the feeling during General Schwarzkopf’s later years he was a little less enthusiastic about what his brilliant tactical victory had handed to a bunch of scoundrels and clowns. Mr. Buchanan’s closing summation alluding to the Iraq strategic disaster as the root of growing trouble for the USA and the world strongly merits careful analysis and delineation of all its echoing ramifications, and wide contemplation and discussion at the highest levels. Only incompetent self appointed experts ignore such historically important glaring issues. Primitive intellect, a common feature among the neo cons and nouveau riche recklessly substitute treachery and savagery for the missing rare talent of the caliber of the late General Schwarzkopf, besotted by their MOABS and other technology. This infatuation is equally as bad if not worse in the Intelligence hierarchy, another area professionals like Michael Scheurer have drawn attention to along with the truly glaring problem of today’s military leadership. Many are dismayed by the flip flopping Mr.Trump. We shouldn’t be, if we follow our own advice as offered above suggesting we understand at the deepest level who we are dealing with and what they may or may not be offering as an endgame, an exit strategy – with a plan B, just in case. Mr. Trump desires to be a strong President. That is necessary and good. Intellectually, however, he isn’t fully equipped or as yet experienced in this very different type of leadership (no President in history didn’t benefit from some great advice from all kinds of places) as opposed to his business experience. Common sense should tell him that he made a huge mistake placing spoiled rich man’s son Jared Kushner ahead of talented self made Mr. Bannon. So we are dealing with a man who is more comfortable with the worst element of his self reflection, and his parochial and inexperienced reliance of whatever men are currently wearing uniforms – overlooking the rot the weapons racket linked with treacherous zionist covetous goals has wrought on our military. Michael Scheurer summed it up quite well in his recent article. I’d only add in plain terms that it isn’t only the Economy that needs fixing, and before you squander trillions on the infatuation with technology handouts you really stand to gain – everything – by a sober, careful, experienced unbiased in depth examination of who you are giving it to and what it will bring you.

    1. P.S. Thanks to Mr. Paul Craig Roberts for his recent article on the 9/11 American disaster (April 27) which followed naturally from the root American strategic disaster of the Iraq war as described above by Mr. Buchanan.

  8. Israel is in total control of the U.S. and has been since 1963 and the actual capital of the U.S. is TEL AVIV, wake up America.

  9. i couldnt help but to rename the article … “terrorism for dummies”
    but just in case there is someone out there who wants to know the depth of the middle east current situation he or she should read with close attention what i have to say down below
    but before, i would like to thank darkmoon and co. at the site for allowing me to post the following:
    the four middle eastern projects
    the first project is the oldest and is found in the old testament, it is called
    this project demands from the zionists club (zionists refers to a mostly jew membership but it also includes arab, wasp, celtic, russian and persian members known as free masons) to build a state from the nile to the euphrates that will be created right before the real messiah comes because according to them that guy that came 2017 (minus 33) years ago was a sorcerer whose mother got pregnant by some drunken neighbour. the girl then went about the place talking about some large holy spirit that did it,which is accoding to them, a horny teenage lie)
    the jews wont go ahead with this project because isis warrior would wait for them outside damascus, split their asses in two then march to palestine. yes, just like that.
    i know i know i am a takfiri, i am a jew, i am a cia agent i am a moron, blah blah blah
    but the project is there, its an elephant; if it was a snake it wouldve bit you long time ago. the project is called crescent because it forms a sideways written “u” that compiles the countries of yemen, bahrain, iraq, saudi arabia, syria and lebanon. countries that iran wants to possess because they are shia and feel that ali shouldve been the prophet etc they hate us
    it is basically a plan where certain parts of the koran. chapters like al infal, al tawba and mohamed´s wont be read nowhere because they contain very jihadistic verses.
    in other words the us and the saudis want to turn the middle east into countries- countries like jordan and egypt- who also form part of this conglomerate- that have discotheques, whisky, whores (excuse my language) and chevron gas stations next to mosques and temples.
    this one is my favourite. 🙂
    no body asked us for permission when they went and formed the soviet union the united states or the european union so dont come in here sticking you noses in businesss that doesnt concern you. thats right, hajee! stay away from our oil, sands and sisters!
    we are islam
    we are a third of the world
    leave us alone otherwise we are gonna keep going until we make you our bitches !
    you got seinfeld, jessicah parker and sarah silverman, enjoy their sitcoms and make them rich
    when it comes to us we loudly tell ya
    take a hike!
    loose players are those who are in it with it because they are scavengers seeing if they can get some of the cake´s leftovers
    countries like turkey, qatar, russia, france, pakistan may side with one of the projects then leave, then come back or switch over etc according to their convenience
    we hate them too

    1. @ Avatar…………Palestinian……..Avatar is better (^-^).
      I like what you wrote ,it’s hard to predict what will happen to the middle east ,the end game is at the hands of God.
      But let me put my readings to what I think will happen in the near future
      * Assad will not survive beyond this year, Russia and Putin will not risk conformations with Israel ,over Assad survival ,therefore, Syria will be de-facto divided , just like Iraq.
      *Jordan will be next ,but it will be swiftly divided ,Amman metropolitan area will be given to the Palestinians.
      *Lebanon is already divided ,Just they will either contain hizbullah or defeat it.
      *Half of Sinai will be divided between Hamas and Israel.
      *Saudi Royal Family will be restricted to Najd region.the rest will be divided
      Hijaz region will become independent ,just like the Vatican.
      The tiny city States in the Gulf will disappear ,some to the Saudi ,some to the Shia Iraq ,some to Oman or Iran.
      That is my readings and the winner as always will be The Great Jewish State ,Israel.

  10. man is for the most part a social insect and thereby for the most part funneled into thinking like one, an ocean borne rock licker unaware of the tidal sweeps that carry it in and off shorelines.

    by way of example, people pore endlessly over such minutiae as whether Trump’s parents died in jew geriatric homes in order to divine the future, while ignoring the much larger signs.

    Consider that, as per universal understanding and agreement here, Jew was the prime and in fact only motivator of the 2 world wars, only a dozen years apart that nearly destroyed europe’s peoples and thus fulfilled the age old dream of judaic race.
    And in the aftermath, jew pressed for hard and fully anticipated a third world war to accomplish the end goal of extinction of white race and thus jew’s ascension to utter, eternal dominion over the human world.

    Consider the well known speech by rabbi Rabinovich to a giant 1952 Budapest congregation of rabbis from all across the globe:

    The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach, and because its fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to increase our efforts and our caution tenfold. I can safely promise you that BEFORE TEN YEARS HAVE PASSED, [i.e., by 1962] our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a king and every Gentile a slave (Applause from the gathering)

    think for a moment on this phenomenon; jew was brilliantly successful just a couple of years after the publication of the Protocols, everything going with serpentine smoothness, over 100 million dead goyim rotting in the battlefields and gulags of europe, got their occult requirement of palestine renamed to Israel after having subjugated all the world’s leaders into craven submission, just one more proper war and the cake is theirs to eat in perpetuity.
    So what happened, we are in 2017, 55 years behind the Armageddon schedule, no big war despite the frantic yelping of jews desperate to cross the messianic finish line.
    Don’t say, it is because sneaky jew planned it that way because there is no way he would have embarrassed himself so publicly, to in the hour of his greatest genocidal triumph assert that he is a hairbreath from attaining the ultimate goal, only to see it elusively slip from his grasp, over and over again.

    by all means, advance whatever explanation and theory you have, i will put forward mine as follows.
    Simply put, there are shabbos put in power by jew, every bit as slippery as jew and more, who turned out double-betrayers and are actively but invisibly sabotaging the infernal script.

    How is this possible?
    well, as i see it, there are 2 kinds of shabbos, broadly speaking: Reversibles and Irreversibles.

    The latter are condemned slaves of hell, the sick perverts, satanists in junior brotherhood with jew, stamped with the mark of the animal, no way out for them – full, instant, unquestioning obedience expected and supplied, your hillaries, blairs, Podestas, harpers, Churchills, Wilsons, FDR’s and inumerable others.

    Reversibles are of the more robust moral constitution, money-shabbos, power-shabbos, single-issue shabbos, various autocrats in africa and south america, environmental and animal rights defenders allied with Soros to promote their pet project, politicians like Nixon, carter, justin trudeau, and … quite likely Trump, although i cannot say for sure, only by reading the distant signs and timing events and non-events.
    They are exceedingly hard to identify because part of their long term gameplan is to fool the jew, ie, strike a deal more beneficial to them than to him, which is very, very hard and if jew is fooled, rest assured that most of us will be as well.

    I can only divine their presence by the said lack of catastrophes foretold, anticipated and mightily pushed by the international Enemy.
    Without that hidden banana peel, jew would have achieved his Jew Dream long ago and we would have either been dust or groveling in said dust.

    so this is my countervailing view, i see indices of trump providing unspoken resistance, even of other responsible leaders playing along to give him underground assistance, Putin most certainly, also Xi, Assad, Khamenei, Kim, … and who knows, maybe even the awful Merkel, i can’t figure her out but someone with Phd in quantum chemistry cannot be the dullest knife in the drawer, especially with her top notch Stasi training alongside Putin, grand masters of kabuki.

    in summa summarum, time will tell and time is on our side because the truth is eternal while the lie decays.

    1. another twist in how the game may be played is that jews likewise can be subject of blackmail schemes …
      Will Trump Release the Missing JFK Files?
      I don’t know how many of you recall how in the aftermath of last years october election, trump was invited to white house for a private viewing of Obama Shows Trump “The Film” During Private White House Meeting

      ed note–Please note a few passages from the piece–
      ‘… Trump White House is acknowledging that it is focused on the issue…’
      ‘Under the 1992 JFK Assassination Records Collection Act, the library of documents about Kennedy’s death must be made public in full by the deadline of this October 26, the law’s 25th anniversary, unless Trump decides otherwise. It is his decision alone…’
      ‘Other documents are known to identify, by name, foreign spies who had previously been granted anonymity for information about Oswald and the assassination…’
      Of the many trump cards which the president now possesses in putting pressure on Judea, Inc, this one is without a doubt one of the biggest, overshadowed and outdone only by Israel’s involvement in 9/11, and all can rest assured that in some fashion, Trump and his peeps are busy at work figuring out how to use this to their advantage in dealing with an insane leader named Netanyahu in charge of an insane nuclear armed state such as Israel. And remember, all it takes is the offhand discussion of one name–Meyer Lansky–to begin a series of dominoes falling that could result in panic within Israel and within those intelligence services in the US under her thumb.

      and rest assured that Putin has his treasure trove of blackmail ammo.
      Which brings me to another, oft overlooked point in the deadly game:
      ammo fired is ammo spent, i.e., the power of blackmail is NOT to reveal it but use it as instrument of psychological torture and intimidation to bend the opponent to the blackmailer’s will.
      And that will drive the game, not our burning desire to be privy to the secrets constantly teased before our noses.

      oh yeah, and there are all sorts of indications that Obama too was a “Reversible” shabbo, for which he was roundly hated by Netanyahu cluster, doomsday postponed another 8 years, even as he had to play the dirty game of regime changes under the watchful eye of Victoria nuland.

      1. Lobro –

        “I don’t know how many of you recall how in the aftermath of last years october election,”

        I don’t recall that one.. Not at all..!!

        There WAS a little one in November though.. 🙂

        Been that-a-way since the beginning…

    2. Lobro –

      “Consider that, as per universal understanding and agreement here, Jew was the prime and in fact only motivator of the 2 world wars, only a dozen years apart that nearly destroyed europe’s peoples and thus fulfilled the age old dream of judaic race.”

      Those two international skirmishes were played out to solidify the Federal Reserve and establish the strength of Bretton Woods in 1944. The USD became the currency of the world. It remains the major currency today.

      The rest is dust, fluff and myths. Stories and guesses at best. 🙂

      1. @Pat
        Those two international skirmishes were played out to solidify the Federal Reserve and establish the strength of Bretton Woods in 1944. The USD became the currency of the world. It remains the major currency today.
        The rest is dust, fluff and myths. Stories and guesses at best.

        I think there is a lot more than dust, fluff and myths.
        From my analysis here are some of the major movements:
        WW1 1914-1920
        1917 The Balfour Declaration: The Balfour Declaration was a single paragraph in a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland.

        It read:
        His Majesty’s government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
        1917: The fall of Palestine to the British
        1917: The Bolshevik revolution.
        1920: Formation of the League of Nations (if your aim is to set up world government, you have to create a body to govern Europe. That entity later acts as an embryo to develop into the UN that later is to mature into the world government.)

        1922: The League of Nations formally awarded Britain a mandate over Palestine.

        There are many pieces which I will leave out but of note is the dismantling of the Caliphate system and the Treaty of Versailles.
        Even though on the surface it looks like a war between Britain and Germany some of the bigger picture is the capture of Palestine that is to eventually lead to the creation of Israel that is to possibly lead to the headquarters of the world; the fall of the czar and the rise of communism; the dissolution of the caliphate.
        The czar (the remnant of the Byzantine world) and the caliphate system being constructs of a religious world view.

        WWII: 1939-1945
        1944: Bretton Woods Accord. The US currency becomes the world reserve currency.
        1945: League of Nations evolves into the UN, an inter-governmental organization to promote international co-operation and to create and maintain international order. The Atlantic Charter that was the basis for the UN was signed in 1942.
        1945: IMF and the World Bank formed from the BWA.
        1946: Constitution of the World Health Organization signed.
        1948: The State of Israel formed. European Jews move en masse to Israel.
        1949: NATO formed.

        I believe a big part of WWII was to engineer conditions to make it favorable for European Jews to move to Palestine. They needed occupation on the ground since not too many moved after WWI. Hegelian dialectic as usual…. and to create and market the holohoax narrative.

      2. Seeb –


        Remember the “YUGE” Pharisee-Jew Banker was quoted: “When I control currency…… I care not who makes laws..”

        This was Primary:

        1944: Bretton Woods Accord. The US currency becomes the WORLD RESERVE CURRENCY.


        This was a reeult:
        1945: IMF and the World Bank formed from the Bretton Woods Aagreement.

    3. @Lobro: Thank you so much for the Rose Rabinovitch link. You are spot on with the social insect observation. “To be nobody-but-yourself – in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else – means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight; and never stop fighting”. – E. E. Cummings. Mrs. Rabinovitch, Benjamin Freedman, Bobby Fischer (he really hit a nerve in Hollywood) and other decent human beings are trying to awaken outsiders, even from beyond the grave. That “hidden banana peel” factor may yet one day awaken zionists too. Biologics can’t distinguish between Ashkenazis or anyone else, though they are trying. The Hindus, particularly the worshippers of Lord Shiva, will never submit, nor will devout Muslims, Christians, and many others. As I’ve said before, ‘sympathy for the jew’ doesn’t really play very well in Asia as a whole.

      1. Winston,

        The Hindus, particularly the worshippers of Lord Shiva, will never submit, nor will devout Muslims, Christians, and many others

        And this is one point I keep hammering home; opposite to what some claim, that religions inhibit resistance to jew’s diabolical schemes, they in fact protect humanity from this terrible peril.
        Two reasons on two levels: at one, they all stress strict adherence to a moral code, responsibility of the individual to the numinous, and on another, if the individual stands in direct relationship to an all-encompassing whole, i.e., the truth, he cannot be swayed, intimidated and corrupted by a diseased, fragmentary, rapidly decaying untruth, bent on short-term goals of secular power.

        Without that, the said siren call of fleeting secular power is too tempting to resist for just about everyone.

      2. @ Winston
        @ Lobro

        What you both are saying about the religiously committed is exactly why the jews will never accomplish their fantasy of world tyranny. Belief in a spiritual creator along with a moral code cannot be completely overcome by those that do not have it. History proves it. History also proves that there will be times when fighting is required to preserve that spiritual creator moral code.

      3. Winston –

        “The other part of Machiavelli’s formula is that force must be accompanied by good laws, or the ruling power is sowing the seeds for its own destruction – widely overlooked today.”

        I agree that it is “widely overlooked today.”

        The SPECIFIC LAW being “overlooked today” is Noahide Law which is – CREEPING – into the laws of ALL countries.

        Criminalizing ‘holocaust’ denial is a PRIME example. That would be “BLASPHEMY” in Noahide Laws…. in US and RUSSIA and UK….. ‘Put-On’ agrees with the results from the likes of Chabad Lubavitcher Kushner in DC…!!

        The fact IS that EVERY YEAR since 1978 there has been a PROCLAMATION of recognition of Chabad Lubavitch – NOAHIDE LAWS – made by EACH and EVERY US President..!!!

        Every year..!!
        Every year..!!
        Every year..!!

        WHO KNEW?????

        The Chabad Lubavitch and Noahide Laws originate in the Torah.

        Every year – under the radar – since 1978 – Jimmy Carter – Chabad Lubavitch has been officially recognized by Presidents’ Proclamations and Congressional actions.

        **Trump did so JUST this month…!!!

        Catholics will get the death penalty for sure..!!

      4. @Lobro

        The Protocols were published around 1903, plagiarizing some material from the Dialogue in Hell and some from Hertzl, who led the Zionist Congress in Basel in 1897, 4 years after the Dreyfuss affair that made him a Zionist. What is the problem ? If the Protocols were the real minutes of a real meeting, why would they plagiarize from the Dialogue in Hell ? Why would reality copy fiction ?
        Here are quotes from the Dialogue in Hell besides quotes from the Protocols. Judge for yourself :

        ” How are loans made? By the issue of bonds entailing on the Government the obligation to pay interest proportionate to the capital it has been paid. Thus, if a loan is at 5%, the State, after 20 years, has paid out a sum equal to the borrowed capital. When 40 years have expired it has paid double, after 60 years triple: yet it remains debtor for the entire capital sum.”
        — Montesquieu, Dialogues, p. 209

        “A loan is an issue of Government paper which entails an obligation to pay interest amounting to a percentage of the total sum of the borrowed money. If a loan is at 5%, then in 20 years the Government would have unnecessarily paid out a sum equal to that of the loan in order to cover the percentage. In 40 years it will have paid twice; and in 60 thrice that amount, but the loan will still remain as an unpaid debt.”
        — Protocols, p. 77

        “Like the god Vishnu, my press will have a hundred arms, and these arms will give their hands to all the different shades of opinion throughout the country.”
        — Machiavelli, Dialogues, p. 141

        “These newspapers, like the Indian god Vishnu, will be possessed of hundreds of hands, each of which will be feeling the pulse of varying public opinion.”
        — Protocols, p. 43

        “Now I understand the figure of the god Vishnu; you have a hundred arms like the Indian idol, and each of your fingers touches a spring.”
        — Montesquieu, Dialogues, p. 207

        “Our Government will resemble the Hindu god Vishnu. Each of our hundred hands will hold one spring of the social machinery of State.”
        — Protocols, p. 65

        Philip Graves brought this plagiarism to light in a series of articles in The Times in 1921, the first published evidence that the Protocols was not an authentic document.[18][19]

        Wikipedia, Protocols of Zion

        The Protocols of Ginzberg by Frey are another matter and deserve separate attention. Even if they are real, then they do not autenticize the Protocols of Zion, with all their obvious plagiarisms.

        1. @ Franklin Ryckaert

          Your debate on the authenticity of the Protocols with Lobro has been excellent. As we have never got round to publishing an article on this subject, we have decided to run your exchange of comments with Lobro as a feature article, the date of publication to be determined later. As the debate has now run on for almost 5000 words, the article will have to end at this point, with your above comment being the last one.

          You are of course welcome to continue the debate with Lobro, but any further comments on the subject cannot be included in the article because of its already excessive length.

          Many thanks to both of you for your learned and fascinating contributions!

          Admin Toby

          P.S. None of your comments have been edited or altered in any way.

          1. Uncle :

            You don’t like my “The Mystery of The Protocols” post because? Because I wrote it? Because if any other DM commentator had sent in a post like my “The Mystery of The Protocols” post, you would not CENSOR it, you would feature it. You would feature it because it’s a Truthful post, a Right-On-Target post. So what about my Truthful and On-Target “Mystery of The Protocols” post that’s got your panties all tied up in knots irritating your twat? What’s the twat issue du jour, in other words.

              1. The mystery that surrounds The Protocols is the type of mystery which one finds in the jew Kabbalah. The mystery which surrounds The Protocols has a jew qabalah dynamic to it, very much so. It doesn’t matter if it’s real or a forgery or whatever, the salient feature of The Protocols is the jew qabalah mystery which surrounds The Protocols. The mystery of the Protocols is there on purpose, the mystery of The Protocols helps protect the jews while the jews communicate to us their intentions and agendas and goals, the jew qabalah mystery serves as a protective shield to protect the jews as the jews reveal their jew religion to the world. The jews want to reveal their jew religion to the world and do so with as little backlash against them as possible, hence the “great” mystery inherently built-in to the saga of The Protocols. Everything about The Protocols is jew-to-the-core, real, forgery, whatever, it’s jew-to-the-core and everything in The Protocols is jew. Including the inherent mystery purposely built-in to narrative concerning The Protocols. The mystery purposely put there by the jew qabalah rabbis.

                The Protocols very much describe the workings of the powers and principalities of this world. The jew qabalah is THE MAIN BOOK of Satanism, THE MAIN BOOK OF SATANISTS. Satanists are obligated to reveal their plans before hand, which sounds honest, except the Satanists reveal their satanic plans in a very under-handed and a very difficult way to discern and in a way which is mysterious so most people don’t even realize the satanists are revealing themselves and their plans to us, hence the mystery which surrounds The Protocols. Satanists are obligated to reveal their satanic plans, but they are at-the-same-tim obligated to reveal their satanic plans in such a way hardly anyone even realizes the satanists are Signaling and Revealing their satanic intentions, satanic agendas, satanic goals, hence the mystery which surrounds The Protocols. The Mystery is meant to divert our attention from The Fact the satanists are revealing their satanic agendas and satanic goals to us. Instead of focusing on their satanic agendas and satanic goals and maybe what we can do to stop them or at least slow them down, everyone is debating if the Protocols are real or not. A total waste of psychic energy. The EXACT reason the satanists made sure to include an air of mystery to their Protocols, that we would waste our psychic energy debating whether The Protocols are real or not instead of focusing on what we can to stop or at least slow down their satanic agendas and their satanic goals and their satanic New World Order.

      5. what TROJ is saying makes occult sense

        Satanists are obligated to reveal their plans before hand, which sounds honest, except the Satanists reveal their satanic plans in a very under-handed and a very difficult way to discern and in a way which is mysterious so most people don’t even realize the satanists are revealing themselves and their plans to us, hence the mystery which surrounds The Protocols.

        it might be argued that it goes back to the original challenge that God offered to Satan, which the latter accepted, that the world of free-thinking men was satan’s to corrupt to the core, let the chips fall where they may.
        One salient detail of the said deal was that man’s perdition could not happen by brute force, only by way of corruption of spirit and this can be seen in the ways of the jew, also mythical monsters like werewolves and vampires, all of whom must be invited into the household of the goyim where they can proceed to wreak havoc and steal their souls in exchange for eternal undeath under the titular ownership of Satan.
        But in order for the contract, signed-in-blood to have validity, it had to be up front, no fine print, thus the prior warning (eg, The Protocols) – and yet the fools jumped for it.

        Fear of the Cross, of light, lack of reflection (soul), unquenchable thirst for blood, foreign origin (hibernating in coffins filled with soil of their original home) – don’t they all symbolize the Jew?

        what about the “faustian bargain”? lots and lots of symbolic but very educational stuff there, especially in Goethe’s version (Nikola Tesla in his youth learned by heart the entire Faust in German and said that Goethe was the greatest intellect who ever lived – some reference, that)

        Once again, don’t dismiss TROJ’s explanation out of hand.

      6. We need to jolly well find out how much of Joly was abused and used…

        If we bear in mind that all three of these examples are from the second section of Krushevan’s 1903 edition (the most ‘plagiarised’ part with 8 percent of the text allegedly coming from Joly’s ‘Dialogue’) then we can see just how weak the anti-Protocols case is in that they are ignoring nearly all the text to focus their attention on selective examples of convergence.

        I would add that while this does not remove the fact that Joly’s ‘Dialogue’ has been used it is not a case of ‘plagiarism’ but rather as a simple benchmark aid to the composition, which proves very little other than that the author must have been aware of Joly’s work. For which we can; as before stated, remove Krushevan from contention for being the author of the Protocols because of the Ukrainianisms in the original text which he did not write with.

        Even someone with a mediocre mind can see that the Protocols are not a copy of Joly’s work.

    4. @Lobro

      Before you construct a whole theory on the alleged speech of that rabbi Rabinovich, make sure it is genuine. For some critical thoughts, go to : Semitic Controversies :

      1) Eustace Mullins and the Story of the 1952 Speech of Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich.

      2) Analysing the Text of the 1952 Speech of Emanuel Rabinovich.

      1. Thanks Franklin, maybe… but what of Rose and her correspondence with Jeff Rense in 2003? An agent provocateur? Any thoughts on the “Colombo” plan? Sounds asinine when they already control most of the Northern Hemisphere, and the hated white race provide endless useful idiots like young Mr. Falwell, who aside from his emotional attachment to Israel, is probably not all of a bad fellow. He said in the last couple days that bringing America closer to Israel is one of Trumps greatest 100 days achievements. If he was better informed and reflected, he probably should have said: “bringing America closer to militant zionism and war criminal Netanyahu”. As Machiavelli noted, men are more swayed by emotion than reason, hence the need for force. The other part of Machiavelli’s formula is that force must be accompanied by good laws, or the ruling power is sowing the seeds for its own destruction – widely overlooked today.

      2. Franklin, I read the semitic controversies opinion and it is a valid criticism of the document itself, though not of its content … one of those situations, bad vehicle for a good content.
        It strikes me that the owners of the semitic controversies are jews, albeit rather honest ones, maybe ex-jews like yossi gurvitz types.
        I may comment in that regard in more depth but for now, just understand that my theory is in no way altered by this aspersion on the reported speech.
        Eustace Mullins has never been less than 100% honest and if he got taken for a ride, so was i in extension.
        Quite possibly, the “speech” was actually some hurriedly taken notes of the actual meeting by someone who interviewed an attendee and it certainly makes tons of sense.

        There is no doubt in my mind that post-WW2, Jews were pushing hard for a hat trick as they have clearly continued ever since, everything points that way, Korean war, shipping nuclear secrets to the Soviet union, Cold war and so forth, right up to today’s maneuverings.

        My claim stands: there is absolutely no way we would be even conversing about it today had it not been for a very significant drag on jewish efforts by fake shabbos applying brakes in all sorts of ways – remember, it takes a goy to fight jew’s wars.

        And if we can identify these fake shabbos and give them maximum help and support, the fight against this satanic menace would take a very positive turn and might remove the menace altogether.
        Otherwise all this feeble and moronic activity about home made bunkers, camping supplies as a way of fighting back is ridiculously puny, inefficient and defeatist.

      3. @Lobro

        I consider the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Harold Rosenthal Interview*) and the Speech of rabbi Rabinovich as fakes, but still containing psychological truths, because they show the way Jews really think. However it harms our case if we keep on quoting sources that can be proven to be fake. It is safer to quote sources that are unmistakably Jewish, such as the Old Testament, the Talmud, the Qaballah and pronouncements of rabbis and Jewish thinkers. Jews have produced enough genuine material to convict themselves. Yes, they do control finance, politics and the media, they are behind most wars and they do plan our genocide by “multiculturalism”, but we don’t need fake documents to prove that where we simply can quote their genuine pronouncements.

        *) For a critique of the Harold Rosenthal document, see again Semitic Controversies :

        1) Harold Russell Rosenthal, Walter White Jr. and the Hidden Tyranny.

        2) Analyzing the Rosenthal Document.

        Finally, if you have a sense of humor, here is a video with a fake interview with a “rabbi Finkelstein”, where he spills all the beans about his evil tribe. Enjoy !

      4. Franklin,

        I consider the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Harold Rosenthal Interview*) and the Speech of rabbi Rabinovich as fakes, but still containing psychological truths, because they show the way Jews really think. However it harms our case if we keep on quoting sources that can be proven to be fake. It is safer to quote sources that are unmistakably Jewish, such as the Old Testament, the Talmud, the Qaballah and pronouncements of rabbis and Jewish thinkers. Jews have produced enough genuine material to convict themselves. Yes, they do control finance, politics and the media, they are behind most wars and they do plan our genocide by “multiculturalism”, but we don’t need fake documents to prove that where we simply can quote their genuine pronouncements.

        On the other hand, Jews can be counted on to instantly pounce on documents that may have been procured without their sanction and thus label them “fake, forgeries, antisemitic slander and blood libel“.
        The shrill intensity of their anguished shrieking betrays them as safely as kol nidre, which they also go to great pains to downplay or even deny altogether.
        Nor should we jump up and salute every time wikisnopia objects to some source that portrays Jews in realistic light.
        If you take trouble to research whether or not The Protocols are real, many reasonable arguments come to light supporting the notion that they are real and not work of an “antisemite” out to blacken the good name of wonderful chosen children of God.
        These same trusted jew sources like wikipedia and snopes are quick to argue that the holohoax is real and well supported by documentary evidence such as the minutes of wannsee conference.
        In Auto-Emmancipation, the early Zionist (note the vintage, 1882) Leon Pinsker said

        “The struggle to achieve our ends must be entered upon in such a spirit as to exert an irresistible pressure upon international politics.”

        Compare to the protocol 1:

        “Only force and cunning conquers in political affairs. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit, and treachery for the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the rule of others if by it we secure submission and sovereignty.”

        “He must be blind indeed who will assert that the Jews are not the chosen people, the people chosen for universal hatred.”

        Look at bro kapner’s article on the subject

        CLASSIFIED US INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENTS investigating international financial issues surrounding WW I were compiled in August 1919. These sensitive documents were given SECRET classification until 1973.

        A hard copy of this document may be obtained from US National Archives in Washington DC – its number is 245-1.

        On page 5 of the document, the public writings of Theodore Herzl, hailed as the father of world political Zionism, are cited as having “identity of thought found in the Protocols.”

        This long-suppressed, finally declassified document, displays striking similarities between Herzl’s essay published in 1897 titled “The Jewish State” and Protocols 1 and 20:

        Theodore Herzl:

        “Every point which arises in the relations between nations is a question of might. I do not here surrender any portion of our prescriptive right when I make this statement.

        In the world as it now is and will probably remain, might precedes right. For us to be loyal patriots as were the Huguenots who were forced to emigrate is therefore useless. The Jews must acquire economic power sufficiently great to overcome prejudice against them.

        When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, but when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.”

        From The Protocols:

        “According to the law of being, might is right. Our right lies in force. Through our financial dominance we will manipulate capital, create depressions, and bankrupt Gentile states.

        In our hands is the greatest power of our day — gold. We shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all the evil we have had to commit has served to bringing everything into order.

        We shall contrive to prove that we are benefactors who have restored to the mangled earth the true good of the person, on the condition, of course, of strict observance of the laws established by us.”

        [Noahide laws, UN agenda 21, all these aristocratic wildlife and environment conservation charities, gala hangouts], how do you propose that it is a forgery by some clueless “nazi” skinhead as the Snopes asserts?
        When a document’s provenance cannot be doubted, they actively suppress it.

        Lots of good arguments for The Protocols authenticity to be found here, e.g.,

        A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the dated of its reception August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Sovietland was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner’s being shot on sight. The fact it in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols.

        or this

        There has been recently published a volume of Herzl’s “Diaries,” a translation of some passages of which appeared in the Jewish Chronicle of July 14, 1922. Herzl gives an account of his first visit to England in 1895 [note the year, about concurrent with discovery of the Protocols], and his conversation with Colonel Goldsmid, a Jew brought up as a Christian, an Officer in the English Army, and at heart a Jew Nationalist all the time.
        Goldsmid suggested to Herzl that the best way of expropriating the English Aristocracy and so destroying their power to protect the people of England against Jew domination, was to put excessive taxes on the land. Herzl thought this an excellent idea, and it is now to be found definitely embodied in Protocol VI!

        The above extract from Herzl’s Diary is an extremely significant bit of evidence bearing on the existence of the Jew World Plot and authenticity of the Protocols, but any reader of intelligence will be able from his own knowledge of recent history and from his own experience to confirm the genuineness of every line of them, and it is in the light of this living comment that all readers are invited to study Mr. Marsden’s translation of this terrible inhuman document.

        And here is another very significant circumstance. The present successor of Herzl as leader of the Zionist movement, Dr. Weizmann, quoted one of these sayings at the send-off banquet given to Chief Rabbi Hertz on October 6, 1920. The Chief Rabbi was on the point of leaving for his Empire tour a sort of Jewish answer to the Empire tour of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales.
        And this is the “saying” of the SAGES which Dr. Weizmann quoted: “A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world.” (Jewish Guardian, Cot. 8, 1920.)

        Now compare this with the last clause but one of Protocol XI, “God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, which appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.”

        The remarkable correspondence between these passages proves several things.
        · It proves that the Learned Elders exist. It proves that Dr. Weizmann knows all about them.
        · It proves that the desire for a “National Home” in Palestine is only camouflage and an infinitesimal part of the Jew’s real object.
        · It proves that the Jews of the world have no intentions of settling in Palestine or any separate country, and their annual prayer that they may all meet “Next Year in Jerusalem” is merely a piece of their characteristic make-believe.

        It also demonstrates that the Jews are now a world menace, and that the Aryan races will have to domicile them permanently out of Europe.

        Franklin, maybe the Rabinovich speech is a figment of someone’s imagination.
        maybe someone heard something in a fleeting conversation, a bit of knowledgeable gossip and decided to spin it into a factual narrative – garbled but ultimately truthful.

        But the worst reaction is to immediately kowtow to jew and beg his indulgence for every little discrepancy from the established fact.
        This is the right and honorable thing to do when dealing with honorable debating opponent but not with the kol nidrean Enemy of humankind whose very existence is rooted in the Devil’s Lie.
        The Enemy will use your very words of contrite apology every single time thereafter into perpetuity and make you eat a crow ever increasing in size, mouthful by mouthful, each time forcing you to acknowle “mea culpa, mea ultima culpa” for pointing out his crimes against humanity (jew cries out in pain even as he strikes you, don’t he)

        THE PROTOCOLS ARE TRUE, as true as it gets.

      5. moreover:

        The essence of the argument is that the fact that there are parallels between the Protocols and Joly’s book is not proof the Protocols are fake. That only proves that there is a connection between the two documents, nothing more and nothing less. Peter Myer’s argument is that both the Protocols and Joly’s writings may be based on a third ongoing document, which may be the genuine one.


        My argument, then, is that both the Protocols and Joly use a document like Q, unknown to us. This document would have circulated amongst leaders of some of the secret societies operating in Europe.

        Moreover, while the Jews claim it the Protocols are forgeries, they have not been able to prove who forged the Protocols. The Jews blame the Okhrana but they provide no evidence for this allegation.

        The Protocols also contain many indications that they could not have been forged by Russians.
        For instance, in one part, the Protocols say that

        [indeed, i (lobro)] asked this very question many times before in this forum and never received a sensible answer
        And this is only one example. There is plenty of evidence in the Protocols that is inconsistent with the theory that they were forged by the Okhrana.

        but of course, the “gd save the queen” haters of catholicism were prohibited from free, logical thought by the hidden masters for centuries, thus they have no problem grinding on about hitler-the-jew, hitler-the-male-prostitute, vatican-owns-the-world, jesuits-jews-illuminati, and so forth, what jew whispers, zombie shouts out loud.

      6. @Lobro


        [indeed, i (lobro)] asked this very question many times before in this forum

        The forgers of the Protocols wanted to impersonate Jews and Jews do consider the Catholic Church as their greatest enemy. If the Russian secret service was behind this forgery, they didn’t write it to settle accounts with the Catholic Church (and thus associate it with Jews), they did it to smear the Jews. Jewish hatred for the Catholic Church would make the document appear more convincing.

      7. franklin, by this argument, viz, the enemies of jews wish to smear them by creating documents, ie, forgeries, so true to jewish nature, their behavior and speech patterns that this exact correspondence proves their artifice.

        first you deny the authenticity because it contains wording foreign to jew usage for the rabinovich speech and after that you deny authenticity to the protocols because they are completely characteristic and true to the jew behaviors and modes of writing – thus it must be the work of anti-judaic agents.

        yeah right.

        does it not strike you as strange how intensely jews work against allowing the wider exposure of the goyim to the protocols?
        if they were just a crude forgery as they so incessantly bleat, why not just laugh it off?
        someone could rewrite the Protocols but assign its creators to negroes, how far would it travel?

        Wal-Mart ends anti-Semitic book sale
        No. 1 retailer agrees to take tract off online market after complaints from Jewish leaders.

        September 24, 2004: 8:46 AM EDT

        LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Bowing to a barrage of complaints from Jewish groups, retail leader Wal-Mart Inc. has stopped selling “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” an infamous anti-Semitic tract long exposed as fake.

        Jewish leaders had complained that the book, which PURPORTS to tell of an international Jewish conspiracy to take over the world, was being sold on with a description that suggested it might be genuine instead of a forgery concocted by the Czarist secret police in the early 20th Century.

        The description, now withdrawn from the Wal-Mart (WMT: Research, Estimates) Web site, said,

        If … The Protocols are genuine (which can never be proven conclusively), it might cause some of us to keep a wary eye on world affairs. We neither support nor deny its message. We simply make it available for those who wish a copy.”

        So what do we have here?
        sez Lord Reuters: ““The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” an infamous anti-Semitic tract LONG EXPOSED AS FAKE
        but, even though the whole world has supposedly been made aware of fakery since long ago, there is “barrage of complaints from Jewish groups”, ie, a widely concerted effort to knock the copies off Walmart shelves.
        Why, what’s the big deal? Are there no obvious fakes in wide circulation, old flicks of tarzan choking an elephant and stuff, 20,000 leagues under the sea, which would take the traveler half way to Mercury or something.

        Now you argue strenuously that it was concocted by Czarist police (early in the 20th century …).
        Got proof?
        using your ultra-convoluted argument i could claim that jews wrote the protocols just in order to make it look like a forgery by Russian secret police, which is officially accepted today, thus, jew swindle worked.

        And what about herzl’s writings?
        Read again,

        CLASSIFIED US INTELLIGENCE DOCUMENTS investigating international financial issues surrounding WW I were compiled in August 1919. These sensitive documents were given SECRET classification until 1973.

        A hard copy of this document may be obtained from US National Archives in Washington DC – its number is 245-1.

        On page 5 of the document, the PUBLIC writings of Theodore Herzl, hailed as the father of world political Zionism, are cited as having “IDENTITY OF THOUGHT FOUND IN THE PROTOCOLS.”

        what’s the exit now, Franklin, are the documents in the US National Archives also fakes?
        Or Herzl was greatly influenced by the tricks of the Czarist secret police, so much that in a comical reverse, jews religiously followed the Protocols, mistakenly believing them to be true … so fake that they are true.

      8. here is the paper in its entirety, Franklin, have a look at the “forgery”, U.S. War Department investigation and evaluation of issues generated by Jewish power.
        … compiled in August 1919 and given SECRET classification until 1973

        lots of good stuff there, in the Congressional hearings, YUGE … BIGGLY 🙂

        almost right off the bat:

        Dr. George A. Simons testifying before the Senate Committee said (Pages 135, 136 and 137 of the Record):

        Senator King: Tell us about the book. What is bad about it ? Is it anti-Christian ?

        Mr. Simons: It is anti-Christian and it shows what this secret Jewish society has been doing in order to make a conquest of the world, and to make the Christian forces as ineffective as possible, and finally to have the whole world, if you please, in their grip; and now in that book ever so many things are said with regard to their program and their methods, which DOVETAIL INTO THE BOLSHEVIK REGIME. It just looks as if that connected in some way.

        Now, I have no animus against the Jews, but I have a great passion for truth: If there is anything in it I think we ought to know. The man who wrote it is considered a truth-loving man, a man held in the highest esteem by the authorities of the Russian Orthodox Church. ******

        the author (translator) in question, who published in in 1905 in Russian, was prof. Sergei Nilus.
        Once again, consider the chronology:
        · the purported forgery published in 1905, in Czarist Russia,
        · its program is followed to the letter by Bolshevik Jews after 1917.

        please explain the principles of time travel to the low-IQ yours truly, Franklin.

      9. @Lobro

        Jews are against the spreading of certain ideas if they deem them harmful to themselves, not necessarily because they believe that they are true. Fantasies can be as dangerous as facts to them.

        Thus Jews are not only against the spreading of the Protocols, but also of Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice, Charles Dickens Oliver Twist or even Wagner’s operas, but that does not mean they really believe Shylock, Fagin or Siegfried are real historical figures.

        The meeting of the “Elders of Zion” of the Protocols is believed to have been modeled on the Zionist congresses. Small wonder the forgers took some material from Theodore Hertzl. Not Hertzl quoted from the Protocols, but the forgers of the Protocols quoted from Hertzl.

        What pertains to one forgery does not necessarily pertain to others. Some forgery may be masterful, another may contain blunders. Different authors, different creations.

      10. what’s more, in my list of staunch resisters to Pax Judaica, i forgot to mention Joe Stalin, here is a reprint of te 1939 Kollontai interview

        The brief part that struck me quite vividly

        At this moment I butted in; I wanted to speak about Stalin’s role in history, but I could just say: ‘Your name will be inscribed…’ that Stalin raised his hand and stopped me and I stopped. Stalin continued:

        ‘Many matters of our party and people will be distorted and abused, above all in foreign countries and, yes, even in our country too.
        Zionism, in a tearing hurry for world supremacy, will be harsh on us, be vengeful on account of our successes and achievements.

        They still consider Russia as a barbarous country, as a raw material adjunct. And my name will also be slandered; it is being slandered even now. To me they shall attribute many a crime.

        International Zionism shall by all means attempt to destroy our union, so that Russia could never rise again. The strength of the USSR lies in the friendship of the peoples.

        The sharp edge of the struggles will be directed, first of all, towards the destruction of this friendship, to the severance of the periphery from Russia.

        How sharp was that dude, (((widely reviled))) as just a brute peasant bent on wanton butchery!
        Indeed, had he not jumped into the breach of the power vacuum after Lenin’s death, today we’d be living fully in the WHEN ISRAEL IS MIGHTY world (do yourself a favor and watch Gurvitz interview until this truth sinks in, instead of flapping on about how Rothschilds just want to set OBOR rates and Jews are fully satisfied with their present day level of Complete Control).

        If there is one overwhelming activity today that an extraterrestrial would want to know, it is
        Judea’s war on Russia.

        And if it doesn’t happen on Trump’s watch, you can all rattle and prattle about how he is “controlled by jews” and it is all a bunch of easily disproved nonsense – the proof is in NO WAR.
        Just as if Joe Kennedy had had it his way, America would not have entered WW2, certainly not on the side of JUnited Kingdom.
        Was joe Kennedy owned by jew?

      11. ‘The only difference between reality and fiction is that fiction needs to be credible.’
        —Mark Twain

      12. how many ways do you want it, Franklin?

        Small wonder the forgers took some material from Theodore Hertzl. Not Hertzl quoted from the Protocols, but the forgers of the Protocols quoted from Hertzl

        Theodor Herzl (1860‑1904)

        Now the majority of accusers claim that The Protocols were lifted from Maurice Joly’s 1864 (see the year, Franklin? when herzl was 4 years old) Dialogue in hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu” (“Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu”) shortly after the establishment of the Alliance Israélite Universelle.

        How do you square this with your claim, franklin?
        besides, after dismissing the authenticity of the protocols due to lack of solid proof, you advance theories and explanations which have absolutely no basis in known fact, ie, the protocols followed herzl.
        Now, if you know anything about Theodore Herzl, he claimed that it was the notorious Dreyfuss case in France (1894-1906 – please pay attention to timeline, Franklin) that made Herzl a sworn Zionist

        It is said that the Dreyfus case ” made a Jew of Herzl.” He did not know Hebrew, and had never been taught the fanatical books of the Talmud, such as the Shukhan Aruk and the Abodah Zarah. He was opposed to violent methods, and in one of his novels, Altneuland, has left a picture of a civilized Jewish state, patterned on those of Western Europe.

        This wonderful work of a truly brilliant woman, Mrs. Leslie Fry [Pen name for Paquita Louise de Shishmareff], born a Jewess who converted to Christianity I heartily recommend to anyone interested in some of the big developments a hundred years ago, including the foundation of Zionism and the ideological platform for the Protocols.

        She identifies ASHER GINZBERG as the author and this strikes me as the most likely to be the truth of it.

        He now broke with the Friends of Zion, and with him went a group of young men who had come to share his advanced views. These men he formed (1889) into a secret organization called the Sons of Moses. It met in his house in Yamskaya Street, Odessa, and numbered among its first members, Ben Avigdor, Zalman Epstein, Louis Epstein, and Jacob Eisenstaat. It was to this small group that Ginzberg read what is to-day known as ” the protocols “, in which the national aim is set forth in such direct, forceful language, – in strange contrast to the confused, pedantic style of the Talmud.

        The opening words give the tone of the whole.

        ” Let us put aside phraseology and discuss the inner meaning of every thought: by comparison and deduction let us illuminate the situation. In this way I will describe our system, both from our own point of view and that of the goyim.

        ” It must be remembered that people with base instincts are more numerous (…) than those with noble ones; therefore, the best results in governing are achieved through violence and intimidation, and not through academic discussion. Every man seeks power; every one would like to become a dictator if he possibly could; and rare indeed are those who would not sacrifice the common good in order to attain personal advantage.”

        The argument is then developed with conciseness and lucidity: all objections are anticipated and met in a few terse phrases. No rhetorical effect is sought; expression is natural and vivid: e.g. of the mob at the time of a revolution, the author says:

        ” These beasts fall asleep when they have drunk enough blood; it is then easy to shackle them.”

        The Protocols are sometimes criticized as containing nothing that had not been said previously by philosophers or statesmen; but even if that were true, it would detract little from their interest. For their importance does not lie in the aim, world domination, nor in the theory by which it is attained, exploitation of man’s baser instincts, but in the extraordinary astuteness with which the practical application of the plan has been suited to existing conditions.

        The very fact that the language is forceful and incisive, that all the allusions are striking, and the thesis so to speak irrefutable, is to some an obstacle to belief: nor is this surprising.

        For the past century the Jews have been making rapid progress in the theory and practice of politics, while the rest of the world thought them merely emerging from the ghetto; and, as it cannot understand the intricate new machinery of government they have devised and set up, it says, ” Such a thing is impossible.” Yet, like a great engine of war, the organization of the Kahal advances on the course determined, crashing all resistance.

        That course is succinctly stated in the twenty-four protocols of Ginzberg: they are an epitome of Jewish thought from Rabbi Akiba and Maimonides down to Marx and Engels. At the same time the reader is reminded constantly of some familiar event of recent years which bears out the thesis. For example the passage:

        ” To show that all the gentile governments of Europe are enslaved by us, we will manifest our power by subjecting one of them to a reign of terror, violence and crime.”

        Can anyone, recalling the Russian revolution of 1918, read this, knowing it was written before 1897, and not be impressed by the correspondence between the prophecy and its fulfilment two decades later?

        But Ginzberg was no visionary: he knew of what he wrote, and the course of the revolutionary movement already on foot in Russia had been too carefully calculated to leave any doubt as to its eventual success.


    5. @ Lobro

      Good post.

      “So what happened, we are in 2017, 55 years behind the Armageddon schedule, no big war despite the frantic yelping of jews desperate to cross the messianic finish line.”

      Pointing out the obvious shouldn’t be required, but jewish programing is effective.

      To summarize your post in a simplistic fashion, the jews and their stooges are plagued by Murphy’s Law just like the good guys. Murphy’s Law is equal opportunity oops. 🙂

      1. I disagree, the jews are continuing with their destructive plan, more poverty even for the ones who have jobs, more multi-culturism, censureship all over, an ashkenazi jew Drumpf as a president, fake-wars against ‘ terrorism’ etc.

  11. An analysis of what the neocon in “neocon generals: means:

    For all their talk about “anti-Communism,” the real engine driving neocon Cold Warrior instincts was punishing the hated Russian goyim for the sin of “anti-Semitism,” not any opposition to residual or latent Marxism. As further evidence that this is the case, one need only consider the fact that while the Old Right championed Christian dissidents such as Solzhenitsyn, to the neocons the only legitimate “dissidents” were Zionists like Natan Sharansky, just as the only “refugees” championed by the neos were invariably Jewish (including today’s shady Odessa Mafiosi). Solzhenitsyn represented the Russian nationalism and Orthodox Church that made so many of the neocons’ predecessors embrace Bolshevism, thus Solzhenitsyn and the plight of Christian dissidents were relegated to obscurity in neocon publications, while Zionist noise-makers in the USSR were given a hero’s welcome.

  12. I’d like to see Bashar al-Assad publicly confront the “U.S. government”, e.g., at the UN, and say something like:

    “U.S. president Donald Trump has called me an ‘animal’, and the U.S. government has demanded that I step down from power in Syria.

    But by his actions since being inaugurated as president of the U.S., Donald Trump has shown the world that he is a liar and a mass murderer, much lower than any animal. And this is not surprising, as the government that he presides over is nothing more than an illegitimate criminal enterprise which happens to be the greatest purveyor of violence, terror and chaos that the world has ever seen.

    During his campaign, Donald Trump discussed conducting an investigation into the events of 09/11/2001, but just like all his other disingenuous campaign rhetoric, he apparently has no intention of actually doing so.

    I’d like to make an offer to Donald Trump and the U.S. government.

    Let’s commission an independent international investigation into the “terrorist attack” of 09/11/2001. And if the investigation shows that the terrorist attack and related events happened substantially as the U.S. government has claimed, I will voluntarily step down from power.

    On the other hand, if the investigation does not support the U.S. government’s narrative, in any significant aspect, or if it shows U.S. government complicity, the U.S. government will withdraw its troops from the Mideast and from Afghanistan and will hand over any person within its jurisdiction implicated by the investigation, for prosecution by an international tribunal.”

    I know that nothing like this will ever happen, as most foreign leaders just don’t have the guts to do it. Hugo Chavez might have had the guts, but unfortunately he’s no longer with us. Anyway, it’s nice to dream once in a while…

    1. Hugo Chavez was in all probability killed by the CIA, which has the capability to cause cancer in people without being noticed. The same could happen to Bashar al-Assad.

      What could be done however is an international conference on 9/11 in Iran, in which experts from all over the world would speak. However, the (Jewish owned) Western media would treat such a conference the same way they did to the conference on the Holocaust in that country.

      9/11 will go the same way as JFK. More and more people will doubt the official explanation, but it will stay the official explanation.

  13. What doesn’t make President Donald Trump the first Jewish president is that it’s possible to criticize him without being called an anti-semite. It wasn’t possible to criticize Barack Obama without being called a racist. Anyone who criticized Hillary Clinton was a misogynist. So, Donald Trump is not a Jewish president otherwise he would be off limits. I think the truth is probably that Donald Trump is weaker and more vulnerable than he seemed to be during the campaign. It’s disheartening that Steve Banning has been shoved aside to make room for “never Trumpers and Goldman Sacks operatives. Probably the deep state gave Trump some kind of ultimatum like ‘we’ll crash the economy if you don’t give up on your Trump agenda.

    But… Trump did manage to turn around the Globalist agenda of disarming the American people. The Second amendment is safer under Trump. Trump has opened up the Global Warming hoax as a topic of debate. The U.S. is no longer dumping billions into the pockets of globalists to combat global warming. The border is at least raised as an issue, and it should be. Los Angles is lost to the border…the city has literally turned into a weed patch, not that this is entirely bad, but it does indicate an extreme level of decline. So… we’ll have to wait and see if there are more cracks in the globalist agenda to come. Clearly, foreign policy is lost for the time being, at least. I’m not surprised.

    Jewish president? Naught… Deep State not going to give up easily…YES.. we’ll all have to be vigilant and active because now we know how evil they really are. George Wells, who is Jewish, has opened up a whole new branch of enquiry by researching the possibility that the “deep state” is using the national security apparatus to protect ratlines of drugs, slaves, body parts–unreal evil activity.

  14. @Pat
    Remember the “YUGE” Pharisee-Jew Banker was quoted: “When I control currency…… I care not who makes laws..”

    I am with you almost 100% however, I wanted to point out the game is now gone past the above statement. They have been in control of money and resources for quite some time now and the present aim IS TO MAKE THE LAWS. You, yourself have been foremost in educating us here about the NOAHIDE laws and I have befitted much from it. It actually goes much deeper, which you know…implementation of Agenda 21 through legal arms etc. They are putting in place ‘micro’ laws that forces us to vaccinate our babies. If you can’t prove you’ve been vaccinated then you can’t get into schools and it goes on and on in every sphere of our lives. My aim was to point out the creation of organizations from which the laws of complete control emanate.
    Jefferson’s definition of liberty comes to mind: “Liberty is the unobstructed action of a man so long ……I specifically say not mandated by the law for the law is often the tool of tyrannical regimes.” Precisely! And I agree, total control of money is the central pillar.

    1. Seeb –


      I agree. Good shot. Your points are valid. We are on parallel paths. That’s about as good as same path. In reality…. no one is ever on my path with me. We are all different in minds.

      To me…”caring not who makes laws” is not claiming laws are not important…. it just means he can buy the law-makers. ‘Big-ass bags’ full of lobby $$$$ and cuties and wine…!! 🙂

      But… there has to be chaos… wars… for the maximum control. Order – CONTROL – with chaos.

      Peace offers the least amount of control. Peace is NOT the goal of politicians.

      Thanks for replying so kindly.

  15. Patrick Buchanan, the greatest twetieth century president we never had.

    His comment that “The US Congress is Israeli-occupied territory” was beautiful, and was and still is the truth.

    1. The US controls the World. We Jews, control the US! (deduced from comments by Golda Meir, herself!)
      We are entering the “Lex Hebraica”. Donald is just one more soldier in this persuit!
      One has to admit and give reference to the Guys! Brilliant and top obstinate. It seems you are on control!
      BUT! There is one big mistake. Not all of Jews are Zionist, not all German Nazi`s, not all American
      Idiots, not all Catholics, Jesuits, not all Russian Putin, not all French, Le Pen and not all Turks, Erdogan!
      Any dictator-ship has a tremendous and fatal problem. Everything for the own Crowd, nothing for the Others!
      The “Old Men” in charge can be caught by their success. Caution! Heading the real problems, we do have on Earth, we would need all spiritual/inventive creativity. The Creative Imperative, also the one of the enemies!
      The running of “The Perpetuum Mobile” of currency control (Petrodollar/FIAT Money) is a success story, as everybody, “happily”, joined the matrix. Open hands begging toward the top and kick (their ass) downwards.
      The higher they get, salary is swapped for silence, in cash of course!
      This game, now, as the Money System is at its “regular” end/cycle is exchanged to Dictatorship Orwell 2.0, again with the “collaboration” of all the sheep (facebook/google/youtube/etc.!) ! Why!?
      War, as usual, is to much of a risk (social riots, civil war, loss of control). The highly complication of the clock-work (globalisation) needs its tribute.
      Now, we do control them virtually, with there own collaboration (smile!) They do not even realise. No cash, no gold. No safe-heaven, no opposition! Perfect plan. (chip, chip, chip is hip !)
      Trump is part of that matrix. Hillary did “fall”, because Socialists, we do not need them for the time being. We induced them to “deficit spending” eversince, like the hillariously dum Communists.
      “Universe and stupidity of Mankind are endless! Regarding the Universe, I am not so sure!” (+/- Einstein)

Comments are closed.