World Class Liar Tony Blair Lies About Brexit

By Stephen Glover
sourced from the DAILY MAIL

How em­bar­rass­ing for Tony Blair that his own recent opinion poll re­veals that Bri­tain wants Brexit more than ever… and yet he persists in making out that the Brits are now having second thoughts about Brexit. 


17 Jul 2017.  TONY BLAIR is the most dis­cred­ited politi­cian in Bri­tain. Any cause in the world is li­able to be weak­ened by his em­brace.

Many Leave sup­port­ers will there­fore have been cheered by his lat­est anti- Brexit re­marks over the week­end.

He told Sky News’ So­phy Ridge yes­ter­day what he had al­ready said on Ra­dio Four’s To­day pro­gramme on Satur­day morn­ing — namely that Brexit may not hap­pen. In his view, it is ‘ab­so­lutely nec­es­sary’ that it doesn’t be­cause of the ‘dam­age’ the Leave vote is al­legedly caus­ing the UK econ­omy.

Set aside that last week’s em­ploy­ment fig­ures were the best for over 40 years. For­get too, for the mo­ment, how all the pre­vi­ous scare sto­ries spread by the Re­main camp about in­stant eco­nomic Ar­maged­don fol­low­ing the last June’s Ref­er­en­dum have been con­founded.

What is most in­ter­est­ing about Blair’s char­ac­ter­is­ti­cally ma­nip­u­la­tive in­ter­ven­tion is that he seems at last to be very dimly aware of how im­por­tant the is­sue of immigration is for Leave sup­port­ers.

This is be­cause his own foun­da­tion has done some il­lu­mi­nat­ing polling. It found that a whop­ping 76 per cent of re­spon­dents think immigration pol­icy in this coun­try is too open. Mean­while 56 per cent agreed that ‘Brexit must mean Brexit’.

Need­less to say, Blair did not cite th­ese fig­ures dur­ing his tour of the stu­dios. In­deed, he told So­phy Ridge that ‘pub­lic opin­ion is mov­ing’ on Brexit al­though his own poll sug­gests the pre­cise op­po­site. But then what is truth to a man like Tony Blair?


Not­with­stand­ing his in­grained in­abil­ity to be straight­for­ward, the for­mer prime min­is­ter — who en­cour­aged un­prece­dented lev­els of immigration into this coun­try dur­ing his time in of­fice — has ap­par­ently be­lat­edly half wo­ken up to the im­por­tance of the is­sue.

He has moved from hint­ing six months ago that a sec­ond ref­er­en­dum might be nec­es­sary, to sug­gest­ing now that the EU might be pre­pared to com­pro­mise on the free move­ment of peo­ple in or­der to keep the UK in the sin­gle mar­ket. Europe, he claims, is now ‘ look­ing at its own re­form pro­gramme’.

This is ab­so­lute rub­bish, of course. There is no ev­i­dence that ei­ther the bu­reau­crats in Brus­sels or EU lead­ers have changed their minds about the sacro­sanct na­ture of open bor­ders.

Only last week, the EU chief ne­go­tia­tor, Michel Barnier, said that free­dom of move­ment of peo­ple, goods, ser­vices and cap­i­tal — the four core prin­ci­ples of the EU sin­gle mar­ket — were ‘in­di­vis­i­ble’.

Dur­ing his un­pro­duc­tive ne­go­ti­a­tions be­fore the Ref­er­en­dum, David Cameron was un­able to wrest any sub­stan­tial con­ces­sions en­abling us to con­trol our own bor­ders. The EU might pos­si­bly stretch a lit­tle fur­ther in or­der to re­verse the out­come of the Ref­er­en­dum, but it is in­con­ceiv­able that it would jet­ti­son one of the cor­ner­stones of the sin­gle mar­ket.

Dur­ing his un­pro­duc­tive ne­go­ti­a­tions be­fore the Ref­er­en­dum, David Cameron was un­able to wrest any sub­stan­tial con­ces­sions en­abling us to con­trol our own bor­ders. The EU might pos­si­bly stretch a lit­tle fur­ther in or­der to re­verse the out­come of the Ref­er­en­dum, but it is in­con­ceiv­able that it would jet­ti­son one of the cor­ner­stones of the sin­gle mar­ket.

So Tony Blair, who has re­ferred only vaguely to con­ver­sa­tions he has had with uniden­ti­fied EU fig­ures, is pre­tend­ing that some­thing might be on of­fer which cat­e­gor­i­cally is not.

In­tran­si­gent Re­moan­ers such as Blair will never ac­cept how cru­cial it is for most peo­ple that Bri­tain should re­gain con­trol over its own bor­ders. If his own poll is any­thing to go by, this wish has grown stronger rather than weaker over re­cent months, de­spite all the scare sto­ries over Brexit.

In­su­lated from the real world, and en­joy­ing life as a mem­ber of the pam­pered su­per-rich, it is hardly sur­pris­ing that he should be so out of touch. For once in his life, the Shadow Chan­cel­lor, John McDon­nell, got it right when he said over the week­end that Blair ‘hadn’t re­ally lis­tened to the na­ture of the de­bate go­ing on in the pubs, the clubs and school gates’.

Peo­ple can see on the tele­vi­sion and read in the news­pa­pers that the EU is un­able to deal with the stream of refugees, es­pe­cially those com­ing from Libya. More than 86,000 have crossed the Mediter­ranean to Italy this year, a 20 per cent in­crease on 2016.

Ac­cord­ing to a re­cent leaked Ger­man gov­ern­ment re­port, up to 6.6 mil­lion peo­ple are wait­ing in coun­tries around the Mediter­ranean to cross into Europe. They are thought to in­clude more than 2.5 mil­lion in North Africa alone. The United Na­tions says that seven in 10 peo­ple com­ing from Libya are eco­nomic mi­grants. In other words, most shouldn’t be de­scribed as refugees.

So des­per­ate is the Ital­ian gov­ern­ment as a re­sult of this state of af­fairs that its of­fi­cials have threat­ened to use a Brus­sels di­rec­tive to al­low 200,000 mi­grants who have en­tered the coun­try to travel across Europe.

Mean­while the Aus­trian gov­ern­ment has just an­nounced it is ready to use sol­diers and tanks to stop mi­grants cross­ing its bor­der with Italy even though both coun­tries are part of the EU’s bor­der-free Schen­gen zone, which is sup­posed to elim­i­nate pass­port checks at the fron­tier.

In Brus­sels, the likes of Michel Barnier cling to the cen­tral prin­ci­ple of free move­ment of peo­ple. It is a prin­ci­ple which the Bri­tish have re­jected, and con­tinue to re­ject. It is also a prin­ci­ple which mil­lions of or­di­nary Euro­peans (though not yet the po­lit­i­cal class in most coun­tries) find in­creas­ingly un­ac­cept­able.

Surely it is clear as can be that Brus­sels has no sen­si­ble plan to deal with this nev­erend­ing tide of mi­grants. The Bri­tish peo­ple re­alise this is the case, which ex­plains why Blair’s poll found that so many re­spon­dents think immigration pol­icy in this coun­try is too open.

And it also ex­plains, I be­lieve, why his at­tempts to in­vei­gle us into chang­ing our minds will never suc­ceed. He sim­ply does not un­der­stand the mag­ni­tude of the prob­lem, and has never done so.

In­deed, as prime min­is­ter he did a great deal to make it worse.

Blair and many in the po­lit­i­cal elite will never get it, de­tached and de­luded as they are. They don’t see how deeply the idea of tak­ing back con­trol res­onates with the ma­jor­ity of their fel­low coun­try­men, and so they can’t and won’t un­der­stand that there is no go­ing back on the demo­cratic de­ci­sion of the Bri­tish peo­ple.

27 thoughts to “World Class Liar Tony Blair Lies About Brexit”

  1. Stephen Glover and Nigel Farage accurately describe un-indicted war criminal Anthony Blair and his grasp on ‘reality’. Mr. Blair and other creatures from Narcissism Unlimited seem to think it’s all an endless agreeable ride, habitual lies as a way of life able to smooth any inconvenient problems no matter how massive, with no accountable personal repercussions approaching on the horizon as has been witnessed time and again for millennia in world history…

    Violence on a continental scale is approaching rapidly in Europe.

  2. Blair is one of the most contemptible creatures to ever inhabit this planet. As for Brexit, it only means partial freedom for the UK. To be really independent and free, the UK would have to leave NATO, remove all US bases, cancel the 5 eyes agreement and go it alone. At the moment they, like the rest of Europe, are an effete, effeminate and eunuchised jackal race, ever ready to lick the boots and embed themselves up the posterior orifice of JUSA.
    They, together with the rest of the European population, whine and whinge about the flood of immigrants to their shores, yet it’s the result of their own spineless governments, which they elected, supporting invasions and regime change in West Asia and North Africa. The stupid bastards in Europe deserve everything that’s coming to them. Action and consequences of action, karma! The European governments, with the compliance of their supine, animal masses crawled up the anus of JUSA! Now they must pay the price.

    1. Felix speaks for all of us. He has expressed in a few words the entire grim situation. We have a world here that is essentially being bullied and bossed about by the United States, the anus of the world, the Sodom and Gomorrah of the world.

      And yet most good Americans are unaware of this: or that America itself, once a free and proud nation, has fallen under the heel of international Jewry.

      Indeed, Europe is no different in this respect. Also a subjugated continent, in particular the emasculated German people, cash cows in eternity to the state of Israel.

      Britain? America’s lapdog, only too happy to grovel at the feet of the Jewish moneylenders who have taken over their country — lock, stock and barrel.

      1. Sard –

        If there were any “pride” here in the last 300 years, it came as a result of British arrogance…. the same exhibited by Mr Blair..!!

        America has never been “free” at all.

        If America were ever “free” it was before this country suffered waaaay less freedom when the Plymouth and Virginia Companies of 1606 invaded the land with permits and patents and ARROGANT CHARTERS from the British Crown over 400 years ago. They were combined into the London Company c. 1610-1612 and became the first British Colony in in 1624.

        Governments are nothing to be “proud” about. They ALL are criminal in nature. They must use force to exist. And they steal elections.

        ALL national leaders are LIARS..!! 🙂

    2. Felix –

      You wrote:
      “The European governments, with the compliance of their supine, animal masses crawled up the anus of JUSA! Now they must pay the price.”

      If by that you infer that London’s CHOSEN Bankers are in charge… in London they would say, “Spot on..!!” 🙂

      1. Pat,
        A century ago, London was the financial centre of the world, just as Frankfurt, origin of the Rothschilds, was a couple of centuries before that. However, the world’s financial centre is now (((Jew))) York and has been since the US congress enacted Act 1776 (Lend Lease) during World War 2. This Act had the effect of stripping Britain of her assets. Remember the Jews boast about their geographical dispersion being their greatest strength. Why stay in a shithole like London, with its terrible overpriced restaurants, surly unfriendly, service and dreadful weather? Also London pales into insignificance when compared to the financial power of New York. No, a criminal conspiracy always gravitates to where the most money can be stolen! The Jews always follow the money it’s axiomatic!

      2. Felix –

        Thanks for the info. It is good. So noted.

        I go by what is going on as I write this. It will happen in 30 minutes. 🙂

        You have claimed many times here that gold is the key to controlling all wealth of the world. Fixing the price is as important as owning it. Rothschild did did it in his House in London until 2004. Even then…. it stayed in London.

        The London Gold Fixing (or Gold Fix) – the setting of the price of gold that used to be held on the premises of Nathan Mayer Rothschild & Sons by the members of The London Gold Market Fixing Ltd.

        However, in 2004, Nathan Mayer Rothschild left the precious metals business in London and sold its place on the fixing to Barclays. From that time onwards, the fixing has taken place via a dedicated conference line. Some banks simply moved their London operations away from the close proximity to the Bank of England and went into areas such as Canary Wharf.

        However, the benchmark is still determined twice each business day of the London bullion market.

        It is designed to fix a price for settling contracts between members of the London bullion market, but the gold fixing informally provides a recognized rate that is used as a benchmark for pricing the majority of gold products and derivatives throughout the world’s markets.

        The gold fix in London is conducted in the United States dollar (USD), the Pound sterling (GBP), and the Euro (EUR) daily at 10.30am and 3pm, by London time…!!


        When it is called the New York Gold Fix and Eastern US time is used…. I’ll consider changing my claims. 🙂

      3. Pat,
        There are 4 gold fixing markets in the world today; London, Comex in the US, Zurich, and Hong Kong denominated in HK dollars. There are plans to open a fifth in Shanghai denominated in Yuan. So London is no longer alone.
        Also, don’t forget Russia is now China’s largest supplier of oil and they receive Yuan for their oil. Saudi Arabia used to be China’s largest supplier, but the Chinese have told them to sell in Yuan. That should cause a bit of a raspberry in the New York and London oil markets. “He who has physical gold sets the rules.”

      4. Felix –

        All that you have written supports the claims of the UN in 1960:

        US will be the main breadbasket and R&R center of the world.
        China will be the main manufacturing center.
        Russia will be the main resource supplier.

        As for gold price fixing…
        I believe fixing the price is even MORE important than physically owning it. I differ with what CHOSEN Sinclair and CHOSEN Schiff tell us. The ones who FIX it… know what the price will be… and can short it or go long. They know when to buy and sell physical gold as well. They ‘fix’ the game.

        “The one who pays the workers is the boss.” Even in congress.

      5. Hold on Felix! London may be damp but it is still a vital and interesting city. In fact I would say the influx of foreigners has made the place better.

        Regarding banking, I agree. These people think that because they handle billions they should be paid billions.

        They claim they are worth it because they are irreplaceable but most of them could not hold down a job outside their bubble.

      6. Hi John,
        Perhaps I’m being overly harsh, but please look at how a visitor from East Asia would perceive London upon arrival
        at Heathrow, aka Thiefrow in the airline business. Maybe his baggage has been rifled by the baggage handlers and some of his prized possessions have gone missing. Then he has the unpleasant experience of being ripped off by extortionate money changers. Only in the baboon colonies of Europe do such creatures exist! Next an unpleasant journey into London itself on the Underground, crammed into smelly carriages reeking of body odour. Then arrival at a “hotel” and being greeted by surly staff, who act as if they are doing you a favour. Then going to a restaurant, ordering a meal and being charged extra for your vegetables! On top of that, being hit by a service charge, plus another 20% VAT. Yes, the tourist sites are interesting but again extortionate entry fees. When I compare London to my first visit to Washington DC in 1977, one could enter all of the Smithsonian museums free of charge. Again service in US restaurants is superb and there is none of this nonsense of being “jewed” by having to pay extra for your vegetables.
        Now take a look at service in the Far East; Singapore Airlines, the best in the world. Changi Airport in Singapore ranked consistently number one in the world. The Oriental Hotel in Bangkok, best in the world!
        One other point concerning London (Paris too) a number of Asian countries, including China, issued travel advice to their nationals visiting the UK and France to avoid certain areas due to the dangers of being robbed by black people. The press in UK and France got all upset at the “racist” Chinese for daring to be so politically incorrect as to mention the fact that blacks rob tourists. That’s another nice thing about Asia, no PC nonsense.
        No John, Blair can keep his “cool” Britannia. I have absolutely no plans to go to Europe in the future.

  3. UK’s Daily Mail is an Israeli Hasbara (propaganda) filth.

    Tony Blair is one of the most beloved British leaders among the organized Jewry. During his political career he always served Israel’s interests more than his own country’s interests.

    Tony Blair is a convicted War Criminal at the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal (KLWCT) in Malaysia in 2012.

    In 2015, Zionist organization, the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR) elected Tony Blair as its chairperson to fight antisemitism among European Christians.

    In 2014, former member of British parliament, George Galloway, produced a documentary, ‘The Killing of Tony Blair’ .

    Last year, UK’s prime minister David Cameron with Jewish family roots, admitted that Britain joined European Union to protect Israel’s interests among the European nations.

    “When Europe is discussing its attitude to Israel, do you want Britain – Israel’s greatest friend – in there opposing boycotts, opposing the campaign for divestment and sanctions, or do you want us outside the room, powerless to affect the discussion that takes place?” Cameron said.

  4. Blair is a war criminal just like the Bushes and Kissinger and Cheney and Obama and now Trump , they are all war criminals for their Zionist masters and fellow war criminals in Zionist Israel and their neocons, and lets not forget the Clintons , war criminal one and all.

    1. One thing to be said for most the commenters on DM: They get it. Along with Blair being the man toy of the “JUSA” (thanks Felix), he may well be the perfect example of the psychopath that achieves high office whose very being of pronouncements and actions speaks of psychopathy. As the PATRIOT has pointed out, they are all a seething pile of narcissistic reptiles that would screw their own sons and daughters, what say you “big Dick” Cheney, if given the chance. However, considering who the “democracies” vote into office on both sides of the pond, can there be any doubt that the ever faithful just love to be screwed.
      And speaking of the faithful. Doesn’t the New testament tell the faithful that they must support those who lead and rule in government because “fear not, God is in control.” Well, considering the leadership of the Western Christian world for the last 2000 years, God has been doing a pretty piss poor job or else playing a cruel joke on all us lesser beings.
      Oh, now I get it. It’s the Jew God that says “OBEY” the chosen and (((their))) sock puppets.

      1. Joejamicus,
        “Faith” is bullshit. Why not “action” ? Make it happen. Even my German shepherd Hans understands this concept. He aggressive pursues the bones of my steak dinner. He sits by the dinner table demanding it. He makes sure I have no peace until he gets “his” bone. Hes not a creature of faith. He makes it happen.

      2. @ Toejamicus

        “Doesn’t the New testament tell the faithful that they must support those who lead and rule in government because “fear not, God is in control.”

        No it does not in the KJV. Jesus said to avoid the courts and prison by settling with your adversary before hand, Matthew 5:25. Paul said to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey the magistrate, Titus 1:1. At no time did Jesus or Paul ever say to support those who lead or rule in government. That rumor most likely was started by those liars in government claiming that a government is Christian.

  5. @Ungenius

    Here is that “rumor” for you :

    1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

    2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

    3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:

    4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

    5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.

    6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.

    7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

    KJV : Romans 13:1-7.

    1. FR –
      Rumors abound. We know that the words in KJV were written by men. Men spread rumors by inserting their beliefs into what they write.

      A previously misplaced handwritten draft of the KJV Bible was discovered in 2015.

      From Cambridge in May, 2017:

      It is rare that archival research makes the national news.  Jeffrey Alan Miller’s identification of a draft of a portion of the King James Bible hit the headlines in October 2015: not only was it the earliest known draft, but was uniquely a draft written by the hand of one of the translators, who was known by name.  The notebook in which Miller found this work – Sidney Sussex College, MS Ward B – had belonged to Samuel Ward (1572-1643), Master of the College from 1610 until his death.

      Eighteen months after the discovery, the notebook has been digitised in full and published on the Cambridge Digital Library, in the latest instance of an ongoing collaboration between the University Library and the Cambridge Colleges to make archival and manuscript material available online.

      What else did Ward write in this notebook – and does it have any further bearing on his work as a Bible translator?  Over what period did he use this notebook?  When and from whom did he acquire it?  Another, as yet unknown, hand made notes on the opening leaves concerning Romans 6 and Galatians 5, apparently prior to the notebook’s use by Ward; was this another translator?  These questions and many others are prompted by Miller’s discovery.  The availability of MS Ward B for all to view online means that further revelations will surely follow.

    2. @ Franklin Ryckaert

      Thanks. I stand corrected. Tojamicus is correct when he said New Testament which includes Paul. I should have only spoke of Jesus rather than Jesus and Paul, but I came across the reference to Paul with a search and included it. I do not read Paul since I am a follower of the teachings of Jesus, not Paul.

      Your reference is a good reason for not being a follower of Paul. If what Paul said is true, then the Jesus hating jews and the pedophiles that run western governments would be ordained by God which is obviously erroneous which makes Paul’s doctrine erroneous. No surprise for me. Paul, being a past Pharisee, is a good example of old habits dying hard.

      Paul is a favorite with organized religion since he came up with the structure of churches, not Jesus. Hence, the doctrine of Paul is preached much more in churches than the message of Jesus which is a condition that has bothered me for a long time. I consider most of Christianity to actually be Paulism with Jesus in the back seat.

      1. @ Ungenius

        The first Christians were all Jews who never traveled beyond Palestine and had no realistic assessment of Roman power. Paul was not only born outside Palestine but was widely traveled in the Roman Empire. Everywhere he must have seen signs of its military power (marching armies, military camps etc.). Hence he concluded that rebellion against the Roman government was useless, better obey than die in an unequal confrontation. That’s why he advocated obedience to the government and he did that in the only form the first Christians would accept : by saying that the government is instituted by God.

      2. FR –

        You wrote:
        “The first Christians were all Jews who never traveled beyond Palestine..”

        That means the ‘CHOSENS’ got together and started Christianity, early on.

        I told that one for years. Even Matthew was Levi – a ‘CHOSEN’ – before being renamed by Jesus.

      3. @Pat

        ” English form of Ματθαιος (Matthaios), which was a Greek form of the Hebrew name מַתִּתְיָהוּ (Mattityahu) meaning “gift of YAHWEH”. Matthew, also called Levi, was one of the twelve apostles. He was a tax collector, and supposedly the author of the first gospel in the New Testament. ”

      4. FR –

        Thanks. I already researched that at libraries, such as Center For Enlightenment.. at Virginia Beach, decades ago. That one was Cayce’s library. I bought bibles and books there to take with me to read on the submarine. I searched a lot in the 70s. I lived in Newport News, Virginia, at the time. I went to DC very often to search the Library of Congress and National Archives. ‘Fiche’ microfilm reader back then. 🙂

        I understand the “supposedly” nature of the guessing games over the centuries.

        No one even knows when and where Levi – Matthew – died.

        The Book of Matthew… was written about 60 A. D., but after Mark.

        The Author always speaks of himself as “the publican,” which may indicate his sense of humility, felt in having been exalted from so low an estate to that of an apostle. He was the son of Alpheus (Mar. 2:14; Lu. 5:27), and was called Levi until Jesus called him and gave him the name Matthew, which means “Gift of God.”

        We know nothing of his work except his call and farewell feast (9:9-10), and that he was with the apostles on the day of Pentecost. Thus silent and observant and qualified by former occupation, he could well undertake the writing of this book.

        It MIGHT be – possible – that he was chosen by the others for this great task.

        We know nothing of his death.

      5. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        So, using your reasoning, Paul knew he was lying just to keep the peace. Nothing like a lie to make things all better. If Paul was lying, that’s even worse than being mistaken.

        “The first Christians were all Jews…”

        A common mistake of identity.

        When Jesus was here in the flesh, there were only followers of Jesus, not Christians. Paul is the one that claimed the name Christians which was initially used as an insult. Prior to adoption of the name Christian, the followers of Jesus were known as The Way.

        After being tempted by the devil, Jesus began his ministry in Capernaum around the Sea of Galilee, located on the northeast corner of the area of Galilee, not the area known as Judea. Most seem to forget that there were 12 tribes of Israel with Judah being just one of the twelve and all the tribes had synagogues. Jesus ministered to the Israelites of Galilee (western side of the Sea of Galilee), people that came from Judea/jews (no where near the Sea of Galilee), and from the east side of the Sea of Galilee, gentiles from Syria as well as gentiles from Decapolis located on the east side of the river Jordan. From the Sea of Galilee, Jesus then went to his home town of Nazareth in the area known as Galilee, not Judea. See Matthew 4 and Mark 1. Most of Jesus’ first followers were not Judeans/jews.

        Except for his last visit, every time Jesus went into Judea, he left to return to Galilee because the Judeans/jews wanted to kill him

Comments are closed.