Holocaust Revisionist Alison Chabloz on trial for ‘offending’ Jews with satirical song

Jews may offend Christians as much as they want, but Christians are not allowed to offend Jews. Seems a bit unfair, doesn’t it? Why don’t they put Sarah Silverman on trial (pictured HERE) for offending 2.2 billion Christians?  

By Sebastian Murphy-Bates
for The Daily Mail

Alison Chabloz, 53, arrives at court holding flowers. She’s a brave lady and we wish her well. She has our full support. (LD)

— Anti-Semitic songwriter, 53, who ‘mocked Anne Frank’ tells court the Holocaust is ‘meaningless’ and insists she’s a ‘revisionist’ not a ‘denier’.
— Alison Chabloz, 53, labelled the Holocaust as the ‘Holohoax’ in one song.
— The blogger arrived at court with fans who supported her from the gallery.
—  She mocks prominent Jewish figures, including Elie Wiesel and Anne Frank.
—  Chabloz, from Derbyshire, faces five charges.

7 March 2018.  An anti-Semitic song writer told a court today that the holocaust is ‘meaningless’ and the Germans were unfairly blamed for the Second World War.

Alison Chabloz, 53, laughed as she was read lyrics to her songs mocked Jews being fashioned into lampshades, having their heads shrunk and being turned into bars of soap.

Some were performed live at the London Forum, while others were played for the camera, but all were uploaded to the internet.

In one number she mocks prominent Jewish figures including Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel and Anne and Otto Frank to the tune of a traditional Jewish song.

Chabloz was asked by prosecutor, Karen Robinson, whether she denied the holocaust.

‘Deny the holocaust? I am sorry I do not understand this term. Who can deny the holocaust? It is a term that is meaningless in itself.’

Ms Robinson said: ‘In your police interview you made a distinction between holocaust denial and revisionism.’

Chabloz said:

‘You can call it holocaust denial but I prefer holocaust revisionism. I think there should be an official scientific and forensic investigation. I doubt very much that a murder case would be brought to these courts without forensic investigation.

It is very unlikely to have been more than a million killed —  that is my understanding of having researched the information available. Certainly a million —  perhaps more —  but until there is an official forensics investigation…

It is impossible to assess that the gas chambers actually existed to kill human beings. Without evidence, it is impossible to affirm that the supposed murder took place. There is absolutely no doubt that those taken to concentration camps suffered great tragedy, taken away from family and home.

As the war years continued and got harder for everybody and we see the allied bombing of the German infrastructure —why would they not bomb the concentration camps? A disproportionate amount of blame was put on the Germans by the victors.

The victors got to write history. It was a war — everybody suffered.

I would say that the so-called holocaust has been used to sustain the criminal state of Israel — it is used as a foundation myth. By sending school children on trips to Auschwitz and inculcating them into believing in the gas chambers, the so-called holocaust is used as a weapon to prevent nationalistic feeling amongst European people. It’s about furthering the globalist agenda.

It is certainly a topic worthy of investigation and of intelligent debate and discussion.’

ALISON  arrived at court holding onto flowers
and was followed into court by some of her supporters

Much of the questioning revolved around historical rather than legal argument as Ms Robinson tried to pin down Chabloz on her anti-semitism.

In one of her songs Chabloz jokes that if six million Jews had been killed that would not have been a bad thing.

Ms Robinson questioned Chabloz on her police interview where she said, ‘My grandfather certainly didn’t fight for our towns and cities to be taken over by non-whites and non-Christians.’

Chabloz told her, ‘It’s my right to express those views.’

Ms Robinson said: ‘This is not an unqualified right — one cannot send material or matter on the internet which is grossly offensive.’

Chabloz retorted, ‘But it depends for whom doesn’t it, because there are plenty of parodies of Christian music that say Jesus was gay or that he must have been born by a donkey. It is concerning that where I live, my people I love, my race, that we will become an ethnic minority.’

Ms Robinson told her, ‘The views you have expressed are anti-Semitic and racist. You said of the white race, “It breaks my heart to see that disappearing.” That is nothing more than racism.’

At which point there was loud booing from the public gallery and Chabloz’s barrister, Adrian Davies, rose to speak:

‘Now the witness is being treated much as a heretic during the inquisition, she is entitled to any political view that she wishes,’ Mr Davies said. ‘The example of the well known case of the street preachers who preach in the street that homosexuality is wrong — they are perfectly entitled to express that view so long as they are not being grossly offensive.

It is not a crime in England to say that no Jews died at the hands of the Germans — it is a perfectly lawful position —it is therefore not relevant to interrogate the witness about her opinions.’

The Crown must prove that Chabloz has caused ‘gross’ offence, Mr Davies believes that the statute is poorly set out.

Chabloz says that her songs provoke a ‘range of reactions’ and although some are ‘close to the bone,’ it is no fault of hers if someone chooses to be offended.

She cited a recent music video on YouTube by the black rapper Xxxtencion where he is seen to lynch a white child and the disparity in public outrage.

Chabloz is represented by Adrian Davies, who defended infamous historian and holocaust denier David Irving in 2001 at the Court of Appeal following his failed libel case against Deborah Lipstadt.

Chabloz, of Moss Croft, Town Lane, Glossop, Derbyshire, denies five counts of sending obscene material by public communication networks at Westminster Magistrates’ Court.

The charges centre on whether embedding the hyperlink to the footage constitutes as sending, and if her songs were grossly offensive.

She was bailed ahead of final submissions on 14 May and a verdict will be given on 25 May.

Trials that proved the Holocaust

The Holocaust – or Shoah in Hebrew – refers to a Nazi-led genocide against Jews and other minorities during World War II.

Six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust in concentration camps, extermination camps, mass shootings and ghettos.

By the time the Soviets liberated Auschwitz concentration camp (pictured) in 1945, 1.1million people had been killed there.

Of those, 90 per cent were Jewish, with the remaining 10 per cent being Romany, Soviets and Poles.

When the war ended, General Dwight D Eisenhower (later to become 24th president of the United States) took steps against documenting the camps.

He feared any attempts to show what had happened would be dismissed as propaganda.

The same day, he visited a camp near Gotha and found what he said was ‘indisputable evidence of Nazi brutality and ruthless disregard of every shred of decency’.

He ordered pictures be taken of the victims in the camp and brought Germans from the surrounding villages to bury the dead.

The Nuremberg trials from 1945-1946 served to preserve the historical record of the Holocaust with the core documents that brought Nazi war criminals to justice.

Otto Adolf Eichmann, who oversaw deportation of Jews to ghettos and concentration camps was captured by the Israeli government and tried in 1961 after fleeing to Argentina.

In proving Eichmann’s personal guilty, the prosecution also hoped to provide a historical account of the holocaust. Eichmann was sentenced to death for war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.

The 1961 court room drama called Judgment at Nuremberg used newsreel footage from concentration camps that showed rows of naked corpses being bulldozed into pits.


DISCLAIMER. All articles published on this website reflect the views of their original authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of anyone associated with this website.

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

40 thoughts on “Holocaust Revisionist Alison Chabloz on trial for ‘offending’ Jews with satirical song

  1. Why would the Nazis transport Jews all the way to Auschwitz in Poland to kill them? Why use irritant cyanide gas (Zyklon) when people crowded into an airtight room with an unventilated heater will soon die painlessly from carbon monoxide poisoning?

    Why were there 4.3 million survivors claiming compensation from Germany? Why did the Red cross only give 272,000 as the total number of deaths in ALL the camps? The Red Cross had access to the camps. Wouldn’t they have known if Jews were being gassed?

    Why were there a hospital, a pharmacy, a theatre, an orchestra, a choir, a library and a swimming pool at Auschwitz, in a death camp? Why were there no signs on wartime aerial photographs of the trainloads of coke that would have been required to incinerate millions of bodies? Why weren’t thousands of tons of ashes and bones ever found?

    The photos of piles of bodies show emaciation typical of starvation and disease, something that would not have time to occur if people were being gassed on arrival. It was Typhus, dysentery and starvation that killed these people, because by 1944 allied bombing had destroyed the infrastructure of Germany.

    Thies Christophersen had been in charge of an agricultural research enterprise in the Auschwitz region in 1944. He visited the Birkenau camp several times to requisition personnel there and never noticed the horrors usually described.

    The Austrian-born Canadian Maria Van Herwaarden was interned at Birkenau starting in 1942. She saw nothing, either close up or from a distance, that resembled mass murder, although she confirmed that many of the inmates had died of typhus.


    1. Someone in my family was with Patton’s army at the “liberation” of Buchenwald. He was OSS, posing as a newspaper correspondent. In 1995, after his death, an Alabama newspaper published correspondence he’d written his wife (they were of a prominent planter family there) after the “liberation”, when he left Patton’s army to smuggle Werner von Braun out of Germany before the Soviets could get hold of him. In a long and beautifully-written letter, he described the horrors they had encountered as a result of the starvation caused by Allied bombings. NO MENTION OF “JEWS” is found therein. He, as a very literary correspondent, would surely have made note of any particular racial distinction of the inmates.

      1. And three of the leading politicians at the time did not mention nor gas chambers, nor holocoust. How come?

        Churchill, Eisenhower and De Gaulle wrote their War Time Memoirs, some 7000 pages in total published between 1949 and 1953 and not one word about gas chambers or holocoust!!

        How is that possible if it all were true!

    2. True justice is determined on substantial, overwhelming evidence, not on eyewitness hearsay. “Trials that proved the Holocaust?” Show us any evidence outside hearsay evidence. Show us the documents, show us the signed orders, show us any substantial evidence that support the Jew’s claims for a genocidal intent by Germans.

      Akira Kurosawa’s movie Rashomon, depicts the unreliability of eyewitness testimony when put on trial. Likewise the child’s game of “telephone” demonstrates how rumors begin and where they wind up.

      Outside eyewitness testimonies and photographs, there is no evidence for the Jew’s claims of German genocidal intent. Many of the photographs have been proven fraudulent by photographic experts who show how various shadows and object placements prove these photos were altered.

      Then there are those photographs only identified by captions. Photographs of bodies, shoes and eyeglasses are meaningless, until one puts a caption beneath describing them belonging to Jews, as there is NOTHING in the photograph itself that provides any evidence for the caption’s claims.

      Many of the dates, times, and locations of events have also been disproven by factual evidence. The Wanssee Conference is a classic example of historical misrepresentation. The Wansee conference was where the “final solution” known as the “Holocaust was ostensibly formulated. Yet nothing in the recorded minutes of that meeting provide any positive evidence for this claim.

      Jews claim the Germans used “code words” to avoid directly addressing the issue. Yet they fail to explain why high level German staff might use code words in one of their internal staff meetings. There is no evidence anywhere that Germans used such duplicity in their command structure, yet this type of duplicity is common among Jews making the claim. More to the point, German documents show Reinhard Heydrich, the supposed “architect of the final solution,” was not even in the town when this meeting occurred.

      Denier bud did four hours of video that addressed the physical evidence of the Jews claims. His experiments show Jewish claims do not fit physical evidence that runs fully contrary to their claims. Fred Leuchter also substantiated physical evidence that does not align with Jewish claims. German chemist Germar Rudolf further supported Leuchter’s original investigation.

      Proof for Jewish claims for a “Nazi Holocaust” simply do not exist, while evidence disproving their claims is overwhelming. Their lie cannot withstand the light of true, impartial investigation, which is why they suppress the evidence with draconian, legal measures.

      1. “Proof for Jewish claims for a “Nazi Holocaust” simply do not exist, while evidence disproving their claims is overwhelming.”

        And that’s why it’s illegal to even question Jewish claims in Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Switzerland. Russia, too, I seem to recall.

        RationalWiki has this little editorial “quip” in the entry on “List of countries where Holocaust denial is legal”
        valid, researched, and not at all racist opinions bullshit

        Note the lengthy list of nations where Holohoax denial is not a crime, yet. This is the Jewish way of saying “So what if a few hundred Holohoax denying goyim spend years in jail for disbelieving our lies. Look at all the countries where it doesn’t happen!”

    3. Why allow the lovely Jews dictate the terms of debate? A Goy is forced to “accept” or “deny” the event. I say “forget.” Innocent people are dying like flies all around us and we are in a position to help. We can to some degree control the present as well as guide the future. The past is gone. Nothing we can do now. If a Jew asks “Do you believe in the Holocaust? ” My advice…..lie. Play the game. Look him in the eye and (if youre good enough) force a tear or two. Reply, “Yes, it was terrible. God (Satan) bless you. I feel your pain.” Words are cheap. Tell them what they want to hear. In practice however noone can force you to visit a Holocaust museum or donate to private Jewish charaties. Sometimes, to beat the Jew you have to become the Jew. 🙂

      1. “In practice however noone can force you to visit a Holocaust museum or donate to private Jewish charaties.”

        True, but US taxpayer dollars can be and are allocated to build and/or maintain some of those holocaust museums, and private Jewish charities in the US get billions in donations, income – for them – that is often US tax exempt. US schools can and do require students to attend holocaust “education” at taxpayer expense, and let’s not forget about the Kosher tax paid on an astonishing number and variety of foods and goods: http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/KosherFoodTax.pdf (Thanks again for that link, Pat)

        N.B. Wikipedia editors claim the Kosher tax is an “antisemitic canard”, and then note that (paraphrasing) “anyway, it’s just a tiny amount on almost each and every can, bottle, package, box, carton, etc…”

        I don’t recall voting for any of this, or any politician who did.

      2. Telling lies goes against the grain in some people, some would just not lie.
        Truth or lies, it’s what you can live with.
        Myself its taken years to realise that Freemasons control what we think.
        Just look how many Jews are Freemasons.
        Dave Owen.

      3. Rabbi Philip Lazowksi and his son, ADL National Commissioner Alan Lazowski, testifying in support of CT bill requiring Holocaust and Genocide education in high school curriculum. We must tell the stories of Holocaust survivors like Rabbi Lazowski for generations to come.

        “requiring Holocaust and Genocide education in high school curriculum”
        “for generations to come.”

        But “It’s OK to be white” is “hate speech.”

        “It feels quite intended to intimidate, intended to instill fear,” said Loretta Capeheart, associate vice president of diversity, equity and inclusion at Clark College.


      4. Great spot on the twitter bigoted censorship CARN, and great work by whomever, this is the sort of undeniable righteous propaganda the anti Zionist movement should be pushing.

    4. The Jewish verson of the holocaust story is based on hearsay, on the statements of Jews who were claiming compensation from Germany. In time the Holocaust became a weapon used by Jews to silence all citicism or resistance to Jewish Power. Just the accusation of anti-semitism is a poison pill for your career or business. Most people are still scared of even discussing Jewish Power.

      The USSR bolstered the holocaust story with their propaganda because of their hatred of the Nazis. It is too much of a coincidence that the gassing of Jews only occured in those camps which came into the territory later conquered by the USSR.

      We have been lied to, contolled and manipulated for 75 years.

    5. The RationalWiki website “is a wiki whose stated aims are to critique and challenge pseudoscience and the anti-science movement, explore authoritarianism and fundamentalism- …”

      RationalWiki has an extensive section on “Holocaust Denial” – a sort of training document / cheat sheet for hasbara merchants who want to do battle with holohoax deniers and revisionists. For those who believe it’s good to “know your enemy”, it’s quite educational.

      Here’s a sample of the kind of sophistry that appears to be considered an effective argument at RationalWiki – from a section titled “Questions to ask a Holocaust denier”:

      Did the Nazis exterminate Romani, gays, and political opponents?
      – If so, the gas chambers and crematories were functional, despite Holocaust deniers’ “proof” that they were useless.
      – If not, these groups of people were also part of the conspiracy.

    1. It IS a Stalin style show trial, from the early years when Jewish Bolsheviks were judge, jury and executioner; the verdict was known before the charges were read; and the only unknown was whether or not the accused would break down in a teary confession of their “crimes”.

      The UK is breaking new ground / old ground in communist methods. Within the last week three conservatives have been “detained” for thought crimes, potential thought crimes. Two of them, Brittany Pettibone and Martin Sellner were held in detention for a crime they didn’t commit, but authorities claimed they would have. Here’s a link to that story. Whoops, looks like ADL monitored JewTube won’t allow “anonymous” viewing!

      Lauren Southern, another conservative who has annoyed the politically correct authorities with a documentary about the plight of white farmers in South Africa (Farmlands), was held under sweeping powers intended to be used against terrorists, but pressed into service against a 22 year old Canadian woman whose crime was a social experiment in which she responded to lefty propaganda that Jesus was gay with a leaflet campaign stating that Allah was a god for LGBT people. Silly, perhaps, but not exactly terrorism. This video isn’t restricted, yet. The meat of the video is in minutes 6:30 -12.30.

      And let’s not forget that simply viewing “far right propaganda” – as defined by the ADL / SPLC and others – in the UK can get the viewer a 15 year term in the slammer.

      1. ” silly perhaps ” no f#####g stupid, Zionism will never be defeated so long as anti Zionists rub other anti Zionists up the wrong way while making fruitless points,
        The Zionists greatest strength is not their unity, its anti Zionist disunity .

      2. OK, I’ll go with “f#####g stupid”, but it still isn’t terrorism. I agree that such ill considered action(s) cause anti-Zionist disunity, and that is a BIG problem.

  2. Keep it up Jews! Let your chutzpatic arrogance bloom fully so the goyim can smell the stink of its carrion flower presence. Keep frothing at the mouth and acting insane in the most obvious manners, like you own the world.

    Show us your hypocrisy! Take out your bullhorns, get in our face and shout, “Fuck you goyim! We own you and your leaders and they know it!”

    Sooner or later the goyim herds will begin noticing your pathological lying and realize you are psychopathic, mass murdering scum that has floated to the top of the planet.

    Keep it up bubis and it will be the day of the rope for you and yours. Unlike the other lies you have fabricated as “history,” this time it really will be genocide.

    1. The day of the rope reminds me of Leo Frank. One day in the foreseeable future we might see many more Leo Franks swinging. I don’t claim to be a prophet. Anyone with more than 2-3 braincells can see this scenario being rolled out some years from now.

  3. Good legal defence costs, Alison has a PayPal link on her WordPress account, I am sure one of you computer eggheads could provide a link. Even I am willing to donate a little, and i am skint. Every little helps.

  4. I certainly hope this trial ends in a dismissal with prejudice for frivolous prosecution. I think it’s much more likely that Alison Chabloz will be effectively silenced, and forbidden to perform anything that could even vaguely offend the ever-so-tender sensibilities of the most degenerate, repulsive and porn addicted Jew (Harvey Weinstein, for instance). A crackdown on “thought crimes” – holocaust denial, lack of enthusiasm for globalism, “climate denial”, “antisemitic canards”, etc. – is in progress with ADL / SPLC / Google / Facebook and others leading the way in identifying, purging and eventually punishing “online hate”.

    Given the recent detention of several conservatives for “thought crimes”, one can only speculate when such “crimes” may result in a lengthy stay at an asylum for the criminally insane, or a trip to a re-education gulag. But some scientists are working to make that unnecessary. Turns out that a quick toot of oxytocin+ can turn the most unrepentant white nationalist into a multiculti-loving proponent of the deep state’s “more immigrants, please” agenda.

    Nina Marsh, Dirk Scheele, Justin S. Feinstein, Holger Gerhardt, Sabrina Strang, Wolfgang Maier and René Hurlemann released a study last year where they found that

    the combination of oxytocin and peer-derived altruistic norms reduces outgroup rejection even in the most selfish and xenophobic individuals, and thereby would be expected to increase the ease by which people adapt to rapidly changing social ecosystems.

    I saved the best part for last! More from Nina Marsh et al:

    In a series of experiments settled in the context of the current refugee crisis, we tested the propensity of 183 Caucasian participants to make donations to people in need, half of whom were refugees (outgroup) and half of whom were natives (ingroup). Participants scoring low on xenophobic attitudes exhibited an altruistic preference for the outgroup, which further increased after nasal delivery of the neuropeptide oxytocin. In contrast, participants with higher levels of xenophobia generally failed to exhibit enhanced altruism toward the outgroup. This tendency was only countered by pairing oxytocin with peer-derived altruistic norms, resulting in a 74% increase in refugee-directed donations. Collectively, these findings reveal the underlying sociobiological conditions associated with outgroup-directed altruism by showing that charitable social cues co-occurring with enhanced activity of the oxytocin system reduce the effects of xenophobia by facilitating prosocial behavior toward refugees. Source

    Will future “thought crime” perpetrators be given an oxytocin inhaler to go along with the asylum / gulag treatment? Will an oxytocin inhaler and a workbook or computer based training be sufficient to get white people to love their replacement, and give their houses and fortunes to white hating sub-Saharan immigrants? It looks like we’re about to find out.

    1. Not a mention of this trial on the BBC or other media.

      When is the verdict expected? and can I ask that it be announced here on Darkmoon.

      Good Luck Alison Chabloz. We all admire your honesty and courage.

  5. In 1917, just before the Bolshevik revolution, Our Lady of Fatima revealed that “Russia will spread her errors throughout the world, provoking wars, persecution of the Church…and many will be martyred” if people did not stop offending God so grievously. So John Kirby above is correct in saying that this is like a Stalinist show trial, since the ideological descendants of the Russian communists now rule the western world. It will only get worse as their power continually increases. The Blessed Virgin asked that people pray the rosary every day to overcome this diabolical power. No mere human means can do it, since we are up against the powers of darkness. I sometimes wonder if Our Lady of Fatima actually said “The Jews will spread their errors throughout the world beginning in Russia….” and that the Catholic Church authorities cravenly changed the words so as not to offend their greatest enemy and the greatest enemy of mankind, organized Jewry.

  6. The questions her lawyer dares not ask:
    – Who is a Semite? and
    – How can one be promoting hate against a group of languages?

  7. With events like this the Jews are causing anti-semitism. How can they not see it? How can they be so blinkered? It is as though they are not in contact with real life. Free speech is being punished here, and ordinary people can see how dangerous that is.

    Jewish Power is all powerful in the USA and Europe, but events like this are undermining it, courtesy of the Jews themselves.

    To quote Arch stanton (Above): “Keep it up Jews”, you won’t be in control for much longer.

    1. John –

      “With events like this the Jews are causing anti-semitism. How can they not see it?”

      They DO see it. THEY invented it.!! They have to have it.

      They profit from anti-semitism…. $$$!!!

      That’s why THEY invented the word..!! 🙂

  8. In a case similar to Alison’s, a YouTube “shitposter” who goes by the name CountDankula was ” found guilty of being “Grossly Offensive” under the Communications Act of 2003″

    Here’s the video that got him in trouble: (may be restricted) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYslEzHbpus&bpctr=1521582479

    Here’s the guy that objected to the joke.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *