New Zealand anti-mosque terrorist: False Flag? Hypnotized to kill?

By KEVIN BARRETT
Veterans Today Editor

DISCLAIMER. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of anyone associated with this website.

Was the the New Zealand mosque terrorism incident a false flag operation? It’s interesting that this horrific event happened just a few days after scholarly books by Professor Kevin MacDonald, the so-called intellectual godfather of white nationalism, were banned by Amazon.

The New Zealand massacre has obvious beneficiaries:

(1) Those pushing for more censorship. (2) Those pushing for more censorship. (3) Those pushing for more censorship. (4) Those seeking to enflame the (post)Christian-vs-Muslim “Clash of Civilizations.” (5) Those pushing for gun control.

Note that all five of the above groups answer to the term, “the Zionists.”

It’s also interesting that these events usually happen to nations that Bibi Netanyahu is mad at. “Breivik’s massacre” of the young anti-Zionist wing of the Norwegian Labor Party was obviously Israeli retaliation against Norway for its anti-Zionist actions. Likewise the Charlie Hebdo massacre happened after Bibi repeatedly threatened that France would be hit by terrorism if it didn’t stop siding with the Palestinians. And now New Zealand — the current target of Zionist rage due to its official statements sympathizing with the people of Gaza.

Whether or not Zionists directly orchestrated the New Zealand massacre, they are still responsible for it.

Maybe they hypnotized the neo-Nazi killer(s)’ MK Ultra style and unleashed him; or maybe they just let the 9/11 mass hypnosis operation do its work implanting intergenerational Islamophobia into the Western unconscious. Either way, THEY DID IT.

Below is my analysis of how they have hypnotized the world, spilling the blood of tens if not hundreds of million in the process.


Sorry, Ilhan, Jews HAVE Hypnotized the World
Kevin Barrett, for The Unz Review
15 March 2019

Rep. Ilhan Omar equivocally-unequivocally apologized for tweeting that Zionist power was “all about the Benjamins.” A few weeks later, she didn’t apologize at all for suggesting that American congressional representatives shouldn’t have to swear loyalty oaths to Israel.

But Rep. Omar did in fact issue one genuinely unequivocal apology. It involved this 2012 tweet:

“It’s now apparent to me that I spent lots of energy putting my 2012 tweet in context and little energy in disavowing the anti-semitic trope I unknowingly used, which is unfortunate and offensive.”

The above tweet was posted by Omar on January 21, 2012,  in response to an attack from New York Times op-ed writer Bari Weiss.

As I recently wrote, Ilhan Omar’s other two “anti-Semitic tropes”—that the US supports Israel due to Jewish-Zionist money power, and that Congress has a dual-loyalty problem—are all-too-obviously true.

But what about Israel hypnotizing the world? Is that a fair statement? An exaggeration? A racist calumny?

Actually, in some ways it is an understatement.

Jewish tribal power has been “hypnotizing the world” in various ways since long before the modern nation state (or settler colony of genocidal squatters, if you will) called “Israel” was founded in 1948.

I put the expression “hypnotize the world” in quotes not only because it was Omar who said it, but because it is obviously a figure of speech, not a literal statement. But as figures of speech go, this one is unusually accurate and revealing…

SOURCE

43 thoughts to “New Zealand anti-mosque terrorist: False Flag? Hypnotized to kill?”

  1. @ Admin

    DISCLAIMER. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of anyone associated with this website.

    I’m glad to hear that.

    The intelligent reader will deduce from your disclaimer that the publishers of the Darkmoon site are not very impressed with the substandard article they decided to published here.

    I think you do this solely to appease the dimwitted conspiracy theorists among us who would otherwise die of sheer boredom. These saddos need conspiracy theories in the same way as fish need water.

    1. I agree. Kevin Barrett’s hastily cobbled together article begins with a typo in the very first sentence — “Was the the (sic) New Zealand mosque terrorist incident a false flag operation?” You would think that a site with at least half a dozen editors floating round, with Barrett himself being a senior editor, would go the trouble of checking his first sentence. But no, they don’t need to do that, do they?

      Their prestige suffices to convince the uneducated masses who throng their site — salivating for ever more sensational conspiracy theories to stimulate their jaded palates — that everything they say is gospel truth. If UFOs have just landed and little green men have already infiltrated the higher echelons of government, including the White House, the CIA and the FBI, then so be it! You gotta believe it. Because the editors of Veterans Today have told you so!

      Who are these guys anyway? ….. Duff? Dean? Barrett? ….. Are they Himalayan sages or something?

      Small frogs in a small pond! Trying their best to make BIG splashes!

      No can do!

      1. One of the more astute commenters on this site, Kendra Blewitt, gets it right in a previous comment. He doesn’t mention Veterans Today in tones of breathless admiration. Nor does he parrot the iconic names of Jim Stone and Miles Mathis, two other infallible seers of the internet for whom nothing is as it seems and the entire world is just smoke and mirrors seen through the thick glass of a goldfish bowl.

        Kendra writes — I quote him (or is it her?) from the previous thread:

        I have just read the long Manifesto. Not sure what to think of it. Renegade Tribune apparently thinks it is a hoax where nobody was killed. Scott Creighton apparently thinks it was done by a brainwashed victim for the purpose of justifying Internet censorship. I personally suspect it’s probably real.

        “I personally suspect it’s probably real.” Heartening words! Here is a man who takes the common sense view that most of the people he sees in the streets and supermarkets around him are, well, just ordinary people. Not sinister infiltrators from some extraterrestrial civilization trying to take over Planet Earth! — as in the sensational cult movie “They Live”.

        Watch this 3-minute clip from “They Live” — not to be missed!

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI8AMRbqY6w

    2. The publishers of this website said, as they ALWAYS say in the wording of a disclaimer, “…the views do not NECESSARILY reflect the opinions of anyone associated with this website.”

      This doesn’t mean they DON’T, only that they CAN’T in the interest of presenting the article as only a responsible publisher would DO. It doesn’t imply that they aren’t very impressed with the article. This is IRRELEVANT!

  2. I hope that cowardly little soyboy rat who came up behind Fraser Banning goes to jail for longer than Heritage Australian Brenton Fraser.

    But he won’t. Judges are occupied by rats like him all over the parasites Anglosphere.

  3. It doesn’t follow from the fact that we are being acted upon by strong forces of manipulation that it is impossible for anyone to act purely out of his or her own initiative. I don’t think Barrett undersrands this as well as he should. Yes, there are good reasons why Tarrant might have been manipulated. But I think he acted out of his own initiative, and what makes me believe this is his Manifesto. I do a lot of writing myself and I think I’m sensitive to the writing of others, especially to writing that hasn’t been edited.

    1. @ Kendra Blewitt

      “It doesn’t follow from the fact that we are being acted upon by strong forces of manipulation that it is impossible for anyone to act purely out of his or her own initiative.”

      Well being that it’s your strawman, you might as well have your way with it; knock your socks off.

      “I don’t think Barrett undersrands (sic) this as well as he should.”

      The more likely possibility is that Barrett’s reasoning ability is superior to yours.

      “Yes, there are good reasons why Tarrant might have been manipulated. But I think he acted out of his own initiative, and what makes me believe this is his Manifesto.”

      Seriously? On the contrary, it is the contrived, contradictory bullshit in “his” “manifesto” that gives it all away as some kind of a fraud. The “manifesto” – as much of it as I could stand to read – is a mishmash of conspicuously jew-and-jew-controlled-traitorous-politician-friendly, infantile “reasoning,” expressed in “big words.”

      “I do a lot of writing myself and I think I’m sensitive to the writing of others, especially to writing that hasn’t been edited.”

      LOL!

      1. Please also read the Blogs of Captain Ajit Vadakayil
        GOOGLE AJIT VADAKAYIL FALSE FLAG ATTACK
        Valuable information on World Intrigue is available

    1. Barrett (sometimes spelled Barret or Barratt) is a surname that has been associated with several different people, places and organisations. Barrett is a popular Irish surname, in both south-east and south-west Ireland. It is most common in the Irish counties of Mayo and Galwayin and Galway but particularly County Cork, and within England, East Anglia, especially Norfolk. The Gaelic version of the name is Barόid in the south and Bairéid in the west. The Barretts of Ireland first appeared following the Norman invasion. As with many other Anglo-Norman families, they were quickly assimilated into Irish culture. Another translation for Barrett is “warlike people.”[dubious – discuss][1]

      People with the surname Barrett are largely found in the US, United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Jamaica, and Denmark.

      Source: Wikipedia, Barrett (name)

      Since the obvious false flag of 9/11 and the many after that by “Muslim terrorists” or “angry white men”, it is the best default position to suspect another false flag, while of course reaching a conclusion only after deep research. There is no harm in expressing one’s suspicion, as Barrett does.

    1. Oh yes, Muslim convert from an Irish Catholic background Kevin Barrett, who is highly critical of Jews MUST be a Jewish agent himself. Makes perfectly sense (but only to a senseless mind). And of course “Jewish” Wikipedia has falsified the information about the Irish origin of the name Barrett long ago, because they prepared “their Jewish agent” Barat to “work for them”. Everything is a vast Jewish conspiracy. 2 x 2 does not equal 4 if Wikipedia says so. That too is a Jewish conspiracy. You have figured it all out. Congratulations !

      1. @ FR

        At last, logic. I keep asking posters on this site to explain some things to me. Never get direct answers though. All it takes is one credible entity or person of substance to speak and people will listen. This was a false flag operation right ? The jews control the media, well what about Al Jazeera or the media in many Muslim countries. The Jews control the money right ? Well what about Bill Gates or Warren Buffett they can surely afford to speak up and place a spotlight on the truth. So, the jews are trying to ignite a war between the muslims and chrisitians right? And all of the powerful Muslim nations like Saudia Arabia, Malaysia and Turkey stand by in silence. You mean to tell me that there security apparatus and inteligence agencies can’t figure out what most of the posters on this site seem so sure of, NZ was a false flag orchastrated by Jews. Like I said, the simplest answer is in most cases correct. This was a horrific act purpotrated by a deranged and very sick man braught to the brink by chicken little theories!

      2. One of the perpetrators fled to Israel, and the police were engaged in a drill imitating just such an attack (a hall mark of all false flags of and since 9/11). That makes a “simple” explanation less likely….

    2. Thanks, Marcus –

      Lotta jew origins noted:
      Barad can refer to a number of people, places, and things. It occurs as a family name with multiple ethnic sources and meanings (Hebrew: ברד‎, Russian: Барад). It was ranked # 88,149 in popularity in the 1990 US census.[1]
      Variants of the surname include: Barada, Barade, Baradi, Baradt, Barat, Bard, Brar, BARRETT, Albarado, and Al-Barad’i.

      Barad is a common name in the Maratha clan system and among the Savji people of India.
      Barad is a Jewish Ashkenazic name derived from the Hebrew patronymic phrase Ben Rabi David “son of Rabbi David”.[2]
      Barad is a Jewish Sephardic name of unknown origin.[3]

      Barada is an Arabic toponymic name, from a place name meaning cold (for example, the Barada River in Syria).[4]

      1. Thanks Pat. I think there are more jews in this world than they want the goyim to know, jewish protestants, jewish catholics, jewish presbyterians, jewish mormons, etc etc they are the spies, the sleepers for their tribe.

  4. Barrett belonged to the Unitarian Universalist religion prior to his conversion to Islam. I am knowlegeable of this religion because I was raised in it. In the 50s when I grew up this was a religion that a lot of assimilated Jews joined. For example, Alvan Weinberg, the Director of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, belonged to the Oak Ridge Unitarian Universalist church that I attended as a youngster. Because this church did not believe in the divine nature of Christ it was a natural form of the Christian religion for Jews to convert to. In recent times, if I am not mistaken, it is even permissible for a religious Jew to belong to this church, as in dual citizenship. Now then, is Barret a Jew? If so he is a genuinely converted Jew, I suspect.

    1. Kendra

      The Unitarian Universalists’ rejection of the divine nature of Christ was prompted by how the nature of Divinity itself is presented in the Christian Bible. It doesn’t necessarily imply that its members aren’t open to the IDEA of Divinity and what it truly is. In this regard, their “rejection” has disassociated themselves from more of the questionable doctrines of Christianity reflecting the particulars of “Divinity” better than virtually all the organized religions, IMO.

      I can just hear it now, “Brownhawk is a converted jew, TOO!” Let’s just say that like many here, we’re ALL trying to convert the kind of thinking which has “jewified” us

  5. A blast from the past! :

    “Falling To Pieces For Israel” ;

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtHjRXROVMM

    Can anyone watch the above video and honestly say that the standing-ovation-jack*sses are not hypotized?

    The video is from BMan, from BMan’s heyday –> every dog has its’ day, that’s what they say and I guess they’re right, what a heyday it was! 😎

    1. On his blog, B’man (also Beulah Man as I recall seemingly eons ago) posted an essay describing a crossroads he has encountered; he contemplates, among other things, shutting down his blog, a container still of much valuable data, I know! I think I have read posts by B’Man on Darkmoon comment boards, so perhaps — until I can post a comment on his site — I’ll just encourage those of you acquainted with or knowing of B’Man (“Maurice”! ;-)) to send a final word or, like me, tell him to hang in there after a “time out”.

      Some of the greatest bloggers flame out, for sure. Some, like dear Zen Gardner, get FLAMED! Keep on truckin’, B’Man, I join the chorus assembling at your website as I type. One of the greatest rockers of all time, Neil Young penned and sang in his plaintive voice the following: “My my, hey hey, Rock and roll is here to stay, It’s better to burn out than to fade away. My my, hey hey.” BTW, I stopped hoping to die before I got old about the time i began to feel my age….Nice thought, Peter Townsend, no doubt another of the PTB’s band formers!

      1. For those who would go in search in cyberspace, the correct spelling (another sign of age I fear!) is BUELAHMAN[dot]wordpress[dot]com. which, based on the following and other data, seems viable indeed! Any of us ready to step in and pinch-hit for a buddy in the trenches?? This is B’Ball, busters! Perhaps “Maurice” can follow the path blazed by Darkmoon and others! Without losing track, missing the trail, and disappearing on us!

        NOTE: We collected the majority of metadata history records for Buelahman.wordpress.com. Buelah Man WordPress has a medium sized description which rather positively influences the efficiency of search engines index and hence improves positions of the domain. The description and keywords of Buelahman.wordpress were last changed more than 2 months ago.
        SOURCE: https://updates.easycounter.com/buelahman.wordpress.com

  6. It’s interesting that this horrific event happened just a few days after scholarly books by Professor Kevin MacDonald, the so-called intellectual godfather of white nationalism, were banned by Amazon.

    This seems a naked, barefaced, and bold lie. Scholarly books by Professor Kevin MacDonald are NOT banned by Amazon:

    https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Kevin+MacDonald&i=stripbooks-intl-ship&ref=nb_sb_noss_2

    I would suggest you do some fact checking lest you make fools of yourselves.

    ADMIN: It is you who have made a fool of yourself, Circassian. As LD has already pointed out twice on this website, it is common knowledge that TWO of Kevin MacDonald’s most important books have been banned by Amazon: The Culture of Critique and Separation and its Discontents. All his other books are still available.

    If you have any doubts, see here:

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/03/12/amazon-bans-culture-of-critique-and-separation-and-its-discontents/

  7. Monday, March 18, 2019

    “…NZ Police “Happened to Be in a Training Session” When Mosque Shooting Began
    From thefreethoughtproject.com:
    “It took police officers in New Zealand 36 minutes to catch the terrorist who murdered 50 people in two Christchurch mosques last week. Dramatic footage shows that just two officers—only one of whom had a gun—apprehend the suspect after his bloody rampage. We are now learning that this response time would have been longer, but police happened to be conducting a drill nearby practicing for a similar attack…”

    Source : What They Don’t Tell You, March 18, 2019.

    “…It remains unclear if the attackers of the two mosques were the same or there were five attackers involved. One of the terrorists managed to escape the country hours after Friday noon. The fifth attacker has defected to Israel with the help of unknown aides. No official reaction has been made by Tel Aviv or local authorities on the issue yet…”

    Northerntruthseeker, March 16, 2019

    A simultaneous drill, the hallmark of a false flag operation. One of the attackers fled to Israel…need I say more ?

    1. @ franklin Ryckaert,

      I don’t have much faith in the Northerntruthseeker site. A few years back, when the Dylan Storm Roof shooting took place (Roof shot dead several Blacks in an historic Black church in Charleston NC) Northerntruthseeker claimed the shooting had been a hoax and nobody had died. They even cited a Black guy named Red Silver whom they said they knew and trusted.

      Regarding Tarrant, for me the best evidence is his Manifesto.

    2. @ FR

      I keep asking these questions respectfully. How is it that all of the non controlled Jewish media around the world more so in Muslim countries like Saudia Arabia, Turkey and many others where these governments have substantial influence over the media in addition to having substantial well funded intelligence agencies do they tell the same story as those in the western media ? Why has 9/11 not been exposed by others outside the writings of alt right media ? Is it suggested that the Jews control the media and intelligence agencies in all countries the likes of Iran, Syria, Jordan & Turkey and have the power to subvert the truth in a country where it cuts against that countries interest? The intelligence agencies in these countries can spill the beans to their local media to discredit Israel, the Zionists and the West, why not ? You see, I cannot get a straight logical answer to this question. I have tried and I am continuing to try. if everything is a Jewish conspiracy and there is no one left in a position to prove otherwise I guess I am wrong and everyone here is right. I am just a skeptic and need real proof. I would appreciate a direct logical answer to my questions for a start. Too much to ask ? Otherwise these ideas of false flags are all conspiracy theories and he conspiracy theorists contribute to the dillisions of a sick man like the NZ shooter.

      1. @Ralan

        In Muslim countries there is a wide spread suspicion among the common people, Islamic organizations and even politicians that 9/11 was done by the US and Israel. See : The New Republic, September 3, 2011 : Why is the Middle East Still in Thrall to 9/11 Conspiracy Theories ?

        But they cannot express that belief in the press because there is no free press in those countries. With a few exceptions Muslim countries are under influence of the US (and thus the Jewish Lobby) and their governments do not allow the press to vent anti US ideas. One of the exceptions is Iran, and typically 9/11 conspiracy theories (and Holocaust revisionism !) do appear in its media. Jewish control of the press in Muslim countries therefore is not direct, but indirect via US pressure.

  8. I’ve managed to read a number of “quick and dirty” analyses — including the one above. Gordon Duff’s post at Veterans Today might well work better for some here than Kevin B.’s barrage. I have purchased and read Barrett’s books and happily heard him speak in person in Grass Valley here in Kali-fornication. I trust his judgment; as more “facts” come to light, Kevin may revisit his earlier thoughts.
    Breaking stories like this require a very fast draw if you want to survive the duel. Even “quick, first-impression” analyses can establish a place-holder for off-setting counter-impressions opposed to the MSM (Big Media) story line(s). I have found that if I stick with the event and its sequela, follow and follow up alternative investigations enough solid information emerges to make the call with greater certainty. Alternative investigations have got to be really hard as the “authorities” and PTB work simultaneously in tandem on the cover-up and clean-up (if any). For Sandy Hook, they razed the building hosting that event!
    Analogous to the concept of “selective toxicity” — several years of spraying the same pesticide on bugs in a field seems the easiest way to create “super resistant bugs”! — revealing, embarrassing findings of alternative investigations may simply serve to assist PTB’s ironing out still obvious wrinkles in “The State Program” — all the better to design, implement, and execute false-flag attacks in the future.

    1. AD –

      Yep!

      It takes decades for the lies to get straightened out and evidence burned/trashed completely… or hammered into ships at Avondale Shipyards in New Orleans… like WTC steel was.. by then, mostly forgotten with new invented chaos hitting daily.

    2. BTW, for those paying attention to my mention of the concept of “selective toxicity”, you’ll have a big hint about glyphosate (“Round-up”). Ever hear of herding cattle to slaughter? No accidents in the Universe (my projected epitaph, should I ever pass). I say no more on that for now!

  9. According to his parents, the killer stayed abroad for a while, after his return he was completely different … I think he was trained in one of those countries to finish off a mass of Muslims.
    He was promised a lot of money and the possibility of hiding under a different identity after his assignment to kill innocent people.
    Where did he get the money for his travels, purchase of his automatic weapons?

    First of course the media circus process with which they will also earn a lot of money. Same story as Breivik and many others.
    Today there was a “terror” attack in Utrecht, Holland of course by a Muslim and immediately it is considered in the MSM that it is a revenge action on the “attack” in New Zealand …

    The Jews are busy preparing a war between Christians and Muslims.

    Too bad for them, but everywhere the Jews leave their fingerprints behind:

    Brenton Tarrant recorded his murderous raid with a camera on his head and streamed the images live on Facebook. The video was also uploaded to YouTube, owned by Google, a short time later. The original live stream was removed fairly quickly, but the various social media platforms struggled to get the images offline. They were continuously shared by users. According to Facebook, the company removed 1.5 million uploads from the video in the first hours after the attack.

  10. Having read above and below — much the same, go figure! — I remain in concurrence with Jim Stone’s assessment. http://82.221.129.208/ http://82.221.129.208/.wo8.html For those who wish spoon-fed JS (better than the alternative! ;-)) see below.
    Jim wrote recently today the following:
    I AM CALLING IT: CHRISTCHURCH SHOOTING NEVER HAPPENED
    Too many other credible sources confirmed what I thought. You can see the shell casings flying out of the gun and hit a wall, but it is as if they vanish into the wall, they never hit the ground afterward. There are clear details on the ground that are much larger than a shell casing, and it cannot be explained how the shell casings simply disappeared other than that the entire video was hoaxed with an AI, that was not programmed to realize it had to generate the casings on the ground laying still after they fell. It only calculated the frames where the casings were still moving away from the gun.
    Remember, all along I have stated they have something to hide in that shooting video because if they did not, it would not be banned everywhere or a crime to have it. The vanishing brass is obviously it, it proves Christchurch was BULLSHIT.
    I was extremely careful before posting this, as you can see by reading down the page. I suspected a hoax but it was such a sensitive issue I did not want to go there. However, now it is clear it was a hoax and if the video re-surfaces where you can see the casings on the sidewalk, THAT will be a hoax, because in the original videos they missed that!
    Ok, so now with Christchurch we have: A hoax video set up by intelligence agencies (predominantly Britain) with a Jewish actor who’s mug is everywhere but has his face blanked out in court (GEE, WHY?) because he’s in Israel now as some have speculated and they don’t want people to realize the court case is a sham where the guy who “did it” is not even there.
    Add to this that they are banning the video everywhere because there is not enough (if any) blood, plus there is a pre-scene crisis act video where someone who is “shot” is texting while looking comfortable and another guy is eating a snicker bar (as if THAT would happen right after a shooting) and then vanishing brass? Stupid. They F***ED this up but want all the gun ban and hatred towards whites mileage they can possibly get out of it so BAN THE VIDEO.
    OK, there. I said it. And this time around I was so shocked by it all that I kept my mouth shut early on, rather than dig this and say it like it is. I also had major doubts about one of the web sites that was a source of some of the info, but so much came in from elsewhere on other topics that I am going to have to go along with “A Jewish actor was the main shooter” because when the shooter’s face is blanked out in court there HAS TO be a reason – he’s not there at all and only Israel would cover it all up for him and have a place waiting. He’ll lay low with “five swimming pools and a lake” for a few months, and then vanish into Argentina with a totally new identity.
    So there. I [Jim Stone writing here] said it.

    I say in closing out this topic for me for awhile, I hope I did not violate policy of site or offend by the reproduction of post above. I apologize if I did and I shall undoubtedly correct my ways.

    1. Lol. Short answer: yes.

      Longer answer: strictly speaking, every site seems to be a gatekeeper of sorts. You find a site and its owners speaking sense right up until you reach the particular gate or gates that they are “keeping” or guarding. When you start pushing against the gate then out come the attack dogs.

      Note that this doesn’t mean that every website is part of a vast conspiracy of official gatekeeping to protect the global Jewish Oligarchs. No; we all have thresholds and lines that we’ll not see broached; particular beliefs that we will hold to even in the face of logic. So it makes sense that site owners would stop particular posters from pushing against their own redlines.

      Saying that, a lot of sites are officially gatekeeping.

  11. The chief and predictable outcome of the Christchurch event is a further extensive purge of real or alleged “white nationalist” and “alt.right” comment on the internet and in print. This does not mean (just) the suppression of crackpot Jew-hate, but criticism of multiculturalism, mass-immigration, replacement arguments, and “equality, diversity, inclusion” ideology in general.

    Incidentally, the cited “admiration” for Oswald Mosley ignores his lifelong opposition to violence and terrorism, but fits the vilification of his memory and policies by his opponents.

  12. ALL FOR GUN CONTROL!!

    “Countries with firearms bans have the highest murder rates!!”

    Jim Fetzer – JamesFetzer.org:

    “Several developments of late may be worth mention here. On Thursday, John B. Wells interviewed me about New Zealand, the Boston bombing and Sandy Hook for “Caravan to Midnight”, broadcast nationwide on Friday, 22 March 2019, with over 100 slides and videos, including the suppressed footage of the staged New Zealand mosque attacks. Saturday, I was interviewed for 2.5 hours by Michael Decon, “End of Days”, a wide-ranging conversation covering New Zealand, Sandy Hook, 9/11 and JFK, where I emphasized that new research has shown that the Pozner HONR Network appears to be a Deep State, cyber-terrorist organization dedicated to taking down research on conspiracies, so far successfully more than 10,000 times.”

    “Ironically, for all that has gone before, this might be the crucial development in the Sandy Hook “Pozner v. Fetzer” lawsuit, where I (as a Defendant) have now filed a Counterclaim against the Plaintiff, which turns him into the Defendant of a suit being brought against him by me. I have welcomed this lawsuit as an opportunity to present abundant and compelling proof that the alleged child shooting massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES) on 14 December 2012 was a FEMA drill at an abandoned school, which was presented as a real event to promote gun control. This Counterclaim may provide the most promising opportunity of all to accomplish that objective, which will have made the whole enterprise worthwhile.”

    https://jamesfetzer.org/2019/03/sandy-hook-pozner-v-fetzer-lawsuit-defendants-counterclaim-against-leonard-pozner/

    This is VERY ENTERTAINING…..

    “End Of Days-156” – James Fetzer exposed fakery & TIES with New Zealand, Sandy Hook and other fakery…. All to grab guns from the people:

    Saturday Mar 23, 2019
    https://youtu.be/l1nDD-0USAo?t=123

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *