13 thoughts to “Crucifixion: What Was It Like?”

  1. Stories about Jesus and his death is not believed by me or my Ashkenazim tribe. Some of us read Talmudic Scripts or attend Synagogue services, most Ashkenazim are not concerned with religious teachings. History of the Ashkenazic Judaic Cult is buried in mystery. Consensus says they have Turkic/Mongolian/Asiatic roots. No tribe has more influence in the last thousand years than the Ashkenazim, their presence is on every mind. They bleed when cut because they are human. Any attempt to maim the Ashkenazim will bring about a pestilence to the Planet. It is best for humanity that we all try to behave and accept other ways of life.

  2. The more I study Christianity, the more I have come to realize that, like its hag mother Judaism, Christianity is a sick, twisted death cult that dwells on the vileness and morbidity of the body ostensibly to provide more “glory to the soul.”

    What is the Eucharist if not the very embodiment of cannibalism? Just to make it all the more grisly, the church maintains the concept of “transubstantiation.” Could it be more humerus? Has anyone noticed the glee shining on certain Christians’ faces when they tell you you’re going to burn in hell because you don’t believe like their Talmudvision teacher tells you?

    What was crucifixion like? Get real! Come on now, who hasn’t tried twisting their mind around this particular torture. But hold! There are many others to envision, most every bit as gruesome. How about having hot lead poured down your throat because of your espousing heretical views? Christians did that you know.

    Thanks to Jews, the sickness of their death cult religions have permeated our cultures until we find almost our soul entertainment in the Jews’ hideous minds bleeding their special brand of horror. We see and hear it in Church on Sunday. We see it on TV, we see it in the movies, in books and magazines. It is everywhere, with it grisly rotting hand of flesh reaching out from the Jews’ open, graveyard sewer to claw at our throats. Will mankind purge itself of this sick, nihilistic morbidity before it is too late?

    1. @ Arch Stanton

      Transubstantiation is all about “cannibalism”, is it? So the words cited in a comment below from the Gospel of St John in which Jesus says “you must eat my flesh and drink my blood” are, in your opinion, the founder of Christianity’s attempt to popularize cannibalism?

      (See Sardonicus’s quote to Freya below, containing the words: “I am the bread of life”, which is about the doctrine of transubstantiation which you conflate with cannibalism.)

      What are your credentials, sir? Who are you exactly? What gives you the right to abuse the hospitality of this excellent neo-Chrisitian website by pouring your vomit and spittle all over Jesus Christ? Can’t you do this on your own site? Are you not aware that most of your comments are longwinded and off-topic rants that no one here has time to read from one end to the other because they are so damn long?

      Can’t you make a short and crisp on-topic comment occasionally so that we can rest easy in the comforting belief that you are not actually suffering from incipient Alzheimers?

      My view of you is extremely negative, Mr Stanton. I don’t like you or respect you one little bit. You lack modesty and decency , dear sir. You are bigheaded, a swaggering bully, a braggart. I see you essentially as an intellectually insecure narcisssist. A timewaster par excellence. You knock Christianity as a substitute for masturbation — in exactly the same way Sigmund Freud did, another well-known compulsive wanker.

      By all means continue to abuse the hospitality if this site if Admin is willing to put up with your longwinded, masturbatory rants. But I do feel sorry for you.

  3. Saul/Paul did not corrupt Christianity for saying: “I am crucified with Christ. Nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me” (that’s an erroneous statement by LD in the thread ‘Behold, The Hour Cometh’) – The Holy Spirit should live in everyone who calls himself a ‘Christian’, a follower of Jesus Christ.

    WHAT IS SALVATION? An easy question to answer – but not so easy to live by at all…
    What would be the solution to all our troubles? SPEAKING THE TRUTH would make THE DIFFERENCE – and could change everything virtually over night. What keeps us enslaved to the SATANIC TYRANNY OF LIES around us? It’s the fact that too many people are afraid to know the truth, and to speak the truth for fear of negative consequences.

    ‘SALVATION’ in the sense Jesus taught about was ‘OBEDIENCE TO GOD’S LAWS’, to follow in his footsteps, to follow his example… That’s not easy at all, isn’t it?

    The rabbi Saul (who changed his name to Paul) falsified Jesus’ teaching about ‘SALVATION’.
    Salvation in the individual & common sense cannot possibly be brought about by blaming scapegoats… The scapegoat doctrine is Jewish doctrine… Jews always blame scapegoats… They always blame their own crimes on their victims. It’s what they call “religion“.

    Christians can’t possibly “be saved“, “gain eternal life in God“ by Jesus having been murdered. That’s absurd, isn’t it? It’s Paul’s erroneous rabbinical teaching – and as absurd as rabbinical teaching usually is. Paul hoped to convince the people that the temple offerings were superfluous, not necessary any longer. But he fell into a trap… THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS CHRIST WAS MURDER! There is nothing good about murder. You can’t glorify murder – it will most certainly backfire. … (just read Arch Stanton’s post – such an erroneous non-sense comes from ‘Pauline theology’!)

    Jesus taught about self-responsibility, and NOT ABOUT “HUMAN SACRIFICE TO PLEASE THE GOD/S“, not about scapegoats. That’s what the scribes and pharisees did, and what THE TEMPLE SERVICE was all about (and what the Talmudic lunatics want to resume after rebuilding the Temple in Jerusalem), what the temple priests profited from; their income. That’s what the Talmudists, the Satanists do. They offer human sacrifices to their God/s (Satan – Lucifer – Molech – Baal or whatever the name). Their hidden criminal rituals, organized terror attacks and wars are their HUMAN SACRIFICE RITUALS to their imagined ‘gods’. They consider themselves gods. They are self-worshippers. Insane psychopaths.

    Jesus (very logically) taught that ‘YOU WILL REAP WHAT YOU SOW’. He taught a lot of things. He was a spiritual teacher, the MESSIAH & SAVIOR in that sense. God’s spirit lived in him – and he promised GOD’S HOLY SPIRIT to his followers too. So that they would be enabled to follow his example… lose their weakness and overcome their fear/s…

    1. @ Freya

      Saul/Paul did not corrupt Christianity for saying: “I am crucified with Christ. Nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me” (that’s an erroneous statement by LD in the thread ‘Behold, The Hour Cometh’) – The Holy Spirit should live in everyone who calls himself a ‘Christian’, a follower of Jesus Christ.

      BLAH . . . BLAH . . . BLAH . . . BLAH . . . BLAH . . .

      Jesus (very logically) taught that ‘YOU WILL REAP WHAT YOU SOW’ . . .

      No, Lasha Darkmoon has NOT made an “erroneous statement” about St Paul just because YOU say she has, you arrogant bitch! Your inflated opinion of yourself as someone gifted with superior genius is truly laughable!

      Remember this, lady: you were originally booted off this site for shouting and screaming at Admin like a hysterical banshee as if YOU OWNED THE SITE! You accused Franklin Ryckaert FALSELY of being a Jew. Yes, we all know your lame face-saving excuse for that ad hominem attack on Ryckaert who is ten times smarter than you and whose reputation you tried to damage in your nasty spite and malice. You didn’t actually SAY Ryckaert was a Jew, you claim, you just ASKED HIM POLITELY if he was a Jew. 🙂

      Same thing, lady! “Oh, I didn’t call Mr X a pedophile, I just asked him politely if he was a pedophile.” Ha ha, big joke! Your dishonesty, dear German lady, is only equalled by your insolent stupidity.

      You were the ignorant German lady, remember, who insisted that Stalin was also a Jew when he was no such thing! (He was a Georgian). And you called four other famous men “Jewish” when only ONE of them was a proven Jew, Ilya Ehrenberg. You are basically arrogant and stupid and need someone to keep reminding you of your intellectual mediocrity.

      As for your foolish comment, “Jesus (very logically) taught that ‘YOU WILL REAP WHAT YOU SOW’”, it shows again your pig-ignorant stupidity because it implies that Jesus knew better than St Paul that “you will reap what you sow.” I have news for you, you ignorant booby, St Paul believed exactly the same thing! It was St Paul who said, “God is not mocked. For whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”

      https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians+6%3A7&version=KJV

      I back Lasha Darkmoon 100% in her defense of St Paul. St Paul was a genuine convert to Christianity and is not the cartoon villain Jew you foolishly imagine him to be in your heated imagination. St Paul accepted crucifixion for Christ’s sake and insisted, like St Peter, that he be nailed to the cross with his head in the downward position as a mark of respect for Jesus. All the disciples were Jews without exception, including Judas Iscariot, the only Jewish villain in this tragic saga.

      Think carefully before you open your big mouth in future! 🙂

      Sardonicus,
      Zen Monastery,
      Osaka, Japan

      1. Transubstantiation: “According to the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, the change of substance or essence by which the bread and wine offered in the sacrifice of the sacrament of the Eucharist during the Mass, become, in reality, the body and blood of Jesus Christ.”

        Cannibalism is the act of one individual of a species consuming all or part of another individual of the same species as food.

        The Paschal lamb was eaten as food after the sacrifice. If Jesus was the Paschal lamb for the Passover sacrifice, how else can one define the bread and wine of the Eucharist, literally becoming the flesh and blood of Jesus upon ingestion, as being anything other than cannibalism? Jesus would have been appalled.

        Jesus’ actions at the last supper were a parody, a cynical mockery of the Temple’s Passover feast where the Paschal lamb was slaughtered and then consumed in remission for Israel’s (the people) sins. The words he used make a mockery of the priest’s consuming the sacrifice. However, his mocking parody had a very serious intent in replacing the old sacrificial law with his new “Testament” of final remission of sin.

        Traditional Jewish blessing:

        “Blessed be Thou, the Eternal, our God, the King of the world, who hast sanctified us by Thy commands, and hast ordained that we should eat the Passover.”

        Jesus’ blessing:

        “Take, eat; this is my body. And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it, for this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” (during passover)

        With these words, Jesus obviously usurped the old god YHVH with his “fulfillment” of sacrificial law. Yet Christians still parody YHVH’s demand for bloody sacrificial ritual when observing the Eucharist. Why? The question is how many times must Christians endure this sickening, overtly Jewish, ritual of consuming the blood and body of a sacrifice before one’s sins are finally washed away? Why do Christians continue observing a sacrificial act on a regular basis as did first century Jewish priests?

        Jesus plainly stated his act was to be the final sacrifice for the remission of Jewish sin, why then do non-Jew Christians believe they must observe this watered down version of the Jew’s murderous, bloody ritual when even Israeli authorities proscribe the act?

        The Paschal Lamb

        At the very threshold of the Mosaic dispensation stands the sacrifice of the Paschal Lamb connected with the redemption of Israel, and which in many respects must be regarded as typical, or rather anticipatory, of all the others. But there was one sacrifice which, even under the Old Testament, required no renewal. It was when God had entered into covenant relationship with Israel, and Israel became the ‘people of God.’ Then Moses sprinkled ‘the blood of the covenant’ on the altar and on the people (Exo 24). On the ground of this covenant-sacrifice all others rested (Psa 50:5). These were, then, either sacrifices of communion with God, or else intended to restore that communion when it had been disturbed or dimmed through sin and trespass: sacrifices in communion, or for communion with God. To the former class belong the burnt- and the peace-offerings; to the latter, the sin- and the trespass-offerings. But, as without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin, every service and every worshipper had, so to speak, to be purified by blood, and the mediatorial agency of the priesthood called in to bring near unto God, and to convey the assurance of acceptance.

        Read that again, “But, as without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin, every service and every worshipper had, so to speak, to be purified by blood, and the mediatorial agency of the priesthood called in to bring near unto God, and to convey the assurance of acceptance.”

        Are not Christian priests now claiming the same mediatorial agency as those Jewish priests of old when they perform the Eucharist? If Christians followed the words of Jesus instead of those of the execrable Jew, Saul/Paul, if they were more Jesus than Jew, they would not observe Jesus’ sacrifice as religious tradition.

        “Vomit and spittle all over Jesus Christ?” What a laugh! Other website commenters have accused me of being Christian and slavishly worshiping Jesus because I once wrote of my love and admiration for both Jesus and Hitler for their attempts to undermine the Jews’ iron-fisted economic control. As far as these anti-Christisans are concerned, I’m a card carrying, bible thumping Christian who worships Jesus. Why? Because they are too busy and too goddamned important to actually read what I have written, a fact to which they often admit. If one doesn’t have a “luminous” name like Paris Hilton, Arthur Koestler, or any other Jewish recognized “authority” on all matters, they refuse to even look at any evidence contrary to their established views. Isn’t that exactly the problem one encounters when trying to tell others about the Jews Hallowedhoax? But for most, even scholarly authorship will not overcome the bias of that lie.

        No one listens and no one reads without the overwhelming veil of Jewish lies covering their minds. Thus, no one understands what Jesus and the Bible were really about because they have been steeped in Saul/Paul’s self-serving lies about Jesus and his very real mission to undermine the Temple’s sacrificial law.

        When I wrote my book, I knew I would incur the wrath of all three Jewish based religions. This is understandable as I reveal numerous ugly details behind Old Testament stories, like the fact Abram and his “lord” were both criminal extortionists, while Jacob was a weak, fem-boy thief whose mother was still dressing him into early adulthood.

        What surprised me was the unexpected wrath received from atheist and anti-Christians as well. Apparently, neither side can tolerate any deviation from their beloved scholar’s versions of this story. (Sufis have some interesting comments about such scholars) Both sides are so immersed in their own, versions (visions?) they are no longer capable of entertaining any alternative narration outside their own carefully, preconstructed views on the subject. It’s the old story of the sage’s attempt to fill the already full cup of the initiate.

        As for shorter posts, soundbites will not be found reading Darkmoon. One might try watching television, where volumes of information are summed up for the viewer in a few words. But then, how much information does one get from a soundbite?

  4. Jesus Christ did not teach “Salvation through his dying on the cross” rabbi Saul/Paul did…
    He did not teach “you must eat my flesh and drink my blood” in remembrance of me, someone else did. For Christians Jesus Christ has the highest authority nobody else. No ex-rabbi Saul/Paul nor any Talmudic “Pope” on his golden throne. An abomination. Jesus would say to him: “I don’t know you….”

    1. @ Freya

      Once a fool, always a fool. And you will always be an opinionated fool. No religion remains static. It evolves and changes as new interpretations of its core teachings develop in the course of time. Out of acorns, oaks. Out of small seeds, giant trees. Buddhism evolved after the death of Buddha. Same with Vedanta. Same with Islam. New disciples add bricks to the original edifice. Religions grow and change, as all things grow and change in time.

      You have not the slightest idea of the meaning of the words “You must eat my flesh and drink my blood.” This is the developed doctrine of transubstantiation which is taken literally by the Catholics and symbolically by the Protestants (Lutherans) to signify spiritual unity. It has nothing to do with cannibalism.

      What you call an “abomination” is simply a sacrament. You are not a true Christian. Even Christ would have rejected your childish nonsense. I’m surprised Admin lets you post your hysterical ravings on this neo-Christian website which you bring into disrepute. You are an opinionated, unimaginative, totally unoriginal, brainwashed, mediocre-minded conspiracy theorist who gets all your ideas second hand from Jew-controlled conspiracy theory websites. Their object is to undermine Christianity by sneering at a genuine spiritual genius like St Paul who proved his sincerity by accepting crucifixion for Christ’s sake. And you have suckered by these same sly Jews into accepting their dangerous crap — a Useful Idiot for the Jews.

      Would YOU accept crucifixion for Christ’s sake, German lady? I doubt it! Until you can prove your virtue, like St Paul, by accepting a heroic death on a martyr’s cross, you need to shut your ugly mouth and cultivate some humility.

      1. @ Sardonicus

        Why do you call this crazy coot a “German lady”? Why not a “German Jewish lady”. She practices the well-known Jewish trick of calling everyone she doesn’t like a “Jew” to deflect attention from her own possible Jewishness. As you say quite correctly, she is a “Useful Idiot for the Jews”.

        I’m not saying she IS a Jew without any proof, but I think she talks like a Jew and has many of the characteristics of a Jewish troll.

        I’ll go further in saying that I think you, Sardonicus, are possibly being a bit too naive in assuming that this “Freya” entity is a female. IMO, this entity has too much testosterone for a female. I wouldn’t be surprised if “Freya” turned out to be a man. Maybe a man with a beard! A nice rabbinical beard! 🙂

    2. @ Freya

      Jesus Christ did not teach “Salvation through his dying on the cross” rabbi Saul/Paul did…. He did not teach “you must eat my flesh and drink my blood” in remembrance of me, someone else did. For Christians Jesus Christ has the highest authority nobody else. No ex-rabbi Saul/Paul nor any Talmudic “Pope” on his golden throne. An abomination. Jesus would say to him: “I don’t know you….”

      So you think the evil Talmudic ex-rabbi rabbi Saul/ Paul said these words, right? And Jesus Christ, you tell us confidently, would have regarded these horrible words — “You must eat my flesh and drink my blood” — with severe disapproval and regard them as an “abomination”.

      FREYA: Jesus would say to him (St Paul): “I don’t know you….”

      I have news for you, dear lady, St Paul did not say these words. The words you regard as an “abomination” that would have been rejected as evil nonsense by Jesus Christ were actually said by Christ himself!!!!!!!!! ….. What do you think of that, eh? 🙂

      Doesn’t that prove your stupid ignorance conclusively?

      Here, read Jesus’s own words from the Gospel of St John:

      6. 35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

      41 The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, I am the bread which came down from heaven.

      42 And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?

      43 Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves.

      48 I am that bread of life.

      49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.

      50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.

      51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

      53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

      54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

      55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. 56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

      https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+6&version=AKJV

      I don’t think a person as ignorant and stupid as you should be allowed to spread your deliberate lies and disinfo on this site. If you can get mixed up between Jesus Christ and St Paul and falsify your quotations, , then you are unfit to post your comments on this site.

      @ Admin

      Please give this brain-damaged woman the boot. Ban her at once! We wouldn’t mind her posting on this site if she actually told the truth and didn’t fabricate and doctor her quotations. She also has the knack of calling anyone a “Jew” whom she doesn’t like. She called FIVE famous leaders “Jews” recently (including Stalin) and only ONE of the five turned out to be real Jews. The rest were non-Jews.

  5. You find lies “amusing” –
    we know you do. Nothing worthwhile.

    “A man with a nice rabbinical beard”
    AND speaking the truth.

    That would really be something.
    You are “very long bearded” indeed.

    We know already what you gang stalkers have to offer.
    Trying a vendetta for a third time?

    If someone has been “booted off“
    it should have been you stalkers…

    We know that “the bearded Ones”
    like to crucify Jesus and his followers

    In every way and everywhere possible
    As horrible as they are, vain and evil

    Turning the whole world into hell on earth.
    They’ll find themselves in a hell of their own making

    Nobody to blame but themselves….
    What a surprise that will be…

    Nothing to laugh about!
    No more….

    1. None of Hitlers followers were fanatical Jew hating women. Even Eva Braun had a fondness for many a pretty Jewess. But only crazy men are capable of extreme Jew Hatred. That is why I would bet my Talmud that Freya is an over 90 year old former male death camp guard.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *