The Three Superpowers Shape Up For War

These three extracts come from three separate articles, all recent, with source links provided at the end of each extract. A 7-minute video follows. 

“I don’t think anyone would survive such a conflict.”
— Vladimir Putin

The latest in a long series of bloody terrorist attacks attributed to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) unfolded in Iran early Wednesday with coordinated armed assaults on the Iranian Parliament (Majlis) and the mausoleum of the late supreme leader of the Islamic Republic, Imam Khomeini. At least 12 people were killed and 43 wounded.

The reactions of the US government and the Western media to the attacks in Tehran stand in stark contrast to their response to the May 22 bombing that killed 22 people at the Manchester Arena and the London Bridge attacks that claimed nine lives last Saturday.

The Trump White House released a vicious statement that effectively justified the killings in Iran, declaring, “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote,” an attitude that found its reflection in the relative indifference of the media to the loss of Iranian lives.

It is clearly understood that terrorism against Iran serves definite political aims that are in sync with those of US imperialism and its regional allies.

For its part, Tehran’s reaction to the attacks was unambiguous. It laid the responsibility at the door of the US and its principal regional ally, Saudi Arabia. The attack was understood in Tehran as a political act carried out in conjunction with identifiable state actors and aimed at furthering definite geostrategic objectives.

The same can be said of the earlier acts of terrorism carried out in Manchester and London, as well as those in Paris, Brussels and elsewhere before them.

Underlying the violence on the streets of Europe is the far greater violence inflicted upon the Middle East by US, British and French imperialism.

ISIS is itself the direct product of a series of imperialist wars.

The latest round of terror has its source in growing dissatisfaction among Washington’s Middle Eastern allies and its Islamist proxy forces over the slow pace of the US intervention in Syria and Washington’s failure to bring the six-year war for regime change to a victorious conclusion.

The people giving the orders for these attacks live in upper-class neighborhoods in London, Paris and elsewhere, enjoying close connections with intelligence agencies and government officials. Those who carry out the terrorist atrocities are expendable assets, foot soldiers who are easily replaced from among the broad layers enraged by the slaughter carried out by the United States and its Nato allies in the Middle East.

What has become clear after 16 years of the so-called “war on terrorism”—going all the way back to the hijackers of 9/11—is that these elements move in and out of the Middle East, Europe and the US itself not only without hindrance, but under what amounts to state protection. When they arrive at passport control, their names come up with definite instructions that they are not to be stopped. “Welcome home, sir! Enjoy your vacation in Libya?”

Why have they enjoyed this carte blanche? Because they are auxiliaries of US and European intelligence, necessary proxies in wars for regime change from Libya to Syria and beyond that are being waged to further (((imperialist interests))).

If from time to time these elements turn against their sponsors, with innocent civilians paying with their lives, that is part of the price of doing business.

Innocent men, women and children, whether in London, Manchester, Paris, Tehran, Baghdad or Kabul, are paying the terrible price for these (((imperialist operations))), which leave a trail of blood and destruction everywhere.

Source


All the signs of a looming war on the Korean Peninsula are surfacing. We’re watching as each country moves strategic pieces into place. But unlike past world wars, although there will be ground troops,  the battle is likely to be fierce, brutal and quick. It will also be globally devastating.

With the three super powers drawn into the mix — the US, Russia and China — other nations will be coerced into choosing sides.

Ordinary citizens will be the last to know what is about to happen.

As previously noted, both China and Russia are mobilizing troops to the North Korean border, and the United States now has a Naval strike group directly off the coast of the rogue state. Confrontation appears to be imminent.

In the United States, retailers report that the sale of gas masks and anti-radiation pills has spiked in recent weeks amid fears of impending global disaster. Elite billionaires are building bunkers and making long term plans to survive the coming catastrophe.

Meanwhile, various governments around the world are carefully positioning their pieces on the grand chessboard.

North Korea has responded to President Trump’s deployment of an aircraft carrier, surveillance drones and missile tests by saying that IF EVEN A SINGLE BULLET IS FIRED IT WILL NUKE THE UNITED STATES.

All signs point to serious trouble in the very near future. The world sits on the brink of a war unlike anything mankind has ever witnessed.

Source

With tensions among the world’s super powers mounting in places like Ukraine, Syria, North Korea and  most recently Qatar and Iran, it may only be a matter of time before someone pushes the red button.

When they do, all bets are off, and as we’ve learned from the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in June of 1914, once the trigger is pulled there’s no going back.

We are, in fact, at war right now.

Action has already been taken by both sides.

Putin and the Russian people believe the America’s actions are going to lead to a nuclear conflict initiated by America.

The leadership of the US is made up of politicians who began their careers as (((Marxist-Socialists))).  Traitors now have their fingers on the triggers of nuclear warheads. (((These dope-smoking Marxists of dubious citizenship))) will have no qualms in destroying our country.

Instead of statesmen and diplomats, we now have self-interested, politically-motivated belligerents backing Russia and other nations into corners and pushing them toward war.

How long the war of words will continue is unknown.

However, when the missiles begin to fly you can be sure of one thing: the men who gave the orders to unleash Armageddon will be safely ensconced in their bunkers or in other hideouts out of harm’s way.

Vladimir Putin has recently made it clear how all this will play out:

The Putin Interviews, between the Russian leader and Oscar-winning director Oliver Stone, which will be screened on Showtime, were shot between summer 2015 and February this year. They give an extraordinary insight into one of the most powerful men in the world.

Stone asked Putin whether the US would be “dominant” in the event of a hot war between the two nuclear powers.

“I don’t think anyone would survive such a conflict,” Putin said.

NO  ONE  WILL  SURVIVE

Source

VIDEO : 6.46 mins

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

148 thoughts on “The Three Superpowers Shape Up For War

    1. FR –

      “There will be no WW III”

      Correct. They are doing just fine without that “YUGE” WAR.

      The military support and supply INDUSTRIES… globally, are making greater profits with the controlled ‘wars’ in play at present. Large scale devastating wars in the major countries would stop the manufacturing and the supply chains. Russia needs $$$$ too “BIGGLY” for that plan to help them.

      The news media would suffer if the WAR occurred on that scale. There would also be fewer to watch TV and search internet for porn sites.

      EMP is no issue either. It is a myth….. provided to promote hysteria:

      https://youtu.be/ohqKmAz_aeM?t=1550

    2. @ Franklin Ryckaert

      There will be no WW III

      You are not a prophet. Nor do you prove your point by citing Sputnik News and rense.com as your authorities. You are ever ready to reject “the argument from authority” when it suits you, as you have done several times in the past when someone else quotes a source to prove their point. And yet, here you do it yourself! 🙂

      1. @ Pat

        FR – “There will be no WW III”

        Correct. They are doing just fine without that “YUGE” WAR.

        No, he is NOT necessarily correct! Nor are you. He is using the invalid “argument from authority” to prove his point, whereas you are just GUESSING — something you tell other people not to do!

        Why is “guessing” only wrong when other people do it?
        and why is it right when you do it? Any idea. 🙂

      2. Bradley –

        If the type of warfare you fear actually took place, you wouldn’t be able to broadcast your doom and gloom via Internet all over the world… What fun would THAT be???!! 🙁

      3. @ Pat

        In any case, your argument is logically weak. Extremely weak. It’s based on the stupid idea that war is bad for arms sales and that the important thing is to stir up constant fear of war in order to boost arms sales.

        A stupid idea for three reasons: (1) If there’s never an actual war, then peace is perpetual. So why stock up on arms if peace is perpetual? (2) War is necessary in order to remind people that they need to stock up on arms in order to survive. (3) There has never been a period without war, serious war. The idea that nukes make serious wars impossible is not an an argument YOU can use, since you are one of these conspiracy kooks who don’t believe in the existence of nuclear weapons.

      4. Bradley –

        Thanks for the attention. I like it..!! 🙂

        You wrote:
        “Why is “guessing” only wrong when other people do it?
        and why is it right when you do it? Any idea”

        I have never told people they are wrong for guessing…. I have never written it here either.. and I have included myself as a guesser…. numerous times.

        I have even taken criticism over the years here when I claimed – wrote – that one person’s guesses are as good as another’s guesses.

        “I can’t please everyone…. so… I’ll please myself” Like Ricky. 🙂

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT6bgyimP8g

    3. @ FR

      There are several flashpoints where WW3 could start, and the Korean Peninsula is merely one of them, right?
      I don’t see how you can construe the beast’s withdrawal of two aircraft carriers from the Sea of Japan as an indication that WW3 will not happen. It may just mean that the beast has decided to concentrate on the pursuit of its Satanic agenda in the Mideast (i.e. it will start WW3 there) and doesn’t want to spread its forces too thin.

      1. Then why move those carriers to NK in the first place ? Withdrawal means loss of face. At least this means they are not totally mad.

      2. “Then why move those carriers to NK in the first place ?”

        When you have an unlimited supply of money, cannon fodder, etc., and you’re a new “president” on a power head trip, why not?

        Or perhaps as part of a ploy to cause Kim Jong Un to issue threats and do even more missile testing, thereby demonstrating to South Korea (and especially the new South Korean president) the “need” for the THAAD missile system.

        “Withdrawal means loss of face.”

        To you it may seem so, but to our calculating masters, they may have made their point to South Korea.

        “At least this means they are not totally mad.”

        It means that in addition to their demon-possession, they are also calculating, just like the Green River killer.

      3. @Harold,
        I seriously doubt if nuclear war will start in the Middle East because Israel is there. Any fallout would come their way even if they are not hit.

      4. I seriously doubt if nuclear war would start in the Middle East because Israel is there. Even if it is not hit directly the fallout would be devastating.

      5. @ Folly,

        “I seriously doubt if nuclear war will start in the Middle East because Israel is there. Any fallout would come their way even if they are not hit.”

        My concern is that the U.S. government may start a war, then begin to lose, and then resort to tactical nukes. Things have a way of escalating out of control, IMO.

    4. No WW3?…hell there shouldn’t have been a WW2. But the same power block with different actors, decided Germany and its economic miracle had to be destroyed. They did so primarily by ignoring and mocking Hitler’s numerous peace proposals while offering none back. Kind of like what’s going on between American belligerence now versus Putin’s common sense diplomacy. Don’t put any money down on no WW3!!!

      1. Steve –

        There was no Facebook in WWII…

        There are more people with cell phones than have indoor plumbing and toilets globally.

        They got us now..!! 🙂

  1. “Limited war” is the order of the day. There will always be some “limited war”, merely as a by-product of keeping an active and effective military establishment. On the other hand, “total war” has no resultant positive outcome – for either side involved. Unless there are ‘leaders’ who enjoy the prospect of an endless nightmare, there will be no such conflagration. “Total war” would result in complete power-outages for entire civilizations. (There could then be no televised broadcasts of sensational interests! 🙂 )

  2. Bradley –

    I apologize for trying to make fun of your fear. It is a comfort for many of us to trust that others are more prone to sanity than insanity. (Hopefully, it will always be so!)
    All of us naturally seek solutions to things which present themselves as problems. Sometimes the easiest “solution” is to convince oneself there is no “problem”… I cannot know for sure if people who believe there is no nuclear war threat are totally correct – but I DO believe it is a GOOD GUESS (and puts me more at ease!). 🙂

    1. “When a dog bites a man, that is not news; when a man bites a dog, that is news.” — Anon

      Similarly, who wants to read a boring article saying that nothing is going to happen? that the status quo is going to continue ad infinitum?

      Have you guys ever read a blockbuster novel in which nothing exciting ever happens?

      One thing is certain. If Paul Craig Roberts is a popular writer,
      it’s precisely because he knows how to to write sensational articles predicting imminent disaster and doom. Lasha Darkmoon does exactly the same thing. Writers write things in order to get read,
      not in order to induce yawns and put everyone to sleep.

      Better “fear porn” than yawn porn.

      1. Yes, but how do know it’s true? Does a thing have to be boring and yawn-inducing in order to be true? Isn’t history full of sensational events?

        In any case, how can you say an article predicting WWIII is “false”? If it hasn’t happened yet, surely it’s neither false nor true?

        It’s an hypothesis that needs to be tested — and only future events can do that.

      2. The article we are discussing was written by three different writers who all say pretty much the same thing: that things are hotting up and that a major conflagration seems imminent. Putin confirms that things look very serious. That it’s a powder keg.

        Articles like this have a right to exist.

        Scoffing at them serves no purpose.

      3. Sard –

        Right on..!! That’s why I post my ‘powder keg’ guesses..!!

        I do what Darkmoon does… elicit EXCITING arguments..!! 🙂

      4. Well done, Pat!

        The only thing I’ve got against you and Franklin is that your comments are too darn sensational.

        I’m jealous cos I can’t keep up with you! 🙂

      5. @ Sardonicus

        Better “fear porn” than yawn porn

        I object to this comment on principle. It is not only obscurantist and ontologically untenable, it is far to clever for its own good. The person who wrote this comment is trying to confuse everyone.

      6. Others commenters here that we need to be on our guard against are Pat, Franklin Ryckaert, and Flopot. Their posts are consistently off-topic, alarming, and needlessly subversive. They bring this website into serious disrepute.

        Mind you, the name “Lasha Darkmoon” is not quite right. Something suspicious about that name. Anyone who chooses a name like this is asking for trouble.

        I hope this comment will be allowed by the moderator. It is not meant to be hostile, just helpful. I would prefer it if Lasha Darkmoon were to change her name to something a bit more sober and respectable.

      7. Mary –

        “Others commenters here that we need to be on our guard against are Pat, Franklin Ryckaert, and Flopot.”

        At least you ARE “BIGGLY” ‘on topic’ with this one???…. about the 3 super-powers: Sard, Frank and Flo..!!

        BUT.. Pat, not so much..!! Pat smiles too much to be a “YUGE” danger.. and Pat has NO NUKES…!! Just a worn-out Rickson Gracie trained MMA instructor.. 🙂

      8. Gordon Bennett! I’ve been labelled a subversive. I am a disturber of the peace. Apologies.

        Mary, allow me to sum up my drivel in a neat check-list:

        1. Are we heading to war? Yes, another bankster planned conflagration that I think will be of a regional nature, not a World War.

        2. Will it be a nuclear exchange? I am slowly becoming a nuke skeptic – the Zionists would’ve used ’em years ago, e.g FALSE FLAGS GALORE.

        3. Can I use slieght* in a sentence? Can I even spell sleight with confidence? Most definitely not.

        *typo humour is a type o’ humour.

      9. Sardonicus: “One thing is certain. If Paul Craig Roberts is a popular writer,
        it’s precisely because he knows how to to write sensational articles predicting imminent disaster and doom. Lasha Darkmoon does exactly the same thing. Writers write things in order to get read,
        not in order to induce yawns and put everyone to sleep.

        Better “fear porn” than yawn porn.”

        With all due respect to my dear Sardonicus, I’m going to disagree with you.

        The idea that Nukes do not exist and therefore there will never be a Thermonuclear WW3 is much more controversial and provocative than predicting a Thermonuclear WW3 that never happens.

        I have read at least 6 articles at Darkmoon in the past 2 years predicting a Thermonuclear WW3.

        Ever hear of the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf Too Many Times? Nobody believes you after the first fake cry/false flag.

        Of course, I still love Lasha no matter how many times she publishes Cry Wolf and End Times stories. 🙂

  3. Bradley –

    You wrote:
    “Good for the sale of scalping knives, eh Pat?”

    Sure..!!! You are onto something. Mystery close to being solved..!!

    I like your guess..!! 🙂

  4. I thought it was the Indians who specialized in scalping. The various tribes practiced on each other a lot and when the Europeans arrived in Amurrika, why, just so many more heads for the native tribes to deal with.

    I found this statement, right or wrong, on straightdope.com:

    “Explorers described Indians scalping each other in Mexico (1520), Canada (1535), Florida (1563), and elsewhere. In 1540 Simón Rodriguez, of Hernando de Soto’s party, may have become the first white man scalped by Indians.”

    In any case, I am not sure that a war to clear the air once in a while can be any worse than being in a constant state of tension.

    Maybe planet Earth is under some kind of curse.

    1. Wyandotte,
      I dont know where you got your información. The British started the tradición of scalping. They would divide and conquer…playing tribe against tribe. They would hire allied indians to kill enemy tribes. They had no way to compensate their allies without evidense. A corpse couldnt be carried on horseback hundreds of miles away to the nearest British fort before decomposition so simplemente a scalp would suffice. Thats how it worked.

    2. @ Donaldo Colina

      Thanks for keeping the record almost completely straight. You left off the ((( ))) around they. 🙂

      In addition, the jews used their rum monopoly to “inspire” the indians to do battle against one another. It was easier to get drunk indians to fight.

  5. The Trump White House released a vicious statement that effectively justified the killings in Iran, declaring, “We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote,” an attitude that found its reflection in the relative indifference of the media to the loss of Iranian lives.

    Accumulated insults can also start wars — from public insults to attacking someone’s allies: these erode respect for oneself and in the eyes of the world. If you’re not careful, you ultimately convince yourself that a response is necessary. This is why Sparta went to war with Athens: it had less to do with a nebulous “fear of growing Athenian power” than a growing exasperation with constant Athenian sleights. Hopefully the Iranians are as careful as Putin and will not take the bait.

    Human psychology has not changed in over 2400 years — if you peel away Thucydides’ layer of “realpolitik”, his work shows that respect and revenge start wars. Culture matters. This is what his fans in the (((neoconservative))) branch see in his great work, “The Peloponnesian War”. However, they cynically ignore its intended purpose as a warning on how to avoid wars: instead they use it as a primer on how to start wars. The cherry on the cake is that Thucydides unintentionally provided them with the propaganda on how to hide such conflict-engineering, i.e. by convincing the world that war is an inevitability of power.

    Yes, I’m already seeing 1000 holes in my observations but those were my thoughts this afternoon so I’ll post and be damned.

    Incidentally, this adds to the notion that Trump is indeed a Zionist puppet/war monger. His needless insults against Iran, and his attempts to impose a “Megarian Decree” on Qatar, all smack of the intention to push Iran into doing something rash. My internal gauge is fast approaching a final judgement on Trump.

    1. Apologies for the grammar but I was experimenting with colons and dashes 😛

      Btw I agree with the posters here that the objective is a LIMITED WAR, not a nuclear conflict. My only observation on the nuclear-bomb conspiracy theory is that the fake Al-Qaeda/ISIS/Al-Nusra terrorists (in reality Zionist mercenaries, dupes and proxies) would have set off a nuke a long, long time ago. The ultimate false flag.

      In fact there would have been nukes flying all over the Middle East decades ago.

      1. @ Flopot

        But what happens if the beast’s forces start losing the “limited war” that they start? Also, I believe Russia has already warned that they will use nukes if their forces are threatened.

      2. @Harold

        They firebomb a city, seed it with radioactive material and then claim twas a nuclear explosion? When Israelis are testing the effects of “dirty bombs” in the Negev [FACT], you know it is not for the good of humanity.

        The idea of nuclear weapons being a hoax never ever occurred to me until I reflected on the certainty that the Zionists would’ve used ’em a long, long time ago. So no nuclear false flags is kind of a “QED” moment for me.

        Oops! I’m being subversive again. Sorry Mary, I’m quite contrary.

      1. Oh dear, Grammar Fiend unmasked as a fraud! 🙂

        I will never live this down.

        Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa . . .

      2. Ah yes, you’re right — tis slights. Thank you. Recall my post is about deliberate snubs, in this case the record of disrespect shown to Sparta by Athens (at least according to the Spartan cultural ledger of wrongs).

        I might have engaged in a “silence of sleight” by not revealing my ignorance, thus preventing the inevitable projection of Herr Gadfly back to his lofty height 😛

        PS I am uncertain how to use “sleight” in a sentence. Apparently it is a noun but that does not help me in the slightest. I am aware of the phrase “sleight of hand” and have used it in the past, but that comes naturally because English is my native tongue. But to consciously use “sleight” feels very strange and I have no “ear” for it.

      3. @ Flopot

        Ah yes, you’re right — tis slights. Thank you. Recall my post is about deliberate snubs, in this case the record of disrespect shown to Sparta by Athens (at least according to the Spartan cultural ledger of wrongs).

        If you were referring to a deliberate snub or humiliation, as I thought you were, then SLIGHT is the correct term, not SLEIGHT as Franklin Ryckaert suggested.

        So I need not have confessed to being wrong. No need for a
        mea culpa! 🙂

      4. The Gadfly is once again perched upon his panopticon of correction. My God, what have I done?!?

        Seriously though, thanks for keeping us en pointe 😉

      5. @ Flopot

        I am uncertain how to use “sleight” in a sentence. Apparently it is a noun but that does not help me in the slightest.

        As a former publishing editor, let me explain. When in doubt, always use SLIGHT. Avoid using SLEIGHT except in the phrase “sleight of hand”.

        1. SLIGHT: If I snub you or humiliate you in some way, for example, by failing to invite you to my birthday party while inviting all your friends, that is a SLIGHT (noun). A deliberate snub. If I cut you in public, by deliberately ignoring you in the street when you happen to be a work colleague or a fellow student, then I am SLIGHTING you, i.e., deliberately snubbing or humiliating you.

        SLEIGHT This is never used as a verb. You can never “sleight” anyone. The word is almost always used in the phrase “SLEIGHT OF HAND”. It means manual dexterity in performing conjuring tricks. A magician who pulls rabbits from a hat is engaging in “sleight of hand” (= skill or trickery with the fingers or hands, manual dexterity). Card cheats have this skill. So do pickpockets.

        Summary: If the Athenians were snubbing or dissing the Spartans, then they were SLIGHTING (not “sleighting”) the Spartans.

        It seems I was right originally when I said the correct term to use was “SLIGHT”. Hurrah, I am vindicated. 🙂

      6. @Grammar Friend

        Thanks for the advice and the explanation. Great stuff.

        Hurrah, I am vindicated.

        You’re welcome. That is why I posted the following reply to your correction…

        Ah yes, you’re right

        😀

    2. @Flopot,
      When I read Trump’s statement it sounded like he was talking about the US, Britain, Saudi Arabia, and Israel, who have been, and continue to be, “sponsors of terrorism.” Iran is not even in the same league.

      1. Yes, that is the deadly irony. Of course it doesn’t change the fact that it was a nasty insult designed to insult an entire people.

  6. When cops (e.g. the FBI) are trying to catch a serial killer, what’s one of the things they always do? They try to create a psychological profile of the killer based on the information they have, right?
    IIRC they have an office that specializes in “behavioral science”, staffed with experts whose job it is to “get inside the killer’s head”, to try to figure out what his background might be and what he’s likely to do next.

    Just like the FBI tries to understand the “mind” of a serial killer to predict what he’ll do next, I think it’s important to understand the nature of evil, particularly Jewish evil, to understand what the Jewish collective is capable of and what they’ll likely do in any particular situation.

    And from studying the Bible, the robust historical record, current events, etc., I can’t help but conclude that WW3 is not only possible, but very likely, bordering on inevitable.

    To put it another way, I know the Jews WILL NEVER STOP, because it is simply not in their demonically evil nature to stop. They cannot stop any more than Ted Bundy or the Green River killer could stop. Thus they will never abandon their agenda to achieve complete world domination and control. So the question of whether WW3 will happen or not seems to depend on the intended victims. Will they give up their sovereignty, disarm and place themselves at the mercy of the beast, or will they fight to defend themselves?

    Orange Clown’s escalation of aggression in the Mideast is a very, very bad sign, IMO, and if he doesn’t back off, and soon, I don’t see how WW3 will not happen.

    1. And to get an even more fundamental understanding of what’s going on, read the Bible, e.g., John 8:44.

      1. I would like to point to the prophecy of Jesus in Matthew 24:15, speaking about the abomination that causes desolation occupying Jerusalem and further warns of the consequences from verse 16 to 22.

    2. Patriot,

      You’ve already said that about the Protocols eight times!

      Try saying something new, OK?

      instead of copying and pasting the same comment eight times! 🙂

      1. The hell on earth that the Zionists have caused has no equal in the history of the world and America is under Zionist control.

  7. The Jew (global) Central Bank and the Shabbos Goi in D.C. and other nations’ governments PLANTED by D.C. are frightened they may have moved too far and fast with their implementation of Noahide Law, (public law 102-14) and the flexing of their central bank tyranny.

    http://www.takebackourrights.org/docs/Christians-full%20page.html

    More frightening than that, however, is the almost COMPLETE ignorance of Sewer Nation’s “idiot culture” in grasping whom is at the head of this global “snake”.
    They just haven’t a clue. More than anything else THAT will bring their, (the synagogue) global agenda of “Goy” genocide nearer to or to fruition.

  8. Yeah sure, “exciting arguments”. Anyone disgrees with Pat, even a little bit disagrees with Pat, and Uncle is right there sending anyone who disagrees with Pat off to Spamblinka. Even if you disagree with Pat about one little thing, you’re thrown into prison for “thought criminals” and nobody gets to hear your side of the story, ONLY Pat’s take on everything. Gee, really “exciting arguments” going here under Uncle’s CENSORIOUS thumb.

  9. scalping came to america from egypt. sachems in the great lakes area were called pharaohs. eqyptian artifacts have been found in that area and there are dozens of matching hieroglyphs in central america. egyptian hieroglyphics depict humans with extended superstructure designs on top of their heads, which i think represent the person’s cloud-consciousness. i’m guessing scalping may have been originally done in egypt as an attack on the victim’s higher identity or as an attempt to acquire his cloud.
    the way things work in the foreign space known as washington dc – it’s all about the flows of money coming up out of the working class and into the offshore accounts of the trainload of war profiteers attached to the congress. congressmen are corporate stand-ins funneling the flows of capital into the same channels. some have their munitions factories of one kind or another back in their “districts’. they’re not here to find world peace, they’re here to get those contracts filled.
    somebody check and see if the MOAB bomb didn’t come from a town in utah.
    this is a very greedy business and of course it broke the genuine economy decades ago, which is what the big jew parasite private foreign corporation known as the central bank always wants to do, so there will be a national debt that the public can never get out from under. slaves held hostage to war. it’s in the trillions now and can never be paid back.
    time to declare national bankruptcy, kill the fed bank and go back to honest banking.
    establish a peace department and call a global symposium.
    no more instant retail wars on credit, or never ending terrorist proxy conflicts all over the globe.
    so the contracts have to be renewed and new weapons systems approved from time to time.
    all this bs with korea is designed to jack the tension and increase the military spending and improve the profits.
    the kim jongs are as into it all as the sauds and duponts.
    yes the russians have their arsenal of icbms. of course they do. they have their filthy warmongers too. but the russian war profiteers are not going to launch their subs and land silos en masse any more than we are, bunkers or not.
    now, it doesn’t mean there will never be another korean or vietnam type war where they may even use lightweight tactical nukes. they used them in nam, which is the real poison people refer to as agent orange.
    there was a veterans group lawsuit about that proceeding in the usa on paper in the federal building in okc, but it was destroyed and lost when the adl/fbi blew up that structure, the same way the investigation into dov zacheim’s missing pentagon trillions was wrecked when the rocket hit the part of the building where the staff and files were.
    the korea threat is diminishing now, the carrier groups have been redeployed elsewhere, because the contracts have been approved, till next time.
    iran is next on the jews’ hit list, going the way of syria.
    trump indicated toward putin on isis but now he looks like just another zionist stooge, like theresa may, whose special election is probably part of the plot to defeat brexit.

    1. “all this bs with korea is designed to jack the tension and increase the military spending and improve the profits.”

      Our masters don’t really need any excuses to increase military spending, do they? And “profits”? They can just take all the money they want. They can print money; who’s going to stop them?
      Chumpster fraudster’s bellicose Korea posturing may have been a psyop mainly directed at the the new South Korean president (who is apparently skeptical of the need for U.S. occupation forces in South Korea, questions the THAAD deployment, and favors a conciliatory approach in diplomatic relations with North Korea).

      “the kim jongs are as into it all as the sauds and duponts.”

      I disagree completely. North Korea is legitimately defending itself from a murderous serial aggressor on a lawless global rampage. Kim Jong Un would be irresponsible if he didn’t develop a deterrent.

      “yes the russians have their arsenal of icbms. of course they do.”

      Of course they do because if they didn’t, they’d probably have been attacked by U.S./NATO already.

      “they have their filthy warmongers too.”

      Seriously? Who has Russia attacked? In case you didn’t notice, U.S./NATO has Russia surrounded. If there were “warmongers” in Russia anything like those in the corrupt “West”, there would’ve already been a nuclear war.

      “but the russian war profiteers are not going to launch their subs and land silos en masse any more than we are, bunkers or not.”

      LOL! Russian “war profiteers”? Seriously? I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but Russia has done everything humanly possible to avoid another cold war type arms race with U.S./NATO. U.S./NATO is at Russia’s borders, not vice versa; U.S. put missiles in Romania and Poland, Russia didn’t put missiles in Mexico and Canada; the U.S. overthrew the government of Ukraine, not Russia; the U.S. is funding and arming terrorist mercenaries all over the Mideast, not Russia. You seem to be trying to put Russia on the same moral plane as the U.S., which is simply absurd.

      1. Harold –

        You wrote:
        “They can just take all the money they want. They can print money; who’s going to stop them?”

        That is NOT the case. You need more study on how ‘currency’ – USD and others – come into existence.

        The bulk of it is created by loans at commercial banks.

        Most of the money in our economy is created by banks, in the form of bank deposits – the numbers that appear in your account.

        Banks create new money whenever they make loans.

        Over 97% of the money in the US economy today – and other countries – is created by banks… just 3% is created by the government.

        This short 2 minute video explains how it is created in UK:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01IusDeSPE4

        This is really good:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EobPnLZiOo8

        Banks can create money through the accounting they use when they make loans. The numbers that you see when you check your account balance are just accounting entries in the banks’ computers. These numbers are a ‘liability’ or IOU from your bank to you. But by using your debit card or internet banking, you can spend these IOUs as though they were the same as £10 notes. By creating these electronic IOUs, banks can effectively create a substitute for money.

        http://positivemoney.org/how-money-works/how-banks-create-money/

      2. Pat,

        “Harold –

        You wrote:
        “They can just take all the money they want. They can print money; who’s going to stop them?”

        That is NOT the case. You need more study on how ‘currency’ – USD and others – come into existence.”

        No, you need to get a “life”. Or at least you need to stop wasting time and internet bandwidth by trying to pick out some word or phrase from a comment I made, ignore the context and overall subject of the discussion, then construe it so you can merely be “contrary” and lecture me from your position of “superior” knowledge.

        The general point I was making is that the ambitious imperial agenda has never been hindered by lack of money. By the phrase “[printing] money”, I was referring to government’s use of “debt monetization” to facilitate its profligate spending. Look it up if you don’t know what it means.

      3. Fixit –

        You wrote:
        “A “crisis” in Korea was completely manufactured by the USA…”

        Yep…

        All the hype is staged with fake news from the USA’s MSM..!!

        Nukes are so VERY, VERY, simple to build according to some. 🙂 (Not me.)
        BUT ONLY the 9 countries below have nuclear engineers smart enough to make them..!!

        Engineers in Germany, Japan, S Korea, Thailand, Australia and Canada must be too dumb or too lazy..!!

        It can’t be a function of money…. since Russia and N Korea are dead broke..
        … and India is collapsing…!!

        US
        UK
        China
        Russia
        North Korea
        Pakistan
        France
        Israel
        India

  10. An interesting patchwork. The treasonous criminals and their throw away proxies who live in the better neighborhoods (Bill Van Auken), North Korea, and a general very brief overview that touches the ME, WW3, and Oliver Stone with Mr. Putin. I’m concerned with the clear and ongoing peril pointed out by Mr. Auken most of all, the treason within. In The ME, Libya is an endless disaster, Afghanistan is unwinnable unless you compromise and find the right Afghan leader (certainly not right according to zionist whims, which are all that seem to matter these days, but by Afghan choice) and Iraq and Syria are becoming assets to common sense policy such as the end result in Lebanon, diametrically and effectively opposed to the abomination of zionism. Exposing the filth in the first portion as described by Mr. Van Auken is both practical and highly useful, though it would be nice to see it from somewhere other than a socialist forum.

  11. From the words of Mister Mojo Risen have a good time before the whole shit house goes up in flames.

  12. Engineering the conflict in the Gulf…

    ((( https://www.sott.net/article/353430-USs-Machiavellian-plot-to-provoke-Saudi-Arabia-into-a-blood-border-war-with-Qatar )))

    I’m putting the link in brackets because the author does use the words Zionist, Jew or Neo-conservative to describe the real manipulators. He does assign blame to the chief Zionist proxy, namely the United States of America, and that will suffice to explain the ongoing attempts at implementing Oded Yinon and the “New Middle East” in the Gulf states.

    We have a clear case of a (((nefarious protagonist))) engineering lists of perceived slights for aggrieved nations to war over. It is all in the Protoc…sorry, you know that already. Anyway, there you have it: take Thucydides and invert his purpose; create your crises and wars; and then claim such conflicts are inevitable. Sure doesn’t Thucydides say as much 😉

    FACT: without the machinations of the Few, we would not have had so many world wars and bloody revolutions. I am not so naive to think that all war would be ended by now; but I’m certain we would’ve been well on our way to eradicating it in a humane way, as opposed to wiping out all the Goy and then proclaiming a Roman Peace.

    1. Oh for goodness sake. Correction…

      I’m putting the link in brackets because the author does NOT use the words…

  13. Humm.. Not to have a WWIII is maybe as simple as saying to the humanoid reptiles ?? We know, where you & your family live, & your clan as well ?? You will be the first target with multi headed nuke missiles ?? Then your place of work, City of London, Wall St, Brussels, Frankfurt, Milan & not to be left behind, the little shitty country of course ??
    So just have a good think ??

  14. Flopot (and others)- there are no nukes. It’s just more Jewish BS.
    See http://www.nukelies.org if you want a lot of reading.
    .
    Or you might watch my stunning 3 1/2 hr video, called ‘Lords of the Nukes’ to suggest that, if you can watch a Tolkien film, you can watch this too.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHjohmgOh2M
    It has huge amounts of graphics and movies and drawings and took me a lot of work. It’s probably too good for you lot, in fact.
    .
    It hadn’t occurred to me in my innocence that ‘Lasha’ could sound whiplike, and I suppose ‘darkmoon’ could have a bodily interpretation too. Sigh. And I thought she was just a poetess.

    1. Be careful, Rerevisionist. You are treading on one of the pet fears of the fearful! Since learning early to fear the boogey-man and goblins and wampus cats, aged and “mature adults” have acquired more sophisticated terrors…
      (After all: without Fear and Greed, there is no compulsion for “Progress”.) Lasha simply fills a need for some literacy in the display. Fear is fun! Fear is stimulating! Hardly a day goes by when I don’t get a call from some telemarketer hawking some form of “home security” (and I tell ’em I already have some good dogs and a shotgun). And consider gold and silver: Who-the-hell would bother with it if not for fear of becoming financially destitute??! “Nukes” are one of those things which transcends all social and economic boundaries. EVERYBODY can be afraid of them, no apologies! 🙂

      1. @ Gilbert

        Jews exist and nukes exist…that’s a bad combination of things. It’s like drinking and driving, fleas and Y. pestis bacteria, sociopaths and powerful political offices, pedophiles and children, etc.

    2. @ Rerevisionist

      It hadn’t occurred to me in my innocence that ‘Lasha’ could sound whiplike, and I suppose ‘darkmoon’ could have a bodily interpretation too. Sigh. And I thought she was just a poetess.

      LD is a poet as well as a painter of surrealist and visionary works, mostly of weird landscapes with exotic flora and fauna in the Henri Rousseau style. A naive primitive artist, I would say, judging from some of her paintings which I saw long ago. Perhaps she chose the name “Lasha Darkmoon” because it’s the perfect name for the kind of otherworldly art she specializes in.

      I’d love to know how Lasha came to choose such a flamboyant name.

      When I first met her in 2001 at the Academy of Art in the Via delle Casine, Florence, that was not her name. It was a simple English name beginning with ‘A’. I have corresponded briefly with Lasha over the years and asked her several times: “What made you choose the name Lasha Darkmoon?” She has never answered my question.

      Maybe Toby or Sister Monica will oblige?

      1. To me, the name “Lasha Darkmoon” inspires some mystique. It was a clever choice of pen names. It creates a certain interest in hearing what that person has to say, and it inspires a certain mental picture of the person using it. It is definitely unusual, and suites its purpose! 🙂

      2. OFF-TOPIC: How Lasha Darkmoon got her name
        (Please skip this if you find it boring)

        @ Sardonicus

        I’d love to know how Lasha came to choose such a flamboyant name…. Maybe Toby or Sister Monica will oblige?

        I’m surprised she never told you. There was no attempt to choose a “flamboyant name”. The name came about by pure chance…. like this:

        1. She was posting as a commenter on the xymphora site in 2009 as “Xanadu” but needed to choose a different name for some reason. She ended up with the name “Lasha Darkmoon” as the result of a typo.

        2. She wanted a normal 2-word name: forename + surname.

        3. While trying to figure out what name to use, she happened to stumble across a site on the internet called “Darkmoon Faire”. (A now defunct site). This gave her the name Darkmoon.

        4. Searching for a first name, she settled on the name “Kasha“. In case you don’t know, “kasha” is the name for LD’s favorite breakfast cereal. This is buckwheat porridge.

        LD happened to have a bowl of kasha on her desk at the time. She was eating her morning porridge. Kasha is a very popular breakfast cereal in Russia. LD’s Russian granny had introduced her to kasha ever since she was a child. She grew up on kasha. Which apart from buckwheat can contain organic wholegrain wheat, barley, oats and rye. It’s an all-purpose cereal, incredibly rich in fibre, B-vitamins and minerals. LD gives it to Dobbin horse when he’s feeling depressed and below par and it frisks him up in no time at all. It’s the best natural antidepressant and general high-fibre tonic.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kasha

        5. So that’s how LD ended up with the name “KASHA DARKMOON”, the name she originally intended to use.

        6. When typing out the name in the user name box, however, LD’s finger slipped on the keyboard. Instead of hitting the ‘K’ button, she hit the ‘L’ button next to it — and ended up with “Lasha Darkmoon” instead of “Kasha Darkmoon”.

        She decided to stick with the name “Lasha” because she thought it sounded much better than “Kasha”. So many things in life are the result of pure chance…

      3. The name “Lasha” always sounded to me like the name of one of Santa’s reindeers, so does “Kasha”, come to think of it, lol.

      4. I sent in a post yesterday for this thread commentary. It’s not up on the board. I’m surprised it’s being CENSORED, as my comment is very much in-line with Pat’s way of looking at politics, controlled opposition, both Left and Right are controlled by the same pharisees, both sides work towards the same goals, ultimately have the same agenda, etc., etc..

        If I disagree with Pat, I get CENSORED, and if I happen to agree with Pat on something, I also get CENSORED? Or, it doesn’t matter if I agree or disagree with Pat, I’m in Spamblinka where I “deserve” to be because I question the Heliocentric theory and I gotta be “punished” for it because I’m a “thought criminal” and so “obviously” ” ipso facto” a “joo” a “troll” and I am “dangerous”?

        U stoopid fucktards in ADMIN, assh*les.

      5. good to hear from you again, Sister Monica, and good to know lasha hit “D” instead one of the neighbors.
        I’ll have to try kasha to see if my keying accuracy improves.

        of course her english names are insufficiently remarkable for a poetess of her quality, unlike julia roberts who despite the name theft sounds as cadaverous as she looks.

      6. Really? I thought it was because she was lashing out at Jews. Of course, a little S&M play never bothered members of the tribe. No doubt some of the trolls here are waiting for Lasha to appear in a Nadzee SS uniform complete with short, black, leather dress and riding crop.

    3. Rerevisionist –

      I operated nuclear reactors on two submarines for years…. without ‘filling up’ with gas – or ANY fuel – along the way. 🙂

      The nuclear reactor cores there last approximately 5 years without replacement. I helped replace one in 1970 in Newport News shipyard. It took almost 2 years.

      I DO believe nuke WEAPONS are fake. The physics and size requirements don’t match up to generate explosions….. in mobile equipment.

      The man in the youtube interview suggested reactors may not be fake. He is correct to be flexible there. Nuclear reactors are real…. used as a heat source. The reactors cannot generate a NUCLEAR explosion…. NOT even close. The explosions which DO occur at nuclear facilities are STEAM excursions….. NOT NUCLEAR explosions.

      I believe the Manhattan Project was set up to perfect man-made transmutation of base metals into NOBLE metals.

      1. Yup. There is also the bleedin’ obvious fact that the Zios would’ve set off a real nuke a long, long time ago — nuke false-flags galore. Heck Israel would’ve blasted ’em off and the JWO media would’ve sold it at a “good thing”. Sure didn’t the gullible goy think the exploding nukes in Japan were “a good thing”? Yes, I now believe these were fake but we didn’t know that at the time and the majority of us believed it was a “good thing”.

        So if the JWO had access to nukes then they would’ve used ’em time and time again because they could easily sell it to the sheep via their control of, well, EVERYTHING! They could sell us an alien invasion and we’d believe it, “Nuke the b*stards. Don’t worry if New York is completely destroyed — it will be for the good of humanity”.

        Reason and logic are enough to rule out nukes as being real. But to get to that point you have to accept the context of a massive unreality that surrounds us. 9/11 is the bowling-ball sized “red pill” suppository that you have to insert in order to fully comprehend the JWO. After that moment you will shrug and accept that nukes are probably fake. Until that moment you’ll be a cognitive-dissonant — a right ding-a-ling. 😉

        Think about the following list…

        1. Jews planned and implemented the major world revolutions.
        2. Jews planned and implemented two world wars.
        3. Jews control world finance and most governments in the Western world.
        4. Jews control most world businesses; academia; and the media, i.e. CULTURE
        5. Modern history (at least the last 300 years) is fake.
        6. Nukes are fake.

        No. 6 doesn’t seem so outlandish when placed in context.

      2. Circumstantial evidence is available to show that transmutation to NOBLE metals might be conducted at Area 51, in Nevada.

        The United States Air Force facility commonly known as Area 51 is a highly classified remote detachment of Edwards Air Force Base, within the Nevada Test and Training Range.

        A picture of Groom Lake has been on Google Earth for years and the latest time stamps show it was updated in 2007. Photos of the place have been shown publicly since the late 1980s.

        The airport is deep within heavily restricted airspace, guarded by fighter jets.

        Groom Lake was outed by the Clinton Administration. The government admitted that it exists **ONLY after workers filed lawsuits claiming their – HEALTH WAS HARMED – by working there. That admission of the area’s existence became necessary to handle the case in court..!!

        ALL of Nevada is “BIGGLY” laden with uranium. 🙂

        http://www.us-mining.com/nevada/uranium-mines

      3. The problem with nuclear power is that there isn’t any where it would make sense. For example, in the Antarctic. Or islands a long way from fuel supplies. Or large factories needing energy. And it does happen to exist where it’s linked into the mains. The site http://www.nukelies.org has some dispute with an admitted troll, on nuclear submarines, so called. These seem to be regarded as evidential – a bit like Auschwitz. Or a claim that a core that took 2 years to swap between 1970 and 1972 presumably was all in a day’s work. But I agree, obviously, nuke bombs are a more important issue than nuke power.

        Curious to speculate about trolls: is there a central agency to watch for comments and postings and what have you, which then directs to an approved troll? I expect it will come out eventually, probably in badly-written memoirs that don’t sell many copies.

      4. Rerev –

        If calling me a “troll” is all ya got… you don’t have much there… no facts.

        I have distributed and supported your site and claims on nuke weapons being fake. I agree there. I shall continue lending support on that issue.

        You should do more research into nuclear reactors. You are waaay “BIGGLY” under-educated there.

        More homework needed ‘RRev’ …. stop your GUESSING..!!

        You seem to be the “troll”.. on that one.!! 🙂

      5. “I DO believe nuke WEAPONS are fake.”

        Seriously? You have personal experience with nuclear reactors, but you claim that there are no such things as nuclear bombs?

        “The physics and size requirements don’t match up to generate explosions….. in mobile equipment.”

        This is just part of your contrariness shtick, right?

      6. Harold –

        I am very serious there.

        This will help you understand why I make that claim… Understanding ‘buckling’ is proof. This is a good starting point for you. Have fun:

        Buckling
        http://www.nuclear-power.net/nuclear-power/reactor-physics/neutron-diffusion-theory/geometrical-material-buckling/

        —-Criticality Condition:

        The basic classification of states of a nuclear reaction is according to the multiplication factor as eigenvalue which is a measure of the change in the fission neutron population from one neutron generation to the subsequent generation.

        keff < 1. This condition is known as the subcritical state.
        keff = 1. This condition is known as the critical state.
        keff > 1. This condition is known as the SUPERCRITICAL state.

        For any positive value of materials buckling, there is a – UNIQUE – critical size for applicable nuclear geometry.

        Generally, the multiplication of a uniform fission of any shape and size is given by keff = k∞.PNL, with the non/leakage probability.

        The total non-leakage probability is primarily a function of migration area and the relative curvature of the neutron flux given by the geometrical buckling.

        ………….

        ALSO:
        Unlike other explosives, such as gunpowder, a small amount will not produce a smaller explosion once the proper mass is obtained, known as the ‘critical mass.’ Only a BIG BOOM is available with nukes.
        That means there are NO ‘mini nukes’…period. No ‘suitcase’ nukes either. Forklift required.

        It is ‘all-or-none’ at the minimum required critical mass. That mass varies with the material, but is usually about 123 pounds for U and …. 24 pounds for Pu, on this planet. It must be refined and enriched for that small amount to work as a weapon.

        Little Boy was 140 lbs of U. When the hollow-front projectile reached the target and slid over the target insert, the assembled super-critical mass of uranium would be completely surrounded by a tamper and neutron reflector of tungsten carbide and steel, both materials having a combined mass of 2,300 kg (5,100 lb).(Suitcase???)
        See: wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

        Fat Man was 13.6 lbs Pu, and – SUPPOSEDLY – took 5,300 lbs of explosives to detonate.(Suitcase impossible)
        See: http://www.atomicheritage.org/history/little-boy-and-fat-man

        “The nominal spherical critical mass for an untampered U-235 nuclear weapon is 56 kilograms (123 lb), a sphere 17.32 cm (6.8″) in diameter. The required material must be 85% or more of U-238 and is known as weapons grade uranium, though for a crude, inefficient weapon 20% is sufficient (called weapon(s)-usable). Even lower enrichment can be used, but then the required critical mass rapidly increases. Use of a large tamper, implosion geometries, trigger tubes, polonium triggers, tritium enhancement, and neutron reflectors can enable a more compact, economical weapon using one-fourth or less of the nominal critical mass, though this would likely only be possible in a country that already had extensive experience in engineering nuclear weapons.”
        See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235

        This will explain why Pu weapons are almost impossible to make, even for governments.
        See: wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-239

        Detonation of a nuclear weapon involves bringing fissile material into its optimal supercritical state very rapidly. During part of this process, the assembly is supercritical, but not yet in an optimal state for a chain reaction. Free neutrons, in particular from spontaneous fissions, can cause the device to undergo a preliminary chain reaction that destroys the fissile material before it is ready to produce a large explosion, which is known as predetonation. To keep the probability of predetonation low, the duration of the non-optimal assembly period is minimized and fissile and other materials are used which have low spontaneous fission rates. In fact, the combination of materials has to be such that it is unlikely that there is even a single spontaneous fission during the period of supercritical assembly. In particular, the gun method cannot be used with plutonium.

        If two pieces of subcritical material are not brought together fast enough, nuclear predetonation can occur, whereby a smaller explosion than expected will blow the bulk of the material apart. That ‘fizzle’ might happen in a nuclear reactor during core meltdown.
        See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_chain_reaction

        They would ALSO have a “BIGGLY” limited shelf-life..!! 🙂

      7. Pat, if I understand you correctly, your position is that nuclear weapons are inherently physically impossible to build.

        I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but nothing in the link or the cut and paste text of your post supports your outrageous claim.

        An atomic bomb is actually a rather simple device in theory. Very briefly, you assemble a critical mass of fissionable material (which can undergo a chain reaction), such as U-235 or Pu-239, in a very short period of time, and you arrange it so inertia holds it together long enough for most of the material to undergo fission.

        The rest is just engineering details; by now well established, proven, time tested engineering details.

        “The nominal spherical critical mass for an untampered U-235 nuclear weapon is 56 kilograms (123 lb), a sphere 17.32 cm (6.8″) in diameter. The required material must be 85% or more of U-238 and is known as weapons grade uranium, though for a crude, inefficient weapon 20% is sufficient (called weapon(s)-usable).”

        You’re actually going to cut and paste text from the Wikipedia “Uranium-235” page? This is supposed to somehow convince me that an atomic bomb is somehow impossible? (And btw how did you even screw up the cut and paste text? U-235 is weapons grade material not, U-238).

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235

        And why would you even quote Wikipedia regarding U-235? When according to other pages of Wikipedia, nuclear weapons DO EXIST?

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon

        If Wikipedia is so ignorant and stupid and/or dishonest as to claim that nuclear weapons exist, why would you rely on any information from their U-235 page?

        But let’s forget the “impossible to build argument” for a minute. You’re implying that Hiroshima and Nagasaki never happened? The Russians are building the S-500 missile system for a threat that doesn’t exist? Los Alamos, Sandia and Lawrence Livermore national laboratories are all a scam? The “Castle Bravo” hydrogen bomb test on Bikini Atoll never happened? And on and on and on ad infinitum?

        And then you expect to be taken seriously?

      8. There are only two items remaining that will completely destroy what remains in my bucket list of beliefs.

        (1) Nuclear weapons don’t exist.

        (2) John Wayne’s real name was Marion Goldstein.

      9. Harold –

        “An atomic bomb is actually a rather simple device in theory.”

        HA!!!! 🙂 🙂 🙂

        No wonder you failed Nuclear Physics 101, Junior…..!!! 🙂 🙂

      10. “’An atomic bomb is actually a rather simple device in theory.’

        HA!!!! 🙂 🙂 🙂

        No wonder you failed Nuclear Physics 101, Junior…..!!!”

        So the cut-and-paste contrarian who apparently doesn’t know the difference between U-235 and U-238 is going to lecture me on the subject? LOL!

        BTW Junior, I didn’t fail any of my physics classes; rather, I graduated from college (as an EE) with a gpa of 3.5 or something like that. Physics and engineering were my favorite subjects. What’s your educational background?

        Anyway, as I said, atomic bombs are actually quite simple in theory (and construction). After all, atomic bombs were invented in the 1940s, and that was before things like lasers and transistors were invented.

        Finally compare the relative “ease” of building “traditional” atomic bombs with that of of achieving controlled hydrogen fusion; or achieving a “fissionless” hydrogen (pure-fusion) bomb; or the difficulty of releasing large amounts of energy from nuclear isomers (i.e. induced gamma emission); or the difficulty of doing anything with anti-matter, etc.

        Building “atomic bombs” was long ago reduced to an engineering problem, and this is why the only practical way to prevent “proliferation” is to limit the availability of weapons grade fissile material.

        But you’ll never agree with anything I say because you’re just being contrary. At first I thought your studious contrariness was just shtick, but now that you’re making the laughably absurd claim that nuclear weapons don’t exist, I’m beginning to suspect that your whole purpose here is to play a role of “conspiracy theory kook” and smear this site by association.

      11. @ Pat

        “ALSO:
        Unlike other explosives, such as gunpowder, a small amount will not produce a smaller explosion once the proper mass is obtained, known as the ‘critical mass.’ Only a BIG BOOM is available with nukes.
        That means there are NO ‘mini nukes’…period. No ‘suitcase’ nukes either. Forklift required.

        It is ‘all-or-none’ at the minimum required critical mass. That mass varies with the material, but is usually about 123 pounds for U and …. 24 pounds for Pu, on this planet. It must be refined and enriched for that small amount to work as a weapon.”

        (1) But you said there are no such things as atomic bombs, right? Now you’re saying they do exist, but they can’t be made smaller than “fat man”?

        (2) Did you not read your own cut and paste material? Apparently you do not understand the phrase “critical mass”.

        Later in your comment, you pasted this:

        “Use of a large tamper, implosion geometries, trigger tubes, polonium triggers, tritium enhancement, and neutron reflectors can enable a more compact, economical weapon using one-fourth or less of the nominal critical mass, though this would likely only be possible in a country that already had extensive experience in engineering nuclear weapons.”

        Really it’s a matter of “efficiency”; how much energy did you get out of your plutonium core vs. the theoretical maximum. The fat man design was crude and only yielded an energy release of something like 20% of the theoretical maximum. Jew puppet Truman was in a hurry to drop the bombs on Japan before they could surrender, so there was no time for refinement of the design.

        Of course simple improvements were made to the design of “fat man” after the war that doubled the efficiency and significantly reduced the amount of high explosives necessary.

      12. Harold –

        EE… OK.

        Without looking it up, Junior … please tell me which course you took in EE deliberated on BE – Binding Energy – in depth… and tell me the MeV produced per fission.

        That value will remain constant indefinitely… no matter the modifications…. perfections.

  15. harold
    “Our masters don’t really need any excuses to increase military spending, do they? And “profits”? They can just take all the money they want. They can print money; who’s going to stop them?”
    actually they do need an excuse – to print the money. but it’s not just about the profits. it’s about controlling the lower classes through the use of violence in order that the security structure keep its shape.
    good observation on south korea’s plight.
    “I disagree completely. North Korea is legitimately defending itself from a murderous serial aggressor on a lawless global rampage. Kim Jong Un would be irresponsible if he didn’t develop a deterrent”.
    so it would appear, and i guess you can believe it i you want; that the jongs are really good guys trying to promote free speech and democracy in their county, like the saudis, right? they’re just pretending to be a murderous gangster-state dictatorship, where everybody but the ruling class lives in poverty and fear.
    “Of course they do because if they didn’t, they’d probably have been attacked by U.S./NATO already.
    you really don’t understand the history of the collusion between the us and russia dating back to the ww2 alliance. the usa built russia, at the same time it was demonizing it. do you really think there are no rich war profiteers in russia? russia sells arms all over the world, just like the western powers do. remember when they shot down 007, because it strayed off course into their airspace? pretty ruthless i’d say, if that’s what actually happened.
    look man, the jews have had control of russia since they murdered the czar and his whole family. that means they control the war production too, and the banking. just like they do in the west. the banksters play both sides off against each other. it’s been going on forever.
    the question is – who is putin?
    is he a real reformer, who just can’t quite do it, or is he a real good frontman for the usual suspects?

    1. Bark –

      Your guesses match up very well with mine.

      I have been of the opinion that N Korea is an experiment to find out the minimum benefits require to keep people productive and still maintain loyalty to the heads of state. It is as if it were a prison camp itself…. totally. The US, Russia and China keep NK afloat.

      NK has NO nukes…. They don’t even have electricity available. It is a sham country.

      NASA photo shows North Korea is in the dark

      Associated Press/NASA – This Jan. 30, 2014 photo made available by NASA on Monday, Feb. 24, 2014 shows North Korea, darker area at center, between South Korea, right, and China, left. Lights from the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, are visible at center. The image comparing the night time lights of the countries was made by the Expedition 38 crew aboard the International Space Station. (AP Photo/NASA)

      According to a recent report by the Korea Institute for National Unification, electricity in North Korea is “sporadic and unreliable, with homes that have electricity often receiving just a few hours per day.” About half of North Korea’s 24 million people live in extreme poverty, with most homes and apartments “heated by open fireplaces burning wood or briquettes.” And many “lack flush toilets.”

      http://news.yahoo.com/north-korea-dark-space-photo-142219444.html

      ‘Put-On’ is as phony as Trump. He loves the TV appearances. He proved that by agreeing to his recent interview with NBC… the most Pharisee-Jew controlled of the MSM outlets.

    2. “actually they do need an excuse – to print the money. but it’s not just about the profits. it’s about controlling the lower classes through the use of violence in order that the security structure keep its shape.
      good observation on south korea’s plight.”

      Obviously, they no longer “need” excuses – FOR ALMOST ANYTHING THEY DO. They rule by raw power. They generally do whatever they want regardless of what the constitution, laws, treaties, common sense, etc. have to say about it.

      “so it would appear, and i guess you can believe it i you want; that the jongs are really good guys trying to promote free speech and democracy in their county, like the saudis, right? they’re just pretending to be a murderous gangster-state dictatorship, where everybody but the ruling class lives in poverty and fear.”

      First of all, who are you, as a citizen of the utterly corrupt and oppressive “West” to judge other peoples’ governments? Jews believe it’s their “right” as the chosen among us to sit in judgment of everything and everyone else, particularly governments that they don’t like. Jews will be the ones to determine whether Saddam Hussein should rule Iraq; Jews will be the ones to determine whether Gaddafi should rule Libya; Jews will be the ones to determine whether Assad should rule Syria; etc., etc., etc.

      That said, the Jongs are no worse than any other rulers are they? Is the NK government worse than that of the Philippines or Saudi Arabia? And to the extent it is, Kim Jong Un at least has an excuse because a big part of the blame lies on their foreign oppressors. You put them under sanctions, you isolate them politically and economically, then you blame the victims for “poverty”? Seriously?

      The situation in North Korea is similar to that of Cuba. If North Korea all of a sudden became an “open society” it would be immediately targeted and subverted from within just like other societies were subverted by the Jews and their Shabbos Goy puppets. But you pretend otherwise.

      Look at the U.S. Is this an open democratic society? No; it’s a lawless post-constitutional Judeo-communist hellhole. After basically ONE “[false-flag] terrorist attack”, we lost everything. So how do any of us have any standing to blame anyone else for their “bad” government? Kim Jong Un may be a bastard, but the Jews hate the guy and what he does, right or wrong, he does for North Korea, which is more than can be said for your pathetic government.

      “you really don’t understand the history of the collusion between the us and russia dating back to the ww2 alliance. the usa built russia, at the same time it was demonizing it.”

      I’m sorry, but your apparent ignorance of 20th century history reflects poorly on you, not on me.

      “do you really think there are no rich war profiteers in russia?

      I think that’s just a meaningless bare assertion. First, please define the phrase “war profiteers” as it would apply to contemporary Russia and it’s state owned defense industries; and then please name the “war profiteers.”

      “russia sells arms all over the world, just like the western powers do.”

      So what? Why shouldn’t they? Everybody has a right to defend themselves no? Especially with America on a global rampage. That hardly justifies the phrase “war profiteer”.

      “remember when they shot down 007, because it strayed off course into their airspace? pretty ruthless i’d say, if that’s what actually happened.”

      Now you want to change the subject? That incident happened at time when tensions were high and IIRC the plane didn’t respond to warnings. I’m not familiar enough with the details to discuss it but it’s irrelevant. We’re discussing contemporary Russia but you want to go back to the USSR? Seriously? Then how about the Sand Creek massacre? How about the Moro crater massacre? How about the No Gun Ri massacre? How about the Ma Lai massacre? Pretty ruthless I’d say.

      “look man, the jews have had control of russia since they murdered the czar and his whole family. that means they control the war production too, and the banking.”

      The situation is more nuanced than that, but details apparently aren’t your strong suit. Jews HAD control of Russia. But Joe Stalin largely purged them from power. If you knew anything about the USSR, you’d know that the USSR came to support the Arab governments in the Arab-Israeli conflict, which it obviously wouldn’t have done if Jews had significant power in the government.
      And if Jews had significant control over contemporary Russia, Russia would not be defending Syria and selling weapons to Iran.

      Being that you’re apparently just making up stories, I’m probably not going to waste any more time arguing absurdities with you.

    3. True. [Added later – I’ve lost track who this was addressed to!] Once you see Jews took over Russia as the USSR, and when you realise that the Fed was established in 1913, just in time for WW1, and of course that the English Civil War (so called) established the Jewish Bank of England, you have most of the puzzle pieces. In addition, ‘Saudi Arabia’ seems to be a Jewish fief; and Castro in Cuba was a Marrano Jew. It’s possible Hitler was a plant, too, financed to keep out Germans (& Austrians, & Hungarians, & Poles) who wanted serious revenge for WW1.
      .
      I’m inclined to think now that England after the Norman Conquest was that era’s equivalent of the USSR, with the ‘harrowing of the north’ genocidal, and probably a lot of locals collaborating with the Normans, probably having arranged it beforehand.
      .
      I also think – following musings over the early church – that Jews hijacked early Christianity for Greeks and Romans, by simple repetition for years and years, in the manner of the infliction of ‘Holocaustianity’. I think Catholicism co-operated more or less openly, while denying it: burning the Talmud at intervals suggests shock at the contents, but also prevents anyone reading it; condemning usury sounds wonderful, but in practice means the Jew monopoly is preserved; the occasional anger could be dealt with by ‘sanctuary’ – and note the use of the same word in the US, wherever Jews want to park invading non-whites. Keeping things in Latin by the church controlled input – they would only teach Latin to approved boys. Heretics were treated viciously, e.g. with tongue-boring and hard labour; but some heretics, for example Quakers, for approved and cossetted – see mileswmathis on Fox, Cromwell, and Quakers.
      ___
      Ooh I just read a rant about Stalin. Of course Jews ran Russia – but Stalin scared them all! Of course he did. Or perhaps he was just another front. Anyone who seriously imagines Jew mass murderers couldn’t have ice picked Stalin is a fool – or a troll.

      1. “Anyone who seriously imagines Jew mass murderers couldn’t have ice picked Stalin is a fool – or a troll.”

        Well look who’s talkin’; the person who claims that E doesn’t equal mc^2.

        BTW Jews probably did murder Stalin, but that doesn’t mean that he didn’t turn the tables on them and purge them from power. He did, and the Jew communists came to the U.S. and set up shop here.

      1. doesn’t pass the smell test, these are old tricks, such as this one: ‘A Jew with a little moustache’: Spoof passport for Adolf Hitler produced by British agents during World War Two

        The real truth is more likely to be found here: Russia Quietly Strips Emigres of Dual Citizenship/

        Under new regulations the consulates are enforcing, anyone seeking to renew a passport who was not registered as living in Russia on February 6, 1992, will be rejected, even if his or her passport had been renewed on previous occasions.

        It is unclear just how many people this new policy will affect. But it will certainly apply to thousands of Jews who emigrated from Russia after July 1, 1991

        Would Putin have allowed this had he been a Jew?
        I have little doubt that that passport was cooked up by Mossad forgers, the same ones that spread slander that Gaddafi was a jew as was Khomeini, Ahmedinejad, Saddam, probably Assad – i don’t doubt that they are working at his passport right now … what better way to alienate a dangerous leader from his jew-hating supporters than brand him a jew?

        Elementary dear watson, let cui bono guide you at every step.

        … not to mention that his mother was a lowly assembly line monkey at some Soviet shoe factory … typical jew princess occupation, right?

  16. Nostradamus got the exact date of 911, St. Malachy has shown the last Pope is in play.
    Jews did 911 and all world wars. Those who do not name the enemy by name are complicit in their crimes.

  17. arguing over whether the mobile nukes exist or not is quite pointless without a definitive proof, because of the level of expertise required to form an educated guess.
    From semi-personal experience, i do know a celebrated retired physician and emeritus in havana who served as the head of the military medical corps and received advanced training on radioactive wmds in St. petersburg (leningrad, back in the day, ~1962, missile crisis and all) but has of late been labeled as dissident and ekes out his final years in poverty (monthly stipend less than the cost of imported prostate pills).
    At the Kirov (? … yes indeed, i did manage to remember), his internship included looking after a number of hiroshima+nagasaki victims of severe radiation poisoning, he told me about the horrors of protracted suffering and even showed me some old photos of him as a young doctor posing with disfigured patients who were said to be very grateful for the treatment.

    So, either old Carlos was lying and i have the highest confidence in his integrity or was himself duped into believing in radio-phantoms.

    Once again, maybe the tiger walking out there doesn’t bite but why tempt the fate and chase it with a stick?

    1. Lobro –

      “arguing over whether the mobile nukes exist or not is quite pointless without a definitive proof”

      If so… you should NEVER mention it at all..!! 🙂

      You discuss numerous items without any proof… only guesses and repeating hearsay from others, including a physician… as in this instance…. where you are not sure:

      “So, either old Carlos was lying and i have the highest confidence in his integrity or was himself duped into believing in radio-phantoms.”

      I don’t believe ANY physicians.. They are Pharisee-Jew trained..!! 🙂

    2. Pat,
      your cynicism stands you in good stand. Sometimes.

      here (Minutes of the second meeting of the Target Committee
      Los Alamos, May 10-11, 1945
      ) you will see the recently declassified under the FOI act, minutes of the meetings where the los Alamos targeting committee discusses the most appropriate locations for dropping the bomb, taking into consideration the need to salvage it should it fail to detonate and such.
      sample points raised:
      look at the discussion regarding the deployment of “Little Boy” vs. “Fat Man” bomb versions, the detonating heights and considerable uncertainties regarding mission’s success – would they have agonized that much over conventional explosives?
      Read about extreme precautions and dry run training of the crews should they be forced to return to home base with the intact payload (euphemistically called “The Gadget”) in 5. Gadget Jettisoning and Landing
      … read this passage carefully to see that it goes many degrees beyond the “false flag” status, much more complex than 9/11 head fake

      In the case of the Fat Man this can probably best be accomplished by dropping the bomb into shallow water from a low altitude. Tests on this will be carried out with both inert and live units. In the case of the Little Boy the situation is considerably more complicated since water leaking into the Little boy will set off a nuclear reaction, and since the American held territory in the vicinity of the base is so densely filled that no suitable jettisoning ground for the Little Boy has been found which is sufficiently devoid of moisture, which is sufficiently soft that the projectile is sure not to seat from the impact, and which is sufficiently remote from extremely important American installations WHOSE DAMAGE BY A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION would seriously affect the American war effort.

      anyone think that this kind of language is mere kabuki to entertain subsequent generations? get serious.

      6. Status of Targets [in progress, Kyoto was #1, Hiroshima #2, Nagasaki not even listed]
      [partial quote]
      (2) Hiroshima – This is an important army depot and port of embarkation in the middle of an urban industrial area. It is a good radar target and it is such a size that a large part of the city could be extensively damaged. There are adjacent hills which are likely to produce a focussing effect which would considerably increase the blast damage. Due to rivers IT IS NOT A GOOD INCENDIARY TARGET. (Classified as an AA Target)

      7. Psychological Factors in Target Selection

      A. It was agreed that psychological factors in the target selection were of great importance. Two aspects of this are (1) obtaining the greatest psychological effect against Japan and (2) making the initial use sufficiently spectacular for the importance of the weapon to be internationally recognized when publicity on it is released.

      B. In this respect Kyoto has the advantage of the people being more highly intelligent and hence better able to appreciate the significance of the weapon. Hiroshima has the advantage of being such a size and with possible focussing from nearby mountains that a large fraction of the city may be destroyed. The Emperor’s palace in Tokyo has a greater fame than any other target but is of least strategic value.

      8. Use Against “Military” Objectives

      A. It was agreed that for the initial use of the weapon any small and strictly military objective should be located in a much larger area subject to blast damage in order to avoid undue risks of the weapon being lost due to bad placing of the bomb. [would it have mattered had it been just an “ordinary” MOAB?]

      9. Radiological Effect

      A. Dr. Oppenheimer presented a memo he had prepared on the radiological effects of the gadget. This memo will not be repeated in this summary but it is being sent to General Groves as a separate exhibit. The basic recommendations of this memo are
      (1) for radiological reasons no aircraft should be closer than 2-1/2 miles to the point of detonation (for blast reasons the distance should be greater) and
      (2) aircraft must avoid the cloud of radio-active materials. If other aircraft are to conduct missions shortly after the detonation a monitoring plane should determine the areas to be avoided.
      [why would they have faked such discussion in order to anticipate fooling general public 50 years later?!?]

      btw, thanks for calling my good friend a liar.

      1. Harold –

        Don’t fret so much… “Junior”..!! It causes wrinkles..!! 🙂 🙂

        ..

        Lobro –

        YOU suggested he was lying… now you waffle again..!! 🙂

      2. @Lobro

        If nukes existed then the Zionists would’ve used ’em. Cased closed as far as I’m concerned.

        Let me try and put it another way — 9/11 and Hiroshima share the same DNA. You have two events in which 1000s and 100,000s of people are slaughtered but the true causes of each event are hidden. With 9/11 the lie is “planes as missiles”; with Japan it is “the A-bomb”. It is always about manipulation and both events were used to manipulate the mass consciousness of an entire planet.

        However, I can see no way around the logic that if nukes existed then the Zionists would’ve used ’em. I don’t buy any argument that suggests the Zionists would be afraid of being nuked in response — how can you nuke a global-wide elite? Besides, all the planted evidence and media hot air would pin the blame on the selected patsy.

        Of course, if I believe nukes are fake then where does that leave my hopes in Putin? Thus I have reached another COGNITIVE DISSONANCE impasse. I still have hopes that Putin is genuine but logic shows me that that nukes simply don’t exist. I have no answer to this clash of thoughts 🙁

        Point of information: it was reported that Israel was testing dirty bombs in the Negev. Now why would the Zionists be doing that? To prepare for the effects of such an attack? Not likely. To prepare for a false flag attack? Probably.

        Why is everything else a lie yet the nukes narrative must be real? I mean we it is the same propaganda machines promoting the 9/11 mass lies that propounded the nuke stories. Ah well, that’s my .5 pence worth of thoughts 😛

      3. Alrighty. Good luck Darkmooners, I’m winding down my online research into how the world works. I think I see the broad strokes now.

        I hope you find an answer to the pressing question of our times — how do you survive in a JWO? 😀 I’m going to keep my head down and hope the Eye passes by me. And yes, if I have to lie and shill then I will. Adios.

      4. Flopot:

        If nukes existed then the Zionists would’ve used ’em.

        WHY? On whom? Give us the old cui bono, because i fail to see one.
        the point of the threat, the Damocles sword, is NOT to use it, let it hang there.

        had they used it, let’s say against Rome and Vatican, very likely the reaction would have doomed the creeping talmudic project forever and beyond and were they to use it now, their worldwide demise by Russia, Iran, China and maybe even Trump, would have been guaranteed.
        I would take a very personal action as would many other catholics, an RC jihad.

        It makes absolutely no sense, against whom, Syria? Not sufficiently developed, ie, “target rich environment“, in DoD perv-talk and destroying Damascus, maybe the world’s oldest city wouldn’t play too well – a net loss, no particular gain, their artificial allies would drop off like flies.

        Iran?
        wouldn’t they love that … except Iran is huge, powerful, proud, diversified, they would hit back and given that hezbollah, Iran’s farm team can wipe out Israel, what would they hope to gain, with America in hiding, Russia ready to jump in big time, the world in uproar.

        Action-wise, israel is NOTHING, A-bomb or no A-bomb.
        Tonight their soccer (futbol) team lost at home 0-3 to A-lbania, lol, mighty Yahweh’s foreskin caught in zipper.

        Pat: 100%, GMO-free BS, i never intimated at all that Dr Carlos could lie, only put it to you hypothetically as everyone for whom english is not the third or lower language would instantly discern.
        let me look up English-Missourian translator for a clearer picture …

      5. “If nukes existed then the Zionists would’ve used ’em. Cased closed as far as I’m concerned.”

        By that reasoning there can never be a first time for anything, can there? But in a sense they did already use them, because the Jew-controlled U.S. government used them on Japan. (I realize Pat et al. will say that never happened).

  18. pat – what little human value may have been left in the medical profession was finished off in the usa with the advent of managed healthcare. hospital doctors now are high priests of death. they kill people under their care with impunity every day, especially the old. when was the last time you heard of a doctor being prosecuted for it? do not check the ‘donor’ box on your drivers license, because their decision to keep you alive or not in the emergency room will be weighed against how much money you’re worth to the hospital as merchandise. they refuse to acknowledge vaccines as poisons despite the roughly one in fifty cases of autism now, not just because they’re greedy on the kickbacks but because as well they are a elitist death cult, and the warmongers know it. remember when prince died after he came down with the flu on tour, was it? they gave him a super shot of something that was supposed to cure him instantly. it killed him. they tried to give me one a year or so ago for the same kind of thing. no doctor will ever stick me with another injection.
    and you’re probably right about north korea being a slave state, run by a bloodline gangster family, for the benefit of hidden corporate entities, who always appreciate overpopulation, debt and poverty and more better ways to capture and exploit wage slaves.
    do they have nukes in north korea?
    hard for us to say, but i would bet not many of the poor devils living there wants me dead, were they ever allowed to think for themselves about it. it’s a slave state run by ruthless dictators.
    harold – thanks for the response. nice of you to hold the insults to a minimum.
    i have the right to judge whatever i want, whether i’m perfect or not. so do you. especially people’s governments.
    what kim does for north korea doesn’t look like much to me. it stays dirt poor because he wants it that way, otherwise he’d improve things. how much dough do you think him and his cronies have is swiss accounts? every depressed country in the world is being held down because of capital flight. that’s what’s wrong with africa. read the book ‘treasure islands’.
    and read the book ‘stalin’, written by montgomery hyde. i read it thirty years ago. still have it in my library.
    his real name was joseph d’jugashvilli. and he was first and foremost forever and for always a jew.
    ‘juga’ means ‘jew’. ‘ashvilli’ means ‘iron city’, as near a i can figure. ‘stalin’ means ‘steel’, so that figures. joe steel. he rules with the iron hand.
    the ‘jugat’ is the old sumerian hebrew mind over matter process of manipulating molecular structures, working miracles, moses type rod tricks, which are facilitated through incantations and chants, in case anybody knows those ‘spells’. notice ‘juga’ is in the word ‘conjugation’.
    if ‘uncle joe’, as fdr called him affectionately, got rid of some other jews, like trotsky (bronstein) it was only about the internecine power struggle.
    the jews never lost control of russia and stalin’s ‘cleaning out the synagogue’ it doesn’t add up at all to the millions of christians he murdered in russia and the other cleansing programs him and his buddy nikita (solomon perlmutter) khruschev conducted there and in easter europe, after that was given to the communists by their western comrades, fdr, eisenhower, truman, marshall etal after ww2.
    the mutual kremlin/pentagon nuclear war military industrial complex was planned for and verified by the bombs dropped on japan, which were totally unnecessary for victory but did accentuate and define the so-called cold war for the next forty years or so, though even after glasnost and peristroika the bureaucrats in Dirty City and their media plants continue to flog the red menace whenever they need it to work for them.
    you think communism ‘collapsed’ at some point during the eighties and now we have something totally different going on in russia. that’s the state media narrative. but what really happened was – when the time came the jewish ruling class morphed russia into the same pseudo commie pseudo capitalist central bankster militarized fascistic security and surveillance state that we have in the usa now. chinese communism was graduated into the same thing. that was another big shift toward the basel and brussels globalist new world order.
    guys like putin and trump come along and they may even mean well but they can’t make things change because the real ptb have too much power; they have control of the higher state puppet show offices and the higher organs of protection and control and the money system. not unless they’re willing to take the gloves all the way off and actually clean the swamp out, not just talk about it.

    1. Bark –

      I mostly agree…

      NO WWIII… with superpowers. Here’s why. All hooked together at the top:

      Communism = UN Agenda-21 today.

      Gorby’s Communism morphed into a global adventure and NGO… Green Cross International and Gobachev Foundation… with $$$ MILLIONS from the US and famous folks around the world.

      The usual suspects appear… Cousteau, Turner, Redford, Suzuki and DiCaprio…. Etc.

      XXII International Research and Practice Conference on “Environmental Education for SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Safety and Culture”

      “…the “Basic Principles of State Environmental
      Development Policy of the Russian Federation through to 2030..”

      http://www.green-cross.ru/upload/Inf_Letter_Edu_2016-eng.pdf

      Green Cross Russia
      http://www.gcint.org/our-network/green-cross-russia/
      Founded: 1993
      Town : Moscow
      Address : Gorbachev Foundation, Leningradsky pr. 39, str. 14,
      Postal code : 125167
      Website : http://www.green-cross.ru
      President : Sergei BARANOVSKY

      ……………………….

      “Global warming is not only the number one environmental challenge we face today, but one of the most important issues facing all of humanity. We all have to do our part to raise awareness about global warming and the problems we as a people face in promoting a sustainable environmental future for our planet.”

      -Leonardo DiCaprio-
      Board Member Global Green USA

      Global Green is Green Cross International USA Branch

      Board:
      January 9th, 2012 by Global Green USA.

      Founder, President Emerita, Immediate Past Chair
      Diane Meyer Simon
      Activist

      Chairperson
      Scott Seydel
      President, The Seydel Companies

      Treasurer
      Robert S. Bucklin
      Vice Chairman, Rabobank North America Wholesale

      Secretary
      Zem Spire Joaquin
      Entrepreneur & Activist

      President & CEO, Global Green USA – Mathew Petersen

      Mr. Carlton A. Brown
      COO, Full Spectrum of NY

      Sebastian Copeland
      Photography/Lecturer/Activist

      Leonardo DiCaprio
      Actor/Activist

      Christy Ferer
      CEO & Founder, Vidicom

      Anna Getty
      Activist

      The Honorable Lee Hamilton
      Director, The Center on Congress at Indiana University

      Jordan Harris
      Co-Founder, OZOCar

      Cody Horn
      Actor/Activist

      Thomas Mayne
      Architect, morphosis

      Pat Mitchell
      President/CEO, The Museum of Television & Radio

      Jerry Moss
      Co-Founder A&M Records

      Edward Norton
      Actor/Activist

      Mr. Pierre Andre Senizergues
      CEO & Founder, Sole Technology, Inc.

      Jeremy Wiesen
      Professor of Entrepreneurship, Retired

      Christiana Wyly
      Operating Partner, Satori Capital

      COUNCIL OF ADVISORS:
      Homero Aridjis
      Jason Berman, Ph.D.
      Leila Conners
      Jayni Chase
      John Paul deJoria
      John Emerson
      Ambassador Wyche Fowler
      Nathan Gardels
      Dr. Jane Goodall, DBE
      The Honorable Gary Hart
      David Hoffman
      Gale Anne Hurd
      Bruce Katz
      The Honorable Robert Kerrey
      Norman Lear
      Chief Oren Lyons
      Rev. James Parks Morton
      The Honorable Christopher Shays
      Marianne Williamson

      Honorary Board (2012)

      Princess Basma Bint Talal, Jordan

      Victor Danilov-Danilyan, Russia

      Prof. Istvan Lang, Hungary

      Dr. Rita Levi Montalcini, Italy

      Dr. Rudolphus Lubbers, The Netherlands

      Prof. Wangari Maathai, Kenya

      Pat Mitchell, USA

      Adolf Ogi, Switzerland

      H. E. Javier Perez de Cuellar, Peru

      –Robert Redford, USA

      Dr. Karan Singh, India

      Rabbi Awraham Soetendorp, The Netherlands

      David Suzuki, Canada

      Dr. Monkombu S. Swaminathan, India

      Diane Meyer Simon, USA

      –Ted Turner, USA

      –Dr. Yevgeny Velikhov, Russia

      Wakako Hironaka, Japan

      1. “i have the right to judge whatever i want, whether i’m perfect or not. so do you. especially people’s governments.”

        Okay Pat, let’s see how well that works out in practice.

        you presumably claim the same right to judge North Korean social and political system, the government and the rulers regardless of the fact that you are rather ignorant of them.

        on the other hand, you have expertise in operation of nuclear reactors powering US submarines, whereas i don’t.
        By the above rule, i have the same right to sound off on nuclear powered submarines as you, even though i couldn’t tell them apart from a capsized fishing trawler.

        This is why americans have no problem stating that kim il jong (or whatever his name) is going to ship nuclear bubble gum to our kids while wearing a santa Claus outfit.
        As for them figuring out where North Korea or any kind of Korea, eg, Chick Korea is on the globe, might as well spin a roulette wheel with countries’ names inscribed on the rim, it doesn’t interfere with judgement none.

        And the fact that the Americans have no problem with it suits the Jews just fine and at the same time pisses the hell out of the rest of the world, used to reason, balance and justice.

      2. Lobro –

        You wrote:
        “Okay Pat, let’s see how well that works out in practice.”

        HUH???????? 🙂 🙂 🙂

        Take me out of your ‘knee-jerk’ gun-sights.. PLEASE..!!

        Your dyslexia kicked in HERE..!! 🙂

        Barkingdeer claimed:
        “i have the right to judge whatever i want, whether i’m perfect or not. so do you. especially people’s governments.”

        NOT ME..!!! WHEW..!! 🙂 🙂

        I always use caps where needed… not “i”…. or “i’m”

        BTW – – I like your silly sub analogy..!! 🙂 We drove Barkingdeer may not..

        We drove thru a trawler’s nets off Virginia.HA!!!!!

      3. well …. judging you for what barkingdeer said is 100% american, so don’t try to dodge the judgment.

        this is exactly the approach used against saddam, gaddafi, assad, russia, iran, hitler, kim, tiny tim … the list is endless and each one of them did 9/11 and holocaust, not necessarily in that order.

        United States of Dyslexia would be a good name for the entire country.

      4. Lobro –

        My epilepsy kicked in with the last sentence while editing… and timed out.. before I could correct it.

        Both of us have seen better-health times. 🙂

        We did almost sink a Russian trawler before they could cut the ropes when we rammed and dragged their nets.. off the coast of Virginia in 1972…. headed to Holy Loch, Scotland.

        The 100 ton fake fishing boat…. was no match for 8000 tons of submarine.. while running on the surface. HUBBA – HUBBA..!! 🙂

      5. Lobro –
        “so don’t try to dodge the judgment.”

        Judge Barkingdeer for his claim… NOT me..!!

        I repeat….
        Take me out of your ‘knee-jerk’ gun-sights.. PLEASE..!! 🙂 🙂

        AND…. OWN your mistakes.. Stop the deflections..!! 🙂

      6. Whoa, whoa, torah, torah! You don’t get it, do you.

        Pat, true that our health(s) have seen better days.
        That said, i don’t think that our sapiencia has suffered overmuch, apart from memory lapses, tricks and such.
        When i said “Don’t dodge the judgment”, your innocence or bark’s guilt had nothing to do with it.
        I now proceed to demonstrate a basic talmudic technique, whereby tarring someone with a brush properly deserved by someone else is an element of judicial evidence.
        Fairness is no defence.
        Truth is no defence.
        Throwing yourself at the court’s mercy and requesting compassion and forgiveness is no defence, not at all.
        In Arnold Leese’s “My Irrelevant defence“, he describes it thus:

        Under the law of libel, the truth of my statements with reference to Ritual Murder could not be used as an argument in my defence; it was deemed sufficient under the law that the statements had been written, and that they “rendered His Majesty’s subjects of Jewish faith liable to suspicion, affront and boycott” and so amounted to a Public Mischief.
        [moving on]
        I came to Court very fully prepared, if the truth of my statements was challenged, to justify the statements I had made in The Fascist, and was even ready to demand that “Rex,” the prosecutor, should produce from the Public Records Office certain Close and Patent Rolls of the State wherein Jewish Ritual Murder is recorded as an established fact in this country! But I was forbidden by the Judge to use this line of defence; it did not matter who else had charged the Jews with ritual murder, or how often, or what historic facts proved it, or how many convictions there had been under proper juridical authority; thus, when I asked Inspector Kitchener, the only witness who appeared against me, “When you brought this case, were you under the impression that Ritual Murder was a thing of the past?” and he replied “Yes,” the Judge intervened with the remark
        The truth of a libel is no defense, I must point out again.”

        Again, the Attorney-General, who was acting as Prosecuting Counsel, interrupted another question of mine to the same witness, by the remark: “In my submission,
        it is CORRECTLY laid down that the defendant is in no case allowed to prove the truth of a seditious libel as a justification for having published it.”
        [Everybody stand up+applaud, for here we witness the birth of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS]

        The Judge then said, “That is the law as I understand it.” He made it clear to me that to proceed further in such a line of defence would be CONTEMPT OF COURT,
        [pursuit of truth is proof of criminally subversive mind (truthopath? veropath?)]
        as the “truth” of the “libel” was “irrelevant” to the issue of the trial!

        so you can see that Libel, as in “BLOOD LIBEL” is a purely talmudic vehicle that steamrolls over truth and justice as either nonexistent or in themselves criminal.

        here in a nutshell you have the bare bones struggle between Judaism and Jesus who saw it as his mission to combat it and its insane Yhwh’s laws and replace them with a simple, clear law of his own, namely LOGOS:
        Truth, Justice, Compassion, Balance.

        this grand lesson has been entirely lost on American protestants and gradually bred out of the rest of the failing West and I am conducting this mock prosecution of you Pat to demonstrate its working (maybe I prearranged with barkingdeer to so frame you, feel free to blame my dyslexia, the truth of which is no defense).
        In Germany, if you are charged with Holo denial and you attempt to defend yourself, that in itself renders you even more criminally liable.

        So cease+desist Pat, throw yourself at the nonexistent mercy of the 33rd degree Scottish Rite Court because your groveling amuses the august panelists.

        (maybe if you and your lawyer show up in the judge’s chambers with a suitcase loaded with cash, we can cross out Pat and substitute Kim Jong Ill, the III or Vlad Putin in your stead or just toss a bunch of 🙂 ‘s into the slammer, they don’t mind, being of eternally optimistic attitude)

      7. Lobro –

        NOW… THAT’S what I call a “YUGE” deflection…!!
        A very nice one, BTW.

        I’m glad I motivated you to produce the monstrosity. The ‘MOAD’..!!

        Circassian would be proud..!!

        I don’t waste $$$ on lawyers. Toss the 🙂 s in the slammer….
        ‘BUTT’… Watch for the low-flying ‘Grammer Feigned’… since you incorrectly used the apostrophe… 🙂

    2. “i have the right to judge whatever i want, whether i’m perfect or not. so do you. especially people’s governments.”

      Before the Jews and their goy puppets attack any country, what do they do? They generally sit in judgement of the ruler and/or the government of that country. The judgement is the first step. The Jews determined that Assad was “no good”; he “gassed his own people”; he’s “an animal”, etc. The Jews determined that Assad is simply not fit to rule Syria. They did the same thing to Yanukovych in Ukraine, Gaddafi in Libya and Saddam Hussein in Iraq. They did it to Milosevic in Yugoslavia, Noriega in Panama, Mossadegh in Iran, Arbenz in Guatemala, and many others.

      The judgement is a very important part of the process of world domination and control. Once judgement is pronounced by the tribe, it generally leads to action; e.g., sanctions, isolation, political subversion and ultimately military attack and/or invasion.

      As I see it, neither the Jews nor their puppet politicians have any right whatsoever to judge anyone else’s rulers, unless those rulers are unjustifiably aggressing against another country. For example the Saudi Arabian government is attacking Yemen. If they can attack Yemen they can attack any other country including any country I might happen to live in, for example. I therefore believe I have “standing” to publicly denounce them for it.

      When you say you have a “right” to judge Kim Jong Un, even though you don’t live on the Korean peninsula, even though he didn’t attack your country or do anything to you personally, you put yourself on the same “superior” existential plane claimed by the Jews. (Maybe that’s because you are Jewish)?

      I’m sorry, but I have nothing but contempt for anyone who claims a superior right to exist, which is what the Jews claim, and what you’re impliedly claiming. Consequently, I don’t take you seriously at all.

      “what kim does for north korea doesn’t look like much to me.” Since it’s really none of your business in the first place, who cares what you and your Jewish comrades happen to “think” about it?

      “it stays dirt poor because he wants it that way, otherwise he’d improve things.”

      That’s just a ridiculous bare assertion.

      “how much dough do you think him and his cronies have is swiss accounts? every depressed country in the world is being held down because of capital flight.”

      Another bare assertion.

      “guys like putin and trump come along and they may even mean well but they can’t make things change because the real ptb have too much power;”

      You’re actually going to equate Putin with Trump? Seriously? Putin has an approval rating (among the Russian people) that’s hovering somewhere in the mid to upper 80s. What’s Trump’s approval rating? Somewhere in the 30s apparently. Putin is obviously doing something right by his people and he at least seems to be hampering the Jew agenda, while traitorous liar Trump is pursuing the Jew agenda.

  19. Not to worry, Not – To – Worry! Just remember to whistle discretely when passing by the nuclear graveyard while repeating the magic mantra: “Trump will save us, Trump will save us.” See? It’s not so scary anymore – is it?

  20. rerevisionist
    “True. [Added later – I’ve lost track who this was addressed to!] Once you see Jews took over Russia as the USSR, and when you realise that the Fed was established in 1913, just in time for WW1, and of course that the English Civil War (so called) established the Jewish Bank of England, you have most of the puzzle pieces. In addition, ‘Saudi Arabia’ seems to be a Jewish fief; and Castro in Cuba was a Marrano Jew. It’s possible Hitler was a plant, too, financed to keep out Germans (& Austrians, & Hungarians, & Poles) who wanted serious revenge for WW1.”
    you got all that right. except, judging from his financial sources during his rise to power, his poor management conduct during ww2, the fact that his own generals tried to kill him at one point and the way it all turned out, with the destruction of the german army, the massacre of millions of german civilians, the ruin of its cities and infrastructure and the advancement of the jewish state in palestine it’s much harder to say hitler was not a double agent all along. it isn’t as if we never see that sort of thing. look at obama.
    and remember – the first rule of war is treachery.

  21. Russia’s economy is in shambles. They cannot fight another major power… such as USA or China.

    ‘Put-On’ begs for USA help…. at conferences and forums in Russia. 🙂

    The implosion of the Soviet Union left many enterprises without viable funding.

    Russia has nearly 20,000 ghost towns — places once built to serve strategically important locations or rich mineral deposits whose significance was later downgraded to unnecessary. The usual scenario: the incipient death of towns which were born during Soviet central planning, grandiloquent building projects or the Soviet electrification scheme.

    Patriotism — the carburetor of Soviet progress — could not kept them going either. A move to a new city is not unusual nowadays. Yet, unlike the majority of immigrants, people who come from ghost towns have no home to go back to.

    https://www.rbth.com/travel/2013/02/05/life_goes_on_in_russian_ghost_towns_22505.html

    1. ‘Put-On’ needs welfare ‘FROM’ US… not warfare… ‘WITH’ US.. 🙂

      Generation Drain: Mass exodus spawns ghost towns in rural Russia

      Over 3,000 villages deserted in one year alone.
      Russia’s youth are beating a path to the big cities to make their living – but the rural towns they leave behind are dying out as a result. RT’s Egor Piskunov has more on the generation drain to hear how the few who stay behind are coping.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLdPJOWAGUc

      –Sochi Becoming A Ghost Town–
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U86lvdpoY80

      –Vladimir Putin’s Sochi Olympic park lying desolate and abandoned one year after Olympics–

      A $51 billion ‘ghetto’: Extraordinary images show Vladimir Putin’s Sochi Olympic park lying desolate and abandoned one year after most expensive games in history
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_E_9gxht1o

  22. Israel is most likely to be the first to use nukes, on their neighbours. It would go a long way to clearing the ground for Greater Israel.

    1. John: You need to correct your email address or your posts will be held up for monitoring. Please insert the ‘k’.

      1. I see all the comments by myself and Fixit and my sister Fiona have been scrubbed.
        I guess you have a policy of not publishing truths and see your site as little more than empty gossip exchange. No wonder some of your readers are so ignorant – -they are denied access to truths.
        Any way cheerio and good luck. I don’t imagine many people are interested in Trump/ Comey but if the US does attack NK we will know that you played a useful part in helping spread misinformation about them. We always distrust websites where the person running it has to hide behind a fake name and takes no responsibility for what the gossipers say.
        Serena Fiona and Marcus (Fixit)

      2. @ Serena
        @ Fiona
        @ Mr Fixit
        @ Others in family of 5

        For your information, we scrubbed all your posts because of your arrogant rudeness to us and your hectoring tone in telling us that we were “under obligation” to publish all your comments. No, madam, we are under no such “obligation”!

        We are under no obligation to publish the comments of 3-5 different individuals all purportedly using the same computer (or IP number). How do we know you are not ONE person using different names? This is strictly against the rules of our website. Sorry, we have no intention to let you break our rules.

        None of the articles we have posted here have been hostile to North Korea, as you falsely claim. On the contrary, ALL of the articles we have published have been highly critical of the United States. Nor did we have any problem posting your pro-North Korea comments, so what the hell are you complaining about?

        In future, learn to behave properly and politely and stop thinking you can order this website around as if you owned it.

        — Admin Toby

  23. As soon as you guys set foot in America, you began scalping the Indians.

    Huh? This idea is upside down, but this has become standard fare in today’s upside down world. People today have a tendency to lay all the blame on one side, leaving the other side blameless, but it has always taken “two to tango.” No doubt this penchant for one-sided blame is due to the victim programming established to hold Jews completely blameless for the justified retaliations carried out against them.

    It is interesting how often Jews have used the Indian in the same manner as the Negro, as a tool for slandering the white man and instilling guilt in his race. Inevitably those following the Jew’s lead have no clue about the subject matter used in these examples. Instead, they simply parrot the same old hoary lies originally jinned up by Jew propagandists to slander their enemy. Before quoting such examples, one should spend time reading and studying Indian atrocities carried out against all enemies, including other tribes. These are horrors that make Jews look almost human – almost.

    Like other primitive people, the Indian’s downfall was due to overwhelming technical superiority. However, had the various tribes not divided themselves with vicious, internecine wars, things might have been different. One thing is certain, if the moccasin had been on the other foot, Indians would have literally massacred or enslaved the white man in the very same fashion they massacred and enslaved other tribes.

    Scalping was a long held tradition among Indians before the white man showed up. While psychopathic murderers of all stripes have taken various body parts from their victims, like Vietnamese ears or Japanese skulls, or Indian scalps and scrotums, this type of ghoulish behavior was never an example of any white, American, cultural tradition as was the scalping tradition of the Indians.

    Fro the American Indian, scalping was a means of visibly demonstrating one’s prowess as a warrior. In part, it served a similar function as drinking blood or eating flesh as a means of absorbing an enemies power, acts long carried out by primitive peoples. Indians commonly believed that without a head, one would be denied entry to the “happy hunting grounds.” Thus decapitation was at times used by the white man in their attempt to instill fear in the tribes. Of course like most forms of terrorism, decapitation did little to dissuade dedicated Indian warriors from mortal combat and predatory acts.

    Another interesting point is how various tribes considered themselves to be the only “humans,” while other peoples and tribes were merely animals. Now where have we heard that before? By the time of the Torah, Jews had learned early on the best method for instilling fear and hatred for other races is to paint them as non-humans, which is exactly what they have done to Germans.

    Jews are a classic example of what happens when a primitive people obtain the capability to fully understand and use advanced technology while retaining their primitive culture. Careful study of the American Indian shows their downfall was due to the fact that, while using the white man’s advanced technology, they never really developed an understanding of the technology they had stolen from him.

    A classic example of this was the Indian’s inability to understand and use the “sight picture” to accurately aim a firearm. The bow and arrow had been the Indian’s primary weapon since time immemorial. As traditional archery does not use a sight picture for aiming, Indians never truly developed the concept for maximizing the deadly accuracy of the firearm. For Indian’s, use of the white man’s firearm was largely a matter of what would later be referred to as “spray and pray” in the age of the machine gun.

    And speaking of machine guns, how many know General George Custer had a full compliment of Gatling guns at his disposal, but did not take them to his final battle at “Little Big Horn” as he felt they were unnecessary? “A Href = “http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-little-bighorn-were-the-weapons-the-deciding-factor.htm”>Here is an interesting take on that subject. Perhaps the most interesting point this author makes in his article can be found in the following paragraph:

    It is a perplexing incongruity in a citizen-soldier army, but the vast majority of soldiers, when the time comes to kill, become conscientious objectors. It has been asserted that man is essentially a killer at heart, yet recent studies have found evidence quite to the contrary. Men, soldiers or not, simply have an innate resistance to killing. It is fairly well-established that when faced with danger, a man will usually respond by fight or flight.

    Obviously the author of this article never made a study of the psychopathic Jew. But then Jews have long used proxies to murder their enemies – at least in terms of mass warfare. This is not because Jews have any innate resistance to killing, but, with extremely rare exception, are abject cowards on the battlefield. This makes perfect sense considering that, for Jews, this material life is all there is, lose your life and one loses everything. After all, what good is vast material wealth when one lays in the grave for some abstract political or religious ideal?

    I take issue with the author’s idea that the types of weaponry had no influence on the outcome of the battle. As Douglas MacArthur once reportedly said: “Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword never came up against a machine gun.”

    1. @ Arch Stanton

      “One thing is certain, if the moccasin had been on the other foot, Indians would have literally massacred or enslaved the white man in the very same fashion they massacred and enslaved other tribes.”

      It appears as if you have fallen for the jewish version of American history which is the common version where everyone is a savage unless they came from Europe with an “official” rag on a stick. The truth has nothing to do with white guilt, just common sense not blurred by propaganda.

      The American Indians had a superior power, much greater numbers. Had they did as you suppose due to their savagery, there would have been no colonies until much later in history when landing parties were of much greater numbers began to occur. The Vikings would have immediately been eliminated instead of leaving of their own accord. The copper traders of the bronze age would not have been able to acquire the easy copper in Minnesota. The indians would not have assisted the people coming off of the Mayflower so that they could survive. The jews would not have been able to trade beads to the indians for Manhattan. The indians would not have traded fur pelts with the settlers. Etc. etc. etc.

      Had Jesus not walked America, what you suppose about the savagery of the indians from the jewish version of history might have been true, but Jesus did and the indians learned.

      Here is some serious savagery.

      “Live your life that the fear of death can never enter your heart.
      Trouble no one about his religion.
      Respect others in their views and demand that they respect yours.
      Love your life, perfect your life, beautify all things in your life.
      Seek to make your life long and of service to your people.
      Prepare a noble death song for the day when you go over the great divide.
      Always give a word or sign of salute when meeting or passing a friend,
      or even a stranger, if in a lonely place.
      Show respect to all people, but grovel to none.
      When you rise in the morning, give thanks for the light,
      for your life, for your strength.
      Give thanks for your food and for the joy of living.
      If you see no reason to give thanks, the fault lies in yourself.
      Abuse no one and no thing, for abuse turns the wise ones to fools
      and robs the spirit of its vision.
      When your time comes to die,
      be not like those whose hearts are filled with fear of death,
      so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time
      to live their lives over again in a different way.
      Sing your death song, and die like a hero going home.”
      — Tecumseh
      (1768-1813) Shawnee Chief

      A little more savagery.

      “Before our white brothers arrived to make us civilized men, we didn’t have any kind of prison. Because of this, we had no delinquents. Without a prison, there can be no delinquents. We had no locks nor keys and therefore, among us there were no thieves. When someone was so poor that he couldn’t afford a horse, a tent, or a blanket, he would, in that case, receive it all as a gift. We were too uncivilized to give great importance to civilized property. We didn’t know any kind of money and consequently, the value of a human being was not determined by his wealth. We had no written laws laid down, no lawyers, no politicians, therefore we were not able to cheat and swindle one another. We were really in bad shape before the white men arrived and I don’t know how to explain how we were able to manage these fundamental things that (so they tell us) are so necessary for a civilized society.” –John (Fire) Lame Deer – Lakota Sioux

      What you are “certain of” most probably is just another jewish lie called “official” history.

  24. One doesn’t need a PhD to understand the difference between CIA-Mossad-MI6 terrorism against White folks at Manchester Arena and the London Bridge than their terrorism against Muslims of a country which Netanyahu designated greatest existential threat to the Zionist entity.

    Both Manchester Arena and the London Bridge were as much false flag operation as the July 2007 London tube bombing.

    In September 2011, ahead of the 10th anniversary of September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks – the Zionist-controlled British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) arranged a road-trip for five non-believers of the official 9/11 lie, across the east coast of United States in search for ‘the truth’ about the 9/11.

    On October 1, 2012 – BBC aired a similar bus trip which took four Brits who, supposedly, refuse to believe the official lie about the July 7, 2005 London bombing. Like the 9/11, Muslims were also wrongly blamed for the London bombing. However, trail of one of the four so-called bombers, Anthony John Hill aka “Maud dib” exposed 7/7 as an inside job carried out by MI5 and Israeli Mossad.

    The guide for BBC’s 7/7 bus trip was no other than the Irish stand-up comedian Andrew Maxwell, who also guided the 9/11 road trip last year. The four ‘non-believers’ were; Tony Topping (a UFOs believer), Davina (a young woman converted to Islam recently), Layla (a nude model and low-budget film actress) and Jon Scobie of WeAreChange Birmingham. Evidently Jon tried to ask some important and informed questions but was largely shot down and left on the cutting room floor. Read the whole story from those who were invited but refused to join the bus trip, here, here and here.

    Below I have posted five videos to explain the so-called “7/7 conspiracy theories” including the BBC’s ‘Conspiracy Road Trip’.

    https://rehmat1.com/2012/11/04/bbc-markets-official-77-bombing-story/

  25. The Puniest “SUPERPOWER” overpowers its it own people. The only people Russia can whip..!!

    “FREE SPEECH” is very expensive in ‘Put-On’ country..!! 🙂

    Putin critic Alexei Navalny jailed after calling for Moscow protests

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/12/russian-opposition-leader-alexei-navalny-detained-moscow-protest

    Yesterday… a Moscow court sentenced Navalny to 30 days in prison for calling people to an unsanctioned rally.

    The protest comes as Russia enters an election cycle, with a vote due next March expected to give Putin six more years in the Kremlin. Navalny, a lawyer turned anti-corruption campaigner, has announced his intention to stand, though few expect him to be allowed on to the ballot.

    Navalny is popular among a minority of the population, and his support is growing. A protest in March against alleged corruption linked to the prime minister, Dmitry Medvedev, drew an estimated 60,000 people to the streets in cities across Russia.

    Monday’s protest was the latest salvo in Navalny’s battle with the Kremlin, and was seen as a test of whether the event in March was a flash in the pan or the start of a sustained problem for the Kremlin before elections.

    …………………….

    Anti-Kremlin protesters fill Russian streets, Putin critic Navalny jailed

    The Interior Ministry said the turnout at the Moscow protest was about 4,500.

    State media ignored the demonstrations, broadcasting Soviet-style coverage of Putin handing out state awards instead.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-opposition-protests-idUSKBN192167

    Baton-wielding riot police broke up anti-corruption protests and detained hundreds of demonstrators in Moscow and other Russian cities on Monday, before a court sentenced opposition leader Alexei Navalny to his second prison term this year.

    The protests, called by Navalny, a strong critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin, drew thousands of people and were some of the biggest in Russia since 2012.

    “Russia without Putin” and “Russia will be free” chanted the demonstrators, including many young people, who crowded into central Moscow on a public holiday.

  26. pat – you’re on the right track.
    the russians never had an economy. it was always a lie. the us built russia.
    fred koch was joe stalin’s favorite oil man.
    everybody in the place they call the DISTRICT of columbia named kagan something is a bloodline descendant of joe stalin and the other wheel kaganovitch; stalin married his sister after his present wife “committed suicide”…
    look at chuck todd. he’s joe stalin.
    the bolosheviki stienies stole the wealth of russia after the revolution.
    i don’t know about putin but communist russia was always a ‘put-on’…

    1. Bark –
      Yep…

      BTW – Kagan means “KING”…. “Ruler”… 🙂

      Kagan, Khaghan, Kha-khan, Xagahn, Qaghan, Chagan, Қан, or Kha’an… is a title in the Turkic language equal to the status of emperor and used to refer to someone who rules a khaganate or empire.

  27. pat – all heavy on the ‘k’ sound. the k race is the master alien bloodline, creators of the human race, the ‘hue man’. the ‘gn’ sound, or ‘ng’, references the ‘gene’ or dna molecule. ‘ing’ is often a bloodline reference sound. ‘king’ means ‘k blood’…
    communism is a jewish bankster plot. it’s been well established in the upper echelons of government in the usa for about 100 years now. two mainstays are the privately owned central bank and the graduated income tax. those are two main planks in the communist manifesto, been in play here since woodrow wilson in 1913.. fdr, ww2 and the alliance with russia was all instrumental in melding the kgb and the cia into one force for the globalists.

Comments are closed.