By DAVID SIMS
BRITISH PATRIOT, SINGER-SONGWRITER, AND HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST,
VICTIM OF A SMEAR CAMPAIGN ORGANIZED BY JEWS.
“I have received numerous death threats . . . ignored by the police.”
Why does the law regard speech that offends the Jews as a crime? It doesn’t regard speech that offends white gentiles as criminal. What makes the Jews so “special”? Why is there a legal double standard?
Well, there is an old saying: “If you wish to know who rules over you, first find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”
If Stalin is your ruler and you criticize him, you will soon be picked up by the secret police for torture, execution, or internal exile to a gulag in Siberia.
If the Jews are your rulers and you give them offense, you will soon be treated as Alison Chabloz is being treated.
Before being charged as presently, Alison Chabloz was being harassed by Jews for her opinions on history as expressed by her music. They sent malicious notes through the mail to scare her away from her art and to discourage her from using her freedom of speech. Ms. Chabloz didn’t know who was sending her these creepy notes, so she asked the police to investigate.
The Jews, using their corrupt influence, turned the investigation on its head, resulting in Ms. Chabloz being criminally charged for composing and for singing her song (((Survivors))), which draws attention to three Jews who have been proved to have lied about their experiences with the so-called Holocaust in Germany during the 1940s.
Americans may find it hard to believe, but in many parts of Europe the truth is not a defense against allegations of hate speech. If you truthfully assert that a Jew is lying about the Holocaust, then you, not the Jew, will be charged with hate speech and put on trial — and yes, found guilty.
Your guilt is decided before they even put you on trial. It is a foregone conclusion. The trial is a farce, and everyone knows it.
It doesn’t matter that you can prove that what you said was true.
The truth is no longer a defense. The operative question now is: are you causing offense to a particular Jew? Or to Jews in general? If Jews are complaining about you, that alone decides your guilt. You must not offend the Jew. That is anathema. That is the Eleventh Commandment.
Criticizing Israel or organized Jewry in general is seen as anti-Semitism. It may lead to a second Holocaust. It is the Ultimate Crime. In comparison, pedophilia and cannibalism pale into insignificance.
I’ll say it again in different words: the judges are corrupted, the trials are rigged, there is no justice whatsoever, and the outcome is a foregone conclusion. You will be put in prison for telling the truth.
Indeed, the Jews can commit crimes first, as they did in Alison Chabloz’s case, but it will not matter. Their crimes will be papered over, swept under the rug, and the only charges that will be made by the police will be against you, apparently for failing to REVERE the Jews sufficiently.
It’s a losing game.
As I said above: