Gun Massacres — Who Benefits?

By Irish Savant
August 8, 2019
Published on Truthseeker

I’m not strongly into the ‘false flag’ theory to explain all and every violent event that occurs. I think many on our side are too quick to apply the FF label in the absence of convincing evidence. However it’s always correct to ask Cui bono (Who benefits) from such massacres?

You don’t need to be of a conspiratorial mind-set to be highly sceptical of the explosive growth of such incidents in recent times. Because every such incident elicits a barrage of outraged demands for gun-ownership “reform”. Every time. This despite overwhelming evidence that such “reform” would prove worthless in terms of countering such attacks.

(See below ****)

Now the manipulators have successfully seized on the latest massacres to win over Trump and Congressional Republicans, hitherto the only meaningful defenders of the Second Amendment in the political arena.

“We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms, and that if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process,” Trump said. “That is why I have called for red-flag laws, also known as extreme-risk protection orders.”

Well done Donald, you’ve just lost about half your base while gaining not a single Dem convert. Not one.

Congressional Republicans, under pressure to respond to this weekend’s massacres, appear to be coalescing around legislation to help law enforcement take guns from those who pose an imminent danger — a measure that, if signed into law, would be the most significant gun safety legislation enacted in 20 years.

It would indeed be the most significant gun safety legislation enacted in 20 years. Because it would provide a mechanism to progressively chip away at gun ownership rights the same way so-called hate speech laws are used to progressively smother almost everything not consistent with The Narrative.

Countries like Britain and Sweden, historically bastions of free speech and discourse, have been transformed into USSR-lite. And increasingly less lite as time goes on.

Had Western peoples been aware of the eventual impact of seemingly innocent initial restrictions on “hate” – I mean, how could you not oppose hate? – The legislation would have been overwhelmingly rejected. But bit by bit the range and depth of what qualified as “hate” was extended until we are where we are today. Unless White Americans (because – be in no doubt – they’re the target) act now gun rights, like free speech, will go the way of the dodo.

****

Bad guys can always acquire a gun. Would-be murderers or terrorists can always get hold a gun or if not a weapon equally lethal. This applies especially in the USA where existing circumstances (hundreds of millions of guns in existence and Latin America lying across a porous border) render it impossible to disarm gang-bangers or terrorists.

Bad guys will ignore gun-free zone warnings. In the name of Jesus it should not be necessary to point this out but many otherwise normal people profess to think that sticking up a sign will stop would-be mass murderers. It’d be comical were not lives as stake.

The ownership/murder ratio does not hold up. The ratio of gun ownership does not correlate at all with the ratio of murders. For instance Norway, Canada and Switzerland lag only slightly behind the USA in the gun ownership ratio but the gun death ratio (especially in Norway and Switzerland) is but a fraction of America’s. Same within the USA, States and cities with rigid gun control laws have the highest ratios of gun crime.

The 80/20 rule applies: Analysis of race-delineated gun deaths shows that approximately 80% of White killers kill themselves while the ratio is reversed for black killers.

Gun deaths are actually declining: Despite the opportunistic hysteria that accompanies every mass killing in the USA the number of gun deaths there has actually declined since the nineties. (Last year 12 per 100,000, 15 for most of the nineties…a 20% decline).

Legally-owned gun-holders can deter or foil attacks. Think of the football coach who valiantly threw himself in front of his students when Cruz started firing. What if he had had a powerful gun? We know what would have happened. Cruz would have been offed and the death toll drastically reduced. Note that American politicians strangely enough have no problem with guns when it’s their own asses being protected. The takeaway: Guns don’t murder, the people who use them do.

The nigger in the woodpile: An appropriate metaphor here because the mystery ingredient underpinning all of the anomalies above is race. As FBI statistics show, year after year, blacks murder at about six times the rate of Whites, Hispanics three to four times the White rate. If you normalise the figures, i.e. isolate the ratio of gun murders committed by Whites, you’ll see that America is little different from most European countries.

Source

14 thoughts to “Gun Massacres — Who Benefits?”

  1. “…Well done Donald, you’ve just lost about half your base while gaining not a single Dem convert. Not one…”

    Trump is a real clod. He seems to get stupider by the day. What did we do to deserve this?

  2. https://mises.org/wire/mexicans-are-safer-el-paso-mexico
    The above link should dispel the BIG LIES that the .gov and mass media keep pushing.

    This Russian has done a good analysis of what happens with “sensible gun safety laws”
    http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/28-12-2012/123335-americans_guns-0/
    Americans never give up your guns December 27, 2012
    By Stanislav Mishin

    Dr MacDonald and Dr Joyce have both written on the topic, I might suggest with genuine insight:
    theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/02/Jews-and-Jewish-organizations-lead-the-gun-control-campaign/
    Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign Kevin MacDonald January 1, 2013

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/10/jews-and-gun-control-a-reprise/
    Jews and Gun Control: A Reprise by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D. October 4, 2015

    These two quotes from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn speak volumes of what will happen once the traditional American is disarmed:

    And to the question some may ask regarding the Bolshevik methods: Were you there?, Solzhenitsyn would answer, ‘Yes’:

    “You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the ‘Russian Revolution.’ It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

    “We cannot state that all Jews were Bolsheviks. But: Without Jews there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.”

    “God does not change the conditions of a people unless they first change that which is in their hearts.”
    Qur’an 13:12

  3. NATO’s Operation Gladio is in operation here in the zio/US and has been for decades just as it has been in Europe, this is the deep states assassination team that kills via false flags to spread terror and hysteria through the countries targeted, and the zio/US is the main funder of NATO, who benefits, the zionist satanic NWO.

  4. The opening graphic is outstanding, a meme that describes the real situation, politicians know all to well the power and protection guns provide. If you use a reverse image search you can find similar memes and spread them over the internet. 4chan and 8chan are famous for internet memes – which is why the government is desperate to shut them down and why Alex Jones is a psyop being used to wage an infowar on you.

    http://i50.tinypic.com/2eqctiu.jpg
    http://rabidrepublicanblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Count-the-Guards.jpg
    https://pics.me.me/look-son-another-anti-gun-politician-turning-point-usa-surrounded-by-34815321.png
    https://pics.me.me/politicians-and-billionaires-are-in-favor-of-gun-control-as-28091712.png
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/99/2d/ed/992dedee77ffd2a42f925aae64be2e32.jpg

    These scumbag politicians say guns are bad yet rule over us with arsenals of guns. The United States government lectures us about the dangers of guns. The United States government is waging war against the people when they do staged false flag gun crimes, real shootings or fake. How obvious is the fact that the State is a Organized Crime Syndicate? Only criminals use the state against the electorate.

    Never in this anti-gun discussion on the nauseating non-stop sh-tstream media do the pundits talk about the government’s guns. They have more guns than everybody put together – and they use them for violent crime all day, everyday, they are the ones that false flag us into war and use guns to totally destroy entire nations.

    The government violates all the laws it classifies as felonies. It kidnaps people everyday all day and calls it “arrest”. The government holds people for ransom and calls it “bail”. The government gang stalks anyone they want – anyone who is not towing the official narrative or is talking truth. Truth is the great enemy of a criminal state, and if your government is run by Jews then it is a criminal operation.

    Where did the government get this permission to treat us like underlings, threaten and imprison us, terrorize us with false flags and wars? They say they have the right to rule over us because of the vote, back in the middle ages they said they had the divine right of kings. How obvious is it that criminal scumbags have no right to tell us anything. If a ordinary criminal used a gun to rob you, you would know that criminal is illegally using force against you – but if the government uses it’s guns to force you to pay income taxes you don’t say that at all – you probably think it is your duty to pay tax.

    The real problem with government is BELIEF. Belief in government authority is the real fundamental thing that is causing all this problem with the state and it’s war against us. In a previous essay the topic of the “end-times Beast” came up. The beast is the state, it is when government officials get so much power that they feel they can do anything to us. They gather so much power unto themselves that they feel invincible and you feel powerless. We are obviously in one of those times in which government power is unchecked – except for an opposing government with just as many guns and weapons.

    This is why Russia is vilified. Russia has done nothing to us but everyday Rachel Madcow is going off about Russiagate and imaginary Russian election meddling. What is she really doing? She is a mouthpiece of the evil beast, the Jewish beast that is upset with Russia for not allowing it to take power over the whole world. Russia opposed the Jew military beast (US military) in Syria. Russian arms destroyed Israel’s proxy army called ISIS, which is often called Israel Secret Intelligence Service.

    ISIS is the evil Muslim proxy arming doing the dirty work for the Anti-Christ Netanyahu. Bibi wants your guns so that Jews can treat you like the unarmed Palestinians. Jews are gutless cowards because they are unrighteous hellions initiating illegal force against the defenseless. The Jew is using the United States government to do it’s dirty work, so ISIS and USGov are the same thing to Jewish supremacists, tools used to wage war.

    Do not be fooled by the Yellow Haired Orange Clown. He is a slavish whore of Israel. Trump and Pence are pathetic errand boys for Bibi. Trump is not on your side, he is not for whites or guns, he is simply a puppet of Israel fooling you, he is carrying out Israeli agenda for us. Keep your guns and stop voting for whores of Israel.

    Question “Gun Massacres — Who Benefits?”
    Answer “The State”

    https://kevinbarrett.heresycentral.is/2019/08/mass-shootings/

    False Flag Weekly News Aug. 9th 2019: Mass shootings, mass censorship
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=5lpR4ZcLuCA

    1. Bark –

      Please tell me where the word ‘gun’ is written in the US Constitution.

      If you claim ‘arms’ means ‘guns’, then what ‘arms’ meant in 1789 was ‘black powder muzzle loaders’ only. That’s all they had as firearms. They did have great powerful air rifles too, which could be part of the ‘arms’ mentioned.
      It STILL means that today!!
      The proof of that is that ‘black powder’ rifles and pistols do not fall under BATFE regulations. That allows judges to agree with the 2nd amendment. But, they will never tell you that. 🙂

      You do not have the power to reverse the US Marshals sent by judges…. to enforce BATFE regulations per CFR – Code of Federal Regulations.

      BTW – the Judiciary Act was the very first act passed by congress & signed by Washington in 1789. They had been working on it for eight years prior!!

  5. PAT
    I believe the term is now ‘firearms’, what they say you’re not allowed to have if you fall into that felonious category, or what they say have been restored, your ‘firearms rights’ in case you get them back through a pardon or some other process…
    I understand it’s open to interpretation, which would necessarily have to include consideration of the word ‘militia’, since the real purpose of the 2nd Amendment was/is that militias be enabled to deal with military and police forces, meaning they-you-us should have whatever weapons they have…
    Not just weapons either, but also communications equipment…
    And I believe you that’s it’s been interpreted funky…
    Bottom Line is – the Jury has the right to do anything it wants and is the final authority in a Constitutional Courtroom, which I admit there are none currently operating, not that I know of…
    The 6th Amendment says you have the right to Trial By Jury…
    The 7th Amendment says the Jury Rules…
    The Jury are supposed to judge the case..
    The Judge is supposed to be a Jurist, legal expert advising the Jury on matters of Law, but having no authority over them…
    The 21st Amendment repealed the 18th Amendment…
    There was never an Amendment to repeal the 2nd, 6th or 7th or any of the others…
    The yellow fringe flag replaces the Constitutional Court with the Article 15 type military Captains Mast, which I’ve been to, as a witness not a defendant…
    When you go through the gate you are coming on board, ding ding…
    That makes the County Judge a Military Officer, which he’s not supposed to be; whereas there are only 2 ranks, the Chief Justice, the only one who wears stripes, and all the others…
    However, you are not subject to any of the Yellow Flag Court, if you do not relinquish your sovereignty (Constitutional Status), which you do the second you say anything in cooperation with the judge… If he asks you your name and you answer, or he looks at you and says your name and you respond by nodding your head, you have then surrendered your sovereignty and made yourself subject to his “Rulings”…

    1. Bark –
      “the Jury has the right to do anything it wants and is the final authority in a Constitutional Courtroom,”

      That is absolutely false. The final authority is the judge. Like it or not… Judges have always controlled the evidence and testimonies allowed.

      The judge can remove the jury any time during the trial…. so they cannot hear. Or reverse the jury’s decisions!!

      AND – all things were different in those times. For instance….

      The definitions of the boundaries of the states – See this map of United States at the Close of the Revolution, 1783:
      Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida all extended west to the Mississippi River.
      https://etc.usf.edu/maps/pages/1200/1228/1228.htm

      See more:
      https://etc.usf.edu/maps/galleries/us/earlyamerica14001800/index.htm

  6. PAT
    I know they can.. They do that and lots of other stuff, including overturn the verdict…
    I’m telling you it’s not in keeping with the original documentation…
    What are you trying to say, there’s no America?
    Because I don’t think we’d have guns, if we didn’t have the right…
    I can see how Judges have usurped the power in the courtroom… Hasn’t that bee a gradual process?
    https://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2012/01/08/

    1. Bark –
      “What are you trying to say, there’s no America?”

      I do not know exactly what you meant when you wrote “America” in your question.

      The US Constitution was NOT written for “America”….. but for the United States of America.

      I DO KNOW what is happening in the United States today. The US is here; due process is gone. The government takes guns away from the people for any reason… and DUE PROCESS is applied later when convenient, meaning it is nonexistent!!

      In the United States, a “red flag” law is a gun violence prevention law that permits police or family members or anyone at all…. to petition a state court to order the temporary removal of firearms from a person who MAY present a danger to others or themselves.

      A JUDGE makes the determination to issue the order based on statements and actions made by the gun owner in question. Refusal to comply with the order IS punishable as a CRIMINAL offense.

      After a set time, the guns are returned to the person from whom they were seized unless another court hearing extends the period of confiscation.

      Such orders are known by various names, including “Extreme Risk Protection Orders” (ERPO) (in Oregon, Washington, Maryland, and Vermont); “Risk Protection Orders” (in Florida); “Gun Violence Restraining Orders” (in California); “risk warrants” (in Connecticut); and “Proceedings for the Seizure and Retention of a Firearm” (in Indiana).

      As of today, 17 states and the District of Columbia have passed some form of “red-flag” law. The specifics of the laws, and the degree to which they are enforced, vary from state to state.

      BOTTOM LINE – The 2nd amendment is MOOT in ALL respects… TODAY!!

    2. Bark –

      I am posting this briefly constructed message at the end of this thread for you to review, if you find it here. It contains numerous links within the documents which I have had for decades. It will take you a long time to study and relate this information to land possession and all other conditions of today. This message will answer many questions you have asked me over the last year or so.

      ………………………………..

      What is “Office Found”?
      James Montgomery explained it in 1998:
      https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/king42.htm

      The Law of “Office Found”
      The ruling of the case below should upset everyone, but The Informer and I have been saying, and continue to say this is the condition in this country. Also, contained in the Blackstone quote, is mentioned rights of the British in their declaration of liberties, but not so, read Declaration of Rights 1689, third section, it is made clear the rights of the corporation and the grantors take precedence.

      “Office Found”, depends on the context. (1)If talking about the king, it refers to an heir or successor, and removing holdings from aliens. (2)If talking about a sub-corporations, the corporations are protecting their grants to keep the grants out of the hands of an alien friend or enemy. In either case, once office is found, the land or possession reverts back to the corporation, state or king, the sovereign.
      [ I wonder if this is why we were all declared to be enemy aliens by FDR in 1933? ]

      The land mark case: FAIRFAX’S DEVISEE v. HUNTER’S LESSEE, 11 U.S. 603 (1812) absolutely defines a Treaty is the Supreme law of the land, and how the Treaties of 1783 and 1814 protected the kings holdings, period! https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/11/603.html

      In the case below you will see what the king has been doing is recapturing corporate holdings that came about after the two Treaties were passed, because the holdings were in the hands of aliens.
      “Military conquerors of foreign states in time of war may doubtless displace the courts of the conquered country, and may establish civil tribunals in their place for administering justice; and in such cases it is unquestionably true that the jurisdiction of suits of every description is transferred to the new tribunals. United States v. Rice, 4 Wheat. 246; Cross v. Harrison, 16 How. 164….Towns, provinces, and territories, says Halleck, which are retaken from the conqueror during the war, or which are restored to their former sovereign by the treaty of peace, are entitled to the right of postliminy; and the original sovereign owner, on recovering his dominion over them, whether by force of arms or by treaty, is bound to restore them to their former state. In other words, he acquires no new right over them, either by the act of recapture or of restoration. . . . He rules not by any newly acquired title which relates back to any former period, but by his antecedent title, which, in contemplation of law, has never been divested. Halleck, Int. Law, 871.” DOW v. JOHNSON, 100 U.S. 158 (1879) —–caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/100/158.html

      This court, speaking by Mr. Justice Johnson, among other things, said:
      “It is clear, therefore, that this doctrine has no sufficient sanction in authority, and it will be found equally unsupported by principle or analogy. [152 U.S. 505, 509] ‘The general rule is positively against it, for the books, old and new, uniformly represent the king as a competent grantor in all cases in which an individual may grant, and any person in esse, and not civiliter mortuus, as a competent grantee. Femes covert, infants, aliens, persons attainted of treason or felony, clerks, convicts, and many others, are expressly enumerated as competent grantees. Perkins, Grant, 47, 48, 51, etc.; Comy. Dig. ‘Grant,’ B 1. It behooves those, therefore, who would except aliens, when the immediate object of the king’s grant, to maintain the exception.” MANUEL v. WULFF, 152 U.S. 505 (1894)

      …..

      (additional excerpt)
      Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782:-

      ARTICLE 1

      “It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France….”

      Notice this is just one year before the 1783 Treaty of Peace is signed, the king of France (Rothschild’s) made sure his debt was protected before he signed on to the con of the millennium. The king of England’s Charter on one side, the Rothschild’s debt obligations on the other, both vying for a piece of America. The king of England for his trust, the Rothschilds for their corporate take-over and control of the king’s trust, the Pope as the main benefactor of both sides. The Pope remains even further in the background than the Rothschild’s, however he stands to gain no matter what happens.

      Here are a few quotes from William Manley German, in a speech to the House of Commons December 1913.

      “….Referring to Canada’s bank acts: I believe the plan outlined follows the English system, a system applied to the great banks of England. Mr. White, House of Commons, December 17, 1912, in response to a question from the Honourable William Manley German. i.e. they were creating an English system which is to say a Rothschildian cartel….”

      “Senator Robert L. Owen continues: “It was not very long until this information was brought to the Rothschild’s Bank, and they saw that here was a nation ready to be exploited; here was a nation setting up an example that they could issue their own money instead of the money coming through the banks.”

      “The Rothschild’s Bank caused a bill to be introduced in the English Parliament, which provided that no colony of England could issue its own money.” “Thus, they had to use English money. The colonies were compelled to discard their money and mortgage themselves to the Rothchild’s Bank of England to get money.” “Then, for the first time in the history of the United States, money began to be based on debt. Benjamin Franklin stated that in one year from that date the streets of the colonies were filled with the unemployed.”

      “Franklin later claimed that this was the real cause of the War of Independence. He said: “The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England and the Rothschild’s Bank took away from the colonies their money which created unemployment, dissatisfaction and debt.” William Manley German, in a speech to the House of Commons December 1913, Brigham Young University, web site. http://library.byu.edu/~rdh/eurodocs/uk.html.

  7. Sad as it is to say, but many “mass shootings” are orchestrated by our own “three letter” govt. organizations. The video clip of Philly police spraying fake blood on themselves starts at about 1:00 into this video…
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8zGiDv_IJQ

    Why would this not be on the news anywhere? Because the MSM (including the “conservative” ones like Fox) are a propaganda arm of our govt., which itself is controlled by very evil people who control our politics, foreign policy, and all the choke points of culture. The spirit of Antichrist reigns through these human agents, and I believe they have taken over the Catholic Church as well. The Rosary is our spiritual life line right now.
    Cheers!

Comments are closed.