Kevin MacDonald Interview : Finland Questions

By Kevin MacDonald
The Occidental Observer


LD: This article has nothing to do with the situation in Finland. As Kevin MacDonald explains in his opening paragraph: “I am giving a talk in Finland next month, and the organizer, Tuukka Kuru, asked me to answer some questions so that attendees would have a better idea of where I am coming from. They were translated into Finnish and posted here.”

The reason I think this article very important is because it provides an invaluable insight into the political philosophy of a man whose meticulous research and personal experience over decades, underpinned by a thorough knowledge of evolutionary psychology, makes him better equipped to discuss these issues than anyone else I know.

For the ordinary reader who is new to White Nationalism and wonders how it relates to crucial questions such as multiculturalism, mass immigration, race conflict, and a hostile elite hellbent on changing the demography of our White homelands so as to render the white race extinct within the foreseeable future, this article is a perfect introduction. It covers all the main questions in just over 4000 words as clearly and succinctly as possible.

As an evolutionary psychologist, MacDonald sees life as essentially a Darwinian  struggle between different species and competing races for survival and supremacy. Survival in this human jungle indeed means supremacy, for there is no way an inferior race can survive in the long run. In this theatre of natural selection, where the survival of the fittest is guaranteed, the race is always to the swift and the battle to the strong. Quite literally.

One race, MacDonald notes matter-of-factly, has shown itself remarkably resilient in surviving against all the odds. This it has done through a combination of acquired skills over the centuries: a superior IQ, the solidarity of honeybees in a hive, remarkable networking skills, and a tendency to win the game of life by cheating. The reader already knowns the name of this race, now actively engaged in White genocide, so I won’t spell it out. All I can say is — God help us all, and especially our children. The future looks bleak. [LD]

TUUKKA KURU:  Hello Mr.Macdonald! How would you describe yourself to the Finnish audience, most of them haven’t heard about your exciting life and career!

KEVIN MACDONALD (pictured) :  I am a retired psychology professor who became aware of the disaster unfolding for our people while doing research for my books particularly the chapter on immigration in The Culture of Critique (hereafter CofC). Since retirement, I have continued to write on all the issues facing our people. Right now I am finishing up a book on Western peoples, to be titled Western Individualism and the Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future.

2). TK:  You have done years of research on Evolutionary Psychology and wrote several books about group behaviour and group evolutionary strategies. What is the meaning of “group evolutionary strategy”? Is there different kind of strategies for different kind of populations?

KMD:  A group strategy is essentially a way of getting on the world in which group-level processes are important. These processes include: a.)  How are group boundaries policed? (E.g.: Who can be a group member? Is membership to be based on ethnicity or being a good citizen?); b.) What shall be policies toward ”cheaters”? (E.g., How are people who attempt to be part of the group without paying the costs of group membership, such as observing rules like paying taxes and marrying within the group, treated?) c.) How are group members expected to treat other group members and outsiders? d.) Who are acceptable marriage partners? (E.g., should group members be allowed to marry people from outside the group?)

There are a variety of different group strategies. I describe some of them in my work on Judaism and in Diaspora Peoples which describes the Puritans, Mennonites, Roma and Overseas Chinese. Each of these groups has a somewhat different strategy. For example, Roma have a very different group strategy than Jews or Overseas Chinese.

3.) The Culture of Critique (1998) made you famous person in international nationalist circles and even I have one copy of the book in my bookshelf! Many public figures, like Patrick Little and Mike Enoch, have stated that the book was the turning point in their political life and many anti-racist organizations have labeled it as intellectual basis of modern anti-Semitism. What is Culture of Critique and why it has made such a impact around the world?

CofC describes various influential intellectual movements centered around ethnically conscious Jews who were attempting to change the culture of the West to serve specific Jewish interests. Several specifically Jewish interests were involved: ending anti-Jewish attitudes, promoting and legitimizing immigration to the West from all the peoples of the world in the belief it would make Jews safer, pathologizing national identities among White people based on race or ethnicity, and de-legitimizing the interests of the traditional peoples of the West in maintaining their cultural and demographic dominance.

I don’t like to call my work ”anti-Semitic.” It attempts to portray Jewish groups and Jewish activism as accurately as possible and to describe the real conflicts of interest between Jews and the peoples of the West. Perhaps ”Judeo-critical” would be better.

4.) Many people have noticed time to time that the Jewish population is greatly overrepresented in various radical and far left-movements. Jewish activist groups have formed intellectual core in various left-leaning human rights groups around the Western world, most clearly seen in USA during the segregation era, South Africa during Apartheid, and nowadays in multicultural Europe. Nationalists have argued whether the overpresentation is just coincidence or a manifestation of Judaism itself. How should we see this connection between the Jews and the left-leaning politics?

This is a complicated area which I discuss in Chapter 3 of CofC. Basically there are several interrelated facets to Jewish leftist activism: Jews tend to have hostility toward non-Jewish power structures, motivated in part by the fact that Jews tend to see their history in the West as one long tale of persecution of blameless Jews—termed the lachrymose view of Jewish history. Moreover, Jews tend to believe, with some reason, that historical anti-Semitism has been more characteristic of the right than the left. For Jewish intellectuals, a major lesson of the National Socialist era in Germany was a belief that non-Jews, particularly in a genetically homogeneous European-based culture, could rise up against them. Moreover, Jews have often seen leftist activism as a key to obtaining power for Jews by diminishing the power of traditional elites (e.g., Jews supported the 1848 revolutions in Europe and the Bolsehvik Revolution in Russia aimed at toppling non-Jewish elites seen as anti-Jewish). Given that anti-Semitism has historically been more common on the right than the left, once Jews have obtained power, they have typically promoted punishment for actions and ideas they see as anti-Jewish. A good example illustrating this is Jewish involvement in the Bolsehvik Revolution which overthrew the Czar who was seen as a persecutor of Jews. This resulted in Jews becoming an elite in the Soviet Union — an elite hostile to the traditional people and culture of Russia. This in turn brought about an era of mass murder of millions of Russians as well as severe punishments for anti-Jewish ideas and actions.

5.) How would you define the “JQ”, and how should it be discussed in countries which have a really small number of Jews, like in Finland?

The Jewish Question is essentially the question of the extent and quality of Jewish influence in particular societies, as discussed, e.g., in CofC. Ever since the Enlightenment, Jews have wielded influence far beyond their numbers in all the societies of the West, including, e.g., Sweden (here and here) and Australia (here and here), which have very few Jews but where Jewish media ownership or influence and the activism of individual Jews have made a great impact. Jewish influence on issues like migration and multiculturalism can be indirect — an important but underresearched topic. For example, the EU is pressuring all member states to accept migration, including states such as Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, and now Italy which have governments hostile to migration. The EU is dominated by Germany, France, and the U.K. which have a strong Jewish presence and whose Jewish communities have exerted their influence by promoting generous immigration and refugee policies. This would apply to Finland as well since it is an EU member.

Moreover, another indirect effect has occurred because of the power of the United States in the post-World War II era. Once mass migration and multiculturalism became dominant in the US after 1965, it’s not surprising that it filtered into the rest of the Western world. Western culture is significantly international — it is more-or-less characteristic among all the Western nations. Imagine being a Finnish professor attending an international academic conference where, because of the pre-eminence of the English-speaking and especially the American academic establishment, the most prominent people in the field are all on the left and promoting migration and culturalism. There is a great deal of social pressure to adopt similar attitudes. American media, such as the New York Times and Hollywood, also has a significant presence throughout the West as well, particularly among educated people, and American media is decidedly pro-immigration and pro-multiculturalism.

6.) You work as a editor of the Occidental Observer, which promotes White identity, interests and culture. Have you always been pro-White identitarian, or has there been some kind of transformation period in your life? What is the biggest reason that made you White Nationalist?

I only became a White nationalist in the late 1990s in doing my reading for CofC. I began to realize what was happening and why it was happening. The current culture of the West is suicidal in the long run. We have to understand how and why this has happened. I emphasize not only Jewish influence but also Western individualism and the liberal, post-Enlightment tradition which I believe have made Western societies uniquely successful but also uniquely susceptible to Jewish activism.

7.) Nowadays its trendy to say that race is just a “social construct” and beneath the skin we are all the same. At the same time David Reich, professor of genetics at Harvard, told to New York Times that race is biological reality. Nicholas Wade made the same statement in his book Troublesome Inheritance in 2014. Why is race is important biological tool to you Mr.Macdonald and how do you justify your point of view?

Like many others who have read the population genetics literature, I have concluded that there are genetic fault lines between peoples who have been separated for thousands of years. These fault lines are not absolute, and they may blur even more in the future because of miscegenation. The West, e.g., is not homogeneously European genetically at this time because of non-European immigration, but ancestral genetic differences between peoples differences are still apparent. Individuals of European descent cluster together genetically much more closely than they do to people from other geographical areas.

8.) Race can be seen as a difficult concept to understand in Finland, and many nationalists have stated that it has no use in current Finnish society, as they are promoting “shared values” instead of shared ethnicity. This same division between the civic nationalists and ethnonationalists can be seen in many countries all around the Western world. What is your opinion about civic nationalism? Do you see it as a workable concept at all?

Civic nationalism is promoted by elites throughout the West as an acceptable way of promoting some sense of social cohesion within a nation while avoiding any sense that nationalism should be based on shared ethnicity. This is the so-called ”proposition nation” concept—that, for example, Americans are united only sharing a commitment to democracy and any and all peoples can participate. The problem with this is that in the long run, the traditional populations of all Western countries will be replaced by other peoples. This is a moral travesty, and the irony (really hypocrisy) is that many of the same people who are promoting migration to the West, deny the existence of race, and promote the proposition nation concept are deeply concerned about advancing their own ethnic interests in doing so by, e.g., getting more of their people to come to the West and obtain political and cultural power. Africa is expected to have 4 billion people by the end of the century, and there will always be pressure for them to settle in Europe and elsewhere in the West because their countries are poverty ridden and politically unstable. In the long run, our people would be dwindling, powerless minority in societies they have dominated for hundreds or thousands of years. This is obviously a maladaptive outcome for White people. We need to have a sense of our ethnic interests in maintaining power in our homelands in Europe, North America, and elsewhere.

9.) The USA has been a forerunner in cultural deconstruction, which have destroyed the mainstream White racial identity and replaced it with other group identites and sub-cultures. It has been stated in CofC that the start of this process goes all way back to Franz Boas, former Jewish anthropologist and socialist/ethnic activist. What are the true reasons behind this deconstruction? Why especially White identity is targeted on these policies?

The answer to this is essentially the answer to why Jews like Franz Boas have been on the left (see above): 1) hostility toward the people and culture of the West because of historical grievances; 2) a desire to end anti-Semitism by promoting punishment for actions and ideas and actions they see as anti-Jewish and historically more common on the right; 3) by promoting theories of anti-Semitism in which anti-Semitism is portrayed as evil and Jews are always innocent victims; 4) and fear that Western majorities could rise up against them, as well as a desire to increase the power of their own group.

10.) Finland became part of the “multicultural experiment” on early 1990’s, when our country accepted the first Somali refugees from Russia. Nowadays mainstream politicians and journalists have stated that “Finnishness is a open concept” and “Finland has always been multicultural”. Its not unusual to see comments which state that there has never been “Finnish nation” and we are all just mixture between all other populations. I’m sure that all of this sounds bit too familiar to you also. Can you tell us some backstory of the multicultural experiment and people behind the concept?

Such claims are common throughout the West these days. In CofC I trace the Jewish promotion of multiculturalism to philosopher Horace Kallen. His ideas were picked up by the mainstream Jewish community, Jewish activists, Jewish organizations, wealthy Jewish political donors, etc. These ideas became more-or-less official dogma among American Jews who wanted an ideology where they could be full citizens of the U.S. but also retain a strong ethnic and cultural identity as Jews.

11.) Numerous Jewish groups have promoted multiculturalism and open migration all around the Europe, and the large portion of those migrants are coming from Islamic countries. There has been numerous headlines from France and Sweden telling us that Jews have faced violence and persecution in the hands of Muslim gangs. Yet they still strongly support the policies that let those non-European people in. Is there some particular reason why the Jews prioritize white nationalist movements over the Muslim ones?

Muslim immigration is indeed leading to problems for the Jewish community, particularly in the U.K. where Muslims are very anti-Israel and are an important part of the Labour Party coalition. Jeremy Corbyn is widely seen as an anti-Semite. So far this has not changed the policies of the big Jewish organizations, but most Jews now vote for the Conservatives, and Jewish financial support of Labour has dried up. Street-level violence by Muslims against Jews is also a problem in the U.K., France, and elsewhere and has led to some emigration by Jews, especially to Israel. But this tendency has not affected Jewish elites. They are not affected by street-level violence and they still have very large influence throughout the West. I don’t see the official stance of Jewish organizations toward Muslim immigration changing any time soon. They tend to see homogeneous White societies as potentially far more dangerous than a multicultural society and they believe that Muslim anti-Jewish attitudes, although hostile, can be effectively managed. They may be wrong about this as the situation in the U.K. suggests.

12.) How do you see the endgame of the current multicultural experiment? Is Europe becoming continent-sized Lebanon or South Africa? What happens to US if we cant change the current trend in next 40 years?

The expected result will be more and more conflict between groups, with White populations coalescing politically on one side and non-Whites (and Jews and sexual non-conformists [LGBTQ]) on the other. I call this the racialization of politics, as traditional politics based on social class gives way to conflicts between various identity groups aligned against the White majority. We already see that in the U.S. and there are similar trends elsewhere. Because Whites will be a minority in these projected societies they will lose power and be at the mercy of other peoples who often have historical grudges against them (e.g., Blacks regarding slavery)—not a good prospect.

13.) What is your opinion on “Pan-Europeanism”?  Do you support little nation states with unique culture, people and language or larger Pan-European empires, as Mr. Richard Spencer does?

Yes, I support Europe maintaining its traditional peoples, languages, and borders. The EU was a great idea until the globalists took over. But there is nothing wrong with having common markets and free travel, although a free labor market has problems because it lowers the wages of native workers. However, I wouldn’t approve of all Europeans being able to achieve permanent citizenship anywhere they want in the EU because that would erode national cultures over time.

14.) Many people who are attending our conference are trying to find the suitable method to save our western civilization and our beloved nations. As we can see, there is no easy way out in the current situation, but we have to win, and we need right tools to ensure that. What kind of actions you propose for the next 5, 10 and 20 years? What is our greatest threat at the moment and how should we respond to that?

Sorry, but I don’t have any sure-fire ideas that can help our cause beyond what we already see. Certainly there are good signs, particularly the rise of populism in Europe, the popularity of the steadfastly anti-migration governments in Eastern Europe and now Italy. The election of Donald Trump was also based on his populist campaign rhetoric, but he has had a very difficult time enacting them and seems to be surrendering on a lot of his proposals, so overall he is a disappointment.

The fact that populism is rising despite massive opposition by elites in the media, corporations, Christian religions, and the academic world throughout the West shows that there is hope for the a White resurgence. We all have to ask ourselves what we can do to further our cause. For me, it is writing and maintaining a social media presence. Some may be able to donate money, and others could become active in nationalist organizations and political parties which now exist most Western countries. In the U.S., where the two-party system will remain dominant for the foreseeable future, activism within the Republican party is a possible option.

15.) How do you define “White Nationalism” and should we see it as supreme identity of all people of European origin or more like short-term alliance between different white nations against the common multicultural threat? Do you see whiteness strictly as a biological entity, or more like cultural and traditional institution?

White nationalism is simply the idea that Whites have interests as Whites in policies such as immigration and multi-culturalism — policies which erode and will eventually destroy the demographic basis of White power throughout the West. In the U.S., there has always been a Black/White racial divide, so it’s natural to make common cause and identify as a White person, as opposed, e.g., to an Irish-American or Polish American. And by identifying as White, they have much more power collectively than in separate hyphenated groups.

Europeans should also realize that they have interests as Europeans but also in retaining national identities. One way to think about this is that Europeans are closely related genetically and therefore share common ethnic interests. But they also share a common culture and have for a long time, beginning in the Middle Ages with the cultural hegemony of the Catholic Church. Europeans have to realize that their culture is unique and uniquely valuable and that it is to some extent a product of European genes — the subject of my forthcoming book. Moreover, for the foreseeable future there will be pressure to migrate to Europe from many parts of the Third World. I don’t see this changing in our lifetime. Africa has a very high birthrate and chronic political instability and poverty. Tens of millions of Africans would love to move to Europe and elsewhere in the West and there will be far more in the future who wish to do so. As noted above, pan-European institutions are a good idea and would definitely help defuse some of the destructive nationalism that has been such a problem in the past.

16.) Many people don’t realize that neoconservatism is strictly Jewish concept, and the founders of the movement were mostly ex-members of the academic Radical Left which separated from the Soviet led state-communism. How did neoconservatism became such a powerful institution in United States and what are the intellectual origins behind the movement?

I delve into this in my paper, ”Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement.” It started with a group of former leftists who became disillusioned with President Jimmy Carter because he opposed West Bank settlements in Israel. They wanted to make pro-Israel policies a bi-partisan issue in US politics and therefore targeted especially the Republican Party because Jews were relatively unrepresented there (~70–80% of Jews consistently vote Democrat). They were also motivated by increasing anti-Semitism in the Soviet Union, and Republicans were generally far more hostile toward the USSR than Democrats. In other policy areas, they have not eschewed their liberal positions, particularly on immigration and multiculturalism, although some advocate assimilation instead of multiculturalism. (Multiculturalism and assimilation both result in the ethnic displacement of White populations). The basic result is the the GOP has moved to the left on immigration and multiculturalism.

As with all Jewish movements, neoconservatism is well-funded and has access to the elite mainstream media. They established think tanks and journals, and they developed bases in elite American universities, especially Johns Hopkins and the University of Chicago; wealthy Jewish neoconservatives centered in the Republican Jewish coalition have been an important part of GOP funding. Jobs and positions of influence have been open to people, including non-Jews, who take their policy positions.This has been a big key to their success. It’s not only about Jews, but also about willing non-Jews who benefit one way or another by participating.

Neocons rose to power during the Reagan Administration, elbowing out the paleoconservatives, and have dominated Republican foreign policy ever since, at least until Donald Trump talked about the U.S. disengaging from the Middle East. (Neocons have been strong advocates of American wars in the Middle East and want the U.S. to remain their indefinitely—obviously because of their attachment to Israel. Now they want war with Iran.) As a result of Trump’s rhetoric on foreign policy and immigration, many neocons became Never-Trumpers, but they may try to return if the Republicans change back to their previous positions after Trump is gone.

17.)  What is your opinion on USA-Israeli relations and the power of the Jewish lobby inside the State? Should USA change its policy in Middle East? Do you support isolation policy, or some other doctrine?

The Israel Lobby continues to have a dominant influence on American foreign policy. I have written a lot about this, but see also John Mearsheimer Steven Walt’s The Israel Lobby, a book that was condemned by Jewish activists as ”anti-Semitic” but is a thoroughly researched, honest account of the influence of the Lobby.

American wars in the Middle East have been costly disasters, trillions of dollars, thousands of lives, and many thousands of severe injuries — for no discernible benefit to the U.S. The U.S. should withdraw from Syria and Afghanistan and should never have invaded Iraq. Israel is armed to the teeth and is well able to defend itself.

18.) What is your opinion on NATO? Should it be disbanded or expanded from the current state?

Like the EU, NATO is a good idea at its beginnings. It had an important function in creating a military alliance against the USSR during the Cold War. But since the 1990s and with a strong push from U.S. leadership, it expanded into Eastern Europe, antagonizing Russia. Russian hostility is justified because there were promises not to expand to the east after the collapse of the USSR. The entire U.S. foreign policy establishment hates Russia: neocons and the Israel Lobby hate Russia because of Russia’s Middle East policy supporting Iran and Syria. Many Republicans hate Russia as a sort of remnant of their anti-communism. And now the Democrats hate Russia because they see hating Russia as as a weapon against Trump whom they are accusing of collusion with Vladimir Putin. Abandoning NATO is thus seen as selling out to Russia by the American foreign policy establishment. Trump seems to want to leave NATO but at this point he is only asking for NATO governments to pay their fair share.

19.) Leading world powers, USA and Russia, are both becoming increasingly multiracial and prone to inner conflicts in the future, while China has maintained its Chinese majority population. Will this trend somehow affect global power balance?

Having a multicultural, conflict ridden nation—as I believe the U.S. is fated to be and indeed already is—will certainly weaken it in the long run. Russia may be saved by its tradition of autocratic government: these new people and cultures may not be able to exert much power, at least in the foreseeable future. China has many things going for it—a relatively homogeneous population ethnically, negligible immigration, a nationalist government pursuing national interests, high average IQ, and now a great deal of wealth. However, there are things that could hold it back, e.g., a tradition of corruption and a lack of inventiveness.

20.) Name three unexpected things about yourself that isn’t mainstream knowledge!

I grew up during the 1960s couter-cultural revolution and aspired to be a jazz musician. I am now pursuing music as a hobby. My first research was on the personality and behavioral development of wolf cubs, which eventually led to a career teaching mainly developmental psychology of children and courses in personality.


51 thoughts to “Kevin MacDonald Interview : Finland Questions”

  1. In accordance with our strict policy guidelines, all comments considered defamatory, disrespectful, or needlessly confrontational will be deleted at once.

    In view of the problems we have been having recently with trolls and one or two unruly posters, please try to keep your comments on-topic. This is a serious website for serious political discussion and this is a serious article, so please do your best to refrain from irrelevant gossip and chatroom flippancy.

    Thank you.

    1. A brilliant article. I’m glad you posted it here. It’s a perfect introduction, as LD says in her introduction, to White Nationalism and the crucial questions that surround it. In fact, this article could serve as a “Frequently Answered Questions” (FAQ) to White Nationalism itself.

      I was interested to note how LD, in her brief but apposite introduction, stresses the importance of Darwinism in trying to understand the political philosophy of Kevin MacDonald. Darwinism has clearly been a major influence for MacDonald, and rightly so I believe. For without understanding natural selection, otherwise known as “the Survival of the Fittest”, one cannot really get to grips with what is happening in the world today.

      What is happening? and what is threatening our future? White genocide is happening. White genocide, now in full throttle at the instigation of a particular race hellbent on destroying us and flooding our White homelands with hostile invaders from Africa, the Middle East and Asia.

      This paragraph from LD’s introduction puts MacDonald’s brilliant analysis into perspective and tells us exactly where the good professor is coming from:

      One race, MacDonald notes matter-of-factly, has shown itself remarkably resilient in surviving against all the odds. This it has done through a combination of acquired skills over the centuries: a superior IQ, the solidarity of honeybees in a hive, remarkable networking skills, and a tendency to win the game of life by cheating. The reader already knowns the name of this race, now actively engaged in White genocide, so I won’t spell it out. All I can say is—God help us all, and especially our children. The future looks bleak.

      Hmm, I wonder what race LD could be referring to! 🙂

      1. Saki –

        It would likely be the same sickos calling the Palestinians ‘Agricultural Terrorists’ in Israel:

        Palestinians uproot 50 trees that were planted by Jews in memory of terror victim, Ori Ansbacher, the Israeli teen who was raped and murdered by a Palestinian terrorist.

        Shlomo Neeman, who heads the Gush Etzion Regional Council, called on the State of Israel to bring an end to this “agricultural terrorism once and for all”, adding it is all too common and it cannot be tolerated.

        Ynet reports that the Egged Bus Company has undertaken an initiative in which poems written by Ansbacher will be displayed on company vehicles.

    2. I have no problem with good people of any colour, be they European, African, Arab or Chinese. So long as they are decent hard-working, lawbiding people they get my support.

      Immigration control is necessary because in a country as small as Britain we could not cope with unlimited immigration. We are entitled to restrict entry to those who will benefit our country. This usually means people with the skills we need. Unfortunatey the recent waves of immigrants (especially illegals) have not met that criterion.

      Regarding the obliteration of the white European race, that is boloney because our beautiful women will always be in demand and through them we will always have blondes and brunettes. It’s Darwinian. I wouldn’t be surprised if a major industry in nordic eggs and sperm developed. It could be our currency!!!

      1. JK –

        “I wouldn’t be surprised if a major industry in nordic eggs and sperm developed. It could be our currency!!!”

        GREAT IDEA!!!!

        I LUVITT!! Which would be worth more.. Boys or Girls?? 🙂

        1. (Posted by Admin on FT’s behalf)

          We are again at the point in our human evolution where another shift from the current prevailing geocentric world view to the heliocentric world view is a much-needed activity, and Kevin is splendidly fulfilling this Galilean/Copernican/Kepleran role.

          Think of the “Out of Africa” nonsense or the “LGBQI-etc” infecting our learning institutions, and where the next generation falls into the self-destructive trap of hedonistic-inversion/nihilism.

          Fortunately, Nature seems to have a self-corrective function because all this doom and gloom is really nothing new – it’s all a repeat and as Richard Wagner shows us in his Ring Cycle, eventually everything humanly created comes crashing down in flames but is then returned to the Rhine River for cleansing and for that inevitable new beginning.

          This is cyclical Nature at work where we, as eternal mortals, are privileged to observe the particular and the universal impulses of beauty and ugliness interact.

          Luckily I have no need to seek Heaven-Paradise for a better place where I can find my inner peace and be without worries, and hence I rejoice with James Joyce: “Welcome, O life! I go to encounter for the millionth time the reality of experience and to forge in the smithy of my soul the uncreated conscience of my race.”

      2. “I have no problem with good people of any colour, be they European, African, Arab or Chinese.”

        It’s attitudes like that, and people like you that have got us in this rotten position in the first place.

  2. There are NO ‘good Jews’ – NONE !!
    Not that all are ‘bad’, but all who accept
    their evil heritage may become
    fully evil themselves at any time.
    It can be called “getting the ropes.”

    Former Jews should be accepted;
    however, because of Judaism’s ‘Kol Nidre’
    none should be trusted among us,
    and particularly not as ‘allies’ in this war.

    First Thing First : Eliminate Jew Influence


    1. Whenever the Jewish question is raised and so as not to get into a spin, I recall my own maxim: “Don’t only blame the Jews, also blame those that bend to their pressure!”

      Interestingly, when Trump’s long-time personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, recently before Congress pulled out the race card against Trump and called him a “racist”, Trump did not bend.

      [As an aside, it appears that Cohen’s lawyers have approached Trump’s lawyers about pardoning Cohen to which Trump has said NO!]

      I also sensed that here is a classic example of a person at the end of his battle-of-the-wills, which is much like pulling out the “antisemitic” or “Holocaust denier” cards against those who refuse to bend to historical falsifiers’ claims about, for example, the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, i.e. without a physical/forensic investigation being made.

      This is the battle-of-the-wills sphere wherein disembodied thinking occurs — there is no connection to the physical world but rather a total reliance on sophistry, on fabrications, and on outright lying often assisted/fortified through legal pressure.

      German philosopher Martin Heidegger’s maxim, made known to the world only in 2014 with the publication of his Black Books — he died in 1976 — explains what kind of conceptual deceptive pressure is employed by individuals who pull out the race card — as did also recently Veterans Today’s Gordon Duff, when he also labelled Trump a racist:

      “The Jews, with their marked gift for calculating, live, already for the longest time, according to the principle of race, which is why they are resisting its consistent application with utmost violence.”

      If it is recalled that religions are abstract belief systems, ideas becoming ideologies, without physical substance, then it is clear why those who call themselves Jews are desperately looking for a Jewish DNA, which however will never exist — except in someone’s mind as expressed, for example in the statement: My mother was Jewish, so I am Jewish. The Muslims operate on the patrilineal principle. Heidegger was right in labelling such behaviour as “…live … according to the principle of race…”.

      So the survival of the fittest battle needs to rely on a deceptive use of concepts, which are criminalized for a targeted group, e.g. Europeans, to the advantage of the abstract agitator – Jew.

      In the context of what is proposed for the European race, a la Barbara Lerner Spectre’s aim to “brown Europe”, then for Europeans it is an existential necessity fearlessly to raise the RACE issue and confront those who cannot tolerate a white Europe.

      1. Thank you. Very insightful, informing. Actionable.

        I appreciate especially your calling out Duff of VT, a monster of sorts in his own right, I think. How he could go after, tooth and nail, TRUMP, while explaining away or ignoring the CLINTON side of the same coin, has bothered me. So many sites I encountered, dug into, proved “FAKE”. I shall endeavor to find Heidegger’s “black books”. Do we not all have them, next to our diaries?

    2. Judaism also operated as a patriarchal system. Up though the first century, Judaism was solely based on the father’s bloodline, as is clearly seen in all those tiresome, Biblical genealogical listings.

      Jewish women had no rights. They could not own property or enter into contracts. Essentially Jewish women of that era were chattel, slaves to their husbands. While a husband could divorce his wife merely by making a written public declaration of the divorce, no venue for divorce was afforded Jewish women.

      Jewish woman had to have a male representative to survive, lest they be reduced to a short, brutal life of prostitution or slavery. Lacking a husband, the Jewess could come under the protection of a blood relative like a son, brother or uncle.

      This is why there are all those Old Testament stories of Jewesses manipulating men to assure their own survival. The story of Jacob and Esau is one of these stories where a domineering Jewess, Rebekah, uses her effeminate son to steal the wealth and inheritance of her husband.

      And Isaac loved Esau, because he did eat of his venison: but Rebekah loved Jacob.

      Isaac, whose health is failing, is leaving all his possessions, including his right of tribal leadership, to his son Esau. Rebekah fears, rightly so, that her strong willed and manly son Esau, “whom Isaac loves,” will exclude her from his beneficence; so Rebekah schemes and manipulates her effeminate son Jacob to carry out the theft of Isaac’s fortunes to ensure she will have a male benefactor who will maintain favorable disposition towards her.

      The story of Tamar is yet another narrative of a Jewess concubine that manipulates her male master, Judah, into impregnating her so she will be assured of a male heir to represent her.

      Tamar’s plan was to become pregnant by this ruse so that she might bear a child in Judah’s line, since Judah had not given her to his son Shelah. So she played the part of a prostitute and struck a bargain with Judah for a goat, secured by his staff, seal, and cord. When Judah was able to have a goat sent to Timnath, in order to collect his staff and seal, the woman was nowhere to be found and no one knew of any prostitute in Timnath.

      Three months later, Tamar was accused of prostitution on account of her pregnancy. Upon hearing the news, Judah ordered that she be burned to death, Tamar sent the staff, seal, and cord to Judah with a message declaring that the owner of these items was the man who had made her pregnant. Upon recognizing these items as his security, Judah released Tamar from her sentence. Tamar, having thus secured her place in the family as well as Judah’s posterity, gave birth to twins, Perez and Zerah. Their birth is reminiscent of the birth of Rebekah’s twin sons.

      This is the Jewish patriarchal tradition Islam assumed around 700AD. However, it should be noted Semitic tribes of the Near East have always been patriarchal in their tribal traditions. One might ask how Muslim women feel about their role in Semitic society.

      It should be noted that French Foreign Legionnaires in Algeria were known for reserving the last bullet for themselves, as to be captured meant being turned over to Arab women for torture. This was a greatly feared, fate worse than death, (Imagine a Legionnaire being afraid of women) as these woman would then take out their long held animosities against their assigned Muslim slave status on the Legionnaire.

      And look at what Jewish women like Barbara Lerner Spectre and Diane Feinstein are doing to white men today. Perhaps we should all reserve a last bullet for ourselves.

      1. Arch, that’s solid reporting/thinking. Why, when and how did this accepted yet relatively modern
        ‘my mother is a Jew so I am a Jew’ about face begin to be the benchmark?

        As for the fear of the women, Kipling ended his “The Young British Soldier ”
        with the very same truth..

        “When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains,
        And the women come out to cut up what remains,
        Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
        An’ go to your Gawd like a soldier.
        Go, go, go like a soldier,
        Go, go, go like a soldier,
        Go, go, go like a soldier,
        So-oldier of the Queen!”

      2. HP –

        Mother is jew so kids are jews ever since Israel was formed in 1947. ‘Right of Return’ needed to increase population there. All bunk, if it is a religion!!

        Now even granddad & grandmom are used to qualify folks as jews…. even non-jew spouses.

        In 1970, Israel took another historic step by granting automatic citizenship not only to Jews, but also to their non-Jewish children, grandchildren, and spouses, and to the non-Jewish spouses of their children and grandchildren. This addition not only ensured that families would not be broken apart, but also promised a safe haven in Israel for non-Jews subject to persecution because of their Jewish roots.

      3. Pat, thanks.
        So 1947 was the Mother clause and then came the
        all for one, one for all pièce de résistance of 1970.
        Wow, whole lotta rearranging goin’ on!
        I reckon they need all the shrinks they can muster..

      4. It is interesting how Jews use gullible goyim to flesh out their ranks. Jesus told his disciples twice, he was there only for the lost sheep of Israel, i.e. the Temple Jews. He clearly commanded his disciples to “go not unto the gentiles or their cities,” but focus on the Jewish “lost sheep of Israel.” Yet, from the beginning, that is exactly what Saul/Paul does, he goes to the gentiles. Why? Obviously to fill out the very thin Jewish presence comprising his Christian ranks. After all, what good is it to be a king (or high priest) with no subjects to lord over?

        Once again, we see this same technique used in the Jews’ 1970 Law of Return

        “granting automatic citizenship not only to Jews, but also to their non-Jewish children, grandchildren, and spouses, and to the non-Jewish spouses of their children and grandchildren. This addition not only ensured that families would not be broken apart, but also promised a safe haven in Israel for non-Jews subject to persecution because of their Jewish roots.”

        This goes directly against the spirit of the Jews’ Talmudic law that says one must be the seventh generation descendant of a convert to be accepted as a true Jew. Note the touchy-feely reason given as an assurance that families are not broken apart. Ya sure you betcha! As if these lying, psychopathic, Jew murderers ever gave a good goddamn about families or children. Just ask any Palestinian about the Jews’ caring attitudes towards families.

        How’s that again? “A safe haven in Israel for non-Jews subject to persecution because of their Jewish roots.” Non-Semite goy begin persecuted by anti-Semite goy? Hell, the goyim don’t even persecute Jews, let alone non-Jews claiming they are Jews! More bizarre Jewish double-think that is double-plus good – for Jews.

        Once again, in this act one finds Jews using unwitting goyim to flesh out their ranks, stemming from their highly racist, in-group proclivities, doing so in the effort to further their Near East agenda of complete hegemony over the Near East region and its rich supply of oil reserves.

        The more “Jews” in Israel, the more Jews to justify pushing Palestinians from their homeland, as every increase in the “Jewish” population justifies the need for more living space for Jews. It also serves to confuse and obfuscate the issue of who is actually a Jew. Just as circumcision hid the Jew among similarly mutilated goy, the increase in the goy population of Israel hides the true Jew. The more goy related to Jews, the more support Jews receive from the goy, in the same manner white grandmothers support their Negro-sired, nappy-headed grandchildren.

        It’z all Jew tricks and the joke is on the stupid goyim. Those gullible enough to be taken in by Jews to further an agenda of destroying white civilization so elite Jews might one day “ride like an effendi” over the ruined remains of this planet.

        And say, here’s another thought, what if that “shitty little country” is slated for sacrifice? Like America, the only reason Israel exists is because it provides a useful function. The “holy land” serves as global Jewry’s religious/cultural icon and focal rallying point. But how long will this be necessary for the wealthy, elite, “international” Jew that has no need for god or a nation state because they perceive themselves to be god. After all, don’t Jews win arguments with god, so if they know more than god, what need have they for god?

        Americans are blissfully ignorant of the extremely tenuous nature of their continued existence. The only reason America still exists is because it provides a huge, threatening, mindless golem with which Jews bully the remainder of the world. But with the new scalar and satellite weapons technology, that need is being rapidly eclipsed. Elite Jews are now able to wreak mass destruction anywhere on the planet, from anywhere on the planet, or even from space. Why do you think all that money was spent on developing manned orbital platforms? This should greatly worry Americas’ goyim population because with the Jews complete control over Americas’ food supply, (now largely grown and shipped in from foreign countries) power grid, money system, law, military, nuclear weapons and so on, it will be a simple matter for Jews to pull the plug on America’s life support system and let it expire in writhing agony.

        So what if Israel becomes more useful as a sacrificial goat to engender outrage among the remaining global population? After all, wasn’t that the function of having six million Jews die an imaginary death, to outrage the world over the loss of the precious, oppressed, chosen people of god? But why make it imaginary? When one looks at Rothschild holdings around the planet and the massive mansions of wealthy Jews located on prime real-estate, throughout the western world, one must ask why even insane Jews would what to live in Israel. Why live in a desert shithole when there are huge regions of great beauty, grandeur and most importantly an abundance of lush foliage and water? Yes sir, god’s promised land of milk honey, and blond shiksas is out there for Jews, so why waste any time on a desert shithole?

        Picture Israel loaded up with sacrificial, goy goat i.e. “Jews” – so vat’s to lose? Suddenly that “shitty little country” suffers an unprovoked, false-flag, nuclear attack or simulated nuclear attack using the new weapon technology. A great hue and cry of pain and anguish would arise from worldwide Jewry. They would begin a massive campaign of hand wringing, teeth gnashing and garment rendering over the loss of their precious “holy land” and its “six million” Jews. A faux enemy could then be easily jinned up to justify an all-out attack on whatever enemy target has been chosen by elite, global Jewry. Jews could use the loss of Israel to buff up their rapidly waning victim status and once again enjoy the immense power of unrestricted oppression and hate to justify whatever ends they desire. And what better use could there be for “non-Jewish children, grandchildren, and spouses, and non-Jewish spouses of their children and grandchildren?”

        Is it wrong to think Jewish on such matters?

  4. Marshal Philippe Pétain did not like Jews. However, in reality, he was less an enemy of the Jews than most other Vichy officials:

    “A Jew is never responsible for his origin; a Freemason always is one of his own choice and should be treated more harshly than Jews,” said Pétain in a nation-wide radio talk.

    “Together, the two have brought us down to defeat by teaching our reserve officers at universities not to respect French authority but only internationalism.”

  5. “Don’t only blame the Jews, also blame those who bend to their pressure”

    This would have to include those of Freemasonry, as I stated in the ” Stalin’s Gulags” commentariat. White American Ivy League educated men (mostly) and their British counterparts.

    It wasn’t the Jews who were primarily responsible for the creation of Is-ra-el, a quintessential example of “jewification” if ever there was one.

    Hahaha. I see Bob in D.C beat me to the punch! But I won’t edit my comment. Petain was right, and it can’t be stated enough.

  6. As once again and always the uber-Jews will sacrifice the lower caste/class common Jews for their own security and gain. A natural default for any upper class/caste, innit?
    Who believes the black and brown minority hordes would differentiate between white people and Jews, more precisely common Jews, even if they could?

    When the pot is stirred and the pump primed, their blood will rise and the whistle will blow.
    The spoils are at hand and the common low caste/class Jews are for all intents and purposes now white people too.
    I rather doubt they’d choose this path if they had a say.

    The black and brown hordes don’t want equality, that’s a pipe dream and even they know this.
    They want revenge for wrongs real and imagined. The worst of human nature is one of the uber-Jew’s great tools.

    “The poor will always be with you” So too the envious.
    Up to and including the point of bloody murder.

    The Bible, among other scripture, tells me so..

  7. KMD wrote:
    “Jewish influence on issues like migration and multiculturalism can be indirect — an important but underresearched topic. For example, the EU is pressuring all member states to accept migration, including states such as Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, and now Italy which have governments hostile to migration. The EU is dominated by Germany, France, and the U.K. which have a strong Jewish presence and whose Jewish communities have exerted their influence by promoting generous immigration and refugee policies. This would apply to Finland as well since it is an EU member.”

    In particular, he noted that jew influence can be indirect and is underresearched. I agree.

    I found that one very powerful underresearched person was in charge of WORLD migration – Peter Sutherland.

    You should know that the first MANAGER of MIGRATION in Europe and the world was Ireland’s Peter Sutherland.

    What Peter Sutherland wanted, he got… He was very dangerous.

    Peter Denis Sutherland (25 April 1946 – 7 January 2018) was an Irish businessman, barrister
    and politician who served as UN Special Representative for International Migration from 2006 to 2017, Chairman of Goldman Sachs from 1995 to 2015, Director-General of the World Trade
    Organization from 1993 to 1995, European Commissioner for Competition from 1985 to 1989
    and Attorney General of Ireland from 1981 to 1982 and 1982 to 1994.

    He was a barrister by profession and was a Senior Counsel of the Irish Bar. He was known for
    serving in a variety of international organisations, political and business roles.

    Sutherland was the United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General for
    International Migration until March 2017.

    Peter Sutherland was managing the MIGRATION of people worldwide!!

    Pete was CEO of BP plc and Goldman Sachs Intl at the same time. He helped set up the BP
    bonds thru Goldman to profit from the Gulf oil rig explosion in 2010.

    He has been credited as the single most important enabler of GATT.

    Peter Sutherland was chairman of BP plc (1997 – 2010). He was also chairman of Goldman
    Sachs International (1995 – 2010).
    Before these appointments, he was the founding director-general of the World Trade
    He had previously served as director general of GATT since July 1993 and was
    instrumental in concluding the Uruguay GATT Round Negotiations.
    He was Chairman of Allied Irish Banks from 1989-1993 and Chairman of the Board of
    Governors of the European Institute of Public Administration (Maastricht) 1991-1996.

    He was made European Honorary Chairman of Trilateral Commission.

    —Peter was replaced by Louise Arbour, CC GOQ (born February 10, 1947). She is a Canadian
    lawyer, prosecutor and jurist. She is currently the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for International Migration.

    Arbour was the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, a former justice of the Supreme
    Court of Canada and the Court of Appeal for Ontario and a former Chief Prosecutor of the
    International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. From 2009 until 2014, she served as President and CEO of the International Crisis Group.

    She made history with the indictment of a sitting head of state, Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milošević, as well as the first prosecution of sexual assault as the articles of crimes against humanity.

    On January 24, 2008, Arbour welcomed the entry into force of the 2004 version of the Arab Charter on Human Rights, which has been criticized for containing the following:

    “Article 2 – All forms of racism, Zionism and foreign occupation and domination constitute an impediment to human dignity and a major barrier to the exercise of the fundamental rights of peoples; all such practices must be condemned and efforts must be deployed for their elimination.”

    Following criticisms about this statement, **Arbour reportedly distanced herself from the aspects of the charter which proposed Zionism be eliminated.

    So, she shows more promise than Peter did. But, I doubt that her anti-Zionist position of years ago will bear little fruit.

    To dilute any hope…. In 2017, she was listed as a North American Member of the Trilateral Commission of New York City. She is listed along with Strobe Talbott of UN Agenda-21 ‘Sustainable Development’ invention fame:

    1. Pat
      All roads lead to Agenda-21, don’t they? In the collective mindset the programming is advancing this as a panacea to all the troubles which have plagued mankind for centuries.

      (Create the)Problem-(Cause a)Reaction-(Provide the)Solution

      Something’s gotta give…..and it will

      1. Jake –

        I agree! I have been posting that here for over 5 years.

        In 2010, as head of BOTH BP Intl & Goldman Sachs Intl…. he planned & arranged the finances for the Gulf of Mexico – Deepwater Horizon – offshore oil spill to float $50 billion in bonds for BP for that intentional debacle.

        He was the chief finance manager for the Popes.

        GATT would never have happened without him.

        Pete was the founding director-general of the World Trade Organisation.

        He had previously served as director general of GATT since July 1993 and was instrumental in concluding the Uruguay GATT Round Negotiations. Prior to this position, he was chairman of Allied Irish Banks from 1989-1993 and chairman of the Board of Governors of the European Institute of Public Administration (Maastricht) 1991-1996.

        From 1981 until early 1982, he was attorney general of Ireland and was a member of the Council of State. He was reappointed in 1982 until 1984 when he was nominated by the Government of Ireland as a member of the Commission of the European Communities in charge of competition policy. During his first year at the Commission he was also responsible for social Affairs, health and education and thereafter for relations with the European Parliament.

        He served on the Board of Directors of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc and is associated with the following organisations:
        World Economic Forum (Davos), Foundation Board member;

        The Federal Trust, president;

        European Policy Centre Advisory Council, president;

        European Round Table of Industrialists, vice-chairman;

        the Royal Irish Academy, member;

        goodwill ambassador to the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation;

        and consultor for the Administration of the Patrimony of the Holy See.(Pope-Vatican money)

        He has published numerous articles and the book “Premier Janvier 1993, ce qui va changer en Europe” (Paris).
        He was presented with the Robert Schuman Medal for his work on European Integration and the David Rockefeller Award of the Trilateral Commission.

        He is dead as of Jan 2018. Not a moment too soon!!!

  8. “Race can be a difficult subject to understand”, as quoted from above. As Les Visible and I write over and over again, Jews are not a race and the words “race and racism” should never be used in describing them. Deny this truth at your peril, as you have, if you do, been inducted Orwellian fashion, into the Chosenites lexicon. Ditto for our misuse of the word “anti-Semite”, which is applied to Jews when the vast majority of them are not Semites, but European, Ashkenazi, Khazarian-ancestry people calling themselves Jews. Even Henry Makow speaks of his Khazarian ancestry. The Jews, who more than worry us by trying to destroy the White ethnic groups, are Makow’s “cabalist, satanist, Zionist Jews” who control the planet’s financial system. Doris Lessing said words to the effect that if you cannot provide adequate, true definitions, it means you “are helpless, without any real choice.” Pure Semites are pure bred Arabs, who are members of the broad racial grouping known as Caucasians, as differentiated from Mongoloids and Negroids.

    1. I subscribe to Bradley’s theory that Jews are Neanderthals racially. But I don’t think the Jew’s race gives rise to his special mind. I think his religion did this, and what his mind amounts to is a corruption of the moral faculty — i.e., he is a man who lacks a sense of honor.

  9. The abundance of (embezzled) money to buy control of specific areas of commerce, such as MSM, Hollywood, financial centers, political influence including bribes, etc., is suggested by Wall Street using the FRBNY. Ref.

    This scheme, developed with assistance from a Rothschild agent, is deemed similar to what ravished European banker/nations for centuries as related by Benjamin Ginsberg in FATAL EMBRACE, JEWS AND THE STATE. It is also submitted to be the scheme behind the Euro.

  10. KMD: “the popularity of the steadfastly anti-migration governments in Eastern Europe and now Italy”.

    The situation is disheartening regardless. Do we attribute the above statement to a real fightback, or are Eastern and Southern Europeans just a little slow, backward, and behind the times? Don’t forget that 50 years ago in the West, the public were mostly overtly racist, strict immigration laws and border controls were in place, and the police dealt brutally with immigrant criminals, but look what it has come to be. Who is to say that South and East Europe won’t follow suit? This is the whole point of all the propaganda, advertising, entertainment, UN/EU/NGO campaigns, and other means of globalist policy spreading – to have everybody adopt the same world view and policy, and the consequences that follow.

    Just a further note on Eastern Europe. Russians and East Europeans were far more racist during their communist phase than westerners of those days, and more so than their contemporaries these days. During the cold war the “internationalist” policy of those countries was to support anti-colonialist and anti-imperialist struggles in the third world and to enable the creation of independent secular regimes, and not to flood Europe with Africans and Asians. Some were allowed temporarily into their countries but only for education purposes, and miscegenation was frowned upon and discouraged. Western globalist policy was opposed to this, and now that the West has won the cold war and forced those former communist countries to adopt liberal capitalism and democracy, I can’t see how they will resist the cultural changes coming from the West in the long term. The revival of religion helps, but then the west was also far more religious in the past. The West built churches too before starting to demolish them, or convert them into shops, offices, and mosques. The pressures to enforce the globalist system are enormous and unrelenting, as the intention is to cover every square inch of this earth. It’s just a matter of when and how.

    It also depends on the view of history one has: does history develop in a linear fashion, or cyclically? I would like to hope that it is the latter, since then to every action there should be a reaction, and the pendulum should swing the other way to balance the societal disequilibrium. Otherwise we are truly lost.

    1. “…also promised a safe haven in Israel for non-Jews subject to persecution because of their Jewish roots.”

      What persecution?

      The Jews have had to suffer retaliation for their misanthropic behaviour, but never persecution.

      Is a criminal “persecuted” for his crimes, or is he punished?

  11. Whether evolutionary struggle, devolutionary struggle or any other type struggle, it’s really really hard to even survive much less prevail, when your hands are tied.

      1. (Bhagavad-gita 9:25)
        “Pisaca worship is called “black arts” or “black magic.” There are many men who practice this black art, and they think that it is spiritualism, but such activities are completely materialistic. “

  12. Victor Ostrovsky, a Canadian Jew, former Mossad “katsa”, confessed in his first book “By Way of Deception” that the accusation of anti-semitism is just a trick, and they always use it. It is used to avoid debate; we shouldn’t bother too much with it.
    Interesting to note that the trick of name calling is the only “argument” used in the political left discourse. They say you are a racist, homophobic, sexist, misogynist, rapist, etc.

    What about the Jews being a race? I’m going to agree with Max Bilney, it doesn’t fit. You can convert to be a Tribe member, any race can be a Jew; it sounds like citizenry to me. When they say “fellow Jew” they are actually saying fellow citizen. Therefore, I believe the Tribe is a theocratic nation; a special kind of nation in the political world because it doesn’t need a territory to exist. Theocratic because it is based on religious principles and the circumcision is the most important of them. This article shows the importance of circumcision to explain Jewish behavior. As Arch Stanton stated above, it is a patriarchal system.

    So, how they maintain their political cohesion being so spread? It’s another trick used by the big Jew, an old one: the external enemy threat, “gentile hate sickness”. Fear is a powerful force to unite when a society is faced with imminent external threat. In the particular case of Jews, imminent is forever.

    1. Jews don’t have enemies. It’s all in their imagination! They just need a ‘ justification’ for their miscobduct. The ‘ threat ‘ is real in their minds. jews should heal themselves of themselves. With all hewish doctors, psychiatrics etc why don’t they heal themselves? Answer is that they have more advantages staying sick than healed.

  13. @Sardonicus

    Sorry for this OT comment — just wanted to say “RIP Brexit”. UK Parliament has voted that there cannot be a “no deal Brexit”, the joke being that a no deal Brexit is, in fact, a pure Brexit. So that’s the wheeze to stop Brexit (if indeed there was ever a genuine chance): we now have a choice of a deal which keeps us in the EU; or to abandon Brexit which keeps us in the EU.

    The Masters of Discourse are not clever, just brutal: they control all the mechanisms of political debate and thus can convince the British people that black is white, white is black. I had stopped watching all mainstream broadcasts quite a while ago; I also stopped paying attention to mainstream politics in the press, on the radio and via the “interweb”. This result just confirms that it is all kabuki designed to distract, entertain and confuse.

    In the long run the MoD will regret their supposed “cleverness” because this moment will be an epiphany (a red-pill moment if you like) for many ordinary British people. The UK Parliament has just nullified the referendum.

    1. I am as disappointed as you are, Flopot. No, more than disappointed. Outraged!

      The whole country is run by Jew-controlled lickspittles. And the biggest lickspittle of all is Theresa (Je suis Juif) May. The woman is a traitor and should be horsewhipped all the way to hell where she can team up with her soulmate in treachery, Judas Iscariot. She has betrayed the 17.4 million Brits who voted for Brexit.

      Remember what this bitch said: “No deal is better than a bad deal.” But now she has managed to rule out a “No Deal” for the type of feather-spft Brexit which would satisfy only an ardent Remainer. I have only word for this Judas cow and it is a monosyllable that begins with a ‘C’.

      1. Well put. QED. No more need be said. Pull up the ladder, Brexit is dead. I am utterly disappointed but also completely jaded and not surprised at all about the outcome — but I had dared to hope. What a fool I am.

        Thanks for sharing your opinion Sard.


      2. Sard,

        I’m no fan of the EU, and as it stands I’d prefer it to break up, but if GB+NI leaves the EU it loses the UK. Surely the UK would then break up as Scotland would leave to remain/join the EU, and later on perhaps NI too to join Ireland and hence the EU (note the revival of IRA “bombings” up in NI and in London just around the time when they’re supposed to finalise the separation – I wonder who’s really behind this – wanting to send out a reminder perhaps), and even Wales further down the line as they’re not very fond of the English (I wonder if they’ll restart burning English holiday homes there). Of course globalism and immigration will continue to grow whether in or out of any combinations, as that is the present trend.

        BREXIT may have been about leaving the EU but surely not about breaking up the UK, but that may well end up being the consequence. That is perhaps another reason why the politicians are stalling and it may never happen, despite the referendum votes.

    2. If you like your Democratic Brexit vote you can keep your Democratic Brexit vote!
      (just kidding, no you can’t)

      1. I knew it was too good to be true but there’s a small hopium processor still humming away deep in my brain. Hard to dig out!

    3. Three quarters of MPs voted remain in the referendum. Their treachery has come as a shock and a lesson in just how powerful, arrogant and unscrupulous our political class is. The remainers are deliberately trying to overturn the referendum result.

      Things will change. The Brits are not likely to rebel in the streets, but the next General Election will be judgement day for many of these people.

      We need a new parliment, one that is tune with the people, as soon as possible.

      We need a General Election NOW.

      1. Well said, John! But I don’t think a General Election will do the trick. The only thing that will do the trick is a Bloody Revolution, with the guillotine working full time. With Theresa May playing the part of Marie Antoinette.

        Only kidding. I wouldn’t hurt a fly. 🙂

        Well, maybe a dung fly.

      2. I advise against a General Election for two reasons.

        (1) Corbyn could win. Not only would mass immigration from the Third World then continue, if not increase, but the pound would plummet, making everything more expensive. Property would then be snapped up by rich foreigners — by Russian oligarchs, Chinese industrialists, and filthy rich Jews.

        (2) If the Tories win, we would still not get Brexit, because most of these Tory scum in Parliament are Remainers and they clearly DON’T BELIEVE IN DEMOCRACY!

        If there were a second Referendum? Equally futile! Because Remain could win, thanks to all the scare stories circulating. And if Leave wins? They’d just scream again: “Sorry, we can’t accept this result! Let’s have a THIRD referendum — until the stupid sheeple get it right!”

        Who said this was a democracy?

        To find a true democracy maybe you need to go back to Ancient Athens.

  14. It is parliament against the people.

    I have been asking friends how they feel and I am surprised by the FURY, not just anger but absolute fury, expressed by ordinary Brits. There may be trouble ahead, and this awful Conservative government has brought it about. (And I am a lifelong Conservative). The people have been betrayed.

    It is noticeable that the wealthy and public sector people are all remainers. The ordinary working people are mostly leavers.

    1. You’re right about the fury. But it’s more than just fury. It’s the most withering contempt. Comments from the public I’ve heard in passing: “These w*nkers are unfit to rule!” And “Theresa May should be gang-raped and burnt alive!” And the riposte: “Who’d want to rape that foul bitch? I’d just feed her to the crocodiles.”

      Yes, feelings are running high. If this goes on, there’ll soon be riots. Parliament dynamited. MPs castrated and their houses set on fire. I’ve actually heard people talking like this. I couldn’t believe my ears.

      Expect blood in the streets at any moment.

      1. I think that’s what the jews want, a revoution by the masses, so they have the excuse of having a state of emergency. A revolt can only win if it is supported by a minimum of a certain ‘ white’ elite. And we know this ‘ white ‘ elite doesn’t exist as it is the jews who are in the keypositions in society.

  15. We are getting Brexit-in-name-only.

    God Forbid that there should be violence. The only way now to get out of the EU is to regroup politically, and to use an American expression, “Throw the bums out”.

Comments are closed.