British Patriot Jez Turner faces a prison sentence for criticizing Jews

Published also on the Truthseeker

Sourced from the Jewish website
Campaign Against Antisemitism


Moments ago, neo-Nazi leader Jeremy Bedford-Turner was unanimously convicted by a jury of incitement to racial hatred over a speech he gave in 2015 at a demonstration called to protest against the “Jewification” of Golders Green.

The sentence has not yet been handed down.

Private email of Lasha Darkmoon (May 19) to selected correspondents:

I know Jez personally, but only as an online correspondent. We’ve exchanged several friendly emails. A nice guy who wouldn’t harm a fly. I had no idea Jez was a “neo-Nazi”. Never once in his correspondence with me did he mention Hitler or Nazi Germany or say anything even vaguely inflammatory. He was always courteous and restrained, with a sunny disposition and a great sense of humor.

Too bad they’ve manufactured a reason to throw him in prison! When he emerges, he will have have a prison record. He will find it hard to get a job. He will no longer be invited to give lectures. Anyone who associates with him will be regarded as a leper, a neo-Nazi sympathizer. His freedom of speech will be severely curtailed, and he will have to watch every word he says from now on.

And yet we told that it is an “antisemitic canard” to talk of “Jewish power”. Jews are the Eternal Victims, facing endless pogroms and persecutions and fighting back valiantly against shocking calumnies. So we are instructed daily by the mass media.

Apologies for speaking out. I broke my own rule of being a “silent reader” on this forum! I did it for Jez’s sake, because I know he shouldn’t be in prison and that this is a cruel miscarriage of justice. There are others being similarly mistreated right now: Ursula Haverbeck, Monica Schaefer, Alison Chabloz. Who is next in line for the guillotine I shudder to think!

This certainly doesn’t increase our respect for the law.


The article by Campaign Against Antisemitism continues:

The prosecution was blocked for two years by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), forcing Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) into a long legal battle which culminated in the CPS having to reverse its decision not to prosecute Mr Bedford-Turner.

CAA welcomes the verdict and the clear and strong message that it sends that stirring up racial hatred against Jews will not be tolerated, but the key question now is why the CPS got this case so dismally wrong.

In July 2015, neo-Nazis sought to march through Golders Green. Campaign Against Antisemitism stopped their march, and instead they gathered in Whitehall, Westminster in central London, on 4th July. In his speech to neo-Nazis surrounded by police, Mr Bedford-Turner said that:

“…all politicians are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune, and the ruling regimes in the West for the last one hundred years have danced to the same tune.”

Evoking medieval libels which claimed that Jews drank the blood of non-Jewish children, Mr Bedford-Turner told his followers, of whom one third were from the violent extreme-right National Rebirth of Poland group, that the French Revolution and both World Wars were massacres perpetrated by Jews. He concluded that England was “merry” during the period of the expulsion of Jews from England and demanded: “Let’s free England from Jewish control.” The speech was filmed and posted on YouTube, where it remains.

LD: The article neglects to mention that Jez’s reference to England being known as “merry” during the long period of Jewish expulsion was not something Jez made up himself in order to mock the Jews; he was simply referring to a witty and well-known quote by Nesta Webster.

Under cross-examination on Friday, Mr Bedford-Turner defended his speech. Asked about his views on Jews, Mr Bedford-Turner said: “I would very much like them to leave England.” When asked if this applied to Jewish children, he answered: “Ideally, yes”, reasoning that “Jewish power would have no power if there were no Jews.” He also claimed that Jack the Ripper was a Jew but Jewish power covered this up to the consternation of Judge David Tomlinson. Mr Bedford-Turner’s supporters initially enthusiastically filled the public gallery, but their numbers dwindled over the course of three days in court.

Mr Bedford-Turner was only prosecuted because we forced the CPS to defend British Jews, against its will. The CPS was expertly represented by Louis Mably QC during the trial, but though the prosecution cannot be faulted, the CPS itself has behaved appallingly to try to stop this prosecution from taking place. Mr Bedford-Turner was only prosecuted because we forced the CPS to defend British Jews, against its will.

After CAA reported the speech to the Metropolitan Police Service, Mr Bedford-Turner was interviewed by police officers and a file was passed to the CPS, but after more than five months, senior lawyers from the CPS’s Counter Terrorism Division finally confirmed that they would not to prosecute the case. The CPS told us that there was no realistic prospect of a jury finding that Mr Bedford-Turner’s speech amounted to incitement to racial or religious hatred, defined by law as using threatening, abusive, or insulting words or behaviour with the intention (or likely consequence) of stirring up racial or religious hatred. CAA’s Chairman, Gideon Falter, who had witnessed the speech, applied for Victims’ Right to Review, but was told by the CPS that he was not a victim and had no victim’s rights.  

Faced with no alternative, CAA took the unusual step of issuing judicial review proceedings to submit the CPS decision to the scrutiny of the High Court. CAA was partly motivated by a growing concern that the CPS is failing to take antisemitic crime seriously. 2015, the year in which the crime was committed, was amongst the worst years on record for antisemitic hate crime. Yet of 15,442 prosecutions of hate crimes by the CPS that year, only 12 were prosecutions of antisemitic hate crime. In the years since, as antisemitic crime has surged, the CPS has continued to prosecute only a paltry number of antisemitic crimes.

We have since been told by a source at the CPS that it was the Director of Public Prosecutions who personally interceded to overrule a senior prosecutor who had advised going ahead with the prosecution. Whilst waiting for the High Court to decide whether to allow CAA to proceed, the case was brought to the attention of the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Chief Executive of the CPS, but we have since been told by a source at the CPS that it was the Director of Public Prosecutions who personally interceded to overrule a senior prosecutor who had advised going ahead with the prosecution.

In the end, on 6th January 2017, the Hon. Mr Justice Haddon-Cave gave CAA’s judicial review permission to proceed on all grounds and limited CAA’s cost liability to zero. He held that this case “raises potentially important issues for society in this growing area of racist and religious hate crime.” The case was expedited to be held before a Divisional Court of the Administrative Division of the High Court on Wednesday 8th March 2017, but on the eve of the hearing, after more than a year of maintaining that her decision was correct, the Director of Public Prosecutions agreed that the decision should be quashed and taken again by a more senior lawyer.

CAA was represented pro bono by leading counsel Brian Kennelly QC, junior counsel Jamie Susskind, and solicitor David Sonn, to whom we are immensely grateful, and without whom Mr Bedford-Turner would have escaped justice.

Now that Mr Bedford-Turner has been convicted, CAA has been entirely vindicated.

More than half of British Jews believe that the CPS is doing too little to fight antisemitism. CAA’s latest Antisemitism Barometer research shows that following a 45% surge in antisemitic crime and a 36% drop in charging of antisemitic crime:

Almost one in three British Jews have considered leaving the UK due to antisemitism. Only 59% of British Jews feel welcome in the UK, and 17% feel unwelcome. 37% of British Jews have been concealing their Judaism in public.
Only 23% of British Jews think the CPS does enough to protect them. More than half of British Jews believe that the CPS is doing too little to fight antisemitism.

64% of British Jews felt that the authorities were not doing enough to address and punish antisemitism. Only 39% of British Jews have confidence that if they reported a hate crime, it would be prosecuted if there was enough evidence.

For more on Jez Turner, see “The Trial of Jez Turner: A Jewish Witchhunt“, which is an abridged version by Lasha Darkmoon of an excellent article by Andrew Joyce on the Occidental Observer.

Gideon Falter (pictured), Chairman of CAA, said: “We are delighted by this result, Jeremy Bedford-Turner has been unanimously convicted by a jury of incitement to racial hatred.
The real question is why the Director of Public Prosecutions and CPS got this so dismally wrong. CAA had to battle the CPS in court since 2015 to force them to prosecute this case, but a speech that took us and a jury moments to understand as a clear-cut case of incitement, was repeatedly and wrongly dismissed by the CPS as not only not an offence of incitement, but not even a lesser offence. This was always a matter of basic law and common sense.
The question now is why the CPS seems to demonstrate such incompetence in dealing with cases of antisemitism. Despite record levels of antisemitic crime, there are dismally few prosecutions of antisemites in Britain every year. Antisemites are becoming bolder and British Jews are losing faith in the authorities. The CPS must stop making excuses and prosecute antisemites with zero tolerance. If they do not, we will continue to hold them to account in court.”

Source: Campaign Against Antisemitism

72 thoughts to “British Patriot Jez Turner faces a prison sentence for criticizing Jews”

  1. Jez Turner’s case reminds of the pronouncement of Gilad Atzmon :

    “Jewish power is the power to silence criticism of Jewish power”.

    And that is true. YHWH’s Chosen Mafia prefers to operate in secrecy. There is no greater threat to the parasite than to be noticed as such. Notice that Gideon Falter calls Turner’s remarks a “crime”, while he only mentioned Jewish power. Of course “inciting racial or religious hatred” has nothing to do with mentioning Jewish power.

    The good news is that Jews are not only powerful parasites, but also utterly paranoid :

    “Almost one in three British Jews have considered leaving the UK due to antisemitism. Only 59% of British Jews feel welcome in the UK, and 17% feel unwelcome. 37% of British Jews have been concealing their Judaism in public.”

    So if we press a little further we can make that 100% ? Perhaps not only in the UK but also in the rest of the western world ? That would solve a lot of problems ! Only thing is where to settle all Jews where they cannot harm others anymore. A Jewish state in Palestine clearly was not the right solution. But where then ? My proposal is Tierra del Fuego at the southern tip of South America, far removed from the rest of humanity, where they can live their “chosen” life without parasitizing on others.
    South Zion, an idea whose time has come !

    1. I hear Madagascar is nice… If jews love living in “multicultural and diverse” societies so much, I’m sure the local Africans will welcome them with open arms. As a bonus, once there, you can be sure they’ll never be able to get off the island… because they’d actually have to do MANUAL LABOR to build a boat. Even if they employ the natives… they’ll never even remotely be a threat. #problemsolved #makeitso

      1. A previous comment made about isolating the Jew.

        “He’s (Greg Johnson) a white nationalist that advocates for a white ethno-state and he includes Jews among others to be excluded from the new country. He argues for this to be done in an orderly, non-violent and a way as fair as possible to non-whites.”

        Let’s see now Jews expelled from 109 countries over 1700 years. England, 300 years without Jews, look at England today after Jews wormed their way back into that island nation. Germany began expelling Jews after the 1933 enabling act Look at what happened to Germany and the suicidal direction it has taken since the end of WWII.

        Just how smart does a professor have to be to understand expelling or prohibiting Jews from your country DOESN’T WORK? Just how smart does a professor have to be to recognize that playing nicey-nice with Jews DOESN’T WORK? No doubt if Mr. Johnson spent time on the Gaza front lines with the Palestinians, he would develop a much better understanding not only of how Jews work, but the only possible solution for resolving their presence. Why bless my heart, it’s the very same solution the Jews have for the white man’s presence – complete total, utter, genocide.

        Jews tell us to our face they are conducting, unrestricted, genocidal warfare on white civilization of the same type they carried out against Germany by means of their allied proxies. This is a war people like Greg Johnson approach like a monopoly game.

        ~ Or ~

        as John Kaminski succinctly stated, We have to get rid of them before they get rid of us.

    2. Nothing for them to be “paranoid” about in Merry Old England, Franklin… The merry old Englishmen surrendered their liberty teeth to the damn commie regime a long time ago, and have few shotguns and rifles to bolster defense against legal abuse. It’s really difficult for me to feel sorry for them!


        Reminds me of the time when Marlon Brando mentioned on a nationally televised TV show that he thought that Jews controlled Hollywood.

        Jewish organizations were outraged! Positively outraged. For a while, it looked like he would never work in Hollywood again, or anywhere again.

        Then he apologized and retracted his statement. Something like “I was wrong to ever think that Jews control Hollywood.”

        Afterwards, the Jewish organizations, very generously and graciously, said that they were satisfied with his apology and he was allowed to work again in Hollywood. They didn’t have to forgive him, but they did. This is because everyone knows that they don’t control Hollywood and they will let you work in Hollywood as long as you don’t go around making crazy conspiracy theory comments suggesting that they control Hollywood.

        As everyone knows, except for Joel Stein and a few hundred top exectuives in Hollywood, they absolutely do not control Hollywood. It’s silly to even think such thoughts and people who think such thoughts are dangerous and should be locked up.

    3. Franklin,
      I say relocate the Chosenites to Utah. Lots of wilderness. Driving my rig through Utah at times I dont even get cell phone service. Very remote. Deep canyons and wildlife. Let the Jews have coyotes, rams and rattlers as their new neighbors. 🙂

    4. Franklin Ryckaert: Jez Turner’s case reminds of the pronouncement of Gilad Atzmon: “Jewish power is the power to silence criticism of Jewish power”.

      It’s often quoted, but the problem with Atzmon’s pronouncement, like 99.99% of all pronouncements by the “good Jews”, is that it doesn’t really tell you the whole truth, not all 100 percent of it.

      Consequently, we are left demoralized, no better nor happier than before knowing the “pronouncement” because there doesn’t seem to be a solution, which only further demoralizes us, the poor helpless and hapless goyim. Is this COHEN-cidental? A Jewish trick or just a Jewish character flaw and preference to kvetch ad infinitum?

      A more truthful and therefore more helpful pronouncement would be, Jewish power is the power to print money out of thin air.

      I mean, if you can print money out of thin air, what can’t you buy and who can’t you bribe?

      Stop the FED and you stop Jewish Power. Duh! It’s really that simple.


      I’ve written repeatedly about the Jewish Federal Reserve and their “money-out-of-thin-air” SCAM, so I don’t want to be too redundant and off topic here, but for those new to Darkmoon, see the Credit River Decision.

      1. Credit River Decision

        “The money boys that run the “private Federal Reserve Bank” soon got back at Judge Mahoney by poisoning him in what appeared to have been a fishing boat accident (but with his body pumped full of poison) in June of 1969, less than 6 months later.”

        Leonard Cohen would sing, “That’s how it goes… and everybody knows.”

  2.  This is travesty of justice and shocking attack on free-speech. What we are told about living in a free democracy is becoming a more blatantly obvious lie in the UK day by day.

    “The CPS must stop making excuses and prosecute antisemites with zero tolerance. If they do not, we will continue to hold them to account in court.”

    The jews are hoisted by their own petard with this statement and case it clearly shows the lengths of Jewish power in the UK.

    To tell the truth is becoming a revolutionary act as George Orwell once said!!

    Where are all the liberal free-speech advocates when this witch hunt and persecution of nationalists and revisionists is going on……there’s a deafening silence!!

    1. We see the same ignorance/cowardice here in “Jewmerica”. The Jew and his Shabbos Goi have made this culture ignorant and timid.
      Had the Jury found him innocent, they could have moved forward to rescind these treacherous laws made to (covertly) place the Jew at the TOP OF THE HEAP in spite of all reasons for wanting them OUT being valid. they’ve come to OWN the world thanks to this sewer and Britain annihilating “others” to place a Central Bank in nearly every nation on earth.
      Repulsive. Yes, let’s begin talks re: Madagascar (again).

      If a non-Jew killed another non-Jew or a non-Jew killed a Jew the killer is liable for execution. If a Jew killed a non-Jew, he is exempt from punishment.
      (Babylonian Talmud: BT Sanhedrin 57a)

      Congressman Bill Dannemeyer’s warning is IGNORED here;

      Same treachery used to implement the central bank here in ’13!

  3. A similar Law criminilising criticisim of Jews was recently passed in the USA.

    George Orwell, where are you now we need you?

  4. I just read that he was sentenced to one year imprisonment, with 6 months suspended. That means his custodial sentence is six months. Under the British system of imprisonment he is entitled 1/3 remission of his sentence for good behaviour, which means 4 months in gaol. However his job prospects have been destroyed and he has been publicly branded a “Nazi” and anti-semite, whatever that’s supposed to mean.
    One point where Europe and North America differ from traditional fascist or communist dictatorships, is that North Americans and Europeans foolishly believe they are free. At least in the military dictatorship I live under I am quite free to express my prejudices, mock any race, give the “Roman” salute without let or hindrance. As Voltaire is reported to have said, “If you want to know who your real rulers are, see who you cannot criticise!”

    1. I predict the Jew’s plan is to murder him in prison. This man presents a grave danger to the Jews, one far worse than that of Ursula Haverbeck or Monika Schaefer. I knew they would not be able to lock him up and throwaway the key like they do to those in Germany. So they sentenced him to prison long enough to effect their murder plan.

      This is SOP for the Jews’ most dangerous enemies. If loyal Brits want to take effective action, they should demand a 24 hour watch on him like they did to the German prisoners at Nuremberg, perhaps with cameras in the cell. Because of the threat, he should be isolated from other prisoners. Those seeking this solution should then hound and harass authorities, making a huge stink that cannot be ignored and continue until until their demands are met.

      They should also state publicly that, should anything happen to Mr. Turner while in custody, they will seek charges against those refusing to mount a 24 watch on him. If anything does happen, they should start screaming “murder most foul!” as long and loud as possible, pointing to the fact the authorities purposely allowed it to happen, demanding charges be brought against those authorities in charge of prisoners. The key is to make a stink that cannot be ignored so Jews cannot slink away in the dark of night with the same old “it was suicide” lie.

  5. In the UK, back in 1965, the first Race Relations Act was brought into being. This was not a law, but a piece of legislation created to stop the natural fightback of the people, who would ultimately see their country change from a nation into a globalist state, leading inevitably to what is now known as White Genocide.

    The Race Relations Act (1965) was brought in to protect the very people behind the future drastic demographic changes in the British Isles, i.e. the Jews. The subsequent hate speech laws are merely an add-on to the Race Relations Act of 1965.

    The Sordid Origin of Hate-Speech Laws come straight from Soviet Russia, that hell on earth of Jewish dominance over the non-Jew.

    As FRANKLIN RYCKAERT correctly points out, what Gilad Atzmon states about Jewish power maybe he and readers here do not realize that Gilad too has been targeted by the Campaign Against Antisemitism (C.A.A.) and is being sued for libel in the High Court. Gilad has been a strong campaigner against Israel’s genocide of t Palestinians. Jews have done their best to destroy Gilad’s career, stopping his concerts through threats of violence if they go ahead. And of course the police remain silent.

    The transition of Communism from Russia to Europe is now complete. This was the Jews’ goal from day one. The complete control of Western civilization in order to bring about the total destruction of Western civilization. Bankers like Communism as debts are always paid.

    The question is, will these people succeed?

    Cases such as these — Jez Turner, Ursula Haverbeck, Monica Schaefer and Alison Chabloz — only serve to highlight just why Jews are persecuted. In fact, the word persecution is not appropriate. We should instead see this so-called “persecution” for what it really is – retaliation to Jewish oppression.

    There is an old Russian saying: “The Jew will always tell you how persecuted he is, but will never tell you why.” I have this gut feeling that there will come a time, very soon, when there will be no Jews left to answer the question: “Why are you persecuted?”

    Jews not bringing about just another Holocaust by their bad behavior; they are bringing about their own extinction.

  6. “If you want to know who rules over you, just ask yourself whom you’re not allowed to criticize.” (Attributed to Voltaire but it may have been someone else)

    1. “If you want to know who rules over you, just ask yourself whom you’re not allowed to criticize.” (Attributed to Voltaire but it may have been someone else)

      Yes, this famous quote is frequently misattribituted to the great Voltaire. I’m sure Voltaire would have loved to have said it, but unfortunately he didn’t! (See Voltaire, Wikiquotes, Misattributed).

      The man who actually said it was Kevin Strom (in 1993).,_kevin/kevin_strom_works/Kevin_Strom_1991-1994/Kevin_A._Strom_19930814-ADV_All_America_Must_Know_the_Terror_That_Is_Upon_Us.html

    2. Voltaire, a Frenchman who could handle the truth, did say, to his eternal credit …
      “I am convinced that everything has come down to us from the banks of the Ganges, – astronomy, astrology, metempsychosis, etc… It is very important to note that some 2,500 years ago at the least Pythagoras went from Samos to the Ganges to learn geometry…But he would certainly not have undertaken such a strange journey had the reputation of the Brahmins’ science not been long established in Europe”

  7. “Jews are the Eternal Victims, facing endless pogroms and persecutions and fighting back valiantly against shocking calumnies. So we are instructed daily by the mass media.”

    As an old Polish proverb says, “The Jew cries out in pain while he is striking you.”

    1. This guy had the right idea….. 😉

      “When in 1550 the Polish King Sigismund August desired to permit them free entry
      into Russia, this was denied by Ivan with these words: “We absolutely do not permit the
      entry of the Jew into my lands, because we do not wish to see evil in our lands, but rather
      may God grant that the people in my land may have rest from that irritation. And you, our
      brother, should not write us on account of the jews again,” for they had “alienated the
      Russians from [G24] Christianity, brought poisonous plants into our lands and done much
      evil to our lands.”

  8. Things in England are not much different than here.

    We lost the White American Race War with finality and certitude over 50 years ago, terms of surrender being the anti-White legislation passed back then.

    The United States Government is LEGALLY anti-White. Those who decry unfairness must understand that such is in keeping with the spirit of the ‘law’.

    Though that war was lost, we fight on in guerrilla style with propaganda, now greatly augmented by the internet. In such warfare, anonymity is best. Few public ‘lightning rods’ are needed – for now.

    First Thing First : Eliminate Jew Influence

  9. Sourced from a WN website:

    BY SENTENCING dissident Jez Turner to 12 months in gaol, a court judge found the martyred defendant not guilty — but sentenced him anyway for not being Politically Correct.

    Jez Turner (48), a British Army veteran who had served his country’s Zionist elite for 10 years as a soldier, stood accused of ‘inciting racial hatred’. The alleged offence occurred in 2015 when Turner criticised Jewish control of a sinister autonomous police squad using the moniker shomrim. These facts were not challenged. The case swung on the remote possibility that the dissident’s truthful criticism could “incite racial hatred.”

    Michael Walsh, editor of the Ethnic European,… says he talked with Jez before his court appearance; he seemed resigned to a guilty verdict. “I told Jez that the sentence before the trial had already been agreed upon and passed by unseen men in the background. The court appearance is theatre to give a false but reassuring semblance of justice being met. The inexperienced jury are putty in the hands of professional jurists.”

    According to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes the right to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart informational and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

    Henderson goes on to say, “What has been made very clear in this trial, and that of the trial of Alison Chabloz, is that we have an elite which is hell-bent on squeezing the range of permitted opinion ever more tightly into a Politically Correct shape.”

    The media, themselves as controlled as the electoral and judicial process, cheered the verdict and acted as the public prosecutor by giving a one-sided account of the trial and verdict.

    Yet, the irony is that by caving in to a British-based foreign-funded Jewish cabal and saying the words “guilty,” the jury, prosecuting counsel, Metropolitan Police and corporate media actually found Jez Turner not guilty and proven right; that Britain is indeed ruled by Jews.


    by Michael Walsh

    Tell me, sir, how does it feel,
    To steal from man his rights,
    To take away his freedom,
    His voice and what he writes.

    The lowlife is the man that steals,
    The aged mother’s purse,
    But steal from man his liberty,
    There’s nothing that is worse,
    Than ermine bandit in his robes,
    Who raids the public purse,
    Who puts in gaol the tongue and pen,
    Such man is English curse.


    Hope I haven’t too badly bruised the concept of “fair use”.

    According to CAA the trial was about “inciting racial hatred”. However, the case was about Turner’s criticisms of Shomrim, an all Jewish “security” force that operates in some of the predominantly Jewish areas of the UK.

    Mr Turner’s ‘offence’ dated back to 2015 when he spoke at a demonstration in Whitehall against the special Jewish police force known as Shomrim. (H&D‘s assistant editor spoke at the same event – click here for transcript.)

    This racially exclusive police force had already attracted opposition from several senior police officers. When Shomrim first began to appear in North London in 2008, then Hackney borough commander Steve Dann said: I am very upset that no-one has approached me about this. It has been done behind my back. I see this as a slight against us, that we are not providing a service.

    In 2010 Dann’s successor in Hackney, Steve Bending said: I do not support the concept of any community having their own patrol service. There is a risk of other communities feeling intimidated by this course of action.

    So upset was Bending that he left the Metropolitan Police and emigrated to the United Arab Emirates.

    CPS’ initial and ongoing refusal to prosecute – until heavily pressured by CAA – looks less like anti-semitism, and more like a reasonable response to Jewish demands to be granted rights above and beyond those of average UK citizens.

    Yet Mr Turner’s criticism of Shomrim has today been criminalised. The Metropolitan Police and the Crown Prosecution Service had at first not thought to prosecute him for the 2015 speech, but relentless pressure was exerted by the ‘Campaign Against Antisemitism’ and the Community Security Trust, an ultra-Zionist lobby group whose founders were part of the violent Jewish 62 Group, which also spawned Searchlight magazine.

    In a sense this was a CST prosecution, not a Crown prosecution. We now know who rules 21st century Britain. Meanwhile on the very same day as Mr Turner was imprisoned, the Zionist state shamelessly slaughtered another 55 Palestinians, a crime which will go unpunished – in fact simply drawing attention to this mass murder will itself be judged a crime, unless anyone who dares criticise the Jewish state weighs his words very carefully.

    Source: Ibid

    I will note that some claim Turner may be controlled opposition, though the evidence for that seems to be mainly speculation and conjecture. (2.38 min)

    1. Carn –

      –A REGISTERED CHARITY — Shomrim polices everything from drink-driving to racist abuse and its patrols are aimed at protecting all members of society, with 64 per cent of its work last year supporting the non-Jewish community.

      Quotes from the founding rabbi, Herschel Gluck:
      “Don’t forget many of the people in this community are the children or grandchildren of Holocaust survivors or are Holocaust survivors themselves.” (Whining about Holocaust(sic) gets them more TAX-EXEMPT $$$)

      “And the Holocaust was a very traumatic experience for Jewish relations with government and authorities and many people still feel very vulnerable” he says. (Whining about being so “vulnerable” gets them more TAX-EXEMPT $$$)

      Rabbi Gluck says “Shomrim has very good relations with the Met, with local police and with all the organs of state it needs to work with” allowing it to work as “a bridge” between the Jewish population and wider society. (Spreading their influence throughout the UK gets them more TAX-EXEMPT $$$)

    2. (ADMIN: The second half of this comment has been DELETED. See below.)

      The absurd claim that Jez Turner is secretly working for the Jews has been made in a rubbishy YouTube video that has probably been made by Jews themselves to blacken Jez Turner’s reputation. Even when Jez is sentenced to a year in prison for his alleged anti-Semitism and branded a neo-Nazi, these idiots are still claiming that Jez is a secret agent for the Jews because hatred is what Jews want and need. They flourish under hatred, y’see. The more hatred they get, after all, the more protection they get! The more they get laws passed in their favor, y’see. You dare not criticize Israel or advocate boycotting its goods. That’s forbidden!

      So Jez is secretly working for the Jews, right? Because he’s helping to get laws passed that shield Jews from criticism!?! Get t? The more Jez does to ATTACK Jews openly, the more he’s really DEFENDING Jewish interests!

      You familiar with this line of contorted reasoning? Yes, it’s frequently promoted on this website by a couple of kooks! It’s known as the “Kabbuki theory”, or 4D-chess, and it’s main proponent here is the asinine asshole . . .

      ADMIN: The rest of this comment has been deleted as unfit for publication.
      We’ve only just seen it.

      1. @ ADMIN

        I read the comment and agree with it 100%, thought the gutter language in which it was expressed made it unpublishable on any respectable website. If only Dr Parker could have used more restrained language to make his valid point! 🙂

        Emma Kirby
        (Silent Reader . . . my last post)

    3. concerning controlled opposition, and fishyness.
      some weeks ago “count duckula” was in court charged with hate crime in scotland,
      he had put a video on youtube of his girlfriends pug dog doing “give a paw”
      to “sieg heil!” and “gas the jews! gas the jews!”
      his defence being, that he made the video as a joke for his girlfriend,
      found guilty, he was fined £800.
      a heinous slur on the jewish people of the kind usually greeted with howls of anguish and cries of despair
      yet this count has since been positively lauded by both the left and right,
      including some “prominent” jewish celebrities, and in particular by Tommy Robinson,
      (a Shillman fellow) as a champion of free speech!
      all in complete agreement that it was obviously a “joke,” and the prosecution a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
      does anyone know of any similar events,
      whereby someone has openly published, or said in public, something as clearly “anti semitic” as
      “gas the jews! gas the jews!”with a few “sieg heils” thrown in to boot
      then later been hailed as a hero of free speech for doing so?
      and by the very people one would least expect it of?

      1. A copy of the “Nazi Pug” video, ICYMI:

        Dankula trained the pug to do “the most offensive thing I could think of” to mess with his girlfriend (soon to be wife). He has appealed the fine, and amassed well over 100K to pay legal expenses.

        Alison Chabloz has written an article on Dankula’s peculiar popularity:

        Here is a possible explanation for the support for free speech Dankula now enjoys from the left.

        From a blog post apparently written by him:

        Me being an actual Nazi

        This one is actually quite dark and truly gave me and my friends insight into the way the media works. The papers included statements linking me to various racist groups and actual Nazi culture. So I decided to combat this by posting on my Facebook a picture of me loudly and proudly displaying my hammer and sickle tattoo on my chest. The same photo as below.

        (Photo of CD with Hammer and Sickle tattoo.)

        I am also connected to several communist groups throughout Scotland and other countries which the papers would know if they actually bothered to do any research, within half an hour of me posting the above picture, any references to me being an actual Nazi were removed from the articles across all the papers websites.

        I will say it again, I am in no way a Nazi, I am in fact a Communist who believes in absolute equality for people all races, creeds, sexual orientations etc. I am so Communist I even commissioned an artist to make me a giant painting of Lenin to hang above my bed.

        I am not joking.

    4. BLM? Black Lives Matter or Bureau of Land Management?

      Jewish wordsmiths have done it again. In my thoughts “CAA” means “Civil Aeronautics Authority.”

      “In 1938, the Civil Aeronautics Act transferred the federal civil aviation responsibilities from the Commerce Department to a new independent agency, the Civil Aeronautics Authority.

      In this example, one finds a yet another reconstituted interpretation for a hoary, Jewish acronym. This provides a good example for the reason Jews are so fond of acronyms and why the world is now inundated with such Jewish nonsense.

      Prior to the twentieth century, acronyms were limited to British titles and did not exist in conversation. During that war, even ribald thoughts about the military mysteriously turned into acronyms. “SNAFU” is but one example, Situation Normal – All Fucked Up. While those of more delicate constitution say, “All Fouled Up,” I assure the reader the first interpretation is what came to mind to the WWII solider when using the term.

      In this example, one sees how acronyms are easily modified in the mind of both the speaker and listener (or reader.) Since then, acronyms have proliferated at an absurd pace with each passing year.

      Jews have a penchant for words that have to be understood in context if one is to understand the intended meaning. One such word is “Torah” a word that can mean either instruction, law or both, depending on how the Jew uses the word in conversation.

      There is a classic story about a Jewish lad that hides under the bed while his parents are having sex. His father, a rabbi, hearing the boy gasp (go figure), pulls the boy from under the bed and accuses him of voyeurism (go figure). The Jewish lad responds to the accusation with the statement, “This is not voyeurism, this is Torah!” Vat!? You didn’t zee zat coming?

      Of course, the most famous of all phony, Jewish acronyms is “Nazi.” While not technically an acronym, Jews admit they invented the term as counter to slander and defame the German National Socialist Party that operated under the acronym NSDAP.

      Jewish wordsmiths transmuted “NSDAP” into “Nazi.” Look at how well that bastardized acronym has served the Jew. Is it any wonder the English language has now become moribund it the attempt to labor under the Jewish acronym?

      Around the turn of the 21st century, Jews actually began with the desired acronym that would invoke the desired “hot-button” reaction in the subconscious, and then twisted the definition to fit the acronym.

      The “Patriot” act is a classic example of this type of Jewish wordsmithing, to wit, Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. That’s some twisting eh?

      Such jargon is confusing to those uniformed with the details of the subject matter. Jews however have no care to inform, they only care about programming the mind to react in a desired manner. Their acronymic jargon is specifically designed to program a subconscious, knee-jerk reaction.

      What comes to mind when you hear “911”? Does it typically hold the same meaning for the listener the speaker intends? Even if one understands the term in context, does the subconscious mind still interpret it in that manner?

      Jews hate clarity. They feed on the confusion and obscurity of their efforts. They hate concise definitions and work continually to modify and erase the clarity of words so people will misunderstand what is being said.

      Acronyms serve to cloud ones thoughts with a failure to clearly identify the subject being discussed. Confusion and obfuscation are Jewish bywords for keeping the gullible goyim stupid and uninformed.

      My suggestion is to reject, or at least avoid, acronyms in conversation. Insist on having the full meaning spelled out for you. Tell the speaker you want to avoid the confusion acronyms tend to inject into a conversation. Get in the Jew’s face and yell “IDWHAMA!” I Don’t Want to Hear Any More Acronyms!

  10. Once they take your guns then they can take everything else, your voice, your freedim, your life…
    No doubt violence against Jews is on the rise in European countries. Look what’s happening. .
    At the same time england, france, Germany etc. Are being overrun by muslims, who hate Jews, the indigenous white populations are waking up to the jew bank ster plot to wreck their turf…
    Someday the gloves will come all the way off. .. the big globalist manipulators don’t give a Dam about any threats and inconvenience to the schmucko, those Jews who think they should be supporting Israel and zionism…
    It’s just another chapter in the ongoing herzl zionista plot to dislocated Jews from their homes in Europe and cause them to move to Palestine. .
    That was oNE big rEason for ww2….
    Somebody has to fulfill the financing on all those new settlement projects being built in Palestine, at us taxpayer expense..

    1. You are absolutely CORRECT about the guns, barkingdeer! It takes nothing but RESOLVE and DETERMINATION to selectively exterminate individual enemies quietly and effectively, using the methodologies of assassins. A .22 Mark 2 Ruger is a widely-preferred piece; or any good, accurate .22 rifle will do-the-trick. A well-placed shot requires good planning. Millions of people in a country create a good mileau for anonymity and selection. It is a target-rich environment! 😁
      (In truth, I believe all these piece-of-shit politicians who promote “gun control” are afraid of that very thing – that some good American will hold them accountable for their misdeeds!).

      1. Yep, Gil –

        There is NO absolute gun freedom anywhere. As you wrote – politicians will not allow it. FEAR it.

        The UN gun control wheel is rolling slowly world-wide… even to Asia… Just a few months ago:

        Newly amended law bans foreigners from using, owning guns in Thailand

        BANGKOK, Oct. 12 (Xinhua) — Foreigners are banned from possessing and using guns in Thailand after the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) passed amendments to the Weapon, Firearm, Explosive and Firework Act Thursday.

        According to the newly amended law, only Thais can register guns with authorities. Previously, foreigners residing in Thailand could apply for gun ownership.

        Owning a firearm in Thailand has been legal since 1947. The Act Controlling Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, Fireworks and Imitation of Firearms only allows people to obtain licenses to own guns for the purposes of self-defense, protection of property, sports or hunting. But it did not mention that applicants must be Thai nationals.

        The new law also brings stricter control on weapon silencers fireworks and electrics darts.

        Offenses under the law could face a jail term of one to 20 years.

        (the excuse as usual):
        Thailand has a high per capita gun murder rate with 7.48 registered gun deaths per 100,000 people. The rate is twice as high as that of the United States, which had 3.55 deaths per 100,000 people in 2013.


        Thailand: Amendments to Firearms Law

        (Oct. 23, 2017) On October 12, 2017, Thailand’s National Legislative Assembly passed amendments to the 1947 Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, Fireworks, and the Equivalent of Firearms Act (the Act) at the third reading, with 201 legislators in favor, one against, and five abstentions. The amendments, made to keep pace with developments in weapons technology and changes in Thai society, will enter into effect upon publication in the Royal Gazette.  (New Legislation: Foreigners Can’t Own Guns, PHUKET GAZETTE (Oct. 13, 2017).)

        The amended law will cover weapon silencers, electric darts, and new types of fireworks including bang fai (locally-made rockets) and talai (“rocket-like fireworks with a circular wing”).  (Id.)  There reportedly have been shooting contests with these two types of rockets that have resulted in injuries, deaths, and property damage.  (Id.)  The amendment further provides that anyone who creates a bomb scare may be subject upon conviction to up to three years of imprisonment and/or fined up to 60,000 Baht (about US$1,817).  (Id.)

        Another significant change is that only Thais will be permitted to register a gun with the authorities. Formerly, foreigners residing in Thailand could also apply for weapons permits.  (Id.)

        Some Other Features of the Current Firearms Act
        The Act already prohibits the manufacture, purchase, ownership, use, ordering, or import of firearms or ammunition, except by persons who have been granted a license from the local registrar. (The Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, Fireworks, and the Equivalent of Firearms Act, B.E.2490 (1947) (as amended)) § 7, THAI LAW FORUM (uploaded Mar. 11, 2013).)  Violation of this provision is punishable upon conviction with imprisonment for a period of between one and ten years and/or fines of between 2,000 and 20,000 Baht (about US$61-$606).  (Id. § 72.)

        In addition, no one may possess ammunition without a license to possess and use firearms.  (Id. § 8.)  It is also prohibited for anyone to carry firearms without a license within a town, village, or public thoroughfare, except in cases of necessity or emergency.  (Id. § 8 bis.)  Carrying firearms in the open or to sites of worship, merriment, entertainment, or the like is also not permitted.  (Id.)

        People may only be issued a license to own and use firearms and ammunition for purposes of self-defense, protection of property, or use in sports or hunting, and a license must be obtained for each firearm.  (Id. § 9.)  Applicants for a firearms license must be at least 20 years of age (the age of majority under the Civil and Commercial Code), have a record of good behavior, have an occupation and receive income, and have a permanent address in Thailand with a name “listed in the house registration specifically in the area where you are applying for a license, for at least six months.”  (Chaninat & Leeds, Gun Law of Thailand (Sept. 30, 2011), THAI LAW FORUM; Firearms Act, § 9; Thai Civil and Commercial Code, Title 2: Persons, § 19, THAILAND LAW LIBRARY (last visited Oct. 17, 2017).)

        The application fee for most firearms licenses is 1,000 Baht (about US$30) for each license or unit; a license for possession and use of air rifles is 200 Baht per license/unit.; carry licenses are also 1,000 Baht per license. (Chaninat & Leeds, supra.)  The price of a firearm was said to be about US$600 in 2016.  (Gabriel Domínguez, A Look at Thailand’s Fervent Gun Culture, DW (Feb. 19, 2016).)

        Use of firearms, ammunition, or explosives other than those specified as permissible according to ministerial regulations in the commission of certain crimes pursuant to the Penal Code is punishable by life imprisonment or the death penalty.  (Firearms Act, § 72bis ¶ 4.)

        Gun Culture
        Thailand is said to have “the highest reported rate of gun-related deaths in Southeast Asia – almost 50 percent more gun homicides than the Philippines,” and, based on 2013 data compiled by the Institute for Health and Metric Evaluation of the University of Washington, “the rate is also twice as high as that of the US, which had 3.55 deaths per 100,000 people” as opposed to Thailand’s rate of 748 per 100,000 people. (Domínguez, supra.)  The same year, the U.S. State Department’s Bureau for Diplomatic Security characterized Thailand as having “a fervent gun culture on par with the United States and … [being] a world leader in firearms-related homicides.”  (Id.)  As reported in early 2016, the gun-ownership ratio in Thailand is also high, with more than six million registered guns among the population of 66.7 million, according to Ministry of Interior figures, or one in ten people legally owning a gun.  (Id.) 

        There is also a black market in which weapons are sold illegally, which could push the estimates of the actual number of civilian-held firearms in circulation, legal and illegal, to about ten million.  (Id.)

      2. Pat,

        Didn’t know you read Xinhua News… still the Cold War submariner looking for Chicoms under your bunk? 🙂

        The anti-gun laws for foreigners in Thailand could be a good “antisemitic” sign/omen: too many (((fake Whites))) and “euro-trash” there as it is, not to mention Rothchilds’ Cocaine Importing Agency (C.I.A.) operatives, agents, stooges, etc., ….

      3. Andy –

        Hey, man! You know… Xi’s Chicoms are still everywhere!! 🙂

        You wrote:
        “The anti-gun laws for foreigners in Thailand could be a good “antisemitic” sign/omen”

        “could be” is a guess… and “could be” correct.

        What is not a ‘guess’ is the entire UN pushed firearms law which is as bad as the US, or worse.

        They even need licenses for air-rifles!!

        The application fee for most firearms licenses is 1,000 Baht (about US$30) for each license or unit;
        a license for possession and use of air rifles is 200 Baht per license/unit.;

  11. Evoking medieval libels which claimed that Jews drank the blood of non-Jewish children, Mr Bedford-Turner told his followers, of whom one third were from the violent extreme-right National Rebirth of Poland group, that the French Revolution and both World Wars were massacres perpetrated by Jews.

    Where’s the lie? Jez Turner did absolutely nothing wrong!

    “Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity,” said Marshall McLuhan. It appears the Jews have perfected this technique with their Hate Speech Laws.

    1. “It appears the Jews have perfected this technique with their Hate Speech Laws”…. FOR SURE!!

  12. If this man has said he wants us to be free of Jewish control what is wrong in saying that? You may not agree but surely he has the right of free speech to say this. It is ludicrous to deny that the Jews have power and influence far greater than their numbers in the population; at 1 in 50 in America and 1 in 220 in Britain.

    1. John –

      There has never been a “right of free speech” anywhere.

      Even in the US Constitution it is written that…
      “Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom of speech….”

      That documentation specifically limits CONGRESS ONLY.

      The framers omitted other avenues of authority, such as Executive Orders, Emergency Powers, Rules of war, Judgements of the courts… etc.

      Freedom is a dream… just a goal and cannot exist in any countries using JEW commercial laws. That is more pronounce in the UK… where everyone who is not a ‘royal’ is considered a ‘subject’ in commerce. Chattel!

      1. The problem is that the judges, the jewish judges, don’t aplly the Constitution/human rights if the application is not in the benefit of the jewish status quo/regime. It’s not for nothing the jews love the legal professions.

      2. Pat, and speaking of dreams, those subtle words and deeds which manifest and extend far beyond mere illegal words, I imagine a lot of them are (lol) technically illegal as well.
        “And if my thought dreams could be seen, they’d probably put my head in a guillotine.” They just can’t prove it, yet..

        So I dream, and especially day dream as much as I may.
        Although the drawback is this approach does wreak havoc on a person’s schooling, I cipher it to be a small price to pay for all that dreaming..
        (still ciphering)

      3. NOTALMUD –

        There are NO human rights in jew Commerical Law. Just privileges.

        And constitutions do not and cannot give any rights. They cannot even guard or protect any rights… as you say… it all depends on venue and judges,

      4. Pat,

        You are very correct. There is no free speech, although I would beg to differ that before the control mechanism began to form, that is before rulers, people were free to speak freely. Freedom of speech is the nemesis of tyranny. Considering that we live under an anarcho-tyranny today, well, it is obvious that people are being arrested for speaking freely. The last thing tyrants want is their tyranny challenged!

        I caught a disturbing post over at the Irish Savant the other day. And yes, it is far worse than people think. Jews have not only complete control over the aristocracy. politics, the msm, academia, the judiciary, the police, the armed forces, the entertainment industry but have now moved into the world of computing to completely control that as well.

        We are told that there are two kinds of rights – natural and legal. The latter of course being nonsense, simply because they can be changed, willy nilly, by those in charge of the legal system, which in itself is nothing more than legislation for profit. Therefore there should be no legal rights, only rights which will always be seen as natural. And this is how people control. They confuse through language by ‘piggybacking’ on words, until the original definition no longer holds sway.

        The way forward is a simple one – remove the legal system completely and sadly this will not be done through any petition or presentation to any Parliament or authoritative body.
        God’s laws are there for the preservation of the self. They are there for that very reason and the only laws that are needed. Legality was created for one reason and one reason only – power over another/s. Legality most certainly stems from the Babylonian Talmud, with its thousands upon thousands of regulations and when one considers that everything that is illegal results in going to court where your finances will be taken, it very much coincides with Talmudic doctrine that it’s perfectly acceptable behaviour to steal from a non Jew.

        Unless people realize that any restriction on freedom of speech is a crime against humanity and worse condone it, then whatever nightmare befalls them is completely their own doing.

  13. the worm is turning though… zog days may be numbered…
    made plain to lots of people in europe now too, jewish zionist aggression against iran ruining good deals, for no good reason…
    it’s not the usa doing it. the usa is totally controlled by the zionists… that fake won’t work much longer.
    tump and the entire us congress nothing more than stooges for the israelis, or whoever…
    jez is 100% right, but they was probably a better way to put it…

  14. All defendants Chabloz, Turner, Haverbeck etc., should demand as a legal request that their judges will be no jewish judges. A fair trial is impossible if they are jewish. Does sombody know if they have made this legal request?

  15. After reading the article, and reviewing all the comments…. I believe BEDFORD-TURNER is being made an example of to ward off others, and likely even paid to spend a short time incarcerated to help that cause – jew cause.

    If he were truly a threat he would get the Edgar Steele treatment. A long sentence and death by torture while there.

    Attorney and author Edgar Steele was a little-known Idaho lawyer until 2000, when he represented the neo-Nazi Aryan Nations after the group was sued by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

    In his own words

    “To the Arabs, America and Israel are the same. In a very real sense, they are absolutely correct, of course. America is Jewish controlled now, at all levels. America IS the Jews. … [The 9/11 attacks] happened because we have been taken over from within by people that see that the only way to remain in power is to conquer the rest of the world,”

    Steele was SO BRAVE – that he filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Council of Conservative Citizens in the hate group’s lawsuit challenging a Virginia law that banned public cross burnings. The next year, he spoke at the annual conference of the Holocaust-denial magazine The Barnes Review as well as to the 10-year anniversary celebration of Media Bypass, a publication then owned by adherents of the anti-Semitic Christian Identity theology. Steele also spoke at former Klan leader David Duke’s 2004 European-American Unity and Rights Organization conference and at Aryanfest 2005, where he verbally attacked blacks in South Africa.

    But… They fixed HIM for THAT!!

    1. From a public standpoint, Jews are slaves to the letter of the law. They must maintain this slavishness as lack of it might result in calling their precious laws into question. Therefore they must to have “proper charges” to justify the sentence.

      Edgar Steele was railroaded on a Trumped up charge for the attempted murder of his wife, a charge his wife denied. As I wrote earlier, the charges against Turner simply did not allow for long term incarceration, but as Carnaptious pointed out in his comment – “A man jailed for leaving a bacon sandwich outside a mosque is found dead in prison halfway through his 12-month sentence,” six months is more than enough time for Jews to meet out their illegal death sentence. One might wonder if these individuals are tried in absentia in some star-chamber, Sanhedrin court where exalted Jew judges make such legal decrees outside the goyim courts.

      Should Turner survive his sentence and continue the crusade, no doubt a Trumped up charge with long term/fatal consequences will be manufactured by the Jew’s god of law.

      Neffer forget! Jesus brought down the Temple by attacking its phony legal system.

      1. Arch Stanton: “From a public standpoint, Jews are slaves to the letter of the law. They must maintain this slavishness as lack of it might result in calling their precious laws into question. Therefore they must to have “proper charges” to justify the sentence.”

        Yes, indeed. They don’t call it the JEWdicial for nuffin.

        Jews are highly anal retentive when it comes to laws and following the ‘letter of the law’. You could say quite literally, without any pun intended, that they are attracted to the law profession like flies on shit.

        Note how the Jews spell out their plan to use “law” and specifically “international law” — a concept unknown in 1897 when they held their first Zionist Congress in Switzerland — in order to establish a Jews-only homeland vis a vis what we now know as the United Nations.

        [Laws are mentioned 4 times in the following short passage, which I have highlighted in bold font.]

        Following a festive opening in which the representatives were expected to arrive in formal dress, tails and white tie, the Congress got down to the business at hand. The main items on the agenda were the presentation of Herzl’s plans, the establishment of the World Zionist Organization and the declaration of Zionism’s goals-the Basel program.

        In the version submitted to the Congress on the second day of its deliberations (August 30) by a committee under the chairmanship of Max Nordau, it was stated: “The aim of Zionism is to create for the Jewish people a home in Eretz­Israel secured by law.”

        To meet halfway the request of numerous delegates, the most prominent of whom was Leo Motzkin, who sought the inclusion of the phrase “by international law,” a compromise formula proposed by Herzl was eventually adopted:

        Zionism seeks to establish a home for the Jewish people in Eretz­Israel secured under public law. The Congress contemplates the following means to the attainment of this end:

        1. The promotion by appropriate means of the settlement in Eretz-Israel of Jewish farmers, artisans, and manufacturers.

        2. The organization and uniting of the whole of Jewry by means of appropriate institutions, both local and international, in accordance with the laws of each country.

        3. The strengthening and fostering of Jewish national sentiment and national consciousness.

        4. Preparatory steps toward obtaining the consent of governments, where necessary, in order to reach the goals of Zionism.

        Source: Virtual Jewish Library


        It appears that 1897 is the seminal year that the Rothschilds set in motion the planning of the 2 world wars necessary for the establishment of the UN in 1945 and then, finally, Israel in 1948. The year 1948 was not arbitrary; on the contrary, but I don’t want to go too off topic here. For those interested, see my recent posts on Jewish occult numbers and their staged events:

        Why is the number 126 lucky to Jewish people?

        We all know (((who did 911))).

      2. @ Justice For Chinese

        “They don’t call it the JEWdicial for nuffin.”

        Likewise, they don’t call it edJEWcation of nuffin.

  16. @ timetobehonest, who do you think interpret the laws and natural law??? The Jews!


      On the contrary, I and others believe, the biggest misconception, in history, courtesy of Jewish propaganda and doing what they do best – lie, is the fact that the laws of Moses are the law of the Israelites, NOT the Jews. Esau the brother of Jacob left the family, went to Idumea and it is through his bloodline that the Jews are descended from, not of Jacob, the father of the Israelites and are therefore Edomites.
      The Jews’ laws are those within the Talmud.
      The laws of God are there for the self preservation of oneself, simply because if you, for example, steal from another, sleep with another’s wife, murder another then you are bringing harm to yourself from those wronged. The ‘laws’ within the Talmud are created for the authority of the Jews, over the non Jews. They are there for material theft and gain for themselves.

      The bible is the journey of the Israelites, not the Jews. It is more apparent today, that when God commanded the killing of, it was of the Jews he was speaking about, for look at how they have corrupted and destroyed this world since time immemorial? It was a stark warning and the failure of our ancestors in doing the will of God has created what the world is today.

      Legality is Jewish law.
      Common law is God’s law.

      Here is a very good website, by a bible scholar.

      1. The “God” you speak of doesn’t make commands, period, let alone commanding to kill.

        Let’s put it this way: The very fact that any form of death can occur at ALL, caused by anything you can possibly imagine, INFERS that we exist in a place NEVER INTENDED by the very power that makes Existence POSSIBLE!

        We rationalize the way things are, therefore we fail to see how they are meant to be

      2. @ Time To Be Honest

        It has been my experience that praying properly for the truth causes a perspective shift revealing such things as the Second Commandment according to Jesus not being in the original jewish Ten Commandments of the Old “Testament” which should bring into question what laws Jesus said he was not going to change one tittle since he whacked several Mosaic Laws.

        Since I interface weekly with a “biblical scholar,” it appears to me that they have a taller mountain to climb to understand the simplicity of the teachings of Jesus by choosing to ignore the significant differences between what Jesus said in the Gospels and the Mosaic Law.

        Since you seem to be alluding to the “real jew vs fake jew” non-issue, would you happen to be an associate of New Song? 🙂 She has not returned since the great blackout of Darkmoon a few months ago.

      3. Ungenius,

        I am no associate of New Song. I simply saw this article on the truthseeker and responded.
        You seem to be mistaken in what I have written, regarding Jews. The ‘real Jew – fake jew’ issue is the Ashkenazi/Khazar theory of Arthur Koestler’s 13th Tribe and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together. As a people, the Jews are a multiracial group, who have mixed with all peoples of this earth, hence why they wish to do the same to all non Jews. In my eyes, a Jew is simply one who adheres to the Talmud and the Cabala, while promoting the false claim that they are Israelites.

        This pure Jewish story, which we hear all the time from people on Truth websites is nonsense, quite frankly. The Jewish religion is not Christianity. As stated, the Old Testament is a book about the Israelites, of whom the Jews MOST CERTAINLY are not as this has been one of the greatest lies of all time, something Jews are experts at. The Jew has hijacked the identity, in order to give them the land of Israel, for their own nefarious reasons. The Jew does not study the Old Testament to relate to, but quite the contrary, to deceive others into believing they are of the line of Israel, which they are not. This deception has resulted in millions of Christian Zionists, supporting these deceivers in their quest to secure the land of Palestine for themselves. These whackos believe that Christ will come back to save the Jews, when the reality is he will come back for his people – the Israelites.

        Ungenius, I do not buy the ‘fake Jew’ deception, for that is what it is.

      4. BROWNHAWK,

        I am stating that which was written within the Old Testament. I understand your point, that is, the bible was written by man and not the word of God. Was it? Where is your proof? Sure, you can certainly have the belief that God would never command another to kill, as most certainly many will, but where is your proof?

        Why does the heart stop beating, to take your view that death can occur whenever, wherever and to whomever? We have cases where incredibly fit people die young of a heart attack and people who have gorged on foods, with little to no exercise have survived. This of course baffles scientists, whose promotion of a healthy lifestyle doesn’t fair well in this scenario. However, that stated, from my own findings, healthy eating and regular exercise, certainly cures ills, my body may have. Removing trans fats, for example will certainly reduce cholestrol and thus stop the build up, within arteries, of fat, that blocks blood flow and thus increasing the risk of a heart problem.
        Therefore, to equate this with my argument on God commanding one to kill, is the same as the commandments, which are there to preserve one’s existence.

        The Old Testament clearly points out that there were peoples, of the time who posed a grave threat to the existence of the Israelites, the descendants of Adam and Eve, God’s human creation. Therefore, God commanded that this threat be removed and I truly do believe that it was the Jews, whom God commanded the Israelites to remove, for their own safety, not then, but in the future, when their descendants walked the earth. They failed and we now have the hell on earth we do today because of it.

        I certainly won’t condemn your belief that God gave no command nor created any commandments, but what I will state is that when the bible was written, whomever did was certainly on the ball when it came to who posed a threat to mankind, whether a deity or not.

      5. TTBH

        Instead of breaking down your reply point by point, first of all I will say that I cringe every time I read or hear someone asking, “where is the proof?” when deliberating over a topic like this. Let’s just say that my entire premise, the one reflecting what I’m inclined to believe, is that the power which makes manifested existence possible AT ALL never intended for its expressions (e.g.; us) to exist in a mortal state. That we ARE means that some force acting with its OWN brand of power imposed it upon Man and the whole of Creation

        Given that, I will ask you (and whoever else may be interested) to think about the ramifications of this possible reality. For example, IF this represents the unvarnished Truth (capital “T”), then what good would it do to kill all these jews back in the day, if their numbers would in all likliehood only get endlessly replenished anyway to suit THEIR commander for whom it would be no skin off his nose however many of his minions were killed?

        Sure, hypothetically you could keep slaughtering them in waves for century after century while trying to maintain a life of peace, until you die and hope that you’ve passed on this fighting spirit to your descendants, and their descendants, ad infinitum. This is all fine and well, but again, given my belief, this would only be treating a symptom when the TRUE life is dwelling in such a way that only our most magnificent imaginations can behold

        What gets us there?

        This is what faith is all about

  17. Brown. – you jump to conclusions bro…

    If anybody saw the movie ‘Munich ‘ – it was made plain enough that the Jews kill whomever they please at any time and place. .
    But not just them. Everybody does it. ..
    ‘Power to the People ‘ means ‘Let the World Be Ruled By Law”‘…
    As soon as we get that war will end. …
    Because war is maintained as the climate of oppression by the operatives of all intelligence services…
    Where countries conduct business they have reason to cooperate. That was the surmise with trump new Russian posture. Make more deals.
    Seems a stretch now to think djt kills the current Iran relationship with something in mind better for later.

    1. BD

      Thank you for pointing out my mistake. That’s what I get for not proofreading

      This is how it should read:

      The “God” you speak of is YHWH the Imposter, whose commands include to kill. The true loving Creator does not make commands. The 2nd paragraph is OK

    2. Bark –

      The “Climate Of Oppression” is getting worse…. in US and UK… Especially since 2008.

      Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben discuss how Serco companies work with the SES Deep State shadow government to implement 5G, and then manage the societal effects of their coming mass murder program. That’s why Serco runs FEMA camps, owns pathology companies, houses migrants, owns laundries, operates prisons, provides transport and rail, run hospitals and leisure centers, builds ships and space technology—to zap the populace with 5G like a mosquito zapper, then handle the clean up. This is important information that citizens around the world need to know about.
      (Published on May 17, 2018)


      SES = Senior Executive Service:

      These the are the “Obama Holdouts” that still control the executive branch of government a full year after Trump has come to office. Obama expanded the existing program of Deep State managers and appointed over 7,000 of the 8,156 bosses who are called the Senior Executive Service. Some call it the “Shadow Government”, and it is true that this federal cabal works in the shadows.

      Some call it Obama’s Army.

      The Senior Executive Service (SES) in 2016 had 8,156 members who were appointees. Obama appointed over 7,000 of them to these key positions. Most of these appointees do not arise from inside the respective agencies through a merit system and often are not qualified.

      It is little known that there are many more SES appointees than any other type of political appointment. The “key bosses” in the federal government’s SES program are not only unqualified cronies, but they are also paid more than the highest government rate of G-15. They can even get bonuses, and each agency can set the salary of each SES member, which has no top range.


      1. Wig –

        Thanks. You usually have good videos. BUT – – – This is the BEST VIDEO I have watched lately!!

        Rothschild Inc owns Trump.

    3. BD

      The way I see it, the “NWO” has been building for centuries, and when it reaches its pinnacle that will mark the beginning of its end, not the other way around.

      Given a perspective of the cyclic periods of time known as the yugas, my understanding is that this planet has been steadily moving out of the Kali for CENTURIES, since around the time of the Battle of Hastings and the defeat of the Khazarians by the ancient Rus.

      Certain mystics say that a momentous turning point occurred in 2012 whereby it will no longer be possible for the oppression to continue along its not-so-merry way because 12/12/12 signifies a beginning of the end of “time” in terms of its “passing”* which ENABLES a state of oppressiveness. I’ve written on this before, as you know, and will continue to elaborate down the road

      *The ancients say that “time” is an entity, a gift of the Divine in whose embrace singular beings of consciousness (i.e.; you and me, etc.) are conscious of their (our) PRESENCE, and that “passages of time” reflect that the true state of this entity have been messed with, thus altering what we would refer to as “timelessness”.

      1. Aye; we’ve been living in a NWO for at least 2 centuries now. 1984 and “The Matrix” are not dystopian speculations — they’re euphemisms 😉


    Jez, who they referred to as being a White Supremacist, was sentenced to 12 months in prison on the 14th of May. But I’m led to believe that 6months of the sentence will be on licence (whatever that means).

Comments are closed.