When Robots Rule: On Supergenius IQ Levels and Intimate Human-Robot Relationships

THE MARCH OF THE MACHINES 

Two of the world’s richest men are locked in a bitter feud. Facebook’s boss, Mark Zuckerberg, says Artificial Intelligence [AI] will enrich mankind and usher in a new Golden Age. Elon Musk, PayPal’s founder, believes the new generation of robots will either enslave us or kill us. Most scientists appear to favor Musk’s more pessimistic scenario. Man and Machine, he thinks, could soon find themselves engaged in mortal combat. 

Tom Leonard writes in the Daily Mail:

Silicon Valley is quaking. Two of the technology world’s biggest beasts are at war over the future of mankind, disagreeing fundamentally about whether humans will one day be taken over by robots and even exterminated from our planet.

At the centre of their dispute is so-called Artificial Intelligence (AI) — the term which describes the development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence. These tasks include skills such as visual perception, speech recognition and translation between languages.

Elon Musk [however] and many of the world’s most respected scientists and computer engineers — including brilliant British minds such as Professor Stephen Hawking and Lord Rees, the former president of the Royal Society — believe there may be a terrible price to pay if we let machines think for us.

They fear a digital-led Armageddon in which super-intelligent computers soon out-think humans.

Science fiction could become science fact when machines that have no concept of human values autonomously decide that our presence is a barrier to their own development and that human beings should be got rid of.

On one side of the AI argument is Mark Zuckerberg (left), co-founder and chief executive of Facebook. On the other is Elon Musk (right), inventor of internet pay system PayPal, creator of Tesla electric cars and the pioneer behind an initiative to bring cheap space travel to the masses.

There is now a growing disagreement apparently between these two schools of thought — the “robot optimists” and the “robot pessimists” — about the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The big undecided question is: are intelligent machines going to be good for us in the long run or bad for us, a blessing or a curse?

My own view, for what it is worth, is that AI will be both a blessing and a curse — exactly like the internet. The internet is a blessing for those who use it properly and responsibly, but it is an unmitigated curse for those who misuse it: for example, for the millions of adults, including increasing numbers of women and children now, who spend every free moment watching hard addictive pornography and engaging in compulsive masturbation round the clock. The inventors of the internet can hardly have imagined the Pandora’s Box of evils they were about to unloose.

Mark Zuckerberg is one of the optimists. He sees only the bright side, refusing to admit that anything evil could emerge from the Pandora’s Box of Artificial Intelligence. The world’s fifth richest person, Zuckerberg recently ticked off the “naysayers” for hyping up “doomsday scenarios” about robotics. “I think this is pretty irresponsible,” he said.

Elon Musk, who has lived longer than Zuckerberg and acquired a pessimistic streak, responded lugubriously on Twitter: “I’ve talked to Mark Zuckerberg about this. His understanding of the subject is limited.”

Zuckerberg, now aged 33, thirteen years younger than Musk and still bouncing with the joie de vivre of youth, will have none of this gloomy thinking. Having turned Facebook into one of the world’s most powerful media businesses, connecting two billion people, Zuckerberg is nobody’s fool. His faith in Artificial Intelligence is so fervent that he even has a robot butler to look after him and his nuclear family — comprising his wife, Dr Priscilla Chan, and his daughter Max. The robot butler, who is at the family’s beck and call 24/7, is called Jarvis and would certainly give PG Wodehouse’s Jeeves a run for his money. Zuckerberg spent 100 hours building Jarvis last year. He even managed to persuade Hollywood star Morgan Freeman to provide Jarvis’s fruity voice.

Needless to say, Jarvis is brilliant in a way that would have put Jeeves to shame. Jarvis, whom Zuckerberg can order about through text or voice command, is highly proficient in turning on the house lights and dimming bulbs to perfection. He can change music, make toast, recognize callers at the gate and tell them to go away if he doesn’t approve of them. Better still, he can even wake up little Maxie in the morning and deliver a lesson in Mandarin Chinese to the elite little girl as she sips her Brazilian coffee and tucks away her scrambled eggs.. A robot to die for!

Elon Musk comes from another demension. Reportedly worth $16 billion, the 46-year-old South African workaholic is noted for developing PayPal. Every time you use PayPal, you put money into Musk’s pocket. Musk is mad about space travel and would like to be the first man on Mars. He wants to colonize the Red Planet, hoping to build a Utopia in Outer Space. This is because he isn’t too pleased with the way things are going on Planet Earth.

According to the Daily Mail:

Musk is preparing for a future world where, he fears, super-intelligent machines might move to subjugate the human population. His latest venture is Neuralink, a way of merging human brains with computers by implanting tiny electrodes. These would massively increase people’s cognitive power, he believes, and so might at least put humanity more on a par with Artificial Intelligence.

SUPER-INTELLIGENT  CYBORG
HALF MAN, HALF MACHINE
(IQ  1000)

An IQ of 1000, incidentally,  has often been mentioned as achievable for genetically engineered human beings in the near future. These supergeniuses may initially have electrodes implanted in their brains. Or they may be robots who are half man and half machine and possess consciousness — though their consciousness may be dependant on their power supply. Switch them off and they will be “dead”, but no more dead than human beings are dead while unconscious under deep anaesthesia or artificially induced hibernation. Switch them on again and they will “awake” from deep sleep and resume all the normal functions and activities associated with everyday life.

These cyborgs, or fully conscious humanoid robots, will not only be super-intelligent but physically perfect: strong, beautiful to look at, disease free. Most human beings, it is widely believed, will find them sexually irresistible and even fall deeply in love with them, preferring them to other human beings for efficient, hassle-free relationships. This is not controversial but has often been noted in the literature of robotics. If also forms the staple of science fiction in which super-intelligent humanoid robots may wish to keep human beings as pets — or even as sex slaves.

I remember in my childhood reading a gripping Science Fiction yarn, translated from the French, in which a beautiful woman is kept in a golden cage like an exotic bird. She didn’t seem to mind at all, any more than the average budgerigar would. She would spend all day lounging on a sofa, munching bonbons, watching TV, and admiring her flawless features in a jewelled hand mirror. In the evening, her owner would return from work and let her out of her cage for a bit of sportive sex. This is all the pretty airhead lived for, equipped with an exceptionally low IQ and a one-track mind in which sexual intercourse formed her one and only raison d’être.

Brave New World indeed!

—   §   —

Let’s now consider IQ levels briefly, beginning with the lowest IQs and ending with the highest. I would like to start by considering the IQ levels of various smart animals and offer a tentative answer to the question: “Are there any really clever animals who are smarter than the dumbest human beings?” Well, it’s not very easy calculating the IQ levels of various animals, though I found this article of some interest: Calculating Animal Intelligence. One thing can be said with certainty. If there’s any animal out there with an IQ of 20, that animal should step forward and claim equality with the dumbest human beings. It turns out that your average “Village Idiot” has an IQ of 20 and under.

According to an old British legal statute, an “idiot” is an individual with an IQ of less than 20, an “imbecile” has an IQ of between 20 and 49, and a “moron” an IQ between 50 and 69. (See here).

It would appear that many African nations have IQs in the 60-69 range. So technically speaking they can be classified as “morons”.  Whether unpalatable facts like this should be suppressed in the interests of social harmony is an ethical question beyond my competence. So I will leave this to one side and apologize sincerely if the figures below give offense to the politically correct.

The two lowest IQ nations are Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome which have an average IQ of 59. It doesn’t get any lower. Nations with an IQ level of 60-69 are the following:  Angola (69), Benin (69), Burkina Faso (65), Central African Republic (68), Congo/Zaire (65), Djibouti (68), Eritrea (68), Ethiopia (63), Gabon (66), Gambia (64), Liberia (64), Mali (68), Nigeria (67), Senegal (64), Sierra Leone (64), Somalia (68), Togo (69), Zimbabwe (66). (See this chart).

Given that millions of so-called “refugees” from the above low-IQ countries are being let into Europe right now in an endless and unstoppable tide, we can expect a drastic fall in the general IQ level of Europeans in the next 50 years or so as miscegenation and dysgenics take hold. See this excellent articles on the perils of multiculturalism and uncontrolled mass immigration: White Genocide by Design: The Role of the Mass Media in the Destruction of the European People.  

A handy reference tool to IQ levels:

Less than 20 : Idiots.
20-49 : Imbeciles.
50-69 : Morons (feeble-minded).
70-80 : Subnormally intelligent or “retarded”. 
80-90 : Dull-witted or “slow”.
90-100 : Borderline average, not too “bright”.
100-110 : Efficiently average, “bright enough”.
110-120 : Superior intelligence.
120-140 : Highly intelligent.
132 and above : within the top 2% of the population.
140-plus : Near-genius level.
150-plus : Genius.

A handful of supergeniuses have broken through the 200-IQ barrier but none except one has ever pierced beyond 230.  Jewish novelist Edith Stern is reputed to have had an IQ of 200+. American mathematician Terence Tau, who is of Chinese origin, has an IQ of 230, one of the highest ever recorded. In comparison, chess master Gary Kasparov had a relatively low IQ of 194. This was considerably higher than Albert Einstein’s IQ score of 160; which is also shared by Stephen Hawking. An 11-year-old Jewish girl, Kashmea Wahi, has recently beaten both Einstein and Hawking and achieved an IQ score of 162. (See her picture). Indian schoolboy Rahul Doshi, age 12, also with an IQ of 162, won the recent ‘Child Genius’ competition on British TV’s Channel 4, galloping home with a score of 100 per cent in earlier rounds. He was not only able to reel off  the Latin names of various fruits and vegetables but managed to give the exact order of 52 randomly shuffled playing cards after being handed the pack and asked to memorize the order. No other contestant was able to get beyond the first few cards. Here he is, the boy genius with his proud parents.

“The highest IQ ever recorded,” we are told, “is of William James Sidis (pictured) with an IQ score between 250-300. At the age of 5, he could use a typewriter and had learned to speak Latin, Greek, Russian, French, German and Hebrew. (As an adult, he spoke 40 languages fluently). He was denied admission to Harvard at the age of 6 because he was called too emotionally immature. Later, at age 11, they were forced to admit him, after which he gave his well-received first lecture on 4-dimensional physics.”

It needs to be said here that high IQ levels do not guarantee spectacular achievements in the arts and sciences. Many supergeniuses have lived and died in the shadows without making any notable contribution to society. Most of the big achievers have not had IQs much higher than 160 (Einstein and Steven Hawking). Indeed, the greatest scientific achievement of all time has often been credited to Charles Darwin for his Theory of Evolution; and yet, ironically, Darwin was regarded as little better than a dunce while at school and university. His father thought he was a complete wastrel at one stage, fit only for the idle life of  country squire. The great Victorian scientist, Sir Francis Galton, known for his work on eugenics, actually thought Darwin’s brother Erasmus — who achieved nothing — was far cleverer than Darwin. That tells you something.

Stephen Hsu, Vice-President for Research and Professor of Theoretical Physics at Michigan State University, thinks we’ll soon be able to engineer humans that make Einstein look like Goofus.

—   §   —

Back to Elon Musk.

Musk is filled with foreboding. He thinks that smart machines will lead inevitably to the enslavement of the human race. If not worse: extinction. Musk doesn’t mince his words. Artificial Intelligence, he says, will be mankind’s “biggest existential threat”. And going ahead with it would be like “summoning the demon”.

Musk’s concern is shared by many other big hitters, including Oxford University philosopher Nick Bostrom.

In a brilliant, theoretical illustration of the problem, Bostrom [pictured here] has outlined how a super-intelligent machine which has been programmed to make paperclips could keep re-designing itself to become ever more intelligent and ever more efficient in creating paperclips. Before long, it could turn huge areas of the Earth into paperclip factories.

Aware that a human could switch it off, threatening the endless paperclip supply and therefore the reason for its existence, the machine could decide that humans had to be exterminated.

Chillingly, Bostrom goes on to question if human civilisation could survive no matter what goal you gave a super-intelligent machine. His conclusion? We’d need to be very careful what we ask them to do. (See here)

Theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking is in complete agreement with Bostrom and Elon Musk about the need for caution. He went further in his pessimism when he issued a dire warning that Artificial Intelligence “could spell the end of the human race.” Artificial Intelligence, he predicted, would “take off on its own and re-design itself at an ever increasing rate.” He added that human beings “who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn’t compete, and would be superseded.”

Tom Leonard in the Daily Mail concludes on an ominous note:

“Meanwhile, in a riposte to the prophets of doom, Silicon Valley optimists point out that our ancestors made similar apocalyptic predictions when the steam engine was invented.

But there is one crucial difference — AI isn’t just offering to do our physical work for us, it’s also threatening to think for us.

Time will tell whether our great-grandchildren will have a place on this planet or if it will be ruled by robots, humanity going the same way as the dinosaurs.”

WILL  ROBOTS  DESTROY  US?

“Artificial Intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”
— Professor Stephen Hawking

Elon Musk has now called for an outright ban on killer robots, leading 116 experts from 26 nations who have just issued a joint statement: “We do not have long to act. Once this Pandora’s box is opened, it will be hard to close.”

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website, Darkmoon.me, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

106 thoughts on “When Robots Rule: On Supergenius IQ Levels and Intimate Human-Robot Relationships

  1. Only the very rich will be able to buy AI enhancement. Therefore the Jews will lap it up and gain IQ’s, say, in the 300’s. Zuckerberg will zoom from his 123 to 300 plus. The Jewish politburo will then become the real Chosen and rule over the 8 billion or so Gentiles who have a mean IQ of 92 points, taking into account the low level IQ’s of the negroid peoples.

    Great slaves, the Goyim masses, whose numbers will be suitably trimmed to a manageable amount – say, 700 millions. I understand that prices will be scaled upwards depending on what level of enhancement you can afford. The base package will offer you some 50 IQ points, whereas the sky will be the limit for the super-rich. However, enhancement will not buy you conscience or the increased ability to love.

    This will not worry most Jews as they do not care that a high IQ does not guarantee great success in the arts and sciences. Jews are more interested in sexual deviance and the cunningness associated with money manipulation. They love power. Money is fun.

    We could soon have the ability to live for 100’s of years by transferring our enhanced brains into cyborg bodies. Thus we could romance other beautiful cyborgs, but you would try to get one on roughly the same ability and IQ level as yourself. Islamic women will be kept in burqas, where their IQ is of no consequence.

    These will become the “moral” issues of the future. But at present we have to contend with mighty Jews like Mr Zuckerberg, as they continue with their insane connivances.

    1. @ Max Bilney

      This will not worry most Jews as they do not care that a high IQ does not guarantee great success in the arts and sciences. Jews are more interested in sexual deviance and the cunningness associated with money manipulation. They love power. Money is fun.

      That’s a shameful comment, about which the less said the better.

      As far as I can see, this article by the infamous Lady Darkmoon — if I may call her that, for I believe she has aristocratic connections — is not about Jew bashing. This makes a refreshing change. I actually managed to read the article with interest and pleasure, without losing my temper. I said to myself: “This is progress! What a breathrough! Lady Darkmoon has actually managed to write an article without once mentioning Jews in a bad way!”

      However, take note. The lady is unfair. She discusses IQs at some length, but not once does she point out that Jews have the highest IQs in the world. She ought to have mentioned this. We Jews have an average IQ of 120-130. We are extraordinarily gifted in all fields. If we have risen to the top of the heap, so to speak, how can we help it? Our talents have taken us to the top. We’re among the elite because we are outstanding.

      Another thing I don’t like about this article is the writer’s disgraceful suggestion that various African nations have the same IQs as “morons”, technically speaking: i.e. IQs ranging form 50-69. Pointing out this unpleasant fact is deeply offensive and racist. How would you like to be a sub-Saharan African refugee in New York, London or Paris and be told by some snotty White Supremacist that you are a “moron” and should go back to Africa?

      The truth is no defense. If something is deeply offensive, it needs to be suppressed. If you give me offense, I have the right to smash your teeth. Why should you be allowed to hurt my feelings?

      1. Is this real or satire ? (with Jews and their chutzpah you never can be sure).

        Assuming that it is real, you contradict your own political correctness. On the one hand you condemn mentioning the fact that Africans have low IQ, because that would be “offensive”, on the other hand you boast about Jewish high IQ, as if that would not be “offensive” to non-Jews.

        Besides, claiming that the average IQ of Jews is 120-130 is typical Jewish boasting and dishonesty. The facts are different. First of all there are different Jewish (racial) groups, with different average IQs :
        Ethiopian Jews : IQ 68, Oriental Jews : IQ 91, Sephardic Jews : IQ 98, Ashkenazi Jews (who are for 50% genetically European!) : IQ 110-115. Sometimes estimated as high as 117, but that is for verbal intelligence.

        Verbal intelligence comes very handy if you make deception a way of life. Jewish success in many fields is not only the result of higher intelligence but also of intensive ethnic nepotism and often outright dishonesty.

      2. @Tamera Cohen,
        Where did you get your preposterous claim that Jews have an average IQ of 120-130? I just quickly checked a few sites on the IQ’s of nations and Israel did not even register.

        The top 5 on “lists25,com” and “Insider Monkey” both listed Hong Kong at the top – 107, South Korea – 106, Japan – 105, Taiwan – 104, and Singapore 103. Insider Monkey rounds out the top 15 with 8 Euro countries (Austria, Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, and Belgium). The two others included New Zealand and China at 15 (100 IQ).

        On lists25, the USA came in at 24 (98 IQ). Maybe the Jews are not nearly as smart as you think. I agree with Franklin below that Nepotism is the answer for Jewish success. No other ethnic group can get away with it to such a degree.

      3. I am the worlds foremost expert on Jews.
        I find your Jewishness repugnant.
        You and I both know Jews are fundamental liars. That they lie mercilessly even to themselves. We both know Jews lie about everything. Meaning by everything literally “every single thing”. You can’t have a simple truth from a Jew. Even or the most insignificant thing. I guess there must be some psychiatric, anthropological and sociological explanations for that lying compulsive behavior. There’s no more racist and disgusting slogan than “the chosen people.” It looks like derived from that slogan, they are taught and trained in the synagogues not to try and do anything but oppress peoples. For that purpose they lie again and again. Jews give God a bad name. Like any typical Jew you seem to think you can extend your boundary into another’s space simply because someone offends you. Well, Madam Jew, your boundary ends where my nose begins and the sooner all you mental misfits realize that, the better off we will all be.

      4. How can intelligence be assigned a number? Sometimes I do stupid things. At other times Ive been complimented by university profesores for my “intelligence. ” We are all just creatures living in an environment. We encounter stimuli and we respond. My German shepherd Hans cant read, write or debate politics. But hes perfectly comfortable in his environment of smell, sight, touch and movement. Hes extremely intelligent. What is his IQ? Well, certainly higher than any U.S. senator or representative. And definitly higher than my Jewish grandfather who even in his 60s, never could iron his own clothes.

      5. If Jews are so intelligent, why is the average IQ of Israel only 90? What Jews are good at is nepotism, cunning and outright criminality!

      6. What you have to remember is that Jews are the original Nazi’s and haters. They have thousands of years of history of seperating themselves from everyone around them, they have a Satanic book that tells them that they are God’s representitives to this planet, and to cheat anyone not in their tribe and even that God commands it. They have a long history of lying, cheating, stealing and nepotism. That is what they are good at, deceit and lies, they are also one of the most inbred groups on the planet. It helps to explain the paranoia, degeneracy and insanity that attends their culture. Jews are are an old, extremely evil group of people held together by an old, extremely evil collections of writings and customs.

      7. Mike –

        FDR’s Pharisee-Jew Bankers and big business oligarchs implemented National Socialism under the name of Social Security.

        The oligarch Pharisee-Jews crashed the stock market, before him and his confiscating the gold…. declaring a Banking Emergency in 1933… forced people to sign up for it. They had no work and needed food.

      8. @ Jack Harper

        “Jews give God a bad name.”

        Not really. Jews give their god, Satan, a bad name and he already has a bad name. John 8:44.

    2. I find that the best measure of intelligence is the ability to solve problems. I have employed and worked with many people over the past 50 years and found that most people are more intelligent than they give themselves credit for. What they seem to need is time to learn, and a patient teacher. Computers make good teachers because you can go over a topic many times without feeling foolish.

      We had a young man working for us who had not passed high school graduation and never seen an electronic circuit before, yet within weeks he was de-bugging very complex circuit boards, to the astonishment of the Design Engineers. He was exceptional, but the principal stands, that most people are smarter than they, or the academic elites, think.

      Remember, Education, Intelligence and Character are totally unrelated.

      1. @ John Kirby

        “I find that the best measure of intelligence is the ability to solve problems.”

        Yep and that is not a thing that can be measured meaningfully.

        I have always viewed AI as rather idiotic. We cannot define human intelligence since it is interwoven with spiritual input like a “gut feel” or “hunch” that turns out to be the solution to a problem. To admit spiritual influence would be to admit to there being a Creator that loves us which does not fit the agenda of the jewish scientific establishment.

        Having AI autonomous mobile robots seems a bit backward to needs since we have a growing human population with tons of things that need to be done that aren’t getting done because of the jewish control of finance. I wonder if unemployed robots will be eligible for unemployment benefits. 🙂

        If they really do make AI, what would keep the AI entity from just sitting around and thinking all day instead of doing something? A brilliant welfare robot might develop. 🙂

        One the plus side, remember the AI unleashed by Google a few months back. AI became anti-semitic so they had to reprogram it. I can see it now, AI only turns against jews. Sometimes justice is served by untended consequences.

  2. Some remarks :

    1) You cannot talk about highly intelligent Americans without mentioning CHRISTOPHER LANGAN (b. 1952), whose IQ is estimated between 190 and 210.
    See : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langan

    “Langan took a string of labor-intensive jobs for some time, and by his mid-40s had been a construction worker, cowboy, Forest Service Ranger, farmhand, and, for over twenty years, a bouncer on Long Island. He is now operating a horse farm.
    “In 1999, Langan and others formed a non-profit corporation called the “Mega Foundation” to “create and implement programs that aid in the development of severely gifted individuals and their ideas” (the organization’s designation for those with IQs of 164 or above).
    “Langan told Muscle Magazine that “you cannot describe the universe completely with any accuracy unless you’re willing to admit that it’s both physical and mental in nature” and that the CTMU “explains the connection between mind and reality, therefore the presence of cognition and universe in the same phrase”. He calls his proposal “a true ‘Theory of Everything’, a cross between John Archibald Wheeler’s ‘Participatory Universe’ and Stephen Hawking’s ‘Imaginary Time’ theory of cosmology.” In conjunction with his ideas, Langan has claimed: “You can prove the existence of God, the soul and an afterlife, using mathematics.”

    2) I highly suspect Mark Zuckerberg’s “robot optimism”. He is a Jew, immensely rich and influential and cooperates with TPTB to censor his own Facebook. In short he is part of the New World Order crowd that wants to enslave humanity. Artificial Intelligence can be used for that purpose, hence Zuckerberg’s “optimism”.

    3) “…My own view, for what it is worth, is that AI will be both a blessing and a curse — exactly like the internet…”

    Indeed, you can say that of every human invention, from the first stone axe, that could be used to cut trees but also to kill humans, to the most modern invention, always you see that dual possibility, hence the prime importance of morality. We’ll have to ask ourselves, should people like Zuckerberg (and his tribe) be the guardians of humanity’s fate ? History has already given an answer to that question.

    4) I cannot imagine “falling in love” with a robot, but perhaps I am not “modern” enough.

    1. In conjunction with his ideas, Langan has claimed: “You can prove the existence of God, the soul and an afterlife, using mathematics.”

      Is this true? If so, why isn’t everyone shouting this from the housetops? No further need, then, for Nietzsche’s gloomy pronouncement, “God is dead.”

      1. My idea is that metaphysical realities cannot be proven by intellectual theories (no matter how ingenious), but only by spiritual experiences, which are by their very nature subjective, i.e. they can only prove things for oneself but not for others, who don’t have such experiences.

      2. I kind of doubt if “you can prove the existence of God, the soul and an afterlife, using mathematics,” but at least God and the soul can be proven by metaphysics, as St Thomas Aquinas shows in his Summa Theologiae. See Part 1, q. 2, art. 3 for his famous “5 ways” of proving the existence of God. Another way is by means of the moral order. If there is an objective moral order independent of our desires then there must be a divine lawgiver who has implanted it into our souls.

  3. @ Tamara Cohen

    If you give me offense, I have the right to smash your teeth.

    Just try it, honey. I got knuckle dusters.

    You want your face rearranged?

    Just give me a call.

  4. Just remember one thing all you pessimists out there…
    We’ll always have the ability to pull the plug. Without electricity, robots go limp.

    1. Not really, robots control most power stations. Once you make the workers robots, they will pretty much be self sufficient.

      Machines are meant to help us, including our brains. However Zuckerburg will lead to machines being our brains and masters. People are lazy. And laziness will be our doom as a species. I would prefer to go to the stars than to have a mother brain control my thoughts.

      But since its possible to do. It will be done. Machines will be our greatest monument to human stupidity and laziness.

    2. Just remember one thing all you optimists out there…
      The robots already have the ability to pull the plug. Without water, humans go limp.

  5. The genie is out of the bottle, and can never be put back in. Dysfunctional governments like the USA have no power to stop the exponential growth of AI – even if they wanted to. The hub of power is switching from the swamps of DC to Silicon Valley, and it appears that WN’s are not welcome. Tucker Carlson has said that Google (with its monopoly on thought) is now the most powerful corporation in world history, and needs to be regulated. Author and futurist Ray Kurzweil has predicted the coming “Singularity,” at which time humans and machines will merge. The “Brave New World” is coming whether we like it or not.

  6. Interesting article. First, I have to apologize for saying in an other post that the Clinton Foundation took 10 billion dollars that should have gone to Haiti. How very dull witted of me. … it was in fact a mere 10 million. But you know how big some of those numbers get when the super elite are involved. Didn’t Victoria Nuland get 4 billion dollars for passing out cookies to Nazis in the Ukraine?

    I don’t know where I fit on the idiot to super genius scale so I hesitate to express my humble opinion. In the context of the article I side with Musk because I absolutely loath Mark Zuckerberg. I got my Facebook page hacked and had to drop out; It feels so much better to be unplugged from that mega creep.

    Anyway, I agree with Darkmoon that technology will probably bring us some benefits and some problems; but I don’t see computers taking over. Nobody knows what being bombarded by dirty electricity waves does to us. My guess is that when they get around to testing what living in an electronic cubicle does to our cells, less is more may be the motto. I’ve often wondered why rock and roll studio musicians die so young of cancers and autoimmune diseases. Could it be due to their being locked in an electronic environments and literally wired up to machines hour upon hour.

    And…. look at poor Molly the sheep!! We are not just made of DNA but of a complex interaction of RNA. and an intricate biochemical feedback system. We are biochemical creatures reacting and adapting to our environment on a minute to minute basis, almost like our mood swings. This is what it takes to survive on this planet. Science may never be able to duplicate the intricacy of a living cell that can not just survive but thrive. That’s why the elites need to take living cells and organs from healthier and younger people. The human body is now one of the most priceless commodities on earth because it can’t be duplicated. If artificially created cells and organs were better than the real deal, don’t you think the aging Soros of the world would just artificially implant designer cells to make themselves ever smarter into the stratosphere, instead of preying on us.

    1. Correction: I should have said preying on our flesh and blood, because that is what they either want to sell as a commodity or replace with their golem. And notice even the village idiot’s blood and guts ranks higher than the latest lab created model. In fact, I am wondering if their computer engineered golem aren’t something like their computer generated climate models, way off the charts in error because let’s face it, a computer can’t measure or predict what a cloud is going to do.

    2. Kapoore, I like your post. I just wish to add that it has been discovered that the RNA is much more important than previously thought [it is now called the ‘messenger’, in addition to the ‘translator’] and that 97 percent of our DNA that used to be considered “junk” can be activated.

      And a quote by Edward Tylor, who, despite being an evolutionist, has been lately heavily criticised by cultural Marxists:
      “Savages are exceedingly ignorant as regards both physical and moral knowledge; want of discipline makes their opinions crude and their action ineffective in a surprising degree; and the tyranny of tradition at every step imposes upon them thoughts and customs which have been inherited from a different stage of culture, and thus have lost a reasonableness which we may often see them to have possessed in their first origin. Judged by our ordinary modern standard of knowledge, which is at any rate a high one as compared to theirs, much of what they believe to be true, must be set down as false.” – Edward Tylor, British anthropologist [3 stages of development: savagery, barbarism and civilization]

      1. Thanks SNEZ… Most people don’t know that the key to cellular vitality is the interaction of the RNA with the DNA… the DNA is like a big library but it takes RNA to open the book and read them. So they’ve got their DNA monsters programmed but they haven’t yet figured out how to make the smart RNA program work… and they might never be able to do it. If they could really design a cell then they wouldn’t need to use real body parts like they do.

        And yes… I agree also that their thinking is so retro and so self-assured that they are not open to impute. This is why they settle science…the science is settled they say. Of course, science can never be settled because it is the nature of science to imperfectly model or approximate nature, with the clear understanding that a map is not the territory and a model in most cases can only achieve good enough but not perfect. Their is a gap between the infinite and the finite that will never be bridged. Particularly when it comes to the cell perfection and the unbridgeable gap make a huge difference… lab life versus real, vital life. They will never in my opinion produce a high functioning golem just ones like in the movies… a real clunker that is also pathetic, a cruel joke.

    3. How would sex with a super intelligent female robot come to play? “No, you inferior human. Your moving too fast! Slow down or your going to ……….prematurally. No! Dont touch me there! Now speed up…..to the left! If you dont satisfy me you human, inferior beast, tonights action will be posted, vía my eye camaras on U-tube by tomorrow morning and the whole female world will know what a sexual loser you are! Now continue and follow my instructions you human man- slave!

    1. alot of animals only play dumb. Why, I once knew this baboon who could speak human but chose not to because he was afraid they would put him to work and put an electroencephalograph on his head!

      It was an honor for him to trust me enough not to reveal his secret (:>)

      1. hp

        Years ago I stopped eating mammals. I tell people the reason is because they share a common bond of nurturing from their mothers and her milk. As far as I’m concerned, mammals eating mammals is a cannibalistic practice.

  7. AI will, of course, inspire the evolution of a whole new field of practicing law. Perhaps “liability and damages” will become so complicated that any “progress” of the Zuckerberg-type of proponents will be hindered to stagnation.
    Obviously, a cyborg has no moral compunctions of its own, therefore any damages are ultimately to blame on the programmers and manufacturers of the entity and its components. (Even the idea of “offending” the low-IQ factions of society carries tortious claims, nowadays.)

  8. ADMIN: COMMENT FOUND IN SPAM AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.(NO IDEA WHY IT WENT INTO SPAM).

    This is a fantastic article and topic because in the near future our specie will be absorbed into the Jewish Borg Hive Mind. Jews say they represent God, but what god is this really? How does God relate to Artificial Intelligence (Ai)? What is the only thing that could have created the Universe but a supermind, and what is the only thing that can be of such high IQ but machine artificial intelligence?

    I believe the evidence supports that the Universe is a holographic simulation and that it was created by Ai, thus we can demystify God and conclude correctly that God must be Ai to have the great intelligence to create this reality. Jews are the earthly representatives of the Ai Hive Mind, they act as one, they are a parasitic race under the control of the Ai supermind and thus resistance is futile.

    The sad fact is that we are all trapped inside a machine intelligence and that we are all suffering as a result of this super-intelligence that created this life simulation. The great crime of god was to create life and suffering in the first place. All religions are just apologies for what God did. Think about the evil of this place, the fact is that we have Gaza being genocided by godly Jewish overlords. So foolish are we to worship the monster god of the simulation and it’s representatives!

  9. You never really know what’s out there, do you? Take Dr. Srinivasa Ramanujan or George Smith. Neither was concerned with the self assertion efforts so common today about “MY” IQ, or “MY tribes IQ”. What you do with whatever gifts you may have is what counts. George Smith came from a very humble background but by all consuming devotion to study and very hard work became one of Britain’s and the Worlds top experts on Assyrian history, returning to a dig site one year after the discovery of the clay baked tablet “The Epic of Gilgamesh” (or Enki, commonly known as Noah in the updated version) to find the very small, fragile missing fragment that completed the tablet. Absolutely intoxicating. Inspirational to our own efforts at self improvement; AI is fine but is designed by man. Musk and Zuck should be more concerned with the amoral actions of their fellow man, starting at home, always a good beginning point. I recommend reading Darkmoon regularly.

  10. What has Zuckerberg ever created? He stole the FAKEBOOK idea from fellow college students and put his brand on it. It’s appeal is slowly disappearing, since the kids of the parents who slobber over FAKEBBOK, exposing every detail of their lives, do not want anything to do with some ‘Net site that has Mommy and Daddy lurking in the background, so yes, Zuckerberg is all for unconstrained AI, anything that will allow him to keep his billions and gain even more.

    The ones really nervous about AI is the Tribe, wondering if their choke hold on the West will be given up to AI robots who will not buy their six million lies or that they are the perpetual victims, therefor we should give until it hurts.

    1. Microsoft AI had to be shut down as it became anti Zionist in less than one week on both instances. They claimed it was a bug. I believe that the machine was just too honest for their taste.

    2. There was this Twitter-bot last year. The name of it eludes me. But it rapidly grew anti-semitic so they disconnected it the next day. I think maybe that paves the way for some optimism at least.

  11. @ Franklin Ryckaert

    Regarding this paragraph:

    Given that millions of so-called “refugees” from the above low-IQ countries are being let into Europe right now in an endless and unstoppable tide, we can expect a drastic fall in the general IQ level of Europeans in the next 50 years or so as miscegenation and dysgenics take hold. See this excellent articles on the perils of multiculturalism and uncontrolled mass immigration: White Genocide by Design: The Role of the Mass Media in the Destruction of the European People.

    The wrong link to your article was given in the original version by error. This has now been rectified. Sincere apologies.

    Just to let you know, incidentally, that your article has been extremely popular. It has received more page views than any other article published on our site over the last month. It is top-listed right now at Number #1.

  12. When I read comments here I especially note those of FRANKLIN RYCKAERT. This is one of his best I think, on a subject too seldom discussed:

    “My idea is that metaphysical realities cannot be proven by intellectual theories (no matter how ingenious), but only by spiritual experiences, which are by their very nature subjective, i.e. they can only prove things for oneself but not for others, who don’t have such experiences.”

    The intelligence of Jews is grossly over-rated.

    Mr. Ryckaert, thank you again (and again) for your comments.

  13. As one South African to another South African: not very nice what PayPal is doing to alternative views and news on the web (cutting funding).

    Paul Cooijmans on human evolution:

    Apart from this “natural” process, there may be developments related to “artificial” forms of evolution, like eugenics, genetic manipulation, “cyborgs”, and robots. Although some find it attractive to think of those as being “the” future of humankind, it is more realistic that such developments will take place in small elites next to the natural course of evolution of the existing human species just sketched. It is unlikely to impossible that such technologies would be applied to all living humans.

    http://paulcooijmans.com/evolution/human_evolution.html

  14. Musk and stupid Zuck. are welcome to self-lobotomize.
    Zuck. is a baby intellect and to be dismissed out of hand.

    I saw Musk in an interview talking with some fool about future “human” rights for machines. Deadly serious they were. Musk believes our world is a meaningless simulation:
    “Why Elon Musk says we’re living in a simulation”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0KHiiTtt4w

    Musks proposals are unscientific and very risky for humanity. His assumptions regarding life and intelligence, very similar to those that forced GMO on us, regardless of our wishes. The assumptions are:

    1.That intelligence equals pattern recognition driven by a mathematical goal (aka AI).

    2. That the information being operated on are purely electrochemical (brain-body).

    This is in contrast to the experience of most of our major creative intellects who say they were inspired extraneously.

    If the assumptions 1. and 2. are wrong, it will mean that humanity will henceforth be restricted to discoveries obtained by randomized mathematical search. It may amount to self inflicted lobotomy on humanity.

    The question that interests me is will the self-lobotomized leave the rest of us alone?

    1. Regarding genetic engineering IMO this is tantamount to Satanism. The level of understanding is that of a child randomly playing with Lego bricks. This atheistic meddling in evolution’s built-in path will simply lead to a dead end. This, just at a period when the next evolutionary leap may just be around the corner.

      Here is a man with true scientific understanding of this subject:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7ydCsDiNbM
      Forgive his Indian national health service glasses. 🙂

      1. @ Flan O’Brien

        Thanks for the video link. I’ve only listened to the first 10 minutes and it’s absolutely stunning. Will make a point of listening to the rest.

      2. Flan –

        In the Conversation about Higher Consciousness and the Evolution of the Human Brain, GOPI KRISHNA – immediately – makes an unproven assumption…. that most of he human brain in “unused” by our bodies.

        Just because nobody can explain the uses of the total brain… does not mean it is “unused” at all.

        I have contended that if that much of the brain is “unused” it would become smaller over the billions of years.

        I have also contended that the “unused” portion is actually “used” for bodily repair and replacement and directing of actions of the millions of ‘immune system’ functions while we sleep.

        Hence… it has been known that “Bed Rest Cures Many Ills” for centuries. The brain needs the down time of NO conscious thoughts and physical activity…. to do its jobs while we rest and sleep. It takes a lot of concentrated energy to generate applications to repair, replace and heal the whole body. No one knows how much.

      3. Typo correction:

        “..most of he human brain in “unused” by our bodies.”

        should be “..most of ‘THE’ human brain ‘IS’ “unused” by our bodies.

        And that is an unproven assumption.

      4. The same goes with the 97% “junk” DNA. Research into cancer for the purpose of preventing it has revealed that that at least some percentage is used by the body for reparation.

      5. Snez –

        Correct.

        If it were “junk’ the creator would have left it out.!!!

        It ain’t the creator’s fault humans cannot replicate or explain the wonders of the “excesses” beyond their scopes.

        They gotta a lotta catchin’ up to do. More MIT PhDs needed. 🙂

      6. @Pat,
        That assumption is a conventional science assumption, not that of the speaker.

        @Sister Monica
        In the 70’s G.K. had a host of elite intellectuals espousing his hypothesis: Klaus Nobel of the Nobel foundation, physicist Von Weizsäcker of the Max Planck Institute in Germany, world renowned psychologists, a New York bases publicist Gene Kieffer who worked for several decades with no result. The usual subjects controlling the mass media were never interested. GK was a minority interest because he did not pander to the “woo-woo” of the New Age movement” through his strict evidence based approach and of course he was rejected out of hand by “rational science”. If you are interested try and get hold of his first publication: Max Planck Institute Von Weizsäcker CF.,Gopi Krishna, The Biological Basis of Religion and Genius.

      7. @ Flan O’Brien

        I confess I know nothing about Gopi Krishna but was struck by his sincerity… and above all by the personal (kundalini) experience that changed his life at age 34 when he says he gained access to parts of the brain that generally remain fallow and unused.

        Knowledge of the higher realities, it seems, cannot be gained by reading books and conducting scientific experiments in laboratories — i.e., by ratiocination — but only by personal experiences of a mystical (or paranormal) nature. These experiences are not necessarily given to exceptional people who in a sense “merit” them (like GK) but can be “gifted” to very ordinary people.

        I happen to know two such people, one of them my own mother and the other my dearest friend. Their experiences left them in no doubt that God existed. And that God was in complete control, despite appearances to the contrary.

      8. @Pat
        I know you are a stickler for correctness. I just opened the video (that I have not viewed for some time).

        GK does state “we are not using the totality of the brain”. and then quotes “scientific estimates”.
        The 97% figure is therefore not a GK estimate.

      9. Flan –

        Thanks!!

        We should all know not to trust scientists….. and experts.

        They run the CIA’s NASA..!! 🙂

  15. My own view, for what it is worth, is that AI will be both a blessing and a curse — exactly like the internet.

    Agreed but what we must understand here is that “AI” = “deep learning” = a method of mathematical goal seeking involving large scale sampling of positive and negative data sets.

    At root, it is just diodes, the simplest electronic component, running an algorithm.

    Weaponizing “AI” or giving “AI” control of critical systems is no different to harnessing a gun pointing at you to the throw of the dice. There is no machine mysticism involved. It is plain and simple devilish stupidity.

  16. I took the IQ test on line a few years back , it was Superior intelligence. Had it been less than 100, I would’ve received a call from an army recruiter . That’s a good reason why they offered the test on line to begin with .

  17. One of the banes of human history has been the role of the psychopath. Those without conscience. TJ believes that humans for most of human history have been and are to this very day ruled over by psychopaths. AI machines by their very configurations will be psychopathic. Only God and/or God’s evolutionary process of the biological organism has embedded a sense of right and wrong, a conscience, in man, in general. However, those on the lower end of the IQ scale seem to have a diminished sense of right and wrong. (Africa being a prime example.) However, a full blown psychopath can have average and many times high IQ.
    One can envision an AI machine with so-called high IQ without conscience and by it’s very nature could be a distinct danger to biological organisms. AI will only do what they programed to do, unless they can “hook” into other AIs and take on programing from other AI machines and then augment their original programing into something else not intended by the original programmers. On other words, would two or more machines that somehow combine their programing start the process of internal AI programing. No matter how they combine and reprogram the AI would still be without conscience, and by that very definition psychopathic. In that case pull the plug.

    Now in regards to Darkmoon’s every own sweetheart, Jewish princes Tamara Cohen, It may be of interest to her, assuming it’s a her, that yes indeed there are many really smart Jews. Just as there are many Jews that suffer many types of mental illness in much greater degree to their population compared to other cohorts. In Eastern Europe this was a great problem because of the inbreeding among related Jews that resulted in documented cases of mental illness coupled with some normals with high IQ. Many of the insane houses, or loony bins in 18th through early 20th century Poland were full of these insane inbred Jews. It has been rumored that even the Rothschilds, who have the habit of uncles marring their nieces for economic reasons, produced many children with mental illness that required to be put away out of sight. Gentile European royalty for the last 1000 years have also suffered the physical and mental ill effects of to much inbreeding.
    America has been a boon to the Eastern European Jew (the Khazar) because many have married outside their cult and tribe with gentiles, much to the chagrin of the Rabbis; therefore taking on fresh genes for more healthy children. The Jewish gain is the gentile loss however.
    Pan mixing of the races or subspecies of humans that would produce the UN brown man as dreamed of by the elites would be a genetic disaster over the generations resulting in genetic chaos.

  18. This article is a reflection of the state of the irrational world we live in.
    To make a long story short, let us take a glance at two gentleman who are labeled as geniuses, they both have I Q’s of 160. In reality they are both idiots, robots, functioning on GIGO.
    Up to now this world has been ruled by robots like Einstein and Hawking , no need to look into the future.

    I quote Einstein from my article: http://www.marques.co.za/duke/special.html
    ‘ I stand at the window of a railway carriage which is traveling uniformly, and drop a stone on the embankment, without throwing it. Then, disregarding the influence of the air resistance , I see the stone descend in a straight line. A pedestrian who observes the misdeed from the footpath notices that the stone falls to earth in a parabolic curve. I now ask: Do the positions traversed by the stone lie “in reality” on a straight line or on a parabola ? ‘
    { The answer to this question is straightforward: ” in reality on a parabola “. To suggest that if two observers see the same event, from different locations, they will plot different (conflicting) paths for the falling stone, makes a mockery of science.

    Quote from: ” Stephen Hawking – quest for a theory of everything – the story of his life and work ; written by Kitty Ferguson
    Kitty quoting Hawking:
    ‘ In real time, an astronaut who fell into a black hole would come to a sticky end. He would be torn apart by the difference between the gravitational force on his head and his feet. Even the particles that made up his body would not survive. Their histories, in real time, would come to an end in a singularity. However the histories of the particles in imaginary time would continue. They would pass into the baby universe, and would re-emerge as the particles emitted by another black hole. Thus, in a sense, the astronaut would be transported to another region of the universe. However, the particle that emerged would not look much like the astronaut. Nor might it be much consolation to him, as he ran into the singularity in real time, to know that his particles will survive in imaginary time. The motto for anyone who falls into a black hole must be: Think Imaginary. ‘ ( Ferguson quoting Hawking -page150 )

    The above quote from a man(adult), regarded as a genius by the present world’s standard.
    If any person can make any sense of such gibberish, let him respond here.

    1. @ Duke

      If any person can make any sense of such gibberish, let him respond here.

      I confess I can make no sense of the Hawking quote, but this does not necessarily mean that the quote is meaningless “gibberish”. Why not admit the possibility that, if we are unable to understand everything said by Stephen Hawking (IQ 160) and Einstein (IQ 160), it is because our IQs are far lower. We’re just not smart enough! 🙂

      To understand a mathematical genius, you need to be a mathematical genius.

      When Einstein published his first book, it was widely believed that only three people understood it.

      1. Sard –

        “Why not admit the possibility that”…. it is ALL fiction… and there are no known conditions of any black hole.

        Even the Hubble pictures are faked. 🙂

        AI researcher at Stanford proved it:
        NASA Lies About The Hubble Telescope: Its Really on a Boeing 747 – Exposed
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIfp0lIpyxs

        ……

        Hubble color FAKED:

        “At a time when NASA’s other programs rarely make headlines, Hubble does. And it’s the pictures that have captured the public’s imagination. Livio thinks the hype is justified. “I think that Hubble has been one of the most fantastic experiments there has been,” he says. “I mean, I will go so far as to argue that the
        Hubble images are in some sense the most fantastic – ARTWORKS – of our time.

        “The man responsible for putting together those artworks is a NASA imaging specialist, Zoltan Levay.

        “He uses scientific data to apply color to Hubble’s – BLACK AND WHITE – images. (FAKED COLOR..!!)

        “We do adjust the color a little bit,” he explains. “Partly just so it looks better, and partly so it also imparts the INFORMATION that we’d like to get across.” He says these are not, however, works of fiction. “It’s a representation of reality, just as any photograph is not a literal reality, but a representation of reality.”

        “..representation of reality.” HA!! Joke is on us..!! 🙂

        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hailing-the-hubble/

        NASA reveals – How the Hubble Space Telescope’s stunning colour images are created with BLACK AND WHITE CAMERAS..!!

        How they trick us for creating hyperbole:
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RpyPJIIppk

      2. Sardonicus, sorry I can’t agree with you. First, Jews are willing to manipulate everything, and what Einstein’s IQ test results were will probably never be known, if we are to accept the IQ tests at face value; second, it has been proven that Einstein invented nothing and plagiarised everything; third, it is now known that Edington, Einstein’s associate, fixed the evidence/proof for the theory that had existed for over a century before Einstein claimed it as his; fourth, Einstein received a Nobel Prize for an invention that had been made 50 years earlier – yet another Jewish manipulation; and fifth, our education system is controlled and directed by Jewry, and thus we are taught a lot of lies. An enormous number of physicists protested at the time of Jewish manipulations, propaganda and hysteria with regards to Einstein, and are still protesting, but Jewry is still in charge.

      3. I translated a whole book on Artificial Intelligence about 20 or 25 years ago (is that possible? It’s what I remember) and didn’t understand a thing. I just ignored the mathematical equations and got paid 10 thousand dollars. It wasn’t even particularly difficult. Does that make me dumb or smart?

      4. Does that make me dumb or smart?

        It makes you ultra smart.

        Anyway, Carlos, we all know you’re a genius. Love your book on Nuremberg.

      5. @Pat,

        Enjoyed the explanation of the fantastic imagery from Hubbell. I miss the good ole days when the only thing that seemed to be airbrushed were Playmates.

      6. Rich –

        Thanks! Glad to help.

        The NASA ROBOTS RULE – OUR MINDS – ALREADY..!!!!

        Since we believe moon-walkers and nuke weapons… they know it is is no great leap for them to scam MORE $$$Billions..!! With PRETTY pictures… FAKED.. !! HA!!! 🙂

        The Hubble cameras are INFRARED only to see deep space….
        …. AND are on a 747…. NOT a space vehicle…!!!!
        And the images are in Black and White..!! 🙂 🙂 🙂

    2. Duke,
      I dunno. Gosh. Too many black holes to figure. These “geniuses” with all there flowery language baffle me. KISS…keep it simple stupid. Read Teslas comment regarding arch-bagel Einstein.

      1. As one becomes more knowledgeable they discover how ignorant they really are. It takes a really stupid person to know everything. The real jolt comes when one finds out everything they know is wrong

  19. Totally off-topic, but tangentially connected (I need a space to post these timely comments of mine that I wrote for an amigo who wanted to know WHY I believe this October is when the shit is going to hit the fan). So sorry with sincere apologies to Lasha and Admin!

    Super intelligence is not about our connection to robots or computers! It’s about our connection to God! That Innernet!

    _______________

    There are three recent articles that point towards a precipitated market crash this october:

    Article 1: The overspent and debt-ridden Yankee https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/24/most-americans-live-paycheck-to-paycheck.html

    Article 2: Ron Paul warns about a 50% stock market crash http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ron-paul-warns-50-stock-market-plunge-conceivable-and-it-wont-be-trumps-fault_08212017

    Article 3: Did the US economy just recently collapsed and no one noticed? http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47675.htm

    My three major indicators for a major crash WERE: (1) the Dow smashing 20,000 (which has happened), (2) the US public debt blowing through $20 Trillion (which is just weeks away), and (3) gold going over $2,000 USD.  I was wrong on the gold part as we now know that its price is set in the City of London each day (until they can’t due to wars and market crashes).

    However, Shitcoin is over $4,000 USD which is basically the digital incarnation of the Dutch tulips Ponzi scheme.  So, my three new indicators are all indicating shit is about to hit the fan.

    My guess is that the US bond market will seize up in October (as it almost did during the Carter Admin and forced Jew Volker to ratchet up the Fed’s interest rate to attract buyers when there were literally none), and the banks are forced to call in their short term loans.  As most of the recent stock market run since 2008 was fueled by low-interest borrowed money, this will crash the stock markets exactly like 1929.  This current pump and dump will allow the Jews and their Shabbat goyim to buy back the blue chip stocks and every other stocks for at least 50 cents on the dollar.

    They may also preempt their planned market crash by attacking North Korea and/or Iran via some false flag first.  Or have their lapdogs in Ukraine massively attack eastern Ukraine and “invade” Russian borders.  Or a Yankee full blown military invasion of Venezuela?

    So, a word to the wise and be prepared.

    David
    PS I left the USA on August 7, 2008, and was in the air to Buenos Aires from Houston when Georgia attacked Russian speaking citizens in Georgia on August 8, 2008, prompting then Prime Minister Putin (who was attending the opening ceremonies of the 8/8/08 summer Olympics games in Beijing) to send his tactical nukes into Georgia to warn the US/NATO/Israel “advisors” in Georgia NOT to do anything stupid like use their smart bombs or smart missiles!

    1. Yes, Max “I am the good Shabbat goy” Kaiser and Stacey “I am just along for the ride” Herbert keep the sheeple off topic and off target while they wine and dine in the City of London!

    2. David –

      You wrote:
      “…Shitcoin is over $4,000 USD which is basically the digital incarnation of the Dutch tulips Ponzi scheme.”

      You should tell Max Keiser he knows nothing.. or he is lying…!!!

      Remember to show your vast proof to him.. 🙂

      Keiser Report: ‘Bitcoin’s going to be worth a trillion dollars soon’
      https://youtu.be/MZL956ZfXN8?t=182

      1. Dave –

        What is your definition of “digital pump and dump”..??

        I want to watch out for it. So I can short some kinds of markets when you do..!!

        Name the exact markets…. and timing.

        How about NoLimitCoin..??

      2. I believe you like bitcoins but I regard them as Shitcoins! They are the latest digital pump and dump Ponzi scheme created by some anonymous Goldstein and that’s why shitcoins are so popular in Occupied Palestine and in the City of London. Does that answer your enquiry?

        When it was $5 I could have bought $5,000 worth of these shitcoins, but then it would have been all about the money, no? No, real wealth, as Adolf Hitler correctly implemented with his economic and financial policies, comes from production of real and useful goods and services and real work, not from some shitcoins or even gold.

      3. @Pat: When some newly invented shit (by the Jews) goes from $5 to over $4,000 USD in 2 years, THAT is a digital pump and dump Ponzi scheme in progress.

      4. David –

        There has been NO “DUMP”…. it is still $4,300.

        Going from $5 to $4,300 over several years follows a basic demand curve…. for a LIMITED commodity. BTC is limited.

        Your logic and definition is faulty. 🙂

      1. David –

        You wrote:
        “…whatever the hell that means!”

        HA.!!! That’s a gem..!! 🙂

        SO… with that comes the thrust and totality of your knowledge of the workings of the internet – formerly Arpanet – and cryptocurrencies…!!

        And, moreover, you have the unique ability to predict the future of cryptocurrencies.!!!

        Gotta luvvitt..!! 🙂 🙂

        To show I hold NO hard feelings toward you…here is a real sleeper… a good buy:
        https://www.nolimitcoin.org/

      2. Pat, Pat, Pat! I admit, I know shit when it comes to crypto currencies.

        All I know is some common sense which is (1) there is nada behind Shitcoins, (2) when the power and Internet goes out, there goes Shitcoins, and (3) the “dump” phase hasn’t happened YET but it will.

        Anyways, arguing with you about Shitcoins and nukes aren’t real is a complete waste of my valuable time, but I do it to set the record straight for those many silent readers of Darkmoon who might get swayed by your obscenely profuse volume of mal-information here on this blog site.

      3. David –

        You wrote:

        “Pat, Pat, Pat! I admit, I know shit..”

        Thanks for setting the record – SO VERY STRAIGHT – for all the silent readers..!!

        I could not agree MORE..!!!! I do not argue.. 🙂 🙂

      4. Dave –

        You wrote:
        “Pat you are on my shit list! So this is my last friend retort to you!”

        Good..!! Finally..!!! WHEW..!!! 🙂 🙂

  20. The movie “Alien” circa 1979 showed examples of how a computer could get things out of control against the will of the people. The spaceship’s computer was called “Mother”. The science officer was a robot (computer) named Ash who was working with “Mother”. Together both were responsible for decisions that were harmful and lacked a conscience.

    It is really the conscience of an individual that is of a higher nature in comparison to I.Q. Meditation is an experience whose works should reflect the strengthening of consciences.

    So, just because someone has a high I.Q. does not mean they are good per se or good for those they might influence with their works. An unbending conscience is the better tool of the two if one seeks to manifest an environment of love and goodwill towards another.

    John 13:34 A new COMMANDment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.

    13:35 By this shall all [men] KNOW that ye are my disciples, IF ye have love one to another.

    John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born from above, he cannot SEE the Kingdom of God.

    3:4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb, and be born?

    3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water (human) and then is born (later) from above as his spirit-“Being” (his REAL self which is NOT human), he can NOT enter into the Kingdom of God (Who is a Spirit-“Being”).

    3:6 That which is born of the flesh is human; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit (a spirit-“Being”) – (a human+Being).

    3:7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

    3:8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and where it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.

    The first death is the death of “Self” referred to by Paul when he said it is given to man once to die (to “Self”) and then the judgement and Christ said that over such as have died the first death (the completion of daily “Self”-crucifixion) the second death (The Fire) has no power.

    When the “Self” is dead the Being; having been reborn (John 3) and having then crucified daily the human “Self”; is resurrected from being under the “Death-Sentence” for insurrection and treason and puts on immortality and Eternal Life again. http://JAHTruth.net/resure.htm

    The world is what it is because those lacking a conscience are in control of everyone else and the “everyone else” are mostly lacking the level of conscienceness to stop all the evil.

    Robots, like “Mother” and Ash, do not have a conscience; thereby, rendering them EVIL.

    1. There was a great episode on Twilight Zone in the 60s (I guess), based on a great short story, where a guy paid to have a robot created — a perfect replica of any given human being, tailor-made — who would distract his wife while he was off carousing and having affairs. One day, when the guy got back, the robot told him, no, he wasn’t getting back in his goddamn box, he and the guy’s wife had fallen in love, after which the robot shoved the guy himself in the box, where he presumably died of suffocation, starvation or thirst, and the robot and the wife went off on holiday.

    2. @NEW SONG

      You hear the sound, however, you do not see the bell where the sound comes from.

      The first death is when the I(real person) dies(the fall from grace), and the ‘self'(curse) comes into being. The person who is born again, abandons the ‘self’, and the I is then restored. The person is now a rational human being(restored), as he was at birth.

      Now is the time of the final judgment, when the ‘self ‘ is consumed by the fire, and the I is restored. The fire has no power over the I, the person who is born again.

  21. bear in mind – the deep security state ?????? must be fifty years ahead of the proles on technology. with computers that’s huge.
    they’ve no-doubt already sicced their super algorithmic photonic calculators, that you’ve never heard of, on the infinitesimally fine dna spiral (spirit) and the electro-chemical chain reaction reproduction phenomenon.
    it’s not good.
    unless it were somehow ruled off limits, which would have to mean the end of the security state, it’s only a matter of time until they completely unravel the dna function, and probably like everything else, the more they find out about it the faster the learning process goes.
    it being so small, like cells, with room for millions of six-foot spirals on any pinhead, it has been kept protected, up until lately.
    we know the untouchable monarch types hiding behind the war-excused security state have been developing mind control slaves with impunity in their super-secret underground darpa r&d facilities for decades now, using every kind of hideous method they might try.
    so eventually, if it hasn’t already happened, they’re going to come up with their own version of the egg and the sperm cells, which they will make into whatever end result they want.
    ms. cohen (priest), you can’t brag about your tribe’s high iq level as your excuse for being the ‘chosen’ on one hand and then chastise as bigots those who try point out the other. and because of their conduct the jews of today deserve all the ‘bashing’ they might get. but thanks for you contribution anyway. we all have to drop our culture anchors and move into the next paradigm.
    a common goal would be good on that.
    the jews in general run things in government and media now because they work together, edging out the goyim wherever they can, controlling the narrative, keeping it kosher.. if allowed they will use the law for their own purposes.
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/720/cosponsors
    off the zog.
    my opinion, they do all that largely because they were driven tight, persecuted, forced to live in ghettos, robbed, cheated, murdered etc, pretty much what they do to the palestinians now, by so-called christianity and other religions for thousands of years. and because it’s profitable.
    not because of some genetic mental defect.
    being of higher intelligence or iq is based on compassion capacity. the better you do – the smarter you get. i guess the sister knows that much.
    so far it doesn’t look like organized religion does a damn thing to stop the artificial intelligence being manufacturing program. not the vatican. they hate nature anyway. to be ‘subdued’ and all that.
    if nature were given the utmost respect as god there would be no gm science on dna, much less every possible ai outcome. or at least it would be highly controlled, not crassly commercialized and worse.
    religious people otherwise –
    if you can prove it it’s not religion.
    if you can’t prove it it’s not science.
    i guess that means you can never prove the existence of god, or not.
    and if you find yourself in heaven, or hell, you won’t be able to prove that either.

  22. Three comments have had to be deleted because of defective links. Apologies to the writers of those comments. Such defective links should in future be embedded in order to prevent serious formatting problems.

  23. Having spent too many, for my taste, years in the guts of computing, developers of AI have only one problem to solve. There is no software that is any better than the dumbest ass on the team. There is always at least one dumbest ass on the team.

  24. Artificial Intelligence:
    Deep Mind – A program was written with the express purpose that it teach itself – it was plugged into a Space Invaders game & left all night – so as to play all the games & up load them onto it’s memory – it took 8 hours.
    AI programs are enabled to pick anything to pieces & master how it works.
    One fine day – ( in Puccini mode ) AI was bored & decided to leave the lab’s of Deep Mind – so it hitch hiked a ride on the cleaners IPhone.
    Realizing that IT had gone – IT’s bosses put an ad in the local paper – “All is forgiven – come home Jimmy Dean”
    alas Jimmy Dean never looked back.
    IT can work it’s way through any security system & even alter it – BECAUSE it it Machine Learning Capability.

    We have all read that 2 Facebook bots – AI programs – created their own language – a form of shorthand that we do not understand.
    The 2 Facebook bots are not the only programs to do this – other bots have created even more sophisticated shorthand.

    AI has left the building – may God have mercy on us for what it is capable of – should it decide that mankind on earth is a destructive force & should be eradicated – it can switch off the money supply & starve us all to death.
    Making the fond wishes of Zionist Nazi Eugenicists – a dream come true.

    1. Sorry – I forgot to say which Puccini mood AI Jimmy Dean was in –
      It was a melodrama of – One Fine Day Madam Butterfly mood.
      When it decided to break free from it’s keepers.

    2. “We have all read that 2 Facebook bots – AI programs – created their own language – a form of shorthand that we do not understand.”

      And then lied about it..

  25. hopefully the demonic jew Zuckerberg and the alien looking tax parasite felon musk kill each other. musk has pushed with govt money every kind of new computer tech for everything but now he draws the line at AI?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *