Trump finally caves in under intense Jewish Pressure

By PETRUS GERMANICUS
(‘Peter’)

This 1400-word analysis of the Trump presidency by ‘Peter’ was posted this morning as a comment. We decided to delete the comment and run it as a feature article instead. As a committed member of the Alt-Right who voted for Trump, and who honestly believes that Trump started out with good intentions, Peter is certainly well qualified to give his informed opinion here.  

“After being elected and the attacks by the media didn’t let up,
Trump finally caved in. He has turned his back 180 degrees . . . “

President Trump’s most ardent supporters during his campaign for president were the Alt-Right. His anti-immigration stance, statement to a Jewish group that he didn’t want their money and would be neutral in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, statement that he did not want to topple Assad and wanted good relations with Russia if possible, all appealed to the Alt-Right and others on the right too.

Steve Bannon, the former editor of Breitbart News and someone who shared Trump’s political outlook, was going to play an important role in the administration, but like Trump, Bannon was attacked by the mainstream media from the very beginning. He was repeatedly called a “fascist”.

Jared Kushner is the prototype opposite of everything Trump and Bannon stand for. He belongs to the Democratic party, is the owner of the newspaper New York Observer (since 2016 Observer.com) which supported none of Trump’s policies and is a devout Jew and strong supporter of Israel. If Jared Kushner was not Trump’s son in law, he would never have been part of the presidential administration, none of whose policies he supported. Israel benefits from the terrorists in its neighbor and enemy Syria, which have destroyed and weakened the country, and Jews recognize how this benefits Israel. Jews are also the main force behind non-white immigration to white countries.

Since the beginning of Trump’s campaign, Jews like Soros, Jews in Trump’s own administration and most importantly the Jews in the mainstream media (TV and print) have viciously attacked and opposed Trump. When the Jewish media demonizes Putin (a Christian, supporter of traditional values, against homosexual and LGBT propaganda and nationalist) and Assad, which they do every day in the media for their own benefit, most people are still unaware (or just deny it) that Jews hold that power in the media. I think many people deny to themselves Jews have such power in the media, because if they accepted this fact it would require them to look at everything differently and would require them to judge Jews negatively, which is absolutely forbidden since the end of WW II and the “holocaust” has been drilled into every non-Jews head worldwide.

After being elected and the attacks by the media didn’t let up, Trump finally caved in. He has turned his back 180 degrees on his positions on Syria and Russia and has received criticism for backing off his illegal immigrant stance too.

The “Russia fixed the election” propaganda by the media and Trump’s opponents was a powerful weapon, despite the fact not a single bit of proof has been presented. That’s the power of the media.

If you haven’t noticed by now, there is no “white privilege” in the US, but there is “Jewish privilege” worldwide. They’ve suffered and we all owe them. Actually, someone said that to me a couple months ago. When I stated my case that there is no evidence for the Holocaust, a hardcore believer asked, if I didn’t feel remorse for what Germans (my people) did to the Jews? So, I’m sure the thought didn’t escape Trump that replacing Bannon the “fascist” with a devout Jew in his cabinet would relieve some of the attacks on him.

Immediately after launching an attack on Syria, Trump received his first support from the media. I believe it was CNN that announced its support to the world, saying this was the “day Trump became president”, the attack was “presidential”.

The video about Kushner (see here), with the unanimous support of the “genius” Kushner “wunderkind” is about as believable as the “Putin fixed the election” story, and there is nothing unusual about it. A part of Jewish ethnocentrism is strong support and advocating for Jews promotion to positions of power. This is a central part of their success and part of that process is building up Jews with mediocre records into geniuses, justifying the power granted them. This is done over and over again, with Jews alive today, or Jews even Jews from centuries ago. Here a few examples. Don’t feel obligated to read the full length articles I linked to.

Here is an article on the composer Gustav Mahler:

“The Mahler symphonies … get me out of here. I keep surreptitiously cheering Kingsley Amis’s verdict “Mahler lacks talent even more spectacularly than he lacks genius.” …

The leap in Mahler’s stature from near-oblivion in 1960 (when, as Britain’s Spectatornoted on January 13, “[H]is impact on the general public was roughly the equivalent of, say, [Poland’s Karol] Szymanowski today”) to deification after that date, has little or nothing to do with musical merits and almost everything to do with external considerations.”

Why would the reputation of a composer enhance Jewish power? The German-Jewish Theodor Adorno thought it was important. He was one of the most important cultural Marxists and a member of the Frankfurt School. From the article “By several accounts, the two most important advocates of Mahler during the 1960s were Adorno and conductor Leonard Bernstein.”

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/02/14/kevin-macdonald-why-is-mahler-so-popular/

Here is another example of Jews advocating for a Jew with mediocre abilities:

Elena Kagan Gets the Nomination

“It’s great to be Jewish in the year 2010. The latest evidence is the appointment of Elena Kagan as the third Jew on the Supreme Court. Philip Weiss puts it this way:

The Kagan appointment means that we have entered a period in which Jews are equal members, if not actually predominant members, of the American Establishment. Obama’s two closest political advisers are Jewish, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, and are said to be his foreign-policy braintrust. The economy is supervised to a large degree by Jewish appointees, Larry Summers and Fed Reserve Board chair Paul Bernanke (Time‘s man of the year last year, a selection overseen by Rick Stengel, the Time magazine editor, who is also Jewish).

Of course, that’s just scratching the surface on Jewish representation…..”

“Weiss goes on to take the standard line that Jews have achieved so much because of their bookish culture. But if there’s anything that stands out about Kagan, it’s how utterly ordinary she is in terms of scholarly accomplishment or anything else that would qualify her for the court–very few publications, no experience as a judge, little courtroom experience — the Harriet Miers of the Obama administration.”

“Her only talent seems to be getting really prestigious jobs without any obvious qualifications apart from her ethnic background.”

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/05/10/kevin-macdonald-elena-kagan-gets-the-nomination/

On Contemporary Opera and Wagner’s ‘Jewry in Music’

“This month marks the 165th anniversary of the publication of Richard Wagner’s landmark essay ‘Das Judenthum in der Musik.’ Almost right on cue the opera scene, particularly in Berlin, has recently played host to a series of episodes that would have the Old Sorcerer spinning in his grave. Back in June Kirill Petrenko, a Siberian-born Jewish conductor, was appointed as music director to the Berlin Philharmonic beginning September 2018. Petrenko was no-one’s first choice. His name apparently came into the reckoning only after 124 orchestra members split down the middle in an all-day election on May 11, half of them voting for the German favourite Christian Thielemann and the other half for the young Latvian, Andris Nelsons. By nightfall, the players were steeped in conflict, forcing leaders to seek a third, compromise candidate.”

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/09/26/on-contemporary-opera-and-wagners-jewry-in-music/

Pariah to Messiah: The Engineered Apotheosis of Baruch Spinoza, Part 1 of 3

“A recurring theme here at TOO has been the monitoring of ethnic networking in efforts to establish Jewish figures in positions of scientific, academic, artistic or cultural pre-eminence.”

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/03/04/pariah-to-messiah-the-engineered-apotheosis-of-baruch-spinoza-part-1-of-3/

But one of the obstacles to recognizing the existence of Jewish power is getting people to believe that they are being duped by a tiny ethnic group with power way out of proportion to their numbers, that the media they control will very rarely let cat out of the bag. I repeatedly come up against people who insist Jews don’t have extraordinary influence in the media.

Billy Graham & President Nixon recorded talking about the Jewish Domination of US Media:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqCKx4tWk6w

Brother Nathanel on the Jewish media, with President Trump:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqCKx4tWk6w

One of the first things to address Jewish power is getting people to recognize (or admit) its existence. How such a tiny group has achieved such power is a different matter. The reason is complicated, there is not a clear answer and it’s not just intelligence. Other races are highly intelligent too. Their exponential growth in power has really taken hold since the end of WW II.

While Hitler never “ordered” the so called “Holocaust”, communism was Germany and Europe’s main enemy and Hitler openly identified his main enemy as “Jewish Bolshevism”. With the help of the other Great Powers of that period, Jews won WW II and now basically run the world.

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

88 thoughts on “Trump finally caves in under intense Jewish Pressure

  1. There are apparently three possibilities: (1) Trump had good intentions to start with but then under pressure he “caved” in to the Jews and turned around 180 degrees on most of his campaign promises; (2) Trump never actually “caved”; he never reversed himself, although it may seem that way. Instead he’s got a brilliant but very complex, esoteric plan to beat the Jews at their own game; and (3) His whole campaign was a calculated fraud from the beginning; he never had any intention of following through on most of his campaign promises. He is a consummate Jew puppet ruler.

    I claim that the only plausible theory is #3.

    The fundamental problem with theory #1 is this: What motivating force would be so strong as to compel Trump to do it in the first place, but so weak that he could quickly and easily be talked out of it or convinced otherwise after the election?

    Choosing to dedicate yourself to a fight against evil and risking your life, reputation, etc., in the process isn’t like choosing vanilla ice cream over chocolate ice cream, is it? So anyone who argues for #1 (as Peter is doing here if I understand correctly) has to explain why at the age of 70 someone like Trump would make a serious run for president in the first place, under the circumstances.

    1. If Trump was a conman all along, then why did he withdraw from the TPP and the Paris Climate Change Agreement, two major parts of the Jewish globalist agenda ?

      It seems more likely that he had good intentions and could push through some changes that he wanted in the beginning, but then was swiftly forced by the Jews to change course, probably by blackmail (pedophilia ?), or the threat of financial ruin or even a threat against his life and/or of his family.

      Another argument is, that if Trump was an agent for the Jews all along, there would not exist such an hysterical opposition against him from nearly 100% of the Jewish press. The Jews clearly wanted Hillary for president, and not their supposed “agent” Trump.

      1. “If Trump was a conman all along, then why did he withdraw from the TPP and the Paris Climate Change Agreement, two major parts of the Jewish globalist agenda ?”

        Put simply, probably so that people like you could pose questions like this on forums like this; thereby helping to create some “doubt”, especially for those who demand it.

        I believe that the Jews are in a desperate situation. At the end of Obama’s term their agenda was stalled, their machinations exposed more than ever, the people are sick and tired of endless confrontation and wars, etc. So they are probably willing to give up a few relatively minor things if they have to, if it will help advance the non-negotiable part of the agenda.

      2. FR –

        You wrote:
        “If Trump was a conman all along, then why did he withdraw from the TPP and the Paris Climate Change Agreement, two major parts of the Jewish globalist agenda ?”

        TPP and Climate mess withdrawals can be reversed/reformed/ rewritten easily any time. “JUST a damned piece of paper..!!” re: Shrub/Dubya.

        The Gorby’s Great Green Climate Change Agreement is still open for three more years.

        Bottom line…

        It is A RUSE… for YOU to respond as YOU did…!! 🙂

      3. “Another argument is, that if Trump was an agent for the Jews all along, there would not exist such an hysterical opposition against him from nearly 100% of the Jewish press.”

        Why do we have to assume that there really is true “hysterical opposition” to Trump, merely based on what the Jew controlled media is saying?

        Wasn’t there also “hysterical opposition” to Saddam Hussien and his non-existent “weapons of mass destruction” by the Jew controlled mass media?

        History shows that you can’t take Jews’ “hysterical opposition” (or anything else they say) at face value. It must be the subject of serious analysis on a case by case basis.

        “The Jews clearly wanted Hillary for president, and not their supposed “agent” Trump.”

        Or so we were supposed to think. See my post below for a different opinion.

      4. If Trump was a conman all along

        One could see that early on, BEFORE the election, when he chose the CZ, war and Israeli loving Pence.
        Pence was the ‘insurance’ policy that in case something happened to Trump, the endless ME wars, banker bailouts and loyalty to Israel would continue.

        As for the Paris Accords, what Trump has done is to stall the agreement until 2020, when it can be reanimated and shoved down our throats.
        The TPP is still lurking in the halls of Congress, but it will be done piece-meal, taking our poison a small bite at a time.

      5. @ Harold Smith
        @ Franklin Ryckaert
        @ Lobro

        I think we have three horses in the race here:

        1. Trump was always the Jew’s willing agent and is now showing it; he never had good intentions but just made cynical promises to get elected. He is a duplicitous traitor through and through. (Harold Smith theory)

        2. Trump really did start out with good intentions, promising great things and hoping he could fulfil his pledges. But he is a weak man who is also smart enough to know that the Jews have got him cornered and that he has no option but to do their bidding. Maybe he is subject to blackmail (pedophilia, plus financial skeletons in the cupboard). Also assassination fears. (He probably has many personal bodyguards, lookalikes, and food tasters to make sure he isn’t poisoned). All this makes Trump a helpless puppet of the Jews, albeit a most reluctant one. (Franklin Ryckaert theory).

        I myself find it virtually impossible to decide between these two hypotheses.

        3. Finally, Trump was always a good guy and is still a man of high principle. He’s done some good things, and sure, he’s broken some promises. But give him time. He’s a wily operator, a consummate chess master like Putin. He knows exactly how Jews operate and is playing them at their own game. We’ve just got to faith in him and stop undermining him by demonizing him. (Lobro’s theory).

        I find #3 harder to accept than #1 and #2 . . . but Lobro’s horse is still in the running and could overtake the other two in the right circumstances. But as Lobro himself would admit, there’s only ONE way for Trump to get his way and NAIL THE JEWS — assuming this is his secret overall aim — and that is to declare martial law and assume dictatorial powers.

        In order for Trump to succeed he must become the equivalent of Stalin or Hitler, Julius Caesar or Genghiz Khan.

        The armed forces must be behind him 100 percent.

        Every congressman would be arrested. AIPAC and the ADL would be declared terrorist organizations. The Jew media bosses would be rounded up and put in front of firing squads. All American Jews would be interned and arrangements made to find a new homeland for them where they could be kept out of harm’s way. As for Israel, it could be handed over to the Palestinians and arrangements made to deport the 6-7 million Israeli land grabbers to their new homeland — wherever it is.

        Unfortunately, this is the stuff of fiction. The anti-Semite’s ultimate pipe dream.

      6. @ Lobro

        I hope Lobro will stick around and discuss these matters with us. He is too valuable an asset to lose.

        Lobro, don’t go, OK? If I’ve given you offense by any of my previous comments, sincere apologies. LD assures me in an email that no one in ADMIN bears you the slightest ill-feeling and that you are imagining it all.

        Also, in case you were concerned, that the “Ariadna” who attacked you had a completely different email address and IP number from the “Ariadnatheo” we all knew. So it’s probably a completely different person.

        In any case, the heat will die down soon if you just give it a chance. Storms always subside … and the Ocean returns to calm.

        Cheers!

        Sardonicus

      7. @ Sardonicus

        “In order for Trump to succeed he must become the equivalent of Stalin or Hitler, Julius Caesar or Genghiz Khan.”

        How do you define success? As I see it, America is like a patient brought into a hospital emergency room suffering a heart attack. The patient needs two things: acute care to survive the heart attack, followed by long term care to regain cardiovascular health.

        In my view, near term success or acute care in this case means preventing WW3 by de-escalating tensions with Russia. As commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces, the president doesn’t have to become some kind of a tyrant to do what the constitution gives him the authority to do in the first place, which would be to pull the military out of Syria for example. Just doing that that would mess up the Jew agenda big time. And what are the Jews realistically going to do about it? Especially if he takes his case TO THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED HIM TO DO PRECISELY THAT.

        Then he could order the state dept to begin negotiations with Russia in good faith on whole bunch of other issues from Ukraine to NATO expansion to intermediate range missiles, etc. And this is also well within his constitutional authority.

        Once he starts doing things like this, the Jew agenda is finished. Period. The end.
        Of course he could also do things like order NIST to answer the questions posed by AE911 Truth, etc.
        As I see it, he’s got all the power he needs to save the U.S. (and the world), if that was his intention.

      8. @ Harold Smith

        @ Sardonicus: “In order for Trump to succeed he must become the equivalent of Stalin or Hitler, Julius Caesar or Genghiz Khan.”

        How do you define success? As I see it, America is like a patient brought into a hospital emergency room suffering a heart attack. The patient needs two things: acute care to survive the heart attack, followed by long term care to regain cardiovascular health.

        Well, Harold, I’m not disagreeing with you in any way, since I’ve already said that your hypothesis and Ryckaert’s hypothesis are are the two hot favorites in the race and that deciding between them would be a tough assignment.

        What I am dealing with in the above quote is Lobro’s hypothesis, not your hypothesis. The question I am asking here is not, “What must Trump do to satisfy Harold Smith?” but “What must Trump do to satisfy Lobro?”

        See the difference?

        Now I know how Lobro’s mind works. And I know, because he has said so several times, that what would make Trump “succeed” in Lobro’s eyes is that Trump should finally NAIL THE JEWS. This is what all bona fide “anti-Semites” want: the end of Jewish rule in America, the end of Jewish influence everywhere.

        I’m not suggesting that Lobro is an “extremist” and wants the extermination of the Jews. He has never said that. What Lobro wants is basically what ALL of us want, yourself included. He wants a “final solution” to the Jewish problem, and by “final” he does NOT mean “extermination”. He means he wants something effective to be done about the Jews to curtail their power, to clip their wings, and to get them out of everyone’s hair.

        I don’t think Lobro would disagree with that assessment.

        What Lobro wants, I want too. And you want too. And everyone who is sick of Jewish bad behavior wants: the end of Jewish power. Lobro wants their powers stripped away from them. This means in practice taking the media out of their hands, reversing ALL Jewish policies that are damaging America and Europe and the Middle East.

        It’s within this context you will understand my quote and surely agree with it:

        “In order for Trump to succeed he must become the equivalent of Stalin or Hitler, Julius Caesar or Genghiz Khan.”

        How else is Trump, or a neo-Hitler or neo-Stalin, to solve the age-old Jewish problem of Jewish domination and tentacular control over the media, the universities, Wall Street, the Federal Reserve, the Military-Industrial complex, the corporations, Big Pharma, and, finally, Zionist Occupied Government, except by dictatorial power?

        It stands to reason that the only way to get the better of an all-powerful group like the Jews is to wield GREATER power than them. This can’t be done by legal means, Harold, or by appealing to Congress or Supreme Court judges. It needs an iron fist, raw power, the type of totalitarian power wielded by a dictator. Such a man, like Julius Caesar, must have the army at his back. Genghiz Khan never had to consult Jewish Supreme Court judges for permission to chop off their heads. He just chopped them off if they got in the way.

        Let me tell you this, Harold. If Lobro had supreme power, the power of a Stalin, he’d know exactly whose heads needed chopping off and he would give the necessary orders. This is actually a compliment to Lobro, and I hope he will take it as a compliment.

        The Jewish Problem will never be solved except by blood in the streets.

      9. @ Sardonicus

        “The question I am asking here is not, ‘What must Trump do to satisfy Harold Smith?’ but ‘What must Trump do to satisfy Lobro?'”

        I must’ve misunderstood something somewhere along the line, because IIRC, in previous discussions it seemed Lobro was quite satisfied with Trump’s performance so far, whereas I am the one who isn’t.

        “He wants a ‘final solution’ to the Jewish problem, and by ‘final’ he does NOT mean ‘extermination’. He means he wants something effective to be done about the Jews to curtail their power, to clip their wings, and to get them out of everyone’s hair.”

        I always assumed that a real investigation into 9/11 would do exactly that. With 9/11, the Jews seem to have handed us a silver bullet on a silver platter. A real investigation into 9/11 would leave them completely morally defenseless, IMO. Their power would be a thing of the past.

        The president, as the head of the executive branch, could in theory demand an investigation of the 9/11 attacks. He could call the Jews’ bluff just like Putin called their bluff in the “war on terror.”
        Trump could address the nation and say something like: “In order to mollify those people who continue to question the events of 9/11/01 and to restore faith in government, I’m going to order the Atty. General to work with AE911 Truth to investigate the collapses of the WTC buildings…blah…blah…blah”, or something like that.

        This is why the Jews MUST keep control of the executive branch at all costs, IMO; “he who rides a tiger can never dismount, lest he be mauled to death” or something like that.

      10. @ Harold Smith
        @ Lobro

        I’m not disagreeing with you, Harold. I’m actually agreeing with you! Yes, Trump should should announce a wide-raging and independent investigation into 9/11. That would bring the entire Jewish house of cards toppling down. So why doesn’t he do that? That’s a question you need to ask Lobro. Not me. And Lobro’s answer would probably be, “Because it would be too risky, and the time isn’t right.”

        As I see it, you or Franklin Ryckaert are probably right about Trump.

        Trump is an incorrigible villain in cahoots with the Jews, always was and always will be. (Your view). Or Trump had good intentions to start with but has now capitulated to the Jews and is letting them run the show out of sheer weakness. (Ryckaert’s view).

        Lobro’s view is of course the complete opposite of your view. However, Lobro’s view is pretty much the same as Ryckaert’s view with one significant difference. Ryckaert says Trump started out with good intentions; Lobro says exactly the same thing. Both agree on this, that Trump was honest and sincere in his good intentions and meant to keep his promises when he made them.

        However, this is where Ryckaert and Lobro part company: whereas Ryckaert maintains that Trump has now capitulalted to the Jews out of weakness, Lobro denies this. Lobro honestly believes that Trump is still putting up a manly fight, struggling with the Jewish enemy behind the scenes, throwing them the occasional bone to keep them happy, making concessions that don’t really matter, bombing Syria but making sure the damage is only cosmetic, appointing Jared as his chief adviser but without meaning to take Jared’s advice,i.e, unless Jared’s advice coincides with his own agenda.

        Now the point is, as Flopot pointed out before he left, Lobro’s position, however implausible it may seem to you and me, is intellectually defensible. Why and how? For two reasons: (1) It may actually prove correct in the end. (2) Lobro continues to defend his thesis, so it has to be defensible.

      11. @ Sardonicus

        “Now the point is, as Flopot pointed out before he left, Lobro’s position, however implausible it may seem to you and me, is intellectually defensible. Why and how? For two reasons: (1) It may actually prove correct in the end. (2) Lobro continues to defend his thesis, so it has to be defensible.”

        I’ll make one final comment on the subject and then I’ll shut-up about it :).

        Without going off on an epistemological tangent, as I see it, Lobro’s theory is “intellectually defensible” only because in a logical sense it’s non-falsifiable. This is why I once asked him for some examples of what Trump would have to do to get him to change his mind.

        But here’s the thing. Lobro’s an intelligent person IMO, and some of his posts also imply an impressive moral reasoning ability. I think he and I would probably agree on 98% of everything in the universe, yet for some reason he seems to have what I would call a “moral blind spot” when it comes to Trump.

        Trump’s actions so far in Syria, Iraq and Yemen prove (to me at least) that Trump is just another mass-murderer in the service of the state. Or to put it a little more charitably, prove that Trump has a callous disregard for human life. (There’s just no other way I can interpret the things he’s done so far, primarily in Syria, Iraq and Yemen).

        I touched on the moral reasoning angle before but I didn’t dive into it very deeply, because many people don’t seem to accept this kind of reasoning. But in my view someone who would fire 59 missiles at a Syrian govt. military base, or use white phosphorous munitions in civilian populated areas – not caring in the slightest about the concept of “right or wrong” or how many innocent people he would be killing or maiming – is not a person who would make a selfless decision to put himself at risk for the sake of others by running for president on a platform of “draining the swamp”, thereby making America great again, etc. It would just be completely out of character, IMO.

        Well that’s all I’m going to say about it. BTW I too hope that neither Flopot nor Lobro go away (or anyone else for that matter). Their comments are always interesting even if we disagree about some things.

      12. No need for you to “shut up”, Harold, since you are doing such a splendid job talking. I agree again with everything you say. You give me no opportunity, alas, to tear you apart since you preempt any possible future attack by echoing my own thought processes in a most frustrating manner! 🙂

        Without going off on an epistemological tangent, as I see it, Lobro’s theory is “intellectually defensible” only because in a logical sense it’s non-falsifiable.

        I like your unspoken reference to Popper’s falsification theory, one of the foundation principles of modern science. But is it true that Lobro’s thesis is non-falsifiable? I hesitate to answer for him, but I’m not sure he would agree to that.

        After all, Harold, what Lobro is saying is that Trump is basically a good guy and that he’s fighting the Jews (in secret) in an attempt to weaken Jewish power and influence. This thesis is surely falsifiable if Trump turns out to be a widely acknowledged arch-villain who is openly shown to be in bed with the Jews.

        But here’s the thing. Lobro’s an intelligent person IMO, and some of his posts also imply an impressive moral reasoning ability. I think he and I would probably agree on 98% of everything in the universe, yet for some reason he seems to have what I would call a “moral blind spot” when it comes to Trump.

        I agree. Lobro’s a moral person, but he refuses to acknowledge that many of Trump’s actions are morally indefensible. This is because the *emotional* part of Lobro’s brain is far more developed than the *rational/logical* part of his brain. Madame Butterfly has explained this in a brilliant analogy.

        Lobro is besotted with Trump, she explains, and therefore refuses to see any evil in the man — in exactly the same way as a loving mother finds it impossible to admit that her son is a serial killer. Everyone else knows that the Moon Strangler (let’s call him) is a psychotic serial killer. But one person holds out because of her deep emotional commitment to the Moon Strangler: the Moon Strangler’s mom!

        As far as the killer’s mom is concerned, the Moon Strangler will always be “Mama’s boy”. 🙂

        Well that’s all I’m going to say about it. BTW I too hope that neither Flopot nor Lobro go away (or anyone else for that matter). Their comments are always interesting even if we disagree about some things.

        I couldn’t agree more. Lobro is in many ways the linchpin of this site. He’s on the same page as the rest of us 98% of the time. However, he has caught the “Trump bug”. This is an emotional attachment to Trump that he finds it very hard to shake off. It’s like an addiction.

        It’s a bit like you, Harold, falling madly in love with a beautiful girl and refusing to admit she’s the Whore of Babylon. 🙂

        By the way, that’s happened to me more than once.

      13. … what Trump would have to do to get him to change his mind

        few examples:
        • attack iran in an organized way as opposed to a provocation within the decision scope of the regional commanders (e.g., downing an airliner and saying oops, sorry),
        • foment an actual color revolution with Kiev maidan attributes of violent clashes with students and moronectuals (those considering themselves intellectuals but without a single original thought in head, example, gary Kasparov) attacking riot cops with jew snipers getting cold beer+pizza delivery on rooftops,
        • shafting palestinians beyond the regular presidential “call of duty”,
        • entering into ruinous supra-national treaties, a la, NAFTA
        • suddenly getting a bunch of “likes” and “I-heart-trump” from MSM and hollywood jews

        and most of all, moving the team talmud ball forward to the next down, in a clearly measurable way, e.g., at least comparable to what the previous 4 presidents did.

        falsifiable enough?

        but then, i have a constructive challenge for you!
        First off, do you believe that,
        a) trump’s powers are unfettered within constitutional restraints, e.g., he can summarily cancel holo-worship, arraign MSM on racketeering, summon up a new, impartial, wide open 9/11 inquest, simply call up the generals and tell them no-more-wars, budget drastically slashed to reasonable levels, a bunch of crazy-ass cash scarfing r+d programs canned, cut subsidies to israel and to academic institutions that do not promote and defend freedom of speech, call the fed to account for its activities, audit the nation’s gold reserves, prohibit dual-citizens from holding public office or sensitive gov’t positions … just for starters, i can think of a lot more,
        or
        b) each of the above actions would result in a massive rebellion from inside and outside the government branches, the supreme court strikedowns, push for impeachment, etc, etc.

        This seems to be the crux of our disagreement, that you largely favor a) and i, b).
        Moreover, these biases (let me fairly apportion the label) tend to result in perceiving all of trump’s successes and failures as mere window-dressing by you and me respectively.

        once again, my metrics are relative to the previous presidents, many of whom harbored no great love of the Jew and yet ended up bent to his will, what would they have done in Trump’s place?
        What would St Obama do?
        (remember the martyrdom of Ukraine, Libya, Sudan, all on the watch of the Nobel peace prize winner – do you HONESTLY think that trump will score the Nobel? or Coudenhove, at least … which cities qualify for the future “The Donald International Airport”? hm, Buffalo, Wichita, Yazoo city …)

        ok, no more and no more slaps on the back because someone secretly pasted “OBSCURANTIST” sign that way … while i basked in the belief of “BRILLIANT”.

        TROJ: i am aware of your post … thanks cellmate and if it is any consolation, we form a mutual admiration club, i asked the Devil for the gift of poetry and he said, “no way, bro lobro, your soul is not worth it, besides i gave it to TROJ already” … and Robert Johnson got da blues …

      14. i have on several occasions brought up the following THEORY (currently non-falsifiable, absent any of the above listed refuting events).
        Namely, trump, being very bright but in a lifelong tight spot, learned many of the fundamentals of the kabbalah arts and is dissembling as a village fool or a court clown while sabotaging the detested power structure, sort of like the roman emperor claudius in his day, surviving his murderous nephew caligula.

        Consider the oft cited exchange between the spain’s chief rabbi Chemor, facing the edict of expulsion in 1942 and the Grand Sanhedrin in Seljuk occupied Constantinople, here goes the quote describing the relevant Kabbalah:

        1. As for what you say that the King of Spain obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise.

        2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs.

        3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christians’ lives.

        4. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches.

        5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.

        6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.

        watch the donald in action, after that insane Wapo article that Obama choked by not punishing Russian election theft severely enough and thus threw poor Hillary under the bus of convenience … the normal reaction would be to call bullshit on the entire Russia hacking story due to lack of a shred of evidence, right? And run into a giant stonewall of the entire ZOG structure, “Trump, the Holohack denier!”
        Well, not the orange trickster (Putin must be applauding): Trump Blasts Obama On Russia: “He Didn’t ‘Choke’…He Expected Clinton To Win So He Colluded Or Obstructed”
        Check mate … mate, what do they do now, deny that obama was aware of the massive hack, there was no hack?!?
        How can anyone not admire the sheer elegance of this move?
        Everybody knows (73% of americans, which is mind-boggling) that the russia story is an absolute canard, so why even defend … go on attack and now FBI MUST do something, either forcibly deny the canard (which i expect they will – lesser of 2 evils) or go after Obama for obstruction of justice, not reporting a crime in progress, interfering with elections, etc, etc – call Wapo to the witness stand – in the mother of all hanging participles (yes, Gram fiend?) – what’s not to like?

        Chemor’s bones rattling thru frustrated backflips in his crypt.

      15. @ Lobro

        “• attack iran in an organized way…
        • foment an actual color revolution…
        • shafting palestinians…
        • entering into ruinous supra-national treaties, a la, NAFTA
        • suddenly getting a bunch of “likes” and “I-heart-trump” from MSM and hollywood jews

        and most of all, moving the team talmud ball forward to the next down, in a clearly measurable way, e.g., at least comparable to what the previous 4 presidents did.

        falsifiable enough?”

        Okay, here’s just *one* of my problems: To me it’s pointless to discuss the issue of whether or not the things you mentioned are reasonable criteria upon which to decide whether Trump is a consummate Jew puppet or not, when, as I type this, he’s already illegally invaded Syria, committed war crimes, constantly risks escalation, and seems poised to try to illegally occupy the Euphrates valley (directly and/or by proxy).

        https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-on-collision-course-with-syria-and-iran-after-fall-of-de-facto-islamic-state-capital/2017/06/21/b03d9620-55cc-11e7-ba90-f5875b7d1876_story.html?utm_term=.a267a317f806

        Probably you would respond to this by saying, yes, he’s in Syria, but he hasn’t actually done anything really bad; e.g. he hasn’t started WW3 (yet at least).

        So I’ll prospectively address this point with an example: Here in Pennsylvania (and it’s probably the same in other states) it is a crime to merely “risk a catastrophe”. Even if a “catastrophe” doesn’t actually happen, someone who recklessly puts his neighbors at risk of harm nevertheless commits a 3rd degree felony. An example would be someone who stores 50,000 gallons of gasoline in an unapproved container.

        What sentient person would want to live near a madman that’s got 50,000 gallons of gasoline stored in a container that could fail at any moment? I know I wouldn’t. But my point is that the law recognizes such behavior as *criminal*. It is neither legally nor morally proper in this society to recklessly subject others to such unnecessary risk.

        Anyway, against the backdrop of what’s already happening, especially the risks being taken in Syria, your list seems not only arbitrary (and possibly irrelevant to the instant question), but also open to interpretation. For example, an incident could happen at any time in Syria that would result in open conflict between U.S. forces and/or Syrian or Iranian forces, right? And such a conflict could escalate to full blown war, yet it still technically wouldn’t meet your criteria. Finally, no matter what bad things happen in the Mideast because of U.S. actions, you could still blame it all on “the pentagon”; Trump didn’t want this to happen but his evil, bumbling subordinates are responsible, or they gave him bad advice, etc., etc., etc.

        In light of this, I don’t think it’s worth any further debate.

        “but then, i have a constructive challenge for you!
        First off, do you believe that,
        a) trump’s powers are unfettered within constitutional restraints, e.g., he can summarily cancel holo-worship, arraign MSM on racketeering, summon up a new, impartial, wide open 9/11 inquest, simply call up the generals and tell them no-more-wars, budget drastically slashed to reasonable levels, a bunch of crazy-ass cash scarfing r+d programs canned, cut subsidies to israel and to academic institutions that do not promote and defend freedom of speech, call the fed to account for its activities, audit the nation’s gold reserves, prohibit dual-citizens from holding public office or sensitive gov’t positions … just for starters, i can think of a lot more,
        or
        b) each of the above actions would result in a massive rebellion from inside and outside the government branches, the supreme court strikedowns, push for impeachment, etc, etc.

        This seems to be the crux of our disagreement, that you largely favor a) and i, b).”

        Here’s the problem, IMO: Not only do I not see Trump taking any “foreign policy” baby steps in the right direction (in accordance with his campaign promises); not only do I not see Trump even obliquely challenging the “deep state” in any truly meaningful context; not only do I not see Trump appealing to the people who elected him, etc.; rather, all I see is that Trump HAS CLEARLY GONE OUT OF HIS WAY TO ESCALATE the situation in Syria (and elsewhere).

        So for purposes of this discussion, the question in my mind is no longer: Does Trump have de facto power to act freely on some issue that is technically within the bounds of his constitutional authority, but does he have de facto power to NOT take some kind of risky/immoral Jew-friendly action? In this case action that is clearly outside the bounds of his legitimate constitutional authority?

        As I see it, we are very far into the realm of the absurd here, so once again further debate of the issue seems pointless.

        Finally I should mention that there are at least two more lines of reasoning which suggest to me that Trump is a liar, fraud and consummate Jew puppet ruler, and which I’ve come to see almost as threshold issues in any debate (even though others may vehemently disagree): (1) Trump simply does not have the moral character (other personal qualities) from which an inspired, courageous political effort to “save America” would spring forth; and (2) Biblical prophecy, if I understand it correctly, tells me that the second beast of Rev 13:11 (aka the “little horn” of Daniel 7:8) is a reference to the office of president of the U.S. That is, the second beast is not a particular “man” per se, but a political office held by “a man”. And the first beast has control of office, and impliedly of the man who holds the office.

      16. @Sardonicus
        “So it’s probably a completely different person.”
        With respect, no it is’t. It’s the very same person without a doubt. The person who ‘Peter’ refers to as his friend, further down this page when he says;
        “For the record, my friend Ariadna”
        is without a doubt the writer who goes by the name ‘Ariadnatheo’, just ask him if you have doubts.
        The person who insulted Lobro and ‘Peters’ friend are one and the same.
        You’re welcome 😉

      17. Sardonicus

        Pertaining to your accounting of Franklin’s #2 horse, consider the old adage regarding the destination of the road’s paving material. Trump’s intentions are comprised of that which he has been led to BELIEVE are “good”. But good for WHAT? Having blackmail material on him is unnecessary, therefore my money won’t back this horse

        Harold Smith opines that Trump is a virtual automaton who shows a CONSCIOUS WILLINGNESS to play his role in implementing the agenda. But I don’t think he’s a deviant on THAT level of deviousness. Even the ashke-nazis riddled throughout his administration are serving master whose real aims even at least some of THEM would be horrified by. So I can’t bet on this horse, either.

        Lobro’s horse is a longshot, but not of the hopeless variety who doesn’t have a shot of even hitting the BOARD, let alone winning. This longshot is a horse with the potential of “waking up”, which is what is attributed to ones that jump up and win from time to time. Happens every day at racetracks all over the world.

        So if I were a betting man (and I’ve been known to drop a bob or two, as they say in merry old England) that’s where my money would go.

        But as any horseplayer knows, there’s no such animal as a “sure thing”.

    2. Hi Petrus,
      My sympathies have been with the German people for a long time. They were the victims of WW3. The Official Holocaust story is false. In Germany you can’t say that, but In Britain we can, for now.

    3. “I claim that the only plausible theory is #3.”
      It appears to be the only logical conclusion, and well stated indeed.

      We Whites were in great need of someone who might turn around the genocidal plan of the Tribe. Alas, we should have paid REAL attention to the Jewish history of the Trump family and all of the Jewish in-laws.

      I still think he is better than Hillary, by far.
      speech by Hassan Nasrallah, leader of Hezbollah 02.16.2010
      “But I would like to stress today on one factor from which I will get started. It is the factor of youth which unite these martyr leaders. Since their youth, these brethren martyrs had early awareness regarding the cause of struggle against the Israeli enemy, Al Qods and Palestine… Since youth, they had the enthusiasm to be part of the responsibility, work, offering and sacrifice. Since youth they were men and not lads.

      They did not know the life of amusement, luxury and the life admissible to those of their age. They were men since they were but children and remained men while they were lads and passed away men as martyrs.”

      Now I ask you what white Christian boys are growing up to be…

      Watching every injustice…

  2. Trump was always owned by the dual citizen Zionists and as in every election for POTUS the Zionists control both parties and so in every election the Zionists win. The only president in decades who was pro America was JFK and that is why he was taken out and the same thing happened to RFK and JFK jr.

    The only way America can shed Zionist control is to abolish the FED ie take away their ability to create money out of thin air to support Israel and its wars and the Zionist control of America will end.

  3. One doesn’t make and loose FOUR fortunes in NYC, then make another multi-billion dollar fortune unless that person is in bed with the criminal gangsters that run NYC, the FED and Wall Street, including those TBTF banks.

    Trump is a CON ARTIST, always has been, selling dreams to the gullible, who pony up the money, then are shocked when they pull back the curtain and see what they really bought.

    And that’s what happened with Trump. He sold PO and disaffected Americans a dream, Vote for Me and I’ll turn this mess around, but that’s all it was, a pipe dream.

    Trump conned his supporters and now, they’re crying FOUL and putting the blame everywhere except where it belongs, on Trump.

    P.S. Remember ‘Hope and Change?’ Trump was Obama in white-face, using his con man skills to dupe the rubes and now, they’re shocked that he’s just like Obama. Like Putin said, the person in the WH changes, but the policies NEVER change.

    The only good thing about Trump is that it–hopefully–crashed that psycho-bitch Hillary’s political career, but as stupid as the Dems are, don’t count her out yet.

    1. Hillary’s political career was already over with (before the election). She was politically “all used up”; that is, obsolete, and couldn’t be reinvented into anything useful under the circumstances.

      But in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton was very useful as an actor whose carefully crafted role was to make Trump look reasonable by comparison – mainly in the realm of foreign policy, and especially in regard to relations with Russia.

      Hillary Clinton was a natural for her role as herself: a wild-eyed madwoman, slavishly obedient to the Jews and intent on confrontation, particularly confrontation with Russia, regardless of consequences.

      In contrast to Clinton, Trump’s role was that of the protagonistic “why can’t we all just get along (especially with nuclear armed Russia) reasonable person. Considering that Trump was “independently wealthy” (and ostensibly not dependent on political donations); a loving father and grandfather; a “successful” businessman (with lots to lose in an unnecessary nuclear war); and finally, an apparent political “outsider” with a history of questioning Obama’s improprieties; Trump was a natural for the role he played. It was all so “plausible”.

      This is why the Jews didn’t run Sanders against Trump: because Sanders, as corrupt as he may be, stood a better chance against Trump than Clinton did, in large part because he wasn’t seen as a wild-eyed, maniacal warmonger who would risk WW3 for the Jewish agenda.

      The Jews strategy in 2016 apparently harkens back to the strategy used by the Jew-controlled Johnson campaign in 1964 against Barry Goldwater, with wild-eyed maniac Hillary Clinton standing in for Goldwater.

      Back then, the Johnson campaign used the famous “Daisy” attack ad to graphically show the American electorate what would happen in the event of a Goldwater victory:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDTBnsqxZ3k

      According to Wikipedia, this strategy was considered to be an important factor in Johnson’s landslide victory over Goldwater:

      “‘Daisy’, sometimes known as ‘Daisy Girl’ or ‘Peace, Little Girl’, was a controversial political advertisement aired on television during the 1964 United States presidential election by incumbent president Lyndon B. Johnson’s campaign. Though only aired once (by the campaign), it is considered to be an important factor in Johnson’s landslide victory over Barry Goldwater and an important turning point in political and advertising history. It remains one of the most controversial political advertisements ever made.”

      Of course the Jews didn’t really need to make an updated version of the video, because most sentient people today understand full well what the consequences of a war with Russia would be, especially a nuclear war. And these are the people that the Jews depended on to swing the election to their candidate of choice, Trump.

      I believe this is why Obama decided to seriously ramp up tensions with Russia in the early fall of 2016, as the presidential campaign reached a climax, giving the electorate a little taste of what would happen if the wrong person won. And the message was clear: Either vote for Trump or vote for nuclear war.

      1. @ Harold Smith

        You present extremely cogent and compelling arguments in support of your theory about Trump. If I was sitting in a jury box listening to all the evidence adduced to date regarding the three competing theories about the man – as Sard has succinctly summarized above – I believe your theory is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and would get my vote. Of course, this is an ongoing saga and none of us have the luxury of sitting in judgment after-the-fact, as we would under normal circumstances, but if I had to vote today, as I stated, you’d get my vote.

  4. Good article, Peter –

    The Alt-Right went for the $$$$. Go figger..!! 🙂

    They fell for Trump’s ‘Made For TV ‘ lies which aired on the Apprentice. The show gave him the ‘household name’ recognition to justify his being (S)elected. The American people need to be led and sold the idea of being a part of ‘some-sort-of’ totally faked democracy.

    Trump’s platform of LIES all appealed to the Alt-Right and conservatives. The Alt-Right websites made $$$$ hand over fist. Trump bragged about that. He got his share too. He owns stock in ALL media.

    ALL LIES..!! For $$$$. And 20/20 hindsight proves it.

    Steve Bannon, the former editor of Breitbart News was led to the slaughter… as a sacrificial lamb to give the Dems a fake win. He got a big boost in name recognition and now that leads to more..$$$$.

    Jared Kushner is a 180 degree opposite of everything Trump and Bannon CLAIMED – CLAIMED – CLAIMED they stood for..!! They are LIARS..!!

    **Trump followed orders from Netanyahu…. and chose Jared. If Trump did not want Jared Kushner, and his opposing(sic) views and policies, he would never have been part of the presidential administration… PERIOD..!!

    I wrote dozens of times before the election that Pharisee-Jews in Trump’s own businesses around the world were too obvious. The ones in the mainstream media and internet have opposed Trump…. BUT… in a ‘false-flag’ fashion, to make more SENSATIONAL news and $$$$$.

    THE hysterical opposition against DJT from nearly 100% of the Pharisee-Jew press is PLANNED…. To GRAB EYEBALLS to read advertisements… for more $$$$..!!

    Bottom line:
    Follow the $$$$…!! Go figger… 🙂

  5. Here’s the PARTIAL list of Das Juden Trump has appointed to his cabinet. That’s appointed EARLY on in his Kosher WH.

    Michael Abboud (Sephardic Jew) – Communications Coordinator, Donald J. Trump for President

    Paul Achleitner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Chairman, Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank (Donald Trump’s largest lender)

    Sheldon Adelson (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Elliott Broidy (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

    Michael Cohen (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and Special Counsel, The Trump Organization

    Gil Dezer (Ashkenazic Jew) – President, Trump Dezer Development

    Michael Dezer (Ashkenazic Jew) – Founder, Trump Dezer Development

    Lewis Eisenberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

    Boris Epshteyn (Ashkenazic Jew) – Senior Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Stephen Feinberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

    Alan Fishman (Ashkenazic Jew) – Chairman, Ladder Capital (Donald Trump’s second largest lender)

    David Friedman (Ashkenazic Jew) – Co-Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump

    Samuel Fox (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

    Alan Garten (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and General Counsel, The Trump Organization

    Bruce Gelb (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Michael Glassner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Deputy Campaign Manager and Former National Political Director, Donald J. Trump for President

    Lawrence Glick (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President of Strategic Development, The Trump Organization

    Jason Greenblatt (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, The Trump Organization; Co-Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump

    Vincent Harris (Ashkenazic Jew) – Former Digital Strategy Manager, Donald J. Trump for President

    Carl Icahn (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Peter Kalikow (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

    Daniel Kowalski (Ashkenazic Jew) – Deputy Policy Director, Donald J. Trump for President

    Charles Kushner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Jared Kushner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Yael Kushner [née Ivanka Trump] (Orthodox Jewish convert) – Executive Vice President, The Trump Organization

    Bennett LeBow (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

    Richard LeFrak (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

    Corey Lewandowski (Ashkenazic Jew/East European) – Former Campaign Manager, Donald J. Trump for President

    Ronald Lieberman (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President of Management & Development, The Trump Organization

    Howard Lorber (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

    David Malpass (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council

    Douglas Manchester (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Make America Great Again PAC

    Bernard Marcus (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Rebekah Mercer (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Make America Number One PAC

    Robert Mercer (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Make America Number One PAC

    Amanda Miller (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice President of Marketing, The Trump Organization

    Eli Miller (Ashkenazic Jew) – Chief Operating Officer, Donald J. Trump for President

    Jason Miller (Ashkenazic Jew) – Senior Communications Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Stephen Miller (Ashkenazic Jew) – National Policy Director, Donald J. Trump for President

    Steven Mnuchin (Ashkenazic Jew) – National Finance Chairman, Donald J. Trump for President

    Samuel Nunberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – Former Policy Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

    David Orowitz (Ashkenazic Jew) – Senior Vice President of Acquisitions and Development, The Trump Organization

    Geoffrey Palmer [né Weissinger] (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Rebuilding America Now PAC

    John Paulson (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council

    Stewart Rahr (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Richard Roberts (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Israel Advisory Committee for Donald Trump

    George Ross (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and Senior Counsel, The Trump Organization

    Wilbur Ross (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Steven Roth (Ashkenazic Jew) – Member, Trump Economic Advisory Council; Donor, Trump Victory Fund

    Felix Sater (Ashkenazic Jew) – Former Senior Adviser, The Trump Organization

    Keith Schiller (Ashkenazic Jew) – Director of Security, The Trump Organization

    Melvin Sembler (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

    Lara Trump [née Yunaska] (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Vanessa Trump [née Haydon] (Ashkenazic Jew/North European) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Ronald Weiser (Ashkenazic Jew) – Vice Chairman, Trump Victory Committee

    Andrew Weiss (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President, The Trump Organization

    Allen Weisselberg (Ashkenazic Jew) – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, The Trump Organization

    Lawrence Weitzner (Ashkenazic Jew) – Adviser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Steven Witkoff (Ashkenazic Jew) – Donor, Trump Victory Fund

    Stephen Wynn [né Weinberg] (Ashkenazic Jew) – Endorser, Donald J. Trump for President

    Naturally, Comrade Trumpsky appointed a Jew to head the US Treasury and will let the Jewess Yellen remain as FED head. To appoint a non-Jew to these vital positions wouldn’t be Kosher.

    http://www.prabhupada.org.uk/articles1/jew_owned_trump.htm

    I realize this hurts, and believe me, it’s no picnic for anyone to watch our nation get flushed down a Star of David shaped toilet.

    1. Greg –

      Thanks for this list……

      Everyone needs to remember this list. It has been presented here before. It gets shuttled away and ignored by ‘Trump-ettes’ still jumping and waving pom-poms here.

      This list makes us realize that these very close personal and business relationships were developed over decades. Yes…. DECADES..!!!

      This list comprises the most dangerous part of the ‘SWAMP’ to be drained.

      Trump came to Washington, D.C., promising to “DRAIN THE SWAMP.”

      BUT… the ‘SWAMP’ is draining HIM..!! 🙂

      So it’s business as usual. No ‘SWAMP’ draining… no serious budget cuts… no clearing the Deep State land… no end to the make-believe wars… no Trump reflation trade… no big infrastructure projects… no “jobs – jobs – jobs”… and no change in course.

      Know the list. You will KNOW why.

      Follow the $$$$…. LIKE TRUMP DOES..!!! 🙂

    2. Trump had that same damned bunch of criminal leaches ALL around him – TRAINING HIM – when the Pharisee-Jew lawyers disregarded Federal Election Laws and caused him to DROP OUT in 2012..!!

      Donald Trump had to give up his 2012 Presidential campaign or face criminal charges by the FEC for campaign contributions violations in 2011..!!

      He and HIS personal Pharisee-Jew attorney, Michael Cohen, had to remove his website:
      http://www.ShouldTrumpRun.com

      FEC case:
      http://eqs.fec.gov/eqsdocsMUR/13044342667.pdf

      So much for Trump really out-maneuvering them in that chess game..!! HA!!!

      After spending $$$Millions for nothing… and wasting time…

      He sure fooled and outsmarted (((them))) there..!! 🙂

    3. ADMIN: PLEASE CORRECT TYPO IN YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS OR YOUR POSTS WILL BE HELD UP

      Thanks Greg for the current American version of the Soviet Politburo and the International Comintern. Like 9/11, TJ knew that the twin tower and building #7 attack was an inside job the day after, the whole Trump for President didn’t pass the smell test. Yes Greg, America has been swirling around and down the Kosherized toilet bowl for at least 100 years. We can pound our fingers to the bone commenting on “is Trump this or is Trump that”, which will make little or no difference as to the end result that is carved in granite.
      Here is just a few of the little things that spells the end of what’s left of the American Constitutional Republic (which is another way of saying a White Civilization).
      1. Unpayable debt: personal, corporate, State and national. (Illinois is the harbinger for the other States). The 1.3 trillion dollar college student debt with their mostly worthless degrees is a monument to Schrupeter’s “creative destruction”.
      2. Millions of Bible believing Christians Zionists that believe the sun rises and sets right out of (((their))) fannies.
      3. A multitude of public educated Americans under 30 that haven’t the slightest idea where they’re going because they don’t know were they’ve been and would be hard pressed to find where they live on a map.
      4. Non-White European immigration into the “Camp Of The Saints”. Not even considering the first three this all by itself will spell the end of White European Civilization as planned and designed by (((them))).
      5. As Austrian-born American economist and political Scientist Joseph Schrumpeter remarked about the military complex; “…created by wars that required it, it then creates the wars it requires” which was most likely part of his economic theory on “creative destruction”. Can there be any doubt the American military-industrial-intelligence-media-entertainment-educational complex (register for the draft!) has since the end of the 1st world war been doing just that.
      TJ is sure that Darkmooners can add to this list. When all is said and done, trying to “Make America Great Again” is a fools errand, especially with the later day version of the Politburo firmly in control, as it has been for decades. Hey, I know. Maybe (((someone))) will descend out of the “clouds” and save us all.

    4. “Naturally, Comrade Trumpsky … will let the Jewess Yellen remain as FED head.”

      The President appoints the 7 Fed board members, including the chairman and vice chairman. However, there is no means for the President to remove any board member, once appointed. The president must wait for a member’s term to expire. During the campaign, Trump said he would replace Yellen. Yellen replied she was not going anywhere until the end of her term as chair. Yellen’s term as chairman expires in Feb 2018. I doubt Trump will reappoint her. The President appoints the chair and vice-chairmen from the current sitting board of governors. Traditionally, Presidents have replaced an outgoing chairman with the current vice-chairman. Stanley Fischer is the current vice-chairman. Yellen can stay on at the Fed as a governor until 2024.

      Fwiw, there is currently only 4 governors currently on the Fed’s board. There are 3 vacancies Trump needs to fill. I suspect he will do that before Feb 2018 when Yellen’s chairmanship position expires. I have a gut feeling Fischer will not be moved from vice-chair to chairman of the fed. It is possible Trump will replace the vice-chair, also, when Fischer’s term expires in June 2018. If that happens, it is possible that for the first time in over 4-decades there will be no Jewish representation in the leadership of the Fed’s board of governors.

  6. “… a hardcore believer asked, if I didn’t feel remorse for what Germans (my people) did to the Jews?”

    I am wondering; what was the author’s rejoinder to this question?. Had I been in his place, I would have asked why one should feel guilt for a crime that one’s ancestors SUPPOSEDLY had committed.By accepting this question as reasonable, the guilt gets projected to the next generation of Germans.Nothing irks me quite as much as the idea of “inherited sin”, and how white people have fallen into this intellectual trap.

    ” This is a central part of their success and part of that process is building up Jews with mediocre records into geniuses, justifying the power granted them.”

    Yes, their media ownership allowed them to craft Einstein’s reputation such that today he is regarded by the general public as the “quintessential genius”, which he does not and did not deserve.

    1. Donald –

      They’ve been practicing with the jig-a-boos for a long time, and had some success – right up to our White House! Now, they have little Jared Kushner waiting in the wings…

  7. curiously No ONE on Earth has to be a (((JEW))) !!!

    http://careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com/2017/06/there-is-only-one-political-party-in.html

    the ‘Old Testament’ is NOT about any so-called
    ((((JEWS))))…!

    consider the irony of the holohoax…

    allegedly six million NON HEBREWS perished in
    Ovens that didn’t exist so a stool sculpture deity cult compound in PALESTINE for
    the Gog & Magog proselytes to talmudic Judaism could claim the “homeland” of the children of Israel who were never…

    https://buelahman.wordpress.com/2017/06/24/change-for-morons/

    (((((JEWS)))))….go figure.

    1. Official 20th century history concerning Jews has been a total fraud, but the internet is now bringing out the truth. The truth will destroy the credibility (and power) of the Jewish Lobby.

      Now who was it said the “The truth shall set you free”‘?

  8. Thanks Peter and LD, great article. Possibly the proper response to “Don’t you feel remorse for what your people did to the jews?” as mentioned could start with “Don’t you feel remorse for what your people did to Christ”? Then a discussion of collective guilt, with themes like “Should Mongolia Pay Reparations for the World Holocaust of Ghengis Khan?” and “Should World Jewry Pay Reparations to Russia for the Bolshevik Holocaust?”

    I suggest these responses, as any objective discussion of historic facts, such as H. P. Krause’s memoir of his life selling rare books with a brief incarceration in Dachau (He described it as less than horrific for the greater part) or Paul Rassinier’s memoir of the far grimmer WARTIME incarceration in Buchenwald is probably beyond the scope of their residual intellectual honesty, such as it is. Despite Rassinier’s description, he is labeled by modern ‘historians’ as the “father of Holocaust denial” by habitual liars like those often seen on wikipedia. A brief glance at the Unz site and elsewhere shows reports of the late Simon Wiesenthal and associates caught red handed faking film and other evidence.

    World jewry wield holocaustianity like a club to beat Germans with, the intellectually deficient killing themselves to constantly ‘prove’ with all the insane legislation and vicious incarceration what wonderful unprejudiced creatures they are. Sensing submission, the jew follows with the attempted death blow to Europe of mass miscegenation as “Europe is too White”. Who are the real racists?

  9. Hitler was a liar. He was the anti-Christ along with Rothschild working towards a NWO.

    We have Hitler to thank (not) for counterfeit-Israel and a pivotal role in its development.

    The Protocols make it quite clear that ‘anti-semitism’, meaning ‘anti-counterfeit-Jew’, is an ‘indispensable’ part of the plan for world domination. It will be used for ‘the management of our lesser brethren’. The document makes chilling reading for both counterfeit-Jews and Gentiles alike when one looks back to the treatment of counterfeit-Jewry during the Second World War; that a self-appointed elite should be willing to sacrifice and allow the persecution of their ‘lesser brethren’, for the greater aim of world domination, should be a wake-up-call to all of counterfeit-Jewry, the vast majority of whom constitute what the authors of the Protocols deem to be ‘lesser brethren’.

    ‘Anti-Semitic’ is a phrase which means ‘against Semites’ but has come to be used solely as meaning ‘anti-counterfeit-Jewish’. The irony inherent in this ill-used phrase is that the Semitic Arabs are actually amongst the greatest victims in the crime and fraud known as Zionism, in which Ashkenazi-counterfeit-Jews, who are racially non-Semitic, in the first half of the Twentieth Century, fostered and executed a plan (as prophesied by God through Ezekiel 11:15) to create an officially recognized homeland in Palestine. The result of which was the mass displacement and persecution of the indigenous Arab citizens. This is without doubt ‘anti-semitism’ at its worst. And yet to state this plain fact openly today is to invite the accusation of being ‘anti-Semitic’! The ordinary Jewish people, unbeknownst to themselves, have been victims to the same ancient agenda and are considered by the Elders to be necessary sacrifices to their cause. As the British; American and other Anglo-Saxon and Celtic peoples are also descended from Shem/Sem, they are also Semitic peoples. Therefore anyone who is anti-British or anti-American is anti-Semitic, in the true definition of the term.

    http://JAHTruth.net/illumin.htm

    The Semites are being dominated (led to destruction) by non-Semitic, counterfeit-Jews.

  10. Thank you Admin and LD for making my comment into an article. For the record, my friend Ariadna believes the answer is Harold’s number 3, “he never had any intention of following through on most of his campaign promises.”

    Here is Brother Nathanael’s video on the Jewish media. The link in the article is wrong.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTwcwzqdPLk

  11. “The role of the President of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel.” – Jewess Ann Lewis (sister to homo congressman Barney Frank)

    “All American presidents are slaves of the Jews
    Presidents are just puppets of the Jews !
    The Jews control Amerijewka !
    Wake-up ! goyims gentiles ”

    Inline image 2

  12. @ Peter

    A good comment/article.

    Just to keep the record straight, neither Bannon or Kushner is a member of Trump’s Cabinet. They are advisors not requiring Senate approval.

    One thing is for sure. By 2020, we will all know which of your presented alternative applies. Hindsight is always 20/20.

    My personal barometer about whether he is a jewish stooge or not rests with the actions of the jewish media. If the jewish media falls in love with Trump, he is a jewish stooge, otherwise, probably not.

  13. Sorry if the following point has already been made, for I scan read this article.

    There are two camps:

    1. Tribe Globalist Banksters and

    2.Tribe Zionists.

    The former hardly give a hoot about the Shitty Little Country and the latter place it square centre to their apocalyptic messianic psychopathy.

    Group 1., media owning do not care for Trump. Group 2. seem quite happy with his performance so far.

    1. Hi Flan,
      In fact the main US financial support for Israel is Wall St. You aren’t in the “In Crowd” unless you are seen to be in with the Zionists

      1. Hi John
        I suppose this depends on the definition. I don’t believe those banksters are heartfelt psychotic religious types. They are “cause” contributing hands-off types.

  14. ((“They’ve suffered and we all owe them”. Actually, someone said that to me a couple months ago. When I stated my case that there is no evidence for the Holocaust, a hardcore believer asked, if I didn’t feel remorse for what Germans (my people) did to the Jews?))

    That paragraph sums up the problem, DOUBLE STANDARDS. The Jewish Bolsheviks had massacred tens of millions in the Soviet Union before WW2, but few know that, and the media never touch upon it.

    Time for Germany to get up off its knees.

    1. I feel that things are changing. More people are beginning to see the truth about Jewish Power and deception.

      It is a feeling, just that, but it is very strong.

  15. I agree. The Trump administration has done a 180 on foreign policy in the Middle East and it all started with the dreadful trip to the Middle East. I am writing e-mails on a daily basis to Trump to follow through with his campaign promise to stay neutral, to peace with Russia, to put America first, as he promised. There is no way to put Americans first while simultaneously putting Israel first.

    So… I have to admit that Trump has failed us by siding with Israel. Recently I watched a short video of the Trump clan leaving Israel. First the President and Melania shake hands and climb the steps into the plane, do the ritual turning and wave before entering the cabin; and then Jared and Ivanka linger with Netanyahu and his wife. I can’t remember his wife’s name but she can’t seem to let go of Jared with the hugs, kisses, hand presses, etc. etc.

    I’m still a Trump fan but I’m sad and annoyed by this turn of policy. I’m hoping that something will change his mind. Maybe when he begins digging into the DC pedophile ring, he’ll find that Israel is involved in the blackmail. Now that is Ivanka’s project—she wants to get rid of pedophiles but maybe she won’t like it once she learns the truth. If they back off that–then I know we’ve really been screwed.

  16. i will continue the development of the discussion into which a number of posters tossed their hats, i think primarily harold and myself and as such, this references harold’s in particular – i chose to skip the reply button in order to gain text width.
    here is the interesting bit – one of them, at any rate.

    there are at least two more lines of reasoning which suggest to me that Trump is a liar, fraud and consummate Jew puppet ruler, and which I’ve come to see almost as threshold issues in any debate (even though others may vehemently disagree):
    (1) Trump simply does not have the moral character (other personal qualities) from which an inspired, courageous political effort to “save America” would spring forth; and
    (2) Biblical prophecy, if I understand it correctly, tells me that the second beast of Rev 13:11 (aka the “little horn” of Daniel 7:8) is a reference to the office of president of the U.S. That is, the second beast is not a particular “man” per se, but a political office held by “a man”. And the first beast has control of office, and impliedly of the man who holds the office.

    first, we need to establish the palying field, secular or spiritual.
    When Jesus said, the truth will set you free, he meant the latter, because in this world, the truth has a pronounced opposite effect, no need to enumerate cases, they are well known to all.
    Therefore, a political leader that hews to nothing but the truth ends up with – nothing, that is, in this world of sweat, blood and stink.
    Hitler never told a lie, as far as i can tell or so few that they escaped my attention, a good, kind, honest man that ought to be beatified into St Adolph with much more justification than St Joan d’Arc.
    Though he sets a shining example, his people, the Germans were thrown to the lions in Jew-run arena of horrors.
    If we ever end up with a politician who will dial back the Jew century to a more normal world, he will have to be a consumate deceiver – there is simply no other way – i challenge anyone to offer a plausible scenario, outline the steps, rung by rung, without once jumping the shark, whereby a wholly honest person
    • gets elected into an office (ANY office in the land),
    • works his way into public prominence, ie, gets the time of day by the requisite echo chamber, gets into the public eye on the regular basis,
    • garners sufficient support by the segment of the elites (who, pray tell) who are themselves willing to stand up to the jew’s global power structure in order to run a campaign on a national scale,
    • keeps dodging the assassins (recall how when Putin flew to Canberra for the g20 meeting, the path across the pacific was lined with naval forces guarding the skies – he has that kind of support),
    • once in the office, he has an actual bridge to the machinery of power, DoD, CIA, FBI, SCOTUS, congress, NSA and of course, that supportive echo chamber (like trump gets in form of Fox – to some extent). Keep in mind that as of today, each of these elements of the power machine are thoroughly corrupt, there simply are no good, brave patriots at any of the control levers.

    can you tell me which of these 5 steps are non-essential for the chances of the grand success?

    i say that the best that can be done under the circumstances dictated by reality is to have an excellent quality liar, pretender, swindler, thief – BUT ON OUR SIDE, someone who either dodges punches, rolls with them and uses the tactics of the guerilla warfare to win the needed elements to his side, like say, fidel castro did in the cuban revolution, one army or police outpost at the time, snowballing his way into military might and popular ethusiasm of the tough campesinos.
    Even Putin once filled that role over in Russia but has with time evolved into a proper Christian soldier.
    Whether trump fits the bill is open to question, i agree, but why dump all hope while hope remains?
    Ask syrians whether they feel more optimistic today or last year … for all the trash talk about “‘tyrant assad, chemical bombs, israel to the rescue”. In the pro sports, the purpose of the trash talk is to sell tickets to the event, PPV.

    As for the Revelations, i don’t know. I just don’t know.
    From the standpoint of academic quality logic, if the nasty developments were ordained as such, there is no avoiding that doomsday bullet and blaming Trump is both unfair and pointless, he and all of us are jerked around on very long reaching cosmic strings – the ultimate string theory.

    1. and JIMBO … i bear no antagonism to Ariadna nor Ariadnatheo for calling me deranged.
      She merely voiced a common belief.

      what did krishnamurty say (i won’t look it up, promise): “To be well adjusted in a profoundly corrupt world is no proof of virtue” … okay, let me look it up and see how far off am i … in the ball park … he talks about mental health, i, about the morality, ceratinly related matters if not identical.

      thanks, ariadna, by being off my rocker, i am off the hook.

      1. @Lobro
        “i bear no antagonism…”
        I didn’t think you would, that’s why I said ‘insulted’ and not ‘offended’ atb 😉

      2. @Lobro – I’m going to post here part of what Ariadna wrote to me two days ago. She complimented me on my article and wrote this regarding you. “What struck me in the Comments was the naked lie by Sardonicus that I would have at any time attacked/criticized Lobro. I never did. I have always liked his verve and writing style even though I never shared his hopes for Trump.”

      3. @ Peter
        @ Ariadnatheo

        PETER writes: I’m going to post here part of what Ariadna wrote to me two days ago. She complimented me on my article and wrote this regarding you. “What struck me in the Comments was the naked lie by Sardonicus that I would have at any time attacked/criticized Lobro. I never did. I have always liked his verve and writing style even though I never shared his hopes for Trump.”

        If this is an attack on Sardonicus, I think it is ill-judged. I have no recollection of Sardonicus ever making such a comment about Ariadnatheo being willing to criticize or attack Lobro. Where is the evidence?

        I can also remember Sardonicus urging Ariadnatheo to return to this website because he missed her, so he is most unlikely to be hostile to Ariadnatheo as she supposes. Maybe she has gotten Sardonicus mixed up with another commenter who attacked her, but it certainly wasn’t Sardonicus. (Unless I’m wrong and my memory has failed me).

        Another thing. Sardonicus is also an admirer of Lobro’s literary style and shares most of Lobro’s views on everything. Apart from his admiration for Donald Trump, of course.

        P.S. A comment attacking Lobro occurred on our site recently from someone called “Ariadna”. Lobro took this to be “Ariadnatheo”. We pointed out subsequently that “Ariadna” was using a different IP number and email address, so there was reason to believe these were two entirely separate posters. (BTW, we’ve had several ‘Pats’ and ‘Joes’ on this site and the duplication of names is not uncommon.)

      4. @ Peter
        @ Ariadnatheo

        I’ve just found the comment in Peter’s article that Ariadnatheo has interpreted as a “vicious attack” her by Sardonicus. I’m afraid Ariadnatheo has got it COMPLETELY WRONG. Far from being a “vicious attack” on Ariadnatheo it is the exact OPPOSITE. It is pointing out what I said above: that the vicious attack on Lobro by “Ariadna” was NOT written by “Ariadnatheo” and that “Ariadna” and “Ariadnatheo” are TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PEOPLE.

        Here is Sardonicus’s comment:

        Also, in case you were concerned, the “Ariadna” who attacked you [LOBRO] had a completely different email address and IP number from the “Ariadnatheo” we all knew. So it’s probably a completely different person.

        Sardonicus had noticed that we had already pointed out that the IP numbers and email addresses of these two commenters were entirely different. So he was actually springing to the defense of Ariadnatheo, not attacking her.

        Ariadnatheo owes Sardonicus an apology. Because she is attacking the person who defended her.

      5. @ Ariadnatheo

        You’ve got it wrong, dear lady. I was actually defending you, not attacking you! I also pleaded with you to keep posting on this site, which I’d hardy do if I hated you. I happen to be one of your most ardent fans. Lasha loves you too — she told me so in a private email — and nothing would please her more than to see you return to this website.

      6. OK, let me explain. Here is the comment recently posted on the DM site by someone under the name “Ariadna”. Not “Ariadnatheo”, please note, but “Ariadna”:

        Just dropping in, not staying. Have better things to do with my time than bandy words with mentally deranged posters.”

        Lobro took this as a personal attack on him by YOU, Ariadnatheo, because he jumped to the conclusion that you were posting under the alternative name of “Ariadna”. Lobro will confirm that. Because he said something like “Even Ariadna (meaning YOU, Ariadnatheo) is attacking me now.”

        So as gesture of kindness to Lobro as well as you, I pointed out that the vicious comment attacking Lobro as “mentally deranged” was NOT written by you, Ariadnatheo, but by a completely different poster called “Ariadna”.

        Get it? I was exculpating you, exonerating you of all blame for a vicious comment that you did not post.

        It’s saddening to me that I should find myself attacked by you and given the cold shoulder by Lobro when my feelings toward both you and Lobro are 100% positive.

      7. @Sardonicus said;
        “You’ve got it wrong, dear lady. I was actually defending you, not attacking you! I also pleaded with you to keep posting on this site, which I’d hardy do if I hated you. I happen to be one of your most ardent fans…”

        Allow me to help. The contributor that you allude to in the above, sometimes forgets but never forgives. Do you remember saying this about her, on this site, just 6 months ago?;

        “Well, it’s nice to know that Ariadnatheo, aka Ariadna Theokopoulos, can now be contacted easily enough on her new Lasha-bashing “experimental” site.

        https://gabrielarad06.wordpress.com/2013/12/19/2/#comments

        What a sad little bitch! A frustrated failed writer fit only for publication on obscure fringe sites. Accused more than once of plagiarism, if I remember correctly. Obviously the reason for her hasty departure being the plagiarism charge, since apparently she wasn’t even banned from this site.
        I mean, didn’t Sister Monica invite her to go on posting here?”

        Just scroll down;
        https://www.darkmoon.me/2017/cia-may-assassinate-trump-if-he-steps-out-of-line/

      8. Lobro –
        Sard –

        I want Peter and Ariadnatheo to post more comments here. They are fun to read.

        Ariadnatheo wrote she liked ME… but not my LISTS…

        Then she started posting lists… Go figger.. 🙂

        Peter must like me as much as his friend, Ariadnatheo, does… since he is compelled to read all of my comments.

        He said so:

        Peter
        March 31, 2017 at 4:40 pm
        https://www.darkmoon.me/2017/trumps-dangerous-enemies-are-out-to-get-him/#comment-950552

        I sometimes wonder if Pat is working for the Jews. He helps them.
        If Pat had been a German in the 1930’s he would have denounced Hitler and Goebbels as working for the Jews.

        ………………………………….

        Peter
        March 23, 2017 at 2:14 pm
        https://www.darkmoon.me/2017/israel-threatens-to-destroy-syrias-air-defence-systems-without-the-slightest-hesitation/#comment-949894

        @Lobro – Pat is a propagandist and disseminates disinformation.

        They read my comments… and argue…
        …..so I like both of them. 🙂

      9. @Admin – I wouldn’t call it an attack. She wrote me that in confidence and I hesitated to reproduce it, as Ariadna is a friend, and I have no reason of my own to attack Sardonicus. I will refer Ariadna to the comments you and Sardonicus made. It appears a mistake has been made.

      10. @ Peter

        Of course a mistake has been made. Sardonicus is one of Ariadnatheo’s greatest fans. He has pleaded with her to return to this site more than once. So how could he have attacked her?

      11. @Jimbo – I’m not aware of Ariadna ever plagiarizing anything. She has no reason to do that. She’s one of the best writers I’ve ever read. Much better than myself. Just where would people with views like those expressed on this website get their articles published? The New York Times? I’m glad for “obscure” websites like this, as the truth about things is seeping out on websites like this, as much as the Jews are trying to shut it down. Seriously, we all have to use pseudonyms and write for “obscure” websites. They are the most informative and interesting websites. Surely you don’t think “Lasha Darkmoon” is a real name. I don’t recall ever seeing a comment from a “Jimbo” before and I wonder what motivates you to be so nasty towards Ariadna.

      12. Jimbo, Adriana, Adrianatheo, Adriana Theodopulous (sorry, too lazy to scroll up and doublecheck, I know stuff is missing from surname), Peter and Sard.
        And pat.

        i both forget and forgive in whichever order, have better use for neurons than vindictiveness.
        And like i said, i never took offense in either case, i know, that animal instinct, you know, when someone enters my defensive perimeter with toxic intent, i react viciously enough, not many such instances (Circassian and gabreal Jones come to mind).

        so, asfarasiamconcerned, everything is cool, absolutely and without qualifiers.
        I always liked ariadna’s posts and even if she copied and pasted every single one of them, so what, i never read them before and like them just the same.
        And if i read them, i forgot, so tell me again 🙂
        And i do kind of doubt that she needs to resort to it, she has enough steam built up to power through on her own.

        so, by the popular acclaim and this here edict, you are to report back to the forum with some sharp tongued posts, chop-chop.
        And no more pettiness, it does grieve me so.

      13. @ Lobro

        I adore your sangfroid, darling, and I’m glad to see you’ve recovered your equanmity again after going though a difficult patch recently.

        Please don’t mind me flinging the word “darling” at you now and again … but this is quite a common form of politesse in England among the upper middle classes to which I unfortunately belong. Not my fault! 🙂

        “Darling” is the equivalent of the American “honey” or “sweetie pie” and we use this term even to total strangers, like bartenders and cabdrivers. So you mustn’t think I’m getting fresh with you when I address you as “darling”, OK? It’s quite innocently meant.

        By the way, I am the new monitor. Lasha’s sister, aka Lucy Skipping. You knew me long ago on the Xymphora site as “Lalara Pandora”, so we are very old friends! 🙂

      14. @ Peter

        This is all getting a bit complicated for me. Let me try to explain.

        Firstly, I didn’t write the comment accusing Ariadnatheo of plagiarism. Somebody else did. Probably the same guy who accused her of plagiarism in the first place. A troll.

        Yes, the comment bears the name “Sardonicus”. But let me tell you I didn’t write it. And it’s the first time I’ve seen it. I’m not a regular commenter like Pat and Lobro. Whole days go by and I don’t post anything. So naturally I don’t read each and every comment. Otherwise I would have seen that bogus comment, written by some troll in my name, and asked for it to be deleted.

        I ask for it to be deleted NOW and also for Admin to confirm that the person who wrote that comment in my name has a completely different email address and IP number to me.

        This has happened before. Pat will remember. A guy wrote a comment in the name of “Pat” attacking Lobro viciously. Lobro got upset and wondered why Pat had attacked him. Pat had to explain, “It wasn’t me!” And Admin confirmed that Pat was innocent.

        Try and remember we had a whole bunch of trolls attacking this site in the time of Ellie K. She brought them with her. Even admitted she was Jewish.

        This site is largely unmonitored, so what can you expect? The whole damn site is a bear garden, but that’s what makes it fun. You never know what’s coming next.

        Bottom line. I didn’t write the comment attacking Ariadnatheo for plagiarism. That was written by a Jewish troll. Someone jealous of Ariadnatheo (or mad at her) and trying to scare her away from this site. Well, they succeeded.

      15. Skipper,
        i am happy to remain your darling, even if deranged one.
        It is not fate worse than death, in my book.

        Welcome back to the steel cage.
        Just remember this, Skip, i will indent for emphasis:

        under no circumstances, ever presume that I am attacking Lasha, openly or stealthily – never.

        if it appears that way, the reason is because it merely appears that way, an optical illusion due to everyone else’s dyslexia – not mine.
        Feel free to ask for clarification, in fact you are obliged to do so.
        And it pretty much goes the same for all of lasha’s intimate circle, to wit, you, Toby, Monica, Sard, Grammar fiend, butterfly, Ruth, monty … in some way i count them all as her defenders, whether self-appointed or by her majesty’s decree.

        okay, enough lovey-dovey, i feel like a kid at the Christmas family dinner where i must kiss all the aunts and uncles and then run off to wipe my mouth on the sleeve behind their backs.

      16. @Sardonicus – I believe that. It appears there have been some trolls here to create dissension.

      17. Heeey – ‘SKIPPER’ Lucy –

        Glad you’re back.

        No preacher to put up with here anymore…
        No ‘Ty-Ranter’… cussing us out.. 🙂

      18. @Peter
        “It appears a mistake has been made.”
        Yes, mistakes have been made. Sardonicus has now said he didn’t write the comment which bore his nik which I cut and pasted above from 6 months ago. So it was the fake Sardonicus which said all the “nasty”things about your friend Ariadna. Read my comment again, the quotation marks are accurate.
        The fake Sardonicus quote that I posted starts with;
        “Well, it’s nice to know…”and ends with “…invite her to go on posting here?”
        Can you see now that it was not I who accused Ariadna of plagiarism but the fake Sardonicus?
        No need to apologise Peter, it’s one of the hazards of skim reading.
        You said;
        “I don’t recall ever seeing a comment from a “Jimbo” before.”
        You also didn’t see the quotation marks in my comment either 😉
        @TROSardonicus
        Apologies for wrongly attributing a comment to you. The comment in question should maybe have some sort of ADMIN addendum so as to avoid further misunderstandings?

      19. @ Jimbo

        Thanks for your timely intervention. Otherwise we would never have known that a troll had assumed Sardonicus’ identity to post a hostile comment to Ariadnatheo. Sardonicus himself was unaware the comment had been made or else he would have spoken up sooner. (He doesn’t check in every day and therefore failed to see the comment).

        I have made an addendum to the pseudo-Sardonicus’s comment, as you suggest, so everything should now be in order.

      20. @Admin
        Thank you. It all goes to show how a simple oversight can cause a damaging ripple effect throughout the site with long term consequences. Vigilance always.

    2. “i say that the best that can be done under the circumstances dictated by reality is to have an excellent quality liar, pretender, swindler, thief – BUT ON OUR SIDE, someone who either dodges punches, rolls with them and uses the tactics of the guerilla warfare to win the needed elements to his side, like say, fidel castro did in the cuban revolution, one army or police outpost at the time, snowballing his way into military might and popular ethusiasm of the tough campesinos.
      Even Putin once filled that role over in Russia but has with time evolved into a proper Christian soldier.
      Whether trump fits the bill is open to question, i agree, but why dump all hope while hope remains?”

      I understand your reasoning, but as I see it, there’s a serious contradiction there. If someone has these “qualities” why would they want to be on “our side” (as that set of qualities is usually associated with the type of person who would most likely end up doing Jew dirty work)?

      I’ve often pondered the question: What kind of a person (other than Jesus Christ) would it take to overthrow the Jewish power structure in the U.S.? And I’ve come to the conclusion that it would have to be: a courageous person; someone of above average intelligence; (That leaves me out of the picture already); someone of above average moral character (but not necessarily a “saint”); someone with above average leadership qualities; someone with strong patriotic/nationalistic convictions; and someone who can be ruthless when necessary (especially in pursuit of what their convictions tell them is a proper goal).

      An example of such a person might have been General George Patton. He apparently had all the requisite personal qualities, IMO. IIRC he also had some money (or at least his wife did), and he had name recognition. So in Gen. Patton we had a real patriot with guts, money and name recognition, who looked behind the curtain, didn’t like what he saw, and was going to try to do something about it. No wonder the Jews murdered him. Can’t have a guy like that running around.

      There’s nothing more threatening to the Jews than a courageous, disillusioned person with some serious convictions, some means and some name recognition. I think Pat Tillman fell into the same category as Patton, and he got the same treatment accordingly.

      Then taking that set of traits and substituting strong moral convictions for strong patriotic/nationalistic convictions, you end up with people like Martin Luther King and Princess Diana, both of whom also met an early death.

      And I bet if Ed Snowden were to come back to the U.S. and get into politics, something unfortunate may happen to him as well.

      “As for the Revelations, i don’t know. I just don’t know…”

      A subject for a subsequent comment.

      1. No wonder the Jews murdered him. Can’t have a guy like that running around.

        so we agree (as per my 4th bulleted point).

        Now i’ve known several criminal types in my life, even starting in grade school, with whom i got along rather well and they seemed to have liked me, perhaps due to my naivety and open trust and have thus taken me under their wing in a manner of speaking, warning me about common pitfalls, pointing out character flaws in other rabble, generally acting protectively until i was somewhat streetproofed – though i don’t think i will ever graduate from this school.
        I’ve known dangerous dudes, black, white, mexican, guys who killed other guys in street combat and for all the flaws, they retained some kind of honor and repaid trust with trust.
        Next door to me here in Sarajevo, there is a giant Rotweiler who happens to share my Christian name and though everybody crosses the street to avoid his barred gateway, i occasionally feed him chunks of the meat pie i pick up from the local bakery – he eats out my hand though he could effortlessly slice off a few fingers.
        And i want to give Trumpeter the same shot.
        Because what else is there?

        “As for the Revelations, i don’t know. I just don’t know…”

        A subject for a subsequent comment.

        I was just going to say that before even having read yours (I am no authority on the subject but was going to stick in a lengthy quote by someone who does indeed)

    3. likely erratum and certain apology:

      Hitler never told a lie, as far as i can tell or so few that they escaped my attention, a good, kind, honest man that ought to be beatified into St Adolph with much more justification than St Joan d’Arc.

      Phil privately took me to task for comparing Hitler favorably to St Joan about whom I know next to nothing, just a bare bones outline, so that regardless of the actual score, I had no right to make that assumption.
      She was a true hero, martyred in Christ.

      Thus, sorry, until the next blooper.
      (i’ll try not to say that krauts are better than frogs 🙂 )

  17. Trump’s Tweets are juvenile….

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
    Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump Jun 26
    ..under a magnifying glass, they have zero “tapes” of T people colluding. There is no collusion & no obstruction. I should be given apology!
    31,223 replies 18,415 retweets 79,607 likes

    ..

    Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump Jun 26
    The real story is that President Obama did NOTHING after being informed in August about Russian meddling. With 4 months looking at Russia…
    17,250 replies 18,127 retweets 69,357 likes

    ..
    Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump Jun 26
    …and did not want to “rock the boat.” He didn’t “choke,” he colluded or obstructed, and it did the Dems and Crooked Hillary no good.

    SINCE… Hillary is crooked… he should arrest and indict her..!!

    The TV invented Buffoon IS losing it..!! 🙂

    1. Sadly, I agree, Trump has turned out to be juvenile, Those smirks and scowls, ridiculous.

      I was wrong, along with many others.

      1. John –

        “I was wrong, along with many others.”

        Don’t take it so hard. The Buffoon was (S)elected by the Pharisee-Jews “BIGGLY” controlling the voting machines.

        I thought he was running to make Hillary look good… since he had two or three barge-loads of Pharisee-Jew garbage dragging him around. 🙂

        I never thought they would claim that ‘Apprentice’ jerk. I was wrong.

        They’ve had a “YUGE” blast stuffing his ‘dumb-ass’ actions down our throats.

    2. I bear no antagonism to Pat and Uncle for labeling me a “joo” even though they both fully well knew they were lying when they labeled me a “joo”. I have forgiven them for lying [ even though neither one of ’em ever apologized to me and I doubt I will ever get an apology from either one of the two liars ].

      I don’t ask for an apology anymore because I realize with those TWO they’re NOT MAN ENOUGH AND NOT ETHICAL ENOUGH TO APOLOGIZE FOR KNOWINGLY LYING IN ORDER TO SLANDER ME.

      If they want to be dishonorable that’s their problem not mine. If they want to be dishonorable it’s a reflection on their character not mine.

  18. Is New Song really a LIAR? I am not so sure. I have said that Hitler may forever remain an enigma to many, however I think there is ample evidence to suggest he was groomed for his infamous role in history. If you follow the money you will see all the famous wars are bankers wars, to be precise: jew wars. When you get past all the rambling, ranting and rhetoric of the economic success brought about by the Socialist Party you will see the same players, J.P. Morgan, Rockefellers and company.

    According to Russian historian Nickolay Starikov, “”Who Made Hitler Attack Stalin” (St.Petersburg, 2008).:
    The key structures of the West’s post-war strategy were the central financial institutions of the United States and Great Britain – the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve System – coupled with financial-industrial organizations, who set out to establish absolute control over the financial system in Germany to manage the politics of Central Europe. The implementation of this strategy included the following steps:

    1st: 1919-1924 – Preparing the grounds for massive American financial investments in the German economy.
    2nd: 1924-1929 – Establishing control over the financial system and funding the National-Socialist movement.
    3rd: 1929-1933 – Inciting and unleashing a deep economic crisis ensuring the Nazis would rise to power.
    4th: 1933-1939 – Financial cooperation with the Nazi government and support for its expansionist foreign policy, aimed at preparing and unleashing the new world war.
    The loans were officially given to Germany to ensure the payment of reparations, in reality, they were designed to restore the country’s military-industrial potential. In fact, the Germans paid off the loans with shares of German companies, allowing American capital to actively integrate itself into the German economy. The total amount of foreign investment in German industry from 1924-1929 amounted to nearly 63 billion gold marks (the loans accounted for 30 billion of this), and 10 billion in reparations was paid off. American bankers – primarily J.P. Morgan, provided Seventy percent of Germany’s financial income. As a result, as early as 1929, Germany’s industry was second in the world, but to a large extent it was in the hands of America’s leading financial-industrial groups.

    Thus, I.G. Farben, the company that became the German war machine’s key component, was under the control of Rockefeller’s Standard Oil at the time it funded 45 percent of Hitler’s election campaign in 1930. Through General Electric, J.P. Morgan controlled the German radio and electrical industry in the form of AEG and Siemens (by 1933, General Electric owned a 30 percent stake in AEG). Through telecom company ITT, he controlled 40 percent of Germany’s telephone network and 30 percent of aircraft manufacturer Focke-Wulf. Opel was taken over by the Dupont family’s General Motors. Henry Ford held a 100 percent stake in Volkswagen. In 1926, with the participation of Rockefeller bank, Dillon Reed and Co., the second largest industrial monopoly emerged – metallurgical firm Vereinigte Stahlwerke (Unified Steel Trusts) of Thyssen, Flick, Wolf, Fegler, etc.

    American cooperation with Germany’s military-industrial complex became so intense and pervasive that, by 1933, American capital had reached key sectors of German industry and even major banks like Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank, Donat Bank, etc.
    German Chancellor Brüning wrote in his memoirs that beginning in 1923, Hitler received large sums of money from abroad – from where exactly is unknown, but it passed through Swiss and Swedish banks. It is also known that in 1922, Hitler met with U.S. Military Attaché Capt. Truman Smith in Munich – a meeting Smith recounted in a detailed report to his Washington superiors (in the Office of Military Intelligence), saying he thought highly of Hitler.

    In the summer of 1934, Britain signed the Anglo-German Transfer Agreement, which became one of the foundations of British policy towards the Third Reich, and by the end of the 1930’s, Germany developed into Britain’s primary trading partner. Schroeder’s bank turned into Germany’s and Great Britain’s main agent, and in 1936, its New York branch merged with a Rockefeller holding to create the investment bank “Schroeder, Rockefeller and Co.”, which the New York Times described as “economic-propagandist axis of Berlin-Rome”. As he admitted himself, Hitler viewed foreign credit as the financial basis of his four-year plan, so this didn’t raise the slightest alarm.

    In August 1934, American oil giant Standard Oil purchased 730,000 acres of land in Germany and built large oil refineries that supplied the Nazis with oil. At the same time, the United States secretly provided Germany with the most modern equipment for airplane factories, which would soon produce German aircraft. Germany received a large number of patents from American firms Pratt and Whitney, Douglas, and the Bendix Corporation, and the “Junker-87” dive-bomber was built using purely American technology. By 1941, when the second world war was in full-swing, American investment in the German economy totaled $475 million, Standard Oil invested $120 million alone, General Motors — $35 million, ITT — $30 million, and Ford — $17.5 million.
    ……………….

    If you look at role of Prescott Bush, Coca Cola, IBM, the Bank of International Settlements, the huge number of jews in key parts of the Nazi party, the stalling of HItler to take out Britain when he had the chance, his choice when to attack Russia, the Nazi party connection with the Russian Jew Alfred Rosenberg, Hitler himself being a jew and on and on…..lest I forget the big sell of the holohaux and the creation of the ‘anti-semitic’ rantings that really sold the world that this must be stopped at all cost and never allowed to happen again. I don’t think anyone else could have sold it more convincingly.

    Remember it was Theodore Hertzl the founder of the zioinist movement that pushed for the creation of a Jewish state. AS I said before, after WWI the British ‘gave’ Palestine to the Jews but they did not move. WWII was engineered in part to move the jews en masse to Palestine.

    Here is Hertzl words: “It would be an excellent idea to call in respectable, accredited anti-Semites as liquidators of property. To the people they would vouch for the fact that we do not wish to bring about the impoverishment of the countries that we leave. At first they must not be given large fees for this; otherwise we shall spoil our instruments and make them despicable as ‘stooges of the Jews.’ Later their fees will increase, and in the end we shall have only Gentile officials in the countries from which we have emigrated. The anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies.” (The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl. Vol. 1, edited by Raphael Patai, translated by Harry Zohn, page 83-84).

    Notice how he says ‘later their fees will increase’, we all know how much money Israel gets every year.

    “The wealthy Jews rule the world; the fate of the governments lies in their hands. They start wars between countries, and when they wish, the governments make peace. When the wealthy Jews sing, the nations and their leaders dance along, and meanwhile the Jews get richer!” (Published by Herzl in a German newspaper, taken from truetorahjews.org).
    I hate using the word anti-semite for them since they are not semitic; just take a look at the list provided by Greg Bacon and you will see that most of them are Ashkenazi Khazarians. The vast majority of jews in Palestine and in the world are false jews. I hope to write some more details about this later.

  19. here is the promised reveal of The Revelations.
    Since i know nothing of them, too opaque for my reading comprehension, it may be said that i trust them but don’t know what they are saying, I will simply switch to a related track of the Lady of Fatima’s 3rd secret message and let someone way more atuned to it speak – the indomitable bishop Richard Williamson.

    by way of synopsis, from what i understand of it, the Church of Catholics groans under the cloven foot of Satan who formally took Vatican with this latest antipope jorge bergoglio, post-conciliar Church refused to divulge the whole message because it would unmask the grinning demons.
    I would only add my suspicion that Ratzinger fought a rearguard battle as pope Benedict xvi – and lost, the reason for his unique abdication.
    Here, tell me if i read it correctly

    Fatima Crucial – II

    Churchmen make war on Fatima – all in vain.
    Satan will be defeated, once again.

    Last week these “Comments” argued that if only Church and world had heeded Our Lady’s great message given through the three children of Fatima, Portugal, in 1917, then the world could have been spared the material disaster of World War II, and the Church might have avoided the much greater spiritual disaster of the Second Vatican Council. But in 1960, which was the year when, at the latest, Our Lady wished the third part of the Secret given to the children in 1917 to be revealed, instead the churchmen locked it away, most likely because it condemned in advance the disastrous Council on which their hearts were set. And ever since, the same Conciliar churchmen have made war on Fatima, to stop it from condemning them.

    Yet faithful Catholics knew of the existence of the “Third Secret” and wanted to know what it said. Over the next 40 years a few details of its contents leaked out here and there, and, especially thanks to the labours of Fr Nicholas Gruner, pressure built up for its publication. That is why in 2000 the churchmen in Rome made a special effort to bury Fatima once and for all. As head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Ratzinger published a text which he claimed was the Third Secret of Fatima. Alas, Fatima experts immediately saw serious differences between the Cardinal’s text and what was known of the true Third Secret, awaited since 1960. They suspected that the true Third Secret was still locked away inside the Vatican.

    What confirmed this suspicion was the fact that later in the same year 2000, the Cardinal himself told a personal friend (and a saintly priest), Dr Ingo Dollinger, that “What we published was not the whole Secret. We acted under orders.” Over the next many years, Dr Dollinger told the story of the Cardinal’s admission for many priests, seminarians and lay-folk to hear. Most recently, he confirmed the story once more, and gave permission for it to be published on May 16, 2016. But the truth about the Third Secret could not be allowed to get out. See THIS
    [i embedded the link since bishop Rick doesn’t seem to know how to do it – i always respect tech ignorance and am laboriously cultivating it myself]

    Within days (May 21), the Vatican released a Press Statement that quoted Benedict XVI, the former Cardinal Ratzinger, as saying that he had never spoken to Dr Dollinger about Fatima, and that the entire Third Secret had been made public! Obviously, Conciliar Rome will go to any lengths to stifle Fatima, but Fatima will not be stifled. [popes never lie, only forget that they are infallible]

    At HERE we go again [lobro humbly scurrying around with a brush and a dustpan] on the Internet, see details of an interview given in 2011 by the famous exorcist of Rome (but no Conciliarist), Fr Gabriel Amorth, who wanted the interview to be made public only after his death – he died last year.
    Fr Amorth knew Padre Pio for 26 years, and the interviewer asked Fr Amorth if, in a conversation held with Padre Pio in about 1960, Padre Pio connected the Third Secret to the loss of faith in the Church.

    Padre Pio replied very sorrowfully: “You know, Gabriele? It is Satan who has been introduced into the bosom of the Church and within a very short time will come to rule a false Church.”

    More recently still, it is the brave Cardinal Burke who is entering the fray on behalf of Our Lady of Fatima. He is one of the four Cardinals who earlier this year raised serious objections to the papal document, Amoris Laetitia, on marriage and family. On May 19 in Rome he appealed at a meeting of Roman Life Forum for Catholics to “work for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.”
    He admitted that John-Paul II had made such a consecration of the world in 1984, but “once again we hear the call of Our Lady of Fatima to consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart, in accord with her explicit instruction.” The Cardinal is quite right. May he at least never be obliged to swallow his words!

    Kyrie eleison.

    without raising the doctrine of non-falsifiabilty (let the sleeping dogs of Popper lie and lying dogs sleep – fat chance of that), it makes eminent sense to me.

  20. i poked around that site, “onepeter” and hit this article that talks about a subject that has fascinated me for the past couple of years, namely benedict 16th’s abdication.
    here goes something that caught my eye and it relates heavily to the current debates, a matter of geo-occult import:

    The conflicts between the Church and the United States did not become less, even with the passing of John Paul II.

    They instead continued during the pontificate of Pope Ratzinger, in the course of which, what exacerbated them was not only the [policy and strategic] investment made by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the political Islam of the Muslim Brotherhood during the so-called Arab Spring, but also
    the firm desire of Benedict XVI to achieve an historic reconciliation with the Patriarchate of Moscow [under Patriarch Kirill], the true and proper religious coronation of a geopolitical project of Euro-Russian integration, which were in his intentions strongly supported by Germany and also by Silvio Berlusconi’s Italy
    – but not by that more American-friendly one [Italy], which is to be recognized in Giorgio Napolitano [Italian President, 2006-2015].

    How it has come to an end is well-known to everyone.
    The Italian and papal governments were simultaneously hit by a scandalous, coordinated, and unusually violent and unprecedented campaign, even involving more or less opaque maneuvers in the financial field, with the final effect coming to a head in November 2011 with Berlusconi’s departure from the Palazzo Chigi and, on February 10 [sic – 11], 2013, the abdication of Ratzinger.

    At the height of the crisis, Italy progressively saw its access to international financial markets closed, while the Institute for Religious Works (IOR) [the Vatican Bank] was temporarily cut out of the Swift 4 circuit.

    Alessandro Rico published, on 17 May, an article entitled “Ratzinger costretto ad abdicare dal ricatto di Obama” (“Ratzinger Forced to Abdicate Due to Obama’s Blackmail”) in the Italian newspaper La Verità.

    lobro’s animal hunch proven right, again.
    This is truly the Big Show, the forces of the underworld showing their strength, Clinton-Obama pushing for the endgame scenario.
    The intriguing part, again a hunch that i brought up in the past, is Frau merkel’s true role … i keep saying that the old guard Satsi/KGB cadres are a tricky bunch and not in a hurry to show their hand just for the sake of facebook “likes”.
    I claim that both she and Putin are aware of the stakes but now through rabbi jorge Bergolio, the bad guys have the upper hand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *