Prince Andrew Witch Hunt Heats Up As Epstein Scandal Erupts Again

Victoria Bekiempis
The Guardian
19 November 2019


Ghislaine Maxwell is at the center of the Epstein controversy, but she’s in hiding. The  British socialite friend of Prince Andrew is accused of recruiting girls for the disgraced financier’s sex trafficking ring.

Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of crooked Jewish financier Robert Maxwell,
is accused of recruiting girls  for Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring.

Prince Andrew’s recent interview about his relationship with the alleged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein has sparked many questions but one stands out: what happened to Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite friend of the prince who is accused of procuring victims for the disgraced financier?

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, the Queen of England’s younger son, admitted ties to Maxwell and Epstein during the bombshell BBC Newsnight interview – while adamantly denying wrongdoing and expressing regret for continued association with Epstein.

Prince Andrew said he met Epstein through Maxwell, the daughter of late media baron Robert Maxwell. Ms Maxwell has vehemently denied allegations of wrongdoing but her current whereabouts are unknown, with media reports placing sightings of her in various cities in the US and Europe.

Epstein killed himself in a Manhattan jail in August, following his arrest on federal sex trafficking charges.

At the center of this controversy is Epstein’s accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who claims Maxwell recruited her to work as his masseuse when she was 15 years old. Giuffre has alleged that a sexual encounter took place with Andrew around 2001, when she was 17.

Giuffre claims Epstein flew her to London on his private jet. After dining with the prince and dancing with him at the Tramp nightclub, she claims, they had a sexual encounter in Maxwell’s Belgravia house.

Prince Andrew stands with Virginia Giuffre while Ghislaine Maxwell smiles in the background. Prince Andrew claims the photo is a fake and that he has no recollection of meeting Virginia.  

Posing with his hand around the teen Giuffre was purportedly taken at Maxwell’s home – she is seen smiling in the background. Andrew said in the Newsnight interview he last had contact with Maxwell earlier this year, before Epstein’s arrest.

Multiple women in addition to Giuffre have alleged Maxwell enabled Epstein’s sex trafficking ring, either recruiting them directly or planning visits to his homes.

Yet Maxwell’s fate remains an almost complete mystery. She has not been charged. And while she presently faces civil litigation, the likelihood of a court appearance is unknown. Her last public appearance seems to have been at a Los Angeles fast-food restaurant in August, though doubts have been raised about the veracity of that sighting.

Multiple attorneys listed for Maxwell did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Federal authorities have said the investigation into Epstein’s sex trafficking is ongoing. But, officially, their comment is general and does not relate specifically to Maxwell or anyone else.

Legal opinions about whether Andrew could face legal trouble in the US are split and Maxwell’s potential role in any legal move against the prince is unclear – though she would probably be vital to such a ploy.

Mitchell Garabedian, the Boston lawyer who exposed Catholic clergy sex abuse, said in an email attorneys would want to locate Maxwell in the US, as courts here would have legal power to get her to testify.

“Certainly, given Ms Maxwell’s central role in the Epstein matter, what Ms Maxwell has to say as a witness about Prince Andrew’s involvement will greatly affect the opinions of countless others whether connected to law enforcement or otherwise,” Garabedian wrote.

Asked whether this meant Andrew was exposed to US legal liability, Garabedian said, “It depends on the facts.”

Paul Shechtman, a veteran criminal law attorney who teaches criminal procedure at Columbia University Law School, said that while pursuing a case against Maxwell probably appeals to the federal prosecutors who arrested Epstein, targeting Andrew might not.

“Everything points to the fact that she is a serious subject of the southern district [of New York]’s investigation and at the same time, and for a variety of reasons, I don’t think he is,” Shechtman said.

Authorities would have to prove Andrew knew someone was underage, Shechtman said, and “as a general matter, having sexual relations with someone who’s underage is a state crime and not a federal crime.

“I think his exposure for a federal prosecution is quite small indeed,” he said, adding. “I think he can continue to be a prince.”

Rebecca Roiphe, a professor of law at New York Law School and former assistant district attorney in Manhattan, said Andrew’s links to Maxwell meant he was caught up in the scandal, regardless of his links to Epstein. But that did not necessarily mean he would face charges.

“The mere fact that Prince Andrew was friends with Maxwell and she was allegedly involved in Epstein’s conduct does not itself prove Prince Andrew’s involvement,” she said in an email. “But it certainly raises questions that will affect publicity and in this particular case publicity is, on its own, quite powerful.”

Certainly Andrew’s Newsnight interview was a blow in the global courtroom of public opinion. But amid the fallout from such a catastrophic PR blunder, another uncomfortable fact emerged. With Epstein dead and Maxwell missing, Andrew has become the most public face of an ongoing investigation.

“Of course, if it’s proved that Andrew was involved with Maxwell and Epstein in the alleged criminal acts then he could face criminal liability,” Roiphe continued.

“Prosecutors are eager to hold someone responsible for Epstein’s alleged crimes. Maxwell is an obvious choice now that Epstein is dead but she is unavailable, which may mean that Prince Andrew is high on their list.”

Meanwhile, Epstein’s estate is facing numerous lawsuits from women who say he sexually abused them, many while they were underage. On Monday, a new lawsuit was filed by a woman identified as Jane Doe 15, who alleged that Epstein assaulted her at his New Mexico ranch when she was 15.

“Jane Doe was only 15 years old when Jeffrey Epstein preyed upon her, trafficked her and sexually abused her,” said the accuser’s lawyer, Gloria Allred, at a news conference. “She wants to speak her truth and encourage other underage victims of Jeffrey Epstein who have not yet asserted their legal rights.”

LD: Many big questions swirling round here. Firstly, is Prince Andrew guilty of all the sex charges laid against him?—that he had sex with numerous underage girls thanks to Epstein finding them for him—or is he as spotlessly innocent as he claims? Is a witch hunt being conducted against the prince, and, indirectly, at the Royal Family? Could some interested parties be plotting to bring the British monarchy to an end? 

Secondly, did Epstein really commit suicide as claimed or was he strangled to death in his cell? Or is he alive and well in Israel? His death seems extremely suspicious as well as extremely convenient. 

Thirdly, how come the  Jewish procuress Ghislaine Maxwell has gone missing?—the one person who knows all the grisly secrets of the Epstein scandal and has an address book full of juicy names?  Has she done a bunk to Israel? If not, where is she? and why is she in hiding? and is her life in danger?

Many other fascinating questions . . .  we may never know the answers . . .  interesting times.  [LD]   

VIDEO   :   10.50 mins

40 thoughts to “Prince Andrew Witch Hunt Heats Up As Epstein Scandal Erupts Again”

  1. The nonsensical impeachment push in DC is being used to dominate the news to grab thoughts and minds away from Epstein’s former HIGH-PROFILE customers globally. That includes Andrew….. and government officials everywhere.

    France has kept the pressure on it, though….

    French probe of Jeffrey Epstein case heating up!

    Paris Police Search French Modeling Agency Tied to Jeffrey Epstein!!

    Epstein victims say French investigation into sex network has stalled, claims being ‘swept under the rug’!!

    1. Prince Andrew latest: Lady Colin Campbell dropped from Christmas lights event after ‘defending’ Epstein

      Royal biographer Lady Colin Campbell has been sacked from turning on the Christmas lights in Prince Charles’ home town – after ‘appearing to partially defend’ convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

      Lady C had been set to appear at the switching-on in Tetbury, Glos., on Dec 6, which is near Prince Charles’ Highgrove House estate.

      But the 70-year-old’s appearance has now been pulled by furious organisers after she said ‘soliciting sex was not the same as paedophilia’.

    2. Epstein accuser says she once took Bill Clinton’s seat on private jet, saw bedroom floor made of mattress foam

      A woman who came forward with accusations of child sex abuse against Jeffrey Epstein on Monday described a disturbing encounter with the now-deceased sex offender. She said she took former President Bill Clinton’s seat on the “Lolita Express,” described bizarre bedroom floors made of mattress foam and said she was encouraged to cry after sex with the disgraced money man.

      The accuser, who goes by the name Jane Doe 15, has enlisted high-powered attorney Gloria Allred, who held a news conference Monday in Los Angeles.

      The accuser was 15 when Epstein preyed upon her and she was seeking compensatory and punitive damages as a result, Allred said.

      “Her lawsuit alleges battery, assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress,” Allred said.

      Jane Doe 15 said Epstein began grooming her when she was in New York for a school trip and eventually found herself on the “Lolita Express,” his private jet.

      “When I chose a seat on the jet, Jeffrey told me that is where his good friend Bill Clinton always chose to sit,” Jane Doe 15 said.

      “I was invited to his home. There, his assistant took a photo of me and later reached out, inviting me to Epstein’s ranch. I only knew Jeffrey Epstein for five days. During a trip to the Zorro Ranch, his massive compound surrounded by government land in the New Mexico desert, Epstein took my sexual innocence in front of a wall of framed photographs of him shaking hands with and smiling with celebrities and political leaders,” Jane Doe 15 said. “I was only 15 years old. After, he wanted to talk to me about what had just been my first sexual experience and directed me to take time to myself that night to cry.”

      Jane Doe 15 said Epstein offered her money for college almost immediately after the sexual encounter.

  2. I think It was all a Mossad operation. How did Epstein get so rich? why would he and Maxwell risk exposure so blatantly?

    1. Mossad are interested in information and, if necessary, blackmail. Maxwell’s father was a Mossad agent and although guilty of defrauding his British employees pension fund was honored posthumously in Israel and given a prestigious burial plot on the Mount of Olives. She has now ruined her life by getting involved in this dirty work, for what? not for money, but for Israel.

      1. @John Kirky -,”She has now ruined her life….”
        Are you OUT OF YOUR MIND? Ghizzy Mazwell will be feted, honored & lavished by “The Powers That REALLY Be” – ’til the day she croaks and is carried in a casket up that Mount to join her ol’ man – for her “Devotion To Zion” & MISSION ACCOMPLISHED (of garnering Blackmail Material on EVERY Goy Politician/VIP Of Note in the West).
        THAT also explains why she has NOT been apprehended and NEVER will be apprehended.
        Hope that helps the “penny drop”. You’re Welcome.

      2. Yes, I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. Ghislaine Maxwell was working, like her father, for Mossad. Not for money, as you say, but to further Jewish aims. When her father became too much of a problem, Mosssad bumped him off to stop him talking. They’ll do the same to Maxwell’s daughter if she becomes a threat in any way to Israel’s interests. If she’s caught or forced to give evidence in court, she could “sing”, i.e., reveal info that Mossad would not like to see revealed.

        Mossad and Ghislaine are in the blackmail business. They have names. Many important people have been compromised by close association with Epstein. If Ghislaine “talks”, there could be problems. If Ghislaine has gone missing, you can be darn sure that Mossad is either protecting her or has abducted her.

      3. Saki
        Then again, it can be said with confidence that all of life as we’ve KNOWN it amounts to being one long conspiracy ……with nothing theoretical ABOUT it! 😎

      4. John, ISISrael did the very same thing to the 9 recruited young Egyptian Jews who staged terrorist attacks in Egypt back in 1954. Even though there were no deaths from the bombs placed in the Egyptian, US and UK facilities, israHell did honor the Egyptian spies 50 Years After Fiasco”. The motive of the attacks was to instill fear in the hearts of the Egyptian Jews, so they would move to ISISrael.

        ISISrael is the mother of all of the depiction. As the old saying goes, ” bad habits are hard to break.”

    2. while they keep us busy figuring out if he was killed or commented suicide.
      he most likely is alive on a beach near Tel Aviv recovering from plastic surgery.

  3. How come the British Brainwashing Corporation – long-time employer/enabler of the late mega-pedophile Jimmy Saville – gets to act all righteous & squeaky-clean and “go after” Prince Andrew?

    Well maybe it’s because the Boys & Buggery Corporation is not so “British” after all… but ‘answers to’. and ‘runs the narrative for’ a “Higher Power” than mere “Royals” or Dumb Brits…. a power with tentacles in “High PLaces” and a HQ in Tel Aviv… and maybe the “Royals” are now being squeezed for “Services NOT Rendered” – like getting on board with ‘World War For Israel’ – but soon will be… OR ELSE!

  4. Let Us not forget : whiddlejoew was one of the first in the Noosphere, if not THE FIRST ONE in the Noosphere, to say that Epstein is really alive and is in Israel. Let Us not forget to give credit where credit is due.

    Sometimes whiddlejoew thinks Epstein is not in Israel but is somewhere in South America. The point is : whiddlejoew was one of the first in the Noosphere, if not THE FIRST ONE in the Noosphere, to say that Epstein did not commit suicide, was not murdered, is still alive. Let Us not begrudge whiddlejoew the credit he so richly deserves for being keen, sharp, and smart. WE *wink* *wink* always give credit where credit is due. Right, uncle?

  5. Why all the fuss??? Just because a few little “me too” skanks were porked by a dirty old man who enticed them with $$ and glamour, should the world stop and spend hours speculating over it? I, for one, don’t give a damn. Far more important is the circus going on in the U.S. Capitol right now.

    1. @ Gilbert Huntly

      Why all the fuss??? Just because a few little “me too” skanks were porked by a dirty old man who enticed them with $$ and glamour, should the world stop and spend hours speculating over it? I, for one, don’t give a damn. Far more important is the circus going on in the U.S. Capitol right now.

      I beg to differ, and many on this site agree with me. You are most misguided in your stated view that there are far more important things going on “in the U.S. Capitol right now.” The opposite is the case, and you have been taken for one of the many suckers.

      What is going on with Trump and impeachment proceedings against him is seen by insiders as pure theater — intended to distract attention from the really toxic issue that American Jews and Mossad would like to deflect your attention from: the Epstein case and its shocking ramifications involving pedophilia in high places.

      I feel sorry for you that you have mistaken the distraction — the theater of Trump and his woes — as the important issue. It is not the important issue. It is the distraction. The really important issue here is the toxic issue they are trying to sweep under the carpet: the ticking time bomb of the Epstein scandal.



      1. Well said, Saki. What you say is pretty obvious to the intelligent. Only the unintelligent, who can’t see the wood for the trees, would disagree with you.

      2. No, Sard. We who are not minuscule enough to allow an obsession with the carnal and sordid lives of those who have celebrity status in the world of mediocrity simply do not lower ourselves to mingle with self-important peons who thus indulge. The skanks and Jews of this world are not relegated to importance.

        1. Spoken like a true American patriot, Gilbert.
          Keep up the good work on this site. Always nice to hear from you! 🙂

  6. Anybody really buying it that a person can hang himself from his bunk, or better yet, from a doorknob, as in robin williams’ case?
    So now they’ve arrested the two guards on duty at the prison, right outside epstien’s cell…
    that will keep their mouths sewed shut for a while…
    we’ll see if they get some form of the jack ruby treatment…
    epstien’s hidden away somewhere, he’ll be on vacation for the rest of his life…

    1. Bark –
      “Anybody really buying it that a person can hang himself from his bunk, or better yet, from a doorknob, as in robin williams’ case?”

      Or even better…. from a towel rack as Amschel Rothschild did(not) in a hotel bathroom in 1996??

      “Less than two hours later she returned to room 402 to make his bed. When she knocked and received no answer she let herself in to find his fully- clothed body in the bathroom, his dressing gown belt fastened around his neck and tied to the towel rail.”

      The ‘very-wealthy’ musta studied Houdini’s tricks!! 🙂

  7. SAKI
    I think GHs statement was probably more about not dignifying the proposition to begin with…
    Young Harlots aside,, oedo is rampant wherever the perps can get away with it, which is going to be behind whatever firewalls, like state and police offices…
    It’s going to be as bad as as it can get too, including more than just sex crimes….
    Not saying i know Cathy Obriens book is all true, buit it might be…

  8. Pat :

    Do you think Trump was recently poisoned? [ Jim Stone says Trump was poisoned with polonium ]. Also : do you think Trump has a doppelganger? As usual, I can’t wait to hear what you have to say! It’s always a learning experience to hear what you have to say! 🙂

    1. I saw Stone’s comment a couple days ago. Supposedly poisoned Friday. Trump has made appearances since Friday. I do not believe he has a dopple.

      BUT, ya navah knowz deze daze! 🙂

  9. From day one, Epstein’s death smelled fishy all the way to the highest heavens, especially after many famous names started popping up who were implicated in having sex with minors and he was set to stand trial next year.

    Epstein’s death brings to mind how Jack Ruby was able to kill Lee Harvey Oswald while in the custody of the Dallas Police Department. Both Oswald and Epstein were shot before they could stand trial.

  10. According to the British Telegraph, Epstein’s British confident Ghislain Maxwell said she and Epstein were videotaping everyone who visited Epstein’s private island in the Caribbean. The same claim was confirmed by NYT reporter James B. Stewart who said that Epstein made it clear to him during dinner, that he “knew an astonishing number of rich, famous and powerful people, and had photos to prove it. He also claimed to know a great deal about these people, some of it potentially damaging or embarrassing.”

    Personally, I smell Mossad! It is a repeat of Monica Lewinsky.

  11. After 9/11, the US government told Americans, “If you see something, say something.” We were also allowed and encouraged to connect the dots. However, you don’t have to connect the dots in Epstein’s death.

    This is the price you pay for committing mischief on earth. I hope he’ll rot in hell.

  12. PAT
    The fact that they PTB hand the public these ridiculous theories as the official story show how little they have to fear from them…
    The Deep State Power Structure is much more significant, much more technologically advanced than the proles can even imagine, and getting more God-Like all the time…
    The more benign philosophical aspects of our religions will only have served to docilify the masses…
    The sapping of masculinity under the religop-corporate state feminization process works with that…
    When the Information Hourglass Politi-Conomy has been fully implemented the peons will then be completely separated into a permanent underclass of totally surveilled and regulated trans-humanist thought-control hive-mind slaves, where the REX 84 Firewall-State will have been patterned off the omnipotent and omniscient ET Avatar-Jehova Pharoah of the Old Testament…
    Not only will the proles not have a thing to say about it – eventually they won’t even know about it…
    If the USA as a freely evolving Constitutional Republic does not survive…
    Don’t throw in the towel…

    1. The US Constitution is a goddamn piece of paper, said GHWB. The patriot act has already watered away the freedoms enshrined in the Constitution.
      The fact is young females are easIly bamboozled with fame, glory, money, and more often than not, drugs and liquor. Epstein played them to his advantage to get what he wanted.
      What should be more concerning is how did he go from a Physics teacher to a billionaire Financier? He was no investment Banker? Just as several traders are intrigued at how Tesla stocks went from $ 17 @ IPO to $ 350 these days? The company is hardly ever profitable.
      How long will it take to expose the scam that is the stock Market?

      1. Ed –

        It is evident to me that the most useful role the “stock market” plays for ALL of us is that it curbs inflation. The over-supply of m3 (money/currency/digits) is daily trimmed down by “evaporation” of funds. E.g., a ten-dollar share fell to a five-dollar share overnight. Where went the lost five dollars???
        Years ago, when I was in high school, I bought 100 shares of Penn Central Railroad common stock just so I could frame the famous certificate, and hang it on my wall. Now, that certificate is a conversation piece of memorabilia – and is more valuable as such than its subsequent market value. A once great railroad is no more – but the world still turns. 😉

    2. Bark –

      “USA as a freely evolving Constitutional Republic”

      Spooner: “No Treason in The Constitution of No Authority”… in 19th century.

      All supposed ‘constitutions’ are instruments of fraud and deception. This applies as much to the pretended “Articles of Confederation” as it applies to the falsely-called “U.S. Constitution.”

      The Rothschilds, and that class of money-lenders of whom they are the representatives and agents – men who never think of lending a shilling to their next-door neighbors, for purposes of honest industry, unless upon the most ample security, and at the highest rate of interest – stand ready, at all times, to lend money in unlimited amounts to those robbers and murderers, who call themselves governments, to be expended in shooting down those who do not submit quietly to being robbed and enslaved.

      No Treason The Constitution of No Authority
      By Lysander Spooner

      The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living eighty years ago. And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that only a small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the subject, or asked, or permitted to express either their consent or dissent in any formal manner. Those persons, if any, who did give their consent formally, are all dead now. Most of them have been dead forty, fifty, sixty, or seventy years. And the constitution, so far as it was their contract, died with them. They had no natural power or right to make it obligatory upon their children. It is not only plainly impossible, in the nature of things, that they could bind their posterity, but they did not even attempt to bind them. That is to say, the instrument does not purport to be an agreement between any body but “the people” then existing; nor does it, either expressly or impliedly, assert any right, power, or disposition, on their part, to bind anybody but themselves. Let us see. Its language is:
      We, the people of the United States (that is, the people then existing in the United States), in order to form a more perfect union, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

      It is plain, in the first place, that this language, as an agreement, purports to be only what it at most really was, viz., a contract between the people then existing; and, of necessity, binding, as a contract, only upon those then existing. In the second place, the language neither expresses nor implies that they had any right or power, to bind their “posterity” to live under it. It does not say that their “posterity” will, shall, or must live under it. It only says, in effect, that their hopes and motives in adopting it were that it might prove useful to their posterity, as well as to themselves, by promoting their union, safety, tranquillity, liberty, etc.

      **Suppose an agreement were entered into, in this form:
      We, the people of Boston, agree to maintain a fort on Governor’s Island, to protect ourselves and our posterity against invasion.

      This agreement, as an agreement, would clearly bind nobody but the people then existing. Secondly, it would assert no right, power, or disposition, on their part, to compel their “posterity” to maintain such a fort. It would only indicate that the supposed welfare of their posterity was one of the motives that induced the original parties to enter into the agreement.

      When a man says he is building a house for himself and his posterity, he does not mean to be understood as saying that he has any thought of binding them, nor is it to be inferred that he is so foolish as to imagine that he has any right or power to bind them, to live in it. So far as they are concerned, he only means to be understood as saying that his hopes and motives, in building it, are that they, or at least some of them, may find it for their happiness to live in it.

      So when a man says he is planting a tree for himself and his posterity, he does not mean to be understood as saying that he has any thought of compelling them, nor is it to be inferred that he is such a simpleton as to imagine that he has any right or power to compel them, to eat the fruit. So far as they are concerned, he only means to say that his hopes and motives, in planting the tree, are that its fruit may be agreeable to them.

      So it was with those who originally adopted the Constitution. Whatever may have been their personal intentions, the legal meaning of their language, so far as their “posterity” was concerned, simply was, that their hopes and motives, in entering into the agreement, were that it might prove useful and acceptable to their posterity; that it might promote their union, safety, tranquillity, and welfare; and that it might tend “to secure to them the blessings of liberty.” The language does not assert nor at all imply, any right, power, or disposition, on the part of the original parties to the agreement, to compel their “posterity” to live under it. If they had intended to bind their posterity to live under it, they should have said that their objective was, not “to secure to them the blessings of liberty,” but to make slaves of them; for if their “posterity” are bound to live under it, they are nothing less than the slaves of their foolish, tyrannical, and dead grandfathers.

      It cannot be said that the Constitution formed “the people of the United States,” for all time, into a corporation. It does not speak of “the people” as a corporation, but as individuals. A corporation does not describe itself as “we,” nor as “people,” nor as “ourselves.” Nor does a corporation, in legal language, have any “posterity.” It supposes itself to have, and speaks of itself as having, perpetual existence, as a single individuality.

      Moreover, no body of men, existing at any one time, have the power to create a perpetual corporation. A corporation can become practically perpetual only by the voluntary accession of new members, as the old ones die off. But for this voluntary accession of new members, the corporation necessarily dies with the death of those who originally composed it.

      Legally speaking, therefore, there is, in the Constitution, nothing that professes or attempts to bind the “posterity” of those who established it.

      If, then, those who established the Constitution, had no power to bind, and did not attempt to bind, their posterity, the question arises, whether their posterity have bound themselves. If they have done so, they can have done so in only one or both of these two ways, viz., by voting, and paying taxes.

      1. Or by reciting the oath “to uphold and defend”, as have most of us Americans.
        Nothing makes me more suspicious and wary than when some lawyer or politician says The Constitution is an “evolutionary” document. Human nature requires a government, and that government must be chained by an absolute – or it is nothing more than a whimsical tyranny. The addendum of The Bill of Rights makes The U.S. Constitution palatable – and worthy of fidelity.

      2. Pat,

        Very well said, and I learned a lot. Thanks.

        All supposed ‘constitutions’ are instruments of fraud and deception. This applies as much to the pretended “Articles of Confederation” as it applies to the falsely-called “U.S. Constitution.”

  13. OK maybe so, I’m sure there are forces detrimental to Constitutional Freedom at work against the Republic, not just the usual monarchical suspects either…
    Intel Communities and all those warmongers, many police too, consider themselves immune from the Rule of Law all over the place, and I’m sure some among them would preach the Constitution is dead, never existed, is a fraud anyway… Just a piece of paper..
    But there’s no fraud in the fact that US citizens have the right to keep and bear arms…
    And that’s a Constitutional Right that a lot of people in other countries do not have…
    People believe they have those rights, and if the state were to try to confiscate all the arms in the USA – there would be a violent and bloody revolution.. so of course they do it a little at a time…
    In many states it’s Open Carry, and Stand Your Ground..
    In many others, Second Amendment States, firearms possession is basically Unrestricted… As it should be…
    And as well the First Amendment still applies, and others…
    Yes i get it, it’s a big deal how they’ve screwed with the courts, that part of it, where the rubber meets the road…
    There are all kinds of ways to chip away and change other processes to diminish the effect of the Constitutional Guarantees, like they have done with the general empowerment of the Deep Secret State, militarization of police and electronic voting, then these major assaults on health and well being with vaccines and 5G BS…
    I don’t like it either..
    You’re right – the Epstein thing is a big distraction, like the impeachment…
    If you are telling me there is not even any contest left, there is no Constitutional Government in the USA, then I need to know what you suggest…

    1. Bark –
      You wrote:
      “But there’s no fraud in the fact that US citizens have the right to keep and bear arms…
      And that’s a Constitutional Right that a lot of people in other countries do not have…”

      That is NOT the case.

      The US Constitution confers no rights anywhere at all within it!
      It is a paper of the establishments & limitations of the government – period! The Bill of rights is a list which enumerates – to government – “Keep your cotton-pickin’ HANDS OFF!!” That’s all.

      Rights belong to those who win the conflicts and are alive. The rest are slaves or dead.

      Rights are few in a corrupt society, no matter who makes the list.

      My suggestion is to do what you believe you are strong enough to do. Don’t hang you dreams on papers.

  14. Just saying bro – all these people have guns lawfully..
    The constitution says they do…
    Nobody is saying they don’t, not yet…
    Nobody is saying officially the constitution doesn’t exist..
    The right to keep and bear is a fact of life in the usa…
    It is enumerated in the constitution, safe from the creator, the universe whatever…
    If some subversives say otherwise, that’s not the reality…
    Things may have changed on the books somewhere, but if that happened, it was never followed up on officially.
    Judges, presidents, soldiers and sailors all take the oath to PPD the constitution – not to PPD what’s left of it, if anything…
    If it doesn’t exist – what’s happening then?


    “USA as a freely evolving Constitutional Republic”
    The USA is more like a freely evolving Illuminati (AshkeNAZI Jooz + Seconded Lords) control experiment and military arm; a military arm that was/is used to muscle the world into submission for the global mafia system (governments) of the jooz. This military arm was also engineered to be the first independent ‘Illumnaiti’ country; independent for it was not like the rest of Europe with its long history of monarchs and tribal roots.

    This new ‘illumanati-joo controlled’ country was to also muscle ‘old’ Europe to accept…be part of the program or you will lose and be left behind. Of course the benefit to the real people is only trickled down as crumbs at the table, while the substantial payoffs are to the seconded Lords who assist in selling hopes to the commoners, that they have a true say in the whole game. It is the same old feudal system, only garbed very nicely.

    They are the magicians in the court of the Pharaoh. The magicians’ job is to sell a false perception thereby creating a false reality..a false reality for the individual and for the collective. The new ‘freely’ evolving false reality of the collective is truly frightening. These ‘new people’ as I call them, have truly been reduced to farm animals, and in that sense they have become almost literally ‘goyeem’.

    From its very founding, if you follow the money you will see names like Solomon, who funded Jefferson, among others. As much as I think Thomas Jefferson had a brilliant mind, in many ways he was used. In his defense he was passionate for the cause of ‘freedom’, but again it is the same old Hegelian dialectic being played out.

    One can clearly see the role of the free-masons of France (we know Franklin’s connection) and their critical support for the new revolution, with not just rhetoric but military support. One can credit the king of France for this but any critical thinker will see the hidden hand of the freemasons/illuminati. The King was already feeling the mood of the populace and he too would have to face the same a little later as the new Illuminati owned country (USA) would fully support the French revolution. Jefferson himself was very passionate about this.

    The whole reality of the right to bear arms etc., superficially sold as some freedom for the people against intrusive government is somewhat laughable. The reality is that this false perception creates a culture that generates pent up emotions and enormous energy that is sublimated into the religion of patriotism, expressing itself in reality, as instigating intrusive wars on behalf of the jooz and selected Lords….all for a world government, Pharaoh-like state….and it comes with its mandatory hymns (anthems) and ritualistic solemn prayer (standing, saluting…), and most importantly BLIND love, allegiance and obedience; the more you show it the better citizen you are.

    See Danios list of wars since the creation of the Illuminati State:

    The pyramid on the dollar bill is there not because it looks ‘nice’, it is telling the world something openly. The ‘all-seeing’ eye of Raa is also there for a reason.

    This is obviously not something altogether new, the Qur’an says, “And of the people are some who say, ‘We believe in God and the last day but they really don’t believe’…..When it is said to them, “Do not spread corruption and mischief on the Earth.” They say, “We are only peacemakers (liberators).” Q2:10-13.

    I sure heard that a lot in my life, over and over again, “They hate democracy….we are bringing liberty….”, all the while the reality was the exact opposite. They do not know God, they do not love God, they do not love human beings, really, I don’t think they love anything created by God. They’ve been slowly killing the planet; they are working towards a dead world and that time is just around the corner. The result of this is the removal of a lot of people from the Earth; of course it will be understood by the ‘new people’ as some natural cause, since their perception is solely based on the information supplied. Gates himself let it slip when he was talking about population growth and the role of vaccines and the ‘health care system’.

    And this is exactly an integral part of the Pharaohnic system. They create an ‘elite’ class of intellectuals who become managers of the system for the Lords – the Lords are waiting for their ultimate Lord to come, their messiah. The elite class is secular and each has its own experts (another pyramid inside), they are then handled directly and through funding, from the Carnegie Foundation as an example.

    Their Messiah will be the end time Pharaoh and so the God of Pharaoh is definitely not the God of Musa (Moses/Musha), he is the opposite.

    Of note, the story told the most in the Qur’an is the story of Moses and the Pharaoh because it is the prototype of one whose appetite for ‘Lordship’ grew, not as an agency of God but for absolute Lordship. The Prophet was commissioned to advise him (Pharaoh) that he should return to God that he may be purified and serve God, thereby serving the people.

    Like today, Pharaoh was fortified, he had the wealthy (Qaroon/Korah) – the Corporations and Princes; he had Hamaan (Amaan) – the military might; and he had the magicians – the elite class, this includes their false religions: evangelical protestantism, the largest most ardent supporters of Israel and everything Jewish, perhaps the purest worshipers of Jews; the hidden religion of the Kabbalah masking as Judaism, never really showing itself but always present and wahabism fronting as Islam. Since the birth of the Rothchild state they have spent billions to break Muslim unity on a theological and political level and they have served as the right hand of their fathers in helping to shatter the Middle East into abject poverty and servitude.

    For anyone wanting to hear the actual Qur’an, of part of the story of Musa (A.S) and the Pharaoh, it is a reaction video but it truly is beautiful. The questions the Qur’an asks and the manner in which it does so truly shakes the soul, the closest analogy I can give is that of one who has no pulse and his heart is given a shock to make it beat again. These verses do exactly that, it gives the heart of the soul a shock and tries to resuscitate it to real life, not just for the believer but more importantly for the transgressor.

    With regard to distractions and the Epstein case etc. I would say that some of the biggest moves that are covered up and have been for years and years is the funding and empowering of China. China is now possessing many countries in Africa and all around Australia and the Western governments are all hush. Godless, jew-communist China has now refined it’s deception with enormous power and created a model surveillance Pharoah-like state and will soon openly challenge the White countries….and when all is said and done, expect to see Israel as the most powerful state in the world. They are making it the umbilical cord of the world; if you don’t submit you will simply be cut off. I think the time is coming soon when Iran will be forced to capitulate also.

    I bid you peace that can only come from the Kind and Merciful (Rahmaan).

Comments are closed.