The Official Story Doesn’t Mean a Thing

. . . when it’s written by the slaveowners

By JOHN KAMINSKI

To believe the official story about Sandy Hook is to believe the official story of 9/11. It takes the same kind of willing blindness to refuse to competently analyze relevant facts that are usually suppressed or at least denigrated by a hidden perpetrator.

To believe in 9/11 is to believe 6 million Jews perished in concentration camp gas chambers during World War II. The Holocaust idea didn’t really percolate until the late 1960s when Elie Wiesel wrote his fabricated Holocaust novel and was later given the Nobel Prize.

Observe these three iconic etchings on the public’s consciousness, erecting a smokescreen for Jewish criminality with three fantasies presented as historical fact.

This is the “official story” extant in the world, gnawing at the structures of society as the world turns into the slave colony the Jews have always wanted it to be.

To believe in the fable of the 6 million (which was first trumpeted in the late 1800s, right after Jews murdered Czar Alexander II) is to believe Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the president hero who guided us to victory in World War II. Actually, FDR blocked European leaders from making peace with Hitler and blocked Japan from getting oil from abroad, forcing three great nations of people who all wanted peace into the most destructive war ever waged.

It seems almost too fantastic to note that Jews have destroyed the countries which have been most kindly to them. Germany stands as the primary example, stripped of its genuine independence in perpetuity by the Jew World Order currently nested in the United States. Russia certainly has felt the lash of the Jews, with Solzhentsyn’s tally of 66 million non-Jewish dead being their major contribution to that unfortunate country.

Poland and Germany took them in when they were chased out of Russia for killing the Czar, and nothing but blood has followed these once proud nations ever since.

What is happening in the United States lags behind the misfortunes that have been vomited upon European countries. The African invasions have been coordinated by Jewish NGOs as part of the kosher plan to destabilize all the nations of the world through debt and disruption.

They have made it a crime to say the Jewish religion is depraved, when examples of kosher depravity are the primary examples of decay in all countries.

For example:

“If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there”
— Moed Kattan 17a

Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews. When a Jew murders a Gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.
— Sanhedrin 57a

“Jews are Divine. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God”
— Sanhedrin 58b

And the foundation of the new Holocaust religion, the holy 6 million? Choose your own biggest whopper! (This article explains).

Today, America is dying of a venereal disease of the spirit called Jewish morality, spread throughout the population by a nonstop onslaught of perverse propaganda from Jewish owned media aimed at destroying all families and making everyone depend on the all-powerful arms of the state.

This is called Communism, which according to the famous rabbi Moses Hess, is another term for Judaism. So if you have any interest in the people who are now running society, consider one of the things these so-called humans believe? They actually believe, in their own words, that all “Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human [and that] all Gentile children are animals.” (Yebamoth 98a)

SOURCE

98 thoughts to “The Official Story Doesn’t Mean a Thing”

  1. The Sandy Hook story in which nobody supposedly died there is disinformation. The 9-11 event was a screw-up in which evidence was left behind (thermite), and this resulted in a decision to attack the “conspiracy theorists” with an ad hominem accusation that would destroy their credibility; and (Jew) Sunstein recommended the Sandy Hook thing, in which “conspiracy theorists” would subscribe to the ridiculous belief that “breaking news” was being fabricated. Sunstein’s plot worked out wonderfully well, and the 9-11 Truth movement was badly damaged by the Sandy Hook psy-op.

    Kaminski is a hub in a big wheel in the Truth movenent. That the Sandy Hook disinfo stuff is being voiced by him is not good. But there we are. I think Kaminski is genuine, but he is voicing disinfo. So there we are. We need to improve.

    1. The fact is no one died at Sandy Hook , the school was closed in 2008 and the whole deal was a staged anti gun hoax, there is a lot more to this scam, look up Wolfgang Halbig and expert on Sandy Hook.

      911 was done by Israel and the Zionist controlled U.S. deep state and the WTC twin towers and WTC building 3/ 4/ 5 and 6 were destroyed by DEWs ie direct energy weapons and WTC 7 was destroyed by conventional demolition.

      Check drjudywood.com and read Judy Woods book where did the towers go and see her videos on you tube, she is a scientist and has the theory on directed energy weapons being used on 911 at the WTC, and she is right!

      1. Stop pushing the Judy Woods psyop. You’re making yourself look foolish or something more sinister. Anyone with a brain knows that she is a spook — tells a bit of the truth then drags you into la-la land with her energy beams.

        I fire energy beams from my eyes and rectum. I really do. Now, do you believe me? If so then that explains why you believe Judy Woods. She is a misdirection agent so please, please leave her out of this!

      2. Hi Flopot,
        I don’t know who did 911, or how it was done, but I do know that steel is a ductile material that will bend and stretch but WILL NOT CRUMBLE at normal temperatures.

        WTC7 CRUMBLED. A high quality steel framed building CRUMBLED internally.

        There is no process that I know of that could have caused that.

      3. Will the “9/11 Grand Jury” or the “Dark Overlord Hacker Group” cover up this evidence? Of course they will because both are a ruse to divert public attention from real evidence.

        https://vgy.me/rdJ9xg.jpg

        Words from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, in the Gospel of Matthew, were found by a firefighter in March 2002, under the Tully Road, a temporary truck route that covered the last remnants of the south tower. The pages of the Bible in which they were printed had fused to a chunk of steel as the World Trade Center turned to dust in mid-air, to be found only months later.

        “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you not to resist an evildoer. On the contrary, whoever slaps you on the right cheek, turn the other to him as well. If anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, let him have your coat as well. And if anyone forces you to go one mile, go two with him. Give to the person who asks you for something, and do not turn away from the person who wants to borrow something from you.”

        The fabric of the human mind is flexible, but the strings of credulity can only stretch out so far, and then incredulity settles in. The image above depicts an artifact residing in the 9/11 Museum of an open Bible fused to a hunk of steel wreckage, with some of the steel overlapping the pages after it was softened by a type of directed energy. How could this happen and not have burned the paper yet the result can clearly be seen?

        The autoignition point of paper has a range of from 440 – 470°F, depending on the type of paper. Steel melts at 2500°F. How then, did this artifact of Bible pages become “fused” with steel, without the paper combusting into a blackened mass of ashes?

        Revisit that day, and remember all the images of showers of paper floating down through the air and scattering all over the sidewalks and streets, when the towers were destroyed. These papers were intact and surely not burned. What process was at work that could turn steel and concrete towers to dust, and yet not affect paper?

        A process used in directed energy technology can cause a dissociation and alteration of the molecular structure of metal, to fuse with combustible objects and appear as if the materials melted together, but with no discernable evidence of heat or combustion.

        So evidently, a technology exists which can accomplish those results, the results seen in the Bible papers fused to the steel. This is not a miracle, other than this technology being able to appear miraculous to most people. Arthur C. Clarke once opined: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Other forces were at work the day of 9/11, other than magic or the hand of the Divine.

        Very much related to this anomalous artifact in the 9/11 Museum, is another one found in the ruins of an almost forgotten and seldom mentioned building which was immediately destroyed on the morning of 9/11.

        St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox church, just across the street from the south side of the South Tower, or WTC-2. When retrieval of the relics in the church was undertaken in the following days, only a few pieces survived and one find was called a miracle. “The great miracle, was the recovery of an icon of St. Spyridon. The silver around the icon had melted, but the paper icon had not been burnt.”

        https://vgy.me/toY1uh.jpg

        This discovery was one of the church’s most holy relics, and it was declared a miracle because the silver onlay applied to a paper icon of St. Spyridon had “dustified”, leaving the paper intact and unscorched. The melting point of silver is 1,763°F.

        The best collection of evidence making the case for a directed energy technology at work and used as a weapon on 9/11, can be found at the website of Judy Wood, Ph.D – and in her landmark book: ”Where Did The Towers Go?”.

        A copy of the book is available at The Library of Congress.

        https://lccn.loc.gov/2010916516

        Or, you have the option of purchasing a copy from Amazon.

        This download is the Foreword and book review of “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” by Eric Larsen, Professor Emeritus at John Jay College of Criminal Justice 1971 – 2006 (35 years), plus the Author’s Preface.

        http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/Where%20Did%20The%20Towers%20Go%20-%20Dr%20Judy%20Wood.pdf

    2. “The 9-11 event was a screw-up in which evidence was left behind (thermite)…”

      In what sense was it a “screw up”? The perpeTRAITORS apparently got everything or almost everything they sought to gain from it, and here we are almost 20 years after the fact and the perps are still walking around free.

      BTW most large-scale jew scams against humanity seem to be “sloppy” and I think at least some of this is deliberate; I think they enjoy taunting reasonable people with deliberate sloppiness.

      From the outrageous narrative to the bizarre behavior and statements of the actors to the obviously staged “crime scene” to the obvious cover-up, the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting scam is overflowing with such in-your-face sloppiness.

      1. Hi Harold,
        Donaldo agrees with you. The events are sloppy and ” in your face “. The perpetrators must “get off” on leaving such mountains of evidence. Is Trump for real? Simple answer amigo. When Donaldo sees “Lucky Larry” Silverstein in handcuffs then faith will be restored. 🙂

    3. No one died at Sandy Hook, any HONEST person spending just a couple of hours researching the Sandy Hook Hoax will find all the information they need proving it as a staged event. Jim Fetzer wrote a whole book on it. It was a staged psyop for gun control and confiscation which is now happening.

      Calling Kaminski a disinformationist makes you the disinformationist. Once again you “blew it” dear. LOL The Sandy Hook shills are on the cusp of madness insisting this obvious hoax real. Sandy Hook Hoax was pure evil, a direct attack on our freedoms and liberties – anyone defending this hoax are extremely stupid, uniformed, or evil. Which are you Sandra?

      The iconic picture of crisis actor Gene Rosen standing in front of the “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN” electronic sign, just google it.

  2. i don’t get why someone who understands the 9-11 machination, sees it for what it was, doesn’t get the sandy hook hoax too… there’s every bit as much detail saying so… sandy hook was a total hoax from the front to the back… no ambulances, crisis actors here, there and everywhere.. the correct number of christmas trees placed in advance.. they made it a crime to inquire after any of the victims… almost all the cars on the scene either silver or black… published online the day before… a 100% kill rate, this by a wormy deranged teenager, not some hitman… the school demolished afterwards…
    is it because including children exclusively as victims makes the lie just too big to see through?
    what is it – hit the big compassion chord and the sniffer shuts down completely?

  3. @ Barkingdeer

    Michael Collins Piper saw the Sandy Hook story that no children died there as being disinformation that would badly damage the 9-11 Truth movement, and he spoke out about this. And soon thereafter he had a heart attack. And not long after that he died. And since then nobody with a following has been saying that Sandy Hook was disinfo aimed at the Truth movement. But I do. I am a Philosopher. I am a nobody but I am a Philosopher who cares about truth.

  4. Could it that you both are ‘right’ on this. My idea for what it’s worth (probably not a lot) is Sandy Hook was almost certainly a total hoax. I base this actually more on what happened since then as i was not up to speed on this kind of stuff at that time. I am thinking Parkland FL (clear hoax) the truck in NY ran down a bunch of Argentinian bicyclists in 2017 (absolute hoax), Las Vegas 2017 major hoax nobody died at all. So as much as I respect the likes of Michael Collins Piper HE was not up to speed on this kind of stuff. It happens! or I mean these ‘events’ don’t happen they are hoaxes. But maybe Kendra has a point also……………..what if they are actually hoaxes the controllers of course know they are and know some people will see through them and even though those people are truthful and see the truth they will be seen as ‘nut cases’ and therefore will unwittingly do the job of the controllers. I know it’s a bit complicated but I think something very like that is playing out. There has been hoax after hoax in Europe esp in France esp Nice 2016 a total incredibly bad hoax but to most people if they see anyone pointing this out it will only reduce the credibility of the people pointing it out further and convince people all these ‘truthers’ are nuts. Plus it serves to divide, people get into arguments pro and con as we see here. We have arguments about whether these evens are ‘real’ or not. They are not in my opinion but what difference does that make? I say this as I like both Kendra and Barkingdeer his comments I prize probably as much if not more than anyone here.

  5. Two or three months before Sandy Hook, a JEW couple from Israel living in Greenwich Village NYC were apprehended by the FBI. The JEW couple from Israel had tons of weapons and lots and lots of NAZI White Supremacist paraphenalia and Nazi White Supremacist fliers and handouts. The JEW couple would drive every day from Greenwich Village NYC to Newtown, Conn. , for weeks they drove back and forth every day. Fortunately, they were caught and apprehended. They were quietly sent back to Israel. [ If it had been me with all the weapons and all the NAZI White Supremacist fliers and handouts I would be in prison for the rest of my life, same for any NON jew ].

    I do believe the JEWS were planning a REAL mass shooting of school children in Newtown, Conn — to be blamed on White “Nazi White Supremacist” Americans. But not at Sandy Hook school as the Sandy Hook school was closed down years before 2012 because of asbestos ; A REAL mass shooting of school children at another school in or around Newtown. When the JEW couple from Israel were apprehended, the JEWS decided to go with a psyops “shooting”. I think the JEW couple from Israel who were apprehended were the ringleaders and when they got caught the JEWS had to change their plans and the JEWS decided to go with a fake shooting.

  6. Photos of the Sandy Hook school corridor, cluttered with shelving, indicate that the school was closed long before the incident. Are those photos genuine?

  7. In the beginning I thought Sandy Hook was a hoax because everyone else did. Then gradually I began to suspect Fetzer of being a government disinformation agent because of things he was putting out regarding 9-11. To be specific, my stance was that the Thermite Argument, which consisted of three artickes of evidence, to wit, (a) the super hot fire in the WTC rubble heap, (b) the tiny balls of iron found in WTC dust, and (c) chips of nanothermite found in WTC dust, was irrefutable. Yet Fetzer kept saying things that either drew attention away from the Thermite Argument or else raised doubts about it. At last I drew the conclusion that Fetzer was a government disinformation agent. And it was this belief about Fetzer that caused me to believe that Sandy Hook was disinformation. Later on I read _False Flags_ by Michael Collins Piper, and I saw that he thought the same thing about Sandy Hook that I did.

    I am very sure that Adam Lanza killed 20 children at Sandy Hook, along with 6 teachers. There is good evidence provided by Deanna Spingola in her book _Screening Sandy Hook_ that Lanza was being treated with drugs that cause violence in people and that he was in a bad state at the time of the shooting. On her website Spingola provides other evidence that there was a real shooting at Sandy Hook.

    But for me the real argument is Fetzer. If he is a government disinformation agent, as I believe, everything he touches will be disinfo. And the Fetzer story about Sandy Hook being a hoax really does discredit 9-11 Truth people, in my opinion.

    1. Jim Fetzer’s opposition to the empirically evident fact that thermite was involved in the destruction of the WTC towers seems to be an issue of personal bias more than anything else, IMO.

      I’ve had several lively debates with him on the issue when he was associated with the “Veterans Today” web site and I never saw any kind of convincing argument in support of his position.

      But I don’t think he’s a “government disinformation agent”; I think it was just a matter of bad blood between him and Steven Jones and some of the other members of “Scholars for 9/11 Truth.”

      1. @ Harold Smith

        At the time of the Dylan Storm Roof shooting of Blacks in an historic Black church Fetzer claimed that the shooting was a hoax that never happened.

        If I am not mistaken Fetzer claims that no airplanes flew into the WTC Twin Towers, but that the sighted airplanes were mere “holograms” or manufactured shows of light.

        Fetzer also claimed that nobody was killed at the Las Vegas shooting, if I’m not mistaken.

        There is simply too much false information being put out by this guy for it to be unintentional. And it really is having a bad effect on the 9-11 Truch movement, which I don’t think is accidental.

      2. I’m honestly not familiar with his position on the shooting at the church or the Las Vegas shooting, but for the sake of argument I’ll take your word for it.

        Of course I could be wrong, but my impression is that he has a tendency to shoot from the hip, often prematurely, and then refuse to back down later, even when the balance of the evidence goes against his theories, sort of like what I think I see Paul Craig Roberts and Justin Raimondo doing when it comes to Trump for example.

  8. With due respect to John Kaminski, but that quote of Benjamin Franklin about the danger of admitting Jews to the US is fake. See the Wikipedia article Franklin Prophesy here :
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Prophesy

    from which following excerpt :

    “The “Franklin Prophecy”, sometimes called “The Franklin Forgery”, is an antisemitic speech falsely attributed to Benjamin Franklin, warning of the supposed dangers of admitting Jews to the nascent United States. The speech was purportedly transcribed by Charles Cotesworth Pinckney during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, but was unknown before its appearance in 1934 in the pages of William Dudley Pelley’s Silver Legion pro-Nazi weekly magazine Liberation. No evidence exists for the document’s authenticity, and some of the author’s claims have actively been disproven.”

    It is with this “Franklin Prophesy” the same as with that other famous forgery the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”. The text is fake but the contents are so much full of psychological truths that its authenticity is firmly believed by many.

    1. John Kaminski didn’t use that quote on his website.
      It looks like LD added it when posting Kaminski’s article on this website.

      1. The picture was added by a member of staff, not by LD who is on leave of absence. So Kaminski is not responsible for the fake Ben Franklin quote. This has now been deleted. Many thanks to Franklin Ryckaert for alerting us to this fake quote.

    2. I find it to be a blueprinti i.e “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”… much the same as ‘1984’……can anyone truthfully say they are all a load of cobblers?

    3. Agreed about “Benjamin Franklin on the Jews”.
      One might as well believe “Chief Seattle”s speech on the “talking wires” and “iron horse”, unintentionally faked by a white man in Southern California in the 1980s.

      1. When I first read the “Chief Seattle Speech”, one of the first things that came to mind was, within 2 or 3 days of the first reading, was that whoever wrote it had a knowledge of the works of Shakespeare;
        and that second, anybody who can speak of the “rustling of insect wings and the unfurling of the leaves in spring” also knows the words for “President”, “locomotive”, and “telegraph”.
        Third, that it describes the destruction of the buffalo on the Great Plains in the 1880s, but was supposedly written in Western Washington in the 1840s. You find similar problems in most, if not all, fake documents.

  9. I can tell you this Kendra – if you’re ever in a firefight, where you shoot a bunch of the other guys, take the time to walk through and put another bullet in each one of thems’ head, because they will not all be dead… no way it happened like that…
    It’s true, they’re sloppy as hell…
    Fletcher Prouty (Donald Sutherland in stone’s jew version JFK movie) said the Cia has been known to set up completely fake air force bases, airplanes, hangers, trucks. Hundreds of guys walking around in air force uinforms – imposters all Cia creeps.
    They have been in complete control of their own deep state since 1963… they tell the prez only what they want him to know… a little deal like Sandy hook is no problem.. the whole neighborhood was full of crisis actors, living in their crisis actor hoax houses…
    Didn’t that whole Sandy hook thing happen like the day after Obama got “reelected”?
    Patrick – hoaxes on hoaxes for the purpose of hoaxing the hoax… we’re all well hoaxed by now.
    Most workers don’t understand it’s a constant state of class warfare, conducted on the surreptitious X-WAR level, perpetrated against them by the corporate/political hierarchy and big religion. All wars now are contrived and orchestrated for profit/control..
    But it’s really all about the information… as long as they have it and you don’t it means the plow horse only sees the furrow in front of him…
    the lies of omission might even be bigger than the hoaxes… war is the exegency excusing their mofo… thats what the spooks are for, to make sure we don’t have peace…
    Bill Casey said the Cia Ownes everybody of significance in the commercial media… there is no free press and no journalism outside of the web… first they just left stuff out, then they started making stuff up, then they created events…
    But, since AL gore gave humans the Internet, now the old obfuscation game no longer works, not on everybody…
    I’m not so sure the protocols are a forgery…
    I heard Henry ford put copies in all his made As…

  10. @ Wiggins

    You asked if there is such a substance as thermite.

    Actually thermite is not a single substance for it has a plurality of particular forms. The essential form is a sand-like mixture of an oxide of a metal and a pure metal of a different type than that of the oxide. The most common type of thermite is a mixture of iron oxide (rust) and pure aluminum. But there are a number of different pure metal / metal oxide combinations that are used as thermite. Now then, thermite is a substance that burns with great heat. What happens when it burns is that the oxygen atoms of the metal oxide molecules break loose and attact the nearby pure metal — with the end result that metal oxide becomes a pure metal and the pure metal becomes an oxide. Thus, in the case of common iron oxide / aluminum thermite you end up with aluminum oxide and pure molten iron. Finally, thermite does not need oxygen from the air to burn; it contains its own oxygen supply.

    Common iron oxide / aluminum thermite (which was used in the WTC towers) burns so hot that the hot iron it produces actually boils, so that iron is actually momentarily turned into a vapor. The fire is so hot that it vaporizes iron, that is.

    Nanothermite is just thermite that has been made using the new “nano” technology. Nanothermite is not a sand as is normal thermite, but it is a single uniform substance. Some of the properties of nanothermite are different from those of normal thermite. 1) It ignites at a lower temperature. 2) It is explosive. 3) It can be made into a paint.

    It is widely thought that nanothermite was painted onto the bottoms of the floors in the WTC towers, which was caused all the dust.

      1. The official story is always a lie because the nation is run by liars. The biggest lie of all is 911 and it was the greatest emotional shock engineered by the cabal that runs the world. A huge amount of (intentional) confusion has been sowed in the 911 truth movement. How did the trade towers came down is an endless argument, I’ve always maintained they did it by the simplest means – a standard controlled demolition.

        Here’s the kicker, the towers were wired with explosives at the time of construction. David Rockefeller built the towers so he could stage a terrorist event. It was an inside job before the towers were even built.

        I wrote an essay on Veterans Today back in 2014 “Skyscrapers Pre-Wired to Come Down” look it up, here is a
        quote: “They never told the tenants they were sitting on bombs. That is a huge scandal. How many other buildings in downtown NYC and other cities are currently wired for controlled demolition? “

      2. What’s the answer to the burnt out cars , melted tyre rims, tyres which seem to be intact – and the strange melted substance [steel rock WTF] at the bottom of BUILDING 6……Yes….6 ????

      3. Wiggins,
        Thermite was used by US Army Rangers to take out the German Guns (88’s, etc.) during D-Day-Point De-Huac (spelling ?).

        Scott,
        Bush did not have the security for the WTC Complex. It was Kroll Associates-a “jew” company.

    1. There were no planes used on 911 and there were holograms of planes used as a close look at the videos shows as stated by John Lear son of the designed of the Lear Jet and John Lear has videos on youtube that explain why no planes were used, John Lear is a pilot and explains why an airliner could not do what the perpetrators of 911 said.

      1. Exactly…you actually see the nose cone of one plane coming out the other side of the tower and wings disappearing passing another tower……it’s all there if people care to look.

  11. If the shrunken numbers on that plaque at Auschwitz didn’t do it for the willing victim populations of Europe and elsewhere, and since the right before our eyes collapse of Bldg. (“pull it”) 7 did little more than induce a gigundo collective psychosis in the boobousie, then the idea/chore of convincing or somehow compelling action from folks waaay too busy spinning their wheels on the treadmill of consumption to even notice, is just about the hardest job I can think of and I once had a job shoveling pliers with a pitchfork all day. Yeah, steel splinters.. (lol)

    It seems nothing short of a nuke attack or their car not starting will muster much more than an annoyed look from them because that’s what’s you and I are, talking like that.
    An annoyance in general and to them in particular.

    Psycho-techo mesmerism with a dash of pharmacopoeia, and they got the fever.

  12. The perpeTraitors of 9/11 terrorist attacks were were neither Arabs nor Muslims. They were plain and simple Israeli Jews. While media and public officials get credit for refuting the claim by leading the GOP front runner, no one dared to make a reference about the 5 dancing Israelis. However, as always the case, liars always get caught in the end.

    1- It was a five dancing Israelis who were arrested for celebrating the attack, by filming the event, dancing and giving high fives.

    2- Their names were: Sivan Kurzberg, his brother Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmeul, Oded Ellner, and Omar Marmari.

    3- Their employer: Urban Moving a front for the Mossad spy agency; Israeli Selective Intelligence Service (ISIS).

    3 Company owner: Israeli citizen known as Dominick.

    4-Time served in New York jail: 71 Days.

    5 -Their testimony is regarded as top secret.

    6- They were deported overnight to Israel along with over 120 Israeli spies, under the presence of minor visa violations.

    7- During the same period, over 1000 Arabs were rounded up and deported for overstaying their visas as a distraction from the 5 dancing Israelis.

    8- The FBI added the name of Dominick as a suspect in the 9/11 attacks after he fled to Israel the next day, leaving many valuables behind.

    9- No request was made by the Justice Department to have him extradited to the US and or to be questioned by the FBI.

    10 – No pictures or names of the 5 dancing Israelis were blasted on the front pages of US newspaper. We only saw 3 of them on an Israeli TV show.

    It all began when a neighbor saw several Middle Eastern-looking men on the top of a white moving van. The neighbor then called the police and claimed that men were posing, dancing and laughing, against the background of the burning towers. The men had their camera set on the top of the van and were video recording the fall of the World Trade Center.

    Shortly after, another 911 call came in from a mysterious caller ( presumably from among the 5 dancing Israelis). The caller claimed to have seen a white moving van with Palestinian-looking men inside mixing chemicals and heading toward the Holland Tunnel. Police immediately blocked all tunnel and bridges linking New York to New Jersey. Moments later the police spotted the white moving van at the George Washington Bridge with two passengers and tons of explosions. This was intended to blow up the G.W. Bridge. That explains why the mysterious caller wanted to distract the police. That way they would leave the explosive-loaded van on the bridge and catch a ride with the second moving van. But three of the five Israelis were placed under arrest by the East Ruthford, N.J. police officer Scott DeCarlo.

    During the interrogations the five dancing Israelis kept saying, ” We are not your problem, the Palestinians are your problem” and adding “We are here to document the event”. First of all, how did the 911 caller know what the Palestinians looked like who were supposedly in the van traveling toward the George Washington Bridge? Secondly, What event were those people documenting? Inquiring mind wants to know!

    1. @ Mahmoud

      I agree that the Jews did 9-11. But I don’t think the “dancing Israelis” are the strong evidence for this. I think Christopher Bollyn has the best answers here.

      In my view the “dancing Israelis” were used to communicate to Jews what 9-11 was all about, employing mainstream media. The “dancing Israelis” were Jews dressed as Arabs and they were celebrating the destruction of the towers. To Jews that would mean that Jews did the deed and it would be blamed on Arabs. All the “dancing Israelis” were doing was sending this message to the Jewish community, so they would know what had gone down and who would take the blame.

      The best proof of who did the deed is given by Bollyn. In 1987 an Israeli company named Atwell Security was awarded the security contract by the Port Authority, which administered the WTC complex of buildings. The head of Atwell Security was a Jew named Bendor. It turned our Bendor was a former Shin Bet chief (the equilivant of our FBI) who had been fired owing to a scandal. (He had ordered the deaths of some captured bus hijackers without a trial, and his orders had been that they be killed by having their heads impacted by stones.) When the Port Authority learned of this they cancelled the contract with Atwell. What is significant here is that an Israeli company had acquired the WTC security contract, because whoever planned to blow up the buildings would need to have control of security in order to plant explosives.

  13. Watch the video of building 7 collapsing.
    It’s something other than a typical controlled demolition.. maybe… it looks like the whole building weakens and collapses almost at once.. the penthouse on the top floor crumbles onto dust. Doesn’t look right…

    1. Is sure doesn’t look right! I believe Judy Woods book ‘Where did the Towers go’ is BY FAR the best book on 9/11. Thermite and controlled demolition are controlled opposition imo. All these elaborate scenarios with various versions of bombs in the buildings are mostly ridiculous disinformation or delusion. Judy Wood pretty much cracked the code I don’t know why more people cannot or won’t see that. It’s true she does not get into WHO did it but once we understand WHAT happened the ‘who’ becomes more possible. For sure Osama Bin Laden did not have access to directed energy weapons so he can be ruled out

      1. Please, not Judy Woods and her energy beams again. The buildings were demolished so let us leave it at that.

      2. @Patrick Griffin When you’ve had an opportunity to look into the “fires of Kalifornication”, I look forward to your take on “directed energy weapons” — APPARENTLY to no one but us “cons’ piracy theorists” — on Santa Rosa, Reddding, and Paradise, California. Note that aluminum oxide and other nanoparticulates in “chemclouds” — do tell me you “believe” in chemclouding” (aka “geoengineering”) — also sserve, and have long served, as so-called “accelerants”.

        After 10 – 20 years of being sprayed like bugs, I can see where “they” have little to do than blast “Smart Meter” dwellings with fire and brimstone from above. Those of us yet to be burned out of our communities in Kalifornication count our blessings to date, have little hope for the future.

      3. Apologies for inadvertent “double post”….
        @Patrick Griffin When you’ve had an opportunity to look into the “fires of Kalifornication”, I look forward to your take on “directed energy weapons” — APPARENTLY to no one but us “cons’ piracy theorists” — aimed at, on, and against Santa Rosa, Redding, and Paradise, California. Note that aluminum oxide and other nanoparticulates in “chemclouds” — do tell me you “believe” in chemclouding” (aka “geoengineering”) — also serve, and have long served, as so-called “accelerants”.

        After 10 – 20 years of being sprayed like bugs, I can see where “they” have little to do than blast “Smart Meter” dwellings with fire and brimstone from above. Those of us yet to be burned out of our communities in Kalifornication count our blessings to date, have little hope for the future. Legalized pot farming will go the way of corn fields in Iowa, faster than it took Big Ag to destroy or absorb “cooperatives”. You wait and see!

        In the meantime, and in mean times do we live — much meaner and leaner times ahead — read up on the Whiskey Rebellion. Ink hardly dry on the presssiouss (thnx. Golem, aptly named!) Constitution, St. George [Washington] sends the army out to crush those not willing to pay a tax on their labors and products. Freedom sure did not last long in them days!

        If I weren’t born and raised in the good ol’ USoA, Inc., I’d have harsher, (here) forbidden words to write….Time to plant next season’s seeds, friends of Cannabis! Grow your own! Medicate wisely.

    1. @ Alan Donelson: no ‘reply ‘ button your post I so I write down here. Well yes I am aware of the idea that these fires and set and promoted by ‘directed energy weapons’. Seems quite likely though I must admit I don’t know for sure. There are lots of suspicious signs involving the selective burning of cars but not trees etc. I mean since it seems certain some weapons of that nature were used on 9/11 that they would be used again and is such a different context to put people off the track. Your mention of pot farming is intriguing also maybe another part of the agenda. Also and this is of course just a guess the fact that the town was called ‘Paradise’ seems like some deliberate mockery of people who might strive for such a thing. Instead the get Hell on Earth. BTW this is a bit random but if you watch the video of this Don Henley song ‘The Last Resort’ it is beyond spooky if you go to the 5:35 mins mark and see Paradise going up in flames. You can watch the whole thing it is a great song imo but if you don’t have the time go to 5:35 mark . Predictive programming? ‘so they called it Paradise/I don’t know why/call someplace Paradise/kiss it goodbye

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4zR9r9olOg

  14. The pentagon was not hit by a plane or a missile it was a prewired demolition of that part of pentagon where financial records were kept that the deep state wanted destroyed. April Gallop who worked at the pentagon in the area that was blown up stated that she walked out through the hole and that there were no parts of a plane or a missile, a video of her statement was on youtube, not sure if it still is there.

    The day prior to 911 at the pentagon Donald Rumsfeld stated that 2.3 billion was missing from the pentagon and of course after 911 was never heard of again, who benefits!

    1. Even $2.3 million missing would be an outrageous crime.

      Your figure ($2.3 billion) would be a thousand times worse.

      The actual figure is $2.3 TRILLION.

    2. The missing 2.3 trillion is chicken feed. Dr. Mark Skidmore, prof of public finance at Michigan State and his grad. students discovered 21 trillion missing from the books of the Defense Department and HUD. Do you think that some of this corpus of missing trillions was used to fund all the shootings and other psyops, including 9/11, real or hoaxed? Lord forbid if the (((tribe))) and their willing helpers were to use their own resources to fund these pure terror events. That includes the California set wild fires as of late.
      As usual the clueless taxpayers are funding their own destruction. TJ believes its is possible that some of the missing 21 trillion is used to build HUD housing that the government is using to put up thousands of the diseased from the third world under the UN Resettlement Program that Trump refuses to stop or is not permitted to stop.

  15. The commies are fake jews, israelis, deep state,sayanim,talmudists,kabbalists,zionists,liberals….heck they change their name so often to throw everyone off the scent. The raw truth is these demonic people follow the TALMUD and KABBALAH which are very anti human books that tell them the whole world and everything in it belongs to them. America was set up to be the hammer to bash everyone into submission around the world and install jewish central banks and make the countries ripe for jewish businesses and exploitation.

    The constitution created a federal government that bends over to the jewish bankers and extorts the money from the people. The government is a corporation, a jewish business, as are ALL GOVERNMENTS around the world.

    The jews are working towards their goal of TIKKUN OLAM, or “righting the wrongs of the world”, sounds nice and cute until you dig deeper and find out that “making things right” means enslaving everyone mentally, physically, spiritually and financially to THEIR benefit, and those that don’t want it are to be exterminated. They have created a mountain of diversions and distractions to keep people off balance.

    “….a nation with a collective, room-temp IQ”

    The politicians must LOVE the room-temp IQ of the nations they ‘rule’ over.

    “Americans are the most misled, misdirected, and therefore the most gullible people on the face of the planet” ~ Alan Hart, author, ‘Zionism; The True Threat to Israel

    Amerikans can’t form an original thought to save their lives, and depend on being told what to do and what to believe.

    Then….’suddenly’….reality sets in and the Fantasy Cinderella World they were taught to believe in suddenly starts to crumble!

    ‘WHAT!? But EVERYTHING was ‘jusssst fiiiiine’! How could this be happening!?”

    What till this train wreck REALLY starts to pile up the cars – and Amerika starts a global war. And won’t they be surprised when the war is no longer ‘over there somewhere’, and quickly lose their motto of ‘If it’s not happening to me, then it’s not happening at all’.

    This country and it’s leaders SUCK. Just fucking criminals.

    Amerika IS going to collapse, and nothing is going to stop it. Sit back and enjoy the show. It’s going to get VERY ugly.

    1. @ BASIC

      Your comments are well-informed and sincere, but please avoid the unnecessary use of the F-word on our site if you wish to go on posting here. You have used the f-word twice so far: “f***ing billboard people and “f***ing” criminals”. You would not be allowed to use such language on the Occidental Observer, a respectable White Nationalist site, so please don’t use this bad language here. We are not a site for angry rednecks who feel the need to cuss and swear to make a simple point.

      Please check out our “Site Policies and Guidelines” document and let me know if, as a new poster, you intend to abide by our rules.

      # 11. RACIST TERMS like “nigger”, “nigra”, “baboon”, “wog”, “raghead”, “kike” and “yid” should be avoided at all times. Such vulgar talk lowers the tone on our website and gives it a bad name. So please STOP using these terms!

      # 12. Posters who resort to 4-letter-word obscenities, ribald sex talk, and foul abuse will be given a warning and then invited to leave. So will hotheads and agents provocateurs guilty of incitement to violence and genocide. Please refrain from all inflammatory talk about “the extermination of the Jews.” Freedom of speech is fine, but we don’t want our website to be shut down.

      SITE POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
      https://www.darkmoon.me/site-policies-and-guidelines/

      1. @Admin Toby: Questions for clarification, more out of curiosity of the meaning of language than any desire to endanger your website, our oasis, a favored watering hole [e.g., barkingdeer, Brer Desert Fox, and even more ferocious mammals, ourselves lambs in France lying with pernicious LYON], our office water cooler, Le Rrrroommmm du Caffeine when visiting our client detective’s domain.

        1) Is there NEVER an appropriate time, or line, or sentence, or paragraph, to EMPLOY — as opposed to “resort to” — particularly peculiar “4-letter-word obscenities”?
        2) Is it OK, given very clearly ambiguous guidelines, to insert an UNDERSCORE to defeat enemies’ search engines looking for trouble? For instance, “f_ck “, “fu_k”, and a great many variations easily produced in Microsoft Excel. Mathematics offers formulas to determine how many, not all you’ll find in the Oxford Dictionary!
        3) Most helpful, Admin Toby, would be a few examples that slide by your very clear statement “but please avoid the UNNECESSARY [emphasis added in lieu of italics] use of the F-word on our site”. Has anyone — perhaps John Kaminski, Paul Craig Robertson (I always confuse him with dear Pat R.) — managed to deploy the “F-word” appropriately here on Darkmoon?? Of course, we would not bother to search Kevin McD.’s texts, waste of time! Nor any of those denizens here who take rhetorical high roads.

        FULL DISCLOSURE: I find myself an expert hired by attorneys for the word “FECK”.
        My client is FECK, an Irish soul, not so formal as some, “used to express annoyance, frustration, impatience, or surprise.” My purpose here is, simply and mirrorly, to pave the way for a lawsuit against DARKMOON, unfairly hampering the use of four-letter words that just happen to begin with an F and, possibly, those also ending in “K”.

        Thus, we seek clarification.

        As Country Joe and the Fish did many, many times — most recently to my knowledge in next door Grass [aptly named] Valley during 2018 at the age of 75! — GIMME AN F! GIMME A [bleep]; GIMME A [bleep]; GIMME a [bleep]. NOW, what’s that spell? What’s that spell?!? We anssered accurately, at Woodstock and in Grass Valley. We had not forgotten the F-Word!

        Having a wife of 30 years (marriage, not age), I know that in Canada, French Canadians note others in their bilingual country commenting on all the “young fucks” getting slaughtered on the ice fields. Differences in spelling — “phoque” vs. “fuck” — helped us unilingual Anglophones get the joke. No joke, whatsoever. The slaughter of baby seals ranks up there with the “harvest” of whales, dolphins, and other great sea mammals, all of whom put so-called “homo sapiens” to shame. NOTE: “Putain” translates as “fuck” (cf. https://www.lovefrance.info/french-swear-words/). DISCLAIMER: I offer the above, a meta-analysis, as an EMPLOYMENT, not a RESORTMENT, to that dreaded four-letter word.

      2. ADMIN TOBY
        January 6, 2019 at 1:44 pm
        @ BASIC
        “RACIST TERMS:…”

        ME: How about “igrenoid”, adjective “igrenoidal”?
        Are they acceptable? You can’t have prohibited them, because I just made them up.

  16. i think it was a missile that hit the pentagon, fired from a fighter jet…
    there was a picture of a couple of pentagon warlocks in white shirts out on the lawn picking up metal parts of what looked like the casing…
    it was definitely not an airliner…
    so the question is – what really happened to that airliner, the one that went missing?
    and what happened to the american media?
    and what happened to the americans?
    it was probably full of crisis actors, got repainted or scrapped somewhere…
    the figure was in the trillions, but the question is – why would donald rumsfeld make the statement, unless he was not in on the 9-11 machination?
    dov zachiem was the mossad agent pentagon comptroller at the time… he probably embezzled the dough off to shkevaadzzitszz…
    his main business was making and installing remote controls in jet airliners…
    all jet airliners are remote controlled..
    and all skyscrapers are built with explosives wired in…
    so i hear…

  17. April Gallop was at work at the pentagon on 911 and walked out through the hole that was blown in the wall, no planes or missiles were used, see her video on youtube!

  18. It doesn’t really matter how the Towers were destroyed and it really doesn’t matter what happened at the Pentagon. What matters is : The JEWS did 9/11 and everyone in Washington knows it, including Trump, including Nancy Pelosi, including the Top Brass at the Pentagon, and the Jews who did 9/11 will never be brought to justice.

    I’m not at all opposed to trying to figure out scientifically what caused all the destruction of 9/11. It’s just that even if-and-when we ever figure it out , the Jews who did 9/11 will never be brought to justice.

    What really matters is knowing who is responsible for doing 9/11 and that’s already known ; The most important aspect of 9/11, knowing who really did it, Washington already knows who really did 9/11, but that is something Washington will never admit to, will always cover-up, will always blame the Muslims for. And when we figure out the science which caused all the destruction of 9/11, Washington will still never admit the Jews did 9/11, NEVER.

    1. Hi TROJ,
      Historians, in the future, will dig deep into 911.
      Fear of Jewish Power will not last forever in every country.

  19. Basic – thanks for the recommendation on the book, you got “redeeming social value”….
    Possibly build 7 came down with some molecular discombobulatoon ray weapon we profane know nothing about..
    Most of what we even say is uninformed blather.
    DARPA is several decades ahead of the public..
    When they do decide to zap us all we’ll probably never even know it… maybe they’ve figured out how to rip off souls too…

    1. Don’t worry M’boy……G5 is ready to rock……along with smart meters we’ve got everything covered. 😉

    2. Hi Barkingdeer

      I agree. I don’t know who did 911, or how it was done, but I do know that steel is a ductile material that will bend and stretch but WILL NOT CRUMBLE at normal temperatures.

      WTC7 CRUMBLED. A high quality steel framed building CRUMBLED internally.

      There is no process that I know of that could have caused that.

  20. Remember when the Sandy Hook hoax happened and we were bombarded with a voluminous barrage of utterly dishonest, misleading, contradictory and constantly changing “facts”? First we got the dramatic announcement that there’d been a mass shooting at an elementary school. As mass shootings go what could be more horrific? And we were given some time to imagine in our minds what the horrific scene must have been like, e.g., bloody, screaming children trying to escape a vicious sub-human AR15 (and the unfortunate human holding it as it did all the dirty work); then, uncharacteristically-shortly-thereafter, the name of the perpetrator was announced to a shocked audience: it was “Ryan Lanza”; then it was “Adam Lanza”; then his mother was a teacher at the school; then his mother wasn’t a teacher at the school; then there were implications that there was more than one shooter; then the cops were chasing somebody through the woods; then the murder weapon was a shotgun and an AR15 was found in the trunk of Lanza’s car; then the murder weapon was an AR15 and a shotgun was found in the trunk of Lanza’s car; then the school nurse only saw the killer’s feet; then the school nurse looked into his eyes; and then we met Gene Rosen, and on and on ad nauseum.

    First, orange clown makes the dramatic announcement that he’s pulling the troops out of Syria and Afghanistan; the man of reason has finally had enough “sand and death”; he’s had enough of the warmongers he himself hired. One courageous man, the iconic orange clown, stands alone in front of the world, and in the face of withering criticism, announces that he’s finally going to fulfill his campaign promises “deep state” be damned.

    And then a moment of silent astonishment in the audience…you could hear a pin drop…and the 4D chess theorists are calculatingly given some time to scream (with delight): “SEE WE TOLD YOU SO.”

    Alas, then come the wave of qualifications, changes and new information: We can’t abandon the Kurds, can we? And what about Iran? And Mattis quit because I’m pulling out of Syria, but I fired Mattis. And Bolton was silent but Bolton was actually vehemently opposed. And we have to consult our allies before we do this. And Bibi doesn’t want me to pull out rapidly. And ISIS was “destroyed” but ISIS isn’t destroyed. And Mike Pompeo. And Lindsey Graham. And lunch with Lindsey Graham, and on and on ad nauseum.

    1. ISIS aka AL CIADA is a creation of the U.S. and Israel and Britain via the CIA and the MOSSAD and MI6 and so ISIS aka AL CIADA will exist as long as the Zionists remain in control of the trinity of evil for the goal of a satanic Zionist NWO.

      Trump is just another puppet of the real rulers of America, the Zionists!

  21. Attention! attention!
    the protocols aren´t a fake!
    Attention attention !
    Benjamin Franklin quotes aren´t a fake!
    NO ONE HERE AT DARKMOOM HAS NEITHER THE INVESTIGATIVE NOR THE ACADEMIC AUTHORITY TO determine that those prophecies are lies and anti-semitic hoaxes! much less when resorting To a joke of a website like wikipedia who has been exposed a trillion times as a Jew website!
    how can you call in a Jew as a witness to defend another Jew? 😉
    WAKE UP PEOPLE FOR GOD´S SAKE!
    Notice how if you go in google you will see that the first 50 entries are there to “clarify” and “inform” readers that the protocols are a fake! wikipedia, the guardian, the times, the new york times, the holocaust encyplopedia, lol, all these are zionist entities !
    ———————————————————
    After a three hour search i found this at a white nationalist site:
    “the text of the Protocols ends with a single statement, ‘Signed by the representatives of Sion of the 33rd Degree’.
    Why would an anti-Semitic forger have made up such a statement? Why would he not have attempted to incriminate all Jews, rather than just a few – the few who constitute ‘the representatives of Sion of the 33rd Degree’? Why would he not declare that the document was signed by, say, the representatives of the ….etc etc etc”
    EVERYTHING MENTIONED IN THE PROTOCOLS HAS TAKEN PLACE. EVERYTHING PRESIDENT FRANKLIN PROPHETIZED HAS MATERIALIZED!
    what is better evidence?

    1. @ Avatar

      Those who doubt the authenticity of the Protocols and the authenticity of the Ben Franklin quote, as Franklin Ryckaert does, have a right to do so. They should not be silenced by the ridicule of conspiracy theorists who know even less about Ben Franklin than they know about the Protocols.

      My own views on this subject are nebulous, but those who doubt the anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists who assert that the Protocols were written by a secret cabal of Jews, with Lord Rothschild pulling the strings, have my full backing. Doubt is essential in the presence of blind belief in unproven conspiracy theories.

      1. “a secret cabal of Jews, with Lord Rothschild pulling the strings”

        Lol. There was nothing secret about the Balfour Declaration, for example.

        So: a cabal pulling the strings? Yah! Secret? Get outta here.

        The question is not whether the cabal exists but whether the Protocols are a hoax. That the Protocols accurately describe the methods and goals of International Jewry is not up for debate. Sure you can indulge in sophistry to try and deny or misdirect, but Jewish Supremacist puppetry and plans have long been laid bare on this very website.

        Non! The question at hand is whether this notorious document is from the very hand of the very obvious Cabal. I, Hercule Poirot, will name the author of this blue-print to power as, “The Old Aristocrat”. Qui? Do you not see?

        Think of the, how you say his name, the Old Oligarch from Athens! The man, for I do not see Aspasia dictating such a document, who wrote the pamphlet excoriating the conspiracy of the Athenian Democracy. The man who pretends to describe with honesty the workings of people power. Thus this “Old Aristocrat” is pretending to describe the workings and methods of the Cabal. He forges a technical document that encapsulates what he sees as the ways of his enemy, the International Jew, and pretends it is their manger to power. I mean, their crib-sheet to power, do you see?

        The Protocols do show the way of International Finance but they are a hoax nonetheless. The last attempt by a defeated enemy to stave off the inevitable victory of, what is that vulgar word, ah yes, zee Bankster.

      2. @ Flopot

        The Protocols do show the way of International Finance but they are a hoax nonetheless.

        So who is disagreeing with you?

        Why are you getting so angry when I agree with your above statement 100 percent? My views on the Protocols are not what you think. You have misunderstood me completely, ascribing to me a viewpoint that I do not have!

        I am not — I repeat NOT — taking the typically Jewish viewpoint that the Protocols is a “forgery” or a “plagiarism”. Nor am I attempting to disparage it. On the contrary, I think the Protocols is a consummate work of genius that predicts what is actually going on. In other words, this is what international Jewry is actually up to. The Protocols bears comparison with Machiavelli’s Prince, only it far better. Even the phrase “literary hoax”, if this is meant to disparage the book, is one I would shrink from using. I maintain, along with Solzhenitsyn and Dr David Duke, that the Protocols is actually the most outstanding “literary spoof” of all time, a work of fiction comparable to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four — a work of fiction disguised as fact.

        All you need to know is that my views in regard to the Protocols are identical to those of Lasha Darkmoon who backs Dr David Duke and Solzhenitsyn to the hilt. You have simply failed to understand what these views are, preferring to get on your high horse and assume that I am taking a dismissive Jewish viewpoint. Wrong! 🙂

        The Jews are justifiably incensed with the Protocols precisely because it shows them up. It catches them with their pants down.

        If the Protocols can justly be described as “the bible of the anti-Semites”, then you need to know that it was written by a brilliant anti-Semite with anti-Semitic intent: to increase hatred of Jews by ripping the mask from their faces and showing them up. As I say, this is what angers the Jews and why they call it a “forgery” and a “plagiarism” in an attempt to rubbish the book.

        No, you have failed to understand that this book is a work of fiction — a brilliant work of fiction passing itself of as a factual document that is purportedly the minutes of a clandestine committee of Jews setting out their secret agenda for world domination. In that sense, the book is a “hoax”. (As you yourself say).

        Surely you not accusing Dr David Duke and Solzhenitsyn of “working for the Jews” in asserting that the Protocols is work of brilliant literary fiction in the same genre as Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four?

        If you have time, watch this video. It will show you where I am coming from:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H84QAauKhos&t=716s&bpctr=1546899831

        Kind regards,

        Sardonicus.

      3. Of course, the ultimate lesson of the Protocols debate is not whether they are a hoax or not, but how to live with their inherent authenticity?

      4. Bravo, Sardonicus, bravo. I agree with you and I will watch that video. I think it was written by an enemy of the Supremacist Jews (((International Finance, “banksters”, the Merchant Princes etc etc etc ))) but constructed or posed as an internal document emanating from some nefarious committee. I never considered it a deliberate work of fiction, a satire on the feverish scuttling, to and fro, of the gilded rats in their pipes and sewers.

        The narrative voice of the Protocols is a fascinating construct — oblique, sneering and vile all at once. Yes, it has to be a work of literary fiction — it is easy to imagine the true author (that enemy of International Jewry) sitting down and pretending to listen to one of these conspirators wax exaltingly about their dirty tricks. I cannot recall if the Protocols are first, second or third person.

      5. Flopot,

        You and I are on the same page here. Excellent!

        This is what I am basically saying:

        The Protocols manage only too well in stirring up anti-Jewish feeling, especially in the Middle East where the Arabs have good reason to hate Israel because of the theft of Palestine. It has become the bible of the anti-Semites even in the west. These people get very angry (like Lobro did on this site) if you tell them the work is a “literary hoax” because they think you are attacking the book and what it says. In fact, you are not doing this at all. 🙂 You are praising the book for its political nous, its extraordinary success as a satirical spoof — essentially a satirical work of fiction written by an anti-Semitic genius of the calibre of Jonathan Swift.

        Lasha Darkmoon once thought that this book could have been written by Dostoevsky, an anti-Semitic genius who lived in the right era to write it, and who left the manuscript among his unpublished papers … and that it was later picked up and kept ready for use by the Tsar’s secret police. But she has now changed her mind about this. Dostoevsky, though a genius, just didn’t have the satirical gifts of Jonathan Swift. She thinks the book shows evidence of a French hand, probably written by a satirical genius cast in the same mode as Voltaire.

    2. Hi Avatar
      The Protocols have been subjected to a propaganda blitz to undermine them, but I doubt if the Tsarist Police could have predicted the future as the protocols did.

      The fact that it all came true is not coincidence.

      1. The Protocols are “true fiction” , i.e. they are fiction but they aptly describe how Jews really think and act and in that sense they are “true”. Because its author (a genius no doubt) understood Jewish behavior in the past and in the present, by extrapolation he also could predict how they would act in the future. That is why readers of the Protocols are struck by its uncanny accuracy and therefore many refuse to believe they are not genuine. People who point out the fictitiousness of the Protocols are then seen by such people as “working for the Jews”. Key to understanding this problem is to understand the meaning of “true fiction”.

      2. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        Bravo, bravo! I couldn’t have put it better! What you say is 100 per cent true.

        But why is it so hard convincing the diehard anti-Semites who believe that you are “working for the Jews” if you dare to state the blindingly obvious truth: that the Protocols were NOT written by Jews, setting out their plans for Jewish world domination, but by an unknown anti-Semitic genius as a satirical spoof or “true fiction” disguised as fact?

        In this sense, the Protocols is indeed a “hoax”. A brilliant and successful hoax that is unique in every way: because it tells the truth in fictional form, like Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.

        Lasha Darkmoon to me in a private email last year:

        “The Protocols a ‘forgery’? No, this is an emotive term concocted by the Jews and their supporters to rubbish the Protocols and make it seem worthless. It cannot be a “forgery” for the simple reason that there is no original it can be compared to. The Protocols a shocking ‘plagiarism’? No, this too is an emotive term intended to discredit the book. The fact that the book borrows many of its ideas from previous books (like Machiavelli’s The Prince) does not make it a worthless plagiarism. If so, Newton is a “plagiarist” for following in the footsteps of Copernicus and Galileo and for saying “I stand on the shoulders of others.” And the biggest plagiarist of all would be Shakespeare for “stealing” most of his plots from Holinshed, Boccaccio and Plutarch.”

    3. reply to: THE AVATAR
      January 7, 2019 at 6:49 pm
      HIM: …EVERYTHING PRESIDENT FRANKLIN PROPHETIZED HAS MATERIALIZED!…
      ME: …President Franklin? I must have missed something.

  22. lots of “unproven conspiracy theories” out there…
    like the one that says god gave palestine to the jews a few thousand years ago, and now that means they have the right to exercise the ‘final solution’ against the arabs..
    if the protocols were faked, and i don’t think so (in fact it seems a desperate stretch to say they were a “brilliant” fake, because they’re so accurate), they were more likely faked by the jews themselves, the rabbi class…
    because, the truth is, the big jews want jews well hated by every form of goyim, so they won’t forget their tribe… and, like the pentagon warmongers and vigilante police, the exigency will excuse their crimes…
    here’s what’s been up more recently with that – if you’ve never seen this one – take the time to watch it… i think it pegs things pretty well…
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7lhWp7G9rA

  23. @ Franklyn Rykaert, how can you be so sure that the protocols are ‘ true fiction’? It’s just your opinion nothing more. You speak as a jew, a hidden jew protecting the jewish interests.

    ADMIN: We reject your comment as ill-informed and stupid. Franklin Ryckaert is not a Jew but a self-confessed anti-Semite:

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2014/why-i-am-an-anti-semite-by-franklin-ryckaert/

    Please go away and read the latest comments on the Protocols by Sardonicus and Flopot … and then come back if you wish.

    1. (ADMIN: I allow this comment, but reject it totally. No more comments from you please. This is your last one.)

      @ ADMIN

      Thank you for your link you have provided. But I am not convinced about Franklin Rykaert. I have been reading his comments for six months and only a jew could have written his comments, in the interest of the jew narrative. So or he is a jew or he has changed side. Maybe met a nice jewess, good pay by the jews or even threatened by the jews? It’s all possible. Or maybe he has always been a hidden jew and sold himself as “antisemite” for his curriculum vitae, by writing “antisemitism” articles as your link provides.

      Or maybe Darkmoon.me is just a Tel Aviv site? My opinion is that this is just another jewish site pretending to be “antisemitic” as many, many posters already have expressed. How much do the jews pay You all for being desinfo-agents?

  24. I’m writing from memory, but I researched the “Benjamin Franklin statement on the Jews” in the 1980s and found it was a complete farce, a hoax. It’s not written in 18th century English, it’s not written in B. Franklin’s writing style (which is very distinctive); if Franklin had made a “speech” (or whatever it’s supposed to be) at the “Convention”, there would be an official record at the “Convention” itself; we would not have to search for a “diary” or whatever by Chas. Pinckney of South Carolina, or some other document entitled “Table Talk at the Convention”, or whatever. There were two Chas. Pinckneys of South Carolina. Neither one of them left a “diary” or anything other entry entitled “Table Talk at the Convention”; cela n’existe pas, monsieur. Or whatever.
    In short, it’s like the famous “speech” by “Chief Seattle”, written by a white man in Southern California in the 1980s: a great literary production, containing a great deal of truth, but it is not a historical document, and it proves nothing. The “diarrhea of Ann Frank” is another example.

      1. I am inclined to believe that the protocols are genuine, that is written by Jews. The orthodox jews are so arrogant I wouldn’t put anything past them. They despise us..

    1. CWP –

      All the same bunch of SOSDD… 🙂

      I’ll stand with Patrick Henry and denounce the whole damned rotten bunch of Freemason elitist ‘founding fraudsters’ in Philly….. then Annapolis….. then DC.

      The scoundrels were so hated, they were chased with knives, hammers, guns and pitchforks and some almost beaten to death… to the point they had to move around and hold secret meetings, sending messages by coded names… not allowing the public to know what was going on.

      AND… Franklin even wanted to have the States return to the royal system:
      “Although sold as a revolutionary, in 1764 Franklin called for a change from proprietary to a Royal government. That should look very strange to you. We are told he did this to counter the hegemony of the Penns, but in any case he was arguing for the Royals just 12 years before 1776. Although he was Speaker of the Pennsylvania House, this call for a Royal government cost him his seat. In 1765, while
      claiming to oppose the Stamp Act, he recommended a friend for the post of stamp distributor for Pennsylvania.

      Locals weren’t fooled by his empty words and nearly burned his house down. Learning his lesson, he became a much better liar on the subject, and supposedly helped lead to its repeal.”
      http://mileswmathis.com/ben.pdf
      ………
      ………

      Franklin was one of the greatest deceiver of all time… in early America.
      Not to be trusted.
      I have written about that for years.

      Examples:
      Art I,sec 8, cl 17 “…other needful buildings.” is Franklin’s handiwork in US Const. [other needful grains-gunpowder] and one of the reasons Patrick Henry would not sign it. He knew it would allow uncontrolled expansion of DC Government..!!

      —-Instant study ordered by Pres. Eisenhower in 1955:
      Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within The States (1956):

      “Objections made by Patrick Henry and others, based upon the dangers to personal rights and liberties which clause 17 presented, were anticipated or replied to by James Iredell of North Carolina (subsequently a United States Supreme court Justice) and Mr. Madison. They assured that the rights of residents of federalized areas would by protected by appropriate reservations made by the States in granting their respective consents to federalization.”
      “(It may be noted that this assurance has to this time [1956] borne ONLY little fruit.)”

      SEE:
      Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the States
      Report of the Interdepartmental Committee
      For the Study of Jurisdiction Over
      Federal Areas Within the States

      http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj1-3.htm

      Entire document: constitution.org/juris/fjur/fed_jur.htm

      Proof of treachery admitted in his own writings:
      Franklin Autobiography ch10:
      http://www.earlyamerica.com/lives/franklin/chapt10/
      —“I shall take the money, for I understand very well their meaning; other grain is gunpowder,” which he accordingly bought, and they never objected to it.— (“Other Grain” is Gunpowder…..so, “Other needful Buildings” in Art I; sec 8; cl 17.)

      (Ben): My being many years in the Assembly, the majority of which were constantly Quakers, gave me frequent opportunities of seeing the embarrassment given them by their principle against war, whenever application was made to them, by order of the crown, to grant aids for military purposes. They were unwilling to offend government, on the one hand, by a direct refusal; and their friends, the body of the Quakers, on the other, by a compliance contrary to their principles; hence a variety of evasions to avoid complying, and modes of disguising the compliance when it became unavoidable. The common mode at last was, to grant money under the phrase of its being “for the king’s use,” and never to inquire how it was applied.

      But, if the demand was not directly from the crown, that phrase was found not so proper, and some other was to be invented. As, when powder was wanting (I think it was for the garrison at Louisburg), and the government of New England solicited a grant of some from Pennsilvania, which was much urg’d on the House by Governor Thomas, they could not grant money to buy powder, because that was an ingredient of war; but they voted an aid to New England of three thousand pounds, to he put into the hands of the governor, and appropriated it for the purchasing of bread, flour, wheat, or other grain. Some of the council, desirous of giving the House still further embarrassment, advis’d the governor not to accept provision, as not being the thing he had demanded; but be reply’d, “I shall take the money, for I understand very well their meaning; other grain is gunpowder,” which he accordingly bought, and they never objected to it.

      ….

      Another doosey…. “Fire-Engine” purchase:

      (Ben): It was in allusion to this fact that, when in our fire company we feared the success of our proposal in favour of the lottery, and I had said to my friend Mr. Syng, one of our members, “If we fail, let us move the purchase of a fire-engine with the money; the Quakers can have no objection to that; and then, if you nominate me and I you as a committee for that purpose, we will buy a great gun, which is certainly a fire-engine.”

      “I see,” says he, “you have improv’d by being so long in the Assembly; your equivocal project would be just a match for their wheat or other grain.”

      These embarrassments that the Quakers suffer’d from having establish’d and published it as one of their principles that no kind of war was lawful, and which, being once published, they could not afterwards, however they might change their minds, easily get rid of, reminds me of what I think a more prudent conduct in another sect among us, that of the Dunkers.

  25. FWIW – i’m not at all certain about sardo either… nor this site…
    so what…
    admin quelling speech expressing suspicion about certain commentators being trolls would make one wonder… all that business about “who you’re not allowed to criticize”…
    no-doubt some are doing computer combat by deception…
    it doesn’t matter though… we’re here to add, not subtract…
    i would suggest we all steer clear of personal attacks and conjecture on our fellow commentators’ character/orientation..yes there will be trolls.. what else is new?
    the whole gd internet is one big surveillance apparatus…
    we know who you are – we saw what you did…
    here’s a quote from george washington.. who’s he talking about?

    This tribe of black gentry work more effectually against us, than the enemy’s arms. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties, and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each State, long ere this, has not hunted them down as pests to society, and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.

  26. LD,

    I find it very strange that my comment/reply to Kendra Blewitt about Sandy Hook and MCP dying shortly after moving in with Secret Agent Man Mark Glenn of “the ugly truth”, and my description of what Secret Agent Man Mark Glenn and his “jew” friend, Patricia Goldstein, try to have done to me, etc. was removed!

    Is someone here trying to “run-cover” for Secret Agent Man Mark Glenn of “the ugly truth?

    Marc C. Daniele

    ADMIN TOBY: LD has nothing to do with comment monitoring, so you are wrong to address her. I doubt if she has even had time to read your comment.

    Your comment was removed because it is in breach of our rules. It attacked a public figure who is not here to defend himself: Mark Glenn. It was therefore judged to be DEFAMATORY. We have nothing against you airing your views on Sandy Hook, but your angry attack on Mark Glenn (“secret agent Mark Glenn” etc. etc.) made it clear that you had a personal grudge against Mark Glenn and thought you could use our site as a convenient platform to launch a spiteful ad hominem attack on him. Wrong! We don’t allow this kind of misbehavior on our site.

    You were probably banned from posting comments on the Ugly Truth site, right? So you are a disgruntled banned poster who thinks he can go to some alternative site and spew your personal bile all over the place. Sorry, this site is not a spitoon for your ad hominem spit. Understand?

    If you don’t accept our authority, too bad. We make the rules here. Not you!

    — ADMIN TOBY

    1. Hey “Admin Toby” (Newbie!)

      Had you grasped the comment I made, instead of “running cover” for Secret Agent Man, Mark Glenn of “the ugly truth” (“A Public Figure”-ROTFLMFAO), by deleting it, you would have seen how it ties directly in to MCP’s “opinion” on the Sandy Hook HOAX (being directly influenced by Secret Agent Man Mark Glenn of “the ugly truth”, and his death shortly after moving in with Secret Agent Man, Mark Glenn of “the ugly truth”!

      (SNIP . . . SNIP . . . SNIP)

      I don’t know who you are, or how long you have been around, but I suspect you are fairly new (“Newbie”) to what is going on, so I suggest you let Lasha run her site until you are “up to speed” on things!

      Marc C. Daniele

      1. @ Marc C. Daniele

        The above comment will be your last comment on this site for several reasons:

        (1) We couldn’t care less about what people say about Sandy Hook on our site. People are allowed to take opposite views on this subject, and we don’t take sides or give a damn what they say. So we couldn’t care less what Mark Glenn thinks about Sandy Hook or his involvement or non-involvement in the Sandy Hook controversy. Can you understand that? Obviously not.

        (2) You could have said exactly what you wanted about Sandy Hook and we would have had no problem publishing your comment, but you were more interested in pursuing your personal vendetta with Mark Glenn than in making a legitimate comment about Sandy Hook. You thought you could use our site as a convenient platform from which to attack Mark Glenn and spew your venom all over him. Wrong! We will not you allow you, or anyone else for that matter, to use our site as a stomping ground for hate speech and defamation. Mark Glenn is not here to defend himself and he has clearly banned you from posting your hateful comments on his website. That’s why you come sneaking in here, a disgruntled man with an axe to grind, hoping to find a place to shoot off your mouth and badmouth Mark Glenn.

        I’m sorry. We can’t let you do that. We are not a site for shit stirrers and hate mongers.

        (3) FYI, we have no reason to defend Mark Glenn or stick up for him in any way, since many of his views are the very opposite of our own. He doesn’t approve of the Darkmoon site, in case you didn’t know that. So we are not acting as his “cover” as you suggest, you stupid little man with the brains of a gnat.

        (4) Finally, we will not in principle publish the comments of ANYONE so foolish as to attack the administrators of this website and demand publication here as if you had a divine right to our hospitality. I think you are more than just a fool, sir, to expect this. You obviously have a serious personality disorder.

        P.S. A copy of this comment exchange will be emailed to Mark Glenn so that he knows what you’ve been up to here, excreting your foul poison. Will you kindly now GO AWAY now and leave this site alone!. We have had enough of you. VAMOOSE!

      2. MARC C. Daniele:

        @ “Admin Toby” (Newbie!)

        I can’t help but wonder how Lasha would feel about you, a “Newbie”, helping destroy her site and reputation by “running cover”, not only for Secret Agent Man Mark Glenn of “the ugly truth”, but also for the disinformation agent posting here, going by the name of “Kendra Blewitt” (kosher?). Twice now you (a “Newbie”) have removed IT’S (SIC) name, and credible information that directly contradicts IT’S (SIC) disinformation, ie: I have a screenshot of a story of the so called “Dylan Roof Shooting” that was entered in to the yahoo search engine a day BEFORE it is alleged to have taken place! This alone proves the “Dylan Roof Shooting” is complete Bullshit!

        Besides being Anti-Truth, are you Anti-White also?

        By the way, nice “jewish” touch with the “Hate Speech” BULLSHIT! Are you kosher, or just a “useful idiot”, ie a “shabezz goy”? Either way, you have proven you are nothing but a “tool”!

        Oh, and I could give two shits if you send Secret Agent Man Mark Glenn of “the ugly truth” copies of my comments! IT knows what it did! Again, why do you think IT has almost no visitors to IT’S (SIC) site, and has become irrelevant! Stupid little boy!

        Now, get you last word in, stupid little boy!

        MY OATH DOES NOT EXPIRE UNTIL I DO!

        Service Connected US Army Vet,
        Marc C. Daniele

        As I usually say to all the hasbrats and their “shabezz goy”- Don’t forget to “Support The Troops and Veterans”, UNLESS we learn the real facts and speak out about them!

        ADMIN TOBY

        @ Marc C. Daniele

        OK Marc, you’ve made your point!

        You don’t like Mark Glenn (evil “secret agent) And you don’t like the evil Darkmoon site (“hasbara rats”, “useful idiots”,”anti-truth”, “anti-white”, and “secretly working for them Jews”). 🙂

        You are now in Spamblinka with the equally brain-damaged “Freya” and the clownish nutcase known as “The Real Original Joe”. Unlike those other two world-class geniuses, however, you still have to learn to write proper English. Anyone who keeps mixing up the two very simple words ITS and IT’S, as you keep doing, clearly needs to go back to school and get a proper education!

        Good-bye, sir! — and good luck to you in all your future ungrammatical ravings! 🙂

      3. @ Marc C. Daniele

        BTW, we are just about to publish a brilliant article by your hate object, “Secret Agent” Mark Glenn, sent to us this very minute (by sheer coincidence) by our trusted correspondent ‘HT’.

        We don’t see any evidence whatever, after reading this eloquent attack on Israel by Mark Glenn, that Glenn is a secret agent for the Jews. As you foolishly maintain.

        The article is ironically entitled “ISRAEL, WE BLESS THEE.”

        A damning title, no? 🙂

  27. I researched the Benjamin Franklin “speech” in the 1980s.

    I am writing from memory, but it was very obvious to me then that it was a fantastic fake.

    First, if he had made a “speech” at the Constitutional Convention, there would be an official record of it among the other official records. We would not be reduced to hunting for the private “diary” of Chas W. Pinckney of South Carolina, or another equally spurious book called “Table Talk at the Convention”. There were two Chas W. Pinckneys of South Carolina, neither of them ever left or published any such “diary” or “book”. Cela n’existe pas, monsieur.

    The “speech” is not in 18th century English and it not written in the style of Benjamin Franklin, which was very distinctive, rather archaic.

    As for the Protocols, the original has never been produced. So we might be in the same situation as with the Benjamin Franklin “speech”.

    Another possibility is that the Protocols were forged by Jews working for the Czarist secret police to provoke anti-Semitism and encourage Jewish emigration.

    I don’t know how plausible that is, but I believe it was definitely written by a Jew. And a very smart Jew at that.

Comments are closed.