Freedom’s enemies finally kill Faurisson

By JOHN KAMINSKI

A false version of history now controls the world

The first time I remember encountering Robert Faurisson was seeing that photo of his bloodied face after he’d been attacked in 1989 by a group of gangsters called “the Sons of Jewish memory”. The Jews had wanted to kill Robert Faurisson for a long time, before they finally succeeded last weekend.

Translation: “Attack on Professor Robert Faurisson at Vichy by three young Jews,
“the Sons of Jewish Memory”, on 16 September 1989.” 

The last time I saw Faurisson was on this spontaneous video made mere hours before his death. Vincent Reynouard’s quick camera work captured the phenomenon that has dogged the scrupulous French classics professor — as well as the entire Holocaust Revisionist movement — for the last 40 years.

Study the video. It will be the last you’ll see of the old professor, but it won’t be the last you’ll see of the Jewish technique used to counter ironclad evidence of the Jewish lies about World War II.

VIDEO  :  8.23 mins

After all, that’s why all those old women have been put in jail in Germany for trying to tell the world what Faurisson and his confederates have been advocating for the better part of a half century. This is what you should expect when trying to organize a meeting to discuss easy-to-prove lies about World War II.

Jews can’t allow the truth about World War II to be told, because if it was, the whole world would turn on them with actions much worse than what the black Communist government of South Africa is doing to the remaining white farmers it has not yet murdered. The rest of the world was still mired in a Jewish-created Depression in 1940 while Germany had become unbelievably prosperous under Hitler’s leadership.

So, Faurisson’s last event was the fiasco at Shepperton, his old hometown, which clearly demonstrated the power of the Jews in getting businesses to follow orders. What put him squarely in the middle of this Jewish target was a statement he first made in 1979.

“Show me a photo or a drawing of the homicidal gas chamber?”

Continue reading HERE

8 thoughts to “Freedom’s enemies finally kill Faurisson”

  1. Thanks, Lasha! John K is very good. Accurate.

    I found Faurisson’s revelations to be very telling about Russia, then, and now… even”TODAY”, as told at 2:17 of the video:

    “As for the ‘so-called’ gas chambers, that millions of tourists still visit TODAY…. this is a vast fabrication of SOVIET PROPAGANDA.”

    Faurisson Sows Panic in his Hometown

    https://youtu.be/pUQhcxeJc8A?t=137

    1. Thies Christophersen had been in charge of an agricultural research enterprise in the Auschwitz region in 1944. He visited the Birkenau camp several times to requisition personnel there and never noticed the horrors usually described. On the witness stand he repeated point by point what he had written about the camp, starting in 1973 with a 19-page report (Kritik, Nr. 23, pp. 14-32). The Austrian-born Canadian Maria Van Herwaarden was interned at Birkenau starting in 1942. She saw nothing, either close up or from a distance, that resembled mass murder, although she confirmed that many of the inmates had died of typhus. The Zündel Trials (1985 and 1988) by ROBERT FAURISSON
      In 1946 Burg attended the Nuremberg trials at times when matters involving Jews were being raised. During one of these attendances he met Ilya Ehrenburg and a Jewish publisher who had been in Auschwitz for several years. Burg asked the publisher whether he had seen any gassing institutions for human beings and he said no. Ehrenburg, who had been the head of propaganda for the Red Army during the war, told Burg he had been to Auschwitz but he too had not seen anything of gassings. Burg had discussed this information with Zündel in general. (25-6857, 6858) Burg could not understand the emphasis on gassings. (26-6904) [Joseph G. Burg] The ‘False News’ Trial of Ernst Zündel — 1988
      Survivor Testimony
      Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of extermination at Auschwitz.
      An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. [16] She was interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced laborer. On the train journey to the camp, a Gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz. Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
      Auschwitz was no vacation resort, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus. She saw some take their own lives. But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings, or of any extermination program.
      A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing stories only later. [17]
      Inmates Released
      More than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to other camps, and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Soviet forces. In addition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentences were released, and returned to their home countries. [18] If Auschwitz had actually been a top secret extermination center, it is difficult to believe that the German authorities would have released inmates who “knew” what was happening there.
      One prominent Holocaust historian, Gerald Reitlinger, estimated that perhaps 700,000 Jews perished at Auschwitz. [3] French Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac estimated in 1993 that the number of those who perished there was about 800,000 – of whom 630,000 were Jewish. [4]
      Fritjof Meyer, a respected foreign policy analyst, author of several books, and managing editor of Germany’s foremost weekly news magazine, presented a still lower figure in 2002. Writing in the scholarly German journal Osteuropa, he estimated that altogether 500,000 or 510,000 persons — Jews and non-Jews — perished in Auschwitz. [5]

      It is known that the International Tracing Service (an arm of the Red Cross) has copies of all the registration particulars from Auschwitz. This probably includes the daily roll-call documents, which contain registration details and daily death totals. In any case, it has had in its possession enough information to (unofficially) provide the following approximate statistics regarding deaths (from all causes, including, old age) at Auschwitz (this was long before the Soviet records were released):

      Deaths at Auschwitz
      Year Red Cross Certificates
      1940/1941 19,500
      1942 48,500 37,195
      1943 37,000 28,727
      1944 30,000
      1945 500
      Total 135,500

  2. Is Darkmoon being hacked?

    I am having trouble posting a article about Auschwitz.

    ADMIN: Don’t panic! The site is not being “hacked”. Your comment ended up in Spam for some reason and has just been approved. (See above). This is just a routine computer glitch.

  3. Melvin :

    Do you think the synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh was a real shooting or some sort of jew false flag of some kind and no jews were actually killed or injured? Do you think false flags are a good strategy for your tribe? You like jew false flags, right? You jews gain alot of benefits from jew false flags, right?

    1. @Joe – I was thinking the same thing. They’ve done it more than once, before. It’s possible. As the saying goes, they “cried wolf once too often”.

    2. THEREALORIGINALJOE, I have been wondering the same thing myself ever since I first heard the ‘news’. Now of course on the most logical of levels I know it need not matter if this in fact DID, or did NOT happen – the end result is going to be the same either way, as we are already seeing. However, that being said, I admit I am not well-versed enough in this area to be able to justify certain things – such as the well-constructed plans put into place to pull off all of the events that took place afterwards, such as these memorial services that I have seen splashed across all area newspapers in my area (I am a couple hours away from Pittsburgh). This is where I have trouble conceiving of the fact there would have to be so many people involved on varying (compartmentalized?) levels in order to pull off something of this magnitude.
      Can it be ANY surprise whatsoever that the 97 year old matriarch of the 11 supposed-dead, as fate would have it, of a mere 11, would just so happen to be a Holohoax survivor? COME ON NOW!

  4. The Squirrel hill news story in to put Qanon front and center.
    ” welcome to the mainstream ” , ” we knew this would happen”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *