The Plot Against Christ

Sourced from The Truthseeker


Is Christianity a “slave religion” designed to turn Christians into wimps and sissies? 

“It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle,
than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.”
(Matthew: 19:24)

Christianity, we are frequently told, is a Jewish plot. It was cunningly designed to emasculate Christians and turn them into wimps. It does this by encouraging Christians to love their enemies and turn the other cheek. So goes a popular conspiracy theory popularized by the late White Nationalist leader Dr William Pierce. Root out Christianity and return to your pagan roots, Dr Pierce urges. Christianity is a “slave religion” and will turn you into a pathetic pacifist incapable of standing up to your enemies.

Here are some significant extracts from Pierce’s history of the White Race, Who We Are. These ideas have had a persuasive effect on many who were looking for pretexts to dump Christianity and find salvation elsewhere:

—  “For more than two centuries it [Christianity] festered in the sewers and catacombs of Rome, along with dozens of other alien religious sects from the Levant; its first adherents were Rome’s slaves, a cosmopolitan lot from all the lands conquered by the Romans. It was a religion designed to appeal to slaves: blessed are the poor, the meek, the wretched, the despised, it told them, for you shall inherit the earth from the strong, the brave, the proud, and the mighty; there will be pie in the sky for all believers, and the rest will suffer eternal torment. It appealed directly to a sense of envy and resentment of the weak against the strong.”

—  “A Frank of the seventh or eighth century would tremble in superstitious awe before some fragment of bone or vial of dried blood which the Church had declared a sacred relic with miracle-working powers—but if you smote him on the cheek you would have a fight on your hands, not another cheek turned. As for the brotherhood of man and equality in the eyes of the Lord, the Germans had no time for such nonsense; when confronted with non-Whites, they instinctively reached for the nearest lethal weapon.”

—  “Slave Morality. But Christian ethics—the slave morality preached in the Roman catacombs—was like a time bomb ticking away in Europe—a Trojan horse brought inside the fortress, waiting for its season. That season came, and the damage was done. Today Christianity is one of the most active forces working from within to destroy the White race.”

—  “The inversion of natural values inherent in the exalting of the botched, the unclean, and the poor in spirit in the Sermon on the Mount—the injunction to “resist not evil”—all are prescriptions for racial suicide. Indeed, had a fiendishly clever enemy set out to concoct a set of doctrines intended to lead the White race to its destruction, he could hardly have done better.”

—  Extracts from William Pierce’s “Who We Are”. (Emphasis added)

You get the idea. Christianity is the great weakener. If you want to be strong, dump Christianity.

Dr Pierce’s ideas are well-expressed and obviously sincere, but other thinkers before him had nurtured the same beliefs.  Dr Pierce was clearly influenced by Nietzsche who had raved against Christianity in his Antichrist. Note this. There is not a single historical fact in Nietzsche’s rhetoric: just fine words and histrionic posturing, befitting a man who sounded more like a mad prophet than a wise philosopher.

Let’s hear what Nietzsche has to say. It is even more extreme, verging on hysteria, than anything Dr Pierce had to say. We are used to this sort of thing now, but in 1895, when these words first burst into print, they must have struck most readers as the ravings of a lunatic:

“Christianity remains to this day the greatest misfortune of humanity…. Our age knows better. What was formerly merely sickly now becomes indecent—it is indecent to be a Christian today…. I call Christianity the one great curse, the one great intrinsic depravity, the one great instinct of revenge, for which no means are venomous enough, or secret, subterranean and small enough—I call it the one immortal blemish upon the human race.”

— Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist

Can you see a single factual statement here? Unfortunately, you cannot. You see only rhetoric and mood music, the verbal froth and fury of a man who was at the end of his tether and was soon to be pronounced clinically insane.

You can’t have it both ways. If the Jews invented Christianity as a cunning ploy to weaken Christians and turn them into natural-born slaves, which is what the Christ-bashing conspiracy theorists maintain, then you need to explain why the Jews have spent so much of their time and energy, ever since the foundation of Christianity, trying to destroy the very thing they should never have created in the first place. Why create a Frankenstein monster in Palestine 2000 years ago—i.e., Christianity, under the alleged distorter and corrupter of Christ’s original teachings, St Paul—in order to spend the next 2000 years trying to destroy it? The inability to answer this simple question has never troubled the conspiracy theorists who move in a world beyond the tedious limitations of logic and fact.

I will ask this awkward question again and challenge the Christ-bashing conspiracy theorists to answer it: If Christianity is so mad, bad and dangerous to organized Jewry that they should have spent the last 2000 years trying to destroy it, why did they bother to create it in the first place under the aegis of the allegedly wicked and scheming St Paul?

If you can answer that, fine; if you cannot, why keep spreading these preposterous conspiracy theories?

We need to clarify here that neither Nietzsche nor Dr William Pierce went so far as to state that Christianity had actually been cooked up and planned by an evil cabal of Jews, with St Paul as the ringleader, so as to bring the whole edifice of Christianity crashing down like a house of cards at some later date. This is a much later conspiracy theory which is in vogue today among the more wild-eyed Christophobes who infest the internet. The reader will be familiar with these types, for whom no evidence for their bizarre theories is ever necessary.

—  §  —

Another fatal flaw in the argument of these logically challenged conspiracy theories theorists is their glib assumption that Christians have all read Christ’s Sermon on the Mount and been profoundly influenced by its message. Having been infected by Christ’s noble words in St Matthew’s Gospel, these 2.2 billion Christians have all decided to implement its instructions to the letter, swept away by devout enthusiasm. One can imagine some hypothetical individual, at one moment a fierce Viking warrior, suddenly morphing into a pathetic wimp after picking up his New Testament and casting an eye over its contents—something he would have been most unlikely to do in any case, given that New Testaments and Bibles in the vernacular were almost non-existent in those distant days before the invention of the printing press in the mid-fifteenth century. Most Bibles were then in Latin, totally inaccessible to all but an infinitesimal minority of learned monks and clerics.

You are being asked to believe the absurdity that 2.2 billion Christians have been exposed to the extreme pacifism of Christ’s Sermon on the Mount—in which they are told to turn the other cheek and love their enemies—and that this exposure to Christ’s pacifist ideas has induced a mass hypnosis in them, turning 2.2 billion Christians into wimps and sissies. But since when did the injunction “Be ye therefore perfect” produce perfection? Long before Christ came on the scene, telling us to be perfect, Moses had given the Jews the Ten Commandments. Have these commandments, drummed into the Jewish mind over the millennia, produced a race of model citizens? No, they have certainly not! They have had no effect whatever in turning Jewish sinners, en masse, into Jewish saints. So why should Christ’s pacifist teachings turn most Christians into servile sissies when Moses’ Ten Commandments have notably failed to turn most Jews into paragons of virtue?

I wish someone had asked Dr Pierce this question: Do most Christians, when you strike them on the right cheek, turn the other cheek and invite you to strike that cheek also? If so, I have yet to come across one such Christian.

One has only to look at the blood-soaked history of Europe and America to see that Christians are among the most belligerent people on earth, despite the pacifist teachings of Christianity. Ever since the foundation of Christianity, Christian nations have waged war without ceasing, killing off vast numbers of people without agonizing too much about it. The Crusades were not fought by pathologically altruistic Christians. Nor was the British Empire, on which the sun never set, acquired by exemplary Christians with a sword in one hand and a New Testament in the other. In short, Christianity has had no effect whatsoever in turning its adherents into limp-wristed poltroons. If this is why the Jews “invented” Christianity—to emasculate Chrisitans—they failed spectacularly.

Christ’s Sermon on the Mount, ironically, didn’t even turn Christ into a wimp. For if Christ had followed his own teachings at all times, he would hardly have taken a whip to the moneychangers in the temple. The same man who said “Blessed are the peacemakers” also said, “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.”

—  §  —

The world would be an infinitely worse place today if all of us were to give up our religious beliefs and become atheists instead, given that more millions (100 million-plus) have died under atheistical Communism in the 20th century than at any other time in history.

One of the most brilliant mathematicians and philosophers of the 17th century, Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), had a mind-altering mystical experience which turned his entire life upside down. There was no need for any tiresome logic chopping, ratiocination or “empirical evidence” after that. He had entered into intimate contact with the Divine. And that’s all that mattered:

“On 23 November 1654, between 10:30 and 12:30 at night, Pascal had an intense religious vision and immediately recorded the experience in a brief note to himself which began: “Fire. God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of the philosophers and the scholars…” and concluded by quoting Psalm 119:16: “I will not forget thy word. Amen.” He seems to have carefully sewn this document into his coat and always transferred it when he changed clothes; a servant discovered it only by chance after his death.”

When it comes to the difference between faith and what the scoffers like to call “blind belief”, Pascal said it best: “The heart has its reasons, which reason does not know. We feel it in a thousand things. It is the heart which experiences God, and not the reason. This, then, is faith: God felt by the heart—not by reason.” (See here)

These words bring to mind Hamlet’s famous comment to his friend Horatio, “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” Words that were more or less echoed in the twentieth century by the great biologist J.B.S. Haldane: “The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.”

In the last analysis, there is every reason to believe that Christianity and the great Oriental religions—in particular Buddhism and Vedanta—are perfectly compatible with modern science. According to Vedanta, Mind is everything. Mind did not arise out of matter, but matter out of mind. In the beginning, only Mind existed.

The great physicist Sir James Jeans was once asked in an interview: “Do you believe that life on this planet is the result of some sort of accident, or do you believe that it is a part of some great scheme?” He replied:

“I incline to the idealistic theory that consciousness is fundamental, and that the material universe is derivative from consciousness, not consciousness from the material universe. In general, the universe seems to me to be nearer to a Great Thought than to a great machine. It may well be that each individual consciousness ought to be compared to brain-cell in a Universal Mind.

Take some time now to consider the work of the theoretical physicist and theologian John Charlton Polkinghorne. Born in 1930, Polkinghorne managed to combine quantum physics and mathematics with Christian theology, becoming a practicing Anglican priest while serving as Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge University. He achieved this synthesis in several acclaimed books which included The Quantum World (1989), Quantum Physics and the World (1989), Quantum Physics and Theology: An Unexpected Kinship (2005), Exploring Reality, The Intertwining of Science and Religion (2007), and Questions of Truth (2009). 

Polkinghorne was knighted by the Queen of England in 1997, and in 2002 he received the £1 million ($1.45 million) Templeton Prize, awarded for “exceptional contributions to affirming life’s spiritual dimension.”

When political radicals like William Pierce call for the death and destruction of Christianity, they have no concept what cultural vandalism they are advocating. Renaissance masterpieces produced by Christian artists like Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and Raphael are among the most celebrated works of art ever produced. If Christianity had been aborted in the womb or destroyed in its infancy, none of these great works of genius would ever have seen the light of day, for Christianity provided the rich soil which gave them birth.

The most admired classical music in the Western canon is the Christian sacred music of composers like Pachelbel, Vivaldi, Bach, Handel, Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Schubert and Verdi. Many well-known historical figures who influenced Western science considered themselves Christian: Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Boyle.

According to 100 Years of Nobel Prize (2005), a review of Nobel prizes awarded between 1901 and 2000, 65.4% of Nobel Prize Laureates have identified Christianity in its various forms as their religious preference (423 prizes). Overall, Christians have won a total of 78.3% of all the Nobel Prizes in Peace, 72.5% in Chemistry, 65.3% in Physics, 62% in Medicine, 54% in Economics and 49.5% of all Literature awards.” (See Role of Christianity in Civilization).

By all means disparage Christianity if that’s what you need to do, but at least take the trouble to find out the names of the stellar luminaries you are disparaging. Ask yourself, in all honesty, if your own contributions to human welfare have been greater than those provided by renowned Christians—I pick out their names at random—like Pascal, Mozart, Beethoven, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, JS Bach, Botticelli, Tintoretto, Velazqez, Michaelangelo, Milton, Leonardo da Vinci, Copernicus, Galileo, Leibniz, Lavoisier, Marconi, Mendel, Tielhard de Chardin, Swedenborg, Albertus Magnus, Thomas More, JRR Tolkien, William Tyndale, William Wilberforce, Dietrich Bohhoeffer, Meister Eckhart, Erasmus, St Teresa of Avila, Joan of Arc, Florence Nightingale, and a thousand other illustrious names one could invoke in a long litany of praise.

Collage of photos of 49 renowned Christians from all walks of life: Saint PeterPaul the ApostleJohn of DamascusSaint HelenaSaints Cyril and MethodiusThe RomanovsSun Yat-senConstantine the GreatCharlemagneJoan of ArcThomas AquinasAugustine of HippoCatherine of SienaAntoni GaudíMichelangeloJean-Baptiste de La SalleMaria TheresaJean CalvinTeresa of ÁvilaAnton ChekhovBrothers GrimmIsaac NewtonMartin LutherChristopher ColumbusLudwig van BeethovenGalileo GalileiWilliam ShakespeareWolfgang Amadeus MozartLeonardo da VinciThérèse of LisieuxGregor MendelJohn D. RockefellerFlorence NightingaleLouis PasteurMax PlanckMartin Luther King Jr.Mother TeresaJohn F. KennedyPatriarch Bartholomew I of ConstantinoplePope John Paul IILeo TolstoyLuiz Inácio Lula da SilvaNelson MandelaLionel MessiCarlos Slim HelúMarissa MayerNovak DjokovicGerard ButlerFreida Pinto. (See here)

—  §  —

The glory that was Greece and the grandeur that was Rome had its culmination in the magnificent achievements of Europe and its people over the centuries. Whatever has been greatest in the last 2000 years of European civilization since Golgotha, and whatever bears the stamp of its transcendent genius, was nurtured in the rich soil of Christianity. Europe would be a dead husk, a barren desert plunged in spiritual darkness, were it not for its Christian heritage.

The fate of  Western civilization now lies in the balance and is threatened as never before. Abandoning Christianity, the source of our inner strength, would be a recipe for disaster and only hasten our doom.

Scene: The Plaça de Sant Roc in Sabadell, a city in Catalonia, Spain, nestling on the banks of the lazy River Ripoli with its orange orchards and flour mills. Here you will find a few local musicians, in the market square, playing the most inspired music ever composed in the history of our planet. It is the Ode to Joy from the finale of Ludwig van Beethoven’s majestic Ninth Symphony (1824). Never before had mankind enjoyed the privilege of listening to such supernaturally sublime music—music utterly steeped in the ethos of Christianity out of which it arose, and whose numinous beauty has haunted even the minds of the most devout atheists.

Listen to it now and reflect: Christianity gave us this precious gift. No neo-pagan, no humanist, no atheist or nihilist has ever produced a note of music to match this. Nor ever will.

VIDEO : 5.40 seconds

Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website,, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

137 thoughts to “The Plot Against Christ”

  1. Thanks for this superbly written article in celebration of Easter Sunday. This is sure to give all the wild-eyed Christ haters on this site a hissy fit. They will either sulk and remain silent or creep off into the shadows like cowards and plan snipe attacks on Christianity from a safe distance.

    What I hate about these people is their cowardice and intolerance.

    Listen, you Christ-hating creeps, do we Christians interfere with your atheism and anti-Christian beliefs? No, we leave you alone! We don’t keep attacking you for your ideas! We tolerate your skepticism and your unbelief! So why can’t you do the same for us? Why can’t you just leave us alone,
    as we leave you alone?

    This is a pro-Christian site. It is not a site for anti-Christian fanatics with personal problems. It is not a site for Christ hating psychotics.

    The mark of a civilized human being is respect for people’s deeply held religious beliefs. The attack on Christianity launched on this pro-Christian site by Arch Stanton and his like is not valid criticism.

    It is a cowardly macroaggression that shows a total lack of sensitivity.

    1. @ Arch Stanton

      I personally know Christians that maintain ideas of a flat earth and the geocentric concept of the solar system. Christians who believe dinosaurs and dragons were present with man and a race of giant demi-gods existed that walked among men.

      Your attempt to disparage Christianity on the grounds that some Christians believe in the Flat Earth theory and other half-baked ideas like this only demonstrates your own mind-numbing stupidity. You have acquired a fine vocabulary and the smattering of an education, Mr Stanton, but your logic is so flawed as to discredit you totally as a serious thinker. In fact, you strike me as little better than an intellectual cretin, educated beyond your intelligence.

      What about all those Christians who have received Nobel prizes, Mr Stanton? Come, don’t tell me you are smarter than all these Christian super geniuses! Do you think you know more than all the great Christians listed below?

      According to 100 Years of Nobel Prize (2005), a review of Nobel prizes awarded between 1901 and 2000, 65.4% of Nobel Prize Laureates have identified Christianity in its various forms as their religious preference (423 prizes). Overall, Christians have won a total of 78.3% of all the Nobel Prizes in Peace, 72.5% in Chemistry, 65.3% in Physics, 62% in Medicine, 54% in Economics and 49.5% of all Literature awards.” (See Role of Christianity in Civilization).

      By all means disparage Christianity if that’s what you need to do, but at least take the trouble to find out the names of the stellar luminaries you are disparaging. Ask yourself, in all honesty, if your own contributions to human welfare have been greater than those provided by renowned Christians—I pick out their names at random—like Pascal, Mozart, Beethoven, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, JS Bach, Botticelli, Tintoretto, Velazqez, Michaelangelo, Milton, Leonardo da Vinci, Copernicus, Galileo, Leibniz, Lavoisier, Marconi, Mendel, Tielhard de Chardin, Swedenborg, Albertus Magnus, Thomas More, JRR Tolkien, William Tyndale, William Wilberforce, Dietrich Bohhoeffer, Meister Eckhart, Erasmus, St Teresa of Avila, Joan of Arc, Florence Nightingale, and a thousand other illustrious names one could invoke in a long litany of praise.

      1. I think we must make allowances for the likes of Arch Stanton.
        He has an inordinately high opinion of himself. The trouble is,
        his high opinion of himself is misplaced and is not widely shared!

        People who need to attack others for their deeply held religious beliefs, as Mr Stanton does, are simply intellectual hooligans.

        They do not deserve our respect.

    2. @Sardonicus
      What I find interesting with you comment and the article itself is how you play on this one sentence:
      “Can you see a single factual statement here? ” when quoting Nietzsche.
      Then at the same time the christians refuse to discuss the facts as to why the very foundation of their religion – the Bible – is constructed in the way it is. And done so by a set of decisions made in conventions during the fourth century. Why were other books not included? And what was the prerequisite to get included? A god-given decision? Come on!
      I find the four gospels interesting, and I find Jesus fascinating. But the rest of the book is mostly old jewish myths and lies. With a Yahweh killing other people for his chosen ones. And I see it every time: the christians starts of with the gospels, it is not enough in the long run, and throw themselves into the old testament. It is the labyrint of contradicting ideas they just love to ponder on. They find a god-given accept for almost anything.
      I just finished celebrating Easter, which in my language is name after the jewish pesach. Pesach is one of their many religious celebrations where they celebrate their lord slaughtered another people to save (((his own))).
      I would love to celebrate Easter as it was traditionally ment to be celebrated – a rebirth of nature. I do not mind including the Christ story as part of it, but I do not want the jewish lies included.
      As to the inspiration to music, architecture and art. Maybe it was the other way around? Maybe the white man’s incredible capacity to create awe inspiring cathedrals, paintings and music was what saved Christianity, and not Christianity that saved man?

      1. One things for sure. The (((Christian))) propaganda machine is in full swing. Im a trucker and of course travel all 48 states. I see billboards pushing “agendas” every day. One of them off of I40 outside of Nashville, TN states….”Real Christians love their enemies.” What the hell does that mean? I can rest assure you, Donaldo has several enemies (not counting the hordes of Chosenites who hate the 75% of me which isnt Jewish) and I sure dont love them. Whoever is investing the money to rent these billboards sure has an agenda. What is it? Let me guess. Simply to convince people that the virtious thing to do is tolerate getting screwed without retailiating against the perpetrators. In essesence to be pussyfied. Its that simple. Another one of my favorite billboards features a picture of John Wayne stating, “Dont much like quiters son.” …..Grit….pass it on.” Whats the message? “Dear Americans. (((we))) are going to keep f..cking you and bleeding you dry. Just show some character and take it. Oh well. Just some thoughts as I drink my tequila.

      2. Bjørn –
        GOOD POINT:

        Since man – supposedly – was created to look like the gods…

        “Maybe the white man’s incredible capacity to create awe inspiring cathedrals, paintings and music was what saved Christianity, and not Christianity that saved man?”

    3. Astonishing that people are still defending a dead faith. Jesus was a jew. This cannot be disputed. Jesus said “Not one dot or tittle of the law shall pass away before heaven and Earth” meaning- HE WAS A JEW. (a hardcore Torah believing jew to boot) Matthew 15:26: “But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs.” Meaning: “Dogs” was in reference to the caanaite/gentiles. Hence, Jesus was a very typical jewish supremacist much like the ones wrecking the world today, not a universally-loving, ultra-hippy from burningman

      Xtianity is a pathological, eschatological, end-times jewish cult whipped-up from the rabid imagination of jews who were being sacked & pillaged by Romans for being as obnoxious and seditious as they’ve been from day one. Jesus’ final prophesy: “There are some standing here today who shall not taste death before the son of man comes in his kingdom/cloud/whatever” In short: Jesus will not be bringing the pork chops and we Whites had better slough off this semitic mental illness & deprogram as quickly as possible.

      our subservience to this treacherous myth of christ will result in indefinite subservience to the terrorist state of Israel. The two are absolutely ONE

      1. Please bear in mind that this is a pro-Christian site and that what you have just said is profoundly anti-Christian. It would be a sad thing indeed if your perception of the truth were identical with the truth itself. It is not. What IS, and what you THINK it is, are two entirely different things.

      2. Nonsense, if Jesus Christ and Israel are one then why is Israel and the jewish supremacists ruling Israel and the western countries so very anti-christian??

        Jesus whipped the moneylenders out of the temple and overturned their tables. Jesus was the nemesis of the jewish pharisees who felt threatened so had Jesus put to death!!

  2. Perhaps Nietzsche’s rethoric doesn’t contain any historical facts but neither can any Christian offer historical facts about what the figure Jesus actually has said or done, if ever there was such a figure, because even that isn’t established historical fact.

    Furthermore, it doesn’t matter whether the jews invented Christianity or not. Who cares? What matters is its effect on Europeans and the devastation it brought to inherent European peoples and their culture. Now that IS a historical fact. The total intolerance of Christianity and its zealous war on everything non-Christian.
    Jesus died for our sins? Can anybody please explain what the hell that means? I mean, what – does – that – mean?? “He died for our sins.” How can anyone get inspiration from that?

    Nobelprize winners? I didn’t know that being selected by an ultrapolitical NWO institute to receive a ‘prize’ for doing so-called ‘humanity’ a favour with something ‘good’? Well, ‘good’ according to our oppressors that is. Is that a pro-Christian argument or what? It’s not clear to me. Especially when one looks at the list of winners. Besides, we were doing pretty well before the first Christians, resentful herds of non-white mongrels, destroyed every trace of everything they were not and never could have been.

    Christianity is an early form of mandatory one size fits all paradigm which laid the foundation for later mordernized forms like liberalism, humanism, communism alle-menschen-werden-bruder bullshit. It was used by an evil self proclaimed elite who preached it but obviously never believed any of it themselves. Keep the sheeple dumb and ignorant by banning education except for the clergy, who were and are till this day – WITHOUT EXCEPTION – a bunch of homosexual pedophile perverts.

    I don’t comment on the figure Christ, because that man is not responsible for the destruction that was done under a banner carrying his name.

    The only cross on our banners should be the hakenkreuz. That at least is Aryan.

    Oh wait, edit. For some of you who obviously are a little slow, not being a Christian doesn’t mean being an atheist or a Christ hater. Gosh, the nerve!

    1. 1138 –

      The Clergy – rebbe included – are the worst criminals. They break their vows – they lie – while breaking the trust they hide behind… smiling all the way.

    2. @1138, Good post. None of it matters but what it’s paved the way for and what it has become today. Jesus may have been divine, but that was ages ago and god doesn’t stay stuck in time, all the while his original teachings have been hidden, changed, and corrupted – but the core of bhakti (devotion) that still resides in some who love Christ is a very beautiful thing, though I’d say extremely rare and, if it presents itself, without much jnana (knowledge) to guide the heart.

      Some new form of spirituality needs to come about to combat the current age. What it is, I’m unsure, but I believe Gurdjieff was on the right track when he said, “Unless the ‘wisdom’ of the East and the ‘energy’ of the West are harnessed and used harmoniously the world will destroy itself.”

    3. @1138
      “Jesus died for our sins? Can anybody please explain what the hell that means?”
      It means that all sin against God’s commandments – which are for our own good , by the way – requires atonement so that justice may be served – divine justice. So Christ, who was without sin, freely underwent torture and death in order to atone for all the sins of mankind. His sacrifice could be applied to us since he was man, like us, and his sacrifice would have infinite value, since he was also the Son of God, the second person in the Blessed Trinity. But in order for his sacrificial atonement to be effective in us requires that we repent of our sins and have a firm resolve not further offend God. By means of sincere repentance our spiritual blindness will be healed and we will be open to God’s gift of faith, and then the sacrament of baptism.

  3. An excellent commentary, my dear Doctor Lasha. I’ll print it, it’s one to keep.
    At a young age I read Nietzche, and was attracted to his ideas re: Christianity as a ‘slave religion’.
    Maybe my thoughts were a natural young person’s rebellious nature (taught for 8 years in a strict Lutheran school). I later became an active member of Pierce’s group, the National Alliance. I was no atheist, but rather a committed Pagan/Wiccan. Funny how small the gap between pagan and Christian ‘believers’, and how wide the gulf between atheists and those who acknowledge a God/gods/or ‘Spirit’.
    I considered surely that Europe flourished in spite of Christianity and not because of it.
    But slowly I came to see there was a resonance between the European mind and Christ’s teachings. The European longing and gradual movement toward mercy, justice, peace, fairness, friendship and honesty naturally found a home in the teachings of Jesus.
    As far as pacifism goes, the western people’s ‘Just War’ concepts, if implemented, would make the inevitable wars much less brutal and savage.
    Contrast the ideas of war as last resort, no civilian targeting, no rape or mistreatment of prisoners, etc. to the conduct of the Khanate, the MS13’s, the innercity gangs, the mid-eastern Daesh head-choppers.

    Consider the cultural images in Ezra Pound’s ‘Usura’. While not a Christian poem per se, it conveys much of the Jesus/European syntheses. If any here are unfamiliar with his references, you owe it to yourselves to research them.

    With Usura

    With usura hath no man a house of good stone
    each block cut smooth and well fitting
    that design might cover their face,
    with usura
    hath no man a painted paradise on his church wall
    harpes et luz
    or where virgin receiveth message
    and halo projects from incision,
    with usura
    seeth no man Gonzaga his heirs and his concubines
    no picture is made to endure nor to live with
    but it is made to sell and sell quickly
    with usura, sin against nature,
    is thy bread ever more of stale rags
    is thy bread dry as paper,
    with no mountain wheat, no strong flour
    with usura the line grows thick
    with usura is no clear demarcation
    and no man can find site for his dwelling.
    Stonecutter is kept from his tone
    weaver is kept from his loom

    wool comes not to market
    sheep bringeth no gain with usura
    Usura is a murrain, usura
    blunteth the needle in the maid’s hand
    and stoppeth the spinner’s cunning. Pietro Lombardo
    came not by usura
    Duccio came not by usura
    nor Pier della Francesca; Zuan Bellin’ not by usura
    nor was ‘La Calunnia’ painted.
    Came not by usura Angelico; came not Ambrogio Praedis,
    Came no church of cut stone signed: Adamo me fecit.
    Not by usura St. Trophime
    Not by usura Saint Hilaire,
    Usura rusteth the chisel
    It rusteth the craft and the craftsman
    It gnaweth the thread in the loom
    None learneth to weave gold in her pattern;
    Azure hath a canker by usura; cramoisi is unbroidered
    Emerald findeth no Memling
    Usura slayeth the child in the womb
    It stayeth the young man’s courting
    It hath brought palsey to bed, lyeth
    between the young bride and her bridegroom

    They have brought whores for Eleusis
    Corpses are set to banquet
    at behest of usura.

  4. As a Christian the one thing that bothers me is the Christians who believe that Israel can do no wrong and that the jews are Gods chosen people, this belief has led to America being financially raped by the Zionists and has led America into wars of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Syria and potentially Iran and Russia, all for Israel and with not a peep out of fundamentalist Christians.

    The Zionists who control America are going to lead America to destruction and the process is accelerating with the the unpayable debt and the wars fought for Israel and the catalyst for this was the Israeli attack on 911 which led to the wars in the Mideast, with Israel as the provocateur.

    All Christian denominations should wake up while there is time to do so or face the holocaust which the Zionists have planned to eliminate Christians and the groundwork for this holocaust is being laid with the Zionist backed gun control and the Zionist war against Christians.

    God bless Putin and Russia and Assad and Syria for defending Christians and standing against the terror groups which Israel and the U.S. and Britain have created to destroy civilization.

    1. The Zionist Chrstians bother me hugely too. They are, however, the victims of the Schofield ‘bible’, and of all those who popularised it. Dr Stephen Sizer’s account of them in his Zion’s Christian Soldiers points out both their deluded condition that results from a too-literal a reading of the Bible, and from the heretical work of Schofield, who re-interpreted the King James Version in simple, alluring terms, inventing great loads of good that will accrue to a nation, and upon Zionist individuals, who protects Jews. And, of course, he gives a lurid account of the horrors that will befall those nations and individuals who do them injury. (There are, according to Dr Sizer, some 50 million Christian Zionists in the USA, and they are massively influential politically

      The contemporary clerical leaders of mainstream Christianity are a pretty questionable lot too. We need look only at the fierce defence of the holohoax by the contemporary Roman and Anglican Church senior-most clergy. But then, Christianity is not the Church leaders. Christianity has survived some pretty nasty top-brass clerics over the ages. And that is telling of its greatness.

      Lasha quite brilliantly exemplifies the Christian ethos through the great enrichers of our cultural/spiritual vistas, not through popes, etc. The sheer durability of Christianity, its power of surviving its basest leaders, speaks volumes for its Godly nature. I am often in the grip of a serious rage when I see a misbehaving senior cleric. I would at those times gladly wring that cleric’s scrawny neck. For instance:

      1. Just recently, the Archbishop of Canterbury took a nasty swipe at Alison Chabloz, and urges her ‘stopping’, despite her case being sub judice. His desire to serve the Jews drove him even to speaking publicly in contempt of court!
      2. A newly-minted shabbos goy bishop persecuted the very fine priest Dr Sizer until the latter resigned his ministry. This shabby bishop rushed to please the Jews, who wanted the Church of England to stop Dr Sizer’s devoted work in the interest of Palestinians. (Those Jews tried to have him prosecuted by the Crown Prosecution Service, but found no luck there. They did better when they sought the services of the C of E top brass!)
      3. Only the RC Church is maintaining the Christian marriage. The Protestant Churches are falling over themselves to endorse homosexual marriage, and homosexuality generally, HIV/AIDS notwithstanding. They allow homosexuals to adopt children, which is, flatly, child abuse. They protect homosexual child abusers.
      Despite these pretty evil aspects of Christian Churches, I remain an emotional Christian: I defend it against attackers, and I am grateful for its presence among us. Just one reason for this: Among Christians are the wonderful people I am privileged to know who will pursue truth without regard for their personal safety. There is Sister Moniker Schaefer now, a gentle musician of fine physical frame and fine sensibilities, whose very fine mind will not tolerate the holohoax. She is unlawfully imprisoned for this by the shameful German authorities. Monika has many fellow travellers whose courage is as great as hers. I love them for this, and understand Christianity through them.

      Thank you, Lasha, for your masterly discourse. You stride heroically in an area where even pussy-footing is difficult. (And thank you for the beautiful poem this morning. It did me much needed good.)

      Finally, do we not all prefer the society of our fellow Christians to that of any other people? That, too, tells us a lot about why we should be grateful for Christianity, and for being Christians.

      1. With you on 99% of that Sofie, one thing if I may, Zionists are not Jews, they forgo that right when they defied G Ds will by becoming Zionist,
        A similar comparison is the ” homosexual ” Christians, who are in fact not Christian, or indeed not under G D’s wings, but belong to satan

        PS regards the RC church, I fear the current ” pope ” may disappoint.

      2. The Protocols of Zion lay out the Zionists plan for a Satanic NWO , the Zionist war on Christianity is a war with no quarter given by the Zionists, Christians have been forewarned and Russia and Putin are Christians only hope.

      3. @ Sophie Johnson

        The outstanding comment above by Sophie deserves commemoration. It has the ring of truth and sincerity.

        Lasha Darkmoon, I happen to know, has a deep respect and affection for Sophie Johnson which probably springs from her perception that she and Sophie are kindred spirits.

        If everyone here spoke with the wisdom of Sophie, which can only come from an inner life of prayer and meditation, the world would be a far better place.

        God bless you, Sophie, and may you find the peace that passes all understanding.

  5. SW, Usura is my personal battle cry, the best of the best, especially read by the old man himself in his bitter twilight.

    one christian omitted from the honor roll is monsignor georges lemaitre, a catholic priest who first postulated the big bang as the causative principle of the physical universe.
    why is his contribution consistently suppressed? need i ask?

    next, to the meat of the article:

    Christianity, we are frequently told, is a Jewish plot. It was cunningly designed to emasculate Christians and turn them into wimps. It does this by encouraging Christians to love their enemies and turn the other cheek.

    in march 17 circular (557), bishop richard williamson of the marcel initiative penned this (“Constant Enemies”, quoted in full):

    Many readers of these “Comments” – by no means all – must be shocked and incredulous when these “Comments” keep referring to the Jews as being one major source of the problems in today’s Church and world. That is because ever since the French Revolution (1789), when the Freemasons emancipated the Jews and gave them liberty to occupy all positions of influence in society, the Jews by their progressive control of politics, universities and the media in particular have more and more taken over people’s minds, and they have used this control granted to them by unwary Gentiles to persuade everybody that Jews are the victims rather than the cause of the constant tensions between themselves and the rest of the world.

    Yet in the Middle Ages, when the Faith enlightened men’s minds with the Way, the Truth and the Life, Catholic Popes and Church Councils issued a stream of documents to make Christians wary of Jewish trickery, even forbidding Christians, for the sake of their eternal salvation, to associate with Jews.
    Was that merely “anti-Semitism”? In our own day an Italian professor has just argued – and he is not alone – that Jews are the controlling force within the Conciliar Papacy and Church. There follows a brief summary of the professor’s argument, that can be found in full at:—http://​www.​unavox.​it/​ArtDiversi/​DIV2277_​Lamendola_​Scacco_​in_​tre_​mosse.​html

    The neo-modernism presently ravaging the Catholic Church is the modernism condemned by St Pius X, but with a new element added: Talmudic Judaism.
    The Jews have always striven to neutralise the divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, because if He is not God then Catholicism is nothing, and then the main obstacle to their own ruling of the world is out of the way.
    For instance in 2009, why was there such a worldwide fury over a few remarks on Swedish television casting doubt on the existence of homicidal gas-chambers in Germany during World War II? The problem cannot have been merely the one bishop who made the remarks. In fact the uproar was designed secondarily to cripple the Traditional Society of St Pius X to which the bishop then belonged, but primarily to force Pope Benedict XVI to back away from that Catholic Tradition which is in line with the Faith of the Middle Ages. Thus Cardinal Ruini, Pope’s Vicar Emeritus for the diocese of Rome, declared at the time, “Nobody who denies the ‘Holocaust’ can be a Catholic bishop.”

    The professor goes on to say that a great step forward to this placing of the “Holocaust” at the centre of the Catholic religion had been taken back in 1965 when Vatican II declared in its document Nostra Aetate that the covenant of God with the Israelites in the Old Testament was still valid, meaning that redemption by Jesus Christ is no longer necessary for salvation, in other words His Catholic Church is no longer in unique possession of the complete Truth and no longer the only means of eternal salvation. Whereupon the religious importance of Our Lord Jesus Christ, dropped by Vatican II, was immediately picked up by the Jews and attached to their “Holocaust.” Said B’nai B’rith’s Abraham Foxman in New York, “The Holocaust is not merely an example of genocide, but it is an almost successful attack on God’s chosen people, in other words on God Himself.”

    Thus for Jews, the “Holocaust” is a theological event, central to the new religion which is to be imposed on the entire world, and before which all other religions must bow, starting with Catholicism. Here is why Catholic bishops calling the “Holocaust” in question must be silenced and banned, and the Catholic Church must do what its Talmudic masters tell it to do. And the Italian professor concludes that the “Elder Brethren” have succeeded in making themselves into the indisputable guardians of the Church of Christ.

    Notice that this thesis perfectly exemplifies Tertullian’s statement that only the weakness of Catholics is the strength of the Jews. The propaganda in favour of the “Holocaust” took off only after Vatican II. Before the Council, people still had a little too much common sense to believe that about twice as many Jews were exterminated in Europe as there had been in Europe before the war.

    But “fear not little flock” (Lk. XII, 32). Every Catholic knows that it is God and not His enemies who will have the last word. This catastrophic end of the Church’s Fifth Age through which we are now living is preparing and paying in advance for the Church’s greatest triumph in all its history, the brief Sixth Age, or Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Sometime thereafter may come the greatest triumph in all the world’s history of God’s enemies, the three and a half year reign o f the Antichrist (Jn. V, 43), or the Church’s Seventh Age. But then follows the last word to end all last words, the General Judgement, belonging to God, and perfectly re-establishing His universal justice.

    Kyrie eleison.

    wimp? i don’t think so.

    btw, please lay off arch, he has the same right of speech that we each claim for ourselves.
    shutting people up through bullying and intimidation will kill this blog quicker than any jew censorship.
    we should be thankful to arch for spurring and fertilizing debate that advances one’s comprehension of the bigger picture, isn’t this the goal?

    so, thank you arch, like all of us, sometimes you connect for a homer and sometimes you strike out.
    but never quit swinging.

    1. @ Lobro

      Darling, I am so glad to see you back! 🙂
      Accept a tender loving Easter Sunday kiss of peace from me,
      a most unworthy person. I fear it will not be long.
      The long shadows of evening are falling across the sunken garden.
      You know what I mean, better than most.

    2. Re: Benedict XVI, as mentioned in “Constant Enemies” —
      Wasn’t he an obvious victim of homosexual blackmail,
      along with his equally queer brother back in Augsburg?…

  6. “I wish someone had asked Dr Pierce this question: Do most Christians, when you strike them on the right cheek, turn the other cheek and invite you to strike that cheek also? If so, I have yet to come across one such Christian.”

    Figuratively speaking, modern-day Christians do this ALL of the time. Blacks or illegals murder one of their own, and they genuflect in the courtrooms and “forgive” the killers. Millions of third-world illegals pour through the borders of the West and millions of white Christians welcome them and their foreign ways and attitudes. THAT’S turning the altruistic cheek.

    I will say this… Christianity’s comparisons to sheep are true. And one might argue that in a world entirely populated by sheep, it might actually work. But, when their are (((wolves))) and other predators out there – incapable of EVER transitioning into ovinity – the fold will inevitably be led to the slaughter.
    On the other hand, the incredible art inspired by this religion is incomparable. The music of Bach, the paintings and sculptures of Michelangelo, the great cathedrals of Europe… carry within them an inspired greatness that only God could divine.
    So, there it is… the conundrum of our times.

    1. @ Joe

      You don’t know what you’re talking about. Get your head tested! The Darkmoon site has been in the front rank of those who are against mass immigration, multiculturalism and letting in illegals and altruistically “turning the other cheek”.

      So how can you say the Christians are doing all this if the Darkmoon site, which is Christian, is doing the very opposite? Why would Lasha Darkmoon make a point of publishing this article by Franklin Ryckaert if she she were of these feeble “altruistic Christians” you are talking about?

  7. Even if we were to accept that Jesus WAS crucified, why didn’t he simply prove the validity of resurrection by returning in his previous bodily state immediately after BEING crucified, instead of asking followers to believe in “articles of faith”?

    Even if the reality of time regarding its yugic cycles has precluded an ascension taking us beyond the habitations of these mortal coils, wouldn’t this have been a preferable way for him to impart his message of eternity? Unless of course this is exactly what he did, but that part is missing from the general narrative.

    1. Resurrection immediately after the crucifixion would run the risk of the belief that Jesus death was not real.

      1. Franklin, et al

        Let’s not forget the general theme of there being lies that undermine the truth, and the dangerous rationalizations that SUPPORT the lies


        Riddle me this: Given the premise, if resurrection infers getting off the wheel of reincarnation once and for all, whose time is rapidly approaching in keeping with this planet’s nearing position of having moved far enough away from the kali yuga, then what does the Christ message of this have to do with being nailed to a cross? Why this narrative?

  8. Sure. The communist/terrorist Nelson Mandela certainly deserves “a long litany of praise” for the terror bombings and slaughter that Mandela the Christian authorized in South Africa and boasted about in his autobiography, “Long Walk to Freedom” (1994, Little Brown & Company)! And Christian Zionism . . . the less said, the better! And that great, noble, Christian communist, Martin Luther King, Jr. – more praise?

  9. The apostate church was beginning to emerge even in the days when the epistles were written.
    Jude 1:3-4 KJVS

    [3] Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. [4] For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

    Since then the Christian religion has devolved into institutions of power and control that mind earthly things rather than heavenly things. Apostle Paul wrote the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. That is as true today as in his day, maybe more so. The mark of the beast system in the book of Revelation is a economic system.

    This website has spent much time shining a light on those behind today’s world economic system.

  10. Some remarks :

    1) Pierce : “…As for the brotherhood of man and equality in the eyes of the Lord, the Germans had no time for such nonsense; when confronted with non-Whites, they instinctively reached for the nearest lethal weapon…”

    Typically a projection of Pierce. At the time we are speaking about, the Germans met only other Whites, for they stayed inside Europe. As for “instinctively reaching for the nearest lethal weapon when confronting with non-Whites”, even the most “racist” colonial Whites didn’t behave that way. Some did commit crimes, but never without a reason.

    2) “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.”

    The context proves that this is meant metaphorically, not literally. With “the sword” is meant disunion with one’s own family for following Jesus. It is the same when you join a modern sect. Your own family will object. Every religious teacher who attracts followers will have this problem. The Buddha too was confronted with this problem, when young people joined his sangha to become monks. Here are the words of Jesus, which provide the context :

    35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

    36 And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.

    37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

    38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.

    KJV, Matthew 10 :35-38.

    3) Jesus’ injunction to “turn the other cheek” too has not to be taken literally. It simply means not to be revengeful. Revengefulness was (and still is) a typical trait of Judaism which Jesus tried to change.

    4) That many (or most) European geniuses were Christians, of course does not prove that Christianity is right. It proves that Europeans can produce geniuses in a Christian culture as much as they did in the pagan culture of the Greeks and Romans. I doubt that Christian Africans will ever produce that many geniuses.

    5) Lasha rightly says that if Christianity was a “plot” by the Jews to weaken the Romans, it is very strange that they consistently fought against it right from the beginning.

    4) Another argument against this “Jewish plot” theory is that in the New Testament the Jews are always depicted in an unfavorable way. The Jews have little faith, the Pharisees are always hypocritical and finally the Jews cause Jesus to be crucified while invoking their own damnation :
    “His blood be on us and on our children.”

    No Jewish “plotter” would cause such a scripture to become the holy book of a religion.

  11. Wonderful wonderful wonderful dearest Lasha. You are a beacon of light in the darkness.

  12. I very much doubt Christ’s teaching bear any semblance to Established organized ” Christian ” Religion, however the goodness of the core message is important beyond understanding.
    I very rarely turn the other cheek.
    G D is GREAT…………………………….

    PS, thanks darkmoon and ALL darkmooners, thoroughly compelling Easter Sunday reading, G D Bless.

    1. @Harry
      “I very much doubt Christ’s teaching bear any semblance to Established organized ‘Christian’ Religion….”
      Actually, Christ’s teaching was faithfully preserved and taught by the Catholic Church at least until after Vatican Council II (1962-65) when all hell started breaking loose, thanks largely to Jewish influence. And now we have a pope (or anti-pope) Francis who seems to want to unravel all that the apostles and their successors have handed down.

  13. here’s worthy subject.
    observers of the religious can see – it’s a fine line between zealotry and fanaticism.
    the belief in the supreme being as separate is the basis of fanaticism, wouldn’t you say?
    whereas otherwise, the hoop has no sharp points, no barbs, no hooks…
    the fanatic actually worships the power structure and immediately condemns those who question christianity as ‘atheists’ (termites), whereas, even those who try to portray it as a plot are not necessarily atheistic…
    try to calm down.
    and of course the power structure, any power structure, will become corrupted.
    to the extent that any nation, race, religious sect or political faction appreciates conflict to maintain its identity it remains immature for the greater purposes of progressive evolution, bringing real peace to the world and restoring the biosphere… that’s what really goes hand in hand up the sunlit path.
    humans continue to hassle each other over their religious beliefs in a power over death, while the oceans slowly but surely choke to death on plastic garbage.. and religious people everywhere still concentrate on their heavenly paradise, disregarding earth as ultimately insignificant and the flesh at putrid.
    and let’s face it, after obama got his, the nobel peace prize doesn’t mean much anymore…
    it’s kinda like knighthoods being passed out to guys like mick jagger and elton john.
    the more benign elements of the christian philosophy are good as guidelines, but can’t be taken literally in every instance, and jesus was not the first one to preach them. the fact remains, no religion has all the answers to man’s earthly plight, though islam and zionism have decided on conquest at the next best thing..
    those who slaughtered the indians on the american frontier weren’t real christians, not anymore than the pope is now… maybe mother theresa was. but the fact is, christianity, or some other more realistic philosophical approach, has not much chance against the aggressive and unconscionable forces of disaster capitalism.
    the sixties hippies were the last real shot at that kind of departure, renouncing violence and the materialist ‘ideal”, trying to get back to the land and reconnect with nature…
    the higher religious ideals might be kept alive in cloistered monasteries but they don’t last long in the real world.
    maybe if the priest was actually the poorest man in town, but back in appalachia where i came from he was one of the richest. him and the undertaker..
    most likely jesus is only a literary character, personified out of the pagan sun worship, and that’s not a hateful thing to say…
    whatever genuine essene gnosticism there was yeasting under the roman catacombs was coopted and rubbed out by the new testament, written by jews, and the episode of the crucifixion, which programmed torture, martyrdom and sacrifice as god’s tenets and became part of the avaricious methodology of roman expansion.
    whether jesus ever really existed or not – catholicism is not christianity it’s not much alive presently among the waspy sons of the pioneers either.

    1. Harold –

      Napolitano would be put to death for writing this ‘so called’ blasphemy under Noahide Laws pushed by Chabadists:

      “Jesus is the hypostatic union — not half God and half man and not just a godly good man and not God connected to a man but …. truly and fully God… and, at the same time, truly and fully man.”

      There are seven laws, which are biblically binding on all humanity. They are prohibitions on idolatry, blasphemy (or the reviling of G-d), forbidden sexual relationships, theft, murder, lawlessness (the failure to establish courts and processes of justice) and the consumption of the limb of a living animal, associated with cruelty to animals. They are known as the seven Noahide laws.

  14. Traditional religions had a hard time accepting science even with the valiant attempt of geniuses like St. Thomas Aquinas to synthesize the first scientific thinker in the West, Aristotle, into Christianity. Eastern religions were much slower to do this until the recent rise of materialism in China and India, and they lagged behind the West in material growth.

    Postmodernism was founded in the West by immigrants from Hitler’s Germany who almost understandably overreacted to Hitler’s absolutism with a relativity of all values which became another absolutism, with a sort of sick cultural Marxism, or equality of all things. This only left the West more lost and alienated.

    As gradually and slowly as the world developed traditional religion it has gradually and slowly rejected traditional religions. Now comes the gradual and slow development of a saving material religion, based on evolution and science to fill the great gap and emptiness of material life without religion.  

    The traditional or perennial philosophy seeks to return to a past golden time when traditional religions ruled empires, although they  have their modern versions of Aquinas trying intellectually to include the modern world.  They greatly downplay or reject the idea of natural evolutionary progress and believe in eternal cycles always leading back to traditional religious empires.

    The advantage of the philosophy theological materialism is that it is science-oriented without rejecting traditional religion. The traditional Inward Path to experience a god within is seen as the first human glimpse of the real Godhood which can only be reached in the Outward Path of material evolution.

    We no longer have to scourge ourselves or block all material desires to experience the inward god, although this inward path can be followed if we must, at first.  But we do need the discipline of the evolutionary sciences to gradually evolve toward real Godhood. 

    May the best philosophy win.


  15. I give up, I quit. Atheists and Christians are so mired in tired, age-old arguments, they will never be able to entertain any rational thoughts on the subject. The two opposing sides will just go round and round and round forevermore; never entertaining or examining any truly alternative thoughts on the matter. History provides conclusive proof one side will never convince the other of its convictions because their arguments are grounded in limitations set forth by priests and the Jews opposing them.

    Jesus was a profoundly religious atheist in his opposition to the Temple’s wrathful, vindictive, judgemental “god” YHVH. He was purposely set against the Temple, its priesthood and its sacrificial religion. For Jews, Jesus was a heretic among heretics, but how many Christians understand this? Had he lived long enough, Jesus would have been among the very first to reject Saul/Paul’s Judaic “Christianity” in the same manner he rejected Temple Judaism.

    “Christianity” is a Jewish based religion and was from its inception. With little effort, one can easily find ancient Judaism’s second Temple’s old laws and customs redacted to fit the new religious framework of Christianity. It is beyond obvious how Christians revere and honor the very old Testament figures the second Temple priests used to validate and enforce their religious system. So we have one Jewish religious system opposing another Jewish religious system – Jews set ’em up and Jews knock em down.

    Keep chasing those hoary, religious fairy tails around in circles and see if it ever makes any difference.

    1. @ Arch Stanton

      “I give up, I quit.”

      Quit by all means. That’s what all weaklings do. You really disgust me. Why? Because you expect your own views to be tolerated and respected and indeed they are tolerated and respected on this site. (Which is why they are published here, including your articles). But do you extend a similar tolerance and respect for the religious views of others when they clash with your own? No, you do not! That’s why I despise you — you pompous, self-opinionated, gutless, intellectual prig.

      Why should I respect you if you spit on my religion, you insufferable creep?

      1. Anyone who attacks Christianity is doing the Jew’s dirty work. This is exactly what the Jews want, isn’t it? So people like Arch Stanton, without knowing it, are Useful Idiots for the Jews.

        Not very bright, are you, Arch? In attacking Christianity, you are doing the Jew’s dirty work. You are a Useful Idiot for the Jews.

      2. @Madame
        But the jews fear even more those who select the christian part of Christianity, and completely disregard the rest.
        Most christians are suckers for the old Testament, or the Torah if you like. The jews knows that, and quietly laughs as they attack Jesus. The OT is their backdoor into control, helped by Paul’s letters.
        Arch is not a useful idiot for the jews. On the contrary, he is dangerous. He is forcing you to look at the conglomerate of contradicting ideas within the Bible, and select the parts that is spiritually apt for the white European. And that is mainly the gospels, stories about a man who I doubt was jewish.
        I am fed up with being surrounded by history myths of some cheating bastards in the Middle East, while my own people’s history from the same time is hardly discussed. Why should I care/learn about Moses?

      3. As a youngster brought up in the Catholic religion; the catechism was the main source of teaching, I don’t remember ever having my hands on a Bible……

    2. Like lobro saiid, keep swingin’ Arch. Although I do sympathize with your exasperation. And I wonder, why no responses to my “cruci-fiction” comment? Cat got yer all tongues?

      The comments of Sardonicus and Madama Butterfly reflect our points exactly in their taking offense at the questioning of jew-inspired sacred cows of Christ-extracted “Christianity”. That’s right folks, and if much of the “christ” has been taken out of “christianity, then what are we left with, hmmm?

    3. I ask people to read instead of condemn, but no one does. Apparently, condemnation and ad hominem attacks are much simpler. I challenge anyone to find a story even close to the one I have written about Jesus the man. Show me facts that proves the story wrong.

      Jesus was an historical character, albeit a minor one blown far out of proportion by religionists. The story of Jesus is much like that other story Jews have mislabeled the “Holocaust;” yet another story blown completely out of proportion to its actual historical significance. But then Jews do things like that.

      Jews do not hate fictional characters. I defy anyone to find another character outside Hitler so vehemently hated by the Jews. (Haman doesn’t count as Jews simply use that character for an excuse to celebrate their murderous inclinations.)

      Jesus was a Jew. Had he not been a Jew, no Temple Jew would have listened to his oppositional teachings against the Temple; he would have had no authority to do so. If Jesus was not a Jew, the stories make no sense.

      As nay-sayers have tried claiming Jesus was not a Jew, or that he was a fictional character, they have also worked diligently to obfuscate his mission. Jesus’ real mission was not about performing godly miracles or rebelling against Roman oppression, it was about the Temple.

      I have written how the raising of Lazarus was a public demonstration against the horrific practice of burying the living by decree of Temple priests. They did so to profit from their sacrificial observance of the Para Aduma. So the Raising of Lazarus was about the opposition to a greedy priesthood torturing people for money and pleasure. Doesn’t this fit perfectly with other historically validated actions by Jews?

      Contrast my explanation with the traditional Christian version of the story that Jesus simply performed a few “miracles” by raising the dead, doing so for no reason outside being “god” incarnate and a generally good guy. How would Occam apply his razor here?

      What’s more, Jesus presented numerous examples of his healing powers, yet there are only three instances of his “raising the dead.” The first account is from Luke 7:11.

      The first resurrection Jesus performed was when the “Lord” approached the town of Nain.

      There he met a funeral procession leaving the city. In the coffin was a young man, the only son of a widow. Jesus came close and touched the coffin and spoke to the dead man: “Young man, I say to you, get up!” Obeying the divine order, “the dead man sat up and began to talk.”

      This total nonsense, as first century Jews did not use “coffins.” Coffins are used to bury people in the ground, first century Jews buried their people in caves called “sepulchers,” as made plainly evident by other Gospel stories. Later, they placed the decomposed remains in an “ossuary” as evidenced by archeological finds.

      Coffins were unknown to the early Israelites (as they are to contemporary Oriental Jewry). The corpse was laid horizontally and face upward on a bier (II Sam. 3:31); [ . . .] note the remarkable way in which the Mishnah (Sanh. 7:2) prescribes that this be carried out. Bodies were buried clothed and carried to the tomb on a bier (II Sam. 3:31), but not in a coffin. – The Jewish Virtual Library

      The second story is that of the “rich man” Jarius’ and his daughter, a story clearly indicating the money aspect of raising the dead and after all, we are talking Jews here, are we not? So why only two credible stories? Why didn’t Jesus go around the graveyards raising a multitude of people from the dead as he did healing a multitude of sick people?

      The evidence is all there, right in front of the Christian’s nose; yet no one studies the facts, using them along with logic to refute what I have written, they simply castigate or ignore me for my disbelieving their fanciful stories of magic and mysticism. I have spent more than twenty-five years of devotion studying this man and his story. I have written more than seven hundred pages about Jesus. I ask those denigrating me – what have you done?

      Perhaps the most galling thing about all this is that I truly revere Jesus for what he did for the same reason I revere Hitler for what he did. Both gave their lives to address the root of the problem, i.e. the greedy, murderous, avaricious psychopathic Jew. I truly admire this highly spiritual man that sacrificed his life to help his people escape the oppression of religious Jews. More than anything, I want Jesus to be recognized for his truly great effort in opposing the Jew, as opposed to the magical mystical nonsense put forth by the Christian priests to enrich themselves and their churches. Yet, what has changed in two thousand years since his death?

      I predicted everyone in the Judaic based religions would fear and hate my story. So far I have found that to be exactly the case.

      1. @ Arch Stanton

        Lasha tells me she has enjoyed reading what you have to say. She thinks you have a right to express your opinions here without being subjected to needless ad hominem attacks. She has asked me tell you to continue enlightening us with your opinions, exactly as before, and not to be deterred by your critics.

        @ Arch Stanton’s critics

        You have a right to contradict and critique Arch Stanton but would be wise to do so more politely. Show more respect please.

      2. Yes, Arch… here is MORE of what jews do when in charge:

        Major Israeli Intelligence Penetration Of Trump Campaign And Administration Discovered

        Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, his brother Joshua Kushner, and their father, Charles Kushner—convicted in 2005 on 18 federal counts of making illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering—attempted in April 2017 to shake down the Finance Minister of Qatar, Ali Sharif Al Emadi during a meeting in New York.

        The Kushners insisted that El Emadi invest a half billion dollars in the “financially stressed,” i.e., bankrupt, Kushner building at *666* Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. Joshua Kushner was also looking for Qatari investment in his and Jared’s high-tech venture capital firm, Thrive Capital.

      3. Arch Stanton: “Jesus was a Jew. Had he not been a Jew, no Temple Jew would have listened to his oppositional teachings against the Temple; he would have had no authority to do so. If Jesus was not a Jew, the stories make no sense.”

        This is generally acknowledged by the vast majority of Christians, and only really disputed by a tiny fringe minority of “White Christian Identity” or “Two-seedline” Christians like Pastor James P. Wickstrom who, funnily enough, believe they are the real Jews.

        (I recently learned that Pastor Wickstrom passed away and until the Jews shut down his podcasts about a year ago, I was an avid follower for many years and found his sermons very interesting and fascinating. RIP.)

        Moreover, I agree with your thesis that “Jesus’ real mission was not about performing godly miracles or rebelling against Roman oppression, it was about the Temple.” Arguably, the greatest crime of the Jewish Temple was (and still is) usury and debt.

        Today, as I started to dig deeper (pardon the pun) of Jesus’s entombment on the day of Jewish Passover, which tangentially led me to his Sermon on the Mount, I was truly amazed to discover that the word “debt” and “debtors” had been scrubbed clean from the Lord’s Prayer.

        The infiltration of the Christian Church goes back to at least 1662, if the Anglican Book of Common Prayer is any clue. I was raised an Anglican and this is how I remember it — the following is taken from Anglican Book of Common Prayer, 1662:

        Our Father who art in Heaven,
        Hallowed be thy name;
        Thy kingdom come
        Thy will be done
        On earth as it is in heaven.
        Give us this day our daily bread;
        And forgive us our trespasses
        As we forgive those who trespass against us;
        And lead us not into temptation,
        But deliver us from evil.

        Here is the actual text of the Prayer as it appears in Matthew 5:1–7:29 New International Version:

        “This, then, is how you should pray:

        Our Father in heaven,
        hallowed be your name,
        your kingdom come,
        your will be done,
        on earth as it is in heaven.
        Give us today our daily bread.
        And forgive us our debts,
        as we also have forgiven our debtors.
        And lead us not into temptation,
        but deliver us from the evil one.

        Indeed, from the point of view of the Synagogue of Satan, Jesus was an evil anti-usurer, if not anti-Semite who will forever be hated, forever cursed to boil in a vat of Jewish semen and shit.

      4. JFC –

        Yes…. New International Version brought commerce into the narrative.

        For decades I have used that switch to illustrate that DEBT is a CRIME of TRESPASS:

        TRESPASS is an area of criminal law or tort law broadly divided into three groups:
        trespass to the person
        trespass to chattels
        trespass to land.

      5. Pat,

        Good point. I checked with a couple of other Bibles, including the King James one, and the words “debts” and “debtors” are intact and used instead of “trespasses”. The King James version is generally accepted as the least corrupted, but I cited the New International version because it is written in contemporary, easy-to-understand English.

        The significance of the “switch” should be obvious and, I hope, revolutionary. It should make all Christians rejoice: God forgives our debts! It’s no big deal if we don’t pay our (((debtors)))

        By the way, there is actually a legal precedence — The Credit River Decision — that makes it perfectly legal not to pay our “debts” but you’ll never ever hear about it in our filthy lying Jew Press.

        The Credit River Decision

        An honest judge rules honestly on money matters.

        A Minnesota Trial Court’s decision holding the Federal Reserve Act unconstitutional and VOID; holding the National Banking Act unconstitutional and VOID; declaring a mortgage acquired by the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota in the regular course of its business, along with the foreclosure and the sheriff’s sale, to be VOID.

        This decision, which is legally sound, has the effect of declaring all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by the Federal Reserve, National and State Banks to be null and VOID. This amounts to an emancipation of this nation from personal, national and State debt purportedly owed to this banking system. Every True American owes it to himself/herself, to his or her country, and to the people of the world for that matter, to study this decision very carefully and to understand it, for upon it hangs the question of freedom or slavery.


        The “Credit River Decision” handed down by a jury of 12 on a cold day in December, in the Credit River Township Hall, was an experience that I’ll never forget.

        The Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court had phoned me a week before the trial and asked me if I would be an associate justice in assisting Justice Martin V. Mahoney since he had never handled a jury trial before. I accepted, and it took me two hours to get my car running in the 22 below zero weather.

        I got to the courtroom about 30 minutes before trial, and helped get the wood stove going, since the trial was being held in an unheated storeroom of a general store. This was the first time I met Justice Mahoney, and I was impressed with his no-nonsense manner of handling matters before him. My OB was to help pick the jury, and to keep Jerome Daly and the attorney representing the Bank of Montgomery from engaging in a fist fight. The courtroom was highly charged, and the Jury was all business.

        The banker testified about the mortgage loan given to Jerome Daly, but then Daly cross-examined the banker about the creating of money “out of thin air,” and the banker admitted that this was standard banking practice. When Justice Mahoney heard the banker testify that he could “create money out of thin air,” Mahoney said, “It sounds like fraud to me.” I looked at the faces of the jurors, and they were all agreeing with Mahoney by shaking their heads and by the looks on their faces.

        I must admit that up until that point, I really didn’t believe Jerome’s theory, and thought he was making this up. After I heard the testimony of the banker, my mouth had dropped open in shock, and I was in complete disbelief. There was no doubt in my mind that the Jury would find for Daly.

        Jerome Daly had taken on the banks, the Federal Reserve Banking System, and the money lenders, and had won.

        It is now twenty-eight years since this “Landmark Decision,” and Justice Mahoney is quoted more often than any Supreme Court justice ever was. The money boys that run the “private Federal Reserve Bank” soon got back at Mahoney by poisoning him in what appeared to have been a fishing boat accident (but with his body pumped full of poison) in June of 1969, less than 6 months later.

        Both Jerome Daly and Justice Martin V. Mahoney are truly the greatest men that I have ever had the pleasure to meet. The Credit River Decision was and still is the most important legal decision ever decided by a Jury. — Bill Drexler

        Source of quotation:

      6. @ Justice For Chinese

        “…Good point. I checked with a couple of other Bibles, including the King James one, and the words “debts” and “debtors” are intact and used instead of “trespasses”…”

        The original Greek (Koine) text in Matthew 6 : 9-13 says :

        καὶ ἄφες ἡμῖν τὰ ὀφειλήματα ἡμῶν,
        ὡς καὶ ἡμεῖς ἀφίεμεν τοῖς ὀφειλέταις ἡμῶν·

        Which means literally : “And forgive us our debts, as we too have forgiven our debtors.”
        ὀφειλήμα means indeed “debt” (plural : ὀφειλήματα).

        But the Lord’s Prayer in Luke 11 : 2-4 says :

        καὶ ἄφες ἡμῖν τὰς ἁμαρτίας ἡμῶν, καὶ γὰρ αὐτοὶ ἀφίομεν παντὶ ὀφείλοντι ἡμῖν

        Which means literally :”And forgive us our sins, because we ourselves too have forgiven our debtors”. In the first part of the sentence the word ἁμαρτίας, which means “sins” is used, but in the second part the word ὀφείλοντι which means “debtors” is used.

        So what are we talking about (financial) debt or (moral) sin ?

        Here is the answer :

        ‘Debts’ is an Aramaism for trespasses and wrongdoings against one’s neighbour (sins), and is not a monetary debt in this context (this is why Luke has ἁμαρτίας—’sins’ instead of—there can be no doubt—Jesus’ original ὀφειλήματα—’debts’).…/is-this-literal-translation-of-the-lord-prayer…

        In Aramaic, the language in which Jesus and his disciples spoke, the word for “debt” was also used metaphorically for “trespass”.

        1. “Forgive us our debts” = “Forgive us our karmic debts”, i.e. our sins.

          According to Hinduism/Buddhism, when one sins one has to pay the price of that sin at some future date. One acquires bad karma. However, if the person who is the victim of that sin forgives the sin freely, the sinner is let off the bad karma, i.e. the sin is forgiven.

          One is already half way to forgiveness if one repents sincerely and is incapable of sinning again in the same way.

      7. Thanks, FR –

        Since, “In Aramaic, the language in which Jesus and his disciples spoke, the word for “debt” was also used metaphorically for “trespass”….. they knew debts were crimes.

        The bible and many old documents have been SO wrongly interpreted to the point that everyone is guessing what was meant in those times. 🙂

      8. pat, don’t jump on a single interpretation of a single word to formulate the entire ancient history.
        debt does not have to mean being in hock to a usurer, although given america’s level of debt, one can be excused for thinking that.
        here is the paternoster in latin, surely came first (there is no lord’s prayer in torah)

        Pater Noster, qui es in caelis,
        sanctificétur nomen Tuum,
        adveniat Regnum Tuum,
        fiat volúntas tua,
        sicut in caelo et in terra.
        Panem nostrum cotidiánum
        da nobis hódie,
        et dimitte nobis DÉBITA nostra,
        sicut et nos dimittímus
        DEBITÓRIBUS nostris;
        et ne nos indúcas in tentationem,
        sed libera nos a malo.

        if you insist that “dimitte nobis débita nostra, sicut et nos dimittímus debitóribus nostris” means “give us a break on the money we owe you just as we write off some of the money owed to us by our debtors”, then why stop there, see the word FIAT in the prayer?
        God was obviously printing FIAT money (in heaven, cielo), a prototype for today’s jewish federal reserve on earth.

        btw, you are a frequent visitor to mexico, e.g., yucatan peninsula, cancun, etc., to sample ceviche if nothing else.
        translate this then 😉 : DEBEMOS encontrarnos alguna vez

      9. @Sister Monica
        “One is already half way to forgiveness if one repents sincerely and is incapable of sinning again in the same way.”
        Being a Catholic, don’t you believe that one is entirely forgiven by God if one repents sincerely and has a firm resolve to amend his life? This is traditional Christian teaching, although one must also make atonement for sins committed, either in this life or in the next, i.e. in Purgatory.
        And how can one be “incapable of sinning again in the same way”? One is always capable of sinning. The only person ever incapable of sinning was Christ, being a divine Person (although taking on a human nature). And the only persons capable of not sinning (as opposed to being incapable of sinning) were the Blessed Virgin Mary, conceived without Original Sin, and St John the Baptist, who was sanctified in his mother Elizabeth’s womb. (Luke 1.39-44).
        See, e.g.,

        1. Darrell,

          Your above comment ended up in Spam for some reason. I have no idea why. Anyway, I approved it as soon as I saw it.

          Sr. Monica

      10. Actions speak louder than words: Jesus whooped their asses!

        “Driving of the Merchants From the Temple” by Scarsellino

        Matthew 21:12-13 King James Version (KJV)

        12 And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

        13 And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

        Was this whopping the trigger event that caused Jesus’s death a week later?

        If we learn nothing else about Jewish history, we should have learned by now that no one who challenges the Temple banksters and their corrupt money system lives very long; not Hitler; not JFK; not even Jesus.


        Thanks for your very interesting post about the original meaning of “debts” in Aramaic. However, it doesn’t really change the fact that “debts” and “trespass” and “sin” are all interchangeable in morality and as moral equivalents, if not in tort law, as Pat has pointed out.

        But getting back to my original point: using the word “debts” in 1662 — as it first appears in the Anglican Common Prayer — would have been understood in the modern sense today as a monetary obligation. Why the tricky “switch” then? Why was the word “trespass” used instead of “debts”?

        As an Anglican and Protestant, I grew up obsessing about making money and making sure I paid all my debts. Had I known that God forgives all my debts every time I simply recited my daily prayers, I would have, in hindsight, been a lot happier and a lot richer.

        In short, Protestantism was a Jew PSYOP. The Catholics themselves knew this and called it a “Judaizing religion” if they didn’t exactly call it a PSYOP — a contemporary term used “to denote any action which is practiced mainly by psychological methods with the aim of evoking a planned psychological reaction: various techniques are used, and are aimed at influencing a target audience’s value system, belief system, emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior.” — Wikipedia

        If this dirty “switch”, along with the Credit River Decision were made widely known to Christians and to all Americans today, what do you suppose would happen? I hope a much-needed paradigm change would happen and, I fear for my Jewish friends, also a real Holocaust would happen this time around.

        BTW, Mr. Ryckaert, what is your take on the word “moneychangers”? Why was Jesus so upset with the moneychangers; so much so that he whipped and chased them out of the Temple?

        Here’s what I found to be the standard interpretation of Mathew 21:12-3 and the meaning of “moneychangers” by Jack Zavada

        Jesus Drives the Money Changers From the Temple – Story Summary:

        Jesus Christ and his disciples journeyed to Jerusalem to celebrate the feast of Passover. They found the sacred city of God overflowing with thousands of pilgrims from all parts of the world.

        Entering the Temple, Jesus saw the money changers, along with merchants who were selling animals for sacrifice. Pilgrims carried coins from their hometowns, most bearing the images of Roman emperors or Greek gods, which Temple authorities considered idolatrous.

        [Pat, I am reminded of your recent post about the Noahide Laws being passed by the traitorous US Congress in 1994 and their prohibitions on idolatry. Is this why the Rothschilds had to resort to occult symbolism (i.e. Star of David) to denote their Godliness instead of just putting their own ugly faces and Kosher noses on our money?]

        The high priest ordered that only Tyrian shekels would be accepted for the annual half-shekel Temple tax because they contained a higher percentage of silver, so the money changers exchanged unacceptable coins for these shekels. Of course, they extracted a profit, sometimes much more than the law allowed.

        Jesus was so filled with anger at the desecration of the holy place that he took some cords and wove them into a small whip. He ran about, knocking over the tables of the money changers, spilling coins on the ground. He drove the exchangers out of the area, along with the men selling pigeons and cattle. He also prevented people from using the court as a shortcut.

        As he cleansed the Temple of greed and profit, Jesus quoted from Isaiah 56:7: “My house shall be called a house of prayer, but you make it a den of robbers.” (Matthew 21:13, ESV)

        The disciples and others present were in awe of Jesus’ authority in God’s sacred place. His followers remembered a passage from Psalm 69:9: “Zeal for your house will consume me.” (John 2:17, ESV)

        The common people were impressed by Jesus’ teaching, but the chief priests and scribes feared him because of his popularity. They began to plot a way to destroy Jesus.

        From the above explanation of what occurred in the Temple and in the historical records from the 1st Century (Flavius Josephus’s Books of the History of the Jewish War against the Romans), there was in real-life a bloody Jewish rebellion in Palestine that was, I would argue, basically a currency war. I would also argue that all Jewish wars are ostensibly currency wars.

        I believe this violent action and scene in the Jewish Temple against the moneychangers is the key to understanding who Jesus really was why the Romans adopted Christianity as a state religion if they did not, as Joseph Atwill claims, invented it in the first place.

        If you analyze the story of Jesus as a piece of literature or film, the arc of the story and dramatic apex occurs in the Temple scene — the mise-en-scène in a movie — where Jesus, the Prince of Peace, is totally and inexplicably out of character and becomes violent at the sight of the moneychangers.

        The story ends with the crucifixion of Christ, which is very anti-climatic from a cinematic point of view. A more interesting conclusion and cinematic climax would be the massacre of the Jews and the sacking of their Temple, which in fact is what happened in 70 AD; but, Oy Vey!, which Hollywood Jew in his right Talmudic mind is going to make a movie glorifying the sacking of their Holy Temple and proclaiming Caesar Vespasianus Augustus as the Son of Man, aka the Son of (((God)))?

        Luke 21 New International Version (NIV)

        The Widow’s Offering

        21 As Jesus looked up, he saw the rich putting their gifts into the temple treasury. 2 He also saw a poor widow put in two very small copper coins. 3 “Truly I tell you,” he said, “this poor widow has put in more than all the others. 4 All these people gave their gifts out of their wealth; but she out of her poverty put in all she had to live on.”

        The Destruction of the Temple and Signs of the End Times

        5 Some of his disciples were remarking about how the temple was adorned with beautiful stones and with gifts dedicated to God. But Jesus said, 6 “As for what you see here, the time will come when not one stone will be left on another; every one of them will be thrown down.”

        7 “Teacher,” they asked, “when will these things happen? And what will be the sign that they are about to take place?”

        8 He replied: “Watch out that you are not deceived. For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am he,’ and, ‘The time is near.’ Do not follow them. 9 When you hear of wars and uprisings, do not be frightened. These things must happen first, but the end will not come right away.”

        10 Then he said to them: “Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. 11 There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various places, and fearful events and great signs from heaven.

        12 “But before all this, they will seize you and persecute you. They will hand you over to synagogues and put you in prison, and you will be brought before kings and governors, and all on account of my name. 13 And so you will bear testimony to me. 14 But make up your mind not to worry beforehand how you will defend yourselves. 15 For I will give you words and wisdom that none of your adversaries will be able to resist or contradict. 16 You will be betrayed even by parents, brothers and sisters, relatives and friends, and they will put some of you to death.17 Everyone will hate you because of me. 18 But not a hair of your head will perish.19 Stand firm, and you will win life.

        20 “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. 21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. 22 For this is the time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been written. 23 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against this people. 24 They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.

        25 “There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea. 26 People will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken. 27 At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 28 When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.”

        29 He told them this parable: “Look at the fig tree and all the trees. 30 When they sprout leaves, you can see for yourselves and know that summer is near. 31 Even so, when you see these things happening, you know that the kingdom of God is near.

        32 “Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. 33 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.

        34 “Be careful, or your hearts will be weighed down with carousing, drunkenness and the anxieties of life, and that day will close on you suddenly like a trap. 35 For it will come on all those who live on the face of the whole earth. 36 Be always on the watch, and pray that you may be able to escape all that is about to happen, and that you may be able to stand before the Son of Man.”

        In any event, and whether you believe the Bible is fiction or not, the pertinent and important question to ask in any moral parable is who are the good guys? Which side was Jesus on? The Romans or the Jews?

        Arch Stanton’s claim that Jesus’s opposition to the Jews was based on his opposition to their bloody animal sacrifices — unless he can prove Jesus was a vegan — is rather naive and simply wrong, though I agree with his central thesis that the crux of the New Testament is explicitly anti-Jew and, therefore I would argue, implicitly pro-Roman.

        If it isn’t obvious, it should be: Jesus is a Roman martyr. The Jews rejected Jesus and still reject him today. Jesus is also the greatest saint of the Roman Catholic Church. Incidentally, why do Catholics nowadays leave out the “Roman” part when they refer to themselves as “Catholics”?

        Indeed, and inarguably, the entire foundation of Christianity aka the Roman Catholic Church was built on the mission of Jesus Christ as explicated in the New Testament aka The Gospels. Vatican City, the headquarters of ALL Catholic Churches, has always been and is still situated in the heart of ROME!

        To paraphrase Gilad Atzom’s famous quotation about fake “anti-Zionist Zionists”, Christianity is an antisemitic Semitic fake religion, but the Rabbis, the masters of dissembling and lies, weren’t fooled one bit — not even for a minute.

        In conclusion, the Jews do not want to destroy Christianity. On the contrary, they need Christianity. Without Christianity, there would be no anti-Semitism, and without anti-Semitism, they couldn’t have their shit-hole homeland called Israel.

    1. Jesus was buried like a Jew, according to the Gospel of St. John 19:38-42 New International Version:

      Later, Joseph of Arimathea asked Pilate for the body of Jesus. Now Joseph was a disciple of Jesus, but secretly because he feared the Jewish leaders. With Pilate’s permission, he came and took the body away. He was accompanied by Nicodemus, the man who earlier had visited Jesus at night. Nicodemus brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about seventy-five pounds. Taking Jesus’ body, the two of them wrapped it, with the spices, in strips of linen. This was in accordance with Jewish burial customs. At the place where Jesus was crucified, there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb, in which no one had ever been laid. Because it was the Jewish day of Preparation and since the tomb was nearby, they laid Jesus there.

      It gets curiouser and curiouser as to who’s a wicked crypto-Jew and who’s not.

      1. @ Justice For Chinese

        The dead have no say in what is done with their body after death. The corpse is at the mercy of those taking care of it.

        Since Jesus, the Son of the Father, was before Abraham, he could not have been a jew since there were no jews at that time.

        Jesus’ lineage was only the Father. Had there been a term for surrogate birth mother at the time, it would have been used instead of Mary just being a virgin. Those of the time referred to Jesus as the son of David, but Jesus rejected that label with the question of how that could be when David called Jesus Lord. Jesus also did not accepted the label of being king of the Jews.

        With just a cursory investigation of scripture, it becomes obvious that being jewish was someone adopting the jewish cult beliefs. Jesus did not accept those beliefs. Jesus repeatedly criticized the jewish cult beliefs. There were conversions to the jewish cult. The book of Ester mentions it and so did Jesus. Being jewish has nothing to do with who had sex with who, just another jewish lie to keep the cult viable.

      2. @Ungenius
        “Jesus also did not accept the label of being king of the Jews.”
        That may be true if one means “king of the Jews ONLY.” When Jesus was asked by Pilate if he were the king of the Jews, he responded with a question (John 18.34), but when Pilate shortly after asked, “So you are a king?” he replied “You have said it….” (John 18.37), which is a Hebrew/Aramaic way of saying “Yes”. Jesus, being both Son of God and Son of Man, was sent by God the Father to the Israelites (a.k.a Jews), but the mission of his apostles and their successors was to the entire human race. So he was indeed king of the Jews, being the Jewish Messiah, but only as part of his being king of heaven and earth. “All power in heaven and earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.” (Mt. 28.18-20)

  16. @ Sherrii

    Whoever plots against Christ is a crypto Jew or satanist or both.

    Agreed. But there’s more to this than meets the eye. As a clinical psychologist and psychotherapist, I can tell you this. Those who have a problem with Christianity and prefer to scoff and sneer at it in an acrimonious manner almost certainly have serious sex problems which determine this hostility of theirs.

    In rejecting religion, they are also rejecting the inner voice that tells them not to masturbate. God rejection and the habit of masturbation are always found together. Extensive surveys have established this connection.

  17. hey everyone, let’s pause for breath and take stock of the situation:
    this powerful article attracted 34 comments in less than a day (more like 1/2 day, i think, in which case 3 comments/hr meets all kinds of satisfying metrics), most of them impassioned, some even sensible 🙂

    and it was fueled by arch’s initial comment, this is why we all ought to be grateful, singing from the same hymnal in the same voice is a complete waste of time, don’t you all think?
    i know that in my own case, a few new and interesting thoughts are crystalizing on the subject, sprouting tangential tendrils to who knows where.

    it is completely irrelevant whether arch is in the end right or wrong – and i happen to think that he is wrong – but the effort to prove to him that he is wrong is in itself worth almost any price, because arch is neither stupid nor shallow, far from it and cheap marketing tricks will not suffice.

    a true christian is grateful for the obstacles, the greater they are, the greater the reciprocal faith that God shows in his strength and ability to surmount them and that in itself should be pleasing enough.
    the easiest and smoothest path is the chute to perdition, a brightly lit slide greased with blood, sweat and tears of the innocents – have a good trip, jews!

    sister Monica: i do have an inkling of what you are saying and it will be an ongoing dialogue underwriting much of what i’ll be saying, here, there and elsewhere.

    1. sister Monica: i do have an inkling of what you are saying and it will be an ongoing dialogue underwriting much of what i’ll be saying, here, there and elsewhere.

      I know what you’re saying, Lobro.
      The axe could fall at any moment.
      Let’s hope it doesn’t chop off the wrong head.
      (You know better than most what I mean).


    2. but the effort to prove to him that he is wrong is in itself worth almost any price

      Verily brother, this is all I ask. Not sure about the price though.

  18. Religious people are the ones upon whom the childhood indoctrination program and all the subsequent reconditioning has the lasting effect.
    That’s good for hammerheads, I guess.
    I notice there is a lot of regurgitation of dogma and referral to scriptures, etc., as if that somehow proves the case.
    It is good to have a sense of reverence and to regulate one’s behavior ethically in order to maintain it, and him without dogma while he’s at it is commendable.
    But it seems a big waste of time, at a time when we’re rapidly running out of time, to be arguing details on ancient history, and casting personal aspersions in the process.
    There is plenty to be said about enlightening the masses on the J-subject and if everybody was fully aware of that the world might get past the big hang-up of zionism and israel.
    I’m pretty sure the USA doesn’t function properly because it is controlled by the zionism faction.
    Hopefully we’ll all break the frame at some point in the process, jews included, when we realize the greater truth, and move the conversation into more productive realms.

  19. here is one such tangential outgrowth, must highlight it or lose it to the memory hole.

    Insulting One’s Faith

    hmm, not sure what that means, if faith is understood to be the personal, encrypted communication channel between a sentient being and God.
    jews tried their damned, condemned best to insult Jesus in the cruelest, most vulgar manner possible right from judas’ kiss onward, if not before, jeered him mercilessly on his laborious trek to calvary, hooted with glee during spiking, mocked him transfixed on the cross to come down if he was the true Son of God – why?
    Because the devil’s materialists only believe in physical power, unable to conceive a spiritual timelessness outside the causal stream.
    and yes, they were all there the christ pissers, larry david, sarah silverman having an orgasm at the thought that she would kill jesus again and again and again in the centuries to come.
    Was Jesus insulted, did he feel offended and swore back at them? think about it, so why should we?

    in the dramatic way, it was perfect – crossing myself as i utter this heresy.
    what if jews, in their tender mercy decided to execute the offender against judaism in a more “humane” way, let’s say, put him to sleep by way of a lethal injection, would that have been preferable?
    Or, alternatively, to butcher Him in a medieval fashion, disembowel him, break him on the wheel with hammers, then draw and quarter him, what kind of crucified image would he present as an amputee?
    So you see, it must have been choreographed in some fateful way – a Passion Play (ask yourself about the meaning of the term Passion and its true link to today’s meaning, another strange tendril).

    i looked at these issues a bit in my offline time, the Passion script.
    in the era of tiberius’ rule, it went as follows: tiberius was rather well inclined towards jews (judeans, overwhelmingly represented by pharisees at the top, also sicarii, the assassin cult, their paramilitary arm, thus judas iscariot doing the jonathan polard bit, queen esther, same old, same old, betraying and backstabbing, what jews do best, by deception waging the war.
    tiberius was sympathetic because his son’s best friend was herod agrippa, a royal jew brought up in rome like a roman, not very jewish at all.
    the 2nd most powerful man in the empire was seianus (sejanus), the commander of the praetorian guard and a major league schemer – and an even more major league ***antisemite*** 😀
    he couldn’t stand jews, need we wonder why? because jews were jews, even back then and they were a power to be reckoned with in rome already at that time.
    seianus installed his good friend and protege pontius pilate as a governor in godforsaken judea and pilate shared sejanus’ distate for judeans, had the trial of jesus taken place then, no way would pilate have approved his capital punishment, maybe a light flogging at the worst.
    But in the interim, sejanus was caught conspiring against tiberius, proved to have secretly assassinated tiberius’ son and heir and that was the end, the huge scandal and downfall, so that pilate was left without his protector and shaking in his boots for his and his family’s life because the wrath of tiberius swept dozens of mighty patrician families out of existence on the suspicion that they took part in the plot.
    And all this strengthened the hand of the sanhedrin against pilate so when they hauled in jesus following judas’ betrayal, condemned him in the religious court, pilate had no choice, however much he hated what he had to do, thus the symbolic washing of hands.

    And thus the all time most dramatic Passion, if nothing else, having spawned the history’s greatest outpouring of artistic genius – ALL OF THEM, NEVER REPEATED AFTER CHRISTIANITY WENT OUT OF FASHION.

    raphael, caravaggio, titian, michaelangelo, bellini, leonardo, dürer, dante, bosch, rembrandt, marlowe, palestrina, vivladi, bach, shakespeare … c’mon arch, let’s see a repeat today, look at all todays’s mighty men of letters, the nobelists, the men of science, atheists, unbelievers, aren’t they great?
    aren’t they?

    me, insulted by their lack of belief?
    LOL, i don’t give 2 shits what they think arch, my 1-man, singular faith trumps them all, every one of them, comfortably, i will do a victory lap while they wallow in the sweltering impotence of their confusion.

    because i do my own thinking, my own struggle, my own path, the roar of the crowds unheard and irrelevant.

    1. Very eloquently and profoundly put, Lobro! Keep up the good work. You too, Sardo.

      I might add that several comments here include the statement that Jesus may just be a fictional character. I would call that desperate wish fulfillment, which I think can best be translated as, “If Jesus never existed then Christian moral teaching has no basis, and if that’s so then it’s OK for me to continue to indulge in my favorite vices and not need to fear an eternal hell or humble myself before God and repent of my sins.” How convenient!

      Heck, even the ancient pagan writers and Christ’s Jewish enemies acknowledged him. Tell me, why would it only be recently that the “fictional Jesus” has had some following and not for the almost 2000 years previously?

  20. Why create a Frankenstein monster in Palestine 2000 years ago—i.e., Christianity, under the alleged distorter and corrupter of Christ’s original teachings, St Paul—in order to spend the next 2000 years trying to destroy it?

    One could ask the same of Communism, built up then torn down. It is the destruction and chaos that counts for the Tribe, not the tool.

    You are being asked to believe the absurdity that 2.2 billion Christians have been exposed to the extreme pacifism of Christ’s Sermon on the Mount
    Do most Christians, when you strike them on the right cheek, turn the other cheek and invite you to strike that cheek also? If so, I have yet to come across one such Christian.

    Nonetheless they have been exposed to a meme of significant pacifism and a deferring of life’s benefits for after death. Admittedly for most, Natural Law kicks in for most when violence threatens. This pacifism / lack of assertiveness abounds when governments trample their natural rights or even when simply conducting everyday transactions.

    The world would be an infinitely worse place today if all of us were to give up our religious beliefs and become atheists instead

    Recognizing the flaws in religion does not imply we must become atheists. Quite the contrary. It is arguable that truth is the highest principle of God after love. Truth is paramount.

    Which beliefs to give up depends on your definition of religious beliefs. If those beliefs:

    – are faith based
    – are not knowledge based

    then yes, give up the superfluous baggage.

    One of the most brilliant mathematicians and philosophers of the 17th century, Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), had a mind-altering mystical experience which turned his entire life upside down.

    Christianity and the great Oriental religions—in particular Buddhism and Vedanta—are perfectly compatible with modern science.

    Those who by His grace of God were given a glimpse of deeper reality and swooned at the power of God’s Love do not come down on any side of this argument. Quite right that the core message of the prophets is compatible with science, but bloated, confusing and faith based religious texts serve no one.

    Christian essence, as propounded by Jesus is a good: Love God, Don’t Steal, Be Neighborly.

    Despite the wonderful Christian inspired art and science, history shows that that whatever the propaganda used to dumb down populations, whether it be from Religionists or Communists, it eventually leads to mass death.

  21. Coincidentally Mark Passio just published this: Fake-Ass Christians – Part 1 of 2 – YouTube

    Very relevant to this thread, entirely respectful of Jesus.

    Genuine Christianity is not what most people think it is. Human beings have been given a false form of Christianity to keep them spiritually asleep. In this paradigm-changing presentation, Mark Passio points out the hallmark beliefs and behaviors of false “Christians” and defines what it really is.

  22. @ Lasha

    An truly excellent article and great video selection (over 76-million views).

    In the video, the music was moving, but the most interesting thing to me was the reaction of the children; one girl clinging to a lamppost directing with one hand, two girls jumping up and down with their arms in the air and hands moving back and firth, the initial girl that put the coin in the hat standing in awe, motionless in front of the orchestra the whole time, etc., no negative reactions by any kids. Thanks for posting the video.

    Even with all the excellent points in your article, the spiritually numb won’t be moved toward the message of Jesus until they decide to move themselves as a result of whatever small or large event in their life begs for a decision toward oneness with the Father. For the truly stubborn, there will be more than one event. I speak from experience since I spent ten years of my life thinking I was an atheist.

    The attraction of people to the message of Jesus is the kingdom of God that Jesus said we are supposed to be preaching to others. Unfortunately, the kingdom of God is seldom preached by organized Christianity. These four KJV scriptures briefly outline the kingdom of God.

    Jesus said in Luke 16:16 – “The law and the prophets were until John (the Baptist): since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.”

    Luke 17:20-21 – And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he (Jesus) answered them and said, “The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.”

    Jesus said in Mark 10:14-15, “Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God. Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein.”

    Jesus said in John 14:6 & 23 – “…I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. …If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.”

  23. “I might add that several comments here include the statement that Jesus may just be a fictional character. I would call that desperate wish fulfillment, which I think can best be translated as, “If Jesus never existed then Christian moral teaching has no basis, and if that’s so then it’s OK for me to continue to indulge in my favorite vices and not need to fear an eternal hell or humble myself before God and repent of my sins.” How convenient!”

    darrell – you bring up a good point. which is, contrary to the fearful impression – not every so-called non-religious person in the world is automatically a craven lunatic. and not everybody feels the need for, or believes in, a rigid control system…
    also, the good points about the christian philosophy are still good, whether jesus is just a literary character or not, and, as has been pointed out by research, jesus wasn’t the first person in history to advocate them…
    it’s the bad parts of christianity, the torture-mudrer scene at the end, as well as the bad acts committed by organized religions down through the ages, that make people think, the abrahamic versions especially, are not authentic, straight from god, but more likely a creation of the romans, in the case of christianity/catholicism, or other politically oriented forces……
    and look what we’ve come to.
    research also indicates that the roman empire was inbred and infiltrated with jews, just the same as the british aristocracy is now… check the ‘roman nose’… hollywood likes giving you that profile in their roman movies…
    we do know why jews have big noses, right?

    1. Bark –

      You know better than to PAINT with this invention of yours:

      “I might add that several comments here include the statement that Jesus may just be a fictional character. I would call that desperate wish fulfillment, which I think can best be translated as, “If Jesus never existed then Christian moral teaching has no basis, and if that’s so then it’s OK for me to continue to indulge in my favorite vices and not need to fear an eternal hell or humble myself before God and repent of my sins.” How convenient!”

      BUT – It doesn’t account for all the queer Christian preachers and priests.

      If my brush were as wide as your invention I would – wrongly – label all Christians as wanting to act as those queers.!!

  24. Just wow! This is a fantastic article and thank you so much for your words of wisdom

  25. I read this fine article before I attended church services, yesterday. While sitting there, enduring my desire to be elsewhere, and wondering “Why did I bother??!”, I decided that the problem with Christianity is “churchianity”. Christian churches have become too silly for real men to engage. Hardly ever do the pastors address the gist of current affairs from which their congregations are seeking remedy. “Churchianity” is why Christians are falling away from what is left of their religion – or so it seems, to me, to be the primary reason.

    1. @ Gilbert Huntly

      You have hit the nail on the head with “churchianity.” That is how Christianity was infected in the beginning, with organization and buildings.

      How many buildings did Jesus say to build? None.

      What earthly hierarchy did Jesus say to establish? None.

      “Churchianity” is “Paulism,” not the teachings of Jesus.

      I stopped, as you say, enduring in 1978 and actually started learning about Jesus a couple of years later.

  26. The following insinuation requires a thread of its own IMO, because it touches on much wider issues and treads deep waters.
    April 2, 2018 at 1:51 am

    Re: Benedict XVI, as mentioned in “Constant Enemies” —
    Wasn’t he an obvious victim of homosexual blackmail, along with his equally queer brother back in Augsburg?…

    Hmm, and just who may be the source of these “facts”? ever wonder? Start with this: Italian Geo-Strategist Fuels Debate Over Pope Benedict’s Resignation

    The conflicts between the Church and the United States did not become less, even with the passing of John Paul II. They instead continued during the pontificate of Pope Ratzinger, in the course of which, what exacerbated them was not only the [policy and strategic] investment made by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the political Islam of the Muslim Brotherhood during the so-called Arab Spring,

    [read this carefully, CB, more than once]
    [note the inclusion of Germany, supremely important observation, something that i’ve been hinting at for some time]

    – but not by that more American-friendly one [Italy], which is to be recognized in Giorgio Napolitano [Italian President, 2006-2015].

    How it has come to an end is well-known to everyone. The Italian and papal governments were simultaneously hit by a scandalous, coordinated, and unusually violent and unprecedented campaign, even involving more or less opaque maneuvers in the financial field, with the final effect coming to a head in November 2011 with Berlusconi’s departure from the Palazzo Chigi and, on February 10 [sic – 11], 2013, the abdication of Ratzinger. At the height of the crisis, Italy progressively saw its access to international financial markets closed, while the Institute for Religious Works (IOR) [the Vatican Bank] was temporarily cut out of the Swift 4 circuit.

    So, once again, where might you have got your evidence” that Benedict XVI is a queer?
    Could you have misheard or misread the last year’s june 4th infowars article by corsi, titled ” Gay Orgy Sex Scandal Rocks Vatican as Pope Fires Traditionalists”, subheaded as

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Evidence emerging from the Vatican in recent days strongly suggests Pope Francis is transforming the Catholic Church into a socialist political organization that embraces the LGBT agenda, IN COMPLETE REJECTION OF THE TRADITIONAL PRO-FAMILY RELIGIOUS ORIENTATION OF HIS PREDECESSOR, POPE BENEDICT XVI.
    [sure jives with your version, don’t it]
    Last week, Pope Francis fired the Vatican’s top theologian, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Mueller, the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, who had a reputation as a staunch defender of the traditional family.

    Now, lets get to the heart of the localized issue, I think that I will open up on the bigger one in a subsequent post.
    Here is the smoking gun, courtesy of WikiLeaks: Clinton, Obama, Soros Overthrew Pope Benedict In Vatican Coup
    A group of Catholic lay leaders have asked President Trump to investigate their claims Soros, Obama and Clinton organized a Vatican coup to install radical leftist Pope Francis

    What, you mean neither WaPo nor NYT mentioned this? What a strange oversight.

    Regarding the Podesta e-mails in question, The New American reported last October:

    “Podesta, a longtime Clinton adviser/confidante and hand-picked top activist for left-wing funder George Soros, revealed in a 2011 e-mail that he and other activists were working to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Catholic Church, an obvious reference to the disastrous “Arab Spring” coups organized that same year by the Obama-Clinton-Soros team that destabilized the Middle East and brought radical Islamist regimes and terrorist groups to power in the region. The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church, which he described as a “middle ages [sic] dictatorship.”

    So, will you continue beating the war drum on behalf of Hillary Clinton, Obama, John Podesta, Jew Newman, boss Soros and his boss, the Rothschilds?
    Ever wonder why all of a sudden they were having a love fest with Pope Francis?

    Next post will deal with the issue of who is the antichrist’s best, most effective weapon today, all JEW needs to do is pull the trigger as often as he likes, which is often indeed.

    1. Lobro –

      Any religious organization as large and far-flung as the Catholic Church is GOING TO TEMPT internal corruption of itself. It is significant that America – a republic now older than the Roman republic – was almost entirely assembled by PROTESTANT white men who shyyed away from the central “authority” of Catholicism. Even now, the miriad diversity of Protestant sects are difficult to manipulate into any adhesive body politic. (Thank God!)
      Nobody I know – including myself – would contribute a plugged nickel to anything championed by the current communist Pope, or join his congregation. (Might just as well become a Jew!)

      1. That would be the commie Pope who recently claimed there is NO hell, or maybe not, according to the pedophiles and perverts people at the Vatican.

        No hell is an interesting claim. Now which other “Judeo-Christian” religion claims there is no hell…

      2. More on the Hell vs no Hell story. Pope Francis is quoted, “those who do not repent and cannot therefore be forgiven disappear. There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls.”

        Sartre provides more on that quote, and its refutation by the Vatican in this article.

        For a list of reasons for scorning the torture of hell, read Why is the idea of eternal damnation so repulsive to many people? Pope Francis in not a spiritual Pontiff. He is an apparatchik of his fellow travelers. His pronouncements deny The Theology Of Hell And Damnation. For A Defense Of The Traditional Christian Doctrine Of Hell, listen to the presentation by Dr. Scott M. Sullivan.

        Jorge Mario Bergoglio has committed more damage to Christianity and especially to the Catholic Church than any other Bishop of Rome. The Heresy Charges Against Pope Francis are an unprecedented condemnation in modern times.

        Heresy charges against the Pope? Apparently so.

        Last September, a group of 62 clergy and lay scholars took the rare step of presenting Pope Francis with a “Filial Correction,” charging him with permitting the spread of seven heresies, at least by omission, about marriage, the moral life, and the reception of the sacraments.

        The filial correction, in the form of a 25-page letter, was delivered to the Pope at his Santa Marta residence on August 11, 2017. No similar action has taken place within the Catholic Church since the Middle Ages, when Pope John XXII was admonished for errors which he later recanted on his deathbed.

        The number of signatories quickly grew to 250 scholars, some from prominent institutions around the world. Pope Francis has issued no response.

        One might think that bringing heresy charges against a sitting Pope would be fairly notable news, but it wasn’t until I read this article that I heard of it, and I spend a lot of time reading news.

        Interesting article, lots of links, and a fairly quick read. 🙂

    2. @ Lobro

      A lot of what you have written was also uncovered by the citizen investigators of PizzaGate sometime in 2017.

      What they determined was that the coup was accomplished with the leverage resulting from Benedict’s association with pedophilia while in Poland. It seems his brother was neck deep in it. Some Italian investigative journalist had tied Benedict into pedophilia via his brother. As the story goes, the coup instigators you mentioned made the deal to keep it secret if Benedict would abdicate. Benedict did and remained at the Vatican to avoid prosecution.

      This is just what I recall. Is it true? I personally don’t know since I am just a lurker, but those PizzaGate investigators are a determined dedicated bunch of people and there has to be a reason why Benedict was willing to abdicate. For anyone interested enough to chase this rabbit down the hole, the details should be at the archive link on the Voat PizzaGate forum.

      Also, since Francis was installed as part of the NWO cabal, Qanon (very close to Trump) has indicated that Francis will fall with the cabal, no info on how. Time will tell.

      BTW, for your 4D chess position on Trump, as of March 31, 2018, there are over 25,000 sealed federal indictments waiting to be served. About 6,000 were generated just in the month of March. All of these indictments have been generated since October 30, 2017, five months. The normal number of sealed federal indictments in a year is about 1,200. Something really big is on the way for the Swamp.

      I hope your Easter was good.

  27. I do consider myself a good Christian .. I will not start a conflict & I will do the impossible most to avoid conflict & quarrel or discord ? But if someone will hit me on the right cheek, I will answer my Christian way ?? I’ll kick him with all my might in to his balls ! With the hope, that he will have an omelette between his legs ??

  28. Darkmoon says:
    “Christianity, we are frequently told, is a Jewish plot. It was cunningly designed to emasculate Christians and turn them into wimps”
    You are right, i say but maybe we should rethink the thought and write it this way …
    “Christianity, we are frequently told, is a Jewish plot. It was cunningly designed to emasculate GENTILES and turn them into wimps”…
    not because the term “GENTILE” would also include Muslims and other non jewish groups but because the plot was designed before christianity was born…
    i think

  29. I see the UN has very kindly, Christian like, agreed to help the Zionist entity out with a little problem, black face’s , apparently African people don’t fit with the Idea of a racially pure Zionist Jewish state.
    The original plan was to pay another African country, (probably with the $ the US tax payer kindly gives the Zionist) to take the unwanted , however that plan was scuppered , now the UN has agreed to take the unwanted to as yet unnamed ” western countries “.
    You couldn’t make it up.

    1. Ya can’t make this up either…

      New Scientific Health Terror Prediction
      “The violent subjugation of the Palestinians, Iraqis,
      and Afghans will only ensure that those who oppose us
      will increasingly speak to us in the language we speak
      to them—violence.”
      – Chris Hedges
      The March 31, 2018 issue of ‘The Lancet’ (much-respected
      British medical journal) includes a story making major
      news in the Middle East and virtually no news in the USA.
      I am sad to predict that this news is the reason that major
      instances (radical-Muslim) of terrorist-inspired events will
      soon increase. The Lancet headline:
      “The Palestinian Health Predicament Worsens”
      The Lancet abstract:
      “The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA),
      which administers health services to 5.3 million Palestinian
      refugees through 143 primary health facilities, is in acute
      crisis. After President Trump cut almost US $300 million
      from UNRWA’s 2018 budget, services will run out of money
      by the end of May. Irrespective of one’s views about the
      complex politics of the Middle East, America’s decision to
      threaten the provision of basic health care to millions of
      dependent people seems utterly cruel. This emergency was
      a major theme of last week’s annual Lancet Palestinian
      Health Alliance (LPHA) scientific meeting, held in Beirut.”
      March 30, 2018 headline in London’s Daily Mail newspaper:
      “Siege in Gaza: Twelve killed by Israeli forces, 370 injured
      and DRONES drop tear gas on thousands of Palestinians as
      they swarm the border, burn photos of Trump, and vow to
      protest for weeks until US embassy moves to Jerusalem”
      17 People are reported to have died and 1,000+ were injured.
      On Friday (March 30, 2018) the New York Times reported:
      “WASHINGTON — President Trump, having this week signaled
      a possible withdrawal of American troops from Syria, has also
      ordered the State Department to suspend more than $200 million
      in funds for recovery efforts there while the administration
      reassesses its role in the conflict, administration officials
      said Friday.”
      These are desperate people and we are only making
      their plight a little bit worse. Doesn’t anyone see that?
      They will get mad. They will get even. They are planning…

  30. lasha

    Indeed, Pascal said it best:

    “the heart has it’s reasons, which reason does not know. We feel it in a thousand things. It is the heart which experiences God, and not the reason. This, then, is faith. God felt by the heart – not by reason.”

    This is Christ in a nutshell, with the irony of course that he uses his reasoning powers appropriately and perfectly within a scope of intellectual prowess.

    And I would REASON that all of our babbling tongues that REASON this that and the other about the REASONS for bashing Christianity are really bashing the REASONS behind that which creates intellectual divisiveness and a subsequent distraction from matters of the heart as engendered by REASON ITSELF, or more precisely, as engendered by the endless myriad of RATIONALIZATIONS produced by the twisted and meandering synapses of brain matter largely due to that confounding word “JEW”!

    For the sake of argument, in pressing my point, FORGET about this word, and instead simply ponder the SOURCE of confusion creating the aforementioned divisiveness and distraction as fostered by our aforementioned babbling tongues and twisting synapses!

    pesky words

    Potential for epiphany forthcoming

  31. Christianity is a 2000 year old pillar of our grown culture, with all its beauty and all its ugliness. If we are strong our strength will determine what is happening in Rome and what is happening to us – see Concordat. If we are weak others will decide on the fate of Rome and on our own fate. That`s all that there is to it. I think Pearce is a genius, but even a genius can make one or two small mistakes. And if we don`t wake up soon we will be lost, ending up on the garbage dump of history. The Asians are now reaching for their place in the sun, as Ribbentrop described Germany`s efforts at Nuremberg whilst the white man, since then, seems to have lost all his faculties by way of induced stupidity. Criminal international syndicates are working day and night, as Kennedy put it, to destroy our way of life! (monolithic block speech) Taking account of current power structures change can only come from within America, but knowing the general frame of our brothers across the ocean I see no hope.

  32. From the article:

    “Why create a Frankenstein monster in Palestine 2000 years ago—i.e., Christianity, under the alleged distorter and corrupter of Christ’s original teachings, St Paul—in order to spend the next 2000 years trying to destroy it? The inability to answer this simple question has never troubled the conspiracy theorists who move in a world beyond the tedious limitations of logic and fact.”

    Here is some tedious logic and facts:
    Everyone here knows the jews need constant chaos to control their victims.
    In planning and building their own perfect enemy…. they gloat and brag that they know the next moves of their prey.
    Everyone here knows the jews build enemies they can control…. and profit by doing so.!!

  33. Rather than everybody trumpeting their own opinions, largely unreferenced, lacking properly sourced historical evidence and just as often short on rationale, let me try to gather a few items in support of my thesis that it is Christianity and ONLY Christianity, CATHOLIC CHURCH to be specific that has taken definite, official steps to stem the spread of the Judaic plague afflicting the home populations – I challenge anyone to come up with counterexamples, namely, where an atheist authority or of any other major religion did likewise.
    If no one can produce such examples, then this should put the end to this eternally recurring set of biased and unjustified attacks on Christianity and in particular, Catholicism.
    linking to a previous comment


    Which of the 6 words, highlighted and quoted are beyond your vocabulary?
    Another example, everyone encouraged to search on their own, even as late as the 20th century,
    The Vatican’s semiofficial organ, L’Osservatore Romano, of August 13, 1938, in an article headed “The Jews and the Vatican Council” (1870) speaks of the Catholic Church’s PROTECTIVE measures for Jews, and then goes on to say:

    “But—in order to set things straight—by this it was not intended that Jews should be allowed to abuse the hospitality of Christian countries. Along with these protective ordinances, there existed restrictive and precautionary decrees with regard to them. The civil power was in accord with the Church in this, since, as Delassus says, ‘they both had the same interest in preventing the nations from being invaded by the Jewish element and thereby losing control of society.’ But if Christians were forbidden to force Jews to embrace the Catholic religion, to disturb their synagogues, their Sabbath and their festivals,


    Now show me where other non-Christian organizations did likewise and tell me again how it is Christianity’s fault that Talmudism nearly rules the world today, that Hillary Clinton, Theresa May, Emmanuel Macron, Justin Trudeau and the rest are that way because they are Christian – yeah right, read again the Wikileaks revelations in this regard.

    One more thing, the nail in the anti-Christian coffin: who or what do Jews consider the greatest, most existential threat to their essential plan of world conquest and eternal dominance and enslavement of non-Jews and it underpins their every public action as they maneuver to aim every available threat against this Enemy of Judaism?
    Answer: Russia, the final refuge and bulwark of Christianity and European mindset against the ever-encroaching evil.

    Or will the usual apostles of kabuki claim that just as with Trump, it is just a game, don’t pay attention to results on the ground, Jews really, I mean, really love Russia as they have shown in the past. Just as they love the rest of us, even more so.

    We had the solution, decreed, enshrined in law, functioning … until atheistic materialism, falsely and inappropriately relying on science, took it all away, having poisoned and destroyed the authority that promulgated these protective measures.

    (And now the assorted ignoramuses are pointing to the very enemies of Christianity, the Freemasons, atheists, sellout shabbos, as “proof” that Christianity mollycoddles the Jews)

    1. Forgive one who lapsed from Catholicism; bounced, then rolled far from the apple tree, a fallen away, then roamin’ Catholic indeed; put down tentative roots in all sorts of rabbit holes; and found Self not faraway at all. Have you not read Michael Hoffman’s The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome? How about the same author’s Judaism Discovered? The insidious, invasive, and seemingly inevitable conquest of the “Church” began and ended well before Vatican II, so it would seem. And much of the “anti-Jew” stance of “The Church” may well have been Talmudic cover — say one thing, do another. I commend to you Mr. Hoffman’s works.

    2. alan, %%metoo kind of thing.
      far be it that i feel entitled to casting stones, except at those i clearly perceive as having hocked their souls and are in voluntary thrall to evil, yes, i will cast stones, cinder blocks and finish off with whatever blunt object is handy.
      but now, as the dusk sets in, i see more clearly, viz, that by having fallen off the same tree, it was not me who rolled downhill but the tree got up, cut off from its roots and walked away.

      i do not defend the present day r/c, because i cannot in good conscience defend it, can only cherrypick individual bits that still appeal to me, i know and know of, a few clergymen that did not turn their backs on the christ and afaiac, they are the small but adamant heart of the church, chips off the old rock upon which st. peter built the edifice.

      i guess i am apostate by standing the traditional ground and not running with the bleating herd.
      am i right to take this position?
      i don’t know but it doesn’t matter, if i see something closer to the essence, a clearer picture of the truth, i will change accordingly, i got no false pride in the matter of the truth, i can take pride in admitting that i am wrong.

      when i see that i am wrong.

      and yes, i’ve read (admittedly partially, though i will continue to the earmarked page), his “judaism’s strange gods”, for sure he knows his stuff, although in the matter of “loving jews as brothers” or admission of holocaust and “unjust persecution”, i don’t see much evidence to convince me.

    3. @ Lobro

      Despite all our differences of opinion on minor and peripheral points, I commend you for your honesty and sincerity on the basic and most important points. Thank you for returning to this site after your recent self-banishment. Your wisdom and decency are much needed here. Lasha has found a true friend in you.

      1. everything is cool sard, i prefer snarls fronting for a good heart to smiles covering up a bad one.

        you are a winner in that respect.

    4. Great thoughts Lobro…but, then we had the Borgias and Pope Joan…WTF? Don’t get me wrong….I am 100% on board,

  34. When Jesus as a young boy (same as Buddha) saw the animals in the temples killed, and why, he renounced Judaism and the barbaric Priests to literally “head for the hills” to learn from the Buddists.

    “The scrolls narrate the story of Jesus (identified as “Issa”) from birth to death. But most significantly, the scrolls tell of Christ’s travels between the ages of 13-30.”
    Jesus, Isha, Issa, the name is the same.

    Jesusu in Tibet

      1. BH, true that. This also lends an ear to the belief of Pure Land Buddhism as the original Buddhism,
        complete with the Supreme Personality by many other names.

        (Bhakti Ananda Goswami)

      2. hp

        In keeping with the premise of “cruci-fiction”, a conjoining of Christ’s teachings with Eastern thought may be in order

        It must be considered that the Christian Bible, extant or otherwise, EXCLUDES certain pertinent information that would “join forces” with the East in such a way that makes any notion of Jesus allowing for stakes to be pounded through his flesh on a Roman cross PREPOSTEROUS! In this world virtually NOTHING is far-fetched, and in that vein I wouldn’t put anything past agents of Darkness substituting some poor schmuck to do a superb impersonation of Jesus on the cross with the promise of being rewarded in the soon-to-come nether regions by his satanic master. All for the diabolical pleasure of making people BELIEVE they laid their slimy claws on him!

        Given this premise, as preposterous as IT may sound in what may be the greatest rationalization of them all, the aforementioned “conjoining” could involve Christ’s INTIMATE KNOWLEDGE of the reality of yugic cycles and that in 2,000 or so years time from his presence here, planet Earth and many of it’s inhabitants will be far enough away from the kali yuga for a reality of resurrection to “kick in”, so to speak, in one way of expressing the nature of yugas in their ascending and descending state. This would imply, in defining “resurrection”, that heretofore, in this realm of existence at any rate, and prior to Christ’s first appearance, that the ability to get off the subjugating wheel of reincarnation hasn’t been POSSIBLE for those who’ve entered through the womb like the vast majority of us……until now.

        None of which is to say that what may indeed be a MYTH of crucifixion doesn’t represent in believers having faith in a reality of eternal existence, but a missing conjunction of “East and West” certainly looks to me to be a major factor in all of this.

        And astute readers, maybe such as yourself, will make reference to the fact that the subject of reincarnation was/is non-existent in the various tomes of Christianity

      3. BH, Christ’s teachings, Eastern teachings, (aka) Universal teachings.

        “‘Thou shalt not kill’ does not apply to murder of one’s own kind only, but to all living beings: and this Commandment was inscribed in the human breast long before it was proclaimed from Sinai.”

      4. the short answer, lasha, is that the jew’s hating Christ has nothing to do with the invention of “Christianity, of which catholicism and protestantism are judaic “offshoots” that came to be used for geopolitical purposes after the Reformation

        more on this later

      5. BH, I don’t really know anything beyond what the Vedas and the parampara Acharyas and sadhus tell me.
        For me to speculate on or second guess my superiors is simply wheel spinning and even worse, offensive to these.
        For better or worse (better) I’m done with that.

      6. BH, to further explain what I mean, because I like you, those yugas and the ciphering you refer to are from Swami Yukteshwar who re-arranged the cosmology in the 1890’s. Just for the West I assume and also for propaganda’s sake as a tool to make it much more easy to comprehend and work with for the Westerners. This of course due to the godlike immensity of the cosmology. I mean, c’mon man, Lord Brahma’s life duration is 311 trillion 40 billion years! (one breath of Vishnu.) Hard for those unaccustomed to this to even grasp it mush less ‘work with it.’ So THAT cosmology just had to go! Now it’s being re-arranged, again. For what purpose other than creating debate and commerce, I struggle to ascertain. But I do know the original ‘new ager types like HPB and such grabbed this new cosmology and ran with it.

        Here is the bona fide Vedic version.
        Here is the re-arranged Vedic version. (1894)
        Here is the re-arranged Vedic version, enhanced.

        (aka) how the Kali yuga rolls..

      7. Obviously I did not mean HPB personally because by 1894 she really did know the truth..

        Thank you admin, for suffering my long windedness.

  35. How can one possibly think Jesus would have wanted his name associated with the following?

    Christianity is a form of magical thinking. It cannot be disseminated on a large scale through rational persuasion. No one can explain how Christ rose from the dead, how god subsists as three persons in one or how a bible that teaches a geocentric, flat earth cosmology is an infallible guide to universal truth. These are “mysteries.” This is what makes Christianity such a dangerous and destructive cult. Conversion, unless done for gain or under threat of force, is an emotional affair. No one is “reasoned” into Christianity. Either that person must be gullible enough to accept the teachings of the Christian faith without question or he must be forcibly converted using the sword. It was through the latter that Christians were able to spread their gospel beyond imperial frontiers, nominally converting all Europe by the 14th century.

    The spread of Christianity cannot be understood apart from the use of force. The barbarians who invaded the western empire had to convert to Christianity as soon as they set foot on Roman territory. Conversion to the religion was a condition of their migration and settlement on imperial soil. They would not have been allowed to participate in Roman society as pagans.

    Christian missions located beyond the imperial frontiers would typically focus on converting barbarian rulers and their courts. Once the king was made to accept the new religion, he would then compel his followers to convert along with him. This pattern emerged early in the Christianization of Europe. These kings were the “new Constantines,” because they embraced Christianity, often after invoking Christ for victory in battle, like Constantine during the battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312, and then imposed the religion on the aristocracy and the common people.

    The earliest of these new Constantines included Caedwalla, the 7th century king of Wessex. He invaded the island of Wight and exterminated most of the Jutes who lived there. Caedwalla replaced these with Christian West Saxons and forced the survivors to convert to Christianity at sword-point. Another was Edwin, the 7th century king of Northumbria, who used a mixture of bribery and threats to convert aristocracy and common people to the new religion.

    After the collapse of the West, Christianity remained confined between the river Elbe in the north and the Danube in the south on continental Europe, until 1000. Barbarians motivated by greed and lust for power were the driving force behind the renewed territorial expansion of medieval Christendom. They were impressed by the wealth, opulence and might of Constantinople and the Frankish dominions and wanted it for themselves. For the pagan warlord, Christianity was akin to the cargo cults of Melanesia. If only his barbarian court displayed all the trappings of the Christian religion, he would be as rich as the emperor in Constantinople!

    In an illuminating anecdote, medieval chronicler Notker the Stammerer accurately captured the mentality of barbarian converts to Christianity. In the 9th century, Danes would flock to the Frankish court of Louis the Pious to undergo baptism. In exchange for conversion, Louis would give each man a set of brand new garments and weapons. Once, when Louis ran out of these articles to give prospective converts, he had a few rags stitched together into a coarse tunic and gave it to an old Dane who had been baptized some twenty times before. “If it was not because I was ashamed of my nakedness, I would give you back both the clothes and your Christ,” the Dane snapped back angrily. The “rice bowl” Christians of the 19th and 20th centuries make it difficult to dismiss this story as just another monkish fable.

    The power-mad King Stephen of Hungary forced his subjects to convert to Christianity. He believed that Christianization of his kingdom would make it as powerful and as influential as Byzantium. Laws were enacted forbidding pagan ritual practice. Stephen ordered all Magyars to attend church on Sunday and observe Lent and fast days. Failure to obey this draconian legislation was dealt with harshly. Eating meat during Lent was punished by imprisonment; working on a Sunday was punished by confiscation of one’s tools and beasts of burden. The legal penalty for murmuring during a church service was having one’s head shorn, accompanied by a severe flogging. The “Black” Magyars who resisted Stephen’s forced conversion of Hungary were cruelly suppressed. Many were tortured and then blinded by Stephen’s Christian soldiers, who were angered by the intransigence of their pagan foes. These men preferred death to the shame and dishonor of being forcibly baptized into an alien Semitic religion and culture.

    Christianization in Poland unleashed a similar wave of violence. Mieszko I forcibly Christianized Poland to strengthen his grip over the country and avoid forced conversion by the East Franks. Idolatry was suppressed by smashing pagan idols and sanctuaries, confiscating estates and beheading those who refused to convert. Although very little Christian legislation survives from Mieszko’s reign, his successor Boleslaw I, prescribed knocking a man’s teeth out upon refusal to observe Lenten fasting. Fornication was punished by nailing a man’s scrotum to a bridge and giving him the choice between death and castration.

    The brutality of these methods led to a great pagan reaction to the Christianization of Poland. Pagans retaliated by killing Christian priests and destroying churches. By the middle of the 11th century, the land was plunged into chaos, the Christian church in Poland nearly wiped out, and Mieszko’s dynasty temporarily driven from power.

    The Saxon Wars of Charlemagne, lasting from 772 to 804, was the first time in history that Christianity was used as an instrument of imperialist conquest. Charlemagne initiated formal hostilities by destroying pagan monuments in Saxony. In 782, Charlemagne promptly avenged a Frankish defeat at Saxon hands by massacring 4,500 Saxons in savage reprisal. The Saxon Capitulary of 785 ordered the death penalty for any Saxon caught resisting baptism or observing heathen practices.

    Rulers forcibly converted pagans to Christianity for reasons of personal self-aggrandizement. Michael III, emperor at Constantinople, forced the Bulgarian Khan Boris to accept the eastern orthodox rite in 864, after he was defeated in battle. Forced Christianization allowed Michael to expand his sphere of influence in the Balkans. Bulgaria was then flooded with Byzantine clergy who, with the help of Boris’s army, began a nationwide campaign to demolish all pagan holy sites.

    The boyars accused the Khan of accepting laws that threatened the stability and autonomy of the state. In 866, they revolted against the khan’s forced Christianization of the country but were suppressed with great cruelty. In the final decade of the ninth century, Boris’s eldest son Vladimir, who became ruler of Bulgaria, tried to eliminate Christianity and restore paganism. In this endeavor, he was supported by the boyars. Vladimir ordered the killing of Christian priests and the destruction of churches. Boris was compelled to leave his monastic retreat and suppress the revolt. Vladimir was deposed, blinded and imprisoned in a dungeon, never to be heard from again.

    By the 12th and 13th centuries, crusades were launched to convert the indigenous peoples of Scandinavia and the Baltic region to Christianity. There were crusades against the Wends, Finns, Livonians (Latvians and Estonians), Lithuanians and Prussians. St. Bernard of Clairvaux, a monastic reformer, called for the cultural and physical extermination of northern Europeans who resisted forced conversion to the Christian religion. – Ferdinand Bardamu

    Christianity reeks with the bloody stench of the Jew

    1. Humanity reeks with the bloody stench of badness (Satan), believers and non believers can and have been touched.

    2. Arch –

      “The Saxon Capitulary of 785 ordered the death penalty for any Saxon caught resisting baptism or observing heathen practices.”

      Surely, that must have been in the interest of ‘peace’ as practiced in the Middle-Eastern countries today.

      Grave yards are very peaceful places….
      … the original Arch Stanton knows.!! 🙂

    3. @Arch
      “St. Bernard of Clairvaux, a monastic reformer, called for the cultural and physical extermination of northern Europeans who resisted forced conversion to the Christian religion.”

      This statement, as well as much of the rest of this ideological distortion of history by Ferdinand Bardamu, is just another example, among many, of Jewish/Freemasonic/Protestant anti-Catholic propaganda. If you want more objective history, read Warren H Carroll or, even better yet, E Michael Jones, especially his “Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History,” parts of which can be read here:

      1. Sorry, here’s the correct link:
        (ADMIN: Unfortunately this link is defective and damages our formatting, so it has to be deleted).

        See also Norman Cohn, “The Pursuit of the Millennium” and Edward A Synan, “The Popes and the Jews in the Middle Ages,” for serious scholarship and a good antidote to the swill of Ferdinand Bardamu and his admirer Arch Stanton, both books which can be purchased used and cheaply at

      2. The link doesn’t work for some reason. Just search “jewish revolutionary spirit” at One can also search the same on youtube.

      1. Wig –

        I envy you with those good fish & chips like I got in Scotland on my numerous trips there in early 70s I had to take my own napkins, though. No seats, stood against the wall… Still the best. 🙂

  36. a bunch of quick notes, caught in the middle of semiannual move.
    • arch, stand your ground and for whatever you think is right, it is not only your inalienable right but equally inalienable duty,
    • i will come back to the points you raised in questioning the authenticity of NON-jewish christ and his ordinariness as just another human – maybe you are right and maybe you are wrong, let’s see and i will oppose you on these points and will also oppose any pitchfork and torch carrying lynch mob that denies you the freedom of (civil) speech, one thing i can almost guarantee is that it will be a lively and enlightening debate because i have a high opinion of your intellect.

    here is the bonus point, i think that lasha and franklin as the resident experts on the issues of IQ might appreciate.
    ashkenazi mythical IQ of 117, we keep hearing about it ad nauseam and how this superiority is the reason they are hated worldwide because it bestows divine, chosen powers on them, powers that we mere goyums cannot even conceive of, thus our envy and nazis’ 6m deicide – the benighted root of antisemitism.

    in israel there are 6m jews (surprise, surprise, always that 6-6-6), 2.8m g-d blessed (God damned, same thing) ashkenazis and 3.2m mizrahis (sephardis) and the average israel jew IQ is said to be 95 if i recall.
    well then, simple arithmetic shows that in order for the above numbers to stand,

    the average IQ of a mizrahi (sephardic) is 76.

    so that all these african schwartzas pouring into israel (and all the antifa, antiracist, kind organizers of black lives matter, the great underground railroad, etc, are violently forcing them out of the country) can only raise that average.

    ok, out, on a tight timeline.

    be nice sard, primarily to yourself.

    1. @Lobro

      According to Lasha’s list Israel’s average IQ is 94, but it’s population is rather diverse : 20% of its population consists of Arabs (average IQ 85) while its Jewish population consists for about half of Ashkenazis and half of Sephardis. Sephardic Jews come from Spain (average IQ 100), but in Israel the term also denotes Mizrahi (“oriental”) Jews who come from Arabic countries and have an IQ similar to Arabs. While I do think Israel’s Ashkenazi elite will be fairly intelligent, I suspect most of the ordinary Ashkenazis in Israel will not be the brightest, because the most intelligent Ashkenazis would not have emigrated to a country that still had to be developed from the ground up, while the developed West offered far more chances to make a quick buck. So Israel shows a rather “Third World” profile : a small intelligent top, with a mediocre to stupid mass.

    2. franklin, briefly (being the worst multitasker imaginable and that’s what i must be today).

      on the subject of jew soul, culture, beauty, achievements, progress and all-around ineffability **curled lip snigger**, i guess wikipedia is as good source of hype as any.
      herewith then, the list of sephardi/mizrahi israeli achievers – not too bad when the average iq is lucky to be over 80, pick the whatever phony rationale they come up with, given that their iq is on par with arabs.

      Traditionally the terms “Mizrahi Jews” and “Sephardi Jews” were used as all encompassing terms referring to the Jews descended from the Jewish communities of Iberia, North Africa and the Middle East; but due to the melting pot effect of the Israeli society the terms have gradually become more vague. Many Israeli descendants of Mizrahi and Sephardi Jewish immigrants have gradually adopted the Israeli culture and intermarried with descendants of other Jewish communities.

      there is no difference between sephardis (moorish jews who remained after reconquista by isabella of aragon and were subsequently expelled in 1492 for … well, being typical jews, eating catholic babies when not usuring).
      side note: the remaining muslims were welcome to stay, provided they behaved better than today’s migrants and the jews, who did okay under the muslim rulers were told to pack and gtfo.
      anyway, a pleasant gallery of faces to peruse.

      my point is that the magical ashkenazi iq figure is so much bullshit like just about anything out of jew orifices.

      they could be loading tankers of it at night to spread clandestinely around the world along with plague bearing rats.

  37. Who was Jesús Christ and why does he matter? I challenge any Darkmooner to tell me how much this “entity” enlightened them. Is there anything he taught that an intelligent human being couldnt have figured out for himself? I dont think so. He said hed return “someday.” Oh well. What a sad joke. For 2000 years, the believers have waited for him. I personally prefer the “Jewish” narrative. No heaven….no hell. When your time comes, its a permanente “dirt nap.” The Jews have it right, the here and now.

  38. franklin – good behavior increases the intellect.
    yizrayhell is full of zionist stooges and lowbrow free-house parasites. and victims, coerced into moving there out of fearmongering campaigns, wars and pogroms…
    the big jews have always been behind the misfortune that befell the little ones.
    why would any decent (basically intelligent) person go to palestine to get in on that terrible travesty?
    a decent person wouldn’t…
    not because it’s less opportune than the usa or some other rich country.
    a good (wise) person wouldn’t go because it’s wrong to steal someone’s country….

  39. Lobro –

    I memorized the pray in Latin in my 3 years of it in high school. I can repeat it today. Billy and I had the same ‘favorite’ teacher in different years. Mrs Elizabeth Buck, Summa Cum Laude Latin.

    I see you are back to your usual false assumptions and guesses… inventions. That’s OK…. you are a funny guy. 🙂

    You wrote:
    “if you insist that “dimitte nobis débita nostra, sicut et nos dimittímus debitóribus nostris” means “give us a break on the money we owe you just as we write off some of the money owed to us by our debtors”, then why stop there, see the word FIAT in the prayer?”

    I didn’t “stop there” at all.. because I never WENT there. YOU did. Considering “FIAT” is your guess… not mine… You mentioned it NOT me.

    You also wrote:
    “God was obviously printing FIAT money (in heaven, cielo), a prototype for today’s jewish federal reserve on earth.”

    “OBVIOUSLY”???? C’mon!! Shirley!!! 🙂

    You, even more “OBVIOUSLY”…. do not know the meaning of “FIAT”…. when referencing currency.

    1. BTW – I forgot to reply to your offer…

      We could have ‘fiat’ ceviche e cervesa con pámpano a la parrilla at a nice beach bar…. in Ciudad del Carmen.!! 🙂

  40. A cogent thesis, though it does not begin to address who done it.

    Suffice to say that, it is only the ugly fake sisters who deride and impersonate Cinderella, but never does Cinderella attack or impersonate the ugly fake sisters; if anything Cinderella is too blue eyed and innocent to realize that the fake sisters are not only impersonating her, but not even related to her.

    The low impersonates the high.
    Never the reverse.

    Oh, and since we are on the topic of, Christianity, as in, you know, like, Christ, well, Christ was emphatically clear in John 8:44 and 47, and Matthew 23:33. Let us just get that out of the way without any pussyfooting around, without even beginning to address the fact of the two eye witnesses as to Yashuah the Christos’ physical description to Tiberius Caesar, but I recognize that double witness and thus morsel of historicity is beyond the mental faculties and cognitive function of today’s electronically lobotomized lemmings.

    Luke 22:36 – 38.
    No, Christ was not having a bad hair day.
    No, it was not a suggestion. It was a commandment.


    “For what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?”

    Shame on an otherwise impeccable and astute, if jejune, piece.

    Then again what more could be expected, from the weaker sex, when, not only is logos, Logic, the privilege of men, but well yes, let’s shall we, since the topic was, CHRISTIANITY, well then, I suppose the Authority on that is, Christ himself, … now how did he put it:

    1 Timothy 2:12
    “But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.”

    Or shall we quote the Vedas?
    As if quoting the 6th Veda wasn’t enough. The first 5 Vedas are even more uncompromising on that.

    1. @ Bhibatsu

      Your rudeness and bad temper discredit you.
      These are are not admirable qualities.
      You sound like a juvenile delinquent with low blood sugar.
      Cultivate more restraint and try to write better English.

  41. One-Million Christians Slaughtered over Past 10 Years. Westerners Not Interested

    More than one-million Christians have been slaughtered in the ten-year period between 2005 to 2015 in the Middle East and Africa simply because they are Christian.

    Father Andre Mahanna says that Christians have been genocided over the past 200 years, yet there is no outrage, which he attributes to Western secularism and the rise of radical Islam.

    Father Mahanna says that Christianity is the only religion that asks its followers to love their enemy, and he is calling for Christians to use their influence to end the bloodbath.

    Priest speaks out about global persecution of Christians

Comments are closed.