Britain, Brexit and Boris Johnson: A Recipe for Disaster

By Lasha Darkmoon
with help from an Unnamed Correspondent
August 17, 2019


The transition from Theresa May to Boris Johnson is a step from the frying pan into the fire. But what has this got to do with America and the Jews? Read on to find out…

from the frying pan into the fire

A few days’ ago I received an unsolicited round robin email from an unknown correspondent with whom I’d had no contact before and of whose existence I had hitherto been totally unaware. After completing this article, partly based on this gentleman’s remarks, and finding my article roughly three times  the length of his initial 750-word email, I decided belatedly to research my mysterious correspondent’s name on the internet to see if I could find out something about him.

To my astonishment, I discovered that my correspondent (whose name I intend to keep confidential) had an article on Wikipedia devoted exclusively to himself. He was described by the online encyclopaedia as a notorious “neo-Nazi political activist” belonging to the National Front (NF) and the “British National Party (BNP) who had blotted his copybook by denying the Holocaust and putting in a good word for the White race—in short, a political pariah of the worst possible stamp.

The National Front and the British National Party were organizations I’d naturally heard about, like most other people who take an interest in politics, but I’d never had any dealings with these people myself for one simple reason: I happen  to be a recluse living in a remote corner of England, on the outskirts of foggy Dartmoor; and I am, in addition, a non-voter on principle with a passionate need for privacy, anonymity, and non-involvement with political parties.  I haven’t voted for any political party for over 20 years, though I made an exception recently by voting for Brexit in the June 2016 referendum.

“The first rule of British politics is never to trust the promises of Tory politicians,” my unnamed correspondent points out in his round robin email. “They break their word every time.”

I can understand why a man who says things like this is unpopular with the political class.  My firebrand correspondent, despite being persona non grata,  goes on to make some pertinent observations:

In one man’s lifetime, the nation witnessed Tory Prime Minister Harold MacMillan promise at the General Election of 1959: ”Vote for us Tories and we will STOP Immigration.” What a lie! In 1972, Tory Prime Minister Ted Heath took Britain into the European Common Market on the promise that it was a simple trading bloc with no political agenda and with no plans to subject us to rule from Brussels. What a lie! Prime Minister Maggie Thatcher promised us in 1979 that she understood our fears of “being swamped by alien cultures”. What a lie!

Thatcher cared nothing for our absolutely justified fears of being swamped by millions of outsiders and their alien cultures. She broke every promise she had made to the electorate in terms of understanding our concerns about unchecked mass immigration. She, too, turned out to be a liar in the old Tory tradition of regarding the electorate as fools.

Then along came Tory Prime Minister David Cameron in 2010 who promised the nation that the winning Brexit vote at the Referendum would be respected and implemented. What a lie! Three years later . . .  and we are still waiting.

I had no idea myself that the Tory party contained so many shocking liars. But then, the records reveal that the rival Labour Party is no better when it comes to the Machiavellian arts of mendacity. They all lie.

Of one thing we can be certain. Britain will never allow another referendum again. The 2016 flirtation with democracy is almost certain to be the last one. Referenda, you see, are dangerous things. Positively toxic. They can actually allow democracy to sneak in by the back door.

When a referendum goes all wonky, the only way out of the mess is to force people to vote again, if necessary several times, until they get it right. Nothing must be allowed to wreck the sanctity of the status quo, after all, with the Masters at the top of the social pyramid cracking their cat-o’-nine-tails, and the slaves, ever docile and submissive, grovelling at their heels like whipped curs.

Brexit came as as a shock to our ruling classes. It was the Revolt of the Lackeys. Unforgivable!

Tory Prime Minister Theresa May solemnly promised the nation that we would be OUT of the European superstate on the 31st of March this year. She lied. She did her best to keep us shackled to the European juggernaut forever. She started by telling us that “No Deal is better than a bad deal!” And the sheeple believed her. And then she changed her tune and began chanting the exact opposite like a malfunctioning robot: “A bad deal is worse than No Deal!” And though fewer of the sheeple now believed her, many still did. These were mostly the baa-aah-ing young lambs who continued to bleat her praises as she led them down to the familiar path to the slaughterhouse.

Lies, lies, lies!

This is what politicians do, it seems. They manufacture lies for the masses. They make promises they intend to break.

Enter now Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the reigning monarch of the moment.


The question is: will Boris Johnson—known both to friends and political foes as “BoJo”—continue the pattern that we’ve come to expect of Tories and break every promise he makes ? Well, he is a Tory; but let’s just take a quick look at the team of government ministers he has selected to rule with him.

[1]  Sajid Javid, the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, is the son of an immigrant bus-driver from Pakistan. Here he is, pictured with his British wife.

[2]  Priti Patel (pictured), the daughter of Ugandan Indians is the new Home Secretary, in charge of the police, the Judiciary, and immigration affairs.

So two of the most important posts in the British government, that of Chancellor and Home Secretary, have gone to two British citizens of Pakistani and Indian origin.

[3]  Then there is  Dominic Raab,  the new Foreign Secretary, another extremely important post. He, too, is of immigrant stock: the son of a Czech Jew who likes to let people know how his father fled the Nazis and managed to escape the Holocaust. “Every one of us in politics must always stand against antisemitism in all its forms,” he orates, as if the people he is lecturing are somehow unaware of the prevalence of antisemitism and need constant reminding.

[4] Next there is Grant Shapps, the new Transport Secretary. Another  Jew. In an interview with the Jewish Chronicle in 2010, Mr Shapps boasted: “I feel totally Jewish; I am totally Jewish. I don’t eat pork, we only buy kosher meat and we don’t mix meat and milk. I like being Jewish and I married a Jewish girl. It’s like a way of life…” He then adds the bizarre non sequitur: “I don’t know if there is a God or not. But one thing I am absolutely certain of is that God wouldn’t care if you were Jewish or Christian or Muslim.”  (For more details, see this excellent article in The Occidental Observer)

[5] Finally, there is Boris Johnson himself, the new Prime Minister—the  ultimate British toff and jolly boarding school japer—a cross between Machiavelli and Bertie Wooster. An alumnus of Eton and Oxford, Boris somehow gives the impression that his ancestors swept into Britain with William the Conqueror, if not with the Druids. But no, it would appear that Boris was born in New York city and likes to boast that his grandfather was a Turk, an Emir of the Turkish empire, according to my unnamed White Nationalist correspondent: “On his mother’s side, his grandfather was a Jewish dealer in old rags in Muscovy at a time when the Russian Czars were still sitting on the imperial throne.”

That’s interesting to know. Not a single person I’ve met has heard that one of BoJo’s grandfathers was a Turkish grandee and that his other grandfather was a Jewish rag merchant from Russia. If they knew this, they’d be gobsmacked. Which just goes to show how the most significant facts are cunningly kept out of the daily newspapers and television.

So there we have it: our Prime Minister and his Foreign Secretary are both British Jews, as is his Transport Secretary. They come buttressed for extra support by a Chancellor and Home Secretary of Pakistani and Ugandan Indian origin. It makes you wonder. How come this country is now being governed right at the top by Jews, Indians and Pakistanis, with White indigenous Brits being shunted off into subordinate roles? This is known as “diversity” and “equal opportunity”, I guess, code words for discrimination against the indigenous white population.

Do members of the new Boris Johnson government, my unnamed correspondent asks:

“. . . feel any affinity or identity with Britain? Do they know what it feels like to be British? Through our ancestors, we, the native peoples of the British Isles, were here when Stonehenge was built four thousand years ago. We were with the Celtic Queen Boudicca when she gave her life in an attempt to defend Britain from an earlier invasion. We have built and defended this land over the centuries. The Industrial revolution was the product of our native genius. We ruled a world empire, an empire that brought civilisation to benighted peoples around the globe, and when they wanted Independence we were generous enough to grant them that too.”

Well, he certainly sounds like a “White Supremacist”, it will be said by our namby-pamby  brigade of politically correct ninnywits in high office. We are now, if Boris Johnson’s new team of political appointees is anything to go on, essentially being governed by a sinister cadre of foreigners. By Jews and Asians, to be precise. Assimilated infiltrators  without any of our traditional values or atavistic instincts.

The new government have already indicated they have no intention of restricting the number of immigrants entering Britain, thus breaking all the solemn promises of previous Tory administrations who undertook to crack down on  immigration. Even illegal immigrants, including criminals, are made welcome here and given housing in preference to native born Brits who are treated like lepers in their own country. White old ladies in their seventies and eighties are now being regularly raped and beaten to death by black thugs from Africa and jihadi Muslim fanatics from Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Even if our new Prime Minister manages to get us out of Europe, it will be at an incalculable cost. We will be jumping out of the jaws of one shark, the United States of Europe, into the jaws of an even bigger shark, the United States of America.

Let Finian Cunningham explain:

Since Boris Johnson took over as Britain’s new prime minister three weeks ago he has been holding intensive phone calls with US President Donald Trump. There is a buzz that the much-vaunted “special relationship” between the US and Britain is finding new ardor.

But this supposed special alliance is never about equals. It’s all about Britain doing the bidding of its master in Washington. So when the pair are patting each other’s backs, that means potential trouble for the rest of the world from abuse of power by Washington and its enabling British lackey.

Trump has gone out of his way to compliment Johnson as Britain’s new leader, in particular praising his harder line towards the EU over separation terms.

Trump’s contempt for the EU is in line with Boris Johnson’s and that of his hard Brexit cabinet. Johnson’s Downing Street office and acolytes like Dominic Raab and Brexit planner Michael Gove are gunning for an abrupt exit in which Britain will not have any transitional trading relations with the EU. It will instead be moving to World Trade Organization rules as a sole trading nation.

That’s partly why Johnson and his government are assiduously courting the Trump administration. London needs to find favor with the White House in order to avail itself of a US-British trade deal as a substitute for the EU, which has up to now been Britain’s biggest market for imports and exports.

Johnson is desperately relying on Trump to throw a trade life-line to the UK. That acute reliance on Washington by Britain makes Johnson an even more pliable British leader to American demands.

Their discussions were said to revolve around Iran and Hong Kong.

The White House wants Britain to take a much tougher line in the Persian Gulf towards Iran and also towards China, in accordance with US demands.

And Bolton is upping the ante for Britain to show more muscle. That, in turn, dangerously escalates tensions towards a military confrontation.

What this all means is that Britain is set to pander even more than usual to Washington’s imperious foreign policy. The Anglo-American axis has been responsible for numerous criminal wars in the Middle East and countless other subterfuges. Washington and London have worked together to escalate hostility and tensions towards Russia.

With the unscrupulous Johnson as prime minister and Britain’s post-Brexit desperation for American economic favors, the British bulldog will not merely be attentively hearing its master’s voice. It will be snapping and yapping to please. That’s a bad sign for international relations and peace.

See Finian Cunningham, Bulldog Britain Hears Master’s Voice

And so, hey presto!—the fierce British bulldog, thanks to Boris Johnson’s sycophantic genuflections to America, is suddenly transformed into a fawning lapdog.

Britain will now kowtow to America and do its will, as if it had been turned to all intents and purposes into America’s 51st state. And it will ultimately take its orders, as America itself already does, from  international Jewry and the network of Zionist lobbies, think tanks, and media conglomerates that crisscross  the world.

We are now, like flies caught in a sticky web, under the iron fist of ZOG. It’s been like this for some time of course, but never before has it been so chillingly obvious.

“Today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.” — Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad of Malaysia, in a speech to the Tenth Islamic Summit Conference at Putrajaya, Malaysia, October 16, 2003

72 thoughts to “Britain, Brexit and Boris Johnson: A Recipe for Disaster”

  1. Boris Johnson himself, the new Prime Minister—the ultimate British toff and jolly boarding school japer—a cross between Machiavelli and Bertie Wooster.

    A perfect description of Britain’s latest political fop – or is that flop? The description runs a bit deeper than one might think. In the TV series, it’s the Jew butler running Bertie’s life.

    1. I disagree. Boris may be a bit odd, but he has humanity. He has made mistakes, (like spilling red wine on his girlfriend’s white sofa), but nobody’s inflammable. The main thing is that he is determined to get us out of the EU. He is up against the British establishment, which now seems to consist of the BBC, the civil service and the Guardian.

      The last three years have shown the most shocking, arrogant and undemocratic disregard that this establishment has for the wishes of the people. All this fuss about no deal is based on conjecture and is nothing more than a policy for reversing the result of the referendum, which they had promised to enact.

      I don’t think a General Election would be a good idea now, but come the day there will be 17.4 million voters who wil not vote for any Remainer. The result could be historic. Many of them will be finished in politics.

      1. @ John Kirby

        “The main thing is that he [Boris Johnson] is determined to get us out of the EU.

        With all due respect, I think you miss the point. We are all ardent Brexiters here—none more so than Lasha Darkmoon—but getting Britain out of the EU is no longer the issue. Why would you want Britain to be out of the EU if it means ENSLAVEMENT TO AMERICA? and DOMINATION BY INTERNATIONAL JEWRY?

        I’m sorry, but you obviously haven’t read the article or made any sense of it.

        How can you back a man who is now outed as as a JEW? Who has two other JEWS supporting him (Dominic Raab and Grant Schapps)? And as Foreign Secretary and Chancellor, Jew Boris appoints a PAKISTANI and an INDIAN?

        Quite happy to see the country run by Jews, Indians and Pakistanis, are you? 🙂

      2. You have failed to take on board this comment of LD’s because you just haven’t bothered to read the article properly and treat it with the respect it deserves:

        Even if our new Prime Minister manages to get us out of Europe, it will be at an incalculable cost. We will be jumping out of the jaws of one shark, the United States of Europe, into the jaws of an even bigger shark, the United States of America.

        You need to pay more attention to details, sir. There’s no point getting out of the EU if it means falling into the clutches of the Jew-dominated United States.

        You need to read the entire block quote from Finian Cunningham that explains why Boris Johnson is a menace: BECAUSE HE IS A JEW, SURROUNDED BY JEWS AND ASIANS, SUCKING UP TO CRYPTO-JEW TRUMP AND LEADING BRITAIN INTO JEWISH BONDAGE!!!!!!!!!!

      3. Well said, Sardonicus! No one has been more pro-Brexit than LD. And yet here she is being openly disrespected by an old man set in his ways who believes that Brexit is somehow a “good thing”, even when Brexit now means means grinding servitude to the United States. More wars in the Middle East by Zionist stooge Trump and his new Jewboy lapdog Boris Johnson. This is what this old duffer is backing, probably because rich pig BoJO has promised him a tax cut!

        As you say, he just hasn’t bothered to read the article but nevertheless feels very important if he can disrespect it.

        He has no grasp of the facts. No grasp of the new nuances. And he fails to see that the transition from Theresa May to Boris Johnson is not an improvement, as he imagines, but a step “from the frying pan into the fire”.

      4. Sard –

        Jews already control Britain & US:

        A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land by 1250!!

        The Shetar’s Effect on English Law –
        A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land
        (The Georgetown Law Journal, Volume 71, Pages 1179 – 1200)

        By 1250, scutage had completely replaced feudal services; tenant obligations had been reduced to monetary payments….

        Most important, the encumbrance of real property permitted by the Jewish Law of shetar had been adopted by English law.

        Bonds contained the traditional Hebrew formula pledging “all my goods, movable and immovable.” Creditors had the statutory right to execute against the debtor’s land. No longer were personal obligations and rights in land rigidly separate.

        Even while Edward was divesting himself of his Jewish money lenders, he made their legacy permanent.

        A small but significant principle of Jewish Law, wherein personal debt superseded rights in real property had become the law of the land!!

      5. I always read Ms Darkmoon’s articles carefully. I am not frightened of the USA , despite the stranglehold the Jewish Lobby has on Congress. That power seems to be ebbing, due to the internet. I am an optimist and think the internet is bringing a revolution in the knowledge and understanding of ordinary people.

        Although I may meet opposition here on Darkmoon I have to say I have met many fine Jews, although I have had problems with young male orthodox Jews. Even Jews have problems with the “Frummers”. I find that most Jews are not Zionist fanatics but they do support Israel, and that is not a crime. I have voiced my skepticism about the Holocaust to Jews and found they will at least listen without flying into a rage. I think many of them can see it has been a gigantic scam.

        There are 170 countries that are NOT in the EU, and most of them are doing fine, but President Trump is squandering goodwill around the world. I just hope he is deselected at the primaries

      6. @ John Kirby

        Thanks, John. An excellent riposte to your critics and spoken like a true gentleman! Yes, LD agrees with you absolutely that there are many fine Jews and regrets that this website has attracted so many extreme and virulent antisemites. We’ve had a few good Jews show up on this site now and then but they have found the antisemitism here a bit too much to bear and have scuttled off — perhaps “driven off” would be a better way of putting it!

        Still, we have some really fine posters here, and I would like to thank you for joining us.

        Re Boris Johnson, I think we are all agreed that if Boris delivers the goods and gets us out of Europe in one piece — without making us a vassal state of the the US in the process! — we would all rejoice. If the UK is actually a better and healthier country 1-2 years from now under BoJO’s stewardship, who could complain? So let’s see what he actually does.

        Personally, I can’t see how he can possibly fulfil all his grandiose promises. It would cost too much. Remember that most politicians, especially the Tory ones, have a very bad reputation for breaking their promises. Their main priority is to protect the wealth of the rich, usually at the expense of the poor. I think that is undeniable.

      7. I appreciate John Kirby’s comments. I mostly agree with him.

        Where I don’t…. so what!!?? I do a lot of guessing connecting the dots as best as I can. 🙂

      8. To me Boris isn’t worth a damn, but anything is better than Theresa May.
        Every day Boris says one thing, and every other day he says the exact opposite.
        After Trump I don’t believe anything any of these people say any more.

      9. Hi Sister Monica,
        Tax policy is not a question of protecting the rich or punishing the poor. It is about extracting as much money as possible from the people.

        At present 10% of the population pays 90% of income tax. If the tax rate for high earners is raised to too high a level, (as it was by the Harold Wilson Government in the 1960s, to 85%) the the high earners leave the country. Wilson called it the “Brain Drain” but never would admit that it was his tax policy that made the best and brightest leave the country. Three of my cousins, (Aero Engineers) went to work at Lockheed in the USA and never came back.

        An Economist, Arther Laffer had the good sense to point out that a zero tax rate will bring in no money, neither will 100%, because people would have no incentive to work. Somewhere between zero and 100% lies a peak for money brought in for the government. It turns out to be 19%. If that was imposed as a flat rate for all earnings over the personal allowance, then the government would receive maximum haul. Of all countries it is Russia that
        has adopted this syste, Their tax return form is so simple that nobody needs an accountant, which I would think will hit the accountants.

        That is economics, but politics is different. Any reduction in tax rates to high earners is now described a gift to the rich. It shows how far we have come to the powerful state that the citizens money is deemed as being the governments to dispense.

        My main beef is that those in the elite are paid huge amounts. Most of these people have never done a days hard work or created wealth.

        The usual suspects, the BBC, and the Civil Service are small fry compared to the magic circle in big business. Most of the senior executives of big companies have not built the companies they head. In fact many of them do not even understand the company’s activities and certainly not the technology, but they are first with their noses in the trough. They are cheating their employees, their customers and their shareholders

        I am no socialist but these greedy, arrogant shits need sorting out.

  2. It is quite amazing how the British people continue to swallow the lies as they have done for a hundred years and longer. The ruling class hold them in utter contempt. The Conservatives are even worse than Labour. At least with Labour you know that you are dealing with communists who openly hate Britain and its native population. The Conservatives pretend to stand for traditional Britain but have consistently betrayed it. Unfortunately, the system itself is terminally corrupt. Democracy is a system designed to prevent any meaningful change. It is so easily corruptible through the media and finance, which is why it is pushed by the jews everywhere. The British people, and all white people in the West have no real options. They have been disarmed and kept ignorant while our elites continually weave ever tighter controls on them as they push them towards extinction or slavery through unlimited invasion by the Third World. We are probably at the point now where the only thing which could possibly bring about any long term change is catastrophe, either natural or man made. The outlook is grim whatever way you look at it.

    1. “…The British people, and all white people in the West have no real options…”

      The British people had the option to vote en masse for the BNP when it still was a functioning party, but they didn’t. Of course most white people are afraid to be called “racist”, thus they refrain from openly expressing their rejection of mass non-white immigration, but in the anonymity of the voting booth nobody sees whom you are voting for. You can freely vote for an anti-immigration party. But even this minimum “courage” the British people could not muster. Survival has to be earned.

      1. “The British people had the option to vote en masse for the BNP when it still was a functioning party, but they didn’t.”

        True. The British people also have convenient amnesia. Wonderboy Nigel, upon forming the UKIP, stated that his goal was to smash the BNP. Nigel has been so clever in denouncing immigration (from the EU) but steering away from non-white immigration. Nigel is so far up Trump’s arse the only thing you can see are the soles of his feet.

        As for Labour, the much vilified Arthur Scargill once said that he only wished Labour would keep half the promises it makes to its constituents, as the Conservatives keep to theirs.

        It’s the system. Whether in the UK or US, the system is designed to keep power in the hands of the elite.

    2. Brilliant! Everything you say would be recognized as the unvarnished truth by LD and the people behind this beleaguered website. However, we also believe that the Unexpected (if not the Uncanny) invariably occurs to restore the balance when things are getting really bad for the Children of Light. Our enemies don’t know it, but we have powerful friends in high places! 🙂

    3. Democracy – the big, really big, Jewish lie. Our problems began when we allowed Jews to define our words. To wit:

      Democracy (Greek: δημοκρατία dēmokratía, literally “rule by people”) is a system of government where the citizens exercise power by voting. In a direct democracy, the citizens as a whole form a governing body and vote directly on each issue. In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives from among themselves. These representatives meet to form a governing body, such as a legislature. In a constitutional democracy the powers of the majority are exercised within the framework of a representative democracy, but the constitution limits the majority and protects the minority, usually through the enjoyment by all of certain individual rights, e.g. freedom of speech, or freedom of association.

      A republic (Latin: res publica) is a form of government in which the country is considered a “public matter”, not the private concern or property of the rulers. The primary positions of power within a republic are not inherited, but are attained through democracy, oligarchy or autocracy. It is a form of government under which the head of state is not a hereditary monarch. In the context of American constitutional law, the definition of republic refers specifically to a form of government in which elected individuals represent the citizen body and exercise power according to the rule of law under a constitution, including separation of powers with an elected head of state, referred to as a constitutional republic or representative democracy.

      George W. Bush was quoted as saying, “Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!” “Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, while still White House counsel, wrote the “Constitution is an outdated document.” So much for the Jews’ idea of America as a “constitutional republic.” As with the term “anarchy,” the addition of new meanings, twisted by Jews to suit their agenda, redefine original definitions.

      Definition of anarchy

      1a : absence of government
      b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority the city’s descent into anarchy
      c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government
      2a : absence or denial of any authority or established order anarchy prevailed in the ghetto
      b : absence of order : disorder not manicured plots but a wild anarchy of nature— Israel Shenker

      Note the clear reflection of Jewishness in 2a and 2b? Yet one finds the following addendum included in the definition:

      Anarchy exemplifies how words may have similar yet distinctive meanings. The earliest recorded use of the word, from the early 16th century, meant simply “absence of government,” albeit with the implication of civil disorder. A similar but ameliorated meaning began to be employed in the 19th century in reference to a Utopian society that had no government. The establishment of these two senses of anarchy did not stop the word from being applied outside the realm of government with the broadened meaning “a state of confusion or disorder.” The existence of definitions that are in semantic conflict does not imply that one (or more) of them is wrong; it simply shows that multisense words like anarchy mean different things in different contexts. Another example of a sense-shifting word relating to government is aristocracy. When first used in English, this word carried the sole meaning “government by the best individuals.” It may still be used in such a fashion, but more commonly, it is encountered in the extended sense “the aggregate of those believed to be superior.”

      Of course, in this one finds the usual Jew disclaimer justifying the confusion of definitions. This has become standard practice among languages where definitions are controlled by Jewish wordsmiths. In languages controlled by Jew wordsmiths, words that originally had specific meaning are now redefined, and often inverted, to convey concepts unintended by the original definition. Thus, the Jews’ “fluidity” of language, loses all sensibility among a flood of confounding meanings.

      Jews invariably twist and subvert not only meaning, but the “spirit” of the definition. The spirit of original Greek democracy was a system where, lacking any form of centralized government, political power was held by the people in the form of voting directly on issues. In this sense, the definition of democracy actually embodies the intent of anarchy. Additional definitions are completely bogus, inverting the original meaning of the definition. A true definition of the Jews’ “democracy” should read something to the following effect, “A corrupted form of government whereby power is held by a tiny, elite cabal of non-governmental individuals who select political candidates by controlling the political process through financial means.”

      Of course, by this definition there would no longer be any reason to call it “democracy.” There is small difference between democracy and monarchy. Monarchies are determined by bloodline, therefore the answer for selecting the “right leader” was to murder or marry off the monarchy to achieve the desired results for control. This makes monarchies one of the most murderously bloody forms of governmental control ever devised. As monarchs were obviously manipulated to achieve ends not in keeping with the peoples’ wishes, such obvious machinations by monarchs, led people to understand the appointed leadership had no real authority over them. This was the very situation that led to the Magna Carta.

      Magna Carta Libertatum (Medieval Latin for “the Great Charter of the Liberties”), commonly called Magna Carta (also Magna Charta; “Great Charter”), is a charter of rights English barons forced King John of England to agree to at Runnymede on 15 June 1215. First drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury to make peace between the unpopular King and a group of rebel barons, it promised protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, to be implemented through a council of 25 barons.

      The Jews’ idea of “representative Democracy” simply divides the monarchy’s power base to a somewhat larger degree, while preselecting the new ruling class for the voting public. To add even more confusion, Jews added another term “constitutional democracy” that combines republicanism and democracy, making these definitions utterlyuseless for explaining the true purpose and political intent of these two systems.

      Jews use words to control people, doing so by controlling the mind’s conscious and subconscious imagery. The original idea of democracy is political power held by the people. Therefore, Jews adopted this pretty sounding word to convince people they actually have a powerful voice in government, when in fact they have none at all. Instead, Jews created a sham political system they fully control, using mere words to keep gullible goyim subdued and complacent in falsely defined beliefs.

      The Jews’ version of “democracy” can best be summed up in the following statement – If voting actually worked, (((they))) would make it illegal.

      The wicked witches and wizards of Wordsmithy mutter foul incantations while crouching over their bubbling cauldrons of verbiage. Their teeth drip red with the blood of Palestinian children as they stir in nasty expletives while croaking, “we think it’s worth it!” Demon Shabbat goy and zombie social warriors grovel at their feet, supplying ever more ingredients that feed a vicious vichyssoise of verbosity.

      Eye of guilt, heart of hate, white genocide will be your fate!
      Lump of lies, sweet words and myths, error from tongue of vulture, a flask of horror with shot of terror, will wreck the white man’s culture. Small twist of humor to top it off, so they won’t know we kill them soft.

      We spit in your face, we lie in your ear,
      We smother your world with blankets of fear.
      Holocausts and trade towers to make you flinch,
      We’ve stolen your Christmas with our Grinch.

      Monsanto brings fruit from our vines,
      With genes we’ve spliced like Frankenstein,
      This horror food we sell to you,
      Is gobbled down without a clue.

      Promised health, medical incantation,
      It’s a death of stealth by vaccination,
      Laced with mercury that is so hot,
      These kill and maim like bullets shot.

      They cannot see with their own eye,
      Clear evidence that we deny,
      Those trails of death that cross the sky.

      We drive the Goyim to despair,
      For this, a lie we quote,
      “You have a voice in de-moc-rac-y”,
      “You have the right to vote!”

      Stolen houses from widows, Wall Street deals from hell,
      We fatten our coffers with these sweet words: buy! Buy! BUY! No – sell!

      Stealing from the goyim is like taking a grizzly bear’s honey,
      Be careful, make sure they’re fast asleep, before you debase their money.

      These things from our bag of tricks we play,
      So to the goyim this we say,
      A stake to the heart is our only fear,
      But we’ve stolen your soul so killing us will cost you dear!

  3. So the British people either don’t understand the ZOG or their elections process is screwed with, which is keeping them from voting it out…
    In the USA we think it’s a lot of both…
    Neither BoJo nor Trump LOOK Jewish…
    Neither do these guys, but I’m betting now 90% of them in this picture are…
    Neither did Blll Clinton, but they all fill their administrations with mazaltavers…
    I think the Queen owns the Corporation, her and the Pope..
    The Hoff Juden are the Bilderbergers (bureaucrats – see above), they operate the governmental control machine and run the public relations program…
    The President and the prime Minister are the two main frontmen…
    Both pretty blustery now, lots of great promises..
    But what’s changing?
    We’ll believe Brexit when we see it, like the secure US border…

    1. “I think the Queen owns the Corporation,”

      The Queen owns land, and some businesses. Owning is not the same as controlling. The Queen only controls what was inherited. That she needs permission to enter The City of London, tells you who is in control. In reality, the Queen and the rest of the aristocracy, who generally have long term thinking in order to pass on their estates, control very little. While there has been a significant mixing of the aristocracy with the (((financial elite))), it is the financial elite who have taken control. The House of Lords was stripped of any political power it had to push back, and its hereditary rights diluted to the point of being irrelevant.

      1. ” While there has been a significant mixing of the aristocracy with the (((financial elite))), it is the financial elite who have taken control. The House of Lords was stripped of any political power it had to push back, and its hereditary rights diluted to the point of being irrelevant.”

        I can believe that. Please show the documents proclaiming it or used for enforcing it.

      2. Thanks, Wig –

        I did not see where the Queen’s control of anything was removed.

        I have been aware, for a long time, of the Queen’s ability to dismiss HER government in Canada… which is the opposite of the Queen not having control of any land in UK:

        Canadian Parliament is dissolved

        Sep 7, 2008 … TORONTO — The Canadian prime minister dissolved Parliament on Sunday, Sept 7, 2008, and called for an early election next month in hopes of strengthening his Conservative minority government’s hold on power.

        **The governor general is the representative of Queen Elizabeth II.


        The governor general signs the corresponding proclamation in the name of Her Majesty The Queen for the pro forma summoning of a new Parliament.

    2. Bark –

      The Ultimate Delusion
      By: Stephen Ames

      Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows: S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997.

      At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
      “This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997.”

      Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England?

      This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law. Remember, King George was the “Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America.” See: Treaty of Peace (1783) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large 80.. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA ..’

      What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)
      The United States is not a land mass, it is a corporation.

      Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.

  4. And if anyone in the UK is foolish enough to think that Nigel Farage is any different then think again, he’s a zionist lackey just like the rest of them along with the zionist troll Kate Hopkins and Tommy Robinson ( real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon ).

  5. M*** C*****
    If there’s a general election called for Oct 31st or within a week of it. Britain is leaving the EU.

  6. No thinking, honest white person can avoid being called “racist” when describing the flaws of our respective governments. Until most of them overcome that fear, things will continue to worsen. We’re almost at a point that it can no longer matter, anyway (just so you know).

  7. WHAT?!? Politicians lie?

    Say it isn’t so.

    This has been my American mantle for decades: If their mouth is moving, the politician is lying.

    But really, the simplicity is overwhelming. It easily boils down to the issue of jews ramrodding the particular Pol. This is why I have been so adamant about Trump being a bald faced liar, obviously from Day One. The fact that so many could see all the jews that surround and control his ENTIRE life, yet they still insist that he is some sort of Savior, well, tells me that most people are just plain idiots.

    I’m sure it is the same for most any European or English Pol.

    As for America, Never an R (Republican) or D (Democrat) Again? The jew owns every one of them.

      1. Of course there are jews that occupy the “opposing” side. Even ideologically hating the man whom the greater brethren deemed to be the Goyim’s face and leader into their jew world order.

        Just because there are two (or more) jew factions fighting for supreme control, doesn’t mean that in the end they won’t unite.

      2. Buelahman

        In the “end” the truth will be revealed to show what we all know anyway, that there is no honor among thieves, at which time (((they))) will annihilate themselves.

        The old cliche will apply – “the darkest hour is before the dawn”

  8. LD –

    Since you are a confessed “non-voter on principle” (so am I) this will bolster your decision there:

    Google Sent Police to ‘SWAT’ a Whistleblower When He Leaked Google’s Documents Proving Google’s Interference with US Elections!!

    Zachary Vorhies, a Senior engineer at Google, released hundreds of documents to Project Veritas, including a blacklist of conservative news sites. When Google discovered he leaked the files, they contacted police who ‘swatted’ him, which is a harassment tactic of causing an emergency service to send a team of police and medical personnel to someone’s home, as the company requested a mental-health check. He says Google is not who they say the are, and it does exactly what is swears it does not do. He broke from Google because he fears the company will destroy the entire free-election system.

    ”Google whistleblower reveals tech giant DOES blacklist right-wing news sites and says the company called police when he leaked the evidence, leaving him ‘fearing for his life”

    • Engineer Zachary Vorhies released hundreds of documents to Project Veritas
    • He says he added a ‘dead man’s switch’ to the files in case he was ‘assassinated’ 
    • One of the files leaked by Vorhies is a ‘news black list site for Google Now’
    • He claims it is a list of the web pages Google restricts including conservative leaning websites such as The National Enquirer, Media Matters and Infowars
    • Another file appears to show a ranking classifier to ‘define channel quality’ 
    • Images show Vorhies walking towards officers after ‘Google called the police’
    • ‘Google is not who they say they are’, he warns in a chat with Project Veritas
    • CEO Sundar Pichai’s told congress that Google is not biased in December 2018

    BTW – This man will NEVER pass a background check for purchasing firearms in the US because of the mental health evaluation alone!!! That is Question # 6 on the form.

    1. “BTW – This man will NEVER pass a background check for purchasing firearms in the US because of the mental health evaluation alone!!! That is Question # 6 on the form.”
      The background check is unconstitutional.
      This is the meaning the authors of the 2nd amendment would have understood in 1791, when it was a relatively new word:
      infringe (v.)
      mid-15c., enfrangen, “to violate,” from Latin infringere “to damage, break off, break, bruise,” from in- “in” (from PIE root *en “in”) + frangere “to break” (from PIE root *bhreg- “to break”). Meaning “encroach” first recorded c. 1760. Related: Infringed; infringing.
      The only background check should be whether they are capable of serving in a militia (not reserves), to which the federal government retains the right to appoint commanders. Clearly this engineer would be. In short, ALL “gun laws” are unconstitutional, even the ones supported by the NRA.

      1. “The background check is unconstitutional.”

        I disagree.

        You mistakenly researched the word ‘infringe(d)’…. when you should have concentrated on ‘arms’ and what it meant in 1789.

        Taken in context: ”Arms” in 1789 included black powder muzzle-loaded muskets and pistols. It could not have included ‘cartridge’ chambered weapons, since they did not exist at the time.

        This is why ‘black powder’ rifles & pistols – ‘arms’ – are not regulated by BATFE, and require no registrations or background checks.

        So….. all officials can rightly declare, “The 2nd amendment is fully intact.” And it IS… even with background checks!! 🙂

  9. What’s the alternative to this recipe to disaster? I don’t see or hear or smell one manifesting from the inglorious leaders of the so-called Western free world.
    From our (lol) exemplars!

    Is there a righteous recipe for the collective, for the individuals of this age of quarrel and anger and greed and lust and deceit? One which exists beyond what if, should be and could be; beyond promises and pipe dreams. And most especially, beyond the phoniest delusion of them all. The modern new age “I’m not religious, I’m spiritual” baloney which is nothing more than a recipe for spiritual suicide.

    H.L. Mencken named that tune in a dozen words..
    “Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.”

    1. “H.L. Mencken named that tune in a dozen words..”

      I can do it in fewer words: “Democracy means governed by Jewish rules”. I say Jewish rules, because it is the useful idiot goyim that implement the rules.

  10. There’s always plenty of guff available for guys like Trump and Nigel to work with, and it’s always been the tactic, that the ZOGGER get out in front of one or several issues that resonate with the public, like BREXIT and the BORDER, and says a lot of stuff the public wants to hear.. And politicians like Trump will actually work on some of the issues, like the China trade thing, that will benefit, as long as the ZOG authorizes…
    The ZOG is OK with the China trade issue, right now the shorts (most sophisticated) are working it on Wall Street…
    From the position on the cutting edge the puppet actually controls the effect, while pretending to really care…
    We call them Left Gate Keepers, and the so-called alternative media, where you have them using traditional broadcast methods, is full of them…
    People still show up for Trump’s rallies, whereas Hillary on the other hand had to hire..
    The gist above was that Boris is trying to shift Britain’s trade to the USA as a way of saving the British economy, in case BREXIT really happens, because somehow Britain will still have to play by Brussels’ rules as it leaves the EU, which ate designed to make it impossible economically…
    I say a country like England with 60,000,000 people should be able to care for itself, make everything it needs for itself..
    That’s real Nationalism..
    The international trade thing is not necessary; it’s how the globalists control individual nation’s economies, and politics…
    Trump hates the EU too, supposed;y.. He wised off to the Pope too..
    That sounds good..
    But Trump falls short now, where he should be using every bit of presidential power to force the issues..
    He’ll never put the army on the Southern Border…
    That’s the main issue, the one that got him elected, and he should have made a lot more progress on it by now..
    His Base is there for the taking, in case the next Candidate points it out, that Trump hasn’t done it, that the president needs to force the Constitutional crisis by ignoring the Commie Courts and militarizing the Southern Border and rounding up all the illegals here now and shipping them out……
    Go Pure National..
    He won’t do it and neither will Boris…

  11. Referendum are fine, but only if they are ‘binding’. When they are ‘advisory’ they are little more then placebo’s designed to satiate the sheep with pablum thus allowing time for the liars to implement their plans.
    Experience from a small town in mid west US where the people voted TWICE against the building of a 14 million dollar library (which we didn’t need or want). Subsequently the Mayor simply ignored the will of the people and went ahead with his plans. We now have a huge eyesore which houses little of interest save children’s books and bad movies from the 80’s. The library board wanted more power and more money. In order to garner support for their plan, they piled books in the windows around the old building prior to the ‘vote’ to give the appearance they were out of room. After the vote the windows cleared up.
    It was an ‘advisory’ referendum both times.
    You must put forth BINDING referenda in order to enforce the will of the people. Politicians are professional liars. That is their JOB. Never trust a politician. And never EVER trust your government.

    Remember the term ‘lawmakers’ is synonymous with ‘freedom curtailers’.

  12. Meet the new Boss. Same as the old Boss. Brexit, I will believe it when I see it with my own eyes. Coupla months left, right? The date will come and go. Just like last time. Nuffin will happen. Jewnited Kingdom will still be part of the Jewropean Jewnion as ever. We need a revolution to get this yoke off our backs. Mark my words.

  13. Clown actors in the US and UK. The orange orangutan yellow haired clown tweeting threats every 60 seconds is the twin of Boris the ass clown. Watch how the next Brexit dates come and go with nothing done. They are actors, simians ooh ooh aah aah, let’s listen to Trump calling Boris the first time:

    1. Thanks, Jake –

      A gift is appropriate.




      “I have observed these doctrines gradually diffusing and mixing with all the different systems of Free Masonry; till, at last, AN ASSOCIATION HAS BEEN FORMED for the express purpose of ROOTING OUT ALL THE RELIGIOUS ESTABLISHMENTS, AND OVERTURNING ALL THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTS OF EUROPE. I have seen this Association exerting itself zealously and systematically, till it has become almost irresistible: And I have seen that the most active leaders in the French Revolution were members of this Association, and conducted their first movements according to its principles, and by means of its instructions and assistance, formerly requested and obtained: And, lastly, I have seen that this Association still exists, still works in secret, and that not only several appearances among ourselves show that its emissaries are endeavoring to propagate their detestable doctrines among us, but that the Association has Lodges in Britain corresponding with the mother Lodge at Munich ever since 1784.”

      Sourced from this very good book List in pdf:

  14. ADMIN
    If we could please go a little off topic for a bit?

    The ATF/ADL might think the word FIREARMS only means black powder muzzle loaders, and you and others might agree with them (not saying you do), but I don’t think so…
    Technically speaking, a FIREARM is any old SmokePole, whether you pour the powder down the barrel or it comes in a cartridge, whether it fires with a wick fuse, a flint spark or a primer…
    As far as the SPIRIT goes – it’s clear the Second Amendment refers to Citizens Militias having the gear necessary to stand up to corrupt authorities, and invaders… And that’s a real good idea…
    Therefore, whatever weapons, as well a any other critical gear, the authorities might have the people SHALL have too.. There’s no other way to interpret the Second Amendment…
    Don’t get me wrong, I very much appreciate your research information, and I think you have made it clear what’s wrong and needs be done…
    What’s wrong?
    Well, there is apparently a YUGE discrepancy between what the real documentation actually says and who and what we think we have the right to call ourselves…
    How did that happen?
    Mostly, deals were made and the public wasn’t told…
    But also, no-doubt the public was led to believe what wasn’t true, and also outright lied to..
    What to do about it?
    Bring Clarity…
    You keep studying until you’re sure you have the whole picture, and the Recovery Plan..
    Form a network, compare notes, discuss it, come to a consensus…
    Write a book, show the copies..
    Call a National Symposium..
    Film it and jack it onto the net…
    That’s a good start…

    1. Barkingdeer –

      I must agree. Firearms have evolved into requiring and using metallic cartridges just as “public conveyances” have evolved from horses to motor vehicles. Certain rules and regulations have, necessarily, followed, but the original idea of transportation has not been impeded. Likewise, the evolution of firearms has NOT in any way changed the verbiage of George Mason’s original Declaration of Rights for Virginia, after which our Bill of Rights was patterned. Indeed, the General Assembly of Virginia made it Article One of the Constitution of Virginia in 1971. It states that every able-bodied man, woman, and child will necessarily be trained to arms for the SECURITY of a FREE state.

    2. Bark –
      Gil –

      The 2nd amendment was written as “ARMS”… NOT “FIREARMS”!!

      You guys invented “FIREARMS” to fit your wishes!! 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂

      1. Pat –

        How is it that rifles, shotguns, and pistols are not “arms”??? How is it those same “arms” cannot be “firearms”??? 🤔

      2. Pat is just pulling your leg. He’s being pernickety. The next he’ll be saying is this: “Listen, ARMS and FIRE-ARMS are not the same! They are not identical or exchangeable terms! If they were, people would be saying things like ‘I like the tattoos on your legs and fire-arms!'”

        Right, Pat? 🙂

      3. Gil –
        Those questions are NOT for ME to decide! 🙂

        I can now further understand why ‘patriots’ lose in court. They mostly lack experience with definitions. As I have seen in court cases, numerous times, judges claim that anything in the US Constitution is a “political issue” and will not be mentioned in the courtroom upon pain of contempt, and removal from the premises.

        What the judges want – judges get – IN THEIR courts!

        So, the definition of “arms” in the 2nd amendment is a political issue, which cannot be heard in lower courts.

        You might enjoy my quick research. You could assume that you will find every word of legal significance from the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and US Constitution, in this dictionary which was used then.  The definitions might shed better light on the full meanings of those documents. But… you cannot use them, per se, as a defense or within a suit in court.

        However, you might want to use the definitions for Shepardizing statutes…. since Case Law is Common Law.

        1750 Jacob English law dictionary – Armour and Arms – Page 58 of 843:

        Armour and Arms , In the Understanding of Law, are extended to any Thing that a Man wears for his Defense, or takes into his Hands, or useth in Anger to strike or cast at another.

        By the Common Law it is an Offense for Persons to go or ride armed with dangerous and unusual weapons:

      4. Pat –

        Mercifully, this forum is NOT a courtroom. For purposes of discussion, here, “arms” and “firearms” are synonymous. Whatever difference there is doesn’t amount to a piece of ‘coon shit. 🤔

    3. At the end what counts is are the jews going to respect the second amendment. The jews
      have a habit to discard rules etc. when they are not in their interest. Laws, constitution etc. are by them considered as just privileges, guidelines, and nothing more. Go to the jewish courts of the jewsa and you know what I mean.

    1. I’m really looking forward to the start of deer hunting season. Deer hunting season is ALWAYS the best time of the year! 🙂

  15. I don’t want them to mess around with the 2nd amendment. I have a rifle. I like to go hunting, I especially enjoy, lol, hunting deer. I would hate to have to go give up my rifle and no longer be able to go hunting, for deer especially, lol. As a matter of fact, right now I have an uncontrollable desire to, lol, hunt me some deer. Anybody want to join me? Hunting deer down and shooting ’em is a LOT OF FUN! lol, After you shoot them, they stop making their, lol, annoying deer sounds, their grunts and bleats, their “barks” so to speak, STOP . Then everything is peaceful and quiet again. If the gub’mint tries to take away my deer hunting rifle then it’s Molon Labe time, baby, Molon Labe!!!! NOBODY can stop me from hunting deer, NOBODY! *grin*

    Dear barkingdeer, do you grunt more than you bleat? Or, do you bleat more than you grunt? Which one is mo’ fun for you? Grunting or Bleating?

    Learn more about the annoying noises deer make before you hunt ’em down and shut ’em up by putting an end to their “barking” so to speak which is really grunting and bleating noises by hunting ’em down and going, lol, target crazy with your hunting rifle on the noisy deer , they never shut up unless you make ’em shut up with your trusty hunting rifle, lol . I’m itching to go a’deer huntin’, anyone want to join me, it’s alot of fun! 🙂 :

  16. There is an infraction at law which reads “use of a firearm in commission of a felony”. It refers to rifles, shotguns, or handguns. Sometimes judges can be just plain “persnickety” when asking for “type” of “weapon”.
    When I first appeared before a circuit judge back in the day when a formal court proceeding was required to obtain a concealed-carry permit, a “type” of “weapon” was asked for. When I told the judge it would be a handgun (as opposed to a switchblade, dirk, or blackjack), old Judge Sullenberger got persnickety and demanded I indicate the brand and caliber of THE handgun I intended to carry concealed. I quickly stated a Smith & Wesson .38 Special Airweight, which came to mind, first, and it made the old bastard happy. I got my permit. I ignored that stipulation and carry whatever-the-hell I want, which the letter of the law allows, anyway. Much depends on the courtroom judges, who are often known to exceed their bounds. That is why case findings are “overturned” or “reversed”.

    1. Gil –

      “Much depends on the courtroom judges, who are often known to exceed their bounds.”

      EGG-ZAK-LEE!!! 100%!! 🙂
      I made that exact point earlier in the discussion.
      What judges want – judges get – in THEIR courtrooms.

      Judges can make any laws moot, as they legislate from the bench.

      Some judges have deemed “a well regulated Militia” to argue that the Framers intended only to restrict Congress from legislating away a state’s right to self-defense. Scholars have come to call this theory “the collective rights theory.” A collective rights theory of the Second Amendment asserts that citizens do not have an individual right to possess guns and that local, state, and federal legislative bodies therefore possess the authority to regulate firearms without implicating a constitutional right.

      1. Yes, Pat, I acknowledge your prior point. You will likely also agree that the body of The Bill of Rights is directed at INDIVIDUAL rights – not a “collective theory”. Those judges who voice that theory are dead wrong! 😡
        Law is not an exact science, like medicine is not exactly predictable. That is why lawyers “practice” law, and physicians “practice” medicine. As goes the practice, so go the definitions when legislators discuss the options – like we discuss issues on this forum.

      2. Gil
        To take it a step further, an individual rightfully concluding that self-protection in using whatever means reasonably deemed necessary reflects the absolute common sense of inhabiting this mortal reality. Any Govt. overseer proclaiming the right to “grant” such an action oversteps its bounds.

        The problem is that the simple common sense action of self-protection became consumed with language that would circumvent this fundamental principle. Language crafted by the State presuming to authorize what is essentially an inherent right can only spell danger to the natural instinct for protection and survival

      3. Brownhawk –

        I’m sure you have heard the old saying “An armed society is a POLITE society.” (?)
        Consider the Japanese, who, when carrying the katana (two-hand killing sword), they trained themselves to be polite – which has become a good habit. We could use some of that in the USA, for sure! That kind of “arm” requires expertise and effort, but is VERY effective in commanding good manners. 🙂

  17. I believe I read the UK voted NO, mainly based on their opposition to mass immigration.

    Boris has already flip-flopped on the subject of Brexit, calculating his own selfish interest.

    A Brexit unbeliever who flip-flopped already clearly does not care about mass immigration, appointing immigrants to key posts. Impossible to find British culture loving talent? or is he just a virtue signalling tosser?

    Boris is in the same sky high ego , small heart league as Trump. Impossible to predict but effortlessly led by the Tribe. The fool has the choice of 1. being pushed by Trump into WWIII against Iran, 2. losing some UK trade with the EU after a clean Brexit or 3. a “Brexit” agreement with the EU (= no change).

    My money is on 3.

    No one has yet pointed out the Israeli interest in Brexit – to increase trade with them. Surely that is why Trump is beating the Brexit drum- which is of course a good thing, but for the wrong reasons.

  18. Thanks Pat and GH,
    Both of you have an excellent comments. Are we in the court now? just kidding.

    “What judges want – judges get – in THEIR courtrooms.
    Judges can make any laws moot, as they legislate from the bench.”

    “The Bill of Rights is directed at INDIVIDUAL rights – not a “collective theory”. Those judges who voice that theory are dead wrong!”

  19. LD correctly wrote:

    “We are now, like flies caught in a sticky web, under the iron fist of ZOG. It’s been like this for some time of course, but never before has it been so chillingly obvious.”

    Using 20-20 hindsight…..

    JFK ordered this document printed to FUEL the FEAR in 1961!!

    Total disarmament plans from UN in 1961.

    My dad bought many boxes of them from the Birch Society in 1962, and I handed them out everywhere, especially at the American Legion events. WE BOUGHT INTO THE FEAR!! 🙂

    Disarmament Series 5
    Released September 1961
    Office of Public Services
    For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S . Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C . • Price 15 cents

    The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order.

    All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.

    The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently farreaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.


    This is still in effect. They are closer now, with ‘smart-phones’ and A.I. in place.

    NO WW-3!!

    The population of Iran is 83 million and they have over 50 million ‘smart-phones’ today – one for every person capable of using one!!

    1. Bark –

      Good video! Thanks! I saw RFK & Teddy with LBJ to allow MORE third world trash into the US!!

      Somalis have been taking over the nursing industry since the early 90s. Many still can’t speak English while making life threatening decisions!

      Now… even PC Roberts is blaming jews!!

      “In the United States white people are also being demonized. For the entirety of his academic life Noel Ignatiev, a son of Jewish immigrants from Russia, campaigned for whiteness to be abolished.

      “The goal of destroying the white race is simply so desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly object to it.”

      “Another Jew, Jason Blum, has produced a movie for NBC Universal titled “The Hunt.” It is about members of the American elite hunting and killing Trump ‘DEPLORABLES’ for sport. This is propaganda that accustoms people to murdering the white working class. Commentators have pointed out that it is similar to the Nazi demonization of Jews that led to their deportation from Western Europe and many deaths.”

  20. PM Boris Johnson has taken the fight to his Brexit enemies by suspending Parliament!

    Remain MPs, dubbed the “Rabble Alliance”, are now left with just four days next week to try to derail Brexit and pass a law to stop a No Deal on October 31. Senior sources told The Sun that No10’s extraordinary move was designed to prove to Brussels that Parliament will not be able to stop Britain from leaving in October.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *