Everything is a Hoax

Paul Craig Roberts
Via The Truthseeker

An Israeli expert on terrorism and covert assassination procedures explains that the alleged Russian GRU attack on the Skripals with a supposedly deadly nerve agent is a completely obvious hoax to anyone who knows anything at all. 

The official story, says the expert, is “stupidity on stupidity.”

I agree with him.

The question is: Why did the British government think that they could get away with such an obvious hoax? The answer is that the people in Western countries don’t know anything about anything. They live in a world in which their reality is a product of the propaganda fed to them by “news organizations” and Hollywood movies. They only receive controlled explanations. Therefore, they know nothing about how anything really functions. Read the account by the Israeli expert to understand the vast difference between the British government’s hoax and the reality of how an assassination is conducted.

The Israeli expert got me to wondering why the British government thought anyone would fall for such a transparently false story. Having just read David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth’s new book, 9/11 Unmasked, and David Ray Griffin’s 2017 book, Bush and Cheney: How They Runed America and the World, the answer became obvious. The British government had watched the idiot Western populations fall for the official 9/11 conspiracy story in which a few Saudi Arabians, who could not fly airplanes and without the support of any intelligence agency, caused the entire security apparatus ot the United States to fail utterly, and no one was held responsible for the total failure. The British government concluded that anyone who could possibly believe such an obviously false story would believe anything.

I remember coming to that conclusion years ago before the official conspiracy theory in the 9/11 Commission Report was blown to pieces by thousands of scientists, structural engineers, high-rise architects, military and civilian pilots, first responders on the scene, and a large number of former high government officials both in the US and abroad.

At first I did not connect the zionist neoconservatives’ plot, outlined in their public writings (for example, Norman Podhorttz in Commentary) to destroy 7 Middle Eastern countries in five years (also described by General Wesley Clark) and their statement that they needed a “new Pearl Harbor” to implement their plan, with the attack on the World Trade Center. But as I watched the twin towers blow up floor by floor it was completely obvious that these were not builldings falling down due to asymetrical structural damage and limited, low temperature office fires that probably did not even warm the massive steel structure to the point of being warm to the touch. When you watch the videos you see buildings blowing up. It is as clear as day. You see each floor blow. You see steel beams and other debris fly out the sides as projectiles. It is amazing that any human is so completely stupid as to think what he is seeing with his own eyes are buildings falling down from structural damage. But it required many years before half of the American people realized that the official account was pure bullshit.

Today polls indicate that a majority of people do not believe the official 9/11 propaganda any more than they believe the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the alleged Gulf of Tonkin attack, or the report from Admiral McCain (father of John) erasing Israel’s responsibility for the destruction of the USS Liberty and its crew during LBJ’s administration, or that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, or Iran had nukes, or the many lies about Syria, Libya’s Gaddafi, or Somalia, or Yemen, or the “Russian invasion of Georgia,” the “Russian invasion of Ukraine.” But at each time the idiot population, no matter how many times they had learned that the governments lied to them initially believed the next lie, thereby permitting the lie to become fact. Thus, the idiot Western populations created their own world of controlled explanations.

Only a deranged person could believe anything any Western government says. But the Western world has a huge number of deranged people. There are plenty of them to validate the next official lie. The ignorant fools make it possible for Western governments to continue their policy of lies that are driving the world to extinction in a war with Russia and China.

Perhaps I am being too hard on the insouciant Western populations. Ron Unz is no moron. Yet he accepted the transparently false 9/11 story until he started to pay attention. Once he paid attention, he realized it was false.

Like myself, Ron Unz has noticed that the 9/11 Truth movement has succeeded in totally discrediting the official 9/11 story. But the unanswered question remains: Who did it?

Unz says it was Israel, not Bush & Cheney. This is also the position of Christopher Bollyn. It seems certain that Israel was involved. We have the fact of the Mossad agents caught celebrating as they filmed the collalpse of the WTC towers. Obviously, they knew in advance and were set up ready to film. Later they were shown on Israeli TV where they stated that they had been sent to film the destruction of the buildings.

We also have the fact of the large profits made by someone that the US government continues to protect on shorting the stock of the airlines, the planes of which were allegely hijacked.

In other words, the 9/11 attack was known in advance, as was the destruction of WTC building 7 as evidenced by the BBC reporter standing in front of the still standing building accouncing its destruction about a half hour before it occurred.

Unz and Bollyn’s case against Israel is powerful. I agree with Unz that George W. Bush was not part of the plot. If he had been, he would have been on the scene directing America’s heroic response to the first, and only, terrorist attack on America. lnstead, Bush was moved out of the way, and kept out of the way, while Cheney handled the situation.

I understand what Unz is doing by focusing attention on the main beneficiary of the hoax 9/11 story. However Cheney and his corporation, Halliburton, also benefitted. Halliburton received large municifient US government contracts for services in Afghanistan and Iraq. Cheney, as David Ray Griffen proves, achieved his aim of elevating the executive branch above the US Constitution and statutory US law.

Moreover, it was impossible for Mossad to pull off such an attack without high level support in the US government. Only a US official could have ordered the numerous simulations of the attack underway in order to confuse the air traffic controllers and the US Air Force.

The Israeli government could not have ordered the destruction of the crime scene, opposed by the New York fire marshall as a felony. This required US government authority. The steel beams, which showed all sorts of distortions that could only have been caused by nano-thermite were quickly sent to Asia for reprocessing. The intense fires and molten rubble in the buildings’ remains six weeks after their collapse never received an official explanation. To this day, no one has explained how low-temperature, smothered office fires that burned for one hour or less melted or weakened massive steel beams and produced molten steel six weeks afterward.

Unz is correct that Israel made out like a bandit. Israel as a result of 9/11 got rid of half of the constraints on its expansion. Only Syria and Iran remain, and the Trump regime is pushing hard for Israel, even against Russia, a government that at its will can completely destroy the United States and Israel, something that much of the world wishes would happen.

Unz is correct that right now the totally evil and corrupt US and Israeli governments have the entire world on the path to extinction. However, he omits American responsibility, that of the evil Dick Cheney, the Zionist neconservatives who are Israel’s Fifth Column in America, and the utter insouciance of the American people who do not show enough intelligence or awareness to warrant their survival.


46 thoughts to “Everything is a Hoax”

  1. PCR often uses the word “insouciance” describing Americans. I, on the other hand, believe they are overwhelmed with information/propaganda to the point of ignoring it as a defense mechanism for personal survival. Most Americans I know perceieve something amiss, but simply don’t join the conversation because it invites more controversy to their already troubling lives. As was so emphatically impressed upon us during the recent Kavenaugh controversy – people believe what they WANT to believe, evidence be damned. 😣

    1. You are absolutely right Gil. One globalist…and his name escapes me…said that when the average American gets to the point where he doesn’t know “what” to believe, then we have won. We are so bombarded with info and disinformation and misinformation from multiple sources that we don’t know what to believe. Roberts is correct that a large segment of the population has an immense normalcy bias and is therefore “insouciant”, but I think the majority of us out there know something is terribly wrong and the “system” is irretrievably broken. I think we are witnessing the death throes of an incredibly evil empire, I just don’t want it to take us all down with it.

      1. Thanks, Carn –

        Like many others… Casey waved at us as he got the final trip to Bethesda for a check-up. I doubt he knew he was waving good-bye….. smiling at us. 🙂

    1. This is another brick in the wall of why the West is doomed – the wrong cannot be righted with a wrong diagnosis of what is wrong. Go for it, John, you are on the right path, brother. But I shall not shed a tear when you reach the end of your rope.

  2. “Everything Is A Hoax” includes….

    The constitution was a “HOAX”… a ruse. AND it has even MORE effect today than it ever did when Franklin brokered away America to the Crown.

    The US was ALWAYS a municipal corporation under the US Constitution. But, even before that, the land was owned by corporations/companies, established as the Virginia Company and Plymouth Company…. etc, licensed by the Crown.

    **The Constitution of 1789 contained ALL of the elements demanded by the Crown in the Treaties in 1783!!

    Contract between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America February 25, 1783:

    And as it is necessary to the good order of His Majesty’s finances, and also useful to the operations of the finances of the United States, to assign periods for payment of the six millions Iivres in question, and to regulate the conditions and terms of reimbursement, which should be made at His Majesty’s royal treasury at Paris after the manner of what has been stipulated for the preceding advances by (*)former contract of the 16th July, 1782
    [ (*) http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fr-1782.asp ]

    We, Charles Gravier, Count de Vergennes, etc., Counselor of the King in his Councils, Commander of his Orders, Chief of the Royal Council of Finances, Counselor of State, etc., Minister and Secretary of State and of his Commands and Finances, invested with full powers by His Majesty, given to us for the purpose of these presents- –

    And we, Benjamin Franklin, Minister and Plenipotentiary of the United States of North America, likewise invested with powers by the Congress of said States for the same purpose of these presents, after having compared and duly communicated to each other our respective powers, have agreed upon the following articles:


    The Paris Peace Treaty of September 30, 1783:


    Good Example of ‘loser’ dictating and achieving the results of the terms:

    —Treaty Article 4:
    “It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.”

    —US Const – Art I, sec 10:
    “No state shall…make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…”

    Once the Constitution was signed, Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg. 99. Webster’s 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.)

    There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since the Constitution was accepted in 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)

    There have not been any Judges in America since the Constitution was accepted in 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)

    The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24) 20. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)

    You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)

    America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)

    The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)

    The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)

    We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)

    1. Pat

      OK, points well taken, but explain why a state of complete totaltarianism hasn’t ALREADY been long since exacted? Where else was left for the (((British))) Empire to subjugate? Why go through all the bother for the last 230 or so years?

      Could it be that it was because they never got all the guns? And what would have successfully accomplished that if not the British army actually WINNING the war, George III financing notwithstanding?

      1. B-Hawk –

        What you claim is “bother”…. are known as profit mechanisms… wars…. to bankers. 🙂

    2. “………………” Crickets? Tell me what I’m missing. Where’s Gilbert Huntly weighing in on this? Or whoever else may care to venture a guess 🤔

      1. B-Hawk –

        “Tell me what I’m missing.”

        OK… Just read the very short Treaties and Agreements & see the Players… at the links I posted… and you will be missing… NOTHING!! 🙂


        ARTICLE 1
        It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit:

        1. 28 February 1778 750,000
        2. 19 May do 750,000
        3. 3 August do 750,000
        4. 1 November do 750,000
        Total 3,000,000
        5. 10 June 1779 250,000
        6. 16 September do 250,000
        7. 4 October do 250,000
        8. 21 December do 250,000
        Total 1,000,000
        9. 29 February 1780 750,000
        10. 23 May do 750,000
        11. 21 June do 750,000
        12. 5 October do 750,000
        13. 27 November do 1,000,000
        Total 4,000,000
        14. 15 February 1781 750,000
        15. 15 May do 750,000
        16. 15 August do 750,000
        17. 1 August do 1,000,000
        18. 15 November do 750,000
        Total 4,000,000
        19. 10 April 1782 1,500,000
        20. 1 July do 1,500,000
        21. 5 of tbe same month 3,000,000
        Total 6,000,000
        Amounting in the whole to eighteen milIions, viz 18, 000, 000

        By which receipts the said Minister has promised, in the name of Congress and in behalf of the thirteen United States, to cause to be paid and reimbursed to the royal treasury of His Majesty, on the 1st of January, 1788, at the house of his Grand Banker at Paris, the said sum of eighteen millions, money of France, with interest at five per cent per annum.

      2. Brownhawk –

        I just got back on here. (Pleased you enquired after me!)
        Anyhow, like you, I don’t believe it has been so meticulously planned as that for which Pat provides citings. Although I cannot argue with his facts, I think his conclusions are not so ironclad. There is too much historic evidence and writings for it to be anything other than “a work in progress”, arriving at imprecise conclusions. Courts still entertain arguments of judicial theory, e.g. “practice of law”. People still study law, and argue in legislative forums to define code and statute. We are an evolutionary society, and “judges” are necessary not only to “interpret”, but to babysit to ensure that radical deviations from the norm do not upset the general welfare. For this reason, The Constitution is faaar more than a plan of conquest.

      3. IThanks for that reply, Gil. I was hoping someone besides Pat and I would speak on this. Glad you came through.

        As you gathered from my post, that Pat would say the “bother” has everything to do with trillionaires making even more of the filthy lucre (((they))) create out of thin air makes no sense on the face of it.

        Cornwallis is alleged to have said to someone at Yorktown that no matter the ceasing of hostilities, and whatever may be gleaned from that, the fact will remain that the umbilical cord to London will not be severed, but the OTHER fact that remains is that the guns could not be confiscated.

        Like you said, “imprecise conclusions”

      4. @ Brownhawk

        The usurping by the founding whores (James Madison, the primary whore twice in 1787 and 1816, Alexander “the jew” Hamilton, the secondary whore, Ben Franklin, and the lot), in 1787 of the Articles of Confederation by the Constitution, approved in 1789, would not have been ratified if not for the Bill of Rights, especially the Second Amendment.

        The usurpation by the Constitution was all about installing a jewish central bank, The Bank of the United States, which occurred in 1792. The first attempt at a jewish central bank, The Bank of the Americas, in 1783 failed because the 13 sovereign States were prosperous and had no need to borrow money. The powerless central government under the Articles of Confederation could not borrow money without the permission of the 13 States, each of which determined their own money. The Constitution fixed that for the jewish bankers.

        PCR came close to calling out the jewish bankers by bringing up Israel, but close only counts in horseshoes and nuclear bombs.

      5. Ung

        I appreciate your weighing in on this, but doesn’t all this reflect machinations which were only deemed necessary BECAUSE of the defeat of the British Army? It seems to me that the bankers who ALREADY had a stranglehold on all the world’s money wouldn’t have seen the need for overseeing the drafting of an American Constitution, since the mindset of the colonists would had to have been to accept the ignominy of defeat , and to act accordingly in being completely subjugated to the whims of George III and the British Crown…..WITHOUT their guns!

        1. Uncle Sam, a government that does nothing but lies us into one war after another and has no qualms about destroying countries and killing very large numbers of civilians and even starts-up, bankrolls, arms, Islamic Jihadists, with a Deep State that has killed many many American truth tellers, a government which has killed many foreign leaders for all kinds of reasons, same government is absolutely appalled by Khashoggi’s disappearance and possible murder. Same government said NOTHING when Gary Webb was murdered, same government wasn’t the least bit concerned about the murder of Gary Webb, same government was not appalled at all, not in the least — and Webb was an American citizen and he was murdered here in the United States. Alot of other American journalists have been murdered by the American Deep State and Uncle Sam never says a word about their deaths at the hands of the Deep State and Uncle Sam never gets morally-righteously appalled and horrified and deeply opposed that many American journalists who have murdered by the American Deep State. So there must be some kind of Geo-Political reasons why Uncle Sam is acting righteous about Khashoggi’s disappearance. I use the word “acting” because the righteousness of it all is a put-on, a real act Uncle Sam is putting on. Also, Hillary Clinton had a United States ambassador murdered , the U.S. ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens. No outrage about that from all the “morally upstanding” United States senators and no outrage about that from any of America’s newspapers and TV news shows.

          From the movie “The Godfather” , @ 0:28 :


      6. @ Brownhawk

        Your assumption about the jewish bankers already having a stranglehold on all the world’s money at that time is not correct. The War of Independence was a result of the British jewish bankers not having control of the money in the 13 colonies.

      7. Ung

        Why would you presume I didn’t know that? If you read the post in proper context it would register that when saying (((they))) already had a stranglehold, it conveyed everywhere BUT the colonies.

      8. Ung

        Had you read my post in proper context you would see it conveyed that the stranglehold on the world’s money had been established everywhere BUT the colonies

        Now allow me to re-word your reply in reflecting my position:

        The War of Independence resulted in the British Jewish bankers attaining control of the money in the colonies, as intended. This got them their cake. However, it did NOT result in a victory on the battlefield*. Had it done so, the guns would have been relinquished, and there would have been no need for the drafting of an American Constitution. They had their cake, but they haven’t eaten it, and the bastards are STILL hungry, and very vengeful.

        Prove me wrong. Pat, your thoughts?

        *Washington did not put the fix in by “throwing” the war. This is as absurd as saying Hitler was a WILLING Zionist tool. Big difference between “willing tool” and “DUPED tool”. Instead, I suggest that in characterizing Washington’s having been duped, look no farther than his aide-de-camp during the war, and Secretary of the Treasury AFTER it – Alexander Hamilton. As a Rothschild agent it was HE whose advice to his commander-in-chief was followed, which put the final nail in the coffin keeping the umbilical cord to the Crown from being cut

  3. Not just US, Inc., and Rothschild’s cutout Israel, of course. In fact, no mention of banksters and those above (below?) them, hands hidden still and still deadly. Into the veil shielding Those With No Name let us now weave, thus integrate corporations, multi-national [aka global] and merciless, no loyalties to nation, to a people — or, apparently, to humanity itself. After the takedown, after the drugging of Lady Liberty, rendering her senseless, defenseless, let us then blame her for insouciance. Great answer, PCR. Blame the victim of a gang bang.

  4. Hoax.
    The U.S. And the Zionist entity have grounded all IT’S F35 fleet.
    Claiming faulty fuel lines.
    In an attempt at stopping the whole F35 multi billion $ charade from nose diving, should one be downed over Syria.
    Here’s how this COULD play out,
    The Zionist entity try to take out Syrias new acquired s300 system with Their US supplied F35s, Russia tracks said F35s using the s400 systems it has in Syria, a “Missile” takes down a F35, and Russia attributes the downing to the Syrian s300s or even more embarrassing for the US , the older s200.
    The industrial military complex just can’t risk this, so the Zionist entity F35 have been grounded.

  5. 2 flags at the courthouse. one red, white and blue on the roof.. one red, white, blue and yellow inside the courtroom…
    how can this be – one country with two flags…
    some things only come in ones – mother, god, country…
    from what i hear, there are no lawyers in the usa. instead we have ‘attorneys at law’.
    they’re primary function is to act as collection agents for the corporate court…
    if you carry a copy of the constitution into a courtroom, the judge will throw you in jail, so i hear..
    if that’s true, it means the constitution does mean something… no?
    the constitution is mostly about the rules of engagement between the states and between the states and the people…
    article 1, section 10 – basically, the state can only deal in ‘lawful money’ (gold and silver backed – silver certificates)..
    it doesn’t say you can’t have private banks with their own currencies..
    but it does mean you don’t have to pay any taxes, because there is no “lawful money”…
    then you have the bill of rights, which doesn’t sound to me like anything any king would want for his ‘subjects’, i mean of this really is a kingdom..
    it may be that the USA is a CORP, the king and the pope own it all, according to them, at least…
    but the constitution does sound good in some good governance and human rights aspects…
    i mean, i don’t think there’s anything like it in saudi arabia…

  6. Barking mentions Saudi Arabia.
    Is Jamal Kkashoggs disappearance a hoax?.
    ( yes, a pathetic attempt to sound , On topic )
    The UK/US governments, having made such a huge hue and cry about Russia attacking its traitors who have Based themselves in other countries, skripal ECT, (this despite the UK/US doing the same in syria) have painted themselves into a corner, alsauds nonchalant response is only making it worse for the hypocritical west.

  7. Hoax: Transitive verb (probably contraction of hocus (as in “hocus-pocus” – BH) to trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous

    Noun: 1) An act intended to trick or dupe: IMPOSTURE
    2) Something accepted or established as fraud or fabrication

    Official versions of 9/11, JFK’S murder, the Kavanaugh hearings, Germany being solely responsible for starting both world wars, the holocaust, etc, etc, ad nauseum are preposterous to anyone with half a brain that chooses to use it. Both verb and noun definitions apply here in sufficiently demonstrating preposterousness. But what about other considerations in defining “hoax”?

    I am convinced that Jesus’ “true life of abundance” is what was being revealed to me during my epiphanous experience in the wilderness of the NH White Mts. 40 years ago, an ephemeral event that has formed the unfolding of my spiritual perception ever since. The conclusion I’ve come to, about which I’ve written so much metaphysical-related stuff on these threads over the years, what I call a “NLE” (Near Life Experience), is exactly that, and that a reality ending with what we know as “death” is a reality we experience in ways that DON’T reflect my epiphany

    Even though it’s in the OT, instead of dismissing it outright, there is something instructive in the books of Ecclesiastes, for example, which serves as a good example of what does NOT reflect a life of Jesus’ “true abundance”. At first, the writer perceives that “all is vanity, and vexation of spirit” in describing the many travails characterizing this worldly experience. It all seems so futile to him in his contemplation of life’s meaning and purpose. By the end of his attempt to understand the “why” of these ways of existence, he concludes by saying in effect “well, it must be the way God wants it, otherwise it wouldn’t BE this way…” Really?

    But what if this is simply a rationalization of the “way things are” which doesn’t question WHY they are what they are? What if instead this is a reflection of an impostor only CLAIMING to be the God of the TRUE intent for how the TRUE God wanted his Creation to BE?

    True Divinity does not perpetrate hoaxes. This world as materially constituted is a hoax IN AND OF ITSELF – the doing of the impostor known as “YHWH”.

    1. @ Brownhawk

      If you drop a “hoax rock” on your “hoax foot,” explain to me how the pain is a hoax. 🙂

      Being a woodsman in the past as I was, you should have noticed that everything in natural is balanced and fits together quite nicely. The only thing that doesn’t fit in with balanced nature is mankind. If mankind were to totally disappear tomorrow, the rest of nature would go on as if we had never been here. Mankind is not necessary for natural balance, so there must be a reason why this is so. Jesus told us why.

      1. Ung

        You don’t see what I see in reflecting the full import of what Jesus was conveying. We are interpreting things differently, and you don’t have the “patent” on that conveyance.

        Do you recall my many posts* over the years alluding to HOW I see? I f you do, then you would understand that in my view there is a transcendence within the “balance of nature” in which its material composite is seen as the illusion it really is.

        *I’m tired of re-hashing all the content of those posts, so I guess y’all are gonna have to wait for my book…….if I ever finish it, that is (:>}

    2. BH, metaphysical speaking, find the Catch-22.. (not a HOAX)
      Metaphysical Society: Can Krsna consciousness be compared to the ultimate consciousness of Christ?

      Srila Prabhupada: Yes. There is no difference between consciousness of Christ and that of Krsna, provided one follows Christ’s orders. Christ spoke as the son of God, and Krsna is speaking as God, so there is no difference in their teachings. Whether the father speaks it or the son speaks it, the truth is the same.

      1. hp

        I’m well aware if the catch-22 application, as you should know. We have differences in our understanding of the metaphysics involved, is all.

        Did you ever wonder, why the “22” in catch-22? Considerations of MY understanding ties it in with such things as the Hopi prophecies, which correlate with those of Jesus Christ, as opposed to those who’ve hijacked what he was all about, and who’ve fashioned a false presentation of what “messiah”, or ” savior” really portends in suiting their own purposes

      2. HP/B-Hawk –

        The Russian jew Joseph Heller wrote the book, Catch-22. He was the son of jews, Lena and Isaac Donald Heller, who were from Russia.

        When you use very ambiguous jew metaphors and ideology and terms, such as catch-22… you give them power over your thoughts….. and the interpretations are too numerous to be exact. They HIJACK your meanings that way.

        I prefer to write the exact situation. I might write that I have a right to do anything they can’t stop me from doing. I might write that I have to have collateral to borrow something of value. I would never use the ambiguous term, catch-22.

        BTW – why 22?

      3. Pat
        I’m sure I speak for hp when I say we’re both big boys who can for the most part navigate the treacherous waters of “Jew terminology”. But sometimes what we’re talkin about is more complicated than what any cognitive dissonance would imply

        For example, we need to do a better job on this site in making distinctions between ” Jew”, with its pejorative application, and the Hebraic, and also as it may involve Sanskrit in getting on top of “jew-termed” wordings

        As for the #22, refer to my post on the antichrist to get an idea on what that’s all about, and which goes beyond Jew deception such as what we see in the extant Christian Bibles

  8. The question is: Why did the British government think that they could get away with such an obvious hoax? The answer is that the people in Western countries don’t know anything about anything.

    Not sure if the situation is that bright. Perhaps the British government is just as stupid as the people in Western countries are. It seems to me that the British and American “elites” are set for recycling of a type we have not seen before in the West – an odd job assigned to an odd president by some odd powers.

    The good news for you, my Aryan brothers and sisters, is that you don’t have to worry too much about “Rule 84 Section 5 of the New Code” anymore:


    1. “– an odd job assigned to an odd president by some odd powers.”
      That’s an interesting enough comment, innit..

  9. Khasnoggi.
    Recent timeline
    Trump threatens ” severe punishment ” against the Saudis.
    Saudis transfer $100 million into US back account.
    Trump changes line to, ” rogue killers ” and suggests we all should apply ” innocent until proven guilty ”
    Reports suggest the Turks have audio recordings which they won’t make public as this would prove they had multiple bugs and spy equipment planted in the embassy, and that the Turks are also wanting their share of the Alsaud blood money.
    The recordings reveal khashoggi was beaten, and drugged then dismembered in the consulate Generals side office.
    Fat Mike pompeo, a US crime cartel enforcer, spent today using the carrot and stick routine on the Turks.
    This story just keeps giving shocking (to the plebs) headlines, why Darkmoon is not covering it, I cannot fathom.

Comments are closed.