18 thoughts to “Germany Fights Back (9-minute video)”

  1. Interesting article: Hand grenades & Gang Violence Rattle Sweden’s Middle Classes by Alan Barry & Christina Anderson March 3 2018.

    “The influx of heavy weapons has caught Sweden’s criminal justice system unprepared.”
    “The border with Denmark is open, with insufficient personnel to search every vehicle entering the country.”

    1. RD –

      Back to Tommy – the con-artist in the video:

      THIS Tommy Robinson CON-GAME was planned last year by a jew lawyer! He wears numerous hats – Broadcaster, commentator, columnist, lawyer… fraudster.

      Ezra Levant Registered the SAVETOMMY.COM Domain Name More Than a Year Ago.

      Ezra the Jew IS at it once again – STILL!!

      You can see from this whois page, the savetommy.com domain name was registered in May 2017, more than a year ago.


      See the Tweet from Katie Hopkins who first found fame on The Apprentice in 2006:

      More on Katie – another con-artist:

  2. It was inevitable. Successive arrogant governments and the media have ignored the people for so long that they now regard the people as the problem.

    It isn’t just Germany. All over Europe there is anger and revolution in the hearts of decent ordinary people who have been ignored for a lifetime.

    I think the day is coming when there will be mass expulsions. It would be best done voluntarily. If you offered a family of five £5,000 a head to go back to Africa they would snatch your hand off.

    1. @ John Kirby

      If you offered a family of five £5,000 a head to go back to Africa they would snatch your hand off.

      Hope you’re right, John. But I don’t think this would work except in exceptional cases. Why wouldn’t it work?

      (1) Because many of these migrants have MORE than £5,000 (as much as 10k) to smuggle them into the UK etc. (People like Soros could be subsidizing them). They’re not exactly on the breadline if they’ve got expensive smart phones.

      (2) Because there’s nothing to stop them taking the money and sneaking back into the country later.

      (3) Because most of them are getting generous welfare payments in the West, all housing and food paid, including for their numerous children, dole money that is far in excess of £5,000 a year. Some are living in posh 5-bedroom houses or luxury hotels. One migrant and his family (from Eritrea) was getting £50,000 per year in state benefits.

      1. I think many of our present leaders will be thrown out of office over the next few years

      2. @ Sardonicus

        Soros IS paying their way via his front companies/governments. Soros has unlimited funds since he is a front man for the jewish banking cartel.

        You are correct concerning the freebies. As long as the government is providing freebies, freebie seekers will not leave. The migrants are a problem only because the government condones and encourages them. The real problem is the government.

        On the plus side, it appears that Italy has started rejecting migrant loaded vessels and it looks like Merkel might be losing her position.

    2. John –
      You wrote:
      ” Successive arrogant governments and the media have ignored the people for so long that they now regard the people as the problem.”


      The people in the US have been officially declared ‘enemies’ since 1933, when FDR had congress pull in the Trading With The Enemy Act of 1917.

      “During time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that be may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as be may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.

      What just happened?

      At as far as commercial, monetary or business transactions were concerned, the people of the United States were no longer differentiated from any other enemy of the United States. We had lost that crucial distinction.

      Comparing Exhibit 17 with Exhibit 19, we can see that the phrase which excluded transactions executed wholly within the United States has been removed from the amended version of Section 5 (b) of the Act of March 9, 1933, Section 2, and replaced with “by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof’.

      All monetary transactions, whether domestic or international in scope, were now placed at the whim of the President of the United States through the authority given to him by the Trading with the Enemy Act.

      To summarize this critical point: On October the 6th of 1917, at the beginning of America’s involvement in World War 1, Congress passed a Trading with the Enemy Act empowering the government to take control over any and all commercial, monetary or business transactions conducted by enemies or allies of enemies within our continental borders. That act also defined the term “enemy” and excluded from that definition citizens of the United States.

      In Section 5 (b) of this act, we see that the President was given unlimited authority to control the commercial transactions of defined enemies, but we see that credits relating solely to transactions executed wholly within the United States were excluded from that controlling authority. As transactions wholly domestic in nature were excluded from authority, the government had no extraordinary control over the daily business conducted by the citizens of the United States, because we were certainly not enemies.

      Citizens of the United States were not enemies of their country in 1917, and the transactions conducted by citizens within this country were not considered to be enemy transactions. But in looking again at Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, (Exhibit 17), we can see that the phrase excluding wholly domestic transactions has been removed from the amended version and replaced with “by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof’.

      The people of the United States were now subject to the power of the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6,1917, as amended. For the purposes of all commercial, monetary, and, in effect, all business transactions. “We the People”, became the same as the enemy, and were treated no differently. There was no longer any distinction.


      1. Damn good explanation of it, Pat! I have experienced the effects of the arbitrary selection of EPA enforcement, btw. My company was fined for participation in a “super-fund” cleanup project allegedly caused by a battery manufacturer to whom I had sold ONE truckload of salvage batteries a couple of years prior. It cost me $100,000, plus attorney fees. I know for a fact that (((certain))) dealers were not cited.
        (It happened in Richmond, where my political views were not unknown…😶)
        I recall a friend speaking of the “Trading With the Enemy Act” in the context of deals involving government meddling, and your explanation helps clarify my confusion! (I didn’t ever consider myself an “enemy” of my government, particularly! 😶 )

    3. The German people in particular have been badly treated. Their level of immigrants-refugees-asylum-seekers has been the highest in Europe. Mrs Merkel seems to think that Germany still owes for WW2 and the “holocaust”.

      Jews never admit that during the 1919-1933 Wemar period jews controlled, looted and degraded Germany, turning Berlin into a sin bin, later celebrated by Isherwood, as in the film “Cabaret”. The German people hated it and the 1933 antisemitic laws reflected that.

      It is worth reading “The origins of WW2” by AJP Taylor, also Patrick Buchanan’s book “Churchill, Hitler and the unnecessary war”. They opened my eyes to the skullduggery that went from 1933 onwards when international Jewry declared economic war on Germany, as the country, under Hitler, was rebuilding, from ruin to renown, in the space of six years, a tremendous achievement.

      Regarding the holocaust. When you consider that there had been a six year worldwide Jewish economic war on Germany from 1933 onward, it is not surprising that when war started in 1939 Jews were regarded as enemy aliens. Many Jews had already fled Germany but many of the remaining Jews were interned, not massacred, but interned in forced labor camps.

      Auschwitz was a labor camp. There were no genocidal gassings there but there many deaths due to starvation and disease, due in turn to the destruction of German infrastructure by allied bombing. No mass graves have ever been found to tally with the 4 million Jews who are supposed to have been killed there. There is no evidence on contemporary aerial photographs of the trainloads of coke that would have been required to incinerate millions of bodies

      After the war 4.3 million Jews applied for compensation as “Holocaust Survivors”. The whole thing has been an extreme case of “Compensitis”. After 75 years Jewish organizations still demand special (favorable) treatment.

      Very few of the present German people were even alive during WW2.

      1. Off Topic a bit but this is typical :-

        The Israeli Ministerial Committee for Legislation on Sunday approved legislation that would sentence anyone who attempts to film the actions of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers in the occupied West Bank to as much as five years in prison.

      2. The Bolsheviks were mainly Jews. Over 300 of the 384 original Commissars were Jews. This was the regime that Hitler saw as the enemy:-

        “Nowhere on the planet, nowhere in history, was there a regime more vicious, more bloodthirsty, and at the same time more cunning and ingenious than the Bolshevik, the self-styled regime.

        No other regime on earth could compare with it either in the number of those it had done to death, in hardness, in the range of its ambitions, or in its thorough-going and unmitigated totalitarianism…”

        — Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago: 1918-1956 (New York: Harper Perennial, 1992), p.28.

  3. To paraphrase Mark Twain’s famous quotation about democracy and voting…. If protesting on the streets made any difference, the kikes wouldn’t let us do it.

    Is Tommy (Rubinstein) serious?

    He’s pushing the old Marxist “Left” versus “Right” dialectic: it’s rather pitiful and disingenuous at this late stage of White Genocide by the Kosher Nosetra if you want my genuine pro-German and pro-White opinion. 🙂

      1. thanks for reply
        every country has the right to preserve her culture, peoples and ethnicity
        if you donnot cite right persons’ voices against NWO… you will be falling into the trap of controlled opposition.

        This will mislead followers also…

  4. Dr. Greg Johnson comments:

    “Robinson is being promoted by Ezra Levant and his ilk as a leader to ensure a Jew-safe, Jew-controlled opposition in the UK. He’s a truly shady, dishonest character. I am not going to remain silent about him.”


    I am afraid he is up to something. One never can be too careful. I am also very weary of Pegida (not the supporters, but the organisers).

    And I am eyeing out if a similar move will be made in South Africa amongst the Boers, should they be able to manouvre themselves into a position to create their own Volkstaat (nation state). Usually there is a fronting person (window dresser who takes the lead and has established credibility) of the own kind but who secretly works for the other side. On the last moment these persons then pull the plug. It happened in Rhodesia (Ken Flower, mole for MI6 – see Wikipedia).

    The normal Tom, Dick and Harry does not have the insight and cunning of these conspirators. They will fall time and again into the same trap.

Comments are closed.