LD: This is the complete text of Brenton Tarrant’s Manifesto, “The Great Replacement”, published here purely for reference purposes. It is extremely long, and most people won’t have time to read it. If you have time, read it; you will learn much from it. If you don’t have time, dip into it and read a few bits and pieces here and there in order to get into the mind of a man driven to desperation and at the end of his tether.
Here is a man, a self-identified terrorist, who is deeply concerned about the White genocide being perpetrated against his race by the Architects of Evil. I am referring of course to malicious and uncontrolled mass immigration and its baleful fruits: miscegenation, the mongrelization of Western man, savage race wars, culture wars, and the inevitable brutalization of the masses stemming from cultural Marxism and hedonistic materialism — the prevailing philosophy of our decadent elite.
An edited abridgement of this long cri de coeur is clearly needed. It hope it will soon be done. [LD]
Sourced from The New Observer
whose editor provides the introduction and running commentary
The mass shooting in a Christchurch, New Zealand, mosque by a self-identified white terrorist is the inevitable result of the orchestrated global campaign being waged to destroy white people through mass immigration and Islamic terrorism, a trend which is steadily increasing and which can only be stopped by the halting of the invasion of white nations, according to the shooter’s own manifesto.
The steady increase in the number of such mass-shooting terrorist incidents—starting with the Anders Brevik attack in Norway in 2011, the Dylan Roof shooting of 2015, and the Robert Bowers shooting of 2018—is the surest indicator that as the invasion and destruction of white nations continue, increasing numbers of whites will resort to physical violent resistance.
It is now clear that the only way to prevent a further escalation is for the establishment to halt and reverse the Third world invasion—but, given their nature and openly declared aims, this is unlikely.
In the latest shooting—details of which are still emerging—a white Australian by the name of Brenton Tarrant released a detailed 74-page manifesto before his attack, which is still being circulated on the internet.
In that manifesto, titled “The Great Replacement: Towards a New Society,” Tarrant mapped out the exact reasons for his attack—and anyone, no matter what their political persuasion, should have an understanding of his rationale, even if only to understand the root cause of the situation which forces people to such extreme acts.
The manifesto starts off by laying emphasis on the fact that the nonwhites currently flooding into white nations have a higher birthrate than do whites.
“If there is one thing I want you to remember from these writings, its that the birthrates must change. Even if we were to deport all Non-Europeans from our lands tomorrow, the European people would still be spiraling into decay and eventual death,” Tarrant wrote.
“Every day we become fewer in number, we grow older, we grow weaker. In the end we must return to replacement fertility levels, or it will kill us.”
He points out that to maintain a population, “the people must achieve a birthrate that reaches replacement fertility levels. In the Western world this is roughly 2.06 births per woman,” but there is “not a single Western country, not a single white nation, that reaches these levels. White people are failing to reproduce, failing to create families, failing to have children. But despite this sub-replacement fertility rate, the population in the West is increasing, and rapidly. How is this possible? Mass immigration and the higher fertility rates of the immigrants themselves are causing this increase in population.”
Tarrant goes on to say that white nations are “experiencing an invasion on a level never seen before in history. Millions of people pouring across our borders, legally. Invited by the state and corporate entities to replace the White people who have failed to reproduce, failed to create the cheap labour, new consumers and tax base that the corporations and states need to thrive.
“This crisis of mass immigration and sub-replacement fertility is an assault on the European people that, if not combated, will ultimately result in the complete racial and cultural replacement of the European people.”
Tarrant states that “This is WHITE GENOCIDE” and to “return to replacement fertility levels is priority number one. But it is no simple task. There are myriad reasons behind the decline in fertility rates and the destruction of the traditional family unit.
“We must inevitably correct the disaster of hedonistic, nihilistic individualism. But it will take some time, time we do not have due to the crisis of mass immigration.
“Due to mass immigration we lack the time scale required to enact the civilizational paradigm shift we need to undertake to return to health and prosperity.
“Mass immigration will disenfranchise us, subvert our nations, destroy our communities, destroy our ethnic binds, destroy our cultures, destroy our peoples. Long before low fertility levels ever could.
“Thus, before we deal with the fertility rates, we must deal with both the invaders within our lands and the invaders that seek to enter our lands. We must crush immigration and deport those invaders already living on our soil. It is not just a matter of our prosperity, but the very survival of our people.”
Tarrant then goes on to do a “question and answer” session, clearly aimed at journalists aiming to find out his motives, he then says that he is just an “ordinary White man, 28 years old. Born in Australia to a working class, low income family. My parents are of Scottish, Irish and English stock.”
He says that he worked for a short time before making some money investing in Bitconnect, and “then used the money from the investment to travel.”
It was during these travels, he says, that he realized that he had to resort to violence to “take a stand to ensure a future for my people.”
In answer to the question “Why did you carry out the attack?,” Tarrant says that he wanted to “most of all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people.”
In addition, he continued, he wanted to “take revenge on the invaders for the hundreds of thousands of deaths caused by foreign invaders in European lands throughout history. To take revenge for the enslavement of millions of Europeans taken from their lands by the Islamic slavers. To take revenge for the thousands of European lives lost to terror attacks throughout European lands. To take revenge for Ebba Akerlund.”
Ebba Akerlund was a 12-year-old Swedish girl, murdered by an Uzbeki Muslim who carried out a truck-ramming attack in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2017. Rakhmat Akilov killed another four white people in that attack.
Tarrant went to declare his intention to terrify the nonwhites, saying that his attack was designed to “directly reduce immigration rates to European lands by intimidating and physically removing the invaders themselves.”
Tarrant also wrote that his aim was to “agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result.”
He also wrote that he wanted to “incite violence, retaliation and further divide between the European people and the invaders currently occupying European soil,” and to “show the effect of direct action, lighting a path forward for those that wish to follow. A path for those that wish to free their ancestors lands from the invaders grasp and to be a beacon for those that wish to create a lasting culture, to tell them they are not alone.”
His revolutionary aims are also clearly mapped out in his manifesto: “To create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic, powerful and revolutionary action can occur. To add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing Western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of Western thought.”
Tarrant’s manifesto is also particularly focused on the fact that the Turks should be driven out of Constantinople (modern Istanbul) and that city should be returned to Christian rule once more, referring to the fact that that city was taken by the Ottoman Turks in 1453.
Finally, Tarrant says, he carried out the attack to “create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states. This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.
“This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the ‘melting pot’ pipe dream.”
In answer to the question of whether there was any “particular event or reason you decided to commit to a violent attack?” Tarrant wrote that there was a “period of time 2 years prior to the attack to the attack that dramatically changed my views. The period of time was from, beginning of April,2017 until the end May,2017.
“In this time period a series of events broke down my own reserves, my reservations, my cynicism and revealed the truth of the Wests current situation.
“These events turned my thoughts from pursuing a democratic, political solution and finally caused the revelation of the truth, that a violent, revolutionary solution is the only possible solution to our current crisis.
“I was travelling as a tourist in Western Europe at the time, France, Spain Portugal and others. The first event that begun the change was the terror attack in Stockholm, on the 7th of April 2017. It was another terror attack in the seemingly never ending attacks that had been occurring on a regular basis throughout my adult life. But for some reason this was different. The jaded cynicism with which I had greeted previous attacks didn’t eventuate. Something that had been a part of my life for as long as I could remember, cynicism in the face of attacks on the West by Islamic invaders, was suddenly no longer there.
“I could no longer bring the sneer to my face, I could no longer turn my back on the violence. Something, this time, was different.
“That difference was Ebba Akerlund. Young, innocent and dead Ebba. Ebba was walking to meet her mother after school, when she was murdered by an Islamic attacker, driving a stolen vehicle through the shopping promenade on which she was walking. Ebba was partially deaf, unable to hear the attacker coming.
“Ebba’s death at the hands of the invaders, the indignity of her violent demise and my inability to stop it broke through my own jaded cynicism like a sledgehammer.
“I could no longer ignore the attacks. They were attacks on my people, attacks on my culture, attacks on my faith and attacks on my soul. They would not be ignored.
“The second event was the 2017 French General election. The candidates were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker with no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast, feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure whose most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants.
“Despite this ridiculous match up, the possibility of a victory by the quasi-nationalist was at least, to myself, a sign that maybe a political solution was still possible. The internationalist, globalist, anti-white, ex-banker won. It wasn’t even close. The truth of the political situation in Europe was suddenly impossible to accept. My despair set in. My belief in a democratic solution vanished.”
The “final push,” Tarrant continued, was “witnessing the state of French cities and towns. For many years I had been hearing and reading of the invasion of France by non-whites, many of these rumours and stories I believed to be exaggerations, created to push a political narrative.
“But once I arrived in France, I found the stories to not only be true, but profoundly understated.
“In every French city, in every French town the invaders were there.
No matter where I travelled, no matter how small or rural the community I visited, the invaders were there.
“The French people were often in a minority themselves, and the French that were in the streets were often alone, childless or of advanced age. Whilst the immigrants were young, energized and with large families and many children.
“I remember pulling into a shopping centre car park to buy groceries in some moderate sized town in Eastern France, of roughly 15-25 thousand people. As I sat there in the parking lot, in my rental car, I watched a stream of the invaders walk through the shopping centre’s front doors.
“For every french man or woman there was double the number of invaders.
“I had seen enough, and in anger, drove out of the town, refusing to stay any longer in the cursed place and headed on to the next town.
“Driving toward the next French town on my itinerary, knowing that inevitably the invaders would also been there, I found my emotions swinging between fuming rage and suffocating despair at the indignity of
the invasion of France, the pessimism of the French people, the loss of culture and identity and the farce of the political solutions offered.”
He then described how he came acorss a World War I cemetery, with thousands of little white crosses marking the burial places of men killed in that conflict.
“In front of those endless crosses, in front of those dead soldiers lost in forgotten wars, my despair turned to shame, my shame to guilt, my guilt to anger and my anger to rage. WHY WON’T SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING?
WHY DON’T I DO SOMETHING? The spell broke, why don’t I do something? Why not me? If not me, then who? Why them when I could do it myself? It was there I decided to do something, it was there I decided to take action, to commit to force. To commit to violence. To take the fight to the invaders myself.”
Tarrant continued by saying that he represents “millions of European and other ethno-nationalist peoples that wish to live in peace amongst their own people, living in their own lands, practicing their own traditions and deciding the future of their own kind.”
He adds that he is “not a direct member of any organization or group, though I have donated to many nationalist groups and have interacted with many more,” and that no “group ordered my attack, I make the decision myself. Though I did contact the reborn Knights Templar for a blessing in support of the attack, which was given.”
In response to the question why he targeted the mosque, Tarrant wrote they “were an obvious, visible and large group of invaders, from a culture with higher fertility rates, higher social trust and strong, robust traditions that seek to occupy my peoples lands and ethnically replace my own people.”
He had been planning the attack for “roughly two years in advance and an attack at the location in Christchurch three months in advance,” and chose to use firearms “for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of United states and thereby the political situation of the world.”
Tarrant wrote that the “US is torn into many factions by its second amendment, along state, social, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.
“With enough pressure the left wing within the United states will seek to abolish the second amendment, and the right wing within the US will see this as an attack on their very freedom and liberty.
“This attempted abolishment of rights by the left will result in a dramatic polarization of the people in the United States and eventually a fracturing of the US along cultural and racial lines.”
In response to the question why he chose New Zealand “as a place to attack,” Tarrant wrote that he had not originally planned to carry out an attack here, but “I soon found out that New Zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the West. Secondly an attack in New Zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that nowhere in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was nowhere left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration.”
Asked what drove him to decide to attack that mosque, Tarrant wrote that he had originally considered attacking the mosque in Dunedin, “particularly after watching the video on their Facebook page . . . The video was entitled “Very interesting video. Only for Muslims. Please do not redistribute” that proved their knowledge of their actions, and their guilt.”
Tarrant then provided a link to the Facebook video, which has however since been removed. The video in question has in fact been circulating for quite a while, and deals with Muslim birth rates and how Islam will, if immigration is left unchecked, dominate the world.
However, Tarrant wrote, “after visiting the mosques in Christchurch and Linwood and seeing the desecration of the church that had been converted to a mosque in Ashburton, my plans changed. The Christchurch and Linwood mosques had far more invaders, in a more prominent and optically foreign building, with less students, more adults and a prior history of extremism.
“Attacking these mosques also allowed for an extra planned attack on the mosque in Ashburton, whilst I am unsure as of this time of writing whether I will reach that target, it was a bonus objective.”
In answer to whether he considered his actions a “terrorist attack,” Tarrant said that “By the definition, then yes. It is a terrorist attack. But I believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force.”
Asked if he felt “any remorse for the attack,” Tarrant wrote “No, I only wish I could have killed more invaders, and more traitors as well.”
In answer to the question if he “personally hate[s] Muslims?” Tarrant wrote “A Muslim man or woman living in their homelands? No. A Muslim man or woman choosing to invade our lands live on our soil and replace our people? Yes, I dislike them.
“The only Muslim I truly hate is the convert, those from our own people that turn their backs on their heritage, turn their backs on their cultures, turn their back on their traditions and became blood traitors to their own race. These I hate.”
In answer to the question if he “personally hate[s] foreigners/other cultures,” Tarrant wrote “No, I spent many years travelling through many, many nations. Everywhere I travelled, barring a few small exceptions, I was treated wonderfully, often as a guest and even as a friend. The varied cultures of the world greeted me with warmth and compassion, and I very much enjoyed nearly every moment I spent with them.
“I wish the different peoples of their world all the best regardless of their ethnicity, race, culture of faith and that they live in peace and prosperity, amongst their own people, practicing their own traditions, in their own nations.
“But, if those same people seek to come to my peoples lands, replace my people, subjugate my people, make war upon on my people, then I shall be forced to fight them, and hold nothing in reserve.”
In answer to the question if he believed “those you attacked were innocent?” Tarrant wrote that there “are no innocents in an invasion, all those who colonize other peoples lands share guilt.”
In answer to the question if he intended to “survive the attack,” he wrote “Yes, but death was a definite possibility. These situations are chaotic and virtually impossible to control, no matter the planning.
“Survival was a better alternative to death in order to further spread my ideals by media coverage and to deplete resources from the state by my own imprisonment.”
Asked if the attack was “‘racist’ in origin,” Tarrant wrote that “fertility rates are innately tied to race, so yes. There was a racial component to the attack.” In addition, he wrote in answer to a question if the attack was “ ‘xenophobic’ in origin,” Tarrant added that “fertility rates are cultural, there is no denying that, so there was a war of cultures being fought by the invaders, and my attack was a response to this. Though I hold no great fear or distrust of other peoples.”
In answer to the question if the attack was “ ‘islamophobic’ in origin,” Tarrant wrote that “Islamic nations in particular have high birth rates, regardless of race or ethnicity, and in this there was an anti-islamic motivation to the attacks, as well as a want for revenge against Islam for the 1300 years of war and devastation that it has brought upon the people of the West and other peoples of the world.”
Furthermore, he wrote, the attack was “beyond all doubt, anti-immigration, anti-ethnic replacement and anti-cultural replacement.”
He denied that the attack was “anti-diversity in origin” because, he wrote, the attack was “in the name of diversity. To ensure diverse peoples remain diverse, separate, unique, undiluted in unrestrained in cultural or ethnic expression and autonomy. To ensure that the peoples of the world remain true to their traditions and faiths and do not become watered down and corrupted by the influence of outsiders. The attack was to ensure a preservation of beauty, art and tradition. In my mind a rainbow is only beautiful to due its variety of colours, mix the colours together and you destroy them all and they are gone forever and the end result is far from anything beautiful.”
In answer to the question if intended to go on trial should he survive the attack, Tarrant wrote “Yes, and to plead not guilty. The attack was a partisan action against a[n] occupying force, and I am a lawful, uniformed combatant.”
Asked if he was a “racist,” Tarrant wrote that “Yes, by definition, as I believe racial differences exist between peoples and they have a great impact on the way we shape our societies. I also believe fertility rates are part of those racial differences and that the immigrants in our lands with high fertility must be forced out to ensure the existence of our race. So yes. I am a racist.”
Asked I he was/is a “Nazi,” Tarrant wrote “No, actual Nazis do not exist. They haven’t been a political or social force anywhere in the world for more than 60 years.”
In answer to the question of if he is “an anti-Semite,” Tarrant wrote “
No. A Jew living in Israel is no enemy of mine, so long as they do not seek to subvert or harm my people.”
He denied being a “neo-Nazi,” writing that “that is a very broad category of people, and the definition is fuzzy at best. So no, I don’t believe so.”
He also denied being a conservative, dismissing “conservatism is corporatism in disguise, I want no part of it,” and in answer to the question of whether he was a Christian, he wrote “That is complicated. When I know, I will tell you.”
Tarrant readily admitted to being a “fascist,” saying that “the person that will be called a fascist, is an actual fascist. I am sure the journalists will love that. I mostly agree with Sir Oswald Mosley’s views and consider myself an Eco-fascist by nature.”
Tarrant said that the “nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China,” and that the political figure or party in history which whom he “most associates” with was Sir Oswald Mosley.
Asked if he was a “homophobe,” Tarrant wrote “No, I simply do not care all that much what gay people do. As long as they are loyal to their people and place their peoples well-being first, then I have no issues.”
He also claimed to be “right wing” and “left wing,” “depending on the definition.”
Asked if he is a “socialist,” Tarrant wrote that this also depended “on the definition. Worker ownership of the means of production? It depends on who those workers are, their intents, who currently owns the means of production, their intents and who currently owns the state, and its intents.”
Asked if he is a “supporter of Donald Trump,” Tarrant wrote “As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.”
Asked if he was “intolerant,” Tarrant wrote “Sure. The last virtues of a dying nation are tolerance and apathy, and I want none of it.”
He added that he developed his beliefs from research on the internet, and then goes on to mock those who would ascribe his actions to social media or movies, saying that he was influenced by conservative pro-Trump US black activist Candace Owens, and that the game “Spyro the dragon 3 taught me ethno-nationalism” and “Fortnite trained me to be a killer and to floss on the corpses of my enemies. No.”
Asked if he considered himself a leader, Tarrant wrote “No, just a partisan,” and that he had no ties to “any other partisans/freedom fighters/ethno soldiers”—only that he had “brief contact with Knight Justiciar Breivik, receiving a blessing for my mission after contacting his brother knights.”
This last claim is likely to be disinformation designed to trick leftist journalists into thinking there is some truth to the claim of an “international Knights Templar organization” as originally claimed by Brevik.
Asked if he was convicted, would “he expect to stay in prison,” Tarrant wrote “Yes, until I am either killed, released or enough time passes and the greater situation is an obvious defeat of our people. Then I will commit suicide, happy in the knowledge I did my best to prevent the death of my race.”
Asked if he really believed he would be released from prison, Tarrant wrote that he did “not just expect to be released, but I also expect an eventual Nobel Peace prize. As was awarded to the Terrorist Nelson Mandela once his own people achieved victory and took power. I expect to be freed in 27 years from my incarceration, the same number of years as Mandela, for the same crime.”
Asked for his “views,” Tarrant said he is an “Ethno-nationalist Eco-fascist. Ethnic autonomy for all peoples with a focus on the preservation of nature, and the natural order.”
Asked what he “encourage[s]” others to do, Tarrant wrote that they need to “Make your plans, get training, form alliances, get equipped and then act. The time for meekness has long since passed, the time for a political solution has long since passed. Men of the West must be men once more.”
In answer to the question that his attack would “do more harm than good,” Tarrant wrote that “there isn’t a successful, influential grand movement established just yet, and no leading organizations, so there is no great structure created that could be brought to harm. As for how the public perceives us? Did they perceive us any differently after the attack than they did before?”
In answer to the statement that “Democracy is the only solution, why are you committing to force?” Tarrant wrote that “Democracy is mob rule and the mob itself is ruled by our enemies. The global and corporate run press controls them, the education system (long since fallen to the long march through the institutions carried out by the Marxists) controls them, the state (long since heavily lost to its corporate backers) controls them and the anti-white media machine controls them. Do not suffer under the delusion of an effortless, riskless democratic victory. Prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss, struggle, death. Force is the only path to power and the only path to true victory.”
Asked why he was “using force,” Tarrant wrote that “There is no nation in the world that wasn’t founded by, or maintained by, the use of force. Force is power. History is the history of power. Violence is power and violence is the reality of history. Wake up.”
Asked “what makes you think that you have all the answers,” He wrote that “I don’t, but I may have some. Take from my views that which works, discard that which does not. Victory is all that matters.”
Asked why “attack immigrants when ‘x’’ are the issue?” Tarrant wrote that “because the ‘x’ groups can be dealt with in time, but the high fertility immigrants will destroy us now, soon it is a matter of survival we destroy them first.”
Asked why then attack Muslims in particular if “all high fertility immigrants are the issue,” Tarrant wrote that the reason was “Historical, societal and statistical. . . They are the most despised group of invaders in the West, attacking them receives the greatest level of support. They are also one of the strongest groups, with high fertility, high in group preference and a will to conquer.”
Asked why “focus on immigration and birth rates when climate change is such a huge issue,” Tarrant said that they “are the same issue, the environment is being destroyed by over population, we Europeans are one of the groups that are not over populating the world. The invaders are the ones over populating the world. Kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment.£
Asked if his attack will “just result in the vilification of ethnonationalists/racial autonomists,” Tarrant wrote “No, people will forget my motivations quickly and only remember the attack itself. Don’t believe me, can anymore tell you the motivation of the Madrid train bomber attackers?”
The rest of Tarrant’s manifesto consists of “Addresses to various groups” such as conservatives (“Ask yourself, truly, what has modern conservatism managed to conserve? What does it seek to conserve? The natural environment? Western Culture? Ethnic autonomy? Religion? The nation? The race? Nothing is conserved. The natural environment is industrialized, pulverized and commoditized.”); Christians (“Ask yourself, what would Pope Urban II do?” [Urban II was the Pope who launched the Crusades, the Christian counter-attack to the Muslim invasion of the Middle East]; Antifa/Marxists/Communists (“I do not want to convert you, I do not want to come to an understanding. I want you in my sights. I want your neck under my boot.); and Turks (“You can live in peace in your own lands, and may no harm come to you. We are coming for Constantinople and we will destroy every mosque and minaret in the city. The Hagia Sophia will be free of minarets and Constantinople will be rightfully Christian owned once more”).
Section II of Tarant’s manifesto says that the “people who are to blame most are ourselves, European men. Strong men do not get ethnically replaced, strong men do not allow their culture to degrade, strong men do not allow their people to die. Weak men have created this situation and strong men are needed to fix it.”
He then lists a large number of nonwhite outrages against whites, focusing on the mass rapes and abuse carried out by Muslim grooming gangs in Britain, Australia, Germany and elsewhere.
Tarrant uses a large number of Wikipedia entries to list these attacks by name—and it will be interesting (and obvious) to note that Wikipedia will not be “blamed” for his actions, unlike so-called “right wing” websites which are always blamed after incidents such as this.
Tarrant also attacks the concept of diversity, writing that the “diverse nations across the world are scenes of endless social, political, religious and ethnic conflict.
“The United States is one of the most diverse nations on Earth, and they are about an inch away from tearing each other to pieces. Brazil with all its racial diversity is completely fractured as a nation, where people cannot get along and separate and self-segregate whenever possible. South Africa with all its “diversity” is turning into a bloody backwater as its diversity increases, black on other black, black on white, white on black, black on Indian, doesn’t not matter, its ethnicity vs ethnicity. They all turn on each other in the end.
“Why is it that what gives Western nations strength(diversity)is not what gives Eastern nations(China, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea)their strength? How are they so strong, China set to be the world’s most dominant nation in this century, whilst lacking diversity? Why is [it] that their non-diverse nations do so much better than our own, and on so many different metrics?
“Diversity is not a strength. Unity, purpose, trust, traditions, nationalism and racial nationalism is what provides strength. Everything else is just a catchphrase.”
Significantly, Tarrant goes on to predict that the “radicalization of young Western men is not just unavoidable, but inevitable.
“It should come as no shock that European men, in every nation, and on every continent are turning to radical notions and methods to combat the social and moral decay of their nations and the continued ethnic replacement of their people.
“Radical, explosive action is the only desired, and required, response to an attempted genocide. These men and women are not being brainwashed, corrupted or misled. They are finally removing their blindfolds and seeing the reality of the the world and their peoples future.
“The truth that the West killed the notion of god, and proceeded to replace it with nothing. Brought forth two competing ideologies(communism and fascism)to replace this loss of god, then proceeded to allow both sides to slaughter each other to a standstill and then let corporate backed capitalists tear the survivor to pieces.
“Resulting in a society with no core beliefs, no purpose and no vision for the future. A society of rampant nihilism, consumerism and individualism, where every individual is a competitor and the rights of the individual override all notions of responsibility.
“In this hell the individual is all and the race is worthless, something to rail against and use whenever possible, a power structure to climb, or topple.
“The truth that they are rapidly becoming, not just a global minority, but a minority within their own lands. The Truth that they are left, alone, an individual in a society worshiping the cult of the individual, to respond against an influx of outsiders from all corners of the world.
“Enemies bound by faith, culture or tradition with higher levels of fertility, trust and in group preference resulting in much stronger communities.
“The truth that they are expected not to combat these myriad, unending and dedicated interlopers, but to embrace them, accept their own disenfranchisement, accept the loss of their fathers lands, their own impoverishment, their own REPLACEMENT.
“But they will not accept this death. This eradication of their people, their culture, their very soul. They see the decay all around them, plummeting, free-falling birth rates all across the Western world.
“Millions of invaders landing on our shores, conquering our towns and without a single shot fired in response. Broken families with soaring divorce rates, that’s if they even bother to get married at all. Suicide rates climbing year by year, not just for adults, by even teens and children as well and the only time people seem to even notice is when one of their own idols commits the act (singers, sports stars, actors).
“Drug use at all levels of society, in all age groups, any source of distraction or relief to escape a culture of nihilism. Rampant urbanization and industrialization, ever expanding cities and shrinking forests, a complete removal of man from nature, with the obvious results.
“Pedophile politicians, pedophile priests and pedophile pop stars, demonstrating to all the true depravity of our age.
“Art and beauty subverted beyond all recognition, bauhaus travesties replacing nouveau wonders, soulless metropolitan architecture of glass and steel reflecting no society, no culture, no people and therefore belonging everywhere, and nowhere.
“Suicidal, nihilistic and degenerate pop icons produced from a dead culture: Michael Jackson(pedophile, self-hating, self-mutilating, opiod addict); Madonna(anti-christian, pro miscegenation) Kurt Cobain(suicidal, drug addict, self-hater, anti-social), Freddy Mercury(lifelong identity crisis, lifelong battle with hedonism and drug use, eventual death due to sexual hedonism) just to name a few.
“Empty nurseries, full casinos, empty churches and full mosques, entropy in blitzspeed. Politicians writ in the same ink as Eligabolus, worshiping all that is foreign, poisonous and subversive.
“So these young men and women see this suicidal nihilism and isolate themselves from this mainstream, ‘multicultural’, egalitarian, individualistic insanity and look for allies anywhere they can find them, in the flesh or online.
“They congregate, discuss, despair, strategize, debate and plan. They decry weakness, mock fecklessness and worship strength, and in this worship of strength they radicalize and find the solution.
“Somehow this isolation then radicalization is seen as a surprise, yet for anyone who was paying attention, it was a long time coming.
“Once the corporate and state medias grip on the zeitgeist of modernity was finally broken by the internet, true freedom of thought and discussion flourished and the Overton window was not just shifted, but shattered. All possibility of expression and belief was open to be taught, discussed and spoken.
“This open and often anonymous discussion allowed for information, outside of the states and the corporation control, to be accessed often for the first time.
“The result is obvious. People are finding their way home. Finding their people, finding their traditions, seeing through the lies of history, the brainwashing of the institutions and they angry, they are energized and yes, against their degenerate societies, they are radicalized.
“Radicalization is the rational response to degeneration,” Tarrant concluded in this section, confirming the likelihood that this sort of terrorist attack is only likely to increase as the system becomes ever more anti-white.
The rest of Tarrant’s manifesto includes a list of specific targets, a call to take up arms and “expect a soldier’s fight and a soldier’s death.”
He writes that the “unarmed invader is more dangerous that the armed,” that it is “far better to encourage radical, violent change regardless of its origins. As only in times of radical change and social discomfort can great and terrific change occur. These tumultuous times can be brought about through action.”
Referring specifically to the US, Tarrant writes that America “is in turmoil, more so that at any other time in history. States hate other states, the electoral college is under attack at every turn and the races are at each other’s throats.
“On top of this is a two party political system, split by racial, social, cultural, linguistic and class divides. The end result is a nation in gridlock, unable to respond to any great change, unable to commit to any great projects. A political and social stalemate that makes any advancement impossible.
“Meanwhile the 10000 ton boulder of demographic change rolls ever forward, gaining momentum and possibly destroying all in its path.
“Eventually, when the white population of the USA realizes the truth of the situation, war will erupt.
“Soon the replacement of the whites within Texas will hit its apogee and with the non-white political and social control of Texas; and with this control, the electoral college will be heavily stacked in favor of a democratic victory so that every electoral cycle will be a certainty.
“After an election cycle or two with certain Democratic victory, those remaining, non-democratic voting, non-brainwashed whites will see the future clear before them, and with this knowledge realize the impossibility of a diplomatic or political victory.
“Within a short time regular and widespread political, social and racial violence will commence. In this tempest of conflict is where will be strike, a strong, unified, ethnically and culturally focused pro-white, pro-European group will be everything the average white family need and long for. With these boosted numbers, and with our unified forces, complete control of the United states will be possible. Above all be ready for violence, and when the times comes, strike hard and fast.”
Tarrant goes on to urge tax resistance, writing that “until our nations are run by men and women loyal to our cause taxation should be considered theft, and refusal to pay taxes a sign of racial loyalty.
“Giving your own earned wealth, which you received through your own labour, to a person or group that despises you, places laws into effect that disenfranchises your people and seeks to ethnically replace you is utterly foolish. Do not pay to have your people destroyed, do not line the pockets of the traitors within our ranks, don’t lend support to a corrupt and broken state.”
His conclusion is that there “is only one victory, but many defeats. To lose our lands, our culture and our people is a defeat. To continue on without our culture, but still own our lands, is a defeat. To survive with our culture, but to lose our lands, to lose our future, is a defeat.
“The war will not be easy, the death toll will assuredly be high. The going will be tough and many of us will die.
“I cannot guarantee it will be comfortable, I cannot guarantee it will be easy and I cannot guarantee that every act will be a success.
“All I can guarantee is that inaction is sure defeat, power structures will be tested and likely will fall and most of all there is only the future ahead and attempting to march back to any earlier time will get you nowhere at all.
“You may stumble. You may fall. But the only way to get to the final destination, total victory, is to get up and keep marching forward. No matter what. March.
“Mistakes will be made, losses will be had, some failures are certain and some endeavours will go bad.
“But in the end the struggle is a beauty in itself, and the victory will be all the sweeter because of it. Final victory is yours, if you have the will for it.
“As for me, my time has come. I cannot guarantee my success. All I know is the certainty of my will and the necessity of my cause. Live or die, know I did it all for you; my friends, my family, my people, my culture, my RACE.
“Goodbye, god bless you all and I will see you in Valhalla.