Brexit Betrayal: Democracy is dead in Britain — and Enemy of the People Theresa May has killed it

By RICHARD LITTLEJOHN
The Daily Mail, 15 March 2019

NOTE BY LD :  The Daily Mail is not responsible for the pictures, captions and title of this article. For this I accept full responsibility. The article by veteran columnist Richard Littlejohn  is the best article I have read so far on the Brexit Betrayal and has my full support. It’s a wonder the Daily Mail dared to publish it.

PRIME MINISTER THERESA MAY:
LIAR, TRAITOR, ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE

‘Call me Judas Iscariot!’

“The whole country is run by Jew-controlled lickspittles. And the biggest lickspittle of all is Theresa (‘Je suis Juif’) May. The woman is a traitor and should be horsewhipped all the way to hell where she can team up with her soulmate in treachery, Judas Iscariot. She has betrayed the 17.4 million Brits who voted for Brexit.”

— John Sardonicus, in a comment to this website


Insane

The entire political class have taken leave of their senses. Both during the referendum campaign and since the result was announced, their behaviour has bordered on the clinically insane.

Of course, you should never underestimate their uncanny ability to make everything about them. But the unedifying orgy of self-indulgence we have seen over the past week has plumbed new depths of cynicism and opportunism . . .

No, not this past week. The paragraphs above are taken from my column on July 1, 2016, a few days after the result was declared. I warned you back then that the fix was already in, that embittered Remainers would do everything in their power to stop Brexit, either by holding a second referendum or forcing a General Election.

For the past almost three years we’ve been living in a Looking Glass World where, like Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty, words mean whatever the politicians say they mean

Getting on for three years later, and a few days before we were due to escape, that’s exactly where we are right now. As the Tory leadership candidates jockeyed for position to succeed Call Me Dave, I also said that Theresa May, a Remainer who spent the referendum campaign hiding behind the sofa, shouldn’t be allowed within a mile of No 10.

Then again, what do I know?

It gives me no pleasure to have been proved horribly right. By now, I had hoped we would be free of the shackles of the EU, forging a brilliant future as a freebooting, independent nation once more.

Fat chance of that happening any time soon. If ever.

Believe me, this is a column I didn’t want to have to write. Like you, I’m thoroughly sick of the whole Brexit circus, which is what the political class have been banking on all along.

The heart sinks whenever someone asks: ‘What’s going to happen over Brexit, Rich?’

I can only reply: ‘Ask me one on sport.’

As I wrote some time ago, I’ve run out of invective. The bile mine is exhausted. Fury has given way to resignation and despair. We can only watch this slow-motion car crash unfold with impotent frustration.

I’d always believed there would probably be some kind of 11th-hour form of words stitched up. It wouldn’t be ideal, but we’d have to swallow some watered down, marshmallow soft form of Brexit, which would allow us to leave with a modicum of dignity.

Traitor

Sadly, Mrs May’s dismal, defeatist ‘deal’ doesn’t even reach that threshold. Nor will it, no matter how many times she brings it back to the Commons.

But I suppose it was always on the cards that the Remain headbangers were never going to rest until they’d halted Brexit altogether.

As of now, it looks as if they’ve won. They’re certainly well ahead on away goals. Ruling out No Deal effectively means No Brexit.

Be in no doubt that what we are witnessing is a coup against the people. There may not be tanks on the streets, but it’s a coup all the same. A few hundred MPs have decided to defy the will of the 17,410,742 British citizens who voted to leave the EU. It was the largest number of people to have voted for anything in our proud history.

But the majority of ‘Hon members’ have been determined to overturn the referendum result, despite repeatedly promising to ‘respect’ it. The electorate is being treated with undisguised contempt. If they get away with it — which they probably will — Britain will have ceased to be a proper democracy.

Any chance of securing a dignified exit from the EU was scuppered on Wednesday night, when MPs voted to take No Deal off the table.

Ruling out ‘No Deal’ effectively means No Brexit

What’s the point of entering any kind of negotiation when your opponents know there’s no chance of you walking away without a deal, no matter how derisory?

About the same as agreeing to pay a £39 billion bill up front, I guess, without knowing what you’re going to get in return. If you’re not prepared to walk away empty-handed, you’re going to get taken to the cleaners.

Curiously, one of the proposers of the No Deal motion was Labour MP Jack Dromey, a former trades union official and husband of Harriet Harman.

Jack used to be a national officer with the TGWU, now Unite. Somehow I can’t ever imagine him going into talks with an employer, on his hands and knees, promising that he’d take whatever pathetic pay rise they decided to offer and guaranteeing there was no danger that his members would go on strike. He’d have been lynched as a class traitor.

So why does he think that’s an appropriate way to approach negotiations with the EU?

Still, when it comes to Brexit, the usual rules don’t seem to apply. For the past almost three years we’ve been living in a Looking Glass World where, like Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty, words mean whatever the politicians say they mean.

Promises to respect the referendum result turn out not to be worth the manifestos they are written on.

‘No Deal is better than a bad deal,’ was just another meaningless, insincere pledge.

‘Brexit means Brexit.’ Don’t make me laugh. ‘We will leave on March 29, 2019.’ In your dreams.

Liar

On Monday night, we were asked to believe that May had secured a famous victory in Strasbourg. Anyone who watched her humiliated, hollowed-out husk sitting alongside a bombastic Jean-Claude Drunker at their press conference would have had no problem working out that she had achieved absolutely nothing of significance.

In the interests of gallantry, it is almost de rigueur to acknowledge that the Prime Minister has worked hard, done her best in difficult circumstances.

But, as I wrote in July 2016, she was never up to the job. Nor was her heart in it. She capitulated to the EU’s demands from the off, drove Leave campaigners from her Cabinet, and relied on unelected civil servants resolutely opposed to Brexit to construct her ‘deal’.

Worst of all, she deceived the British public, for which she deserves never to be forgiven. She’s entitled to humiliate herself, but she’s not entitled to humiliate her country.

Revolution

May is by no means the only culprit, though. The 17.4 million Leave voters have been comprehensively betrayed by an unholy, cross-party alliance of MPs, big business, the judiciary and most of the media.

You can trace this week’s events back to the court case brought by that strange woman Gina Miller. Remember her?

Mrs Miller, married to a multi-millionaire hedge fund manager, and bankrolled by wealthy Remainers, many of whom lived abroad, managed to persuade the Supreme Court to give Parliament — not the Prime Minister — the power to determine when, and if, Brexit might happen.

It was, you might say, the ultimate backstop. Since then, MPs have gleefully seized even more control of the process, finally allowing them to stop Brexit in its tracks this week.

Meanwhile, Tony Blair, a former Prime Minister, has been encouraging EU leaders to stand firm against Britain.

‘Traitor’ is a highly-charged word, but how else to describe an ex-PM conspiring with foreign powers to thwart the will of his own people? Maybe Blair still hankers to be President of Europe some day.

Ultimately, however, this is about much more than just Brexit. It’s about how we are governed and whether we live in a functioning democracy. Right now, we don’t.

Why bother with a second referendum or, even, a General Election? We’ve had both in the past three years and the politicians have simply ignored promises they made at the time.

The referendum gave a clear instruction to Leave. At the election, 85 per cent of people voted for parties who promised to respect the referendum result.

Yet the overwhelming majority of MPs no longer feel it necessary to honour their manifesto commitments. Once inside the Westminster bubble, they think they can behave as they like, and to blazes with the people who pay their wages.

This isn’t representative government, it’s revolution. Parliament has rebelled against the people.

And for what? They’ve taken back control so they can sub-contract it out to unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.

Whatever happens now, our democracy is broken. Like Humpty Dumpty, it’s going to be a hell of a job to put it back together again.

Source 

“Ha ha ha!
We betrayed 17.4 million people who voted for Brexit!
F**K  DEMOCRACY!”

90 thoughts to “Brexit Betrayal: Democracy is dead in Britain — and Enemy of the People Theresa May has killed it”

  1. @ LD

    Thanks for quoting me at the beginning of the article, but I wish you hadn’t. The comment makes me sound a wee bit crazy. Like an angry wasp caught in a jam jar.

    1. BTW, I think your pictures and captions border on the incendiary. Be careful. They could get you into trouble. The people you are attacking are extremely dangerous.

      1. What puzzles me is how the Remainers could think that things would be OK if they succeed in stopping Brexit. The day they voted to preclude No Deal was the day they won the battle.

        Mrs May’s deal would permanently keep us as a vassal to the EU and is so bad that staying in the EU would be better for Britain than her deal. Remainer MPs see this as a means of defeating the referendum result.

        The consequences of this process will rip the country apart politically, and I hope to see most of these elites brought down by the fury of 17.4 million Brits.

        It isn’t just the MPs. it is also the civil service.

      2. John,

        You speak truth! So why don’t you start the Revolution and I will be the first to follow you to the barricades! You will be in charge of the 17.4 million rebels marching on the Houses of Parliament. As for me, I will undertake the sad task of manning the guillotines! 🙂

      3. Hi Sardonicus,
        Thanks for the compliment but I am 81 years old and I think national leadership should be by somebody younger. I am in good shape and should last a good few more years. I am not a politician by nature, and the older one gets the less diplomatic one becomes.

        I note your comments on Jews, and the comments of others here on Darkmoon. I advise fairness, not caution, but simple fairness. As a child I was at the local greammar school, in the maths stream, together with many Jews. They were the good guys, and of course very smart. I was never bullied by Jewish boys, Later, as a young man I had several Jewish friends, again they were good guys, clever and funny.

        I have spent about a third of the past 50 years in the USA, and it has been there that I first experienced the kind of Jews who give the race a bad name. Again, most Jews in America are decent people I can admire and support. Some though have behaved very badly, mainly young men, arrogant and full of themselves. I am sure most Jews will admit to themselves that there is a problem.

        I am not a racist. I will always support decent people of any race or religion, but that does not mean I have to bow to bad behaviour.

        I think immigration into Britain must be greatly reduced, but that does not make me a racist. Millions of new houses have been built in this small but beautiful country to just about cope with immigrants, not for our own British young people. We owe our first loyalty to our own people.

        Similarly I will always resist the powerful Jewish organizations who turn any unfavorable comment on Jews or Israel into a major crisis. I happen to believe that the official story of the holocaust does not stand up to scrutiny, but it has been used by Jewish orgnizations. I used to believe in the holocaust until I read that poor Ann Frank died in the hospital at Belsen, probably of typhus, after having been moved to Belsen from Auschwitz to get away fro the advancing Red Army. Not the kind of thing you would expect in a death camp.That started me making enquiries and I now think the holocaust started as Soviet propaganda and was taken up by Jewish organizations in the 1940s to gain favors, and to establish Israel, at great cost to the Palestinians, who have been treatd very badly. No wonder Gaza voted for Hamas.

        AIPAC has great influence over the US Congress. I think it is a disgrace that candidates are asked to pledge support for Israel. I thay refuse they will find their opponents are well-funded, not by AIPAC directly, but by Jews who take their orders from AIPAC.

      1. Who said that Democratic Leaders like May Merkel and Macron do not work for the people. They work hard for Banksters, Rapefugees and of course Israhell and Military Industrial Complex. They have worked hard to make Europe a Multicultural and Diverse land with lots of action like Terror Attacks and Gang Rapes just like the Hollywood Movies. Now everybody has a chance to become a Hero or Heroine or even a Evil Gangster.
        This is real Democracy and what more can you ask for.LONG LIVE DEMOCRACY AND THE NEW SOVIET EUROPEAN UNION.

    2. In the US there is a company called Ditch Witch which manufactures backhoes and other products. Everytime Donaldo sees Theresa May’s hideous face, he thinks of the word “Ditch Witch” and imagines this woman, the real witch, sitting on one of these backhoes digging a hole deeper and deeper for the British people. Unfortunately things won’t get better for the Brits until Ms. May either retires or is resting in a hole of her own. 😁

    3. The word coup might sound melodramatic, but it is appropriate. Not since WW2 has the country been under such serious threat. The tragedy is that now it our own ruling clique who have set themselves against the people.

      Anything could happen now.

    4. If you ain’t crazy, then you ain’t paying attention. Don’t know about the “angry wasp” part. Your comments never seemed to have that kind of ineffective, buzzing sound; but like a wasp, they do sting.

  2. “Democracy is dead in Britain — and Enemy of the People Theresa May has killed it”

    I never knew democracy was alive in Britain over the last 1000 years!

    If you cannot actually own land there, there is no place for a democracy to operate.

    When buying land in Britain…. it means you are buying a 99-year lease on the property, rather than the property itself. At the end of the 99 years, the property reverts to the lessor, who still owns it, typically including all the “fixtures”. Fixtures include the house and everything attached to the house or the ground. The furniture and the silverware you can take with you when you leave, but you can’t take away or destroy the house or the outbuildings or the fences.

    English property titles go back to the Norman Conquest in 1066. The English tend to resist actually selling property, since land was historically the only source of wealth (i.e. before they started minting gold and silver coins, or investing in stocks and bonds), but they were willing to rent the land and the castle to someone for longer than the lifetime of a human being, knowing that they would come back into the family eventually.

    May is an ass anyway!!

    1. In the US, a deed for property is just a contract to pay rent….. in the form of taxes; if not paid on time the property is sold at auction.

      1. Pat, sold after they move you off the property kicking and screaming or dead and silent.
        Either way, it’s a done deal..

      2. That’s correct. That’s why the real English aristocracy lost their real estate. They could not affford the taxes etc. The jews came by invented taxes, loans etc and bought everything from them, even the aristocratic titles. The ‘ english’ elite is almost all jewish. Of course they pretend being english, british. It is always the same with the jews.

      3. @Marcus

        I think there was also a lot of inter-marriage going on, posh shilling if you like; that and the more nefarious methods via usury and state-violence.

        But make no mistake, the great European nations from the of the Age of Discovery onwards, were Jewish controlled.

    2. @ Pat

      “I never knew democracy was alive in Britain over the last 1000 years!”

      Granted. But the pretence was always there before. Now even the pretence is gone. In other words, they have finally outed themselves as anti-democrats. What we have here is a plutocratic oligarchy: rich pigs with their snouts in the trough. The people are told they need to suffer cutbacks, to get used to being poorer, to undergo austerity. Meanwhile, MPs have awarded themselves a generous inflation-busting salary increase. And the gap between rich and poor grows sharper by the day as in America.

      1. “And the gap between rich and poor grows sharper by the day as in America.”

        Kosher Taxes speed it along…. 🙂

        The (K) (U) and over 100 more rabbi jurisdictions exist globally. Here are just a few:

        Council of Orthodox Rabbis (70)
        Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations (21)
        Montreal Kosher (17)
        New Jersey Kosher (9)
        British Columbia Kosher (8)
        Star-K Kosher (6)
        Beverly Hills Kosher (4)
        Committee For The Furtherance of Torah Observance (5)
        Michigan Kosher (2)
        Los Angeles Kosher (1)
        Massachusetts Kosher (1)

        Many more……

        Letters to Moshe Ronen, President of the Canadian Jewish Congress:

        http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/KosherFoodTax.pdf

    3. and so are properties in commonwealth colonies. Subjects are subjects – a bit like the untouchables in India. Just not kosher enough to own property 100% but very capable of paying taxes for the illusion of “rightful ownership”.
      Crown land, resources and politicians in the ex colonies always belong to the great kingdom. That is what Royal English demockcrassy is all about.

    4. Sorry Pat but you are wrong. There are some houses in Britain where the land is leased, but most have freehold. Just recently there has been a case of a builder selling homes subject land leasehold, and it has caused a big legal fuss.

      My own house is thatched and is probably about 400 years old, came with the freehold of the land. The interesting thing about these old houses in Europe is that there may have been many houses on the same site over the centuries. Thatched houses with open fires burnt down frequently, or dry rot brought the place down, for it to be rebuilt.

      Interesting point regarding building materials in the old days. The stone to build my house came from a quarry on the hillside at the back of the house. So the horse and cart went the few yards up the hill empty and down the hill full of stone.

      Interes

      1. JK –

        No need to be “sorry”… you did nothing wrong. You just disagree with me. That’s all, and good, also

        John, even as a ‘freeholder’, if you do not pay your rent – TAXES – the property will be taken from you. That means someone else is the actual owner. It is very easy to understand that.

        I am not “sorry” that I explained that. 🙂

      2. JK –

        You once wrote here that the banks own everything – including property – due to usury.

        I agree 100%.

        Money is created by loans & will eventually lead to the banks owning everything. They already own all property….. And not a shot fired.

      3. Hi Pat,
        The banks don’t evrything just YET, but in the long run they will do. In the long run the banks will own all the money and assets, and the people will owe all the debt..

        John Maynard Keynes pointed out that “in the long run we are all dead”

  3. If you like your 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, Brexit vote,
    you can keep your 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th Brexit vote!
    (just kidding, no you can’t)

  4. They are all jews. Where is Corbyn , the so called anti-semite when you need him? All jews. What a joke welcome in the jewish dictatorship.

  5. I thought there could still be a technical “no deal” Brexit, despite the Commons vote? What did I miss? I stopped following the details of the charade weeks ago after I concluded twas all kabuki (not withstanding Pat’s knowledge that it has ALWAYS been kabuki).

    1. I loved the comment on gallantry, and that is why I am so amused by the English. A complete devotion to the little niceties of life. The incredibly polite speech and personal behaviour in public. But that can go hand in hand with the most gross indecencies at political levels.

      The sharp diction and the razor wit in parliament prove that the English are still the masters of their own language despite it being spread around the world.

      But the perfidy! Oh, the perfidy! A ruling class that could let entire nations (Ireland, India) starve to death, or abandon their own kith and kin in times of war (Australia WW2), are hardly likely to feel pangs of conscience about ignoring their own electorate on this trifling matter.

      It’ small potatoes to the Poms.

      Yet, still I love you for the good you have given the world; and you are in my blood.

    2. There has never been a true democracy in Britain. We the people have always been under the heel of first the landed aristocracy and lately the Jewish International Banking clique. Presumably you don’t know but the writer of this article with the very english name, Richard Littlejohn is Jewish and lives last i heard in Florida.

      1. @ Mark

        Presumably you don’t know but the writer of this article with the very english name, Richard Littlejohn is Jewish and lives last i heard in Florida.

        I did a check on Littlejohn. It’s true that he spends much of the year living in a gated mansion in Florida but he spends the rest of his time in London with his very English family. I have been unable to find even a shred of evidence showing that he is Jewish. He is notoriously homophobic, unlike most Jews who promote homosexuality. He is also a hard Brexiter, unlike most Jews who wish to be part of Europe. He neither looks nor behaves like a Jew and his family background is typically English.

    3. Hi Flopot, The big question now is can the Commons overide Mrs May if she decides to go ahead with No Deal, (Which is what I want) The supreme Court gave the authority to decide on what kind of deal would accepted to Parliament and they voted to not allow No Deal.

      I doubt Mrs May would win. The Remainers would take it to the Supreme Court and win.

      So now with no hope of No Deal we are faced with the choice between Mrs May’s bad deal and staying in the EU. My view is that Mrs May’s deal is so bad that it would be better to stay in the EU.

      Do you think it could have been planned that way by our wonderful elites?

      Great article by Richard Littlejohn.

    4. Hi Flopot

      Parliament voted to preclude No Deal. So now there is no hope of a clean No Deal brexit. The Supreme Court gave parliament the power to decide.

      So now we are left with two choices: either Mrs May’s deal or stay in the EU. Mrs May’s deal is so bad for Britain that staying in the EU is preferable. So the pro-EU elites have won.

      It is hard to understand how they think their treachery will turn out well for Britain.

  6. Fake to whatever extent it may be now, the American revolution did give the world a huge improvement on England, or as the Jews named it, great Britain….
    Some say Theresa May-Be May is just another actress… that she’s reallly princess di, older now, in a somewhat familiar role…
    Pocahontas what’s her name being Annette Benning, one of the finicum episode ladies- patty hearst… it goes on and on..
    I’d like to see us give a little time to the likes of miles Mathias and ed chiarini….
    Just about everybody with any brain activity on this site denies the official version of the NZ episode, in fact there is no official version at all until someone has been convicted in a real courtroom, never happen… what you’re hearing is merely media bs..
    Of course our Zionista friends would rather not see the boat rocked too much, because they know they’re in control with everything to lose and hell to pay, if the whole truth ever does come out..
    The British parliament is an obvious hoax in and of itself, much like the USA Congress with its 12% approval rating… we can all tell what a shallow farce the commercial media is…. there have been plenty enough obvious false flag productions and phony presidential commission cover-ups stuck in our faces in the past… the disarmament and white genocide globalist agenda reeks attached..
    Trannies running the world the perfect ruse stand-ins…
    So how about we go a step further now and give miles and end a little limelight?
    Take a good look at Theresa May…
    Tell me she’s not a believable diane Spencer with 2 or 3 decades added….
    ask yourselves why you would believe it not..

    1. Bark,
      Donaldos been around the block a time or two. Believe the unbelievable. Don’t believe the believable. Tell me. What evidence do you have about May/Princess Di?

  7. Democracy in Britain? That died a long time ago just before it made an attempt to be born in a Royal kingdom that always lived from the baksheesh and life support of Jewish merchants that kept the illusion of royalty and power afloat. The middle ages were a prime example how “white English aristocracy” became infested with the scent of shekels while giving birth to colonial (white) supremacy and power sponsored by little powerful and not so white men in the background that were happily knighted and blue blooded along the way for their good deeds to the crown keeping the Royals and their subjects afloat while waging wars, plundering and robbing all the planet for the blood thirsty empire of money changers – the only kingdom that functions “democratically” since centuries on the rocky island. The profiteering of COL and that of their ancestors meddling with British affairs and claiming it as their own – that is British and world history.
    How could have Theresa May killed democracy that never existed in the first place? She just did a fantastic job of what the PM’s of Britain are usually expected to do – serve the empire in a typical British and kosher way.

  8. So much twaddle here, but Richard Littlejohn is right, absolutely spot on right. His article should be part of the fightback against our arrogant elites.

  9. It is now obvious to me that Brexit is controlled by…. those who own all of Britain.

    In 1943, a jew Harvard lawyer, scholar & author, Jacob J Rabinowitz, admitted this description of the system of personal debt obligation with private property as collateral. [ Rabinowitz authored ‘The Brandeis Method of Constitutional Law’ and many others, including Medieval Germany Notes. ]

    The system goes back to the 12th century, at least.

    This is where ‘Pharisee-style’ usury was brought to European Banking in London.

    The Common Law Mortgage and the Conditional Bond – Penn Law….

    http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9338&context=penn_law_review

    (Page 194 – Summary):
    “The conditional conveyance by way of security had been in use by the Jews for a long time prior to their settlement in England, and was used by them in England in their transactions with Christians. The technical device by which the conditional conveyance was effected was, in every detail, identical with the classical English mortgage in its original form, namely, two separate instruments were used and a third party was employed as a depositary.

    “A device similar in conception and design to the conditional conveyance was used by the Jews during the middle ages in England and elsewhere for the purpose of effecting conditional obligations. This device was in every respect identical with the common law conditional bond in the earlier stage of its development.

    “Both of these devices were developed by the Jews for the purpose of evading a certain rule of Hebrew law which is similar to the rule against penalties in English law.”

    “The Jews introduced the business of money-lending on a large scale in England, and with it the means by which this business was carried on. When Englishmen learned the business of money-lending from the Jew they adopted his methods and devices, outstanding examples of which are the conditional conveyance by way of security and the conditional bond *which have survived to our own day.”

    -AGAIN-

    “…they ADOPTED his methods and devices..which have SURVIVED to our own day.”

    1. Remember…
      “Give me the power to coin a nation’s money, and I care not who makes the laws” was the Rothschild claim centuries ago. That claim would be better stated today as, “Give me the power to issue the worlds’ DEBT, and I care not who makes the laws.”

      It could be written…
      “I care not who wants BREXIT!!”

      “…..I care not who makes the laws” part…. still rings as loudly as ever…!!

      I emphasize the debt issues… commercial loans issues… business dealings… “follow the DEBT” rather than the “money.” Mainly debt circulates today. That is THE source of the criminal bankers’ power.

      Without USURY… their systems FAILS..!!

  10. PAT: In 1943, a jew Harvard lawyer, scholar & author, Jacob J Rabinowitz, admitted this description of the system of personal debt obligation with private property as collateral. [ Rabinowitz authored ‘The Brandeis Method of Constitutional Law’ and many others, including Medieval Germany Notes. ] The system goes back to the 12th century, at least.

    Pat, I recall you had a negative opinion or view of work engaged by Anna Von Reitz et al. Anna has posted recently a discussion of “The US National Debt vs. The American States National Credit”. Does the following excerpt relate directly, indirectly, or orthogonally (!) to your statement above.

    ANNA VON REITZ WROTE:

    The US National Debt is approximately 25 trillion dollars. This debt is owed by United States Citizens and Citizens of the United States.

    Approximately 90% of this debt is owed to American State Citizens and American State Nationals, with the remainder being trade deficits and other forms of debt owed to other countries, primarily to China.

    The DOD has discovered a credit of approximately 21 trillion dollars on its books. This is the National Credit owed to the American States and People.

    This credit accrued over nearly a hundred years during which generations of Americans exchanged their labor and goods for I.O.U.’s issued by the Federal Reserve.

    When the DOD issues a Credit Voucher to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to offset Debts presented for payment by American State Nationals or American State Citizens, the US National Debt is decreased by the amount of the Voucher.

    If, however, DOD issues a Credit Voucher to pay off Debts presented for payment by United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States, the net affect is to increase the US National Debt, plus additional interest.

    When our National Credit is accessed by American State Nationals and American State Citizens and applied to their debts, the US National Debt decreases and US Credit Rating is restored.

    1. AD –

      Thanks for the notes and question.

      You are correct that I do not subscribe to Anna’s claims. I do not believe she has any authority beyond her own property.

      The question has no simple answer because she has made claims based on unproven assumptions.

      She writes about American State Nationals and/or American State Citizens. Those persons are not recognized anymore… if ever.

      Individual sovereignty is impossible to attain today, without becoming a hermit, cut off from society completely. And then, the hermit would be sojourning on another person’s property, and could be arrested for trespassing there. And once the hermit is booked, placed into the system, the hermit is…. in the matrix…. with a control number.

      Further, any person who uses the common utilities or services supplied by any government approved entity(s) is ‘effectively connected’ to the Federal Government. That includes the roads and highways used by the public. Highways have been designated ‘seas of tar’ in many official documents over the years, indicating Admiralty Law is applied.

      Anyone using electricity supplied by ‘the grid’ is assumed to be receiving a benefit from the TVA, since the electrons produced by the TVA are fungible. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, especially in Admiralty. Ignorance of accepting a benefit is not an excuse either.

      I could write many pages, but I do not have the energy anymore. My writings always produce more arguments than I care to address at this stage of the game.

      I once believed similar to Anna. I do not belong to that ‘religion’ anymore. Those who did in the past usually hid or went to jail, or both. The CODE enforcers have more resources and are more capable than any individual.

      Maybe this will help you to do your own research.

      Main take-away = “EFFECTIVELY CONNECTED” is the key to government control.

      1. Thank you, Pat, most appreciated. As others also concluded, that “boat” sailed yesterday, before we arrived on dock. (Cue Mr. Carlin!) For different reasons (pragmatic and practical), I agree with your judgement RE Anna Von Reitz and her Living Law cadre of noble, idealistic, morally right, decent folks. I hope to meet up with Anna et alia before I die, if only to thank them personally for bringing Cervantes’ Don Quixote into the 21st Century.

        Tilting at windmills, pissing into the headwinds, David taking on Goliath [exception proving this rule and rulers], rolling stones up a mountain, over and over again, definitions of insanity — NOT! I submit that, already, given aspirations, knowledge accumulated, documents compiled, by Anna Von Reitz et alia, logs of events and ratings of success preserved, Anna will leave a legacy that may survive until our next go-round with Reality as human beings. Before that, I too shall have returned to soil and lan as an American, not as a “US Citizen”. For whatever it’s worth to anyone, including “government”.

        One “royal guy” once said he would like to come back as a virus and wipe out people more effectively than he and others already had to that date. Think about that. How can we best extricate ourselves from this messy, complicated, overly complex MATRIX? I know of two simple, off-topic answers I’d give: euthanasia and suicide. (Invest now — SOYLENT GREEN, INC. listed on the stock markets!!)

        As these KINDS of answers become more acceptable among us, we shall devise scenarios equal to or greater than those handed down to us from souls who did battle before. We can go individually, we can pass as a pack. And we don’t have to die on our knees with a bullet in the head from the back!

        Grow a pair, men! And arm your women, too.

      2. No Pat you should write. It is fascinating.

        What is the sovereignty of a person on a boat in international waters? He/she is not “connected”.

        Stupid question I know but I had that thought.

      3. Jake –

        Thanks for asking…
        “What is the sovereignty of a person on a boat in international waters? He/she is not “connected”.”

        Not “a stupid question” at all.

        Being “connected” can be claimed in thousands of ways – both, tacitly & explicitly … in the context of being EFFECTIVELY connected.

        If someone purchased a boat and continues to purchase fuel and supplies to maintain it, there is an EFFECTIVE connection there. A BENEFIT is received. Also, there are pirates, criminals and rogues to deal with. “Connections” offer safety as well as control. A trade off.

        I do not know any person who is not EFFECTIVELY connected to the ‘Law of The Land’ and to the ‘Law of The Sea’ at this point in the game. And the very fewest of people have any clue at all about their true and precise status and address.

        In the late 70s, a friend of mine claimed the courts had no jurisdiction over him… he claimed he was sovereign. The judge looked at him and said, “You’re here, aren’t ya!!??” That sums it up very well.

        You see, even communicating with any of the authorities implies an EFFECTIVE connection. An answer by letter is an admission of relative status by the respondent.

        When wanting fewer problems, just learn when to stop pushing. Pushing to the maximum is futile. Attorney, Edgar J. Steele, found that out….. and so have many thousands of others.

        http://americanfreepress.net/edgar-steele-first-amendment-martyr-dies-in-prison-under-mysterious-circumstances/

        And even “Free Born” John Lilburne in Britain in the 17th century found out his true status. He died at age 43, as a result of the proof he endured:

        John Lilburne (1614 – 29 August 1657), also known as Freeborn John, was an English political Leveller before, during and after the English Civil Wars 1642–1650.

        He coined the term “freeborn rights”, defining them as rights with which every human being is born, as opposed to rights bestowed by government or human law.

        In his early life he was a Puritan, though towards the end of his life he became a Quaker.

        His works have been cited in opinions by the United States Supreme Court. (The SCOTUS knows the score. So do ALL government agencies, globally.)

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lilburne

        This info might help you stay out of trouble. 🙂

  11. @ Sardonicus and Madame Butterfly i must apologise it seems i was wrong about Littlejohn having jewish heritage, perhaps i confused him with another conservative Peter Hitchens who i understand has some jewish ancestry. Littlejohn is certainly a Zionist and supporter of Israel!!

    1. @ Mark

      Littlejohn is certainly a Zionist and supporter of Israel!!

      I’m not so sure about that, Mark. My contacts within the newspaper industry tell me that all journalists who work for mainstream newspapers have to pretend to support Israel and be fiercely philosemitic as the price they must pay to keep their jobs.

      Any mainstream journo who took an openly anti-Zionist line would be sacked at once. So they have to put on a show of adoration for all Jews when in their hearts they secretly detest them.

      Wouldn’t you detest a man who forced you against your will to suck up to him and say nice things about him — just to keep your job?

      Ever heard of “crocodile tears”? It’s a bit like that. Only this time it’s a variation on that: crocodile smiles. 🙂

      1. @Sardonicus.

        Well I suppose it is not hard to believe that mainstream journalists have to pretend to be loyal to Israel and supportive of jews to keep their jobs seeing how the mainstream media is mainly Jewish owned and controlled.
        . Perhaps that’s the case with Littlejohn that he is secretly an ‘anti-semite’ but I just doubt it from someone who made the documentary ‘The War on Britain’s Jews’ and has written articles on ‘anti-semitism’ in the Labour Party!!

  12. No Brexit means Brits can help pay for Millions of $$$ dollars in damages to churches in France since the beginning of February!!

    Eucharist desecrated, statues smashed in series of French church attacks

    https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2019/02/14/eucharist-desecrated-statues-smashed-in-series-of-french-church-attacks/

    Paris, France, Feb 15, 2019 / 12:30 am (CNA/EWTN News).- At least 10 incidents of vandalism and desecration of Catholic churches have been reported in France since the beginning of February, according to French news sources and watch groups.

    Vandals in Catholic churches throughout the country have smashed statues, knocked down tabernacles, scattered or destroyed the Eucharist, burnt altar cloths and torn down crosses, among other acts of desecration of religious items.

    French Church Is Ninth in Eleven Days Vandalised Across the Country

    A French church in the commune of Maisons-Laffitte was vandalised over the weekend and has become the ninth church to be desecrated across France in the last 11 days.

    The attack, which targeted the Saint Nicolas Roman Catholic church, saw the tabernacle of the church overthrown and vandalised and is not the first church in the area to be vandalised in recent weeks….

    According to the Observatoire de la Christianophobie (Observatory of Christianophobia), the incident is the ninth church attack in only 11 days with another church in the city of Tarn being not only vandalised but partially set on fire on February 5th. Two teenagers were later arrested in connection with the Tarn attack.

    In the Notre-Dame-Des-Enfants in Nîmes last week an even more grotesque attack occurred when not only was the tabernacle of the church attacked and desecrated but the attackers smeared faeces on the walls of the church, as well.

    https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/02/12/french-church-ninth-eleven-days-vandalised-across-country/

  13. @ MARCUS

    The Chinese have one of the oldest traditions of recorded history in the world. Marcus the Chinese levied taxes over 3000 years ago. So, taxes were invented by a Jew you say ?
    Of course, a Chinese Jew. Why are you so STUPID ?

    1. Of course, a Chinese Jew. Why are you so STUPID ?

      Isn’t it clear! Because of the Jews, of course 🙂

      They make Marcuses stupid.

    2. Ralan –

      This is not 3000 years ago, but you may not know this:

      Jews and Judaism in China have had a long history.

      Jewish settlers are documented in China as early as the 7th or 8th century CE.

      Relatively isolated communities developed through the Tang and Song Dynasties (7th to 12th centuries CE) all the way through the Qing Dynasty (19th century), most notably in the Kaifeng Jews (the term “Chinese Jews” is often used in a restricted sense to refer to these communities).

      During the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), a Ming emperor conferred seven surnames upon the Jews, by which they are identifiable today: Ai (艾), Shi (石), Gao (高), Jin (金), Li (李), Zhang (張), and Zhao (趙). Interestingly, two of these, Jin and Shi, are the equivalent of common Jewish names in the west: Gold and Stone.
      https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/Jews_of_Kai-Fung-Foo%2C_China.jpg

      Jews and Judaism in China are predominantly composed of Sephardi Jews and their descendants. Other Jewish ethnic divisions are also represented, including Ashkenazi Jews, Mizrahi Jews and a number of converts.

      China’s Jewish communities have been ethnically diverse ranging from the Jews of Kaifeng and other places during the history of Imperial China, who, it is reported, came to be more or less totally assimilated into Chinese culture, to 19th- and 20th-century Ashkenazi Jews, to Baghdadis, to Indians.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_China

      The Talmud is used in China for businesses in certain areas.

      1. The Newsweek story, by Isaac Stone Fish, covers the surprising trend in publishing books on Jewish topics, including those supposedly revealing business secrets in the Talmud.

        … Titles such as Crack the Talmud: 101 Jewish Business Rules, The Illustrated Jewish Wisdom Book, and Know All of the Money-Making Stories of the Talmud share the shelves with stories of Warren Buffet and Bill Gates.

        With the increasing interest in business education in China, and a rise in sales of self-help literature, the production of business guides to the Talmud has exploded.

        The guides are like the Chinese equivalents of books such as Sun Tzu and the Art of Business. …

        http://tracingthetribe.blogspot.com/2011/01/china-talmud-as-business-guide.html

        Taiwan:
        There’s even a Talmud hotel in Taiwan inspired by “the Talmud’s concept of success” that features a copy of the book Talmud Business Success Bible in every room.
        https://talmud.hotel.com.tw/eng/

      2. Yes, long history. Read one, you have the ending for another. Appearances — both behavior and morphing appearances generationally fixed by wise choices (e.g., intermarriage, surgery) — seem the overriding factor in fake assimilation.

        I have not independently researched this question. Nonetheless, the pattern sketched for “Jews and China” apears congruent with the Protocols and, analogously, even the history of white and black slaves in America, pursued back to Africa’s early, early times.

        If indeed (((they))) — by whatever appellation one prefers — succeed in effectively and sustainably infecting China — a well established “state”, geographically defined, economically active, and likely psychosocially under direct attack by the usual suspects (not a recent development based on my reading) — then I too would lose hope at a much higher rate than even today.-

        Someone might address the ON THE OTHER HAND — Jesuits!

      3. @PAT

        Thanks for the education, but Marcus my man claimed the Jew invented taxes so can we stick to the time period please. While we are at it if anyone here can explain how the Jewish dinosaurs forced all of the other dinosaurs into extinction that might just set the whole thing straight. Then I will know all that I need to know about how rediculous this all is.

      4. Ralan –

        “Stick to the time period…”

        I don’t answer anyone in the fashion they want. My answers are what I want. And I am not changing for you or anyone else. I do not bend. Those who have seen me write here for 6 years will testify to that. I have been called every name imaginable and many others also. One guy lately called me an ‘ass clown’…. whatever da hell dat issss!! 🙂

        If you want to engage, you will not like some of the answers I give, and…. in new-age yiddish… das isss yus ‘tushiski’!! 🙂

        So… Live with it!!!!

      5. There are more jews in the world than they want us goyim to know.jewish catholics, jewish protestants etc. It’s full of jews, spies and sleepers. Always lying, cheating.

  14. I did mention in an earlier comment to another post my concern that if the UK leaves the EU it may break up itself. So to revisit the Brexit referendum results( https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/eu_referendum/results):

    England
    Leave 53.4%
    15,188,406 VOTES
    Remain 46.6%
    13,266,996 VOTES
    Turnout: 73.0%

    Northern Ireland
    Leave 44.2%
    349,442 VOTES
    Remain 55.8%
    440,707 VOTES
    Turnout: 62.7%

    Scotland
    Leave 38.0%
    1,018,322 VOTES
    Remain 62.0%
    1,661,191 VOTES
    Turnout: 67.2%

    Wales
    Leave 52.5%
    854,572 VOTES
    Remain 47.5%
    772,347 VOTES
    Turnout: 71.7%

    Scotland and NI have already voted to remain in the EU, it’s just whether they’d vote to stay in the UK in any future referendum but it depends how it’s phrased. Brexit was mainly about stopping immigration and against the rules imposed by eurocrats in Brussels, but it seems to me leaving won’t stop the immigrants, nor will past EU standards and regulations be repealed, and rules are rules so it doesn’t much matter who enacts them, and it’s not as if they’ll be very different from EU rules in the future. Stay or leave will not solve the problems that the people who voted for Brexit are concerned about. It’s the government and the leading parties that are the main problem however you look at it.

    So should we say that the democratic wishes of the people should be obeyed and we’ll see what happens to the UK after that? If the UK had never joined the EU, then I wouldn’t see a problem about its unified future, but now that it is in the EU, I am not so sure that leaving is such a good idea.

    What we want is an EU by and for the Europeans but it’s not as if the UK wants that whether it stays of leaves. I can’t see either Labour or Tory governments joining up with Salvini and Orban to push for solving the immigrant question. So I don’t know what is best. Break up even the UK and GB, and even further into counties and see what can be salvaged for the white race? Give London and another city or two to the muslims and make sure they stay there? It seems the politicians will just keep plodding along like the blind leading the blind in some painting by Brueghel.

    The problem is that there is no major party in the UK that stands for the views that the people who voted for Brexit have and I’m not sure that UKIP even stands for that.

    1. LD has nothing to do with the Comment section. You should know that by now. I deleted your comment because it was not only off-topic but also insolent and sarcastic. If you have nothing to say, keep silent.

  15. Since so many people want to talk about the Jews –
    The Jews clearly invented taxes in the USA, the main ones that are the big globalist robbery, where workers are strapped to the international banking network, paying out billions every year to a private corporation, which operates unconstitutionally and has never been and will never be audited…
    That would be the income tax, which is one of the planks in the jewish communist manifesto and has no business in the constitutional republic..
    That and the privately owned central bank..
    Rothschild, Warburg, Kuhn, Loeb, shiff and yes Rockefeller (Clinton)…. many more..
    The guy on the $10 bill is Alexander Levine Hamilton, just another Rothschild bankster agent..
    But misgotten taxes and fiat banking are only one part of the big mazaltaver fk story we stupid goyim have been dealing with for many decades now, but are finally beginning to understand for the gross special interest ripoff that it is…
    Some more of the story is the way the ashkenazi of eastern Europe, the khazars and a lot of ruthless bolsheviki, not many at all of whom were real Jews to begin with, were able, big-time under the 3-plus term FDR presidency, to HEAVILY infiltrate the us state department and from there commie-fi the USA in general, while they laid the rotten little state of Israel off on the rest of the world; it did have enough problems already but a lot of animosity for the USA among the arabs was not the case before 1948.. look how bad things have gotten now…
    And, since the ashkenazi had been loaded into the federal police organs, they were also able, through the machinations of jew-ish groups like the ADL, to rev up the hard dope traffic.. now you have the opioid epidemic, killing a lot more Americans every year than all killed in the whole Vietnam war.. I believe that’s the satler brothers, kosher mfers..
    Now we see the Jews-who-are-not-Jews hold hands with the Vatican Jesuits on the massive invasion of white Europe and the USA, gradually being overrun with third world malefisceants…
    Some of us white people in the USA and Europe have it figured out now..
    We’re not giving up our guns no matter how many phony episodes they present..
    I suppose maybe when the globalists force that issue the S might finally HTF once and for all with these creeps…

    1. @ BARKINGDEER

      The 2nd amendment made sense when it passed and people have right to bear arms and rise against a tyranus goverment, I agree. What good does your gun do now against a tank or F35. Let me know how that works out. Unless your a doomsday preper and believe the world is comimg to an end. Good luck timing that as well.

  16. LETTER TO LOCAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY OFFICE

    I intend to continue to to support the Conservative Party, but unless the Parliamentary Party changes its policy (And its leaders) I do not intend to vote Conservative at the next General Election. I will vote for whatever party Nigel Farage leads, and I will also support the “Leave means Leave” movement.

    I am loyal to what I consider to be the traditional Conservative Party, and hope to see it rebuilt. The present leadership is not in tune with my beliefs, or those of 17.4 million other British people.

    Since the Supreme court decision to allocate all decisions on Brexit to parliament, and the subsequent motion to preclude No Deal, I am afraid the battle is lost. No deal was an opportunity to escape the dead hand of the EU, and we have thrown it way. The EU is a trade protection area. It is anti-free-trade. It is also a gravy train for powerful and anti-democratic bureaucrats. How could our MPs want to hand over control to that?

    Despite the referendum result it has come to this; our ruling clique have maneuvered us into a situation where the only choice is between Mrs May’s deal and remaining in the EU; and Mrs May’s deal is so bad I now think that remaining in the EU would be preferable.

    I cannot express how shocked and disappointed I am with this obdurate woman and the 75% of MPs (Plus the entire Civil Service) who have colluded in a deliberate plan to subvert the clear will of the people,

  17. You all hate Jews too much; if you want to make a change…. change yourselves first and the Jew wont “rob you”. It is your leaders who are corrupt—-
    ————————————————————
    Let me give you a perfect example:
    Donald Trump just bombastically declared the Golan Heights to be Israeli territory
    ..Previously…
    He pompously declared Jerusalem Capital of Israel…
    Before that
    He used a wrecking ball to scrap the “horrible” Iran nuclear accords
    And at about the same time
    He shut down the Palestinian representative office in Washington!
    lol
    😉 😉 😉
    Did Jew Netanyahu MAKE HIM DO THAT?
    Trump is going down… the investigation are results are in.. Could it be he was trying to influence Jews all over the corridors of power so that they can help him out?
    Maybe
    But one thing is for sure …… he didn’t do all of the above because he is a true “Zionist” or a lover of Israel… or an Ideologist
    he is just corrupt like the rest.
    You all need to start loving Jews because it is us who are cleaning your house.
    and your blood
    Just ask the daughers of Bush, Clinton and of Trump who all married Jews!

    1. Well, well, well. May I see YOUR DNA profile, your passports (plural), bank statements — OH, how about a real name, sir or madam? I do not want to presume your gender, maybe you need no stinkin’ gender! You clearly need no sense of propriety.

    2. “…You all need to start loving Jews because it is us who are cleaning your house…”

      He just made a slip of the tongue and betrayed that he is indeed a Jew, which many already suspected all along.

  18. raylan
    the second amendment will always make sense in a free country, full of real people…
    yes i know the odds aren’t good, and they probably have stuff we don’t even dream of…
    but it is the principle of the thing too… there has to be a point beyond which people will not be pushed…
    more and more it looks like, if we don’t have the will and a plan to resist, we’re all going to end up in orwell’s dystopia.. only it’s going to be much worse, the 5G trans-humanist AI cartoonland…
    is that what all this ‘trans’ stuff is about too?
    avatar
    yes we know our leaders are corrupt..
    the jews and jesuits killed all the others, remember?
    trump?
    well you can’t help but notice how the charges were basically dropped against him at the same time he gave the golan to netanyahu… just saying… they either got something good on him or he’s one of them anyway…
    we’ll see where his free speech crackdown comes out with the universities…
    if it’s anything like his border control program, i’d say don’t get your hopes up..
    it’s to be expected somebody will come up yelling and swinging about the very thing the globalists are working on, him being the fake news front man all along… so he is another hitler then… cause that’s what he was too…
    maybe it’s a little complicated, this will take a little time, but the idea is really to implement the anti-antisemite laws… first jews have to get control of the issue… they’re several steps ahead…
    there’s never been anything stopping trump from putting the army on the border under martial law…
    instead we get strung along…
    they say he caved on the wall deal.. i guess i’ll take anne coulter’s word for it…

    1. BARKINGDEER

      I am a firm believer that our system is broken. I also believe that we are at a tipping point and that something has to give. I am not sure that its a year or two or a decade or two but things must change.

      Where you loose me is when you go off into Jew land such as to tie Trumps actions in Israel to the release of the Mueller report. Just simply a coincidence. To script such a conspiracy and flip a switch to make something like this happen would be impossible. Think about the thousands of moving pieces over the two years of the investigation and then manipulating the outcome with so many stakeholders, is just not realistic. You can blame me all you want but I can tell you I wish we Jews were such magicians. You give us to much credit.

  19. raylan
    i appreciate your input, glad you toned down the invective… we’re trying to discuss things here…
    nobody hates people just because they were born jewish.. that’s bs propaganda, useful in keeping the jews demografied as useful idiots for the zionists… antisemitism is the old trick the zionists use to personally attack critics of us policy toward israel and the middle east… besides which, if you have a country that’s exclusively for one type of people, a race, ethnicity, religion or mentality, in israel’s case all of the above, it means you have no right to pretend you’re really just like everybody else in the first place… do you?
    i guess maybe it’s possible you just don’t understand how much power the so-called jews have in the us government? “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain”… seems hard to believe though…
    what do you think camp david is there for, what goes on there?
    do you know how big the jew-ish lobbies are? do you not see everybody who is somebody have to go to the aipac meeting, not registered as a foreign agent, and pledge allegiance to israel?
    why is that happening?
    did you not hear senator shumer saying he’s here for israel?
    it is not as if the israelis do a gd thing for us..
    give me a president who says the well being of the israelis is no more or less important than that of all their neighbors, somebody who doesn’t have to go to israel, put on the beanie hat and stand in front of the wall…
    surely you can see the effect this has on the rest of us, who have no prejudice on the subject…
    do you know that the huge majority of ambassadorships to other countries go to jews? how does that happen?
    do you know that everybody in the clinton’s cabinet was jewish, except for maybe the dead guy?
    and what abut the media bro? you not going to tell us jews don’t have total control of that, now are you?
    we’re tired of seeing jewish presidents or their stooges and we’re sick and tired of jewish media..
    tell me – is trump jewish?
    and now we’ve got the whole zuckerburg internet censorship program going on….
    why is it every time we lose something else we see jews hauling it away?
    tell me something man – how many jewish presidents has the usa had?
    surely you don’t deny the whole bush cheny neocon 9-11 atrocity was a jewish plot, with the whole nyc chamber of commerce involved…
    you have to get over your personal prejudices and become a real american, who’s not here for his group, but is here for the whole..

  20. Pat,

    you said:

    “I do not know any person who is not EFFECTIVELY connected to the ‘Law of The Land’ and to the ‘Law of The Sea’ at this point in the game. And the very fewest of people have any clue at all about their true and precise status and address.

    In the late 70s, a friend of mine claimed the courts had no jurisdiction over him… he claimed he was sovereign. The judge looked at him and said, “You’re here, aren’t ya!!??” That sums it up very well.

    You see, even communicating with any of the authorities implies an EFFECTIVE connection. An answer by letter is an admission of relative status by the respondent.

    When wanting fewer problems, just learn when to stop pushing. Pushing to the maximum is futile. Attorney, Edgar J. Steele, found that out….. and so have many thousands of others.”

    I wanted to study more, maybe you can give me some leads to start.

    thank you.

    1. Dmitry –

      Here is a very small sample….. to get you started on a new journey in ‘LAND’ Law.

      All through your reading… please keep in mind that states are considered to be ‘foreign’ to the USA.

      This document explains how the US is operating under Martial Law Proper TODAY:
      Military Government and Martial Law – by William E. Birkhimer, L.L.B., Major, General Staff, U.S. Army (Interim Judge Advocate General)
      Third Edition Revised. Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A. 1914
      Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1892, by William E. Birkhimer, In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

      https://tinyurl.com/MilGovPDF1

      Military Jurisdiction under the US Constitution, & the concept of Military Government

      The Hague Conventions of 1907 specify that “territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army.” Birkhimer on page 33 of Military Government and Martial Law notes that: “The truth must be that a territory is militarily occupied when the invader dominates it to the exclusion of the former and regular government. The true test is exclusive possession.” (Reconstruction in US after Lincoln’s War)

      The form of administration by which an occupying power exercises government authority over occupied territory is called “military government.”

      The standard reference for this is Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866), where the Supreme Court held that:

      There are under the Constitution three kinds of military jurisdiction: one to be exercised both in peace and war; another to be exercised in time of foreign war without the boundaries of the United States, or in time of rebellion and civil war within states or districts occupied by rebels treated [71 U.S. 2, 142] as belligerents; and a third to be exercised in time of invasion or insurrection within the limits of the United States, or during rebellion within the limits of states maintaining adhesion to the National Government, when the public danger requires its exercise.

      *The first of these may be called jurisdiction under MILITARY LAW, and is found in acts of Congress prescribing rules and articles of war, or otherwise providing for the government of the national forces;
      **the second may be distinguished as MILITARY GOVERNMENT, superseding, as far as may be deemed expedient, the local law, and exercised by the military commander under the direction of the President, with the express or implied sanction of Congress;
      ***while the third may be denominated MARTIAL LAW PROPER, and is called into action by Congress, or temporarily, when the action of Congress cannot be invited, and in the case of justifying or excusing peril, by the President, in times of insurrection or invasion, or of civil or foreign war, within districts or localities ….where ordinary law no longer adequately secures public safety and private rights.

      We can organize this more straightforwardly as follows.

      There are under the Constitution three kinds of military jurisdiction:
      • MILITARY LAW is exercised both in peace and war; and is found in acts of Congress prescribing rules and articles of war, or otherwise providing for the government of the national forces;
      • MILITARY GOVERNMENT is exercised in time of foreign war without the boundaries of the United States, or in time of rebellion and civil war within states or districts occupied by rebels treated as belligerents; superseding, as far as may be deemed expedient, the local law, and exercised by the military commander under the direction of the President, with the express or implied sanction of Congress;
      • MARTIAL LAW PROPER is exercised in time of invasion or insurrection within the limits of the United States, or during rebellion within the limits of states maintaining adhesion to the National Government, when the public danger requires its exercise; and is called into action by Congress, or temporarily, when the action of Congress cannot be invited, and in the case of justifying or excusing peril, by the President, in times of insurrection or invasion, or of civil or foreign war, within districts or localities where ordinary law no longer adequately secures public safety and private rights.

      (II) The Right to Institute Military Governments

      See Birkhimer, p. 21
      The US Constitution has placed no limit upon the war powers of the government, but they are regulated and limited by the laws of war. One of these powers is the right to institute military governments.

      Military Government includes civil administration of military government for interim cessions, which is commonly composed of both civil and military components.

      Technically speaking, military government is used as an interim and provisional government of undetermined cessions, and especially for “foreign territory” under control by conquest; and while it is not martial law but it can be indefinite; hence the some persons regard military government as the international law equivalent of “martial law.”

      The administration of occupied territory is conducted under military government. There does not have to be a formal announcement of the beginning of “military government,” nor is there any requirement of a specific number of people to be in place, or “on site” before military government can be said to have commenced.

      See Birkhimer, p. 25 – 26
      No proclamation of the part of the victorious commander is necessary to the lawful inauguration and enforcement of military government. That government results from the fact that the former sovereignty is ousted, and the opposing army how has control. {22}Yet the issuing such proclamation is useful as publishing to all living in the district occupied those rules of conduct which will govern the conqueror in the exercise of his authority. Wellington, indeed, as previously mentioned, said that the commander is bound to lay down distinctly the rules according to which his will is to be carried out. But the laws of war do not imperatively require this, and in very many instances it is not done. When it is not, the mere fact that the country is militarily occupied by the enemy is deemed sufficient notification to all concerned that the regular has been supplanted by a military government.
         Reference: {22} Instructions for Armies in the Field, Gi O. 100, A.G. 0., 1863.

      <<<>>>

      The Constitution of 1789 contained ALL of the elements demanded by the Crown in the Treaties in 1783.

      Contract between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America February 25, 1783:

      And as it is necessary to the good order of His Majesty’s finances, and also useful to the operations of the finances of the United States, to assign periods for payment of the six millions Iivres in question, and to regulate the conditions and terms of reimbursement, which should be made at His Majesty’s royal treasury at Paris after the manner of what has been stipulated for the preceding advances by former contract of the 16th July, 1782-
      We, Charles Gravier, Count de Vergennes, etc., Counselor of the King in his Councils, Commander of his Orders, Chief of the Royal Council of Finances, Counselor of State, etc., Minister and Secretary of State and of his Commands and Finances, invested with full powers by His Majesty, given to us for the purpose of these presents- –
      And we, Benjamin Franklin, Minister and Plenipotentiary of the United States of North America, likewise invested with powers by the Congress of said States for the same purpose of these presents, after having compared and duly communicated to each other our respective powers, have agreed upon the following articles:
      (Finalized)The Paris Peace Treaty of September 30, 1783:

      http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp

      Example:
      Treaty Article 4:
      It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.

      US Const – Art I, sec 10:
      No state shall…make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.

      Once the Constitution was signed, Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg. 99. Webster’s 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.)

      There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since the Constitution was accepted in 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)

      There have not been any Judges in America since the Constitution was accepted in 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)

      The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24) 20. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)

      You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)

      America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1803.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)

      The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)

      The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)

      We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)

      Much of the present conditions are explained here by Senators Church & Mathias from their 1973 investigation – HOW A NATIONAL EMERGENCY APPLIES TODAY:

      Senate Report 93-549
      War and Emergency Powers Acts
      http://barefootsworld.org/war_ep.html

    1. Glad to help.

      Birkhimer is a main reference used by SCOTUS. That pdf is lengthy because it is precise & accurate. Notice the status of Taiwan therein!!

      ……

      This is one which confuses mot folks in America, as they claim ‘constitutional rights’ when they have none:

      “You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)”

      http://freedom-school.com/law/padelford-v-city-of-savannah.html

      Padelford, Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah
      14 Ga. 438, 1854 WL 1492 (Ga., Jan Term 1854) (NO. 64)

      “No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it.”

      [5.] The Constitution is to be construed in the sense in which it was understood by the makers of it at the time when they made it.

      [6.] This sense is expressed by the four following propositions:
      That the Constitution delegated to the General Government, or any department thereof, no power by implication, but only delegated such powers as it expressly enumerated.
      That it delegated no exclusive power, unless the delegation was said to be exclusive.
      That it laid no prohibition upon the States, except such as it specified.
      That the words used in it, if susceptible of more meanings than one, were used in the meaning which was least favorable to the delegation of power, and most favorable to its retention.

      This is a very interesting case for 2 reasons:
      1, a man is not a party to the constitutions, and
      2, the supreme court of Georgia is equal to the US Supreme Court.

  21. All of what Pat says is indeed the situation we find ourselves in. The only quarrel I have with him regarding the fraudulence of the Revolutionary War addresses the FACT that true American Patriots didn’t see it that way. It’s not like they were in on a rigged game and dutifully played their parts as “crisis actors”. Blood was spilled and people died. But the one thing George III DIDN’T accomplish was to confiscate the guns of a thoroughly defeated American enemy. Had this occurred, we wouldn’t have seen world history play out the way it has all these many years later. World totalitarianism would have been virtually a done deal, which explains the great effort to confiscate them NOW

    In the paraphrased words of “Moses” (Charlton Heston): “you’ll have to pry my gun from my cold, dead hands!”

    SIC SEMPER TYRANIS! 😠

    1. B-Hawk –

      If that is your “only quarrel” I take it gladly. 🙂
      Here is why……

      You wrote:
      “But the one thing George III DIDN’T accomplish was to confiscate the guns of a thoroughly defeated American enemy. Had this occurred, we wouldn’t have seen world history play out the way it has all these many years later.”

      Yep. They needed the Americans to keep the guns so that Lincoln’s War would render ALL states subservient to London’s bankers….. and Martial Law Proper installed nation-wide!!! North & South lost states’ rights during reconstruction.

      The London bankers needed their world-wide police force. They got it!!

      President Andrew Johnson speaks against Congress controlling the states, Martial Law Proper, which still exists today. He was impeached for this action:

       (p.250 THE THIRTY-NINTH CONGRESS.)
       
      “In other words, when a State judge, acting upon a question involving a conflict between a State law and a Federal law, and bound, according to his own judgment and responsibility, to give an impartial decision between the two, comes to the conclusion that the State law is valid and the Federal law is invalid, he must not follow the dictates of his own judgment, at the peril of fine and imprisonment. The legislative department of the Government of the United States thus takes from the judicial department of the States the sacred and exclusive duty of judicial decision, and converts the State judge into a mere ministerial officer, bound to decree according to the will of Congress.”

      “The ninth section authorizes the President, or such person as he may empower for that purpose, to employ such part of the land and naval forces of the United States, or of the militia, as shall be necessary to prevent the violation and enforce the due execution of this act.’ This language seems to imply a permanent military force, that is to be always at hand, and whose only business is to be the enforcement of this measure over the vast region where it is intended to operate.”

      (Page 246 is Andrew Johnson’s reasons for his veto of Civil Rights Bill of 1865 and Freedmen’s Bureau Bill. He, as a Democrat, was impeached for doing that.)
       
      246 THE THIRTY-NINTH CONGRESS.

      “To the Senate of the United States:

      “I regret that the bill which has passed both houses of Congress, entitled ‘An act to protect all persons in the United States in their civil rights, and furnish the means for their vindication,’ contains provisions which I can not approve, consistently with my sense of duty to the whole people and my obligations to the Constitution of the United States. I am therefore constrained to return it to the Senate, the house in which it originated, with my objections to its becoming a law.” (cont’d):
      http://www.archive.org/stream/historyofthirtyn01barn/historyofthirtyn01barn_djvu.txt

      1. Pat

        Consider all of what you say being a moot point IF the guns had already been confiscated at the outset had the Americans been thoroughly defeated. There woulda been no NEED for a Civil War because States Rights would have become a non-issue, as that reality would have been nipped in the bud.

      2. B-Hawk –

        “Consider all of what you say being a moot point IF the guns had already been confiscated at the outset had the Americans been thoroughly defeated.”

        That is not correct.

        They had to have the guns to declare Military Government…. because of the war…. which needed guns to be accomplished.

        Military laws are enacted in the US today because of guns. Guns give them the leverage & fear needed to do so.

        They have control. Martial Law Proper…. a Military Government.

        READ this whole book……

        This BOOK explains how the US is operating under Martial Law Proper TODAY:
        Military Government and Martial Law – by William E. Birkhimer, L.L.B., Major, General Staff, U.S. Army (Interim Judge Advocate General)
        Third Edition Revised. Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A. 1914
        Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1892, by William E. Birkhimer, In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

        https://tinyurl.com/MilGovPDF1

        Military Jurisdiction under the US Constitution, & the concept of Military Government

        The Hague Conventions of 1907 specify that “territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army.” Birkhimer on page 33 of Military Government and Martial Law notes that: “The truth must be that a territory is militarily occupied when the invader dominates it to the exclusion of the former and regular government. The true test is exclusive possession.”
        (Reconstruction in US after Lincoln’s War)

      3. Pat

        Instead of “….at the outset”, I should have phrased that, “if the guns had already been confiscated at the end of the Revolutionary War”….

        And take the comment from there.

        George III had his cake (the financial umbilical cord to London was never severed). But he couldn’t eat it (We kept our guns)

      4. I like to think that had Jefferson not been in Paris at the time Hamilton was bending Washington’s ear over what kind of money system to create for the new republic, history may have taken a dramatic turn for the good.

        Benedict Arnold looks like a great American patriot compared to that greatest traitor of them all – the scumbag Rothschild agent Alexander Hamilton.

        I guess we’ll never know ☹

      5. It didn’t matter what 🤴 wanted. We kept ’em, and (((they’ve))) been scramblin’ ever since…for a “do-over” 😎

  22. Democracy AND freedom of speech are DEAD in Britain!

    Proof that the British have NO freedom of speech….
    The press groups there have been under an official ‘gag order’ for almost three years now:

    European human rights chiefs -ORDER- the British press NOT to reveal when terrorists are Muslims in crackdown on freedom of speech

    The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), chaired by Christian Ahlund said discussions over immigration had caused increasing ‘xenophobia’.

    -Report out from the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance

    -Blames increase in hate crimes and racism in UK on the ‘worrying examples of intolerance and hate speech in newspapers

    -Claims Islamophobia rises when media reports when terrorists are Muslim

    http://tinyurl.com/y2ovd3nh

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *